Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© Stephanie Pollitt 2015. Originally published in Explorations: The UC Davis Undergraduate Research Journal, Vol. 17 (2015). http://Explorations.UCDavis.edu © The Regents of the University of California.
Imaging In Tyto Alba: A Toolkit for Investigating the Auditory Localization Pathway Stephanie L Pollitt, William DeBello
Abstract:
The barn owl auditory localization circuit undergoes learning through changes in the strength and pattern of synapses, but how these processes occur on a circuit level is unknown. Two new methods have been developed that can be used to study those processes. Array tomography uses antibodies raised against synaptic and neuronal proteins to visualize their distribution in ultra-‐thin brain sections. CLARITY, in contrast, visualizes intact circuits in translucent brains. However, use of these techniques in barn owls requires development of an antibody toolkit that works in avians. Antibodies were vetted using Western blots, immunohistochemistry and array tomography, and assembled into a searchable database called ADAPT. By using this toolkit in conjunction with array tomography and CLARITY, we hope to measure the remodeling of axonal projections and to develop a 3D map to aid microelectrode navigation in vivo. Key Words: Barn Owl, Auditory Localization, Antibodies, CLARITY, Array Tomography Introduction:
The barn owl is a predatory species that relies heavily on auditory information to
hunt. It has a highly complex auditory map in the Inferior Colliculus External nucleus (ICX)
of the tectal lobe that incorporates both Interaural Level Difference (ILD) and Interaural
Time Difference (ITD) information from
the Inferior Colliculus Core (ICC) lateral
shell to localize and catch prey (Figure 1).
This map projects onto the visual map,
located in the optic tectum (OT), to form a
multimodal map of space. Thus, when
visual perception is shifted using prisms
surgically attached in front of the eyes,
there is a mismatch between the
visual and auditory perceptions of
location. Within hours, the owl will
learn to coordinate reaching
behavior with its new visual perception of space; this is believed to occur at the level of the
Figure 1: Slice of barn owl tectal lobe, stained with SV2-‐a, labeled to show different anatomical structures. Abbreviations: ICC: Inferior Colliculus Core nucleus; ICCls: Inferior Colliculus Core lateral shell; ICX: Inferior Colliculus External nucleus; OT: Optic Tectum.
UC Davis | EXPLORATIONS: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNALVol. 17 (2015) S. Pollitt p.2
2 Imaging in Tyto Alba: A Toolkit for Investigating the Auditory Localization Pathway cerebellum. However, when the barn owl hunts using purely auditory cues, the visual
adaptation causes overcorrected reaching behavior. In a matter of weeks, the ICX circuit
will adapt to re-‐align the auditory and visual maps. At this point, the owl will correctly
reach to visual and auditory stimuli. Wild barn owls use this ability to adapt to changing
auditory cues as their heads grow, which is consistent with the observation that the
plasticity in the circuit is significantly reduced in mature owls. This new circuit represents
a form of learning, and there are still questions regarding the synaptic clustering, the
integration of excitatory and inhibitory synapses, and exactly how the circuit
reorganization starts.
Current imaging techniques like immunohistochemistry that might be used to
reconstruct these circuits are insufficient due to low quality images from thick slices of
tissue, low antibody penetration, and the limited number of antibodies that can be used on
each slice. Therefore, in order to investigate these phenomena, the laboratory is beginning
to apply emerging tools for connectome reconstruction including high-‐throughput electron
microscopy, cellular/molecular phenotyping, array tomography and CLARITY. The latter
two are the focus of my thesis project. Array tomography encases blocks of brain tissue in a
resin then prepares a library of antibodies in high resolution. CLARITY (Clear Lipid-‐
exchanged Anatomically Rigid Imaging/immunostaining-‐compatible Tissue hYdrogel) is a
technique that entails perfusion with a hydrogel, which fixes the hydrophilic components of
the brain in place. The lipids are then removed via electrophoresis, leaving a translucent
brain that can be stained with antibody and imaged intact. Like array tomography, clarified
tissue can be subjected to elution and restaining with antibodies. Both techniques can also
be used to visualize tracer injections. These properties make both array tomography and
CLARITY ideal for visualizing proteins associated with adaptation.
One necessary component in both of these techniques is a set of antibodies that
work well in avian tissue across many types of fixation. Antibodies are generally against
proteins or peptide sequences derived from mammals, so immunohistochemistry in barn
owls can be a guessing game as to whether or not a particular antibody will bind its avian
counterpart protein. This is because amino acid sequences diverge across species,
including between mammals and aves. For example, the protein synapsin, commonly used
to visualize synapses in mammals, is not present in the avian genome. Also, antibodies that
UC Davis | EXPLORATIONS: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNALVol. 17 (2015) S. Pollitt p.3
3
work well on one type of fixed tissue might not work as well on tissue fixed even slightly
differently. Therefore, having a well-‐vetted set of antibodies is integral to investigating the
barn owl learned circuit. This paper demonstrates the efficacy of a selection of antibodies
in western blots, standard immunohistochemistry, and array tomography, as well as the
CLARITY technique.
Antibody Immunogen Company Host Species
Clonality Product Number
Concentration (IHC)
Concentration (Western Blot)
Concentration (AT)
CaMKIIα-‐a Rat Calmodulin Kinase IIα 6G9 clone
Genetex Mouse IgG1 Monoclonal
GTX41976
1:500 1:1500 1:100
CaMKIIα-‐b Recombinant Rat Calmodulin Kinase IIα 6G9 clone
Caymen Mouse IgG1 Monoclonal
10011437
1:500 1:1500 N/A
CaMKIIα-‐d Rat Calmodulin Kinase IIα 6G9 clone
Enzo Life Sciences
Mouse IgG1 Monoclonal
ADI-‐KAM-‐CA002-‐D
1:500 1:1500 N/A
GABA-‐b Synthetic human GABA Receptor α1
Abcam Rabbit IgG Polyclonal
ab33299 1:500 1:1000 N/A
GAD-‐a Synthetic rat GAD 65 and GAD 67
Millipore Rabbit Polyclonal ab1511 1:600 N/A 1:100
GAD-‐b Synthetic Human GAD 65 and GAD 67
Abcam Rabbit Polyclonal ab11070 1:600 N/A N/A
GluR1-‐a Rat Glutamate Receptor 1 (extracellular domain)
Millipore Rabbit Polyclonal PC246-‐100UG
1:5 (serum concentration is 0.1µg/µL)
N/A N/A
GluR2/3-‐a Rat Glutamate Receptor 2
Millipore Rabbit Polyclonal 07-‐598 1:500 1:1000 1:100
SV2-‐a Synaptic vesicles from Ommata
DSHB Mouse IgG1 Monoclonal
SV2 1:200 1:1000 1:500
Syntag-‐a Synthetic human Synaptotagmin 1 (amino acids 276-‐325 internal region)
Sigma Rabbit Polyclonal SAB4502907 1:200 1:600 1:100
Syntag-‐b Rat synaptotagmin 1
Millipore Mouse IgG2a Monoclonal
MAB5200 1:500 N/A N/A
Syntag-‐c Recombinant protein of rat synaptotagmin 1 (aa 80 -‐ 421), which contains the C-‐terminus
Synaptic Systems (SySy)
Mouse IgG2a Monoclonal
105011 1:500 N/A N/A
Syntag-‐d Synthetic human Synaptotagmin 1 (amino acids 176-‐225 internal region)
Sigma Rabbit Polyclonal SAB4502908 1:200 1:600 1:100
Table 1: List of antibodies used in this paper, in alphabetical order. Antibody ID was derived from the antigen and a letter code to segregate it from other antibodies from different sources with the same antigen. Concentrations refer to amount of serum : amount of antibody solution.
UC Davis | EXPLORATIONS: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNALVol. 17 (2015) S. Pollitt p.4
4
4 Imaging in Tyto Alba: A Toolkit for Investigating the Auditory Localization Pathway
Methods:
Immunohistochemistry:
Barn owls are perfused with paraformaldehyde and their brains are removed. The
tectal lobes are blocked off of the brain and sliced with a microtome in 40-‐micron sections.
The sections are then washed in 0.1M phosphate buffer for five minutes and blocked for an
hour in normal serum, bovine serum albumin (BSA), and Triton-‐X in phosphate buffer. The
species of the normal serum is matched to the species used to produce the secondary
antibodies. The primary antibodies are then applied at antibody-‐specific concentrations
(Table 1) in a mixture of normal goat serum, Triton-‐X, BSA, and phosphate buffer.
The antibodies used are from separate species to ensure specific secondary binding.
The slices are allowed to incubate overnight at 4 degrees Celsius. The next day, the slices
are removed from the primary antibody solution and washed twice in Triton-‐X, BSA in
phosphate buffer for five minutes. The secondary solution is then applied, which is
composed of BSA, Triton-‐X, and phosphate buffer with AlexaFluor secondary antibodies at
a 1:200 concentration. The slices incubate at ambient temperature out of the light for two
hours. After that time, the slices are rinsed five times for two minutes each in BSA
phosphate buffer, then twice for five minutes each in phosphate buffer. The slices are then
mounted and coverslipped before imaging at 63x with a fluorescent confocal microscope.
Western Blotting:
A precast gel is inserted into the PAGE set up, which is then filled with a running
buffer composed of Tris base, glycine, SDS, and water. Brain homogenate from rat, mouse,
owl, zebra finch, and canary are diluted 1:1 with sample buffer. The sample buffer is
composed of Tris HCl, glycerol, SDS, bromophenol blue, and 2-‐ mercaptoethanol in water.
Five µL of fluorescent molecular marker and ten µL of each mixture are then injected into
UC Davis | EXPLORATIONS: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNALVol. 17 (2015) S. Pollitt p.5
5
consecutive wells of the gel. Electricity is then applied to the set up at 80 volts for a half an
hour, then 100 volts for the remainder of the time until the lightest bands of protein reach
the bottom of the gel.
Once the electrophoresis is finished, the gel is placed with a nitrocellulose
membrane, two filter papers, and two fiber pads in a tub of transfer buffer to soak. The gel
is then removed from its cassette and placed in a sandwich set up with a nitrocellulose
membrane and two presoaked filter papers and fiber pads on each side. This sandwich is
then put in the transfer set up so that the membrane is between the gel and the red side of
the holder. The transfer buffer, composed of Tris base, glycine, methanol, and water that
was used for soaking is then poured into the transfer chamber. The whole set up is then
run at 90mA (using a ThermoEC power source, model EC250) overnight at 4 degrees
Celsius.
The next day, the membrane is removed from the transfer set up and rinsed for five
minutes in Odyssey blocking
buffer and phosphate buffer
saline. It is then blocked at room
temperature for an hour in the
same solution. The membrane is
then placed in a primary
antibody solution composed of
Odyssey buffer and primary
antibody at antibody-‐specific
concentrations. This is allowed
to sit for four hours at 4 degrees
Celsius on a shaker.
After the membranes are
removed from the primary antibody solution, they are rinsed four times for five minutes
each in a Tween-‐20 and phosphate buffer saline solution. The secondary antibodies are
then diluted 1:10,000 in Odyssey blocking buffer, and applied to the membranes for one
hour at room temperature on the bellydancer shaker. After an hour the membranes are
Figure 2: Diagram of CLARITY electrophoresis setup. Components include a water heater/circulator (1), a filter (2), and two chambers running in parallel, fitted with platinum wire to receive current (3).
UC Davis | EXPLORATIONS: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNALVol. 17 (2015) S. Pollitt p.6
6 Imaging in Tyto Alba: A Toolkit for Investigating the Auditory Localization Pathway rinsed four times for five minutes in the Tween-‐20 and phosphate buffer saline solution
before imaging.
Array Tomography:
All array tomography
staining and imaging was
done at Aratome Inc. in Palo
Alto. A small block of
perfused tissue from the owl
tectum was sliced into 70 nm
serial sections and placed on
a slide. The sections were
then encased in LR White
resin. Multiple rounds of
immunohistochemistry and
imaging at 63x were then
performed on the tissue, with
the antibodies removed after
each round. Each antibody was imaged and stitched together into a 3x3 panel.
CLARITY:
This technique was performed as described in Chung et al, with slight modifications
to reduce the cost of the equipment. The animal (rat embryo or owl) is perfused
transcardially with an acrylamide, bis-‐acrylamide, paraformaldehyde, and photoinitiator in
phosphate buffered saline, a solution called hydrogel, which is chilled to 4 degrees Celsius.
The brain is removed and then placed in 50mL of hydrogel solution and kept at 4 degrees
Celsius for two to three days.
After sitting in the hydrogel, the tissue is “degassed” using nitrogen, a process that
promotes polymerization of the gel by removing the oxygen. This is done by placing the
sample in a dessicator and alternating vacuum and nitrogen gas application. After all of the
oxygen has been displaced from the sample, it is placed in a 37-‐degree water bath until the
gel has solidified.
Figure 3: CaMKIIα immunohistochemistry images. a) From left to right: CaMKIIα-‐a, CaMKIIα-‐b, and CaMKIIα-‐d. b) Large scale images of where in the tectal lobe each image was taken. Green circles indicate the exact spot targeted by confocal microscopy.
UC Davis | EXPLORATIONS: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNALVol. 17 (2015) S. Pollitt p.7
7
The solid gel is removed
from the incubating bath and the
brain is separated from the rest
of the gel. It is then placed in an
SDS, boric acid, and sodium
hydroxide solution called
clearing solution, which is
incubated in the 37-‐degree water
bath for three days. The solution
is changed each day to allow
extra paraformaldehyde and
photoinitiator to wash out.
After washing the sample, it is placed in the electrophoresis clearing set up (Figure
2). This consists of a water circulator/temperature regulator (MGW Lauda model MS), a
water filter (standard house filter from Home Depot), an electrophoretic chamber with
platinum electrodes, and a solution reservoir. Unlike in the original paper, we chose to
place the brain between two cell filters to prevent excessive movement while the solution
was flowing through the electrophoretic chamber, where it is subjected to both electricity
(using above power source for western blots, which only delivered 75 watts compared to
the 300 watt source used in the original paper) and water flow to push the lipids out of the
tissue. After a period of weeks, the brain is completely cleared and can be stained with
multiple rounds of antibodies and imaged intact with a long focal distance 40x objective.
For the purposes of this experiment, it was determined that proof-‐of-‐principle would be a
more achievable goal than trying to test antibodies with clarified tissue, so rat embryo
brains were used instead of owl tectal lobes.
Results
Immunohistochemistry and Western Blots:
Figure 4: CaMKIIα Western blots, target between 50 and 60 kDa. From left to right: CaMKIIα-‐a, CaMKIIα-‐b, and CaMKIIα-‐d. Abbreviations: “Ms” is mouse, “ZF” is zebra finch, “Can” is canary. Molecular weights to left.
UC Davis | EXPLORATIONS: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNALVol. 17 (2015) S. Pollitt p.8
8 Imaging in Tyto Alba: A Toolkit for Investigating the Auditory Localization Pathway Each antibody was first screened with immunohistochemistry to see if a signal could be
observed, then used in Western blots and array tomography if successful. Three CaMKIIα
antibodies were screened, all
of which are 6G9 clones
(Table 1).
Immunohistochemistry
stains show a Golgi-‐like
complete cell fill, including
distal dendrites and spines
(Rodriguez-‐Contreras, Liu
and DeBello, 2005). CaMKIIα-‐
a produced the best signal
with the smallest amount of
noise of all three antibodies
(Figure 3a, left). This is
evident from the complete cell-‐fills and evident processes, as well as the especially strong
signal in the ICX (Figure 3b, left). CaMKIIα-‐d produced the second best signal, with a
slightly higher background than CaMKIIα-‐a but a similar cell-‐fill pattern (Figure 3a, right).
The least characteristic antibody was CaMKIIα-‐b, which produced a weak signal and an
unusually high background (Figure 3a, center). One possible explanation for this is that the
image field was inadvertently located just outside of ICX, in the superficial nucleus of the
inferior colliculus where CaMKII expression is known to be low. To mitigate this possibility,
multiple locations across the slice were imaged, which resulted in similar results
throughout the slice (Figure 3b, center).
Figure 5: Immunohistochemistry confocal images for Synaptotagmin. a) From left to right: Syntag-‐a, Syntag-‐b, Syntag-‐c, and Syntag-‐d b) Large scale images of where in the tectal lobe each image was taken. Green circles indicate the exact spot targeted by confocal microscopy.
UC Davis | EXPLORATIONS: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNALVol. 17 (2015) S. Pollitt p.9
9
All three were also used for
Western blot (Figure 4). CaMKIIα-‐a is
the most characteristic pattern with a
single band for each, but it lacks a
band in the owl lane, and the bands in
the zebra finch and canary lanes didn’t
drop from the well. Because the owl
protein didn’t function well in any of
the gels, it is most likely that the
homogenate was damaged when the
lab freezer broke down. Also, the rat
and mouse signals might be the
strongest because they are the
freshest homogenates, and have been stored in a proper freezer. Although the precise
weight cannot be determined, the presence of signal, however dispersed, indicates that the
antibody is binding to a protein. With that in mind, the CaMKIIα-‐b blot has more functional
owl forebrain homogenate instead of the tectal lobe homogenate like in the CaMKIIα-‐a blot.
However, all three avian homogenate lanes are still smeared and weak compared to the
fresher rat and mouse homogenates. The third blot, CaMKIIα-‐d, is smeared for all
homogenates except the mouse, indicating that there might have been other factors
contributing to the smearing, such as improper sample heating or inexperience. Across all
three blots, the bands that are present are in the correct position (between 50 and 60 kDa),
and the ladder ran clearly.
Figure 6: Synaptotagmin, molecular weight 65 kDa, Western blots. From left to right: Syntag-‐a and Syntag-‐d. Abbreviations: “Ms” is mouse, “ZF” is zebra finch, “Can” is canary. Molecular weights to left.
UC Davis | EXPLORATIONS: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNALVol. 17 (2015) S. Pollitt p.10
10 Imaging in Tyto Alba: A Toolkit for Investigating the Auditory Localization Pathway
Four different
synaptotagmin antibodies
were tested (Table 1). The
staining pattern for
synaptotagmin is generally
punctate grouped into
clusters. Syntag-‐a is the best
example of this, with clear
points of signal, with low
background staining (Figure
5a, left). Syntag-‐d is the
second best, with a weaker
signal and higher background
than Syntag-‐a (Figure 5a, right). Syntag-‐b and Syntag-‐c are both not quite correct, as they
seem to also stain connected processes (Figure 5, center right and center left). They were
all imaged in similar regions of the tectal lobe, so the staining patterns should not have
been affected by site selection (Figure 5b). As the best two examples, Syntag-‐a and Syntag-‐d
were used for a Western blot
(Figure 6). Syntag-‐a (Figure 6
left) shows the best staining, with
bands across the mammalian and
avian samples, though the owl
sample shows little staining,
Figure 7: GABA-‐b, 52 kDa. a) Confocal immunohistochemistry image. b) Larger scale immunohistochemistry image. Green circle indicates the location of the above confocal image. c) Western blot. Abbreviations: “Ms” is mouse, “ZF” is zebra finch, “Can” is canary. Molecular weights to left.
Figure 8: GAD 65/67 a) Confocal immunohistochemistry images. From left to right: GAD-‐a and GAD-‐b. b) Larger scale immunohistochemistry images. Green circle indicates the location of the above confocal image.
UC Davis | EXPLORATIONS: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNALVol. 17 (2015) S. Pollitt p.11
11
most likely due again
to damaged
homogenate. Also, the
bands are consistent
across the samples,
and are observed at
the expected
molecular weight of
65 kDa. It should also
be noted that the
Syntag-‐a and Syntag –
d antibody binding is
weaker than most,
requiring a concentration of 1:200 for immunohistochemistry and 1:600 for Western blots
(Table 1). This is considerably higher than most antibodies like CaMKIIα, which requires
1:500 for immunohistochemistry and 1:1500 for Western blots (Table 1). GABARα1 and
GluR2/3 require only 1:1000
for Western blots (Table 1).
GABA-‐b receptor
immunohistochemistry
staining (Figure 7a) exhibits a
clear signal with low
background staining, and is
highly characteristic of GABA
receptor staining of inhibitor
synapses (Rodriguez-‐
Contreras and DeBello, SFN
poster 2003.). The Western
blot shows only staining in the
mammalian samples and not
Figure 9: GluR1-‐a. a) Confocal immunohistochemistry image. b) Larger scale immunohistochemistry image. Green circle indicates the location of the confocal image.
Figure 10: GluR2/3-‐a, 108 kDa a) Confocal immunohistochemistry image. b) Larger scale immunohistochemistry image. Green circle indicates the location of the confocal image. c) Western blot. Abbreviations: “Ms” is mouse, “ZF” is zebra finch, “Can” is canary. Molecular weights to left.
UC Davis | EXPLORATIONS: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNALVol. 17 (2015) S. Pollitt p.12
12 Imaging in Tyto Alba: A Toolkit for Investigating the Auditory Localization Pathway the avian ones (Figure 7c). Considering that the immunohistochemistry signal in the tectal
slice was so clear, it is probable that the avian homogenates were nonfunctional. The
mammalian bands are at the
correct weight, about 52 kDa.
Two GAD 65/67 antibodies
were tested. GAD-‐a has an
unusually low signal and a high
background staining (Figure 8a
left). GAD-‐b was much more
successful, with clear cell bodies
that don’t overlap with those of
CaMKIIα (Figure 8a right).
However, the GAD-‐b background
staining is still high, and there is
what appears to be an air bubble
obscuring the staining close to the
center of the image. Both antibodies were imaged in similar areas of the slice, though the
slice is inverted on one of the slides (Figure 8b).
GluR1-‐a staining is ubiquitous, but the signal is not strong compared to the
background (Figure 9a). Several imaging locations were selected, but all showed similar
levels of signal (Figure 9b).
GluR2/3 immunohistochemistry staining shows clear structures and low
background staining (Figure 10a). It was stained at 488nm, the opposite channel to SV2-‐a,
568nm (Figure 11a). Qualitatively, there is good overlap between the staining patterns.
One possible explanation is bleed through from SV2 channel, where the signal is strong.
However, there are several bright structures in the SV2 image that are barely, if at all,
visible in the GluR1 image. This argues against bleed through. In combination with the fact
that GluR2 western blot is strong and clean, the simplest interpretation is that the staining
patterns are highly complementary, as would be expected from a pair of pre-‐ and post-‐
synaptic markers. The GluR2/3 Western blot shows clear staining across all channels with
Figure 11: SV2-‐a (95 kDa)a) Confocal immunohistochemistry image. b) Larger scale immunohistochemistry image. Green circle indicates the location of the confocal image. c) Western blot. Abbreviations: “Ms” is mouse, “ZF” is zebra finch, “Can” is canary. Molecular weights to left.
UC Davis | EXPLORATIONS: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNALVol. 17 (2015) S. Pollitt p.13
13
some smearing in the
zebra finch and canary
lanes (Figure 10c). The
bands are all at the
correct weight of 108
kDa, and the signal is
strong.
The SV2-‐a
immunohistochemistry
image shows clear and
precise staining of
processes (Figure 11a).
The antibody binding is
good, but it has trouble penetrating the slice, which results in staining at upper and lower
confocal slices, but not in the middle. For this reason, the concentration was increased from
1:500 to 1:200 (Table 1). Western blots are difficult with vesicle proteins because they are
difficult to separate from their vesicles, which vary in size. This results in smearing across
the lane, with a slightly stronger band at approximately the correct weight of (95 kDa). For
that reason, it is unusual that the rat and mouse bands turned out so clearly (Figure 11c).
The owl band is faint, most likely due to the issues with the homogenate, and it is smeared
like the zebra finch and canary lanes. However, all five samples have bands at the correct
weight.
Array Tomography:
Due to the expense of the array tomography procedure and the difficulty of
outsourcing the tissue, only the best antibodies were chosen for use in array tomography
on owl tectal lobe tissue. Among those chosen were CaMKIIα-‐a, GAD-‐a, GluR2/3-‐a, SV2-‐a,
Syntag-‐a, and Syntag-‐d (Figure 12). The best staining was unsurprisingly observed with
SV2-‐a (Figure 12d), which shows some processes and low background. Syntag-‐a (Figure 12
e) staining was good, with clear punctae and low background, unlike Syntag-‐d (Figure 12f).
This is consistent with the preliminary immunohistochemistry testing (Figure 5). GluR2/3
Figure 12: Array tomography images. Scale bars are 10 µm. a) CaMKIIα-‐a; b) GAD-‐a; c) GluR2/3-‐a; d) SV2-‐a; e) Syntag-‐a; f) Syntag-‐d.
UC Davis | EXPLORATIONS: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNALVol. 17 (2015) S. Pollitt p.14
1414 Imaging in Tyto Alba: A Toolkit for Investigating the Auditory Localization Pathway (Figure 12c) doesn’t show the same processes that were evident from the
immunohistochemistry images (Figure 9a). There appear to be groups of signal that are
hard to decipher from the background. GAD-‐a (Figure 12b) staining looks similar to the
immunohistochemistry testing performed previously (Figure 8a left). Unfortunately, GAD-‐b
was not tested in time for it to be used in the array tomography round. The most
disappointing staining was CaMKIIα-‐a (Figure 12a), which showed none of the
characteristic cell-‐fill staining that was observed in the regular immunohistochemistry
(Figure 3a left). The drastic differences in staining between normal immunohistochemistry
and array tomography are hypothesized to stem from the resin affecting the antibody
binding on-‐off time ratio (conversation with Professor William DeBello). All antibody data
from immunohistochemistry, Western blots, and array tomography were published on a
Filemaker database called ADAPT (Antibody Database for Avian Protein Targets), which
shall hopefully be web accessible in
the near future.
CLARITY:
The CLARITY procedure was
difficult to replicate without the
cooling water circulator and a
stronger power supply (Figure 2).
However, with the supplies used
the rat embryo brain ended up
fairly clear, with little yellowing
(Figure 13). The most problematic
step was the electrophoretic
clearing. The greatest change was
observed during the incubation in clearing solution between days 19 and 36. The changes
due to electrophoretic clearing between days 3 and 19 are almost unobservable. Therefore,
it is possible that without the proper equipment, it is best to leave the brain in a vial of
clearing solution for a longer period of time rather than use substitute equipment. One side
Figure 13: Diagram of CLARITY procedure after perfusion. Images were taken by iPad camera every day, but only a selection are shown for simplification purposes.
UC Davis | EXPLORATIONS: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNALVol. 17 (2015) S. Pollitt p.15
15
effect of the incubation is that the brain swells, as is evident in the picture for day 36.
However, this decreases during incubation in the 80% glycerol solution.
Discussion:
I performed Western blots on protein homogenates derived from rat, mouse,
chicken, barn owl, zebra finch and canary brain. Antibodies that produced expected
banding patterns across mammals and birds were used as probes for
immunohistochemistry and array tomography in tissue from owl ICX. Successive imaging
of stained, stripped and re-‐stained arrays produced high-‐resolution, seven-‐color image
volumes of ~100,000 cubic microns. Antibodies to synaptic proteins SV2 and GAD, as well
as vGlut1/2, VGAT, Homer 1, tubulin and myelin basic protein (not tested in this paper)
labeled synapses and neuropil similar to that observed in mammalian tissue. Other
antibodies tested yielded equivocal results or failed entirely. However, further study with
more varied antibody concentrations and different perfusion methods can add to this
toolkit, as well as testing in other species of aves. This would result in a more complete list
of antibodies and their ideal binding conditions.
One advantage to array tomography that is currently being explored is the ability to
co-‐localize proteins tagged by vetted antibodies through quantitative image analysis. These
co-‐localizations are being assessed quantitatively using a pixel-‐based analysis called the
Van Steensel method, which relies on a Pearson’s correlation to quantify how much two
antibody signals overlap and was used to develop the FIJI plugin Colocalization Test, which
is being used by a graduate student in the lab. This is done by taking the difference between
two Pearson’s correlation coefficients: one measured between the two signals and the
other measured against a randomized image. This reduces the possibility that any
correlation observed is the result of random chance. The result of the statistics gives a
positive correlation if the two signals are co-‐localized. The next step will be to apply an
object-‐based co-‐localization analysis to ultimately to identify individual synapses based on
the co-‐localization of pre-‐ and postsynaptic proteins with spatial relationships expected
based on EM studies. As previously mentioned, this is only possible if a set of antibodies
like that described in this paper has been vetted for use with this technique.
Some disadvantages to array tomography, besides the difficulty with antibodies,
include that slicing tissue distorts it, and that reconstruction introduces error in
UC Davis | EXPLORATIONS: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNALVol. 17 (2015) S. Pollitt p.16
1616 Imaging in Tyto Alba: A Toolkit for Investigating the Auditory Localization Pathway localization. This requires careful application of morphing algorithims to properly align
and register the image stacks to produce a 3-‐D volume. Fortunately, this problem has been
mitigated through the use of statistical colocalization programs, but intact imaging
methods such as CLARITY do not require such reconstruction. (Micheva KD, Busse B,
Weiler NC, O'Rourke N, Smith SJ; 2010).
Although this paper does not cover antibody binding in clarified tissue, CLARITY has
the benefit an isometric procedure, which means it doesn’t change shape during imaging.
This reduces the distortion and the error in image reconstruction. Both procedures allow
the elution and restaining of the tissue with antibodies, which results in a library of
identified proteins that can be co-‐localized without needing tissue from multiple
individuals, as would be necessary for normal immunohistochemistry. However, though
CLARITY has been used successfully in rodents, animals such as barn owls with larger
brains would be difficult to apply the procedure to. The size of the electrophoresis chamber
would need to be expanded to encompass a whole owl brain, though it seems that a single
tectal lobe will fit adequately. Also, there seems to be a relationship between the surface
area to volume ratio of the brain and the ease of removing the lipids, as evidenced by the
relative speed of lipid removal from different layers of the brain (Figure 13). This may
make it more difficult to clarify larger brains without cutting them up. Hopefully these
methods, along with a publically-‐accessible version of ADAPT, can eventually contribute to
the study of barn owl connectomics and learning in the auditory localization pathway.
Acknowledgements:
The authors would like to thank Janet Keiter and Dr. Stephen Noctor of the MIND
institute for their contribution of supplies and tissue for the CLARITY project, as well as
Janet Keiter’s invaluable advice and assistance. Without them this project would not have
been possible.
UC Davis | EXPLORATIONS: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNALVol. 17 (2015) S. Pollitt p.17
17
Works Cited
1. Adolphs R. Acetylcholinesterase staining differentiates functionally distinct auditory
pathways in the barn owl. Journal of Computational Neurology. March 15th, 1993.
329(3):365-‐77. 7681456
2. Buckley K, Kelly RB. Identification of a transmembrane glycoprotein specific for
secretory vesicles of neural and endocrine cells. Journal of Cell Biology. April, 1985.
100(4):1284-‐94. 2579958
3. Busse B, Smith S. Automated analysis of a diverse synapse population. PLoS
Computational Biology. March 28th 2013. 2013;9(3):e1002976. 23555213
4. Carr CE, Fujita I, Konishi M. Distribution of GABAergic neurons and terminals in the
auditory system of the barn owl. Journal of Computational Neurology. August 8th,
1989. 286(2):190-‐207. 2794115
5. Chung K, Wallace J, Kim SY, Kalyanasundaram S, Andalman AS, Davidson TJ,
Mirzabekov JJ, Zalocusky KA, Mattis J, Denisin AK, Pak S, Bernstein H, Ramakrishnan
C, Grosenick L, Gradinaru V, Deisseroth K. Structural and molecular interrogation of
intact biological systems. Nature. May 16th, 2013. 497(7449):332-‐7. 23575631
6. DeFelipe J. From the connectome to the synaptome: an epic love story. November
26th, 2010. 330(6008):1198-‐201.21109663
7. Durstewitz D1, Kröner S, Hemmings HC Jr, Güntürkün O. The dopaminergic
innervation of the pigeon telencephalon: distribution of DARPP-‐32 and co-‐
occurrence with glutamate decarboxylase and tyrosine hydroxylase. Neuroscience.
April, 1998. 83(3):763-‐79. 9483560
8. Hemmings HC Jr, Greengard P. DARPP-‐32, a dopamine-‐ and adenosine 3':5'-‐
monophosphate-‐regulated phosphoprotein: regional, tissue, and phylogenetic
distribution. Journal of Neuroscience. May, 1986. 6(5):1469-‐81. 3711991
9. Hemmings HC Jr, Walaas SI, Ouimet CC, Greengard P. Dopaminergic regulation of
protein phosphorylation in the striatum DARPP 32. Trends in Neurosciences. 1987.
10(9):337-‐83. N/A
10. Jande SS, Maler L, Lawson DE. Immunohistochemical mapping of vitamin D-‐
dependent calcium-‐binding protein in brain. Nature. December 24th, 1981.
294(5843):765-‐7. 7033797
UC Davis | EXPLORATIONS: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNALVol. 17 (2015) S. Pollitt p.18
1818 Imaging in Tyto Alba: A Toolkit for Investigating the Auditory Localization Pathway
11. Koffie RM, Hashimoto T, Tai HC, Kay KR, Serrano-‐Pozo A, Joyner D, Hou S, Kopeikina
KJ, Frosch MP, Lee VM, Holtzman DM, Hyman BT, Spires-‐Jones TL. Apolipoprotein
E4 effects in Alzheimer's disease are mediated by synaptotoxic oligomeric amyloid-‐
β. Brain: a journal of neurology. July 2012. 135(Pt 7):2155-‐68. 22637583
12. Koffie RM, Meyer-‐Luehmann M, Hashimoto T, Adams KW, Mielke ML, Garcia-‐Alloza
M, Micheva KD, Smith SJ, Kim ML, Lee VM, Hyman BT, Spires-‐Jones TL. Oligomeric
amyloid beta associates with postsynaptic densities and correlates with excitatory
synapse loss near senile plaques. Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences
in the United States of America. March 10th, 2009. 106(10):4012-‐7. 19228947
13. Kopeikina KJ, Polydoro M, Tai HC, Yaeger E, Carlson GA, Pitstick R, Hyman BT,
Spires-‐Jones TL. Synaptic alterations in the rTg4510 mouse model of tauopathy.
Journal of Comparative Neurology. Apr 15, 2013. 521(6):1334-‐53. 23047530
14. Kubke MF, Carr CE. Development of AMPA-‐selective glutamate receptors in the
auditory brainstem of the barn owl. Microscopy Research and Technique. May 1st,
1998. 41(3):176-‐86. 9605336
15. Kubke MF1, Gauger B, Basu L, Wagner H, Carr CE. Development of calretinin
immunoreactivity in the brainstem auditory nuclei of the barn owl (Tyto alba).
December 13th, 1999. 415(2):189-‐203. 10545159
16. Lacey CJ, Bryant A, Brill J, Huguenard JR. Enhanced NMDA receptor-‐dependent
thalamic excitation and network oscillations in stargazer mice. Journal of
neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. Aug 8th, 2012.
32(32):11067-‐81. 22875939
17. Levin MD, Kubke MF, Schneider M, Wenthold R, Carr CE. Localization of AMPA-‐
selective glutamate receptors in the auditory brainstem of the barn owl. Journal of
Computational Neurology. February 10th, 1997. 378(2):239-‐53. 9120063
18. Micheva KD, Busse B, Weiler NC, O'Rourke N, Smith SJ. Single-‐synapse analysis of a
diverse synapse population: proteomic imaging methods and markers. Neuron.
November 18th, 2010. 68(4):639-‐53. 21092855
19. Micheva KD, O'Rourke N, Busse B, Smith SJ. Array tomography: rodent brain fixation
and embedding. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. November 1st, 2010. 2010(11).
21041396
UC Davis | EXPLORATIONS: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNALVol. 17 (2015) S. Pollitt p.19
19
20. Micheva KD, O'Rourke N, Busse B, Smith SJ. Array tomography: production of arrays.
Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. November 1st, 2010. 2010(11). 21041397
21. Micheva KD, O'Rourke N, Busse B, Smith SJ. Array tomography: immunostaining and
antibody elution. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. November 1st, 2010. 2010(11).
21041398
22. Micheva KD, O'Rourke N, Busse B, Smith SJ. Array tomography: imaging stained
arrays. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. November 1st, 2010. 2010(11). 21041399
23. Micheva KD, O'Rourke N, Busse B, Smith SJ. Array tomography: semiautomated
image alignment. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. November 1st, 2010. 2010(11).
21041400
24. Micheva KD, Smith SJ. Array tomography: a new tool for imaging the molecular
architecture and ultrastructure of neural circuits. Neuron. July 5th, 2007. 55(1):25-‐
36. 17610815
25. Nichols GS, DeBello WM. Bidirectional regulation of the cAMP response element
binding protein encodes spatial map alignment in prism-‐adapting barn owls. Journal
of Neuroscience. October 1st, 2008. 8(40):9898-‐909. 18829948
26. Oberti D, Kirschmann MA, Hahnloser RH. Projection neuron circuits resolved using
correlative array tomography. April 12th, 2011. 5:50. 21519397
27. Oertel WH, Schmechel DE, Tappaz ML, Kopin IJ. Production of a specific antiserum to
rat brain glutamic acid decarboxylase by injection of an antigen-‐antibody complex.
Neuroscience. 1981. 6(12):2689-‐700. 7322358
28. Maczko KA1, Knudsen PF, Knudsen EI. Auditory and visual space maps in the
cholinergic nucleus isthmi pars parvocellularis of the barn owl. Journal of
Neuroscience. December 6th, 2006. 26(49):12799-‐806. 17151283
29. Parameshwaran-‐Iyer S1, Carr CE, Perney TM. Localization of KCNC1 (Kv3.1)
potassium channel subunits in the avian auditory nucleus magnocellularis and
nucleus laminaris during development. Journal of Neurobiology. May, 2003.
55(2):165-‐78. 12672015
30. Parameshwaran S, Carr CE, Perney TM. Expression of the Kv3.1 potassium channel
in the avian auditory brainstem. Journal of Neuroscience. January 15th, 2001.
21(2):485-‐94. 11160428
UC Davis | EXPLORATIONS: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNALVol. 17 (2015) S. Pollitt p.20
2020 Imaging in Tyto Alba: A Toolkit for Investigating the Auditory Localization Pathway
31. Pena JL, DeBello WM. Auditory processing, plasticity, and learning in the barn owl.
National Research Council, Institute of Laboratory Research Animal Resources
Journal. 2010. 51(4):338-‐52. 21131711
32. Perney TM, Kaczmarek LK. Localization of a high threshold potassium channel in the
rat cochlear nucleus. Journal of Computational Neurology. September 22nd, 1997.
386(2):178-‐202. 9295146
33. Rodriguez-‐Contreras and DeBello. SFN poster 2003.
34. Rodriguez-‐Contreras A, Liu XB, DeBello WM. Axodendritic contacts onto
calcium/calmodulin-‐dependent protein kinase type II-‐expressing neurons in the
barn owl auditory space map. Journal of Neuroscience. June 8th, 2005. 25(23):5611-‐
22. 15944389
35. Takahashi TT, Carr CE, Brecha N, Konishi M. Calcium binding protein-‐like
immunoreactivity labels the terminal field of nucleus laminaris of the barn owl.
Journal of Neuroscience. June 1987. 7(6):1843-‐56. 2439666
36. van Steensel B, van Binnendijk EP, Hornsby CD, van der Voort HT, Krozowski ZS, de
Kloet ER, van Driel R. Partial colocalization of glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid
receptors in discrete compartments in nuclei of rat hippocampus neurons. Journal of
Cell Science. April, 1996. 109 (Pt 4):787-‐92. 8718670
37. Wagner H1, Güntürkün O, Nieder B. Anatomical markers for the subdivisions of the
barn owl's inferior-‐collicular complex and adjacent peri-‐ and subventricular
structures. Journal of Computational Neurology. October 6th 2003. 465(1):145-‐59.
12926022
38. Wenthold RJ, Yokotani N, Doi K, Wada K. Immunochemical characterization of the
non-‐NMDA glutamate receptor using subunit-‐specific antibodies. Evidence for a
hetero-‐oligomeric structure in rat brain. Journal of Biological Chemistry. January 5th,
1992. 267(1):501-‐7. 1309749
39. Wenthold RJ, Zempel JM, Parakkal MH, Reeks KA, Altschuler RA.
Immunocytochemical localization of GABA in the cochlear nucleus of the guinea pig.
August 13th, 1986. 380(1):7-‐18. 3530371