Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Industrialisation of SMR Technology
June 2016
Dr Peter WalkdenProgramme DirectorAmec Foster Wheeler
• A Small Modular Reactor• Not Micro (>100MWe)
• Not Just Small
• Must Be Small + Modular
• Why Small?• Transport – Road, Rail and/or Sea
• Simplified site construction
• Why Modular?• Manufacturing – Production-Line Techniques
• Assembly – In-factory
• Optimised Construction and Commissioning
• Enhanced Quality Control
• Why Small + Modular?• Lifecycle Cost
• Flexible/Adaptable Applications
• New, Efficient Approaches to Risk Management
What Is An SMR?
Perhaps the Real Question is Why Big?
Is it this?
Or this?
3
Power Station Thermodynamics
20
25
30
35
40
60 100 200 500 600
Historical Power Station Thermal Efficiencyvs Electrical Output
(All Fuels)
Electrical Output (MWe)
Th
erm
al E
fficie
ncy (%
)
At the expense of Agility?
Manufacturing, Construction and Through-life Costs?
Factors Driving SMR Deployment in the UK
• Market Potential• Global
• UK
• Competitors
• Business Case• Cash Flow
• Return on Investment (ROI)
• Net Present Value
• Socio-Economic Impacts
• Costs• Design and GDA Costs
• Manufacturing, Assembly and Construction Costs
• Operations Costs
• Life-Cycle Costs
• Finance• Up-Front Investment (Initiation)
• Government Support (Set-up and Through-life)
• Investors (Utilities, Institutional etc.)
Success = Product + Business Case + Investors
Market Potential
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Africa
Asia & Oceania
Central & South America
Eurasia
Europe
Middle East
North America
• Global Market
• Potential ~85 GWe (to 2035)
• Barriers to Global Sales exist
• Accessible Market therefore smaller
• Sufficient size for 2-3 vendors
• Sizeable Production Run required to
recover start-up and set-up costs
• To Produce a Truly Modular
Product
• UK Potential ~7-8 Gwe
• 3rd Party Sales Required
• Degree of International licensing
standardisation required
• Unless home market sufficiently
large e.g. China)
The UK market alone is not sufficiently large to deliver economic viability
Technical Readiness Level (TRL)
• Techniques Exist for Measuring
Technical Readiness (TRL)
• TRL 9 = Fully Developed
• TRL3-6 = Feasibility/Development
• TRL1-3 = Proof of Concept
• No Fully Developed SMR Exist
• Most have TRL 3-6
Potential for Design Input and Intellectual Property (IP) Development
Design and GDA
• Design and GDA historically run sequentially
• Expensive
• Wasteful
• Time Consuming
• Preference for SMR GDA
• Design informed by fabrication, operations and regulatory requirements
• Interactive Design & GDA
• Would require changes to approach by both vendor and regulator
• Critical for SMR Success
• Early Market Entry
• International Standing
• Standard Design
An SMR Design With GDA Approval Would Have International Standing
Manufacturing, Assembly & Construction Costs
• Design for In-Factory Fabrication and
Assembly
• Using production and assembly
techniques from other industries
• Including modular buildings
• Maximise scope in controlled QA
environments
• Minimise on-site scope and site-based
risks
• A Balance
• Requires significant up-front investment
in fabrication and assembly facilities
• Large potential gains in quality, time
and cost through the product life-cycle
The UK has relevant, world-leading
expertise gained in Shipbuilding, Aerospace, Oil and Gas
Operations Costs
• New and significant opportunities for operational gains could arise from a standardised, modular design
• Fleet approach to system engineering and outage support
• Centralised, predictive fleet-wide condition monitoring support
• Leaner, more agile relationships (utility/vendor/supply chain)
• Examples exist in other markets
• Aero-engine market
• Oil and Gas facilities
• The UK has relevant, world-leading expertise informed by ~60 years experience of reactor operations
Opportunities for utility/vendor Risk Management (vs Risk Transfer)
Life-Cycle Costs
• Significant opportunities for Life-cycle
gains would arise from a standardised
design
• Designed for access and maintenance
• Designed to minimise waste volumes and
waste arisings
• Designed for optimised decommissioning
and clean-up
• Examples exist in other markets
• Aero-engine market
• Oil and Gas facilities
• The UK has relevant, world-leading
expertise informed by ~70 years
experience of the reactor life-cycle
Further opportunities for utility/vendor Risk Management
Product Finance
• Industry Accepts the Need to Invest
• Scale and Nature of SMR are compatible with
corporate balance sheets
• Recognise time and money required to exploit
advanced manufacturing techniques
• Government support required
• To assist with First of a Kind (FOAK) launch in
the UK
• Design
• Manufacturing and Assembly set-up
• To achieve economic viability (NOAK)
• To secure 3rd party sales
• The Alternative is to seek Support and/or
Product Launch Elsewhere
• Jobs and Intellectual Property (IP) will follow
• What Are the Success Criteria?
• Early Generation
• Lowest Price for Electricity
• UK Job Creation
• UK IP Ownership
• Other Factors (Pu disposition, CHP etc)
UK Competition Process and Outcomes
Technical Maturity
UK Licensing
International Licensing
IP Availiability
UK Scientific & Technical Jobs
UK Manufacturing Jobs
Production > 30 Reactors
Access to other Investment
Access to International Markets
Grid Conenction by 2025
Commercial Utility Infrastructure
Nuclear Site Licensee Infrastructure
Site Availiable
Plutonium re-use
0123456789
10
SMR Scorecard (Raw Scores)
Scenario A1 Scenario D Scenario A2 Scenario B1 Scenario C Scenario D
The “Home” market is usually the source of a “Launch Customer”
• What is the “Prize”?
• Single vs Multiple Vendors
• GDA “Slot”
• Access to Government
launch funding
• Market Assurances/Contract
for Difference
Summary - Factors Affecting When for the UK ?
There is a growing consensus that there is a global market for SMRs
• A range of views as to the exact size
• Probably sufficient to support 2-3 vendors
• Vendors with a large home market or who are first to market will have a
clear advantage
SMRs Offer Advantages in Terms of:
• Agility/Adaptability
• Faster and Cheaper Deployment
• Operational and Life-Cycle Gains
The Benefits of Modularisation will be Secured By:
• A Standard Design
• A Streamlined Approach to Licencing
• Designed for Fabrication, Assembly and Construction
The UK has advantages in terms of
• Being Open to Nuclear New Build
• Reactor Operations and Life-Cycle Experience
• Experience of Applying Modular Concepts in Comparable Industries
Securing Finance will require a Robust Business Case
• Cash Flow, Return on Investment (ROI), Net Present Value
Government Support will be Required
• To assist with First of a Kind (FOAK) launch in the UK
• To attract long-term investment
• What Does Success Look Like?
• Competition Success Criteria
• A Definition of the “Prize”
• Timeline for GDA Slot
• Site Availability
• Assurances Regarding UK Market Size
• Clarity on Commercial Mechanisms (CfD)
• Clarity on Available Government Funds
• Start-up
• Through-Life
What Can UK Government Do To Help?