21
Inventory Review 2006 Preliminary results Vigdis Vestreng, Met.no/MSC-W/ETC-ACC Elisabeth Rigler, UBA-V, ETC-ACC (new) Martin Adams, AEAT, ETC-ACC TFEIP 12-14 June 2006, Amersfoort, the Netherlands

Inventory Review 2006 Preliminary results

  • Upload
    janus

  • View
    33

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Inventory Review 2006 Preliminary results. Vigdis Vestreng, Met.no/MSC-W/ETC-ACC Elisabeth Rigler, UBA-V, ETC-ACC (new) Martin Adams, AEAT, ETC-ACC TFEIP 12-14 June 2006, Amersfoort, the Netherlands. Stage-2 review. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Inventory Review 2006  Preliminary results

Inventory Review 2006 Preliminary results

Vigdis Vestreng, Met.no/MSC-W/ETC-ACCElisabeth Rigler, UBA-V, ETC-ACC (new)

Martin Adams, AEAT, ETC-ACC

TFEIP 12-14 June 2006, Amersfoort, the Netherlands

Page 2: Inventory Review 2006  Preliminary results

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no

Stage-2 review

“I would like to say, that review results will help for inventory improving for further submissions and for preparing of plan of quality assurance and control regarding emission estimation for UNECE/NEC”

Stage-2 country specific review reports:

Issued 10th May 2006Replied by deadline 10th June: 11 (22%)

Total number last two yrs 37% (18)

Page 3: Inventory Review 2006  Preliminary results

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no

OUTLINE

1. Stage 2 review perspective and connection with Stage 1 and Stage 3

2. Developments/Improvements 3. Preliminary results4. Further streamlining and

improvements

Page 4: Inventory Review 2006  Preliminary results

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no

Data included in review

• Emissions reported under the Convention on LRTAP to the UNECE Secretariat by: March 10th 2006

• Emissions reported under the National Emission Ceilings Directive to the European Commission by: February 28th 2006

• Emission and activity data reported to the UNFCCC by: 08th April 2006

• The LRTAP data was made available to the Parties through a pre-release of WEBDAB.

Page 5: Inventory Review 2006  Preliminary results

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no

Tests included in the review

• Key source analysis• Timeliness• Format• Completeness by pollutant (priority)• Completeness by sector (NE)• Consistency• X-pollutants• Recalculations• Inventory comparison (LRTAP/NEC/UNFCCC)• Trend plots (national totals)• Time series flagging based on log -10 curve fitting• IEFs

Page 6: Inventory Review 2006  Preliminary results

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no

2006 developements• First draft html reports are “serie” produced• Separate testing and reporting of results for LRTAP and NEC

data if the totals are proved to differ by more than 0.1%• Improved key source analysis including percentage

contribution for each sector and both aggregated and detailed sectors

• Introduction of two average reports, one for Eastern Europe and one for Western Europe

• Improved completeness testing with stronger focus on priority compounds, key sources and reporting of Not Estimated

• Improved comparability testing by introduction of more pollutant ratios

• Inclusion of inventory comparisons with UNFCCC data• Inclusion of trend plots• Streamlining and extension of the time series check for

main pollutants to 1980 • Review reports has also been sent from the UNECE

secretariat by ordinary snail mail to ten Parties which we were regarded as needing more support (AM, AZ, BA, GE, HR, KG, KZ, LI, RO, TR)

Page 7: Inventory Review 2006  Preliminary results

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no

Timeliness

Timeliness 2046 Reporting Official submissions - 35 (71%) Parties (left)

Not submitted - 14 Parties (right)Black - Template not used for some or all data

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Th

e R

ussia

n F

ed

era

tion

(De

c)F

ran

ce (D

ec)

Ge

rma

ny (Ja

n)

Irela

nd

(Jan

)R

ep

ub

lic of M

old

ova

(Jan

)B

ulg

aria

(Fe

b)

Slo

vakia

(Fe

b)

Mo

na

co (F

eb

)S

we

de

n (F

eb

)T

FY

R o

f Ma

ced

on

ia (F

eb

)H

un

ga

ry (Fe

b)

Lith

ua

nia

(Fe

b)

Se

rbia

an

d M

on

ten

eg

ro (F

eb

)U

krain

e (F

eb

)A

ustia

(Fe

b)

Be

laru

s (Fe

b)

Ca

na

da

(Fe

b)

Cze

ch R

ep

ub

lic (Fe

b)

De

nm

ark (F

eb

)E

ston

ia (F

eb

)F

inla

nd

(Fe

b)

Gre

ece

(Fe

b)

La

tvia (F

eb

)N

orw

ay (F

eb

)S

love

nia

(Fe

b)

Un

ited

Kin

gd

om

(Fe

b)

Un

ited

Sta

tes o

f Am

erica

(Fe

b)

Po

lan

d (F

eb

)S

witze

rlan

d (F

eb

)N

eth

erla

nd

s (Ma

r)B

elg

ium

(Ma

r)Isla

nd

(Ma

r)P

ortu

ga

l (Ma

r)M

alta

(Ma

y)C

ypru

s (Ma

y)

Arm

en

iaA

zerb

aija

nB

osn

ia a

nd

He

rzeg

ovin

aC

roa

tiaG

eo

rgia

Italy

kaza

khsta

nK

yrgyzsta

nL

ichte

nste

inL

uxe

mb

ou

rgR

om

an

iaS

pa

inT

urke

yE

uro

pe

an

Un

ion

Da

te o

f m

on

th s

ub

mis

sio

n r

ec

eiv

edNum

ber of s

ubmiss

ions incre

ase (u

p 4%, 2

Parties)

Submissions w

ithin deadlin

e incre

ased by 3

Parties

Page 8: Inventory Review 2006  Preliminary results

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no

COMPLETENESS

30% (15) of Parties report complete time series 1990-2004 (PMs 2000-2004) in NFR02 for main pollutants and PMs

Page 9: Inventory Review 2006  Preliminary results

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no

CompletenessSector 1 SOx

0

10

20

30

40

50

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Year

Nu

mb

er

Gap 01

SNAP 01

NFR1 01

NFR2 01

Sector 7 NOx

0

10

20

30

40

50

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Year

Nu

mb

er

Gap 07

SNAP 07

NFR1 07

NFR2 07

Sector 10 NH3

0

10

20

30

40

50

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Year

Nu

mb

er

Gap 10

SNAP 10

NFR1 10

NFR2 10

Sector 7 NMVOC

0

10

20

30

40

50

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

YearN

um

ber

Gap 07

SNAP 07

NFR1 07

NFR2 07

Sector 2 PM2.5

0

10

20

30

40

50

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Year

Nu

mb

er

Gap 02

SNAP 02

NFR1 02

NFR2 02

Sector 2 PM10

0

10

20

30

40

50

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Year

Nu

mb

er

Gap 02

SNAP 02

NFR1 02

NFR2 02

Page 10: Inventory Review 2006  Preliminary results

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no

Recalculations and Inventory comparison

• Some countries have substantial differences (>20%) in nationalt total from year to year due to recalculations – Stage 2 review will provide overview of the recalc and whether or not these recalc are explained (IIRs and or review replies) and make sense as input to the revision of the GP

• NEC/LRTAP differences (as above except GP)

Page 11: Inventory Review 2006  Preliminary results

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no

Transparency

IIR submission increases

2004: 72005: 122006:17

Page 12: Inventory Review 2006  Preliminary results

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no

HM review by ESPREMEAs (tons/year)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Fuel combustionto produce heatand electrisity

Iron and steelproduction

Other sources,and cementproduction

Sum

EMEP

ESPREME

Cd (tons/year)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Fuel combustionto produce heatand electrisity

Iron and steelproduction

Other sources,and cementproduction

Sum

EMEP

ESPREME

Cr (tons/year)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Fuelcombustion toproduce heatand electrisity

Iron and steelproduction

Other sources,and cementproduction

Sum

EMEP

ESPREME

Ni (tons/year)

0500

100015002000250030003500400045005000

Fuel combustionto produce heatand electrisity

Iron and steelproduction

Other sources,and cementproduction

Sum

EMEP

ESPREME

Pb (tons/year)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Fuel combustion toproduce heat and

electrisity

Other sources, andcement production

Sum

EMEP

ESPREME

Page 13: Inventory Review 2006  Preliminary results

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no

Highlights

• Significant gaps and missing sources for HMs other than Hg introduce considerable uncertainties in the modeling and assessment of their environmental fate and thus, finally, their impacts on human health.

• Officially reported emissions are substantially underestimated (up to a factor 2 (Cd)

• Pb in ”unleaded” gasoline – missing source in some countries

• More focus should be placed on estimates of emissions during wastedisposal, mainly, incineration of wastes. This source is clearly the leastaccurately estimated.

• Emission measurements can be proposed in selected fossil fuel powerplants, as combustion of fossil fuels is the main source of emissions of HMsselected in this review.

• Historical trends of HM emissions can be prepared within EMEP using the

information on statistics and emission factors properly selected.

Page 14: Inventory Review 2006  Preliminary results

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no

Preliminary results: POP review by TNO

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Turkey

Poland

Romania

Czech Republic

Bulgaria

Slovak Republic

Hungary

Lithuania

Slovenia

Latvia

Estonia

Cyprus

Malta

reported to EMEP

Pulles et al. (2006)

Page 15: Inventory Review 2006  Preliminary results

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no

POP review by TNO

Closest to 2000 2000EMEP Pulles et al.,2006 low high

Turkey 960 190 2600Poland 333.4 790 220 2000Romania 100.6 490 110 1300Czech Republic 743.8 320 72 880Bulgaria 232.5 290 66 790Slovak Republic 89.9 180 36 500Hungary 99.4 120 35 300Lithuania 12.7 48 7.1 140Slovenia 3.7 36 8.2 97Latvia 13.5 18 2.4 54Estonia 2.4 8.7 1.6 25Cyprus 5.3 6.6 0.8 20Malta 3.9 0.34 13

Page 16: Inventory Review 2006  Preliminary results

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no

HM review by ESPREME

EMEP ESPREME EMEP ESPREME EMEP ESPREME EMEP ESPREME EMEP ESPREME

1. Fuel combustion to produce heat and electricity 322 (49) 391(51) 119 (44) 367 (62) 825 (50) 1394 (51) 3403 (85) 3795 (79) 1377 (13) 1623 (12)

2. Non ferrous metal 132 (20) 132 (17) 52 (19) 52 (9) 54 (3) 54 (2) 49 (1) 49 (1) 1471 (13) 1471 (10)

3. Iron and steel production 106 (16) 114 (15) 37 (14) 46 (8) 409 (25) 571 (21) 106 (3) 171 (4) 0 (0) 2282 (16)

4. Waste disposal 2 (0) 2 (0) 9 (3) 9 (2) 0 (0) 0 (0) 13 (0) 13 (0) 116 (1) 116 (1)

5. Cement procuction and othe sources 92 (14) 124 (16) 52 (19) 116 (20) 370 (22) 692 (26) 447 (11) 769 (16) 247 (2) 892 (6)

6. Gasoline combustion 7712 (71) 7712 (55)

Sum 654 763 269 590 1658 2711 4017 4797 10923 14096

Ni PbAs Cd Cr

Page 17: Inventory Review 2006  Preliminary results

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no

Future improvements

• x-pollutant tests - landfills • Inconsistency test harmonized with

REPDAB • The time series test: Little flagging when

large sigma. Use expected value=midpoint instead? Flag when deviate e.g. 20% on SNAP type aggregation level

• Deadlines: Submission process for NEC submissions

• System for filtering of questions and storing replies

• NB! Added values of Stage -2 review and cc report

Page 18: Inventory Review 2006  Preliminary results

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no

Key source: West

Component Key source categories (Sorted from high to low from left to right) Total (%) Not listed

SOx 1 A 1 a (47.3%)

1 A 1 b (10.0%)

1 A 2 f (9.7%)

1 A 4 b i (5.6%)

1 A 2 a (2.9%)

1 A 3 d ii (2.3%)

1 B 2 a (2.3%)

1 A 4 a (2.3%)

2 B 5 (2.0%)

1 A 2 c (1.6%)

86.0 8

NOx 1 A 3 b iii (20.2%)

1 A 3 b i (15.3%)

1 A 1 a (15.3%)

1 A 2 f (9.1%)

1 A 4 c ii (5.1%)

1 A 4 b i (5.0%)

1 A 3 b ii (4.4%)

1 A 3 d ii (3.6%)

4 D 1 (2.3%)

1 A 1 c (2.1%)

82.5 14

NH3 4 B 1 b (24.8%)

4 B 1 a (21.7%)

4 D 1 (17.2%)

4 B 8 (15.2%)

4 B 9 (10.6%)

1 A 3 b i (2.2%)

4 B 3 (1.5%)

4 B 13 (1.4%)

4 B 6 (1.0%)

95.5 0

NMVOC 1 A 3 b (19.0%)

3 D (17.5%)

3 A (14.8%)

1 B 2 a (8.7%)

1 A 4 b i (8.3%)

3 C (3.4%)

2 D 2 (3.1%)

2 B 5 (3.1%)

4 D 1 (2.8%)

3 B (2.1%)

82.9 13

CO 1 A 3 b i (31.2%)

1 A 4 b i (21.1%)

1 A 2 a (10.3%)

2 C (9.5%)

1 A 2 f (3.9%)

1 A 3 b iv (3.2%)

1 A 4 b ii (2.5%)

1 A 3 b ii (2.3%)

1 A 1 a (1.7%)

6 C (1.6%)

87.1 12

TSP 2 A 7 (22.6%)

4 D 1 (17.4%)

1 A 4 b i (9.8%)

1 A 5 b (7.1%)

1 A 3 b vi (5.2%)

2 A 6 (4.9%)

2 C (4.2%)

1 A 2 f (2.8%)

7 (2.1%)

1 A 4 c ii (2.0%)

78.1 16

PM10 1 A 4 b i (20.2%)

2 A 7 (12.1%)

4 D 1 (7.8%)

2 C (5.5%)

1 A 3 b vi (4.6%)

1 A 2 f (4.2%)

1 A 3 b i (4.0%)

4 B 9 (3.6%)

1 A 1 a (3.2%)

7 (3.1%)

68.2 22

PM2.5 1 A 4 b i (29.5%)

2 A 7 (9.1%)

2 C (5.9%)

1 A 3 b i (5.7%)

1 A 2 f (5.1%)

1 A 3 b iii (4.5%)

1 A 3 b ii (4.2%)

1 A 4 c ii (3.8%)

1 A 1 a (3.2%)

4 D 1 (2.9%)

74.0 20

Pb 1 A 2 f (42.7%)

2 C (12.8%)

1 A 2 a (6.2%)

1 A 3 a ii (ii) (5.0%)

1 A 3 b i (4.5%)

1 A 4 b i (4.3%)

1 A 1 a (4.0%)

1 A 3 b iii (3.0%)

1 A 3 b ii (2.6%)

1 A 4 a (2.5%)

87.8 5

Hg 1 A 1 a (36.2%)

6 A (11.2%)

1 A 2 f (10.7%)

6 C (9.9%)

2 B 5 (8.3%)

2 C (5.5%)

1 A 4 b i (4.7%)

1 A 2 a (2.4%)

1 A 1 b (2.3%)

1 A 2 d (2.2%)

93.5 2

Cd 1 A 2 f (22.4%)

2 C (22.1%)

1 A 1 a (13.2%)

1 A 1 b (12.8%)

1 A 4 b i (8.3%)

1 A 2 a (3.7%)

1 A 2 d (3.1%)

1 A 2 b (3.0%)

6 C (1.4%)

1 A 3 b i (1.3%)

91.2 4

DIOX 1 A 1 b (67.7%)

6 C (10.5%)

1 A 1 a (4.1%)

1 A 3 b i (3.4%)

1 A 4 b i (3.0%)

2 C (3.0%)

1 A 2 f (1.9%)

1 A 2 a (1.4%)

1 A 3 b iii (0.9%)

95.8 0

PAH 1 A 4 b i (24.2%)

3 D (23.4%)

2 G (15.1%)

1 A 3 b i (12.9%)

2 C (7.9%)

1 A 3 b iii (3.5%)

1 A 3 b ii (2.1%)

1 B 1 b (1.9%)

1 A 2 f (1.3%)

2 A 6 (1.0%)

93.4 2

HCB 1 A 2 b (88.5%)

2 C (4.5%)

1 A 4 b i (2.8%)

95.7 0

Page 19: Inventory Review 2006  Preliminary results

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no

Key source: East

Component Key source categories (Sorted from high to low from left to right) Total (%) Not listed

SOx 1 A 1 a (59.1%)

1 A 2 (16.2%)

1 A 4 b (5.3%)

1 A 3 b (4.0%)

1 A 3 e ii (2.8%)

1 A 4 a (1.8%)

2 C (1.2%)

1 A 1 b (1.2%)

1 A 1 c (1.0%)

1 A 4 c i (0.6%)

93.2 31

NOx 1 A 3 b (37.6%)

1 A 1 a (24.8%)

1 A 3 e ii (14.7%)

1 A 2 (9.0%)

1 A 4 b (3.0%)

1 A 4 c ii (1.9%)

2 C (1.2%)

1 A 3 c (0.9%)

2 B (0.8%)

1 A 4 a (0.7%)

94.5 2

NH3 4 B (77.0%)

4 D 1 (8.1%)

2 B 1 (3.0%)

1 A 4 c (0.8%)

6 B (0.8%)

6 D (0.7%)

1 B 2 (0.4%)

1 A 3 b (0.3%)

2 B 5 (0.2%)

4 F (0.1%)

91.4 26

NMVOC 1 A 3 b (51.4%)

1 A 2 (9.4%)

1 B 2 (8.5%)

7 (6.3%)

3 A (4.3%)

1 A 4 b i (3.0%)

3 D (2.2%)

1 A 4 b ii (2.0%)

3 C (1.3%)

3 B (1.3%)

89.8 7

CO 1 A 3 b (61.6%)

1 A 2 (11.2%)

1 A 4 b i (11.0%)

2 C (5.0%)

6 C (3.9%)

1 A 4 c i (1.2%)

1 A 1 a (0.6%)

1 A 4 b ii (0.5%)

95.1 0

TSP 2 C (15.3%)

1 A 1 a (4.5%)

2 A 6 (2.7%)

1 A 4 b i (1.4%)

1 A 2 b (0.6%)

1 A 2 f (0.5%)

1 A 2 a (0.2%)

2 A 1 (0.1%)

1 A 3 b (0.1%)

1 A 4 c ii (0.1%)

25.5 39

PM10 1 A 1 a (33.8%)

1 A 4 b i (20.2%)

1 A 3 b (6.8%)

1 A 2 a (6.5%)

1 A 2 b (4.8%)

2 A (4.7%)

1 B 2 (3.6%)

2 C (1.8%)

1 A 4 c i (1.7%)

1 A 1 c (1.7%)

85.6 10

PM2.5 1 A 1 a (30.8%)

1 A 4 b i (23.7%)

1 A 3 b (9.4%)

1 A 2 a (6.9%)

1 A 2 b (4.9%)

2 A (4.8%)

1 B 2 (3.7%)

1 A 4 c i (1.7%)

1 A 4 c ii (1.4%)

6 C (1.4%)

88.8 8

Pb 1 A 2 (43.7%)

1 A 1 a (13.9%)

2 A 7 (7.7%)

2 C (7.7%)

6 C (7.0%)

1 A 4 c i (6.4%)

1 A 3 b (4.4%)

1 A 4 b (3.5%)

1 B 1 b (1.2%)

95.4 0

Hg 1 A 1 a (41.6%)

1 A 2 (23.8%)

1 A 3 b (13.0%)

6 C (4.4%)

1 A 4 b i (4.2%)

1 A 1 c (3.2%)

2 A (2.4%)

1 A 4 c i (1.6%)

2 B 5 (1.4%)

95.6 0

Cd 1 A 2 (48.2%)

1 A 1 a (19.5%)

1 A 4 c i (13.5%)

1 A 4 b i (5.0%)

1 B 1 b (3.8%)

2 C (2.5%)

6 C (2.3%)

1 A 3 b (1.7%)

96.5 0

DIOX 1 A 4 b i (27.7%)

6 D (18.7%)

1 A 2 (17.7%)

1 A 1 a (13.3%)

2 C (10.9%)

6 C (5.0%)

1 A 3 b i (1.2%)

1 A 4 a (0.9%)

95.5 0

PAH 1 A 4 b i (71.6%)

1 A 4 c i (12.8%)

1 B 1 b (10.0%)

2 C (3.6%)

98.0 0

HCB 2 C (51.7%)

1 A 2 (25.9%)

1 A 1 a (8.7%)

1 A 4 b i (6.1%)

6 C (5.5%)

97.9 0

Page 20: Inventory Review 2006  Preliminary results

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no

West (left) East (right)

Component Key source categories (Sorted from high to low from left to right) Total (%) Not listed

SOx 1 A 1 a (47.3%)

1 A 1 b (10.0%)

1 A 2 f (9.7%)

1 A 4 b i (5.6%)

1 A 2 a (2.9%)

1 A 3 d ii (2.3%)

1 B 2 a (2.3%)

1 A 4 a (2.3%)

2 B 5 (2.0%)

1 A 2 c (1.6%)

86.0 8

NOx 1 A 3 b iii (20.2%)

1 A 3 b i (15.3%)

1 A 1 a (15.3%)

1 A 2 f (9.1%)

1 A 4 c ii (5.1%)

1 A 4 b i (5.0%)

1 A 3 b ii (4.4%)

1 A 3 d ii (3.6%)

4 D 1 (2.3%)

1 A 1 c (2.1%)

82.5 14

NH3 4 B 1 b (24.8%)

4 B 1 a (21.7%)

4 D 1 (17.2%)

4 B 8 (15.2%)

4 B 9 (10.6%)

1 A 3 b i (2.2%)

4 B 3 (1.5%)

4 B 13 (1.4%)

4 B 6 (1.0%)

95.5 0

NMVOC 1 A 3 b (19.0%)

3 D (17.5%)

3 A (14.8%)

1 B 2 a (8.7%)

1 A 4 b i (8.3%)

3 C (3.4%)

2 D 2 (3.1%)

2 B 5 (3.1%)

4 D 1 (2.8%)

3 B (2.1%)

82.9 13

CO 1 A 3 b i (31.2%)

1 A 4 b i (21.1%)

1 A 2 a (10.3%)

2 C (9.5%)

1 A 2 f (3.9%)

1 A 3 b iv (3.2%)

1 A 4 b ii (2.5%)

1 A 3 b ii (2.3%)

1 A 1 a (1.7%)

6 C (1.6%)

87.1 12

TSP 2 A 7 (22.6%)

4 D 1 (17.4%)

1 A 4 b i (9.8%)

1 A 5 b (7.1%)

1 A 3 b vi (5.2%)

2 A 6 (4.9%)

2 C (4.2%)

1 A 2 f (2.8%)

7 (2.1%)

1 A 4 c ii (2.0%)

78.1 16

PM10 1 A 4 b i (20.2%)

2 A 7 (12.1%)

4 D 1 (7.8%)

2 C (5.5%)

1 A 3 b vi (4.6%)

1 A 2 f (4.2%)

1 A 3 b i (4.0%)

4 B 9 (3.6%)

1 A 1 a (3.2%)

7 (3.1%)

68.2 22

PM2.5 1 A 4 b i (29.5%)

2 A 7 (9.1%)

2 C (5.9%)

1 A 3 b i (5.7%)

1 A 2 f (5.1%)

1 A 3 b iii (4.5%)

1 A 3 b ii (4.2%)

1 A 4 c ii (3.8%)

1 A 1 a (3.2%)

4 D 1 (2.9%)

74.0 20

Pb 1 A 2 f (42.7%)

2 C (12.8%)

1 A 2 a (6.2%)

1 A 3 a ii (ii) (5.0%)

1 A 3 b i (4.5%)

1 A 4 b i (4.3%)

1 A 1 a (4.0%)

1 A 3 b iii (3.0%)

1 A 3 b ii (2.6%)

1 A 4 a (2.5%)

87.8 5

Hg 1 A 1 a (36.2%)

6 A (11.2%)

1 A 2 f (10.7%)

6 C (9.9%)

2 B 5 (8.3%)

2 C (5.5%)

1 A 4 b i (4.7%)

1 A 2 a (2.4%)

1 A 1 b (2.3%)

1 A 2 d (2.2%)

93.5 2

Cd 1 A 2 f (22.4%)

2 C (22.1%)

1 A 1 a (13.2%)

1 A 1 b (12.8%)

1 A 4 b i (8.3%)

1 A 2 a (3.7%)

1 A 2 d (3.1%)

1 A 2 b (3.0%)

6 C (1.4%)

1 A 3 b i (1.3%)

91.2 4

DIOX 1 A 1 b (67.7%)

6 C (10.5%)

1 A 1 a (4.1%)

1 A 3 b i (3.4%)

1 A 4 b i (3.0%)

2 C (3.0%)

1 A 2 f (1.9%)

1 A 2 a (1.4%)

1 A 3 b iii (0.9%)

95.8 0

PAH 1 A 4 b i (24.2%)

3 D (23.4%)

2 G (15.1%)

1 A 3 b i (12.9%)

2 C (7.9%)

1 A 3 b iii (3.5%)

1 A 3 b ii (2.1%)

1 B 1 b (1.9%)

1 A 2 f (1.3%)

2 A 6 (1.0%)

93.4 2

HCB 1 A 2 b (88.5%)

2 C (4.5%)

1 A 4 b i (2.8%)

95.7 0

Component Key source categories (Sorted from high to low from left to right) Total (%) Not listed

SOx 1 A 1 a (59.1%)

1 A 2 (16.2%)

1 A 4 b (5.3%)

1 A 3 b (4.0%)

1 A 3 e ii (2.8%)

1 A 4 a (1.8%)

2 C (1.2%)

1 A 1 b (1.2%)

1 A 1 c (1.0%)

1 A 4 c i (0.6%)

93.2 31

NOx 1 A 3 b (37.6%)

1 A 1 a (24.8%)

1 A 3 e ii (14.7%)

1 A 2 (9.0%)

1 A 4 b (3.0%)

1 A 4 c ii (1.9%)

2 C (1.2%)

1 A 3 c (0.9%)

2 B (0.8%)

1 A 4 a (0.7%)

94.5 2

NH3 4 B (77.0%)

4 D 1 (8.1%)

2 B 1 (3.0%)

1 A 4 c (0.8%)

6 B (0.8%)

6 D (0.7%)

1 B 2 (0.4%)

1 A 3 b (0.3%)

2 B 5 (0.2%)

4 F (0.1%)

91.4 26

NMVOC 1 A 3 b (51.4%)

1 A 2 (9.4%)

1 B 2 (8.5%)

7 (6.3%)

3 A (4.3%)

1 A 4 b i (3.0%)

3 D (2.2%)

1 A 4 b ii (2.0%)

3 C (1.3%)

3 B (1.3%)

89.8 7

CO 1 A 3 b (61.6%)

1 A 2 (11.2%)

1 A 4 b i (11.0%)

2 C (5.0%)

6 C (3.9%)

1 A 4 c i (1.2%)

1 A 1 a (0.6%)

1 A 4 b ii (0.5%)

95.1 0

TSP 2 C (15.3%)

1 A 1 a (4.5%)

2 A 6 (2.7%)

1 A 4 b i (1.4%)

1 A 2 b (0.6%)

1 A 2 f (0.5%)

1 A 2 a (0.2%)

2 A 1 (0.1%)

1 A 3 b (0.1%)

1 A 4 c ii (0.1%)

25.5 39

PM10 1 A 1 a (33.8%)

1 A 4 b i (20.2%)

1 A 3 b (6.8%)

1 A 2 a (6.5%)

1 A 2 b (4.8%)

2 A (4.7%)

1 B 2 (3.6%)

2 C (1.8%)

1 A 4 c i (1.7%)

1 A 1 c (1.7%)

85.6 10

PM2.5 1 A 1 a (30.8%)

1 A 4 b i (23.7%)

1 A 3 b (9.4%)

1 A 2 a (6.9%)

1 A 2 b (4.9%)

2 A (4.8%)

1 B 2 (3.7%)

1 A 4 c i (1.7%)

1 A 4 c ii (1.4%)

6 C (1.4%)

88.8 8

Pb 1 A 2 (43.7%)

1 A 1 a (13.9%)

2 A 7 (7.7%)

2 C (7.7%)

6 C (7.0%)

1 A 4 c i (6.4%)

1 A 3 b (4.4%)

1 A 4 b (3.5%)

1 B 1 b (1.2%)

95.4 0

Hg 1 A 1 a (41.6%)

1 A 2 (23.8%)

1 A 3 b (13.0%)

6 C (4.4%)

1 A 4 b i (4.2%)

1 A 1 c (3.2%)

2 A (2.4%)

1 A 4 c i (1.6%)

2 B 5 (1.4%)

95.6 0

Cd 1 A 2 (48.2%)

1 A 1 a (19.5%)

1 A 4 c i (13.5%)

1 A 4 b i (5.0%)

1 B 1 b (3.8%)

2 C (2.5%)

6 C (2.3%)

1 A 3 b (1.7%)

96.5 0

DIOX 1 A 4 b i (27.7%)

6 D (18.7%)

1 A 2 (17.7%)

1 A 1 a (13.3%)

2 C (10.9%)

6 C (5.0%)

1 A 3 b i (1.2%)

1 A 4 a (0.9%)

95.5 0

PAH 1 A 4 b i (71.6%)

1 A 4 c i (12.8%)

1 B 1 b (10.0%)

2 C (3.6%)

98.0 0

HCB 2 C (51.7%)

1 A 2 (25.9%)

1 A 1 a (8.7%)

1 A 4 b i (6.1%)

6 C (5.5%)

97.9 0

Page 21: Inventory Review 2006  Preliminary results

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no

Preliminary results: HM review by ESPREME

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Fo

ssil

fu

elco

mb

ust

ion

to p

rod

uce

hea

t an

d

No

n-f

erro

us

met

als

Iro

n a

nd

stee

lp

rod

uct

ion

Was

ted

isp

osa

l

Cem

ent

pro

du

ctio

nan

d o

ther

sou

rces

Gas

oli

ne

com

bu

stio

n

As EMEP

As ESPREME

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fo

ssil

fu

elco

mb

ust

ion

to p

rod

uce

hea

t an

d

No

n-f

erro

us

met

als

Iro

n a

nd

stee

lp

rod

uct

ion

Was

ted

isp

osa

l

Cem

ent

pro

du

ctio

nan

d o

ther

sou

rces

Gas

oli

ne

com

bu

stio

n

Cd EMEP

Cd ESPREME

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Fo

ssil

fu

elco

mb

ust

ion

to p

rod

uce

hea

t an

d

No

n-f

erro

us

met

als

Iro

n a

nd

stee

lp

rod

uct

ion

Was

ted

isp

osa

l

Cem

ent

pro

du

ctio

nan

d o

ther

sou

rces

Gas

oli

ne

com

bu

stio

n

Cr EMEP

Cr ESPREME

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Fo

ssil

fu

elco

mb

ust

ion

to p

rod

uce

hea

t an

d

No

n-f

erro

us

met

als

Iro

n a

nd

stee

lp

rod

uct

ion

Was

ted

isp

osa

l

Cem

ent

pro

du

ctio

nan

d o

ther

sou

rces

Gas

oli

ne

com

bu

stio

n

Ni EMEP

Ni ESPREME

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Fo

ssil

fu

elco

mb

ust

ion

to p

rod

uce

hea

t an

d

No

n-f

erro

us

met

als

Iro

n a

nd

stee

lp

rod

uct

ion

Was

ted

isp

osa

l

Cem

ent

pro

du

ctio

nan

d o

ther

sou

rces

Gas

oli

ne

com

bu

stio

n

Pb EMEP

Pb ESPREME