1
PHOTOVOLTAICS Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley Indium Phosphide Nanopillar Solar Cells Grown on Silicon Substrates Funded by Saniya Deshpande, Indrasen Bhattacharya, Gilliard Malheiros-Silveira, Wai Son Ko, Thai- Truong Du Tran, Kar Wei Ng, and Connie Chang-Hasnain In P InP pillar Gold contact oxide isolation AM1.5G Si substrate *Tran et. al., “High brightness InP micropillars grown on Silicon with Fermi level splitting larger than 1 eV”, Nano Lett., 2014, 14(6) Core a-Si & SiO 2 1 μm Dark 1 Sun V oc = 0.534 V I sc = 96.0 pA FF = 48.2% AM1.5G Photovoltaic Performance 1 μm After Regrowth III-V nanopillars on silicon: Overview III-V absorbers produce highest conversion efficiencies, but substrate costs for homoepitaxy can be expensive. Silicon substrates- inexpensive and scalable. Growth of III-V nanopillars (InP, InGaP, InGaAs) on lattice-mismatched silicon substrates. InP and InGaP nanopillars were grown by metal organic chemical vapor depositions (MOCVD). Core-shell growth (radial) growth mode allows nanopillar diameters larger than 1 um for better surface to volume ratio. InP nanopillars have low surface recombination velocity , ideal material for photovoltaics. Surface texturing can improve light absorption: 1 sun Fermi level split> 1 eV. Single pillar and ensemble devices have been fabricated. InP nanopillar based devices with silicon undercut •InP based p-i-n junctions were grown on n-doped silicon. •Thin shell of p-InGaAs was grown for better electrical contact and reduced series resistance. •Si substrate was etched using SF6+O2 plasma etch to create electrical isolation between the p-shell and n-doped substrate. Devices shows a lower series resistance of 40 KΩ. •Reverse dark current shows reduction by two orders of magnitude (10 -10 A). Site-controlled growth of nanopillars on silicon .Nanopillars can be nucleated under precise controlled positions Mask for site-controlled growth on silicon: 125 nm of SiO 2 . Nanopillar array pitch can be varied from 1um-50 um Nanopillars grown in selective areas show good optical quality with 30% smaller linewidth compared to spontaneous ones. Regrowth process: placement of junction and electrical isolation. Regrowth performed on upper part of nanopillar to confine p-i-n junction to the top, where there are no defects. Regrown material shows high crystalline quality. Devices exhibit ultra-low dark current, 5 orders of magnitude lower than I sc. Device shows Voc of 0.53V under 1 sun. SEM and electrical characteristics of undercut devices

Indium Phosphide Nanopillar Solar Cells Grown on Silicon ...ucsolar.org/.../Saniya-Berk-Indium-Poster.pdf · nanopillar diameters larger than 1 um for better surface to volume ratio

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    10

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Indium Phosphide Nanopillar Solar Cells Grown on Silicon ...ucsolar.org/.../Saniya-Berk-Indium-Poster.pdf · nanopillar diameters larger than 1 um for better surface to volume ratio

PHOTOVOLTAICS

Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley

Indium Phosphide Nanopillar Solar Cells Grown on Silicon Substrates

Funded by

Saniya Deshpande, Indrasen Bhattacharya, Gilliard Malheiros-Silveira, Wai Son Ko, Thai-Truong Du Tran, Kar Wei Ng, and Connie Chang-Hasnain

InP

InP pillar

Gold contact

oxide isolation

AM1.5G

Si substrate

*Tran et. al., “High brightness InP micropillars grown on Silicon with Fermi level splitting larger than 1 eV”, Nano Lett., 2014, 14(6)

Core

a-Si & SiO2

1 µm

Dark

1 Sun

(a)

Voc = 0.534 VIsc = 96.0 pAFF = 48.2%

AM1.5G Photovoltaic Performance

1 µm

After Regrowth

III-V nanopillars on silicon: Overview • III-V absorbers produce highest conversion efficiencies,

but substrate costs for homoepitaxy can be expensive. • Silicon substrates- inexpensive and scalable. • Growth of III-V nanopillars (InP, InGaP, InGaAs) on

lattice-mismatched silicon substrates.

• InP and InGaP nanopillars were grown by metal organic chemical vapor depositions (MOCVD).

• Core-shell growth (radial) growth mode allows nanopillar diameters larger than 1 um for better surface to volume ratio.

• InP nanopillars have low surface recombination velocity , ideal material for photovoltaics.

• Surface texturing can improve light absorption: 1 sun Fermi level split> 1 eV.

• Single pillar and ensemble devices have been fabricated.

InP nanopillar based devices with silicon undercut •InP based p-i-n junctions were grown on n-doped silicon. •Thin shell of p-InGaAs was grown for better electrical contact and reduced series resistance. •Si substrate was etched using SF6+O2 plasma etch to create electrical isolation between the p-shell and n-doped substrate. •Devices shows a lower series resistance of 40 KΩ. •Reverse dark current shows reduction by two orders of magnitude (10-10 A).

Site-controlled growth of nanopillars on silicon .Nanopillars can be nucleated under precise controlled positions Mask for site-controlled growth on silicon: 125 nm of SiO2. Nanopillar array pitch can be varied from 1um-50 um Nanopillars grown in selective areas show good optical quality with

30% smaller linewidth compared to spontaneous ones.

Regrowth process: placement of junction and electrical isolation.

• Regrowth performed on upper part of nanopillar to confine p-i-n junction to the top, where there are no defects.

• Regrown material shows high crystalline quality.

• Devices exhibit ultra-low dark current, 5 orders of magnitude lower than Isc.

• Device shows Voc of 0.53V under 1 sun.

SEM and electrical characteristics of undercut devices