INDUSTRY FORUM - Home - Mobile River Bridge€¦ · · 2017-09-11INDUSTRY FORUM August 28, ... • Implement the project via Design- Build-Finance-Operate-Maintain ... • This

INDUSTRY FORUM

August 28, 2017DISCLAIMER: The Industry Forum presentation is intended to provide an unofficial overview of the project status and studies performed by the project team as of the presentation date. All data and schedules shown in the presentation are preliminary and subject to change. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review of the preferred project and project alternatives is ongoing and subject to final review and approval by the Federal Highway Administration.

ALDOT Project Objectives

• Accelerate Mobile River Bridge and Bayway Project Delivery and realize the benefits of the project features

• Implement the project via Design-Build-Finance-Operate-Maintain (DBFOM) procurement and achieve commercial close by end of 2018

• Minimize public funds contributions by utilizing private financing that leverages future project revenue

• Transfer development and revenue responsibility from the public to the private sector

• Leverage private sector knowledge, facilitate innovation• Attract private infrastructure investment and capture and leverage

federal funding

• Informative Presentation• Project Overview (Technical)• P3 Delivery• Procurement Process

Today’s Agenda

• Industry Networking • National / Regional / Local

Participants• Make Connections• Displays

Topics

• Environmental Status • Bicycle/Pedestrian • Roadway • Bridges• Geotechnical • Utilities • Right of Way• Storm Surge • Drainage • Signage

• Intelligent Transportation Systems

• Maintenance of Traffic• Interchange Modification

Report• Break• Traffic and Revenue• P3 Delivery• Procurement Process

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Project Overview

N

City of Mobile

City of Spanish Fort

City of DaphneMobile County Baldwin County

B’ AlignmentMain Span

Bridge

Bayway Bridge

Virginia Street Interchange

Canal St. / Water St. Interchange

East Tunnel Interchange

Midbay Interchange

Eastern Shore Interchange

Purpose of the Project

• Increase the capacity of Interstate 10 (I-10) to meet existing and predicted future traffic volumes

• Provide a direct route for vehicles transporting hazardous materials and minimize impacts to Mobile’s maritime industry

• Address long-time geometric concerns, enhance access to major industrial and freight destinations in the Mobile area and facilitate economic growth

Historic Timeline

Environmental

History of MRB Environmental Process

• Alternatives Analysis included:• No Build Alternative• Four Build Alternatives

• A, B, B’, & C• Alternative B’ = Preferred

Alternative

Current Status of Environmental Process

• Federal Register Notice of Intent to Prepare Supplemental DEIS (SDEIS): June 5, 2017

• SDEIS currently being prepared to address:

• Tolling• Refinements to Alternative B’• Studies performed since DEIS • Draft Mitigation Plan • Updated environmental commitments• Bike/Ped• Agency coordination & public involvement

activities since DEIS

Environmental Next Steps/Projected Schedule

• Approved SDEIS• 1st quarter 2018

• Public Hearings• 2nd quarter 2018

• Approved Combined Final EIS/Record of Decision (ROD)

• 2nd quarter 2018

Environmental Commitments

• To be provided in SDEIS and FEIS/ROD:• Lighting• Cultural resources• Vibrations• Aesthetics• Bike/Ped accommodations• Stormwater/Environmental

Stewardship • Bayway Construction Methodology• USFWS Incidental Take Permit

Conditions• Mitigation requirements• Others TBD as part of environmental

process

Environmental Permits Required

Environmental - Aesthetics Requirement

“Create a new visual appearance for the area…opportunities to enhance visual effects and improve aesthetics.”

“Measures that will be addressed include aesthetic treatment for various bridge components such as the pylons, cables, piers, treatment of the underside of the bridge, and other visual enhancement or mitigation measures, including lighting.”

• Aesthetic guidelines will be established with an Aesthetics Steering Committee and issued with the RFP

• Landscape areas will be issued with the RFP• Teams will be encouraged to be innovative

Bike/Ped

Initial Considerations from DEIS

Proposed Accommodations: ALDOT committed to providing pedestrian and bicycle facilities across the Mobile River.

Crepe Myrtle Trail and Eastern Shore National Recreation Trail/I-10 Scenic Underpass Trail: Piers for the proposed bridge will be placed to avoid impacting the Crepe Myrtle Trail and the Eastern Shore National Recreation Trail/I-10 Scenic Underpass Trail. Access to the I-10 Scenic Underpass Trail will be maintained.

Bicycle/Pedestrian Overview

Bicycle/Pedestrian Alternatives Under Study

• Cochrane Bridge Alternatives

• Bankhead Tunnel

• New Mobile River Bridge Alternatives

Roadway

Roadway Survey and Mapping

ALDOT Topographic Survey• Topographic surface features,

drainage features, utility features

• Existing Right-of-Way, ROW to be acquired, property lines and owner information

• Contours / DTM files• Bathymetric Survey

Utility Mapping• Alabama One-Call• Surface features• Subsurface investigations• Coordination with utility owners• Preliminary conflict investigation

Preliminary Interchange Overview

N

City of Mobile




Canal St. / Water St. Interchange

Midbay Interchange




Project Key Map

I-10

RoadwayLower Level BridgeHigh Level Bridge

Canal Street / Water Street Interchange

Project Key Map

Water StreetRoadwayLower Level BridgeHigh Level Bridge

Canal Street


Project Key Map

I-10


Midbay Interchange

Project Key Map

I-10

Project Key Map


Project Key Map


Project Key Map

I-10


Bridges

Bridges Overview

B’ AlignmentMain Span

Bridge

Bayway Bridge

N

City of Mobile



High Level Approaches & Main Span Unit Limits

Main Span StructureHigh Level Approach SpansRoadway/InterchangesOther Structures

West Side High Level Approach SpanMain Span StructureHigh Level Approach SpansRoadway/InterchangesOther Structures

East Side High Level Approach SpanMain Span StructureHigh Level Approach SpansRoadway/InterchangesOther Structures Design Requirement

• Structure type • Girder type and

material consistency required

• Straddle bents • Bridge load rating • Minimum separation

High Level Approach Span Typical Sections

Main Span Bridge - Proposed Structure

Design Requirements• Structure type• Cross-section options• Span length • Vertical clearance• Horizontal clearance

Port, USACE, US Coast Guard and FAA Coordination

is in progress.

US Coast Guard authorization required for any

work occurring in the river.

Main Span StructureHigh Level Approach SpansRoadway/InterchangesOther Structures

Main Span Bridge Typical Sections

Main Span Bridge – Other Design Criteria

• Minimum 100-year service life

• Bridge security• Bridge load rating • Scour • Maintenance and

inspection • Stay cables system

Main Span Bridge – Wind Loads

• Wind Climate Analysis report will be provided to Shortlisted Teams

• The Study focused on:• Required design wind speeds • Site specific turbulence properties

• Testing and Design for Developer• Verifying performance of the

Main Span Bridge• Prepare and submit to ALDOT

a Wind Tunnel Test Report

Main Span Bridge – Vessel Collision

• Preliminary Vessel Collision Report will be provided to Shortlisted Teams

• The intent of the Study was to develop preliminary estimates of vessel impact loads than can be used in: • Evaluating alternative span

lengths • Type of main foundation • Auxiliary methods of protection

systems for the new cable-stayed main span unit

• Developer shall prepare and submit to ALDOT a Vessel Study Report

Bayway Bridge

Existing Bayway Bridge• Completed in 1978• 4-lane facility: 2-lane eastbound bridge, 2-

lane westbound bridge• Concrete girder• Concrete deck at 68-ft span, average

Proposed Bayway Bridge• 8-lane facility: 4-lane eastbound bridge, 4-

lane westbound bridge• Lowest member above 100-yr storm surge

wave heightProposed

Proposed

Existing

Bridges – Next Steps

To be completed prior to RFP:

• High level Approach Spans and Main Span Bridge Type Selection

• High level Approach Spans, Main Span Bridge and Bayway Bridge Type, size and location Plans

• Preliminary Vessel Collision Report• Project-Specific design criteria and technical special provisions• Aesthetic requirements

Geotechnical

Information Gathered to Date

Bayway• Borings along the Bayway (spaced approximately 300

feet). • Depths ranged from 120 ft. to 250 ft. below the existing

mudline• General Subsurface Conditions

Main Span Unit• Borings drilled at each of the main tower locations• Depths up to 320 ft.• General Subsurface Conditions

High Level Approaches• Two (2) high level approach borings were drilled on the

west side• Borings were drilled up to 280-300 ft. below ground

surface. Laboratory Data

• Tests include classification tests (sieve, hydrometer, Atterberg Limits)

• Strength Testing (UU, CU Triaxial Testing, Direct Shears)• Consolidation testing

Historical Information• ALDOT is working to compile information from projects along the

project alignment• This will include subsurface boring logs and pile driving records

Existing Foundations• Bayway

• 54 in. OD Spun-Cast, Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Piles

• 30 in. PPC Square Piles

Current Activities• Additional 72 Standard Penetration Test (SPT) Borings landside

along the project alignment for additional information along the preliminary layout (High Level Approaches)

• Cone Penetrometer Testing (CPT) – approximately 20 soundings• Technical Provisions for the RFP with ALDOT/Dan Brown and

Associates/Thompson Engineering

Load Test Program• Big Picture• Across Bayway and Main Tower• Rapid Load Testing, Static and Dynamic Load Testing

Project Key Map

Project Key Map

Project Key Map

Project Key Map

Project Key Map

Project Key Map

Project Key Map

Project Key Map

Project Key Map

Project Key Map

Project Key Map

Project Key Map

• Historical Data – Oct/Nov. 2017• Geotechnical Subsurface Reports

• Main Bridge – End of Sept/Beginning Oct. 2017• Bayway – Draft RFP• MRB East – Draft RFP• MRB West – Draft RFP

• Load Test Program• Bid / Award / NTP – Dec. 2017• Load Test Data Report – May/June 2018

Schedule

*Tentative and subject to change

Utilities

Utilities Overview

N

City of Mobile



Existing Utility Network

• AT&T - Alabama• AT&T Legacy (Long Distance)• Alabama Power Company - Distribution• Alabama Power Company - Transmission• Uniti Fiber (Formerly Southern Light, LLC)• Comcast Cable• Mobile Gas Service Corporation• Mobile Area Water and Sewer System (MAWSS)• CenturyLink/Qwest/Madison River Communications • Level 3• Utilities Board of the City of Foley d/b/a Riviera Utilities

(Power)• MCI/Verizon • EarthLink

Utilities - SUE Investigation

• Drainage Corridors along Canal and Elmira Street

• Madison Ave for HLA pier placement• US-90/98 at Midbay Interchange

Right-of-Way

Placeholder for Summary of ROW current status and next steps

Right-of-Way Overview

N

City of Mobile



Right-of-Way

Project Key Map

Required ROWPresent ROWStudy Limit

Right-of-Way

Project Key Map


Right-of-Way

Project Key Map


Right-of-Way

Project Key Map


Right-of-Way

Project Key Map


Right-of-Way

Project Key Map


Right-of-Way

Project Key Map


Storm Surge

Storm Surge Overview

Storm surge is an abnormal rise of water generated by a storm, over and above the predicted astronomical tides.

- National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

Typical Storm Surge Bridge Impacts

I-10 Twin SpansNew Orleans, LA

Hwy 90 Biloxi, MS

Hwy 90 Pass Christian, MS

Storm Surge Bridge Impacts

AASHTO 2008 & HEC-25 2 - Guide Specifications for Bridges Vulnerable to Coastal Storms

Design Parameters• Storms, Surge, Waves• Levels I, II and III

Force/Moment Computations• Low frequency (wave

frequency)• High frequency (slamming)

Need to consider Sea Level Rise over structure lifetime

Storm Surge Loads – Level I Results

Storm Surge Loads – Level I Results

100-yr Storm in 2117

Level I Storm Surge – Summary

Current Year (2017) results• Waves impact the deck at 100- and 500-year storm events• AVERAGE 100-year wave impact vertical load = 2.0 kip/ft.• MAXIMUM 100-year wave impact vertical load = 10.8 kip/ft.

50 Year Projection (2067) results• Waves impact the deck at 25-, 50-, 100- and 500-year storm

eventsSea Level Rise Impact

• 2.2 kip/ft. in 2017 at 100-yr storm• 8.8 kip/ft. in 2117 at 100-yr storm

Drainage

Stormwater / Drainage

Design Manuals• Approved Chapters of ALDOT Hydraulic Manual• FHWA Hydraulic Circulars• AASHTO Guidelines• City / Local Guidelines (including MS4)

Risk Assessment / Risk Analysis• Federal Aid Policy Guide, 23 CFR 650A• FEMA Floodplain

Erosion Control / Sediment Prevention• ADEM regulations• City of Mobile MS4• City of Daphne MS4• City of Spanish Fort MS4

Drainage Study

N

City of Mobile



System Outlets

System Outlets

Drainage Considerations

• Water Quality Setting and Section 303(d) status• NCHRP Stormwater Research

• NCHRP Report 778: Bridge Stormwater Runoff Analysis and Treatment Options

• BMP Practices• Bridge sweeping • Porous Friction Course (PFC) and/or Open Graded Friction Course

(OGFC)• Vegetative Filter Strips• Spill Containment Plan

Signage

Signage

Interstate way-finding– MUTCD– ALDOT Standard and Special

Drawings, current non-metric editionUSS Alabama Battleship Park

– Preliminary signage planTolling Related Signage

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)

Intelligent Transportation Systems

• Non-Tolling Components • Fiber Optic Cable and

Connections• CCTV• Dynamic Message Signs• Road Weather Information

Systems• Co-located TMC • Traffic Counters

• Tolling Components• Defined by developer

Maintenance of traffic

Maintenance of Traffic (MOT)

• Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)

• ALDOT Standards & Specifications, current edition

• ALDOT Standard & Special Drawings, current non-metric edition

Interchange Modification Report (IMR)

Interchange Modification Report

An Interchange Modification Report (IMR) is being prepared for:• Duval Street/Broad Street (Exit 24)• Virginia Street (Exit 25, 25B)• Texas Street (Exit 25A)• Canal Street/Water Street (Exit 26A/26B)• East Tunnel (Exit 27)• Mid Bay (Exit 30)• US Hwy 98/90 (Exit 35, 35A, 35B)• AL 181 (Exit 38)

Approval of the IMR will coincide with the Final EIS

Quick Break

ALDOT Overview

ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION• Code of Alabama, Title 23• Cabinet Agency• Director Appointed by Governor• Broad Authority & Discretion over Transportation Issues• Budget and Funding• Innovative Financing & Project Delivery

ALABAMA TOLL ROAD, BRIDGE and TUNNEL AUTHORITY• Code of Alabama, Article 5, Chapter 2 of Title 23• Established 1980, Act 80-691

• 9 Members• Amended 2009, Act 2009-769

• Authorized PPP Contracts• Amended 2017, Act 2017-375

• Updated Enforcement & Interoperability Provisions• Planned Amendment, 2018 Regular Session

• Expand Enforcement Provisions for Registration Suspensions

Traffic and Revenue

Data Collection

• Traffic Counts• Travel Pattern Data

• AirSage (based on cell phone location information)• StreetLight (based on GPS location information)

• Stated-Preference Survey: Value of Time (VOT) estimateby Resource Systems Group, Inc. (Vermont)

• Independent Socioeconomic (Base Year and Forecasts)by Fishkind & Associates, Inc. (Orlando)

Traffic Counts

83 count locations used in model calibration

Historic AADT – Mobile River Crossing

Source: ALDOTI-65

Source: ALDOT

Historic AADT – Mobile Bay Crossing

US 98 Causeway

I-10 Hourly Traffic Volumes

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

I-10 Wallace Tunnel

Eastbound

Westbound

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

I-10 Bayway (East of Mid-Bay Interchange)

Eastbound

Westbound

US-98 Hourly Traffic Volumes

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500US-98 Bankhead Tunnel

Eastbound

Westbound

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500US-98 Causeway (East of Mid-Bay Interchange)

Eastbound

Westbound

Travel Pattern Data

AirSage• Based on cell phone data• Advantages: Large sample size• Disadvantages: Limited location accuracy (especially in rural areas)

StreetLight• Based on GPS Data• Advantages:

• High location accuracy (+/- 5 meters)• Provides travel time between zones by time period

• Disadvantages: • Small sample size (0.5%)

StreetLight DataTravel Patterns in Trips Cross Mobile Bay

Stated-Preference Survey

• Purpose of survey: to estimate the amount customers are willing to pay to save one minute travel time, known as the value of time (VOT)

• Toll Diversion: VOT is used to calculate portion of traffic that will use the toll route

• Received 1,449 Passenger Cars Respondents and 232 Truck Respondents

• Values of Time in 2016 $:• $0.15 per minute for passenger cars

• Ranges from 10¢ to 18¢ by time period and income range• $0.46 per minute for commercial vehicles

Socio-Economic Data (Base and Forecast)

• Socioeconomic (SE) Data is used to estimate existing and future travel demand (known as Trip Generation)

• Measures used in Trip Generation calculations include:• Households (low, medium and high income)• Employment (retail, service and other)• School enrollment (primary, secondary and college/university)

• Developed Independent SE forecasts for 2020, 2030 and 2040• Developed SE forecasts for all 463 Traffic Analysis Zones• Prepared Low, Medium (Base) and High growth forecasts

Traffic Analysis Zone & Roadway Network

• 463 Internal Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs)• 312 from Mobile Area Transportation Study

(MATS) model• 149 from Baldwin County Highway

Department (BCHD) model• 2 new TAZs from splitting zones

• 23 External Zones

• Roadway Networks from MATS and BCHD combined• Link attributes matched between two

models• Interchanges recoded to reflect geometric

details

Travel Demand Model Development• Comprehensive-level Model• 2015 Base Year model• 2020, 2030 and 2040 future year models• Separate Passenger Car and Truck trip

tables• Trip generation based on independent

socioeconomic data• New trip distribution for two-county

regional model area• Travel patterns adjusted using AirSage

and StreetLight Data information• CUBE modeling files will be made

available to Registered Industry Forum attendees

Developed Four Time Period ModelTime Period Hours

AM Peak 6:00 AM-9:00 AMMidday 9:00 AM-4:00 PM

PM Peak 4:00 PM-7:00 PMOvernight 7:00 PM-6:00 AM

Tolling Corridor

• CDM Smith modeled an extensive number of project configurations and toll plans over the past two years.

• Interchange Configurations: Modeled more than 20 different physical alternatives among the five interchanges along the I-10 project corridor.

• Toll Scenarios: Modeled more than 7 Toll Scenarios with several variations within each toll scenario.

• Toll Levels: Modeled different more than ten toll levels within each set of interchange configurations and toll scenario.

Alternatives Modeled

Estimates of Annual Revenue Range

$0.0

$50.0

$100.0

$150.0

$200.0

$250.0

$300.0

Annual Gross Toll Revenue Range (in millions)

Variable Base Case ScenarioApproximate Impacts

on Annual Toll Revenue (2024 to 2053)

Value Of Time (VOT)$0.15 Average(range of $0.10 to $0.18 per TAZ)

25% higher +8.0% to +17.0%

Socioeconomic Data Forecasts Base Scenario High Scenario +7.0%

Revenue days 330 Days 345 Days +4.5%

Truck Growth Rates 2020-2040 CAAGR = 0.9% Increased Growth Rate by 50% +2.0%

External Zone Growth Rates 23 Zone Average = 0.4% Increased Growth Rate by 50% +0.3%

Sensitivity Tests – Upside Potential

Note: Each sensitivity test was run independently, not in combination with one another. These are representative percentage increases.

TOLLING & PROJECT DELIVERY OVERVIEW

Important Features of a Public-Private Partnership (P3)

• Risk allocation to party best suited to manage• Task integration and efficiencies in delivery• Output-based specification contracts• Private innovation used to shape new solutions• Economies of scale• Long-term contracting and whole life costing considerations• Provides contractual incentives and disincentives• Incorporates private sector discipline and innovation• Private “at risk” financing• Competitive procurement process

Public-Private Partnership Features

Financial StructureE

Payment MechanismD

Delivery ModelA

Availability Payments Shadow Tolls Tolls

Private EquityTIFIAPABs Bank DebtPublic Funds

Milestone Payments

Risk AllocationB

Contract StructureC

Design-Bid-Build Design-BuildDesign-Build-

Operate-Maintain

Design-Build-Finance

Design-Build-Finance-Operate-Maintain

Full Concession

Consultant Contract

Service Contract

Management Contract DBF Contract DBFOM

Contract Lease

Full Concession/

Development Rights

Public Responsibility Private Responsibility

Toll Revenue Bonds

P3 Model Performance and Responsibility Allocation

Concessionaire

Project Agreement

Equity Investors$ Investment

$ Return

■ O&M performance■ Cost commitments■ Tolling performance

O&M ContractorDB Contractor

■ Project delivery■ Price and schedule■ Design sufficiency■ Permitting

■ Project ownership■ Public contributions■ ROW / Permitting assistance■ Project oversight

Public Sponsor

Lenders

DB Contract O&M Contract

Key Terms Currently Anticipated

Preferred P3 Structure Design-Build-Finance-Operate-Maintain (DBFOM) The private concessionaire will retain revenue and toll collection

responsibilities

Term • Approximately 50 Years

Public Funds Contributions • Potential Federal and State funding• Amounts and timing to be determined

• Payment of these funds could be in the form of:• Contributions at Financial Close• Progress / Milestone payments• Completion payments

Tolling Responsibilities • Comprehensive Toll Services by Concessionaire:• Toll transactions processing• Toll collections• Customer services handling• Billing and account management• Violation process

O&M Responsibilities • In addition to the Mobile River Bridge and the Bayway section O&M responsibilities; toll operations and incident management for the Wallace Tunnel will be the Concessionaire’s responsibility.

Expected Funding/Financing Sources

Federal Funding and Finance(Subject to federal application processes)

• INFRA Grant• Application in progress through FHWA and Build America

Bureau• Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act

(“TIFIA”) loan Program• ALDOT anticipates submitting a LOI for a Project TIFIA

loan in September 2017• Private Activity Bonds (“PABs”)

• ALDOT anticipates application for a Project PABs allocation on behalf of successful bidder

Project Procurement Milestones

2017

Issue RFQ9/2017

RFQ Response Due (6 Weeks)10/2017

Issue Final RFP5/2018

Announce Preferred Bidder10/2018

Proposal Due Date9/2018

Commercial Close11/2018

Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov

11/2017Issue RFQ Shortlist

Issue Draft RFP12/2017

Industry Review Period

Financial CloseQ1 2019

Industry Forum (2-days)08/2017

2019

PROCUREMENT PROCESS

• ALDOT has done a lot• Move toward procurement• Status quo is not an option• Funding options are limited• ALDOT’s 1st P3

Mobile River Bridge P3 Procurement Process

Mobile River Bridge P3 Innovative Delivery

• Innovative delivery intrigued us• Address a longtime need• Realize benefits years or decades sooner • Unfamiliar process • Brought on advisory team• Procurement tailored for ALDOT

• Get the bridge built• Allow for innovation• Protect ALDOT’s interests• Limit ALDOT’s investment• Streamline process• Rely on what others have done• Take advantage of Private

Sector experience

Mobile River Bridge P3 Moving Ahead

• Background• Schedule / Timeline• Outreach / Market Sounding• RFQ• Draft RFP• RFP• Contact Information

Mobile River Bridge P3 Procurement Process

• Get Arms around Project• Integration (ALDOT) and Collaboration / Decision Making• ALDOT is “All-In” • Understand ALDOT’s Goals

Mobile River Bridge P3 Background

• Big picture look• 18-month procurement• Look familiar • 2-Step RFQ/RFP process• Not as linear as shown• Significant milestones

Mobile River Bridge P3 Overall Timeline

Mobile River Bridge P3 Procurement Timeline – Strategy & Planning

Risk Analysis

Mobile River Bridge P3 Procurement Timeline – Industry Outreach

Share The ProcessConfirm / Refine AssumptionsOpportunities to Add ValueMarket SoundingsRisk AllocationIndustry ForumMarket OutreachFeaturesLevel of Development

Mobile River Bridge P3 Procurement Timeline – RFQ

Mobile River Bridge P3 General – RFQ

Mobile River Bridge P3 Four Primary Categories– RFQ

Mobile River Bridge P3 Technical Capabilities – RFQ• Firm Experience

• Contractor• Engineering• O&M• Tolling

• Key Personnel• Project Manager• Bridge Design Manager• Construction Manager• O&M Manager• Tolling Manager

Mobile River Bridge P3 Financial Capabilities – RFQ• Financial Qualifications

• Execute a financial plan• Reaching Financial Close• Securing Equity Commitments

• Financial Experience• Key Personnel• Depth of Experience• Financial Plan Development• Closing Transactions• Secure Credit Ratings• TIFIA

Mobile River Bridge P3 Project Approaches– RFQ• Technical Approach

• Project Understanding• Risk• Tolling• Operations

• Financial Concept• Understanding• Toll Revenue Risk• Access to Equity

• Other• Management Approach• Team Structure• Key Personnel Availability

Mobile River Bridge P3 Additional Information – RFQ• Project References• Case Studies• Personal References• Communication Restrictions• Public Information• Page Limits• Forms

Mobile River Bridge P3 Procurement Timeline – RFP

Mobile River Bridge P3 Technical & Financial Aspects– RFP

Technical• Phasing / Options• Best Value Determination

• Project Management• Technical Solutions• Operations & Maintenance• Quality Program

• Schedule Acceleration• Tolling Implementation

Financial• Financial Plan• Fix ALDOT’s Costs• Committed Finance• Performance Security

Mobile River Bridge P3 Other – RFP

• Evaluation and Scoring • ATCs• Stipends• DBEs

Mobile River Bridge P3 Procurement Timeline Summary• Award Project

in late 2018• Commercial

Close in 2018• Financial Close

in 2019

Anticipated MilestoneAnticipated Date or Time

FrameIssue Industry Forum Notification July 2017Industry Forum August 2017One-on One Meetings (2 day) August 2017Issue RFQ September 2017RFQ Due Date October 2017Issue RFQ Shortlist November 2017Shortlisted One-on-One Meetings December 2017 May 2018Issue Draft 1 RFP December 2017Issue Draft 2 RFP 1Q 2018Issue Draft 3 RFP 2Q 2018Issue Final RFP 2Q 2018Proposals Due 3Q 2018Best Value Proposer Selected 4Q 2018Contract Award (Conditional) 4Q 2018Submit TIFIA Application 4Q 2018Commercial Close 4Q 2018Financial Close 1Q 2019

Additional Information• Industry Forum & RFQ: www.mobileriverbridge.com• General Questions: Designated Contact – Allison Gregg

Thank you!

Thank you to our Lunch Reception Sponsors!

Documents

INDUSTRY FORUM - Home - Mobile River Bridge€¦ · · 2017-09-11INDUSTRY FORUM August 28, ... • Implement the project via Design- Build-Finance-Operate-Maintain ... • This