1

INTRO

Good evening, I am your host Karen Hudes. This show is a weekly Series called the Network of Global Corporate Control that has been coming to you from DCTV for over two years. Today’s segment is called “People stay calm”. Thanks to DCTV, Carmen Stanley, Studio Producer; Maurice Jackson, Audio and Prompter; and Krushae Starnes, Floor Director.

That was what I tweeted. The rest of the Tweet said, "The insolvent Banking Cartel wants to provoke you during the Global Currency Reset."

https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter10.1.17.pdf

Dear Wolfgang,

I see that the 2%ers are communicating to me through you. These 2%ers are still very confused

about the power transition model, which is 95% accurate, and shows that coalitions have

formed for the rule of law, and that these 2%ers are subject to the rule of law.

http://philosophyofmetrics.com/2014/02/18/sdrs-and-the-new-bretton-woods-part-

six/comment-page-1/#comment-584

* * *

Jason Erb removed this link to the Power Transition Model developed by the National War

College. For other links to the Power Transition model, see:

https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/sentia+model.pdf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7zivANqb74 abdollahian

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4P8DA23G9c kugler

For my exposé of Jason Erb, see:

https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Karen+Takes+on+Josh+and+Jason.pdf

* * *

2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsCEsY05aqE

Karen Hudes

1 second ago

"I don't care what you say about me, as long as you say something about me, and as long as you

spell my name right."

Whatever motivated Josh Tolley to give Jason Erb airtime so that he could attribute positions to

me that I do not hold? I am not talking about the gold standard -- I am talking about minting

gold currency -- coins, leaf and aurum -- http://www.peakprosperity.com/podcast/84359/new-

way-hold-gold from the gold in the Global Debt Facility. The countries can apply to the Global

Debt Facility for more gold as their economies grow, and after 20% of their currency is in locally

issued currencies, or they can simply back their currency with any asset of value, petroleum,

bananas, you name it. Whatever the market will bear. Because using money to exert control will

end along with the legal tender laws.

Jason has been using his podium to attack me because the World Bank bureaucracy is still

intimidated by the Banking Cartel. When I was inside the World Bank, I tried to derail the goon

squad known as the Institutional Integrity Department, that fires all the whistleblowers, and tried

to implement human resources reform under the Strategic Compact with the Board of Executive

Directors, which was promptly rolled back instead of monitored as I proposed. Here is where

that little power struggle now stands: https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter7.11.14.pdf

The Banking Cartel is now hanging on by a thread. It is trying desperately to buy up the Fed

gold bullion certificates held by the Global Debt Facility that render it insolvent, taking

compounded interest into account:

https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Fed+Gold+Bullion+Certificates.pdf Why aren't Jason and

Josh dealing with that issue?

3

Here is a recent Q & A on where the "global reset" now stands:

https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Q+%26+A+on+Reset.pdf

For more information about CT Corporation, see:

https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter4.20.17.pdf

* * *

The Dutch East Indies Company Karen Hudes Thu, Apr 20, 2017 2:56PM Dear Hans, Thank you for forwarding me this video. https://vimeo.com/53076018 Academia does not do a good job explaining our history, and leaves more questions than it answers. The alternative media, like this website about the East India Company http://assassinscreed.wikia.com/wiki/East_India_Company tries to hide reality as well. This site at least shows that the Dutch East Indies Company and the Dutch empire may have had something to do with the current reality. Our world has many hidden aspects. So the thing about Holland is that is where the first corporation - the East India Company - started. And you can see from this tweet in October 2016 that a Dutch company, Wolters Kluwer, is the agent for most of the companies in the world. "This information was forwarded from a friend and I did some checking . . . Holy Cow! These are some very bad guys. This is huge. The top of the heap. Listed as CT CORPORATION SYSTEM on Idaho Secy of State - 1936. http://www.accessidaho.org/public/sos/corp/C19444.html Their registered agent is the CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY which is the registered agent for just about every corporation in the country and the world. CT CORP SYS is also a registered agent. Says they're a a foreign (to Idaho) corporation, a Delaware CORP, but Delaware Secy of State's business entity database is closed until tomorrow. Actually, they are one and the same! The largest in the world!AGENT INFORMATION The Corporation Trust Company Corporation Trust Center 1209 Orange Street Wilmington, DE 19801 New Castle County (also known as CT Corporation System) http://corp.delaware.gov/agents/a9000010.shtml More: *CT*, or the *Corporation Trust Company*, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wolters Kluwer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolters_Kluwer , a multi-national information services company based inthe Netherlands http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Netherlands with operations in over 35 countries. CT is the umbrella brand for two businesses: CT Corporation and CT Lien Solutions. CT Corporation is the largest registered agent service firm in the world

https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Dutch+East+India+Company.pdf They want to control all of the property in the world https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Dutch+East+India+Company.pdf

4

5

* * *

Your legal analysis has ignored the 98%ers, the people who are the beneficiaries of the assets in

the Global Debt Facility, TVM-LSM-666. The 2%ers cannot amend a document without the

assent of the 188 Ministers of Finance who represent the beneficiaries. The 2%ers left out the

lawyer of the Bretton Woods institutions. The 2%ers had no authority to change what Jose

Rizal put into place with the Bilateral Minesfield Breakthrough Successor Agreement. Read

paragraph 6

https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/BILATERAL.pdf

* * *

Must be authenticated by the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF

Listen to this interview after 23:23. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEDZYJzvZvk The

2%ers should have all stepped down then. [YouTube has removed the interview. YouTube is

owned by Google, and Google was created by the CIA

https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/googlecia.pdf ] The death and destruction since May 21,

2013 is something they are going to have to answer for. I called the Secret Service on

December 4, 2014, and asked them to guarantee to Barack Obama that he would not be killed

for doing his real job in representing the American people. The Secret Service hung up on me.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/lss.pdf

If the 2%ers and the Secret Service do not want to be torn from limb to limb by the people's

justice, and would prefer the rule of law, now is the time for them to step aside.

Best,

Karen Hudes

Acting General Counsel

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development

Legal Counsel Global Debt Facility, TVM-LSM-666

* * *

https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/lss.pdf

6

April 21, 2013

Ms. Julia Pierson

Director, U.S. Secret Service

245 Murray Drive

Building 410

Washington DC 20223

Dear Ms. Pierson,

The Secret Service is authorized to participate "in the planning, coordination and implementation

of security operations at special events of national significance." Yesterday a Secret Service

Officer, whose name badge had "Shlek" written on it, prevented me from attending the meeting,

and informed me that I would be arrested if I did not leave the secure area. This was illegal.

I am a World Bank lawyer who reported securities laws violations to the US Congress, including

that the World Bank's Board of Executive Directors were being blackmailed when they fired

Paul Wolfowitz for giving an exhorbitant pay raise to his girlfriend. I warned the Secretary of

Defense on August 6, 2008 that the serious governance issues at the World Bank were a security

risk to world order.

Although the US Congress wrote four letters to the World Bank on my behalf, I was fired in

retaliation. The US Congress called for a GAO inquiry into this corruption, but the World Bank

stonewalled. The US Congress is now requiring results that end the effects of retaliation before

the US contribution to the capital increase can be disbursed under § 7082 of the Consolidated

Appropriations Act, 2012 (Pub. L. 112-74).

The Board of Executive Directors reinstated me in 2009, but I was barred access to the World

Bank buildings illegally. The financial statements of an issuer with internal control lapses of this

nature must receive qualified audits. I bought an IBRD bond and sued to bring the IBRD into

compliance. The World Bank's Development Committee settled my lawsuit on December 20,

2012. I have informed the Chair of the Judicial Conference Executive Committee and

Commander Michael Reese of the DC Second District Police that I am entitled to reinstatement

under the law.

Dr. Marek Belka, the Chairman of the Joint Ministerial Committee of the Boards of Governors

of the Bank and the Fund on the Transfer of Real Resources to Developing Countries, authorized

the issuance to me of the attached badge for the Spring Meetings of the World Bank Group and

International Monetary Fund, which are ongoing.

Ms. Julia Pierson -2- April 21, 2013

7

It would be unfortunate if the U.S. Secret Service again prevents me from attending the rest of

the World Bank meetings when I am legally authorized to do so. I attempted to explain to your

duty officer why that would present a reputational risk for the U.S. Secret Service, and referred

to the economic power documented in ttp://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1107/1107.5728v2.pdf

Your duty officer responded by questioning my sanity. This is highly inappropriate. The Secret

Service and Department of Homeland Security need to improve training for duty officers in this

regard.

Sincerely,

Karen Hudes

Enclosures

Security Badge for Spring Meetings

fax of April 18, 2013 to the Chair of the Judicial Conference Executive Committee

8

email of August 7, 2008 to Chris Armstrong

4/18/2013 12:00:50 PM

To: The Honorable Chief Judge William B. Traxler, Jr.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Chair, Judicial Conference Executive Committee From: Karen Hudes

Fax No: 804-916-2188

No. of pages: 21

Re: Reform of the Federal Judiciary

Dear Judge Traxler,

The Ministers of Finance of 188 members of the Bretton Woods organizations are meeting

tomorrow. Their first order of business is to consider clerical error in the Federal courts on a

matter involving the integrity of the international financial system, and licensing of the legal and

the accountancy professions. (January 19, 2013 letter to the Judicial Conference refers

See http://kahudes.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/ljudicialconference1.pdf )

The chief justices of the state supreme courts are all familiar with this matter, as are the

attorneys general and governors. The public remains largely ignorant, due to abuse of the

economic power identified in http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1107/1107.5728v2.pdf

After my testimony in UK and EU Parliaments, an accurate stakeholder analysis is

predicting that this matter will resolve in favor of the rule of law rather than a currency war. As I

discussed today with your Chief Circuit mediator, Mr. Thomas F. Ball III, confidence of US

citizens in their judiciary will be enhanced if the Judicial Conference acts at this time.

Sincerely,

Karen Hudes

9

Thu, Aug 7, 2008 10:24 am kahudes (kahudes@aol.com)To:Chris_Armstrong Details

Dear Chris,

I really appreciate your getting back to me. I told a friend in

the World Bank's human resources department about the need to reinstate

me at the World Bank before the Appeals Committee finishes botching my

case, and she gave me the name of the person to contact. Can we meet

soon?

Here are the developments:

I met yesterday with Chad Kreikemeier, Senator Hagel's Foreign

Policy Legislative Assistant. Chad asked me many good questions about

the evidence to support my statements that the US has been acting like

a hegemon at the World Bank and that the Europeans want to end the

Gentleman's Agreement as a result.

I also stopped by to talk to Sherman Patrick at the Committee on

Foreign Affairs, and I informed him verbally about the conflicts of

interest in the latest mistake to separate out the function of

Secretary General of ICSID from the General Counsel function at the

World Bank. Tampering with the General Counsel function, and

appointing Russell Reynolds, the Executive Search firm that advised the

World Bank about the Sarbanes Oxley governance problems at the Bank

when I was a candidate for General Counsel, to fill the ICSID Secretary

General function is a frontal assault on rule of law at the World Bank.

The World Bank's Committee on Governance and Administrative

Matters is required to be consulted whenever the General Counsel

function is revised. This was not done.

Playing cat and mouse with these serious governance issues at the

World Bank is also a security risk to the world order, as I informed

Chuck Hagel when he autographed his book, "America Our Next Chapter,"

for me. When you get a chance for serious bedtime reading, in addition

to Senator Hagel's book, take a look at "The War Presidency". This is

by the group which predicted four years ago that the Gentleman's

Agreement would end if the US did not stop its hegemony at the World

Bank.

http://www.allacademic.com//meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/7/4/2/7/pages74272/p74272-

1.php

10

Best, Karen

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Wolfgang Struck wrote:

Dear Karen,

Further to our discussion this for your information: In September 1976 Ferdinand

Marcos and the President of the United States of America signed two documents that

changed the world without changing the world because the documents were held in

secrecy by the powers that be. What does it say there in the SOVEREIGN

AGREEMENT between the President of the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos, as the First

Party and the President of the United States of America, Gerald Ford, as the Second

Party date September 10, 1976? It says:

1. The First Party paid 10,000MT of gold worth $20 Billion and bought the Philippines

from the United States of America.

2. Both parties agree that the First Party or his designated successor King Anthony

Santiago Martin shall administer and rule the Philippines and its people freely and

without foreign interference unless there is reported inhuman activities and other

infringements against the majority of the People of the Philippine Islands.

3. The United States of America guarantees sovereignty to the Philippines to the First

Party before the world and to the world (4.).

In the other attached document CERTIFICATE OF GLOBAL IMMUNITY signed a few

days later on October 4, 1976, Gerald Ford for the United States of America and Queen

Elizabeth for the Committee of the 300, the secret world leaders, signed a document

that guarantees that Marcos as code name TVM-LSM-666 is fully recognized and

protected as the owner of all precious commodities buried and/or found in the

Philippines from buried treasure including gold, platinum, diamonds and historical

assets of unlimited value.

Tell me where I am wrong,

Wolfgang

https://twitter.com/KarenHudes/status/914488046552326146

11

Replying to @blondenfun1 @CharliePoet and

Marcos stood up to Rockefeller, Trilateral Commission:

https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/dctvteleprompt12.8.b.pdf https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YrbzPvr3mM

https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter12.7.15.pdf

https://ia601500.us.archive.org/9/items/Twitter9.29.17_201709/Twitter9.29.17.pdf

Sunday, October 1, 2017

This is to answer the question on everyone's lips as I spend the next several hours

preparing the teleprompters for DCTV's upcoming two segments, the live one on

10/3/17 and the following week's prerecorded segment on 10/10/17.

Rodney Poe8 hours ago

Thank you, Karen, for all of your tireless efforts. This may be a premature question but

have you any projected time frame when we will be getting real money instead of the

federal reserve notes?

Karen Hudes1 second ago

12

Rodney, we are all in this together, and so much depends on how we interact with each

other. The Banking Cartel has only paper currencies backing them, and is hanging on

through their lies. A critical mass knows this. Will we accept José Rizal's Gift of Love,

or will we all perish? The big point is that the likelihood the Coalition for the Rule of

Law implements the Global Currency Reset is over 90%. You can guess when this will

happen along with the rest of us. Stay tuned.

December 18, 2016

We, the coalition for the rule of law that is in charge of the Global Currency Reset, are in

the middle of a currency war. We are the ones in charge. We are refusing to accept the

will of the insolvent Banking Cartel. Yesterday, Venezuela's President Nicolas Maduro

suspended eliminating the country's largest denomination bill, which had sparked cash

shortages, chaos and nationwide protests, saying the measure would be postponed until

early January. http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141642983

Today I advised the good people of Venezuela that we are in a peaceful Global Currency

Reset:

https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter12.18.16.3.pdf

http://in.reuters.com/article/us-venezuela-economy-

idINKBN1470T9?utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_content=5856f2

f604d301071c06bf35&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter

13

I also referred to India's war on cash:

http://in.reuters.com/article/india-modi-corruption-demonetisation-

idINKBN14A1C5?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter

1

https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/dctvteleprompt12.6.16.1.pdf

On November 10, 2016 Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi banned Rs 500

and Rs 1000 banknotes, thereby eliminating 88% of India's outstanding

currency. Zero-hedge called this move a "massive man-made disaster".

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-25/when-money-dies-indias-

demonetization-massive-man-made-disaster India has been called a "cash-

domino-to-fall" http://www.forbes.com/sites/patrickwwatson/2016/12/01/indias-

demonetization-could-be-the-first-cash-domino-to-fall/2/#1c2fb0606506

Digital money simply did not take up the slack. https://hbr.org/2016/12/indias-

botched-war-on-cash The use of gold increased. However, the informal economy

was harmed, along with the "unbanked" population and many businesses.

Nearly half of India's GDP and 80% of its employment is generated by the informal

economy. The country has now had to extend the time for implementing its

"cashless" policy, if indeed this policy is not reversed.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/wadeshepard/2016/12/14/inside-indias-cashless-

revolution/2/#4cdaf2d96058

The Minister of Defense, Manohar Parrikar, used the confusion to escalate the

dispute between Pakistan and India, by military exercises in Benghal. West Bengal's

Chief Minister criticized Manohar Parrikar for the ill-advised exercises.

http://www.ndtv.com/video/news/news/didn-t-expect-it-from-you-

manohar-parrikar-s-stinker-to-mamata-banerjee-on-army-row-441852

2

https://twitter.com/KarenHudes/status/914432706896855040

https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter10.1.17.pdf

3

https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter10.1.17.1.pdf

Subject: Re: THE TRILATERAL OVERTHROW OF MARCOS FOR GOLD Dear Jose Antonio Diaz, Thank you for sending me the link to the story how Marcos stood up to David Rockefeller, George Schultz, and Cardinal Jaime Sin : http://frjoseantoniodiaz.blogspot.com/2015/12/the-trilateral-overthrow-of-marcos-for.html Yes, I already had a part of the puzzle you have so kindly furnished -- a copy of the Trilateral Commission's offer to Marcos, which Marcos refused. https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Trilateral+Commission+(1).pdf The Trilateral Commission and CIA keep on failing in their efforts to steal humanity's gold and other wealth. https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter7.18.15.1.pdf Ferdinand Marcos' legacy to all of humanity is safe with the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF. https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Inventory+D-Tunnel+2.jpg Now it is up to the good people in the United States and the coalition for the rule of law on the Board of Governors of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund to answer Ferdinand Marcos' prayer 13:40-14:40 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sstf3ueOfeU&app=desktop:

"For I know that as I have said in many a speech before my own people and

before the world, fate and destiny have decreed that the United States of

America be the trustee of modern civilization against the threat of a possible

second Dark Ages. And America cannot fail. Therefore, we the Filipino people

come and bring to you a prayer: God in his divine providence may grant you

4

guidance and strengthen both your heart and hand so that hand may be strong

on the lever of power and save our humanity. If America fails, then the world is

lost."

Sincerely, Karen Hudes

Acting General Counsel International Bank for Reconstruction and Development

Legal Counsel, Global Debt Facility, TVM-LSM-666

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Jose Antonio Diaz wrote:

From: Jose Antonio Diaz Subject: THE TRILATERAL OVERTHROW OF MARCOS FOR GOLD Message Body:

Hi Karen, I am a fan of yours. I am a Filipino. I just want to share something interesting to you,

and maybe this can help connect the puzzle. Pls go link:

http://frjoseantoniodiaz.blogspot.com/2015/12/the-trilateral-overthrow-of-marcos-for.html

best,

Jose

5

I have been informing Adam Liptak of the bankruptcy of the Banking Cartel and the

corruption in the world's financial system for a very long time. Adam is a gatekeeper

and is trying to keep the lid on things. The chances he and the other agents of the

Banking Cartel succeed in blocking reality from view? Well, you can see from this tweet

(which is going to the numerous people in my social media) that this is obviously not

working out for the Banking Cartel.

I am attaching an email to the NY Times that I sent on December 21, 2011 following my

phone conversation with Adam. I am also attaching a copy of a Feb 7, 2013 email that I

sent to Adam, asking him when he thought my story was newsworthy.

Here is a letter I sent to the New York Times, also addressed to

the American Society of News Editors and posted on my website

asking why the press is losing the trust of the American People:

http://kahudes.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/press3.pdf

From: Karen Hudes

Date: Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:17 PM

Subject: Fwd: Attention: Emma

To: public@nytimes.com

I spoke to Adam Liptak on the cover-up that the US lost the Gentlemen's

Agreement to nominate the World Bank President because the US broke the

rules at the World Bank; I gave Adam documents on this at the Cato Institute

on December 14, 2011. This email is to a UK whistleblower who used to

work at the International Finance Corporation. Elaine has documented how

UK donor aid to the World Bank is misspent.

-----Original Message----- From: Karen Hudes karenhudes@hotmail.com> To: elaine.colville

6

Cc: eileen.a.murphy <eileen.a.murphy@abc.com>; ppruitt <ppruitt@yahoo-inc.com> Sent: Tue, Dec 20, 2011 9:53 pm Subject: RE: Up-date

Dear Elaine, There was a major breakthrough yesterday. I managed to speak with John Hardy, Jr., who is the President of Coalition for Employment through Exports, Inc. CEE heads a coalition of organizations for the US export community. Before I worked at the World Bank I used to work for the US Export Import Bank. John Hardy and I spoke about all the damaging documents that are now in the public record on my case in the US Court of Appeals. I told John Hardy about how Alan Frumin was involved in Robert Zoellick's contempt of Congress. I then updated James E. McPherson, Executive Director of the National Association of Attorneys General, who confirmed receipt of my update by responding the same day in an email signed "Jim". I also heard from Henrik Hololei, Head of Cabinet in the European Commission, and updated him. I think Hololei contacted me because I told the Europeans that the UK's strange position on European debt rescheduling smacked of the same compromised governance that you had documented in your case. Meanwhile, I have been trying to get the press to take the story, but so far they are refusing to inform the American public. I am copying a couple of the culprits on this reply just to let them know that I am going back to the 187 countries on the World Bank's Board of Governors today and they will have to answer to the American public sooner or later. love, Karen ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Karen Hudes Date: Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:01 PM Subject: Re: Update on World Bank Governance To: dchalian@yahoo-inc.com, vega@yahoo-inc.com, tkelley@yahoo-inc.com I will be calling you during Phil Pruitt's absence from office in the hope of arranging a meeting today. For background I am attaching one more document: an accurate stakeholder analysis which predicted in 2004 that the US would lose the Gentlemen's Agreement to nominate the President of the World Bank if we did not play by the rules. That happened in 2010, although the American people were not told that this happened or why it happened. The same stakeholder analysis (with 95% accuracy) is now predicting a currency war if we don't end the cover-up to the American people.

https://ia601502.us.archive.org/11/items/Twitter9.14.17/Twitter9.14.17.pdf

7

Caganer

From A Caganer (Catalan pronunciation: [kəɣəˈne], Western Catalan: [kaɣaˈne]) is a figurine depicted

in the act of defecation appearing in nativity scenes in Catalonia and neighbouring areas with

Catalan culture such as Andorra, Valencia, and Northern Catalonia (in southern France). It is

most popular and widespread in these areas, but can also be found in other areas of Spain

(Murcia), Portugal, and southern Italy (Naples).

Caganer

The name "El Caganer” literally means "the crapper" or "the shitter". Traditionally, the figurine

is depicted as a peasant, wearing the traditional Catalan red cap (the barretina) and with his

trousers down, showing a bare backside, and defecating

8

Many modern caganers represent celebrities and authority figures. By representing them with their pants down, the caganer serves as a leveling device to bring the mighty down

In 2005, the Barcelona city council provoked a public outcry by commissioning a nativity scene which did

not include a caganer. The local government was reported to have countered these criticisms by

claiming that the Caganer was not included because a civility ordinance[17] had made public defecation

and public urination illegal, meaning that the caganer was now setting a bad example.[18][19] Many saw

this as an attack on Catalan traditions. One writer of a letter to the editor asserted, "A nativity scene

without a caganer is not a nativity scene."[20] A second writer offered a win-win solution. He suggested

including the caganer but also placing a figure of a police officer with a pen and clipboard next to him,

writing a ticket for the infraction. The writer said this would achieve three objectives: respect tradition,

comply with the ordinance and educate the public about how it is being reinforced, and finally,

demonstrate how important it is to respect the law.[21] Finally, the head of Parks and Gardens publicly

denied prohibiting the caganer in the first place, saying that it was the artistic decision of the artist

commissioned by the city to design and install the pessebre.[22] Following a campaign against the

caganer's absence called Salvem el caganer (Save the caganer), and widespread media criticism, the

2006 nativity restored the caganer, who appeared on the northern side of the nativity near a dry

riverbed.

From: Liesje Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 2:34 PM To: Karen Hudes

9

Subject: IMF Plans For Cashless Society Disclosed | TABU; Towards A Better Understanding

This is the link to the IMF paper: https://tabublog.com/2017/04/14/imf-plans-for-cashless-society-disclosed/

Hi Karen,

What faction within the IMF is releasing/leaking these statements -behind the Board of

Governor's back?

When you vote for the US shares, how do they think they can pull this off?

Taken into consideration the scale of corruption and blackmail, isn't it very likely that a

substantial part of the Board is -at least- guilty by association? Or because of the tons of

butter they might have on their own heads?

What would be the mathematical probability for thát scenario?

As always, much love and a peaceful Pesach.

Liesje

[I answered Liesje's question in the previous segment on the Annual Meetings of the

World Bank and IMF]

OUTTRO

As the Overseer Mandate Trustee for the world's wealth and the world's people, I am

telling everyone that we are ending the corruption in the world's money in a Global

Currency Reset. As fake money and fake governments are exposed, people must remain

calm so that we can exchange the paper for real money peacefully. Until next week, I am

your host, Karen Hudes.

10

Ferdinand E. Marcos - Genius of all Time

Sunday, December 6, 2015

THE TRILATERAL OVERTHROW OF MARCOS FOR GOLD

This post is from Facebook I just want to share the information.

THE TRILATERAL OVERTHROW OF MARCOS FOR GOLD

The following Q & A are extracted from “The Marcos Legacy Revisted – Raiders of the Lost Gold, by Erick

A. San Juan, published in 1998 in Makati City, Philippines.

This Q & A is with Erick A. San Juan a prominent civic leader, political activist (anti-Communist advocate),

author, journalist & weekly contributor to newspapers & Philippine radio.

Q. From your direct knowledge, what events or conversations with certain personalities indicated foreign

complicity in the EDSA Revolution and its connection to the Marcos gold? Who were the gainers and

why?

A. During the latter stages of the Marcos regime, I came to be friends with James Brandon Foley* [Note: I

am constrained to break my pledge to preserve the anonymity of my sources because without any

attribution to an authoritative source, this revelation will be nothing but hearsay. My apologies. I sincerely

hope he will understand, given the situation I am in and the position I have taken.] a political officer

(another term for CIA agents at that time) of the U.S. Embassy. We used to go out and date several

women, sometimes to discos, and the like. Our favorite hang-out was the Hyatt Regency. In between

socials, Jim and I would engage in frequent brain-storming at his private apartment at the Seafront. On

one particular night, he disclosed to me that there was a secret operation plan to oust Marcos, and that

men like Jose Concepcion of RFM and the Ayalas were being used as conduits to access the smooth

flow of funds to finally bring an end to the Marcos authoritarian government.

Jim likewise mentioned the involvement of Cardinal Jaime Sin, whose role was to draw a large crowd of

supporters and sympathizers in the event that a blocking force was needed. Sin is an expert in the

Antonio Gramsci-type of Marxism. This was confirmed by Dr. John Coleman in his expose ‘The Violation

of the Christian Church,’ where he stated that Sin’s Radio Veritas ’speaks out Communist propaganda in

13 languages all throughout Asia,’ using Liberation Theology to destroy the moral fiber of the large

number of Catholics. Sin believes in the Marxist principle that ‘Religion is the opium of the masses.’ He

exploited this tactic to the hilt and succeeded in what is now called ‘people power’ mass action. As

acknowledged by Coleman, ‘Cardinal Sin of the Philippines worked diligently to overthrow the

government of President Marcos. He was ably assisted by a former executive of the World Council of

Churches, Jovito Salonga. Salonga was brought back to the Philippines under escort of the U.S. State

Department.’ (CDC Report, October 1988)

In Coleman’s estimation, Salonga was to take Mrs. Aquino and this Protestant ‘will cut a deal with the

Marxist New People’s Army (NPA).’ Although this did not materialize because of Salonga’s poor health,

Coleman was still partly correct. Another fellow Protestant filled in his shoes (Fidel V. Ramos) and has

quite successfully negotiated peace with the Communists!

Q. What events preceding Marcos’ announcement of the snap election proved that he was under

11

American pressure? Why do you think he acceded to the ‘request?’

A. Everything really hinged on the Marcos gold bars. The Trilateral Commission, through its chairman

David Rockefeller, and member George Schultz, were convinced that they had been conned by President

Marcos. This being so, the Trilateralists did everything to pressure him, to destabilize his one-man rule,

cut his source of funding, and even blackmail him (the Dovie Beams affair). A part of the globalists’

notorious activities were documented by David Smith of the U.S. based Newswatch magazine, in August

1987: ‘Representatives from Indonesia and the Philippines went to Jonathan May (ex-World Bank head)

and stated that agents from the Chase Manhattan Bank and other banks said they would ‘forgive’ the

loans and interests if the following were met:

(1) Eliminate their National Currency;

(2) Dollar-denominate their new money system;

(3) Use a debit card system instead of a currency system;

(4) Give the bankers perpetual rights over all natural resources.

Ferdinand Marcos of the Philippines refused to accept and was deposed very shortly thereafter.’

Marcos eventually gave in to the globalists’ proposal for a snap election, using veteran ‘ambush interview’

expert Ted Koppel of CBS. Clever as he was, Marcos did not reveal to the Americans that prior to his

interview with Koppel, he had already conducted a secret survey of the electorate. Despite the adverse

media hype launched against him, Marcos was confident of a re-election.

However, Jim Foley (who was later transferred to Algiers), disclosed that the real agenda was not the

snap election; rather, it was to persuade Marcos to sign a document attesting to the fact that his gold bars

and other precious metals deposited at Fort Knox and other depositories of the world would be under the

guardianship of the Trilateral Commission, and a certain percentage would be given to the Philippine

Government in the form of an investment loan from the World Bank.

The document was subsequently hand-carried by. U.S. Ambassador-at-Large Phillip Habib, which

Marcos refused to sign. The Filipino head of state felt that the war loot (which was remolded into gold

bars bearing the Central Bank seal) must be given to the Filipino people.

Q. How was the American’s influence exerted during the snap election? Was there American involvement

in the walkout of the computer workers?

A. First, there was the barrage of disinformation launched by Newsweek, Time and other publications

regarding the illicit love affairs of both Marcos and the First Lady (e.g., George Hamilton), the incurable

ailment of the President, and the public confidence in Namfrel and distrust in the Comelec. Then came

the walk-out of the computer workers at the PICC. These were all part of the U.S. scenario during the

snap election.

Most of the computer workers were promised visas and immigrant status to the U.S. Some of them, I

understand, took advantage of this rare opportunity.

Q. Did any of your contacts know about the outbreak of the mutiny at EDSA?

A. Both Jim Foley and Norbert Garrett, CIA Station Chief, U.S Embassy, predicted a bloody confrontation

in the event that Marcos stubbornly decided to stay in Malacanang. The Presidents only saving grace was

12

the signing of the document brought by Habib.

Q. Who were pressuring Marcos to give in and leave? Is there any, credible evidence that this happened?

A. The pressures came from both U.S. and Philippine sources. On the American side, there was Philip

Habib. He was joined by U.S. Ambassador to the Philippines, Stephen Bosworth, Richard Armitage,

Michael Armacost, Rep. Stephen Solarz, Norbert Garrett (CIA Station Chief in Manila), and Joseph

Mussomelli (Anti-Fraud Section, U.S. Embassy). Senator Paul Laxalt as you probably know, was the guy

who spoke to Marcos on the phone and told him to ‘cut and cut cleanly.’ Lines to Washington were kept

busy by calls coming in from Lawrence Eagleburger and Henry Kissinger. Later on, I was told that

operating funds came in from Maurice ‘Hank’ Greenberg, through dollar grants from the C.V. Starr

Foundation of New York. Greenberg is a powerful member of the B’nai B’rith. Others like Higdon,

Brzezinski and Generals Pike and Allen of JUSMAG also formed part of the American initiative to oust

Marcos.

On the Philippine side were assets like Joe Concepcion, Jobo Fernandez, Cesar Zalamea, Jaime Ongpin,

and Alex Melchor. Journalists, likewise, were used for their media hype.

Q. Could you elaborate more on Habib’s role in the events that followed?

A. As I have earlier stated, Habib was sent by the Trilateralists to the Philippines to pressure Marcos into

signing the document prepared in the U.S. It contained provisions of equal sharing of the gold bars

among different countries (through their banker’s in the Commission), transshipped by Marcos to Fort

Knox and other depositories under a top secret operation plan coded ‘Tuna Highway.’ Initially, Marcos

was supported by the Commission to implement martial law in l972, and was even provided with a martial

plan. Along with it came a minting plant, installed at the Central Bank premises by Thomas de la Rue Ltd.

of London, and a smelting plant with which to convert the war booty into new gold bars. The plan was

executed by trusted generals of Marcos who diverted some portions of the shipment to other destinations

aside from Fort Knox. This was covered by a prescription period (November 1945 to November 1985) in

accordance with international law. After this 40-year period, it was to be declared ‘finders keepers.’ Some

countries who felt conned by these agreements pursued their claim at the International Court of Justice,

to mature in 2005.

Had Marcos chosen to sign the document, he would have remained President for life. In the process, he

would have received the distinction of being ‘the best President we ever had.’ In addition, the Philippines’

share could have paid our external debt of, at that time, $24 Billion, plus a comprehensive Marshall Plan

for industrialization. (To date, our external debt has zoomed up to $47 Billion, according to the latest BSFI

figures.) Instead, he chose the hard way, and very badly miscalculated. He wanted to regroup his forces

in the North, but was flown to Hawaii instead.

Part 2:

Q. Were there contacts between the Military camps and the embassy and/or Washington during the four

days at EDSA?

A. Definitely. It has always been standard operating procedure for our military officials to ‘keep the line

open’ between them and the defense attaches of the U.S. Embassy. Most of out top ranking officers have

been nurtured in U.S. military schools. Some were even granted immigrant status in the U.S. while

serving the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP). Their families were granted entry to the exclusive

13

clubs of the American government such as JUSMAG, Seafront, Clark Air Base, Subic Base, Camp John

Hay, etc. There they could avail of clubhouse facilities, golf courses and other amenities.

After EDSA, most of the renegade Marcos generals migrated to the U.S. These are the ones who never

resisted the Aquino-Ramos-Enrile-Sin forces.

Q. Why didn’t Marcos move during the first hours of the mutiny when there were very few people around

the camps?

A. Marcos was sternly warned not to harm the people at EDSA, Otherwise, Malacanang would be

targeted by the U.S. military sources. Thus, Marcos took the backseat and relied on the group of then

Col. Rolando Abadilla to finish the job for him. You see, Abadilla’s elite force from the MISG (Military

Intelligence and Security Group), together with a SWAT team, successfully penetrated Camp Crame,

disguised as Ramos supporters. As soon as Marcos was confronted about this by his Chief-of-Staff,

General Fabian Ver, the president simply advised the latter to relax, as Abadilla was in the process of

arresting Defense Secretary Juan Ponce Enrile and his cousin, Fidel Ramos, whom the president

underestimated as a gutless individual. Marcos never imagined that Abadilla would have a change of

heart. Abadilla was the prime suspect as the chief operator of Ninoy’s death at the tarmac.

Q. How do you connect Cardinal Sin with the American plan?

A. Cory Aquino was instructed by Cardinal Sin to seek refuge in a Cebu convent. As the fireworks were

about to start, Cory was to install her revolutionary government in Davao with the assistance of the RAM

forces and her NFIA sympathizers. This alternate plan vas likewise designed by the CIA, with Col.

Voltaire Gazmin given the role of securing Cory in Cebu.

This plan was totally discarded when Marcos peacefully left the Philippines, due to the insistence of

Cardinal Sin, who was backed up all the way by the Vatican and the U.S. State Department. Cory ended

up being the sole titular head.

tambay lang on August 21st, 2009 at 10:06 pm

The Trilateral Commission’s Aborted Deal with FM

The aborted deal of the CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL with the late Pres. Ferdinand Marcos (better

known as the Trilateral Commission) involved an agreement in which the president was promised power

for life and a guarantee of an Investment Loan to be coursed through a Mini-Marshall plan to save the

failing Philippine economy. All these in exchange for his gold bullion.

The original document showing specifically how much gold Marcos kept at Fort Knox was given to me by

an emissary of President Marcos which I handed, in trust, to Reynaldo Fajardo, who was supposed to

write a book on this. This was the very same document brought by Ambassador Philip Habib to Manila in

February 1986 for Marcos’ signature. Marcos, however, didn’t sign the document because THE

CORPORATION wanted the gold bullion for themselves alone and merely offered to give him an

investment loan in exchange. Soon after, through Cardinal Jaime Sin’s call for people support, and armed

with “Plan C,” employing the Marxist principle “Religion is the opium of society.” EDSA People Power

came to the fore. This marked the beginning of Marcos’ downfall.

A photocopy of these records was passed on to me by my friend, Col. Adex Villalon (RES). Had Marcos

known of an impending conflict between the Philippine Government and his family, he could have

14

immediately signed Habib’s document and could have lived happily ever after.

The following is the text of the Trilateral Commission’s communique with the late president Ferdinand

Marcos under the letterhead, THE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL, brought by then U.S. Ambassador

Philip Habib for F.M.’s approval and subsequent signature. The deal turned sour because the

CORPORATION wanted to get everything, simply leaving Marcos a so-called investment loan out of his

total gold hoard. On my visits to Hawaii, Marcos made it clear to me that he did not sign the document

because, in his own words “para akong pinirito sa sarili kong mantika” (I would have been fried in my own

lard). He further added that he had all those years, invested so much of his time, expertise, strategies,

and a lot of guts, just to safeguard all the wealth which he intended to offer his countrymen’s future and

that of our children’s children. This was also the reason why he was forced to leave Malacanang to

regroup in Paoay, Ilocos Norte, but instead, he claimed to have been kidnapped, taken by force and

against his will by the Americans and flown to Hawaii.