Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
S
International Economic Policy 2014-15
Prof. PIERLUIGI [email protected]
Trade Liberalisation and
Global Governance
Ta
riffs …
Fonte: N
enci, 2011
T M
ED
IA M
OND
IALE
0 5 10 15 20 25
1870
1874
1878
1882
1886
1890
1894
1898
1902
1906
1910
1914
1918
1922
1926
1930
1934
1938
1942
1946
1950
1954
1958
1962
1966
1970
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
Trade & Tariffs
Source: Nenci (2011) adapted from Maddison (1989), Mitchell (1992) and Coatsworth and Williamson (2002)
EVOLUTION OF MULTILATERAL
TRADE NEGOTIATIONS
• Rounds involve more and more Members
> 23 in 1947 Geneva Round; 160 in Doha Round
• Negotiations have encompassed more issues
> tariffs only in early Rounds; multiple border and nonborder
issues in later Rounds
• Negotiations have become more protracted
> months in early Rounds; many years in later Rounds
• Developing Countries have become more active
> no involvement in early Rounds; agenda setting now
Nenci, S.
Post-1995 Ministerials
� Singapore 1996 (Singapore issues, plan of action for LDCs, ITA)
� Geneva 1998 (electronic commerce, implementation)
� Seattle 1999 (battle of Seattle)
� Doha 2001 (launch of Doha Round)
� Cancún 2003 (failed mid-term review)
� Hong Kong, China 2005 (wait and see)
� Geneve (2009) and Geneve (2011) (no results)
� Bali (2013) (adoption of the Bali Package)
Nenci, S.
DDA: Topics for Negotiations
� Agriculture
� Non-agricultural market access (NAMA)
� Services
� System of notification and registration of GIs for wines and spirits under TRIPS
� WTO Rules
� Dispute Settlement Understanding
� Trade and environment
� S&DT
Nenci, S.
Benefits of WTO membership
� Support for strengthening policies and institutions associated with international trade;
� Greater stability in commercial policy;
� Better and more secure market access to major export markets;
� Access to WTO’s dispute settlement mechanism.
Nenci, S.
GATT, WTO AND
DEVELOPING COUNTRIESS&DT - ‘Special and Differential Treatment’
�Right to Protect
permits developing countries to retain higher levels of protection than
would otherwise be the case
�Right to Access
offers exports from developing countries access to OECD markets on a
preferential basis
�Right to Slower Adjustment
provides longer period for adoption of new disciplines and measures
Nenci, S.
Multilateral vs RTAs
• A key exception to the MFN in the GATT/WTO is for customs unions (CUs) and free trade areas (FTAs). Two reasons:
• 1. such agreements can contribute to the growth of world trade.
• 2. regional trade liberalization can serve as a building block to further liberalization at the multilateral level
• Whereas regional trade agreements (RTAs) operate among a
smaller group of countries, often in the same region
• Regional trade agreements are also known as “preferential
trade agreements (PTAs),” because they give preferential
treatment (i.e., free trade) to the countries included within
the agreement, but maintain tariffs against outside countries.
Nenci, S.
PTA and WTO
� Under the WTO, such discriminatory trade policies are
generally not allowed:
• Each country in the WTO promises that all countries will pay tariffs no
higher than the nation that pays the lowest: called the “most favored
nation” (MFN) principle.
BUT:
Article XXIV: allows members to form an RIA provided they:
1. eliminate within-union trade barriers on “substantially” all trade
2. do not raise trade barriers on goods produced outside the union
Nenci, S.
During the last decades there has been a rapid growth in the number of regional
trade agreements. As of 15 January 2012, some 511 RTAs had been notified to
the GATT/WTO, 319 were in force
Regional economic integration
RIAs notified to the WTO
Source: WTO 2014
The ‘Mother of all Spaghetti Bowls’: The
Cobden-Chevalier Network in 1875
Source: Lampe (2011)Note: Lines represent unconditional MFN-PTAs signed between 1857 and 1875
Effects of trade agreements
� The welfare gains and losses that arise from regional
trade agreements are more complex than those that
arise from multilateral trade agreements
� 2 main effects:
• Trade creation: occurs when high-cost domestic
production is replaced by low-cost imports from
other members.
• Trade diversion: occurs when low-cost imports from
nonmembers are diverted to high-cost imports from
member nations.
Nenci, S.
Diversity of RTAs
� Vary by type: Regional, North-South, South-South, mega-regionals
� Vary in the breadth and depth – difficult to generalize
� But usually RTAs go far deeper than the multilateral talks, covering issues like investment, labor mobility, competition and state-owned enterprises
� The share of global trade that takes place within regions, especially the EU, could decline in the future. On the other hand, deeper integration in Asia would expand its share of intra-regional trade (WTO, 2014)
Nenci, S.
Examples of Regional Trade Agreements -1
Among the best known are:
- The European Union,
- The European Free Trade Association (EFTA): set up for the
promotion of free trade and economic integration to the benefit of Iceland,
Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland.
- The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA): to remove most
barriers to trade and investment among the United States, Canada, and
Mexico.
- The Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR): economic and political
agreement among Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay to promote
free trade and the fluid movement of goods, people, and currency
among its members.
Nenci, S.
Examples of Regional Trade Agreements -1
-The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Free Trade
Area: Its aims include the acceleration of economic growth, social
progress, cultural development, the protection of regional peace and
stability among its members (Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines,
Singapore , Thailand ,Brunei, Burma (Myanmar), Cambodia, Laos, and
Vietnam)
- The Common Market of Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA):
free trade area to promote regional economic integration through trade
and investment among 19 African countries (Burundi, Comoros, Congo,
Dem Rep.Djibouti, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Libya, Madagascar,
Malawi, Mauritius, Rwanda, Seychelles, Sudan, Swaziland, Uganda,
Zambia, Zimbabwe)
Nenci, S.
Eurasian Economic Union
� The Eurasian Economic Union (EEU), also known as
the Eurasian Union (EAU) is a political and economic
union which was established on 29 May 2014 between
the leaders of Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Russia. The EEU
is said to be a continuation of the Eurasian Economic
Community customs union between the three states.
� A treaty to enlarge the EEU to Armenia was signed on
October 9, 2014.
� The Union will officially go into effect on 1 January
2015 assuming the treaty has been ratified by the
parliaments of the three countries..
Member States:
Signatory states to the
founding treaty[
Armenia
Belarus
Kazakhstan
Russia
Potential future members
Tajikistan
Kyrgyzstan
Nenci, S.
Eurasian Economic Union -2
Aim:
� Create a single economic market of 171 million
people and a gross domestic product of 3 trillion U.S. dollars.
� The core objective is the development of a single market and
achieving the "four freedoms“: free movements of goods,
capital, services and people within the single market.
• The free movement of people means that citizens can move
freely between member states to live, work, study or retire in
another country.
� Member states will have a common external tariff on all goods
entering the market.
� The objectives of the union also include joint coordination in
the area of energy, industry, agriculture and transport.
Nenci, S.
Mega-regionals
� The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
TTIP(EU+US), the Trans-Pacific Partnership TPP (Trans-Pacific)
and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership RCEP
(ASEAN+) represent over three quarters of global GDP and
two thirds of world trade (Ash & Lejarraga, 2014)
� There is also the Canada-European Union: Comprehensive
Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA)
� TTIP alone would cover half of world trade
� TTIP would produce a strong increase of trade between the
EU and the US.
� Largest gains are from NTB removal.
� Trade diverting effects are mainly observed for Brazil and
China and negative welfare effects for LDCs (Brockmeier & al,
2014) Nenci, S.
Mega-regionals -2
� The sheer size of the mega-regions means that there
would be effects on third parties
� The outcomes of the mega-regionals for rules on
trade and investment, trade-related standards and
regulation would likely drive the international rules
and standards
Nenci, S.
• The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) is a
trade agreement that is presently being negotiated between the
European Union and the United States.
• It aims at removing trade barriers in a wide range of economic
sectors to make it easier to buy and sell goods and services between
the EU and the US.
• On top of cutting tariffs across all sectors, the EU and the US want to
tackle barriers behind the customs border (non tariff barriers) such
as differences in technical regulations, standards and approval
procedures (es. now when a car is approved as safe in the EU, it has
to undergo a new approval procedure in the US even though the
safety standards are similar).
• The TTIP negotiations will also look at opening both markets for
services, investment, and public procurement. They could also
shape global rules on trade.
The Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)
Nenci, S.
TTIP � Free Trade Area (FTA)
• Zero tariffs on all goods and services trade between EU
and US
• No change in tariffs on imports from outside; thus mostly
unequal tariffs
27
� Areas that TTIP is set to cover…
• market access for agricultural and industrial goods,
• government procurement,
• investment,
• energy and raw materials,
• regulatory issues,
• sanitary and phytosanitary measures,
• services,
Most important for EU & US
Nenci, S.
TTIP 2
� TTIP is designed to drive growth and create
jobs.
� Independent research shows that TTIP could
boost:
• the EU's economy by €120 billion;
• the US economy by €90 billion;
• the rest of the world by €100 billion
Talks started in July 2013.
Nenci, S.
Trade Effects of TTIP
� The main (expected) effects:
• Trade creation: Import from partner what was previously
produced at home
– Beneficial to partner, which exports
– Beneficial to importing country as a whole
– But harmful to import-competing industry in importing
country
• Trade diversion: Import from partner what was previously
imported from 3rd country
– Harmful to outside country
– Harmful to importing country as whole, as it pays more
for imports
– Beneficial to the partner exporting countryNenci, S.
The Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP)
• The TPP is a proposed regional free-trade agreement.
• The TPP partners now include 12 countries throughout the
Asia-Pacific region that participate in
negotiations: Australia, Brunei
Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New
Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the United States, and Vietnam.
• The proposed agreement began in 2005. Participating
countries set the goal of wrapping up negotiations in 2012,
but contentious issues such as agriculture, intellectual
property, and services and investments have caused
negotiations to continue into the present.
Nenci, S.
TPP: current & potential members
Currently in negotiations
Announced interest in joining
Potential future members Nenci, S.
Relation to Multilateralism
(are RIAs desirable ?)
Contrasting stances among economists:
1. Regionalism is an alternative to multilateralism (a
stumbling bloc) Bhagwati (1998)
2. Regionalism is a useful supplements to multilateralism (a
building bloc) Ethier (1998) e Baldwin (1999).
“Classical” answer:
• “It all depends”. Different degrees of preferences, depth of
integration, country coverage , country size etc.
Nenci, S.