Indian Point Unit 2 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis · 2012-09-27 · Indian Point Unit 2 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis Calculation No. 04071 1-02 Revision 0 Issued For-Use

c

Indian Point Unit 2 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis

Calculation No. 04071 1-02 Revision 0

Issued For-Use

March 23,2005

prepared for:

Entergy Nuclear Northeast 295 Broadway Suite 3

PO Box 308 Buchanan, NY 1051 1-0308

ENTERGY NUCLEAR NORTHEAST

prepared by:

TECHNOLOGIES, INC. E. Main St., Suite 215 Dundee, IL 60118

ACCEPTED ACCEPTED AS NOTED RESUBMITTAL NOT REQUIRED

ACCEPTED AS NOTED RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED 3 4 NOT ACCEPTED

ENT000072 Submitted: March 28, 2012

CSI TECHNOLOGIES. INC . IP2 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis

1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 .

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 2

PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................................................... 3

SCOPE ................................................................................................................................................................ 4

ASSUMPTIONS AND MODELING DECISIONS ......................................................................................... 5

METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................ 8

5.1. 5.2. 5.3. 5.4. 5.5. 5.6. 5.7.

INPUT SPU GLOBAL DATA ........................................................................................................................... 8

UPDATE MODEL BASED ON SPU OPERATIONAL OR CONFIGURATION CHANGES ........................................ 13 UPDATE NETWORK FLOW ANALYSIS DEFIN~ONS ...................................................................................... 13

PERFORM WEAR RATE ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................... 15 QUANTIFY EFFECT OF STRETCH POWER UP RATE ........................................................................................ 16

6 . RESULTS ......................................................................................................................................................... 17

COMPONENT LEVEL WEAR RATE CHANGES DUE TO SPU ........................................................................... 17 STEAM CYCLE LEVEL WEAR RATE CHANGES DUE TO SPU ........................................................................ 17

7 . REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................. 18

REDEFINKION OF CHECWORKS LINES .................................................................................................... 12

IMPLEMENT THE ADVANCED RUN DEFINITION ........................................................................................... 13

6.1. 6.2.

APPENDIX A: CHECWORKS MODELED LINES .............................................................................................. 21 APPENDIX B: APPENDIX c :

COMPONENT LEVEL WEAR RATE CHANGES DUE TO SPU ........................................................ 33 STEAM CYCLE LEVEL WEAR RATE CHANGES DUE TO SPU ..................................................... 35

ATTACHMENT A: REFERENCED CORRESPONDENCE AND COMMUNICATIONS ....................................................... 39

Calculation No . 040711.02. Revision 0 Page 1 of 44

CS/ TECHNOLOGIES, /NC. IP2 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis

( 1. Introduction This calculation documents the revision of the Indian Point Unit 2 CHECWORKS model to predict Flow-Accelerated Corrosion (FAC) wear rate changes due to Stretch Power Uprate (SPU). The Indian Point Unit 2 SPU will change feedwater and steam flow rates, temperatures, and enthalpies, which in turn change local chemistry values. All of these factors affect wear rates due to FAC. As a result of the uprate, some lines will experience accelerated rates of FAC, while others will have reduced rates. The impact on each line depends on the complex interaction of changes in flow rate, pressure, temperature, enthalpy, steam quality, and chemistry on the FAC degradation mechanism. Indian Point 2 had previously developed a CHECWORKS model of FAC-susceptible piping. However, the previous model did not address the changes that will result from Appendix K Uprate and Stretch Power Uprate. This calculation details the process required to revise the CHECWORKS model so that it correctly reflects all plant power levels (the original power level, Appendix K Uprate, and Stretch Power Uprate). Also documented are the changes in FAC wear rates due to the SPU. Note that historical @re-uprate and Appendix K Uprate) operating conditions remain within the model, associated to the applicable operating cycles. The SPU operating conditions are associated to the calendar time that those conditions are scheduled to occur, starting in Cycle 17 [7.3.1]. In this way, the model’s predictions of total current and future wear will be as accurate as possible because the predictions will be based on both historical and expected future operating conditions.

Calculation No. 040711-02, Revision 0 Page 2 of 44

I -~

CSI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. IP2 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis

( 2. Purpose The purposes of the power uprate analysis in CHECWORKS are as follows:

0 To quantify changes in FAC wear rates due to the Stretch Power Uprate (both increases and decreases).

To gain the ability to describe the effects of power uprate on FAC-susceptible piping in the Licensing Submittal.

To ensure that the CHECWORKS model reflects current plant conditions going forward.

0

0


cs/ TECHNOLOGIES, /NC. IP2 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis

I 3. Scope The scope of this power uprate analysis was determined from the input Indian Point 2 CHECWORKS model [7.2]. However, not all lines and components in the input model were included in this analysis. Only those lines and components that were assigned to one of the Wear Rate Analysis run definitions in Table 1 .O of document number 001 30- TR-001 were analyzed as part of this project [7.10]. The CHECWORKS model also contains “non-modeled” lines and components (typically assigned to CHECWORKS lines with the prefix ‘NCW’ for “Non-CHECWORKS”). No analysis was performed on these “NCW’ lines or any other plant lines and components that were not part of the “official” CHECWORKS model. Note that Table 1.0 of document 00130-TR-001 has two hand-written entries “x-under w/ exp joints” and “CND FWH 22 to FWH 23” [7.10]. Lines and components that belong in these two locations were also included in this analysis. This analysis was performed using CHECWORKS FAC version 1 .OG. Assumptions and modeling decisions made during this analysis are documented in Section 4. The methodology employed during this analysis is detailed in Section 5. Results obtained are listed in Section 6 and in the Appendices. Finally, Section 7 includes a list of all references used in this analysis.


I--


i

4. Assumptions and Modeling Decisions The following assumptions and modeling decisions apply to the updated CHECWORKS model.

4.1. All data in the CHECWORKS model received as input (the as-received model) [7.2] was assumed to be complete and accurate.

4.2. Exceptions were made to Assumption 4.1 in the following cases. These exceptions appear in this section, as they are not a standard part of a CHECWORKS power uprate analysis.

4.2.1.

4.2.2.

4.2.3.

4.2.4.

4.2.5.

4.2.6.

The line on the CHECWORKS Heat Balance Diagram (HBD) representing the Moisture Separator/Moisture Preseparator drain lines was remodeled so the downstream connection of the line was the Heater Drain Tank instead of Feedwater Heater 25. The correct configuration was determined from flow diagrams [7.3.3] and the SPU heat balance diagram C7.1.31.

The CHECWORKS HBD was corrected so that the steam driven Feed Pump supply originated in the Main Steam system upstream of LP Turbine as opposed to Main Steam upstream of the HP Turbine. Plant layout shows steam supply as coming from both locations; however, the SPU HBD shows that supply is from Main Steam upstream of LP Turbine under normal operating conditions [7.1.3].

Reheat Steam to the Moisture Separator Reheater on the CHECWORKS HBD was remodeled so the source was from the Main Steam system upstream of the HP Turbine as opposed to downstream of the HP Turbine. The correct configuration was determined from flow diagrams [7.3.3] and the SPU heat balance diagram [7.1.3].

The condensate pump was added to the CHECWORKS HBD; the condensate pump had been omitted previously.

The input CHECWORKS model did not have components in the Condensate system between Feedwater Heaters 22 and Feedwater Heaters 23. All components in these lines were modeled as part of this analysis. Component information and configuration was determined by using the existing FAC isometric for Unit 3 as a guide [7.8]. Lines were named using Sketch 80A as the sketch number. The FAC Program Owner supplied component names [7.9].

An error stating, "The input hydrazine conc, at SG Steam outlet caused a mass in-balance in the Water Chemistry Analysis" was generated when performing water chemistry analysis for Cycle 14. The hydrazine


CSI TECHNOLOGIES, /NC. IP2 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis

4.3.

4.4.

4.5.

4.2.7.

4.2.8.

concentration at the Steam Generator Outlet was lowered from 18 ppb to 15 ppb for this water treatment. This action enabled water chemistry analysis to run without error.

The hydrazine concentration at the SG outlet and MSR drain locations were not specified for Cycle 16 water treatment. If this data is not entered, CHECWORKS calculates a Concentration of zero at these locations. Therefore, estimated hydrazine concentrations were entered at these locations by using the “rules of thumb” for a Recirculating Steam Generator [7.6]. Based on the “rules of thumb”, the concentration of hydrazine at the Steam Generator Outlet was assumed to be 60% of the final feedwater concentration, while the concentration of hydrazine at the MSR Drain was assumed to be 120% of the final feedwater concentration.

During WRA, an error message appeared for component MS- 1 B 14P- 1 US stating that, “Orifice size 5.761” cannot be greater than pipe inside diameter 5.61 1””. The initial thickness of this component (0.507”) was deleted; nominal thickness was then used in this calculation. WRA was able to proceed without further error.

For a number of lines on the SPU Heat Balance Diagram [7.1.3] and Appendix K Heat Balance Diagram [7.1.2], thermodynamic and flow values (pressure, enthalpy, and flow rate) were listed separately for the steam phase and the water phase or for each train in a parallel train configuration. The overall flow rate, pressure, and enthalpy of these lines were calculated and entered in the CHECWORKS Steam Cycle (see Section 5.1.3). The combined flow rate was calculated as the sum of the liquid and steam flow rates (or the sum of multiple trains), the combined pressure was calculated as the average of all pressures, and the enthalpy was calculated as the weighted average of liquid and steam enthalpy (or the weighted average of multiple trains). These calculations were performed based on EPRI’s Guidelines for Plant Modeling and Evaluation of Component Inspection Data [7.6].

Plant period data was estimated for the cycle where the SPU will occur. Start and end dates were estimated based on anticipated dates [7.3.1]. An estimation of operating hours was calculated from these dates based on calendar days. The Water Treatment for this cycle was modeled as equivalent to the most recent complete operating cycle. The model can be updated with actual values for these inputs when this data becomes available.

Due to the use of the Advanced Run Definition feature in this model, which is required for accurate modeling of the power uprate condition, CHECWORKS FAC Version 1 .OG cannot accurately represent the operating conditions in tees that combine or split flow. In order to maintain simplicity in the CHECWORKS model, tees were modeled with a flow rate equal to the highest flow rate present in


._ -- ,-

CSI TECHNOLOGIES, /NC. IP2 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis

the tee. Therefore, the predicted wear rates for tees should be used with caution.



100.00 101.19 104.48

i 5. Methodology Additional input data was entered into the CHECWORKS model to model the power uprate. A number of tasks were required to convert the previous Indian Point Unit 2 model into a format that was compatible with a power uprate. The following section describes the tasks performed to enter power uprate data and to convert the model into a form compatible with multiple power levels.

3090.2 Cycles 1-16A Original Power Level 3127.0 Cycle 16B Appendix K Uprate 3228.5 Cycle 17 to End of Life Stretch Power Uprate

5.1. Input SPU Global Data Additional CHECWORKS Power Levels representing the SPU and Appendix K operating conditions were defined in the model and associated to the applicable Plant Period. The following sections detail the steps involved in this task.

5.1.1. CHECWORKS Heat Balance Diagram The CHECWORKS Heat Balance Diagram (HBD) was reviewed to ensure that it correctly portrayed plant configuration. The CHECWORKS HBD was compared to the plant Heat Balance Diagrams [7.1] and flow diagrams [7.3.3]. Discrepancies were noted and corrected as discussed in Section 4.2.

i 5.1.2. Power Level Data

A Plant Power Level is defined for each power level at which the plant is operated for a significant period of time. Two new power levels were added to the model representing the SPU and Appendix K conditions. Table 5.1 lists all power levels in the model and the operating cycles to which they apply.

Table 5.1 Power Level History

Data was entered for the new power levels on the Power Level Form in accordance with the CHECWORKS User’s Guide [7.5]. Table 5.2 summarizes the Appendix K power level input data and the source of this data.


-----


Temp (F) Blowdown Rate (Mlb/hr>

Table 5.2 Appendix K Power Level Input Data

513.1 7.1.3 0.0542 7.1.3

INotes: Stretch Power Uprate. 3 127.OMWt x - Field should be left blank for a PWR.

Carryover (%) Feedwater Vent Rate f%>

Table 5.1 summarizes the Appendix K power level input data and the source of this data.

0.02 7.1.3 X 7.5

Table 5.3 SPU Power Level Input Data

I Steam Rate (Mlb/hr> I 13.903750 I 7.1.3 I I Pressure (mia) I 765.0 I 7.1.3 I

I Reheater Vent Rate (%) I X I 7.5 I IMoisture Smarator Carrvunder (%> I X I 7.5 I /Notes: Stretch Power Umate. 3228.5 MWt I x - Field should be left blank for a PWR.

5.1.3. Steam Cycle Data Steam Cycle Data is used by CHECWORKS to calculate chemistry conditions during wear rate analysis. It is also used to calculate operating conditions when the Advanced Run Definition feature is implemented (see Section 5.5). Steam cycle data was entered for each heat balance item for the SPU power level. All data was entered in accordance with EPRI’s “Guidelines for Plant Modeling and Evaluation of Component Inspection

Page 9 of 44 Calculation No. 040711-02, Revision 0


Data” [7.6] and the CHECWORKS User’s Guide [7.5]. Table 5.4 summarizes SPU steam cycle input data and the source of this data.

Table 5.4 Appendix K Steam Cycle Input Data

(t

x = No value entered (not required by CHECWORKS). (1) The HBD Item name is automatically generated by CHECWORKS. Feedwater heaters are numbered sequentially in reverse flow order. Feedwater Heater 1 is the feedwater heater closest to the steam generator (equivalent to heater 26 at Indian Point 2). Extraction lines are numbered sequentially in order of decreasing pressure. (2) MSEP 1 represents the conditions in both the moisture separator and moisture pre-separator drain lines as recommended by EPFU Guidelines [7.6]. (3) HPEXTLINE 2 is a fictitious high-pressure extraction line representing the steam lines between the preseparator and main separator as recommended by EPFU Guidelines [7.6]. (4) Flow rate is for exiting steam flow was entered as zero as recommended by EPRI Guidelines [7.6]. Pressure and enthalpy were obtained from the Appendix K PEPSE model [7.1.2].

(5) Enthalpy calculated as the weighted average of the steam and liquid phases. Steam phase enthalpy was obtained directly from the PEPSE diagram as the enthalpy after moisture removal in the LP Turbine. Liquid phase enthalpy was calculated as the enthalpy of saturated liquid at the pressure given on the PEPSE diagram. (6) Reheater drain flow was entered as the sum of the flow through the reheater drain tanks and the vent chamber drains [7.1.2]. Pressure and enthalpy were entered as the conditions through the reheater drain tank [7.1.2].

Table 5.5 summarizes SPU steam cycle input data and the source of this data.



Table 5.5 SPU Steam Cycle Input Data If

x = No value entered (not required by CHECWORKS). (1) The HBD Item name is automatically generated by CHECWORKS. Feedwater heaters are numbered sequentially in reverse flow order. Feedwater Heater 1 is the feedwater heater closest to the steam generator (equivalent to heater 26 at Indian Point 2). Extraction lines are numbered sequentially in order of decreasing pressure. (2) MSEP 1 represents the conditions in both the moisture separator and moisture pre-separator drain lines as recommended by EPRI Guidelines [7.6]. (3) HPEXTLINE 2 is a fictitious high-pressure extraction line representing the steam lines between the pre-separator and main separator as recommended by EPRI Guidelines [7.6]. (4) Flow rate is for exiting steam flow was entered as zero as recommended by EPRI Guidelines [7.6]. Pressure and enthalpy were obtained from the SPU PEPSE model [7.1.3]. (5) Enthalpy calculated as the weighted average of the steam and liquid phases. Steam phase enthalpy was obtained directly from the PEPSE diagram as the enthalpy after moisture removal in the LP Turbine. Liquid phase enthalpy was calculated as the enthalpy of saturated liquid at the pressure given on the PEPSE diagram.

i,,

5.1.4. Plant Period Data Each power level identified in Table 5.1 was associated to the correct operating cycle or cycles. The Appendix K Uprate start date was obtained through correspondence with plant personnel [7.3.3]. The SPU is scheduled for the start of Cycle 17. To include this power level in the model, plant periods were created that have not yet occurred. Start dates,


--- - LI_-


end dates, operating hours, and chemistry data was estimated for these periods (see Section 4.4).

5.2. Redefinition of CHECWORKS Lines The CHECWORKS model was prepared for use of the Advanced Run Definition (see Section 5.5). This task consisted of redefining the CHECWORKS lines within the model so that all components on a given line are subject to the same thermodynamic conditions. Appendix A contains a listing of all lines that appear in the CHECWORKS model. For conservatism, the tee where flow rate changed was associated to the line having the greatest flow rate. Note that the model will over-predict the wear for some sections of tees (see Section 4.5).

Figure 5- 1 illustrates the procedure used to group components into lines. In the diagram, seven lines exist, each with a different percentage of the total flow. Note that the tee is grouped with the line number seeing the greatest percentage of flow.

Figure 5-1 Diagram of Line Redefinition Procedure

1 EQUIPMENT OUTPUT

V


(_ I_____ --


5.3.

5.4.

5.5.

Components were grouped into lines by comparing the input CHECWORKS model [7.2] with FAC isometrics [7.7] and flow diagrams [7.3.3]. New lines were given names according to the naming convention, below. AABBC-D-E AA

BB C D E = Brief description of the line

=

= = =

Abbreviation of the system (ex: CD = Condensate, EX = Extraction Steam, etc.) Sketch number the line begins on (ex: 01, 80, etc.) Sketch letter if sketch number includes a letter (ex: A for sketch 80A) Sequential number for each line on one sketch, numbered in flow order

New line names were created as required by CHECWORKS, not where plant line names changed. Therefore, lines may contain components located on different sketches but in all cases the sketch number corresponds to the first component in the line. For example, line name “CD80-1-FWH 23A to FWH 24A” is located in the Condensate system, on FAC sketch 80, and runs from Feedwater Heater 23A to Feedwater Heater 24A.

Update Model Based on SPU Operational or Configuration Changes With an uprate in power, lines with partial operation may increase or decrease their operation frequency (such as additional trains in operation or bypass lines now operated during full power). Additionally, uprates may call for design changes that may result in piping configuration changes. No operational or configuration changes occurred due to the SPU [7.3.2].

Update Network Flow Analysis Definitions Network Flow Analysis (NFA) is a module within CHECWORKS that calculates flow rate, pressure drops, temperature changes, and steam quality changes based on piping configuration and source/sink conditions. NFA is used where operating conditions are not completely known. A different set of source/sirik conditions is entered for each NFA per power level. Additional input data must be added to each NFA to reflect the SPU power level identified in Section 5.1.2. The Indian Point 2 CHECWORKS model did not contain any NFA definitions; therefore, no updates to the model were performed during this task [7.2].

Implement the Advanced Run Definition This task involved a redefinition of the source in which CHECWORKS obtains thermodynamic conditions (pressure, enthalpy, temperature, and quality) and flow rate conditions for a component. Previously all thermodynamic and flow rate conditions had been entered individually for each component on the component data forms. However, the component form allows only one set of thermodynamic


, _1_- --


and flow rate conditions to be entered (Le. from one power level). Therefore, use of the component form as the input for thermodynamic and flow rate conditions is not valid, as it does not reflect both pre-uprate and post-uprate conditions. Instead, thermodynamic and flow conditions were entered globally (see Section 5.1) and linked to components through the association of a line to the CHECWORKS HBD (except 2-type lines). The following sections detail the steps performed to implement the Advanced Run Definition.

5.5.1. Enter Flow Factors On the CHECWORKS HBD level, flow rates are expressed in totals rather than for each train. For example, feedwater flow rate might be entered as 10 million pounds per hour, where each train of a three-train system sees 3.33 million pounds per hour. As a result, flow multipliers had to be entered for the lines so that the actual flow rate is used to calculate wear rate at the component level. Thus for each line a flow multiplier, or flow factor, was calculated. The flow factor is used to adjust the CHECWORKS HBD calculated flow rate. The calculated flow factor for each line was entered on the ARD form. There are some exceptions to the use of flow factors. The first is for lines and flow segments where NFA would be used to calculate operating conditions and flow rate. For these the train flow is directly entered into the NFA definitions. Therefore, these lines the assigned flow factor is 1 .O. Other exceptions are made for some lines and flow segments where the ARD form is used as the source of operating conditions. In some cases, if the input source (PEPSE or HBD) already listed flow rate per train, then the flow factor is set to 1 .O and the train flow rate is entered. Flow factors were calculated by consulting the CHECWORKS HBD, the plant heat balance diagrams [7.1], and the flow diagrams [7.3.3]. Flow factors for each line appear in Appendix A.

5.5.2. Enter Duty Factors The duty factor is used to specify the fraction of the total plant operating hours that a given line was in operation. For full-time lines, the duty factor is 1 .O. For part-time lines, the duty factor is set to a value less than one based on operation. For example, if a line has full flow half of the time and zero flow half of the time, then the lines would be modeled with full flow and the duty factor would be set to 0.5. Use of the duty factor is in accordance with the recommendations of the EPRI Guidelines for Plant Modeling and Evaluation of Component Inspection Data [7.6]. Duty factors were taken from the input CHECWORKS model [7.2]. Duty factors for each line appear in Appendix A.



I

5.5.3.

5.5.4.

Complete Advanced Run Definition Form for Z-Type Lines Lines not associated to the CHECWORKS HBD are called Z-type lines. Because they are not associated to the HBD, CHECWORKS cannot automatically calculate chemistry and operating conditions for these lines. Therefore, when using the ARD function, the user must input not only flow factors and duty factors but also thermodynamic conditions, flow rate, and chemistry conditions for each operating cycle. Z-type lines were created due to limitations in the CHECWORKS HBD. In these cases, the computer model does not obtain the data fiom the correct location on the HBD, or the CHECWORKS program did not allow the correct data to be entered. For example, there is no global input into CHECWORKS to specify the pressure, temperature, enthalpy, or quality in feedwater heater drain lines. Instead the model calculates the conditions in the shell side drain as being equivalent to tube side heater outlet. This is incorrect, so the CHECWORKS HBD was not used as the source of operating conditions for heater drain lines. Instead, operating conditions for heater drain lines were entered on the ARD form. Appendix A lists all the lines in the model and includes whether or not the line is a Z-type line. For Z-type lines, thermodynamic data and flow rate was obtained from the Heat Balance Diagrams [7.1].

Set Wear Rate Analysis Source of Data Option The CHECWORKS model allows the user to specifL the source of component operating conditions. Component operating conditions can come from one of four locations: the CHECWORKS HBD, the Component form, an NFA, or the ARD. During wear rate analysis, CHECWORKS can use the operating conditions stored at the component level (“COMP”), determine the operating conditions based upon steam cycle data and Advanced Run Definition Flow Factors (“HBD”), use the operating conditions entered on the Advanced Run Definition form only (“ARD”), or to use the operating conditions calculated using an NFA (“NFA”). For all cases, the option “NFA->HBD->ARD->COMP” was selected. This directs CHECWORKS to preferentially use Network Flow Analysis first (if it exists for the line), followed by the ARD (for Z-type lines), the HBD (for all remaining lines), and finally the component. The option “NFA->HBD->ARD->COMP” was selected for all lines since the model includes multiple power levels.

5.6. Perform Wear Rate Analysis Wear Rate Analysis (WRA) is a module within CHECWORKS that provides predicted wear rates and remaining service lives for each modeled component. WRA was run on every component so that the predicted wear rates include the


- I ,


SPU conditions. WRA includes an error-trapping routine, so that discrepancies will be identified and corrected. WRA was performed successfully without error.

5.7. Quantify Effect of Stretch Power Uprate An analysis was performed to calculate the change in CHECWORKS predicted wear rates due to the SPU conditions. Wear Rate Analysis was performed for two periods representing the original power level and the SPU power level. The water treatment for these two periods was modeled as identical, so wear rate changes are due to SPU conditions only. In both cases, Wear Rate Analysis was performed using Pass 2 methods, where predictions are calibrated to inspection history. The analysis obtained both actual results and percentage differences for representative components and lines so that detailed comparisons could be made. The analysis was limited to non-Chromium containing components only, so average values would not be skewed by these components. In addition the changes due to SPU for some of the dominant parameters affecting FAC wear rates (temperature, steam quality, and flow rate) were determined.

i



6. Results

6.1. Component Level Wear Rate Changes due to SPU An analysis was performed on a sample of some of the components in the model most susceptible to FAC. Pass 2 Wear Rate Analysis was performed at the pre- uprate, original power level and the SPU power level. The samples were determined as follows:

0 The five components in the model with the highest wear rates for the original, pre-uprate power level were selected.

0 The five components that experienced the greatest percent increase in wear rate due to the SPU (excluding chromium containing components).

The results of this analysis appear in Appendix B

6.2. Steam Cycle Level Wear Rate Changes due to SPU An analysis was performed comparing Steam Cycle Level changes in wear rate predictions due to the SPU. Lines with similar thermodynamic conditions were grouped together and the average component wear rate was calculated for each grouping, called a Steam Cycle Location. In addition some of the dominant parameters affecting FAC wear rates (temperature, steam quality, and flow rate) were determined. The results of this analysis appear in tabular form in Appendix C. In addition, results are summarized on a steam cycle drawing in Appendix C.

Calculation No. 04071 1-02, Revision 0 Page 17 of 44

.- - _ - - -- *-.--

i‘

i


7 . References

7.1.

7.2.

7.3.

7.4.

Indian Point 2 Heat Balance Diagrams

7.1.1. Original HBD, 3090.2 MWt: Indian Point 2 Nuclear Power Plant “Benchmark PEPSE Model Tuned to 1-22-03 Data”, Sheets 1-6, Run Date 1 / 1 0/05.

7.1.2. Appendix K HBD, 3 127.0 MWt: Indian Point 2 Nuclear Power Plant “Benchmark PEPSE Model Tuned to 1-22-03 Data”, Sheets 1-6, Run Date 11/11/04.

7.1.3. Stretch Power Uprate HBD, 3228.5 MWt: Indian Point 2 Nuclear Power Plant “Uprate PEPSE Model with New HP Turbine”, Sheets 1-6, S&W Calc 58030-HU(S)-001 Rev. 0, Attachment 8.3 pages 1-6.

Indian Point 2 CHECWORKS FAC model, input model (as-received), electronic files provided to CSI on 10/5/2004.

Referenced Correspondence and Communications (see Attachment A)

7.3.1. Email from Harry Hartjen (IP) to Daniel R. Poe (CSI Technologies), dated 10/12/2004, regarding SPU implementation dates, CSI Doc. No. 0407 1 1 1 1.

7.3.2. Email from Harry Hartjen (IP) to Daniel R. Poe (CSI Technologies), dated 10/18/2004, regarding operational and configuration changes due to SPU, CSI Doc. No. 04071 113.

7.3.3. Email from Ron Macina (IP3) to Brian Trudeau (CSI Technologies), dated 1/10/2005, regarding addition a1 Heat Balance Diagrams and uprate start dates, CSI Doc. No 04071 140.

Indian Point 2 Flow Diagrams Main Steam, Dwg No. 9321-F-2017, Rev. 83 Condensate & Boiler Feed Pump Suction, Dwg No. 9321-2018, Rev. 137 Boiler Feedwater, Dwg No. 9321-F-2019, Rev. 110 Extraction Steam, Dwg No. 9321-F-2020, Rev. 41 Heater Drain & Vents, Dwg No. 9321-F-2022-52, Rev. 52 Moisture Separator and Reheater Drains & Vents, Dwg No. 9321-F-2023-21, Rev. 31 Boiler Feed Pump Turbine Steam Lines Drains & Vents, Dwg No. 9321-H-2024-23, Rev. 23 Steam Supply & Condensate Return, Dwg No. 9321-F-2027, Rev. 61 Main Steam, Dwg No. 227780, Rev. 50 Moisture PreSeparator, Dwg No. A-228272, Rev. 15 Condensate & Boiler Feed Pump Suction, Dwg No. A-235307, Rev. 29


-- I_


Heater Drain & Vents, Dwg No. A-235304, Rev. 23 Steam Generator Blowdown & Blowdown Sample System, Dwg No. 9321-F-2729, Rev. 66

7.5. “CHECWORKS Flow-Accelerated Corrosion Application, Version 1 .OG User Guide,” Document TR- 103 1 98-P 1 -R1, October 2000.

7.6. “CHECWORKS StedFeedwater Application, Guidelines for Plant Modeling and Evaluation of Component Inspection Data”, Doc. No. 1009599, Final Report, September 2004.

7.7. Indian Point 2 FAC Program Isometrics/Sketches SK-1 Rev D SK-2 Rev D SK-3 Rev D SK-4 Rev C SK-5 Rev E SK-6 Rev E SK-7 Rev C SK-7A Rev B SK-8 Rev D SK-9 Rev D SK-12 Rev D SK-19 Rev C SK-20 Rev E SK-21A Rev C SK-21 B Rev C SK-22A Rev C SK-22B Rev C SK-23A Rev C SK-23B Rev D SK-24A Rev B SK-24B Rev C SK-25A Rev B SK-25B Rev C SK-26A Rev B SK-26B Rev C SK-27 Rev C SK-28 Rev C SK-29 Rev C SK-30 Rev C SK-31 Rev C SK-32 Rev C

SK-33A Rev C SK-33B Rev C SK-34A Rev C SK-34B Rev C SK-35A Rev C SK-35B Rev C SK-36A Rev C SK-36B Rev C SK-37A Rev C SK-37B Rev C SK-38A Rev C SK-38B Rev D SK-39 Rev B SK-40 Rev B SK-41 R e v B SK-42 Rev B SK-43 Rev B SK-44 Rev B S K 4 A Rev C SK-45B Rev B SK-45C Rev B SK-45D Rev B SK-46A Rev C SK-46B Rev C SK-47 Rev B SK-48A Rev C SK-48B Rev D SK-49A Rev D SK49B Rev B SK-49C Rev D SK-5OA Rev D

SK-50B Rev C SK-50C Rev C SK-51 Rev D SK-52 Rev C SK-53 Rev C SK-54 Rev C SK-56 Rev D SK-57 Rev C SK-66A Rev C SK-68A Rev D SK-69A Rev D SK-71 Rev C SK-72 Rev B SK-73 Rev D SK-74 Rev C SK-75 Rev C SK-76 Rev C SK-77 Rev C SK-78 Rev C SK-80 Rev B SK-81 R e v B SK-82 Rev C SK-83 Rev C SK-84 Rev C SK-92 Rev C SK-93 Rev B SK-94 Rev B SK-95 Rev B SK-242 Rev A SK-243 Rev A SK-244 Rev A

7.8. Indian Point 3 FAC Program Isometric, “Erosion Corrosion Inspection Turbine Building & Heater Bay Condensate System Piping Isometric from F.W. Heaters 32A, B & C to F.W. Heaters 33A, B, C”, Drawing No. EC-H-50061, Revision 1.


. . ___ ,---

CsI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. IP2 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis

7.9. Component Names for Newly Modeled Lines Between Feedwater Heaters 22 and Feedwater Heaters 23, electronic file “UNIT 2 COMP NOS.xls” provided to CSI on 11/15/2004.

7.10. “Flow Accelerated Corrosion Program CHECWORKS Analysis Enhancement”, Technical Report No. 00 130-TR-00 1, Volume 1 of 1, Revision 0, December 2000.


.- . -. -.I I.


Appendix A

CHECWORKS Modeled Lines

Calculation No. 040711-02, Appendix A, Revision 0 Page 21 of 44

--

,--- -- .-

CSI I ECHNOLOGIES, /NC. IP3 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis

CD8OA-2-FWH 22B to HEADER Feedwater Heater 228 to Header A235307-29 HBD 7 0.333 1.000 CD80A-3-FWH 22C to HEADER Feedwater Heater 22C to Header A235307-29 HBD 7 0.333 1.000

Feedwater Heater 22 Outlet Header Between 22BT CD80A-4-FWH 22 OUTLET HEADER and 22CT A235307-29 HBD 7 0.667 1.000

Feedwater Heater 22 Outlet Header to Feedwater CD80A-5-FWH 22 to FWH 23 HEAD Heater 23 Inlet Header A235307-29 HBD 7 1.000 1.000

Feedwater Heater 22 Inlet Header Between 23CT CD80A-6-FWH 23 INLET HEADER and 23BT A235307-29 HBD 7 0.667 1.000

Feedwater Heater 23 Inlet Header to Feedwater CD80A-7-HEADER to FWH 23A Heater 23A A235307-29 HBD 7 0.333 1.000

Feedwater Heater 23 Inlet Header to Feedwater CD80A-8-HEADER to FWH 23B Heater 23B A235307-29 HBD 7 0.333 1.000

Feedwater Heater 23 Inlet Header to Feedwater 0.333 1.000 CD8OA-9-HEADER to FWH 23C Heater 23C A235307-29 HBD 7

CD81-1-FWH 24A to FWH 25A Feedwater Heater 24A to Feedwater Heater 25A A235307-29 HBD 5 0.333 1.000 CD81-2-FWH 24B to FWH 25B Feedwater Heater 24B to Feedwater Heater 25B A235307-29 HBD 5 0.333 1.000 CD81-3-FWH 24C to FWH 25C Feedwater Heater 24C to Feedwater Heater 25C , A235307-29 HBD 5 0.333 1.000 CD82-1-FWH 25A to HDR Feedwater Heater 25A to Header A235307-29 HBD 4 0.333 1.000 CD82-2-FWH 258 to HDR Feedwater Heater 258 to Header A235307-29 HBD 4 0.333 1.000 CD82-3-FWH 25C to HDR Feedwater Heater 25C to Header A235307-29 HBD 4 0.333 1.000

CD82-4-HDR 25BT to 25CT Tee and 25C Tee A235307-29 HBD 4 0.667 1.000

CD82-5-HDR 25CT to HDP OUT ,Tee and Heater Drain Pump Outlet Connection A235307-29 HBD 4 1.000 1.000

Feedwater Heater 25 Outlet Header Between 258

Feedwater Heater 25 Outlet Header Between 2%

Feedwater Heater 25 Outlet Header Between Connection from HDP Discharge and Boiler Feed

CD83-1-HDR HDP to BFP21T Pump 21 Tee A235307-29 Z-type 3 1.000 1.000 CD83-2-HDR to BFP21 Feedwater Heater Header to Boiler Feed Pump21 A235307-29 Z-type 3 0.500 1.000

______ ~~

Calculation No040711-02, Appendix A, Revision 0 Page 22 of 44

.-- -7 ,-

Ch t’ECHNOLOGIES, INC. IP3 CHECWORKS Power Uprate AIMYS~S

5th Point Extraction Steam Header Between Tee to to BT Feedwater Heater 25C and Feedwater Heater 256 9321-F-202041 HBD 18 0.667 1.000


,~ .--

QI I ECHNOLOGIES. INC.

---.%

IP3 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis

5th Point Extraction Steam Header to Feedwater

5th Point Extraction Steam Header to Feedwater

Moisture Preseparator Separating Tank A Vent to

Moisture Preseparator Separating Tank B Vent to

ES7-4-5THPT ESHDR to FWH 25B Heater 25B 9321-F-202041 HBD 18 0.333 1.000

ES7-5-5THPT ESHDR to FWH 25A Heater 25A 9321-F-202041 HBD 18 0.333 1.000

ES7A-1 -SEP TKA VNT to FWH25 Header Upstream of Feedwater Heaters 25A,B,C A228272-15 HBD 18 0.500 1.000

ES7A-2-SEP TKB VNT to FWH25 Header Upstream of Feedwater Heaters 25A,B,C A228272-15 HBD 18 0.500 1.000 ES8-I-6THPT ES to HDR HP Turbine 6th Point Extraction Steam to Header 9321-F-2020-41 HBD 17 0.500 1.000 ES8-2-6THPT ES to HDR HP Turbine 6th Point Extraction Steam to Header 9321-F-202041 HBD 17 0.500 1.000

ES8-3-6THPT ESHDR to FWH 26 Feedwater Heater 26A,B,C 9321 -F-20204 1 HBD 17 1.000 1.000

ES8-4-6THPT ESHDR to FWH 26C Feedwater Heater 26C 9321-F-202041 HBD 17 0.333 1.000

HP Turbine 6th Point Extraction Steam Header to


HP Turbine 6th Point Extraction Steam to Header Between Tee to Feedwater Heater 26C and



ES8-5-6THPT ESHDR 26CT to BT Feedwater Heater 268 9321-F-2020-41 HBD 17 0.667 1.000

ES8-6-6THPT ESHDR to FWH 268 Feedwater Heater 268 9321-F-202041 HBD 17 0.333 1.000

ES8-7-6THPT ESHDR to FWH 26A Feedwater Heater 26A 9321-F-2020-41 HBD 17 0.333 1.000 FW71-1 -BFP21 DISCH to HDR Boiler Feedpump 21 Discharge to Header 9321 -F-2019-110 Z-type 2 0.500 1.000 FW72-1-BFP22 DISCH to HDR Boiler Feedpump 22 Discharge to Header 9321-F-2019-110 Z-type 2 0.500 1.000

Boiler Feedpump Header to Feedwater Heater 26A,B,C Between BFP Discharge Tee and High

FW73-1 -BFPHDR to FWH26ABC Pressure Feedwater Heater Bypass Tee 9321-F-2019-110 Z-type 2 1.000 1.000

Boiler Feedpump Header to Feedwater Heater 26A,B,C Between High Pressure Feedwater Heater

FW73-2-BFPHDR to FWH26ABC Bypass Tee and Feedwater Heater 26C Tee 9321-F-2019-110 Z-type 2 1.000 1.000

I FW73-3-BFPHDR to FWH26C Boiler Feedpump Header to Feedwater Heater 26C 9321-F-2019-110 2-type 2 0.333 , 1.000 J


.?z -1

cb I ECHNOLOGIES, /NC. IP3 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis

Boiler Feedpump Header to Feedwater Heater 26A,B,C Between Feedwater Heater 26C Tee and

0.667 1.000

'W73-5-BFPHDR to FWH26B Boiler Feedpump Header to Feedwater Heater 26B 9321-F-2019-110 2-type 2 0.333 1.000

2 0.333 1.000 'W73-6-BFPHDR to FWH26A Boiler Feedpump Header to Feedwater Heater 26A 9321 -F-2019-110 Z-type

1 0.333 1.000 'W74-1-FWH26A to DISHDR Feedwater Heater 26A to Heater Discharge Header 9321-F-2019-110 HBD

1 0.333 1.000 'W74-2-FWH26B to DISHDR Feedwater Heater 268 to Heater Discharge Header 9321-F-2019-110 HBD Feedwater Heater 26 Discharge Header Between

9321-F-2019-110 HBD 1 0.667 1.000 'W74-3-FWH26 to DISHDR 268 Tee and 26C Tee Feedwater Heater 26C to Heater Discharge

'W74-4-FWH26C to DISHDR Header 9321-F-2019-110 HBD 1 0.333 1.000 Feedwater Heater 26 Discharge Header Between

9321-F-2019-110 HBD 1 1.000 1.000 FW74-5-FWH26 to DISHDR 26C Tee and Steam Generator Takeoff Feedwater Heater 26 Discharge Header to Steam

FW75-I-DISHDR to SG21 Generator 21 9321-F-2019-110 HBD 1 0.250 1.000 Feedwater Heater 26 Discharge Header to Steam

1 0.250 1.000 Feedwater Heater 26 Discharge Header to Steam

0.250 1.000 Feedwater Heater 26 Discharge Header to Steam

1 0.250 1.000 Feedwater Heater 26A to CV Upstream of Heater

HD12-I -FWH26A to CV Drain Tank 9321 -F-2022-52 Z-type 11 0.333 1.000 Feedwater Heater 268 to CV Upstream of Heater

HD12-2-FWH26B to CV Drain Tank 9321 -F-2022-52 2-type 11 0.333 1.000 Feedwater Heater 26C to CV Upstream of Heater

HD12-3-FWH26C to CV Drain Tank 9321 -F-2022-52 Z-type 11 0.333 1.000 HD12-4-FWH26A CV to HTR DR TK Feedwater Heater 26A CV to Heater Drain Tank 9321-F-2022-52 Z-type 11 0.333 1.000

'W73-4-BFPHDR to FWH26ABC Feedwater Heater 26B Tee 9321-F-2014110 Z-type 2

FW76-1-DISHDR to SG22 Generator 22 9321-F-2019-110 HBD

FW77-1 -DISHDR to SG24 Generator 24 9321-F-2019-110 HBD 1

FW78-1 -DISHDR to SG23 Generator 23 9321-F-2019-110 HBD


,--, --* -

ch I ECHNOLOGIES, INC. IP3 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis

iD12-5-FWH26B CV to HTR DR TK Feedwater Heater 26B CV to Heater Drain Tank 9321-F-2022-52 Z-type 11 0.333 1.000 iD12-6-FWH26C CV to HTR DR TK Feedwater Heater 26C CV to Heater Drain Tank 9321-F-2022-52 2-type 11 0.333 1.000 iD19-1-HDT to HDP 21 SUCT Heater Drain Tank to Heater Drain Pump 21 9321 -F-2022-52 HBD 10 0.500 1.000 iD19-2-HDT to HDP 22 SUCT Heater Drain Tank to Heater Drain Pump 22 9321 -F-2022-52 HBD 10 0.500 1.000

iD20-1-HDP21 to BFP SUCTION Suction 9321 -F-2022-52 HBD 9 0.500 1.000

iD20-2-HDP22 to BFP SUCTION Suction 9321 -F-2022-52 HBD 9 0.500 1.000

Heater Drain Pump 21 to Boiler Feed Pump

Heater Drain Pump 22 to Boiler Feed Pump

Heater Drain Pump Discharge Tee to Boiler Feed

Feedwater Heater 24A to CV Upstream of

Feedwater Heater 24A CV to Feedwater Heater

Feedwater Heater 248 to CV Upstream of

Feedwater Heater 24B CV to Feedwater Heater

Feedwater Heater 24C to CV Upstream of

Feedwater Heater 24C CV to Feedwater Heater

Feedwater Heater 23A CV to Feedwater Heater

Feedwater Heater 236 CV to Feedwater Heater

Feedwater Heater 23C CV to Feedwater Heater

Feedwater Heater 23A to CV Upstream of

Feedwater Heater 238 to CV Upstream of

iD20-3-HDP DIS T to BFP SUC Pump Suction 9321-F-2022-52 HBD 9 1.000 1.000

iD21A-I-FWH24A to CV Feedwater Heater 23A A235304-23 Z-type 13 0.333 1.000

iD21A-2-FWH24A CV to FWH23A 23A A235304-23 Z-type 13 0.333 1.000

iD22A-l-FWH24B to CV Feedwater Heater 23B A235304-23 Z-type 13 0.333 1.000

HD22A-2-FWH24B CV to FWH23B 238 A235304-23 Z-type 13 0.333 1.000

HD23A-1 -FWH24C to CV Feedwater Heater 23C A235304-23 Z-type 13 0.333 1.000

HD23A-2-FWH24C CV to FWH23C 23C A235304-23 Z-type 13 0.333 1.000

HD242A-l-FWH23A CV to FWH22A 22A A235304-23 Z-type 14 0.333 1.000

HD243A-l-FWH23B CV to FWH22B 22B A235304-23 Z-type 14 0.333 1.000

HD244A-l-FWH23C CV to FWH22C 22C A235304-23 Z-type 14 0.333 1.000

HD24A-q-FWH23A to CV Feedwater Heater 22A A235304-23 Z-type 14 0.333 1.000

HD25A-l-FWH23B to CV Feedwater Heater 22B A235304-23 Z-type 14 0.333 1.000


,,-\ --- cs, I ECHNOLOGIES, INC. IP3 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis

Feedwater Heater 23C to CV Upstream of HD26A-l-FWH23C to CV Feedwater Heater 22C A235304-23 Z-type 14 0.333 1.000 HD9-1-FWH25A to HTR DRN TK Feedwater Heater 25A Drain to Heater Drain Tank 9321-F-2022-52 Z-type 12 0.333 1.000 HD9-2-FWH25B to HTR DRN TK Feedwater Heater 256 Drain to Heater Drain Tank 9321-F-2022-52 Z-type 12 0.333 1.000 HD9-3-FWH25C to HTR DRN TK Feedwater Heater 25C Drain to Heater Drain Tank 9321-F-2022-52 Z-type 12 0.333 1.000

MS56-1-PRESEP to MSR-A (Line 1 of 2) A235308 Z-type 27 0.250 1.000

MS56-2-PRESEP to MSR-A (Line 2 of 2) A235308 Z-type 27 0.250 1.000 MS56-3-PRESEP to MSR-A Pre-Separator to Moisture Separator Reheater - A A235308 Z-type 27 0.500 1.000

MS56-4-PRESEP to MSR23A 23A A235308 Z-type 27 0.167 1.000 MS56-5-PRESEP to MSR-A Pre-Separator to Moisture Separator Reheater - A A235308 Z-type 27 0.333 1.000

MS56-6-PRESEP to MSR22A 22A A235308 Z-type 27 0.167 1.000

MS56-7-PRESEP to MSR21A 21A A235308 Z-type 27 0.167 , 1.000

MS57-1-PRESEP to MSR-B (Line 1 of 2) A235308 Z-type 27 0.250 1.000

MS57-2-PRESEP to MSR-B (Line 2 of 2) A235308 Z-type 27 0.250 1.000 MS57-3-PRESEP to MSR-B Pre-Separator to Moisture Separator Reheater - B A235308 Z-type 27 0.500 1.000

MS57-4-PRESEP to MSR23B 238 A235308 Z-type 27 0.167 1.000 MS57-5-PRESEP to MSR-B Pre-Separator to Moisture Separator Reheater - B A235308 Z-type 27 0.333 1.000

MS57-6-PRESEP to MSR22B 226 A235308 Z-type 27 0.167 1.000

MS57-7-PRESEP to MSR21 B 21 B A235308 Z-type 27 0.167 1.000

MSD27-1-MS21A to MSDT 21A Moisture Separator Drain Tank 21A (Line 1 of 3) 9321-F-2023-31 Z-type 19 0.056 1.000

Pre-Separator to Moisture Separator Reheater - A

Pre-Separator to Moisture Separator Reheater - A

Pre-Separator to Moisture Separator Reheater -



Pre-Separator to Moisture Separator Reheater - B

Pre-Separator to Moisture Separator Reheater - B



Pre-Separator to Moisture Separator Reheater - Moisture Separator 21A to Header Upstream of

Page 21 of 44 Calculation No. 040711-02, Appendix A, Revision 0

CL I ECHNOLOGIES, INC. IP3 CHECWORKS Power Uprate haiys is

Moisture Separator 21A to Header Upstream of


Moisture Separator 21A Header Upstream of

Moisture Separator 21A Header to Moisture











Moisture Separator 21 B to Header Upstream of


MSD27-2-MS21A to MSDT 21A Moisture Separator Drain Tank 21A (Line 2 of 3) 9321-F-2023-31 Z-type 19 0.056 1,000


MSD27-4-MS21A to MSDT 21A Moisture Separator Drain Tank 21A 9321 -F-2023-31 Z-type 19 0.112 1.000

MSD27-5-MS21A to MSDT 21A Separator Drain Tank 21A 9321-F-2023-31 Z-type 19 , 0.167 1.000





MSD28-5-MS22A to MSDT 22A Separator Drain Tank 22A 9321 -F-2023-31 Z-type 19 0.167 1.000

19 0.056 1.000 MSD29-1-MS23A to MSDT 23A Moisture Separator Drain Tank 23A (Line 1 of 3) 9321-F-2023-31 Z-type


19 0.056 1.000 MSD29-3-MS23A to MSDT 23A Moisture Separator Drain Tank 23A (Line 3 of 3) 9321-F-2023-31 Z-type


MSD29-5-MS23A to MSDT 23A Separator Drain Tank 23A 9321 -F-2023-31 Z-type 19 0.167 1.000

MSD30-1 -MS21 B to MSDT 21 B Moisture Separator Drain Tank 21B (Line 1 of 3) 9321-F-2023-31 Z-type 19 0.056 1.000

MSD30-2-MS21 B to MSDT 21 B Moisture Separator Drain Tank 218 (Line 2 of 3) 9321-F-2023-31 Z-type 19 0.056 1.000

~~ ~


--% _- - I

Ch I ECHNOLOGIES, INC. IP3 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis


Moisture Separator 21B Header Upstream of

Moisture Separator 21 B Header to Moisture

Moisture Separator 22B to Header Upstream of

Moisture Separator 228 to Header Upstream of


Moisture Separator 22B Header Upstream of

Moisture Separator 22B Header to Moisture



Moisture Separator 238 to Header Upstream of

Moisture Separator 238 Header Upstream of

Moisture Separator 238 Header to Moisture

Moisture Separator Drain Tank 21A to Heater



MSD30-3-MS21 B to MSDT 21 B Moisture Separator Drain Tank 218 (Line 3 of 3) 9321-F-2023-31 Z-type 19 0.056 1.000

MSD30-4-MS21 B to MSDT 21 B Moisture Separator Drain Tank 21 B 9321-F-2023-31 Z-type 19 0.112 1.000

MSD30-5-MS21 B to MSDT 21 B Separator Drain Tank 21 B 9321-F-2023-31 Z-type 19 0.167 1.000

MSD31-1-MS22B to MSDT 22B Moisture Separator Drain Tank 22B (Line 1 of 3) 9321-F-2023-31 Z-type 19 0.056 1.000

MSD31-2-MS22B to MSDT 228 Moisture Separator Drain Tank 228 (Line 2 of 3) 9321-F-2023-31 Z-type 19 0.056 1.000

MSD31-3-MS22B to MSDT 22B Moisture Separator Drain Tank 22B (Line 3 of 3) 9321-F-2023-31 Z-type 19 0.056 1.000

MSD31-4-MS22B to MSDT 22B Moisture Separator Drain Tank 228 9321 -F-2023-31 Z-type 19 0.112 1.000

MSD31-5-MS22B to MSDT 228 Separator Drain Tank 22B 9321-F-2023-31 Z-type 19 0.167 1.000

MSD32-1-MS23B to MSDT 23B Moisture Separator Drain Tank 238 (Line 1 of 3) 9321-F-2023-31 Z-type 19 0.056 1.000



MSD32-4-MS23B to MSDT 238 Moisture Separator Drain Tank 23B 9321-F-2023-31 Z-type 19 0.112 1.000

MSD32-5-MS23B to MSDT 238 Separator Drain Tank 23B 9321 -F-2023-31 Z-type 19 0.167 1.000

MSD33A-1-MSDT 21A to HDT Drain Tank 9321 -F-2023-31 Z-type 19 0.167 1.000




--~ h r-

QI I ECHNOLOGIES, INC. IP3 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis

Moisture Separator Drain Tank 21B to Heater Drain Tank Moisture Separator Drain Tank 22B to Heater

Moisture Separator Drain Tank 23B to Heater

Moisture Separator Reheater 21A to Moisture



Moisture Separator Reheater 21 B to Moisture

Moisture Separator Reheater 228 to Moisture

Moisture Separator Reheater 238 to Moisture

Reheater Drain Tank 21A to CV Upstream of

Reheater Drain Tank 21A CV to Feedwater Heater

Reheater Drain Tank A Header to Feedwater Heater 26 Between RHDT 22A and RHDT 23A

Reheater Drain Tank A Header to Feedwater Heater 26 Between RHDT 23A and RHDT 21A

Reheater Drain Tank A Header to Feedwater Heater 26 Between RHDT 21A Connection and

Reheater Drain Tank A Header to Feedwater

9321-F-2023-31 Z-type 19 0.167 1.000 MSD36A-1-MSDT 21 B to HDT

MSD37A-1-MSDT 22B to HDT Drain Tank 9321-F-2023-31 Z-type 19 0.167 1.000

MSD38A-1-MSDT 23B to HDT Drain Tank 9321 -F-2023-31 Z-type 19 0.167 1.000

MSD39-I-RHTR 21A to RHDT 21A Separator Reheater Drain Tank 21A 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000

MSD40-1 -RHTR 22A to RHDT 22A Separator Reheater Drain Tank 22A 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000

MSD41-1 -RHTR 23A to RHDT 23A Separator Reheater Drain Tank 23A 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000

MSD42-1-RHTR 21B to RHDT 21B Separator Reheater Drain Tank 218 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000

MSD43-1-RHTR 228 to RHDT 228 Separator Reheater Drain Tank 22B 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000

MSD44-1 -RHTR 23B to RHDT 238 Separator Reheater Drain Tank 238 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000

MSD45A-I-RHDT21A to CV Feedwater Heater 26 Header 9321 -F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000

MSD45B-l-RHDT21A CV to FWH26 26 Header 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000

MSD45C-1-RHDT A HDR to FWH26 Connections 9321 -F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000

MSD45C-2-RHDT A HDR to FWH26 Connections 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.333 1.000

MSD45C-3-RHDT A HDR to FWH26 Feedwater Heater 26C Tee 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.500 1.000 .. -.-

9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000 MSD45C-4-RHDT A HDR to FWH26C Heater 26C


- -. -\

c& I ECHNOLOGIES, /NC. IP3 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis

Reheater Drain Tank A Header Between Feedwater Heater 26C Tee and Feedwater Heater



Reheater Drain Tank 22A to CV Upstream of

Reheater Drain Tank 22A CV to Feedwater Heater

MSD45C-5-RHDT A HDR to FWH26 26B Tee 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.333 1.000

MSD45D-1-RHDT A HDR to FWH26B Heater 26B 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000

MSD45D-2-RHDT A HDR to FWH26A Heater 26A 9321 -F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000

MSD46A-l-RHDT22A to CV Feedwater Heater 26 Header 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000 .. .-

MSD46A-2-RHDT22A CV to FWH26 26 Header 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000 Reheater Drain Tank 23A to CV UDstream of

MSD47-1 -RHDT23A to CV Feedwater Heater 26 Header 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000 Reheater Drain Tank 23A CV to Feedwater Heater

9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000 MSD47-2-RHDT23A CV to FWH26 26 Header

MSD48A-1 -RHDT21 B to CV

MSD48B-1-RHDT21 B CV to FWH26

MSD48B-2-RHDT B HDR to FWH26

MSD49A-l-RHDT22B to CV

MSD49B-1 -RHDT22B CV to FWH26

MSD49C-I-RHDT B HDR to FWH26

MSD49C-2-RHDT B HDR to FWH26C

Reheater Drain Tank 21 B to CV Upstream of Feedwater Heater 26 Header 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000 Reheater Drain Tank 21 B CV to Feedwater Heater 26 Header 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000 Reheater Drain Tank B Header to Feedwater Heater 26 Between RHDT 23B and RHDT 228 Connections 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.333 1.000 Reheater Drain Tank 228 to CV Upstream of Feedwater Heater 26 Header 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000 Reheater Drain Tank 22B CV to Feedwater Heater 26 Header 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000 Reheater Drain Tank B Header to Feedwater Heater 26 Between RHDT Connections and Feedwater Heater 26 Connections 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.500 1.000 Reheater Drain Tank B Header to Feedwater Heater 26C 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000


CSI I ECHNOLOGIES, INC. IP3 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis

Reheater Drain Tank B Header Between Feedwater Heater 26C Tee and Feedwater Heater

Reheater Drain Tank B Header to Feedwater

Reheater Drain Tank B Header to Feedwater

Reheater Drain Tank 236 to CV Upstream of

Reheater Drain Tank 238 CV to Feedwater Heater

Steam Generator Blowdown from SG 21 to SG


Steam Generator Blowdown from S G 23 to SG


MSD49C-3-RHDT B HDR 26B Tee 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.333 1.000

MSD49C-4-RHDT B HDR to FWH26B Heater 26B 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000

MSD49C-5-RHDT B HDR to FWH26A Heater 26A 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000

MSD50A-l-RHDT23B to CV Feedwater Heater 26 Header 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000

MSDSOC-1-RHDT23B CV to FWH26 26 Header 9321-F-2023-31 HBD 20 0.167 1.000

SG51-1-CONT PEN to SGBFTK Blowdown Flash Tank 9321 -F-272%66 Z-type 30 0.250 1.000

SG52-1 -CONT PEN to SGBFTK Blowdown Flash Tank 9321 -F-2729-66 Z-type 30 0.250 1.000





Appendix B

Component Level Wear Rate Changes due to SPU

Page 33 of 44 Calculation No. 040711-02, Appendix B, Revision 0

___ --- I

CSI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Ip2 CHECWORKS Power Uplrte Analysis

Calculation No. 040711-02, Appendix B, Revision 0 Page 34 of 44


Appendix C

Steam Cycle Level Wear Rate Changes due to SPU

Calculation No. 040711-02, Appendix C, Revision 0 Page 35 of 44

c

c

CSI TECHNOLOGIES. INC. Ipz CHECWORKS Power Upnte Analysis

3 CD Connecbm from HDP to EFP 53 14% 14% 14% 0 1 47 3773 3 7 , 0, 0' 1396 53%

01 977 35% 4 CD ,HDP 36 0 5% 0 5% 0 5% 0 02 5 3 3824, 2 9, 0 ; 5 CD FWH4toFWH5 44 2 8% 2 9% 2 8% 0 2 6 2 3005 2 2: 0; 0 977 35%

4 1%' 4 1% 4 1% 02 6 1 2555 1 8 ' 0 : oi 9 n 35% 6 CD ,FWH3toFWH4 36 7 ' CD FWH2bFWH3 94 3 6% 4 6% 3 5% 0 3 8 7 2043 1 7 0 , 0, 977 35%

HDP Outlet to CD System 9 HD ,Connochon 44 7 1% 10 3 1 , 6 9% 0 6 8 9 3654 6 5, 0 , 01 419 97% 10 ~ HD HDTanktoHDP 15 10 3% 10 4% 10 3% 0 4 47 3848 6 5: 0 : 0 419 97%

12 ' HD FWH5toHDTank 54 2 3% 2 3%, 2 3X: 0 1 3 7 3863 33 0; 0 : 108 57% oi 046 41% 13 , HD FWH4toFWH3 89 5 5%, 5 7% 4 4% 03 5 1 2633 2 3, O /

099 35% 14 ' HD 'FWH3toFWH2 147 58% ~ 5 8%' 4 7% 0 2 080 153%

18 EX ,PresepExtracbontoFWH5 17 17 1% 18 7% 15 4% 0 8 5 3 3879 34 922 -07' 108 57%

FWH 5 to Connecbon from

11 HD FWH6toHDTank 36 -4 1% -4 0% -4 1 % -0 2 3 7 3893 4 1 Oi 0, 1 72 -0 5%

2 1 0 0 , 17 EX ,HPExtrachontoFWH6 75 7 0% 1 0 3%- 0 0% 0 1 2 0 4448, 7 0 920 -08;

3 1 2120

Unlike Unlt 3, does not represent condibon in both Molsture Separator and Monture Preseparator Drains as Moisture Preseparator Drains are not modeled in CHECWORKS Greatest percent change

Greatest percent change decrease in wear

Locabon contains superheated steam both

Moist Separator Drains to HD 44 0 0 1 06 43 2% increase in wear rate (post-SPU) 19 MSD Tank 248 46 3% 66 7% 33 3% 0 5 1 5 3853

-3 6% 7 0% -0 3 4 4 4959 6 2 33, -05, 0 92 -1 1 1 % rate (post-SPU) 20 RHD .Reheater Drain to FWH 6 530 -6 9%

21 , EX LPExtmcbontoFWH4 97 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 0 0 3338, 83 1000 22 , EX LPExhacbontoFWH3 81 -6 2% 11% -7 3% -0 7 103 261 1 2 1 923 08 053 30%

0 046 41%preandpostSPU

0 1 34 9051 -081 1217 62% 27 , MS ,HP Turbine to Moist Separator 77 15 4% 16 1% 1 3 2 3 6 ~ 0 01 3879 Wear rate change due to slight chemisw

NO components from this i d o n in me

No Components from this locabon in the


No Components from this location in the

No Components from this locatton in the



30 SG SteamGenElowdown 117 0 4% 0 5% 0 3% 0 01 1 6 5114 0 0, 0 0 05 0 0% change, not power uprate

- - - - g 77

1 50

2 21

0 51

3 5% CHECWORKS model




- - 1684 1 9 753 -14 0 70 -3 8% CHECWORKS model

- - 0 12 97 6 7% CHECWORKS model - 4978 -08, 997

-1 1 1% CHECWORKS model

8 CD FWHltoFWH2 0 - 1580 2 6 0 0

15 HD ,FWHZtoFWHl 0 - - 1693 2 6 0 0

16 HD ,FWH 1 tocondenser 0 - - 1000 7 6: 0 0

- - - - - -

- - - 23 EX LPExtractiWtoFWH2 0 - - 2115 18, 780, 04 ,

- - - 24 , EX LPExtracbontoFWH 1 0

25 , MS SteamGentoHPTurbine 0

26 , MS steam Gen to Reheater Shell 0 - - 5089 1 3 999 0

- - - - - 0 92

Cakulrtion No. 040711-02, Appendix C, Revision 0 Page 36 of 42

CSI TECHNOLOGIES, IWC.

- - mcawn (roes nor contain pipiiiy - - - - - - - -1 - - - components I 28 , MS MoistSeparatortoReheater 0 NO Components from this locabon in the

29 MS ReheatertoLPExbactron 0 - - - - 0, 9 87 3 4% CHECWORKS model

31 MS Drain 0 - - - - - 101 7 , 0 868 0 2 0 15 10 7% CHECWORKS model

- 4851 101 1000 No Components from this locabon in the Boiler Feed Pump Turbine

IF2 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Anslyru

1

Cakulstiion No. 04071142, Appendix C, Revision 0 Page 37 of 42

r I

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ a I I n

- I ' I

b I

- wl-+ " ..

w -I- Im

A , I c i I n t I .l I N I

w 9 P

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I

- I .I 0

II Ii I!

If

J

19


Attach men t A

Referenced Correspondence and Communications

Calculation No. 040711-02, Attachment A, Revision 0 Page 39 of 44


Reference 7.3.1

Email from Harry Hartjen (IP) to Daniel R. Poe (CSI Technologies), dated 10/12/2004, regarding SPU implementation dates, CSI Doc. No. 04071111.

Dan:

Following are input to the DDIR:

No. 8A SPU operations are expected to be implemented on 11/22/2004 at IP2.

No. 9A SPU operations are expected to be implemented on 04/08/2005 at IP3.

Harry Hartjen

(91 4) 736-8356

Page 40 of 44 Calculation No. 040711-02, Attachment A, Revision 0

I_

-I

CsI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. IP2 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis

Reference 7.3.2

Email from Harry Hartjen (IP) to Daniel R. Poe (CSI Technologies), dated 10/18/2004, regarding operational and configuration changes due to SPU, CSI Doc. No. 04071113.

S

Dan:

Attached is the response from our engineer, the Shaw Group to your request for a listing of all operational and/or configuration changes due to the SPU. Note that there are no operational and/or configuration changes to IPZIP3 due to the SPU. This information was required for DDIR No. 6 and 7.

Per your request, a hard copy set of IP3 FAC isometric drawings will be mailed today to your attention. Note that drawing EC-H-50077 is not yet revised in this mailing. For correct piping configuration, see the information I sent you for the 3R12 Checworks update.

Included in this mailing is: 1. Report No. 001 30-TR-001 Revision 0 Volume 1 of 1. December, 2000. This report serves as the Unit 2 Checworks Model documentation. In addition to the Checworks Wear Rate Analysis Run Definitions listed in Table 1 .O, there are the following two additions:

Flow Accelerated Corrosion Program Checworks Analysis Enhancement, Technical

a. X-under w/exp joints b. CND FWH 22 to FWH 23; this was added due to the SPU.

This information was required for DDIR No. 4

Harry Hartjen

x ~-xI-L.-- --- I_-"-^

From: Cunningham, Glenn [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 2:45 PM To: Hartjen, Harry Cc: Scanlon, Michael; Chakrabarti, Syamal Subject: RE: RAI FAC-1

Harry,

There are no operational changes for Steam Plant Systems, such as use of additional trains or use of bypass lines not currently in operation, associated with uprate of IP2 / IP3. Changes due to the uprate which affect FAC are primarily changes in system flowrates and temperatures, which are documented in the Heat Balance calculations. Impact of these changes on piping velocities and temperatures is addressed in the applicable sections of the BOP Uprate Engineering Reports, forwarded to Entergy for review.

Modifications associated with the uprate of IP2 / IP3 include: (1) MSR internal moisture separation system replacement, (2) HP Turbine rotor replacement, (3) HP turbine interstage drain piping modification, and (4) Relocation of HP turbine 1'' stage pressure taps.

Regards,

Glenn C.

%em*m*

, 1 From: Hartjen, Harry [mailto:[email protected]]

Sent: Wednesday, October 06,2004 1 :30 PM

Page 41 of 44 Calculation No. 04071 1-02, Attachment A, Revision 0


To: Cunningham, Glenn Subject: RE: RAI FAC-1

Glen: This is to confirm that the wear rate comparison will be completed by 12/31/2004.

As I mentioned to you we are having a contractor perform the update to our Checworks models. One of the inputs I have to provide to them is: The listing of all Unit 2 and Unit 3 operational and/or configuration changes due to the power uprate (i.e., additional trains in operation, bypass lines operated at full power, etc.)

Do you have this information or can you direct my question to someone who has this information.

Thanks,

Harry Hartjen (914) 736-8356

From: Cunningham, Glenn [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 1250 PM To: Hartjen, Harry Subject: FW: RAI FAC-1

y_̂ *-

From: Cunningham, Glenn Sent: Wednesday, October 06,2004 1241 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: RAI FAC-1

Harry,

As I indicated, I made a few edits in your input. Please confirm that the wear rate comparison discussed in the last sentence will be completed by the end of 2004.

Thanks,

Internet Email Confidentiality Footer****************** *****************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of The Shaw Group Inc. or its subsidiaries shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

The Shaw Group Inc. http:/hnrww.shawgrp.com


_-.


--__l-l-_l_ _lll~____- - - I

Internet Email Confidentiality Foofer--*****-*** ***************** (

PrivilegedIConfidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of The Shaw Group Inc. or its subsidiaries shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

The Shaw Group Inc. http://w.shawgrp.com

c

Page 43 of 44 Calculation No. 040711-02, Attachment A, Revision 0

I I- -_


Reference 7.3.3

Email from Ron Macina (IP3) to Brian Trudeau (CSI Technologies), dated 1/10/2005, regarding addition a1 Heat Balance Diagrams and uprate start dates, CSI Doc. No 04071 140.

CSI Doc. No. 04071 140 Brian,

Please find below the requested Heat BalancesAnformation. 1) IP3 Pre and Post Appendix K Heat Balances <<IP3TuningR4 Pre Appendix K (3037 NSS Pwr).pdf>> 4P3TuningR4 Post Apendix K.pdf>> 2) IP2 Pre Appendix K Heat Balance <<IP2-TuningR4 Pre Appendix K (3090 NSS Pwr).pdP> 3) Start Date for IP3 Appendix K uprate was 12/22/02 4) Start Date for IP2 Appendix K uprate was 5/23/03

Thanks, Ron Macina 91 4-736-8363

-----0rig i nal Message----- From: Brian Trudeau [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: To: Macina, Ron Subject: Request for Additional HBDs

Tuesday, December 28,2004 3:52 PM

CSI Doc. No. 04071 137

Ron,

Based on our discussion earlier today, it appears that we have some additional work to do on this end. We plan on modeling all three power levels (100% - the Original power level, -101.4% - the Appendix K power level, and 105% - the SPU power level) for each unit. In doing this, we will capture plant conditions at each point in history.

To complete this task, we will need the following input:

(1) Unit 3 PEPSE or HBD at -101.4% power (the Appendix K power uprate) (2) Unit 2 Original PEPSE or HBD at 100% power (pre-Appendix K) (3) Unit 3 Start date for the Appendix K Uprate (4) Unit 2 Start date for the Appendix K Uprate

Please let me know if you have any questions. We will be contacting Harry to inform him of this plan.

Thank you,

Brian Trudeau CSI Technologies, Inc. (847) 836-3000 ext. 71 7 www.csitechnologies.com i


"."

CALCULATION APPROVAL COVER SHEET

Document Title: Indian Point Unit 2 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis

Document No.: 04071 1-02

Client: Entergy Nuclear Northeast

Project No.: 04071 1

This calculation has been prepared in accordance with Section 4.3 of the CSI Quality System Manual, Revision 2.

Revision: 0

Prepared: Date:

Verified: Date:

Approved: Date: 3/2Yk5i-- Daniel R. Poe (CSI)

Approved: Date:

Revision Control Sheet

Rev.

0

Project Number: 04071 1 Project Name:

Client: Entergy Nuclear Northeast Document Title: Document Number: 04071 1-02

Indian Point Units 2 & 3 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis

Indian Point Unit 2 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis

Date Description of Changes CSI Client Approval Approval

3/23/05 Initial Issue - For Use

Documents

Indian Point Unit 2 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis · 2012-09-27 · Indian Point Unit 2 CHECWORKS Power Uprate Analysis Calculation No. 04071 1-02 Revision 0 Issued For-Use