33
Investigating the Impact of Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology Chalmers University of Technology School of Electric Power Engineering School of Electric Power Engineering G G ö ö teborg, Sweden 2003 teborg, Sweden 2003 NORPIE 2004 NORPIE 2004 Trondheim, Norway Trondheim, Norway

Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Introduction background  The standard size has increased from 20 kW to 2 MW.  The production cost: wind =coal based on condensation

Citation preview

Page 1: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Investigating the Impact of Removing the Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Undervoltage Protection for Wind

TurbinesTurbinesPresented byPresented by

KHALED ALGHADHBANKHALED ALGHADHBAN

Chalmers University of TechnologyChalmers University of Technology

School of Electric Power EngineeringSchool of Electric Power Engineering

GGööteborg, Sweden 2003teborg, Sweden 2003

NORPIE 2004NORPIE 2004

Trondheim, NorwayTrondheim, Norway

Page 2: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

OUTLINEOUTLINE

ConclusionConclusion

Case StudiesCase Studies

IntroductionIntroduction

Generator Protection OverviewGenerator Protection Overview

Page 3: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

IntroductionIntroductionbackgroundbackground

The standard size has increased from 20 kW to 2 The standard size has increased from 20 kW to 2 MW. MW. The production cost: wind =coal based on The production cost: wind =coal based on condensationcondensation

Page 4: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

IntroductionIntroductionbackgroundbackground

1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 19990

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Dan

ish

KK

/kW

h

Year

Page 5: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

IntroductionIntroductionbackgroundbackground

24 GW of wind turbines in Europe make utilities 24 GW of wind turbines in Europe make utilities concerned about voltage dipsconcerned about voltage dips

It is required and essential to disconnect the wind It is required and essential to disconnect the wind turbine for serious grid faultsturbine for serious grid faults

whenever possible, the turbine should stay onlinewhenever possible, the turbine should stay online

Page 6: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

IntroductionIntroductionbackgroundbackground

The wind turbine undervoltage setting up to now in The wind turbine undervoltage setting up to now in Sweden is 85% for 0.5 seconds.Sweden is 85% for 0.5 seconds.

ok for few turbines, serious if 100 MW of wind ok for few turbines, serious if 100 MW of wind production is lost, then could lead to voltage collapse.production is lost, then could lead to voltage collapse.

Page 7: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

IntroductionIntroductionPurpose of PaperPurpose of Paper

Not tripping for undervoltage does not damage the Not tripping for undervoltage does not damage the wind turbine generator in itself, an idea is to trip only wind turbine generator in itself, an idea is to trip only for overcurrent and overspeed.for overcurrent and overspeed. The purpose of this paper is to study the impact on a The purpose of this paper is to study the impact on a small grid as well as for the wind turbines if the small grid as well as for the wind turbines if the undervoltage protection is removed and the protection undervoltage protection is removed and the protection function is taken over by overspeed and overcurrent function is taken over by overspeed and overcurrent protections.protections.

Page 8: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Generator Protection Overview

Protection FunctionProtection Function Trip Value (setting)Trip Value (setting)

FrequencyFrequency Low= 47.5 HzLow= 47.5 HzHigh= 51 HzHigh= 51 Hz

OvervoltageOvervoltage High1= 110%High1= 110%High2= 125%High2= 125%

OverspeedOverspeed @ 110% of nominal speed@ 110% of nominal speed

UndervoltageUndervoltage Low1= 360 V @ 60 seconds Low1= 360 V @ 60 seconds delaydelayLow2= 337 V @ 0.5 seconds Low2= 337 V @ 0.5 seconds delaydelay

Page 9: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Generator Protection OverviewGenerator Protection Overview Overcurrent (Inverse time)Overcurrent (Inverse time)

Page 10: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Case Studies using SIMPOW®Case Studies using SIMPOW®

First CaseFirst Case: 70% Voltage Dip : 70% Voltage Dip on Utility Bus with 600ms on Utility Bus with 600ms DurationDuration

Second CaseSecond Case: Different : Different Voltage Dips with Different Voltage Dips with Different DurationsDurations

Page 11: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Case StudiesCase StudiesFirst Case (Voltage Dip at Utility bus)First Case (Voltage Dip at Utility bus)

G GG G

UTILITYSWING BUS

B

B

B

B

SMALL TRANSMISSION LINE

30.0 KV

10.8 KV

10.8 KV10.8 KV

B B

0.69 KV 0.69 KV 0.69 KV0.69 KV

TRANBUS

DISBUS

LOAD1LOAD2

G1BUSG2BUSG3BUSG4BUS

Voltage Dip Here

MeasurementsMeasurements

Page 12: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Case StudiesCase StudiesFirst Case (High Wind)First Case (High Wind)

Existing Settings (with undervoltage protection)Existing Settings (with undervoltage protection)

Page 13: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Case StudiesCase StudiesFirst Case (High Wind)First Case (High Wind)

Existing Settings (with undervoltage protection)Existing Settings (with undervoltage protection)

Page 14: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Case StudiesCase StudiesFirst Case (High Wind)First Case (High Wind)

Existing Settings (with undervoltage protection)Existing Settings (with undervoltage protection)

Page 15: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Case StudiesCase StudiesFirst Case (High Wind)First Case (High Wind)

Existing Settings (with undervoltage protection)Existing Settings (with undervoltage protection)

Page 16: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Case StudiesCase StudiesFirst Case (High Wind)First Case (High Wind)

New Settings (Without Undervoltage protection)New Settings (Without Undervoltage protection)

Page 17: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Case StudiesCase StudiesFirst Case (High Wind)First Case (High Wind)

New Settings (Without Undervoltage protection)New Settings (Without Undervoltage protection)

Page 18: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Case StudiesCase StudiesFirst Case (High Wind)First Case (High Wind)

New Settings (Without Undervoltage protection)New Settings (Without Undervoltage protection)

Page 19: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Case StudiesCase StudiesFirst Case (High Wind)First Case (High Wind)

New Settings (Without Undervoltage protection)New Settings (Without Undervoltage protection)

Page 20: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Case StudiesCase StudiesFirst Case (Low Wind)First Case (Low Wind)

Existing Settings (with Undervoltage Protection)Existing Settings (with Undervoltage Protection)

Page 21: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Case StudiesCase StudiesFirst Case (Low Wind)First Case (Low Wind)

Existing Settings (with Undervoltage Protection)Existing Settings (with Undervoltage Protection)

Page 22: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Case StudiesCase StudiesFirst Case (Low Wind)First Case (Low Wind)

Existing Settings (with Undervoltage Protection)Existing Settings (with Undervoltage Protection)

Page 23: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Case StudiesCase StudiesFirst Case (Low Wind)First Case (Low Wind)

Existing Settings (with Undervoltage Protection)Existing Settings (with Undervoltage Protection)

Page 24: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Case StudiesCase StudiesFirst Case (Low Wind)First Case (Low Wind)

New Settings (without Undervoltage Protection)New Settings (without Undervoltage Protection)

Page 25: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Case StudiesCase StudiesFirst Case (Low Wind)First Case (Low Wind)

New Settings (without Undervoltage Protection)New Settings (without Undervoltage Protection)

Page 26: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Case StudiesCase StudiesFirst Case (Low Wind)First Case (Low Wind)

New Settings (without Undervoltage Protection)New Settings (without Undervoltage Protection)

Page 27: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Case StudiesCase StudiesFirst Case (Low Wind)First Case (Low Wind)

New Settings (without Undervoltage Protection)New Settings (without Undervoltage Protection)

Page 28: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Case StudiesCase StudiesSecond CaseSecond Case

Different Voltage Dips with Different Voltage Dips with Different Durations Different Durations

High Wind SpeedHigh Wind SpeedLow Wind SpeedLow Wind Speed

Page 29: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Case StudiesCase StudiesSecond Case (High Wind)Second Case (High Wind)

0.10.1 0.20.2 0.30.3 0.40.4 0.50.5 0.60.6 0.70.7 0.80.8 0.850.85

600ms600msTRIPPTRIPP YY YY YY YY NN NN NN NN NN

Peak QPeak Q w=1.05w=1.05 2.432.43 2.132.13 1.701.70 1.271.27 1.071.07

800ms800msTRIPPTRIPP YY YY YY YY YY NN NN NN NN

Peak QPeak Q W=1.06W=1.06 2.272.27 1.791.79 1.311.31 1.091.09

1000ms1000msTRIPPTRIPP YY YY YY YY YY NN NN NN NN

Peak QPeak Q W=1.13W=1.13 2.352.35 1.841.84 1.311.31 1.091.09

1500ms1500msTRIPPTRIPP YY YY YY YY YY YY NN NN NN

Peak QPeak Q W=1.08W=1.08 1.891.89 1.311.31 1.081.08

Page 30: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Case StudiesCase StudiesSecond Case (High Wind)Second Case (High Wind)

Page 31: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

Case StudiesCase StudiesSecond Case (Low Wind)Second Case (Low Wind)

0.10.1 0.20.2 0.30.3 0.40.4 0.50.5 0.60.6 0.70.7 0.80.8 0.850.85

600ms600ms

TRIPPTRIPP NN NN NN NN NN NN NN NN NN

Peak QPeak Q 2.662.66 2.492.49 2.292.29 2.092.09 1.881.88 1.621.62 1.311.31 0.990.99 0.820.82

Max PMax P 0.620.62 0.570.57 0.560.56 0.540.54 0.530.53 0.450.45 0.290.29 0.270.27 0.250.25

800ms800ms

TRIPPTRIPP NN NN NN NN NN NN NN NN NN

Peak QPeak Q 2.682.68 2.532.53 2.322.32 2.122.12 1.891.89 1.621.62 1.331.33 1.001.00 0.820.82

Max PMax P 0.620.62 0.620.62 0.490.49 0.530.53 0.560.56 0.390.39 0.360.36 0.280.28 0.220.22

1000ms1000ms

TRIPPTRIPP NN NN NN NN NN NN NN NN NN

Peak QPeak Q 2.682.68 2.542.54 2.332.33 2.132.13 1.891.89 1.621.62 1.331.33 0.990.99 0.820.82

Max PMax P 0.690.69 0.730.73 0.580.58 0.620.62 0.540.54 0.430.43 0.330.33 0.280.28 0.240.24

1500ms1500ms

TRIPPTRIPP NN NN NN NN NN NN NN NN NN

Peak QPeak Q 2.692.69 2.542.54 2.372.37 2.122.12 1.891.89 1.621.62 1.321.32 1.001.00 0.820.82

Max PMax P 0.820.82 0.660.66 0.750.75 0.550.55 0.520.52 0.430.43 0.320.32 0.280.28 0.230.23

Page 32: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

ConclusionConclusion Tripping for undervoltage for a wind turbine can be safely Tripping for undervoltage for a wind turbine can be safely

avoided and thus unnecessary loss of wind power production avoided and thus unnecessary loss of wind power production can be avoided.can be avoided.

Overcurrent and overspeed protection can take over the Overcurrent and overspeed protection can take over the undervoltage function.undervoltage function.

At low wind speeds hardly any dips caused the turbine to At low wind speeds hardly any dips caused the turbine to trip if the undervoltage protection was removed. For high trip if the undervoltage protection was removed. For high wind speeds, the overcurrent protection tripped the turbine wind speeds, the overcurrent protection tripped the turbine for dips lower than 40-60% depending on the dip magnitude. for dips lower than 40-60% depending on the dip magnitude. Using a 10% overspeed limit, generally made the overcurrent Using a 10% overspeed limit, generally made the overcurrent to trip before the overspeed.to trip before the overspeed.

Page 33: Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Turbines Presented by KHALED ALGHADHBAN Chalmers University of Technology School

QUESTIONSQUESTIONS

Presented byPresented byKHALED ALGHADHBANKHALED ALGHADHBAN

Investigating the Impact of Removing the Investigating the Impact of Removing the Undervoltage Protection for Wind Undervoltage Protection for Wind

TurbinesTurbines