Upload
roger-croft
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Inside legal blogs offers legal discussion board, legal blogs .
Citation preview
INSIDE LEGAL BLOGS AND CHAT BOARDSSPONSORED BY JUDGED
PAGE �
www.lawcrossing.com 1. 800.973.1177
Inside Legal Blogs[By The Judge]
Someone in heaven must be looking out for me. A week ago, if someone had asked me to create my ideal job, I would have tried to come up with something
involving all of my passions: ice cream, Three’s Company reruns, and napping. But since no one will pay me to vegetate on my parents’ sofa, eat fudgesicles,
and exchange knowing glances with Mr. Roeper (Why is he always looking straight into the camera? Is he trying to tell me that he knows Jack isn’t really
gay?), I had to come up with Plan B. And what a glorious Plan B it was: to find work that involved surfing the Internet and learning about the trials and
tribulations of my beloved colleagues. But could I make it happen? The answer: a resounding YES. When LawCrossing offered me the opportunity to take
over Inside Legal Blogs, I naturally jumped at the opportunity. (Well, maybe I just nodded my head, but who’s really keeping track?)
Moving on, this week in the world of legal
blogs has been full of good old-fashioned
family fun...well, maybe not family fun in
the case of Tonya Barnhart (discussed
at Overlawyered), who sued Paisano
Publications, LLC, claiming unreasonable
intrusion, false light invasion of privacy,
and appropriation of her likeness, after
it published a photograph of her “baring
her breasts at a pig roast for motorcycle
enthusiasts.” (Yes, you read that correctly).
U.S. District Judge J. Frederick Motz
of Maryland ruled against Barnhart on
summary judgment. Her behavior “cannot
reasonably be said to have constituted a
private act,” Motz wrote. “She exposed
herself at an outdoor fundraising event open
to any member of the public who purchased
a ticket.” Well, jeez, give the girl some credit;
at least they had to purchase tickets.
Jamiroquai was right: the future is made
up of virtual insanity, complete with virtual
property. Law.com reports that Internet-
based game company Linden Lab is being
sued by Marc Bragg for the seizure of
virtual real estate. In the Internet game Second Life, players accrue imaginary
currency called “lindens” (which they can
purchase using real money) by partaking in
real estate ventures with virtual property.
Linden Lab profits by collecting sales and
land taxes (in the form of real money, not
imaginary lindens) on these virtual real
estate transactions; players can cash in
their lindens for real money, as well. Bragg
brought suit, alleging that Linden seized his
virtual land and $2,000 (again, real money,
not lindens). Linden claims Bragg’s land
was seized because he purchased it via an
unauthorized auction.
“The case is one of the first lawsuits
involving virtual property, but many more
are likely to follow,” said assistant professor
at Rutgers School of Law, Camden, Greg
Lastowka. He added, “The idea of property
in virtual worlds is not a stretch.” The
case hinges on whether property rights
are outweighed by user agreements. “The
question is: ‘Do the non-negotiable contracts
that let you participate and buy things in
games…do they trump any possible property
interest you might acquire in the game?’”
Lastowka said.
For me, the idea that real property exists
in virtual worlds is kind of a stretch. Then
again, physics was never my forte; that’s
why I’m a lawyer. On a side note, kudos
to anyone who can convince people to use
real money to buy fake money. That’s what
I call true genius.
Over at isthatlegal, I learned about JAIL
for judges. JAIL, the Judicial Accountability
Initiative Law (How long do you think it took
someone to come up with that acronym?),
may be passed by Amendment E on South
Dakota’s Election Day ballot. JAIL would
allow boards of volunteer citizens to hear
complaints from disgruntled litigants and
criminal defendants who are unsatisfied
with the results of their trials. This volunteer
committee would have the power to subject
judges to criminal and civil liability. Okay,
people, what’s scarier: abolishing judicial
immunity or the idea that people would
actually volunteer for something that sounds
a lot like jury duty?
And, finally, because Halloween passed by
too quickly, I thought I’d throw something
truly frightening into the mix. According to
LegalBlogWatch, Walter Seward of West
Orange, NJ, enjoyed legal practice so much
he stuck with it for 80 years. Like I said,
truly frightening. On a brighter note, he
just celebrated his ��0th birthday. Happy
Birthday, Walter!
Until next week...