Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Drinking Water & Sanitation on Environment: Lok Sabha (till Monsoon Session) 2013-14 – Part-I
Q. No. Q. Type Date Ans by
Ministry Members Title of the Questions Subject Specific Political
Party State Representative
*152 Starred 07.3.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Dr. Kirodilal Meena Drinking Water Quality Health and Sanitation
Ind.
Rajasthan
1624 Unstarred 07.3.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Smt. Mausam Noor Japanese Encephalitis Health and Sanitation
INC West Bengal
1726 Unstarred 07.3.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri Bhakta Charan Das
Contaminated Drinking Water Health and Sanitation
INC Odisha
Dr. Arjun Roy Pollution JD(U) Bihar Shri Feroze Varun Gandhi BJP Uttar Pradesh Smt. Annu Tandon INC Uttar Pradesh
Smt. Paramjit Kaur Gulshan SAD Punjab
Shri Pralhad Venkatesh Joshi BJP Karnataka
Shri Rajiv Ranjan (Lalan) Singh JD(U) Bihar
Shri Naveen Jindal INC Haryana
Shri Jeetendra Singh Bundela BJP Madhya
Pradesh Shri C. Rajendran AIADMK Tamil Nadu Shri Rajendra Agrawal BJP Uttar Pradesh
1751 Unstarred 07.3.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation
Shri Sonawane Pratap Narayanrao Sanitation facilities Health and Sanitation
BJP Maharashtra
Shri Bhausaheb Wakchaure SS Maharashtra
1756 Unstarred 07.3.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation
Shri Baliram Sukur Jadhav
Drinking water and sanitation schemes Health and Sanitation
BVA Maharashtra
1817 Unstarred 07.3.2013 Drinking Water and Dr. Arvind Kumar Sharma Safe Drinking Water Health and Sanitation INC Haryana
Sanitation
Shri Harischandra Deoram Chavan Water Management BJP Maharashtra
Shri Feroze Varun Gandhi BJP Uttar Pradesh
Shri Deoraj Singh Patel BSP Madhya Pradesh
Shri A.K.S. Vijayan DMK Tamil Nadu
Shri Sambandam Keerapalayam Alagiri INC Tamil Nadu
Shri Purnmasi Ram JD(U) Bihar Shri S.S. Ramasubbu INC Tamil Nadu Dr. Thokchom Meinya INC Manipur
Shri Adagooru Huchegowda Vishwanath INC Karnataka
Shri Ravindra Kumar Pandey BJP Jharkhand
Km. Saroj Pandey BJP Chhattisgarh
Shri Vikrambhai Arjanbhai Maadam INC Gujarat
Shri Chandrakant Bhaurao Khaire SS Maharashtra
Shri Kapil Muni Karwariya BSP Uttar Pradesh
Shri Prem Chand Guddu INC Madhya Pradesh
Shri Sudarshan Bhagat BJP Jharkhand
Shri Ponnam Prabhakar INC Andhra Pradesh
Shri Nalin Kumar Kateel BJP Karnataka Shri Ram Sundar Das JD(U) Bihar Smt. Shruti Choudhry INC Haryana Shri Devendra Nagpal RLD Uttar Pradesh Shri Jagdish Singh Rana BSP Uttar Pradesh
1830 Unstarred 07.3.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation
Shri Devji Mansingram Patel Special Status to States Water Management
BJP Rajasthan
Shri Purnmasi Ram JD(U) Bihar Shri A.K.S. Vijayan DMK Tamil Nadu Shri Kameshwar Baitha JMM Jharkhand
*242 Starred 14.03.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri Ravneet Singh
Drinking Water and Sanitation Facilities in Schools Health and Sanitation
INC Punjab
Dr. (Shri) Ajay Kumar Environmental Conservation JVM (P) Jharkhand
*246 Starred 14.03.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri Neeraj Shekhar
Piped Drinking Water Supply Water Management
SP Uttar Pradesh
Shri Yashvir Singh SP Uttar Pradesh
2796 Unstarred 14.03.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Smt. Sushila Saroj Delay in Release of Funds Water Management
SP Uttar Pradesh
2813 Unstarred 14.03.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri Om Prakash Yadav Nirmal Gram Puraskar
Environmental Education, NGOs and Media
Ind.
Bihar
2868 Unstarred 14.03.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri Naranbhai Kachhadia
Allocation under Drinking Water and Sanitation Schemes Health and Sanitation
BJP Gujarat
Shri Asaduddin Owaisi Water Management AIMIM Andhra Pradesh
Shri Sai Prathap Annayyagari INC Andhra
Pradesh
2891 Unstarred 14.03.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri Harin Pathak Bio-Toilets Environmental Conservation
BJP Gujarat
2944 Unstarred 14.03.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri Dushyant Singh
Water Quality Testing Laboratories Environmental Conservation
BJP Rajasthan
Shri Maheshwar Hazari Environmental Education, NGOs and Media JD(U) Bihar
Smt. Sushila Saroj Water Management SP Uttar Pradesh Smt. Usha Verma SP Uttar Pradesh Smt. Seema Upadhyay BSP Uttar Pradesh Shri Harsh Vardhan INC Uttar Pradesh
2956 Unstarred 14.03.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri Nalin Kumar Kateel Drought-like Situation Disaster Management
BJP Karnataka
Shri Suresh Chanabasappa Angadi Water Management BJP Karnataka
Shri A.T. (Nana) Patil BJP Maharashtra Smt. Davidson J. Helen DMK Tamil Nadu
2970 Unstarred 14.03.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation
Shri Chandrakant Raghunath Patil Sanitation Facilities Health and Sanitation
BJP Gujarat
Shri Harin Pathak Environmental Conservation BJP Gujarat Shri Tufani Saroj Environmental Education, SP Uttar Pradesh
NGOs and Media Shri Pradeep Kumar Singh Water Management BJP Bihar
Shri Suresh Kumar Shetkar INC Andhra
Pradesh
Smt. Darshana Vikram Jardosh BJP Gujarat
*435 Starred 25.04.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri Laxman Tudu
Allocation for Tribal Sub-Plan Water Management
BJD Odisha
Shri Mansukhbhai D. Vasava BJP Gujarat
4854 Unstarred 25.04.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Smt. Kamla Devi Patle
MDGs under Sanitation Sector Health and Sanitation
BJP Chhattisgarh
4931 Unstarred 25.04.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation
Shri Mansukhbhai D. Vasava Defunct Toilets Health and Sanitation
BJP Gujarat
Shri Harish Choudhary Pollution INC Rajasthan
5009 Unstarred 25.04.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri Anandrao Adsul Sanitation Facilities Health and Sanitation
SS Maharashtra
Shri Shivaji Adhalrao Patil Environmental Conservation SS Maharashtra
Shri Gajanan Dharmshi Babar
Environmental Education, NGOs and Media SS Maharashtra
Shri P. Kumar Water Management AIADMK Tamil Nadu
Shri Nikhil Kumar Choudhary BJP Bihar
Shri Dharmendra Yadav SP Uttar Pradesh
Shri Arvind Kumar Chaudhary BSP Uttar Pradesh
Shri Hemanand Biswal INC Odisha
Shri Pralhad Venkatesh Joshi BJP Karnataka
Smt. Putul Kumari Ind. Bihar
5010 Unstarred 25.04.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri P.L. Punia
Targets set under Drinking Water and Sanitation Schemes Health and Sanitation
INC Uttar Pradesh
Shri A.K.S. Vijayan Environmental Conservation DMK Tamil Nadu Shri Dilip Singh Judeo BJP Chhattisgarh
5754 Unstarred 25.04.2013 Drinking Water and Smt. Seema Upadhyay
Contaminated Drinking Water Health and Sanitation BSP Uttar Pradesh
Sanitation Smt. Sushila Saroj EIA SP Uttar Pradesh Shri Maheshwar Hazari JD(U) Bihar Smt. Usha Verma SP Uttar Pradesh Shri Harsh Vardhan INC Uttar Pradesh
5836 Unstarred 25.04.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri Prem Chand Guddu
Scheme for Construction of Tiolets Health and Sanitation
INC Madhya Pradesh
5857 Unstarred 25.04.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Smt. Davidson J. Helen Nirmal Gram Villages Water Management
DMK Tamil Nadu
Shri Kirti (Jha) Azad BJP Bihar
5862 Unstarred 25.04.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation
Shri Gopinath Pandurang Munde
Drinking Water and Sanitation Schemes Health and Sanitation
BJP Maharashtra
Shri Lal Ji Tandon Water Management BJP Uttar Pradesh
5921 Unstarred 25.04.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation
Shri Chandrakant Raghunath Patil
Allocation under Drinking Water Scheme Health and Sanitation
BJP Gujarat
5924 Unstarred 25.04.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Dr. Nilesh Narayan Rane
Deficiency in Sanitation Scheme Health and Sanitation
INC Maharashtra
5967 Unstarred 25.04.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri P. Karunakaran Demand for Drinking Water Water Management CPI(M) Kerala
5968 Unstarred 25.04.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri A.K.S. Vijayan Water Purification Plants Environmental Conservation
DMK Tamil Nadu
*77 Starred 08.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Smt. Sumitra Mahajan Safe Drinking Water Health and Sanitation
BJP Madhya Pradesh
Shri Baidyanath Prasad Mahto Water Management JD(U) Bihar
736 Unstarred 08.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation
Shri Mekapati Rajamohan Reddy
Target under Drinking Water Scheme Water Management
YSRCP Andhra Pradesh
Dr. Nilesh Narayan Rane INC Maharashtra
777 Unstarred 08.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Smt. Susmita Bauri Jalmani Scheme Water Management CPI(M) West Bengal
Shri Nalin Kumar Kateel BJP Karnataka
Shri Jayaprakash Korgi Hegde INC Karnataka
Shri Viswanathan Perumal INC Tamil Nadu Smt. Putul Kumari Ind. Bihar
778 Unstarred 08.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Smt. Davidson J. Helen
Contaminated Drinking Water Health and Sanitation
DMK Tamil Nadu
Shri Ram Singh Kaswan Pollution BJP Rajasthan Shri Harsh Vardhan Water Management INC Uttar Pradesh
Shri Harischandra Deoram Chavan BJP Maharashtra
Shri Maheshwar Hazari JD(U) Bihar Smt. Sushila Saroj SP Uttar Pradesh
Shri Haribhau Madhav Jawale BJP Maharashtra
Smt. Seema Upadhyay BSP Uttar Pradesh Smt. Usha Verma SP Uttar Pradesh Shri P.L. Punia INC Uttar Pradesh
788 Unstarred 08.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri Purnmasi Ram
Availability of Drinking Water Water Management JD(U) Bihar
798 Unstarred 08.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation
Ms. Bhavana Gawali (Patil) Construction of Toilets Health and Sanitation
SS Maharashtra
Smt. Priya Sunil Dutt Pollution INC Maharashtra
Shri Baliram Sukur Jadhav Water Management BVA Maharashtra
Shri Nishikant Dubey BJP Jharkhand Shri E.G. Sugavanam DMK Tamil Nadu
799 Unstarred 08.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Prof. Sk. Saidul Haque Review of NBA Health and Sanitation CPI(M) West Bengal
Shri Rangaswamy Dhruvanarayana Water Management INC Karnataka
Shri P. Karunakaran CPI(M) Kerala
802 Unstarred 08.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri Francisco Sardinha Sanitation Facilities Health and Sanitation
INC Goa
Smt. Jayshreeben Patel Pollution BJP Gujarat
Shri Chandrakant Raghunath Patil Water Management BJP Gujarat
803 Unstarred 08.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri Laxman Tudu
Drinking Water in Tribal Areas Water Management
BJD Odisha
Shri Yashbant Narayan Singh Laguri BJD Odisha
818 Unstarred 08.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation
Shri Kunwarjibhai Mohanbhai Bavaliya Old Toilets Health and Sanitation
INC Gujarat
Shri Magunta Sreenivasulu Reddy Water Management INC Andhra
Pradesh
840 Unstarred 08.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri P. Lingam Open Defecation Health and Sanitation
CPI Tamil Nadu
Smt. Sumitra Mahajan Pollution BJP Madhya Pradesh
Shri Prabodh Panda Water Management CPI West Bengal
Shri Rayapati Sambasiva Rao INC Andhra
Pradesh
846 Unstarred 08.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri Prem Chand Guddu
Drinking Water and Sanitation Schemes Health and Sanitation
INC Madhya Pradesh
Shri P.L. Punia Water Management INC Uttar Pradesh
Shri Jayawant Gangaram Awale INC Maharashtra
Shri Jagdish Thakor INC Gujarat
852 Unstarred 08.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri Jai Prakash Agarwal
Expenditure under Drinking Water Scheme Health and Sanitation
INC Delhi
853 Unstarred 08.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri Ram Sundar Das Nirmal Gram Puraskar Health and Sanitation JD(U) Bihar
Shri Harish Choudhary Water Management INC Rajasthan
Shri Kapil Muni Karwariya BSP Uttar Pradesh
*200 Starred 22.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri Bhartruhari Mahtab
National Rural Drinking Water Programme Health and Sanitation
BJD Odisha
Shri Sanjay Shamrao Dhotre Water Management BJP Maharashtra
2072 Unstarred 22.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Smt. Kamla Devi Patle
Water Quality Testing Laboratory
Environmental Education, NGOs and Media
BJP Chhattisgarh
2075 Unstarred 22.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation
Shri Dilip Kumar Mansukhlal Gandhi Drinking Water Disaster Management
BJP Maharashtra
2130 Unstarred 22.08.2013 Drinking Shri Ratan Singh Drinking Water Project in Water Management INC Rajasthan
Water and Sanitation
Rajasthan
2183 Unstarred 22.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri Anto Antony Special Status to States Water Management
INC Kerala
Shri Deoraj Singh Patel BSP Madhya Pradesh
2196 Unstarred 22.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri Prabhunath Singh
National Rural Drinking Water Programme Water Management
RJD Bihar
Shri Sushil Kumar Singh JD(U) Bihar
2252 Unstarred 22.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation
Shri Vilas Baburao Muttemwar
Under-Utilisation of Funds under NBA Water Management INC Maharashtra
2267 Unstarred 22.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation
Shri Sonawane Pratap Narayanrao Sanitation Facilities Health and Sanitation BJP Maharashtra
Shri Raju Shetti alias Devappa Anna Water Management SWP Maharashtra
Shri P. Kumar AIADMK Tamil Nadu
2285 Unstarred 22.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation
Smt. P. Jaya Prada Nahata
Heavy Metal in Drinking Water Health and Sanitation SP
Uttar Pradesh
Shri Neeraj Shekhar Pollution SP Uttar Pradesh Shri Yashvir Singh Water Management SP Uttar Pradesh
*265 Starred 29.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Maulana Badruddin Ajmal Water Quality Fund Health and Sanitation AIUDF
Assam
*267 Starred 29.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation
Shri Jayaprakash Korgi Hegde Total Sanitation Campaign Health and Sanitation INC Karnataka
3024 Unstarred 29.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation
Shri Surendra Singh Nagar Construction of Toilets Health and Sanitation BSP
Uttar Pradesh
3067 Unstarred 29.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Dr. (Smt.) Ratna De (Nag) Allocation of Funds Health and Sanitation AITC
West Bengal
3189 Unstarred 29.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri Ram Sundar Das Sources of Drinking Water
Freshwater and Marine Conservation JD(U) Bihar
3198 Unstarred 29.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation
Shri Harischandra Deoram Chavan Sanitation Facilities Health and Sanitation
BJP Maharashtra
Dr. Munisamy Thambidurai
AIADMK Tamil Nadu
3219 Unstarred 29.08.2013
Drinking Water and Sanitation Shri Hamdullah Sayeed
Water Quality Testing Laboratories
Environmental Education, NGOs and Media
INC Lakshadweep
DRINKING WATER QUALITY 7th March 2013 LSQ *152 SHRI KIRODI LAL Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether the infrastructure available in the country for monitoring the quality of drinking water being supplied to the rural areas is adequate; (b) if so, the details thereof and if not, the reasons therefore including the mechanism presently in place to monitor the quality of the drinking water; (c) whether the Government provides financial and technical assistance to the States including Rajasthan for testing and monitoring as to whether the quality of drinking water being provided in the rural areas is adequate and if so, the details thereof; (d) whether the Government proposes to set up one drinking water quality testing laboratory in each district in the country and if so, the details thereof including the number of such laboratories existing in the country as on date, State/UT-wise; and (e) the steps taken/being taken by the Government in this regard? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) to (e) A Statement is laid on the Table of the House. Statement referred to in the reply to Lok Sabha Starred Question No. 152 due for reply on 7/3/2013 (a) & (b) As reported by the States on the online Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) of the Ministry, as on 4/3/2013, there are 24 State level laboratories, 728 district level laboratories and 1127 sub-district/ block level laboratories in place to monitor the quality of more than 49.93 lakh drinking water sources in rural areas. In addition, as a part of initial screening of drinking water quality and building awareness among the rural people, 3.82 lakh chemical field test kits and 9.17 crore bacteriological vials have been provided so far to the Gram Panchayats for testing water quality by trained grassroots level workers. For this purpose, training has been given to 15.16 lakh grass root level workers. However, considering the need for regular testing of all sources, the increasing number of sources, rising levels of contamination and greater awareness among rural people about water quality, the Ministry has recognized the need to strengthen the infrastructure available for monitoring the quality of drinking water being supplied to the rural areas. (c) Yes Madam. Though drinking water supply is a State subject, Government of India supplements the efforts of the State Governments including Rajasthan, with technical and financial assistance for provision of safe drinking water supply in the rural areas of the country under the centrally sponsored National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP). Under NRDWP, 3% of funds allocated to the States are earmarked for Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillance (WQMS) activities on a 100% Central share basis which, inter alia, includes testing of drinking water sources at the Panchayat level by using simple field test kits, setting up of new district/sub-district water quality testing laboratories and upgrading of existing water quality testing laboratories for testing the quality of drinking water sources. As part of technical assistance, chemists from all States are imparted training in National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nagpur. In order to standardize the level of equipment, instrumentation, chemicals, glassware, manpower, space, period and parameters of sampling, a Uniform Drinking Water Quality Monitoring Protocol has been released as a useful reference document for laboratories at all levels. During 2012-13, under the NRDWP- Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillance (WQMS) component, Rs. 314.98 crore has been allocated to all States. An amount of Rs. 32.19 crore has been allocated to Rajasthan of which, Rs 7.74 crore has been released. Together with an opening balance of Rs. 10.37 crore as on 1/4/2012, the total available funds with Rajasthan during the current financial year for WQMS is Rs. 18.11 crore. State-wise availability of funds under WQMS component during 2012-13 as on 4/3/2013 is at Annex-I. (d)& (e) Under NRDWP-WQMS component, all States have been advised to set up at least one district level water quality testing laboratory and also set up sub-divisional drinking water quality testing laboratories where required using NRDWP-WQMS funds so that testing of quality of drinking water sources is done periodically. The State-wise details of the laboratories existing as on date to monitor the quality of drinking water in rural areas is at Annex-II.
ANNEXURE
Annex-I referred to in para-(c) of the Statement referred to in reply to Lok Sabha Starred question no. 152 due for reply on 7/3/2013 Annex-l Allocation and Release under Water Quality Monitoring & Surveillance component of NRDWP during 2012-13
(in Rs crore)
SI.No. Name of the State/ UT
Opening balance as on 1/4/2012
Allocation during 2012-13
Release ( upto 4/3/2013) Total available funds
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 7.29 21.46 4.34 11.63 2 BIHAR 5.14 15.96 3.47 8.61 3 CHATTISGARH 2.29 5.87 0.88 3.17 4 GOA 0.1 0.25 0.03 0.13 5 GUJARAT 3.89 15.87 6.84 10.73 6 HARYANA 3.45 5.22 a 3.45 7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 0.62 6 a 0.62 8 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 16.38 20.27 a 16.38 9 JHARKHAND 3.03 7.75 1.15 4.18 10 KARNATAKA 5.01 20.45 2.72 7.73 11 KERALA 1.44 6.74 2.19 3.63 12 MADHY A PRADESH 0.95 17.41 8.44 9.39 13 MAHARASHTRA 16.5 30.84 1.11 17.61 14 ORISSA 7.4 9.58 0 7.4 15 PUNJA8 0.65 3.7 1.35 2 16 RAJASTHAN 10.37 32.19 7.74 18.11 17 TAMIL NADU 0.09 11.88 5.94 6.03 18 UTTAR PRADESH 9.22 30.98 7.48 16.7 19 UTTARAKHAND 1.47 6.51 2.04 3.51 20 WEST BENGAL 5.64 14.44 2.14 7.78 21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 1.71 4.78 0.91 2.62 22 ASSAM 7.27 16.05 1.51 8.78 23 MANIPUR 0.3 2.12 0.86 1.16 24 MEGHALAYA 1.12 2.44 0.22 1.34 25 MIZORAM 0.53 1.39 0.69 1.22 26 NAGALAND a 2.01 1.01 1.01 27 SIKKIM 0.21 0.6 0.12 0.33 28 TRIPURA 0.88 2.1 0.27 1.15 29 ANDAMAN & NICOBAR 0 0.05 0.02 0.02 30 CHANDIGARH 0 0 0 0 31 DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI 0 0 0 0 32 DAMAN And DIU 0 0 0 0 33 DELHI 0 0 0 0 34 LAKSHADWEEP 0 0 0 0 35 PUDUCHERRY 0 0.07 0 0 Total 112.95 314.98 63.47 176.42 Annex-II referred to para- (d) & (e) of the Statement referred to in reply to Lok Sabha Starred Question No. 152 due for reply on 7/3/2013
Annex-II Number of water quality testing laboratories existing in the States/UTs as reported on online lMIS as on 4/3/2013
Number of State Number of District Number of Sub
S.No. State/ UT level Laboratories level Laboratories district/Block level laboratories 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 1 51 119 2 BIHAR 1 40 0
3 CHATTISGARH 1 23 3 4 GOA 1 0 10 S GUJARAT 1 27 15 6 HARYANA 0 21 22 7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 0 1B 3 8 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 0 37 11 9 IHARKHAND 1 24 3 10 KARNATAKA 1 42 71 11 KERALA 1 14 16 12 MADHYA PRADESH 1 51 114 13 MAHARASHTRA 0 39 428 14 ORISSA 0 32 44 15 PUNJAB 3 22 12 16 RAJASTHAN 1 32 0 17 TAMIL NADU 0 34 48 1B UTTAR PRADESH 1 75 7 19 UTTARAKHAND 0 28 0 20 WEST BENGAL 1 19 101 21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 0 17 31 22 ASSAM 1 27 32 23 MANIPUR 1 9 2 24 MEGHALAYA 1 7 1 25 MIZORAM 1 8 18 26 NAGALAND 1 11 1 27 SIKKIM 2 1 0 28 TRIPURA 1 B 13
ANDAMAN and 2 29 NICOAR 1 0 30 CHANDIGARH 0 0 0
DADRA and NAGAR 0 31 HAVELI 0 0 32 DAMAN and DIU 0 0 0 33 DELHI 0 0 0 34 LAKSHADWEEP 0 9 0 35 PUDUCHERRY 0 2 0 JAPANESE ENCEPHALITIS 7th March 2013 LSQ1624 SMT MAUSAM NOOR Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the details of the districts in country including West Bengal affected by Japanese Encephalitis (JE) and Advance Encephalitis Syndrome (AES) caused by unsafe drinking Water, State/UT-wise; (b) the measures undertaken by the Government to improve the condition; (c) the number of Stand Alone Purification System (SAPS) installed in various States including West Bengal, State/UT-wise; (d) the percentage of SAPS installed in West Bengal against the targets set; (e) the reasons for slippages, if any; and (f) the steps taken by the Government to achieve the targets set in this regard? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI)
(a) The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare have identified 60 high priority districts in the country including 10 districts in West Bengal, affected by Japanese Encephalitis (JE) and Acute Encephalitis Syndrome (AES) cases. The list of these districts is at Annex-I. (b) Government of India supplements the efforts of the State Governments with technical and financial assistance for provision of safe drinking water supply in the rural areas of the country under the centrally sponsored National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP). 5% of the NRDWP funds at the National Level are earmarked for Water Quality and allocated to those States with habitations affected by excess chemical contamination and with high priority districts affected by Japanese Encephalitis/ Acute Encephalitis Syndrome. Out of these 5% funds, an amount of Rs. 131.25 crore has been allocated to the 60 high priority JE/AES affected districts in 5 States of which Rs. 65.62 crore has been released so far. The activities funded under this provision include replacement of shallow public hand pumps with India Mark-II hand pumps, raising hand pump platforms in shallow aquifers, providing energized tubewells with public stand posts with proper disinfection, intensive sanitary survey & sealing platforms for avoiding leakages, awareness generation and solid and liquid waste management. (c) to (f) As reported by the States on the Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) till 4/3/2013, stand-alone water purification systems have been installed in 91,771 schools against a target of 1,00,000 rural schools under Jalmani programme. In West Bengal, as reported by the State, such systems have been installed in 4581 schools against the target of 6032 rural schools i.e. an achievement of 75.94%. The State/UT-wise physical achievement in installation of stand-alone water purification systems in the country, as reported by States as on 4/3/2013 is at Annex-II. The reasons for delay in achieving targets by some of the States including West Bengal, include procurement issues, selection of appropriate technology and identification of schools. These States have been advised to fully achieve their targets by the end of the current financial year 2012-13.
ANNEXURE Annex-I referred in para-(a) of the reply to Lok Sabha Unstarred question no. 1624 due for reply on 7/3/2013 Annex-I List of 60 high priority Japanese Encephalitis (JE) and Acute Encephalitis Syndrome (AES) affected districts S.N. Name of the State Name of the District 1 Assam Barpeta 2 Assam Dhemah 3 Assam Dibrugarh 4 Assam Golaghat 5 Assam Jorhat 6 Assam Lakhlmpur 7 Assam Sibsagar 8 Assam Sonitpur 9 Assam Tinsukia 10 Assam Udalguri Total = 10 11 Bihar Araria 12 Bihar Darbhanga 13 Bihar Gaya 14 Bihar Gopalganj 15 Bihar Jehanabad 16 Bihar Muzaff Arpur 17 Bihar Nalanda 18 Bihar Nawada 19 Bihar Pashchlm Champaran 20 Bihar Patna 21 Bihar Purba Champ Aran 22 Bihar Samastipur 23 Bihar Saran 24 Bihar Siwan 25 Bihar Vaishall Total = 15 26 Uttar Pradesh Azamgarh 27 Uttar Pradesh Bahraich
28 Uttar Pradesh Ballla 29 Uttar Pradesh Balrampur 30 Uttar Pradesh Basti 31 Uttar Pradesh Deoria 32 Uttar Pradesh Gonda 33 Uttar Pradesh Gorakhpur 34 Uttar Pradesh Hardoi 35 Uttar Pradesh Kanpur Dehat 36 Uttar Pradesh Kushinagar 37 Uttar Pradesh Lakhimpur Kheri 38 Uttar Pradesh Maharajganj 39 UTI AR PRADESH MAU 40 UTI AR PRADESH RAE BAREL! 41 UTI AR PRADESH SAHARANPUR 42 UTTAR PRADESH SANT KABIR NAGAR 43 UTTAR PRADESH SHRA V ASTI 44 UTI AR PRADESH SIDDHARTHNAGAR 45 UTIAR PRADESH SITAPUR Total = 20 46 TAMIL NADU KARUR 47 TAMIL NADU MADURAI 48 TAMIL NADU THANJA VUR 49 TAMIL NADU TIRUV ARUR 50 TAMIL NADU VILLUPURAM Total = 5 51 WEST BENGAL BANKURA 52 WEST BENGAL BARD HAMAN 53 WEST BENGAL BIRBHUM 54 WEST BENGAL DAKSHIN DINAJPUR 55 WEST BENGAL DARJEELING 56 WEST BENGAL HOOGHLY 57 WEST BENGAL HOWRAH 58 WEST BENGAL JALPAIGURI 59 WEST BENGAL MALDA 60 WEST BENGAL MIDNAPUR WEST "Annex-II referred to in para- (c) to (I) of the reply to the Lok Sabha Unstarred Question no. 1624 due for reply on 7/3/2013
Annex- II Achievement in installation of Stand-alone water purification systems in rural schools under Jalmani programme as on 4/3/2013 S.No. Name of the State/ UT Target Achievement 1 Andhra Pradesh 9618 3449 2 Bihar 3831 3331 3 Chhattisgarh 964 887 4 Goa 44 60 5 Gujarat 8829 10586 6 Haryana 873 604 7 Himachal Pradesh 3745 5927 8 Jammu And Kashmir 2180 380 9 Jharkhand 1253 1467 10 Karnataka 6143 10869 11 Kerala 1282 811 12 Madhya Pradesh 2734 2734 13 Maharashtra 8348 8150 14 Orissa 3460 3537 15 Punjab 2722 2765 16 Rajasthan 3443 34
17 Tamil Nadu 8500 8589 18 Uttar Pradesh 13784 10676 19 Uttarakhand 711 918 20 West Bengal 6032 4581 21 Arunachal Pradesh 264 264 22 Assam 7048 7138 23 Manipur 552 315 24 Meghalaya 919 678 25 Mizoram 983 983 26 Nagaland 496 363 27 Sikkim 440 449 28 Tripura 802 1226 TOTAL 100000 91771 CONTAMINATED DRINKING WATER 7th March 2013 LSQ1726 SHRI BHAKTA CHARAN DAS SHRI PRALHAD VENKATESH JOSHI SHRI NAVEEN JINDAL SMT PARAMJIT KAUR GULSHAN SHRI RAJIV RANJAN (LALAN) SINGH SHRI FEROZE VARUN GANDHI SMT ANNU TANDON DR ARJUN ROY SHRI JEETENDRA SINGH BUNDELA SHRI C. RAJENDRAN SHRI RAJENDRA AGRAWAL Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether fluoride, arsenic and other chemicals have been found in the drinking water in various States of the country; (b) if so, the details thereof indicating the survey conducted in this regard, State/UT-wise; (c) the details of the arrangements made for testing of contaminated drinking water indicating the time-intervals/duration of testing the drinking water; (d) the tagets set and achievements made in regard to the quality affected habitations during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise; (e) the allocation made and utilised for the purpose during the said period, State/UT-wise; and (f) the remedial steps taken by the Union Government to provide safe drinking water to all the habitations of the country? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) & (b): As reported by the State Governments on the online Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) of the Ministry, as on 1/4/2012, there were 1.04 lakh rural habitations remaining to be covered with safe drinking water supply in the country. States report the quality affected habitations that have been identified by regular testing of drinking water sources through water quality testing laboratories. State/ UT-wise number of such remaining water quality affected habitations which interalia include arsenic, fluoride and other chemical contamination as on 1/4/2012 is at Annex-I.
(c): 3% of the National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) funds allocated to the States are earmarked for Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillance (WQMS) activities on a 100% Central share basis which, inter alia, includes testing of drinking water sources at the Panchayat level by using simple field test kits, setting up of new district/sub-district water quality testing laboratories and upgrading of existing water quality testing laboratories. The State Governments have been advised to test chemical parameters in drinking water at least once in a year and for bacteriological parameters atleast twice in a year. As reported by the States on the IMIS, 24 State level laboratories, 728 district level laboratories and 1127 sub-district / block level water quality testing laboratories have been set up. The State/UT-wise details of the laboratories set up are at Annex-II. (d): The number of water quality affected habitations targeted and covered by provision of safe drinking water during the last three years and in the current year, State/UT-wise, is at Annex-III. (e) & (f): Rural water supply is a State subject. This Ministry supplements the efforts of the States by providing them with technical and financial assistance under the centrally sponsored National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) for providing safe and adequate drinking water supply facilities in rural areas of the country. A budgetary allocation of Rs.10,500crore has been made for the NRDWP in 2012-13. Up to 67 per cent of the NRDWP funds allocated to States on 50:50 Centre : State sharing basis (90:10 for North-East States and Jammu & Kashmir) can be utilized for provision of safe drinking water in rural areas of the country. Further, 5% of NRDWP funds are earmarked and allocated on 50:50 Centre : State sharing basis (90:10 for North East States and Jammu & Kashmir) to those States facing problems of chemical contamination in drinking water or with Japanese Encephalitis or Acute Encephalitis Syndrome affected high priority districts. Further up to 10 per cent of NRDWP funds allocated to States could be utilized for sustainability of drinking water sources through artificial recharge of ground water and other methods, which may also dilute the level of contamination in aquifers. Allocations made and expenditure reported by States under NRDWP during the last three years and during the current year as on 4/3/2013 is at Annex-IV. Technical assistance is provided to States through sharing information on technologies for treatment of contaminated water in Conferences, Exhibitions, meetings, Handbooks and visits of Technical officers. The Ministry has advised the States on adopting a two-pronged strategy viz., in the short-term to adopt in-situ treatment technologies for removal of specific contaminants and as a long term sustainable solution to provide safe drinking water from alternate safe surface/ groundwater sources. ANNEXURE
Annx-I Annexure referred to in para- (a) & (b) of the reply to the Lok Sabha Unstarred question no. 1726 due for reply on 7/3/2013 StatelUT -wise number of remaining water-quality affected habitations yet to be provided safe drinking water as on 01/04/2012 Contamination Wise Number Of Habitations S.No. State/ UT Total Fluoride Arsenic Iron Salinity Nitrate 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 396 332 0 0 64 0 2 BIHAR 14580 2698 1004 10877 0 1 3 CHATTI$GARH 8815 313 0 8339 163 0 4 GOA 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 GUJARAT 274 57 0 0 64 153 6 HARYANA 17 12 0 0 5 0 7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 30 2 0 22 6 0 9 JHARKHAND 412 41 1 369 0 1 10 KARNA TAKA 5875 2806 19 938 734 1378 11 KERALA 934 106 0 585 186 57 12 MADHYA PRADESH 2789 2485 0 156 148 0 13 MAHARASHTRA 1671 483 0 337 342 509 14 ORISSA 12465 398 0 11051 991 25 15 PUNJAB 33 19 0 1 13 16 RAJASTHAN 26729 7130 5 46 18924 624 17 TAMIL NADU 528 5 0 405 111 7 18 UTTAR PRADESH 882 144 9 23 705 1 19 UTTARAKHAND 17 2 0 13 0 2 20 WEST BENGAL 5448 873 2119 1955 501 0 21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 115 0 0 115 0 0 22 ASSAM 15979 80 1157 14742 0 0 23 MANIPUR 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 MEGHALAYA 97 0 0 97 0
25 MIZORAM 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 NAGALAND 130 0 0 130 0 0 27 SIKKIM 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 TRIPURA 5935 0 0 5935 C 0
29 ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR 0 0 0 0 0 0
30 CHANDIGARH 0 0 0 0 0 0
31 DADRA AND NAGAR HAVELI 0 0 0 0 0 0
32 DAMAN AND DIU 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 LAKSHADWEEP 0 0 0 0 0 0
34 PUDUCHERRY 9 0 0 8 1 0 2758
Total 104160 17986 4314 S6144 2295' Annex-II Annexure referred to in para- (c) of the reply to the Lok Sabha Unstarred question no. 1726 due for reply on 7/3/2013 Number of water quality testing laboratories set up by States/ UTs as reported as on 4/3/2013
S.No. State/ UT Number of State level Laboratories
Number of District level Laboratories
Number of Sub district/Block level laboratories
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 1 51 119 2 BIHAR 1 40 0 3 CHA'ITISGARH 1 23 3 4 GOA 1 0 10 S GUJARAT 1 27 15 6 HARYANA 0 21 22 7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 0 18 3 8 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 0 37 11 S JHARKHAND 1 24 3 10 KARNATAKA 1 42 71 11 KERALA 1 14 16 12 MADHYA PRADESH 1 51 114 13 MAHARASHTRA 0 39 428 14 ORISSA 0 32 44 15 PUNJAB 3 22 12 16 RAJASTHAN 1 32 0 17 TAMIL NADU 0 34 48 18 U'ITAR PRADESH 1 75 7 19 U'ITARAKHAND 0 28 0 20 WEST BENGAL 1 19 101 21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 0 17 31 22 ASSAM 1 27 32 23 MANIPUR 1 9 2 24 MEGHALAYA 1 7 1 25 MIZORAM 1 8 18 26 NAGALAND 1 11 1 27 SIKKIM 2 1 0 28 TRIPURA 1 8 13 ANDAMAN and 29 NICOOAR 1 0 2 30 CHANDIGARH 0 0 0 DADRA and NAGAR 31 HAVEL! 0 0 0 32 DAMAN and DIU 0 0 0 33 DELHI 0 0 0
34 LAKSHADWEEP 0 9 0 35 PUDUCHERRY 0 2 0 Total 24 728 1127 Annexure-III Annexure referred to iJpara-(d) of the reply to the Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 1726 due for reply on 7/3/2013 Coverage of water quality affected habitations during the last three years and current year, as reported by States/UTs as on 4/3/2013 Unit: Number of habitation Annex-III PHYSICAL TARGET AND COVERAGE OF QUALITY AFFECTED HABITATIONS 2009-10 to 2012-:13 UNDER NRDWP
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Sl.No. State and UTs Target Coverage % Target Coverage % Target Coverage % Target Coverage % 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 126 217 100 810 13 16.54 201 189 94.03 170 26 15.29 2 BIHAR 7748 10036 100 7909 5975 75.55 6375 3949 61.94 6100 2040 33.4 3 CHATTJSGARH 3551 1246 35.09 3426 1752 51.14 3283 1540 46.91 4589 1060 23.1 4 GOA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 GUIARAT 390 379 97.18 391 398 100 405 322 79.51 225 165 73.33 6 HARYANA 88 91 100 36 14 38.89 23 20 86.96 10 4 40
7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 13 12 92.31 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 1 1 100 310 0 0 20 1 5 25 19 76
9 IHARKHAND 132 221 100 432 1074 100 804 415 51.62 389 57 14.65 10 KARNATAKA 2638 2344 8.86 4002 1453 36.31 2000 1495 74.75 2218 1070 48.24 11 KERALA 152 101 66.45 47 49 100 157 55 35.03 61 26 42.62 12 MADHYA PRADESH 502 620 100 700 393 56.14 575 499 86.78 835 530 63.47 13 MAHARASHTRA 2086 1009 48.37 4124- 1866 45.25 1272 1177 92.53 774 346 44-.7 14 ORISSA 3452 2257 65.38 1721 1581 91.86 1609 1544 95.96 2407 1632 67.8 15 PUNJAB 466 273 58.58 392 64 16.33 22 10 45.46 33 4 12.12 16 RAJASTHAN 1210 3109 100 3977 2708 68.09 3801 4301 100 1500 732 48.8 17 TAMIL NADU 0 1 0 1009 1009 100 77 77 100 64 56 87.5 18 UTTAR PRADESH 1558 1562 100 2142 1831 85.48 800 63 79.25 850 306 36 19 UTTARAKI-IAND 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 20 WEST BENGAL 2202 1789 81.24 530 2788 52.56 4160 1565 37.62 1623 725 44.67
21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 34 38 100 264 215 81.44- 0 0 0 0 0 0
22 ASSAM 6068 6061 88.25 3515 2906 82.67 3158 3453 100 3537 1834- 51.85 23 MANIPUR 0 0 0 25 1 4 4 2 50 0 0 0 24 MEGHALAYA 8 6 75 102 17 16.67 12 4 33.33 40 1 2.5 25 MIZORAM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 NAGALAND 20 19 95 105 4 3.81 50 36 72 30 22 73.33 27 SIKKIM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 TRIPURA 1346 733 54.46 309 871 100 982 833 84.83 1034 621 60.06 29 A & N Islands 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 CHANDIGARII 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 D&N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 DAMAN and DIU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 DELHI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 LAKSHADWEEP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 PUDUCHERRY 4 4 100 0 4 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 Total 34-595 32129 92.87 41094- 27107 65.96 29790 22121 74-.26 26521 1.1278 42.52 'As reported as on 4.3.2013
Annex-IV Annexure referred to in para-(e) of the reply to the Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 1726 due for reply on 7/3/2013 Year-wise allocation under NRDWP during the last three years and current year and expenditure reported by States/UTs as on 4/3/20 13 OPENING BALANCE. ALLOCATION. RELEASE AND EXPENDITURE UNDER NRDWP DURING LAST THREE YEARS AND CURRENT YEAR
Rs In Crores 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Sl. No
States/UT O.B.
Allocaion
Released
Expenditure O.B. Alloca
ion Released
Expenditure O.B. Alloca
ion Released
Expenditure O.B. Alloca
ion Released
Expenditure
1 ANDHRA PR 4.05 437.09 537.3
7 394.45 149.79 491.02 558.7. 42338 2852 546.32 462.4
1 446.37 301.3 563.39 240.1
6 429.12
2 BIHAR 668.9 372.21 186.1
1 279_36 57B.l 341.46 110.7
3 425.91 32292 374.98 330.0
2 3613 285.65 449.36 206.8
6 274.74
3 CHHATIISGARH
2759 116,01 128.2
2 104.06 56.36 130.27 12201 97.71 82..1
3 143.57 139.06 141.12 80.8
2 145.01 645 103.68
4 GOA 0 S64 3.32 0.5 3.08 5.34 0 1.16 1.92 5' 5.01 1.16 5.91 6.07 0.03 0
5 GUJARAT 92.11 482.75 482.7
5 511.83 70.1 542.67 609.1 527.29 180.09 478.89 571.0
5 467.7 321.59 537.1 381.6
2 571.21
6 HARY ANA 0 207.89 20689 132.35 75.62 233.69 276.9 201.57 150.
95 210.51 23774 344.71 43.98 245.78 230.9
5 205.67
7 HJMACHAI.,PR 8.31 138.52 182.8
5 160.03 31.6 133.71 194.31 165.59 60.3
8 131.41 14603 145.97 61.94 152.04 25.93 86.03
8 J &K 239.6
447.?4-
402.51 383.49 258.
66 449.22 468.91 506.5Z 233.
69 436.21 420.42 507.07 147.
04 510.76 233.82- 28327
9 JHARKHAND
64.94 149.29 111.3
4 86.04 89.82 165.93 129.9
5 128.19 91.63 162.52 148.1
7 169.84 74.31 189.51 85.66 133.56
10
KARNATAKA
32.05 573.67 627.8
6 473.71 191.39
644.92- 703.8 573.93 328.
21 687.11 667.78 782.85 213.
14 681.57 587.24 464.78
11 KERAtA 1.36 152.77 151.8
9 150.56 4.15 144.28 159.83 137.91 27.6
4 144.43 113.39 126.98 16.0
8 168.89 82.05 96.57
12
MADHYA PR
107.4 367.66 37966 354.3 5895 399.04 388.3
3 324.94 122.34 371.91 292.7
8 319.3 35.82 438.41 210.2
8 241.49
13
MAHARASHTRA
204.2 65243 647.8
1 625.59 232.44 133.27 718.4
2 71379 237.06 128.35 718.3
5 642.2 320.1 783.66 414.4
2 342..96
14 ORI5SA 25.8
5 187.13 226.66 198.87 61.6
2 204.88 294.76 211.11 148.
71 206.55 171.05 239.6 84.3
4 238.58 10713 166.86
15 PUNJAB 191
8 8117 88.81 11015 4.02 82.21 106.59 106.93 1.68 86.02 123.4
4 12232 3 90.33 83.49 70.32
1 RAJASTHA ,.. 1036.4 1012. 671.29 348. 1165.4 1099. 852.62 595. 1083.5 11537 1429.16 319. 1340.4 661.4 660.85
6 N 6 16 43 4 48 09 7 6 68 4 2 17
TAMJLNADU
57.2.4 320.43 317.9
5 370.44 5.93 316.<J1
393.53 303.41 96.0
5 330.04 429.55 267.6 240.
27 294.33 144.6 400.81
18 UTIARPR 173.
7 959.12 956.36 967.38 189.
76 899.12 848.68 933.28 105.
18 843.3 802.32 754.2 15<J
.9 678.77 396.62 298.17
19
UTIARAKHAND
4277 126.16 124.9 67.24 103.
92 13939 136.41 55.44 1848
9 136.54 75.57 118.65 141.74 158.4 3.78 91.96
20
WEST BENGAL 692 372.29 394.3 87.76 375.
75 418.03 499.19 363.31 444.
85 343.6 342.51 521.41 265.
96 46227 143.96 377.17
21
ARUNACHAL PR
27.47 '" 178.2 193.8 12.0
2 123.35 19999 116.46 36.79 120.56 184.8
3 214.31 10.09 143.51 78.92 97.96
22 ASSAM ..5 301.6 323.5 269.34 59.3
2 449_64
487.413 480.55 69.9
4 435.58 522.44 468.61 127.
51 510.96 226.72 466.22
23 MANIPUR 16.1 61.6 38.57 30.17 25.2
2 54.61 5277 69.27 8.12 53.39 47.6 41.03 9.29 63.1Z 27.33 15.83
24
MEGHALAYA 0.62 70.4 79.4 68.57 11.5
6 63.48 84.88 70.47 26.11 61.67 95.89 85.44 36.8
3 73.35 33.61 58.33
25 MIZORAM 17.4
3 50.4 55.26 51.11 Z!.38 46 61.58 58.02 24.9
4 39.67 38.83 54.03 974 41.66 1926 23.47
26 NAGALAND 29.6
1 52 47.06 71.58 5.1 19.51 77.52 80.63 199 81.68 .eO.91 81.82 11 60.42 28.4 24.44
27 SIKKIM 9.92 2.1.6 20.6 28.94 0.59 26.24 232 19.27 4.78 28.1 69.19 24.49 49.7
1 18.03 8.38 1428
28 TRJPURA 18.9
2 62.4 0.774 77.35 19.18 57.17 74.66 67.2 27.5
3 56.2 83.86 108.39 4.01 64.28 28.9 51-1
29
A&N !SLANDS 0 0 0 0 0 1.01 0 0 0 0 0 1.15 0.58 0
30
CHAND!GARH 0 0.' 0 0 0 0 1.75 0 0
31
D&N HAVEL1 0 0 0 0 0 9-Jan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
32
DAMAN & DIU 0 0 0 0 0 0.61 0 0 0 " 0 0 0 0
33 DELH! 0 0 0 0 0 4.31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
34
l.AKSHADWEEP 0 0 0 0 0 0.24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
35
PONDICHERRY 0 0 0 0 0 1.54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 1968
7986.43
7969.72 ,,920.26 3043
.9 8550 8941.81 8078.18 3901
.6 8330 8474.02 9079.65 3376
.9 9313.5 4816.52 6050.85
SANITATION FACILITIES 7th March 2013 LSQ1751 SHRI SONAWANE PRATAP NARAYANRAO SHRI WAKCHAURE BHAUSAHEB RAJARAM Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether any survey regarding the need of sanitation in rural areas has been conducted; (b) if so, the details thereof, State/UT wise; (c) the total estimated funds required to provide sanitation facilities in the country especially in backward areas, State/UT-wise; (d) the details of the Central assistance sought by various State Governments and Central assistance provided by the Union Government for sanitation facilities during each of the last three years and the current year State/UT-wise; (e) whether the Government proposes to rope in private players under Public, Private Partnership for sanitation activities; (f) if so, the action plans of the Government in this regard; and (g) the funds allocated/earmarked for the said purpose in 12th Five Year Plan including the tribal areas of the country including Maharashtra? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a)&(b): Yes sir, survey has been conducted by census on number of rural household with and without toilet facilities, depicting the need of sanitation in rural areas. As per census 2011, State/UT-wise details on sanitation status/coverage in rural areas is at Annexure-1. (c): According to projects sanctioned from time to time under Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC) / Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA), the State-wise/UT-wise funds sanctioned, released and expenditure reported up to January, 2013 to provide sanitation facilities in rural areas including backward areas is at Annexure – 2. However, in view of the change in NBA guidelines, making the benefits under NBA available to identified APL categories also, the increase in the incentive for Individual Households Latrines (IHHLs) and results of the Census 2011, the States have been asked to submit revised projects on the basis of a fresh baseline survey for sanction by the Government of India. (d): The TSC/NBA is a demand driven programme. The details of the Central assistance provided to various State Governments for sanitation facilities during each of the last three years and the current year State/UT-wise is at Annexure-3. (e)&(f): As per NBA Guidelines, corporate houses are encouraged to participate in the implementation of Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) as an essential part of the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) by taking up the issues of sanitation through IEC, HRD or through direct targeted interventions. (g): Total allocation for Rural Sanitation is Rs. 34377 crore for 12th Five Year Plan. Out of this allocation, Rs. 3437 crore is earmarked for Tribal Sub Plan (TSP) for the tribal areas of the country including Maharashtra.
Annexure-1 Statement referred in part (a) and (b) of the reply to Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No. 1751 due for reply on 07.03.2013. State/UT wise Total rural households with and without toilets as per Census2011
S.N. State Total households Households with Toilet within premises
Households Access to Public Latrine
Households without access to toilets
1 A & N Islands 59030 35540 517 22973 2 Andhra Pradesh 14246309 4585620 383046 9277643
3 Arunachal Pradesh 195723 103139 5968 86616 4 Assam 5374553 3201625 105929 2066999 5 Bihar 16926958 2978607 171411 13776940 6 Chandigarh 6785 5970 429 386 7 Chhattisgarh 4384112 636991 13853 3733268 8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 35408 9389 979 25040 9 Daman & Diu 12750 6550 1840 4360 10 Goa 124674 88423 2094 34157 11 Gujarat 6765403 2235623 80616 4449164 12 Haryana 2966053 1663159 48691 1254203 13 Himachal Pradesh 1310538 872545 11427 426566 14 Jammu & Kashmir 1497920 578924 45904 873092 15 Jharkhand 4685965 357289 32864 4295812 16 Karnataka 7864196 2234534 272968 5356694 17 Kerala 4095674 3818327 48244 229103 18 Lakshadweep 2523 2474 7 42 19 Madhya Pradesh 11122365 1459201 50926 9612238 20 Maharashtra 13016652 4946854 807153 7262645 21 Manipur 335752 288713 5831 41208 22 Meghalaya 422197 227487 12926 181784 23 Mizoram 104874 88698 2645 13531 24 Nagaland 284911 197223 24125 63563 25 NCT of Delhi 79115 60355 8076 10684 26 Odisha 8144012 1146552 101308 6896152 27 Puducherry 95133 37130 1318 56685 28 Punjab 3315632 2333985 49779 931868 29 Rajasthan 9490363 1864447 46062 7579854 30 Sikkim 92370 77694 946 13730 31 Tamil Nadu 9563899 2220793 335708 7007398 32 Tripura 607779 495053 19082 93644 33 Uttar Pradesh 25475071 5545881 279272 19649918 34 Uttarakhand 1404845 759392 12743 632710 35 West Bengal 13717186 6411152 269205 7036829 INDIA 167826730 51575339 3253892 112997499
Annexure-2 Statement referred in part (c) of the reply to Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No. 1751 due for reply on 07.03.2013. State/UT wise Project sanctioned under TSC/NBA
Rs. in lakh S.N. States/UTs Centre share State share Beneficiary share Total 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 114766.51 43841.36 19579.8 178187.67 2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 4662.35 1562.98 475.61 6700.94 3 ASSAM 65248.07 20582.96 6983.77 92814.8 4 BIHAR 197840.73 71151.11 24388.96 293380.8 5 CHHATTISGARH 45596.64 16475.61 5805.56 67877.81 6 D & N HAVELI 80.69 0 10.31 91 7 GOA 634.96 292.25 132.22 1059.43 8 GUJARAT 43924.9 17352.98 8954.08 70231.96 9 HARYANA 13922.67 5687 3478.17 23087.84 10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 13118.4 4997.33 1516.82 19632.55 11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 28374.07 9628.36 2596.31 40598.74 12 JHARKHAND 60485.48 22185.77 8057.18 90728.43 13 KARNATAKA 70077.23 26898.26 11499.19 108474.68 14 KERALA 11873.91 5544.08 4771.93 22189.92 15 MADHYA PRADESH 113086.85 41987.69 15214.45 170288.99 16 MAHARASHTRA 97771.77 36414.52 14782.75 148969.04 17 MANIPUR 7908.73 2579.5 785.8 11274.03
18 MEGHALAYA 9562.87 3411.07 1035.05 14008.99 19 MIZORAM 4331.58 1521.5 449.06 6302.14 20 NAGALAND 5607.04 1759.75 590.79 7957.58 21 ORISSA 104509.1 37841.95 13853.78 156204.83 22 PUDUCHERRY 481.72 0 90.84 572.56 23 PUNJAB 15139.89 6532.4 2462.18 24134.47 24 RAJASTHAN 69096.73 25759.93 7386.51 102243.17 25 SIKKIM 1338.56 440.74 274.52 2053.82 26 TAMIL NADU 69366.01 28683.56 16317.44 114367.01 27 TRIPURA 6120.24 2400.5 1317.78 9838.52 28 UTTAR PRADESH 192171.8 71925.16 30629.04 294726 29 UTTARAKHAND 9993.12 3641.26 1456.69 15091.07 30 WEST BENGAL 111799.51 43820.36 18528.07 174147.94 Total 1488892.1 554919.94 223424.66 2267236.7
Annexure-3 Statement referred in part (d) of the reply to Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No. 1751 due for reply on 07.03.2013. State-wise fund released by GoI during last three years and current year
Rs. in lakh
S.N. State/UT 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13(Upto Jan, 2013)
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 11078.44 14218.46 9657.28 15022.69 2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 404.97 119.26 204.88 227.15 3 ASSAM 6729.84 9437.36 12251.18 2772.21 4 BIHAR 9046.72 11259.76 17219.09 39814.56 5 CHHATTISGARH 5018.42 5479.58 2702.42 0 6 D & N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 7 GOA 0 0 0 0 8 GUJARAT 3036.91 4692.36 4308.28 3949.42 9 HARYANA 718.15 2361.49 335.27 0 10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 1017.74 2939.78 469.57 1666.96 11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 332.9 2792.51 967.95 3511.01 12 JHARKHAND 3941.66 5466.98 7264.92 4193.31 13 KARNATAKA 5571 4458.66 8709.28 8352.77 14 KERALA 975.45 2286.34 158.89 0 15 MADHYA PRADESH 9987.48 14402.6 15076 25823.23 16 MAHARASHTRA 9894.05 12911.7 5799.94 11872.83 17 MANIPUR 1177.54 80.3 1087.87 912.63 18 MEGHALAYA 1378.78 3105.23 1115.72 792 19 MIZORAM 412.98 653.4 31.38 0 20 NAGALAND 1059.27 1229.45 174.06 396.37 21 ORISSA 5031.55 6836.73 11171.7 0 22 PUDUCHERRY 0 0 0 0 23 PUNJAB 116.02 1116.39 283.18 0 24 RAJASTHAN 4352.64 5670.74 5424.41 6885.49 25 SIKKIM 0 112.86 0 69.87 26 TAMIL NADU 6166.18 7794.35 7662.06 6239.19 27 TRIPURA 836.66 925.14 133.92 124.74 28 UTTAR PRADESH 11579.77 22594 16920.72 25776.25 29 UTTARAKHAND 773.98 1707.61 804.76 2541.96 30 WEST BENGAL 3246.26 8327.5 14124.34 15319.32 Total :- 103885.36 152980.54 144059.07 176263.96 DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION SCHEMES 07 April 2013
LSQ 1756 DR. BALI RAM Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the mode of implementation ofNational Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) and Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan(NBA) being run by the Government; (b) the medium of providing benefitunder the said schemes by the Government to the people residing in rural areas of the country, Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Delhi including the amount of funds sanctioned/released and spent during eachof the last three years and the current year,State/UT- wise; and (c) the number of people benefitedtherefrom, State/UT-wise? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRIBHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a)&(b): Under the National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) , the Government of India supplements the efforts of the States by providing them with technical and financial assistance for providing safe and adequate drinking water supply to the rural areas of the country. The mode of implementation of the NRDWP is through State Government Departments/ Boards incharge of rural drinking water supply. Under the NRDWP, the State Governments are vested with the powers to plan, approve and execute drinking water supply schemes. The State Governments, in consultation with the Ministry, prepare Annual Action Plans to implement rural water supply schemes and activities under the programme, to cover partially covered and quality affected habitations with safe and adequate drinking water supply. Funds are released io the State Water and Sanitation Missions which further release to State/ district level implementing agencies. The amount of funds allocated, released and spent State/UT wise under the NRDWP during the last three years and the current year is at Annexure I. As regard Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan(NBA), it is implemented by taking district as project. There is provision of an implementation mechanism of State Water and Sanitation Mission and District Water and Sanitation Mission. The funds under NBA are released to the State Water and Sanitation Missions of the respective states. States releases funds to Zilla Panchayat/District Water and Sanitation Mission (DWSM). Zilla Panchayat/District Water and Sanitation Mission (DWSM) release funds to Gram Panchayat / Village Water and Sanitation Committee (VWSC). Gram Panchayat/Village Water and Sanitation Committee (VWSC) release funds to eligible Below Poverty Line (BPL) and Above Poverty Line (APL) households after construction and usage of Individual household latrines. State-wise funds released and spent during the last three years and current year is at Annexure-II. (c): The State/UT-wise number of people benefitted from the schemes under the NRDWP in the last three years and the current year is at Annexure III. State/UT-wise number of people benefited under NBA during last three years and current year is at Annexure-IV. Statement referred to part (a)& (b) of reply to Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No.1756 due for answer on 07.03.2013 Annexure I OPENING BALANCE, ALLOCATION, RELEASE AND EXPENDITURE UNDER NRDWP DURING LAST THREE YEARS AND CURRENT YEAR ( Rs in Crore)
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Sl. No.
State/UT
O.B.
Alloc.
Release
Exp. O.B. Allo
c. Rel. Expdn. O.B. Allo
c Rel. Expdn.
O.B.
Alloc. Rel. Exp
dn
1 ANDHRA PR
4.05
437.09
537.37
394.45
149.79
491.02
558.74
423.38
285.2
546.32
462.47
446.37
301.3
563.39
356.42
429.12
2 ARUNACHAL PR
27.47 180 178
.2 193.8
12.02
123.35
199.99
176.46
36.79
120.56
184.83
214.31
10.09
143.51
206.86
274.74
3 ASSAM 4.85 301.6
323.5
269.34
59.32
449.64
487.48
480.55
69.94
435.58
522.44
468.61
127,51
510.96
79.91
103.68
4 BIHAR 668.94
372.21
186.11
279.36
578.1
341.46
170.73
425.91
322.92
374.98
330.02
367.3
285.65
449.36 0.03 0
5 CHHATTISGARH
27.59
116.01
128.22
104.06
56.36
130.27
122.01
97.77
82.13
143.57
139.06
141.12
80.82
145.01
511.54
571.21
6 GOA 0 5.64 3.32 0.5 3.08 5.34 0 1.16 1.92 5.2 5.0
1 1.16
5.91 6.07 230
.95 205.67
7 GUJARAT 92.11
482.75
482.75
511.83 70.1 542.
67 609.1
527.29
180.09
478.89
571.05
467.7
327.59
537.1
72,06
86.03
8 HARYANA 0 207.
89 206.89
132.35
75.62
233.69
276.9
201.57
150.95
210.51
237.74
344.71
43.98
245.78
466.5
283.27
9 HIMACHAL PR 8.31 138.
52 182.85
160.03 31.6 133.
71 194.37
165.S9
60.38
131.47
146.03
145.97
61.94
152.04
150.29
133.56
10 J&K 239.
56
__447^74 ̂
402.51
383.49
258.66
449.22
468.91
506.52
233.69
436.21
420.42
507.07
147.04
510.76
601.44
464.5
11
JHARKHAND
64.94
149.29
111.34
86.04
89.82
165.93
129.95
128.19
91.63
162.52
148.17
169.84
74.31
189.51
112.95
96.57
12
KARNATAKA
32.05
573.67
627.86
473.71
191.39
644.92
703.8
573.93
328.21
687.11
667.78
782.85
213.14
681.57
387.27
241.49
13 KERALA 1.36 152,
77 151.89
150.56 4.15 144
.28 159.83
137.97
27.84
144.43
113.39
126.98
16.08
168.89
490.99
342.96
14
MADHYA PR
107.42
367.66
379.66
354.3
58.95
399.04
388.33
324.94
122.34
371.97
292.78
379.3
35.82
438.41
120.44
147.86
15
MAHARASHTRA
204.24
652.43
647.81
625.59
232.44
733.27
718.42
713.79
237:06j
728.35J
718.35
642.2
320.1
783.66
83.49
70.32
_16J
MANIPUR
16.7 61.6 38.
57 30.17
25.22
54.61
52.77
69.27 53.
39 47.6
47.03
9.29
63.72
1162.46
66O.8S
17
MEGHALAYA
0.62 70.4 79.
4 68.57
11.56
63.48
84.88
70.47
26.11
61.67
95.89
85.44
36.83
73.35 400.
81 18
MIZORAM
17.43 50.4 55.
26 51.11
21.38 46 61.
58 58.02
24.94
39.67
38.83
54.03
9.74
41.66
741.2
298.17
19
NAGALAND
29.61 52 47.
06 71.58 5.1 79,
51 77.52
80.63 1.99 81.
68 80.91
81.82 1.1 60.
42 3.78
91.96
20 OR1SSA 25.8
5 187.13
226.66
198.87
61.62
204.88
294.76
211.11
148.71
206.55 239
.6 84.34
238.58
173.96
377.17
21 PUNJAB 19.
18 81.17
88.81
110.15 4.02 82.
21 106.59
108.93 1.68 88.
02 123.44
122.32 3 90.
33 143.56
97.96
22
RAIASTHAN
3.88
1036.46
1012.16
671.29
348.43
1165.44
1099.48
852.82
595.09
1083.57
1153.76
1429.18
319.68
1340.44
460 466.22
23 SIKK1M 9.9
2 21.6 20.6
28.94 0.59 26.
24 23.2
19.27
4.78
28.1
69.19
24.49
49.71
18.03
27.33
15.83
24
TAM1LNADU
57.24
320.43
317.95
370.44 5.93 316
.91 393.53
303.41
96.05
330.04
429.55
287.6
240.27
294.33 67 58.3
3
25
TRIPURA
18.92 62.4 77.
4 77.35
19.18
57.17
74.66
67.2
27.53
56.2
83.86
108.39
4.01
64.28
20.83
23.47
26
UTTAR PR
173.71
959.12
956.36
967.38
189.78
899.12
848.68
933.28
105.18
843.3
802.32
754.2
159.9
878.77
57.69
24.44
27
UTTARAKHAND
42.77
126.16
124.9
67.24
103.92
139.39
136.41
55.44
184.89
136.54
75.57
118.65
141.74
158.4
8.38
14.28
28
WEST BENGAL
69.2
372.29
394.3
87.76
375.75
418.03
499.19
363.31
444.85
343.6
342.51
521.41
265.96
462.27
59.28 S1.1
2 A&N 0 0 0 0 0 1.01 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 0.5 0
9 ISLANDS 5 8 30
D&N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 0 1.09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
31
DAMAN & DIU 0 0 0 0 o.oo 0.61 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
32 DELHI 0 0 0 0 0 4.31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
33
LAKSHADWEEP 0 0 0 0 o.oo 0.24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
34
P0ND1 CHERRY 0 0 0 0 o.oo 1.54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3S
CHANDIGARH 0 0.4 0 0 0 0 1.7
5 0 0
Total 1967.92
7986.43
7989.72
6920.26
3043.88
8550
8941.81
8078.18
3901.61
8330
8474.02
9079.65
3376.85
9313.5
7070.83
6031.57
As reported on the IMIS as on 04.03.2013 Annexure-ll Statement referred to in part (a)&(b) of reply to Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 1756 due for reply on 07.03.2013 Details of Fund released and expenditure incurred under NBA during last three years and current year
Rs. in lakh Sl.No. State 2009-10 2010-11
2011-12 2011-12 2012-(UptoJan,2013)
Rel Exp Rel Exp
Rel Exp Rel Exp
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 11078.44 3915.05 14218.46 7177.9 9657.28 9151.88 15022.69 5331.67
2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 404.97 659.28 119.26 610.28 204.88 511.09 227.15 94.69
3 ASSAM 6729.84 9436.95 9437.36 6712.08 12251.18 12227.67 2772.21 7579.77 4 BIHAR 9046.72 9014.63 11259.76 12421.48 17219.09 16761.44 39814.56 15929.55
5 CHHATTISGARH 5018.42 6437.99 5479.58 2530.57 2702.42 3286.35 0 1323.32
6 D & N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 GOA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S GUJARAT 3036.91 5154.34 4692.36 3332.98 4308.28 3525.46 3949.42 2782.98 9 HARYANA 718.15 1220.09 2361.49 1410.41 335.27 1542.35 0 540.6
10 H1MACHAL PRADESH 1017.74 1312.38 2939.78 2130.2 469.57 1274.65 1666.96 1226.53
11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 332.9 1383.15 2792.51 1101.93 967.95 2463.42 3511.01 1863.19
12 JHARKHAND 3941.66 3871.91 5466.98 3653.66 7264.92 2334.84 4193.31 1288.78 13 KARNATAKA 5571 4816.9 4458.66 6240.93 8709.28 4115.18 8352.77 5029.31 14 KERALA 975.45 1346.2 2286.34 808.52 158,89 987.89 0 823.61
15 MADHYA PRADESH 9987.48 12732.13 14402.6 12826.57 15076 16700.46 25823.23 10097.76
16 MAHARASHTRA 9894.05 11741.67 12911.7 7263.49 5799.94 8391.45 11872.83 2562.4
17 MANIPUR 1177.54 409.58 80.3 861 1087.87 701.18 912.63 1331.61 18 MEGHALAYA 1378.78 985.46 3105.23 1437.34 1115.72 3290.85 792 529.99 19 MIZORAM 412.98 419.27 653.4 272.81 31.38 691.6 0 159.82 20 NAGALAND 1059.27 971.6 1229.45 264.95 174.06 1371.36 396.37 388.5 21 ORISSA 5031.55 5258.97 6836.73 4928.22 11171.7 4652.38 0 2958.99 22 PUDUCHERRY 0 5.19 0 2.91 0 0 0 0
23 PUNJAB 116.02 326.41 1116.39 420.64 283.18 108.36 0 387.74 24 RAJASTHAN 4352.64 3217.59 5670.74 3757.52 5424.41 3136.6 6885.49 6478.44 25 S1KKIM 0 258.95 112.86 0 0 0 69.87 0 26 TAMIL NADU 6166.18 5406.86 7794.35 5213.1.4 7662.06 10710.19 6239.19 3416.64 27 TRIPURA 836.66 535.74 925.14 574.08 133.92 752.89 124.74 267.43
28 UTTAR PRADESH 11579.77 33657.29 22594 2273891 16920.72 12056.46 25776.25 15538.03
29 UTTARAKHAND 773.98 1102.22 1707.61 1159.57 804.76 1312.67 2541.96 1051.3
30 WEST BENGAL 3246.26 7809.32 8327.5 7654.57 14124.34 11514.02 15319.32 14173.97
Total :- 103885.36 133407.13 152980.5
4 117506.7 144059.07
133572.68
176263.96
103156.62
Annexure III Statement referred to In part (c) of LokSabha UnsUrred Question No 1756 due for answer on 07.03.2013 Coverage of Habitations and Population under NRDWP from 2009-10 to 2012 -13 (Population in Lakh) 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 * SI State/ UT Habitation
s Covered Population Covered
Habitations Covered
Population Covered
Habitations Covered
Population Covered
Habitations Covered
Population Covered
1 ANDHRA PRADESH
5374 79.61 6971 108.72 6183 . 98.54 5033 73.59
2 BIHAR 26622 348.09 14221 162.91 11243 125.36 6984 72.1 3 CHATTISGARH 12002 54.22 7847 28.52 7977 30.67 5379 25 4 GOA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 GU|ARAT 1441 13.17 1079 13.17 1165 14.03 1465 20.7 6 HARYANA 885 24.02 752 22.43 859 27.96 475 15.37 7 HIMACHAL
PRADESH 5204 6.63 5094 5.73 2558 2.76 2059 2.46
8 JAMMU AND KASHMIR
424 4.76 903 8.11 536 4.73 651 6.45
9 JHARKHAND 14605 55.53 11399 50.32 17425 75.26 SOU 21.65 10 KARNATAKA 11625 132.71 6130 83.24 8757 101.3 7128 97.37 11 KERALA 241 5.23 405 8.86 419 9.32 644 14.48 12 MADHYA
PRADESH 10781 81.93 13937 95.35 15644 100.64 11617 77.15
13 MAHARASHTRA
7465 60.52 8987 87.56 6364 59.85 2439 25.58
14 ORiSSA 9525 42.86 7525 31.8 6782 28.89 13014 58.22 15 PUNJAB 1874 23.02 1658 18.12 643 7.22 317 3.83 16 RAJASTHAN 10388 91.34 7254 64.13 7885 48.72 2011 13.26 17 TAMIL NADU 8206 27.02 7039 36.83 6000 24.36 6066 25.23 18 UTTARPRADES
H 1874 21.75 1879 17.83 23134 135 2537 37.59
19 UTTARAKHAND
1200 1.72 1324 1.56 1102 1.34 557 0.71
ZO
WEST BENGAL 4806 58.91 5967 62.6 4619 47.55 3059 38.57
21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH
567 1.22 601 1.62 415 0.89 138 0.22
22 ASSAM 12004 41.3 6467 22.77 6601 22.17 4038 12.37 23 MANIPUR 158 1.59 227 2.58 234 2.46 143 1.68 24 MEGHALAYA 407 1.18 380 1.13 510 1.23 154 0.44 25 MIZ0RAM 124 0.84 121 0.61 122 0.78 5 0.04 26 NAGALAND 84 1.2 128 1.72 116 1.5 80 1.55 27 SIKK1M 110 0.23 100 0.21 50 0.1 41 0.09 28 TRIPURA 843 3.59 976 3.81 1024 4.17 788 3.16
29 ANDAMAN and NICOBAR
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
30 CHANDIGARH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 DADRA and
NAGAR HAVELI
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
32 DAMAN and DIU
0 0 0 0 0 0,00 0 0
33 DELHI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 LAKSHADWEEP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 PUDUCHERRY 40 0.76 12 0.14 0 0 0 0 Total 148879 1184.96 119383 942.37 138367 976.8 81833 648.85 • As on 04.03.2013
Annexure-IV Statement referred to in part (c) of reply to Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 1756 due for reply on 07.03.2013 State/UT-wise number of Individual household latrines (IHHLs) constructed for BPLs during last three years and current year
No. States 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13(upto Jan,2013)
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 238305 656048 5L5650 243683 2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 13412 14346 23659 2872 3 ASSAM 350830 414742 390671 153867 4 BIHAR 472722 545770 646052 473470 5 CHHATTISGARH 257149 149902 48320 25378 6 D & N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 7 GOA 0 800 0 0 8 GUJARAT 283359 168636 93921 28872 9 HARYANA 31909 52877 28727 8005 10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 57302 57848 4528 552 11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 48672 30038 60639 27560 12 JHARKHAND 270839 264958 41458 25860 13 KARNATAKA 485425 435097 191070 140113 14 KERALA 56723 20047 2188 4766 15 MADHYA PRADESH 584526 621743 472521 233027 16 MAHARASHTRA 351898 265218 253423 67004 17 MANIPUR 7565 36545 44671 18890 18 MEGHALAYA 36620 48249 41969 5537 19 MIZORAM 3574 1494 16236 3321 20 NAGALAND 25993 13266 29370 18630 21 ORISSA 285318 396500 222420 81805 22 PUDUCHERRY 208 77 0 0 23 PUNJAB 37397 71405 9343 43101 24 RAJASTHAN 153642 189885 201396 58040 25 SIKKIM 0 0 0 0 26 TAMIL NADU 281848 290606 258521 153910 27 TRIPURA 16390 10431 11383 4226 28 UTTAR PRADESH 1159837 1042578 711103 20399 29 UTTARAKHAND 55874 52324 51998 30501 30 WEST BENGAL 302271 304503 363599 351566 Total :- 5869608 6155933 4734816 2224955 SAFE DRINKING WATER 7th March 2013 LSQ 1817
DR. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA SHRI HARISCHANDRA DEORAM CHAVAN SHRI FEROZE VARUN GANDHI SHRI DEORAJ SINGH PATEL SHRI A.K.S. VIJAYAN SHRI SAMBANDAM KEERAPALAYAM ALAGIRI SHRI PURNMASI RAM SHRI S.S. RAMASUBBU DR. THOKCHOM MEINYA SHRI ADAGOORU HUCHEGOWDA VISHWANATH SHRI RAVINDRA KUMAR PANDEY KM. SAROJ PANDEY SHRI VIKRAMBHAI ARJANBHAI MAADAM SHRI CHANDRAKANT BHAURAO KHAIRE SHRI KAPIL MUNI KARWARIYA SHRI PREM CHAND GUDDU SHRI SUDARSHAN BHAGAT SHRI PONNAM PRABHAKAR SHRI NALIN KUMAR KATEEL SHRI RAM SUNDAR DAS SMT. SHRUTI CHOUDHRY SHRI DEVENDRA NAGPAL SHRI JAGDISH SINGH RANA Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the details of fully covered, partially covered and quality affected areas with regard to drinking water in the country,State/UT-wise; (b) the funds allocated and utilized under the drinking water schemes during 11th and 12th Plan period, year and State/UT-wise; (c) whether the Government has ensured proper utilisation of funds released under the Scheme; (d) if so, the details thereof; (e) the details of the States/districts facing drought-like situation; and (f) the steps taken/being taken by the Government to provide safe drinking water to all the villages/habitations in thecountry? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a): The details of fully covered, partially covered and quality affected rural habitations with regard to drinking water in the country, State/UT-wise is at Annexure I. (b): The funds allocated and utilized under the Accelerated Rural Water Supply Programme (ARWSP)/ National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) during11th and 12th Plan period, year and State/ UT-wise is at Annexure II. (c )& (d): Various mechanisms have been put in place to ensure that the States properly utilize the funds released to them. The State Governments are required to prepare an Annual Action Plan to implement various components and activities of the NRDWP. They have to mark the targeted habitations and provide details of works, schemes and activities in the on-line Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Coverage and progress data is also to be entered in the on-line IMIS. 19 formats have been developed for monitoring all aspects of implementation of the programme. By utilizing the funds provided under NRDWP, States have ensured provision of safe and adequate drinking water supply to 29,632 uncovered, 4,89,283 partially covered and 1,33,529 quality affected rural habitations during the 11th and 12th Plan period. Funds have also been utilized for Operation and Maintenance of existing drinking water supply schemes and for ensuring sustainability of drinking water sources.
(e): Karnataka, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Kerala, Punjab and Haryana have reported facing drought like situation in their States. (f): Rural water supply is a State subject. This Ministry supplements the efforts of the States by providing them with technical and financial assistance under the centrally sponsored National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) for providing safe and adequate drinking water supply facilities in rural areas of the country. A budgetary allocation of Rs.10,500 crore has been made for the NRDWP in 2012-13. Up to 67 per cent of the NRDWP funds allocated to States on 50:50 Centre: State sharing basis (90:10 for North-East States and Jammu & Kashmir) to those States facing problems of chemical contamination in drinking water or with Japanese Encephalitis or Acute Encephalitis Syndrome affected high priority districts. Technical assistance is provided to States through sharing information on technologies for treatment of contaminated water in Conferences, Exhibitions, meetings, Handbooks and visits of Technical officers. The Ministry has advised the States on adopting a two-pronged strategy viz., in the short-term to adopt in-situ treatment technologies for removal of specific contaminants and as a long term sustainable solution to provide safe drinking water from alternate safe surface/ groundwater sources. In addition to this, Government of India provides 3 % NRDWP funds on 100 per cent central assistance basis to States for water quality monitoring and surveillance, which inter alia include taking up works relating to setting up of new or up-gradation of district/ sub-district water quality testing laboratories, providing chemicals and consumables to laboratories and providing field test kits/ refills for testing of drinking water quality to Gram Panchayats. Further up to 10 per cent of NRDWP funds allocated to States could be utilized for sustainability of drinking water sources through artificial recharge of ground water and other methods, which may also dilute the level of contamination in aquifers.
Annexure I Annexure I referred to in part (a) of reply to Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 1817 due for reply on 07.03.2013 Status Of Rural Habitations With Respect To Drinking Water Supply ( as on 1.4.2012) S. No. State/UT Total
Habitations Habitations Fully Covered Partially Covered Quality Affected
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 72387 44463 27528 396 2 BIHAR 107642 82203 10859 14580 3 CHATTISGARH 72231 36801 26615 8815 4 GOA 347 302 45 0 5 GUJARAT 34415 33127 1014 274 6 HARYANA 7385 5893 1475 17 7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 53201 42476 10725 0 8 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 13938 6062 7846 30 9 JHARKHAND 119191 114308 4471 412 10 KARNATAKA 59575 21333 32367 5875 11 KERALA 11883 10949 0 934 12 MADHYA PRADESH 127197 83565 40843 2789 13 MAHARASHTRA 100683 87448 11564 1671 14 ORISSA 141928 73988 55475 12465 15 PUNJAB 15170 12316 2821 33 16 RAJASTHAN 121133 70876 23528 26729 17 TAMIL NADU 94614 84115 9971 528 18 UTTAR PRADESH 260110 245390 13838 882 19 UTTARAKHAND 39142 26997 12128 17 20 WEST BENGAL 95395 86205 3742 5448 21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 5612 2630 2867 115 22 ASSAM 86976 47220 23777 15979 23 MANIPUR 2870 1589 1281 0 24 MEGHALAYA 9326 4903 4326 97 25 MIZORAM 777 711 66 0 26 NAGALAND 1460 1015 315 130 27 SIKKIM 2498 1805 693 0 28 TRIPURA 8132 2032 165 5935 29 ANDAMAN and NICOBAR 491 434 57 0 30 CHANDIGARH 18 18 0 0 31 DADRA and NAGAR HAVELI 70 0 70 0 32 DAMAN and DIU 21 0 21 0 33 DELHI 0 0 0 0 34 LAKSHADWEEP 9 0 9 0 35 PUDUCHERRY 248 237 2 9 Total 1666075 1231411 330504 104160
Annexure II Annexure referred to in part (b) of reply to Lok Sabha unstarred question No 1817 due for reply on 07.03.2013 NRDWP funds allocated and released to States/ UTs during the Eleventh Five Year Plan (Rs in Crore) Sl. 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 No. State/UT OB Allocation Release Expend. OB Allocation Release Expend. OB Allocation Release Expend. 1 ANDHRA PR 86.17 295.30 305.24 388.41 3.00 394.53 395.05 398.05 4.05 437.09 537.37 394.45 2 ARUNACHAL PR 34.87 112.41 112.41 121.31 25.97 146.12 162.46 160.97 27.47 180.00 178.20 193.80 3 ASSAM 5.50 189.59 189.59 117.26 77.83 246.44 242.78 265.40 4.85 301.60 323.50 269.34 4 BIHAR 122.68 279.37 169.69 0.00 292.37 425.38 452.38 73.30 668.94 372.21 186.11 279.36 5 CHHATTISGARH 22.97 95.95 95.95 104.16 14.76 130.42 125.26 112.42 27.59 116.01 128.22 104.06 6 GOA 0.65 3.31 1.66 2.31 0.00 3.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.64 3.32 0.50 7 GUJARAT 19.85 205.89 205.89 219.12 6.62 314.44 369.44 289.33 92.11 482.75 482.75 511.83 8 HARYANA 16.13 93.41 93.41 109.54 0.00 117.29 117.29 117.29 0.00 207.89 206.89 132.35 9 HIMACHAL PR 2.03 117.46 130.42 132.45 0.00 141.51 141.51 141.49 8.31 138.52 182.85 160.03 10 J & K 49.58 329.92 329.92 361.41 18.09 397.86 396.49 176.67 239.56 447.74 402.51 383.49 11 JHARKHAND 33.06 113.88 84.46 117.51 0.00 160.67 80.33 18.85 64.94 149.29 111.34 86.04 12 KARNATAKA 6.76 278.51 283.16 286.57 3.35 477.19 477.85 449.15 32.05 573.67 627.86 473.71 13 KERALA 0.00 82.93 84.25 83.46 0.79 103.33 123.33 106.56 1.36 152.77 151.89 150.56 14 MADHYA PR 37.58 251.62 251.62 267.56 21.65 370.47 380.47 368.61 107.42 367.66 379.66 354.30 15 MAHARASHTRA 29.06 404.40 404.40 378.38 55.08 572.57 648.24 511.06 204.24 652.43 647.81 625.59 16 MANIPUR 6.90 38.59 45.59 34.71 17.79 50.16 45.23 36.33 16.70 61.60 38.57 30.17 17 MEGHALAYA 12.62 44.46 55.29 56.61 11.30 57.79 107.79 74.50 0.62 70.40 79.40 68.57 18 MIZORAM 0.00 31.88 38.88 30.16 8.72 41.44 54.19 45.48 17.43 50.40 55.26 51.11 19 NAGALAND 14.32 32.72 39.75 27.39 26.68 42.53 42.53 39.60 29.61 52.00 47.06 71.58 20 ODISHA 61.66 168.85 171.95 233.60 0.00 298.68 298.68 273.12 25.85 187.13 226.66 198.87 21 PUNJAB 5.14 52.91 51.80 40.28 16.66 86.56 86.56 96.68 19.18 81.17 88.81 110.15 22 RAJASTHAN 12.95 606.72 606.72 619.67 0.00 970.13 971.83 967.95 3.88 1036.46 1012.16 671.29 23 SIKKIM 1.96 13.42 20.13 15.36 6.73 17.45 32.45 28.85 9.92 21.60 20.60 28.94 24 TAMILNADU 0.00 190.90 190.90 190.90 0.00 241.82 287.82 230.58 57.24 320.43 317.95 370.44 25 TRIPURA 13.71 39.43 54.43 54.30 13.84 51.25 41.01 36.99 18.92 62.40 77.40 77.35 26 UTTAR PR 92.10 401.51 401.51 421.14 72.48 539.74 615.78 514.54 173.71 959.12 956.36 967.38 27 UTTARAKHAND 37.12 89.30 89.30 114.14 12.28 107.58 85.87 61.09 42.77 126.16 124.90 67.24 28 WEST BENGAL 42.35 191.37 191.37 230.55 3.18 389.39 389.39 371.62 69.20 372.29 394.30 87.76 29 A&N ISLANDS 35.50 0.00 0.00 4.72 30.78 0.00 0.00 30.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30 D&N HAVELI 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 31 DAMAN & DIU 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32 DELHI 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33 LAKSHADWEEP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34 PUDUCHERRY 1.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35 CHANDIGARH 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grand Total 804.24 4757.01 4699.67 4762.96 740.94 6896.72 7172.01 5998.28 1967.92 7986.43 7989.72 6920.26
Annexure II (continued) Annexure referred to in part (b) of reply to Lok Sabha Unstarred question No 1817 due for reply on 07.03.2013 NRDWP funds allocated and released to States/ UTs during the Eleventh Five Year Plan (Rs in Crore) Sl. 2010-11 2011-12 Total No. State/UT OB Allocation Release Expend. OB Allocation Release Expend. Allocation Release Expend. 1 ANDHRA PR 149.79 491.02 558.74 423.38 285.20 546.32 462.47 446.37 2164.26 2258.87 2050.66 2 ARUNACHAL PR 12.02 123.35 199.99 176.46 36.79 120.56 184.83 214.31 682.44 837.89 866.85 3 ASSAM 59.32 449.64 487.48 480.55 69.94 435.58 522.44 468.61 1622.85 1765.79 1601.16 4 BIHAR 578.10 341.46 170.73 425.91 322.92 374.98 330.02 367.30 1793.40 1308.93 1145.87 5 CHHATTISGARH 56.36 130.27 122.01 97.77 82.13 143.57 139.06 141.12 616.22 610.50 559.53 6 GOA 3.08 5.34 0.00 1.16 1.92 5.20 5.01 1.16 23.47 9.99 5.13 7 GUJARAT 70.10 542.67 609.10 527.29 180.09 478.89 571.05 467.70 2024.64 2238.23 2015.27 8 HARYANA 75.62 233.69 276.90 201.57 150.95 210.51 237.74 344.71 862.79 932.23 905.46 9 HIMACHAL PR 31.60 133.71 194.37 165.59 60.38 131.47 146.03 145.97 662.67 795.18 745.53 10 J & K 258.66 449.22 468.91 506.52 233.69 436.21 420.42 507.07 2060.95 2018.25 1935.16 11 JHARKHAND 89.82 165.93 129.95 128.19 91.63 162.52 148.17 169.84 752.29 554.25 520.43 12 KARNATAKA 191.39 644.92 703.80 573.93 328.21 687.11 667.78 782.85 2661.40 2760.45 2566.21 13 KERALA 4.15 144.28 159.83 137.97 27.84 144.43 113.39 126.98 627.74 632.69 605.53 14 MADHYA PR 58.95 399.04 388.33 324.94 122.34 371.97 292.78 379.30 1760.76 1692.86 1694.71 15 MAHARASHTRA 232.44 733.27 718.42 713.79 237.06 728.35 718.35 642.20 3091.02 3137.22 2871.02 16 MANIPUR 25.22 54.61 52.77 69.27 8.72 53.39 47.60 47.03 258.35 229.76 217.51 17 MEGHALAYA 11.56 63.48 84.88 70.47 26.11 61.67 95.89 85.44 297.80 423.25 355.59 18 MIZORAM 21.38 46.00 61.58 58.02 24.94 39.67 38.83 54.03 209.39 248.74 238.80 19 NAGALAND 5.10 79.51 77.52 80.63 1.99 81.68 80.91 81.82 288.44 287.77 301.02 20 ODISHA 61.62 204.88 294.76 211.11 148.71 206.55 171.05 239.60 1066.09 1163.10 1156.30 21 PUNJAB 4.02 82.21 106.59 108.93 1.68 88.02 123.44 122.32 390.87 457.20 478.36 22 RAJASTHAN 348.43 1165.44 1099.48 852.82 595.09 1083.57 1153.76 1429.18 4862.32 4843.95 4540.91 23 SIKKIM 0.59 26.24 23.20 19.27 4.78 28.10 69.19 24.49 106.81 165.57 116.91 24 TAMILNADU 5.93 316.91 393.53 303.41 96.05 330.04 429.55 287.60 1400.10 1619.75 1382.93 25 TRIPURA 19.18 57.17 74.66 67.20 27.53 56.20 83.86 108.39 266.45 331.36 344.23 26 UTTAR PR 189.78 899.12 848.68 933.28 105.18 843.30 802.32 754.20 3642.79 3624.65 3590.54 27 UTTARAKHAND 103.92 139.39 136.41 55.44 184.89 136.54 75.57 118.65 598.97 512.05 416.56 28 WEST BENGAL 375.75 418.03 499.19 363.31 444.85 343.60 342.51 521.41 1714.68 1816.76 1574.65 29 A&N ISLANDS 0.00 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.00 35.50 30 D&N HAVELI 0.00 1.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.00 0.00 31 DAMAN & DIU 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.00 32 DELHI 0.00 4.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.62 0.00 0.00 33 LAKSHADWEEP 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 34 PUDUCHERRY 0.00 1.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.85 0.00 1.00 35 CHANDIGARH 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 Grand Total 3043.88 8550.00 8941.81 8078.18 3901.61 8330.00 8474.02 9079.65 36520.16 37277.23 34839.33
Annexure II Annexure referred to in part (b) of reply to Lok Sabha unstarred question No 1817 due for reply on 07.03.2013 Funds allocated and released to States/UTs and utilized during the Twelfth Five Year Plan under NRDWP (Rs in Crore) Sl. 2012-13 No. State/UT OB Allocation Release Expend.* 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 301.3 563.39 356.42 429.12 2 BIHAR 285.65 484.25 224.30 274.74 3 CHATTISGARH 80.82 168.88 148.64 103.68 4 GOA 5.91 6.08 0.03 0 5 GUJARAT 327.59 578.29 702.73 571.21 6 HARYANA 43.98 250.24 311.41 205.67 7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 61.94 153.58 72.83 86.03 8 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 147.04 510.76 466.50 283.27 9 JHARKHAND 74.31 191.86 168.43 133.56 10 KARNATAKA 213.14 922.67 842.54 464.5 11 KERALA 16.08 193.59 167.86 96.57 12 MADHYA PRADESH 35.82 447.33 396.18 241.49 13 MAHARASHTRA 320.1 897.96 605.28 342.96 14 ORISSA 84.34 243.92 210.58 147.86 15 PUNJAB 3 101.89 142.42 70.32 16 RAJASTHAN 319.68 1352.53 1266.36 660.85 17 TAMIL NADU 240.27 394.81 570.17 400.81 18 UTTAR PRADESH 159.9 1060.88 923.31 298.17 19 UTTARAKHAND 141.74 159.75 3.78 91.96 20 WEST BENGAL 265.96 523.54 250.46 377.17 21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 10.09 145.33 215.36 97.96 22 ASSAM 127.51 525.71 500.43 466.22 23 MANIPUR 9.29 69.99 63.07 15.83 24 MEGHALAYA 36.83 73.95 67.67 58.33 25 MIZORAM 9.74 48.34 42.72 23.47 26 NAGALAND 1.1 110.25 107.52 24.44 27 SIKKIM 49.71 36.68 17.71 14.28 28 TRIPURA 4.03 70.65 99.88 51.1 29 ANDAMAN and NICOBAR 0 1.15 0.58 0 30 CHANDIGARH 0 0.00 0.00 0 31 DADRA and NAGAR HAVELI 0 0.00 0.00 0 32 DAMAN and DIU 0 0.00 0.00 0 33 DELHI 0 0.00 0.00 0
34 LAKSHADWEEP 0 0.00 0.00 . 0
35 PUDUCHERRY 0 1.75 0.00 0
Grand Total 3376.87 10290.00 8945.04 6031.57
SPECIAL STATUS TO STATES 7th March 2013 LSQ 1830 SHRI DEVJI PATEL SHRI A.K.S. VIJAYAN SHRI KAMESHWAR BAITHA SHRI PURNMASI RAM Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether the Government proposes to allocate additional fund to some States like Bihar, Jharkhand, Rajasthan and Tamil Nadu under National Rural Development Water Mission (NRDWM) by according them special status; (b) if so, the details thereof, State/UT-wise; and (c) the details of additional funds likelyto be released under the Programme, State/ UT-wise? MINISTER OFSTATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) No, Sir. (b) Does not arise in view of (a). (c) Allocation of funds to States under the National Rural Drinking Water Programme are made under as per approved criteria. Additional allocation and subsequent release of funds under National Rural Drinking Water Programme to States is made at the close of the financial year after taking into account factors like the availability of savings, capacity of the States to absorb more funds and expenditure trend. The details of additional funds released to the States in 2012-13 is as under: Sl.No. Name of State/ UT Additional Amount Released (Rs. in Crore) 1. Arunachal Pradesh 66 2. Tripura 31 3. Haryana 76 4. Punjab 45 5. Gujarat 150 6. Tamil Nadu 178 Total 546 DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION FACILITIES IN SCHOOLS 14th March 2013 LSQ*242 SHRI RAVNEET SINGH SHRI AJAY KUMAR Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the total number of schools in the country along with the number of schools that do not have adequate drinking water and sanitation facilities, State/UT-wise; (b) whether the Government has set any targets to provide drinking water and sanitation facilities in all the schools; (c) if so, the details thereof including the funds earmarked for the purpose; (d) whether the directions of the Supreme Court on the subject has been complied with and if so, the details thereof; and
(e) the other steps taken/being taken by the Government in this regard? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) to (e): A Statement is laid on the table of the House. Statement referred to in reply to Lok Sabha Starred Question No.242 for 14.3.2013. (a): The State/UT-wise total number of Government schools in the country and those that do not have drinking water and toilet facilities, as per information provided by the Ministry of Human Resource Development is given at Annexure. (b)&(c): As per information provided by the Ministry of Human Resource Development, the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act, 2009 provides a time frame of three years from the commencement of the Act for completion of school infrastructure. As part of the implementation of NRDWP and NBA, States have been urged to target coverage of all rural Government schools with drinking water and toilet facilities by the end of 2012-13. The Central funds under the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) of Ministry of Human Resource Development, are released to the States/Union Territories for implementation of interventions approved under the Annual Work Plan and Budget (AWP&B) of that State. Under SSA a total allocation of Rs 974 crore has been made for construction of toilets in the year 2011-12 covering all States/UTs. Under National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) of Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation, though funds are not separately earmarked for the purpose, States/UTs can provide drinking water supply facilities to all Government rural schools by utilising NRDWP (Coverage) funds released to them. Further under the Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA), formerly known as Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC), though there is no separate allocation earmarked for school toilets, school sanitation is an integral component wherein Central assistance is provided to States/UTs for provision of toilet units separately for boys and girls in all Government rural schools which do not have a toilet facility. Schools opened prior to 2007 can be covered under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA). Beyond 2007, all new school buildings are sanctioned as composite buildings under Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) of Ministry of Human Resource Development with facilities for girls and boys toilets and drinking water. (d)&(e): The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No.631 of 2004 in the matter of Environment and Consumer Protection Foundation vs Delhi Administration and Others, has directed, in its order dated 3.10.2012, all States and Union Territories to ensure, inter alia, providing toilet facilities for boys and girls and drinking water facilities, if not already provided, within six months. The SSA seeks to augment school infrastructure with the objective of meeting Right to Education Act requirements for which so far 8,53,624 toilets and 2,29,840 drinking water facilities have been sanctioned across the States / Union Territories. Under NRDWP, from 2010-11 till 10.3.2013, 82,245 rural schools have been provided with drinking water supply facilities and 2,87,654 toilet units have been constructed under NBA. Moreover in compliance of the Hon. Supreme Court’s order the Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation has written to Chief Secretaries of all States on 9th October, 2012 to personally review the position and give instructions to the concerned officials to comply with the Court’s directions. Annexure Statement referred in part (a) of the reply to Lok Sabha Starred Question No. 242 due for reply on 14.03.2013.
State/UT-wise total number of schools and the schools without drinking water and toilet facilities as per information provided by Ministry of Human Resource Development State/UT Total No. of
Schools Schools without girls' toilets
Schools without boys' toilets
Schools without drinking water facility
A & N ISLANDS 411 86 61 15 ANDHRA PRADESH 91146 47594 23718 14325 ARUNACHAL PRADESH
4135 2873 2034 1016
ASSAM 44233 21999 7863 5098 BIHAR 71841 35745 19310 4662 CHANDIGARH 191 8 2 0 CHHATTISGARH 49371 28778 17045 3884 D & N HAVELI 297 104 72 5 DAMAN & DIU 104 10 5 1 DELHI 3687 225 30 0 GOA 1115 351 98 8 GUJARAT 34392 9661 300 96 HARYANA 17988 2532 879 89 HIMACHAL 17071 3770 1163 238
PRADESH JAMMU & KASHMIR 24309 18735 13548 4967 JHARKHAND 41922 13950 9249 4152 KARNATAKA 55698 3283 2133 967 KERALA 6690 815 364 148 LAKSHADWEEP 59 10 5 0 MADHYA PRADESH 113193 35494 7878 3364 MAHARASHTRA 71066 20188 3723 5479 MANIPUR 2667 159 100 194 MEGHALAYA 7831 4931 2992 3194 MIZORAM 2670 1270 469 314 NAGALAND 2230 863 278 645 ORISSA 62720 38844 13116 6442 PUDUCHERRY 598 38 5 0 PUNJAB 23539 3703 753 19 RAJASTHAN 89242 25145 6576 5550 SIKKIM 1045 223 53 53 TAMIL NADU 41203 16110 5346 1027 TRIPURA 5016 2729 1060 1105 UTTAR PRADESH 154277 29088 12250 3240 UTTARAKHAND 19082 5193 1875 1257 WEST BENGAL 81481 38719 7594 1978 Total 1142520 413226 161947 73532
PIPED DRINKING WATER SUPPLY 14th March 2013 LSQ*246 SHRI NEERAJ SHEKHAR SHRI YASHVIR SINGH Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the details of the rural population/ habitations and tribal habitations covered under piped drinking water supply so far, State/UT-wise; (b) whether any target has been set for providing piped water supply during the 12th Five Year Plan period; (c) if so, the details thereof and the achievements made so far in this regard; (d) the funds earmarked/allocated for rural drinking water supply for the said Plan period; and (e) the steps taken/being taken by the Government to supply drinking water through pipes to each habitation in the country? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a)to(e): A Statement is laid on the Table of the House. Statement referred to in reply to Lok Sabha Starred Question No.246 for 14.3.2013. (a): The details of the rural population/ habitations and tribal habitations covered under piped drinking water supply so far, State/UT-wise is at Annexure I. (b)&(c): It is targeted to cover 50% of the rural population with piped drinking water supply in the 12th Five Year Plan period. The achievement made in this regard during 2012-13 i.e. the first year of the 12th Five Year Plan is at Annexure II.
(d): The funds earmarked/allocated for rural drinking water supply in the 12th Five Year Plan period is Rs.63,638 Crore. (e): Rural water supply is a State subject. This Ministry supplements the efforts of the States to provide drinking water supply including through piped drinking water supply schemes, by providing technical and financial assistance under the centrally sponsored National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP), in rural areas of the country. The State Governments are vested with powers to select, plan, approve and implement drinking water supply schemes under the NRDWP to cover more habitations with piped water supply. The Ministry has urged the States to take up more piped drinking water supply schemes in the 12th Five Year Plan period under NRDWP.
Table referred to in part (a) of reply to LokSabha Starred Question No. 246 for 14.3.2013 Rural Habitations and Population Covered and ST Population Concentrated Habitations/Population Covered with Piped Water Supply (PWS) Schemes S. No.
StateName Total number of Habitation
Total RuralPopulation(In lakhs)
Covered By PWS as On 01/04/2012
Total ST Conc.Habitations
Populationin STConc.Habitations(In lakhs)
ST concentrated habitations Covered by PWS as On 01/04/2012
Total Habitations
TotalRural Population(in lakhs)
TotalHabitation Total RuralPopulation(In lakhs)
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 72387 612.77 48015 476.05 18467 44.66 7796 23.08 2 BIHAR 107642 904.15 2315 40.57 1952 6.39 51 0.19 3 CHATTISGARH 72231 183.50 9124 39.67 46739 78.31 4994 10.58 4 GOA 347 7.54 106 1.93 0 0 0 0 5 GUJARAT 34415 360.71 23823 302.71 14290 80.73 7955 51.44 6 HARYANA 7385 175.03 5100 133.47 1 0.02 1 0.02 7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 53201 62.28 45280 46.68 3121 2.83 2965 2.52 8 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 13938 100.89 7003 45.54 2304 9.30 902 3.29 9 JHARKHAND 119191 229.65 7834 39.16 64322 86.65 3073 10.01 10 KARNATAKA 59575 383.51 34178 232.18 2744 18.05 1893 11.24 11 KERALA 11883 254.71 10403 223.34 108 1.86 94 1.61 12 MADHYA PRADESH 127197 527.27 6686 54.59 56804 129.87 2962 8.31 13 MAHARASHTRA 100683 650.76 64195 445.91 17964 66.72 8099 36.47 14 ORISSA 141928 347.53 25649 95.49 49242 87.30 5711 13.77 15 PUNJAB 15170 180.56 11476 151.92 3 0.01 1 0 16 RAJASTHAN 121133 519.95 19794 122.86 22920 76.05 1838 7.24 17 TAMIL NADU 94614 349.71 62279 227.82 2485 4.64 1562 2.79 18 UTTAR PRADESH 260110 1570.42 4450 64.18 211 1.01 12 0.12 19 UTTARAKHAND 39142 70.61 14623 22.56 1459 2.84 452 0.65 20 WEST BENGAL 95395 750.88 14246 152.67 10413 40.32 840 3.85 21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 5612 9.75 3928 6.26 5248 7.96 3660 5.02 22 ASSAM 86976 264.11 20812 59.36 17412 43.64 2833 6.10 23 MANIPUR 2870 24.78 2269 16.37 2320 13.86 1826 9.16 24 MEGHALAYA 9326 23.21 5286 11.27 9108 22.31 5168 10.85 25 MIZORAM 777 5.22 579 3.92 770 5.21 574 3.91 26 NAGALAND 1460 17.58 1321 13.63 1442 17.26 1306 13.38 27 SIKKIM 2498 5.40 638 1.07 381 0.80 105 0.17 28 TRIPURA 8132 28.12 4613 15.79 4480 10.56 2173 4.69 29 A & N ISLANDS 491 2.41 5 0.04 158 0.33 0 0 30 CHANDIGARH 18 0.81 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 D & N HAVELI 70 1.68 0 0 66 1.52 0 0 32 DAMAN and DIU 21 0.78 0 0 6 .05 0 0
33 DELHI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 LAKSHADWEEP 9 0.50 0 0 9 0.51 0 0 35 PUDUCHERRY 248 3.58 211 3.07 0 0 0 0 Total 1666075 8630.54 456241 3050.07 356949 861.57 68846 240.44
Annexure II Statement referred to in Part (c) of LokSabha Starred Question No. 246 due for reply on 14.3.2013 Coverage of Rural Habitations and ST Concentrated Habitations with Piped water Supply S. No.
State/ UT % of Rural population in habitations Covered with PWS as on 1.4.2012
% of Rural population in habitations added with PWS during 2012-2013 (as on 10.3.2013)
% of Rural population in habitation s covered with PWS as on 10.3.2013
% of population in ST concentrated habitations Covered with PWS as on 1.4.2012
% of population in ST concentrated habitations added with PWS in 2012-2013 (as on 10.3.2013)
% of population in ST concentrated habitations covered with PWS as on 10.3.2013
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 77.69 6.88 84.57 51.67 3.64 55.31 2 BIHAR 4.49 1.1 5.59 2.89 1.19 4.08 3 CHATTISGARH 21.62 1.17 22.79 13.51 0.49 14 4 GOA 25.56 0 25.56 0 0 0 5 GUJARAT 83.92 5.2 89.12 63.72 6.47 70.19 6 HARYANA 76.26 8.4 84.66 100 0 100 7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 74.95 3.91 78.86 89.19 3.33 92.52 8 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 45.13 4.25 49.38 35.34 4.05 39.39 9 JHARKHAND 17.05 1.4 18.45 11.56 0.58 12.14 10 KARNATAKA 60.54 23.77 84.31 62.26 22.63 84.89 11 KERALA 87.68 5.69 93.37 86.49 3.32 89.81 12 MADHYA PRADESH 10.35 1.74 12.09 6.4 0.81 7.21 13 MAHARASHTRA 68.52 4.5 73.02 54.66 3.43 58.09 14 ORISSA 27.48 1.78 29.26 15.77 0.66 16.43 15 PUNJAB 84.14 2.12 86.26 0.14 0 0.14 16 RAJASTHAN 23.63 1.16 24.79 9.52 0.37 9.89 17 TAMIL NADU 65.14 8.15 73.29 60.16 5.66 65.82 18 UTTAR PRADESH 4.09 0.28 4.37 11.4 0 11.4 19 UTTARAKHAND 31.94 1.01 32.95 22.71 0.37 23.08 20 WEST BENGAL 20.33 4.39 24.72 9.54 2.17 11.71 21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 64.17 2.24 66.41 63.06 2.7 65.76 22 ASSAM 22.48 2.6 25.08 13.98 1.92 15.9 23 MANIPUR 66.05 6.71 72.76 66.1 6.61 72.71 24 MEGHALAYA 48.52 1.64 50.16 48.61 1.69 50.3 25 MIZORAM 75.11 0.74 75.85 75.08 0.74 75.82 26 NAGALAND 77.54 9.25 86.79 77.51 3.24 80.75 27 SIKKIM 19.82 2.47 22.29 21.52 3.89 25.41 28 TRIPURA 56.14 6.12 62.26 44.42 6.57 50.99 29 AND and NICOBAR 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 30 PUDUCHERRY 85.59 0 85.59 0 0 0
35.34 3.9 39.24 27.91 2.49 30.4
DELAY IN RELEASE OF FUNDS 7th March 2013 LSQ 2796 SMT. SUSHILA SAROJ Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether some State/UTs have reported delay in release of funds by Union Government under various schemes posing hurdles in their implementation; (b) if so, the details thereof; and (c) the action taken by the Government in this matter? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a): No, Madam. (b)&(c): Does not arise in view of reply to part (a). NIRMAL GRAM PURASKAR 14th March 2013 LSQ2813 SHRI OM PRAKASH YADAV Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether the agencies hired for survey work in connection with Nirmal Gram Puraskar (NGP) during the last three years and current year were technically and professionally competent to conduct field survey in rural areas; (b) if so, the details thereof; (c) the criteria adopted by these survey agencies to hire local persons from various States /UTs including Bihar; (d) whether the survey agencies conducted field survey in a transparent and statistically sound manner and informed Gram Panchayats as well as other stakeholders about the survey objectives; (e) if so, the details thereof; (f) the details of funds released to each of the agencies that conducted survey in NGP applicant villages in the country including Bihar during 2010 and 2011; (g) whether some State Governments including Bihar raised verbal and written objections to the findings of these survey agencies; and (h) if so, the details thereof and the action taken by the Government in this regard, State/ UT-wise? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a)&(b): Yes sir, the agencies hired for survey work in connection with Nirmal Gram Puraskar (NGP) during last three years were selected on the basis of their technical and professional competency. The agency had to meet the following criteria : i. It should be a legal entity eligible to enter into an agreement/contract with the Department to undertake work contract in India.
ii. Experience of at least 3 years in conducting such surveys related to rural development in at least three different States of India. iii. The agency must have a permanent establishment of its own with at least 20 field supervisors/officials on its roll having experience in conducting such survey with minimum educational qualification of Graduation. iv. A minimum annual turnover of Rupees Fifty Lakh or more during the last three years. v. The nodal officer for the survey should be a post graduate preferably in Statistics, Social Work, Economics, MBA/ with 15 years of experience in the field of Water Supply, Sanitation, Health and Hygiene. During the current year, states have given responsibility for selecting Gram Panchayats for Nirmal Gram Puraskar. (c): The Terms of Reference (ToR) did not specify any criteria for hiring of local persons. However the ToR stipulated that the survey agency had to assign sufficient member of survey teams so as to cover all the allocated GPs within the stipulated time frame. Each survey team was to consist of 1 supervisor and at least 2 investigators. All the members of the team were to be at least graduates and at least one of them was to be able to communicate effectively in the local languages. (d)&(e): Yes, sir. The details are as follows. As per the ToR, the following methodology and procedure were prescribed for carrying out the surveys : i. Households should be selected following Cluster Random Sampling technique so as to invariably represent all the villages or clusters of GP in the same proportion as total BPL and APL and SC/ST households in the GP. 50% of the respondents in the households covered should be women. ii. All schools, Anganwadis and community toilets should be visited and the toilets inspected in the GP. The team shall also interview all the students in Primary classes and collect information to ascertain (a) How many have Toilets in their houses and (b) Usage of toilets by them and their family members. iii. Discussions should be conducted with GP members, School teachers, Anganwadi workers, NGOs, ANM and district/block level officials. iv. The survey team should spent at least 1 night in the GP to ascertain whether the practice of open defecation has been eliminated/stopped or not by visiting the traditional places of open defecation in the evening , at night and in the wee hours of the morning. v. The survey team shall visit all the villages/clusters in the GP to assess the general cleanliness in the village and see if any garbage/waste is dumped near any public drinking water source/public areas/panchayat bhawan etc. The survey team shall also see if there are any choked drains in the village or pools of stagnant water that can act as breeding place for mosquitoes and report the same in the specified format. vi. To collect a copy of resolution banning open defecation in the village and check whether the same has been documented in the register of resolutions of the Gram Sabha. (f): the details of funds released to each of the agencies that conducted survey in NGP applicant villages in the country including Bihar during 2010 and 2011 is at Annexure-1 and 2. (g)&(h): No such objection was raised by Bihar Government. However a representation was received from State of Maharashtra during year 2009-10 regarding NGP 2009. The same was examined and the matter was settled by informing the State that it would not be possible to review those cases for Nirmal gram Puruskar 2009 in view of the facts of the case. ANNEXURE Annexure-1 Statement referred in part (f) of the reply to Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No. 2813 due for reply on 14.03.2013. Funds released to Survey Agencies during 2010 S.N. Agency Name Funds released 1 Action For Agricultural Renewal in Maharashtra-AFARM 2298000 2 Action for Food Production 2241000 3 Agricultural Finance Corporation Ltd. 2154000
4 Anandmay Engineers & Consultants (P) Ltd. 3118000 5 Aryan Foundation for Research and Action 2920000 6 Asian Centre for Socio-Economic & Rural Development 2229000 7 Centre for Advanced Research & Development 3502000 8 Centre for Logical Research & Development Studies 3235000 9 Centre of Science for Villages (CSV) 2267000 10 CMI-Social Research Centre Pvt. Ltd. 3387000 11 Council for Economic & Social Research 2221000 12 Gramin Ekata Vikas Bahuuddeshiya Khadi 2179000 13 Gujarat Vidyapeeth 3248000 14 Help Foundation 3677000 15 Indian Institute of Public Administration 2328000 16 Institute for Human Development 2117000 17 Institute for Resource Management & Economic Development 2770000 18 JSS Consultant 2714000 19 Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) 2946000 20 Marathwada Institute for Training Research Education and Employment (Maitree) 2740000 21 Midstream Marketing & Research Pvt. Ltd 2720000 22 National Bank for Agriculture & Development (NABARD) 2366000 23 New Opportunities for women 2299000 24 Organisation for Applied Socio Economic System (OASES) 3241000 25 Pragna Research and Consultancy Services 2605000 26 Ramakrishna Mission Lokshiksha-Parishad 1153000 27 Rural Economic and Educational Development Society 2325000 28 Santek Consultants Pvt. Ltd. 3541000 29 Social Development & Research Foundation 2872000 30 Society for Human Right & Social Development 3418000 31 Society for Social Services, MBC 2992000 32 SSI Development Society 2692000 33 Uttarakhand Academy of Administration 2853000 34 WIZMIN Management Consultants 2277000 91645000
Annexure-2 Statement referred in part (f) of the reply to Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No. 2813 due for reply on 14.03.2013. Funds released to Survey Agencies during 2011 S.N. Agency Name Funds released 1 Action for Agricultural Renewal in Maharashtra 1597000 2 Advantage India 1621000 3 Aryan Foundation for Research & Action 1711000 4 Awadh Research Foundation 1600000 5 Centre for Advanced Research & Development 1655000 6 Centre for Logical Research & Development Studies 1712000 7 Centre for Management Development Thycaud 1562000 8 Centre of Science for Villages 1673000 9 CMS, Research House 1545000 10 Community Orgn for Oppressed and Depressed Upliftment 1609000 11 Council for Economic & Social Research 1645000 12 Crux Consultants Pvt. Ltd. 1505000 13 CS Datamation Research Services Pvt. Ltd. 1798000 14 Development & Research Services Pvt. Ltd. 1429000 15 DHV India Pvt. Ltd. 1604000 16 DMG Consulting Pvt. Ltd. 1579000 17 GFK Mode Pvt. Ltd. 1617000 18 Global Agrisystem Pvt. Ltd. 1563000 19 GRAMIUM 1826000 20 Help Foundation 1674000 21 Indian Society of Agribusiness Professionals 1605000 22 Institute for Human Development 1606000
23 JiwanJyotiSewaSansthan 1759000 24 KIIT University 1922000 25 Madurai Non Formal Education Centre 2217000 26 Mott MacDonald 1558000 27 NABARD Consultancy Services 1711000 28 NR Management Consultants India Pvt. Ltd. 1637000 29 ORG Center for Social Research 1446000 30 Participatory Rural Development Initiatives Society 1428000 31 Poverty Learning Foundation 1513000 32 Pragna Research & Consultancy Services 1842000 33 Rehabilitation and Improvement through Self-Employment 2129000 34 Research & Development Initiative Pvt. Ltd. 1645000 35 Sambodhi Research & Communications Pvt. Ltd. 1560000 36 Santek Consultants Private Limited 1758000 37 Sigma Research and Consulting Pvt. Ltd. 1640000 38 Social Development & Research Foundation 1907000 39 Society for Education in Values & Action 1608000 40 Society for Human Rights and Social Development 1910000 41 Society for Social Services Madhya Bharat Chapter 1631000 42 Socio-Economic and Educational Development Society 1612000 43 SSI Development Society 2161000 44 TNS India Pvt. Ltd. 1546000 45 Wapcos Ltd. 1552000 Grand Total 75428000 ALLOCATION UNDER DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION SCHEMES 14th March 2013 LSQ 2868 SHRI KACHHADIA NARANBHAI SHRI SAI PRATHAP ANNAYYAGARI SHRI ASADUDDIN OWAISI WILL THE MINISTER OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION BE PLEASED TO STATE:- (a) the details of funds allocated, released and utilised under the National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) and Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) during each of the last three years, State/UT-wise; (b) the reasons for under-utilisation of funds by various State/UT-wise; (c) the steps taken by the Government to ensure optimum utilisation of funds released under these schemes; (d) whether the Government has chalked out any strategy for wide publicity and awareness campaign during the 12th Plan Period for Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA); and (e) if so, the details thereof ? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a): The details of the funds allocated, released and utilized under the National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) during the last three years State/UT-wise is at Annexure I. As regards Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan(NBA) no allocation of funds is made as the programme is demand driven. The details of funds released and utilised under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) during each of the last three years, State/UT-wise is at Annexure-II
(b)&(c): The reasons for some States not being able to utilise the amounts released to them under NRDWP include delays in planning, approval and procurement processes, taking up multi- village schemes that require 2-3 years for completion, imposition of model code of conduct due to declaration of elections/ bye elections. Various mechanisms have been put in place to ensure that the States are able to utilize the funds released to them. The State Governments are required to prepare an Annual Action Plan by March for the coming year to implement various components and activities of the NRDWP. They have to mark the targeted habitations and provide details of works, schemes and activities in the on-line Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Coverage and progress data is also to be entered in the on-line IMIS. Financial performance of States is also monitored through visits of Ministry officers to States, conducting review meetings at National, regional and State levels and video-conferencing during which States are urged to improve pace of utilization of funds. As regard NBA, low physical progress in creation of sanitation facilities in some States is possibly due to less demand generation. In order to ensure optimum utilization of funds regular reviews are carried out. (d)&(e): Information, Education and Communication (IEC) is an important component of the Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA). The major steps taken by the Government to improve IEC as part of NBA are as under: i. Under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA), 15% of the total outlay of district projects has been earmarked for Information, Education and Communication (IEC) activities. ii. IEC Guidelines have been issued in order to provide a broad framework to the States for the implementation of IEC activities to increase awareness among rural people, generation of demand for sanitation facilities and creation of clean environment. iii. Communication and Advocacy Strategy (2012-2017) for Water, Sanitation and Hygiene has been launched in collaboration with UNICEF. It is designed to roll out a number of activities in a phased manner, from planning, implementation to monitoring. iv. Provision has been made to engage Non Governmental Organisations (NGOs), village level motivators (Swachhata Doots/ Sanitation Managers), field functionaries like ASHA, Anganwadi Workers, School Teachers, and Bharat Nirman Volunteers for effectively disseminating IEC messages. v. Mobile message based Communication was carried out on a pilot basis as an effective tool for dissemination of awareness on Sanitation, targeting rural areas of Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar, Jharkhand and Uttar Pradesh. vi. To propagate the message of construction and use of toilets by all , audio and audio-visual spots have been produced in collaboration with UNICEF. ANNEXURE Referred to in part (a) of Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No.2868 due for answer on 14.03.2013
OPENING BALANCE, ALLOCATION, RELEASE AND EXPENDITURE UNDER NRDWP DURING LAST THREE YEARS ( Rs in Crore) Sl. 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 No. State/UT O. B. Alloc. Release Expdn. O. B. Alloc. Rel. Expdn. O. B. Alloc Rel. Expdn. 1 ANDHRA PR 4.05 437.09 537.37 394.45 149.79 491.02 558.74 423.38 285.2 546.32 462.47 446.37 2 ARUNACHAL PR 27.47 180 178.2 193.8 12.02 123.35 199.99 176.46 36.79 120.56 184.83 214.31 3 ASSAM 4.85 301.6 323.5 269.34 59.32 449.64 487.48 480.55 69.94 435.58 522.44 468.61 4 BIHAR 668.94 372.21 186.11 279.36 578.1 341.46 170.73 425.91 322.92 374.98 330.02 367.3 5 CHHATTISGARH 27.59 116.01 128.22 104.06 56.36 130.27 122.01 97.77 82.13 143.57 139.06 141.12 6 GOA 0 5.64 3.32 0.5 3.08 5.34 0 1.16 1.92 5.2 5.01 1.16 7 GUJARAT 92.11 482.75 482.75 511.83 70.1 542.67 609.1 527.29 180.09 478.89 571.05 467.7 8 HARYANA 0 207.89 206.89 132.35 75.62 233.69 276.9 201.57 150.95 210.51 237.74 344.71 9 HIMACHAL PR 8.31 138.52 182.85 160.03 31.6 133.71 194.37 165.59 60.38 131.47 146.03 145.97 10 J & K 239.56 447.74 402.51 383.49 258.66 449.22 468.91 506.52 233.69 436.21 420.42 507.07 11 JHARKHAND 64.94 149.29 111.34 86.04 89.82 165.93 129.95 128.19 91.63 162.52 148.17 169.84 12 KARNATAKA 32.05 573.67 627.86 473.71 191.39 644.92 703.8 573.93 328.21 687.11 667.78 782.85 13 KERALA 1.36 152.77 151.89 150.56 4.15 144.28 159.83 137.97 27.84 144.43 113.39 126.98 14 MADHYA PR 107.42 367.66 379.66 354.3 58.95 399.04 388.33 324.94 122.34 371.97 292.78 379.3 15 MAHARASHTRA 204.24 652.43 647.81 625.59 232.44 733.27 718.42 713.79 237.06 728.35 718.35 642.2 16 MANIPUR 16.7 61.6 38.57 30.17 25.22 54.61 52.77 69.27 8.72 53.39 47.6 47.03 17 MEGHALAYA 0.62 70.4 79.4 68.57 11.56 63.48 84.88 70.47 26.11 61.67 95.89 85.44 18 MIZORAM 17.43 50.4 55.26 51.11 21.38 46 61.58 58.02 24.94 39.67 38.83 54.03 19 NAGALAND 29.61 52 47.06 71.58 5.1 79.51 77.52 80.63 1.99 81.68 80.91 81.82 20 ORISSA 25.85 187.13 226.66 198.87 61.62 204.88 294.76 211.11 148.71 206.55 171.05 239.6 21 PUNJAB 19.18 81.17 88.81 110.15 4.02 82.21 106.59 108.93 1.68 88.02 123.44 122.32 22 RAJASTHAN 3.88 1036.46 1012.16 671.29 348.43 1165.44 1099.48 852.82 595.09 1083.6 1153.76 1429.18 23 SIKKIM 9.92 21.6 20.6 28.94 0.59 26.24 23.2 19.27 4.78 28.1 69.19 24.49 24 TAMILNADU 57.24 320.43 317.95 370.44 5.93 316.91 393.53 303.41 96.05 330.04 429.55 287.6 25 TRIPURA 18.92 62.4 77.4 77.35 19.18 57.17 74.66 67.2 27.53 56.2 83.86 108.39 26 UTTAR PR 173.71 959.12 956.36 967.38 189.78 899.12 848.68 933.28 105.18 843.3 802.32 754.2 27 UTTARAKHAND 42.77 126.16 124.9 67.24 103.92 139.39 136.41 55.44 184.89 136.54 75.57 118.65 28 WEST BENGAL 69.2 372.29 394.3 87.76 375.75 418.03 499.19 363.31 444.85 343.6 342.51 521.41 29 A&N ISLANDS 0 0 0 0 0 1.01 0 0 0 0 30 D&N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 0 1.09 0 0 0 0 31 DAMAN & DIU 0 0 0 0 0 0.61 0 0 0 0 32 DELHI 0 0 0 0 0 4.31 0 0 0 0 33 LAKSHADWEEP 0 0 0 0 0 0.24 0 0 0 0 34 PONDICHERRY 0 0 0 0 0 1.54 0 0 0 0 35 CHANDIGARH 0 0.4 0 0 0 Total 1967.9 7986.43 7989.72 6920.26 3043.88 8550 8941.81 8078.2 3901.6 8330 8474.02 9079.65 As reported on the IMIS as on 10.03.2013.
Annexure II Annexure referred in part (a) of the reply to LokSabha Un-starred Question No. 2868 due for reply on 14.03.2013 State/UT-wise fund released and utilisation reported during last three years Rs. in lakh S.N. State/UT 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Release Utilisation Release Utilisation Release Utilisation 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 11078.44 3915.05 14218.46 7177.9 9657.28 9151.88 2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 404.97 659.28 119.26 610.28 204.88 511.09 3 ASSAM 6729.84 9436.95 9437.36 6712.08 12251.18 12227.67 4 BIHAR 9046.72 9014.63 11259.76 12421.48 17219.09 16761.44 5 CHHATTISGARH 5018.42 6437.99 5479.58 2530.57 2702.42 3286.35 6 D & N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 GOA 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 GUJARAT 3036.91 5154.34 4692.36 3332.98 4308.28 3525.46 9 HARYANA 718.15 1220.09 2361.49 1410.41 335.27 1542.35 10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 1017.74 1312.38 2939.78 2130.2 469.57 1274.65 11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 332.9 1383.15 2792.51 1101.93 967.95 2463.42 12 JHARKHAND 3941.66 3871.91 5466.98 3653.66 7264.92 2334.84 13 KARNATAKA 5571 4816.9 4458.66 6240.93 8709.28 4115.18 14 KERALA 975.45 1346.2 2286.34 808.52 158.89 987.89 15 MADHYA PRADESH 9987.48 12732.13 14402.6 12826.57 15076 16700.46 16 MAHARASHTRA 9894.05 11741.67 12911.7 7263.49 5799.94 8391.45 17 MANIPUR 1177.54 409.58 80.3 861 1087.87 701.18 18 MEGHALAYA 1378.78 985.46 3105.23 1437.34 1115.72 3290.85 19 MIZORAM 412.98 419.27 653.4 272.81 31.38 691.6 20 NAGALAND 1059.27 971.6 1229.45 264.95 174.06 1371.36 21 ORISSA 5031.55 5258.97 6836.73 4928.22 11171.7 4652.38 22 PUDUCHERRY 0 5.19 0 2.91 0 0 23 PUNJAB 116.02 326.41 1116.39 420.64 283.18 108.36 24 RAJASTHAN 4352.64 3217.59 5670.74 3757.52 5424.41 3136.6 25 SIKKIM 0 258.95 112.86 0 0 0 26 TAMIL NADU 6166.18 5406.86 7794.35 5213.14 7662.06 10710.19 27 TRIPURA 836.66 535.74 925.14 574.08 133.92 752.89 28 UTTAR PRADESH 11579.77 33657.29 22594 22738.91 16920.72 12056.46 29 UTTARAKHAND 773.98 1102.22 1707.61 1159.57 804.76 1312.67 30 WEST BENGAL 3246.26 7809.32 8327.5 7654.57 14124.34 11514.02 Total :- 103885.36 133407.13 152980.54 117506.7 144059.07 133572.68
Note: Total utilization by States/UTS are made out of available fund ( unspent balance as opening balance total releases during the year).
BIO TOILETS 14th March 2013 LSQ 2891 SHRI HARIN PATHAK Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether the Ministry is partnering with the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) to build Odourless bio-toilets in villages to eradicate the menace of open defecation; (b) if so, the number of gram panchayats likely to be covered across the country under the programme, State/UT-wise; (c) the estimated expenditure likely to be incurred thereon; and (d) the current status of the programme? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a)to(d): The Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation(MDWS) has signed a Memorandum of Understanding(MoU) with Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) for implementation of bio-digester/bio-tank based eco-friendly toilets developed by DRDO, in Gram Panchayats. The MoU has provisions for MDWS and DRDO to work together for use in these villages. DRDO is responsible for the technical aspects of implementation of the project. There also exists provision for monitoring of the project by a joint team. It has been decided that willing States may implement the projects with technical assistance from DRDO. NBA guidelines shall form the basis for the project including the financial incentive that would be the same for the bio-digester toilets as provided for in the NBA guidelines. Additional cost over and above that fixed under NBA guidelines plus that allowed under MGNREGS would be met by the State Government. WATER QUALITY TESTING LABORATORIES 14th March 2013 LSQ 2944 SHRI DUSHYANT SINGH SHRI MAHESHWAR HAZARI SMT. SUSHILA SAROJ SMT. USHA VERMA SMT. SEEMA UPADHYAY SHRI HARSH VARDHAN Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the number of Water Quality Testing Laboratories (WQTLs) in the country for testing the quality of drinking water State/ UT-wise; (b) whether a number of posts are lying vacant in these WQTLs; (c) if so, the details thereof along with the reasons therefore, State/UT-wise; (d) the procedure followed for testing and measuring the purity/quality of water in these WQTLs; (e) whether the Government proposes to use renewable technology to purify water in the States like Rajasthan that have ample sunlight; and (f) if so, the details thereof?
MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a): As reported by the States on the online Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) of the Ministry as on 11/3/2013, there are 24 State level Water Quality Testing Laboratories (WQTLs), 728 district level WQTLs and 1129 sub-district/ block level WQTLs in the country. The State/UT-wise details of the WQTLs in the country are at Annexure - I. (b)&(c) Rural drinking water supply is a State subject. Ministry of Drinking Water & Sanitation, Government of India, through the Centrally Sponsored Scheme, the National Rural Drinking Water Supply Programme (NRDWP), provides technical and financial assistance to the States/ UTs to supplement their efforts in providing adequate and safe drinking water supply to the rural areas. Under NRDWP, 3% of the funds allocated to the States are earmarked for water quality monitoring and surveillance activities on a 100% Central share basis which, inter alia, includes hiring of manpower on outsourcing basis in WQTLs, testing of drinking water sources at the Panchayat level by using simple field test kits and bacteriological vials, setting up of new district/sub-district WQTLs and up-gradation of existing WQTLs. Staff in WQTLs are appointed by the States/ UTs. As such, the details of posts lying vacant at the State/UT level are not maintained at the central level. However, as reported by the States/UTs on the IMIS as on 11.3.2013, there are 2639 persons (868 chemists, 206 Bacteriologists, 874 Assistants and 691 others) working in district WQTLs in the States/ UTs as per details at Annexure - II. (d): Ministry has advised all the States to test drinking water quality in WQTLs by following the procedures specified by Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) in Methods of sampling and testing for water and waste water (IS – 3025) and Methods of sampling and microbiological examination of water (IS – 1622). (e)&(f): Ministry of Drinking Water & Sanitation is encouraging States including Rajasthan to use renewable technology for supply of safe drinking water to the rural people. States can use renewable technologies for purifying water by utilizing NRDWP funds. Under NRDWP, up to 67 % of the funds allocated can be utilised for provision of safe drinking water facilities, including through use of renewable technology, to rural habitations in the country. In addition, 5 % of NRDWP funds have been earmarked for Water Quality for allocation to States to cover habitations with chemical contamination in drinking water sources and to States with high priority districts affected with Japanese Encephalitis and Acute Encephalitis Syndrome cases. Annexure - I Annexure referred to in part (a) of Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No. 2944 due for reply on 14.3.2013 State/ UT-wise details of the number of drinking water quality testing laboratories as reported by States / UTs on online IMIS of the Ministry ( as on 11/03/2013) S. No. State/ UT Number of State
level Laboratories Number of District level Laboratories
Number of Block /Sub district level laboratories
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 1 51 119 2 BIHAR 1 40 0 3 CHATTISGARH 1 23 3 4 GOA 1 0 10 5 GUJARAT 1 27 15 6 HARYANA 0 21 22 7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 0 18 3 8 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 0 37 13 9 JHARKHAND 1 24 3 10 KARNATAKA 1 42 71 11 KERALA 1 14 16 12 MADHYA PRADESH 1 51 114 13 MAHARASHTRA 0 39 428 14 ORISSA 0 32 44 15 PUNJAB 3 22 12 16 RAJASTHAN 1 32 0 17 TAMIL NADU 0 34 48 18 UTTAR PRADESH 1 75 7 19 UTTARAKHAND 0 28 0 20 WEST BENGAL 1 19 101 21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 0 17 31 22 ASSAM 1 27 32
23 MANIPUR 1 9 2 24 MEGHALAYA 1 7 1 25 MIZORAM 1 8 18 26 NAGALAND 1 11 1 27 SIKKIM 2 1 0 28 TRIPURA 1 8 13 29 ANDAMAN and NICOBAR 1 0 2 30 CHANDIGARH 0 0 0 31 DADRA and NAGAR HAVELI 0 0 0 32 DAMAN and DIU 0 0 0 33 DELHI 0 0 0 34 LAKSHADWEEP 0 9 0 35 PUDUCHERRY 0 2 0 Total 24 728 1129
Annexure II Annexure referred to in Parts (b) & (c) of Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No. 2944 due for reply on14.3.2013 Details of manpower available in district water quality testing laboratories as reported by States on online IMIS of the Ministry (as on 11/03/2013) S. No.
State/ UT Manpower Available in District Laboratory Chemist Bacteriologists Assistant Others Total
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 55 51 102 51 259 2 BIHAR 45 1 40 5 91 3 CHATTISGARH 15 1 36 11 63 4 GOA 0 0 0 0 0 5 GUJARAT 36 23 25 23 107 6 HARYANA 17 0 15 11 43 7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 5 0 3 6 14 8 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 64 6 36 54 160 9 JHARKHAND 13 2 10 5 30 10 KARNATAKA 98 13 63 94 268 11 KERALA 17 9 23 44 93 12 MADHYA PRADESH 37 0 88 44 169 13 MAHARASHTRA 114 66 51 112 343 14 ORISSA 4 0 18 5 27 15 PUNJAB 21 0 22 2 45 16 RAJASTHAN 34 0 83 75 192 17 TAMIL NADU 106 1 64 7 178 18 UTTAR PRADESH 67 0 69 8 144 19 UTTARAKHAND 36 12 13 22 83 20 WEST BENGAL 18 17 16 0 51 21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 2 2 20 4 28 22 ASSAM 15 0 26 40 81 23 MANIPUR 9 0 9 0 18 24 MEGHALAYA 0 0 4 1 5 25 MIZORAM 8 0 8 8 24 26 NAGALAND 3 2 6 25 36 27 SIKKIM 1 0 1 0 2 28 TRIPURA 11 0 1 0 12 29 ANDAMAN and NICOBAR 0 0 0 0 0 30 CHANDIGARH 0 0 0 0 0 31 DADRA and NAGAR HAVELI 0 0 0 0 0 32 DAMAN and DIU 0 0 0 0 0 33 DELHI 0 0 0 0 0 34 LAKSHADWEEP 9 0 16 25 50 35 PUDUCHERRY 8 0 6 9 23 Total 868 206 874 691 2639 DROUGHT LIKE SITUATION 14th March 2013 LSQ 2956 SHRI NALIN KUMAR KATEEL SHRI SURESH CHANABASAPPA ANGADI SHRI A.T. (NANA) PATIL SMT. DAVIDSON J. HELEN Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:-
(a) the names of the States/UTs currently facing drought-like situation and problem in supplying drinking water to the rural areas including Tamil Nadu; (b) the steps taken/being taken by the Government to solve the drinking water problem in these States/UTs; (c) whether the Government has received proposals from the States/UTs for additional financial assistance to deal with the situation; and (d) if so, the funds released to these States/UTs for the purpose during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise? MINISTER OFSTATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI ) (a) As per the information available from the State Governments the States where drought like situation has arisen leading to problems in drinking water supply in 2012-13 are Karnataka, Kerala, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Haryana ,Punjab and Tamilnadu. (b) The Ministry had written to all State Governments in June, 2012 informing them about the forecast by Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) and advising them to take steps for preparedness and response in order to tackle drought like situations in States that may develop during South-West Monsoon 2012. The States were requested to prepare a Contingency Plan for the same. As per Standard Operating Procedure, States have prepared Contingency Plans which include activities like deepening of wells; rejuvenation, repair, replacement of pumping machinery including handpumps; augmentation of source; construction of new wells, re-boring of old tube wells, hydro-fracturing and water supply through tankers. The Ministry had also requested the States to send regular reports on the various activities taken up by them to mitigate drinking water problems. Minister of Agriculture and Food Processing Industries and Minister of Rural Development and Drinking Water and Sanitation along with a team of Central officials visited Maharashtra , Karnataka, Gujarat, Haryana and Punjab in August 2012, to assess the drought situation including scarcity of drinking water. Inter-Ministerial Central Teams also visited Maharashtra, Karnataka, Gujarat , Kerala and Rajasthan for the same purpose. (c) Yes Madam. The States of Karnataka, Maharashtra, Kerala, Gujarat, Punjab Haryanaand Rajasthan had submitted requests for additional financial assistance for drinking water supply to deal with the drought like situation. (d) The funds released to these States during the last three years and the current year under the National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) Programme and Natural Calamity components, are as below: (inRscrore)
State Name 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Progr. Calamity Progr. Calamity Progr. Calamity Progr. Calamity Karnataka 590.67 37.19 703.8 - 659.12 8.66 804.34 38.2 Maharashtra 647.81 - 714.94 3.48 728.35 - 590.28 15 Gujarat 482.75 - 609.1 - 571.05 - 702.73 - Rajasthan 1012.16 - 1099.49 - 1153.76 - 1255.36 11 Haryana 206.89 - 276.9 - 237.74 - 311.41 - Punjab 88.881 - 106.59 - 123.44 - 142.42 - Tamilnadu 317.95 - 393.53 - 417.31 12.24 570.17 - Kerala 152.04 - 151.43 8.4 113.39 - 167.86 - SANITATION FACILITIES 14th March 2013 LSQ 2970 SHRI CHANDRAKANT RAGHUNATH PATIL SHRI HARIN PATHAK SHRI TUFANI SAROJ SHRI PRADEEP KUMAR SINGH SHRI SURESH KUMAR SHETKAR
SMT. DARSHANA VIKRAM JARDOSH Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the present status of sanitation coverage in each State/UT; (b) whether the number of Individual House Hold Latrines (IHHLs) and public toilets in the country is not sufficient to meet the requirement; (c) if so, the details thereof and the reasons therefor, State/UT-wise; (d) whether the Government proposes to enhance technical and financial assistance under sanitation schemes; (e) if so, the details thereof; and (f) the steps taken/being taken by the Government and the role of the States in this regard? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a): State-wise sanitation coverage in rural areas of the country as per Census 2011 is at Annexure-1. (b)&(c): As per Census 2011 data, 11.30 crore households are not having access to latrines, States/UT-wise details is at Annexure-2. Large section of Indian population are not convinced of the need to stop open defecation because of lack of proper awareness about the problems associated with open defecation. Building toilets is often not a priority even for people who can afford to construct toilet & use it. A large number of people also defecate in the open because they can not afford to build a toilet from their own resources. (d) to (e): Government of India constantly provide all the technical assistance required to all the States/UTs through its advisories, guidelines and training. The Government of India has recently enhanced the financial assistance under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA).as per details given below: The scope of providing incentives for individual household latrine units has been widened to cover all APL households who belong to SCs, STs, small and marginal farmers, landless labourers with homesteads, physically challenged and women headed households along-with all BPL households. Financial incentive for construction of toilets has been raised for all eligible beneficiaries to Rs. 4600/- from the earlier amount of Rs 3200/-.under NBA. In addition upto Rs. 4500/- can be spent under Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme for construction of the toilet .Along-with beneficiary contribution of Rs. 900/-, the total unit cost of toilet is now Rs. 10000/-. (f): Under NBA, following steps have been taken : # A shift from motivating individual household toilet construction to covering whole communities in a Gram Panchayat saturation mode for holistic sanitation outcomes. # The provision of enhanced incentive for individual household latrine units to identified APLs along-with all BPL households. # More emphasis on Information Education Communication (IEC).with earmarked 15% of the total outlay of district projects for IEC activities. With a view to give thrust to a new approach towards IEC, the Ministry has launched a Communication and Advocacy Strategy (2012-2017). # Conjoint approach with National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) to ensure water availability for sanitation in Gram Panchayats. Focused convergence of rural sanitation with associated Ministries including Health, School Education, Women and Child Development with NBA. Recasting component of Solid and Liquid Waste Management (SLWM) to a project mode in convergence with MGNREGS . Role of State : Sanitation is a State subject and Centre is only supplementing the efforts of the State Governments for promoting rural sanitation. The State Water and Sanitation Mission (SWSM), set up under the State/UT Government are responsible for coordination and convergence among State Departments dealing with Rural Drinking Water Supply, Rural Sanitation, School
Education, Health, Women and Child Development, Water Resources, Agriculture etc.. The SWSMs also supervise implementation of NBA in the project districts of the State, ensure convergence mechanism between line departments, prepare the Annual Implementation Plan for each district as per the progress made by districts, receive Grant-in-aid from Centre earmarked for specific project districts and disburse to the District Water and Sanitation Missions (DWSMs.). All projects sanctioned by Government of India also need to be approved by State Scheme Sanctioning Committee (SSSC). Annexure-1 Statement referred in part (a) of the reply to Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 2970 due for reply on 14.03.2013. S. No. States/UTs Sanitation Coverage as per Census 2011 1 A & N Islands 61.08 2 Andhra Pradesh 34.88 3 Arunachal Pradesh 55.75 4 Assam 61.54 5 Bihar 18.61 6 Chandigarh 94.31 7 Chhattisgarh 14.85 8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 29.28 9 Daman & Diu 65.80 10 Goa 72.60 11 Gujarat 34.24 12 Haryana 57.71 13 Himachal Pradesh 67.45 14 Jammu & Kashmir 41.71 15 Jharkhand 8.33 16 Karnataka 31.89 17 Kerala 94.41 18 Lakshadweep 98.34 19 Madhya Pradesh 13.58 20 Maharashtra 44.20 21 Manipur 87.73 22 Meghalaya 56.94 23 Mizoram 87.10 24 Nagaland 77.69 25 NCT of Delhi 86.50 26 Odisha 15.32 27 Puducherry 40.41 28 Punjab 71.89 29 Rajasthan 20.13 30 Sikkim 85.14 31 Tamil Nadu 26.73 32 Tripura 84.59 33 Uttar Pradesh 22.87 34 Uttarakhand 54.96 35 West Bengal 48.70 INDIA 32.67 Annexure-2 Statement referred in part (b) and (c) of the reply to Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 2970 due for reply on 14.03.2013. S. No. States/UTs No. of households without access to toilets as per Census 2011 1 A & N Islands 22973 2 Andhra Pradesh 9277643 3 Arunachal Pradesh 86616 4 Assam 2066999 5 Bihar 13776940 6 Chandigarh 386 7 Chhattisgarh 3733268
8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 25040 9 Daman & Diu 4360 10 Goa 34157 11 Gujarat 4449164 12 Haryana 1254203 13 Himachal Pradesh 426566 14 Jammu & Kashmir 873092 15 Jharkhand 4295812 16 Karnataka 5356694 17 Kerala 229103 18 Lakshadweep 42 19 Madhya Pradesh 9612238 20 Maharashtra 7262645 21 Manipur 41208 22 Meghalaya 181784 23 Mizoram 13531 24 Nagaland 63563 25 NCT of Delhi 10684 26 Odisha 6896152 27 Puducherry 56685 28 Punjab 931868 29 Rajasthan 7579854 30 Sikkim 13730 31 Tamil Nadu 7007398 32 Tripura 93644 33 Uttar Pradesh 19649918 34 Uttarakhand 632710 35 West Bengal 7036829 INDIA 112997499 ALLOCATION FOR TRIBAL SUB PLAN 25th April 2013 LSQ*435 SHRI LAXMAN TUDU SHRI MANSUKHBHAI D. VASAVA Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether the Government has earmarked 10 per cent of the annual budget allocation for Tribal Sub-Plan under the National Rural Drinking Water Programme; (b) if so, the details thereof; (c) the details of the amount earmarked for Tribal Sub-Plan during each of the last three years; and (d) the details of achievement made sofar with the help of the earmarked funds to provide drinking water to the habitations falling in tribal areas? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER & SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) to (d): A statement is laid on the Table of the House. Statement referred to in reply to Lok Sabha Starred Question No.435 due for answer on 25.4. 2013. (a) & (b): Yes, Madam. Since 2011-12, at the national level, 10% of the National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) budget is earmarked for Tribal Sub Plan (TSP). States are required to utilize from out of the total State NRDWP allocation a
portion for TSP in proportion to the percentage of population of rural Scheduled Tribe (ST) persons in the State to the total rural population of the State, which when aggregated at the National level comes to 10% of the NRDWP budget. (c): The amounts earmarked for TSP under the NRDWP in the years 2011-12 and 2012-13 are: Year Amount (In Rs. Crore) 2011-12 850.00 2012-13 1050.00 No amount was earmarked for TSP in 2010-11. (d): The achievement in coverage of Scheduled Tribe concentrated rural habitations with drinking water supply under the NRDWP, in the years 2011-12 and 2012-13 are as under: Year Coverage of ST Population Concentrated Habitations Achievement 2011-12 28009 2012-13 29060 As on 28.02.2013 MDGS UNDER SANITATION SECTOR 25th April 2013 LSQ 4854 SMT KAMLA DEVI PATLE Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the details of the progress made under the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in the field of sanitation in the country including Chhattisgarh, State/UT-wise; (b) the details of the States which have not achieved MDGs; and (c) the steps taken by the Government in this regard? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a)&(b): Target 7c, set under Millennium Development Goals (MDG) 7, seeks to halve, by 2015, the proportion of people without sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation (based on 1990 data). This would imply that at least 54.7% of the rural households should have access to sanitation by 2015 to meet MDG target. According to the information presented in the WHO/UNICEF report on ‘Progress on Sanitation and Drinking Water 2012 Update’, the use of sanitation facilities as a percentage of population was 33% in rural areas of the country. As per Census 2011 also, 32.67 % of rural households reported to have access to toilets. No MDG targets have been set for the States, but based on above criteria, the targets have been worked out & shown in Annexure-I along-with the status of achievement as per Census 2011. The states with higher positive values of gap between MDG targets & Sanitation Coverage reported by Census 2011 are the ones, that are lagging behind. (c): Government of India has designed a paradigm shift in Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC) which is now called the Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA), in the XIIth Five Year Plan. The objective of NBA is to achieve sustainable behavior change with provision of sanitary facilities in entire communities in a phased, saturation mode with “Nirmal Grams’ as outcomes. Under NBA, following steps have been taken:
# A shift from motivating individual household toilet construction to covering whole communities in a Gram Panchayat saturation mode for holistic sanitation outcomes. The scope of providing incentives for individual household latrine units has been widened to cover all APL households who belong to SCs, STs, small and marginal farmers, landless labourers with homesteads, physically challenged and women headed households along-with all BPL households. Financial incentive for construction of toilets has been raised for all eligible beneficiaries to Rs. 4600/- from the earlier amount of Rs 3200/-.under NBA. In addition upto Rs. 4500/- can be spent under Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme for construction of the toilet. Along-with beneficiary contribution of Rs. 900/-, the total unit cost of toilet is now Rs. 10000/-. # More emphasis on Information Education Communication (IEC).with earmarked 15% of the total outlay of district projects for IEC activities. With a view to give thrust to a new approach towards IEC, the Ministry has launched a Communication and Advocacy Strategy (2012-2017). # Conjoint approach with National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) to ensure water availability for sanitation in Gram Panchayats. Focused convergence of rural sanitation with associated Ministries including Health, School Education, Women and Child Development with NBA. Annexure-I Statement referred in part (a) and (b) of the reply to Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 4854 due for reply on 25.4.2013 State/UT wise MDG targets and achievements in Rural Sanitation Coverage (in% of households)
S. No. State/UT MDG Targets for Rural Sanitation Coverage to be achieved by 2015
Rural Sanitation Coverage as per Census 2011
Gap between MDG Target and Sanitation Coverage reported by Census2011
A B C D E=(C-D) 1 A & N Islands 63.16 61.08 2.08 2 Andhra Pradesh 53.31 34.88 18.43 3 Arunachal Pradesh 71.31 55.75 15.56 4 Assam 65.27 61.54 3.73 5 Bihar 52.48 18.61 33.87 6 Chandigarh 51.53 94.31 -42.78 7 Chhattisgarh** 51.82 14.85 36.97 8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 55.3 29.28 26.01 9 Daman & Diu 54.19 65.8 -11.61 10 Goa 64.99 72.6 -7.61 11 Gujarat 55.58 34.24 21.34 12 Haryana 53.27 57.71 -4.45 13 Himachal Pradesh 53.21 67.45 -14.24 14 Jammu & Kashmir* NA 41.71 NA 15 Jharkhand** 52.48 8.33 44.15 16 Karnataka 53.42 31.89 21.54 17 Kerala 72.04 94.41 -22.37 18 Lakshadweep 89.44 98.34 -8.9 19 Madhya Pradesh 51.82 13.58 38.24 20 Maharashtra 53.32 44.2 9.12 21 Manipur 66.51 87.73 -21.22 22 Meghalaya 59.07 56.94 2.12 23 Mizoram 79.19 87.1 -7.91 24 Nagaland 63.43 77.69 -14.26 25 NCT of Delhi 64.8 86.5 -21.69 26 Odisha 51.79 15.32 36.47 27 Puducherry 55.92 40.41 15.51 28 Punjab 57.9 71.89 -14 29 Rajasthan 53.32 20.13 33.19 30 Sikkim 65.1 85.14 -20.04 31 Tamil Nadu 53.59 26.73 26.86 32 Tripura 81.21 84.59 -3.38
33 Uttar Pradesh 53.22 22.87 30.35 34 Uttarakhand** 53.22 54.96 -1.74 35 West Bengal 56.15 48.7 7.45 INDIA 54.74 32.67 22.07 # No census conducted in 1991 in Jammu & Kashmir, so no MDG target is available ## Three States i.e. Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand and Uttarakhand were bifurcated from M.P., Bihar and U.P. So their targets are same as original state's MDG targets DEFUNCT TOILETS 25th April 2013 LSQ 4931 SHRI MANSUKHBHAI D. VASAVA SHRI HARISH CHOUDHARY Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether the Union Government has urged the State Governments to conduct baseline survey of the defunct toilets in the country under the Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan; (b) if so, the details thereof; and (c) the details of various works done by the Government and success achieved to renovate the aforesaid toilets so far? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) to (c): Yes sir, Government of India has requested all States/UTs to carry out fresh baseline survey to revise the Project Implementation Plans under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) in view of the modified NBA guidelines. The Baseline Survey inter-alia also seeks to identify and enumerate the dysfunctional toilets. The Survey is in progress. However under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan, responsibility to maintain and repair the Individual Household Latrines (IHHLs) lies with beneficieries. SANITATION FACILITIES 25th April 2013 LSQ 5009 SHRI ANANDRAO ADSUL SHRI SHIVAJI ADHALRAO PATIL SHRI GAJANAN DHARMSHI BABAR SHRI P. KUMAR SHRI NIKHIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY SHRI DHARMENDRA YADAV SHRI ARVIND KUMAR CHAUDHARY SHRI HEMANAND BISWAL SHRI PRALHAD VENKATESH JOSHI SMT. PUTUL KUMARI Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether outlay for improving sanitation facilities has been increased by the Government during the 12th Plan; (b) if so, the details thereof as compared to the 11th Plan; (c) whether the Government has made any assessment of sanitation facilities in the country;
(d) if so, the details and outcome thereof; (e) whether sanitation has been accorded a priority under the Bharat Nirman Scheme; (f) if so, whether this has led the Government to increase its targets and funds earmarked for the purpose; (g) if so, the details thereof; (h) whether it is a fact that there has been a demand to spend at least one per cent of the GDP on sanitation; and (i) if so, the details thereof and the reaction of the Government thereto? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a): Yes, sir. (b): For 12th Plan, an outlay of Rs. 34,377 crore has been provided for Rural Sanitation (425% higher than the 11th Plan) as compared to Rs. 6540 crore provided during 11th Plan. (c): Yes sir, the Government has available an assessment on sanitation facilities in the rural areas from the Census-2011. (d): According to the results of Census 2011, 32.67 % of rural households are reported to have access to toilets. (e) to (g): Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) is not under Bharat Nirman Scheme. However, the Government of India has accorded a high priority to the Sanitation Sector. In the 12th Plan an outlay of Rs. 34,377 crores has been provided for rural sanitation as compared to Rs. 6540 crores in the 11th Plan, which is a significantly higher allocation. The goal is to achieve 100% access to sanitation for all rural households in the Country by 2022 under the NBA. Also as per 12th plan objectives of NBA, 50% of all the Gram Panchayats are to become Nirmal Grams by 2017. (h): The Government is not aware of any such specific demand. (i): Does not arise. TARGETS SET UNDER DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION SCHEMES 25th April 2013 LSQ 5010 SHRI P.L. PUNIA SHRI A.K.S. VIJAYAN SHRI DILIP SINGH JU DEV Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the details of targets set and achievements made under drinking water and sanitation schemes during each of the last three years, State/UT-wise; (b) the details of the proposals received by the Union Government from various States under the said schemes; and (c) the action taken by the Government on the said proposals? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a): The Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation administers two centrally sponsored schemes namely, National Rural Drinking Water Program (NRDWP) and Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA). The targets set and achievements in coverage of habitations with drinking water supply under NRDWP from 2010-11 to 2012-13 is at Annexure I. As regards NBA, being a demand driven scheme, hence no State-wise targets have been set. However, State / UT-wise achievements in construction of Individual Household Latrines, School toilets and Anganwadi toilets during the last 3 years are at Annexure-II.
(b)&(c): Under NRDWP, State Governments are empowered to plan and approve drinking water supply schemes in the State Level Scheme Sanctioning Committee. They do not submit proposals to the Union Government under NRDWP. As regards NBA, during the last 3 years, 17 district Project Implementation Plans have been submitted to the Ministry and approved. ANNEXURE Annexure I Statement referred in part (a) of the reply to Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 5010 due for reply on 25.4.2013 Targets and achievements in coverage of habitations with drinking water supply under NRDWP from 2010-11 to 2012-13 (Number of habitations) 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
S No. State/ UT Target Achievement Target Achievement Target Achievement
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 6843 6971 5700 6183 5477 5699
2 BIHAR 18774 14221 16600 11243 15015 10085
3 CHATTISGARH 11255 7847 11454 7977 12642 6145
4 GOA 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 GUJARAT 1100 1079 1126 1165 1150 1812
6 HARYANA 1007 752 943 859 955 895
7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 5000 5094 2557 2558 2532 2251
8 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 1709 903 1451 536 1279 722
9 JHARKHAND 14735 11399 19559 17425 16583 17187
10 KARNATAKA 13925 6130 9695 8757 10339 8708
11 KERALA 744 405 824 419 696 646
12 MADHYA PRADESH 13399 13937 16744 15644 17074 13149
13 MAHARASHTRA 9745 8987 6502 6364 5940 2954
14 ORISSA 5354 7525 8642 6782 12209 19370
15 PUNJAB 2023 1658 1630 643 1473 435
16 RAJASTHAN 8878 7254 14262 7885 9137 2420
17 TAMIL NADU 7318 7039 6000 6000 7000 6585
18 UTTAR PRADESH 2142 1879 23300 23134 24000 2584
19 UTTARAKHAND 1565 1324 1359 1102 1085 758
20 WEST BENGAL 6630 5967 6096 4619 4152 4232
21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 517 601 308 415 292 153
22 ASSAM 8467 6467 7304 6601 7230 5172
23 MANIPUR 333 227 330 234 250 167
24 MEGHALAYA 760 380 781 510 628 173
25 MIZORAM 124 121 128 122 57 5
26 NAGALAND 105 128 109 116 175 155
27 SIKKIM 175 100 200 50 280 63
28 TRIPURA 834 976 982 1024 1052 1323
29 ANDAMAN and NICOBAR 0 0 0 0 0 0
30 CHANDIGARH 0 0 0 0 0 0
31 DADRA and NAGAR HAVELI 0 0 0 0 0 0
32 DAMAN and DIU 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 LAKSHADWEEP 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 PUDUCHERRY 17 12 0 0 30 0 Total 143478 119383 164586 138367 158732 113848
Annexure II Statement referred in part (a) of the reply to Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 5010 due for reply on 25.4.2013 State/UT-wise achievement in construction of Individual household latrines, school toilets and anganwadi toilets during last 3 years
S.N. State Name
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Individual household latrines
School Toilets AnganwadiToilets
Individual household latrines
School Toilets AnganwadiToilets
Individual household latrines
School Toilets AnganwadiToilets
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 1049704 3961 816 654282 7308 1048 381655 4199 1574
2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 19799 335 331 27781 4 76 4887 0 8
3 ASSAM 498849 4528 1004 510243 633 120 272839 52 76 4 BIHAR 717792 8679 309 839927 22575 1521 787654 16222 4593 5 CHHATTISGARH 236164 616 262 82496 1918 365 51064 1387 220 6 D & N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 GOA 800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 GUJARAT 515224 2323 2343 321357 5182 474 171977 4663 451 9 HARYANA 132137 1340 870 103913 657 633 62949 148 315
10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 216571 6429 4400 30066 802 132 5183 1215 1066
11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 125228 1480 42 70626 2682 97 62441 1863 67
12 JHARKHAND 296678 2158 1451 53479 1228 1067 48204 543 684 13 KARNATAKA 810104 4719 3025 414782 1062 1046 295195 1758 687 14 KERALA 20241 29 195 2188 76 60 5674 34 322
15 MADHYA PRADESH 1166016 16570 4419 900769 43687 1856 551935 1033 804
16 MAHARASHTRA 562183 4222 1574 519563 539 579 189306 159 5800 17 MANIPUR 49576 1227 779 55306 703 144 43917 0 53 18 MEGHALAYA 65417 2833 710 51550 2077 595 14134 1603 113 19 MIZORAM 1611 0 0 17237 0 236 4967 106 219 20 NAGALAND 18224 578 60 46318 304 168 22149 28 20 21 ORISSA 853303 3418 1459 359171 1984 3320 118318 1108 956 22 PUDUCHERRY 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 PUNJAB 118415 1000 1951 32535 5 1197 57421 345 620 24 RAJASTHAN 750948 6323 1734 730385 5297 2015 242707 14283 3350 25 SIKKIM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 TAMIL NADU 473647 1464 182 410794 5605 1202 265824 1561 1144 27 TRIPURA 30392 588 645 24761 1035 777 7035 412 2 28 UTTAR PRADESH 2915407 18410 16076 1613384 18 504 130475 30 80 29 UTTARAKHAND 132913 219 6 125051 192 29 97472 344 19 30 WEST BENGAL 466311 12060 6180 800900 16898 9148 559115 19475 12176 Total 12243731 105509 50823 8798864 122471 28409 4454497 72571 35419
CONTAMINATED DRINKING WATER 2nd May 2013 LSQ 5754 SMT. SEEMA UPADHYAY SMT. SUSHILA SAROJ SHRI MAHESHWAR HAZARI SMT. USHA VERMA SHRI HARSH VARDHAN Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the expenditure incurred for providing safe drinking water in the areas having presence of fluoride, arsenic and other chemicals in ground water during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise; (b) the number of habitations covered so far in supplying safe drinking water through pipeline; (c) whether the Government proposes to set up water quality testing laboratories for testing the purity of water in such areas; and (d) if so, the details thereof ? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER & SANITATIO (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) As reported by the State Governments on the Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) of the Ministry, the expenditure incurred on schemes for providing safe drinking water in the areas having presence of chemical contamination in drinking water sources including fluoride, arsenic and other chemicals in ground water during 2012-13, State/UT-wise is at Annexure. (b) As reported by the states on the online Integrated Management Information System of the Ministry (IMIS), out of the 16,66,075 rural habitations in the country, 5,05,309 rural habitations have access to safe drinking water supply through pipes. (c)&(d) Under the NRDWP, 3% of national allocation, is provided to states under the Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillance component (WQM&S). State are to use allocation under this component to set up State, District and Sub District level water quality testing laboratories to test drinking water samples. As reported by the States on the IMIS, as on 30.4.2013, 24 State level, 732 district level and 1154 Sub District level laboratories have been set up Annexure Annexure referred to in reply to part (a) of LSUS Q. No 5754 Expenditure on covering Quality Affected habitations (In Rs Crore) SL STATE/UT 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13* 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 78.61 63.2 97.56 2 BIHAR 135.81 69.45 75.4 3 CHATTISGARH 3.14 11.75 8.06 4 GOA 0 0 0 5 GUJARAT 34.11 36.59 42.42 6 HARYANA 0 0 0.11 7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 18.94 15.83 8.57 8 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 4.42 13.47 7.74 9 JHARKHAND 23.75 5.36 30.58 10 KARNATAKA 79.4 46.67 116.24 11 KERALA 0 0 20.81 12 MADHYA PRADESH 47.35 30.39 22.99 13 MAHARASHTRA 93.06 59.93 54.04 14 ORISSA 39 41.59 23.04 15 PUNJAB 13.92 10.83 6 16 RAJASTHAN 75 9.36 80.78 17 TAMIL NADU 11.32 10.04 16.22
18 UTTAR PRADESH 139.67 96.47 9.4 19 UTTARAKHAND 0.3 0 0.11 20 WEST BENGAL 91.06 278.36 121.3 21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 2.59 0 0.91 22 ASSAM 174.96 161.59 199.32 23 MANIPUR 0 0 0.9 24 MEGHALAYA 0.66 0.02 0.32 25 MIZORAM 0 0 0 26 NAGALAND 11.78 10.2 11.95 27 SIKKIM 0 0 0 28 TRIPURA 17.01 26.56 13.41 29 ANDAMAN and NICOBAR 0 0 0 30 CHANDIGARH 0 0 0 31 DADRA and NAGAR HAVELI 0 0 0 32 DAMAN and DIU 0 0 0 33 DELHI 0 0 0 34 LAKSHADWEEP 0 0 0 35 PUDUCHERRY 0 0 0 Total 1095.88 997.66 968.18 * As reported on IMIS as on 28.02.2013 SCHEME FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TOILETS 2nd May 2013 LSQ 5836 SHRI PREMCHANDRA GUDDU Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- to Unstarred Question No. 4465 dated 20 December, 2012 regarding Scheme for Construction of Toilets and state: (a) whether the required information has been collected; (b) if so, the details thereof; and (c) the reaction of the Government thereto? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a)& (b): Government of Madhya Pradesh has furnished the requisite information against Unstarred Question No 4465 dated 20.12.2012 regarding Scheme for Construction of Toilets. The details are furnished below: Details of the Unstarred Reply Question No. 4465 that was to be replied on 20.12.2012 1 2 (a) whether the Government is (a)& (b) Government of Madhya Pradesh has aware that the name of the scheme informed that Maryada Abhiyan is a strategy for construction of clean toilets / campaign for the dignity of the women in Madhya Pradesh under Bharat s an umbrella Scheme under Nirmal Bharat Nirman has been changed to Maryada a Abhiyan (NBA). The main focus of this Abhiyan; intervention is to prioritize dignity and (b) if so, the details thereof; safety of women while providing them with safe and appropriate sanitation facilities
in their homes and build ODF villages. The target is to achieve 100% Open Defecation Free (ODF) status all over the state in three phases with the conjoint approach of water and sanitation , as per NBA guidelines, as below:- # Phase-1 (2012-13): To cover 5800 villages where all households are covered through piped water supply, villages of Burhanpur district, Badnawar block (in Dhar district) and Budni block (in Sehore district) from 2012 to March 2013. The projected targets for this period are: 0.7 million toilets for BPL families & 0.7 million toilets for APL. # Phase-2: To cover all other villages where piped water supply schemes can be made functional through repair work. # Phase -3: All remaining villages in the State. The State Government has denied that they have changed the name of NBA, stating Maryada is a focused intervention for the dignity of women in the State. (c) whether the State Governments have the authority to change the names of central schemes; and (d) if not, the action likely to be taken by the Government in this regard? (c) No. (d) The Government of India has advised State Government of Madhya Pradesh that as NBA funds are utilized , the name of the Government of India scheme should be there i.e. NBA. The State Government has also been advised that the State Government can not change the name of the scheme to Maryada and claim that it is only the strategy under NBA. (c): As indicated above in reply to part (d) of the Unstarred Question No. 4465, the Government of India has advised State Government of Madhya Pradesh that as NBA funds are utilized, the name of the Government of India scheme should be there i.e. NBA. The State Government has also been advised that the State Government can not change the name of the scheme to Maryada and claim that it is only the strategy under NBA. NIRMAL GRAM VILLAGES 2nd May 2013 LSQ 5857 SMT HELEN DAVIDSON J SHRI KIRTI (JHA) AZAD Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the number of villages transformed into Nirmal Grams in the country including Tamil Nadu during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise; (b) the details of the target fixed for transforming villages into Nirmal Grams during the financial years 2012-13 and 2013-14 in the country including Tamil Nadu, State/UT-wise; (c) the funds earmarked and released for the purpose during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise; (d) whether the State and the District level review workshops have been organised for the purpose; and (e) if so, the details thereof during the said period, State/UT-wise?
MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a): The number of Gram Panchayats transformed into Nirmal Grams in the country including Tamil Nadu during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise is at Annexure-1. (b): The details of the target fixed for transforming villages into Nirmal Grams during the financial years 2012-13 and 2013-14 in the country including Tamil Nadu, State/UT-wise is at Annexure-2. (c): The funds released by Centre during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise is at Annexure-3. (d)&(e): The Government of India(GoI) organized the regional review meetings for Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan(NBA), covering all the States/UTs were organized on 29-6-2012, 06-07-2012, 15-07-2012, 20-07-2012, 27-7-2012 and 03-08-2012 at Agartala, Chandigarh, Ranchi, Raipur, Jaipur and Hyderabad respectively. One day workshop on Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) for the orientation of State and District Swachchhata Preraks was organized by the GoI on 18th September, 2012 at Vigyan Bhawan, New Delhi. In addition to review by GoI, State Water and Sanitation Mission(SWSM) of the State has the responsibility to supervise the implementation of NBA in the project districts. Annexure-1 Statement referred in part (a) of the reply to Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 5857 due for reply on 02.05.2013. Number of Gram Panchayats transformed into Nirmal Grams during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise S.N. State/UT-wise 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13* 2013-14 1 Andhra Pradesh 44 142 1236 0 2 Arunachal Pradesh 3 14 124 0 3 Assam 2 5 37 0 4 Bihar 13 6 53 0 5 Chhattisgarh 172 124 210 0 6 D & N Haveli 0 0 7 Goa 0 0 8 Gujarat 189 422 794 0 9 Haryana 259 330 1284 0 10 Himachal Pradesh 168 323 1600 0 11 Jammu & Kashmir 0 2 15 0 12 Jharkhand 0 0 17 0 13 Karnataka 121 103 441 0 14 Kerala 103 7 19 0 15 Madhya Pradesh 344 212 2007 0 16 Maharashtra 694 442 2786 0 17 Manipur 0 0 8 0 18 Meghalaya 160 365 876 0 19 Mizoram 5 53 95 0 20 Nagaland 23 17 127 0 21 Orissa 81 48 380 0 22 Puducherry 0 0 23 Punjab 51 19 544 0 24 Rajasthan 82 32 410 0 25 Sikkim 0 0 0 0 26 Tamil Nadu 237 51 1282 0 27 Tripura 0 0 0 0 28 Uttar Pradesh 13 41 1634 0 29 Uttarakhand 44 63 307 0 30 West Bengal 0 36 77 0 Grand Totals 2808 2857 16363 0
* As per Online Monitoring System maintained by Ministry ,however, this is subject to verification. Annexure-2 Statement referred in part (b) of the reply to Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No. 5857 due for reply on 02.05.2013. The details of the target fixed for Nirmal Grams during the financial years 2012-13 and 2013-14 in the country including Tamil Nadu, State/UT-wise S.N. State/UT-wise 2012-13 2013-14* 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 3350 550 2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 161 123 3 ASSAM 93 111 4 BIHAR 634 599 5 CHHATTISGARH 498 560 6 D & N HAVELI 0 0 7 GOA 0 24 8 GUJARAT 1406 2415 9 HARYANA 1721 1845 10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 2129 350 11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 17 480 12 JHARKHAND 171 285 13 KARNATAKA 748 521 14 KERALA 20 0 15 MADHYA PRADESH 5332 5332 16 MAHARASHTRA 5149 3695 17 MANIPUR 149 100 18 MEGHALAYA 1989 800 19 MIZORAM 249 0 20 NAGALAND 142 142 21 ORISSA 1127 900 22 PUDUCHERRY 0 0 23 PUNJAB 6738 500 24 RAJASTHAN 1057 487 25 SIKKIM 0 26 TAMIL NADU 1698 2167 27 TRIPURA 63 63 28 UTTAR PRADESH 3350 3350 29 UTTARAKHAND 729 145 30 WEST BENGAL 221 621 Grand Totals 38941 26165 Annexure-3 Statement referred in part (c) of the reply to Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No. 5857 due for reply on 02.05.2013. The funds released by Centre during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. State/UT-wise 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14* (Opening Balance as on 01/04/13)
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 13880 9657.28 15022.69 23123.73 2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 119.26 204.88 989.08 1163.8 3 ASSAM 9437.36 12251.18 11943.31 11961.13 4 BIHAR 11259.76 17219.09 47814.55 34595.56 5 CHHATTISGARH 5479.58 2702.42 5731.55 7567.08 6 D & N HAVELI 0 0 0 1.48
7 GOA 0 0 0 22.39 8 GUJARAT 4692.36 4308.28 3949.42 4000.65 9 HARYANA 2361.49 335.27 0 365.3 10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 2939.78 469.57 1666.96 954.73 11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 2792.51 967.95 3511.01 1178.97 12 JHARKHAND 5466.98 7264.92 4193.31 12554.06 13 KARNATAKA 4458.66 8709.28 15950.81 16168.66 14 KERALA 2286.34 158.89 0 280.3 15 MADHYA PRADESH 14402.6 15076 25812.96 13686.21 16 MAHARASHTRA 12911.7 5799.94 11872.83 10192.16 17 MANIPUR 80.3 1087.87 3509.18 2706.35 18 MEGHALAYA 3105.23 1115.72 2540.01 1807.59 19 MIZORAM 653.4 31.38 497.48 502.01 20 NAGALAND 1229.45 174.06 2302.68 1813.74 21 ORISSA 6836.73 11171.7 0 15957.38 22 PUDUCHERRY 0 0 0 15.77 23 PUNJAB 1116.39 283.18 0 1276.49 24 RAJASTHAN 5670.74 5424.41 13770.97 14667.4 25 SIKKIM 112.86 0 159.47 272.33 26 TAMIL NADU 7794.35 7662.06 12645.32 10007.3 27 TRIPURA 925.14 133.92 430.47 645.69 28 UTTAR PRADESH 22594 16920.72 25776.25 15585.1 29 UTTARAKHAND 1707.61 804.76 2541.96 1842.13 30 WEST BENGAL 8327.5 14124.34 30638.39 19403.38 Grand Totals 152642.08 144059.07 243270.66 224318.86 *No fund has been released during 2013-14 yet. DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION SCHEMES 2nd May 2013 LSQ 5862 SHRI MUNDE GOPINATHRAO PANDURANG SHRI LAL JI TANDON Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether the Government has conducted any survey for identifying the villages and tribal areas in various States of the country facing shortage of safe drinking water and sanitation facilities; (b) if so, the details thereof, indicating the villages and tribal areas separately. State/UT-wise: (c) the steps taken by the Government to cover more villages under drinking water and sanitation schemes; and (d) the mechanism put in place to monitor the implementation of these schemes all over the country? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANK1) (a)&(b): As regard safe drinking water, as per information reported by States/UTs on the online Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) of the Ministry, out of a total of 16,66,075 rural habitations in the country, as on 1.4.2012, 2,58,241 habitations were partially covered. i..e. having less than 40 litres per capita per day of drinking water supply. The corresponding figures for Scheduled Tribe (ST) concentrated habitations are 3,56,949 and 71.258 respectively. State-wise/UT wise figures are at Annexure I. As regards sanitation facilities, no survey has been conducted for identifying the villages and tribal areas in various States of the country facing shortage of sanitation facilities. Under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA), projects are approved taking districts as unit covering al! Gram Panchayats and villages. As per information reported by States/UTs on the online monitoring system of
the Ministry, out of 2.53,755 Gram Panchayats, 2,09,387 Gram Panchayats are partially covered with sanitation facilities. State/UT-wise status is at Annexure-II. There are 147 Tribal concentrated districts in the country. Against a total target of 3,24,73,004 individual household latrines, 2,45,03,389 latrines have been constructed in these districts so far. (c): The Government of India administers the National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) through which technical and financial assistance is provided to the States, to supplement their efforts in providing safe and adequate and potable drinking water supply to rural areas including the tribal areas. Under the NRDWP. partially covered and quality affected rural habitations are prioritised for coverage with drinking water supply. 10% of allocation is earmarked for the Tribal Sub-plan for coverage of the ST concentrated habitations. Till date, NBA Projects have been sanctioned in 607 rural districts of the country. All villages in the districts are covered under the programme. (d): The Government monitors the implementation of the NRDWP by States through the monthly physical and financial progress reports provided by them on the online monitoring system of the Ministry; review meetings are held periodically with State Government officials; Administrative and Technical Officers of the Ministry visit the States regularly to observe the implementation of the schemes etc; States are also required to prepare Annual Action Plan (AAP) every year and discuss the same with the Ministry so that the priorities under NRDWP are fixed and followed. As regard NBA. comprehensive web-based online monitoring systems for NBA is in place with Gram Panchayat (GP) level data on targets and achievements. The data is being updated at district level and state level. The system has been upgraded with a facility to upload the names and card number for BPL and Identified APL beneficiaries for authentication of data along with the details of SC/ST households. Also Ministry has developed a comprehensive system of monitoring through Performance Review meetings. Area Officers, National Level Monitors and District Level Monitoring and Vigilance and Monitoring Committees at the State/District Level. Annexure-1 Statement referred in part (a) of the reply to Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 5862 due for reply on 2.05.2013. Status of Rural Habitations and ST Drinking Water Supply Concentrated Habitations With Respect To Total RuralHabitations ST Concentrated Habitations s. State Total PartiallyCovered Total PartiallyCovered No. 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 72387 24868 18467 8524 2 BIHAR 107642 4950 1952 19 3 CHATTISGARH 72231 22179 46739 13657 4 GOA 347 45 0 0 5 GUJARAT 34415 347 14290 152 6 HARYANA 7385 1087 1 0 7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 53201 8181 3121 225 8 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 13938 7177 2304 1045 9 JHARKHAND 119191 3336 64322 521 10 KARNATAKA 59575 24986 2744 917 11 KERALA 11883 0 108 0 12 MADHYA PRADESH 127197 26684 56804 13543 13 MAHARASHTRA 100683 7520 17964 854 14 ORISSA 141928 41897 49242 14328 15 PUNJAB 15170 2560 2 16 RAJASTHAN 121133 22531 22920 4140 M TAMIL NADU 94614 3016 2485 40 18 UTTAR PRADESH 260110 12900 211 0 19 UTTARAKHAND 39142 11151 1459 128 20 WEST BENGAL 95395 3655 10413 178 21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 5612 2556 5248 2425 22 ASSAM 86976 20029 17412 4878 23 MANIPUR 2870 1146 2320 990 24 MEGHALAYA 9326 4179 9108 4116 25 MIZORAM 777 61 770 60 26 NAGALAND 1460 266 1442 264 27 SIKKIM 2498 628 381 73 28 TRIPURA 8132 147 4480 78
29 ANDAMAN and NICOBAR 491 57 158 20 30 CHANDIGARH 18 0 0 0
31 DADRA and NAGAR HAVELl 70 70 66 66
32 DAMAN and DIU ' 21 21 6 6 33 DELHI 0 0 0 0 34 LAKSHADWEEP 9 9 9 9 35 PUDUCHERRY 248 2 0 0 Total 1666075 258241 356949 71258 Annexure-2 Statement referred in part (a) and (b) of the reply to Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 5862 due for reply on 2.05.2013. State-wise Total Gram Panchayats and Gram Panchayats partially covered with Sanitation Facilities
S.N. State Name Total GramPanchayats GPs partially covered with Sanitation facilities
l ANDHRA PRADESH 21950 19441 2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 1794 1639 3 ASSAM 4016 3948 4 BIHAR 8593 8324 5 CHHATTISGARH 9858 8831 6 D & N HAVELI 12 12 7 GOA 190 190 8 GUJARAT 14555 11480 9 HARYANA 6283 3421 10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 3245 634 11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 4124 4095 12 JHARKHAND 4631 4389 13 KARNATAKA 5663 4153 14 KERALA 999 0 15 MADHYA PRADESH 23093 19017 16 MAHARASHTRA 28282 15973 17 MANrPUR 2984 2972 18 MEGHALAYA 5564 4100 19 MIZORAM 760 576 20 NAGALAND 1110 893 21 ORISSA 6237 5573 22 PUDUCHERRY 71 71 23 PUNJAB 12845 12135 24 RAJASTHAN 9241 8510 25 SIKKIM 167 3 26 TAMIL NADU 12619 8952 27 TRIPURA 1063 950 28 UTTAR PRADESH 52841 50127 29 UTTARAKHAND 7605 6773 30 WEST BENGAL 3360 2205 Total :- 253755 209387 ALLOCATION UNDER DRINKING WATER SCHEME 2nd May 2013 LSQ 5921 SHRI C. R. PATIL Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the funding pattern between Union Government and State Governments under drinking water schemes;
(b) whether the Government of Gujarat has spent Rs. 11,285 crore during 2004-05 to 2011-12 and Central assistance provided was only 2,421 crore for the said purpose; (c) if so, the reasons for providing less Central assistance to Gujarat; (d) whether the Union Government proposes to reimburse the remaining amount to meet at least 50 per cent expenditure by Government of Gujarat; and (e) if so, the details thereof and if not, the reasons therefor? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a): The Government of India administers the Centrally Sponsored Scheme, National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP), in which financial and technical assistance is provided to the States to supplement their efforts in providing safe and adequate drinking water to the rural areas. Under the NRDWP, the funding pattern between the Centre and the Northeastern States and Jammu & Kashmir is in the ratio of 90: 10, and that between the Centre and States other than Northeastern States and Jammu & Kashmir is 50: 50. (b)& (c): As per data maintained in the Ministry including that available on the Integrated Management Information System (IMIS), the amount released to the State Government of Gujarat by the Ministry of Drinking Water & Sanitation under NRDWP and the erstwhile Accelerated Rural Water Supply Programme (ARWSP), during 2004-05 to 2011-12 is Rs.2573.21 crore. As informed by the Government of Gujarat, the State has released Rs. 11285.19 crore during the same period. Under NRDWP, allocation of funds is made as per prescribed criteria and the States are allocated funds as per their eligibility. During the years 2004-05 to 2011-12, as against allocation of Rs.2346.61 crore to the State of Gujarat, a higher amount of Rs. 2573.21crore has been actually released to the State. Hence, the question of providing less Central assistance to Gujarat does not arise. (d) & (e): Water is State subject. States can, therefore, incur higher expenditure than the required proportionate State share for drinking water schemes. Since the pattern of allocation of funds to states under the NRDWP is as per approved criteria, there is no provision for reimbursing the higher State expenditure incurred by the States, including Gujarat. DEFICIENCY IN SANITATION SCHEME 2nd May 2013 LSQ 5924 DR. NILESH NARAYAN RANE Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether some deficiencies have been found in rural sanitation scheme; (b) if so, the details thereof; and (c) the steps taken by the Government to remove the said deficiencies? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) to (c): Government of India started the Central Rural Sanitation Programme (CRSP) in 1986 to provide sanitation facilities in rural areas. It was simply a supply driven, highly subsidy and infrastructure oriented programme. As a result of deficiencies and low financial allocations, the CRSP had very little impact on the gargantuan problem. The experience of community -driven, awareness-generating campaign based programme in some states and the results of evaluation of CRSP, led to the formulation of Total Sanitation Campaign ( TSC) approach in 1999.The TSC was started as a demand driven, community-led programme with major IEC inputs to make sanitation a felt need of the people. As per the Twelfth Plan Working Group recommendation, the APL-BPL distinction and the very low incentive under the TSC have played havoc with the programme. Many slip-backs in the NGP villages have been attributed to non-availability of water, clearly indicating need to synergize the drinking water and sanitation programme.
Owing to above and to accelerate the progress of sanitation in rural areas, The Government of India has revamped the Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC) as the Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) in the XIIth Five Year Plan. NBA is currently being implemented in 607 rural districts across the country. NBA envisages covering the entire community for saturated outcomes with a view to create Nirmal Gram Panchayats: Under NBA, following steps have been taken: # A shift from motivating individual household toilet construction to covering whole communities in a Gram Panchayat saturation mode for holistic sanitation outcomes. # The scope of providing incentives for individual household latrine units has been widened to cover all APL households who belong to SCs, STs, small and marginal farmers, landless labourers with homesteads, physically challenged and women headed households along-with all BPL households. Financial incentive for construction of toilets has been raised for all eligible beneficiaries to Rs. 4600/- from the earlier amount of Rs 3200/-.under NBA. In addition upto Rs. 4500/- can be spent under Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme for construction of the toilet. Along-with beneficiary contribution of Rs. 900/-, the total amount of Rs. 10000/- is now available for construction of toilets, which in the case of hilly and difficult areas is Rs. 10500/-. # More emphasis on Information Education Communication (IEC) by earmarking 15% of the total outlay of district projects for IEC activities. With a view to give thrust to a new approach towards IEC, the Ministry has launched a Communication and Advocacy Strategy (2012-2017). # Conjoint approach with National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) to ensure water availability for sanitation in Gram Panchayats. Focused convergence of rural sanitation with associated Ministries including Health, School Education, Women and Child Development with NBA. DEMAND FOR DRINKING WATER 2nd May 2013 LSQ 5967 SHRI P. KARUNAKARAN Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether the Union Government has conducted any study about increasing demand for drinking water, keeping in viewthe unprecedented climate condition, rising industrial demand of water and increase in population; (b) if so, the details thereof, State/UTwise; (c) the steps taken by the Government to meet the additional demand; and (d) the amount earmarked for the purpose, State/UT-wise? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a)&(b): The National Commission for Integrated Water Resources Development had assessed that the total water requirement for domestic uses will be about 62 billion cubic metres (BCM) and 111 BCM by the years 2025 and 2050 respectively. (c)&(d) : Rural water supply is a State subject. This Ministry supplements the efforts of the States by providing technical and financial assistance under the centrally sponsored National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP), to provide drinking water supply in rural areas. The State Governments are vested with powers to select, plan, approve and implement drinking water supply schemes under the NRDWP to ensure that the rural population is provided with adequate potable drinking water supply. The State/UT wise allocation and release under NRDWP in 2012-13 is at Annexure. The budget allocation for NRDWP at the national level has been increased from Rs.8500 crore (Revised Estimate) in 2011-12 to Rs.11000 crore in 2013-14. Annexure Annexure referred to in reply to part (c) and (d) of Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 5967 due for 2.5.2013 State/UT wise Allocation and Release under NRDWP in 2012-13
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 563.39 485.14 2 BIHAR 484.24 224.3 3 CHATTISGARH 168.89 148.64 4 GOA 6.07 0.03 5 GUJARAT 578.29 717.47 6 HARYANA 250.24 313.41 7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 153.59 129.9 8 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 510.76 474.5 9 JHARKHAND 191.86 243.43 10 KARNATAKA 922.67 869.24 11 KERALA 193.59 249.04 12 MADHYA PRADESH 447.33 539.56 13 MAHARASHTRA 897.96 846.48 14 ORISSA 243.91 210.58 15 PUNJAB 101.9 144.27 16 RAJASTHAN 1352.54 1411.36 17 TAMIL NADU 394.82 570.17 18 UTTAR PRADESH 1060.87 980.06 19 UTTARAKHAND 159.74 74.28 20 WEST BENGAL 523.53 502.36 21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 145.32 223.22 22 ASSAM 525.71 659.21 23 MANIPUR 69.99 66.21 24 MEGHALAYA 73.96 97.61 25 MIZORAM 48.35 47.92 26 NAGALAND 110.25 110.2 27 SIKKIM 36.69 32.36 28 TRIPURA 70.66 100.59 29 ANDAMAN and NICOBAR 1.15 0.78 30 CHANDIGARH 0 0 31 DADRA and NAGAR HAVELI 0 0 32 DAMAN and DIU 0 0 33 DELHI 0 0 34 LAKSHADWEEP 0 0 35 PUDUCHERRY 1.75 0.88 Total 10290.00 10473.20
WATER PURIFICATION PLANTS 2nd May 2013 LSQ 5968 SHRI A.K.S. VIJAYAN Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether the Government has set up water treatment/purification plants in some coastal areas of the country for providing safe drinking water; (b) if so, the number of such plants established by the Government indicating their locations and the cost involved therein, State/UT-wise; (c) whether the Government has determined/ ascertained per litre water purification cost; (d) if so, the details thereof, State/UT wise; and (e) the details of beneficiaries and the cost at which they are being provided purified drinking water??
MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) to (e): Water supply is a State subject. Government of India supplements the efforts of the States/ UTs with technical and financial assistance under National Rural Drinking Water programme (NRDWP) to provide safe drinking water in rural areas including by setting up water treatment/purification plants in coastal areas. State Governments are empowered to plan, design, sanction, implement, operate and maintain rural water supply projects, including water treatment/purification plants in coastal areas and they maintain the relevant data. Public drinking water supply schemes are generally designed to provide safe drinking water to 100% population in the targeted habitations. Ministry of Earth Sciences has informed that a demonstration thermal desalination plant has been set up in the North Chennai Thermal Power Station. In addition, 3 Low Temperature Thermal Desalination (LTTD) Plants of 1.0 lakh litres per day capacity were installed in the Lakshadweep islands of Kavaratti, Minicoy and Agatti. According to cost estimates made recently by an independent agency for LTTD technology, the operational cost per litre of desalinated water works out to be 19 paise. SAFE DRINKING WATER 8th August 2013 LSQ*77 SMT. SUMITRA MAHAJAN SHRI BAIDYANATH PRASAD MAHTO Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether a large number of people living in the rural areas of the country have no access to safe drinking water; (b) if so, the details thereof indicating the fully covered, partially covered and the quality affected areas State/UT-wise including Madhya Pradesh; (c) the details of the schemes launched for providing safe drinking water and the steps taken to provide drinking water in all the habitations of the country; (d) the details of the funds released for the purpose during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise;and (e) whether the Government has reviewed the performance of drinking water schemes and if so, the details of the outcome thereof? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI ) (a) to (e) A Statement is laid on the table of the House. Statement referred to in reply to Lok Sabha Starred Question No. 77 due for reply on 8.8.2013. (a) As reported by the States on the online Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) of the Ministry, as on 1.4.2013, out of 16,90,870 rural habitations in the country, there are 84,292 rural habitations, in which at least one drinking water source is affected by chemical contamination like excess Iron, Fluoride, Arsenic, Salinity and Nitrate. It is estimated that about 4.64 crore population in the country may be exposed to chemical contamination in drinking water. (b) The number of fully covered, partially covered and quality affected rural habitations in the country, including in Madhya Pradesh, State/UT wise is at Annexure I. (c) Rural water supply is a State subject. This Ministry supplements the efforts of the States by providing them with technical and financial assistance under the centrally sponsored National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP), for providing safe and adequate drinking water supply facilities in rural areas of the country. State Governments are empowered to plan, approve and implement rural water supply schemes.
A budgetary allocation of Rs.11000 crore has been provided for the NRDWP in 2013-14. Under NRDWP, priority has to be given to cover partially covered and quality affected habitations with safe drinking water. Up to 67 per cent of the NRDWP funds allocated to States on 50:50 Centre: State sharing basis (90:10 for North-East States and Jammu & Kashmir) is to be utilized by the States for the coverage of rural habitations with drinking water. Further 5% of NRDWP allocation is earmarked at the national level and allocated to those States facing problems of chemical contamination in drinking water or with Japanese Encephalitis and Acute Encephalitis Syndrome affected high priority districts. In addition to this, to ensure that safe drinking water is being provided, 3 % NRDWP funds on 100 per cent central assistance basis is provided to States for Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillance, which inter alia includes taking up works relating to setting up and operation of new or up-gradation of district/ sub-district level water quality testing laboratories, and providing field test kits/ refills for testing of drinking water quality to Gram Panchayats. Further, up to 10 per cent of NRDWP funds allocated to States is to be utilized for promoting the sustainability of drinking water sources, through artificial recharge of ground water and other methods, which may also dilute the level of contamination in aquifers. (d) The details of the funds released under the NRDWP, during the last three years and the current year, State/UT –wise is given at Annexure II. (e) Yes Madam. The Ministry of Drinking Water & Sanitation reviews the implementation of the National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) periodically by conducting national and regional review meetings and video conferences with the State Department officers dealing with rural water supply. A National Consultation with State Secretaries in-charge of Rural Drinking Water Supply of all States was held on 18 February 2013 followed by a Consultation with State Ministers In-charge of Rural Drinking Water Supply on 19 February 2013. In the Consultation, the State/UT-wise physical and financial performance under NRDWP was reviewed, good practices adopted in various states were shared and the need for a Communication Strategy on rural water supply was discussed. The progress of States in the implementation of the NRDWP is also reviewed during the Annual Action Plan discussions at the beginning of the financial year. States have been advised to expedite physical and financial progress in achieving targets under the Programme. Senior Officers/ Technical Officers of the Ministry also visit the States to observe the progress of implementation of the programme. The review meetings and visits provide information about the implementation of the Programme and enables the Government of India and State Governments to focus on the areas where progress is lacking. ANNEXURE Annexure I Annexure referred to in reply to part (b) to Lok Sabha Starred Question No. 77 due for reply on 8.8.2013 Status of Rural Habitations With Respect To Drinking Water Supply with 40 lpcd (as on 1.4.2013)
SL State Total Habitation
Status of Rural Habitation
Fully Covered Partially Covered Quality Affected 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 72176 38016 30611 3549 2 BIHAR 107642 72877 24178 10587 3 CHATTISGARH 73563 46814 21161 5588 4 GOA 347 345 2 0 5 GUJARAT 34415 33805 403 207 6 HARYANA 7336 6911 414 11 7 HIM. PRADESH 53604 37709 15895 0 8 J & K 13938 6710 7228 0 9 JHARKHAND 119960 75310 44574 76 10 KARNATAKA 59753 24906 31640 3207 11 KERALA 11883 3517 7473 893 12 MADHYA PRADESH 127197 117051 8195 1951 13 MAHARASHTRA 100683 84948 14441 1294 14 ORISSA 157296 103552 44744 9000 15 PUNJAB 15335 10641 4455 239 16 RAJASTHAN 121133 27981 67648 25504 17 TAMIL NADU 98179 76591 21102 486 18 UTTAR PRADESH 260110 259298 26 786 19 UTTARAKHAND 39142 2483 36620 39 20 WEST BENGAL 98120 38627 56786 2707
21 ARUN. PRADESH 5612 690 4808 114 22 ASSAM 87888 38372 36637 12879 23 MANIPUR 2870 1627 1243 0 24 MEGHALAYA 9326 1821 7415 90 25 MIZORAM 777 472 305 0 26 NAGALAND 1500 392 1035 73 27 SIKKIM 2084 518 1566 0 28 TRIPURA 8132 2458 671 5003 29 A & N Islands 503 307 196 0 30 CHANDIGARH 18 0 18 0 31 D & N Haveli 70 0 70 0 32 DAMAN and DIU 21 0 21 0 33 DELHI 0 0 0 0 34 LAKSHADWEEP 9 0 9 0 35 PUDUCHERRY 248 128 111 9 Total 1690870 1114877 491701 84292 Annexure II Annexure referred to in reply to part (d) of the reply to Lok Sabha Starred Question No. 77 due for answer on 8.8.2013 RELEASE UNDER NRDWP DURING 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, and 2013-14 ( Rs in Crore) Sl. STATE 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14* 1 ANDHRA PR 558.74 462.47 485.14 199.19 2 BIHAR 170.73 330.02 224.3 0 3 CHHATTISGARH 122.01 139.06 148.64 17.13 4 GOA 0 5.01 0.03 0 5 GUJARAT 609.1 571.05 717.47 84.93 6 HARYANA 276.9 237.74 313.41 63.68 7 HIMACHAL PR 194.37 146.03 129.9 0 8 J & K 468.91 420.42 474.5 149.26 9 JHARKHAND 129.95 148.17 243.43 7.66 10 KARNATAKA 703.8 667.78 869.24 173.21 11 KERALA 159.83 113.39 249.04 19.58 12 MADHYA PR 388.33 292.78 539.56 102.76 13 MAHARASHTRA 718.42 718.35 846.48 0 14 ORISSA 294.76 171.05 210.58 69.23 15 PUNJAB 106.59 123.44 144.27 30.93 16 RAJASTHAN 1099.48 1153.76 1411.36 352.36 17 TAMILNADU 393.53 429.55 570.17 15.18 18 UTTAR PR 848.68 802.32 980.06 0 19 UTTARAKHAND 136.41 75.57 74.28 68.79 20 WEST BENGAL 499.19 342.51 502.36 166.1 21 ARUNACHAL PR 199.99 184.83 223.22 82.52 22 ASSAM 487.48 522.44 659.21 118.29 23 MANIPUR 52.77 47.6 66.21 15.11 24 MEGHALAYA 84.88 95.89 97.61 9.2 25 MIZORAM 61.58 38.83 47.92 0 26 NAGALAND 77.52 80.91 110.2 31.87 27 SIKKIM 23.2 69.19 32.36 0.7 28 TRIPURA 74.66 83.86 100.59 30 29 A&N ISLANDS 0 0 0.78 0 30 CHANDIGARH 0 0 0 31 D&N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 32 DAMAN & DIU 0 0 0 0 33 DELHI 0 0 0 0 34 LAKSHADWEEP 0 0 0 0 35 PONDICHERRY 0 0 0.88 0.06
Total 8941.81 8474.02 10473.2 1807.74 TARGET UNDER DRINKING WATER SCHEME 8th August 2013 LSQ 736 SHRI MEKAPATI RAJAMOHAN REDDY DR NILESH NARAYAN RANE Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether the Government has recently conducted a survey to identify areas in the country deficient in supply of drinking water; (b) if so, the outcome thereof, State/ UT-wise; (c) whether the available drinking water in these areas is also of inferior quality; (d) if so, the schemes launched by the Government in this regard; (e) the targets fixed and achieved by each State/UT during each of the last three years under these Schemes; (f) whether many States have not achieved the targets fixed to provide safe drinking water in 2012-13; (g) if so, the names of such States; and (h) the details of the guidelines issued to these States by the Union Government to achieve the targets within stipulated period? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI ) (a) to (c) Information on the status of coverage of rural habitations with respect to the supply of drinking water is entered by the States on the Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) of the Ministry. As reported by the States, as on 1.4.2013, out of the 16,90,870 rural habitations in the country, 11,14,877 habitations are fully covered with 40 litres per capita per day (lpcd), and 4,91,701 are partially covered, while 84,292 habitations are quality affected. The status of coverage of Rural Habitations State/UT wise status is at Annexure I. (d) Drinking water supply is a State subject. Government of India supplements the efforts of States with financial and technical assistance through the centrally sponsored scheme, the National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) for providing adequate and safe drinking water to the rural population in the country. Under the NRDWP, the State Governments are vested with the powers to plan, execute and implement drinking water supply schemes. (e ) The targets fixed and achievements by the States /UTs during each of the last three years under the NRDWP is at Annexure II. (f) and (g) Some States have not been able to achieve the targets fixed to provide safe drinking water in 2012-13. The names of these State with their percentage achievements are Uttar Pradesh(98.86),Assam(98.34), Kerala (95.98), Haryana (94.21), Uttarakhand(91.44), Meghalaya(87.93), Chhattisgarh (86.26), Maharashtra (80.59),Manipur (78.80), Bihar (72.99), Punjab(41.89), Sikkim(37.41) and Mizoram(8.77). (h)The Ministry monitors the progress of achievements by the States with respect to targets for coverage of rural habitations. Under NRDWP detailed guidelines have been issued to the States on planning of activities to ensure coverage of targeted habitations. States have to prepare Annual Action Plans at the beginning of every financial year, in which the physical targets of activities are laid out along with the financial provisions. States have to enter information of the schemes being implemented and the mark the habitations targeted for coverage on the online Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) of the Ministry. The progress of utilization of funds and the achievements under the programme are entered by the State on a monthly basis in the IMIS, which is monitored by the Ministry. States which do not report satisfactory progress are advised to improve their performance through letters and in review meetings with state officials. (AnnexureI) Annexure referred to in reply to part (a) of Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 736
Status of Rural Habitations with respect to drinking water supply SL State Total Fully Covered Partially Covered Quality Affected 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 72176 38016 30611 3549 2 BIHAR 107642 72877 24178 10587 3 CHATTISGARH 73563 46814 21161 5588 4 GOA 347 345 2 0 5 GUJARAT 34415 33805 403 207 6 HARYANA 7336 6911 414 11 7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 53604 37709 15895 0 8 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 13938 6710 7228 0 9 JHARKHAND 119960 75310 44574 76 10 KARNATAKA 59753 24906 31640 3207 11 KERALA 11883 3517 7473 893 12 MADHYA PRADESH 127197 117051 8195 1951 13 MAHARASHTRA 100683 84948 14441 1294 14 ORISSA 157296 103552 44744 9000 15 PUNJAB 15335 10641 4455 239 16 RAJASTHAN 121133 27981 67648 25504 17 TAMIL NADU 98179 76591 21102 486 18 UTTAR PRADESH 260110 259298 26 786 19 UTTARAKHAND 39142 2483 36620 39 20 WEST BENGAL 98120 38627 56786 2707 21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 5612 690 4808 114 22 ASSAM 87888 38372 36637 12879 23 MANIPUR 2870 1627 1243 0 24 MEGHALAYA 9326 1821 7415 90 25 MIZORAM 777 472 305 0 26 NAGALAND 1500 392 1035 73 27 SIKKIM 2084 518 1566 0 28 TRIPURA 8132 2458 671 5003 29 A & N ISLANDS 503 307 196 0 30 CHANDIGARH 18 0 18 0 31 D&N HAVELI 70 0 70 0 32 DAMAN and DIU 21 0 21 0 33 DELHI 0 0 0 0 34 LAKSHADWEEP 9 0 9 0 35 PUDUCHERRY 248 128 111 9 Total 1690870 1114877 491701 84292 AnnexureII Annexure I referred to in reply to parts (f) and (g) of Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No 736 TARGET & COVERAGE OF RURAL HABITATIONS UNDER NRDWP FROM 2010-11 to 2012-13
Sl. No. State/Uts 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Target Coverage % Target Coverage % Target Coverage %
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 6673 6971 104.47 5634 6183 109.74 5266 5699 108.22 2 BIHAR 18749 14221 75.85 15810 11243 71.11 15015 10960 72.99 3 CHHATTISGARH 9948 7847 78.88 8409 7977 94.86 10562 9111 86.26 4 GOA - - - - - - - - - 5 GUJARAT 1100 1079 98.09 1125 1165 103.56 1020 1856 181.96 6 HARYANA 1007 752 74.68 862 859 99.65 950 895 94.21 7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 5000 5094 101.88 2557 2558 100.04 2530 2650 104.74 8 JAMMU & KASHMIR 962 903 93.87 923 536 58.07 1067 1153 108.05 9 JHARKHAND 1099 11399 1037.22 19110 17425 91.18 16546 17335 104.76 10 KARNATAKA 8750 6130 70.06 9000 8757 97.3 8245 13284 161.11 11 KERALA 744 405 54.44 824 419 50.85 696 668 95.98 12 M.P. 13300 13937 104.79 16715 15644 93.59 16985 17483 102.93 13 MAHARASHTRA 9745 8987 92.22 6407 6364 99.33 5754 4637 80.59 14 ODISHA 5494 7525 136.97 4725 6782 143.53 9116 19484 213.73 15 PUNJAB 2023 1658 81.96 1630 643 39.45 1473 617 41.89 16 RAJASTHAN 7764 7254 93.43 6073 7885 129.84 2569 3943 153.48 17 TAMILNADU 8009 7039 87.89 6000 6000 100 6460 7203 111.5 18 UTTAR PRADESH 2142 1879 87.72 23300 23134 99.29 24000 23727 98.86 19 UTTARAKHAND 1565 1324 84.6 1341 1102 82.18 1075 983 91.44 20 WEST BENGAL 6630 5967 90 6094 4619 75.8 2469 4236 171.57 21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 534 601 112.55 300 415 138.33 292 358 122.6 22 ASSAM 8157 6467 79.28 6073 6601 108.69 7230 7110 98.34 23 MANIPUR 330 227 68.79 330 234 70.91 250 197 78.8 24 MEGHALAYA 840 380 45.24 535 510 95.33 580 510 87.93 25 MIZORAM 124 121 97.58 125 122 97.6 57 5 8.77 26 NAGALAND 105 128 121.9 85 116 136.47 101 178 176.23 27 SIKKIM 175 100 57.14 200 50 25 270 101 37.41 28 TRIPURA 825 976 118.3 982 1024 104.28 1052 1323 125.76 29 A & N ISLANDS 8 8 100 - - - - - - 30 CHANDIGARH - - - - - - - - - 31 DADRA NAGAR HAVELI - - - - - - - - - 32 DAMAN & DIU - - - - - - - - - 33 DELHI - - - - - - - - - 34 LAKSHADWEEP 10 10 100 - - - - - 35 PUDUCHERRY 12 - - - - 30 No report 0 Total 121812 119401 98.02 145169 138367 95.31 141660 155706 109.91
JALMANI SCHEME 8th August 20 13 LSQ777 SMT. SUSMITA BAURI SHRI NALIN KUMAR KATEEL SHRI JAYAPRAKASH KORGI HEGDE SHRI VISWANATHAN PERUMAL SMT. PUTUL KUMARI Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether the Jalmani Scheme started in the year 2008 for providing safe drinking water to the students studying in the schools of rural areas has been dispensed with after the year 2009-10; (b) if so, the reasons for not continuing the scheme after the year 2009-10; (c) the total funds spent for this scheme; (d) the total number of such schools in which drinking water had been provided; and (e) the State-wise total number of schools deprived of safe drinking water at present? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) & (b) The Hon’ble Finance Minister in his budget speech 2008-09 made an announcement for providing safe drinking water to 1 lakh rural schools in water deficient areas at an estimated cost of Rs 200 crore. Accordingly, after taking necessary approvals, the “Jalmani programme” was launched in the year 2008-09. Ministry of Finance, Government of India has provided Rs 100 crore each during 2008-09 and 2009-10 under the Social Infrastructural Development Fund (SIDF) on 100% Central sharing pattern. The programme was aimed at providing stand alone water purification systems in rural schools to provide safe drinking water at the consumption point especially to tackle bacteriological contamination, turbidity and excess iron. Since this was only a pilot project, further funding under Jalmani programme was not provided by the Ministry of Finance from SIDF. (c) The total funds of Rs.200 crore provided were released to the States by Government of India. As reported by the States into the online Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) developed by the Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation, as on 2/8/2013, an amount of Rs 120.78 crore has been utilized under Jalmani programme. (d) & (e) As reported by the States on the Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) of the Ministry of Drinking Water & Sanitation, as on 2.8.2013 as against a target of coverage of 1 lakh rural schools, the States have so far covered 95,937 rural schools. Since some States have reported coverage of rural schools more than the targeted schools, the number of schools yet to be covered with safe drinking water under Jalmani programme is 13,921 rural schools, as on 2/8/2013. The State-wise details of rural schools yet to be covered are given at Annexure. Annexure referred to in part-(e) of the reply to Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 777 due for reply on 8/8/2013 State-wise details of rural schools yet to be covered under Jalmani programme as reported by the States into the online Integrated Management Information System as on 2/8/2013 Sl. No. Name of the State / UT Number of rural schools yet to be covered under
Jalmani 1 Andhra Pradesh 6020 2 Bihar 446 3 Chhattisgarh 25 4 Goa 0 5 Gujarat 0 6 Haryana 238 7 Hmachal Pradesh 0
8 Jammu and Kashmir 1800 9 Jharkhand 0 10 Karnataka 0 11 Kerala 471 12 Madhya Pradesh 0 13 Maharashtra 157 14 Orissa 0 15 Punjab 0 16 Rajasthan 3409 17 Tamil Nadu 0 18 Uttar Pradesh 0 19 Uttarakhand 0 20 West Bengal 826 21 Arunachal Pradesh 0 22 Assam 0 23 Manipur 237 24 Meghalaya 159 25 Mizoram 0 26 Nagaland 133 27 Sikkim 0 28 Tripura 0 29 Andaman and Nicobar Islands 0 30 Chandigarh 0 31 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 0 32 Daman & Diu 0 33 Delhi 0 34 Lakshadweep 0 35 Puducherry 0 TOTAL 13921 CONTAMINATED DRINKING WATER 8th August 2013 LSQ778 SMT. DAVIDSON J. HELEN SHRI RAM SINGH KASWAN SHRI HARSH VARDHAN SHRI HARISCHANDRA DEORAM CHAVAN SHRI MAHESHWAR HAZARI SMT. SUSHILA SAROJ SHRI HARIBHAU MADHAV JAWALE SMT. SEEMA UPADHYAY SMT. USHA VERMA SHRI P.L. PUNIA Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether the fluoride, arsenic and other chemicals have been found in the drinking water in various States including Delhi of the country; (b) if so, the details thereof as on date, State/UT-wise; (c) the remedial steps taken by the Union Government to provide safe drinking water to all the habitations of the country; (d) whether the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) has pointed out the increase in project cost as the funds were not released to State Governments in time under the Programme; (e) if so, the details of the increase in project cost due to delayed release of funds; and
(f) the reaction of the Government thereto? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) & (b) Yes Sir. In the online Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) developed by the Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation, the State Governments as on 1/4/2013 have reported 84,292 rural habitations with one or more drinking water sources contaminated with fluoride, arsenic, iron, salinity or nitrate. A Statement showing State/UT-wise numbers of such habitations where the rural population may be at risk of consuming unsafe drinking water is at Annexure. (c) Drinking water supply is a State subject. Government of India supplements the efforts of the State Governments with technical and financial assistance for provision of safe drinking water supply in the rural areas of the country under the centrally sponsored National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP). Under NRDWP, States can utilize upto 67% of funds released to them for provision of safe drinking water in water quality affected habitations. 5% of the NRDWP funds are earmarked for Water Quality and allocated to those States with habitations affected by excess chemical contamination and with high priority districts affected by Japanese Encephalitis/Acute Encephalitis Syndrome. In addition, 3% of funds allocated to the States are earmarked for water quality monitoring and surveillance activities on a 100% Central share basis which, inter alia, includes testing of drinking water sources at the Panchayat level by using simple field test kits, setting up of new district/sub-district water quality testing laboratories and upgrading of existing water quality testing laboratories. Apart from NRDWP, the Ministry has also forwarded/recommended specific projects received from the State Governments to Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance for funding from external assistance viz., World Bank and JICA. World Bank funded water supply projects are currently functional in Kerala, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Punjab and Uttarakhand States while JICA funded water supply project is nearly under completion in Tamil Nadu State and JICA funded water supply projects are also under implementation in West Bengal and Rajasthan. (d) & (e) As reported by the Office of Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), issues regarding drinking water quality have been reported to the Parliament in CAG’s Audit Report No. 12 of 2008 for the period ending 2007 as Performance Audit of Accelerated Rural Water Supply Programme (ARWSP). Chapter-3 of the report cites State-specific findings on various deficiencies observed during implementation of works which included cases of time and cost over run. (f) Under National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP), the State Governments are vested with powers to plan, approve, implement and monitor drinking water supply projects. The Government of India releases funds to States as per pre-approved criteria. Funds are released to the States by the Ministry on the basis of the utilization of available funds and submission of pre-requisite documents like Utilization Certificate and Audit Report by the State Governments. States are responsible for delay in the implementation of projects and any cost escalation after the sanctioning of the project by State Governments either due to delay or change of scope or any other reason is to be borne by the State Governments. Annexure referred to in part-(a) & (b) of the reply to Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 778 due for reply on 8/8/2013 Statement showing State/UT-wise Drinking Water Quality Affected Habitations reported by them in the online Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) as on 1/4/2013
AVAILABILITY OF DRINKING WATER
8th August 2013 LSQ 788 SHRI PURNMASI RAM Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether 20 percent of Indian households have to travel more than half a kilometer to fetch drinking water; (b) if so, the details thereof and the reaction of the Government thereto; (c) whether over 20 percent of Indian get their water from unsafe sources including untreated sources like tap and uncovered wells; (d) if so, the details thereof; (e) the percentage of households getting drinking water from tap; and (f) the measures taken to supply safe drinking water to every household in rural areas? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI ) (a)and (b) As per Census 2011, 22.10 percent of rural households in the country have their drinking water supply at a distance of more than 500 meter from their place of residence. The distance of availability of drinking water from households, State-wise/UT-wise is at Annexure I. (c)and (d) Census 2011 has reported that 15.80 percent of rural households in the country are using uncovered wells and other unsafe sources as drinking water sources. The percentage of rural households using uncovered wells and other unsafe sources as sources of drinking water, State/UT wise, is at Annexure II. (e) As per Census 2011, 30.8 percent of rural households in the country are getting their drinking water supply from tap. As per the Integrated Management Information system (IMIS) of the Ministry, the States have reported that as on 1.4.2013, 40.94% of rural population have access to piped water supply. (f) Under the National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP), the Government of India provides financial and technical assistance to States to supplement their efforts to provide adequate safe drinking water to the rural population. A budgetary allocation of Rs. 11,000 crores has been provided for NRDWP in 2013-14. Under NRDWP, priority has to be given to cover partially covered and quality affected habitations with safe drinking water. Upto 67% of total allocation to States can be utilized for coverage of such habitations. Further, 5% of NRDWP allocation is earmarked and allocated to those States facing problems of chemical contamination in drinking water or with Japanese Encephalitis and Acute Encephalitis Syndrome affected high priority districts.
CONSTRUCTION OF TOILETS 8th August 2013 LSQ 798 MS. BHAVANA GAWALI (PATIL) SMT. PRIYA SUNIL DUTT SHRI BALIRAM SUKUR JADHAV SHRI NISHIKANT DUBEY SHRI E.G. SUGAVANAM
Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the details of Central assistance provided by the Government for the construction of Individual Household Latrines (IHHLs) and public toilets in rural areas during each of the last three years and the current year, separately, State/UT-wise; (b) whether the Government proposes to enhance the assistance provided to the State Governments for different development projects especially in rural areas; (c) if so, the details thereof; (d) the number of schools and Anganwadi Centres in the country lacking proper toilet/sanitation facilities, State/UTwise; (e) whether the Government proposes to provide toilets in all schools and Anganwadi Centres in the country particularly in rural areas under the Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA); (f) if so, the steps taken by the Government to construct toilets in the remaining schools and Anganwadi Centres in the country including Mumbai; (g) the amount allocated and utilised for the purpose during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise; (h) whether the Government has released funds to the BPL families in the country for construction of IHHL; and (i) if so, the details thereof during the said period, State/UT-wise? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) Under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan(NBA) earlier known as Total Sanitation Campaign(TSC), component-wise funds are not released. However total fund released from Government of India during the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise is at Annexure-1. (b) & (c) The TSC has been revamped into NBA w.e.f. 1-4-2012. Under the recently revamped Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan, Government of India has enhanced the financial assistance for construction of Individual Household Latrines (IHHLs) for all eligible beneficiaries (BPLs and identified APLs). The financial incentive has been raised from Rs 3200/- to Rs. 4600/-. In addition upto Rs. 4500 can be availed from Mahatma Gandhi NREGA for construction of the toilet with a beneficiary contribution of Rs. 900, the total unit cost of toilet is now Rs. 10000/-.(Rs. 10500/- for Hilly and difficult areas). Further the component of Solid and Liquid Waste Management (SLWM) has been prioritized through focused funding. Under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan(NBA), assistance for SLWM project is available on the basis of total number of households in each Gram Panchayat(GP), subject to a maximum of Rs.7 lakh for a GP having up to 150 households, Rs.12 lakh up to 300 households, Rs.15 lakh up to 500 households and Rs.20 lakh for GPs having more than 500 households. Funding for SLWM project under NBA is provided by the Central and State Government in the ratio of 70:30. Additional cost requirement can be met with convergence with MGNREGS or from the State/GP funds. For School and Anganwadi toilets, convergence with MGNREGA has been facilitated for additional financial requirements. (d) The details of toilet units in schools & anganwadis that were included in the project objectives under TSC/NBA and achievement against these objectives are shown at Annexure-2. (e) to (f) One of the main objectives of NBA is to cover the remaining Government schools not covered under Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) and Anganwadi Centres in Government building in the rural areas with proper sanitation facilities and undertake proactive promotion of hygiene education and sanitary habits among students. Under NBA, Government of India provide financial assistance of Rs.35,000/- (Rs.38,500 in case of hilly and difficult areas) for school toilets in the fund sharing between Central and State Government in the ratio of 70:30. For Anganwadi toilets, financial assistance of Rs.8,000 (Rs.10,000 in case of hilly and difficult areas) is being provided in the fund sharing between Central and State Government in the ratio of 70:30. No project has been approved for Mumbai since Mumbai is not a rural district. To meet the balance objectives of School and Anganwadi toilets still to be constructed in rural areas of country under NBA/TSC, regular review meetings, video conferencing are being organized. (g) State-wise funds are not allocated for construction of school and anganwadi toilet. However, expenditure reported from the central share for the construction of school and anganwadi toilets during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise is at Annexure-3 and Annexure-4 respectively. (h) and
(i) Under NBA, component-wise funds are not released. However expenditure of central share reported for the construction of Individual household latrines for BPLs during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise is at Annexure-5.
Annexure-1 Statement referred in part (a) of the reply to Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No. 798 due for reply on 08.08.2013 State/UT wise fund released under TSC/NBA during last 3 years and current year
Rs. in lakh S.N. State/UT Name 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 13880 9657.28 15022.69 0 2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 119.26 204.88 986.92 0 3 ASSAM 9437.36 12251.18 11943.31 0 4 BIHAR 11259.76 17219.09 47814.55 0 5 CHHATTISGARH 5479.58 2702.42 5731.57 0 6 D & N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 7 GOA 0 0 0 0 8 GUJARAT 4692.36 4308.28 3949.42 1451.81 9 HARYANA 2361.49 335.27 0 0 10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 2939.78 469.57 1666.96 0 11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 2792.51 967.95 3511.01 3085.11 12 JHARKHAND 5466.98 7264.92 4193.31 0 13 KARNATAKA 4458.66 8709.28 15950.81 0 14 KERALA 2286.34 158.89 0 1132.63 15 MADHYA PRADESH 14402.6 15076 25779.96 24130 16 MAHARASHTRA 12911.7 5799.94 12409.22 0 17 MANIPUR 80.3 1087.87 3509.18 0 18 MEGHALAYA 3105.23 1115.72 2540.01 3349.65 19 MIZORAM 653.4 31.38 497.48 0 20 NAGALAND 1229.45 174.06 2302.68 0 21 ORISSA 6836.73 11171.7 0 0 22 PUDUCHERRY 0 0 0 0 23 PUNJAB 1116.39 283.18 0 0 24 RAJASTHAN 5670.74 5424.41 13770.97 0 25 SIKKIM 112.86 0 159.47 0 26 TAMIL NADU 7794.35 7662.06 12811.68 8710.01 27 TRIPURA 925.14 133.92 430.47 941.16 28 UTTAR PRADESH 22594 16920.72 25684.74 20055.54 29 UTTARAKHAND 1707.61 804.76 2541.96 0 30 WEST BENGAL 8327.5 14124.34 30638.14 0 Total 152642.08 144059.07 243846.51 62855.91
Annexure-2 Statement referred in part (d) of the reply to Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No. 798 due for reply on 08.08.2013 The details of school toilets units in schools & anganwadis that were included in the project objectives under TSC/NBA and achievement(Upto July’2013) against these objectives (Figures in number of units) S.N. State School Toilets Toilets for Anganwadi
Sanctioned Achievement Balance Objective
Sanctioned Achievement Balance Objective
1 ANDHRA PRADESH
115908 115908 0 14990 9834 5156
2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH
3944 3888 56 1866 1796 70
3 ASSAM 34772 33766 1006 16819 11018 5801 4 BIHAR 102268 92495 9773 16444 8480 7964
5 CHHATTISGARH 52338 51969 369 10211 10211 0 6 D & N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 GOA 731 446 285 547 58 489 8 GUJARAT 40439 36687 3752 30516 25578 4938 9 HARYANA 9160 9160 0 7599 7599 0 10 HIMACHAL
PRADESH 20738 18111 2627 10308 9513 795
11 JAMMU & KASHMIR
27277 20179 7098 1070 305 765
12 JHARKHAND 42687 39331 3356 11472 7492 3980 13 KARNATAKA 39267 39267 0 26353 26353 0 14 KERALA 3600 3600 0 4957 4957 0 15 MADHYA
PRADESH 137730 137730 0 27595 24758 2837
16 MAHARASHTRA 87452 87452 0 60076 60076 0 17 MANIPUR 3919 3919 0 1201 1201 0 18 MEGHALAYA 10331 9592 739 1851 1771 80 19 MIZORAM 5905 3412 2493 1630 1370 260 20 NAGALAND 2972 2185 787 1302 1005 297 21 ORISSA 70663 70471 192 25160 24954 206 22 PUDUCHERRY 26 0 26 16 16 0 23 PUNJAB 7464 7464 0 3274 3274 0 24 RAJASTHAN 85662 85662 0 32269 20061 12208 25 SIKKIM 1604 1604 0 340 340 0 26 TAMIL NADU 53678 48807 4871 27970 27541 429 27 TRIPURA 6833 6635 198 6024 6024 0 28 UTTAR
PRADESH 269860 243573 26287 107302 101609 5693
29 UTTARAKHAND 3925 3212 713 1601 350 1251 30 WEST BENGAL 134081 124138 9943 84168 47476 36692 Total 1375234 1300663 74571 534931 445020 89911
Annexure-3 Statement referred in part (g) of the reply to Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No. 798 due for reply on 08.08.2013 Expenditure reported from Central share in construction of School toilets during last 3 years and current year under TSC/NBA Rs. in lakh S.N. State/UT Name 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 (Upto
July'13) 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 932.25 1893.98 1399.27 136.72 2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 99.09 71.33 6.76 105.17 3 ASSAM 295.66 204.98 59.13 0 4 BIHAR 1389.71 4062.01 3540.69 485.86 5 CHHATTISGARH 237.24 1066.45 27.21 1.72 6 D & N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 7 GOA 0 0 0 0 8 GUJARAT 462.24 1414.88 1447.56 1.71 9 HARYANA 209.8 230.51 56.24 0.11 10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 1028.98 286.18 879.42 17.7 11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 311.2 660.03 546.69 3.48 12 JHARKHAND 165.41 44.51 131.76 13.41 13 KARNATAKA 164.36 463.3 388.77 32.58 14 KERALA 13.27 17.27 77.7 0 15 MADHYA PRADESH 2527.97 6843.17 680.2 157.93 16 MAHARASHTRA 1001.29 499.27 55.86 0 17 MANIPUR 231.97 55.3 88.88 0 18 MEGHALAYA 395.01 1615.37 308.9 25.73
19 MIZORAM 4.08 0 28.58 25.18 20 NAGALAND 12.81 117.02 10.78 0 21 ORISSA 721.48 840.72 761.91 40.75 22 PUDUCHERRY 0 0 0 0 23 PUNJAB 125.01 4.19 5.04 0 24 RAJASTHAN 1172.3 851.86 2786.73 479.21 25 SIKKIM 0 0 0 0 26 TAMIL NADU 190.27 1998.23 298.86 13.65 27 TRIPURA 150.47 332.24 151 0 28 UTTAR PRADESH 2075.7 283.45 269.93 0 29 UTTARAKHAND 78.49 127.98 74.57 2.91 30 WEST BENGAL 2492.04 4117.99 5008.31 522.53 Total :- 16488.12 28102.22 19090.75 2066.32
Bottom of Form Bottom of Form Bottom of Form
Annexure-4 Statement referred in part (g) of the reply to Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No. 798 due for reply on 08.08.2013 Expenditure reported from Central share in construction of Anganwadi toilets during last 3 years and current year under TSC/NBA Rs. in lakh S.N. State/UT Name 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 (Upto
July'13) 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 19.83 47.07 163.45 25.15 2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 20.38 10.34 19.02 0 3 ASSAM 105.9 34.51 20.77 1.15 4 BIHAR 19.37 71.25 176.15 37.42 5 CHHATTISGARH 16.19 4.89 29.73 0 6 D & N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 7 GOA 0 0 0 0 8 GUJARAT 75.97 51.45 18.24 14.22 9 HARYANA 38.88 33.35 23.47 0 10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 59.64 4.94 21.4 0 11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 1.44 8.01 5.61 0 12 JHARKHAND 7.15 20.9 11.88 0.34 13 KARNATAKA 53.06 92.16 83.82 7.11 14 KERALA 2.28 11.1 3.21 0.05 15 MADHYA PRADESH 184.96 103.81 22.15 4.97 16 MAHARASHTRA 135.4 63.92 396.87 0 17 MANIPUR 28.56 1.4 5.17 0 18 MEGHALAYA 25.68 22.62 16.74 0.85 19 MIZORAM 0 15.02 17.22 0 20 NAGALAND 4.15 16.8 2 0 21 ORISSA 36.44 13.33 19.74 1.73 22 PUDUCHERRY 0 0 0 0 23 PUNJAB 106.88 2.88 48.77 0 24 RAJASTHAN 84.85 171.9 324.76 92.76 25 SIKKIM 0 0 0 0 26 TAMIL NADU 17.25 107.18 93.44 11.26 27 TRIPURA 39.83 85.77 0.01 51.76 28 UTTAR PRADESH 843.8 132.38 18.96 0 29 UTTARAKHAND 1.52 0.8 0.32 0.14 30 WEST BENGAL 403.33 597.13 957.66 30.33 Total :- 2332.74 1724.91 2500.56 279.24
Annexure-5
Statement referred in part (i) of the reply to Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No. 798 due for reply on 08.08.2013 Expenditure reported from Central share for construction of Individual household latrines for BPLs during last 3 years and current year under TSC/NBA Rs. in lakh S.N. State/UT Name 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 (Upto
July'13) 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 5363.79 6281.68 5821.86 2100.51 2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 346.07 337.72 118.3 184.79 3 ASSAM 5956.9 11357.94 9157.22 1275.5 4 BIHAR 10358.46 11335.42 16459.32 2459.92 5 CHHATTISGARH 1371.55 1297.9 949.45 353.69 6 D & N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 7 GOA 0 0 0 0 8 GUJARAT 2102.3 1220.97 1334.36 614.75 9 HARYANA 620.4 983.26 456.65 67.21 10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 393.21 541.42 385.76 18.22 11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 561.06 1430.44 2628.24 87.8 12 JHARKHAND 3151.49 1972.35 1218.34 396.45 13 KARNATAKA 5563.1 2989.05 5510.82 1805.51 14 KERALA 473.45 426.49 268.65 47.82 15 MADHYA PRADESH 8668.38 8266.65 15598.41 5043.77 16 MAHARASHTRA 3306.09 4218.48 3622.56 930.33 17 MANIPUR 388.31 573.49 1532.32 39.17 18 MEGHALAYA 841.87 1146.12 771.75 95.29 19 MIZORAM 40.87 557.94 81.9 33.68 20 NAGALAND 90.07 821.7 293.15 0 21 ORISSA 3610.59 3280.06 1830.95 346.09 22 PUDUCHERRY 1.59 0 0 0 23 PUNJAB 35.24 15.33 315.9 0 24 RAJASTHAN 1925.97 1638.1 4152.84 844.97 25 SIKKIM 0 0 0 0 26 TAMIL NADU 4642.45 7529.95 6790.83 368.41 27 TRIPURA 222.66 231.76 87.55 251.85 28 UTTAR PRADESH 16525.73 9444.48 17089.38 2567.55 29 UTTARAKHAND 975.52 1066.69 1169.93 365.54 30 WEST BENGAL 3953.65 5766.09 11407.52 2042.06 Total :- 81490.75 84731.46 109053.96
22340.87 Bottom of Form Bottom of Form Bottom of Form
REVIEW OF NBA 8th August 2013 LSQ 799 PROF. SK. SAIDUL HAQUE SHRI RANGASWAMY DHRUVANARAYANA SHRI P. KARUNAKARAN Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the strategy worked out for implementation of the Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) and the activities undertaken therein; (b) whether the Government has been able to achieve the targets/ goals set under the NBA during the last three years;
(c) if so, the State/UT-wise details thereof and if not, the reasons therefor; (d) whether the Government has reviewed the NBA to ensure sanitation facilities particularly in rural, tribal and hilly areas of the country; (e) if so, the details and outcome thereof; (f) whether the generation of sewage is increasing in many States including Andhra Pradesh despite spending huge amount so far; (g) if so, the details thereof during the 11th and 12th Plan period, State/UT-wise and reasons there for; and (h) the steps taken by the Government in this regard? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) Government of India has designed a paradigm shift in Total Sanitation Campaign(TSC) which is now called the Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA), in the XIIth Five Year Plan. The strategy adopted under NBA is to transform rural India into ‘Nirmal Bharat’ by adopting the `community led` `people centered` strategies and community saturation & demand driven approach with emphasis on awareness creation and demand generation for sanitary facilities in houses, schools and for cleaner environment. Alternate delivery mechanisms would be adopted to meet the community needs. The provision of incentives for individual household latrine has been widened to cover all APL households who belong to SCs, STs, small and marginal farmers, landless labourers with homesteads, physically challenged and women headed households along-with all BPL households so as to attain community outcomes. Convergence with MNREGS has been adopted to facilitate the rural households with fund availability for creating their own sanitation facilities. Availability of water in the Gram Panchayat shall be an important factor for sustaining sanitation facilities created. Rural School Sanitation remains a major component and an entry point for wider acceptance of sanitation by the rural people. Wider technology options are being provided to meet the customer preferences and location- specific needs. Intensive IEC Campaign is the corner stone of the programme involving Panchayati Raj Institutions, Co-operatives, ASHA, Anganwadi workers, Women Groups, Self Help Groups, NGOs etc. More transparent system involving social audit and active people’s participation in the implementation process of NBA has also been introduced. Under NBA following activities are undertaken: # Motivate communities and Panchayati Raj Institutions promoting sustainable sanitation facilities through awareness creation and health education. # Extensive capacity building of the stake holders like Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs), Village Water and Sanitation Committees (VWSCs) and field functionaries for sustainable sanitation. # Provision of Individual Household Latrine (IHHL) of both Below Poverty Line (BPL) and Identified Above Poverty Line (APL) households within a Gram Panchayat (GP). APL families not covered by the above incentives will take up construction of the household latrines on their own through motivation. # Rural Sanitary Marts can be opened to provide materials, services and guidance needed for constructing different types of latrines and other sanitary facilities for a clean environment. and Production Centers Production Centers are to be opened and operated to produce cost effective affordable sanitary materials at the local level. # To set up Community Sanitary Complex when there is lack of space in the village for construction of household toilets and at public places, markets, etc. where large scale congregation of people takes place and the community owns up the responsibility of their operation and maintenance. # To cover the remaining schools not covered under Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) and Anganwadi Centres in the rural areas with proper sanitation facilities and undertake proactive promotion of hygiene education and sanitary habits among students. # Develop community managed environmental sanitation systems focusing on solid & liquid waste management for overall cleanliness in the rural areas. (b) and (c) Since NBA is demand driven programme, hence no state-wise is target set. However State/UT-wise achievement made under the NBA during the last three years is at Annexure-1.
(d) and (e) Based on the recommendation of a Working Group set up by the Planning Commission, Government of India has reviewed the Total Sanitation Campaign(TSC) and revamped the programme into Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan ( NBA) w.e.f 01.04.12 with the objective to accelerate the sanitation coverage in the rural areas so as to comprehensively cover the rural community through renewed strategies and saturation approach. Under NBA, 10 % of total budget is earmarked for tribal areas. Further for hilly and difficult areas, additional financial assistance are being provided as under against following components of NBA: # Additional Rs 500 for construction of Individual Household Latrines(IHHLs) # Additional Rs 2000 for Anganwadi toilets # Additional Rs 3500 for school toilets (f) to (g) Solid and Liquid Waste Management (SLWM) is one of the key components to maintain overall cleanliness in the rural areas therefore to improve the general quality of life in rural areas . Under this component, activities like compost pits, vermin composting, common and individual biogas plants, low cost drainage, soakage channels/ pits, reuse of waste water and system for collection, segregation and disposal of household garbage etc can be taken up. Construction and maintenance of sewage as such is not being taken up under NBA formerly known as TSC. During 11th and 12th plan period total of Rs 153.74 crore and Rs 76.15 crore was spent respectively on SLWM as per details at Annexure-2. h) Under NBA, during 12th plan period Government of India is implementing SLWM in project mode with focused funding. Assistance for SLWM project is available on the basis of total number of households in each Gram Panchayat(GP), subject to a maximum of Rs.7 lakh for a GP having up to 150 households, Rs.12 lakh up to 300 households, Rs.15 lakh up to 500 households and Rs.20 lakh for GPs having more than 500 households. Funding for SLWM project under NBA is provided by the Central and State Government in the ratio of 70:30. Additional cost requirement can be met with convergence of MGNGREGS or from the State/GP funds. Annexure-I Statement referred in part (c) of the reply to Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No. 799 due for reply on 08.08.2013 State/UT-wise achievement made under the TSC/NBA during the last three years
S.N. State/UT Name
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Individual household latrines
School toilets
Anganwadi toilets
Individual household latrines
School toilets
Anganwadi toilets
Individual household latrines
School toilets
Anganwadi toilets
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 1049704 3961 816 654282 7308 1048 384279 4199 1574
2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 19799 335 331 27781 4 76 5760 0 8
3 ASSAM 498849 4528 1004 510243 633 120 273240 77 76 4 BIHAR 717792 8679 309 839927 22575 1521 796699 17009 4822 5 CHHATTISGARH 236164 616 262 82496 1918 365 52045 1387 220 6 D & N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 GOA 800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 GUJARAT 515224 2323 2343 321357 5182 474 171977 4666 451 9 HARYANA 132137 1340 870 103913 657 633 62949 148 315
10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 216571 6429 4400 30066 802 132 5183 1215 1066
11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 125228 1480 42 70626 2682 97 71900 2011 76 12 JHARKHAND 296678 2158 1451 53479 1228 1067 48500 613 684 13 KARNATAKA 810104 4719 3025 414782 1062 1046 296429 1758 687 14 KERALA 20241 29 195 2188 76 60 5674 34 322 15 MADHYA PRADESH 1166016 16570 4419 900769 43687 1856 558189 1033 804 16 MAHARASHTRA 562183 4222 1574 519563 539 579 189306 159 5800 17 MANIPUR 49576 1227 779 55306 703 144 43917 0 53 18 MEGHALAYA 65417 2833 710 51550 2077 595 14406 1603 130 19 MIZORAM 1611 0 0 17237 0 236 4967 106 219 20 NAGALAND 18224 578 60 46318 304 168 22149 28 20 21 ORISSA 853303 3418 1459 359171 1984 3320 118318 1138 956 22 PUDUCHERRY 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 PUNJAB 118415 1000 1951 32535 5 1197 57421 345 620 24 RAJASTHAN 750948 6323 1734 730385 5297 2015 252800 15511 3421 25 SIKKIM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 TAMIL NADU 473647 1464 182 410794 5605 1202 324216 3095 2076 27 TRIPURA 30392 588 645 24761 1035 777 7035 412 2 28 UTTAR PRADESH 2915407 18410 16076 1613384 18 504 134873 30 80 29 UTTARAKHAND 132913 219 6 125051 192 29 97815 344 19 30 WEST BENGAL 466311 12060 6180 800900 16898 9148 559115 19475 12176 Total 12243731 105509 50823 8798864 122471 28409 4559162 76396 36677
Annexure-2 Statement referred in part (g) of the reply to Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No. 799 due for reply on 08.08.2013 State/UT-wise expenditure on SLWM under the TSC/NBA during the 11th Plan and 12th Plan
S.N. State/UT Name 11th Plan(2007-2012) 12th Plan(2012-13 to 2013-14) upto July, 2013 Centre share State share Beneficiary share Total Centre share State share Beneficiary share Total
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 561.2 115.42 56.9 733.52 434.74 22.1 0 456.84 2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 1.93 0.25 0.24 2.42 0 0 0 0 3 ASSAM 24.52 11.4 6.56 42.49 1.5 0 0 1.5 4 BIHAR 33.98 10.89 3.51 48.38 147.69 36.15 0 183.84 5 CHHATTISGARH 404.69 140.23 108.32 653.24 42.46 11.5 0.2 54.16 6 D & N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 GOA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 GUJARAT 1189.46 471.24 350.87 2011.57 300.72 129.7 33.46 463.88 9 HARYANA 549.21 228.33 149.8 927.34 86.58 23.6 7.58 117.76 10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 105.26 34.89 23.85 163.99 40 13.74 11.24 64.98 11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 14.11 2.2 2.25 18.56 8.76 1 1 10.76 12 JHARKHAND 41.44 108.54 3.77 153.76 18.16 0.39 0 18.55 13 KARNATAKA 224.7 67.12 20.12 311.95 90.02 82.9 3.48 176.4 14 KERALA 407.84 146.37 156.71 710.92 324.42 111.9 2 438.32 15 MADHYA PRADESH 829.32 277.67 147.79 1254.78 152.14 42.62 1.52 196.27 16 MAHARASHTRA 1084.1 273.41 179.58 1537.08 1042.07 508.87 742.18 2293.11 17 MANIPUR 15.08 13.97 0.32 29.37 0 0 0 0 18 MEGHALAYA 1.25 0 0 1.25 0.05 0.11 0 0.16 19 MIZORAM 177.01 53.51 49.4 279.92 21.7 1.46 5.3 28.46 20 NAGALAND 233.39 0 0 233.39 0 0 0 0 21 ORISSA 107.36 37.21 26.97 171.55 27.31 10.74 5.38 43.43 22 PUDUCHERRY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 PUNJAB 197.2 32.51 40 269.71 16 0 0 16 24 RAJASTHAN 62.03 22.83 17.04 101.91 65.98 25.83 5.21 97.02 25 SIKKIM 3 1.95 1 5.95 0 0 0 0 26 TAMIL NADU 453.39 170.69 100.15 724.23 86.21 35.86 5.45 127.52 27 TRIPURA 39.55 15.73 6.46 61.74 31.91 13.68 0 45.59 28 UTTAR PRADESH 2935.05 1192.78 698.89 4826.72 1814.17 97.68 7.4 1919.25 29 UTTARAKHAND 20.38 6.09 5.4 31.86 12.08 4.71 1.65 18.44 30 WEST BENGAL 47.13 15.91 4.24 67.28 643.95 197.84 1.89 843.67 Total 9763.57 3451.15 2160.14 15374.86 5408.61 1372.38 834.94 7615.92
SANITATION FACILITIES 8th August 2013 LSQ 802 SHRI FRANCISCO SARDINHA SMT. JAYSHREEBEN PATEL SHRI CHANDRAKANT RAGHUNATH PATIL Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether the Government is willing to improve the quality of personal hygiene, sanitation and solid as well as liquid waste management in rural areas through enhanced technical and financial support to all rural households; (b) if so, the proposed enhancements in technical and financial measures; (c) if not, the reasons therefor; (d) whether the Government proposes to support construction of bath- cum-toilet facilities for improving personal hygiene and sanitation particularly for rural women; (e) if so, the details thereof; and (f) the manner in which Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan intends to achieve its objective of total sanitation? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) to (b) Yes Madam, To improve the personal hygiene, sanitation and solid as well as liquid waste management and to accelerate the progress of sanitation in rural areas, Government of India has designed a paradigm shift in Total Sanitation Campaign(TSC) which is now called the Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) in the XIIth Five Year Plan. The objective of NBA is to achieve sustainable behaviour change with provision of sanitary facilities in entire communities in a phased, saturation mode with “Nirmal Grams’ as outcomes. The new strategy is to transform rural India into ‘Nirmal Bharat’ by adopting community saturation approach. NBA goal is to achieve 100% access to sanitation for all rural households by 2022. Under NBA, the Government has taken sufficient technical and financial measures to improve the quality of rural sanitation with enhancement in funding for construction of Individual household latrine and Solid and Liquid Waste Management. # The financial incentive for construction of toilets has been raised for all eligible beneficiaries ( BPLs and identified APLs) from Rs 3200/- to Rs. 4600/-. In addition upto Rs. 4500/- to be booked under Mahatma Gandhi NREGA for construction of the toilet is permitted and a beneficiary contribution of Rs. 900, taking the total unit cost of toilet to Rs. 10000/-.(Rs. 10500/- for Hilly and difficult areas) # The component of Solid and Liquid Waste Management (SLWM) has been prioritized through focused funding. Under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan(NBA), assistance for SLWM project is available on the basis of total number of households in each Gram Panchayat(GP), subject to a maximum of Rs.7 lakh for a GP having up to 150 households, Rs.12 lakh up to 300 households, Rs.15 lakh up to 500 households and Rs.20 lakh for GPs having more than 500 households. Funding for SLWM project under NBA is provided by the Central and State Government in the ratio of 70:30. Additional cost requirement can be met with convergence of MGNGREGS or from the State/GP funds. # Govt. has increased the allocation under NBA from Rs.2500 crore in the year 2012-13 to Rs. 4260 crore in 2013-14. # Under NBA, technical assistance is also being provided through training to Village Water and Sanitation Committee (VWSC) and PRI members, block and district functionaries , grass root functionaries in trades such as masonary work, brick-making, toilet pan making and plumbing etc , required for creation of sanitation facilities. (c) Does not arise. (d) At present the NBA provides support for construction of sanitary toilets only and not for bathing space. (e) Does not arise.
(f) NBA goal is to achieve 100% access to sanitation for all rural households by 2022. For this, following actions have been formulated :- # Provision of incentives for Individual Household Latrine (IHHL) of both Below Poverty Line (BPL) and Identified Above Poverty Line (APL) households within a Gram Panchayat (GP). # Appropriate convergence with MNREGS with unskilled man-days and skilled man-days for construction of Individual household latrine, school and anganwadi toilets, sanitary complexes and Solid and Liquid Waste Management to enhance the total financial assistance. # Gram Panchayats where all habitations have access to water to be taken up. Priority may be given to Gram Panchayats having functional piped water supply , # Provision of financial assistance for creation of sanitation facilities in Government Schools and Anganwadis in Government buildings within these GPs # Provision of financial assistance for Solid and Liquid Waste Management (SLWM) for proposed and existing Nirmal Grams # Information Education and Communication(IEC) activities for triggering the demand for construction and use of sanitary facilities in the rural areas. # Extensive capacity building of the stake holders like Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs), Village Water and Sanitation Committees (VWSCs) and field functionaries for sustainable sanitation. # Convergence with Indira Awas Yojna(IAY), National Rural Health Mission(NRHM), Sarva Shiksa Abhiyan(SSA) and Integrated Child Development Services(ICDS). DRINKING WATER IN TRIBAL AREAS 8th August 2013 LSQ 803 SHRI LAXMAN TUDU SHRI YASHBANT NARAYAN SINGH LAGURI Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the present status of supply of safe drinking water in the country, State/UTwise; (b) whether the supply of safe drinking water in tribal areas is not satisfactory; (c) if so, the details thereof and the reaction of the Government thereto; (d) the number of tribal areas in the country where supply of drinking water is unsufficient; (e) the steps taken by the Government in this regard; and (f) the success achieved as a result thereof ? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI ) (a) As entered by the States on the online Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) of the Ministry, as on 01.04.2013, out of the 16,90,870 rural habitations in the country, 11,14,877 habitations are fully covered(65.93%) with at least 40 litres per capita per day (lpcd) and 4,91,701 are partially covered while 84,292 habitations are quality affected.The status of coverage of Rural Habitations State/UT wise is at Annexure I.
(b) (to (e) As reported by the States on the IMIS, as on 1.4.2013, out of the 16,90,870 rural habitations in the country, 3,66,348 are Scheduled Tribe (ST) concentrated habitations. Of these 2,25,800 habitations have been fully covered (61.64%) with at least 40 litres per capita per day,1,22,415 habitations partially covered and 18,133 habitations are quality affected. The Status of coverage of ST concentrated rural habitations with respect to drinking water supply, State/UT wise is at Annexure II. To prioritize the coverage of ST concentrated rural habitations with drinking water supply, from 2011-12, at the national level, 10% of the National Rural Drinking Water Programme budget is earmarked for the Tribal Sub Plan (TSP). States are required to utilise the allocation made under the TSP for covering ST Concentrated habitations. To ensure this the States are to prepare Annual Action Plans (AAP) and prioritize the coverage of partially covered and quality affected ST concentrated habitations. (f ) The achievement in coverage of Scheduled Tribe concentrated rural habitations with drinking water supply under the NRDWP, in the years 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13 are as under: Year Achievement of coverage of ST concentrated Rural Habitations 2010-11 25219 2011-12 28009 2012-13 34599 (AnnexureI) Annexure referred to in reply to part (a) of LokSabhaUnstarred Question No. 803 Status of Rural Habitations with respect to drinking water supply
SL State Total Fully Covered Partially Covered Quality Affected
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 72176 38016 30611 3549 2 BIHAR 107642 72877 24178 10587 3 CHATTISGARH 73563 46814 21161 5588 4 GOA 347 345 2 0 5 GUJARAT 34415 33805 403 207 6 HARYANA 7336 6911 414 11 7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 53604 37709 15895 0 8 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 13938 6710 7228 0 9 JHARKHAND 119960 75310 44574 76 10 KARNATAKA 59753 24906 31640 3207 11 KERALA 11883 3517 7473 893 12 MADHYA PRADESH 127197 117051 8195 1951 13 MAHARASHTRA 100683 84948 14441 1294 14 ORISSA 157296 103552 44744 9000 15 PUNJAB 15335 10641 4455 239 16 RAJASTHAN 121133 27981 67648 25504 17 TAMIL NADU 98179 76591 21102 486 18 UTTAR PRADESH 260110 259298 26 786 19 UTTARAKHAND 39142 2483 36620 39 20 WEST BENGAL 98120 38627 56786 2707 21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 5612 690 4808 114 22 ASSAM 87888 38372 36637 12879 23 MANIPUR 2870 1627 1243 0 24 MEGHALAYA 9326 1821 7415 90 25 MIZORAM 777 472 305 0 26 NAGALAND 1500 392 1035 73 27 SIKKIM 2084 518 1566 0 28 TRIPURA 8132 2458 671 5003 29 A & N ISLANDS 503 307 196 0 30 CHANDIGARH 18 0 18 0 31 D&N HAVELI 70 0 70 0 32 DAMAN and DIU 21 0 21 0 33 DELHI 0 0 0 0
34 LAKSHADWEEP 9 0 9 0 35 PUDUCHERRY 248 128 111 9 Total 1690870 1114877 491701 84292 As on 01/04/2013 (Annexure II) Annexure referred to in reply to part (b) to (d) of LokSabhaUnstarred Question No. 803 Status of Supply of Safe Drinking Water in Scheduled Tribe concentrated Rural Habitations SL State Total Fully Covered Partially Covered Quality Affected 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 18514 8745 9194 575 2 BIHAR 1952 1457 127 368 3 CHATTISGARH 48576 29746 14643 4187 4 GOA 0 0 0 0 5 GUJARAT 14290 13906 317 67 6 HARYANA 2 2 0 0 7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 3166 2538 628 0 8 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2304 1131 1173 0 9 JHARKHAND 64801 39123 25627 51 10 KARNATAKA 2750 1198 1336 216 11 KERALA 108 13 86 9 12 MADHYA PRADESH 57341 52525 3377 1439 13 MAHARASHTRA 17969 15943 1886 140 14 ORISSA 55011 35042 16677 3292 15 PUNJAB 3 2 1 0 16 RAJASTHAN 22923 5498 15580 1845 17 TAMIL NADU 2599 2042 557 0 18 UTTAR PRADESH 211 211 0 0 19 UTTARAKHAND 1459 30 1429 0 20 WEST BENGAL 10690 3638 6896 156 21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 5248 597 4556 95 22 ASSAM 17714 7086 8122 2506 23 MANIPUR 2320 1356 964 0 24 MEGHALAYA 9108 1782 7253 73 25 MIZORAM 770 466 304 0 26 NAGALAND 1482 381 1029 72 27 SIKKIM 343 164 179 0 28 TRIPURA 4480 1142 296 3042 29 A & N ISLANDS 133 36 97 0 30 CHANDIGARH 0 0 0 0 31 D&N HAVELI 66 0 66 0 32 DAMAN and DIU 6 0 6 0 33 DELHI 0 0 0 0 34 LAKSHADWEEP 9 0 9 0 35 PUDUCHERRY 0 0 0 0 Total 366348 225800 122415 18133 OLD TOILETS 8th August 2013 LSQ818 SHRI KUVARJIBHAI MOHANBHAI BAVALIA SHRI MAGUNTA SRINIVASULU REDDY
Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether the Government proposes to provide assistance for reconstruction of old dilapidated and abandoned low cost toilets constructed under Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC); (b) if so, the details thereof and the time by which reconstruction work is likely to be started; (c) the manner in which the Government intends to achieve the Millennium Development Goals and target of reducing by half the proportion of the population without access to sustainable sanitation by 2015; (d) whether there is poor quality and less number of public toilets in the country in comparison to the requirement; (e) if so, the details thereof and the reasons therefor, State/UT-wise; and (f) the steps taken by the Government to increase the number of such toilets in the country in 11th and 12th Plans? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) and (b) No Madam. Under the existing guidelines, maintenance expenses of individual household latrines should be met by the households themselves. (c) To accelerate the sanitation coverage in rural areas, Government of India has designed a paradigm shift in Total Sanitation Campaign(TSC) which is now called the Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) in the XIIth Five Year Plan. The objective of NBA is to achieve sustainable behaviour change with provision of sanitary facilities in entire communities in a phased, saturation mode with “Nirmal Grams’ as outcomes. The new strategy is to transform rural India into ‘Nirmal Bharat’ by adopting community saturation approach. NBA goal is to achieve 100% access to sanitation for all rural households by 2022. The provision of incentive for individual household latrine units has been widened to cover all APL households who are SC/ST, small and marginal farmer, landless labourer with homestead, physically challenged and women headed households along-with all BPL households. The financial incentive for construction of toilets has been raised for all eligible beneficiaries ( BPLs and identified APLs) from Rs 3200/- to Rs. 4600/-. In addition upto Rs. 4500 to be booked under Mahatma Gandhi NREGA for construction of the toilet is permitted and a beneficiary contribution of Rs. 900, taking the total unit cost of toilet to Rs. 10000/-.(Rs. 10500/- for Hilly and difficult areas) Conjoint approach with the scheme of National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) has been adopted to address the issue of availability of water in the Gram Panchayats for sustaining sanitation facilities created. Funds for capacity building of all stakeholders including Panchayati Raj Institutions(PRIs) and field level implementers have been earmarked under the revised strategy. Convergence with other State Departments like Health, Women & Child Development and Panchayati Raj is being focused upon. Provision has been made for incentivizing Accredited Social Health Activists(ASHAs) & Anganwadi workers for promoting sanitation. Self Help Groups, Women’s Groups & NGOs of repute are to be encouraged by states to participate in sanitation promotion. The component of Solid and Liquid Waste Management (SLWM) has been prioritized by focussed funding. Under 12th five year plan Government has allocated Rs 37,159 crore for rural sanitation. Further Government of India has increased the allocation under NBA from Rs.2500 crore in the year 2012-13 to Rs. 4260 crore in 2013-14. (d), (e) and (f) Community Sanitary Complex ( CSC) is an integral component of the NBA. Ordinarily such Sanitary complexes are constructed only when there is lack of space in the village for construction of household toilets and the community owns up the responsibility of their operation and maintenance. The maintenance of such complexes is very essential for which Gram Panchayat is ultimate responsibility. Against approved objective of 33684 number of CSC, 26481 number of CSC has been achieved till 31/07/13. State/UT-wise targets and achievement in construction of Sanitary Complexes is at Annexure-1. ANNEXURE Annexure-I Statement referred in part (e) of the reply to Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No. 818 due for reply on 08.08.2013 PHYSICAL PROGRESS IN CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY COMPLEXES UPTO 31.07.2013 S.N. STATE/UT Project Objectives(nos) Project Performance(nos) % 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 575 987 100 2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 318 157 49.37
3 ASSAM 211 63 29.86 4 BIHAR 2362 994 42.08 5 CHHATTISGARH 618 300 48.54 6 D & N HAVELI 12 1 8.33 7 GOA 150 0 0 8 GUJARAT 1671 1774 100 9 HARYANA 1335 1282 96.03 10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 1229 846 68.84 11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 1080 1055 97.69 12 JHARKHAND 1203 270 22.44 13 KARNATAKA 1305 981 75.17 14 KERALA 1090 1047 96.06 15 MADHYA PRADESH 1602 1131 70.6 16 MAHARASHTRA 8210 6818 83.05 17 MANIPUR 386 318 82.38 18 MEGHALAYA 290 200 68.97 19 MIZORAM 560 560 100 20 NAGALAND 275 220 80 21 ORISSA 818 124 15.16 22 PUDUCHERRY 0 30 0 23 PUNJAB 411 100 24.33 24 RAJASTHAN 1544 617 39.96 25 SIKKIM 789 913 100 26 TAMIL NADU 1438 1752 100 27 TRIPURA 226 275 100 28 UTTAR PRADESH 2366 2420 100 29 UTTARAKHAND 470 108 22.98 30 WEST BENGAL 1140 1138 99.82 Total 33684 26481 78.62 OPEN DEFECATION 8th August 2013 LSQ840 SHRI P. LINGAM SMT. SUMITRA MAHAJAN SHRI PRABODH PANDA SHRI RAYAPATI SAMBASIVA RAO Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether more than fifty per cent of rural population in the country lack toilet facilities and defecate in open; (b) if so, the details and percentage thereof, State/UT-wise; (c) whether the Government has set any target to eliminate the practice of open defecation; (d) if so, the details thereof and the time frame fixed for the said purpose; and (e) the details of the steps taken/being taken by the Government to eliminate the practice of open defecation in rural areas of the country? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) and (b) As per census 2011, 67.33% of rural households are not having access to latrines. State/UT-wise details is at Annexure-1.
(c) and (d) Yes Madam. Under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan(NBA), Govt. of India has set the target to make country open defecation free by the year 2022.. (e) Government of India has designed a paradigm shift in Total Sanitation Campaign(TSC) which is now called the Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA), in the XIIth Five Year Plan. The objective of NBA is to achieve sustainable behavior change with provision of sanitary facilities in entire communities in a phased, saturation mode with “Nirmal Grams’ as outcomes. NBA goal is to achieve 100% access to sanitation for all rural households by 2022. Under NBA, following steps have been taken : # A shift from motivating individual household toilet construction to covering whole communities in a Gram Panchayat saturation mode for holistic sanitation outcomes. # The scope of providing incentives for individual household latrine units has been widened to cover all APL households, who belong to SCs, STs, small and marginal farmers, landless labourers with homesteads, physically challenged and women headed households along-with all BPL households. Financial incentive for construction of toilets has been raised for all eligible beneficiaries to Rs. 4600/- from the earlier amount of Rs 3200/-.under NBA. In addition upto Rs. 4500/- can be spent under Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme for construction of the toilet. Along-with beneficiary contribution of Rs. 900/-, the total unit cost of toilet is now Rs. 10000/-. (Rs. 10500/- for Hilly and difficult areas) # More emphasis on Information Education Communication (IEC).with earmarked 15% of the total outlay of district projects for IEC activities. With a view to give thrust to a new approach towards IEC, the Ministry has launched a Communication and Advocacy Strategy (2012-2017). # Conjoint approach with National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) to ensure water availability for sanitation in Gram Panchayats. Focused convergence of rural sanitation with associated Ministries including Health, School Education, Women and Child Development with NBA. ANNEXURE Annexure-1 Statement referred in part (b) of the reply to Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No. 840 due for reply on 08.08.2013 S.N. State/UT Name % rural households not having access to latrines as per
Census2011 1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 38.92 2 Andhra Pradesh 65.12 3 Arunchal Pradesh 44.25 4 Assam 38.46 5 Bihar 81.39 6 Chandigarh* 5.69 7 Chhatishagarh 85.15 8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli* 70.72 9 Daman & Diu* 34.2 10 Delhi* 13.5 11 Goa 27.4 12 Gujarat 65.76 13 Haryana 42.29 14 Himachal Pradesh 32.55 15 Jammu & Kashmir 58.29 16 Jharkand 91.67 17 Karnataka 68.11 18 Kerala 5.59 19 Lakshadweep* 1.66 20 Madhya Pradesh 86.42 21 Maharashtra 55.8 22 Manipur 12.27 23 Meghalaya 43.06 24 Mizoram 12.9 25 Nagaland 22.31 26 Orissa 84.68 27 Pondicherry* 59.59
28 Punjab 28.11 29 Rajasthan 79.87 30 Sikkim 14.86 31 Tamil Nadu 73.27 32 Tripura 15.41 33 Uttar Pradesh 77.13 34 Uttaranchal 45.04 35 West Bengal 51.3 67.33 DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION SCHEMES 8th August 2013 LSQ 846 SHRI PREM CHAND GUDDU SHRI P.L. PUNIA SHRI JAYAWANT GANGARAM AWALE SHRI JAGDISH THAKOR Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the number of proposals/projects received by the Government from various States/UTs including Maharashtra under drinking water and sanitation schemes during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise; (b) the number of proposals/projects approved and pending out of the above, State/UT- wise; (c) the reasons for the proposals/projects pending, State/UT-wise; (d) the time by which the pending proposals/projects are likely to be approved, State/UT- wise; and (e) the details of the Central assistance provided to States/UTs in this regard during the said period? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) & (b) Under National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP), the State Governments, including Maharashtra, are vested with powers to plan, approve and implement rural drinking water supply projects. No project proposals are received in the Ministry from the States for approval. As regard to Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) formerly known as Total Sanitation Campaign(TSC), 607 district projects have been sanctioned so far including 17 projects sanctioned during last 3 years and current year. During last three years and current year, 17 district projects have been received and sanctioned by Govt. of India as per details is at Annexure-1. During last 3 years and current year, no new projects have been received from Maharashtra for approval by GoI. All the projects sanctioned so far are under implementation including the ones sanctioned during last three years and current years. (c) Does not arise. (d) Does not arise. (e) The details of Central assistance provided to the States under the NRDWP during the last three years and the current year is at Annexure II. The State/UT-wise funds released by Govt. of India under NBA/TSC during the last three years and the current year is at Annexure-III. Annexure-1 Statement referred in part (a) and (b) of the reply to Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No. 846 due for reply on 08.08.2013.
No. of District Projects received and approved during last three years and current year under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan(NBA) S.N. State/UT 2010-2011 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 (Upto
July,2013) Total
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 0 0 0 0 0 2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 0 0 0 0 0 3 ASSAM 0 0 0 0 0 4 BIHAR 0 0 0 0 0 5 CHHATTISGARH 0 0 0 0 0 6 D & N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 0 7 GOA 0 0 0 0 0 8 GUJARAT 0 0 0 0 0 9 HARYANA 0 0 0 0 0 10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 0 0 0 0 0 11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 7 0 0 0 7 12 JHARKHAND 0 0 0 0 0 13 KARNATAKA 2 0 0 0 2 14 KERALA 0 0 0 0 0 15 MADHYA PRADESH 2 0 0 0 2 16 MAHARASHTRA 0 0 0 0 0 17 MANIPUR 0 0 0 0 0 18 MEGHALAYA 0 0 0 0 0 19 MIZORAM 0 0 0 0 0 20 NAGALAND 2 0 0 0 2 21 ORISSA 0 0 0 0 0 22 PUDUCHERRY 0 0 0 0 0 23 PUNJAB 3 0 0 0 3 24 RAJASTHAN 0 0 0 0 0 25 SIKKIM 0 0 0 0 0 26 TAMIL NADU 0 0 0 0 0 27 TRIPURA 0 0 0 0 0 28 UTTAR PRADESH 1 0 0 0 1 29 UTTARAKHAND 0 0 0 0 0 30 WEST BENGAL 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL 17 0 0 0 17 Annexure II Annexure referred to reply to part (e) of Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 846 RELEASE UNDER NRDWP DURING LAST THREE YEARS AND CURRENT YEAR ( Rs in Crore) SL STATE 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 1 ANDHRA PR 558.74 462.47 485.14 199.19 2 BIHAR 170.73 330.02 224.3 0 3 CHHATTISGARH 122.01 139.06 148.64 17.13 4 GOA 0 5.01 0.03 0 5 GUJARAT 609.1 571.05 717.47 84.93 6 HARYANA 276.9 237.74 313.41 63.68 7 HIMACHAL PR 194.37 146.03 129.9 0 8 J & K 468.91 420.42 474.5 149.26 9 JHARKHAND 129.95 148.17 243.43 7.66 10 KARNATAKA 703.8 667.78 869.24 173.21 11 KERALA 159.83 113.39 249.04 19.58 12 MADHYA PR 388.33 292.78 539.56 102.76 13 MAHARASHTRA 718.42 718.35 846.48 0 14 ORISSA 294.76 171.05 210.58 69.23 15 PUNJAB 106.59 123.44 144.27 30.93 16 RAJASTHAN 1099.48 1153.76 1411.36 352.36
17 TAMILNADU 393.53 429.55 570.17 15.18 18 UTTAR PR 848.68 802.32 980.06 0 19 UTTARAKHAND 136.41 75.57 74.28 68.79 20 WEST BENGAL 499.19 342.51 502.36 166.1 21 ARUNACHAL PR 199.99 184.83 223.22 82.52 22 ASSAM 487.48 522.44 659.21 118.29 23 MANIPUR 52.77 47.6 66.21 15.11 24 MEGHALAYA 84.88 95.89 97.61 9.2 25 MIZORAM 61.58 38.83 47.92 0 26 NAGALAND 77.52 80.91 110.2 31.87 27 SIKKIM 23.2 69.19 32.36 0.7 28 TRIPURA 74.66 83.86 100.59 30 29 A&N ISLANDS 0 0 0.78 0 30 CHANDIGARH 0 0 0 0 31 D&N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 32 DAMAN & DIU 0 0 0 0 33 DELHI 0 0 0 0 34 LAKSHADWEEP 0 0 0 0 35 PONDICHERRY 0 0 0.88 0.06 Total 8941.81 8474.02 10473.2 1807.74 Annexure-3 Statement referred in part (e) of the reply to Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No. 846 due for reply on 08.08.2013. State-wise funds released by Government of India during the last three years and the current year under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan(NBA) Rs. in crore S.N. State/UT 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-14(Upto
July,2013) 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 138.8 96.57 150.23 0 2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 1.19 2.05 9.87 0 3 ASSAM 94.37 122.51 119.43 0 4 BIHAR 112.6 172.19 478.15 0 5 CHHATTISGARH 54.8 27.02 57.32 0 6 D & N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 7 GOA 0 0 0 0 8 GUJARAT 46.92 43.08 39.49 14.52 9 HARYANA 23.61 3.35 0 0 10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 29.4 4.7 16.67 0 11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 27.93 9.68 35.11 30.85 12 JHARKHAND 54.67 72.65 41.93 0 13 KARNATAKA 44.59 87.09 159.51 0 14 KERALA 22.86 1.59 0 11.33 15 MADHYA PRADESH 144.03 150.76 257.8 241.3 16 MAHARASHTRA 129.12 58 124.09 0 17 MANIPUR 0.8 10.88 35.09 0 18 MEGHALAYA 31.05 11.16 25.4 33.5 19 MIZORAM 6.53 0.31 4.97 0 20 NAGALAND 12.29 1.74 23.03 0 21 ORISSA 68.37 111.72 0 0 22 PUDUCHERRY 0 0 0 0 23 PUNJAB 11.16 2.83 0 0 24 RAJASTHAN 56.71 54.24 137.71 0 25 SIKKIM 1.13 0 1.59 0 26 TAMIL NADU 77.94 76.62 128.12 87.1 27 TRIPURA 9.25 1.34 4.3 9.41 28 UTTAR PRADESH 225.94 169.21 256.85 200.56 29 UTTARAKHAND 17.08 8.05 25.42 0
30 WEST BENGAL 83.28 141.24 306.38 0 Total 1526.42 1440.59 2438.47 628.56 EXPENDITURE UNDER DRINKING WATER SCHEME 8th August 2013 LSQ 852 SHRI JAI PRAKASH AGARWAL Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) Whether the expenditure have been incurred through Panchayati Raj institutions for supply of drinking water under Bharat Nirman; and (b) if so, the details thereof during each of the last three years, State/UT-wise? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI ) (a)& (b) Under the National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP), which is a part of Bharat Nirman, the Government of India provides financial and technical assistance to States to supplement their efforts in providing adequate safe drinking water to the rural population. States can carry out activities related to Rural Drinking Water Supply through Panchyathi Raj Institutions (PRI’s). The details of the expenditure of the activities carried out through PRI’s are not maintained at the central level. NIRMAL GRAM PURASKAR 8th August 2013 LSQ 853 SHRI RAM SUNDAR DAS SHRI HARISCHANDRA DEORAM CHAVAN SHRI KAPIL MUNI KARWARIYA Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the details of payment made to the agencies conducting survey in Nirmal Gram Puraskar (NGP) applicant villages in the country during each of the last three years and current year State/UT-wise; (b) the details of villages recommended and awarded NGP including Maharashtra during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise; (c) whether the Government proposes to review the guidelines for NGP and to make it more effective and result-oriented; (d) if so, the details thereof, along with the funds released by the Government under the Scheme during the said period, State/UT-wise; and (e) the number of villages targeted to be made Nirmal Grams during 2011-12 and 2012-13 in Maharashtra and the achievements made in this regard? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) Surveying agencies conducting survey for Nirmal Gram Puraskar (NGP) applications were not allocated state-wise responsibility and therefore state- wise payment made to each surveying agency is not available. However, details of total payment made to the surveying agencies during last three year are as under:-
Sl.No. Year Amount paid to the Survey Agencies 1 2010-2011 916.45 lakhs 2 2011-2012 737.69 lakhs 3 2012-2013# Nil 4. 2013-2014# Nil #NGP guidelines have been revised in December 2012. As per revised guidelines, selection of Gram Panchayats for award of Nirmal Gram Puraskar from the year 2012-13 shall be taken up by the States, while selection of the Blocks and District Panchayats shall continue to be with the Centre. (b) Details of Gram Panchayats recommended and awarded NGP including in Maharashtra during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise are at Annexure-1. (c) & (d) NGP Guidelines have been reviewed and revised in December 2012. As per new NGP Guidelines, selection of Gram Panchayats for award of Nirmal Gram Puraskar from the year 2012 shall be taken up by the States, while selection of the Blocks and District Panchayats shall continue to be with the Centre. Under revised NGP guidelines, scoring pattern has been adopted which is more effective and result-oriented. Award money has been doubled. To have sustainability, release of award money to the GPs has been modified as under:- (i) 25% of the award money to be released in cash on declaration of award. (ii) 75% of the award money to be kept as a fixed deposit for two years in the GP’s name.After revision of NGP Guidelines, no funds have been released. (e) No target was fixed for Nirmal Grams for the year 2011-12 for any State including the State of Maharashtra. However, the Government of Maharashtra recommended 3442 GPs for NGP awards, out of which 442 GPs were given NGP awards during the year. After Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC) was revamped into Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan(NBA) w.e.f 1.4.2012, States were asked to identify the GPs with functional water supply scheme for making them Nirmal Grams by implementing NBA in a saturation mode in identified GPs. For the year 2012-13, in Maharashtra, 5149 such GPs were identified for making them Nirmal Grams, out of which 2906 GPs have reportedly achieved 100% project objectives under TSC/NBA. Statement referred in part (b) of the reply to Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 853 due for reply on 8.08.2013 State-wise details of Gram Panchayats recommended by the States for NGP and awarded during last three years and current year Number of PRIs in Unit
S.No. State
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13* 2013-14* Recommended by State
Awarded
Recommended by State
Awarded
Recommended by State
Awarded
Recommended by State
Awarded
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 519 44 573 142 0 0 0 0
2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 19 3 26 14 0 0 0 0
3 ASSAM 7 2 11 5 0 0 0 0 4 BIHAR 30 13 23 6 0 0 0 0 5 CHATTISGARH 364 172 421 124 0 0 0 0 6 GUJARAT 3028 189 2713 422 0 0 0 0 7 HARYANA 1239 259 757 330 0 0 0 0
8 HIMACHAL PRADESH 1256 168 1078 323 0 0 0 0
9 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 21 0 2 2 0 0 0 0
10 JHARKHAND 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 11 KARNATAKA 1346 121 753 103 0 0 0 0 12 KERALA 109 103 26 7 0 0 0 0
13 MADHYA PRADESH 4280 344 1825 212 0 0 0 0
14 MAHARASHTRA 4377 694 3442 442 0 0 0 0 15 MANIPUR 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 16 MEGHALAYA 283 160 1024 365 0 0 0 0 17 MIZORAM 72 5 96 53 0 0 0 0 18 NAGALAND 0 23 58 17 0 0 0 0 19 ORISSA 235 81 272 48 0 0 0 0 20 PUNJAB 153 51 135 19 0 0 0 0 21 RAJASTHAN 387 82 516 32 0 0 0 0 22 SIKKIM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 TAMIL NADU 1303 237 1084 51 0 0 0 0 24 TRIPURA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
25 UTTAR PRADESH 64 13 1064 41 0 0 0 0
26 UTTRAKHAND 282 44 291 63 0 0 0 0 27 WEST BENGAL 407 0 169 36 0 0 0 0 19784 2808 16402 2857 0 0 0 0 * Because of change of NGP guidelines in December, 2012, the process of selection of NGP is on in the States NATIONAL RURAL DRINKING WATER PROGRAMME 22nd August 2013 LSQ*200 SHRI BHARTRUHARI MAHTAB SHRI SANJAY SHAMRAO DHOTRE Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether certain deficiencies have been unearthed in the implementation of the National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) in various States of the country in the recent past; (b) if so, the details thereof along with the reaction of the Government thereto; (c) whether the Government has any mechanism to monitor the activities under the said programme at different levels and to ensure safe and potable water to all the habitations of the country; (d) if so, the details thereof and if not, the reasons therefor; and (e) the other remedial measures taken/ being taken by the Government to remove deficiencies in the implementation of the said programme and to provide safe potable water to all the habitations of the country? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI ) (a) to (e) A Statement is laid on the Table of the House Statement referred to in part (a ) to (e ) of Lok Sabha Starred Question No. 200 due for answer on 22.8.2013. (a) to (e ) Yes, Madam. The deficiencies which have been noticed in the implementation of the National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) in some States include the non-achievement of annual targets of coverage of rural habitations, especially quality affected habitations, and the inadequate utilisation of central funds in time resulting in high unspent balances. The reasons for some States not fully achieving the annual targets of coverage of habitations, include high capital costs of large multi-village schemes to bring water from distant safe sources, time taken for planning, designing, sanctioning, procuring, execution and commissioning of such schemes, lowering of ground water table, drinking water sources becoming contaminated due to natural and man-made causes, slipping back of habitations to partially covered or quality affected status due to drying up
of drinking water sources, water supply systems outliving their life; systems working below rated capacities; poor operation and management of systems; increase in population and emergence of new habitations and procurement issues. The reasons for some States being unable to spend the available funds under NRDWP fully and in time, include delays in procurement processes, taking up multi-village schemes that require 2-3 years for completion thus delaying expenditure, delays in preparatory activities, long time taken for completion of legal formalities including obtaining various clearances, delayed release of funds to implementing authorities etc. Under the NRDWP, various mechanisms have been put in place to monitor the activities at different levels. The State Governments are required to prepare and discuss with the Ministry, an Annual Action Plan to implement various components and activities of the NRDWP. Every year, the States have to mark the habitations targeted for coverage and provide details of works, schemes and activities being taken up, on the on-line Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) of the Ministry. The physical and the financial progress being made by States have to be reported on a monthly basis on the IMIS. The Ministry monitors the information provided regularly, and States which are lagging behind in the implementation of the programme, both in terms of physical achievements and financial expenditure, are advised to take appropriate corrective measures. Senior Officers, Area Officers and Technical Officers of the Ministry tour the States to assess the progress in the implementation of the Programme. The Ministry also conducts meetings of the Secretaries in charge of rural water supply, regional review meetings, video-conferences, etc. through which implementation of NRDWP is monitored. Assessment of achievements is done through periodic evaluations of the programme by the Ministry and the Planning Commission. WATER QUALITY TESTING LABORATORY 22nd August 2013 LSQ 2072 SMT KAMLA DEVI PATLE Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether the Government proposes to establish water quality testing laboratories in every district of the country including Chhattisgarh; and (b) if so, the details thereof State/UT wise? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) & (b) Drinking water supply is a State subject. Government of India supplements the efforts of the State Governments with technical and financial assistance for provision of safe drinking water supply in the rural areas of the country under the centrally sponsored National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP). 3% of funds allocated to all the States including Chhattisgarh under NRDWP are earmarked for water quality monitoring and surveillance activities on a 100% Central share basis which, inter alia, includes testing of drinking water sources at the Panchayat level by using simple field test kits, upgrading of existing water quality testing laboratories and setting up of new State/district /sub-district water quality testing laboratories wherever such facility is not available or needed. Number of water quality testing laboratories reported to be set up/informed by the State/UT Governments into the online Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) of the Ministry as on 1/4/2013 is at Annexure. ANNEXURE Annexure referred in the part (a) & (b) of the reply to Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 2072 due for reply on 22/8/2013 State-wise water quality testing laboratories set up/informed by the States/UTs into the Online Integrated Management Information System of the Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation as on 1/4/2013 S. No. State/UT State
Laboratory District Laboratory
Block Laboratory
Sub-division Laboratory
Active Laboratory
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 ANDHRA
PRADESH 1 51 0 119 0
2 BIHAR 1 40 0 0 0 3 CHATTISGARH 1 22 0 4 1 4 GOA 1 0 1 9 0 5 GUJARAT 1 27 20 0 0
6 HARYANA 0 21 1 22 0 7 HIMACHAL
PRADESH 0 18 0 7 0
8 JAMMU AND KASHMIR
0 23 2 13 0
9 JHARKHAND 1 24 0 3 0 10 KARNATAKA 1 41 17 8 47 11 KERALA 1 14 0 16 0 12 MADHYA
PRADESH 1 50 8 104 0
13 MAHARASHTRA 1 39 399 72 0 14 ODISHA 0 32 0 43 0 15 PUNJAB 2 22 8 4 1 16 RAJASTHAN 1 32 0 0 0 17 TAMIL NADU 0 34 0 48 0 18 UTTAR
PRADESH 1 75 7 0 0
19 UTTARAKHAND 0 28 0 0 0 20 WEST BENGAL 1 18 0 100 0 21 ARUNACHAL
PRADESH 0 17 0 31 0
22 ASSAM 1 27 0 41 6 23 MANIPUR 1 9 0 2 0 24 MEGHALAYA 1 7 0 13 0 25 MIZORAM 1 8 0 18 0 26 NAGALAND 0 11 0 1 1 27 SIKKIM 2 2 0 0 0 28 TRIPURA 1 8 7 6 0 29 ANDAMAN and
NICOBAR 1 0 0 0 2
30 CHANDIGARH 0 0 0 0 0 31 DADRA and
NAGAR HAVELI 0 0 0 0 0
32 DAMAN and DIU 0 0 0 0 0 33 DELHI 0 0 0 0 0 34 LAKSHADWEEP 0 9 0 0 0 35 PUDUCHERRY 0 2 0 0 0 Total 23 726 470 684 58 DRINKING WATER 22nd August 2013 LSQ2075 SHRI DILIP KUMAR MANSUKHLAL GANDHI Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether the Government has taken steps to tackle the problem of drinking water in drought-affected districts/areas of the country including Maharashtra; (b) if so, the details thereof, State/UT wise; (c) whether any State Government has submitted any proposal to Union Government to address this problem; (d) if so, the details thereof; and (e) the reaction of the Government thereto?
MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI ) (a) and (b) The Ministry had written to all State Governments, including Maharashtra, in June 2013, informing them about the forecast by Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) and advising them to take steps for preparedness and response in order to tackle drought like situations in States that may develop during South-West Monsoon. The States were requested to prepare Contingency Plans for the same to handle any situation that may arise. The Ministry had also requested the States to send regular reports on the various activities taken up by them to mitigate drinking water problems. (c ) to (e ) No State has submitted request for assistance to address the problem in 2013. However in 2012, the States of Karnataka, Maharashtra, Kerala, Gujarat, Punjab, Haryana and Rajasthan had submitted requests for additional financial assistance for drinking water supply to deal with the drought. The funds released to these States during 2012-13 under the National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) Programme and Natural Calamity components, are as below: (in Rs crores) Sl.No. Name of State NRDWP (Programme) NRDWP (Calamity) 1. Karnataka 804.34 38.0 2. Maharashtra 590.28 15.0 3. Gujarat 702.73 # 4. Rajasthan 1255.36 11.00 5. Haryana 311.41 # 6. Punjab 142.42 # 7 Tamil nadu 570.17 # 8. Kerala 167.86 # DRINKING WATER PROJECT IN RAJASTHAN 22nd August 2013 LSQ 2130 SHRI RATAN SINGH Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether assistance is being provided by the Union Government to Chambal- Dholpur- Bharatpur drinking water project in Rajasthan; (b) if so, the details thereof; (c) the time by which the said assistance is being given; and ( (d) the present status of the said project and the details of the works yet to be done as on date? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI ) (a) Yes, Madam. (b) Assistance to the Chambal- Dholpur- Bharatpur drinking water project by the Central government was earlier being given under the Accelerated Rural Drinking Water Programme (ARWSP). From 2009, the assistance is under the NRDWP/ National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP). The details of the packages of Project sanctioned, Project cost and Central assistance with regard to cost and expenditure, as reported by the State as on 18/8/2013, is at Annexure I. (c) The Central assistance is being given from the beginning of the above project in 2001. (d) The status of the above project as reported by the State government is at Annexure II.
Annexure I Annexure referred to in reply to part (b) of Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 2130 due for answer on 22.8.2013. Details of Total cost, Govt. of India share, Budget allotted and Expenditure incurred in the Chambal- Dholpur- Bharatpur drinking water project (CDBP) (Amounts in Rs. Crore) Name of package of Total Cost of GOI Share (Under Budget allotment Expenditure upto
CDBP Project ARWSP/NRDWP) upto date 18.8.2013 CDBP Phase- I ; Part- I 548.69 207.67 117.27 116.81 CDBP Phase – I ; Part- II 311.49 121.28 11.47 5.07 (Transmission main ) CDBP Phase - I ; Part- II 720.31 328 Under Process --- (Village cluster distribution system) Annexure II Annexure referred to in reply to part (d) of Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 2130 due for answer on 22.8.2013. (A) Name of package:- CDBP Phase – I; Part- I Total cost Rs 548.69 Cr. (In 5 packages costing Rs. 330.32Cr.- Package I, Rs. 12.81 Cr.- Package II, Rs. 80.30 Cr.- Package III, Rs. 86.45 Cr.- Package IV, Rs.- 35.58Cr. Package V) Project work in brief Package-I Under proposed package work of Transmission line from Chambal River Dholpur to MallahH/W at Bharatpur including WTP at Mallah H/W has been taken up. Date of award of contract:- 5.10.2007 Executive agency :- M/s. IVRCL Ltd., Hyderabad Work completion period & Date:- Originally for 24 Months - 13.10.2009 Budget available under central (GOI) assistance in 2013-14 upto date :- Rs. 117.27 Cr. Expenditure incurred in 2013-14 upto date :- Rs. 116.81 Cr. Work of construction of Intake well in River Chambal, Laying of transmission main from Intake well to Mallah H/W Bharatpur in 85.175 Km length, construction of RWR and pump house at Sagarpada Dholpur and at Mallah H/W Bharatpur, construction of WTP and CWR at Mallah H/W completed. Water supply to Bharatpur city has started from 24.12.2011. For Works of 30 villages of Roopwas (Package III), 63 villages of Kumher (Package IV), & 44 villages of Roopwas (Package V), work orders has been placed and work is under progress. Annexure II (contd.) (B) Name of package:- CDBP Phase - I Part- II (Transmission main from Mallah Bharatpur to Kumher, Deeg, Nagar, Kaman & Pahari ) Cost of package:- Rs. 311.49 Cr. Date of Sanction :- 30.5.2013 Under proposed package work of construction of clear water Transmission Main from Mallah HW Bharatpur to Kumher, Deeg, Nagar, Kaman & Pahari has been proposed. Work of Regional Water Supply Scheme of 97 villages of Bharatpur Tehsil has also been taken up. Executive agency :- M/s. IVRCL Ltd., Hyderabad Work completion period & Date:- 30 Months upto 22.3.2015 Budget available under Central (GOI) assistance in 2013-14 upto date :- Rs. 7.50 Cr. Expenditure incurred in 2013-14 upto date :- Rs. 5.07 Cr. Annexure II (contd.) (C) Name of package:- CDBP Ph- I Part- II (Village cluster distribution system ) Cost of package:- Total cost Rs. 720.31 Cr. (In 3 packages costing Rs. 230.91 Cr. -Package I, Rs. 279.24 Cr.- Package II; Rs. 210.16 Cr. - Package III) (i) Project work in brief :- Package-I : Under proposed package, work of village distribution network in 246 villages of Kaman & Pahari Tehsil has been proposed. Work of augmentation of the Urban Water Supply Scheme Kaman also taken up. Sanction Date:- 30.5.2013 Present status:- Tender for sanction work received on 17.7.13. Finalization of tender is under process. Budget available under Central (GOI) assistance in 2013-14 upto date :- Budget under sanction process. Expenditure incurred in 2013-14 upto date :- Nil (ii) Project work in brief :- Package-II Under proposed package work of village distribution network in 283villages of Deeg & Nagar Tehsil has proposed. Work of augmentation of Urban Water Supply Scheme Deeg & Nagar also taken up. Sanction Date:- 30.5.2013
Present status:- Tender for sanction work received on 31.7.13. Finalization of tender is under process. Budget available under central (GOI) assistance in 2013-14 upto date :- Budget under sanction process. Expenditure incurred in 2013-14 upto date :- . Nil (iii) Project work in brief :- Package-III Under proposed package work of construction of village distribution network in 226 villages of Roopwas, Bharatpur & Kumher Tehsils has been proposed. Work of augmentation of Urban Water Supply Scheme Kumher also been taken up. Sanction Date:- 30.5.2013 Present status:- Tender for sanction work has been received on 31.7.13. Finalization of tender is under process. Budget available under Central (GOI) assistance in 2013-14 upto date :- Budget under sanction process. Expenditure incurred in 2013-14 upto date :- Nil SPECIAL STATUS TO STATES 22nd August 2013 LSQ 2183 SHRI ANTO ANTONY SHRI DEVJI PATEL Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether there is any provision under the National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) to grant special category status to any State in the country thereby enhancing the amount of financial assistance accordingly; (b) if so, the details thereof; (c) whether the Government proposes to enhance financial assistance to any State in the country by according special category status under NRDWP; and (d) if so, the details thereof? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI ) (a) and (b) No, Madam. (c ) No, Madam. (d) Does not arise. NATIONAL RURAL DRINKING WATER PROGRAMME 22nd August 2013 LSQ 2196 SHRI PRABHUNATH SINGH SHRI SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the aims and objectives of National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) and the extent to which the Government has achieved those aims and objectives;
(b) the number of habitations targeted to be covered under NRDWP during Bharat Nirman, Phase-I and how many of them have been actually covered so far; ( (c)whether the Government has ascertained the drawbacks in achieving the targets and if so, the details thereof and the steps taken to address them to achieve the targets; (d) whether the Government has formulated any programme to provide piped water supply to every household in rural areas; and (e) if so, the details thereof? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI ) (a ) The aim and objective of National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) is to provide every rural person with adequate safe water for drinking, cooking and other basic domestic needs on a sustainable basis, with a minimum water quality standard, which should be conveniently accessible at all times and in all situations. Achieving this aim and objective is a continuous process. (b) At the beginning of Bharat Nirman Phase I, as on 1.4.2005, it was targeted to cover 55,067 uncovered, 3,31,604 slipped back and 2,16,968 quality affected habitations with adequate safe drinking water supply. Against this, as reported by the States on the online Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) of this Ministry, as on 15.8.2013, 55,193 uncovered, 8,33,304 partially covered/slipped back and 1,52,371 quality affected habitations have been covered. This includes newly identified Uncovered, Slipped-back, Partially covered habitations and Quality affected habitations. (c) The reasons for not fully achieving the targets of coverage of quality affected habitations include high capital costs of large multi-village schemes to bring water from distant safe sources, time taken for planning, designing, sanctioning, procuring, execution and commissioning of such schemes, lowering of ground water table; drinking water sources becoming contaminated due to natural and man-made causes; water supply systems outliving their life; systems working below rated capacities; poor operation and management of systems; increase in population and emergence of new habitations, procurement issues, etc. To assist in addressing the above issues, the Government of India provides financial and technical assistance to States under the NRDWP, to supplement their efforts to provide adequate safe drinking water to the rural population. In 2013-14, Rs. 11000 crore has been allocated under the NRDWP. In order to achieve the targets under NRDWP, the State Governments are vested with powers to plan, approve and implement drinking water supply schemes. The State Governments, in consultation with the Ministry, prepare Annual Action Plans (AAP) each year, to implement rural water supply schemes to cover partially covered and quality affected habitations and for other activities. To ensure sustainability of functioning of rural water supply schemes, the States have to adopt improved Operation & Maintenance (O&M) methods for their better working and to control leakages. Up to 15% of funds allocated to States under NRDWP can be utilised for O&M. To ensure the sustainability of drinking water sources, the State can utilise 10% of their allocation. To ensure supply of safe drinking water, 5% of national allocation is earmarked for allocation to States with chemical contamination affected habitations and areas reporting Japanese Encephalitis and Acute Encephalitis cases (JE/AES). Further, 67% of funds allocated to States can be utilised for coverage of water quality affected habitations. To facilitate water quality testing, a separate Water Quality Monitoring & Surveillance Component with 3% of NRDWP allocation has been created to strengthen water quality testing practices in States. To incentivise States to involve the Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRI) in the planning, operation and management for drinking water supply schemes, a Management Devolution Index has been formulated to measure the extent of devolution of powers made by States to the PRIs with respect to Funds, Functions and Functionaries in regard to drinking water supply. 10% of funds under NRDWP are kept for allocation to States on the basis of their MDI scores. The Ministry has set up a robust web-based monitoring mechanism at the central level to monitor the implementation of water supply schemes under the NRDWP in the States. (d) and (e ) In the 12th Five Year Plan period, under the NRDWP, the Ministry is giving special emphasis on piped water supply in rural habitations. States are being asked to plan for coverage of habitations with piped water supply through stand posts or household connections. In addition to the fact that this shall reduce the drudgery and time taken in the collection of water, it shall also facilitate in tackling the problem of drinking water quality in the habitations affected with water issues. In addition, to accelerate the setting up piped water supply systems in rural areas in States where the such coverage is low, the Ministry has proposed a project with World Bank support in parts of Assam, Bihar, Jharkhand and Uttar Pradesh which focuses on setting up piped water supply systems. UNDER UTILISATION OF FUNDS UNDER NBA
22nd August 2013 LSQ 2252 SHRI VILAS BABURAO MUTTEMWAR Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether the funds under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) have been under utilised in various States like Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Odisha, Maharashtra, Jharkhand etc.; (b) if so, the details thereof during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise; (c) the steps taken by the Government in this regard; and (d) the steps taken/being taken by the Government to ensure that the rural population of the country is benefited fully from NBA? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) & (b) Details of fund released and expenditure incurred along with opening balances State/UT-wise is at Annexure-1. It can be seen that funds released /sanctioned under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) have been utilised, although the percentage expenditure has been less in respect of Andhra Pradesh, Jharkhand and Odisha as compared to other states. (c) Regular review meetings/Video Conferences etc. are organized by the MDWS to discuss issues relating to implementation of the NBA and to improve the progress and expenditure. Also, release of 2nd installment of central share is made only after 60 % of existing resources have been utilized by the State concerned. d) Under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan, following steps have been taken to provide the benefits to the people: # Information, Education and Communication (IEC) is an extremely important component for rural sanitation programme that lays the basis for successful implementation of the programme. 15% of project outlays are earmarked for IEC activities. With a view to give thrust to a new approach towards IEC, the Ministry has launched a Communication and Advocacy Strategy (2012-17). # The actual implementation of the programme is done by the State Government. They have been urged to step up their IEC activities to generate demand for toilets. # Government of India has also stepped up its efforts by increased allocation and increased spending on IEC activities to bring awareness amongst the rural households about the need to build toilets. # Government of India is reviewing the implementation of the NBA in different States on a regular basis to identify the bottlenecks and remove the same so that the programme can be implemented more speedily to provide the benefits to the people. # The guidelines and other administrative instructions for implementation of NBA are being modified wherever required to speed up the implementation of the programme. # Government of India has a robust on-line monitoring system for the implementation of the programme. # In addition to the field visits by the Officers of Government of India to the extent possible, the states are also being urged to step up their own review and monitoring through State Water and Sanitation Mission (SWSM) at the State level and District Water and Sanitation Mission (DWSM) at the district level. Annexure-I Statement referred in part (b) of the reply to Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No. 2252 due for reply on 22.08.2013 State/UT-wise, central share released and utilized under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan(NBA) during each of last three years and current year State/UT-wise, central share released and utilized under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan(NBA) during each of last three years and current year
Rs. in lakh
. State/UT Name 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14(Upto July, 2013) Opening Balance
Release Expenditure Opening Balance
Release Expenditure Opening Balance
Release Expenditure Opening Balance
Release Expenditure
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 9884.81 13880 7177.9 16586.9 9657.28 9151.88 17092.3 15022.69 9057.44 23057.6 0 3072.26
2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 1181.22 119.26 610.28 690.2 204.88 511.09 383.99 986.92 211.4 1159.5 0 430.08
3 ASSAM 6724.32 9437.36 6712.08 9449.6 12251.2 12227.7 9473.11 11943.31 9459.16 11957.3 0 2022.91 4 BIHAR 9373.95 11259.8 12421.5 8212.23 17219.1 16761.4 8669.88 47814.55 22012.6 34471.9 0 4102.05
5 CHHATTISGARH 1135.77 5479.58 2530.57 4084.78 2702.42 3286.35 3500.84 5731.57 1678.37 7554.04 0 534.68
6 D & N HAVELI 1.48 0 0 1.48 0 0 1.48 0 0 1.48 0 0 7 GOA 22.39 0 0 22.39 0 0 22.39 0 0 22.39 0 0 8 GUJARAT 1407.44 4692.36 3332.98 2766.82 4308.28 3525.46 3549.64 3949.42 3498.4 4000.65 1451.81 916.08 9 HARYANA 1388.32 2361.49 1410.41 2339.4 335.27 1542.35 1132.32 0 767.02 365.3 11781.6 124.99
10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 926.35 2939.78 2130.2 1735.93 469.57 1274.65 930.85 1666.96 1659.06 938.75 0 90.32
11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 945.1 2792.51 1101.93 2635.68 967.95 2463.42 1140.21 3511.01 3641.37 1009.85 3085.11 119.6
12 JHARKHAND 3502.74 5466.98 3653.66 5316.06 7264.92 2334.84 10246.1 4193.31 1886.76 12552.7 0 588.85 13 KARNATAKA 4190.7 4458.66 6240.93 2408.42 8709.28 4115.18 7002.53 15950.81 6963.67 15989.7 0 2441.37 14 KERALA 583 2286.34 808.52 2060.82 158.89 987.89 1231.82 0 951.51 280.3 1132.63 415.51
15 MADHYA PRADESH 5864.8 14402.6 12826.6 7440.82 15076 16700.5 5816.37 25779.96 18249.3 13347 24130 6153.97
16 MAHARASHTRA 1525.51 12911.7 7263.49 7173.71 5799.94 8391.45 4582.2 12409.22 6281.3 10710.1 0 1428.36
17 MANIPUR 1218.31 80.3 861 437.6 1087.87 701.18 824.3 3509.18 1714.13 2619.35 0 273.99 18 MEGHALAYA 1060.57 3105.23 1437.34 2728.46 1115.72 3290.85 553.33 2540.01 1288.58 1804.76 3349.65 209.06 19 MIZORAM 486.46 653.4 272.81 867.05 31.38 691.6 206.83 497.48 203.14 501.16 0 100.62 20 NAGALAND 132.36 1229.45 264.95 1096.85 174.06 1371.36 -100.44 2302.68 388.5 1813.74 0 0 21 ORISSA 10838.1 6836.73 4928.22 12746.6 11171.7 4652.38 19265.9 0 3308.53 15957.4 0 603.32 22 PUDUCHERRY 18.68 0 2.91 15.77 0 0 15.77 0 0 15.77 0 0 23 PUNJAB 793.66 1116.39 420.64 1489.41 283.18 108.36 1664.23 0 387.74 1276.49 0 0 24 RAJASTHAN 4751.23 5670.74 3757.52 6664.45 5424.41 3136.6 8952.26 13770.97 8303.04 14420.2 0 1798.39 25 SIKKIM 0 112.86 0 112.86 0 0 112.86 159.47 0 272.33 0 0 26 TAMIL NADU 2722.95 7794.35 5213.14 5304.16 7662.06 10710.2 2256.03 12811.68 8695.07 6372.64 8710.01 691.11 27 TRIPURA 753.64 925.14 574.08 1104.7 133.92 752.89 485.73 430.47 341.25 574.95 941.16 354.4
28 UTTAR PRADESH 4707.78 22594 22738.9 4562.86 16920.7 12056.5 9427.13 25684.74 20144.2 14967.6 20055.5 3010.57
29 UTTARAKHAND 613.55 1707.61 1159.57 1161.59 804.76 1312.67 653.68 2541.96 1353.52 1842.12 0 407.74
30 WEST BENGAL 5456.52 8327.5 7654.57 6129.45 14124.3 11514 8739.76 30638.14 19974.8 19403.1 0 3380.39
Grand Total:- 82211.7 152642 117507 117347 144059 133573 127833 243846.5 152420 219260 74637.5 33270.63
SANITATION FACILITIES 22nd August 2013 LSQ 2267 SHRI SONAWANE PRATAP NARAYANRAO SHRI SHETTI RAJU ALIAS DEVAPPA ANNA SHRI P. KUMAR Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether sanitation facility in rural areas of our country are still very meagre, if so, the details thereof; (b) whether the Government proposes to rope in private players under Public-Private Partnership (PPP) in sanitation sector; (c) if so, the details thereof; (d) whether the Government proposes to set up a mini-sewerage treatment plant in each village of the country including Maharashtra; (e) if so, the details thereof, State/UT wise and the allocation made/ proposed to be made for the purpose; (f) whether the Government has asked the State Governments to provide top priority for sanitation in their respective States; (g) if so, the details thereof; (h) whether the Government has agreed to provide special funds to the State Governments to undertake special sanitation drives; and (i) if so, the details thereof? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) Yes Madam. As per census 2011, only 32.7% of rural households are having access to latrines. (b) and (c) One of the biggest problems facing the sanitation sector is lack of access to sanitary toilets to a large proportion of rural households. The NBA provides assistance for building of Individual Household latrines (IHHLs) to eligible beneficiaries. The building of IHHLs is an activity which is not readily amenable to Public Private Partnership in the traditional sense of the term. However Private sector does play an important role in the sanitation sector by making available the material requirement for construction of toilets. Moreover, as per NBA Guidelines, corporate houses are encouraged to participate in the implementation of Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) as an essential part of the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) by taking up the issues of sanitation through Information Education Communication (IEC), Human Resource Development (HRD) or through direct targeted interventions. (d) & (e) Under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA), Solid and Liquid Waste Management (SLWM) is one of the key components to bring about improvement in the general quality of life in rural areas. Under this component, activities like compost pits, vermin composting, common and individual biogas plants, low cost drainage, soakage channels/ pits, reuse of waste water and system for collection, segregation and disposal of household garbage etc can be taken up. Under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA), assistance for SLWM project is available on the basis of total number of households in each Gram Panchayat(GP), subject to a maximum of Rs.7 lakh for a GP having up to 150 households, Rs.12 lakh up to 300 households, Rs.15 lakh up to 500 households and Rs.20 lakh for GPs having more than 500 households. Funding for SLWM project under NBA is provided by the Central and State Government in the ratio of 70:30. It is upto the Gram Panchayats / State Governments including that of Maharashtra to take up SLWM projects including mini sewerage treatment plants to meet the local requirement by utilizing assistance available under NBA. Additional cost requirement can be met by convergence with MGNGREGS or from the State/GP funds. (f) & (g) Government of India has accorded a high priority to rural sanitation. Efforts of the State Governments for promoting rural sanitation were supplemented from 1986 till 1999 by the Central Government under the centrally sponsored Rural Sanitation Programme (CRSP) and thereafter from 1999 under the Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC). Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC) was launched as demand driven, community led programme with major Information Education Communication (IEC) inputs to make sanitation a felt need of the people. To accelerate the progress of Sanitation coverage TSC was revamped as Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) in the XIIth Five Year Plan. The objective of NBA is to achieve sustainable behavior change with provision of sanitary facilities in entire communities
in a phased, saturation mode with “Nirmal Grams’ as outcomes. The new strategy is to transform rural India into ‘Nirmal Bharat’ by adopting community saturation approach. NBA goal is to achieve 100% access to sanitation for all rural households by 2022. Under NBA, following steps have been taken : # A shift from motivating individual household toilet construction to covering whole communities in a Gram Panchayat saturation mode for holistic sanitation outcomes. # The scope of providing incentives for individual household latrine units has been widened to cover all APL households who belong to SCs, STs, small and marginal farmers, landless labourers with homesteads, physically challenged and women headed households along-with all BPL households. Financial incentive for construction of toilets has been raised for all eligible beneficiaries to Rs. 4600/- from the earlier amount of Rs 3200/-. under NBA. In addition upto Rs. 4500/- can be spent under Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme for construction of the toilet. Along-with beneficiary contribution of Rs. 900/-, the total unit cost of toilet is now Rs. 10000/-.(Rs. 10500/- for Hilly and difficult areas) # More emphasis on Information Education Communication (IEC).with earmarked 15% of the total outlay of district projects for IEC activities. With a view to give thrust to a new approach towards IEC, the Ministry has launched a Communication and Advocacy Strategy (2012-2017). # Conjoint approach with National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) to ensure water availability for sanitation in Gram Panchayats. Focused convergence of rural sanitation with associated Ministries including Health, School Education, Women and Child Development with NBA. # Funds for capacity building of all stakeholders including Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) and field level implementers have been earmarked under the revised strategy. # Convergence with other State Departments like Health, Women & Child Development and Panchayati Raj is being focused upon. Provision has been made for incentivizing Accredited Social Health Activists(ASHAs) & Anganwadi workers for promoting sanitation. Self Help Groups, Women’s Groups & NGOs of repute are to be encouraged by states to participate in sanitation promotion. # The component of Solid and Liquid Waste Management (SLWM) has been prioritized by focussed funding. (h) and (i) During 12th five year plan, Government of India has allocated Rs 37159 crores for sanitation. Further Government has increased the allocation under NBA from Rs.2500 crore in the year 2012-13 to Rs. 4260 crore in 2013-14. The State/UT wise fund released so far along with details of unspent balances with them as on 31st July,2013 is at Annexure-1.
Annexure-1 Statement referred in part (h) and (i) of the reply to Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No.2267 due for reply on 22.08.2013. State/UT-wise centre share released so far and unspent balance(Centre share) as on 31-7-2013 under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan(NBA)
Rs. in lakh S.No. State/UT Name Centre share released so far Unspent balance as on 31-7-
2013 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 78353.5 19985.30 2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 3880.87 729.42 3 ASSAM 55619.73 9934.02 4 BIHAR 113128.25 30369.26 5 CHHATTISGARH 34080.17 6998.34 6 D & N HAVELI 3.15 1.48 7 GOA 172.32 22.39 8 GUJARAT 36255.26 4536.39 9 HARYANA 22917.69 12021.90 10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 8748.19 848.43 11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 14839.91 3975.36 12 JHARKHAND 34362.22 11958.87 13 KARNATAKA 47924.63 13548.29
14 KERALA 11430.44 997.43 15 MADHYA PRADESH 120654.2 31323.06 16 MAHARASHTRA 68660.49 9235.94 17 MANIPUR 6945.61 2342.91 18 MEGHALAYA 12912.52 4945.35 19 MIZORAM 3400.96 364.61 20 NAGALAND 5419.08 1813.74 21 ORISSA 51676.92 15354.06 22 PUDUCHERRY 94.84 15.77 23 PUNJAB 2921.86 1276.49 24 RAJASTHAN 42857.14 12621.78 25 SIKKIM 1282.54 272.33 26 TAMIL NADU 69506.83 14388.74 27 TRIPURA 6726.03 1161.70 28 UTTAR PRADESH 191937.61 32012.61 29 UTTARAKHAND 8311.87 1434.38 30 WEST BENGAL 81256.73 16022.74 Grand Total:- 1136281.56 260513.10 HEAVY METAL IN DRINKING WATER 22nd August 2013 LSQ 2285 SMT. P. JAYA PRADA NAHATA SHRI NEERAJ SHEKHAR SHRI YASHVIR SINGH Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether the Government has achieved 100 per cent safe drinking water in some areas/habitations/districts affected by heavy metals; and (b) if so, the details thereof during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise, year-wise? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) & (b) Drinking water supply is a State subject. Government of India supplements the efforts of the State Governments with technical and financial assistance for provision of safe drinking water supply in the rural areas of the country under the centrally sponsored National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP). Under NRDWP, the Ministry focuses primarily on contamination of rural drinking water sources for 5 elements viz., arsenic, fluoride, iron, salinity and nitrate affected habitations and monitors the coverage/ achievement of these habitations with safe drinking water facility as they are more evenly distributed in the country. There is no standard definition for “Heavy metals”. In general, Heavy metals have a high atomic number, atomic weight and specific gravity and may include some of the metalloids like arsenic. The Ministry does not monitor achievements of these habitations affected with heavy metals at the Central level since they are restricted only to certain pockets in the country. However, heavy metals include arsenic and iron whose achievements are monitored at the Central level and as reported by the States, year-wise achievements of number of arsenic and iron affected habitations as reported by the States during the last 3 years and the current year (as on 16/8/2013) is at Annexure. ANNEXURE Annexure referred in the part (a) & (b) of the reply to Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 2285 due for reply on 22/8/2013 State-wise achievement of number of arsenic and iron affected habitations reported to be covered with safe drinking water facility by the States/UTs during the last 3 years and the current financial year, 2013-14 (as on 16/8/2013)
WATER QUALITY FUND 29th August 2013 LSQ*265 SHRI BADRUDDIN AJMAL Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the details of the projects implemented to provide sanitation and drinking water facilities in the country including Assam, State/UT-wise; (b) the details of the funds allocated to various States including Assam for the purpose during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise; (c) the details of specific projects for the purpose which have been received from the States and the action taken by the Government thereon including the funds released during 2012-13 and 2013-14 to the States for the purpose, State/UT-wise; and (d) the details of the guidelines for utilisation of the Water Quality Fund under National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) for habitations affected by chemical contamination under Japanese Encephalitis (JE)/Acute Encephalitis Syndrome (AES)? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) to (d) A Statement is laid on the table of the House. Statement referred to in reply to Lok Sabha Starred Question No. 265 for 29.8.2013. (a) The details of the projects implemented to provide drinking water facilities in the country including in Assam, State/UT-wise is given at Annexure-I. Government of India presently administers Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) formerly known as Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC) to accelerate the progress of sanitation in rural areas. Under NBA/TSC, projects are sanctioned taking district as a unit. Till date 607 district projects have been sanctioned and under implementation. State/UT-wise details of district projects sanctioned including Assam is at Annexure-1I. (b) The details of the funds allocated to various States/ UTs, including Assam, for rural drinking water supply, under the National Rural Drinking Water Programme, State/UT wise is at Annexure III. Since NBA is demand driven scheme, no State/UT-wise allocation is made. However State/UT-wise central share released during last 3 years and current year is at Annexure-IV. (c) Drinking Water supply is a State subject. The Government of India provides financial and technical assistance to States under the National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) supplementing their efforts to provide adequate safe drinking water to the rural population. Under the NRDWP, the State Governments are vested with the powers to plan, approve, implement and
operate drinking water supply schemes. The State Governments, in consultation with the Ministry, prepare an Annual Action Plan (AAP) each year, to implement rural water supply schemes to cover partially covered and quality affected habitations and for other activities. Drinking water supply projects prepared thereafter, as per AAP, by the States are examined and approved at the state level by the State Level Scheme Sanctioning Committee (SLSSC). The drinking water projects prepared by the States are not submitted to the Central Government and therefore no funds are released against specific projects to the State/UTs. Under NBA, during 2012-13 and 2013-14, no new district project have been received and sanctioned by Government of India. The fund released to the States during 2012-13 and 2013-14 is at Annexure –IV. (d) Under the NRDWP, 5% of the national allocation is earmarked for allocation to States which have rural habitations with drinking water sources affected by chemical contamination and to States which have the 60 high priority districts identified by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, with respect to incidences of Japanese Encephalitis and Acute Encephalitis Syndrome (JE/AES). The details of the guidelines for the utilization of this fund include the following:- (I) In Water Quality (chemically contaminated) affected habitations, for which 75% of the 5% earmarked NRDWP fund is allocated, the following activities can be taken up. i) Installing drinking water treatment units in water quality affected (chemical contamination) habitations. ii) Schemes for supply of safe drinking water from safe sources to such habitations. iii) Expenditure on any additionality or improvement in existing drinking water supply schemes in chemical contaminated affected habitations for provision of safe water. Arsenic affected habitations should be covered with highest priority followed by fluoride affected habitations. States without arsenic or fluoride affected habitations can utilize these funds for covering other contaminations. (II) In 60 JE/AES affected high priority districts identified by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, for which 25% of the 5% earmarked NRDWP funds is allocated, the following activities can be taken up. i) States should prepare an Action Plan at the beginning of the year incorporating the activities, timelines, estimated costs and names of the habitations to be covered with new water supply schemes using these funds. ii) Repair existing hand pumps to prevent further contamination of water-repair of platform, soak pit, raising of hand pumps in flood prone areas, chlorination of handpumps. iii) Replace public shallow hand pumps in respective habitations by India Mark-II hand pumps. iv) Implement mini water supply schemes in feasible habitations where JE/AES cases have been reported with energized deep borewell and stand posts with adequate number of taps and provision for chlorination. v) Routine regular chlorination of drinking water supply. vi) Activities targeted towards Information, Education and Communication (IEC) and activities under Solid Liquid Waste Management (SLWM).
Annexure I Annexure referred to in reply to part (a) of Lok Sabha Starred Question 265 due for answer on 29.8.2013 Number of completed rural drinking water supply schemes (as reported on 23/08/2013) SL.No. State PWS Handpumps Other Schemes Total 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 72195 353604 27845 453644 2 BIHAR 2067 97216 22461 121744 3 CHATTISGARH 6155 178907 24016 209078 4 GOA 124 0 125 249 5 GUJARAT 62318 4019 8500 74837 6 HARYANA 8521 65 214 8800 7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 12721 14366 1257 28344 8 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 1986 754 913 3653 9 JHARKHAND 9001 227143 43603 279747 10 KARNATAKA 116446 36087 46549 199082
11 KERALA 2963 12 482 3457 12 MADHYA PRADESH 7589 523932 17774 549295 13 MAHARASHTRA 51152 33488 37020 121660 14 ODISHA 9876 344431 15250 369557 15 PUNJAB 8935 1543 1148 11626 16 RAJASTHAN 16471 45743 30958 93172 17 TAMIL NADU 148676 136230 58324 343230 18 UTTAR PRADESH 3456 2008902 1239 2013597 19 UTTARAKHAND 12488 906 285 13679 20 WEST BENGAL 1579 141935 109 143623 21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 7536 71 1047 8654 22 ASSAM 6338 11936 75777 94051 23 MANIPUR 3009 88 146 3243 24 MEGHALAYA 3842 272 3801 7915 25 MIZORAM 680 5 175 860 26 NAGALAND 2958 8 244 3210 27 SIKKIM 2558 0 596 3154 28 TRIPURA 2474 6500 4206 13180 29 ANDAMAN and NICOBAR 266 0 45 311 30 CHANDIGARH 0 0 0 0
31 DADRA and NAGAR HAVELI 0 0 0 0
32 DAMAN and DIU 0 0 0 0 33 DELHI 0 0 0 0 34 LAKSHADWEEP 0 0 0 0 35 PUDUCHERRY 197 0 57 254 Total 584577 4168163 424166 5176906
Annexure-1I Statement referred in part (a) of the reply to Lok Sabha Starred Question No. 265 due for reply on 29.08.2013 State/UT-wise details of district projects sanctioned under NBA S.N. State/UT Name No. of Project Sanctioned 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 22 2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 16 3 ASSAM 26 4 BIHAR 38 5 CHHATTISGARH 16 6 D & N HAVELI 1 7 GOA 2 8 GUJARAT 25 9 HARYANA 20 10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 12 11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 21 12 JHARKHAND 24 13 KARNATAKA 29 14 KERALA 14 15 MADHYA PRADESH 50 16 MAHARASHTRA 33 17 MANIPUR 9 18 MEGHALAYA 7 19 MIZORAM 8 20 NAGALAND 11 21 ORISSA 30 22 PUDUCHERRY 1 23 PUNJAB 20 24 RAJASTHAN 32 25 SIKKIM 4
26 TAMIL NADU 29 27 TRIPURA 4 28 UTTAR PRADESH 71 29 UTTARAKHAND 13 30 WEST BENGAL 19 Total 607
Annexure III Annexure referred to in reply to part (b) of Lok Sabha Starred Question No.265 due for answer on 29.8.2013 ALLOCATION, AND RELEASE UNDER NRDWP DURING LAST THREE YEARS AND CURRENT YEAR ( Rs in Crore) Sl. 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14* No State/UT Alloc. Rel. Alloc Rel. Alloc Rel. Alloc Rel. 1 ANDHRA PR 491.02 558.74 546.32 462.47 563.39 485.14 551.19 237.45 2 BIHAR 341.46 170.73 374.98 330.02 484.24 224.3 440.01 0 3 CHHATTISGARH 130.27 122.01 143.57 139.06 168.89 148.64 141.75 17.13 4 GOA 5.34 0 5.2 5.01 6.07 0.03 5.94 0 5 GUJARAT 542.67 609.1 478.89 571.05 578.29 717.47 526.96 84.93 6 HARYANA 233.69 276.9 210.51 237.74 250.24 313.41 241.8 63.68 7 HIMACHAL PR 133.71 194.37 131.47 146.03 153.59 129.9 148.69 0 8 J & K 449.22 468.91 436.21 420.42 510.76 474.5 499.44 149.26 9 JHARKHAND 165.93 129.95 162.52 148.17 191.86 243.43 185.23 45.02 10 KARNATAKA 644.92 703.8 687.11 667.78 922.67 869.24 668.6 173.21 11 KERALA 144.28 159.83 144.43 113.39 193.59 249.04 165.13 19.58 12 MADHYA PR 399.04 388.33 371.97 292.78 447.33 539.56 428.7 102.76 13 MAHARASHTRA 733.27 718.42 728.35 718.35 897.96 846.48 766.32 0 14 ORISSA 204.88 294.76 206.55 171.05 243.91 210.58 233.25 69.23 15 PUNJAB 82.21 106.59 88.02 123.44 101.9 144.27 88.29 30.93 16 RAJASTHAN 1165.44 1099.48 1083.57 1153.76 1352.54 1411.36 1317.56 352.36 17 TAMILNADU 316.91 393.53 330.04 429.55 394.82 570.17 287.8 77.35 18 UTTAR PR 899.12 848.68 843.3 802.32 1060.87 980.06 860.55 0 19 UTTARAKHAND 139.39 136.41 136.54 75.57 159.74 74.28 154.82 68.79 20 WEST BENGAL 418.03 499.19 343.6 342.51 523.53 502.36 453.29 166.1 21 ARUNACHAL PR 123.35 199.99 120.56 184.83 145.32 223.22 142.18 82.52 22 ASSAM 449.64 487.48 435.58 522.44 525.71 659.21 506.21 231.07 23 MANIPUR 54.61 52.77 53.39 47.6 69.99 66.21 63.12 15.11 24 MEGHALAYA 63.48 84.88 61.67 95.89 73.96 97.61 72.67 9.2 25 MIZORAM 46 61.58 39.67 38.83 48.35 47.92 41.27 0 26 NAGALAND 79.51 77.52 81.68 80.91 110.25 110.2 59.86 31.87 27 SIKKIM 26.24 23.2 28.1 69.19 36.69 32.36 17.86 0.7 28 TRIPURA 57.17 74.66 56.2 83.86 70.66 100.59 63.68 30 29 A&N ISLANDS 1.01 0 0 0 1.15 0.78 1.12 0 30 CHANDIGARH 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 D&N HAVELI 1.09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 DAMAN & DIU 0.61 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 DELHI 4.31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 LAKSHADWEEP 0.24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 PONDICHERRY 1.54 0 0 0 1.75 0.88 1.71 0.06 Total 8550 8941.81 8330 8474.02 10290.02 10473.2 9135 2058.31 As on 23/08/2013 Annexure-IV. Statement referred in part (b) of the reply to Lok Sabha Starred Question No. 265 due for reply on 29.08.2013 State/UT wise fund released under NBA during last 3 years and current year
Rs. in lakh
S.N. State/UT Name 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 (Upto July, 2013)
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 13880 9657.28 15022.69 0 2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 119.26 204.88 986.92 0 3 ASSAM 9437.36 12251.18 11943.31 0 4 BIHAR 11259.76 17219.09 47814.55 0 5 CHHATTISGARH 5479.58 2702.42 5731.57 0 6 D & N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 7 GOA 0 0 0 0 8 GUJARAT 4692.36 4308.28 3949.42 1451.81 9 HARYANA 2361.49 335.27 0 11781.59 10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 2939.78 469.57 1666.96 0 11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 2792.51 967.95 3511.01 3085.11 12 JHARKHAND 5466.98 7264.92 4193.31 0 13 KARNATAKA 4458.66 8709.28 15950.81 0 14 KERALA 2286.34 158.89 0 1132.63 15 MADHYA PRADESH 14402.6 15076 25779.96 24130 16 MAHARASHTRA 12911.7 5799.94 12409.22 0 17 MANIPUR 80.3 1087.87 3509.18 0 18 MEGHALAYA 3105.23 1115.72 2540.01 3349.65 19 MIZORAM 653.4 31.38 497.48 0 20 NAGALAND 1229.45 174.06 2302.68 0 21 ORISSA 6836.73 11171.7 0 0 22 PUDUCHERRY 0 0 0 0 23 PUNJAB 1116.39 283.18 0 0 24 RAJASTHAN 5670.74 5424.41 13770.97 0 25 SIKKIM 112.86 0 159.47 0 26 TAMIL NADU 7794.35 7662.06 12811.68 8710.01 27 TRIPURA 925.14 133.92 430.47 941.16 28 UTTAR PRADESH 22594 16920.72 25684.74 20055.54 29 UTTARAKHAND 1707.61 804.76 2541.96 0 30 WEST BENGAL 8327.5 14124.34 30638.14 0 Total 152642.08 144059.07 243846.51 74637.5 TOTAL SANITATION CAMPAIGN 29th August 2013 LSQ*267 SHRI K.JAYAPRAKASH HEGDE Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the main objectives of the Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC) launched by the Government and the strategy worked out for the purpose; (b) the funding pattern under TSC and the funds allocated to the States during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise; (c) whether the Government has evaluated the implementation of the TSC; (d) if so, the details thereof and the achievements made thereunder; and (e) the steps taken/being taken by the Government for effective implementation of the campaign? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) to (e) A Statement is laid on the table of the House
Statement referred to in reply to Lok Sabha Starred Question No. *267 for 29.08.2013. (a) Government of India has designed a paradigm shift in Total Sanitation Campaign(TSC) which is now called the Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA), in the XIIth Five Year Plan. The main objectives of the NBA are as under: •Bring about an improvement in the general quality of life in the rural areas. •Accelerate sanitation coverage in rural areas to achieve the vision of Nirmal Bharat by 2022 with all gram Panchayats in the country attaining Nirmal status. •Motivate communities and Panchayati Raj Institutions promoting sustainable sanitation facilities through awareness creation and health education. •To cover the remaining schools not covered under Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) and Anganwadi Centres in the rural areas with proper sanitation facilities and undertake proactive promotion of hygiene education and sanitary habits among students. •Encourage cost effective and appropriate technologies for ecologically safe and sustainable sanitation. •Develop community managed environmental sanitation systems focusing on solid & liquid waste management for overall cleanliness in the rural areas. The strategy worked out under NBA is to transform rural India into ‘Nirmal Bharat’ by adopting the 'community led' 'people centered' strategies and community saturation & demand driven approach with emphasis on awareness creation and demand generation for sanitary facilities in houses, schools and for cleaner environment. Alternate delivery mechanisms would be adopted to meet the community needs. The provision of incentives for individual household latrine has been widened to cover all APL households who belong to SCs, STs, small and marginal farmers, landless labourers with homesteads, physically challenged and women headed households along-with all BPL households so as to attain community outcomes. Convergence with MNREGS has been adopted to facilitate the rural households with fund availability for creating their own sanitation facilities. Availability of water in the Gram Panchayat shall be an important factor for sustaining sanitation facilities created. Rural School Sanitation remains a major component and an entry point for wider acceptance of sanitation by the rural people. Wider technology options are being provided to meet the customer preferences and location- specific needs. Intensive IEC Campaign is the corner stone of the programme involving Panchayati Raj Institutions, Co-operatives, ASHA, Anganwadi workers, Women Groups, Self Help Groups, NGOs etc. (b) The funding pattern under NBA is as under :- S.N. Component Amount
earmarked as percent of the NBA project outlay
Contribution Share GOI
State Beneficiary Household/Community
a. IEC, Start Up Activity and Capacity Building
Up to 15% 80% 20% 0%
b. Revolving Fund Up to 5% 80% 20% 0% c. (i) Individual
Household Latrines Actual amount required for full coverage
Rs.3200 Rs.1400 Rs.900
(3700 in case of Hilly and difficult areas)
(ii) Community Sanitary Complexes
Actual amount required for full coverage
60% 30% 10%
d. Institutional Toilets including School and Anganwadi Sanitation
Actual amount required for full coverage
70% 30% 0%
f. Administrative charges
Up to 4% 80% 20% 0%
g. Solid/Liquid Waste Management (Capital Cost)
Actual amount as per SLWM project cost
70% 30% 0%
within limits permitted
Since TSC/NBA is demand driven scheme no state/UT-wise allocation is made. However State/UT-wise central share released during last 3 years and current year is at Annexure-1. (c) and (d) Program Evaluation Office(PEO) of Planning Commission has done Evaluation Study of the TSC. The main findings of the evaluation study are as under :- 1. 88% of the selected households who are having toilets feel that their “general well being” have been improved and 96% of the households in this category feel that with the availability of the toilet, women feel more secured. After having toilets, the medical expenses 1. expenses have been reduced and more time is available for income generating activities. 2. 83% Gram Panchayats who have been awarded with NGP have said that there has been remarkable decrease in open defecation. 3. It was also found that more people in NGP villages are adopting better hygienic practices and hence less affected by the water borne diseases. 4. 13.8% households of the Gram Panchayats awarded with Nirmal Gram Puraskar have reported that some of their family members still resort to open defecation. 5. The reasons for Open Defecation (OD) are lack of awareness/old practice, non existence of community latrines and in sufficient number of latrines. 6. Maintenance of Community Sanitary Complexes appeared to be the biggest problem. The idea of using community toilets as an effective alternative for the poorest section has not really caught up in most of the states. (e) Under NBA, following steps have been taken by the Government for effective implementation of the campaign: Information, Education and Communication (IEC) is an extremely important component for rural sanitation programme that lays the basis for successful implementation of the programme. 15% of project outlays are earmarked for IEC activities. With a view to give thrust to a new approach towards IEC, the Ministry has launched a Communication and Advocacy Strategy (2012-17). The actual implementation of the programme is done by the State Government. They have been urged to step up their IEC activities to generate demand for toilets. Government of India has also stepped up its efforts by increased allocation and increased spending on IEC activities to bring awareness amongst the rural households about the need to build toilets. Government of India is reviewing the implementation of the NBA in different States on a regular basis to identify the bottlenecks and remove the same so that the programme can be implemented more speedily to provide the benefits to the people. The guidelines and other administrative instructions for implementation of NBA are being modified wherever required to speed up the implementation of the programme. Government of India has a robust on-line monitoring system for the implementation of the programme. In addition to the field visits by the Officers of Government of India to the extent possible, the states are also being urged to step up their own review and monitoring through State Water and Sanitation Mission (SWSM) at the State level and District Water and Sanitation Mission (DWSM) at the district level.
Annexure-1 Statement referred in part (b) of the reply to Lok Sabha Starred Question No. *267 due for reply on 29.8.2013 State/UT wise fund released under NBA during last 3 years and current year
Rs. in lakh S.N. State/UT Name 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 (Upto
July, 2013) 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 13880 9657.28 15022.69 0 2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 119.26 204.88 986.92 0 3 ASSAM 9437.36 12251.18 11943.31 0 4 BIHAR 11259.76 17219.09 47814.55 0 5 CHHATTISGARH 5479.58 2702.42 5731.57 0 6 D & N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 7 GOA 0 0 0 0 8 GUJARAT 4692.36 4308.28 3949.42 1451.81 9 HARYANA 2361.49 335.27 0 11781.59 10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 2939.78 469.57 1666.96 0 11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 2792.51 967.95 3511.01 3085.11 12 JHARKHAND 5466.98 7264.92 4193.31 0 13 KARNATAKA 4458.66 8709.28 15950.81 0 14 KERALA 2286.34 158.89 0 1132.63 15 MADHYA PRADESH 14402.6 15076 25779.96 24130 16 MAHARASHTRA 12911.7 5799.94 12409.22 0 17 MANIPUR 80.3 1087.87 3509.18 0 18 MEGHALAYA 3105.23 1115.72 2540.01 3349.65 19 MIZORAM 653.4 31.38 497.48 0 20 NAGALAND 1229.45 174.06 2302.68 0 21 ORISSA 6836.73 11171.7 0 0 22 PUDUCHERRY 0 0 0 0 23 PUNJAB 1116.39 283.18 0 0 24 RAJASTHAN 5670.74 5424.41 13770.97 0 25 SIKKIM 112.86 0 159.47 0 26 TAMIL NADU 7794.35 7662.06 12811.68 8710.01 27 TRIPURA 925.14 133.92 430.47 941.16 28 UTTAR PRADESH 22594 16920.72 25684.74 20055.54 29 UTTARAKHAND 1707.61 804.76 2541.96 0 30 WEST BENGAL 8327.5 14124.34 30638.14 0 Total 152642.1 144059.1 243846.5 74637.5 CONSTRUCTION OF TOILETS 29th August 2013 LSQ 3024 SHRI SURENDRA SINGH NAGAR Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether the Government has formulated any scheme to construct toilets in the rural areas of the country; (b) if so, the details thereof; (c) the number of toilets constructed under the sanitation scheme during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise; (d) whether this has been as per the target fixed in this regard; (e) if so, the details thereof; and (f) if not, the reasons therefor and the reaction of the Government thereto? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI)
(a) and (b) Government of India has given high priority to rural sanitation. Efforts of the State Governments for promoting rural sanitation were supplemented from 1986 till 1999 by the Central Government under the centrally sponsored Rural Sanitation Programme (CRSP) and thereafter from 1999 under the Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC). Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC) was launched as demand driven, community led programme with major IEC inputs to make sanitation a felt need of the people. To accelerate the progress of Sanitation coverage TSC was revamped as Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) in the XIIth Five Year Plan. The objective of NBA is to achieve sustainable behavior change with provision of sanitary facilities in entire communities in a phased, saturation mode with “Nirmal Grams’ as outcomes. The new strategy is to transform rural India into ‘Nirmal Bharat’ by adopting community saturation approach. NBA goal is to achieve 100% access to sanitation for all rural households by 2022. Under NBA, following steps have been taken : # A shift from motivating individual household toilet construction to covering whole communities in a Gram Panchayat saturation mode for holistic sanitation outcomes. # The scope of providing incentives for individual household latrine units has been widened to cover all APL households, who belong to SCs, STs, small and marginal farmers, landless labourers with homesteads, physically challenged and women headed households along-with all BPL households. Financial incentive for construction of toilets has been raised for all eligible beneficiaries to Rs. 4600/- from the earlier amount of Rs 3200/-.under NBA. In addition upto Rs. 4500/- can be spent under Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme for construction of the toilet. Along-with beneficiary contribution of Rs. 900/-, the total unit cost of toilet is now Rs. 10000/-. (Rs. 10500/- for Hilly and difficult areas) # More emphasis on Information Education Communication (IEC).with earmarked 15% of the total outlay of district projects for IEC activities. With a view to give thrust to a new approach towards IEC, the Ministry has launched a Communication and Advocacy Strategy (2012-2017). # Conjoint approach with National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) to ensure water availability for sanitation in Gram Panchayats. Focused convergence of rural sanitation with associated Ministries including Health, School Education, Women and Child Development with NBA. # Funds for capacity building of all stakeholders including Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) and field level implementers have been earmarked under the revised strategy. # Convergence with other State Departments like Health, Women & Child Development and Panchayati Raj is being focused upon. Provision has been made for incentivizing Accredited Social Health Activists(ASHAs) & Anganwadi workers for promoting sanitation. Self Help Groups, Women’s Groups & NGOs of repute are to be encouraged by states to participate in sanitation promotion. # The component of Solid and Liquid Waste Management (SLWM) has been prioritized by focussed funding. (c) As per data available through online monitoring system, the number of toilets constructed under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) formerly known as Total Sanitation Campaign(TSC) during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise is at Annexure-1. (d) Since NBA is demand driven schemes, hence annual targets are not being fixed. (e) and (f) Does not arise.
Annexure-1 Statement referred in part (c) of the reply to Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No.3024 due for reply on 29.08.2013. The number of toilets constructed under NBA during each of the last three years and the current year, State/UT-wise S.N. State/UT Name 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14(Upto
July, 2013) 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 1049704 654282 384279 92798 2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 19799 27781 5760 1025 3 ASSAM 498849 510243 273240 31022 4 BIHAR 717792 839927 796699 86990 5 CHHATTISGARH 236164 82496 52045 8386
6 D & N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 7 GOA 800 0 0 0 8 GUJARAT 515224 321357 171977 32969 9 HARYANA 132137 103913 62949 13169 10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 216571 30066 5183 3628 11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 125228 70626 71900 3538 12 JHARKHAND 296678 53479 48500 16162 13 KARNATAKA 810104 414782 296429 72490 14 KERALA 20241 2188 5674 1101 15 MADHYA PRADESH 1166016 900769 558189 104914 16 MAHARASHTRA 562183 519563 189306 62158 17 MANIPUR 49576 55306 43917 14948 18 MEGHALAYA 65417 51550 14406 3154 19 MIZORAM 1611 17237 4967 3271 20 NAGALAND 18224 46318 22149 0 21 ORISSA 853303 359171 118318 9102 22 PUDUCHERRY 77 0 0 0 23 PUNJAB 118415 32535 57421 591 24 RAJASTHAN 750948 730385 252800 46652 25 SIKKIM 0 0 0 0 26 TAMIL NADU 473647 410794 324216 41485 27 TRIPURA 30392 24761 7035 4445 28 UTTAR PRADESH 2915407 1613384 134873 117652 29 UTTARAKHAND 132913 125051 97815 21537 30 WEST BENGAL 466311 800900 559115 142761 Total 12243731 8798864 4559162 935948 ALLOCATION OF FUNDS 29th August 2013 LSQ 3067 DR. RATNA DE Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the details of funds allocated to the Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation during each of the last three years and the current year; (b) the details of the funds utilised during the said period; (c) the reasons for under-utilisation, if any; and (d) the details of the schemes/ programmes launched for improving the availability of drinking water and sanitation facilities in the country during the said period? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a)& (b) The details of funds allocated to and utilized by Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation under the National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) and under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan(NBA) during each of the last three years and the current year is as below .
(Rs in crore) NRDWP NBA Year Alloc Utili % Utili Alloc Utili %Utili ation sation zation ation sation zation 2010-11 9000.00 8986.74 99.85 1580.00 1580.00 100.00
2011-12 8500.00 8493.15 99.92 1500.00 1500.00 100.00 2012-13 10500.00 10489.05 99.89 2500.00 2473.29 98.93 2013-14 11000.00 2058.31# 18.71 4260.00 763.79# 17.92 #upto July, 2013 (c) The reasons for some States being unable to spend the amount fully and in time under NRDWP include delays in procurement processes, taking up multi-village schemes that require 2-3 years for completion, in ordinate delays in preparatory activities and delayed release of funds to the implementing authorities. As regards sanitation, it is a demand driven scheme and utilization depends upon demand generated from the States. It can be seen that funds allocated under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) has been fully utilised, although % expenditure is low in a few States. The State/UT wise central share released and utilization during last 3 years and current year is at Annexure-1. Government of India has stepped up its own Information Education Communication (IEC) activities and also urging the states to give thrust to IEC activities for which sufficient funds have been made available to States/UTs to create awareness and generate demand. (d) Rural water supply is a States subject. This Ministry supplements the efforts of the States by providing them with technical and financial assistance under the centrally sponsored National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) for providing safe and adequate drinking water supply facilities in rural areas of the country. State Governments are empowered to plan, approve and implement rural water supply schemes. A budgetary allocation of R. 11000 crore has been made for the NRDWP in the year 2013-14. As regards to sanitation, Government of India has designed a paradigm shift in Total Sanitation Campaign(TSC) which is now called the Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) in the XIIth Five Year Plan. The objective of NBA is to achieve sustainable behavior change with provision of sanitary facilities in entire communities in a phased, saturation mode with “Nirmal Grams’ as outcomes. The new strategy is to transform rural India into ‘Nirmal Bharat’ by adopting community saturation approach. NBA goal is to achieve 100% access to sanitation for all rural households by 2022. ANNEXURE
Annexure-1 Statement referred in part (a) & (b) of the reply to Lok Sabha Un-starred Question No. 3067 due for reply on 29.08.2013 State/UT-wise, central share released and utilized under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan(NBA) during each of last three years and current year
S.N. State/UT Name 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14(Upto July, 2013) Release Expenditure Release Expenditure Release Expenditure Release Expenditure
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 13880 7177.9 9657.28 9151.88 15022.69 9057.44 0 2246.47
2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 119.26 610.28 204.88 511.09 986.92 211.4 0 351.34
3 ASSAM 9437.36 6712.08 12251.18 12227.67 11943.31 9459.16 0 1117.72 4 BIHAR 11259.76 12421.48 17219.09 16761.44 47814.55 22012.58 0 2974.25 5 CHHATTISGARH 5479.58 2530.57 2702.42 3286.35 5731.57 1678.37 0 469.53 6 D & N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 GOA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 GUJARAT 4692.36 3332.98 4308.28 3525.46 3949.42 3498.4 1451.81 606 9 HARYANA 2361.49 1410.41 335.27 1542.35 0 767.02 0 100.28 10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 2939.78 2130.2 469.57 1274.65 1666.96 1659.06 0 70.78 11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 2792.51 1101.93 967.95 2463.42 3511.01 3641.37 3085.11 94.11 12 JHARKHAND 5466.98 3653.66 7264.92 2334.84 4193.31 1886.76 0 447.38 13 KARNATAKA 4458.66 6240.93 8709.28 4115.18 15950.81 6963.67 0 1693.87 14 KERALA 2286.34 808.52 158.89 987.89 0 951.51 1132.63 201.1 15 MADHYA PRADESH 14402.6 12826.57 15076 16700.46 25779.96 18249.3 24130 5312.07 16 MAHARASHTRA 12911.7 7263.49 5799.94 8391.45 12409.22 6281.3 0 1242.23 17 MANIPUR 80.3 861 1087.87 701.18 3509.18 1714.13 0 41.17 18 MEGHALAYA 3105.23 1437.34 1115.72 3290.85 2540.01 1288.58 3349.65 149.13 19 MIZORAM 653.4 272.81 31.38 691.6 497.48 203.14 0 83.36 20 NAGALAND 1229.45 264.95 174.06 1371.36 2302.68 388.5 0 0 21 ORISSA 6836.73 4928.22 11171.7 4652.38 0 3308.53 0 421.34 22 PUDUCHERRY 0 2.91 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 PUNJAB 1116.39 420.64 283.18 108.36 0 387.74 0 0 24 RAJASTHAN 5670.74 3757.52 5424.41 3136.6 13770.97 8303.04 0 1525.32 25 SIKKIM 112.86 0 0 0 159.47 0 0 0 26 TAMIL NADU 7794.35 5213.14 7662.06 10710.19 12811.68 8695.07 8710.01 520.29 27 TRIPURA 925.14 574.08 133.92 752.89 430.47 341.25 941.16 302.56 28 UTTAR PRADESH 22594 22738.91 16920.72 12056.46 25684.74 20144.23 20055.54 2145.56 29 UTTARAKHAND 1707.61 1159.57 804.76 1312.67 2541.96 1353.52 0 306.65 30 WEST BENGAL 8327.5 7654.57 14124.34 11514.02 30638.14 19974.77 0 2697.51 Grand Total:- 152642.1 117506.7 144059.1 133572.7 243846.5 152419.9 62855.91 25120.03
SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER 22nd August 2013 LSQ 3189 SHRI RAM SUNDAR DAS Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the sources of drinking water in the rural areas in the country at present; (b) the accessibility and availability of drinking water in rural areas, State/UT-wise; (c) whether more than 20 per cent of people in the country are getting water from unsafe sources including open wells; and (d) if so, the steps being taken by the Government to address this issue? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI ) (a) The sources of drinking water in the country are piped water, handpumps, tube wells, wells and natural sources like springs, rivers, ponds etc. (b) & (c) As per the Census 2011, 84.2% of the households in rural areas have access to drinking water from improved sources i.e covered wells, hand pumps and piped water supply. The status of households with access to drinking water from improved sources, State/UT wise is at Annexure I. Regarding the availability of drinking water in rural areas, as per the Census 2011 figures, 77.9% of the rural households of the country have drinking water available within or near their premises, i.e. within a distance of 500 metres. The State/UT wise list is at Annexure II. (d) Though water is a State subject, the Government of India is administering the centrally sponsored scheme, National Rural Drinking Water Program (NRDWP) for providing financial and technical assistance to the States to supplement their efforts to provide adequate and safe drinking water to all rural habitations. Under the NRDWP, State Governments are empowered to plan, design, approve and implement rural drinking water supply schemes. A budgetary allocation of Rs. 11,000 crore has been made for NRDWP in 2013-14. Upto 67% of the NRDWP funds released to States can be utilized for providing adequate and safe drinking water to rural habitations. States are urged to prioritise the coverage of partially covered and quality affected habitations in their Annual Action Plans under the NRDWP.
Annexure I Annexure referred to in reply to part (b) & (c) of Lok Sabha Unstarred Question 3189 due for answer on 29.8.2013 Census 2011 - Percentage of households with access to drinking water from Improved Sources SL State Tap Water Covered Well Hand Pump/Tube well Total percentage 1 Jammu & Kashmir 55.7 2.3 14.4 72.4 2 Himachal Pradesh 88.7 1.7 4.5 94.9 3 Punjab 34.9 0.3 61.8 97 4 Chandigarh 95.2 0 3.4 98.6 5 Uttarakhand 63.9 0.9 25.6 90.4 6 Haryana 63.6 0.9 28.4 92.9 7 Delhi 59.4 0.2 28.5 88.1 8 Rajasthan 26.9 1.4 45.9 74.2 9 Uttar Pradesh 20.2 0.6 74.2 95 10 Bihar 2.6 0.6 91.4 94.6 11 Sikkim 82.6 0.3 0 82.9 12 Arunachal Pradesh 59.3 1.1 15 75.4 13 Nagaland 51.8 5 2.8 59.6 14 Manipur 29.5 3.1 8 40.6 15 Mizoram 41.4 1.7 2 45.1
16 Tripura 25.2 3.5 33 61.7 17 Meghalaya 28.7 7.9 6.4 43 18 Assam 6.8 1.1 61.5 69.4 19 West Bengal 11.4 0.6 80 92 20 Jharkhand 3.7 1.7 50.6 56 21 Odisha 7.5 1.7 66.9 76.1 22 Chhattisgarh 8.8 0.8 75.3 84.9 23 Madhya Pradesh 9.9 1 63.2 74.1 24 Gujarat 55.8 3.7 29.1 88.6 25 Daman & Diu 84.8 1.2 13 99 26 D & N Haveli 42.5 2.2 41.8 86.5 27 Maharashtra 50.2 3.2 22.9 76.3 28 Andhra Pradesh 63.4 0.5 25.2 89.1 29 Karnataka 56.4 1 28 85.4 30 Goa 77.8 4.9 0.5 83.2 31 Lakshadweep 31 0.4 0.2 31.6 32 Kerala 24.5 14.3 3.9 42.7 33 Tamil Nadu 79.3 0.9 12.9 93.1 34 Puducherry 95 0.1 4.6 99.7 35 A & N Islands 77.5 1 0.8 79.3 India 30.8 1.5 51.9 84.2 SANITATION FACILITIES 29th August 2013 LSQ 3198 SHRI HARISCHANDRA DEORAM CHAVAN DR M.THAMBIDURAI Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) the number of habitations/villages covered under the Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC) in various States of the country, State/UT-wise; (b) whether Central assistance provided by Government under TSC is insufficient in view of the rising prices of construction materials; (c) if so, the details thereof; (d) the measures taken by the Government to increase Central assistance under TSC; (e) whether there are deficiencies in the rural sanitation programme of the Government; (f) if so, the details thereof ; and (g) the steps taken by the Government in this regard? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan(NBA) earlier known as Total Sanitation Campaign(TSC) is being implemented in the rural areas of the country taking district as a unit. All habitations/villages in the districts are supposed to be covered under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA). The State/UT-wise number of districts where Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) is being implemented is at Annexure-1 (b) to (c) Under Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC), total assistance of Rs. 3200/-(central share of Rs 2200/- and State share of Rs. 1000/-) was earlier provided to BPL Households for construction of Individual Household Latrines (IHHLs). (d) The Government of India has revamped Total Sanitation Campaign(TSC) to Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) in 12th Five Year Plan. Under NBA, the financial assistance for construction of Individual Household latrines for BPLs and Identified APLs has been enhanced w.e.f 01/04/12 for all eligible beneficiaries to Rs. 4600/- (Rs 3200/- from Central share and Rs 1400/- from State
share). An additional amount of Rs. 500/- is provided from Central share for Hilly and difficult areas. In addition upto Rs. 4500/- can be spent under Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme for construction of the toilet. Along-with beneficiary contribution of Rs. 900/-, the total amount of money available for construction of Individual household latrine is now Rs. 10000/-. (Rs. 10500/- for Hilly and difficult areas). (e) and (f) Government of India presently administers Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan which has been revamped after eliminating the deficiency reported in Total Sanitation Campaign. The major shortcoming observed were: 1 APL-BPL distinction 2 Poor incentivisation 3 Individual centric 4 Aim at overall scattered coverage 5 Lack of inclusive approach 6 No specific emphasis on Solid & Liquid Waste Management (g) Under NBA, following steps have been taken: # A shift from motivating individual household toilet construction to covering whole communities in a Gram Panchayat saturation mode for holistic sanitation outcomes. # The scope of providing incentives for individual household latrine units has been widened to cover all APL households who belong to SCs, STs, small and marginal farmers, landless labourers with homesteads, physically challenged and women headed households along-with all BPL households. Financial incentive for construction of toilets has been raised for all eligible beneficiaries to Rs. 4600/- from the earlier amount of Rs 3200/-. under NBA. In addition upto Rs. 4500/- can be spent under Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme for construction of the toilet. Along-with beneficiary contribution of Rs. 900/-, the total unit cost of toilet is now Rs. 10000/-.(Rs. 10500/- for Hilly and difficult areas) # More emphasis on Information Education Communication (IEC).with 15% of the total outlay of district projects earmarked for IEC activities. With a view to give thrust to a new approach towards IEC, the Ministry has launched a Communication and Advocacy Strategy (2012-2017). # Conjoint approach with National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) to ensure water availability for sanitation in Gram Panchayats. Focused convergence of rural sanitation with associated Ministries including Health, School Education, Women and Child Development with NBA. # Funds for capacity building of all stakeholders including Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) and field level implementers have been earmarked under the revised strategy. # Convergence with other State Departments like Health, Women & Child Development and Panchayati Raj is being focused upon. Provision has been made for incentivizing Accredited Social Health Activists(ASHAs) & Anganwadi workers for promoting sanitation. Self Help Groups, Women’s Groups & NGOs of repute are to be encouraged by states to participate in sanitation promotion. # The component of Solid and Liquid Waste Management (SLWM) has been prioritized by focussed funding.
Annexure-1 Statement referred in part (a) of the reply to Lok Sabha Starred Question No. 3198 due for reply on 29.08.2013 State/UT-wise details of district projects sanctioned under NBA S.N. State/UT Name No. of Project Sanctioned 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 22 2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 16 3 ASSAM 26 4 BIHAR 38 5 CHHATTISGARH 6 D & N HAVELI 7 GOA 2 8 GUJARAT 25 9 HARYANA 20
10 HIMACHAL PRADESH 12 11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 21 12 JHARKHAND 24 13 KARNATAKA 29 14 KERALA 14 15 MADHYA PRADESH 50 16 MAHARASHTRA 33 17 MANIPUR 9 18 MEGHALAYA 7 19 MIZORAM 8 20 NAGALAND 11 21 ORISSA 30 22 PUDUCHERRY 1 23 PUNJAB 20 24 RAJASTHAN 32 25 SIKKIM 4 26 TAMIL NADU 29 27 TRIPURA 4 28 UTTAR PRADESH 71 29 UTTARAKHAND 13 30 WEST BENGAL 19 Total 607 WATER QUALITY TESTING LABORATORIES 29th August 2013 LSQ 3219 MUHAMMED HAMDULLA A. B. SAYEED Will the Minister of DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION be pleased to state:- (a) whether the infrastructure available in many Water Quality Testing Laboratories (WQTLs) in the country is not satisfactory; (b) if so, whether there is any proposal to upgrade the existing WQTLs in various parts of the country under the National Rural Drinking Water Programme; and (c) if so, the details of assistance likely to be provided to various States/UTs in this regard? MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION (SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI) (a) As reported by the State/UT Governments into the online Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) of the Ministry of Drinking Water & Sanitation, as on 22/8/2013, there are 23 State level drinking water quality testing laboratories, 726 district water quality testing laboratories, 1157 Sub-divisional/Block level water quality testing laboratories and 58 Mobile laboratories set up for testing of drinking water quality in the rural areas of the country. (b) & (c) The Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation, Government of India is supplementing the efforts of the State/UT Governments for providing safe drinking water facility in the rural areas of the country by providing technical and financial assistance under the centrally sponsored National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP). Out of the allocations made to the States/UTs under NRDWP, upto 3% of funds are earmarked for water quality monitoring and surveillance activities on a 100% Central sharing basis which, inter alia, includes testing of drinking water sources at the Panchayat level by using simple field test kits, upgrading of existing water quality testing laboratories and setting up of new State/district/sub-divisional water quality testing laboratories wherever such facility is not available or needed. The Ministry has also released a reference document called “Uniform Drinking Water Quality Monitoring Protocol” in Feb’ 2013 to guide the States/UTs on strengthening and standardizing the drinking water quality testing laboratories at various levels which interalia include suggestive laboratory space, equipment, manpower, methodology of testing, chemicals, glassware, frequency of sampling, etc.
