13
Installation and Calibration of Moisture Probes Ben Worel [email protected] Len Palek [email protected] Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnROAD) More details contact Len for the full presentation & written documentation

Installation and Calibration of Moisture Probes Ben Worel [email protected] Len Palek [email protected] Minnesota Department of Transportation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Installation and Calibration of Moisture Probes Ben Worel ben.worel@state.mn.us Len Palek leonard.e.palek@state.mn.us Minnesota Department of Transportation

Installation and Calibration of

Moisture Probes

Ben [email protected]

Len [email protected]

Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnROAD)

More details contact Len for the full presentation & written documentation

Page 2: Installation and Calibration of Moisture Probes Ben Worel ben.worel@state.mn.us Len Palek leonard.e.palek@state.mn.us Minnesota Department of Transportation

MnROAD Moisture Probes(Experience With)

Model Description Dates InstalledGauges

Installed

EC Decagon-TE and 5TE 2006, 2007, 2008 227

HDHeat Dissipation Sensor - Campbell

Scientific CS229 2006 18MH Concrete Moisture 2004 30MH Concrete Moisture - Sensirion SHT75 2010, 2011 116MP Wescor PST-55-15-SF Psychrometer 1997, 2000 30MR ELE EI23-7724 Moisture Resistance Gauge 1997, 2000 39RE Water Content Relectometer CS616 1999, 2006, 2008 58

TD Fabricated or CS605 or CS610 or CS6451993, 1999, 2000, 2004, 2007, 2008 784

WM Irrometer Watermark 200-X1993, 1999, 2005,

2008, 2011 851

Page 3: Installation and Calibration of Moisture Probes Ben Worel ben.worel@state.mn.us Len Palek leonard.e.palek@state.mn.us Minnesota Department of Transportation

Installation of Moisture Probes at MnROAD

1. Bore Hole2. Separate Materials3. Install Sensors

• Flat installation• 1” Sieve #4 Material - Lite Compaction• 3” Material – Heavy Compaction

May add water as neededCheck void ratio – cup sampler

Page 4: Installation and Calibration of Moisture Probes Ben Worel ben.worel@state.mn.us Len Palek leonard.e.palek@state.mn.us Minnesota Department of Transportation

Installation of Moisture Probes at MnROAD

Campbell CR1000 data logger and multiplexer

Sensor Protectionto Cabinet

Cabinet Setup

Page 5: Installation and Calibration of Moisture Probes Ben Worel ben.worel@state.mn.us Len Palek leonard.e.palek@state.mn.us Minnesota Department of Transportation

Calibration Experience with Moisture Probes

• Calibration efforts prior to 2012– 2006 calibrations for TE (manufacturer’s process)– 2009 generic calibration equations are found not useable – 2010 and 2011 experimented with small scale calibrations

• 2012 Calibration approach– Procedures developed by Starr and Paltineanu (2002) and

refined by Decagon Devices (2010)– MnROAD Experience

(Need calibration for each sensor and materials type)

Page 6: Installation and Calibration of Moisture Probes Ben Worel ben.worel@state.mn.us Len Palek leonard.e.palek@state.mn.us Minnesota Department of Transportation

– Soil drying containers– Scale or mass balance– Drying oven– Volumetric soil sampler– Calibration containers– Sensors (MnROAD started with Decagon TE and 5TE)– Data collection and storage system

Moisture Probe Calibration Lab Equipment

Page 7: Installation and Calibration of Moisture Probes Ben Worel ben.worel@state.mn.us Len Palek leonard.e.palek@state.mn.us Minnesota Department of Transportation

Moisture Probe Calibration Procedure• Sample Preparation

– Air dry material - Sieve material with #4 (2-5mm) sieve• Preliminary Calibration Procedure

– Recording mass and volumes of calibration containers, volumetric samplers, and sensors with wire

– Programming the data logger - Create spreadsheet templates• Calibration Procedure

1. Start with air-dry material2. Fill calibration containers with sensors

(Compact in 5 lifts – 20% of Max Density)

3. Weigh containers to determine density4. Record sensor output

(1 hour of 1 minute intervals)

5. Sample volumetric moisture content6. Record moisture content7. Repeat procedure for next moisture content

(6 Data Points Required)

Page 8: Installation and Calibration of Moisture Probes Ben Worel ben.worel@state.mn.us Len Palek leonard.e.palek@state.mn.us Minnesota Department of Transportation

300 400 500 600 700 800 9000

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

f(x) = 0.000318416008237754 x − 0.00214153552983726R² = 0.738356391489068

Cal. Eq. for 5TE in Clay Subgrade

VWC MeasuredLinear (VWC Measured)

250 300 350 400 450 500 550 6000

0.020.040.060.08

0.10.120.140.160.18

f(x) = 0.000330034333482609 x − 0.0239136637309051R² = 0.978879250392444

Cal. Fcn. for 5TE in Class 5 Base

Meas. VwLinear (Meas. Vw)

Raw Data

VWC

250 300 350 400 450 5000

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

f(x) = 0.000460052139242447 x − 0.0908326943720288R² = 0.964217216122499

Cal. Fcn. for 5TE in Select Granular Sub-base

Meas VWCLinear (Meas VWC)

300 350 400 450 500 5500

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

f(x) = 0.000367331180682297 x − 0.0481024615096635R² = 0.898151625822559

Cal. Fcn. for 5TE in Class 3 Sub-base

Meas VWCLinear (Meas VWC)

Moisture Probe Calibration Functions

Page 9: Installation and Calibration of Moisture Probes Ben Worel ben.worel@state.mn.us Len Palek leonard.e.palek@state.mn.us Minnesota Department of Transportation

Moisture Probe Calibration Functions

SensorMnROADMaterial

Calibration Equation

TE Generic (2006) VWC= 0.00109 RAW - 0.629Sand VWC= 0.0009 RAW - 0.4929Clay VWC = 0.0009 RAW - 0.4693

Select Granular VWC = 0.0011 RAW - 0.6615Class-3 VWC = 0.0009 RAW - 0.5149Class-4 VWC = 0.0008 RAW - 0.4120Class-5 VWC = 0.0007 RAW - 0.3524Class-6 VWC = 0.0011 RAW - 0.6787

Class-7 (Reclaimed) 5TE Generic (2008) VWC = 0.00109 RAW - 0.629

Sand VWC = 0.0004 RAW - 0.0780Clay VWC = 0.0003 RAW - 0.0021

Select Granular VWC = 0.0005 RAW - 0.0908Class-3 VWC = 0.0004 RAW - 0.0481Class-4 VWC = 0.0004 RAW - 0.0520Class-5 VWC = 0.0003 RAW - 0.0239Class-6 VWC = 0.0006 RAW - 0.1438

Class-7 (Reclaimed HMA) VWC = TBD

Next sensor types - Moisture Block (851) and CS616 (58) calibrations

Page 10: Installation and Calibration of Moisture Probes Ben Worel ben.worel@state.mn.us Len Palek leonard.e.palek@state.mn.us Minnesota Department of Transportation

With (top base) - ~.50 VMCWith (bottom base) - ~.35 VMC

Without (top base) - ~1.30 VMCWithout (bottom base) - ~.80 VMC

With Calibration

With Generic Calibration

Moisture Probe Generic and Calibration FunctionsApplied to MnROAD Data

Page 11: Installation and Calibration of Moisture Probes Ben Worel ben.worel@state.mn.us Len Palek leonard.e.palek@state.mn.us Minnesota Department of Transportation

Moisture Gauge - Installation Discussion

• Vertical (with forks) or Horizontal (without fork)• Collect Raw data only (no factors) – apply later• Use sieved material around sensor• Sensor Lead Length effect (50’ vs 500’)• Frequency of measurements (MnROAD 15 minutes)• Excitation Voltage (MnROAD 12 volts)• Data Collection Temperature Ranges (Cabinet Temps)

Page 12: Installation and Calibration of Moisture Probes Ben Worel ben.worel@state.mn.us Len Palek leonard.e.palek@state.mn.us Minnesota Department of Transportation

• Role of material density and moisture measurements?– Differences – maybe soil sampler field?

• Does a generic calibration function work for other types of non-capacitance sensors used in pavement research?

• Does every sensor installed need a calibration? • Discussion on the process (manufacture vs modified)

– Manufacture use same volume of soil compacted in a calibration container– Modified working to get maximum density (minimize voids)

Moisture Gauge – Calibration Discussion

Page 13: Installation and Calibration of Moisture Probes Ben Worel ben.worel@state.mn.us Len Palek leonard.e.palek@state.mn.us Minnesota Department of Transportation

Moisture Probe – Data Use Discussion

• Can moisture sensors detect bound and unbound water in fine-grained clay materials?

• Observe variation in the data• (6 hour running average used) – why?

• Observed manufacture calibration factored data above 100% and negative data (why we did a calibration)

• Flat vs vertical (eliminate potential of condensation)• Installation of sensor at a material interface• Do the readings vary with temperature extreams• Sensor Recommendations

• Capacitance sensors seem the best• Moisture blocks have been improved (not fully tested)