Upload
fergal
View
23
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Influence of Detailed Photographs of Product on Customer’s Purchase Decision. Sanjay Kumar Ranganayakulu Nikhil Bendre Shaunak Natu. Overview. Introduction Hypothesis Design of Experiment AOI’s User Testing Results Conclusion Future Scope. introduction. Increase in online shopping. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Influence of Detailed Photographs of Product on Customer’s Purchase Decision
Sanjay Kumar RanganayakuluNikhil BendreShaunak Natu
• Introduction
• Hypothesis
• Design of Experiment
• AOI’s
• User Testing
• Results
• Conclusion
• Future Scope
OVERVIEW
INTRODUCTION
• Increase in online shopping.
• Need for better on-line product marketing
• Less research on influence of detailed photographs in customers purchase decision
• People generally tend to read the reviews
• Apartment selection as a product domain was selected since one of our team members worked on developing the website as an intern.
HYPOTHESIS
Hypothesis 1: If a set of detailed photographs of an apartment are presented then people would tend to read less reviews.
Hypothesis 2: People would respond positively after viewing a webpage with detailed set of photographs of the product versus the webpage with only one photograph of the product.
DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT
• 2 by 2 within-subjects repeated measure design
• Constant review quality • Independent variables (IV)
1. Level of Detail• High level of detail• Low level of detail
2. Apartment Quality • Good • Bad
• Dependent variables (DV)
1. Objective
• Fixation duration
• Fixation counts
2. Subjective
• Preference ranking
DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT
2 LAYOUTS, 4 APARTMENTS
AOI
USER TESTING
• 21 Participants , 18 Graduate and 3 undergraduate students
• TOBII ET-1750 Eye tracker
• Randomized the webpage layouts to minimize the order effects
• Preference Ranking of the webpage layouts
RESULTS• Quality of apartment: Good• Levels of details: High and Low• AOIs: Pictures and Reviews
Interaction Plot of Mean Fixation Duration
HEAT MAP AND CLUSTER PLOT• Quality of apartment: Good• Levels of details: High and Low
High Low
RESULTS• Quality of apartment: Bad• Levels of details: High and Low• AOIs: Pictures and Reviews
Interaction Plot of Mean Fixation Duration
HEAT MAP AND CLUSTER PLOT• Quality of apartment: Bad• Levels of details: High and Low
High Low
RESULTS• AOI: Pictures• Quality of apartment: Good and Bad• Level of details: High and Low
Interaction Plot of Mean Fixation Duration
RESULTS• AOI: Reviews• Quality of apartment: Good and Bad• Level of details: High and Low
Interaction Plot of Mean Fixation Duration
CLUSTER PLOT• Quality of apartment: Good
• Level of Detail: High
CLUSTER PLOT• Quality of apartment: Good
• Level of Detail: Low
CLUSTER PLOT• Quality of apartment: Bad• Level of Detail: High
CLUSTER PLOT• Quality of apartment: Bad• Level of Detail: Low
RESULTS
Overall preference ranking distribution
CONCLUSION
• Participants tend to spend more time to make a decision if there are less number of pictures than detailed pictures, since they have to rely more on the reviews.
• Preference ranking data indicates that detailed pictures of an apartment could influence people to prefer an apartment even though the quality of reviews is same.
FUTURE SCOPE
• Change the quality of reviews
• Good
• Bad
• Extend it for different products
• Use a larger sample size
• More representative sample demographics.
QUESTIONS ?
THANK YOU