Upload
joella-davidson
View
218
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Behavior Educational Program-Response to Intervention (BEP-RTI)
• Agreeing on and establishing school rules
• Teach these rules to the students
• Gathering and recording behavior through observation
• Receiving positive incentives for appropriate behavior
• Providing the set of established rules to parents and encouraging them to reinforce them at the home environment
Behavior Support Team
• Usually includes coordinator, teacher, parent, and students
• Receive behavioral referrals
• Helps map out plan for behavioral change
• Teacher, parent, and teacher are interviewed using a form called the Functional Behavioral Assessment-Behavior Support Plan Protocol (F-BSP)
• Focused primarily in the Tertiary Prevention
BEP-RTI Coupon
• Teacher gives to student privately
• A positive reinforcement
• Given when goals are being met
• Worth double if signed by teacher
• Can be redeemed at coordinators office
“Check in, Check out” System
• Tertiary Prevention active procedure
• Goals from Behavior Support Plan
• Form called Daily Progress Report (DPR)
• Responsible for form between school and home
• Parent signs form and Student brings it back to the school coordinator
Daily Progress Report (DPR)
• A form used on daily bases
• Teacher encourages student to self-score
• Communicates why and on what behavior needs changing
• Form used on “Check in, Check out” System
• Provides Behavior Support Team information on the progress of the student
Data Based Decisions
• Classroom management based on
• Finding the targeted behaviors
• Gathering and recording observations
• Charted and monitored for progress
• Used with the help of ABC (Antecedent, Behavior, and Consequence) establishment
Functional Behavior Assessment (FBA)
• Tertiary intervention plan for needed support
• Behavior Support Team decided that the primary and secondary prevention levels were unsuccessful
• Detailed observations need to be recorded
• Development of an Individualized Behavior Plan (IBP)
• Consists mainly of a three step process (Step 1: Request for Assistance Form, Step 2: Teacher/Parent/Student Interviews, and Step 3: Establishing a Testable Hypotheses
Functional Behavior Support Plan Protocol (FBSP)
• Type of interview by the Behavioral Support Team (BST) to help figure out the underlying problem
• Establish a hypothesis that may be causing the behavior
• Modify old plans and make new ones as necessary
• Obtain specific, measurable, and objective information about student
• Record frequency, intensity, and context of the behavioral problem
High-5 Ticket
• Receive as an award for showing improvement on a behavior goal
• Can be redeemed at later time for a desired award
• Used as a motivator
• Teacher gives ticket in an “high Five” way
• May, however, be deemed more beneficial to some students to give in private setting
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA)
• Federal Law
• Reauthorized in 2004
• Guidelines for school Special Education Program
• Defines thirteen possible disabilities
• Heavier emphasis on effective scientific based instruction are given to students
Motivational Goal: Relational
• Stems from a theoretical view
• Behavioral problems relating to wanting attention
• Used for creating testable hypothesis
• Solutions: could give more feedback and attention, provide more interaction, or use the attention as a stronger reward
• Motivational incentive for goals to become met
Motivational Goal: Avoidance
• Stems from a theoretical view
• Behavioral problems relating to escaping from people or events
• Used for creating testable hypothesis
• Use gathered data based information to see if there may be an underlying cause
• Use the information to try to avoid another behavior episode
No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)
• Federal law
• Scientific based instruction used by classroom teachers
• Prove through data that students are learning
• Required the three tiered model to be implemented in schools
• Mission of providing student’s individual needs so they won’t fail
Primary Prevention
• First level of three tier model in the Positive Behavior Support (PBS)
• “Check in and check out” with school coordinator
• Uses daily progress report form
• Receives feedback from teacher
• Establishes up to five positive school wide rules
Request for Assistance Form (RAF)
• Forms available to all teachers in school
• Completes form on student with a behavior problems by teacher or other educator with direct contact
• Takes filled form to (BEP) committee
• Committee responds within three days
• Form indicates the methods tried within the classroom
Rewards
• BEP-RTI coupon
• High 5 ticket
• Used to help motivate student to behave appropriately
• Show students that someone is paying attention to them
• Helps students to achieve the goals that have been set for them
Secondary Prevention
• Second level of the tier model in the Positive Behavior Support (PBS)
• Increased attention and support from the first level
• About fifteen percent of students are represented in this level
• Referred to as students who are “at risk” for behavioral problems
• Goal is to stop the behavior from getting out of hand
Self-Scoring
• Shown improvement in their Daily Progress Report (DPR)
• Teacher stops scoring and allows the student to take the responsibility
• It is a process
• Teacher reviews the scores students give themselves
• Teacher gives feedback and encouragement as needed
Tertiary Prevention
• Third level of the tier model in the Positive Behavior Support (PBS)
• Most extreme behavior problems
• About five percent of the students
• Most needed support using a Functional Behavior Assessment (FBA) and an Individualized Behavior Plan (IBP)
• Begins with a Request for Assistance Form (RAF) and develops into a Daily Progress Report (DPR)
Testable Hypotheses
• Done at the tertiary level
• Behavior Support Team (BST) tries to figure out during the Functional Behavior Assessment (FBA)
• Determined cause of behavior
• In order to prevent worsening of behavior in the future
• Reasons and motivations behind behavior problem