19
Improving Teacher Quality Project Director Information 2013-2014 Georgia’s Improving Teacher Quality in Higher Education Program University of Georgia Teacherquality.coe.uga.edu/

Improving Teacher Quality Project Director Information 2013-2014 Georgia’s Improving Teacher Quality in Higher Education Program University of Georgia

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Improving Teacher Quality Project Director Information

2013-2014

Georgia’s Improving Teacher Quality in Higher Education Program

University of GeorgiaTeacherquality.coe.uga.edu/

Improving Teacher Quality

PD report makes purchase and gets receipt

Budget Process Flow Chart

PD report makes

purchase and gets receipt

PD turns receipt into department

Department makes a

check request with receipt

Business office of PD’s school

or division sends request to the grants

office

Grants office sends

invoice for purchases to

TQ officeTQ office

prepares check request for College of

Education to send payment

TQ business office sends to Contract & Grants office

Accounts payable

Payment to your home institution

Improving Teacher Quality

Project Budgets

All receipts should be turned into your business office for reimbursement less than 60 days after purchases.

Your business office should submit an invoice to the ITQ office no later than 90 days after purchase. There must be a ledger attached to the invoice showing how the money was spent.

Do not purchase items that were not listed in your original proposal without permission from the ITQ office.

Purchases made with ITQ funds are for the exclusive use of ITQ-sponsored professional development.

Improving Teacher Quality

Allowable ExpensesRefer to the ITQ RFP pp. 9-11 for allowable expenses.Also, check with your home institution for regulations

and Board of Regents regulations on all expenses (e.g., supplies, lodging, meals, travel expenses for individuals, group travel, reservations, charter buses, etc.).

Some digital devices/accessories are not allowed for purchase with ITQ funds (e.g., iPads, digital cameras, flash drives). Classroom sets of equipment are not allowed for purchase with ITQ funds (e.g., classroom sets of calculators or microscopes).

Improving Teacher Quality

Amending Your Budget

You may shift money from one of three categories Travel, Additional Costs, and Materials & Supplies to the other, as long as the amount is not more than 25% of an individual category. If you need to move more than 25%, please contact the Teacher Quality Office.

Money in Personnel, Support Personnel, Fringe, and Participant Costs may not be moved without permission from the Teacher Quality Office.

Note: Some of the funds you requested may already have been moved from one category to another to comply with budget guidelines.

Improving Teacher Quality

Amending Your Budget

To have budget amendment approved, it must meet the test for a potential audit below:1. The costs are reasonable.2. The costs are allocable (used ONLY for

Teacher Quality work).3. The costs are appropriate to the scope of

the project.Teacher with sea turtle hatchling on St. Catherine’s Island.

Improving Teacher Quality

Requesting Additional Funds

As of now, all of the 2013-14 monies have been awarded, so there is no funding for additional participants or supplies. However, as you get closer to the summer experience, you are welcomed to contact our office to determine if more funds have been made available.

If you have need for additional funds throughout the project, contact our office to determine if unused funds have been returned from other projects that can be made available to you.

Improving Teacher Quality

Critical Budget IssuesIt is critical that you communicate with the ITQ

office regarding any changes in the numbers of participants throughout the grant period.

If, at any time, you become aware that you have budgeted more money for a category than will actually be needed, you are responsible for contacting the ITQ office immediately.

Last year, the ITQ office gave back $140,000 of unused grant money to the USDOE because those funds were returned to our office by project directors too late to be distributed to other projects that could have used those monies.

Improving Teacher Quality

Critical Budget IssuesWe understand the temptation to hold on to

money “just in case” but that has resulted in thousands of dollars being returned annually by projects.

In the past, we tried to address this issue by requiring quarterly budget reports from PDs. However, we found that doing so did not address the problem sufficiently, so we are no longer requiring quarterly budget reports.

Instead, we will focus on keeping track of the number of participants (both summer and follow-up) to determine money that should be returned to the ITQ office for redistribution to other projects.

Improving Teacher Quality

Project Evaluation

Your project evaluation report should include the following critical elements:Summary of the projectOutline of goals and objectivesEvaluation planDescription of data collection and analysisFindings for each goal and/or objectiveRecommendations for project improvementAppendix (includes data collection

instruments, complete data reports)

Improving Teacher Quality

What can project directors do to expedite the evaluation process? • Create a logic model illustrating the projects’

inputs (resources), activities, and outcomes and how these relate to the overall goals.

• Document what data the project team will be collecting during the project (e.g. participant evaluation forms, follow-up experiences) that the evaluator can review as evidence.

• Know the level of evidence needed to meet your reporting requirements (minimum) and what you would like to learn from the data to improve the program (ideal).

Project Evaluation

Improving Teacher Quality

Four sample evaluation reports from 2012-13 ITQ projects are available on the Teacher Quality website for you to consider in working with your evaluator.

An annotated evaluation is also available on the website to assist you in working with your evaluator.

http://teacherquality.coe.uga.edu/project-reporting-3/2013-2014/

Project Evaluation

Improving Teacher Quality

Project Reporting: Project Information

Please complete the project schedule and location information handout attached to your email message and email it to Clarice Thompson by April 5. You may also access the project schedule and location form on the TQ website.

http://teacherquality.coe.uga.edu/project- reporting-3/2013-2014/

Improving Teacher Quality

Project Reporting: Participant Information

Send the registered number of participants to Clarice Thompson via email on the Friday before the start of your workshop/course on Monday.

Send the names and email addresses of actual participants to Clarice Thompson by lunchtime of the first day of your workshop/course. If you will not have access to the internet during the day, you are responsible for arranging a different reporting time with the ITQ office.

Send the names and email addresses of attendees participating in follow-up activities to Clarice Thompson by the end of your first day of follow-up.

Improving Teacher Quality

Project Reporting: Surveys and Reports

Encourage participants to complete Participant Surveys, both initial and follow-up. Links to surveys will be emailed to participants by Clarice.• Initial Survey—To be completed after summer

experience.http://teacherquality.coe.uga.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/2013-2014_INITIAL_EXPERIENCE__Project_Participant_Evaluation_of_Professional_Development.pdf • Follow-Up Survey—To be completed after all follow-up

experiences.  http://teacherquality.coe.uga.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Attendee_Follow-up_Survey_2012-2013.pdf

Improving Teacher Quality

Project Reporting: Surveys and Reports

Complete the Project Director Reports. Links to the report surveys will be emailed to participants by Clarice. Click on the link below to see a list of questions for the Project Director Reports.• Initial Report—To be completed after summer

experience.http://teacherquality.coe.uga.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Project_Director_Initial_Report_2013-2014.pdf• Final Report—To be completed at the end of the

project periodhttp://teacherquality.coe.uga.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/2012-2013_Project_Director_Final_Report.pdf

Improving Teacher Quality

Project Reporting: Site Monitoring

Site Monitoring –Send us at least two of the three following exhibits. We will accept links or the separate pieces/files.• Edited videos (3-5 min.)• Pictures (up to 10)• Sample participant testimonies (1 to 3)—videos (3-5

min.), audio files, and/or written reflections• Teacher work samples (e.g., lesson plans,

curriculum) Provide a brief caption for all photos. Describe what’s

being seen in the picture. Videos must be accompanied by a written transcript in

order to meet video requirements at UGA. All submissions must be “website ready”.

Improving Teacher Quality

Timeline of Required Project Reporting

Number of

participants--

Due on the

Friday before

summer experie

nce begins

on Monday

Names/email

addresses of

participants—

Due by lunchtime of the 1st day

of summer experie

nce

Participant

Initial Survey—Due

by conclusi

on of summer experie

nce

Project Director

Initial Report—Due

by conclusi

on of summer experie

nce

Number of

participants

in follow-

up: Due by beginning of follow-

up experience

Participant

Follow-Up

Survey—Due

by conclusion of follow-

up experience

Project

Director

Final Repor

t—Due by

conclusion of projec

t

Evaluator’s Final Report—Due by

conclusion

of proje

ct

Improving Teacher Quality

Contact Information

Clarice [email protected]

706-542-4043Kathy Thompson Peg Graham

[email protected] [email protected] 706-224-4830 706-621-3935

Feiye Wang Xiaosi Yang [email protected] [email protected]