Iim Trichi Paper on Executive Compensation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 Iim Trichi Paper on Executive Compensation

    1/15

    Page 1of 15

    Board of Directors - Compensation?

    A study on Executive compensation

    By

    Dr Cherukupalli Usha Rani

    Consultant (Finance and HR)

    and

    Mr. Shaik MasoodAsst. Professor of Finance & NCCMP Coordinator

    SEBI Resource Person

    Alluri Institute of Management Sciences

    [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/11/2019 Iim Trichi Paper on Executive Compensation

    2/15

    Page 2of 15

    Abstract: Are we doing really justice to Board of Directors, CEOs and other Executives with the pay package fix

    in India? No. Not at all. People interpret board of directors, as if they act against the rights of the

    shareholders. So there is a need for a good Corporate Governance to protect the rights of the shareholders

    from oppression and mismanagement by board of directors and CEOs of the company. They also think th

    corporate governance is framed in favour of employees, suppliers, and community. Public project board o

    directors and CEOs as they manage company to show their power and prestige. Our objective behind wri

    this paper is how in fact both board of directors and shareholders work together with an expectation, to ea

    fair rate of return for their investments. If every individual in every organization follows ethics and mora

    shareholders will invest their money so that organizations can maximize profits with such large amount o

    share capital. Head of every division is held responsible for the capital employed and its cost as well as vaof rate of return. Cash flow is deducted from the profits on the basis of ROE. Every division should work

    the optimum utilization of capital employed. In another way it is an internal competition. Shareholders

    sometimes invest in companies even if rate of dividend is less than the bank interest. But why?

    Key terms: Corporate Governance BOD, CEO, Ethics, Compensation, Code of Conduct, Shareholders, AGM

  • 8/11/2019 Iim Trichi Paper on Executive Compensation

    3/15

    Page 3of 15

    Introduction

    Board of Directors: They are held responsible and accountable individually and with all other board members forultra vires action against the corporate governance. And they are answerable and accountable to shareholders and

    general public. Board is held responsible for the success and failure of the company. In fact board will work for t

    growth of the company and they serve for the company with the help of experts such as CEOs and other executivBut ultimately board take the responsibility on behalf of shareholders. In olden days any business was run by

    shareholders and directors because they all belong to same family. Later it has taken a different shape so appointm

    of directors by shareholders on the basis of rotation system has been implemented under the umbrella of Corporat

    Governance. Shareholders appoint the directors in annual general meeting (by rotation) (U/S 166) held at the endevery year , who in turn appoint CEOs and other managerial personnelfrom whom shareholders expect fair rate

    return for their investments which attracts some other new investors for the growth of the company. Ownership a

    control have been separated. Directors are also shareholders of the company which shows their interest towards th

    returns on investments made by them.

    Corporate Governance: In general corporate governance seems to be a document which directs an ethical code of

    conduct, whoever deals with the company. But sometimes it leviesboundaries for directors and CEOs of thecompany for their boundary less services who devote their life for the growth of the company. And their returns i

    terms of qualitative and quantitative way are not at all sufficient in relation with their pay package due to regulati

    in corporate governance. Efforts and services of BOD, CEOs and other executives may not be valued in accorda

    with their accountability, responsibility, and commitment.

    Objectives of the study: Our experience with Country Club private limited, Bharti Axa life insurance forced me state this point that every director of the company should have direct communication channel either on phone or a

    email facility with the shareholder and customer. Now a days this job is given to customer care, call centres whowork with half knowledge and vested interest. We feel there is a gap between ownership and control.

    Of course there are some companies who responds immediately say for example Infosys, Wipro, BEL, ISRO,

    Aditya Birla, Just dial, and Butterfly, along with below stated companies who work with lot of commitment,accountability and responsibility. Such companys directors, CEOs andother executives deserve for a pay which

    cannot value in terms of qualitative and quantitative measures.

    Scope of the study: Our study is limited to companies specified in the paper. It doesnt mean that BODs and CEof other companies are getting fair returns. In our next paper we try to extend our research work relating to issues

    raised in market.

    Analysis and Findings: Problems of Board of Directors, CEOs and other Executives: General public have a wronnotion that one of the peculiar characters of company form of organization is limited liability. To some extent

    Directors, CEOs and other executivesliability may be covered by insurance schemes of corporations but the degof risk taken by the Directors, CEOs on the grounds of criminal and other offences and loss of their health cond

    due to stress at work place may continue even after their resignation for the post of director. In case of fraud and

    fraudulent representation outside directors such as Independent directors are also held liable for ultra vires actio

    made (without their notice) inside the company against Memorandum and Articles of company. In this context tosupport our view we would like to mention a few problems for justification. The volume of compensation they

  • 8/11/2019 Iim Trichi Paper on Executive Compensation

    4/15

    Page 4of 15

    receive in terms of money and other emoluments.

    A few examples below stated are the views expressed by external and internal people.

    External Views:

    Example 1: If companies can give the minimum guarantee rather than going for investments in real estates or any

    other investments shareholders may invest in companies so that with huge investments companies can gro

    Based on the trend of investments by shareholders structure of capital in memorandum of association and

    articles as well as company law also can be amended for the sake of economic profits. And moreover fanc

    rates of real estates also comes down when public invest in companies. This is indirectly, changes in corp

    governance providing shelter to public through which we can avoid unemployment problems and can help

    the people below poverty line. . Returns from the capital employed in the business operations are greater

    the cost of that capital. For all the above development every individual in nation should follow ethics. Eve

    individual facing problem in this world to earn more and more money. So to maximise the wealth they

    approach some in right way and a few in a different way.

    Example 2: May be 30 years back when I went to witness an Annual General Meeting of a Hotel company as a

    shareholder, one of the person from among shareholders asked a question to Director Sir I came from

    Mumbai (Bombay) and one of my friend (our shareholder also) requested me to get answer for his questio

    that next year he is going to perform his daughters marriage for which company may give guarantee for

    minimum rate dividend. In response to that question director laughed and said they will try for that. And

    next AGM, because it is a hotel company except lunch on the day AGM held company has not declared an

    dividend to equity share holders. In those days people were happy because a few of the shareholders cann

    effort food in a five star hotel in normal days who invested their money in that hotel company. Later on t

    company has become only VIPs hotel. Whose money has been spent for whom? Whose mistake? Definitit is due to loop holes in corporate governance. During any year if company is unable to pay minimum rat

    dividend to equity shareholders such companies must be closed. The rule of perpetual succession need to

    altered and amended.

    Internal views

    Example 3: Let us try to redesign our corporate governance to obtain economic profits rather than accountin

    profit. The difference here is shareholders should get a fair return of dividend (irrespective of economic irregulari

    which is known as economic profit. We have an opportunity to declare dividend in the following ways. Calculatio

    fair return

    A By reducing salaries paid to CEOs of such companies who fails to pay fair rate of dividend.

    B Reduction of PRP (Performance related Pay) below 3% of profit and 10% of Incremental profit.

    C By fixing the maximum limit in number of directors in Board

  • 8/11/2019 Iim Trichi Paper on Executive Compensation

    5/15

    Page 5of 15

    D Reduction in number of directorships below 12 or 15. (Including internal directors)

    Example 4: Thinking outside the box has become ultra vires action which has not been covered under any

    corporate governance. Example: Due to companies transfer policy and promotion policy, majority of the employe

    were away from their families and provision of company accommodation for such employees and untimely chang

    rule before transfer and after transfer disturbed a lot. If, any organization implement thinking outside the box on

    experimental basis voice of a few sufferers is to be valued and if possible rectified. It should not be a punishment

    transfer of promotion.

    Example 5: Corporate governance as well as articles of association needs to be included standing principles regar

    promotions and transfers. In addition to performance based promotions at least 40% promotions shall be made on

    basis of seniority. Knowledge of senior people should not go waste which is an intangible asset for any organizat

    Example: An executive from a top company has been ignored to promote for higher post that has completed his p

    graduation from a premier institute and such post has been filled with a person who has completed his graduation

    from an ordinary engineering college. Let us alter our corporate governance by giving importance to highly quali

    persons from top ranked intuitions. An underground dada may or may not require the services of a highly qualifie

    person but organizations at higher level require services of a highly qualified person.

    Example 6: Why an executive entered into office premises early morning at 4.30 am?

    May be he has some important work for which he came on that day.

    Next day again a discussion on the same issue among employees in connection with the entry of an executive at 4

    am and following day records have been changed about his arrival time. But why? Is it a rumour or real? If it is solve the problem from the roots. If it is a rumour find out what was the intention behind that rumour? And acting

    accordingly on time is important. If it happened really, concerned director or CEO has to convene a board meetin

    Here board has to face a problem such as if they publicize this issue through public meeting, or through media in

    case of theft of financial fraud issue of removal orders of that particular executive, gives meaning in different wayand takes a different shape. Ultimately it reflects in share value in market.

    Example 7: We can quote another example why an executive committed suicide may be due to work pressure or

    personal problems? A director or a CEO has to solve such problems.

    Example 8: Companies transfer policy and promotion policy. Salary and other benefits

    Boards constantly face such problems. While some of these are unique to one specific board, others are commofrom one board to another.

  • 8/11/2019 Iim Trichi Paper on Executive Compensation

    6/15

    Page 6of 15

    Example 9: Meetings and resolutions: Directors are accountable in a general meeting to equity shareholders whic

    may or may not be possible to solve at AGM. Sometimes discussions may not go as per agenda. Director sometimhas to convince shareholders who were absent for any previous meeting and may not be satisfied with the rate

    dividend declared by board. Settling issues between shareholders and other board members tactfully is a challengjob for concerned directors. Sometimes he has to advise the specific member of board to speak out the issue raise

    board meeting. Delegation of authority in absence of chairman is another job a director has to execute. Director m

    be aware of various decision making techniques. An unresolved issue may be raised by concerned director for

    resolution and some require a special notice.

    Example 10: Estimations of future risk and measuring cost of risk is a challenging job for any company.

    In recent years it was laid down that before retirement any employee approach court for any justice their pension

    be blocked until the matter is settled in court. We know the functioning of judiciary. In such a case union may raimany disturbances and an unpleasant atmosphere.

    Example 11: Recently an issue raised by employees of an IT company regarding leave on Election Day. Different

    states have different poling date. Sometimes people from faraway places may not be able to come back within on

    day after election.

    NOTE: All the examples given in our paper are not related to the companie

    specified in our paper.

    Some internal problems such as fines imposed on employees, termination of an employee, bad behaviour of work

    within the company and outside the company, absence from duties, cost of turnover of employees, performance

    appraisal and performance management systems, feedback systems, recognising key performance areas, employe

    minimum wages, compensation rules as per the act, health, safety and welfare measures as per the factories act,

    complaints received from outsiders, grievance procedures, high rate of attrition if any, dealing with contract and

    casual labourers, travel rules, leave without pay, stealing and threat are some of the internal problems though rela

    to HR but directors have to frame a good governance based on ethics, morals and values reflecting in the vision a

    mission of the company. If companies cannot solve the above issues raised by union indirectly it affects the mark

    price of shares.

    General problems.

    Strategies focused on short-term returns,

    Long-term strategies.Governance issues and shareholder scrutiny

    Executive compensation,

  • 8/11/2019 Iim Trichi Paper on Executive Compensation

    7/15

    Page 7of 15

    Shareholder litigations

    Risk management,

    Tax strategies,Changes in audit rules,

    Messaging to shareholders and the market,

    Board decision-making processes.Demand the attention of many boards.

    Responding to shareholder activism;

    proxy advisory firms; Compensation plans and awards,

    accounting requirements;

    Managing board communications and processes

    Engineers

    byMike Volker

    Website: http://www.sfu.ca/~mvolker/biz/bod.htm

    Investors/shareholders are interested regarding dividend payable by the company and its performance in earnin

    have two methods to measure corporate performance

    1. Dividend rate

    2. Earnings performance.

    Formula for Dividend Rate and Earnings performance

    1 Pay-out ratio=cash dividend declared on common stock/Net Income

    2 Return on common shareholders equity ratio=Net IncomePreferred stock Dividends/Average commonshareholders equity

    If Pay-out ratio increases (compared to last year) return on Investment decreases. And vice versa.

  • 8/11/2019 Iim Trichi Paper on Executive Compensation

    8/15

    Page 8of 15

    Financial performance in view of shareholders return

    year Company name

    Jindal steel Sun Net work Apollo Tyres Hero moto corp Cedilla pha Ramco cements

    D/P(%)

    ROE(%)

    Mps D/P(%)

    ROE(%)

    Mps D/P(%)

    ROE(%)

    Mps D/P(%)

    ROE(%)

    Mps D/P(%)

    ROE(%)

    Mps D/P(%)

    ROE(%)

    2009 5.4929.04 1166 22.54 24.39 306 7.98

    20.98 46.13 10.51 33.72 1563 23.09 21.57 568 13.11 28.85 1

    2010 8.7421.02 720 52.09 28.16 435 24.04

    9.11 69.58 63.39 64.41 1752 20.35 31.03 678 13.48 22.70 1

    2011 5.12 25.96 599 44.65 32.37 366 10.46 12.71 74.53 70.93 65.22 1882 20.97 29.21 812 14.12 12.16 1

    2012 6.63 17.59 425 53.89 26.26 338 8.86 13.90 86.93 20.95 55.44 1892 23.36 25.71 736 15.47 18.78 2

    2013 9.8211.02 298 54.79 23.62 409 13.35

    8.06 128.1 23.93 42.31 1959 30.81 17.13 905 17.71 17.03 2

    2014 --

    11.85280 -- 25.77 395 --

    6.637 165 -- 67.38 2175 -- 20.67 968 -- 11.07 2

    2015 -- 5.13 ---- -- 25.85 -- -- 4.532 -- -- 68.10 -- -- 19.25 -- -- 8.06 -

    D/P: Dividend pay-out ratio in percentage (%) Mps (Rs in crores): Market price per share

    11th April, 2014

    ROE: Return on equity in percentage % (Average of open and closing market price

    share for that year)

    Estimated ROE for 2014 and 2015 calculated on the basis of trend values (Yc=a+bX) equation of straight l

    trend

    a = Sum total earnings(Y) divided by Total Number of years (N): b = sum total of earnings multiplied with dev

    (XY) divided by sum total of square of deviations (X2)(deviations from year (2011) square of deviations taken

    Contd.

    year Company name

    Bharathi airtel Torrent power Gujarat fluro chemica Ambuja Cements Larsen and toubro Reliance Industrie

    D/P

    (%)

    ROE(

    %)

    Mps D/P

    (%)

    ROE(

    %)

    Mps D/P

    (%)

    ROE(

    %)

    Mps D/P

    (%)

    ROE(

    %)

    Mps D/P

    (%)

    ROE(

    %)

    Mps D/P

    (%)

    ROE(

    %)

    2009 4.90

    28.01533 23.17 12.61 193.8 9.65

    15.96 102.3 26.87 26.71 100.5 17.66 27.94 1255 12.39 12.11

    2010 4.03

    25.66656 16.94 21.12 277.2 11.30

    27.64 262.9 51.13 17.31 134.2 17.20 23.89 1633 12.84 11.84

    2011 4.92 17.49 359 24.38 22.26 224.5 11.51 21.86 440.5 39.67 18.43 165.2 22.31 18.12 867 11.76 13.39

    2012 6.63 11.59 301 24.82 21.53 171 14.58 15.09 379.9 53.08 14.37 162.5 22.67 17.67 1296 12.63 12.07

    2013 7.459.41

    318 24.55 6.32 118.1 8.91 20.15 308.7 51.40 14.00 194.4 23.18 16.85 1392 12.51 11.67

    2014 --

    3.05322 -- 13.12 106.2 --

    18.89 303.2 -- 9.66 217.2 -- 13.13 1298 -- 12.11

    2015 -- -2.07 -- -- 11.90 -- -- 18.47 -- -- 6.82 -- -- 9.21 -- -- 12.07

  • 8/11/2019 Iim Trichi Paper on Executive Compensation

    9/15

    Page 9of 15

    D/P: Dividend pay-out ratio in percentage (%) Mps (Rs in crores): Market price per share

    11th

    April, 2014

    ROE: Return on equity in percentage % (Average of open and closing market price share for that year)

    ROE for 2014 and 2015 calculated on the basis of trend values (Yc=a+bX)

    a = Sum total earnings(Y) divided by Total Number of years (N): b = sum total of earnings multiplied with dev

    (XY) divided by sum total of square of deviations (X2)(deviations from year (2011) square of deviations taken

    Interpretation

    From the above table of twelve sample companies pay-out ratio of return on equity and market price of the sha

    can analysed that few follow a stable dividend policy in terms of pay-out ratio whose return on equity was also

    where as if the pay-out ratio increases and return on equity declines or vice versa, we can say that the company

    sufficient new investment opportunities which can be used as internal equity to increase the return on equity,

    otherwise it is better to distribute the profit to keep shareholders happy. Hence it can be concluded that corpora

    performance can directly influence how policy makers take care of their shareholders wealth to keep stable gr

    their market price.

    Suggestions: Working with an inefficient manager creates lot of problems. The real problem is corruption, m

    of funds and vested interest. It needs good governance which comes from participation of public, shareholders

    their decision making, from planning to implementation. There are certain questions aroused in the minds of

    company insiders and outsiders. Our intention is to bring some awareness among general public who are undewrong impression that, directors, CEOs and other executives are held responsible for the above mentioned

    problems, allegations, grievances, offences and liabilities created by external and internal people. A concept o

    ethical code of conduct, avoidance of economic irregularities, global competition, avoiding third party involvem

    between shareholder and directors of the company are some of the factors helps us to regain our investments w

    has been shown in a tabular form.

    Let us not have an assumption that earnings retained are always used for growth of organizations.

  • 8/11/2019 Iim Trichi Paper on Executive Compensation

    10/15

    Page 10of 15

    Additional information

    Sl.No Company Particulars 2013Cr Rs

    2012Cr Rs

    2011Cr Rs

    2010Cr Rs

    2009Cr Rs

    CEO Pay package(Cr)Rs

    1 Jindal steelReported net profit 1,492.45 2,100.45 2,544.10 1,444.68 1,554.23

    69.76 Cr. PA

    2 Equity Dividend 146.51 139.25 130.23 126.32 85.333 Book Value (Rs) 131.18 111.12 83.21 82.25 385.26

    4 Net worth 13,540.18 11,940.54 9,799.53 6,874.01 5,351.22

    5 Dividends Pay-out ratio% 9.82 6.63 5.12 8.74 5.49

    6 Average

    earningsReturn on common shareholders

    equity ratio %11.71 19.32 15.25 17.32 --

    Based on the above data there may be an increase in dividend pay-out ratio and corresponding ROI decreasing

    Means company is willing to pay more dividends in 2014. Doesnt mean that low pay-out ratio is an indication

    low rate of dividends. A low ratio is an indication that company is retaining earnings for future growth. But at

    same time shareholders should find out the reasons for low rate of dividends are paid by the company. Performthrough earnings means profitability. In the above table return on common shareholders equity decreased in 20

    when compared to 2012. During growth it is difficult for any company for high return.

    2 Rs in crores

    Sl.No Company Particulars 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 CEO pay package

    1 Sun Net work Reported Net Profit 683.34 694.65 772.22 567.38 437.11 37.08 Cr

    2 Equity Dividend 374.39 374.38 344.82 295.56 98.52

    3 Equity Dividend (%) 190.00 190.00 175.00 150.00 50.00

    4 Book Value (Rs) 73.41 67.12 60.54 51.13 45.49

    5 Net worth 2,892.85 2,645.24 2,385.71 2,015.01 1,792.51

    6 Dividends pay-out ratio 54.79 53.89 44.65 52.09 22.54

    7 Average

    earnings

    Return on common

    shareholders equity ratio 24.68 27.62 35.10 29.80

    3 Rs in Crores

    Sl.No Company Particulars 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 CEO pay package

    1 Apollo

    TyresReported Net Profit 312.53 181.33 198.25 414.99 108.12

    48.19 Crores

    2 Equity Dividend 25.20 25.20 25.20 37.80 22.68

    3 Equity Dividend (%) 50.00 50.00 50.00 75.00 45.00

    4 Book Value (Rs) 46.24 40.56 37.55 34.19 26.84

    5 Net worth 2,341.43 2,047.60 1,895.56 1,726.60 1,355.71

    6 Dividendspay-out ratio%

    8.06 13.90 12.71 9.11 20.98

    7 Averageearnings

    Return on commonshareholders equity

    ratio%

    14.24 9.20 10.95 26.92

    2013 data indicates low rate of pay -out ratio means that the company is retaining its earnings. But during 2012

    out ratio is more than the ROI means company declared more dividends.

  • 8/11/2019 Iim Trichi Paper on Executive Compensation

    11/15

    Page 11of 15

    4 Rs in Crores

    Sl.No Company Particulars 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 CEO pay package

    1 Hero moto

    corp

    Reported Net

    Profit2,118.18 2,378.13 1,927.90 2,231.83 1,281.76

    59.53 Cr.

    2 Equity Dividend 1,198.13 898.59 2,096.72 2,196.56 399.38

    3 Equity Dividend

    (%)

    3,000.00 2,250.00 5,250.00 5,500.00 1,000.00

    4 Book Value (Rs) 250.70 214.83 148.03 173.52 190.33

    5 Net worth 5,006.24 4,289.83 2,956.06 3,465.02 3,800.75

    6 Dividend pay-

    out ratio%56.56 37.79 108.76 98.42 31.16

    7 AverageEarnings

    Return oncommon

    shareholdersequity ratio%

    45.57 65.64 60.05 35.28

    During 2013 pay- out ratio is more than the ROI means company declared more dividends. During 2012 ROI i

    than the pay-out ratio means company has retained earnings for growth purposes. During 2011 and 2010 comp

    declared dividends more than the ROI. So we can expect high pay -out ratio during 2014 and 2015.

    5 Rs in crores

    Sl.No Company Particulars 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 CEO pay

    1 CadilaHealth care

    Reported NetProfit

    498.60 657.50 610.40 503.30 265.9028.63 Cr. PA

    2 Equity

    Dividend153.60 153.60 128.00 102.40 61.40

    3 Equity

    Dividend (%)150.00 150.00 125.00 100.00 90.00

    4 Book Value

    (Rs)142.20 124.89 102.07 118.84 90.32

    5 Net worth 2,911.50 2,557.10 2,089.90 1,622.10 1,232.80

    6 Dividend pay-

    out ratio%30.81 23.36 20.97 20.35 23.09

    7 Average ROE% 18.24 28.30 32.89 35.26

    6 Rs in crores

    Sl.No Company Particulars 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 CEO pay package(Cr)

    1 Ramco

    cements

    Reported Net

    Profit403.65 385.11 210.98 353.68 363.52

    51.51

    2 Equity

    Dividend71.49 59.58 29.79 47.66 47.66

    3 EquityDividend (%)

    300.00 250.00 125.00 200.00 200.00

    4 Book Value

    (Rs)99.62 86.16 72.89 65.48 52.96

    5 Networth 2,370.76 2,050.38 1,734.51 1,558.16 1,260.20

    6 Dividend payratio%

    17.71 15.47 14.11 13.47 13.11

    7 Average ROE% 18.25 20.35 12.81 25.1

  • 8/11/2019 Iim Trichi Paper on Executive Compensation

    12/15

    Page 12of 15

    7 Rs in crores

    Sl.No Company Particulars 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 CEO Pay Package Cr

    1 Bharti Airtel Reported Net

    Profit5,096.30 5,730.00 7,716.90 9,426.15 7,743.84

    23.49 (crores)

    2 Equity

    Dividend379.80 379.80 379.80 379.79 379.65

    3 EquityDividend (%)

    20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00

    4 Book Value

    (Rs)142.58 130.16 116.16 96.24 145.01

    5 Net worth 54,146.20 49,429.60 44,111.60 36,737.18 27,643.97

    6 Dividend

    pay-out

    ratio%

    7.45 6.63 4.92 4.03 4.90

    7 Average ROE% 9.84 12.25 19.08 29.28

    8 Rs in crores

    Sl.No Company Particulars 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 CEO Pay package

    1 Torrent

    power

    Reported Net

    Profit384.96 1,237.46 1,065.72 836.55 407.89

    39.01 (crores)

    2 EquityDividend

    94.49 307.08 259.85 141.73 94.49

    3 Equity

    Dividend (%)20.00 65.00 55.00 30.00 20.00

    4 Book Value

    (Rs)128.91 121.66 101.33 83.82 68.4

    5 Net worth 6,090.29 5,747.88 4,787.13 3,960.15 3,233.40

    6 Dividendpay-out

    ratio%

    24.54 24.81 24.38 16.94 23.16

    7 Average ROE% 6.50 23.49 24.36 23.25

    9 Rs in crores

    Sl.No Company Particulars 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 CEO pay package

    1 Gujarat fluro

    chemicals

    Reported Net

    Profit398.34 431.60 263.63 334.15 340.14

    37.80 Crores

    2 Preference

    Dividend0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

    3 Equity Dividend 38.45 38.45 38.45 38.45 38.45

    4 Equity Dividend

    (%)350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00

    5 Book Value (Rs) 227.15 194.97 159.05 139.13 112.05

    6 Net worth 2,495.26 2,141.77 1,747.22 1,528.32 1,230.837 Dividend pay-out

    ratio%9.65 8.90 14.58 11.50 11.30

    8 Average

    earningsROE% 17.18 22.19 16.09 24.22

    10 Rs in crores

  • 8/11/2019 Iim Trichi Paper on Executive Compensation

    13/15

    Page 13of 15

    Sl.No Company Particulars 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 CEO pay package

    1 Ambuja

    CementsReported Net Profit 1,095.76 1,061.19 1,325.26 1,120.01 1,606.73

    26.02 Crores

    2 Preference Dividend 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

    3 Equity Dividend 563.24 563.24 525.69 572.63 431.76

    4 Equity Dividend (%) 300.00 300.00 280.00 305.00 230.00

    5 Book Value (Rs) 416.78 393.23 383.09 344.59 320.45

    6 Net worth 7,824.84 7,382.80 7,192.27 6,469.49 6,016.22

    7 Dividend pay-outratio%

    51.4 53.07 39.66 51.12 26.87

    8 Average ROE% 14.94 14.56 19.40 17.94

    11 Rs in crores

    Sl.No Company Particulars 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 CEO pay package

    1 Larsen and

    toubroReported Net Profit 4,910.65 4,456.50 3,957.89 4,375.52 3,481.66

    26.11 crores

    2 Preference Dividend 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

    3 Equity Dividend 1,138.47 1,010.46 882.84 752.75 614.97

    4 Equity Dividend (%) 925.00 825.00 725.00 625.00 525.00

    5 Book Value (Rs) 473.57 411.87 358.81 303.28 212.32

    6 Net worth 29,142.72 25,223.02 21,846.26 18,311.64 12,459.697 Dividend pay-ratio%

    23.18 22.67 22.30 17.20 17.66

    8 Average ROE% 18.06 18.93 19.71 28.43

    12

    Sl

    No

    Company Particulars 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 CEO pay package

    1 Reliance

    IndustriesReported Net Profit 21,003.00 20,040.00 20,286.30 16,235.67 15,309.32

    19.64 crores

    2 Preference Dividend 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003 Equity Dividend 2,628.00 2,531.00 2,384.99 2,084.67 1,897.05

    4 Equity Dividend (%) 90.00 85.00 80.00 70.00 130.00

    5 Book Value (Rs) 557.49 498.21 446.25 392.51 727.66

    6 Net worth 180,020.00 166,096.00 151,540.32 137,170.61 126,372.97

    7 Dividend pay-out

    ratio%12.51 12.62 11.75 12.84 12.39

    8 Average ROE% 12.13 12.61 14.05 12.32

    13

    Sl.No Company Particulars 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 CEO pay package

    1 ICICI Total 15,379.70 11,483.44 8,615.76 6,834.54 6,193.87 1 crore

    2 Preference Dividend 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

    3 Equity Dividend 2,307.23 1,902.04 1,612.58 1,337.86 1,224.58

    4 Equity Dividend (%) 200.00 165.00 140.00 120.00 110.00

    5 Book Value (Rs) 578.65 524.01 478.31 463.01 444.94

    6 Net Worth 66,705.96 60,405.25 55,090.93 51,618.37 49,883.02

    7 Dividend pay-out ratio% 15.00 16.56 18.71 19.57 19.77

    8 Average ROE% 24.19 19.88 16.14 13.46

  • 8/11/2019 Iim Trichi Paper on Executive Compensation

    14/15

    Page 14of 15

    14

    Sl.No Company Particulars

    2013

    2012 2011 2010 2009

    1 WiproReported Net Profit 5,650.20 4,685.10 4,843.70 4,898.00 2,973.80

    2 Preference Dividend 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

    3 Equity Dividend 1,724.70 1,475.20 1,472.60 880.90 586.00

    4 Equity Dividend (%) 350.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 200.00

    5 Book Value (Rs) 98.38 99.04 86.86 120.49 85.42

    6 Net worth 24,229.50 24,352.50 21,320.20 17,692.20 12,515.00

    7Dividend pay-out ratio%

    30.52 31.48 30.4017.98 19.70

    8 AverageROE%

    23.2620.51

    24.8332.42

    Conclusion

    Trusting is most important factor for the growth and development of the company. A healthy person can

    earn and work for the accomplishment of organizational objectives. A positive thinker can maintain good

    health. As long as he or she is healthy, this leads to increase in wealth. Such increase in wealth motivates

    workers/employees/executives/individuals/job seekers towards positive thinking. Positive thinking is always

    good for health. Positive thinking is one of the ethical factors. So ethical behaviour is must for long term

    prosperity of a company. Trusting each other (employer and employee) is important and another ethical

    factor.

  • 8/11/2019 Iim Trichi Paper on Executive Compensation

    15/15

    Page 15of 15

    References:

    Aswathappa K,Organizational Behaviour, Tata Mc Graw hill Publications, 2005

    A.N. Agarwal Advanced Financial Management,

    Franklin G. Moore, 1stedition ,Management, Chapter 1 and 2, Pages 1-40,Harper and Row Publishers, 1964

    I M Pandey, Financial Management.

    Pulapa Subba Rao, IHRM,Excel Publishers, 2010,

    Peter F Drucker Management

    Paul Kimmel,Jerry Weygandt,Donald Kieso,5th

    edition, Financial Accounting, Tools for Business Decision Ma

    Chapter 11, Measuring Corporate Performance, pages,572-576 Wiley India, Reprint 2010

    Prasanna Chandra, Investment Analysis Portfolio Management, Tata Mc.Graw Hill Publishers,Pages 13.3-13.3

    4th

    edition

    Rustom Davar, The management process, pages 366-520

    S.P Gupta. Statistical Methods, 39th

    revised edition, Sultan Chand Publications, Pages 572-660

    S.N. Maheswari 2nd edition, Financial Management, Sultan Chand Publications, Page A,37 ,1992

    Web sites:

    Google.com

    Moneycontrol.com

    Salaries.com

    Magazine:

    Business India

    News Papers

    The Hindu

    Times of India