Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DMD#16808
Interaction of the electrophilic ketoprofenyl-glucuronide and ketoprofenyl-
coenzyme A conjugates with cytosolic glutathione S-transferases
Sandra Osbild, Jérome Bour, Benoît Maunit, Cécile Guillaume, Carine Asensio, Jean-
François Muller, Patrick Netter, Gilbert Kirsch, Denyse Bagrel, Françoise Lapicque and
Eric Battaglia
Laboratoire d’Ingénierie Moléculaire et Biochimie Pharmacologique, Institut
Jean Barriol FR CNRS 2843, Université Paul Verlaine-Metz, 57070 Metz,
France (SO, GK, DB, EB) ;
Laboratoire de Spectrométrie de Masse et de Chimie Laser, Institut Jean
Barriol FR CNRS 2843, Université Paul Verlaine-Metz, 57078 Metz
Technopole, France (JB, BM, JFM);
UMR 7561 CNRS-UHP, Physiopathologie et Pharmacologie Articulaires,
Faculté de Médecine-BP 184, F-54505 Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France (CG,
CA, PN, FL)
DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as doi:10.1124/dmd.107.016808
Copyright 2007 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
2
Running title: interaction of ketoprofen acylated metabolites with GST
Address correspondence to:
Eric Battaglia, Ph.D.
LIMBP, Université Paul Verlaine-Metz, rue Général Delestraint
57070 Metz, France
Phone : (33)3 87 37 84 08
Email : [email protected]
Text pages (including references): 32
# of tables: 0
# of figures: 6
# of references: 42
# of words in abstract: 198
# of words in introduction: 596
# of words in discussion: 1306
Abbreviations used: COX, cyclooxygenases, GST, glutathione S-transferases;
GSH, glutathione reduced form; GSSG, glutathione disulfide; CDNB, 1-chloro-
2,4-dinitrobenzene; NQO, 4-nitroquinoline N-oxide; KPF, ketoprofen (2-(3-
benzoylphenyl) propionic acid); KPF-SCoA, ketoprofenyl-acyl-Coenzyme A;
KPF-OG, ketoprofenyl-acylglucuronide; KPF-SG, ketoprofenyl-S-acyl-
glutathione; 4MU sulfate, 4-methylumbelliferone sulfate; NSAIDs, nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
3
Abstract
Carboxylic acid-containing drugs are metabolized mainly through the formation of
glucuronide and coenzyme A esters. These conjugates have been suspected to be
responsible for the toxicity of several nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs because of the
reactivity of the electrophilic ester bond. We investigated in the present study the
reactivity of ketoprofenyl-acylglucuronide (KPF-OG) and ketoprofenyl-acyl-Coenzyme A
(KPF-SCoA) towards cytosolic rat liver glutathione S-transferases (GST). We observed
that KPF-ScoA, but not KPF-OG inhibited the conjugation of 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene
and 4-nitroquinoline N-oxide catalyzed by both purified cytosolic rat liver GST and GST
from FAO and H5-6 rat hepatoma cell lines. Photoaffinity labeling with KPF-SCoA
suggested that the binding of this metabolite may overlap the binding site of 4-
methylumbelliferone sulfate. Furthermore, high performance liquid chromatography and
mass spectrometry analysis showed that both hydrolysis and transacylation reactions
were observed in the presence of GST and glutathione. The formation of KPF-S-acyl-
glutathione could be kinetically characterized (apparent KM = 196.0 + 70.6 µM). It is
concluded that KPF-SCoA is both a GST inhibitor and a substrate of a GST-dependent
transacylation reaction. The reactivity and inhibitory potency of thioester CoA derivatives
towards GST may have potential implications on the reported in vivo toxicity of some
carboxylic acid-containing drugs.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
4
The development of pharmacovigilance tools over the years has led to the
detection of an increasing number of reports of adverse effects of drugs
(reviewed by (Lee, 2003)). Among those, the proportion of carboxylic acid
drugs withdrawn from the market is strikingly elevated. Carboxylic acid-
containing non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used in
medicine due to their analgesic, antipyretic and anti-inflammatory activities.
Most frequently, the adverse drug reactions resulted in injury to the liver, which
is central for the metabolism of xenobiotics. Consequently, It has been
proposed that protein-drug adducts resulting from the metabolism of some of
these carboxylic acid substances may be associated to the incidence of
adverse drug reactions occasionally observed (Boelsterli, 2002). 2-Aryl
propionic acid-containing NSAIDs are metabolized by the phase II detoxification
enzymes, UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. Although this mechanism is often
considered as a detoxifying system, a few examples of bioactivation through
glucuronidation have been described in the case of carboxylic acid-containing
drugs leading to the formation of electrophilic acylglucuronides (Ritter, 2000). In
addition to glucuronidation, xenobiotics bearing a carboxylic acid group can
undergo a conjugation reaction to coenzyme A, catalyzed by both mitochondrial
and microsomal acyl-CoA synthetases, and resulting in the formation of acyl-
CoA thioesters of the corresponding compounds. This is for instance the case
of the 2-arylpropionic acid drug Ketoprofen (KPF), which is both glucuronidated
(Sabolovic et al., 2004; Sakaguchi et al., 2004) and thio-esterified with CoA
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
5
(Carabaza et al., 1996). The latter metabolite appears to be an obligatory
intermediate in the epimerization of chiral profen drugs, such as KPF, as well
as in the formation of glycine, taurine and carnitine conjugates (Olsen et al.,
2005). KPF, among other drugs, has been used as a model compound to study
the possible reactivity of acyl metabolites with cellular proteins. Thus, it was
previously observed that both of these KPF acyl derivatives are chemically
reactive species which can trigger the formation of adducts with various
proteins such as albumin (Presle et al., 1996), UDP-glucuronosyltransferases
(Terrier et al., 1999), the cyclooxygenase COX-2 (Levoin et al., 2004) and
glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (Asensio et al., 2007).
We have used in the present study the main metabolites of KPF, namely
ketoprofenyl-acylglucuronides (KPF-OG) and ketoprofenyl-acyl-coenzyme A
(KPF-SCoA) as acyl metabolites model compounds from carboxylic acid-
containing NSAIDs (Fig.1), to gain further insights into the reactivity of these
electrophilic metabolites. A study of the interaction of KPF-OG and KPF-SCoA
with cytosolic GST was here undertaken. The choice of these enzymes as
putative target for these metabolites was dictated by previous reports showing
that (1) various electrophilic esters can be substrates for GST (Hayes et al.,
2005), including acyl glucuronides (Shore et al., 1995) and acyl CoA derivatives
(Grillo and Benet, 2002), (2) fatty acyl coA are potent inhibitors of recombinant
GST (Silva et al., 1999), and (3) several CoA esters of xenobiotics can react
with reduced glutathione (GSH), the cosubstrate of GST, leading to the
corresponding thioester derivatives (references therein). The inhibition potency
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
6
of KPF-OG and KPF-SCoA towards cytosolic rat liver GST was evaluated and
the reactivity of KPF-SCoA in the presence of these enzymes was elucidated
and kinetically characterized in the present work. These effects were evaluated
on the conjugation of GSH to both CDNB which is catalyzed by all cytosolic
GST except GST Theta and therefore is considered as a diagnostic GST
substrate, and NQO which has been reported to be an efficient substrate of
GST Mu and Pi (Aceto et al., 1990). Taking advantage of the photoactivatable
properties of the benzophenone moiety, the two metabolites of KPF were used
as photoaffinity labels to study their interaction with GST.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
7
Materials and Methods
Materials. GSH was purchased from Acros (Noisy-le-Grand, France). Purified
GST from rat liver, (RS)-Ketoprofen [R,S-2-(3-benzoylphenyl) propionic acid],
S-Ketoprofen, and all others chemicals were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St
Quentin Fallavier, France) and were of the highest available degree of purity.
Cell culture reagents were from Eurobio (Courtaboeuf, France). KPF-OG was
prepared using a previously published enzymatic method (Terrier et al., 1999).
The chemical synthesis of KPF-SCoA has been previously described (Levoin et
al., 2002). Synthesis of ketoprofenyl-S-acyl-glutathione was performed as
described below. The rat hepatoma Fao and H5-6 cell lines have been cloned
from the H4IIEC3 cell line (Pitot et al., 1964) derived from Reuber H35
hepatoma cells (Reuber, 1961).
Instrumentation. HPLC was performed on a Waters system (Milford, MA)
equipped with a Waters 510 pump and a Waters 996 photodiode array detector
at 254 nm. MALDI-TOF experiments were performed in positive ion mode and
Post Source Decay (PSD) with a Bruker Reflex IV instrument (Bruker-Franzen
Analytik GmbH, Bremen, Germany). For the MALDI-TOF MS sample
preparation, 1 µL of 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid matrix solution (0.1 M in equal
volumes of water/acetonitrile) was added to 1 µL of the sample, placed on the
sample plate and allowed to dry in an air stream. Ionization was achieved by
using a nitrogen laser (λ = 337 nm, pulse duration = 4 ns, output energy = 400
µJ, repetition rate = 5 Hz). A reflectron mode with a total acceleration voltage of
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
8
20 kV and an extraction delay time of 200 ns was used for the mass
spectrometry analysis. The ion assignment was attained after external
calibration performed with polyethylene glycol 400 Na+ and K+ cationized ions.
Chemical synthesis of ketoprofenyl-S-acyl-glutathione. Ketoprofenyl-S-
acyl-glutathione (KPF-SG) was chemically synthesized using a method
modified from the synthesis of acyl-CoA-ketoprofen conjugates (Levoin et al.,
2002), by substituting GSH for CoASH. To a solution of KPF (61 mg, 0.24
mmol) in 5.5 mL anhydrous dichloromethane was added a solution of 2,6
lutidine (28 µL, 0.24 mmol) and ethyl chloroformate (23 µL, 0.24 µmol in 1.85
mL anydrous dichloromethane). The mixture was stirred for 1 hour at room
temperature under nitrogen atmosphere. The formation of the activated KPF
reaction intermediate was monitored by HPLC (retention time 6.4 min) as
described (Levoin et al., 2002). When the reaction was completed, the mixture
was concentrated to dryness and solubilized in tetrahydrofuran (4.5 mL). GSH
(46.2 mg, 0.15 mmole in 4.5 mL distilled water) was then added, the pH
adjusted to 6.2 with NaOH (5N), and the mixture stirred at room temperature for
2 hours under nitrogen atmosphere. The formation of KPF-SG was followed by
HPLC as described below. Finally, tetrahydrofuran was evaporated and the
aqueous layer extracted with hexane to remove unreacted products and
concentrated. KPF-SG from the aqueous phase was purified by semi-
preparative HPLC as described below. The residue was characterized by
MALDI TOF positive ion mass spectrum (see Fig. 5).
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
9
Inhibition of purified rat liver GST activities. GST activities were determined
using 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) as substrate, essentially as
described by (Habig et al., 1974). The enzymatic activity of purified rat liver
cytosolic GST (1.23 µg proteins/mL) was assayed at 340 nm (Uvikon 941
spectrophotometer, Kontron Instruments, SECOMAM, Alès, France) in 0.1 M
sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) at 30°C for 4 min using GSH (3 mM in 0.1 M
sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5) and CDNB (4 mM in DMSO). When 4-
nitroquinoline N-oxide (4NQO, 0.1 mM in dimethylsulfoxide) was used as the
acceptor substrate, the assay was performed as described by (Stanley and
Benson, 1988), except that GSH concentration was held at 2 mM (0.1 M
sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5). For inhibition experiments, the tested
substances (0.1 mM) were dissolved in milliQ® water (CoASH, KPF-OG and
KPF-SCoA) or in dimethylsulfoxide (KPF, 4-methylumbelliferone-sulfate) and
included in the GST assays. Solvents were added at 2% (v/v) in the assays and
did not affect enzyme activities (results not shown). The residual activity (%) in
the presence of the inhibitors was calculated, with control (2% solvent)
representing 100% activity.
Inhibition of GST in cell homogenates. The rat hepatoma cell lines FAO and
H5-6 were grown to subconfluency in DMEM medium supplemented with 10%
(v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 UI/mL penicillin G, 100 µg/mL
streptomycin and 0.25 µg/mL amphotericin B. These cells were cultured in 250
mL-Falcon® flasks (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA) at 37°C in a humidified
atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Cells were scraped in Phosphate Buffered
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
10
Saline and centrifuged (4°C, 500 g) for 5 min. The pellet was resuspended in
0.1 M ice-cold sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), sonicated twice for 10
seconds (VibraCell, Fisher Bioblock Scientific, Illkirch, France) and centrifuged
(4°C , 2500 g) for 15 min. The supernatant was kept at –80°C until GST assay.
The inhibitory potency of KPF, KPF-SCoA and KPF-OG (0.1 mM) on GST
activities (CDNB and 4NQO) in the FAO and H5-6 cell homogenates was
evaluated as described for purified rat liver GST, but with a final protein
concentration of 0.153 mg/mL and 0.468 mg/mL (for initial rate conditions)
respectively, in the assay.
Photoaffinity labeling of purified rat liver GST with ketoprofenyl-CoA.
Purified cytosolic rat liver GST (0.16 mg/mL) were placed into 1.5 mL-
microtubes and incubated for 0-2 hours at 4°C under a 365 nm-UV lamp
(Spectroline, Polylabo, Strasbourg, France) in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer
(pH 7.4) and in the presence of KPF-SCoA (0.5 mM). UV-irradiated samples
were withdrawn at different irradiation times (0-2 h) and diluted 100 times in 0.1
M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) prior to determination of GST activity using
CDNB as acceptor substrate, as described above. The effect of UV irradiation
alone was evaluated by performing in parallel the experiment in the absence of
KPF-SCoA. The residual activity (%) was calculated from the enzyme activity in
the non-irradiated assay at t0 representing 100 % residual activity. GST activity
protection against photoinactivation by KPF-SCoA (0.25 mM) was studied in
the presence of GSH (4 mM in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5), CDNB
(4 mM), 4MU sulfate (2 mM), estrone 3-sulfate (2 mM), and the corresponding
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
11
solvent alone (1% v/v), using the experimental procedures described above
and an irradiation time of 2h.
Protein Assays. Protein concentrations of cell homogenates and purified GST
were determined according to (Lowry et al., 1951), using bovine serum albumin
as standard.
HPLC analysis. Reaction products resulting from the incubation of GST and/or
GSH with KPF-SCoA were analyzed by reverse-phase HPLC with UV detection
at 254 nm. 10 µL of samples were injected in a Lichrospher RP-18 column
(18.5 µm, 125 x 4 mm, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). The mobile phase
consisted of 45 % of 9 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 5.5) and 55 %
methanol and isocratic elution was carried out at a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min.
Reactivity of KPF-SCoA with GSH in the presence of GST. GSH (3 mM in
0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5) was incubated at 30°C in 0.1 M
sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) in presence of KPF-SCoA (0.5 mM) and with
or without GST (2.34 mg proteins/mL in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH
6.5). A sample (23.44 µg proteins) was withdrawn from the mixture as a
function of time (0-4 h) and was mixed to four volumes of methanol to stop the
reaction and precipitate the proteins. After centrifugation (5 minutes, 12000g,
4°C) supernatants were stored at -80°C until HPLC analysis. Controls were
also run in parallel under the same conditions but with KPF-SCoA or CoASH
alone (0.5 mM), GSSG (3 mM) in place of GSH, and heat-denaturated GST,
respectively.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
12
The KPF-SCoA-concentration dependence of the reaction catalyzed by GST
was studied by incubating GST (2.34 mg proteins/mL) and GSH (3 mM) with
KPF-SCoA (0.01 mM to 1 mM) in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) at
30°C during 45 minutes. The reaction mixtures were then treated and analyzed
by reverse-phase HPLC as described above. Controls without GST were run in
parallel to account for the uncatalyzed reaction.
Quantification of ketoprofenyl-S-acyl-glutathione. KPF-SG produced in the
presence of GST was quantified as follows. KPF-SG fractions eluted from the
HPLC column were collected and fully hydrolyzed in the presence of an equal
volume of NaOH (0.5 N) for 2 h at 40°C. The amount of KPF-SG was deduced
from the amount of KPF released, the latter being quantified using a KPF
standard curve and HPLC separation.
Statistical Analysis. Values are expressed as the mean in residual activities ±
standard deviations (S.D.) of at least two experiments performed, at least, in
triplicates.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
13
Results
Inhibition of GST by ketoprofenyl-SCoA and ketoprofenyl-glucuronides.
The effect of the two main acyl metabolites of ketoprofen was first evaluated on
purified rat liver cytosolic GST to find out if GST are possible targets of these
compounds (Fig. 2 A). KPF is a chiral NSAID which has been reported to inhibit
GST (Sadzuka et al., 1994). It was tested in the present study either as
racemates (as administered) or as the S-enantiomer (the form with anti-
inflammatory properties due to the potent inhibition of COX). KPF was found to
more selectively inhibit the conjugation of 4-NQO, an efficient substrate of GST
Mu and Pi. S-KPF inhibition was similar to that observed with the KPF racemic
mixture (results not shown). The inhibitory potency of KPF was lost once
conjugated to glucuronic acid (Fig. 2A). If CoASH alone did not significantly
affect the GST activity, KPF-SCoA could inhibit these enzymes (Fig. 2A).
Likewise, cytosolic GST activity from the FAO and H5-6 rat hepatocarcinoma
cell lines were significantly inhibited by KPF-ScoA, but not by the
acylglucuronide (Fig. 2B).
We next characterized the mode of inhibition of GST by KPF-SCoA. A
Lineweaver-Burk representation could not be performed because of the
relatively low amount of this metabolite available for this study. Therefore,
another approach was undertaken, using KPF-SCoA as a photoaffinity probe
combined with ligand protection experiments. It was indeed previously reported
that KPF can bind to proteins upon UV-irradiation through the benzophenone
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
14
moiety (Bosca et al., 1994; Chuang et al., 1999). We observed in preliminary
experiments that KPF could photolabel GST (unpublished observation).
Furthermore, irradiation of purified rat liver GST in the presence of 0.5 mM
KPF-SCoA led to a time-dependent inactivation, reaching 72 % inactivation
after two hours (Fig. 3A). Conversely, no inhibition of the conjugation reaction
could be detected in the absence of irradiation in these experimental
conditions. No significant protection was observed when the labeling was
carried out in the presence of either GSH, CDNB (Fig. 3B) or 2 mM estrone 3-
sulfate (not shown), while preincubation of the enzymes with 2 mM 4MU sulfate
prior to labeling with 0.25 mM KPF-SCoA brought near full protection against
photoinactivation. KPF-OG photolabeling of GST under similar conditions did
not trigger any significant enzyme inactivation (data not shown). This suggests
that KPF-SCoA binds within the 4MU sulfate binding site.
KPF-SCoA reactivity in the presence of GST. Since KPF-SCoA (but not
KPF-OG) exerts an inhibitory effect towards GST, we next determined the
possible reactivity of the former metabolite with GSH and evaluated the
possibility of a reaction mediated by these enzymes. A representative reverse
phase HPLC chromatogram obtained after incubation of KPF-SCoA with GSH
at pH 6.5 in the presence purified rat liver GST is shown in Fig. 4. Several
species with different retention times were detected at 254 nm. The retention
times of ~2.8 min and 3.3 min matched those of authentic KPF-SCoA R- and S-
enantiomers and therefore were considered as unreacted metabolites. This
assignment was confirmed by mass spectrometric analysis with MALDI TOF
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
15
positive ion mass spectrum in accordance with the structures of the acyl CoA
metabolites (data not shown). The compound eluted at ~5.4 min comigrated
with authentic KPF and the detection of the protonated molecular ion MH+ m/z
255.33 is consistent with the structure of KPF (data not shown). The structure
of the compound eluted at ~4.7 min could not be proposed on the basis of the
retention time from the HPLC analysis and was therefore further characterized
by mass spectrometry.
MS identification of 2-(3-benzoylphenyl) propionic acid-glutathione. A
transacylation product resulting from the reaction between GSH and KPF-
SCoA was postulated on the basis of the electrophilic properties of the thioester
bound, as well as previous reports on similar metabolites (Shore et al., 1995;
Grillo and Benet, 2002; Li et al., 2002; Olsen et al., 2002; Grillo et al., 2003; Li
et al., 2003a). Mass spectrometric analysis was performed to allow the
identification of the reaction products separated by reversed-phase HPLC.
Furthermore, authentic 2-(3-benzoylphenyl) propionic acid-glutathione (KPF-
SG) resulting from such postulated transacylation was chemically synthesized
by coupling ketoprofen to GSH using the mixed anhydride method (Levoin et
al., 2004) and compared to the enzymatic reaction products resulting from the
incubation of GST with KPF-SCoA and GSH. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry
analysis of KPF-SG obtained from chemical and enzymatic synthesis are
shown in Fig. 5. A characteristic protonated molecular ion MH+ m/z 544 and the
potassium adduct ion m/z 582 was detected for the authentic KPF-SG resulting
from the chemical synthesis while the potassium adduct ion m/z 582 was not
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
16
found in the enzymatic reaction products (Fig. 5A and 5B). The lack of the
potassium adduct may be due to the weak concentration of potassium in the
analyzed solution. Likewise, analysis by Post Source Decay (PSD) technique
provided a mass spectrum of the product KPF-SG obtained by chemical
method identical to that acquired during the mass spectrometric analysis of the
product obtained by the enzymatic method. The PSD spectrum of KPF-SG MH+
ion m/z 544 showed characteristic fragment ions m/z 500, 469, 415, 308, 274
and 237 (Fig. 5C) originating from the proposed cleavages depicted in this
Figure.
Kinetic studies of the hydrolytic and transacylation reactions catalyzed by
GST. We characterized the GST-mediated transacylation and KPF-SCoA
hydrolysis by evaluating the time dependence and saturation pattern of these
reactions. The co-incubation of KPF-SCoA and GSH resulted in a significant
uncatalyzed reaction which varied from 3.5 % to 13.9 % of the reaction
observed in the presence of GST as a function of the incubation time (Fig. 6A).
Therefore, the sole contribution of the enzyme-catalyzed reaction was
evaluated by deducing from the amount of the total reaction products that
measured in the absence of enzyme (Fig. 6A). Incubation of KPF-SCoA with
GSH and GST resulted in a time-dependent formation of KPF, the later being
linear for up to 4h (Fig. 6A), defining within these experimental conditions the
time frame of initial rate for the hydrolytic reaction. Moreover, the kinetics of
KPF-SG formation was linear for up to 1 h. An incubation time of 45 min was
accordingly chosen to evaluate the substrate saturation pattern of the
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
17
enzymatic reactions (hydrolysis and transacylation). A saturation curve was
observed for KPF-SCoA concentrations ranging from 0.01 mM to 1mM (Fig.
6B). A double reciprocal plot allowed the determination of an apparent KM
towards KPF-SCoA of 196.0 + 70.6 µM for the transacylation reaction (Fig. 6C).
On the other hand, the hydrolysis reaction resulting in the formation of KPF and
CoASH from KPF-SCoA was too slow to allow the determination of kinetic
parameters for this reaction (data not shown). Since proteins contain multiple
nucleophilic amino acid residues, such as cysteinyl residues which could
account for the observed reactivity of KPF-SCoA (independently of the enzyme
integrity), we evaluated the hydrolytic and transacylation reactions after thermal
denaturation of the purified GST. The products were detected by HPLC at
levels similar to that found with the uncatalyzed reaction (data not shown).
Furthermore, the free thiol moiety of GSH appears to be essential for the
reaction since no products could be detected when glutathione disufide was
substituted for GSH (data not shown).
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
18
Discussion
A number of carboxylic acid drugs have been withdrawn from the market after
observation of unacceptable levels of hepatotoxicity and these idiosyncratic
drug reactions have been hypothesized to be associated to the formation of
chemically reactive substances. Thus, various acyl glucuronides have been
shown to be electrophilic metabolites which can spontaneously react with
proteins both in vitro and in vivo leading to adduct formation (Sallustio et al.,
2000). This reactivity is not limited to proteins since electrophilic acyl
glucuronide conjugates have been reported to react with the tripeptide
glutathione, the cosubstrate for conjugation reaction carried out by GST (Shore
et al., 1995; Grillo and Hua, 2003). A second bioactivation pathway involves the
formation of electrophilic acyl CoA derivatives by acyl-CoA synthetases. Acyl
CoA derivatives of xenobiotics can react with proteins and GSH, resulting in
adduct formation through nucleophilic acyl substitution (Sidenius et al., 2004).
KPF has been previously reported to inhibit GST (Sadzuka et al., 1994). In the
present study, we characterized the inhibitory potency and reactivity towards
GST of the two main acylated metabolites of KPF, namely KPF-OG and KPF-
SCoA (Fig. 1). While KPF-OG did not affect GST activity, we observed that
KPF-SCoA was able to inhibit both CDNB and NQO conjugation to GSH
catalyzed by purified rat liver GST (Fig. 2). A similar inhibitory pattern was
found in homogenates from H5-6 and FAO rat hepatocarcinoma cells and the
inhibition potency of KPF-SCoA was similar to the one observed with KPF (Fig.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
19
2). The lower inhibitory potency observed in the presence of cytosolic extracts
compared to purified GST is likely to be due to the buffering effect of additional
proteins interacting with the two acyl metabolites of KPF. Various proteins such
as albumin (Li et al., 2003b), sulfotransferases (Tulik et al., 2002), COX (Levoin
et al., 2004), hepatocyte nuclear factor-4α (Hertz et al., 2001) and glucose-6-
phosphate dehydrogenase (Asensio et al., 2007) have indeed been reported to
interact with CoA thioester derivatives. It was previously found that long-chain
saturated fatty acyl-CoAs and peroxisome proliferator–CoA thioesters exert
high affinity towards GST (Silva et al., 1999). Our results provide another
example of carboxylic acid–containing compound able to bind to GST. We
observed that this binding resulted in the inhibition of the conjugation activity of
these enzymes.
Taking advantage of the ability of KPF to bind covalently to its protein targets
upon UV irradiation (Chuang et al., 1999), KPF-SCoA was used as a
photoaffinity label to partially characterize the GST binding site of this
metabolite (Fig. 3). An UV-dependent GST inactivation by KPF-SCoA was
detected as well as a major protection in the presence of 4MU sulfate, while
GSH, CDNB and estrone 3-sulfate did not exert any protective effect.
Sulfoconjugates of steroids have been reported to bind in a so-called “ligandin”
or “nonsubstrate” site in the alpha-class rat liver GST isozyme 1-1 (Barycki and
Colman, 1997). Conversely, aromatic sulfoconjugates such as benzyl sulfate
are GST substrates in the presence of GSH (Gillham, 1971). Interestingly,
estrone 3-sulfate was also tested in this same work and was found not to be a
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
20
GST substrate. Therefore, our experiment using KPF-SCoA as photolabel
suggests that it may bind within the electrophilic substrate site (H-site). This is
further supported by the fact that KPF-SCoA behaves as a GST substrate as
shown by the detection of a GST-dependent transacylation reaction with GSH
(Fig. 5 and 6). The observation that the diagnostic GST substrate CDNB does
not protect against inactivation even though KPF-SCoA is itself a GST
substrate can be explained in view of some previous works. For instance, it has
been reported that ethacrynic acid, both a GST inhibitor and a GST substrate,
can bind to human GST P1-1 in a nonproductive and productive mode, which
suggests the existence of multiple binding sites and binding modes for GST
ligands (Oakley et al., 1997). KPF-SCoA binding mode and binding
stoechiometry may thus be distinct from that of CDNB.
The reactivity of KPF-SCoA as potential GST substrate has been evaluated.
The chemical reactivity of the electrophilic thioester bound for a variety of
xenobiotic-SCoA metabolites towards the sulfhydryl moiety of cysteine in both
low molecular weight GSH and proteins has been indeed previously reported
(Shore et al., 1995; Grillo and Benet, 2002; Li et al., 2002; Olsen et al., 2002;
Grillo et al., 2003; Li et al., 2003a). Furthermore, xenobiotic–SCoA were found
to be much more reactive towards GSH compared to acyl glucuronides (Olsen
et al., 2002). While (Silva et al., 1999) highlighted the absence of metabolism
and hydrolysis of the thioester derivatives, interestingly, a transacylation
reaction with GSH, enhanced in the presence of GST, was detected in the
present study. MALDI/TOF MS analysis of KPF-SG obtained by enzymatic
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
21
synthesis led to the identification of the expected ions MH+ m/z 544 (Fig. 5B) in
accordance with the proposed structure. This profile was similar to that
obtained with KPF-SG chemically synthesized (Fig. 5A). Hence we concluded
that KPF-CoA was converted to KPF-SG in the presence of GST.
Using the hypolipidemic drug clofibric acid, Grillo and Benet (2002) have
reported that rat liver GST increase the rate of clofibryl-S-acyl-glutathione
formation from a mixture of clofibryl-S-acyl-CoA and GSH, but the kinetic
parameters of the catalytic reaction were not determined. In the present study,
an apparent KM = 196.0 + 70.6 µM was determined for the transacylation
reaction. This value is similar to those of CDNB-conjugating enzymes. GST
catalyze miscellaneous GSH–dependent reactions such as nucleophilic
aromatic substitution, Michael-type addition, double bond izomerisation,
hydroperoxide reduction (reviewed by (Mahajan and Atkins, 2005)). In addition
to the transacylation reaction, the hydrolysis of KPF-SCoA enhanced in the
presence of GST was detected, but this hydrolysis occurred at a lower rate
(Fig. 6A). A relation between the rate of spontaneous transacylation and
hydrolysis of CoA thioesters has been reported (Sidenius et al., 2004). The
amounts of reaction products (hydrolysis and transacylation) was reduced to
those observed in the absence of enzyme when GST were heat-inactivated
(results not shown), demonstrating that native enzymes contribute to these
reactions. The hydrolytic reaction of KPF-SCoA did not result in a saturation
pattern, which therefore precluded the determination of the kinetic parameters
for this reaction. Hydrolysis of xenobiotic-CoA metabolites has been previously
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
22
reported but this reaction was not studied in the presence of enzymes (Li et al.,
2003a; Sidenius et al., 2004). Furthermore, the hydrolytic activity of GST on
GSH esters (reverse reaction of GSH conjugation) has been demonstrated
(Dietze et al., 1998; Ibarra et al., 2003). It is not established, to the best of our
knowledge, whether carboxylic acid-SCoA conjugates are directly hydrolyzed
by GST or are first transacylated by GSH prior to hydrolysis by GST (reverse
conjugation).
Glutathione thioesters of carboxylic acid containing drugs may be excreted
unchanged in the bile (Shore et al., 1995) or degraded prior to excretion in
urine. Thus, clofibryl-S-acyl-GSH has been shown to be further metabolized in
vivo and in vitro to S- to N-acyl-cysteine amide derivatives with the contribution
of γ-glutamyltransferase (Grillo and Benet, 2001). More recently, the
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory carboxyl drug, zomepirac was found to be
bioactivated to its acyl CoA metabolite, an obligatory intermediate to the in vivo
formation of glycine, taurine and carnitine conjugates (Olsen et al., 2005). A γ-
glutamyl transferase-mediated degradation of clofibryl-S-acyl-GSH resulting in
the formation of S- and N-acyl-cysteine amide derivatives were detected in rat
both in vitro and in vivo (Grillo and Benet, 2001). Whether xenobiotic acyl-GSH
conjugates and their subsequent metabolites may be considered as a
detoxification products remains to be established.
In conclusion, we report for the first time that, unlike KPF-OG, KPF-SCoA is an
inhibitor of both purified and cell homogenate GST. KPF-SCoA is also
transacylated in the presence of GSH and hydrolyzed through reactions
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
23
mediated by purified rat liver GST. The physiotoxicological consequences of
GST inhibition, transacylation and hydrolysis reactions in the presence of CoA
thioesters will deserve future investigations.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
24
Acknowledgment
We thank Nicolas Levoin (CNRS UMR 7561) for his help during the initiation of
the project and Jacques Magdalou (CNRS UMR 7561) for helpful discussion on
the manuscript. We also wish to thank a reviewer for his suggestion regarding
the binding of KPF-SCoA to GST.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
25
References Aceto A, Di Ilio C, Lo Bello M, Bucciarelli T, Angelucci S and Federici G (1990)
Differential activity of human, rat, mouse and bacteria glutathione transferase isoenzymes towards 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide. Carcinogenesis 11:2267-2269.
Asensio C, Levoin N, Guillaume C, Guerquin MJ, Rouguieg K, Chretien F, Chapleur Y, Netter P, Minn A and Lapicque F (2007) Irreversible inhibition of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase by the coenzyme A conjugate of ketoprofen: a key to oxidative stress induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs? Biochem Pharmacol 73:405-416.
Barycki JJ and Colman RF (1997) Identification of the nonsubstrate steroid binding site of rat liver glutathione S-transferase, isozyme 1-1, by the steroid affinity label, 3beta-(iodoacetoxy)dehydroisoandrosterone. Arch Biochem Biophys 345:16-31.
Boelsterli UA (2002) Xenobiotic acyl glucuronides and acyl CoA thioesters as protein-reactive metabolites with the potential to cause idiosyncratic drug reactions. Curr Drug Metab 3:439-450.
Bosca F, Miranda MA, Carganico G and Mauleon D (1994) Photochemical and photobiological properties of ketoprofen associated with the benzophenone chromophore. Photochem Photobiol 60:96-101.
Carabaza A, Suesa N, Tost D, Pascual J, Gomez M, Gutierrez M, Ortega E, Montserrat X, Garcia AM, Mis R, Cabre F, Mauleon D and Carganico G (1996) Stereoselective metabolic pathways of ketoprofen in the rat: incorporation into triacylglycerols and enantiomeric inversion. Chirality 8:163-172.
Chuang VT, Kuniyasu A, Nakayama H, Matsushita Y, Hirono S and Otagiri M (1999) Helix 6 of subdomain III A of human serum albumin is the region primarily photolabeled by ketoprofen, an arylpropionic acid NSAID containing a benzophenone moiety. Biochim Biophys Acta 1434:18-30.
Dietze EC, Grillo MP, Kalhorn T, Nieslanik BS, Jochheim CM and Atkins WM (1998) Thiol ester hydrolysis catalyzed by glutathione S-transferase A1-1. Biochemistry 37:14948-14957.
Gillham B (1971) The reaction of aralkyl sulphate esters with glutathione catalysed by rat liver preparations. Biochem J 121:667-672.
Grillo MP and Benet LZ (2001) Interaction of gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase with clofibryl-S-acyl-glutathione in vitro and in vivo in rat. Chem Res Toxicol 14:1033-1040.
Grillo MP and Benet LZ (2002) Studies on the reactivity of clofibryl-S-acyl-CoA thioester with glutathione in vitro. Drug Metab Dispos 30:55-62.
Grillo MP and Hua F (2003) Identification of zomepirac-S-acyl-glutathione in vitro in incubations with rat hepatocytes and in vivo in rat bile. Drug Metab Dispos 31:1429-1436.
Grillo MP, Knutson CG, Sanders PE, Waldon DJ, Hua F and Ware JA (2003) Studies on the chemical reactivity of diclofenac acyl glucuronide with
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
26
glutathione: identification of diclofenac-S-acyl-glutathione in rat bile. Drug Metab Dispos 31:1327-1336.
Habig WH, Pabst MJ and Jakoby WB (1974) Glutathione S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J Biol Chem 249:7130-7139.
Hayes JD, Flanagan JU and Jowsey IR (2005) Glutathione transferases. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 45:51-88.
Hertz R, Sheena V, Kalderon B, Berman I and Bar-Tana J (2001) Suppression of hepatocyte nuclear factor-4alpha by acyl-CoA thioesters of hypolipidemic peroxisome proliferators. Biochem Pharmacol 61:1057-1062.
Ibarra C, Grillo MP, Lo Bello M, Nucettelli M, Bammler TK and Atkins WM (2003) Exploration of in vitro pro-drug activation and futile cycling by glutathione S-transferases: thiol ester hydrolysis and inhibitor maturation. Arch Biochem Biophys 414:303-311.
Lee WM (2003) Drug-induced hepatotoxicity. N Engl J Med 349:474-485. Levoin N, Blondeau C, Guillaume C, Grandcolas L, Chretien F, Jouzeau JY,
Benoit E, Chapleur Y, Netter P and Lapicque F (2004) Elucidation of the mechanism of inhibition of cyclooxygenases by acyl-coenzyme A and acylglucuronic conjugates of ketoprofen. Biochem Pharmacol 68:1957-1969.
Levoin N, Chretien F, Lapicque F and Chapleur Y (2002) Synthesis and biological testing of Acyl-CoA-ketoprofen conjugates as selective irreversible inhibitors of COX-2. Bioorg Med Chem 10:753-757.
Li C, Benet LZ and Grillo MP (2002) Studies on the chemical reactivity of 2-phenylpropionic acid 1-O-acyl glucuronide and S-acyl-CoA thioester metabolites. Chem Res Toxicol 15:1309-1317.
Li C, Grillo MP and Benet LZ (2003a) In vitro studies on the chemical reactivity of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetyl-S-acyl-CoA thioester. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 187:101-109.
Li C, Olurinde MO, Hodges LM, Grillo MP and Benet LZ (2003b) Covalent binding of 2-phenylpropionyl-S-acyl-CoA thioester to tissue proteins in vitro. Drug Metab Dispos 31:727-730.
Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL and Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265-275.
Mahajan S and Atkins WM (2005) The chemistry and biology of inhibitors and pro-drugs targeted to glutathione S-transferases. Cell Mol Life Sci 62:1221-1233.
Oakley AJ, Rossjohn J, Lo Bello M, Caccuri AM, Federici G and Parker MW (1997) The three-dimensional structure of the human Pi class glutathione transferase P1-1 in complex with the inhibitor ethacrynic acid and its glutathione conjugate. Biochemistry 36:576-585.
Olsen J, Bjornsdottir I, Tjornelund J and Honore Hansen S (2002) Chemical reactivity of the naproxen acyl glucuronide and the naproxen coenzyme A thioester towards bionucleophiles. J Pharm Biomed Anal 29:7-15.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
27
Olsen J, Li C, Bjornsdottir I, Sidenius U, Hansen SH and Benet LZ (2005) In vitro and in vivo studies on acyl-coenzyme A-dependent bioactivation of zomepirac in rats. Chem Res Toxicol 18:1729-1736.
Pitot HC, Peraino C, Morse PA, Jr. and Potter VR (1964) Hepatomas in Tissue Culture Compared with Adapting Liver in Vivo. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 13:229-245.
Presle N, Lapicque F, Fournel-Gigleux S, Magdalou J and Netter P (1996) Stereoselective irreversible binding of ketoprofen glucuronides to albumin. Characterization of the site and the mechanism. Drug Metab Dispos 24:1050-1057.
Reuber MD (1961) A transplantable bile-secreting hepatocellular carcinoma in the rat. J Natl Cancer Inst 26:891-899.
Ritter JK (2000) Roles of glucuronidation and UDP-glucuronosyltransferases in xenobiotic bioactivation reactions. Chem Biol Interact 129:171-193.
Sabolovic N, Heydel JM, Li X, Little JM, Humbert AC, Radominska-Pandya A and Magdalou J (2004) Carboxyl nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are efficiently glucuronidated by microsomes of the human gastrointestinal tract. Biochim Biophys Acta 1675:120-129.
Sadzuka Y, Shimizu Y, Takino Y and Hirota S (1994) Protection against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in the rat by inducers and an inhibitor of glutathione S-transferase. Biochem Pharmacol 48:453-459.
Sakaguchi K, Green M, Stock N, Reger TS, Zunic J and King C (2004) Glucuronidation of carboxylic acid containing compounds by UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms. Arch Biochem Biophys 424:219-225.
Sallustio BC, Sabordo L, Evans AM and Nation RL (2000) Hepatic disposition of electrophilic acyl glucuronide conjugates. Curr Drug Metab 1:163-180.
Shore LJ, Fenselau C, King AR and Dickinson RG (1995) Characterization and formation of the glutathione conjugate of clofibric acid. Drug Metab Dispos 23:119-123.
Sidenius U, Skonberg C, Olsen J and Hansen SH (2004) In vitro reactivity of carboxylic acid-CoA thioesters with glutathione. Chem Res Toxicol 17:75-81.
Silva C, Loyola G, Valenzuela R, Garcia-Huidobro T, Monasterio O and Bronfman M (1999) High-affinity binding of fatty acyl-CoAs and peroxisome proliferator-CoA esters to glutathione S-transferases effect on enzymatic activity. Eur J Biochem 266:143-150.
Stanley JS and Benson AM (1988) The conjugation of 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide, a potent carcinogen, by mammalian glutathione transferases. 4-Nitroquinoline 1-oxide conjugation by human, rat and mouse liver cytosols, extrahepatic organs of mice and purified mouse glutathione transferase isoenzymes. Biochem J 256:303-306.
Terrier N, Benoit E, Senay C, Lapicque F, Radominska-Pandya A, Magdalou J and Fournel-Gigleux S (1999) Human and rat liver UDP-glucuronosyltransferases are targets of ketoprofen acylglucuronide. Mol Pharmacol 56:226-234.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
28
Tulik GR, Chodavarapu S, Edgar R, Giannunzio L, Langland A, Schultz B and Beckmann JD (2002) Inhibition of bovine phenol sulfotransferase (bSULT1A1) by CoA thioesters. Evidence for positive cooperativity and inhibition by interaction with both the nucleotide and phenol binding sites. J Biol Chem 277:39296-39303.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
29
Footnote This work was supported in part by Région de Lorraine. SO is a recipient of a
fellowship from Ministère de la Recherche et de l’Enseignement Supérieur
(France).
Reprint request: Eric Battaglia, PhD. Laboratoire d’Ingénierie Moléculaire et
Biochimie Pharmacologique, Institut Jean Barriol FR CNRS 2843, Université
Paul Verlaine-Metz, 57070 Metz, France ; Tel : (+33)387378408 ; Fax :
(+33)387378423 ; Email : [email protected].
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
30
Legends for figures
Figure 1. Structure of Ketoprofen, Ketoprofen-acylglucuronide and
Ketoprofen-acylCoenzyme A. * Chiral center.
Figure 2. Inhibitory effect of KPF and its acyl metabolites towards GST
activities of purified enzyme and rat hepatoma cell homogenates. A. The
inhibition of the activity of purified rat liver cytosolic GST was evaluated in the
presence of the indicated compounds (0.1 mM) using either CDNB (■) or
4NQO (■) as substrate, under initial rate conditions. B. The inhibitory effect of
KPF, KPF-SCoA and KPF-OG (0.1 mM) towards GST was evaluated using
4NQO as substrate on FAO (□) and H5.6 (■) rat hepatoma cells
homogenates. Residual activity (%) was expressed as the ratio between the
activity in the presence of the compounds and in the absence of compound
(solvent alone) x 100. * p<0.05 vs control (solvent alone) (n=3).
Figure 3. Photoaffinity labeling of purified rat liver GST by KPF-SCoA.
A. Time-dependent GST photoinactivation in the presence of KPF-SCoA. Rat
liver GST (0.16 mg/mL) was incubated in the presence of KPF-SCoA (0.5 mM)
and irradiated (■) or not (♦) at 365 nm for 0-120 min. The GST was also
irradiated in the absence of KPF-SCoA (□). The mixture was then diluted 100
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
31
times in sodium phosphate buffer 0.1 M (pH 6.5) and residual activity was
calculated as described in Figure 2. B. Ligand protection against GST
inactivation by KPF-SCoA. The irradiation of rat liver GST was performed in the
presence KPF-SCoA as described in A but for a single time point (120 min).
GST was irradiated either in the presence of 0.25 mM KPF-SCoA alone or
combined with 2 mM of the GST ligands 4MU sulfate, GSH, or CDNB. The
mixture was subsequently diluted 100 times and residual activity was calculated
as described in Fig. 2, using the enzyme activity found in the absence of
irradiation as corresponding to 100% activity (n=3). * p<0.05.
Figure 4. Representative HPLC chromatogram of the products generated
upon incubation of KPF-SCoA with GSH and GST. GST (2.34 mg/mL) were
incubated in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) for 2 h at 30°C in the
presence of KPF-SCoA (0.5 mM) and GSH (3 mM) and analyzed by reverse-
phase HPLC as described in Material and Methods.
Figure 5. MALDI TOF positive ion mass spectra of KPF-SG formed from (A)
chemical synthesis and (B) enzymatic synthesis. (C) PSD analysis of KPF-SG
produced by cytosolic rat liver GST in the presence of KPF-CoA and GSH as
described in the legend to Fig. 4.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD#16808
32
Figure 6. Characterization of the transacylation and hydrolytic reactions
of KPF-SCoA catalyzed by purified rat liver GST. A. Time-course of the
transacylation and hydrolytic reactions. KPF-SCoA (0.5 mM) and GSH (3 mM)
were incubated with purified rat liver GST and the reaction products were
analyzed as a function of time by reverse-phase HPLC as described in Material
and Methods. Both GST-mediated transacylation leading to KPF-SG (■) and
hydrolysis reaction to KPF (●) are plotted after subtracting the products
obtained in the presence of GST to those obtained in the absence of the
enzymes. Control reactions performed in the same conditions but without GST
are also plotted for transacylation (□) and hydrolysis (○) reactions. B.
Representative Michaelis plot of the GST-dependent catalytic reaction leading
to the formation of the transacylation product KPF-SG. The experimental
conditions were as described in A, but with an incubation time of 45 min, and
with KPF-SCoA concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 1 mM. C. Lineweaver-
Burk plot of B (n=3).
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on October 25, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016808
at ASPE
T Journals on February 3, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
Figure 1
N
N
N
NH2
N
O
OP
OH
O
O
OPO
OH
OH
O
HN
HN
O
OHO
OH
PHO
O
S
O
H3C
O
Ketoprofenyl-acylCoenzyme A
H
CH3COOHO
Ketoprofen
OC-OO
HO
OHHO
O
O
H3C
O
Ketoprofenyl-acylglucuronide
*
*
*
This article has not been copyedited and form
atted. The final version m
ay differ from this version.
DM
D Fast Forw
ard. Published on October 25, 2007 as D
OI: 10.1124/dm
d.107.016808 at ASPET Journals on February 3, 2020 dmd.aspetjournals.org Downloaded from
0
50
100
Control
KPF
KPF-SCoACoASH
KPF-OGre
sid
ual
act
ivit
y (%
)
*
**
**
0
50
100
KPF
KPF-SCoA
KPF-OG
resi
du
al a
ctiv
ity
(%)
**
*
*
A
B
Figure 2
This article has not been copyedited and form
atted. The final version m
ay differ from this version.
DM
D Fast Forw
ard. Published on October 25, 2007 as D
OI: 10.1124/dm
d.107.016808 at ASPET Journals on February 3, 2020 dmd.aspetjournals.org Downloaded from
0
25
50
75
100
0 30 60 90 120
Time (minutes)
resi
dual
act
ivity
(%)
UV - + + + +
KPF-SCoA + + + + +4MU sulfate - - + - -
GSH - - - + -CDNB - - - - +
A
0
25
50
75
100
resi
du
al a
ctiv
ity
(%)
*B
Figure 3
This article has not been copyedited and form
atted. The final version m
ay differ from this version.
DM
D Fast Forw
ard. Published on October 25, 2007 as D
OI: 10.1124/dm
d.107.016808 at ASPET Journals on February 3, 2020 dmd.aspetjournals.org Downloaded from
Figure 4
Elution time (min)
A25
4 nm
This article has not been copyedited and form
atted. The final version m
ay differ from this version.
DM
D Fast Forw
ard. Published on October 25, 2007 as D
OI: 10.1124/dm
d.107.016808 at ASPET Journals on February 3, 2020 dmd.aspetjournals.org Downloaded from
544 582
500 520 540 560 580 600 0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
inte
nsity
m/z
A. Chemical synthesis of KPF-SG
Mr = 543 MH + m/z 544 MK + m/z 582
O
S
H3C
O
HN
NH
O
OOH
H2N
O
O
OH
274
237
145
45469
415
500
130
308
[M+H-129]+
[M+H-44]+
145 193
237
274
308 371 415 469 500
544
100 200 300 400 500 0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
inte
nsi
ty
m/z
C. PSD spectrum of MH+ m/z 544
KPF-SG
544
500 520 540 560 580 600 0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
inte
nsity
m/z
B. Enzymatic synthesis of KPF-SG
Mr = 543 MH + m/z 544
Figure 5
This article has not been copyedited and form
atted. The final version m
ay differ from this version.
DM
D Fast Forw
ard. Published on October 25, 2007 as D
OI: 10.1124/dm
d.107.016808 at ASPET Journals on February 3, 2020 dmd.aspetjournals.org Downloaded from
0
10
20
30
0 60 120 180 240
Time (min)
Pro
duct
s (p
mole
s)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
[KPF-SCoA] (mM)
KP
F-S
G (pm
ole
s/m
in)
r2 = 0,989
0
10
20
30
40
0 25 50 75 100
1/KPF-SCoA (mM)-1
1/V
(pm
ole
s/m
in)-1
B
A
C
Figure 6
This article has not been copyedited and form
atted. The final version m
ay differ from this version.
DM
D Fast Forw
ard. Published on October 25, 2007 as D
OI: 10.1124/dm
d.107.016808 at ASPET Journals on February 3, 2020 dmd.aspetjournals.org Downloaded from