30
6. Integration of grammar with the teaching of listening, speaking, reading, and writing skills. Intan Jamala Binti Maarop Matthew Wong Ling Kang Khairun Najwa Binti Ahmad Wadzir

Integration of Grammar

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Integration of Grammar

6. Integration of grammar with the teaching of listening, speaking,

reading, and writing skills.

Intan Jamala Binti MaaropMatthew Wong Ling Kang

Khairun Najwa Binti Ahmad Wadzir

Page 2: Integration of Grammar

Article related to issues in grammar teaching.

• 1) Current Issues in the Teaching of Grammar: An SLA Perspective

• ROD ELLISUniversity of AucklandAuckland, New Zealan

• Cited from http://ojcsteve.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/ellis_grammar.pdf

Page 3: Integration of Grammar

1) WHAT GRAMMAR SHOULD WE TEACH?- Assuming, then, that grammar teaching can contribute to inter language development, the next logical question concerns what grammar we should teach. This question can be broken down into two separate questions:• 1. What kind of grammar should we base

teaching on?• 2. Which grammatical features should we

teach?

Page 4: Integration of Grammar

2) IS THERE A BEST WAY TO TEACH GRAMMAR FOR IMPLICIT KNOWLEDGE?

- There is a controversy regarding how to measure the effectiveness of the instructional options. Norris and Ortega (2000) have shown that the effectiveness of instruction varies depending on whether it is measured using metalinguistic judgements, selected response, constrained constructed response, or free constructed response. Most SLA researchers (and teachers, too, perhaps) would consider the last of these the most valid measure. Ellis (2002a) reviewed a number of studies that examined the effects of different kinds of instruction on learners’ free constructed responses, reporting that instruction can have an effect on this type of language use.

Page 5: Integration of Grammar

• 2) Integrating Grammar for Communicative Language Teaching

• Bayram PekozGirne American University

• (Girne, Cyprus)bpekoz(at)yahoo.com

• Cited from: file:///F:/Pekoz%20-%20Integrating%20Grammar%20for%20Communicative%20Language%20Teaching%20(CLT).htm

Page 6: Integration of Grammar

• Bayram Pekoz has noted some problems associated with grammar teaching.

Direct grammar instruction is still very common.Contextual instructional techniques are not readily

accessible to practitioners.In most cases grammar instruction is not integrated

into the four skills but given in isolation.Mostly it is teachers that formulate the grammar

rules. Grammar rules will be clearer and be remembered better when students formulate them themselves (inductive learning) than when teachers formulate them (deductive learning).

Learners need repeated input of a grammar item. Just one grammar presentation is not enough.

Page 7: Integration of Grammar

Learners should not be overwhelmed with linguistic terminology (Brown, 2001).

Grammar should be taught in digestible segments bearing the cognitive process in mind.

Traditional grammar teaching, for instance, tends to cover the following points in the same lesson:the passive voice with all the tenses,

all the uses of indirect speech (i.e. reporting statements, negative statements, question forms, imperatives, requests, time expressions, etc.)

all the forms of a structure (i.e. statements, negative statements, questions, exceptions, etc).

Page 8: Integration of Grammar

DIFFERENT TYPES OF APPROACHES IN THE TEACHING

OF GRAMMAR

Page 9: Integration of Grammar

Integration of grammar with the teaching of listening, speaking, reading, and writing

skills.

• Example of teaching integrated grammar skills in a classroom.

- First, teacher will start the lesson by presenting a specific grammar topic – for example, past tense verbs.

Page 10: Integration of Grammar

• For a reading passage, teacher will choose a story told in the past tense.

• Then, the teacher will assign a writing exercise like: ‘What did you do last weekend’?

• For speaking, teacher will ask students what they did in their home country.

• And for a listening exercise, teacher will ask them to interview another student, and then report it to the class.

Page 11: Integration of Grammar

• Another way to do this is to choose a single topic for the entire lesson, both grammar and the four skills.

• For example, a topic could be something like jobs or job interviews. If the grammar lesson of the day is irregular past tense verbs, we can discuss the students’ past job experience, their past job responsibilities and so on. They can conduct mock job interviews with each other (exercising their speaking and listening skills), fill out a job application (writing) and go over wanted ads in the newspaper (reading).

Page 12: Integration of Grammar

THE DEDUCTIVE APPROACH

The deductive approach is a teacher-centered approach. This means that the teacher gives the students a new concept, explains it, and then has the students practice using the concept. For example, when teaching a new grammar concept, the teacher will introduce the concept, explain the rules related to its use, and finally the students will practice using the concept in a variety of different ways.

Page 13: Integration of Grammar

THE INDUCTIVE APPROACH

• inductive approach can also be called rule-discovery learning.

• It suggests that a teacher teach grammar starting with presenting some examples of

sentences. learners• Learners understand grammatical rules from the

examples. The presentation of grammatical• The presentation of grammatical rules can be

spoken or written.

Page 14: Integration of Grammar

•SELECT AND ANALYSE ONE OF THE APPROACH •APPROACH CHOSEN : DEDUCTIVE APPROACH

Page 15: Integration of Grammar

•LETS LEARN GRAMMAR !!!

•Nouns : Common Nouns (Names of the

animals)

Page 16: Integration of Grammar

A VISIT TO ZOO NEGARA

Page 17: Integration of Grammar

Last school holiday, my parents brought

me to the Zoo Negara.

Page 18: Integration of Grammar

We saw a camel.

Page 19: Integration of Grammar

We also saw one big black

bear.

Page 20: Integration of Grammar

Besides that, we also saw

three rhinoceros.

Page 21: Integration of Grammar

There were also three

giraffes and four zebras.

Page 22: Integration of Grammar

ACTIVITIESFill in the blanks with the correct answer.

• 1. There were three _____ and ______in the zoo. (rhinoceros, giraffes)• 2. There were four _________.

(giraffe, giraffes)• 3. There was a _______ in the zoo.

(bear, zebra)

Page 23: Integration of Grammar

FILL IN THE BLANKS WITH THE CORRECT NAMES OF ANIMALS IN

THE ZOO.

Page 24: Integration of Grammar

Three _____Four _____

(giraffe, zebras)

Page 25: Integration of Grammar

Two ________

(rhinocero, rhinoceros)

Page 26: Integration of Grammar

Advantages and disadvantages of the

deductive approach to teachinggrammar

Page 27: Integration of Grammar

ADVANTAGES OF DEDUCTIVE APPROACH

• The deductive approach goes straightforwardly to the point and can,

therefore, be time-saving.• It confirms many learners’ expectations about

classroom learning particularly for those who have an analytical style.

• A number of direct practice/application examples are immediately given.

Page 28: Integration of Grammar

DISADVANTAGES OF DEDUCTIVE APPROACH

• Younger learners may not able to understand the concepts or encounter grammar terminology given.

• Grammar explanation encourages a teacher-fronted, transmission-style classroom, so it will hinder learner involvement and interaction immediately.

Page 29: Integration of Grammar

ADVANTAGES OF INDUCTIVE APPROACH

• Learners are trained to be familiar with the rule discovery; this could

• enhance learning autonomy and self-reliance.• The learners are more active in the learning

process, rather than being• simply passive recipients. In this activity, they

will be motivated.

Page 30: Integration of Grammar

DISADVANTAGES OF INDUCTIVE APPROACH

• The approach is time and energy-consuming as it leads learners to have the appropriate concept of the rule.

• The concepts given implicitly may lead the learners to have the wrong concepts of the rule taught.

• The approach may frustrate the learners with their personal learning

• style, or their past learning experience (or both) would prefer simply to be told the rule.