Upload
phungbao
View
221
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
C4ISR PAC4ISR PA
IMPROVING C4ISR BETWEEN UK AND US FUTURE LAND FORCES (PAPER I-048)
David Chinn
Integration Authority, DE&S,
UK Ministry of Defence
6/25/2007 - 2
C4ISR PAC4ISR PA
Background - Land Battlespace Systems MOU & C4ISR Project Arrangement
• Land Battlespace Systems MOU Signed December 2004 by DEC (GM)• C4ISR Project Arrangement (PA) signed September 2005 by DEC (CC&II)
• C4ISR PA Objectives:
– To enhance C4ISR interoperability between US Joint Forces (Army, USMC, USAF, Navy) and UK Joint Forces operating at brigade level and below in the land environment consistent with the combined NCW/NEC vision of 2014 and beyond
– To facilitate early delivery of C4ISR interoperability capability improvements to current US Army and UK Joint Forces during the period 2008 to 2014
• C4ISR PA Approach:
– Phase 1 (2005-2007) to define the combined vision for C4ISR interoperability in 2014 and develop an implementation plan to realise it
– Phase 2 (2008-2014) to execute the plan and confirm delivery of the specified US/UK C4ISR interoperability capability improvements
6/25/2007 - 3
C4ISR PAC4ISR PA
UK Organizational Structure
• Overall governance & reporting structure
• Multiple DECs
• Integration across multiple IPTs
• Integration Authority SoS co-ordination across DECs & IPTs
DEC GMDEC GM
UAV Tiger TeamUAV Tiger Team
FundingDEC CCIIDEC CCII
MWC SROGen Applegate
CM(BM)
MWC SROGen Applegate
CM(BM)
CID Tiger TeamCID Tiger Team
JSTARS/ASTORTiger Team
JSTARS/ASTORTiger Team
2* US/UK IOC WGAVM Butler CM(IS)
US?
2* US/UK IOC WGCM(IS)
US?
1* LBS MOU SteeringCommittee
Brig Moore DEC GM
1* LBS MOU SteeringCommittee
3* US/UK IOCLt Gen Sir Fulton DCDS(EC)
ASD(C3I)/USD(AT&L)
3* US/UK IOCDCDS(EC)
ASD(C3I)/USD(AT&L)
SIAPTiger Team
SIAPTiger Team
UK GovernanceBrig Shadbolt
DEC CCII
UK Governance
DEC CCII
US ArmyGovernance Col (P)
Cole D/PM FCS
US ArmyGovernance Col (P)
Cole D/PM FCS
US/UK C4ISR PAProject Officer (UK)
Lt Col Ian McNeil
US/UK C4ISR PAProject Officer (UK)US/UK C4ISR PA
Project Officer (US)LTC John Zavarelli
US/UK C4ISR PAProject Officer (US)
Project Manager (UK)Bill McTaggart
Project Manager (UK)Integration Authority
Project Manager(US)
Ed Sarno
Project Manager(US)
FCS/FRES TigerTeam
FCS/FRES TigerTeamFALCON/WIN-T
Tiger TeamFALCON/WIN-T
Tiger TeamGCCS/JOCSTiger Team
GCCS/JOCSTiger Team
JTRS/BowmanTiger Team
JTRS/BowmanTiger TeamTCS Tiger
TeamTCS Tiger
Team
Integrated ProjectTeams FRESTFCS BATCISBATCIS TFCSFRESCSISCSIS DCCDCCFAWSSatcom DIIDII
4/3* CBM Management BoardVCDS
4/3* CBM Management BoardVCDS
2* CBM Executive GroupDGInfo
2* CBM Executive GroupDGInfo
DCBM J6 NEC & C2ISR 1* SGDCM J6
DCBM J6 NEC & C2ISR 1* SGDCM J6
NEC Governance
C4ISR PATiger TeamC4ISR PA
Tiger Team
US Organisation
UK Organisation
Joint US/UK
Funding
6/25/2007 - 4
C4ISR PAC4ISR PA
Future Combat Systems (FCS) System of Systems
� Manned Systems � Unmanned Air Vehicles
Class II Class III Class IV Class I
Armed Robotic VehicleARV RSTAARV Aslt
ARV-A (L)
Small (Manpackable)UGV
Command andControl Vehicle
Non-Line of Sight Cannon
Non-Line of Sight Mortar
FCS Recovery and Maintenance Vehicle
Medical Treatmentand Evacuation
Recon andSurveillance Vehicle
• Unattended Ground Sensors
� Unmanned Ground Vehicles
• Unattended Munitions
• NLOS LS• Intelligent
Munitions System
Infantry CarrierVehicle
MountedCombat System
MULE: (Countermine)
MULE: (Transport)
6/25/2007 - 5
C4ISR PAC4ISR PA
Customers’ Enduring Needs
• Joint, Interagency andMulti-National Capabilities
• Increased Strategic Responsiveness
• Dominant across Full Spectrum Operations
• Battle Command on the Move
• Ubiquitous, Distributed Network with Joint Fires
• Integrated Survivability
• 3-7 Days Self-sustainment
• Network Enabled, Embedded Training
Soldiers as the Centerpiece of the Formation
Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited, TACOM 31 May 2005, FCS Case 05-106
6/25/2007 - 6
C4ISR PAC4ISR PA
UK-US Future Force C4ISR Concept Drivers
Current Environment• Generally Open Terrain• Linear Array of Forces• Nation State Actors/forces• ISR= Movement to contact• Long Theatre Build up a necessary evil• Local Actions have local consequences
Maneuver and Firepower dominate
Future Environment• Urban and Complex Terrain• Non-Linear battle field• Asymmetric and adaptive actors/forces• Sense= Engage• Strategic deployability and off the ramp operations a necessity• Local actions have strategic consequences
Information, Speed, and Precision DominateC4ISR
• C2=Hierarchical Voice and Digital• Most ISR assets at Strategic and national level
C4ISR• Horizontally and vertically integrated networks• Increase in tactical ISR assets= See First
X
Interoperability• Relegated to higher echelons• Mostly Voice and MS Office = air gap to national C2 systems• Ad Hoc and requires augmentation• Formal tactical solutions are Rigid and cumbersome=not used• Limitations force Mission and Geographical Deconfliction TTPs
X
X
Interoperability
C4ISR PA Vision= Integrated Force
XX
XX
...MSR
...
...
... II
6/25/2007 - 7
C4ISR PAC4ISR PA
Experimentation as part of SoS Systems Engineering Approach
• Supports all stages: – Pre-concept and concept definition activities – Investigation of interoperability options and migration strategies– Assessment activities with the investigation and evaluation of
candidate interoperability mechanisms– Demonstration and implementation with the incorporation of
evolving systems and interoperability solutions
• Means of accelerating and de-risking the acquisition cycle– Formally recognised in the US for some time as part of the US
overall acquisition cycle
• UK, experimentation is starting to be used to help inform requirements, solution options and approvals at major acquisition gates
6/25/2007 - 8
C4ISR PAC4ISR PA
SEELEX#5 Scope & FindingsScope:• Tactical level information exchanges - brigade and below interoperability• Investigation of a range of interoperability mechanisms at different echelon
levels• Investigation of key net-centric/net-enabled infrastructure enablers• Near real time exchange of blue and red situational awareness information
across architectures corresponding to current and future force structures • High fidelity models providing real time simulationsFindings:• Proved the value of lower level interoperability:
– Enhanced SA– Better decision support– Improved co-ordination and synchronisation– Improved tempo and tactical agility
• Will help de-risk further interoperability options and solution development• Helps define new interoperability requirements
6/25/2007 - 9
C4ISR PAC4ISR PA
Challenges
• Governance– The PA is novel and contentious and does not fit well within existing
frameworks for the governance of platform requirements.– Reality is that both UK and US equipment programmes are subject
to regular review and change.– Security (information assurance) is a challenge.
• Culture– Teams need significant time to get to know each other.– Ways of working for a relationship between a major programme of
record (FCS) and a more ad-hoc and much smaller group.– Involvement of British Embassy Washington very helpful.– US need to understand their how their own acquisition cycle
influences work with international partners – even Brits.
6/25/2007 - 10
C4ISR PAC4ISR PA
Conclusions
• This is a real-life example of engineering NEC and NCW: need to accommodate the differences in these similar but not identical concepts.
• A number of UK programmes need to interface with one very large US one – FCS.
• Phase 1 completes at end 2007 - now an agreed UK/US land concept, which again has been generated through a hybrid process that tries to satisfy both the UK and US concepts and doctrine communities.
• Draft capability implementation roadmap has been produced.
• The first of an ongoing series of bilateral experiments to test the assumptions upon which this is based has been completed.
• Dependence on overall coherence and political will on both sides of the Atlantic. The prize is a significant improvement in front line capability.
C4ISR PAC4ISR PA
Back-up Slides
6/25/2007 - 12
C4ISR PAC4ISR PA
Background – The Land Battlespace Systems MOU• Land Battlespace Systems MOU Signed in December 2004 by DEC
(GM)
• Aim to address specific issues that include:– Enhancement of interoperability– Risk mitigation based on sharing technology road maps & tools– Tactics, techniques, methods and procedures for LBS employment– Open and common architectures for LBS & LBS components– Identification of system modifications
• MOU established a framework for implementing a cooperative programme of work relating to LBS:– To improve understanding of US and UK national programmes– To leverage each nation’s industrial and technical expertise – To define and implement a joint programme of applied research, concept
development and technology demonstration
6/25/2007 - 13
C4ISR PAC4ISR PA
US/UK LBS C4ISR PA is one of a number of initiatives seeking to promote US/UK interoperability
TheaterTheaterUE/DIVUE/DIV
UA/BDEUA/BDE& below& below
USUS UKUK
OperationalOperational/Strategic/Strategic
LBS MOULBS MOUC4ISR PAC4ISR PA
STP-G
JTRS
GII
Bridging the GapBridging the Gap
GIG
MIPSTP-GTCAMNIS
TCA
SIAPCBFSA
MIPTCAMNIS
GCCS(A)/JC2GCCS(A)/JC2
CENTRIXS/MNIS/NCES
CENTRIXS/MNIS/NCES
DISN / TSAT-TCDISN / TSAT-TC
JC2JC2
NCESNCES
WIN-T / JTRSWIN-T / JTRS
FBCB2 / FCS BCFBCB2 / FCS BC
SOSCOESOSCOE
WIN-T / JTRSWIN-T / JTRS
JOCS/JC2SJOCS/JC2S
CENTRIXS/MNISGRIFFIN/DII/DII(FD)CENTRIXS/MNIS
GRIFFIN/DII/DII(FD)
DFTS / SkynetDFTS / Skynet
JOCS/ComBAT/JC2S/ARRC C2ISJOCS/ComBAT/
JC2S/ARRC C2IS
DBL II / BCOEDBL II / BCOE
Cormorant/SkynetFALCON /BowmanCormorant/SkynetFALCON /Bowman
ComBAT/ Platform BISA
ComBAT/ Platform BISA
DBL II / BCOEDBL II / BCOE
FALCON / BowmanFALCON / Bowman
CBFSA
6/25/2007 - 14
C4ISR PAC4ISR PA
C4ISR Experimentation Approach
Concepts & DoctrineBattle Labs
System of Systems Design- Capability Options
JEFX Series of Experiments
Incremental Delivery of Capabilities
SEELEX Series of Experiments
6/25/2007 - 15
C4ISR PAC4ISR PA
Joint Expeditionary Forces eXperiment 2006 (JEFX’06)
• Mix of Live and Virtual with real forces & systems (actual & surrogate systems) & simulated forces & systems
• Continuous Air Planning and Execution (CAPE) and Non Traditional ISR Information Services (NTISR-IS) approaches with Land forces as an integral part of Non-traditional ISR & targeting successfully investigated
• Effectiveness of initial FCS solution components & C4ISR architectures for the Spin Out 1 increment assessed
6/25/2007 - 16
C4ISR PAC4ISR PA
C4ISR PA Phase 1Two Years-Three major work streams
Concept StageConcept Stage Assessment StageAssessment StageGate1
Gate1
Gate2
Ga2te
01 Jun 2006
01 Jun 2006
01 Mar2006
01 Mar2006
01 Dec2005
01 Dec2005
01 Sep 2006
01 Sep 2006
01 Dec 2007
01 Dec 2007
01 Jun 2007
01 Jun 2007
01 Mar2007
01 Mar2007
01 Dec2006
01 Dec2006
12 Sep 2005
12 Sep 2005
01 Sep 2007
01 Sep 2007
Project Management
Project Management
Strategy Dev and PlanningStrategy Dev and Planning
Technical WorkstreamTechnical
Workstream
-Outline case for change-Build commitment in the leadership team Engage critical stakeholders
-Engage with key stakeholders-Design governance & reporting structure
-Outline case for change-Build commitment in the leadership team Engage critical stakeholders
-Engage with key stakeholders-Design governance & reporting structure
Interoperability Vision & Concept Development
Interoperability Vision & Concept Development
-Quantify the case for change -Coach leaders to enhance performance and commitment
-Engage key stakeholders, manage expectations
-Quantify the case for change -Coach leaders to enhance performance and commitment
-Engage key stakeholders, manage expectations
Refine concepts and products of the concept stageRefine concepts and products of the concept stage
JEFX 08 Planning JEFX 08 Planning
FinalCOAPLAN
FinalCOAPLAN
DraftCOAPlan
DraftCOAPlan
JEFX 06
SEELEX 5SEELEX 5 SEELEX 6SEELEX 6 SEELEX 7SEELEX 7 SEELEX 8SEELEX 8
Baseline Interop White PaperBaseline Interop White PaperW1W1 W2W2
W3W3
US/UK C4ISR Interoperability System of Systems Design US/UK C4ISR Interoperability System of Systems Design
SEELEX 5 Expt Design SEELEX 5 Expt Design
TIMTIM TIMTIM TIMTIM
6/25/2007 - 17
C4ISR PAC4ISR PA
C4ISR PA timescales in relation to the FCS Program Schedule C4ISR PA timescales in relation to the FCS Program Schedule
FY 2005
•SoSCOE Update•Network Update•Battle Command−WMI−Mission Planning−Sustainment
Tools
•SoSCOE Update•Battle Command−DCGS-A
•UGV Family
MS B Update
IPDR
SoSFR
FY 2006
FY 2
008
FY 20
09
FY 2007
FY 2010FY 2011
FY 2012
FY 2013
FY 2017
FY 2016
FY 20
15
FY 2014
IOC
FRP
MS C
DRR
FDTE
IOTE
LUT4
FOC
LUTMS C
NLOS-C(Inc 0)
ICDR
PDR
Class II
T-UGS
U-UGS
IMS
SUGV
UAV
UGS
IMS NLOS-LS
UGV
MGV
LUT
MS C
XEBCT
MS C
LUT
UA UnitSet
Fielding
MS C
LUT
CDR
NLOS-LS
Class I
MV
Prototypes
Class III
Class IV
Mule-TMule-C
ARV-A(L)
ARV-RARV-A
C2V
T-UGS
U-UGS
FRMVRSV
NLOS-M
MCSICV
SO1EntranceDecision
SO2EntranceDecision
SO3 EntranceDecision
SO4EntranceDecision
StandardsStandardsTransportTransportServicesServices
ApplicationsApplicationsSensorsSensors
IOT&EBLRIP
DP
IOT&E
BLRIP DP
IOT&E
BLRIP DP
IOT&E
BLRIP DP
NET
WO
RK
•SoSCOE•ICS•Battle Command−UGS/IMS
Control•UGS•IMS•NLOS-LS
•SoSCOE Update•Battle Command−Sensor Mgmt•Embedded Training•Communication Relay payload
LUT3
LUT2
ProductionLUT UA
FieldingStart
CurrentForce
CurrentForce
CurrentForce
CurrentForce
XEBCT
XEBCT
XEBCT
NLOS-C (Inc 1)
Exp 1.1
Exp 2
Exp 3
Exp 4
PAStarts
PAPhase 2Starts
PAPhase 2
Ends