Upload
dangtu
View
217
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2010
Guidelines for selection of improved varieties/hybrids
of rice, wheat and pulses for NFSM states
National Food Security Mission
Department of Agriculture and Cooperation Ministry of Agriculture Government of India Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi‐110001
Guidelines for selection of improved varieties/hybrids of rice, wheat and pulses for NFSM states
Dr. Shanker Lal National Consultant (Seeds)
National Food Security Mission
Department of Agriculture and Cooperation Ministry of Agriculture Government of India
Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi‐110001
Table of contents
Particulars Pages
FOREWORD ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. i
PREFACE……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ii
ACHNOWLEDGEMENT…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… iii
ABBREVIATIONS………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. iv
1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1
2. Definition of the variety…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1
3. Variety‐development………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1‐2
3.1. Varietal evaluation………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 2
3.1.1. Station Trial………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 2
3.1.2. Multi‐location trials………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2
3.1.3. Initial evaluation trial……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2
3.1.4. Uniform regional trial…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2
3.1.5. Agronomic trial……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2
3.1.6. Adoptive research trial………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2
3.1.7. Mini‐kit trial…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2
4. Identification of entries for release…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2‐3
4.1. Release of varieties by Central Variety Release Committee…………………………………………….. 3
4.2. Release of varieties by State Variety Release Committee……………………………………………….. 3
5. Notification of varieties …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3
6. De‐notification of varieties………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 3
7. Re‐notification of varieties……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3
8. Seed multiplication ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3
9. Varieties developed and released…………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4
10. Criterion for selection of varieties…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4
11. Wheat………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 5
11.1 Details of wheat varieties recommended for NFSM states………………………………………………. 6‐11
12. Rice…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 12
12.1 Details of rice varieties recommended for NFSM states…………………………………………………… 13‐24
13. Rice hybrids……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 25
13.1 Details of rice hybrids recommended for NFSM states……………………………………………………… 26‐32
14. Chickpea…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 33
14.1 Details of chickpea varieties recommended for NFSM states……………………………………………. 34‐42
15. Pigeonpea…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 43
15.1 Details of pigeonpea varieties recommended for NFSM states………………………………………... 44‐50
16. Mungbean…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 51
16.1 Details of mungbean varieties recommended for NFSM states…………………………………………. 52‐59
17. Urdbean…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 60
17.1 Details of urdbean varieties recommended for NFSM states……………………………………………… 61‐67
18. Lentil…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 68
18.1 Details of lentil varieties recommended for NFSM states…………………………………………………… 69‐72
19. Fieldpea……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 73
19.1 Details of fieldpea varieties recommended for NFSM states……………………………………………… 74‐77
20. Minor pulses……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 78
20.1 Details of minor pulses varieties recommended for NFSM states………………………………………. 79‐82
21. Annexure – I : Area, Production and Productivity for food grains (rice, wheat and pulses) during last 50 years…………………………………………………………………………………………………….... 83 22. Annexure – I I : The area under nine agro‐climatic zones for evaluation of varieties……………………….. 84 23. Annexure – III : Proforma for the submission of proposal to Department of Agriculture and Cooperation for notification of a variety…………………………………………………………….. 85 24. Annexure – IV : Number of Varieties of rice, wheat and pulses not older than 10 years and recommended for NFSM States………………………………………………………………………….. 86
Dr. N.B.Singh Tel/Fax: 23383549 E‐mail: [email protected]
FOREWORD
Improved varieties play pivotal role in enhancing productivity of any crop. Improved variety
alone can add 20‐25 % to increased productivity, even if other components of production remain the
same. Improved varieties/hybrids of cereals and millets helped in ushering the green revolution.
Through National Food Security Mission enhancement in the production of rice, wheat and pulses is
aimd at on sustainable basis. In this mission improved varieties are involved in several interventions
such as demonstrations, seed distribution, mini‐kit trial, etc. The improved varieties of these crops will
help in enhancing production by creating awareness among the farmers through these interventions.
Fortunately, excepting pigeonpea, all the crops are self‐pollinated hence the maintenance of the genetic
purity is not a problem. Awareness about the improved varieties of these crops among the farmers and
extension workers is most important for their spread. The list of “Improved varieties/hybrids of rice,
wheat and pulses recommended varieties of rice, wheat and pulses or NFSM states” will be quite
useful to seed producing, seed certification and seed marketing agencies in the country, besides the
farmers who will have the choice for selecting varieties according to their need. The efforts made by Dr
Shanker Lal, National Consultant (seeds), NFSM in compilation of improved varieties of three NFSM
crops are quite praiseworthy. This bulletin will be quite useful to the farmers, agriculture extension
workers, seed producing and certifying agencies and seeds men.
N.B.Singh
November…., 2009
i
PREFACE
Improved varieties of crop species play pivotal role in enhancing production. This has, amply,
been demonstrated through the distribution of quality seeds of high yielding varieties/hybrids of cereals
and millets.
The National Food Security Mission launched by GOI in 17 states in the country aims at
increasing production of food grains through three major crops viz., rice, wheat and pulses (chickpea,
pigeonpea, urdbean, mungbean, lentil and fieldpea and minor pulses like mothbean, horsegram,
cowpea, lathyrus and rajma which are of local importance). Unless the farmers are aware of improved
varieties of these crops, the demand for seeds cannot be generated and consequently the seed
producing agencies cannot plan their seed production and marketing programmes. This will slow down
the varietal replacement rate and the old low yielding varieties will continue in the cultivation.
Therefore, it was felt necessary to prepare the list of recently released varieties/hybrids of these three
mission crops in the form of bulletin.
This bulletin outlines as how the varieties are developed, released, notified, de‐notified and re‐
notified. State wise varieties/hybrids of wheat, rice, pulses have been listed in ten tables. In each crop
the varieties have been classified according to age into three groups i.e., varieties of more than 15 years
old, varieties of more than 10 years old and less than 15 years old and varieties upto 10 years old. In
NFSM, varieties upto 10 years old are allowed for subsidy. The information on each variety included the
year of release, age, duration, production conditions and special features (resistance to diseases, insect
pests, tolerance to abiotic stresses, grain quality, etc).
The information provided in the bulletin will be of immense value to the farmers, extension
workers, seed producing and marketing agencies. This will also help in increasing production of the
three mission crops.
Shanker Lal National Consultant (Seeds)
National Food Security Mission, GOI
ii
iii
ACKNOWLEGEMENT
I am very grateful to Dr. N.B. Singh, Agriculture Commissioner, GOI who inspired me to take up
the work of compilation of improved varieties/hybrids of three mission crops (rice, wheat and pulses). I
am also thankful to him for his continuous advice/suggestions for improving this compilation. I am
thankful to Mr. Mukesh Khullar, Joint Secretary (Crops) and National Mission Director, NFSM and Mrs.
Neeraja Adidam, Director (Crops), Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, GOI for continuously
offering suggestions, the incorporation of which improved the quality of this document. I am also
grateful to Dr. R.S. Saini, who as a Plant Breeder, but looking after extension activities of NFSM helped
me in making this bulletin extension workers friendly. The thanks are also due to Shri Shailendra
Tripathi, Technical Assistant in NFSM who helped me in collecting information on varieties of these
crops. The thanks are also due to Miss. Nancy Malhotra, Stenographer, NFSM Cell for computer typing
of the document and cover designing of the bulletin.
Shanker Lal National Consultant (Seeds)
National Food Security Mission, GOI
ABBREVIATIONS
1. A. Bl = Ascochyta blight 26. NFSM= National Food Security Mission
2. AB= Alternaria Blight 27. PA=Pro‐Agro
3. BL= Blast 28. PB = Pod Borer
4. BLB= Bacterial Leaf Blight 29. PF= Pod Fly
5. BLS=Bacterial Leaf Spot 30.PM= Powdery Mildew
6. BOAA=ß‐N‐Oxalyl‐α‐ß‐Diaminopropionic acid 31. R=Rust
7. BPH= Brown Plant Hopper 32. RF = Rain‐fed
8. Br= Bruchid 33. RF = Rice Fallow
9. BS= Brown Spot 34. RR = Root Rot
10. BSMV=Bean Seed Borne Mosaic Virus 35. RTV= Rice Tungru Virus
11. CLS=Cercospora Leaf Spot 36. SB= Stem Borer, Short Bold
12. CR= Collar Rot 37. Sh.Bl= Sheath Blight
13. CYMV=Cowpea Yellow Mosaic Virus 38. SMD= Sterility Mosaic Disease
14. DRR= Dry Root Rot, 39. SS= Short Slender
15. GLH= Green Leaf Hopper 40. TS = Timely Sown
16. GM= Gall Midge 41. VLS = Very Late Sown
17. GOI= Government of India 42. W = Wilt
18. I = Irrigated 43. WA=widely Adapted
19. ICAR= Indian Council of Agricultural Research 44. WBPH= White Backed Plant Hopper
20. LB= Long Bold 45. YMV= Yellow Mosaic Virus
21. LCV=Leaf Crinckle Virus
22. LF= Leaf Folder
23. LS = Late sown, Long Slender
24. MB= Medium Bold
25. MS= Medium Slender
iv
1
Introduction
Food grains are comprised of rice, wheat, pulses and millets, of which former three have been included in National
Food Security Mission launched by GOI.
The food grain production in India has increased from 82.08 million tonnes from 115.58 million hectares of area
during 1960‐61 to 211.78 million tonnes from 124.07 million hectares during 2006‐07 (Annexure: I).This exhibits 158
percent increase during a period of 46 years. As a result, the nation became almost self‐sufficient in food grains. But the
population in the country is growing at an alarming rate of around 2.5% per year. This necessitates that the food grain
production should also increase at least at the same rate or even at a faster rate in order to improve the nutrition status of
the masses.
The impressive increase in food grain production (Annexure: I) has resulted, in addition to other components,
primarily due to improved crop varieties, capable of exploiting the environment so provided. Better environment alone
cannot lead to better yields from genetically inferior varieties, beyond a certain limit. Similarly, improving the environment
beyond a certain limit for any variety may also adversely affect its performance. For example, the tall varieties of wheat
respond to nitrogen application upto 60 kg/ha, but higher doses used to reduce the yield, mainly due to lodging. Now
improved varieties of dwarf wheat have been tailored which give increased yield upto, even beyond 120 kg N/ha
application. The present day improved varieties of rice, wheat and pulses possess all or combinations of major characters
which enable the farmers for wider choice.
2. Definition of the variety
It is a strain released by Central / State Variety Release Committee for commercial cultivation by the farmers. It is
a synonym of strain, cultivar, race and genotype. However, the term variety is most commonly used by the farmers,
agriculture workers and seedsmen.
3. Variety‐development
It takes 10‐12 years to develop a variety, depending upon the method of breeding employed. Various methods
(introduction, selection, hybridization, mutation, poly‐plodization, biotechnological means, etc) have been designed to
breed the varieties. The specific objectives of breeding would vary greatly from crop to crop. Some of the main objectives
of breeding are higher yield, improved quality, disease and insect pest resistance, tolerance to abiotic stresses, change in
maturity duration, improved agronomic characteristics, photo/thermo‐insensitivity, synchronous maturity, non‐shattering/
non‐lodging habit, determinate growth, dormancy, elimination of toxic substances, suitability to new seasons/areas, etc.
The State Agricultural Universities, ICAR Institutes, Research Stations under State Department of Agriculture and
some NGOs are engaged in variety development. When a variety of food grains (rice, wheat and pulses) is developed, it
goes under series of tests before it is released for commercial cultivation. These steps are summarized below.
3.1 Varietal evaluation: In order to assess the superiority of a newly developed variety over the existing best variety
in terms of yield and other important traits it is evaluated in various trials and tests as detailed
2
below.
3.1.1 Station Trial: It is conducted by the breeder who develops the variety. It is conducted for one or more years
before it is entered in the trial conducted under All India Coordinated Crop Improvement Project.
3.1.2 Multi‐location Trials: These trials are carried out under concern crop coordinated Project at several locations
in the region. Since the soil and climatic conditions vary from one region to another, the country has been divided
into several zones. The three NFSM crops are tested in 9 agro‐climatic zones (Annexure: II) in the following trials.
3.1.3 Initial Evaluation Trial (IET): The new strain developed is included in the IET within the zone in which it was
developed. Such strain is called entry which is tested for one year only. Such entries are promoted to Uniform
Regional Trial (URT), if their performance is outstanding, otherwise are rejected.
3.1.4 Uniform Regional Trial (URT): The superior entries found in IET are promoted to URT which is conducted at 25‐
30 locations within the zone. Every year the entry performing poor is rejected and the ones found superior to check
are identified for release in the workshop.
3.1.5 Agronomic Trial: The entry showing superior performance in URT during first year is also included in the
agronomic trial to work out its suitable agronomy.
3.1.6 Adoptive Research Trial: The varieties identified by the workshop are tested in the adoptive Research Trial.
The data generated from such trials are considered for release of the variety.
3.1.7 Mini‐kit Trials: Such trials are conducted by Crops Division of Ministry of Agriculture, GOI on farmers’ fields. In
wheat, 5 or 10kg seed is planted without replication. In this system, the new variety reaches to the farmers
one year earlier than the certified seed would be available in the market.
4. Identification of entries for release
The outstanding entries are identified for release as new varieties in the annual workshops of the coordinated projects.
The proposals for identification are examined by the Variety Identification Committee.
The proposal for identification is prepared on the prescribed proforma by the breeders who have developed the
variety. Such proposals include the performance of the entry in URT for at least two years, the data from pathologists,
entomologists, quality tests, etc and those from agronomy trials are considered. The entry considered suitable for release
as a variety by the workshop is said to have been identified for pre‐release multiplication or simply as identified. The
criterion for identification of a variety varies from crop to crop. However, it should be superior to existing best variety and
possessing resistance to major diseases and insect pests and one or two distinguishing characters. In addition, the breeder
must be able to spare 10 quintals seed of the proposed variety for supply to State Farms Corporation of India for pre‐
release multiplication as well as for distribution in adoptive and mini‐kit trials.
4.1 Release of variety by the Central Variety Release Committee: After identification by the workshop the variety is tested
at least for one year in adopted research trial. During this period, the reaction of the variety to diseases and insect
pests and assessment of quality parameters are done. Based on the data from the adopted trials, the proposal for its
release as a new variety for consideration by the Central Sub‐Committee on Crop Standards and Release of Varieties
is submitted on the prescribed proforma (Annexure: III.).
3
4.2 Release of the variety by State Variety Release Committee: In addition to the Central Sub‐Committee on Crop
Standards and Release of Varieties, each state has its own variety release committee (SVRC). However, the SVRC
requires a separate set of trials which are conducted at the Regional Research Stations of that state, in addition to the
data generated from coordinated multi‐location trials.
5. Notification of the varieties
After the variety has been released by the Central/State Variety Release Committee the Department of Agriculture
and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, GOI notifies it before its seed can be certified. Only those varieties are
notified which have been identified for pre‐release multiplication by the workshop of concern crop coordinated
project. However, SVRC may release a variety, which has not been identified by the workshop of concern crop
coordinated project or even such strains which were not evaluated under the project, but such varieties cannot be
notified and also the seed of such varieties cannot be certified.
6. De‐ notification of the varieties
The old varieties which have degenerated in genetic quality and performance are de‐notified by the GOI and their
replacements are suggested. Such varieties cease eligibility for seed certification.
7. Re‐notification of the varieties
The old varieties which continue to perform better and are popular among the farmers are re‐notified for specific
period and continue to have eligibility for seed multiplication and certification.
8. Seed Multiplication
When the entry is identified by the workshop, the breeder begins its seed multiplication in the following crop
season. The seed produced by the breeder is termed as ‘Stock Seed’. This stock seed is converted into breeder seed
once the strain is released and notified. In the crop season following notification the foundation seed of newly released
strain is produced, which in turn is used in the production of certified seed in the following season. Thus, the farmer is
able to obtain certified seed of released and notified variety one year in advance. Also, the seed of such variety reaches
many farmers even before its release through mini kit‐trials. Many other farmers would also obtain the seed from
these farmers and thus need not to wait for next two years.
9. Varieties developed and released
With the concerted efforts of breeders working in State Agricultural Universities, ICAR Institutes and State
Department of Agriculture a large number of varieties of three NFSM crops (rice, wheat and pulses) have been
developed and released. Since in the mission the varieties not older than 10 years are promoted, hence only such
varieties whose age is upto 10 years are being listed crop wise and statewise (Annexure:IV). Also, several varieties
have been recommended for more than one state, hence the total number of recommended varieties would be more
than the actual number of released and recommended varieties. Thus from 1999 to 2009, 220 varieties of rice, 146 of
4
wheat and 290 of pulses ( 71 of chickpea, 19 of pigeonpea, 56 of mungbean, 39 of urdbean, 19 of lentil, 36 of fieldpea
and 50 of minor pulses which include cowpea, mothbean, horsegram, Lathyrus and rajma) have been recommended
for NFSM states.
10. Criterion for selection of varieties
For realizing optimum productivity of any crop in any production environment, the choice of an appropriate
variety is extremely essential. The variety to be selected for cultivation must be adapted to the specific agro‐
ecological/production conditions. Improper choice of the variety would result in low productivity, even when adequate
quantities of inputs are applied. It is equally important to use the latest recommended varieties, since all varieties tend
to lose disease resistance on account of evolution of pathotypes/biotypes of the disease. In view of this, in National
Food Security Mission the varieties not older than 10 years of three mission crops (rice, wheat and pulses) are
recommended. When the varieties are most popular among the farmers and are outstanding in one or more
characters, the age relaxation is granted for specific period on case to case basis by Government of India, for awarding
subsidy. Here, the varieties have been grouped into following three categories:
i.) More than 15 years old which are most popular among the farmers
ii.) More than 10 years and equal or less than 15 years old
iii.) The varieties upto 10 years old
The age of the varieties has been reckoned from the year of release to 2009.
5
11. Wheat
Wheat is the second most important food crop of India and accounts for nearly one third of the total food grain
production. It is grown on around 22% of the total area under food grain crops and during
rabi season it covers about 55 % of the total cultivated area and contributes more than 75 %
of food grain production. Since 1967 the area under wheat has increased rapidly from 12.84
to 28.17 million hectares (2006‐07) and production has increased from 11.39 to 73.2 million
tonnes during the same period. Due to improved varieties under cultivation the
productivity has increased from 887 to 2617 kg/ha.
There are two types of wheat viz., bread and Durum. The bread wheat accounts for more than 90 % of the wheat crop
grown, while rest is contributed by macaroni or durum wheat. The former is grown in almost all regions, while durum in
central and peninsular India. Bread wheat is suitable for Chapatti, while durum wheat for the preparation of suji or rawa,
halwa and is extensively used in South Indian preparations. The improved varieties of wheat under three groups
recommended for 9 NFSM states in the country are given in Table: 11.1.
6
Table 11.1: Details of wheat varieties recommended for NFSM states
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/Production conditions
Special features
1. Bihar Age group > 15 years**1.HP 1493 1990 19 ‐ TS, RF ‐
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years2.Raj 3765 1998 11 100‐110 VLS, I Durum wheat 3.NW 1014 1998 11 ‐ VLS, I ‐ 4.K 9465 1998 11 ‐ LS, RF ‐ 5.NW 1012 1998 11 120‐122 TS, I ‐
Age group upto 10 years6.HD 2402 1999 10 ‐ TS, I ‐ 7.PBW 306 2000 9 ‐ VLS, I ‐ 8.PBW 443 2000 9 ‐ TS, I Resistant to yellow & brown rusts
9.HD 2733 2001 8 ‐ TS, I ‐ 10.NW 2036 2003 6 ‐ LS, I ‐ 11.HD 2824 2003 6 ‐ TS, I ‐ 12.PBW 14 2003 6 ‐ LS, I ‐ 13.Raj 4120 2008 1 117‐122 TS, I ‐
2. Gujarat Age group >15years**1.Lok 1 1982 27 ‐ TS, I ‐ 2.GW 2 1985 24 ‐ TS, RF Durum wheat 3.GGW 496 1990 19 ‐ TS, I ‐ 4.GW 502 1990 19 ‐ TS, I ‐
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years5.GW 1139 1998 11 ‐ TS, I Durum wheat 6.Raj 3765 1998 11 100‐110 VLS, I Durum wheat
Age group upto 10 years7.HD 4672 2000 9 ‐ TS, RF Durum wheat8.HUW 510 2000 9 ‐ TS, I ‐ 9.PBW 306 2000 9 ‐ VLS, I ‐ 10.RDW 274 2001 8 153 TS, I Durum wheat, resistant to karnal bunt
& loose smut 11.MPO 1106 2002 7 ‐ TS, I Durum wheat12.GW 322 2002 7 115‐120 TS, I ‐ 13.MP 4010 2003 6 ‐ LS, I ‐ 14.HI 1500 2003 6 ‐ TS, RF ‐ 15.HI 8627 2004 5 130‐135 I, RF ‐ 16.HD 2864 2005 4 105‐110 LS, I ‐ 17.Raj 6560 2005 4 130‐135 TS, I Resistant to rusts18.PDW 291 2005 4 155 TS, I Durum wheat, resistant to karnal bunt
& loose smut 19.HI 1531 2006 3 125‐130 I ‐ 20.HD 2932 2006 3 105‐110 LS, I ‐ 21.GW 366 2007 2 110‐115 TS, I ‐
7
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/Production conditions
Special features
22.HI 1544 2007 2 110‐115 TS, I ‐ 23.PBW 550 2007 2 135 TS, I Resistant to yellow & brown
rusts 24.JW 1202 2008 1 105‐110 LS, I ‐ 25.JW 1203 2008 1 105‐110 LS, I ‐
3. Haryana
Age group >15years**1.WH 147 1975/
1978 34/31 134 TS, I Good for chapati & resistant
to brown rust 2.WH 157 1978/
1989 31/20 142 TS, I Tolerant to salinity &
resistant to yellow rust Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
3.WH 896 1995 14 135 TS, I Durum wheat4.Raj 3765 1998 11 100‐110 VLS, I Durum wheat5.Sonals 1998 11 120 LS, VLS, I Tolerant to drought &
resistant to brown & yellow rusts
6.HS 365 1998 11 ‐ TS, I, RF ‐ Age group upto 10 years
7.HD 2402 1999 10 ‐ TS, I ‐ 8.HD 2687 1999 10 ‐ TS, I ‐ 9.UP 2425 1999 10 ‐ LS, I ‐ 10.PBW 306 2000 9 ‐ VLS, I ‐ 11.PDW 274 2001 8 153 TS, I Resistant to Karnal bunt &
loose smut 12.WH 912 2002 7 146 TS, I Durum wheat, resistant to
karnal bunt, yellow & brown rusts
13.WH 711 2002 7 145 TS, I Resistant to karnal bunt14.WH 912 2002 7 145 TS, I Durum wheat, resistant to
brown & yellow rusts 15.PBW 502 2004 5 150 TS, I Resistant to karnal bunt &
loose smut 16.PDW 291 2005 4 155 TS, I Resistant to karnal bunt &
loose smut 17.Raj 6560 2005 4 130‐135 TS, I Resistant to karnal bunt &
loose smut 18.WH 1021 2007 2 ‐ TS, I Resistant to brown & yellow
rusts 19.PBW 550 2007 2 135 TS, I Resistant to brown & yellow
rusts 20. DBW 17 2007 2 ‐ TS, I Resistant to all rusts
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
8
4. Madhya Pradesh
Age group >15years**
1.Lok 1 1982 27 ‐ TS, I ‐Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
2.Raj 3765 1998 11 100‐110 VLS, I ‐3.DDK 1009 1998 11 ‐ TS, I ‐
Age group upto 10 years4.HI 8498 1999 10 ‐ TS, I Durum wheat5.HD 4672 2000 9 ‐ TS, RF Durum wheat6.HI 1418 2000 9 ‐ LS, I ‐7.HI 1454 2000 9 ‐ TS, I ‐8.PBW 306 2000 9 ‐ VLS, I ‐9.MPO 1106 2002 7 ‐ TS, I Durum wheat10.GW 322 2002 7 ‐ TS, I ‐11.MP 1106 2003 6 115‐120 TS, I ‐12.HI 8627 2004 5 130‐135 I, RF ‐13.JW 1142 2004 5 105‐110 TS, I ‐14.JW 3020 2004 5 125‐130 RF Resistant to rusts 15.HD 2864 2005 4 105‐110 LS, I ‐16.HI 1531 2006 3 125‐130 I ‐17.GW 366 2007 2 110‐115 TS, I ‐
18.HI 1544 2007 2 110‐115 TS, RF ‐19.JW 1202 2008 1 105‐110 LS, I ‐20.JW 1203 2008 1 105‐110 LS, I ‐21.JW 3211 2008 1 120‐122 TS, I, RF Resistant to rusts22.JW 3173 2008 1 125‐130 RF, I Resistant to rusts
5. Maharashtra Age group >15years**
1.Lok 1 1982 27 ‐ TS, I ‐Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
2.Raj 3765 1998 11 ‐ VLS, I Durum wheat3.MACS 2846 1998 11 ‐ TS, I Durum wheat4.NW 1086 1998 11 ‐ TS, I, RF ‐
Age group upto 10 years5.DDK 1009 1999 10 ‐ TS, I ‐6.HIDW 15 1999 10 115‐120 TS, I ‐7.DWR 1006 1999 10 ‐ TS, I ‐8.HI 8498 1999 10 ‐ TS, I Durum wheat9.HW 1044 1999 10 ‐ TS, RF, I ‐10.HD 4672 2000 9 130‐135 TS, RF Durum wheat
11.HUW 510 2000 9 ‐ TS, I ‐12. PBW 306 2000 9 ‐ VLS, I ‐
State Variety Year of
release Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
13.K 4644 2000 9 ‐ TS, RF ‐14.HD 2781 2002 7 ‐ TS, RF ‐15.GW 322 2002 7 130‐135 TS, I ‐16.MPO 1106 2002 7 ‐ TS, I ‐17.NIAW 301 2002 7 ‐ LS, I ‐18.Raj 3777 2003 6 ‐ VLS, I ‐19.Raj 4037 2003 6 ‐ TS, I
9
20.PBW 502 2004 5 ‐ TS, I Resistant to karnal bunt, yellow and brown rusts.
21.HI 8627 2004 5 130‐135 I, RF ‐22.AKAW 3722
2004 5 102‐110 I, RF ‐
23.NIAW 295 2005 4 115‐120 TS, I Resistant to rusts 24.NIAW 917 2005 4 115‐120 TS, I Resistant to rusts25.HD 2864 2005 4 105‐110 LS, I ‐26.HI 1531 2006 3 125‐130 I ‐27.PBW 533 2006 3 117 LS, I ‐28.HD 2932 2006 3 105‐110 LS, I ‐29.GW 366 2007 2 110‐115 TS, I ‐30.HI 1544 2007 2 110‐115 TS, I ‐31.JW 1202 2008 1 105‐110 LS, I ‐32.JW 1203 2008 1 105‐110 LS, I ‐
6. Punjab Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years1.PBW 343 1995 14 ‐ TS, I ‐2.Raj 3765 1998 11 ‐ VLS, I ‐
Age group upto 10 years3.HD 2402 1999 10 ‐ TS, I ‐4.HD 2687 1999 10 ‐ TS, I ‐5.UP 2425 1999 10 ‐ LS, I ‐6.PBW 306 2000 9 ‐ VLS, I ‐7.PBW 274 2001 8 153 TS, I Durum wheat,
resistant to karnal bunt & loose smut
10
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
8.PBW 502 2004 5 150 TS, I Resistant to karnal bunt, yellow & brown rusts
9.PBW 509 2004 5 130 LS, I Resistant to yellow & brown rusts
10.PBW 527 2005 4 160 TS, RF Resistant to yellow & brown rusts
11.Raj 6560 2005 4 130‐135 TS, I ‐
12.PDW 291 2005 4 155 TS, I Durum wheat, resistant to karnal bunt & loose
smut 13.WH 1021 2007 2 120 LS, I ‐
14.PBW 550 2007 2 115‐120 TS, I Resistant to yellow & brown rusts
15. DBW17 2007 2 ‐ TS, I Resistant to all rusts
7.Rajasthan Age group >15years**1.Ganga Sunheri
1966 43 ‐ TS, LS, I, RF ‐
Age group upto 10 years2.HD 2687 1999 10 ‐ TS, I ‐3.UP 2425 1999 10 ‐ VS, I ‐4.PDW 274 2001 8 153 TS, I Durum wheat, resistant
to karnal bunt & loose smut
5.Raj 3777 2003 6 ‐ VLS, I Durum wheat6.PBW 502 2004 5 150 TS, I Resistant to karnal bunt,
yellow and brown rusts 7.Raj 4037 2004 5 120 TS, I ‐8.Raj 6560 2005 4 130‐135 TS, I ‐9.PDW 291 2005 4 155 TS, I Durum wheat, resistant
to karnal bunt & loose smut
10.WH 1021 2007 2 ‐ LS, I ‐11.PBW 550 2007 2 135 TS, I Resistant to yellow &
brown rusts 8. Uttar Pradesh
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years1.Raj 3765 1998 11 100‐110 VLS, I ‐2.K 9465 1998 11 ‐ LS, RF ‐3.K 9533 1998 11 ‐ TS, I ‐4.K 9006 (Ujyar)
1998 11 ‐ TS, RF ‐
5.NW 1012 1998 11 120‐122 TS, I ‐Age group upto 10 years
6.HD 2402 1999 10 ‐ TS, I ‐7.HD 2687 1999 10 ‐ TS, I ‐
State
Variety
Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
11
8.UP 2425 1999 10 ‐ LS, I ‐
9.HUW 468 1999 10 ‐ TS, I ‐
10.PBW 443 2000 9 ‐ TS, I Resistant to yellow & brown rusts
11.HD 2733 2000 9 ‐ TS, I ‐
12.PBW 306 2000 9 ‐ VLS, I ‐
13.NW 1076 2001 8 108‐110 LS, I ‐
14.K 9162 2001 8 ‐ LS, I ‐
15.PDW 274 2001 8 153 TS, I Durum wheat, resistant to karnal bunt & loose
smut 16.NW 2036 2002 7 110‐112 LS, I ‐
17.HUW 533 2002 7 ‐ TS, RF ‐
18.K7903 (Halna)
2002 7 ‐ VLS, I ‐
19.HD 2824 2003 6 ‐ TS, I ‐
20.PBW 14 2003 6 ‐ LS, I ‐
21.NW 1067 2004 5 122‐124 TS, I Suitable for usar soils
22.PBW 502 2004 5 150 TS, I Resistant to karnal bunt, & rusts
23.PDW 291 2005 4 155 TS, I Resistant to karnal bunt, & rusts
24.PBW 550 2007 2 135 TS, I Resistance to yellow & brown rusts
25.WH 1021 2007 2 ‐ LS, I ‐26. DBW17 2007 2 ‐ TS, I Resistant to all rusts
9. West Bengal Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years1.NW 1014 1998 11 ‐ VLS, I ‐2.K 9465 1998 11 ‐ LS, RF ‐3.NW 1012 1998 11 120‐122 TS, I ‐
Age group upto 10 years4.HD 2402 1999 10 ‐ TS, I ‐5.UP 468 1999 10 ‐ TS, I ‐6.BW 1008 (Teesta)
2000 9 ‐ TS, LS, I, RF ‐
7.PBW 443 2000 9 ‐ TS, I Resistant to yellow and brown rusts
12
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
8.HD 2733 2000 9 ‐ TS, I9.NW 2036 2003 6 ‐ LS, I ‐10.HD 2824 2003 6 ‐ TS, I ‐11.PBW 14 2003 6 ‐ LS, I ‐12.JW 3020 2004 5 125‐130 RF Resistant to rusts13.MACS 6145
2004 5 ‐ TS, RF ‐
14.WH 1021 2007 2 ‐ LS, I ‐15.JW 3173 2008 1 125‐130 RF Resistant to rusts16.JW 3211 2008 1 120‐125 RF, I Resistant to rusts17.Raj 4120 2008 1 117‐122 TS, I ‐
*Age has been reckoned from the year of release to 2009 **15 or > 15 years but most popular among the farmers
13
12. Rice
Rice production has witnessed major advances during the last four decades due to wide scale adoption of Green
Evolution techniques. The commendable success could be mainly possible due to development of dwarf and fertilizer
responsive high yielding varieties with disease/pest resistance and suitable for different eco‐systems. There is huge
diversity in rice varieties in respect of grain characteristics such as short bold, long bold, long slender, scented and non‐
scented. These high yielding varieties were instrumental in increasing the rice production which almost tripled from 30.4 m
tonnes during 1966 to a record production of 93.1 m tonnes in 2001‐02. The spread of high yielding varieties has doubled
from a meager 37.9 per cent in mid sixties to nearly 80 per cent now. The varieties of different age groups bred and
released for cultivation in NFSM states have been listed in Table: 12.1. This list will help the farmers in selecting the
varieties suiting to their requirement.
14
Table 12.1: Details of improved varieties of rice recommended for NFSM‐states
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs) *
Duration (days)
Resistantto
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features/ Grain type
1. Andhra Pradesh
Age group > 15 years**1.Swarna (MTU 7029) 1979 30 ‐ SB,BLB Rainfed,
shallow land WA
Age group upto 10 years2.Surya 2000 9 ‐ SB,
WBPH Rainfed,
shallow land LS
3.Vedagiri 2000 9 ‐ BL Rainfed, shallow land
MS
4.Sonasila 2000 9 ‐ BL Rainfed, upland
LS
5.Sravani 2000 9 115‐120 BL Irrigated LS6.Swathi 2000 9 120‐125 BLB Rainfed,
shallow low land
LS
7.Maruteru sonalu 2000 9 150‐160 ‐ Rainfed, upland
MS
8.Bharani 2000 9 ‐ RTV Irrigated, medium
LS
9.Deepti 2000 9 150 BPH Irrigated, medium
MS
10.Kakilam 2000 9 150‐160 BL Rainfed, shallow low
land
‐
11.Vasundhara 2000 9 130‐135 BL Rainfed shallow land
LS
12.Early Sambha 2000 9 130‐135 SBl Irrigated, medium
MS
13.Cotton Dora Sonalu
2000 9 120 BL Irrigated, medium land
LS
14.Vivekdhan 62 2000 9 125‐135 BL Irrigated SB 15.Sumati 2001 8 ‐ ‐ Irrigated,
shallow land Scented, LS
16.Varalu 2001 8 ‐ GM Rainfed, upland
LS
17.Tholakari 2002 7 155 BLB Irrigated MS18.Godawari 2002 7 150 BLB Irrigated LS19.Santhi 2002 7 120‐130 SBL Irrigated,
medium MS
20.Jagtial Sonalu 2002 7 120‐130 BL Limited irrigated
MS
21.Polasa prabha 2002 7 130‐135 BLB Irrigated MS22.Pusa Sugandha 5 2004 5 125‐130 Major
diseases Irrigated, medium
Scented, LS
15
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs) *
Duration (days)
Resistantto
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features/ Grain type
23.Sugandhamati 2004 5 140 BL, GLH Irrigated, medium
Scented, LS
24.Richa 2004 5 130 BL Irrigated/ Rainfed
LS
25.NDR 8002 2004 5 135‐140 BL Irrigated/ rainfed
LS
26.Warangal Sambha 2005 4 140 BL Irrigated, medium
‐
27.Pusa Sugandha 1121
2005 4 135‐140 ‐ Irrigated, medium
Scented
28.Naina 2005 4 ‐ BL,RTV, BPH
Irrigated,
Tolerant toAlkalinity
29.Shusk Samrat 2006 3 ‐ BL Rainfed, upland
LB
30.Virender 2006 3 ‐ Major diseases
Rainfed, upland
‐
31.Sree Kurma 2007 2 110‐115 ‐ Rainfed MS32.Indra 2007 2 Late BLB Irrigated MS33.Pardhiva 2007 2 Late BL Irrigated ‐34.Improved Sambha 2007 2 ‐ BL Rainfed, low
land ‐
35.Warangal sonalu 2007 2 110‐115 ‐ Irrigated, medium
MS
2. Assam Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years1.Luit 1997 12 90‐100 ‐ Rainfed LB
Age group upto 10 years2.Sudhir 1999 10 150‐160 BL,BLB Semi
deepwater LS
3.Padmanath 1999 10 145‐170 ‐ Deep water Kernel large bold, LB
4.Satyarajan 1999 10 130‐135 BL, BPH Rainfed, shallow low
land
MS
5.Basundhara 1999 10 130‐135 BL,BPH Rainfed, shallow low
land
MS
6.Jayamati 1999 10 130‐135 ‐ Rainfed, shallow low
land
Suitable for boro, MS
7.Vivekdhan 62 2000 9 120‐135 BL Irrigated SB 8.Anjali 2002 7 90‐95 ‐ Rainfed,
direct seeded
SB
9.Pusa Sugandha 5
2004 5 125‐130 ‐ Irrigated, medium
Scented, LS
16
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs) *
Duration (days)
Resistantto
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features/ Grain type
10.Sugandhamati 2004 5 140 BL, GLH Irrigated, medium
Scented, LS
11.Richa 2004 5 130 ‐ Irrigated, medium
Scented, LS
12.Shivam 2006 3 115‐125 ‐ Irrigated SB 13.Bhutnath 2006 3 110 BL Rainfed LB 14.Chandrama 2007 2 Boro BL ‐ SB
3. Bihar Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years1.Birsadhan 105 1995 14 85‐90 ‐ Rainfed,
upland ‐
2.Birsadhan 106 1995 14 90‐95 ‐ Rainfed, upland
‐
3.Birsadhan 107 1995 14 90 ‐ Rainfed, upland
‐
Age group upto 10 years4.Vivekdhan 62 2000 9 120‐135 BL Irrigated SB 5.Richharia 2000 9 ‐ ‐ Rainfed, boro LS6.Dhan Laxmi 2000 9 160‐170 BLB, BS Boro LS7.Santosh 2001 8 ‐ ‐ Rainfed,
shallow land ‐
8.Pant Dhan 16 2001 8 ‐ BL, GM Rainfed, upland
‐
9.Pant Dhan 19 2001 8 Early ‐ Irrigated, medium
‐
10.Anjali 2002 7 90‐95 ‐ Rainfed, early SB 11.Richa 2004 5 125‐135 Major
diseases Irrigated, medium
Scented, LS
12.Rajendra Sweta 2004 5 ‐ ‐ Irrigated, medium
Scented,LS
13.Rajendra Mahsuri 1
2004 5 140‐150 Major diseases
Rainfed, shallow low
land
MS
14.Pusa Sugandha 5 2004 5 125‐130 Major diseases
Irrigated, medium
Scented, LS
15.Sugandhamati 2004 5 125‐135 Major diseases
Irrigated, medium
Scented, LS
16.Birsa Vikas Dhan 109
2005 4 95 ‐ Rainfed, upland
‐
17.Birsa Vikas Dhan 110
2005 4 85‐90 ‐ Rainfed, upland
‐
18.Shivam 2006 3 115‐125 ‐ Irrigated SB19.Improved Pusa Basmati
2007 2 ‐ ‐ Irrigated, early
Scented, LS
20.Rajendra Kasturi 2007 2 120 BPH Rainfed, shallow low
land
Scented, LS
21.Warangal Sonalu 2007 2 110‐115 Major diseases
Irrigated, medium
MS
State Variety Year of Age Duration Resistant Agro‐ecology/ Special
17
release (yrs) * (days) to Production conditions
features/Grain type
4. Chhattisgarh Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years1.Mahamaya 1996 13 125‐130 BLB, GM Irrigated,
rainfed ‐
2.Poornima 1997 12 100‐105 Major diseases
Rainfed, upland LB
Age group upto 10 years3.Bamleswari 2000 9 125‐130 SB, BS Irrigated,
medium LB
4.Dhanteswari 2000 9 100‐105 GM, LF Rainfed, upland LS 5.Vivek Dhan 62 2000 9 120‐135 BL Irrigated SB 6.Indira Dhan 1 2004 5 130‐135 ‐ Irrigated,
rainfed MS
7.Pusa Sugandha 5 2004 5 125‐130 ‐ Irrigated, medium
Scented, LS
8.Sugandhamati 2004 5 140 Major diseases
Irrigated, medium
Scented, LS
9.Richa 2004 5 130 BLB, WBPH
Rainfed, early Scented, LS
10.Narendra 8002 2005 4 135‐140 ‐ Rainfed, low land
LS
11.Indra Sugandha Dhan
2005 4 125‐130 GM Irrigated Scented, LS
12.Chandrahasni 2007 2 130‐140 Major diseases
Rainfed, shallow land
MS
13.Improved Pusa Basmati
2007 2 110‐120 ‐ Irrigated, upland
Scented, LS
14.Samleshwari 2007 2 105‐110 ‐ Rainfed, upland Direct seeded, MS
15.Jaldubi 2007 2 125‐140 BL, GM Rainfed, shallow deep
water
Direct seeded, MS
16.PKV‐HMT 2008 1 ‐ BLB Irrigated, medium
Quality rice, LS
17.Karma Mahsuri 2008 1 125‐130 ‐ Irrigated, medium early
Salinity tolerant, MS
5.Gujarat Age group upto 10 years1.Gurjari 1999 10 150‐160 GM Irrigated ‐2.Vivek Dhan 62 2000 9 120‐135 BL, SB Irrigated,
medium SB
3.Dandi 2002 7 130‐135 BL, BLB Irrigated Tolerant to saline/alkaline soils, MB
4.GR 8 2002 7 75‐80 ‐ Rainfed, upland MB 5.GR 104 2003 6 130‐140 BL Irrigated,
medium LS
6.GR 7 2004 5 110‐115 BL, BLB Irrigated, medium early
MS
7.GR 9 2004 5 90‐100 ‐ Rainfed, upland MSState Variety Year of
release Age(yrs) *
Duration (days)
Resistantto
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features/ Grain type
8.Pusa Sugandha 5 2004 5 125‐130 Major Irrigated, Scented, LS
18
diseases medium 9.Sugandhamati 2004 5 140 BL, GLH Irrigated,
medium Scented, LS
10.Virender 2006 3 95 ‐ Upland, direct seeded
LS
6.Jharkhand Age group > 15 years**1.Swarna (MTU 7029)
1979 30 ‐ BLB, SB Rainfed upland
WA
Age group upto 10 years2.Vivek Dhan 62 2000 9 120‐135 BL, SB,
GM Irrigated SB
3.Krishna Hamsa 2001 8 ‐ BL Boro ‐4.Anjali 2002 7 90‐95 BL, BLB,
SB, GM, Rainfed, upland
MS
5. Birsa Dhan 108 2003 6 70 GM, BS, GLH
Rainfed, upland
LS
6.Birsamati 2003 6 130 Major diseases
Rainfed, shallow land
Scented, LS
7.Hazari Dhan 2003 6 ‐ BL Irrigated, medium early
LS
8.Pusa Sugandha 5 2004 5 125‐130 Major diseases
‐ Scented, LS
9.Birsa Dhan 109 2005 4 85 SB Rainfed, upland
LS
10.Birsa Dhan 110 2005 4 95 BL, BLB Rainfed, upland
LS
11.Abhishekh 2006 3 ‐ BL Rainfed, upland
‐
12.Improved Pusa Basmati
2007 2 ‐ BL ‐ Scented, LS
7.Karnataka Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years1.Anjana 1998 11 105‐110 Major
diseases Rainfed,
shallow land SB
Age group upto 10 years2.Karnataka Hill Paddy‐3
2000 9 ‐ BL Rainfed, shallow Land
LS
3.Karnataka Hill Paddy 5
2000 9 150‐155 SL Rainfed, shallow land
MB
4.Hemavathi 2000 9 160‐165 BL Deep water ‐5.Vivek Dhan 62 2000 9 125‐135 ‐ Hilly areas,
irrigated ‐
6.BRS 1 2001 8 ‐ BL Irrigated, medium
‐
7.Sarla 2001 8 ‐ ‐ ‐ MS8.Mugudh Sugandha 2002 7 130‐135 BL Irrigated,
medium Scented, LS
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs) *
Duration (days)
Resistantto
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features/ Grain type
9.Dhanrashi 2002 7 Late Major diseases
Rainfed, shallow low
land
SB
10.Sharavathi 2003 6 Late BL Rainfed, SB
19
shallow land 11.Palghar 2003 6 Medium ‐ Irrigated ‐12.Kadamba 2004 5 Medium BL, SB Irrigated ‐13.Karnataka Hill Paddy 9
2004 5 Medium SB, LF Rainfed ‐
14.Sugandhamati 2004 5 140 ‐ Irrigated Scented, LS 15.Pusa Sugandha 5 2004 5 ‐ ‐ ‐ Scented, LS16.Richa 2004 5 125‐130 ‐ Irrigated Scented, LS 17.Tunga 2006 3 ‐ ‐ Irrigated,
medium Scented, LS
18.Madhuri 2007 2 ‐ BL Shallow low land
SB
19.MASS 46‐1 2007 2 ‐ ‐ Aerobic ‐20.CSR 22 2008 1 Late BL ‐ Salinity
tolerant 8. Kerala
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years1.Deepthi 1998 11 150‐160 BL,SB Irrigated,
medium LS
2.Krishna 1998 11 115‐120 BPH Irrigated, medium
MB
3.Karuna 1998 11 ‐ Major diseases
Irrigated, medium
LB
4.Anjana 1998 11 105‐120 Major diseases
Rainfed, shallow land
SB
5.Kumbham 1998 11 Early ‐ Rainfed, shallow low
land
MB
6.Makaram 1998 11 Medium‐early
‐ Shallow low land
MB
7.Mangla Mahsuri 1998 11 ‐ ‐ Irrigated, medium
SB
8.Uma 1998 11 115‐120 BPH, GM Irrigated, medium early
MB
9.Pavithra 1998 11 115‐120 GM ‐ MB 10.Panchami 1998 11 115‐120 ‐ Medium early MB 11.Remanica 1998 11 115‐120 ‐ Medium early SB 12.Revathy 1998 11 105‐110 BPH Irrigated,
medium MB
Age group upto 10 years13.Vivekdhan 62 2000 9 125‐135 Hilly area SB 14.Harsha 2001 8 Early BL Rainfed,
upland LB
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs) *
Duration (days)
Resistantto
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features/ Grain type
15.Chingam 2002 7 ‐ ‐ Rainfed, upland
‐
16.Dhanu 2002 7 ‐ ‐ Irrigated, medium
‐
17.Gouri 2002 7 ‐ BS Irrigated, medium early
‐
18.Swetha 2002 7 ‐ Major diseases
Irrigated, medium
‐
20
19.Varsha 2002 7 ‐ ‐ Irrigated, medium
‐
20.Kunjukunja Proya 2002 7 ‐ ‐ Rainfed, shallow low
land
‐
21.Kunjukunja Verma 2002 7 ‐ ‐ Irrigated, early
‐
22.Vythila 6 2005 4 ‐ ‐ Irrigated Tol. to salinity23.Sugandhamati 2004 5 144 ‐ Irrigated Scented, LS24.Pusa Sugandha 5 2004 5 125‐130 Major
diseases Irrigated Scented, LS
9.Madhya Pradesh
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years1.Mahamaya 1996 13 125‐128 BLB, GM Irrigated,
rainfed ‐
2.Shyamla 1997 12 130‐135 GM Upland Pigmented plant, LB
3.Poornima 1997 12 100‐105 Major diseases
Irrigated, medium
‐
Age group upto 10 years4.Bamleshwari 2000 9 125‐130 SB, BS Irrigated,
medium MS
5.Danteshwari 2000 9 100‐105 LF, GM Rainfed, upland
LS
6.Rashmi 2001 8 Early BL
Rainfed, upland
LS
7.Pusa Sugandha 5 2004 5 125‐130 Major diseases
Irrigated Scented, LS
8.JR 201 2004 5 105‐110 ‐ Rainfed/upland
LS
9.Narendra 8002 2005 4 125‐140 ‐ Rainfed , shallow low
land
LS
10.Pooja 2005 4 140‐150 BL Rainfed, shallow land
MS
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs) *
Duration (days)
Resistantto
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features/ Grain type
10. Maharashtra Age group upto 10 years1.Karjat 4 2000 9 Early ‐ Irrigated ‐2.Panval 3 2000 9 ‐ Major
diseases Irrigated Tolerant to
salinity/ Alkalinity
3.Phule Mawal 2000 9 Medium early
BL Irrigated ‐
4.SKL 8 2001 8 140‐145 BL Rainfed, shallow low
land
LS
5.SYE 2001 2002 7 130‐135 BL, BLB,SB,
Irrigated, early
SB
21
GM, WBPH
6.Dhanrashi 2002 7 Late ‐ Irrigated SB 7.Palghar 2003 6 Medium ‐ Irrigated LS8.PKV Ganesh 2003 6 125‐130 BL,BLB,
GM Rainfed, upland
‐
9.PKV Makarand 2003 6 115‐120 Major diseases
Rainfed, upland
MS
10.Bhogavati 2004 5 ‐ BL ‐ Scented11.Karjat 5 2005 4 Medium,
early GLH, SB, BPH
Irrigated ‐
12.Karjat 6 2005 4 Medium, early
SB Irrigated ‐
13.Parbhani Aviskar 2005 4 ‐ ‐ Rainfed, upland
‐
14.Phule Radha 2006 3 Medium early
BLB Irrigated SS
15.PKV Khamag 2007 2 135‐138 BL.BLB Rainfed, Irrigated
‐
16.PKV‐ HMT 2008 1 Medium BLB Irrigated Quality rice, SS
11. Orissa
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years1.Sonamani 1997 12 145‐155 ‐ Rainfed,
shallow low land
‐
2.Dhola Heera 1997 12 80 BL Rainfed, upland
‐
3.Radhi 1997 12 120 BL Irrigated, early
‐
Age group upto 10 years4.Lalithagiri 1999 10 95 BL Rainfed,
upland MB
5.Mahanadi 1999 10 150 BL Rainfed, shallow low
land
MB
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs) *
Duration (days)
Resistantto
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features/ Grain type
6.Udyagiri 1999 10 95 BL Irrigated, medium
MS
7.Indravati 1999 10 150 BL Rainfed, shallow low
land
MB
8.Prachi 1999 10 155 ‐ Rainfed, shallow low
land
MB
9.Ramchandi 1999 10 155 ‐ Rainfed, shallow low
land
MB
10.Gajapathi 1999 10 130 BPH Irrigated, medium
MS
11.Konark 1999 10 125 BPH Irrigated, medium
MS
12.Surendra 1999 10 135 BPH Irrigated, MB
22
medium 13.Bhoi 1999 10 125 BL Irrigated,
medium MS
14.Karaveli 1999 10 125 BL Irrigated, medium
MS
15.Golak 1999 10 150‐160 BL. BPH Semi‐deep water
LB
16.Sebti 1999 10 125 BL Irrigated, medium
MS
17.Durg 2000 9 ‐ BLB, RTV Deep water ‐18.Sarla 2002 7 150 BPH For water
logging MB
19.Vandna 2002 7 Early BL Rainfed, upland
LS
20.Jagbandhu 2002 7 150 ‐ Deep water Tolerant to water logging,
MB 21.Varsha Dhan 2002 7 155‐160 ‐ Low land Tolerant to
water logging 22.Anjali 2002 7 90‐95 ‐ Rainfed, direct
seeded Tolerant to drought, SB
23. Geetanjali 2005 4 ‐ ‐ ‐ Scented, LS24. Jogesh 2005 4 ‐ Major
diseases Rainfed, upland
SB
25.Naveen 2006 3 125‐135 BL Rainfed, upland
MB
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs) *
Duration (days)
Resistantto
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features/ Grain type
12. Tamil Nadu Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years1.ASD 19 1997 12 120‐130 ‐ Irrigated ‐2.ADT 42 1998 11 Early GM Irrigated ‐3.TMK 11 1998 11 Early ‐ Irrigated MS
Age group upto 10 years4.CO 47 2000 9 Early BL,BLB,
RTV Irrigated MS
5.ADT 44 2000 9 Early BL, GLH Irrigated ‐6.TRY 1 2000 9 ‐ RTV, GLH Irrigated Salinity/
alkalinity tolerant
7.ADT (R) 45 2001 8 Early GM Irrigated MS 8.TRY (R) 2 2001 8 ‐ ‐ Irrigated Tolerant to
salinity/ alkalinity
9.ADT (R) 46 2002 7 Medium BL Irrigated LS10.TKM(R)12 2002 7 ‐ ‐ Rainfed,
upland MS
11.TKM (R) 13 2003 6 ‐ ‐ Rainfed, ‐
23
upland 12.Sugandhamati 2004 5 125‐130 ‐ Irrigated Scented, LS13.ADT (R) 47 2005 4 Early Major
diseases Irrigated MS
14.ADT (R) 48 2005 4 Early Major diseases
Irrigated ‐
15.AD 99039 2005 4 Early ‐ Irrigated ‐
16.TPS (R) 4 2006 3 Early BL Rainfed/ irrigated
MB
17.CO (R) 48 2007 2 Medium ‐ Irrigated ‐18.RMD (R) 1 2007 2 Early ‐ Irrigated LB
13.Uttar
Pradesh
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years1.Pant Dhan 12 1996 13 125 BLB Irrigated Grains long
bold 2.VL Dhan 61 1997 12 125‐130 BL Irrigated ‐3.Narendra Usar Dhan‐2
1997 12 130 ‐ Irrigated Tol. to salinity& alkalinity
4.Malviya Dhan 36 1997 12 130‐135 Major diseases
Medium, low land
‐
5.Jitendra 1997 12 Late BPH Rainfed, deep water
‐
6.Barh Avrodhi 1997 12 145‐155 BL Shallow deep water
‐
7.Ashwani 1997 12 96‐110 ‐ Rainfed, early ‐
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs) *
Duration (days)
Resistantto
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features/ Grain type
Age group upto 10 years8.Sudhir 1999 10 150‐160 BL, BLB Semi‐deep
water ‐
9.Barani Dhan 2001 8 ‐ Major diseases
Shallow deep water
‐
10.Pant Dhan 18 2002 7 Medium ‐ Irrigated ‐11.Malviya Dhan 2 2004 5 Early ‐ Irrigated LS12.Narendra Dhan 2026
2004 5 Early Major diseases
Irrigated ‐
13.Malviya Dhan 1 2004 5 ‐ ‐ ‐ Scented, LS14.Malviya Basmati 2005 4 125‐130 BLB Irrigated Scented, LS15.Malviya Dhan 3022
2005 4 105 BLB Rainfed LS
16.Narendra 8002 2005 4 135‐140 BL, WBPH
Rainfed, low land
WA
17.Baranideep 2006 3 95‐100 BLB Rainfed, upland
‐
18.Shivam 2006 3 115‐125 BLB Irrigated ‐19.Shusk 2006 3 110‐115 BS, Rainfed,
upland ‐
20.Narendra Narayani
2008 1 115 LB, BS, RTV, SB,
Rainfed, low land
‐
24
21.Narendra Mayank 2008 1 110 LB, BS, RTV, SB,
Flood prone ‐
22.Narendra Jaldeep 2008 1 113 LB, BS, RTV, SB,
Rainfed, low land
‐
14.West Bengal Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years1.Nidhi 1997 12 120‐125 BLB Irrigated,
medium ‐
2.Jitendra 1997 12 Late ‐ Rainfed, deep water
‐
3.Vijetha
1997 12 120‐130 BPH Irrigated, medium
‐
4.Krishna Hamsa 1997 12 145‐155 ‐ Irrigated, medium early
‐
5.Jalprabha 1997 12 165‐180 ‐ Deep water ‐6.Sarswati 1997 12 160‐170 ‐ Semi‐deep
water ‐
7.Jamini 1997 12 135‐150 ‐ Rainfed, upland
‐
8.Golak 1998 11 150‐160 BLB Shallow deep water
LB
9.Neerja 1998 11 150‐160 BPH Rainfed, deep water
LB
10.Jalnidhi 15 1999 10 ‐ ‐ Rainfed, upland
‐
11.Sudhir 1999 10 150‐160 BL, BLB Semi deep water
LS
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs) *
Duration (days)
Resistantto
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features/ Grain type
12.Sunil 1999 10 150‐160 BL Deep water ‐13.Bhagirathi 2000 9 150‐160 SB Semi deep
water ‐
14.Mahananda 2000 9 155‐160 SB, BL Semi deep water
‐
15.PNR 519 2000 9 85‐115 BL Rainfed, irrigated, upland
LS
16.Shashi 2000 9 140‐145 BL Rainfed, shallow low
land
LS
17.Shatabdi 2000 9 115‐120 BL Irrigated, medium late
LS
18.Vivek Dhan 62 2000 9 125‐130 ‐ Irrigated, hill rice
SB
19. Bhudeb 2002 7 ‐ ‐ Shallow deep water
LS
20.Giri 2002 7 Late ‐ Shallow deep water
LS
21.PNR 546 2003 6 90‐95 BLB Irrigated ‐22.Jaldi Dhan 13 2003 6 Early Neck BL Rainfed,
upland LB
23.Pusa Sugandha 5 2004 5 125‐130 Major diseases
Irrigated Scented, LS
25
24.Bhutnath 2004 5 108 ‐ Irrigated ‐*Age has been reckoned from the year of release to 2009. ** More than 15 years old but most popular among the farmer
26
13. Rice Hybrids
The yield levels of semi‐ dwarf varieties of Green Revolution era have plateaued.
More and more rice is to be produced on less and less areas and inputs. Rice hybrids have
shown 15‐20 % higher yield potential than inbred rice varieties under farmers’ field
conditions. Also, the hybrids have shown their ability to perform better under adverse
conditions of drought and salinity. Rice is strictly self‐pollinated crop. Therefore, for
developing commercial rice hybrids use of male sterility is essential. Cytoplasmic male
sterility is being widely used in the hybrid seed production. A male sterile line, when grown side with a pollen parent in an
isolated plot, can produce hybrid seed due to cross‐pollination with the adjoining fertile pollen parent. The seed set on
male sterile plant is the hybrid seed which is used for growing the commercial hybrid crop. This technology helped China to
increase its rice production from 140 m tonnes in 1978 to 188 m tonnes in 1990. After China, India is next largest country
for growing rice hybrids. Since 1994, 38 rice hybrids, both under public and private organizations have been developed.
However, among them, KRH2 and PRH 10, the public bred hybrids and PA 6444, a private bred hybrid have become most
popular across the country. The details of these 38 hybrids statewise under National Food Security Mission are given in
Table:13.1
27
Table: 13.1: Details of rice hybrids recommended for NFSM states
State Hybrid Year of release
Age(yrs) *
Duration (days)
Yield increase (%) over best variety
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
1.Andhra Pradesh
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
1.APRH‐1 1994 15 130‐135 35 (Chaitanya)
I Resistant to BLB, BPH
2.APRH‐2 1994 15 120‐125 44(Chaitanya)
I Resistant to BLB
3.DRRH‐1 1996 13 125‐130 32.7(Tella Hamsa)
Closer Planting Resistant to BL
4.KRH‐ 2 1996 13 130‐135 21.3(Jaya)
Suitable for boro, aerobic inland saline
land
Resistant to BL, SB, BPH, WA
5.PHB‐ 71 1997 12 130‐135 17.4(Jaya)
‐ Resistant to BL, BLB, BPH, GM,
WA Age group upto 10 years
6.PA 6201 2000 9 125‐130 20.0(Jaya)
Irrigated RTV,BL,BPH,WA
7.PA 6444 2001 8 135 24(Jaya)
For boro season
BL, RTV, SB, BPH, GM, LF,WA
8.PRH‐10 2001 8 ‐ 39.8 (PB 1)
Irrigated, medium
Scented, Resistant to BLB, RTV, BPH,LF, WA
9.RH 204 2003 6 120‐125 18(Jaya)
‐ Resistant to BL, BPH, WBPH
10.Suruchi 2004 5 130 20(Jaya)
Suitable for alkaline soils
Resistant to BL, WBPH
11.JKRH 401 2007 2 140 13.34(Jaya)
Irrigated, medium
Resistant to BL, RTV, Sh.BL., BS, SB, WBPH, GM,
LF 12.GK 5003 2008 1 128 33
(IR‐64) ‐ Resistant to BL,
RTV, Sh.BL, BS, WBPH
2.Assam Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years1.KRH‐ 2 1996 13 130‐135 21.3
(Jaya) Suitable for boro, aerobic inland saline,
Resistant to BL, SB, BPH,WA
Age group upto 10 years2.PA 6201 2000 9 125‐130 20.0
(Jaya) Irrigated Resistant to
RTV, BL, BPH, WA
State Hybrid Year of release
Age(yrs) *
Duration (days)
Yield increase (%) over best
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
28
variety 3.PA 6444 2001 8 135 24
(Jaya) For boro season
Resistant to BL, RTV, SB, BPH, GM, LF, Wa
4.PRH‐10 2001 8 ‐ 39.8 (PB 1)
Irrigated, medium
Scented, Resistant to
BLB, RTV, BPH, LF ,WA
5.Suruchi
2004 5 130 20(Jaya)
Suitable for alkaline soils
Resistant to BL, WBPH
3.Bihar Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years1.KRH‐ 2 1996 13 130‐135 21.3
(Jaya) Suitable for boro, aerobic inland saline
Resistant to BL, SB, BPH, WA
Age group upto 10 years2.PA 6201 2000 9 125‐130 20.0
(Jaya) Irrigated Resistant to
RTV, BL, BPH, WA
3.PRH‐122 (Ganga) 2001 8 130 25.3(IR 64)
‐ Resistant to BL, GLH, SB, BPH, WBPH, GM, LF
4.PA 6444 2001 8 135 24(Jaya)
For boro season
Resistant to BL, RTV, SB, BPH, GM, LF, WA
5.PRH‐10 2001 8 ‐ 39.8 (PB 1)
Irrigated, medium
Scented, Resistant to
BLB, RTV, BPH, LF, WA
6.Suruchi 2004 5 130 20(Jaya)
Suitable for alkaline soils
Resistant to BL, WBPH
7.JKRH‐401 2007 2 140 13.34(Jaya)
Irrigated, medium, suitable for alkaline soils
Resistant to BL,RTV, Sh.Bl., BS, SB, WBPH,
GM, LF 4.Chhattisgarh Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
1.KRH‐ 2 1996 13 130‐135 21.3(Jaya)
Suitable for boro, aerobic inland saline,
Resistant to BL, SB, BPH, WA
Age group upto 10 years2.PA 6201
2000 9
125‐130 20.0(Jaya)
Irrigated,
Resistant to RTV, BL, BPH,
WA 3.PRH‐10 2001 8 ‐ 39.8
(PB 1) Irrigated, medium
Scented, Resistant to
BLB, RTV, BPH, LF, WA
State Hybrid Year of release
Age(yrs) *
Duration (days)
Yield increase (%) over best
variety
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
29
State Hybrid Year of release
Age(yrs) *
Duration (days)
Yield increase (%) over best variety
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
3.PHB‐71
1997 12 130‐135 17.4(Jaya)
‐ Resistant to BL. BLB, BPH, GM, WA
Age group upto 10 years4.PA 6201 2000 9 125‐130 20.0 Irrigated, wa Resistant to
4.Suruchi 2004 5 130 20(Jaya)
Suitable for alkaline soils
Resistant to BL, WBPH
5.Indra Sona 2006 3 125‐130 14.56(Jaya)
Irrigated Resistant to BL, BLB, GM
6.JRH ‐4 2007 2 116 12.8(Annanda )
‐ Resistant to BL,BPH, WBPH,
GM, LF 7.JRH ‐5 2007 2 115 16
(Annanda ) ‐ Resistant to
BL,BPH, WBPH, LF
5.Gujarat Age group upto 10 years1.Suruchi 2004 5 130 20
(Jaya) Suitable for alkaline soils
Resistant to BL, WBPH
6.Jharkhand Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years1.KRH‐ 2
1996 13 130‐135 21.3(Jaya)
Suitable for boro, aerobic inland saline,
Resistant to BL, SB, BPH, WA
Age group upto 10 years2.PA 6201 2000 9 125‐130 20.0
(Jaya) Irrigated Resistant to
RTV, BL, BPH, 3.PRH‐122 (Ganga) 2001 8 130 25.3
(IR 64) ‐ Resistant to BL,
GLH, SB, BPH, WBPH, GM, LF
4.PA 6444 2001 8 135 24(Jaya)
For boro season
Resistant to BL, RTV, SB, BPH,
GM, LF 5.PRH‐10 2001 8 ‐ 39.8
(PB 1) Irrigated, medium
Scented, Resistant to
BLB, RTV, BPH, LF, WA
6.JKRH‐401 2007 2 140 13.34(Jaya)
Irrigated, medium
Resistant to BL, RTV, Sh.BL., BS, SB, WBPH, GM,
LF, WA 6.Karnataka Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
1.KRH‐1
1996 13 130 31.4(Mangla)
‐ Resistant to BS, SB
2.KRH‐ 2 1996 13 130‐135 21.3(Jaya)
Suitable for boro, aerobic inland saline
Resistant to BL, SB, BPH, WA
30
(Jaya) RTV, BL, BPH 5.PA 6444 2001 8 135 24
(Jaya) For boro season
Resistant to BL, RTV, SB, BPH,
GM, LF 6.RH‐204 2003 6 120‐125 18
(Jaya) ‐ Resistant to BL.
BPH, WBPH 7.Suruchi 2004 5 130 20
(Jaya) Suitable for alkaline soils
Resistant to BL, WBPH
8.GK 5003 2008 1 128 33(IR‐64)
‐ Resistant to BL, RTV, Sh.BL, BS,
WBPH 7.Kerala Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
1.KRH‐ 2 1996 13 130‐135 21.3(Jaya)
Suitable for boro, aerobic inland saline,
Resistant to BL, SB, BPH, WA
Age group upto 10 years2.Suruchi 2004 5 130 20
(Jaya) Suitable for alkaline soils
Resistant to BL, WBPH
8.Madhya Pradesh
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
1.KRH‐ 2 1996
13 130‐135 21.3(Jaya)
Suitable for boro, aerobic inland saline
Resistant to BL, SB, BPH, WA
Age group upto 10 years2.PA 6201 2000 9 125‐130 20.0
(Jaya) Irrigated, wa Resistant to
RTV, BL, BPH 3.JRH ‐4 2007 2 116 12.8
(Annanda ) ‐ Resistant to
BL,BPH, WBPH, GM, LF
4.JRH ‐5 2007 2 115 16(Annanda )
‐ Resistant to BL,BPH, WBPH,
LF 5.JRH‐8 2008 ‐ Early ‐ ‐ ‐
State Hybrid Year of release
Age(yrs) *
Duration (days)
Yield increase (%) over best
variety
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
9.Maharashtra Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years1.KRH‐ 2 1996 13 130‐135 21.3
(Jaya) Suitable for boro, aerobic inland saline
Resistant to BL, SB, BPH, WA
2.Sahyadri‐1 1998 11 125‐130 32.1(Jaya)
Boro Resistant to BL, GLH
31
3.PA 6444 2001 8 135 24(Jaya)
For boro season
Resistant to BL, RTV, SB, BPH, GM, LF, WA
Age group upto 10 years4.Suruchi 2004 5 130 20
(Jaya) Suitable for alkaline soils
Resistant to BL, WBPH
5.Sahydri‐2 2006 3 115‐120 24.37(Ananda)
‐ Resistant to BL, BLB, RTV
6.Sahydri‐3 2006 3 125‐130 ‐ ‐ Resistant to BL, BLB, Sh. BL, BS, SB, BPH, WBPH,
LF 7.PA 6129 2007 2 120 40
(Annada) ‐ Resistant to BL,
BS, GLH, GM 8.Sahydri‐4 2008 1 115‐120 21.86
(Ananda) ‐ Resistant to
BL,RTV 9.JRH ‐5 2007 2 115 16
(Annanda ) ‐ Resistant to
BL,BPH, WBPH, LF
10.JRH 8 2008 1 Early ‐ ‐ ‐10. Orissa .
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years1.KRH‐ 2 1996 13 130‐135 21.3
(Jaya) Suitable for boro, aerobic inland saline
Resistant to BL, SB, BPH, WA
Age group upto 10 years2.PA 6201 2000 9 125‐130 20.0
(Jaya) Irrigated Resistant to
RTV, BL, BPH, WA
3.PA 6444 2001 8 135 24(Jaya)
For boro season
Resistant to BL, RTV, SB, BPH, GM, LF , WA
4.PRH‐122 (Ganga) 2001 8 130 25.3(IR 64)
‐ Resistant to BL, GLH, SB, BPH, WBPH, GM, LF
5.Suruchi 2004 5 130 20(Jaya)
Suitable for alkaline soils
Resistant to BL, WBPH
State Hybrid Year of release
Age(yrs) *
Duration (days)
Yield increase (%) over best
variety
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
6.Raj Laxmi 2005 4 130‐135 ‐ Suitable for boro
Resistant to BL, BLB, SB, BPH
7.Ajay 205 4 130‐135 ‐ Replacement of lalat
Resistant to BL, BLB, SB, BPH, WBPH, GM
8. JKRH 401 2007 2 140 13.34(Jaya)
Suitable for alkaline soils
Resistant to BL, RTV, Sh.Bl., BS, SB, WBPH, GM,
LF 11.Tamil Nadu Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
1.CORH‐1 1994 15 110‐115 16.2(IR‐50)
‐ Resistant to RTV, GLH, SB, BPH, WBPH,
32
GM 2.KRH‐ 2 1996 13 130‐135 21.3
(Jaya) Suitable for boro, aerobic inland saline
Resistant to BL, SB, BPH, WA
3.PHB‐71 1997 12 130‐135 17.4(Jaya)
‐ Resistant to BL. BLB, BPH, GM
4.CORH‐2 1998 11 125‐130
20.5(ADT‐39)
Replacement of IR 64
Resistant to BL, RTV, WBPH
5.ADTRH‐1 1998 11 115 24.5(ASD‐18)
Suitable for late planting
Resistant to SB, GM
Age group upto 10 years6.PA 6201 2000 9 125‐130 20.0
(Jaya) Irrigated Resistant to
RTV, BL, BPH 7.RH‐204 2003 6 120‐125 18
(Jaya) ‐ Resistant to BL.
BPH, WBPH 8.DRRH‐2 2005 4 115 33.7
(Annanda) Salinity tolerant Resistant to BL,
RTV, BS, WBPH 9.CORH‐3 2006 3 115 28.42
(ADT‐43) ‐ ‐
10.PA 6129 2007 2 120 40(Annada)
‐ Resistant to BL, BS, GLH, GM
11.HRI‐152 2007 2 120 ‐ ‐ ‐12.Uttar Pradesh
1.KRH‐ 2 1996 13 130‐135 21.3(Jaya)
Suitable for boro, aerobic inland saline
Resistant to BL, SB, BPH, WA
2.Pant Shanker Dhan‐1
1997 12 120 8(Jaya)
‐
Resistant to BL, BLB, RTV, BS, SB, BPH, WBPH
3.PHB‐ 71 1997 12 130‐135 17.4(Jaya)
‐ Resistant to BL, BLB, BPH, GM,
WA 4.Narendra Shanker Dhan‐2
1998 11 125‐130 20.9(sarjoo 52)
Rice‐wheat rotation
Resistant to BL GLH, SB, BPH
State Hybrid Year of release
Age(yrs) *
Duration (days)
Yield increase (%) over best
variety
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
Age group upto 10 years5.PA 6201 2000 9 125‐130 20.0
(Jaya) Irrigated Resistant to RTV,
BL, BPH 6.PA 6444 2001 8 135 24
(Jaya) For boro season
Resistant to BL, RTV, SB, BPH, GM, LF , WA
7.PRH‐10 2001 8 ‐ 39.8 (PB 1)
Irrigated, medium
Scented, resistant to BLB, RTV, BPH, LF, WA
8.PRH‐122 (Ganga)
2001 8 130 25.3(IR 64)
‐ Resistant to BL, GLH, SB, BPH, WBPH, GM, LF
9.Narendra usar Shanker Dhan‐3
2004 5 130‐135 53.3(CSR‐10)
For usar soils Resistant to BLB, Sh.BL., GLH, SB,
BPH
33
10.Pant Shanker Dhan‐3
2004 5 125‐130 22.9(NC)
Suitable for rice‐wheat rotation
Resistant to BL, BLB, RTV, BS, SB,
BPH,WBPH 11.Sahydri‐4 2008 1 115‐120 21.86
(Ananda) ‐ Resistant to
BL,RTV 12.PHB‐ 71 1997 12 130‐135 17.4
(Jaya) ‐ Resistant to BL,
BLB, BPH, GM, WA
13.West Bengal
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years1.CNRRH‐3 1995 14 120‐125 37.4
(Khitish) ‐ ‐
2.KRH‐ 2 1996 13 130‐135 21.3(Jaya)
Suitable for boro, aerobic inland saline,
Resistant to BL, SB, BPH, WA
Age group upto 10 years3.PA 6201 2000 9 125‐130 20.0
(Jaya) Irrigated Resistant to RTV,
BL, BPH, WA 4.DRRH‐2 2005 4 115 33.7
(Ananda) Salinity
tolerant, rice‐wheat rotation
Resistant to BL, RTV, BS, WBPH
5.JKRH 401 2007 2 140 13.34(Jaya)
Irrigated, medium
Resistant to BL, RTV, Sh.BL., BS, SB, WBPH, GM,
LF 6.Sahydri‐4 2008 1 115‐120 21.86
(Ananda) ‐ Resistant to
BL,RTV 7.CORH‐3 2006 3 115 28.42
(ADT‐43) ‐ ‐
*Age has been reckoned from the year of release to 2009, ** More than 15 years old but most popular among the farmers
34
14. Chickpea Chickpea is the premier pulse crop in India, covering 7.63 m ha area with annual production of
5.97 m tonnes. It is grown under diverse agro‐climatic conditions in various cropping
systems. Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka and Gujarat are the major chickpea growing states, sharing together over 95 %
area. Among these states, Andhra Pradesh registered highest productivity of 1596 kg/ha and
Rajasthan the lowest productivity of 443 kg/ha.
With the advent of Green Revolution technologies dominated by the semi‐dwarf and input responsive varieties of
rice and wheat, there was a dramatic shift in major cropping systems in northern India. Most of the chickpea crop has been
replaced by high yielding varieties of wheat that can be sown successfully as late as in January. In these areas, the rice crop
is harvested in the end of November where the old varieties of chickpea do not suit for planting. Now under the All India
Coordinated Chickpea Improvement Project short duration and less photo‐thermo‐insensitive varieties have been
developed. For export purpose, bold seeded kabuli varieties have been developed which have as high yield potential as the
desi varieties. Also, the newly developed varieties possess resistance to deadly diseases like wilt, blight and several kinds of
rots. With these new varieties and matching agro‐ technology, the area and production of chickpea will definitely increase.
Here, the statewise recommended varieties of desi and kabuli varieties of chickpea are listed in Table: 14.1.
35
Table: 14.1: Details of Improved varieties of chickpea recommended for NFSM‐ states
State Variety
Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/Production conditions
Special features
1. Andhra Pradesh
Age group > 15 years**
1. JG 62 1972 37 120 RF Susceptible to w2. L 550 1977 32 160 TS, I Small seeded, creamy
white Kabuli 3. Jyoti 1978 31 115 ES, RF ‐ 4. ICCC 32 1984 25 135 TS, RF Kabuli, resistant to w, RR,
A.Bl. 5. JG 315 1984 25 125 TS, RF Resistant to w, WA
6. Pusa 256 1985 24 140 Input responsive , TS,
I
Resistant to w, A.Bl., WA
7.Vishwas (Phule G 5)
1985 24 115 Input responsive, TS, I
Resistant to w, PB
8. Kranti (ICCV 37) 1989 20 105 Upland, RF Salinity tolerant, resistant to w
9.Bharti (ICCV 10) 1992 17 100 RF, LS Coarse seed coat, resistant to w, Br
10.Vijay
1993 16 110 RF, LS Tolerant to moisture stress, resistant to w
Age group upto 10 years11. Dharwad Pragati
1999 10 120 RF Medium bold seeded, resistant to w
12. Gujarat Gram 1 1999 10 118 TS, I ‐
13.KAK 2 1999 10 105 TS, RF Kabuli, resistant to w
14. SAKI (9516) 2000 9 120 TS, I Medium bold seeded, resistant to w
15. Jawahar Gram Kab‐1
2002 7 105 I Kabuli, bold seeded
16.Pusa Subhra 2006 3 115 TS, I Kabuli2. Bihar
Age group > 15 years**1. L 550 1977 32 160 TS, I Small seeded, creamy
white Kabuli 2. Pant G114 1981 28 150 LS, I ‐ 3.Pusa 256
1985 24 140 Input responsive, TS, I
Resistant to w, A.Bl., WA
4. RAU 52 1985 24 145 TS, I Brown seeded
5. Udai (KPG 59) 1992 17 120‐130 LS, I Resistant to w, RR, stunt, PB
36
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/Production conditions
Special features
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
6. KWR 108 1996 13 135 Upland, RF Resistant to wAge group upto 10 years
7. Pusa Kabuli‐1003
1999 10 135 TS, I White, bold seeded Kabuli, resistant to w
8. Gujarat Gram 4
2000 9 125 TS, I Resistant to w
9. HK 2
2005 4 130 TS, I Kabuli
3.Chhattisgarh Age group > 15 years** 1. L 550 1977 32 160 TS, I Small seeded, creamy
white Kabuli 2. ICCC 32 1984 25 135 TS, RF Kabuli,resistant to w, RR,
PB 3. JG 315 1984 25 125 TS, RF Resistant to w4. Vishwas (Phule G5)
1985 24 115 Input responsive, TS,
I
Resistant to w, PB
5.Pusa 256 1985 24 140 Input responsive, TS,
I
Resistant to w & A.Bl., WA
6. Kranti (ICCV 37) 1989 20 105 Upland, RF Tolerant to salinity, resistant to w
7. Bharti (ICCV 10) 1992 17 100 LS Coarse seed coat, resistant to w, DRR, Br
8. Vijay
1993 16 110 TS, RF Small brown seeded, resistant to w
Age group upto 10 years9. Dharwad Pragati
1999 10 120 TS, I ‐
10. Gujarat Gram 1 1999 10 118 TS, I ‐11. KAK 2 1999 10 105 TS, RF Kabuli, bold seeded12. SAKI ( 9516) 2000 9 120 TS, RF Resistant to w, CR, BGM,
stunt
13. Jawahar Gram Kab‐1
2002 7 105 TS, I Kabuli, salinity tolerant, resistant to w
14. Pusa Subhra 2006 3 120 TS, I Kabuli
State
Variety
Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/Production conditions
Special features
4. Gujarat Age group > 15 years**1. L 550 1977 32 160 TS,I Small seeded, creamy
37
white Kabuli2. Pant G 114 1981 28 150 LS, I ‐3. GNG 16 1982 27 160 TS, I Resistant to A.Bl4. Gaurav 1984 25 140 TS, I Resistant to A.Bl
5. GNG‐146 1984 25 150 TS, I Resistant to A.Bl6. ICCC 32 1984 25 135 TS, RF Kabuli, resistant to w,
RR,PB 7. JG 315 1984 25 125 TS, RF Brown seeded,
resistant to w, WA 8. Pusa 256 1985 24 140 Input
responsive, TS, I
Resistant to w, A.Bl., WA
9. Vishwas (Phule G 5)
1985 24 115 Input responsive, TS,
I
Resistant to w, PB
10. Kranti (ICCV 37) 1989 20 105 Upland, RF Tolerant to salinity, resistant to w
11. GPF‐2 1990 19 157 TS, I ‐12.Haryana Chana‐1
1990 19 150 TS, I Resistant to w
13. Bharti (ICCV 10) 1992 17 100 LS Coarse seed coat, resistant to w, DRR, Br
14. Udai (KPG 59)
1992 17 120‐130 LS, I Resistant to w, RR, stunt, PB
15. Vijay 1993 16 110 TS, RF Small brown seeded, resistant to w
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years16. Vardan 1994 15 150 TS, I Resistant to w, A.Bl17. KWR 108 1996 13 135 LS, RF Brown and bold seeded,
resistant to w 18. DCP 92‐3 1998 11 145 TS, I Yellowish brown seeded,
resistant to w Age group upto 10 years
19. Gujarat Gram 1 1999 10 118 RF Small seeded20. Gujarat Gram 2
1999 10 100 RF Small seeded
21.KAK 2 1999 10 105 TS, RF Kabuli, bold seeded22.SAKI (9516) 2000 9 120 TS, RF Resistant to w, CR,
BGM, stunt 23. Pusa Chamatkar
2000 9 150 I ‐
24. RSG 888 2002 7 135 RF Twin podded, resistant to DRR
25.Pusa Subhra 2006 3 115 TS, I Kabuli
State Variety
Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/Production conditions
Special features
26. Rajas 2006 3 145 TS, I Small seeded
27. Ganguar 2007 2 150 TS, I Small seeded
5. Haryana Age group > 15 years**
1. Pant G 114 1981 28 150 LS, I Small seeded
38
2. GNG 16 1982 27 160 TS, I Small seeded3. Gaurav 1984 25 140 TS, I Resistant to A.Bl.4. GNG 146 1984 25 150 TS, I Resistant to A.Bl.5. ICCC 32 1984 25 135 TS, RF Resistant to w, RR, PB6. Pusa 256
1985 24 140 Input responsive, TS,
I
Resistant to w, A.Bl., WA
7. PBG 1 1988 21 160 TS, I Resistant to A.Bl.8. GPF2 1990 19 157 TS, I Small seeded.9. Haryana Chana‐1 1990 19 150 TS, I Resistant to w10. Udai (KPG59)
1992 17 120‐130 LS, I Resistant to w, RR, stunt, PB
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years12. KWR 108 1996 13 135 LS, RF Resistant to w13. Samrat 1996 13 147 TS, I Small seeded, Resistant to
A.Bl. 14. Alok 1997 12 145 TS, I Resistant to w, RR15. DCP 92‐3 1998 11 145 TS, I Yellowish brown seeded
Resistant to w Age group upto 10 years
16. HC 3 1999 10 155 TS, I Small seeded17.Pusa Chamatkar 2000 9 150 I ‐ 18. RSG 888 2002 7 135 RF Twin podded, resistant to
DRR 19. HK1 2002 7 155 RF Kabuli, resistant to w20. HC 5 2004 5 155 RF Small seeded, resistant to
w 21. Ganguar 2007 2 150 TS, I Small seeded
6.Karnataka Age group > 15 years**1.Kranti (ICCV 37) 1989 20 105 Upland, RF Tolerant to salinity,
resistant to w 2.Bharti (ICCV 10) 1992 17 95‐100 LS, RF Coarse seed coat,
resistant to w, DRR & Br Age group upto 10 years
3.Dharwad Pragati 1999 10 120 TS, I ‐ 4.JG 11 1999 10 97 RF Resistant to w5.Phule G 95311 2002 7 90 I Kabuli, resistant to w
7.Madhya Pradesh
Age group > 15 years**1. JG 62 1972 37 120 RF Susceptible to wilt2. L 550 1977 32 160 TS, I Small seeded, creamy
white Kabuli
State Variety
Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/Production conditions
Special features
3. JG 74 1983 26 115 LS, RF Coarse seed coat, resistant to w
4. ICCC 32 1984 25 135 TS, RF Kabuli, resistant to w, RR, PB
5. JG 315 1984 25 125 TS, RF Brown seeded,
resistant to w, WA 6. Pusa 256
1985 24 140 Input responsive, TS,
Resistant to w, A.Bl., WA
39
I7. Vishwas (Phule G 5)
1985 24 115 Input responsive, TS,
I
Resistant to w, PB
8. Kranti (ICCV 37) 1989 20 105 Upland, RF Tolerant to salinity, resistant to w
9. Bharti (ICCV 10) 1992 17 100 LS Coarse seed coat, resistant to w, DRR, Br
10. Vijay
1993 16 110 TS, RF Small brown seeded, resistant to w
Age group upto 10 years11.Dharwad Pragati
1999 10 120 TS, I ‐
12. Gujarat Gram‐1 1999 10 118 RF Small seeded13. KAK 2 1999 10 105 TS, RF Kabuli, bold seeded14. SAKI (9516) 2000 9 120 TS, RF resistant to w, CR,
BGM, stunt 15. Vaibhav (RG 9218)
2000 9 125 TS, RF Small attractive seeded
16. Jawahar Gram Kab‐1
2002 7 105 TS, I Kabuli, tolerant to salinity, resistant to w
17.Pusa Subhra 2006 3 115 TS, I Kabuli8.Maharastra Age group > 15 years**
1. L 550 1977 32 160 TS,I Small seeded, creamy white Kabuli
2. ICCC 32 1984 25 135 TS, RF Kabuli, resistant to w, RR, PB
3. JG 315 1984 25 125 LS, RF Brown seeded, resistant to w, WA
4. Pusa 256
1985 24 140 Input responsive, TS,
I
Resistant to w, A.Bl., WA
5. Vishwas (Phule G 5)
1985 24 115 Input responsive, TS,
I
Resistant to w, PB
State Variety
Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/Production conditions
Special features
6. Kranti (ICCV 37) 1989 20 105 Upland, RF Tolerant to salinity, resistant to w
7. Bharti (ICCV 10) 1992 17 100 LS Coarse seed coat, resistant to w, DRR, Br
8. Vijay 1993 16 110 TS, RF Small brown seeded, resistant to w
Age group upto 10 years
9. Dharwad Pragati 1999 10 120 TS, I ‐
10. Gujarat Gram 1 1999 10 118 RF Small seeded11. KAK 2 1999 10 105 TS, RF Kabuli, bold seeded12. SAKI (9516) 2000 9 120 T.S., RF Resistant to w, CR,
BGM, stunt
40
13. Virat 2000 9 112 RF Bold seeded14. Jawahar Gram Kab‐1
2002 7 105 TS, I Kabuli, salinity tolerant, resistant to w
15. Digvijay 2005 4 110 RF Bold seeded16.Pusa Subhra 2006 3 115 TS, I Kabuli
9. Orissa Age group upto 10 years1. JG 11 1999 10 97 RF Resistant to w, RR
2.Phule G 95311 2002 7 90 RF Kabuli, resistant to w
10. Punjab Age group > 15 years**1. L 550 1977 32 160 TS, I Small seeded, creamy
white Kabuli 2. Pant G114 1981 28 150 LS, I Small seeded3. GNG 16 1982 27 160 TS, I Small seeded4. Gaurav 1984 25 140 TS, I Bold seeded,
resistant to w, A.Bl. 5. GNG 146 1984 25 150 TS, I Resistant to w, A.Bl.6. ICCC 32 1984 25 135 TS, RF Kabuli, resistant to w,
A.Bl., RR 7. Pusa 256
1985 24 140 Input responsive, TS,
I
Resistant to w, A.Bl., WA
8.PBG 1 1988 21 160 TS, I Small and brown seeded, resistant to A.Bl.
9.GPF 2 1990 19 157 TS, I Resistant to A.Bl.10.Haryana Chana‐1
1990 19 150 TS, L Resistant to w
11.Udai (KPG 59) 1992 17 120‐130 LS, I Resistant to w, RR, stunt, PB
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years12. KWR 108 1996 13 135 LS,RF Brown and bold seeded,
resistant to w. 13.Alok 1997 12 145 I Medium bold seeded,
resistant to w, RR
41
State
Variety
Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/Production conditions
Special features
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/Production conditions
Special features
14. DCP 92‐3 1998 11 145 TS, I Yellowish brown seeded, Resistant to w.
15.Karnal Chana‐1 1998 11 155 I Small seeded, Tolerant to salinity.
Age group upto 10 years16.Pusa Chamatkar 2000 9 150 I ‐
17. RSG 888 2002 7 135 RF Twin podded, resistant to DRR.
11.Rajasthan Age group >15 Years**1. Pant G114 1981 28 150 LS, I Small seeded2. GNG 16 1982 27 160 TS, I Small seeded3. Gaurav 1984 25 140 TS, I Bold seeded, resistant to
A.Bl. 4. GNG 146 1984 25 150 TS, I Grayish yellow seeded,
resistant to w, A.Bl. 5. ICCC 32 1984 25 135 TS, RF Kabuli, resistant to w,
RR,PB 6. Pusa 256
1985 24 140 Input responsive
Resistant to w, A.Bl.
7.PBG 1 1988 21 160 TS, I Brown seeded, resistant to A.Bl.
8.GPF 2 1990 19 157 TS, I Resistant to A.Bl.9.Haryana Chana 1
1990 19 150 Brown seeded, resistant to w.
10. Udai (KPG 59) 1992 17 120‐130 LS, I Resistant to w, RR, stunt, PB
Age group >10‐ ≤ 15 Years11.GNG 663 1994 15 150 TS, I Resistant to w12.GNG 469 1996 13 147 I, RF Resistant to w, A.Bl.,
BGM. 13. KWR 108 1996 13 135 LS, RF Brown and bold seeded,
resistant to w. 14. DCP 92‐3 1998 11 145 TS, I Yellowish brown seeded,
resistant to w. 15.Karnal Chana 1 1998 11 155 I Small seeded, tolerant to
salinity. Age group up to 10 years
16. Pusa chamatkar 2000 9 150 I ‐ 17.GNG 1292 2002 7 147 TS, I Resistant to w, RR,
A.Bl., BGM. 18. RSG 888 2002 7 135 RF Small seeded, twin
podded, resistant to DRR. 19.STD 884 2003 6 125‐140 RF Resistant to w, A.Bl.,
RR, BGM 20.RSG 895 (Arpita) 2005 4 125‐130 I, RF Resistant to w, A.Bl.,
RR, BGM
42
21.RSG 945 2005 4 125‐130 I, RF Resistant to w, A.Bl., RR &BGM
22.Pratap Chana 1 2005 4 90 LS, RF Drought tolerant23.RSG 963 2005 4 125‐130 LS, RF Resistant to w, A.Bl,
RR, BGM 24.RSG 973 2006 3 125 RF Resistant to w, A.Bl.,
RR, BGM 25.RSG 807 2006 3 130‐135 TS Resistant to w, A.Bl., RR
& BGM 26.RSG 931 2006 3 130‐140 I, RF Resistant to w, A.Bl., RR,
CR 27.RSG991 2007 2 130‐135 TS Resistant to w, A.Bl.,
RR, BGM 28.RSG 896 2007 2 130‐135 TS Resistant to w, A.Bl.,
RR, BGM 12. Tamil Nadu
Age group >15 Years**1. Kranti (ICCV 37) 1989 20 105 Upland, RF Tolerant to salinity,
resistant to w. 2. Bharti (ICCV 10) 1992 17 100 LS Coarse seed coat,
resistant to w, DRR. Br Age group >10‐ ≤ 15 Years
3.CO 4 1998 11 85 RF Bold seeded.Age group up to 10 years
4.JG 11 1999 10 97 RF Bold seeded, resistant to w, RR
5.Vihar 2002 7 90 RF Small seeded
13. Uttar Pradesh
Age group >15 Years**1. L 550 1977 32 160 TS, I Small, creamy white
seeded kabuli.
2. Pant G114 1981 28 150 LS, I Small seeded
3. GNG 16 1982 27 160 TS, I Small seeded4. Gaurav 1984 25 140 TS, I Bold seeded, resistant to
A.Bl. 5. ICCC 32 1984 25 135 TS, RF Kabuli, resistant to W,
RR, PB.
6.Avrodhi 1987 22 150 I Small seeded, resistant to w
7.PBG 1 1988 21 160 TS, I Brown seeded, resistant to A.Bl.
8.GPF 2 1990 19 157 TS, I Resistant to A.Bl.9.Haryana Chana 1 1990 19 150 TS, I Brown seeded,
resistant to w 10. Udai (KPG 59)
1992 17 120‐130 LS, I Resistant to w, RR, stunt, PB
State
Variety
Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/Production conditions
Special features
Age group >10‐ ≤ 15 Years
11. KWR 108 1996 13 135 LS, RF Brown and bold seeded, resistant to w
43
12. DCP 92‐3 1998 11 145 TS, I Yellowish brown seeded, Resistant to w
13.Karnal Chana‐1 1998 11 155 I Small seeded, tolerant to salinity
Age group up to 10 years14.Pusa Chamatkar 2000 9 150 I ‐
14. West Bengal
Age group >15 Years**1. L 550 1977 32 160 TS, I Small, creamy white
seeded kabuli. 2. B 124 1977 32 145 LS, RF ‐ 3. B 110 1980 29 145 LS, RF ‐ 4. Mahamaya 1 1980 29 130 LS, RF ‐ 5. Pant G 114 1981 28 150 LS, I Small seeded6.Mahamaya 2 1984 25 130 LS, RF Wrinkled brown seeded &
resistant to w 7. Pusa 256
1985 24 140 Input responsive, TS,
I
Resistant to w, A.Bl., WA
8. Udai (KPG 59) 1992 17 120‐130 LS, I Resistant to w, RR, stunt, PB
Age group >10‐ ≤ 15 Years9. KWR 108 1996 13 135 LS, RF Brown and bold seeded,
resistant to w Age group up to 10 years
10. Pusa Kabuli ‐ 1003
1999 10 135 TS, I Kabuli, resistant to w
11.Anuradha 2004 5 126 LS, RF ‐
*The age has been reckoned from the year of release to 2009 **More than 15 years old but most popular among the farmers
44
15. Pigeonpea
Pigeonpea has the distinction of being the second largest pulse crop after
chickpea in the country due to its diversified application in the farming system. The crop
is being grown on 3.55 m ha area with the production of 2.8 m tonnes. The major
pigeonpea growing states are Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat,
Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh which together contribute about 90 % of the total area
under pigeonpea in the country. In the Central Zone of the country, the medium
duration varieties are cultivated where average productivity is more than the national
productivity. In the northern part of the country the early maturing varieties suiting to pigeonpea‐wheat rotation are
required. In this region, there is good scope for increasing the area under pigeonpea.
Concerted efforts in pigeonpea breeding took place with the organization of All India Coordinated Pigeonpea
Improvement Project. The research strategy on varietal improvement had put emphasis on development of high yielding
varieties with resistance to important diseases, besides development of early maturing varieties which could fit in suitable
cropping system, development of photo‐thermo‐ insensitive varieties which can be grown during non‐traditional seasons
and development of suitable plant type for intercropping systems.
In varietal improvement there has been achieved great success. However, practically no breakthrough could be
made in developing varieties resistant to insect pests like pod borer, pod fly, maruca, etc. which incur colossal loss in yield
and quality of grains annually. However, so far the varieties developed and released in the states where National Food
Security Mission is operating are listed in Table15.1.
45
Table 15.1: Details of improved varieties/hybrids of pigeon pea recommended for NFSM‐states
State Variety/hybrid
Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
1.Andhra Pradesh
Age group > 15 years** 1. BDN‐2 1978 31 150‐160 Intercropping White seeded,
resistant to w
2. LRG 30 1982 27 170‐180 Kharif/Rabi Wa
3. Vishakha 1
(TT 6)
1982 27 130‐140 RF Medium bold seeded
4. Maruthi 1985 24 155‐165 Intercropping Resistant to w
5. Pragati
(ICPL87)
1986 23 115‐125 RF Amenable for
ratooning
6. Abhaya 1989 20 170‐175 ‐ Resistant to pb
7. ICPH 8 1991 18 115‐135 Not in cultivation
Hybrid
8. Asha
(ICPL 87119)
1993 16 160‐170 Kharif Bold seeded, resistant
to w,SMD, wa
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years 9. Durga 1995 14 120‐135 ‐ Determinate
10. KM 7 1996 13 170‐180 Kharif Resistant to w, SB
Age group upto 10 years 11. Malviya
Vikalp
1999 10 180‐260 Kharif Resistant to PF
2.Bihar Age group > 15 years** 1. UPAS‐120 1976 33 120‐150 Double
cropping
Resistant to pb
2. Bahar 1986 23 240‐250 Rabi planting Resistant to SMD
3. Birsa Arhar 1 1992 17 180‐200 Kharif Resistant to w
4. Sharad (DA11) 1993 16 240‐250 Rabi White seeded, resistant to SMD,AB
5. Pusa 9 1993 16 210‐250 Pre‐rabi
sowing
Resistant to SMD, AB
46
State Variety/hybrid
Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
3.Chhattisgarh Age group > 15 years**
1. UPAS‐120 1976 33 120‐150 Double cropping
Resistant to pb
2 .No. 148 1982 27 165‐170 RF Resistant to w 3. Vishakha 1 (TT 6)
1982 27 130‐140 RF Medium bold seeded
4. Pragati (ICPL 87)
1986 23 115‐125 RF Amenable for ratooning
5. Jagriti (ICPL 151)
1989 20 110‐150 Kharif Determinate, highly susceptible to Maruca
6. ICPH 8 1991 18 115‐135 Not in cultivation
Hybrid
7. Asha (ICPL 87119)
1993 16 160‐170 Kharif Bold seeded, Resistant to w, SMD
4.Gujarat Age group > 15 years**
1. UPAS‐120 1976 33 120‐150 Double cropping
Resistant to pb
2.No. 148 1982 27 165‐170 Kharif Resistant to w3. Vishakha 1 (TT 6)
1982 27 130‐140 RF Medium bold seeded
4. Pusa 84 1985 24 140‐150 Kharif ‐ 5. T 15‐15 1985 24 200‐210 For
intercropping White seeded,
suitable for vegetable 6. Pragati (ICPL 87)
1986 23 115‐125 RF Suitable for ratooning
7. Pusa 33 1989 20 145‐155 Suitable for arhar‐wheat rotation
Semi spreading
8. Jagriti (ICPL 151)
1989 20 110‐150 Kharif Determinate, susceptible to Maruca
9. ICPH 8 1991 18 115‐135 Not in cultivation
Hybrid
10. G 100 1992 17 120‐135 Kharif, late planting
White seeded, resistant to pb, PF
11. Pusa 855 1993 16 145‐150 Kharif Bold seeded12. Asha (ICPL 87119)
1993 16 160‐170 Kharif Bold seeded, resistant to w, SMD
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years13. KM 7 1996 13 170‐180 Kharif Resistant to w, SB
47
State Variety/hybrid
Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
14. AKPH 410 1997 12 130‐140 Not in cultivation
Hybrid
Age group upto 10 years15.Malviya vikalp 1999 10 180‐260 Kharif Resistant to pf16. BMSR 853 2007 2 150‐160 Kharif Resistant to SMD 17.GTH ‐1 2007 2 140 Kharif White seeded hybrid
5.Haryana Age group > 15 years** 1. UPAS‐120 1976 33 120‐150 Double
cropping Resistant to Pb
2. Manak 1985 24 120‐130 Suitable for arhar‐wheat rotation
‐
3. Pusa 84 1985 24 140‐150 Kharif ‐ 4. Pusa 33 1989 20 145‐155 Suitable for
arhar‐wheat rotation
Semi‐spreading
5. Jagriti (ICPL151)
1989 20 110‐150 Kharif Determinate, susceptible to Maruca
6. Paras 1989 20 130‐145 Suitable for arhar‐wheat rotation
‐
7. Pusa 855 1993 16 145‐150 Kharif ‐ 6.Karnataka Age group > 15 years** 1. No. 148 1982 27 165‐170 RF Resistant to w
2. LRG 30 1982 27 170‐180 Kharif WA
3. Vishakha 1 (TT 6)
1982 27 130‐140 RF Medium bold seeded
4. Maruthi 1985 24 155‐165 Intercropping Resistant to w, wa5. SA‐1 1985 24 180‐190 Kharif ‐ 6. Pragati (ICPL 87)
1986 23 115‐125 RF Good for rationing
7. TTB 7 1988 21 160‐170 Kharif ‐ 8. Asha (ICPL 87119)
1993 16 160‐170 Kharif Bold seeded, resistant to w, SMD
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years9. PS 3 1995 14 180‐190 Kharif White, bold seeded,
resistant to w
Age group upto 10 years10. WRP‐1 2002 7 160 Rainfed,
upland Resistant to w
48
State Variety/ hybrid
Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
11. BRG 1 2004 5 170‐180 LS For vegetable purpose
12. BRG 2 2007 2 145‐160 LS ‐
7.Madhya Pradesh Age group > 15 years**
1. UPAS‐120 1976 33 120‐150 Double cropping
Resistant to pb
2. No. 148 1982 27 165‐170 RF Resistant to w3. Vishakha 1 (TT 6)
1982 27 130‐140 Kharif Medium bold seeded
4. Pragati (ICPL 87)
1986 23 115‐125 RF Good for ratooning
5. Jagriti (ICPL 151)
1989 20 110‐150 Kharif Susceptible to Maruca
6. Pusa 33 1989 20 145‐155 Suitable for arhar‐wheat rotation
Semi‐spreading
7. ICPH 8 1991 18 115‐135 Not in cultivation
Hybrid
8. JA 4 1991 18 180‐200 Kharif Resistant to pb9.Asha (ICPL 87119)
1993 16 160‐170 Kharif Bold seeded, resistant to w,SMD, WA
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years10. KM 7 1996 13 170‐180 Kharif Resistant to w, SB11. AKPH410 1997 12 130‐140 Not in
cultivation Hybrid
Age group upto 10 years12. Malviya vikalp
1999 10 180‐260 Kharif Resistant to PF
13.GTH ‐1 2007 2 140 Kharif White seeded hybrid8.Maharashtra Age group > 15 years**
1. BDN‐2 1978 31 150‐160 For intercropping
White seeded, resistant to w
2. No. 148 1982 27 165‐170 RF Resistant to w3. Vishakha 1 (TT 6)
1982 27 130‐140 RF Medium bold seeded
4. TAT 10 1985 24 110‐115 RF ‐
49
State Variety/hybrid
Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
5. Pragati (ICPL 87)
1986 23 115‐125 RF Good for ratooning
6. Pusa 33 1989 20 145‐155 Suitable for arhar‐wheat rotation
Semi‐spreading
7. Jagriti (ICPL 151)
1989 20 110‐150 Kharif Determinate susceptible to Maruca
8. ICPH 8 1991 18 115‐135 Not in cultivation
Hybrid
9. BSMR 175 1991 18 165‐1701 kharif White seeded, resistant to w, SMD
10.Asha (ICPL 87119)
1993 16 160‐170 Kharif Bold seeded, resistant to w,SMD
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years11. BSMR 736 1996 13 180‐185 Kharif Resistant to w, SMD12. KM 7 1996 13 170‐180 Kharif Resistant to w, SB13. AKPH 410 1997 12 130‐140 Not in
cultivation Hybrid
14. AKPH 2022 1998 11 180‐200 Not in cultivation
Hybrid
Age group upto 10 years15. Malviya vikalp
1999 10 180‐260 Kharif Resistant to PF
16. BSMR 853 2001 8 160‐165 Kharif ‐ 17. BDN 708 2004 5 160‐165 Double
cropping ‐
18 Vipula 2006 3 145‐160 Rainfed Resistant to w, SMD19.GTH ‐1 2007 2 140 Kharif White seeded hybrid
9.Orissa Age group > 15 years** 1. Vishakha 1
(TT 6) 1982 27 130‐140 RF Medium bold seeded
2. ICPH 8 1991 18 115‐135 Not in cultivation
Hybrid
3. Pusa 9 1993 16 210‐250 Pre‐rabisowing
Resistant to SMD, AB
4. Asha (ICPL 87119)
1993 16 160‐170 Kharif Bold seeded, Resistant to w, SMD,
WA Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
5. KM 7 1996 13 170‐180 Kharif Bold seeded, Resistant to w, SB
50
51
State Variety/hybrid
Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
10.Punjab Age group > 15 years**
1. UPAS‐120 1976 33 120‐150 Double cropping Resistant to Pb
2. AL 15 1982 27 130‐140 Suitable for arhar‐ wheat rotation
Small seeded
3. Manak 1985 24 120‐130 Suitable for arhar‐wheat rotation
‐
4. Pusa 84 1985 24 140‐150 Kharif ‐
5. Pusa 33 1989 20 145‐155 Suitable for arhar‐wheat rotation
Semi‐spreading
6. Jagriti (ICPL 151)
1989 20 110‐150 Kharif Determinate susceptible to
Marcua 7. Pusa 855 1993 16 145‐150 Kharif Bold seeded
8. AL 201 1993 16 140‐150 Suitable for arhar‐wheat rotation
‐
9. PPH 4 1994 15 145‐155 Not in cultivation Hybrid
Age group upto 10 years
10. PAU 881 2007 2 130 Kharif ‐
11.Rajasthan Age group > 15 years**
1. UPAS‐120 1976 33 120‐150 Double cropping Resistant to Pb
2. Manak 1985 24 120‐130 Suitable for arhar‐wheat rotation
‐
3. Pusa 84 1985 24 140‐150 Kharif ‐
4. Pusa 33 1989 20 145‐155 Suitable for arhar‐wheat rotation
Semi‐spreading
5. Jagriti (ICPL 151)
1989 20 110‐150 Kharif Determinate susceptible to
Maruca 6. Pusa 855 1993 16 145‐150 Kharif Bold seeded
Age group upto 10 years
7.GTH ‐1 2007 2 140 Kharif White seeded hybrid
12.Tamil Nadu
Age group > 15 years**
1. LRG 30 1982 27 170‐180 Kharif WA2. Vishakha 1 (TT 6)
1982 27 130‐140 Rabi Medium bold seeded
3. SA‐1 1985 24 180‐190 Kharif ‐
State Variety/hybrid
Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
52
*The age has been reckoned from the year of release to 2009 ** More than 15 years old but most popular among the farmers
4. Pragati (ICPL 87)
1986 23 115‐125 RF Good for ratooning
5. Vamban 1 1993 16 95‐100 Intercropping ‐6. Asha (ICPL 87119)
1993 16 160‐170 Kharif Bold seeded, resistant to w, SMD, WA
7. CO 6 1993 16 170‐180 Kharif Resistant to pbAge group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
8. COPH1 1994 15 115‐120 Not in cultivation Hybrid9. CO 5 1995 14 110‐115 RF/Rabi season ‐10. KM 7 1996 13 170‐180 kharif Resistant to w, SB11. COPH 2 1997 12 120‐130 Not in cultivation Hybrid12. APK 1 1998 11 95‐105 Rainfed, irrigated Resistant to SMD
Age group upto 10 years13. Vamban 2 1999 10 170‐180 Rainfed Resistant to SMD14. CORG 7 2004 5 120‐130 Rainfed, irrigated Resistant to SMD15. Vamban 3 2005 4 100‐105 Rainfed, irrigated Resistant to SMD
13. Uttar Pradesh
Age group > 15 years**
1. UPAS‐120 1976 33 120‐150 Double cropping Resistant to pb
2. Manak 1985 24 120‐130 Suitable for arhar‐wheat rotation
‐
3. Pusa 84 1985 24 140‐150 Kharif ‐4. Bahar 1986 23 240‐250 Rabi Resistant to SMD5. T 7 1988 21 260‐270 Intercropping Bold seeded6. Pusa 33 1989 20 145‐155 Suitable for arhar‐
wheat rotation Semi spreading
7. Jagriti (ICPL151)
1989 20 110‐150 Kharif Susceptible to Maruca
8. Pusa 855 1993 16 145‐150 Kharif Bold seeded9. Pusa 9 1993 16 210‐250 Pre‐rabi sowing Resistant to SMD,
SB Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
10. Narendra Arhar‐1
1997 12 240‐260 Kharif Resistant to w, SMD, SB
11. Amar 1997 12 250‐270 Kharif Compact plant, resistant to SMD
14.West Bengal
Age group > 15 years**
1. UPAS‐120 1976 33 120‐150 Double cropping Resistant to pb2. WB 20 1984 25 160‐170 Rabi Resistant to AB3. Bahar 1986 23 240‐250 Rabi planting Resistant to SMD4. Pusa 9 1993 16 210‐250 Pre‐rabi sowing Resistant to SMD,
AB
53
16. Mungbean
Mungbean is one of the important pulse crops of India which accounts for 45
per cent of global production. In India, the major mungbean growing states are
Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Orissa, Karnataka, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and
Uttar Pradesh where it is grown during Kharif, Rabi and spring seasons on account of its
short duration and photo‐ insensitivity and dense crop canopy. It assumes special
significance in crop intensification and diversification, conservation of natural resources
and sustainability of production systems. During the last few years the area and
production of this pulse have considerably reduced due to adverse weather conditions.
Most of the varieties of mungbean developed during pre‐Independence era were long duration and susceptible to
yellow mosaic virus disease. With launching of All India Coordinated Pulses Improvement Project systematic efforts for
varietal development, having the objective of short duration, non‐shattering habit and disease resistance, were made. The
Varieties recommended for different NFSM states season wise and situation wise are listed in Table 16.1.
54
Table: 16.1: Details of improved varieties of mungbean recommended for NFSM‐states
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
1. Andhra Pradesh
Age group > 15 years**
1.Kondaveedu 1980 29 ‐ Kharif Dull green seeded
2.Pant Mung 2 1984 25 ‐ Kharif Shining green seeded
3.PDM 11 1987 22 60‐65 Spring / summer
Shining green seeded,
resistant to YMV, wa
4.PDM 54 (Moti)
1987 22 60‐65 Kharif / rabi
Shining green seeded,
resistant to multiple diseases
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years5.Pusa 9072 1995 14 65‐85 Rabi in RF Resistant to
PM 6.Warangal 2 1995 14 65‐70 Rabi ,Kharif Resistant to
PM 7.Madira 295 1995 14 65‐70 Rabi, Kharif Resistant to
PM 8.LGG 407 1995 14 70‐75 Kharif Resistant to
YMV 9.LGG 450 1995 14 70‐75 Kharif Resistant to
YMV 10.TARM ‐1 1996 13 85 Rabi in RF Resistant to
PM 11.TARM‐18 1996 13 85 Rabi in RF Resistant to
PM,YMV 12.PDM 84‐178
1996 13 65‐70 Summer Resistant to PM, YMV
Age group upto 10 years13.HUM ‐1 1999 10 65 Spring Resistant to
YMV 2. Bihar Age group > 15 years** 1.Sunaina 1971 38 60‐65 Summer Semi erect,
Yellow seeded 2.12/333 1974 35 60‐65 Summer ‐3.ML 5 1976 33 80‐85 Kharif Resistant to
YMV, CLS 4.Amrit 1978 31 85‐100 Kharif ,late
planting Resistant to PM, CLS
5.PS 16 1978 31 60‐70 Summer Shining green seeded,
resistant to PM
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production
Special features
55
conditions 6.PDM 54(Moti) 1987 22 60‐65 Summer Shining green
seeded, resistant to multiple diseases
7.PDM 11 1997 22 60‐65 Spring / summer
Shining green seeded,
Resistant to YMV, WA
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years8.Pant Mung 4 1997 12 70 Kharif Dull green
seeded, Resistant to
YMV Age group upto 10 years
9.HUM 12 2002 7 65 Summer ‐ 10.SML 668 2002 7 60 Spring/
summer WA
11.TMB 37 2005 4 65 Summer WA12.HUM 16 2006 3 60 Summer Resistant to
YMV 13. Pant Mung 6 2007 2 60‐65 Summer,
Kharif Resistant to
YMV, PM, BLS
3.Chhattisgarh Age group > 15 years** 1.PDM 11 1987 22 60‐65 Spring /
summer Shining green seeded, WA
2.Pusa 105 1987 22 70‐75 Kharif Bold seeded3.BM 4 1992 17 65‐70 Kharif ‐
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years4.JM 721 1995 14 60‐65 Spring /
summer Resistant to
YMV 5.TARM 1 1996 13 85 Rabi in RF Resistant to
PM 6.Pusa 9531 1998 11 60‐65 Spring /
summer Resistant to
YMV 7.HUM 1 1999 10 65 Spring Resistant to
YMV 8.SML 668 2002 7 60 Spring /
summer WA
4.Gujarat Age group > 15 years** 1.Sabarmati 1980 29 70‐75 Spring /
summer Dark green seeded,
resistant to PM, CLS
2.PDM 11 1987 22 60‐65 Spring / summer
Shining green seeded,
resistant to YMV
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
3.Pusa 105 1987 22 70‐75 Kharif Bold seeded
56
4.BM 4 1992 17 65‐70 Kharif ‐Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
5.Gujarat Mung 3 1995 14 ‐ Kharif Resistant to PM , CLS
6.TARM 1 1996 13 85 Rabi in RF Resistant to PM
7.Pusa 9531 1998 11 60‐65 Summer Resistant to YMV
Age group upto 10 years8.HUM 1 1999 10 65 Spring Resistant to
YMV 9.Ganga (Gangotri)
2001 8 72 Kharif ‐
10.GM 4 2004 5 65‐70 Kharif, Summer
Resistant to YMV
5. Haryana Age group > 15 years**
1.Pant Mung 3 1985 24 75‐85 Kharif Dull green seeded,
resistant to YMV
2.ML 267 1986 23 70‐75 Kharif Shining light green seeded
3.Vamban 1 1989 20 65 Kharif, summer
Resistant to YMV
4.MUM 2 1992 17 60‐70 Kharif Shining green seeded,
resistant to YMV
5.Asha 1993 16 75‐80 Kharif Resistant to YMV
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years6.Pusa 9531 1998 11 60‐65 Spring /
summer Resistant to
YMV Age group upto 10 years
7.Pusa Vishal 2000 9 60 Spring/ summer
Bold seeded
8.Muskan 2000 9 75‐85 Kharif Resistant to YMV
9.Ganga (Gangotri)
2001 8 72 Kharif ‐
10.SML 668 2002 7 60 Spring / summer
WA
11.Satya 2007 2 70‐75 Kharif Resistant to YMV
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
6.Karnataka Age group > 15 years**
1.PDM 54 (Moti)
1987 22 60‐65 Kharif Shining green seeded,
57
multiple disease
resistance, WA
2.Pusa 105 1987 22 70‐75 Kharif Bold seededAge group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
3.Pusa 9072 1995 14 65‐75 Kharif Resistant to PM
4.TARM 1 1996 13 85 Rabi in RF Resistant to PM
5.TARM 18 1996 13 85 Rabi in RF Resistant to PM
6.PDM 85‐178 1996 13 70‐80 Spring Shining green seeded,
resistant to YMV
Age group upto 10 years7.HUM 1 1999 10 65 Spring Resistant to
YMV 8.OUM 11‐5 2002 7 62 Kharif 9.COGG 912 2005 4 62 Kharif ‐10.KKM 3 2008 1 60 For RF Resistant to
YMV 7.Kerala Age group > 15 years**
1.PDM 54 (Moti)
1987 22 60‐65 Kharif Shining green seeded,
resistant to multiple
diseases, WA Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
2.Pusa 9072 1995 14 65‐75 Rabi in RF Resistant to PM
3.TARM 1 1996 13 85 Rabi in RF Resistant to PM
4.TARM 18 1996 13 85 Rabi in RF Resistant to PM
Age group upto 10 years5.HUM ‐1 1999 10 65 Spring Resistant to
YMV 6.OUM‐11‐5 2002 7 62 Kharif ‐7.COGG 912 2005 4 62 Kharif ‐
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
8. Madhya Pradesh
Age group > 15 years**
1.Pant Mung 3 1985 24 75‐80 Kharif Dull green seeded,
resistant to YMV
58
2.Pusa 105 1987 22 70‐75 Kharif Bold seeded3.PDM 11 1987 22 60‐65 Spring/
summer Shining green
seeded, resistant to YMV, wa
4.BM‐4 1992 17 65‐70 Kharif Bold seededAge group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
5.Pusa 9072 1995 14 65‐75 Rabi in RF Resistant to PM
6.JM 721 1995 14 70‐75 Rabi in RF Resistant toPM, YMV
7.TARM‐1 1996 13 85 Rabi in RF Resistant to PM
8.Pusa 9531 1998 11 60‐65 Spring/ summer
Resistant to YMV
9.HUM‐1 1999 10 65 Spring Resistant to YMV
9.Maharashtra Age group > 15 years** 1.Kopergaon 1982 27 60‐65 Kharif ‐
2.TAP 7 1982 27 65‐70 Rabi in RF Resistant to PM
3.Pusa 105 1987 22 70‐75 Kharif Bold seeded4.PDM 11 1987 22 60‐65 Spring/
summer Shining green
seeded, resistant to YMV, WA
5.BM 4 1992 17 65‐70 Kharif Bold seeded6.AKM 8803 1992 17 65‐70 Kharif ‐7.Phule Mung 2 1992 17 65 Kharif Resistant to
YMV Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
8.TARM 2 1994 15 65 Rabi in RF Resistant to PM
9.Pusa 9072 1995 14 65‐75 Rabi in RF Resistant to PM
10.TARM 1 1996 13 85 Rabi in RF Resistant to PM
11.TARM‐18 1996 13 65‐70 Rabi in RF Resistant to PM, YMV
12.Pusa 9531 1998 11 60‐65 Spring ‐
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
Age group upto 10 years13.HUM 1 1999 10 65 Spring Resistant to
YMV 14.Vaibhav 2001 8 70‐75 Rainfed Resistant to
PM 10.Orissa Age group > 15 years**
1.Sujata 1980 29 65‐70 Kharif, rabi, summer
‐
2.Jyoti 1983 26 60‐75 Kharif ‐
59
3.PDM 54 (Moti) 1987 22 65‐70 Spring Shining green seeded, multiple disease
resistant, WA Age group upto 10 years
4.Oum 115 2002 7 62 Kharif ‐5.HUM ‐12 2002 7 65 Summer ‐6.TMB 37 2005 4 65 Summer Resistant to
YMV 7.HUM 16 2006 3 60 Summer Resistant to
YMV 8.Pant Mung 6 2007 2 60‐65 Summer,
kharif Resistant to YMV, PM, CLS
11.Punjab Age group > 15 years** 1.ML 337 1985 24 70‐75 Kharif Green seeded
, Resistant to YMV, BBL, jassids
2.Pant Mung 3 1985 24 75‐85 Kharif Dull green seeded,
resistant to YMV
3.ML 267 1987 22 75 Spring / summer
Shining light green seeded, resistant to
YMV 4.Vamban‐1 1989 20 65 Kharif/
summer Resistant to
YMV 5.MUM‐2 1992 17 60‐70 Kharif Shining green
seeded, resistant to
YMV Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
6.ML 613 1996 13 85 Kharif Resistant to YMV, PM
7.SML 134 1996 13 68 Spring/ summer
‐
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
8.Pusa 9531 1998 11 60‐65 Spring/ summer
Resistant to YMV, PM
Age group upto 10 years9.Pusa Vishal 2000 9 60 Spring /
summer Bold seeded,
WA
10.Ganga (gangotri)
2001 8 72 Kharif ‐
11.SML 668 2002 7 60 Spring / summer
WA
12.ML 818 2003 6 72 Kharif Resistant to YMV, BLS, CLS
60
13.PDU 911 2007 2 75 Kharif Resistant to YMV, BLS, CLS
12.Rajasthan Age group > 15 years** 1.Pant Mung 3 1985 24 75‐85 Kharif Dull green
seeded, resistant to
YMV 2.ML 267 1986 23 70‐75 ‐ Shining green
seeded 3.PDM 11 1987 22 60‐65 Spring/
summer Shining green
seeded, Resistant to YMV, WA
4.Vamban 1 1989 20 65 Kharif Resistant to YMV
5.RMG 62 1991 18 65‐70 Kharif Tolerant to drought
6.MUM 2 1992 17 60‐70 Kharif Shining green seeded
Age group upto 10 years7.RMG 268 1999 10 65‐75 Spring/
summer Shining green
seeded, resistant to
YMV 8.Pusa Vishal 2000 9 60 Spring /
summer Bold seeded,
WA 9.Ganga (gangotri)
2001 8 72 Kharif ‐
10.SML 668 2002 7 60 Spring/ summer WA11.RMG 492 2003 6 60‐70 Rainfed Resistant to
BLS 13.Tamil Nadu Age group > 15 years**
1.PDM 54 (Moti) 1987 22 60‐65 Kharif Shining green seeded,
resistant to YMV, wa
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
2.ADT 3 1991 18 65‐70 Kharif ‐3.CO 5 1991 18 70‐75 Kharif resistant to
YMV Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
4.Pusa 9072 1995 14 65‐75 Rabi in RF Resistant to PM
5.TARM 1 1996 13 85 Rabi in RF Resistant to PM
6.TARM 18 1996 13 85 Rabi in RF Resistant to PM
7.Paiyur 1 1998 11 85‐90 Rainfed Resistant to YMV
Age group upto 10 years8.CO 6 1999 10 65 Throughout the Resistant to
61
year YMV
9.HUM‐1 1999 10 65 Spring Resistant to
YMV
10.WGG 373 1999 10 70‐75 Kharif Erect Plants
11.OUM 115 2002 7 62 Kharif ‐
12COGG 912 2005 4 65 Kharif ‐
13.COGG 7 2006 3 62 Rainfed ‐
15.West Bengal
Age group > 15 years**
1.PDM 54 (Moti) 1987 22 60‐65 Kharif Shining green seeded, multiple diseases
resistant, WA 2.PDM 11 1987 22 60‐65 Spring/
summer Resistant to
YMV Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
3.Pant Mung 4
1997 12 70 Kharif Dull seeded, resistant to
YMV Age group upto 10 years
4.Hum 12 2002 7 65 Summer ‐5.TMB 37 2005 4 65 Summer Resistant to
YMV 6.HUM 16 2006 3 60 Summer Resistant to
YMV 7.Pant Mung 6
2007 2 60‐65 Kharif, summer Resistant to YMV, PM , CLS
*Age has been reckoned from the year of release to 2009. ** More than 15 years old but most popular among the farmers
62
17. Urdbean
Urdbean is the third most important pulse crop of India after chickpea
and pigeonpea, which is grown in various agro‐ecological conditions under
diverse cropping systems. It is grown on about 2.90 m ha area with annual
production of 1.27 m tonnes. It is grown in different seasons, i.e,. Kharif, rabi
and spring. The crop is primarily intercropped with cereals and millets during
rainy season, sole‐cropped on residual moisture in rice fallows and in
spring/summer season as catch crop in between two main crops of Kharif and
rabi seasons.
Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu and
Uttar Pradesh are major urdbean growing states. The area and production have shown increasing trends in these states. In
northern states the area increase under this pulse is mainly due to development of short duration, high yielding and YMV
resistant varieties suitable for different cropping systems during Kharif and spring seasons. The increasing trend in area
under this crop in southern states resulted due to development of high yielding and powdery mildew resistant varieties
suitable for cultivation in rabi season in rice fallows. In this bulletin information on recommended varieties of urdbean for
different NFSM states has been given in table: 17.1
63
Table 17.1: Details of improved varieties of urdbean recommended for NFSM‐states State Variety Year of
release Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
1. Andhra Pradesh
Age group > 15 years**
1. Pant U‐30 1982 27 80‐85 Kharif Bold seeded, WA
2. LBG 17 1987 22 80‐90 Rabi in RF Grayish black seeded
3. LBG 20 1991 18 70‐75 Rabi in RF Dull black seeded
4. LBG 402 1991 18 78 Rabi in RF ‐5. PDU‐1 (Basant Bahar)
1991 18 70‐80 Rabi in RF Resistant to YMV
6. TAU‐4 1992 17 78 Kharif Resistant to PM
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years7. LBG 611 1995 14 85‐90 Kharif ‐8. WBU 108 1995 14 70‐80 Kharif Resistant to
YMV 9. LBG 623 1997 12 60‐75 Rabi in RF Resistant to
PM 10. KU 301 1998 11 70 Rabi in RF Resistant to
YMV 11. TAU 94‐2 1998 11 70 Rabi in RF Resistant to
PM Age group upto 10 years
12. LBG 685 1999 10 70‐80 Rabi in RF WA13. WBG 26 1999 10 70‐75 Rabi in RF Resistant to
PM 14. KU 96‐3 2003 6 70 Kharif ‐15. LBG 625 (Rashmi)
2008 1 70 Rabi in RF ‐
2. Bihar Age group > 15 years** 1. Naveen 1978 31 85‐110 Kharif Seed shining
grey 2. Pant U‐19 1982 27 70‐75 Kharif/ spring
season Black brown seeded,
resistant to YMV, wa
3. Pant U‐30 1982 27 80‐85 Kharif Bold seeded, wa
4. PDU‐1 (Basan Bahar)
1991 18 70‐80 Rabi in RF Resistant to YMV
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years5. Birsa Urd ‐1 1996 13 80‐90 Kharif ‐
Age group upto 10 years6. Azad Urd ‐1 1999 10 80‐85 Spring/
summer Resistant to
YMV State Variety Year of Age Duration Agro‐ecology/ Special
64
release (yrs)* (days) Production conditions
features
3.Chhattisgarh Age group > 15 years** 1. PDU‐1
(Basant Bahar) 1991 18 70‐80 Rabi in RF Resistant to
YMV
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years2. TAU 94‐2 1998 11 70 Rabi in RF Resistant to
PM Age group upto 10 years
3. KU 96‐3 2003 6 70 Kharif ‐4.Gujarat Age group > 15 years** 1. Jandewal 1984 25 80‐90 Kharif ‐
2. PDU‐1 (Basant Bahar)
1991 18 70‐80 Rabi in RF Resistant to YMV
3. TAU‐4 1992 17 70 Kharif Resistant to PM
4. TAU‐2 1993 16 70 Kharif Resistant to PM
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years5. WBU 108 1995 14 80 Kharif Resistant to
YMV 6. AKU‐4 1996 13 90‐95 Rabi in RF Resistant to
PM Age group upto 10 years
7. IPU 94‐1 (Uttara)
1999 10 85‐90 Kharif Resistant to YMV
8. Barkha 1999 10 70‐80 Kharif Resistant to CLS
9. NDU‐992 2003 6 85 Kharif ‐10. GU‐1 2004 5 70‐75 Kharif,
Summer Resistant to
PM 5.Haryana Age group > 15 years** 1. PANT U ‐ 19 1982 27 70‐75 Kharif Black brown
seeded, resistant to YMV, WA
2. Pragati 1985 24 70‐80 Kharif, Summer
‐
3. PDU‐1 (Basant Bahar)
1991 18 70‐80 Rabi/ summer Resistant to YMV
Age group upto 10 years4. Uttara 1999 10 85‐90 Kharif Resistant to
YMV 5. KU 300 2001 8 70 Spring/
summer Resistant to
YMV 6. Karnataka Age group > 15 years**
1.Khargaon 3 1976 33 90 Kharif ‐2. Pant U‐30 1982 27 80‐85 Kharif Bold seeded,
WA State Variety Year of
release Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
3. LBG 17 1987 22 80‐90 Rabi in RF Grayish black
65
seeded4. PDU‐1 (Basant Bahar)
1991 18 70‐80 Rabi in RF Resistant to YMV, WA
5. LBG 402 1991 18 78 Rabi In RF ‐Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
6. WBU 108 1995 14 80 Kharif Resistant to YMV
7. KU 301 1998 11 70 Rabi in RF Resistant to YMV
8. TAU 94‐2 1998 11 70 Rabi/ summer Resistant to PM
Age group upto 10 years9. WBG 26 1999 10 70‐75 Rabi Resistant to
PM 10. KU 96‐3 2003 6 70 Kharif ‐11. LBG 625 (Rashmi)
2008 1 70 Rabi ‐
7.Kerala Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years 1. TAU 94 ‐ 2 1998 11 70 Rabi Resistant to
PM Age group upto 10 years
2. KU 96 ‐3 2003 6 70 Kharif ‐8. Madhya Pradesh
Age group > 15 years**
1. Khargaone ‐ 3 1976 33 90 Kharif WA2.Pant U ‐ 30 1982 27 80‐85 Kharif Bold seeded,
WA 3. Jawahar Urd ‐2 1987 22 60‐70 Rabi in RF Sympodial
bearing 4. Jawahar Urd ‐3 1987 22 70‐75 Rabi in RF Resistant to
PM, YMV 5. PDU‐1 (Basant Bahar)
1991 18 70‐80 Rabi in RF Resistant to YMV, WA
6. TAU‐4 1992 17 75 Kharif Resistant to PM
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years7. TAU 94‐2 1998 11 70 Rabi in RF Resistant to
PM Age group upto 10 years
8. Barkha 1999 10 70‐80 Kharif Resistant to CLS
9. KU 96‐3 2003 6 70 Kharif ‐9.Maharashtra Age group > 15 years** 1. No. 55 1982 27 80 Kharif Seeds faint
black, WA 2. Pant U‐30 1982 27 80‐85 Kharif Bold seeded,
WA State Variety Year of
release Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
3. Sindhkheda1‐1 1982 27 80‐85 Kharif Sympodial bearing
4. TAU‐1 1985 24 70‐90 Kharif Purplish black seeded
66
5. PDU‐1 (Basant Bahar)
1991 18 70‐80 Rabi Resistant to YMV, WA
6. TAU‐4 1992 17 70 Kharif Resistant to PM
7. TAU‐2 1993 16 70 Kharif Resistant to PM
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
8. AKU‐4 1996 13 90‐95 Rabi in RF Resistant to PM
9. TAU 94‐2 1998 11 70 Rabi in RF Resistant to PM
Age group upto 10 years
10. Barkha 1999 10 70‐80 Kharif Resistant to CLS
11. BDU‐1 2001 8 65‐70 ‐ Resistant to PM
12. KU 96‐3 2003 6 70 Kharif ‐
13. AKU‐15 2005 4 65‐70 Rainfed upland, kharif
Resistant to PM
10. Orissa Age group > 15 years**
1. Pant U ‐ 19 1982 27 70‐75 Kharif Black brown seeded,
resistant to YMV, WA
2. Sarla 1985 24 70‐80 Kharif Brown black seeded
3. LBG 17 1987 22 80‐90 Rabi in RF Grayish black seeded
4. PDU‐1 (Basant Bahar)
1991 18 70‐80 Rabi in RF Resistant to YMV, WA
5. LBG 402 1991 18 78 Rabi in RF ‐
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
6. WBU 108 1995 14 80 Kharif Resistant to YMV
7. TAU 94‐2 1998 11 70 Rabi in RF Resistant to PM
8. KU 301 1998 11 70 Rabi in RF Resistant to YMV
Age group upto 10 years9. WBG 26 1999 10 70‐75 Rabi in RF Resistant to
PM State Variety Year of
release Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
10. Prasad 2008 1 80 Kharif ‐
11. Punjab Age group > 15 years**
1. PDU‐1 (Basant Bahar)
1991 18 70‐80 Rabi in RF Resistant to YMV
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
67
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
5. Pant U‐30 1982 27 80‐85 Kharif Bold seeded, WA
6. ADT‐3 1984 25 70‐75 Kharif Bold seeded7. CO 5 1984 25 70‐75 Kharif Suitable for
fodder also 8. ADT‐4 1991 18 65‐70 Rabi in RF ‐
9. ADT‐5 1991 18 65‐70 Kharif ‐10. Vamban‐1 1991 18 65‐70 Spring/summer Bold seeded
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
2. WBU 108 1995 14 80 Kharif Resistant to YMV
3. Mash 414 1996 13 72 Kharif ‐
4. Mash 338 1996 13 90 Kharif ‐
Age group upto 10 years
5. Uttara 1999 10 85‐90 Kharif Resistant to YMV
6. KU 300 2001 8 70 Spring/summer
Resistant to YMV
7. Mash 1008 2004 5 72 Spring/summer
Resistant to YMV, BLS
8. Mash 114 2008 1 83 Kharif Resistant to YMC,
CLS, BLS 12.Rajasthan Age group > 15 years**
1. PDU‐1 (Basant Bahar)
1991 18 70‐80 Kharif/ Rabi Resistant to YMV, WA
2. TAU‐4 1992 17 75 Kharif Resistant to PM
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
3. WBU 108 1995 14 80 Kharif Resistant to YMV
Age group upto 10 years
4. Uttara 1999 10 85‐90 Kharif Resistant to YMV
5. Barkha 1999 10 70‐80 Kharif Resistant to CLS
6. KU 300 2001 8 70 Spring/summer
Resistant to YMV
13.Tamil Nadu Age group > 15 years**
1. KM‐1 1977 32 65‐70 Kharif / multiple cropping
‐
2. CO 2 1978 31 65‐70 Kharif/ rabi ‐
3. CO 3 1978 31 85‐90 Kharif Bold seeded
4. ADT‐2 1982 27 75 Kharif ‐
68
11. WBU 108 1995 14 80 Kharif Resistant to YMV
12. KBG 512 1996 13 70‐75 Kharif ‐13. Vamban‐2 1997 12 70 Kharif Pods glabrous14. KU 301 1998 11 70 Rabi in RF Resistant to
YMV 15. TAU 94‐2 1998 11 70 Rabi in RF Resistant to
PM Age group upto 10 years
16. WBG 26 1999 10 70‐75 Rabi in RF Resistant to PM
17. KU 96‐3 2003 6 70 Kharif ‐14. Uttar Pradesh
Age group > 15 years**
1. Pant U ‐ 19 1982 27 70‐75 Kharif Black brown seeded,
resistant to YMV, WA
2. Pant U ‐ 35 1987 22 75‐80 Kharif Hairy pods3. PDU‐1 (Basant Bahar)
1991 18 70‐80 Rabi in RF Resistant to YMV, WA
4.Narendra Urd‐1
1993 16 70‐80 Kharif ‐
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years5. WBU 108 1995 14 80 Kharif Resistant to
YMV Age group upto 10 years
6. Uttara 1999 10 85‐90 Kharif Resistant to YMV
7. Azad Urd‐1 1999 10 80‐85 Spring/Summer Resistant to YMV
8. KU 300 2001 8 70 Spring/summer Resistant to
YMV
9. Pant U ‐ 31 2005 4 80 Kharif ‐
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
15. West Bengal
Age group > 15 years**
1. Pant U ‐ 19 1982 27 70‐75 Kharif Black brown seeded,
resistant to YMV, WA
2. PDU ‐ 1 (Basant Bahar)
1991 18 70‐80 Rabi in RF Resistant to YMV, WA
Age group upto 10 years3. Azad Urd‐1 1999 10 80‐85 Spring/Summer Resistant to
YMV, WA
69
4. Uttara 1999 10 85‐90 Kharif Resistant to YMV
*Age has been reckoned from the year of release to 2009. ** More than 15 years old but most popular among the farmers
70
18. Lentil
Lentil is the second most important winter pulse crop of India. Being a cool season crop, its production domain is
mostly confined to northern and central India. It is a highly versatile crop having low risk of insect pests compared to
chickpea. There are two types of lentil i.e., small seeded (Microsperma) types mostly suited for
utera cultivation and also in rice/kharif fallow planting, bold seeded (Macrosperma),
which offers the opportunity for export and internal consumption in the preparation
of dal moth.
Lentil is mainly cultivated in Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh,
Jharkhand, Bihar and West Bengal which together contribute about 85 % of area and 90 % of
production of lentil. In the last two decades, the area under lentil has increased by 57 per cent, production by 168 per cent
and productivity by 71 per cent. The increase in area has been mainly in Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and
Bihar, whereas in West Bengal, Punjab, Haryana and Maharashtra the area has shown declining trend.
The increase in productivity has been achieved mainly through development of improved varieties. However, a
considerable area under lentil is still covered by local varieties which lack stability and succumb to several abiotic and biotic
stresses. These genotypes produce good harvest under normal rainfall, but fail to maintain their productivity in deficit rain
situation and sudden rise in temperature at terminal stage.
In recent years under All India Coordinated Pulses Improvement Project, a large number of varieties having high
yield potential and resistance/tolerance to major diseases like rust and wilt have been developed. Some varieties have
distinct advantage of bold seed. In order to increase high varietal replacement rate the popularization of improved
varieties among the farmers is most important step. The list of improved varieties of lentil recommended for different
NFSM states is given in Table 18.1.
71
Table 18.1: Details of improved varieties of lentil for NFSM‐states
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/Production conditions
Special features
1.Bihar Age group > 15 years**1. Pant L406 1979 30 140‐145 ‐ Grey mottled seeds,
resistant to w, R, WA 2. Pant L639 1981 28 140‐145 ‐ Resistant to w, R, WA3. K 75 (Malika) 1986 23 130‐135 RF Bold seeded, WA4. Arun 1986 23 125‐130 ‐ Resistant to w
Age group upto 10 years5. KLS 218 2005 4 120‐125 ‐ Small seeded6. HUL 57 2005 4 120 ‐ Small seeded,
resistant to R 2.Chhattisgarh Age group > 15 years**
1. K 75 (Malika) 1986 23 130‐135 RF Bold seeded, WA2. JL 1 1991 18 120‐125 LS in rice fallows Resistant to w3. Lens 4076 1993 16 130‐135 ‐ Bold seeded, resistant
to w,R, WA Age group upto 10 years
4. JL 3 1999 10 115‐120 LS in rice fallows Bold seeded, resistant to w
5. Noori 2000 9 110‐120 LS Bold seeded, resistant to w, R
3.Haryana Age group > 15 years**1. Pant L 406 1979 30 140‐145 ‐ Grey mottled seeds,
resistant to w,R, WA 2. Pant L 639 1981 28 140‐145 ‐ Resistant to w,R, WA3. Sapna 1991 18 135‐140 ‐ Bold seeded, resistant
to w, R 4. Pant L 4 1993 16 140‐145 ‐ Small seeded,
resistant to w,R, WA 5. Lens 4076 1993 16 130‐135 ‐ Bold seeded, resistant
to w,R, WA
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years6. Priya 1995 14 130‐135 ‐ Bold seeded, resistant
to w,R 7. Pusa Vaibhav 1996 13 130‐135 ‐ Small seeded,
resistant to w,R, WA 8. Garima 1996 13 135‐140 ‐ Bold seeded, resistant
to R 9. Sheri 1997 12 130‐135 ‐ Extra Bold seeded,
resistant to w,R, WA Age group upto 10 years
10. Haryana Masoor‐1
2005 4 120 TS Resistant to major diseases
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/Production conditions
Special features
72
4.Madhya Pradesh
Age group > 15 years**1. K 75 (Malika) 1986 23 130‐135 RF Bold seeded, WA2. JL 1 1991 18 120‐125 LS in rice fallows Resistant to w3. Lens 4076 1993 16 130‐135 ‐ Bold seeded, resistant
to w,R, WA Age group upto 10 years
4. JL 3 1999 10 115‐120 LS in rice fallows Bold seeded, resistant to w
5. Noori 2000 9 110‐120 LS Bold seeded, resistant to w,R, WA
5.Maharashtra Age group > 15 years**1. K 75 (Malika) 1986 23 130‐135 RF Bold seeded2. Lens 4076 1993 16 130‐135 ‐ Bold seeded, resistant
to w,R, WA Age group upto 10 years
3. JL 3 1999 10 115‐120 LS in rice fallows Bold seeded, resistant to w
4. Noori 2000 9 110‐120 LS Bold seeded, resistant to w, R, WA
6. Punjab Age group > 15 years**1. Pant L 406 1979 30 140‐145 ‐ Grey mottled seeds,
resistant to w,R, WA 2. Pant L 639 1981 28 140‐145 ‐ Resistant to w,R, WA3. LL 56 1983 26 150‐155 ‐ Small seeded,
resistant to R 4. LL 147 1986 23 140‐145 ‐ Small seeded,
resistant to w,R, WA 5. Sapna 1991 18 135‐140 ‐ Bold seeded, resistant
to w,R 6. Pant L 4 1993 16 140‐145 ‐ Small seeded,
resistant to w,R, WA 7. Lens 4076 1993 16 130‐135 ‐ Bold seeded, resistant
to w,R, WA Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
8. Priya 1995 14 130‐135 ‐ Bold seeded, resistant to w, R
9. Pusa Vaibhav 1996 13 130‐135 ‐ Small seeded, resistant to w,R, WA
10. Sheri
1997
12
130‐135
‐
Extra Bold seeded, resistant to w,R, WA
Age group upto 10 years11. LL 699 2002 7 145 ‐ ‐
7. Rajasthan Age group > 15 years**1. Pant L 406 1979 30 140‐145 TS Grey mottled seeds,
resistant to w,R,WA 2. Pant L 639 1981 28 140‐145 ‐ Resistant to w,R,WA3. K 75 (Malika) 1986 23 130‐135 RF Bold seeded, WA
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/Production conditions
Special features
4. Sapna 1991 18 135‐140 ‐ Bold seeded, resistant
73
to w, R5. Pant L 4 1993 16 140‐145 ‐ Small seeded,
resistant to w,R, WA 6. Lens 4076 1993 16 130‐135 ‐ Bold seeded, resistant
to w,R, WA Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
7. Priya 1995 14 130‐135 ‐ Bold seeded, resistant to w,R
8. Pusa Vaibhav 1996 13 130‐135 ‐ Small seeded, resistant to w,R, WA
9. Sheri 1997 12 130‐135 ‐ Extra Bold seeded, resistant to w,R, WA
Age group upto 10 years10. JL 3 1999 10 115‐120 LS in rice fallows Bold seeded, resistant
to w 11. Noori 2000 9 110‐120 LS Bold seeded, resistant
to w, R, WA Age group > 15 years**
8.Uttar Pradesh
1. Pant L 406 1979 30 140‐145 TS Grey mottled seeds, resistant to w,R, WA
2. Pant L 234 1980 29 135‐140 ‐ Medium bold seeded,resistant to w,R, WA
3. Pant L 639 1981 28 140‐145 TS Resistant to w,R, WA4. K 75 (Malika) 1986 23 130‐135 RF Bold seeded, WA5. Sapna 1991 18 135‐140 ‐ Bold seeded, resistant
to w, R 6. Pant L 4 1993 16 140‐145 ‐ Small seeded,
resistant to w,R, WA 7. Lens 4076 1993 16 130‐135 TS Bold seeded,
resistant to w,R, WA Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
8. Priya 1995 14 130‐135 ‐ Bold seeded, resistant to w, R
9. Narendra Masoor 1
1997 12 120‐130 LS Bold seeded, resistant to w, R
10. Sheri 1997 12 130‐135 ‐ Extra Bold seeded, resistant to w, R, WA
Age group upto 10 years11. Pant L 5 1999 10 130‐135 For rice fallows Resistant to w, A.Bl., R12. JL 3 1999 10 115‐120 LS in rice fallows Bold seeded,
resistant to w 13. KLS 218 2005 4 120‐125 ‐ Small seeded14. HUL 57
2005 4 120 ‐ Small seeded, resistant to R
15. Noori 2000 9 110‐120 LS Bold seeded, resistant to w, R, WA
State Variety Year of
release Age(yrs)*
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/Production conditions
Special features
9. West Bengal Age group > 15 years**1. Pant L 406 1979 30 140‐145 ‐ Grey mottled seed,
resistant to w,R, WA 2. Asha 1980 29 120‐125 ‐ Small seeded
74
3. Pant L 639 1981 28 140‐145 ‐ Resistant to w,R, WA4. Ranjan 1983 26 120‐125 LS Small seeded,
resistant to R 5. K 75 (Malika) 1986 23 130‐135 RF Bold seeded, WA6.Arun 1986 23 125‐130 ‐ Resistant to R
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years7. Subrata 1998 11 120‐125 LS Bold seeded,
resistant to R Age group upto 10 years
8. KLS 218 2005 4 120‐125 ‐ Small seeded9. HUL 57 2005 4 120 ‐ Small seeded,
resistant to R *Age has been reckoned from the year of release to 2009 ** More than 15 years old but most popular among the farmers
75
19. Fieldpea
Fieldpea is a cool season legume which is grown for food, feed and vegetable. There are two types of pea grown in
India viz., vegetable type in which grains are very sweet when green and become wrinkled on drying, and grain type where
grains are generally white and round. The green seeds of grain type are not so sweet as vegetable type. The dry grains are
consumed in various forms such as chat, chhola, dal, vegetable and flour and the green seeds are used as fresh, frozen or
canned vegetable.
The major fieldpea growing states are Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Assam and Orissa which together
share as much as 95 % of the total area and production in the country. Among these sates Uttar Pradesh ranks first,
contributing 61.6 % in the area and 79.7 % in the production and is followed by Madhya Pradesh. During the last three
decades the total area under this pulse is almost static, but there is 50 % increase in its production. This is primarily due to
increase in productivity, which has almost doubled during this period. In past few years, there has been gradual increase in
area in Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Orissa and Assam due to development of powdery mildew
resistant and dwarf varieties. Such varieties have been very recently developed under the All India Coordinated Pulses
Improvement Project. The spread of these varieties in northern and central states will definitely push its production. The
list of varieties recommended to NFSM states is given in Table19.1
76
Table 19.1: Details of improved varieties of fieldpea for different NFSM states
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs) *
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
1.Bihar Age group > 15 years** 1.Rachna 1980 29 125‐130 TS, I Tall, WA,
resistant to PM 2.Malviya Matar 2
1988 21 100‐140 TS, I Bold seeded, resistant to PM
Age group upto 10 years3.Malviya Matar15
1999 10 120‐130 RF Dwarf, resistant to PM, R
4.Pusa Prabhat 2000 9 95‐115 LS Extra early, resistant to PM
2. Chhattisgarh Age group > 15 years** 1.Rachna 1980 29 125‐130 RF, TS Tall, resistant
to PM, WA 2.JP 179 1987 22 115‐125 LS Med. tall,
resistant to PM 3.JP 885 1992 17 120‐140 Rainfed, RF Tall, bold
seeded, resistant to PM
Age group upto 10 years4.Ambika 2000 9 100‐125 RF Tall, resistant to
PM 5.KPMR 400 2001 8 120‐140 LS Very early,
resistant to PM 6.Subhra 2001 8 100‐110 TS Tall, resistant to
PM 7.IPF 99‐25 2003 6 110‐120 LS, RF Tall, resistant to
PM 8.IPFD 99‐13 2005 4 102 LS,RF Dwarf, resistant
to PM 9.Paras 2006 3 100 KF Tall, resistant
to PM 10.IPFD 1‐10
2006 3 110 LS, RF Tall, resistant
to PM, R 3. Haryana Age group > 15 years** 1. Rachna 1980 29 125‐130 TS Tall, WA,
resistant to PM 2. Pant P 5 1987 22 130‐150 TS, I Bold seeded,
WA, resistant to PM
3.Aparna 1988 21 120‐130 TS,I Bold seeded leafless, WA, resistant to PM
4.Shikha 1993 16 130‐140 TS, I Tall, resistant to PM
State Variety Year of Age Duration Agro‐ecology/ Special features
77
release (yrs) * (days) Production conditions
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years 5.Alankar 1996 13 115‐135 TS, I Tall, bold
seeded, resistant to PM
6.Uttara 1996 13 120‐140 TS, I Bold seeded, resistant to PM
7.Jayanti 1998 11 120‐140 TS, I Bold seeded, resistant to PM
Age group upto 10 years8. Pusa Prabhat
2000 9 95‐115 LS, I Dwarf, resistant to PM
9.KPMR 522 2001 8 120‐140 TS, I Dwarf, resistant to PM
10.DDR 27 2001 8 100‐115 LS Very early 11.Pant P 42 2007 2 125‐130 TS, I Tall, resistant
to PM, R 12. Hariyal 2007 2 130 TS, I Tall, resistant to
PM 4.Madhya Pradesh
Age group > 15 years**
1.Rachna 1980 29 125‐130 TS, I Tall, WA,resistant to PM
2.JP 179 1987 22 115‐125 LS Med. Tall, resistant to PM
3.JP 885 1992 17 120‐140 RF Tall, bold seeded,
resistant to PM Age group upto 10 years
4.Ambika 2000 9 100‐125 LS, RF Tall, resistant to PM
5.KPMR 400 2001 8 120‐140 LS, RF Very early, resistant to PM
6.IPF 99‐25 2003 6 110‐120 LS, RF Tall, resistant to PM
7.IPFD 99‐13 2005 4 102 LS, RF Dwarf, resistant to PM
8.IPFD 1‐10 2006 3 110 LS Tall, resistant to PM & R
5. Punjab Age group > 15 years** 1.Rachna 1980 29 125‐130 TS, I Tall ,WA,
resistant to PM 2.Pant P 5 1987 22 130‐150 I Bold seeded,
resistant to PM 3.Aparna 1988 21 120‐130 I Leafless, bold
seeded, resistant to PM,
WA
State Variety Year of release
Age(yrs) *
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
78
4.Shikha 1993 16 130‐140 I Tall, bold
seeded,
resistant to PM
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years5.Alankar 1996 13 115‐135 I Tall, bold
seeded, resistant to PM
6.Uttara 1996 13 120‐130 I Bold seeded, resistant to PM
Age group upto 10 years7.DDR 23 2001 8 100‐115 LS, RF Very early8.KPMR 522 2001 8 120‐140 I Dwarf, resistant
to PM 9.Pant P 42 2007 2 125‐130 I Tall, resistant
to PM, R 6. Rajasthan Age group > 15 years** 1.Rachna 1980 29 125‐130 TS, I Tall, WA,
resistant to PM 2.RPG 3 1987 22 110‐120 ‐ Medium bold
seeded 3.Pant P 5 1987 22 130‐150 I Bold seeded,
WA, resistant to PM
4.Aparna 1988 21 120‐130 I Leafless, dwarf, bold seeded, WA, resistant
to PM 5.JP 885 1992 17 120‐140 RF Bold seeded,
resistant to PM 6.Shikha 1993 16 130‐140 I Tall, resistant
to PM Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
7.Alankar 1996 13 115‐135 I Tall, bold seeded,
resistant to PM 8.Uttara 1996 13 120‐140 I Bold seeded,
resistant to PM Age group upto 10 years
9.Ambika 2000 9 100‐125 I Bold seeded, resistant to PM
10.DDR 23 2001 8 100‐115 LS Very early 11.KPMR 400 2001 8 120‐140 LS Very early,
resistant to PM 12.KPMR 522 2001 8 120‐140 I Tall, resistant to
PM 13.IFP 99‐25 2003 6 110‐120 I Tall, resistant to
PM State Variety Year of
release Age(yrs) *
Duration (days)
Agro‐ecology/ Production conditions
Special features
14.IPFD 99‐ 13 2005 4 102 I Dwarf, resistant to PM
15.IPFD 1‐10 2006 3 100 TS, I Tall, resistant to
79
PM, R7. Uttar Pradesh
Age group > 15 years**
1.Rachna 1980 29 125‐130 TS, I Tall, WA, resistant to PM
2.Pant P 5 1987 22 130‐150 TS, I Bold seeded, WA, resistant to PM
3.Aparna 1988 21 120‐130 TS, I Leafless, dwarf, bold seeded, WA, resistant to PM
4.Malviya Matar 2
1988 21 100‐140 TS, I Bold seeded, tall, erect, , resistant to
PM 5.Shikha 1993 16 130‐140 TS, I Tall, resistant to
PM Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
6.Alankar 1996 13 115‐135 TS, I Tall, bold seeded, resistant to PM
7.Uttara 1996 13 120‐140 TS, I Dwarf, resistant to PM
8.Sapna 1997 12 120‐130 TS, I Bold seeded, resistant to PM
Age group upto 10 years9.Malviya Matar 15
1999 10 120‐130 RF Dwarf, resistant to PM
10.Swati 1999 10 110‐125 RF, LS Dwarf 11.Pusa Prabhat
2000 9 95‐115 LS, RF Extra early, WA, resistant to PM
12.DDR 27 2001 8 100‐115 LS, RF Very early13.IAFD 1‐10 2006 3 110 TS, I Dwarf, resistant
to PM, R 8. West Bengal Age group > 15 years** 1.Rachna 1980 29 125‐130 TS, I Tall, resistant to
PM, WA 2.Malviya Matar 2
1988 21 100‐140 TS, I Bold seeded, tall, erect, resistant
to PM 3. Shikha 1993 16 130‐140 I, RF Tall, resistant to
PM Age group upto 10 years
4.Malviya Matar 15
1999 10 120‐130 RF, LS Dwarf, resistant to PM, R
5.Pusa Prabhat 2000 9 95‐115 RF, LS Extra early, WA, resistant to PM
* Age has been reckoned from year of release to 2009 ** More than 15 years old but most popular among the farmers
20. Minor Pulses
There are few pulses which have local importance in crop production. These are:
1. Cowpea: It is grown for grains, vegetable and fodder. The grain types are short duration
and mostly determinate. They have a wide range in terms of grain colour. They are
80
grown both as sole and intercrop. The major cowpea growing states are Rajasthan, Karnataka and Madhya Pradesh.
2. Mothbean: This is highly drought and high temperature tolerant pulse crop grown mainly as intercrop with Kharif
cereals and millets. The major mothbean growing state is Rajasthan, followed by Gujarat and Haryana. The major
use of this pulse is as dal and in the preparation of dalmoth, bhujia and papad.
3. Horse Gram: This is also a very hardy pulse crop grown for grains. The major horse
gram growing state is Karnataka. The other states where it is grown are Orissa,
Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand.
4. Lathyrus: This is also very hardy pulse crop, grown mainly as paira or utera crop in
Chhattisgarh, Bihar and West Bengal. The local varieties possess neurotoxin which is
responsible for crippling disease in human being due to continuous consumption. This
is the reason that its marketing has been banned in many states. Now some low
neurotoxin content varieties have been developed which are quite safe for
consumption.
5. Rajma: This is a prized pulse which is used to be grown only in Jammu and Kashmir,
Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand. Now with the development of improved varieties
it is grown during winter season in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Orissa and Maharashtra.
For enabling the farmers to choose the varieties for matching their
requirement, the list of the improved varieties of these minor pulses has been given in
Table 20.1.
81
Table 20.1: Details of improved varieties of minor pulses recommended for NFSM‐states. Pulse crop Variety Year of
release Age (yrs)*
Duration (Days)
ProductionConditions
Special features
Recommended for the states
1. Cowpea Age group > 15 years**
1.V – 240 1993 16 85‐95 RF, upland ‐ Rajasthan, M.P,
Karnataka, Gujarat,
T.N
2.V – 130 1993 16 90‐100 RF, upland Resistant to
CYMV,white
seeded
Rajasthan, Haryana,
Gujarat
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years3.GC – 3 1997 12 90‐95 RF, early ‐ U.P., Maharashtra,
Karnataka, Gujarat,
T.N.
4.V – 858 1997 12 90‐110 Late
maturity
Requires high
rainfall
U.P. , Maharashtra
5.KBC – 2 1998 11 95‐105 Late
maturity,
TS
‐ Karnataka, T.N.
6.Vamban ‐1 1998 11 90‐100 RF, upland Bold &
Brown
seeded
Karnataka, T.N.
Age group upto 10 years7.RC‐ 101 2001 8 60‐62 RF, upland,
drought
tolerant
White
seeded, non‐
viny,
determinate
Rajasthan
8.GC‐ 5 2005 4 75‐80 Kharif/
summer
‐ Rajasthan, Gujarat
9.COVu ‐702 2005 4 67‐73 RF, upland Resistant to pod borer & LCV, trifoliate
leaves
A.P., Karnataka, Kerala, T.N
82
Pulse crop Variety Year of release
Age (yrs)*
Duration (Days)
ProductionConditions
Special features
Recommended for the states
2.Mothbean Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years
1.RMO‐40 1994 15 60‐64 RF, upland Suitable for
low rainfall
Rajasthan, Gujarat
2.FMM ‐96 1997 12 58‐60 RF, upland Suitable for
low rainfall
Rajasthan,
Gujarat
Age group upto 10 years3. RMO ‐225 1999 10 62‐64 RF, upland Suitable for
low rainfall
Rajasthan
4.CAZRI
Moth‐1
1999 10 70‐72 Input
responsive
Semi‐
spreading
Rajasthan, Haryana,
Gujarat, Maharashtra
5.RMO – 435 2002 7 64‐66 RF, upland Erect,
medium
early
Rajasthan
6.CAZRI
Moth‐2
2003 6 65‐67 Suited to
moderate
rainfall
areas
‐ Rajasthan, Haryana,
Gujarat, Maharashtra
7.RMO‐423 2004 5 62‐64 RF, upland Erect Rajasthan
8.RMO ‐257 2005 4 63‐66 RF, upland Erect, good
for grain &
fodder
Rajasthan
9.CAZRI
Moth‐ 3
2005 4 62‐65 RF, upland Erect,
drought
tolerant
Rajasthan, Haryana,
Gujarat, Maharashtra
3. Horse gram
Age group > 15 years**
1.VLG‐ 1 1983 26 100‐110 Irrigated Seeds
shining,
tolerant to
blight
Uttaranchal
2.Maru Kulthi 1989 20 95‐110 RF, upland Seeds light
brown, semi
spreading
Rajasthan
83
Pulse crop Variety Year of
release
Age
(yrs)*
Duration
(Days)
Production
Conditions
Special
features
Recommended for
the states
3.KBH ‐1 1990 19 100‐110 Irrigated ‐ Karnataka, T.N.,
Kerala
Age group >10 ‐ ≤ 15 years4.PHG ‐9 1997 12 90‐100 Irrigated ‐ Karnataka, T.N.,
Kerala
5.Palem ‐1 1998 11 100‐110 RF, upland Light yellow
seeds
A.P
6.Palem ‐2 1998 11 90‐95 RF, upland Light yellow
seeds
A.P.
Age group upto 10 years7.AK ‐21 1999 10 85‐90 RF, upland ‐ Rajasthan, West
Bengal, Gujarat,
Jharkhand, H.P.
8.AK ‐42 2005 4 90‐95 RF, upland High yielding Rajasthan, West
Bengal, Gujarat,
Jharkhand, H.P.
9.CRIDA‐1‐8R 2007 2 73‐95 RF, upland High yielding A.P., Maharashtra,
T.N., Karnataka
4.Lathyrus Age group > 15 years**
1.Biol ‐ 212
(Ratan)
1997 12 108‐116 Tolerant to
stress
Large seeds,
blue flower,
low BOAA
Bihar, U.P., West
Bengal
Age group upto 10 years
2.Prateek 2006 3 110‐115 Tolerant to
stress
Resistant to
PM, low
BOAA (0.109
%)
Chhattisgarh
3.Mahateora 2008 1 110‐115 ‐ Large seeds,
low BOAA
(0.074 %)
Chhattisgarh
84
Pulse crop Variety Year of
release
Age
(yrs)*
Duration
(Days)
Production
Conditions
Special
features
Recommended for
the states
5. Rajma Age group > 15 years**1. PDR‐14
(Uday)
1987 22 125 Irrigated,
Rabi
Tolerant to
BSMV, red
variegated
seeds
Bihar, U.P., W.B.,
Jharkhand, Orissa
2.HUR‐15
(Malviya
Rajma 15)
1989 20 120 Irrigated,
Rabi
White
seeded
Bihar, U.P., W.B.,
Jharkhand, Orissa
3.HUR‐137
(Malviya
Rajma 137)
1991 18 112‐120 Irrigated,
Rabi
Seeds deep
pink
Bihar, U.P., W.B.,
Jharkhand, Orissa
Age group upto 10 years4.Amber 2002 7 139 Irrigated,
Rabi
Bold seeded Bihar, U.P., W.B.,
Jharkhand, Orissa
5.Utkarsh 2005 4 122 Irrigated,
Rabi
Tolerant to
BSMV, gulf
red colour
Bihar, U.P., W.B.,
Jharkhand, Orissa
6.Arun 2007 2 120 Irrigated,
Rabi
Tolerant to
BSMV, gulf
red colour
Bihar, U.P., W.B.,
Jharkhand, Orissa
*Age has been reckoned from the year of release to 2009. ** More than 15 years old but most popular among the farmers
85
Annexure I: Area, Production and Productivity for food grains (rice, wheat and pulses) during last 50 years.
Year Food grains Rice Wheat Pulses
Area (m.ha)
Prod. (m.t)
Produ‐ctivity (kg/ha)
Area (m.ha)
Prod.(m.t)
Produ‐ctivity (kg/ha)
Area(m.ha)
Prod.(m.t)
Produ‐ctivity (kg/ha)
Area (m.ha)
Prod.(m.t)
Produ‐ctivity (kg/ha)
1960‐61 115.58 82.02 710 34.13 34.58 1013 12.93 11.00 851 23.56 12.70 539
1970‐71 124.32 108.42 872 37.59 42.22 1123 18.24 23.83 1307 22.54 11.82 524
1980‐81 126.67 129.59 1023 40.15 53.63 1336 22.28 36.31 1630 22.46 10.63 473
1990‐91 127.84 176.39 1380 42.69 74.29 1740 24.17 55.14 2281 24.66 14.27 578
1995‐96 121.02 180.42 1491 42.84 76.98 1797 25.01 62.10 2483 22.28 12.31 552
2000‐01 121.05 196.81 1626 44.71 84.98 1901 25.73 69.68 2708 20.35 11.08 544
2001‐02 122.78 212.85 1734 44.90 93.34 2079 26.34 72.77 2762 22.01 13.37 607
2002‐03 113.86 174.77 1535 41.18 71.82 1744 25.20 65.76 2610 20.50 11.13 543
2003‐04 123.45 213.19 1727 42.59 88.53 2077 26.60 72.16 2713 23.46 14.91 635
2004‐05 120.00 198.36 1652 41.91 83.13 1984 26.38 68.64 2602 22.76 13.13 577
2005‐06 121.60 208.60 1715 43.66 91.79 2102 26.48 69.35 2619 22.39 13.39 598
2006‐07 124.07 211.78 1707 43.70 91.05 2084 28.17 73.70 2617 23.76 11.11 594
86
Annexure II: The area under nine agro‐climatic zones for evaluation of varieties
Zones Areas
(1). Northern Hills Zone (NHZ) Hills of Uttar Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh and of
Jammu & Kashmir
(2). Northern Plains Zone (NPZ) Punjab, Eastern Haryana, Northern Uttar Pradesh,
Delhi, Ganaganagar, Alwar and Bharatpur of
Rajasthan, Gwalior and Morena of Madhya Pradesh,
Una and Panota valley of Himachal Pradesh and
Jammu
(3). North Western Plains Zone (NWPZ) Rajasthan(Except Kota and Udaipur), western parts of
Haryana and parts of Gujarat
(4). North Eastern Plains Zone (NEPZ) Eastern Uttar Pradesh, Bihar (except Chhota Nagpur)
(5). Far Eastern Zone (FEZ) West Bengal, Bihar (Chhota Nagpur), Assam, Sikkim,
Arunachal Pradesh, Tripura, Manipur, Mizoram,
Nagaland, Meghalaya
(6). Central Zone (CZ) Kota and Udaipur of Rajasthan, Jhansi (Uttar Pradesh),
parts of Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh (except eastern and
south eastern parts)
(7). South Eastern Zone (SEZ) Orissa, Southern and South Eastern Madhya Pradesh,
some parts of Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh (east
coast region)
(8). Peninsular Zone (PZ) Karnataka, Western Andhra Pradesh, Plains of Tamil
Nadu, remaining parts of Maharashtra
(9). Southern Hills Zone (SHZ) Hills of Tamil Nadu
87
Annexure III: Proforma for submission of proposal to Department of Agriculture and Cooperation for notification of a variety under Section 5 of the Seeds Act, 1966
1. State:
2. Crop:
3. Name of the variety under which released:
4. Year of release:
5. (a) Parentage with details of its pedigree: (b) Source of material in case of introduction: (c) Breeding method: (d) Breeding objective:
6. State the varieties, which most costly resemble the proposed variety in general characteristics:
7. (a) Breeder/Institute responsible for maintaining breeder stock: (b) Quantity of breeder seed of the variety available (in kg):
8. Description of the variety/hybrid:
9. Description of the parents of the hybrid. Is there any problem of synchronization ? If yes, methods to overcome it:
10. Describe at least two identifiable and distinguishable morphological characteristics of the variety. In case of hybrid, please describe also at least two identifiable and distinguishable morphological characteristics of both the parents:
11. Maturity group (early, medium and late, wherever such a classification exists):
12. Disease and pest resistance (give details of any resistance to pests or diseases including races):
13. Recommended ecology:
14. Yield (in kg/hectare): (a) Commercial product (b) Seed 15. Current approximate percentage of the area of the crop (kind) under this variety in the state: 16. Recommendation of the All India Workshop about the variety:
Signature of the Chariman/Convenor, State Seed Subcommittee
Name Designation
88
Annexure IV: Number of Varieties of rice, wheat and pulses not older than 10 years and recommended for NFSM States
States Rice Wheat Pulses
Chickpea Pigeonpea Mungbean Urdbean Lentil Fieldpea Other
Pulses
Total
Pulses
1. Andhra
Pradesh
34 ‐ 6 1 1 4 ‐ ‐ 2 14
2. Assam 13 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
3. Bihar 18 8 3 ‐ 5 1 2 2 3 16
4. Chhattisgarh 15 ‐ 6 ‐ ‐ 1 2 7 2 18
5. Gujarat 8 19 9 3 3 4 ‐ ‐ 6 25
6. Haryana ‐ 14 6 ‐ 5 2 1 5 3 22
7. Jharkhand 11 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 4
8. Karnataka 19 ‐ 3 3 4 3 ‐ ‐ 2 15
9. Kerala 12 ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 1 ‐ ‐ 1 5
10. Madhya
Pradesh
7 19 7 2 ‐ 2 2 5 ‐ 18
11. Maharashtra 16 28 8 5 2 4 2 ‐ 4 25
12. Orissa 22 ‐ 2 1 5 2 ‐ ‐ 3 13
13. Punjab ‐ 13 3 1 5 4 1 3 ‐ 17
14. Rajasthan ‐ 10 13 1 5 3 2 7 10 41
15. Tamil Nadu 15 ‐ 2 2 6 2 ‐ ‐ 2 14
16. Uttar
Pradesh
15 21 1 ‐ 8 4 5 5 3 26
17. West Bengal 15 14 2 ‐ 4 2 2 2 5 17
Total 220 146 71 19 56 39 19 36 50 290