20
Template Template 0 200 400 600 800 1000 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 Maxim um Ozone (ppb) Initial VOC (ppbC) Initial NOx (ppb) S tac k Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and NOy and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in CAMx Chris Emery, Sue Kemball-Cook, Jaegun Jung, Jeremiah Johnson, Greg Yarwood and Bright Dornblaser, TCEQ 13 th Annual CMAS Conference October 28, 2014

Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and NOy and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in CAMx

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and NOy and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in CAMx. Chris Emery, Sue Kemball-Cook, Jaegun Jung, Jeremiah Johnson, Greg Yarwood and Bright Dornblaser, TCEQ 13 th Annual CMAS Conference October 28, 2014. Acknowledgements. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and  NOy  and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in  CAMx

TemplateTemplate

0

200

400

600

800

1000

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

MaximumOzone (ppb)

InitialVOC (ppbC)

InitialNOx (ppb)

Stack

Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and NOy and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in

CAMx

Chris Emery, Sue Kemball-Cook, Jaegun Jung, Jeremiah Johnson, Greg Yarwood

andBright Dornblaser, TCEQ13th Annual CMAS Conference

October 28, 2014

Page 2: Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and  NOy  and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in  CAMx

2

Acknowledgements

• This project was funded by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

• The authors gratefully acknowledge the NOAA Air Resources Laboratory (ARL) for the provision of the HYSPLIT model and use of the READY website (http://www.ready.noaa.gov).

Page 3: Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and  NOy  and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in  CAMx

Background

• As the NAAQS become more stringent, understanding transport is increasingly important

• O3 and some NOy are long-lived in the upper troposphere (UT) and lower stratosphere (LS)– Can be transported for long distances – Can mix downward and influence surface O3

• Models used for O3 planning must accurately simulate O3 and NOy in the UT/LS– Simulate impact of stratospheric air on background– Comparison with column-integrated satellite data

3

Page 4: Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and  NOy  and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in  CAMx

CAMx Vertical Grid

• Model top 15 km• Downward

motion brings LS air into modeling domain

• Top BC is “Zero gradient” mixing ratio assumption

4Figure: http://esrl.noaa.gov/csd/assessments/ozone/2006/chapters/Q1.pdf

TCEQVertical

Grid

Page 5: Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and  NOy  and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in  CAMx

Modeling with the Standard CAMx Top BC

• Comparison of OMI vs. CAMx NO2 columns prompted deeper evaluation of CAMx in UT/LS

• CAMx (red) underestimated UT/LS NO2 relative to INTEX-A aircraft profiles (black)– Ad hoc top BCs for O3 and NOy improved comparison (purple)

5

Page 6: Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and  NOy  and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in  CAMx

Layer Collapsing

• CAMx is typically run with fewer layers than WRF for efficiency

• Effect on surface ozone generally minimal

• Test effect on UT/LS O3 and NOy

6

Layer Collapsingin UT

Surface

WRF CAMx

No Layer Collapsing

Page 7: Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and  NOy  and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in  CAMx

GEOS-Chem Global Model

• A common source for lateral BCs– Spatially

interpolate to CAMx grid

– Map species to CAMx list

• Add new top BCs

7

Page 8: Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and  NOy  and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in  CAMx

Example of New Top BC Extraction

8

Page 9: Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and  NOy  and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in  CAMx

CAMx Model Performance Evaluation

• 3 CAMx runs– Standard Zero Gradient Top BC, 28 layers– GEOS-Chem Top BC, 28 layers– GEOS-Chem Top BC, 38 layers (no layer collapsing)

• Rider 8 modeling platform, June 2006 episode– Lightning NOx emissions– TCEQ AEM3 aircraft emission inventory– CB6r2 chemical mechanism

9

Page 10: Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and  NOy  and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in  CAMx

Ozonesonde at Huntsville, AL

10

• Good agreement < 6 km– No clear benefit from

top BC or extra layers• GEOS-Chem matches

observed profile well– Though not at all US sites

• Zero gradient run– Diffusive, poor > 6 km

• 38 layer top BC run better than 28 layer top BC run > 6 km

Page 11: Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and  NOy  and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in  CAMx

NO2 Profile with new Top BCs

11

• Top BC improves UT/LS NO2 profile

Page 12: Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and  NOy  and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in  CAMx

Effect of Layer Collapsing

• Layer collapsing affects NO2 profile less than ozone

12

Page 13: Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and  NOy  and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in  CAMx

Effect of Layer Collapsing on PAN Profile

• CAMx has a low bias in middle and upper troposphere• PAN driven by BCs (GOES-Chem too low by >100 ppt)

13

Page 14: Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and  NOy  and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in  CAMx

HYSPLIT Trajectory Analysis

• Forward/backward trajectories from UT/LS vertical intrusion events

• Prepared using 4 sets of inputs:1. WRF three-dimensional wind field2. WRF two-dimensional wind field

HYSPLIT calculates vertical component using default divergence method

3. CAMx three-dimensional wind field Vertical component calculated using CAMx algorithm

4. EDAS three-dimensional wind field

14

Page 15: Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and  NOy  and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in  CAMx

Diagnosing UT/LS Intrusion Events

15

Page 16: Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and  NOy  and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in  CAMx

16

June 2, 2006

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

20000

30-May 31-May 1-Jun 2-Jun 3-Jun

Hei

ght a

bove

Gro

und

[m]

Time in GMT

HYSPLIT Back Trajectories. June 2 2Z. Origin at 36.983N, 101.998W. 13638 mAGL.

CAMx

WRF

WRF_noVV

EDAS

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

20000

1-Jun 2-Jun 3-Jun 4-Jun 5-Jun

Hei

ght a

bove

Gro

und

[m]

Time in GMT

HYSPLIT Forward Trajectories. June 2 2Z. Origin at 36.983N, 101.998W. 13638 mAGL.

CAMx

WRF

WRF_noVV

EDAS

Page 17: Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and  NOy  and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in  CAMx

Summary

• New top BC improves performance in UT/LS– Allows for column-integrated satellite comparisons

• UT/LS O3 for 38 layer run was better than 28 layer run– High vertical resolution needed for UT/LS transport– Effects at surface intermittent and generally small

28 layers sufficient for surface O3 in Texas summertime Larger effects expected in Intermountain West springtime

• GEOS-Chem performance in UT/LS was variable– Sometimes contributes to biases in CAMx

• CAMx transport in UT/LS consistent with other models

17

Page 18: Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and  NOy  and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in  CAMx

Thank YouQuestions?

18

Page 19: Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and  NOy  and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in  CAMx

GEOS-Chem PAN

• GEOS-Chem PAN (<100 ppt) lower than INTEX-A observations (300 ppt) near the tropopause

19

Page 20: Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and  NOy  and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in  CAMx

Effect of Layer Collapsing on HNO3 Profile

20

• Good (slightly high) simulation of HNO3 profile