Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
International Conference International Conference
Applications of Structural Fire Applications of Structural Fire EngineeringEngineering Prague 19Prague 19--20 February, 20 February, 20092009
António J. P. Moura Correia a, João Paulo C. Rodrigues a & Valdir Pignatta e Silva bEXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON THE FIRE BEHAVIOUR
� The aim of this study was to analyse the thermal behaviour of steel columns embedded on one-leaf walls. Fire resistance tests with
two different column cross-sections, two orientations of the inertia axis in relation to the fire and two thicknesses of one-leaf buildingwalls, were tested. The experimental results were compared with the ones obtained in the FE program SUPERTEMPCALC.
� OBJECTIVES
Rodrigues a & Valdir Pignatta e Silva b
a Faculty of Sciences and Technology of University of Coimbra, Portugal.bPolytechnic School of University of S. Paulo, Brazil.
EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON THE FIRE BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL COLUMNS EMBEDDED ON WALLS
walls, were tested. The experimental results were compared with the ones obtained in the FE program SUPERTEMPCALC.
� EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
� Columns of cross-sections HEA160 and
HEA200, steel S355, embedded on one-leaf brick walls were tested (Fig. 2).
� The columns were placed in the center of a
S53cm10cm
81cm
� The columns were placed in the center of a
3D restraining frame. This frame hadcolumns HEA200, 3m tall and beamsHEA200, 6m span, steel S355 (Fig. 3).
� The specimens had thermocouples type kin different positions of the cross-section ofthe columns and on the walls (Fig. 1).
� The evolution of temperatures in the
furnace followed the ISO 834 standard fire
S2
S3
S4
294
cm
T5
T6
T3T4
T2T1
Cross Section
81cm
56cm
56cm Fig. 2 – Cases study
Fig. 1 - Position of the thermocouples
� RESULTS
furnace followed the ISO 834 standard firecurve (Fig. 3).
Web parallel to the wall surface:
S13cm
45cm
10cm
In graphs, th_2 stands for the thicker
Fig. 3 - Construction of the test model� The temperature in the flange not
exposed to the fire, is higher in thecase of the walls of smaller
thicknesses (Fig. 4a)).
� In the face of the web exposed to thefire, the temperatures are slightly
higher for the thin than for the thickwalls (Fig. 4b)).
walls, and th_1 for thinner walls
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Tem
pera
ture
(ºC
)
T3_exp_th_2
T3_STC_th_2
T3_exp_th_1
T3_STC_th_1
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Tem
pera
ture
(ºC
)
T6_exp_th_2
T6_STC_th_2
T6_exp_th_1
T6_STC_th_1
walls (Fig. 4b)).
Web perpendicular to the wall surface:
� The temperature in the exposed
flange is higher in the case of the thinthan in the thick walls (Fig. 5a)).
� In some cases a higher temperature
in the unexposed flange was
a) b)
Fig. 4 - HEA 200 with the web parallel to the wall (cases 3 and 7); thermocouple a) T6 ; b) T3
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time (minutes)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time (minutes)
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Tem
pera
ture
(ºC
)
T5_exp_th_2
T5_STC_th_2
T5_exp_th_1
T5_STC_th_1 300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Tem
pera
ture
(ºC
)
T6_exp_th_2
T6_STC_th_2
T6_exp_th_1
T6_STC_th_1
� CONCLUSIONS
� For cases with the web parallel to the wall surface it was concluded that the thicker wall plays an important role in reducing the
temperatures in the unexposed half of the flange and also in the web.
in the unexposed flange wasobserved with the thicker wall.
a) b)
Fig. 5 - HEA 200 - web perpendicular to the wall (cases 4 and 8); thermocouples a) T5 ; b) T6
0
100
200
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Tem
pera
ture
(ºC
)
Time (minutes)
0
100
200
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Tem
pera
ture
(ºC
)
Time (minutes)
� For cases with the web perpendicular to the wall surface it was observed, in the unexposed face of the flange, higher temperatureswith the thicker wall. On the contrary on the exposed flange the temperatures are much higher with thin walls.
CIEC – Center for Research in Civil Engineering
Research Group on Fire Safety EngineeringDepartamento de Engenharia Civil da Faculdade de
Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade de CoimbraRua Luís Reis Santos. 3030-788 Coimbra. PORTUGAL.
Telef: +351 239 797100. Fax: +351 239 797123.
Sponsors:
Escola Politécnica da Universidade de S. Paulo,
Departamento de Engenharia de Estruturas e Geotécnica, BRASIL.