Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
JANUARY 2018
INVESTOR PRESENTATION
2
Safe Harbor Statement
Matters discussed in this release may constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance and may include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and statements other than statements of historical facts. The words “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “project,” “plan,” “potential,” “may,” “should,” “expect,” “pending” and similar expressions generally identify forward-looking statements.
The forward-looking statements in this release are based upon various assumptions, many of which are based, in turn, upon further assumptions, including without limitation, management’s examination of historical operating trends, data contained in our records and other data available from third parties. Although the Company believes that these assumptions were reasonable when made, because these assumptions are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies that are difficult or impossible to predict and are beyond our control, the Company cannot guarantee that it will achieve or accomplish these expectations, beliefs or projections.
Important factors that, in our view, could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward- looking statements include the strength of the world economy and currencies, changes in charter hire rates and vessel values, changes in demand for “ton miles” of oil carried by oil tankers, the effect of changes in OPEC’s petroleum production levels and worldwide oil consumption and storage, changes in demand that may affect attitudes of time charterers to scheduled and unscheduled dry-docking, changes in TORM’s operating expenses, including bunker prices, dry-docking and insurance costs, changes in the regulation of shipping operations, including requirements for double hull tankers or actions taken by regulatory authorities, potential liability from pending or future litigation, domestic and international political conditions, potential disruption of shipping routes due to accidents, political events or acts by terrorists.
In light of these risks and uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements contained in this release because they are statements about events that are not certain to occur as described or at all. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of our future performance, and actual results and future developments may vary materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.
Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, the Company undertakes no obligation to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this release or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
3
Orion purchase price considerations
AGENDA
Attractive Product Tanker Fundamentals
Company Overview
Q3 2017 Financials
123
Source 4
SUPPLY-DEMAND FACTORS MOVING IN OWNERS’ FAVOR
+ Sustained, increasing demand for gasoline and other petroleum products
+ Product inventories have decreased (approaching 5-year average)
+ Relocation of refineries expanding ton-mile demand
+ Low order book, particularly for smaller product tankers
+ Significant reduction of shipyard capacity
Freight rates started to move up in Q4 2017,
with further gains anticipated in 2018
Source 5
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Q1 1
4
Q2 1
4
Q3 1
4
Q4 1
4
Q1 1
5
Q2 1
5
Q3 1
5
Q4 1
5
Q1 1
6
Q2 1
6
Q3 1
6
Q4 1
6
Q1 1
7
Q2 1
7
Q3 1
7e
Q4 1
7f
M b
/dNaphtha Gasoline Jet Diesel
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
M b
/d
RELOCATION OF REFINERIES WILL BENEFIT PRODUCT TANKERS AND EXPAND TON-MILES
3.4 times
* Decline in Saudi Arabia’s diesel exports in 4Q 2016 reflects heavy refinery maintenance
Source: WoodMackenzie
Middle Eastern refinery capacity set to grow Saudi Arabia diesel exports increasing*
1.9m b/d of capacity to be added through
2022Historical rate of 1.5m
b/d of capacity to
6
KEY DEMAND DRIVERS HAVE BEEN NORMALISING
Source: EIA, JODI, WoodMackenzie, TORM Research
Global CPP inventories
Short-term factorsProduct stock draws accelerated in Q3 driven by stronger-than-
expected oil demand, preliminary data for the US and Europe
shows that destocking continued in Q4.
During the first eight months of 2017, global CPP stocks
decreased by a volume equivalent to a loss of potential trade of
5% each month.
A high number of crude newbuilding deliveries in 2018 continue
to pressurize the product tanker market through cannibalization
of the gasoil trade from East to West.
Long-term factorsThe fundamental long-term outlook remains positive with oil
demand increasing and the ton-mile being positively impacted
by increasing imbalances between the demand for and supply
of clean petroleum products.
Middle East refinery capacity additions are expected to
accelerate from 1.5 mb/d during 2011-2016 to 1.9 mb/d during
2017-2022, placing a renewed pressure on less competitive
refineries in other areas.
Billion bbl
US gasoline forward cover (days)Days
20.0
22.0
24.0
26.0
28.0
30.0
32.0
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
W 1
W 6
W 1
1
W 1
6
W 2
1
W 2
6
W 3
1
W 3
6
W 4
1
W 4
6
W 5
1
5 Year High/Low 2017 5 Year Average
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
5-yr High/Low 2015 2016 2017 5-yr Average
Decreasing inventory levels,
approaching 5-year average
7
REDUCED ORDER BOOK FOR THE PRODUCT TANKER FLEET
* The number of vessels at the beginning of 2017 was: LR2 315, LR1 339, MR 1,570, Handy 704 (includes chemical vessels). Net f leet growth: gross order book adjusted for expected scrapping, delivery
slippage and TORM assumptions on additional ordering. Currently confirmed orders account on average for 100% and 71% of forecasted deliveries respectively in 2018 and 2019.
Source: TORM Research
Net fleet growth y-o-y (no. of vessels)*
• In Q3, product tanker newbuilding activity slowed down
from Q2, as owners’ appetite for more expensive Tier 3
tonnage remained weak and newbuilding activity was
focused on dry bulk and container ships
• The product tanker order book to fleet ratio currently stands
at 11%, relatively low compared in historical terms
• Product tanker deliveries totaled 2.7m dwt during Q3,
which combined with limited scrapping activity resulted in a
1.4% net fleet growth in Q3 (Q-over-Q basis)
• For FY 2017, a fleet growth of around 5.4% is forecasted,
followed by a slowdown to around 4% p.a. during 2018-
2019
MR order book as percentage of the fleet (DWT)
2005-2015 average fleet growth for
LR2, LR1, MR and Handysize
%
m dwt
Source 8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
200
0
200
1
200
2
200
3
200
4
200
5
200
6
200
7
200
8
200
9
201
0
201
1
201
2
201
3
201
4
201
5
201
6
201
7
201
8
201
9
202
0
Mill
. d
wt
Total deliveries Total orderbook
Capacity prior restructuring Capacity after restructuring
SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCED SHIPYARD CAPACITY FOR PRODUCT TANKERS
• Yard restructurings and consolidations in Korea and China
have caused a reduction in available capacity for product
tankers
• Overall yard capacity for product tankers is full in 2017 and
2018, and only limited capacity is available for deliveries in
the second half of 2019
• Restrictions on traditional bank financing
• Prices for newbuildings generally firm
Reduction in Korean shipyard capacity* Reduction in shipyard capacity
-45%
* Source: TORM, data as per September 2017
9
STABLE PRODUCT TANKER VESSEL PRICES
Source: Clarksons
Vessel price development
• Second-hand market in Q3 remained slow in a low freight
market. Activity focused on older tonnage with prices overall
unchanged
• In Q4 so far, second-hand activity is picking up with more
buyers interested in acquiring both modern and older tonnage
• In Q4 so far, newbuilding prices have remained firm with some
product tanker contracts for both Tier 2 and 3 versions
− Yards well-employed with other shipping segments:
crude, LPG, dry bulk and containers continue to be
active
USDm
USDm
LR1 - NewbuildingLR2 - Newbuilding MR - Newbuilding
MR - 5 yr. Second-Hand
MR 1Yr T/C
10
Orion purchase price considerations
AGENDA
Attractive Product Tanker Fundamentals
Company Overview
Q3 2017 Financials
123
11
TORM – KEY SUCCESS FACTORS
TORM is a large scale, pure-play product tanker owner, active in all key product tanker segments in order to meet customer needs
Our ~80 product tankers are primarily deployed in the spot market
TORM has a solid capital structurewith financial strength topursue growth
Competitive advantage when pursuing vessel acquisitions from yards
Semi-annual distribution policy of25-50% of net income
TORM’s superior integratedoperating platform includes
in-house technical and commercial management (preferred by customers)
Enhanced responsiveness toTORM’s customers,
resulting in higher TCEs
Scale and focus driving cost-efficient results
TORM pursues selectivegrowth based on rigorous
financial hurdles
In-house S&P team with relationships with brokers,
yards, banks and shipowners
Well-positioned to grow at market lows and to be a consolidator
12
LARGE SCALE, PURE-PLAY PRODUCT TANKER COMPANY
A world-leading pure product tanker company
• One of the largest owners and operators of product
tankers in the world
• 128 years of track record
• Customers consist of major independent oil
companies, state-owned oil companies, oil traders
and refiners
• ~3,000 seafarers and 295 land-based employees
• Listed on Nasdaq Copenhagen and Nasdaq New
York from 11 December 2017
Global footprint with presence in all major segmentsKey facts
On the water
Contracted newbuildings
Newbuilding options
Owned: 72
BB: 5
On order: 8
Newbuilding options: 8
10
LR2
LR1
MR
Handysize
7
52
+4
8
+4
TORM fleet
+4
+4
13
TORM – KEY SUCCESS FACTORS
TORM is a large scale, pure-play product tanker owner, active in all key product tanker segments in order to meet customer needs
Our ~80 product tankers are primarily deployed in the spot market
TORM has a solid capital structurewith financial strength topursue growth
Competitive advantage when pursuing vessel acquisitions from yards
Semi-annual distribution policy of25-50% of net income
TORM’s superior integratedoperating platform includes
in-house technical and commercial management (preferred by customers)
Enhanced responsiveness toTORM’s customers,
resulting in higher TCEs
Scale and focus driving cost-efficient results
TORM pursues selectivegrowth based on rigorous
financial hurdles
In-house S&P team with relationships with brokers,
yards, banks and shipowners
Well-positioned to grow at market lows and to be a consolidator
14
0
20,000
25,000
30,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
Q3
USD 11m
Q2
USD 6m
Q1
USD 8m
Q4
USD -0m
Q3
USD 3m
Q2
USD 4m
Q1
USD 7m
Q4
USD 1m
Q3
USD 8m
MR
rep
ort
ed
TC
E,
US
D/d
ay
TORM COMMERCIALLY OUTPERFORMS PEERS IN ITS KEY MR SEGMENT
Note: Peer group is based on Ardmore, d’Amico (composite of MR and Handy), Frontline 2012, NORDEN, Maersk Tankers, Teekay Tankers, Scorpio and OSG
Q3 2017 excludes: Frontline and Teekay Tankers
*TORM premium calculation is based on TORM MR fleet of 50 vessels earning TORM’s TCE rate compared to the peer average
High-Low
2015 2016 2017
TORM Peer avg.
TORM MR
premium*
FY2016: USD 13m Q1-Q3 2017: USD 24mQ3-Q4 2015: USD 9m
Q3 Performance:
• TORM: USD/day 14,827
• Peer Average: USD/day 12,510
15
VESSEL POSITIONING IS A KEY DRIVER OF TCE DIFFERENTIAL
Source: Clarksons
Note: The shown routes do not reflect actual earnings but are a proxy for earnings within West respectively East region
18,000
16,000
14,000
12,000
10,000
22,000
20,000
2,000
0
6,000
4,000
8,000
JulJunMayAprMarFebJan SepAug Oct
2017WEST – Atlantic basket TC2 & TC14
EAST – Pacific round trip TC10
1616
-0.2% -0.5%
0.3%
2.1%
-0.3%
Note: RoIC defined as Annualized RoIC (adjusted for impairments) or EBIT less tax / invested capital (average invested capital through the period)* Scorpio Tankers adjusted for merger costs
INDUSTRY LEADING ROIC
Q3 2017
*
2.4%
1.1%
3.2%2.8%
4.9%
2016
2.5% 1.2% 0.8% -0.4%1.7%2017 YTD
16
17
TORM – KEY SUCCESS FACTORS
TORM is a large scale, pure-play product tanker owner, active in all key product tanker segments in order to meet customer needs
Our ~80 product tankers are primarily deployed in the spot market
TORM has a solid capital structurewith financial strength topursue growth
Competitive advantage when pursuing vessel acquisitions from yards
Semi-annual distribution policy of25-50% of net income
TORM’s superior integratedoperating platform includes
in-house technical and commercial management (preferred by customers)
Enhanced responsiveness toTORM’s customers,
resulting in higher TCEs
Scale and focus driving cost-efficient results
TORM pursues selectivegrowth based on rigorous
financial hurdles
In-house S&P team with relationships with brokers,
yards, banks and shipowners
Well-positioned to grow at market lows and to be a consolidator
18
ACQUIRED SIX MR RE-SALE NEWBUILDINGS IN Q3 2017 FOR USD 185M; FOUR GSI VESSELS TO BE DELIVERED IN 2019
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
30-31 32-33 34-35 36-37 38-39 40-41 42-43 44-45 46-47 48-49 50-51 52-53 54-55 56-57 58-59 60+
TORM’s MR re-sales
Q3 2017 MR acquisitions:
2 Hyundai Mipo
4 GSI
-The six acquisition vessels
have attractive financing
Clarksons quarterly MR newbuilding prices 2006-2017#
of
qu
art
ers
USDm
Clarksons today
Source: Clarksons, TORM
19
TORM’S NEWBUILDING OPTIONS
Status
Pricing of options
TORM has negotiated to maintain eight options:
Four MR vessels with delivery in 2H 2019/Q1 2020
Four LR1 vessels with delivery in 2H 2019
The options are with high specifications, including:
USCG approved BWMS
All with a scrubber-ready design
The options are attractively priced approximately 10% below Clarksons’ benchmarks and also at
or below all Clarksons’ pricing observations of these vessel classes since 2006
MR options are priced at approximately 10% below Clarksons’ current MR benchmark at USD
33.5m
LR1 options are priced at approximately 10% below Clarksons’ current LR1 benchmark at USD
41.5m
19
20
0
5
10
15
56
-57
60
-61
70
+
68
-69
62
-63
64
-65
66
-67
58
-59
54
-55
52
-53
50
-51
48
-49
46
-47
44
-45
42
-43
40
-41
38
-39
36
-37
THE NEWBUILDING OPTIONS ARE VERY ATTRACTIVELY PRICED IN A HISTORICAL CONTEXT
Clarksons quarterly LR1 newbuilding prices 2006-2017
# o
f q
uart
ers
USDm
Clarksons quarterly MR newbuilding prices 2006-2017
# o
f q
uart
ers
USDm
Four LR1
options
Four MR
options
0
5
10
15
58
-59
60
+
34
-35
32
-33
30
-31
36
-37
56
-57
54
-55
52
-53
50
-51
48
-49
46
-47
44
-45
42
-43
40
-41
38
-39
4 LR1
options
4 MR
options
TORM’s option vessels
Clarksons Q3 2017
Clarksons quarterly 2006-17
Source: Clarksons, TORM 20
21
TORM – KEY SUCCESS FACTORS
TORM is a large scale, pure-play product tanker owner, active in all key product tanker segments in order to meet customer needs
Our ~80 product tankers are primarily deployed in the spot market
TORM has a solid capital structurewith financial strength topursue growth
Competitive advantage when pursuing vessel acquisitions from yards
Semi-annual distribution policy of25-50% of net income
TORM’s superior integratedoperating platform includes
in-house technical and commercial management (preferred by customers)
Enhanced responsiveness toTORM’s customers,
resulting in higher TCEs
Scale and focus driving cost-efficient results
TORM pursues selectivegrowth based on rigorous
financial hurdles
In-house S&P team with relationships with brokers,
yards, banks and shipowners
Well-positioned to grow at market lows and to be a consolidator
22
TORM’S NET ASSET VALUE ESTIMATED AT USD 708M
* Calculated based on 61,985,975 shares (excluding 312,871 treasury shares) and USD/DKK fx rate of 6.28; Other includes Other plant and operating equipment, and total financial assets
30 September 2017 figures, USDm
• Based on broker values, TORM’s
vessels including newbuildings were
estimated at USD 1,524m as of 30
September 2017
• With an outstanding debt of USD
775m and committed CAPEX of
USD 238m, TORM’s Net Loan-to-
Value was 57% ensuring a strong
capital structure
• Adjusting for cash and working
capital, TORM’s Net Asset Value
(NAV) was estimated at USD 708m
• On a per share basis*, the NAV was
estimated at USD 11.4 or DKK 71.9
• Market cap as of 12 January 2018
was USD 535m, or DKK 53.10 per
shareCash
145
Committed
CAPEX
238
Outstanding
debt
775
1,524
Value of
new-
buildings
310
Value of
vessels on
the water
1,214
Market
Cap*
(12/01/18)
708
50
Other*Working
Capital
2
Net LTV
of 57%
Net Asset
Value
535
173
24%
discount
to NAV
23
TORM HAS A FAVOURABLE FINANCING PROFILE AND STRONG LIQUIDITY POSITION
* Total debt includes a non-amortizing USD 6m credit facility
** Of which USD 40m must be cash or cash equivalent
*** Following the balance sheet date, TORM and Danish Ship Finance have agreed to extend the maturity of a loan tranche from June 2019 to December 2021. This is reflected in the graph
As of 30 September 2017 (USDm)
TORM is well-positioned
to service future CAPEX
and debt commitments.
CAPEX commitments Available liquidity (before equity transaction)
98102
Total201920182017 Total available
liquidity
LR2 and MR
financing
agreements
Available
debt facility
Cash position
Ample headroom under
our attractive covenant
package:
• Minimum liquidity: USD
75m**
• Minimum book equity
ratio: 25% (adjusted for
market value of
vessels)
Scheduled debt* repayments***
485
775
2020 repayment
86
2019 repayment
90
2018 repayment
85
2017 repayment
21
Debt as of 30
Sep 2017*
2021 or after
38
238145
75
196 416
24
Orion purchase price considerations
AGENDA
Attractive Product Tanker Fundamentals
Company Overview
Q3 2017 Financials
123
25
USDm Q3 2017 Q3 2016
Q1-Q3
2017
Q1-Q3
2016 2016 2015*
P&L
TCE Earnings 95 103 295 365 458 582
Gross profit 47 50 147 198 242 361
Sale of vessels 0 0 3 0 0 0
EBITDA 37 40 117 166 200 319
Profit before tax -4 2 -1 48 -142 188
Adjusted profit before tax
(excluding impairment
charges)
-2 2 2 47 43 188
Balance sheet
Equity 784 963 784 963 781 976
Net Interest-Bearing Debt 630 612 630 612 609 613
Cash and cash equivalents 145 77 145 77 76 168
Key figures
Earnings per share (USD)-0.1 0.0 0.0 0.8 -2.3 NA
Return on Invested Capital
(adjusted RoIC)
2.1% 2.5% 2.5% 6.3% 4.9% 14.1%
Net Asset Value (NAV) 708 873 708 873 733 1,169
Number of vessels (#) 77 81 77 81 81 74
Tanker TCE/day (USD) 14,290 14,391 14,477 17,248 16,050 22,879
Tanker OPEX/day (USD) 6,631 6,596 6,649 6,967 6,771 7,193
EBITDA OF USD 37M IN Q3 2017
Approximately break-even (net
income) in a very challenging 2017
environment
Note: See appendix slides 39-40 for reconciliation of quarterly non-IFRS measures
* 2015 figures are proforma figures
As of 6 November 2017, 60% of Q4
2017 covered at USD/day 15,775
26
OUR FOCUS ON COST CUTTING HAS REDUCED OPEX BY ~USD/DAY 1,000 SINCE 2014
* Pro forma figures for 2014 and 2015 presents the combined TORM and Njord fleet
TORM’s platform remains highly focused on cost-
efficiencies and high quality technical management Significant reduction in OPEX
• The in-house technical management allows for close
control over operating expenses and no margin leakage
to third-party providers
• The integrated platform provides customers with better
accountability and insight into safety and vessel
performance
• TORM assesses its technical performance across a wide
range of measures which besides OPEX level includes
indicators within e.g. safety (Lost Time Accident
Frequency) and fuel efficiency
OPEX per day (yearly, weighted avg. in USD/day)
0
5,000
1,000
6,000
4,000
8,000
3,000
7,000
2,000
-1,006 or-13%
2015*
7,655
6,771
2016
7,193
2014* 2017 Q1-Q3
6,649
27
TORM HAS A FULLY INTEGRATED BUSINESS MODEL AND ADMIN EXPENSES ARE TRENDING SIGNIFICANTLY DOWN
* Pro forma figures for 2015 presented as though the Restructuring occurred as of 1 January 2015 and include the combined TORM and Njord fleet
TORM operates a fully integrated commercial
and technical platform
TORM has trimmed administration expenses
significantly
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
-52%
Q1-Q3 2017
2010
2009
2008
2016
*2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
• TORM’s operational platform handles commercial and
technical operations in-house
• The integrated business model provides TORM with the
highest possible trading flexibility and earning power
• TORM manages
– ~80 vessels commercially
– ~75 vessels technically
• TORM has a global reach with offices in Denmark, India,
the Philippines, Singapore, the UK and the US
• Average admin cost per earning day for 2016 of
USD/day ~1,450
• Outsourced technical and commercial management
would affect other line items of the P&L
Admin. expenses (quarterly avg. in USDm)
28
TORM HAS SIGNIFICANT OPERATING LEVERAGE
Unfixed days (excluding newbuilding options)
522
2,509
25,070
2,692
16,730
2018
2,4474,238
2,767
19,189
28,641
2019
3,361545
4,963
2017
3,139
LR1LR2 MR
Illustrative change in cash flow generation potential for the TORM fleet
∆ Average TCE/day 2017 2018 2019
USD 2,000 9.9 50.1 57.3
USD 1,000 5.0 25.1 28.6
USD (1,000) (5.0) (25.1) (28.6)
USD (2,000) (9.9) (50.1) (57.3)
# of days as of 30 September 2017
USDm
Of total
earning days 73% 89% 99%
As of 6 November 2017, TORM had covered 60% of the Q4 earning days at a blended rate
of USD/day 15,775, relative to an average Q1 - Q3 2017 rate of USD/day 14,477
Handy
APPENDIX
30
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
LR2 (TC1)
5-year average 2014 2015 2016 2017
Q3 IMPACTED BY INVENTORY DRAWS AND HURRICANE HARVEY
Source: Clarksons. Spot earnings: LR2: TC1 Ras Tanura-> Chiba, LR1: TC5 Ras Tanura-> Chiba and MR: average basket of Rotterdam->NY, Bombay->Chiba, Mina Al Ahmadi->Rotterdam, Amsterdam->Lome,
Houston->Rio de Janeiro, Singapore->Sidney
Spot rates
A reduction in US refining capacity as a result of Hurricane Harvey initially
led to an increase in clean petroleum exports from Europe to US East Coast
and South America, which caused freight to spike sharply.
The secondary effect from Hurricane Harvey was a strengthening of the
transpacific market driven by a combination of low inventories on the US
West Coast and limited supply out of the US Gulf and Mexico.
Q3 MR
Q3 LRIncreased volume of middle distillates moved from the Middle East to
Europe, initially due to a shutdown of Europe’s largest refinery in Rotterdam
and later in order to replenish European stocks, following the rise in exports
across the Atlantic.
Q4-to-dateIn the West, more CPP has been moving from East to West, resulting in an
overcapacity of available vessels West of Suez. On the positive side,
naphtha and gasoline blendstock flows from West to East have increased.
In the East, activity for MRs in the Middle East has been good with strong
rates. The LR rates have improved, primarily driven by increased product
flows from the Middle East to Europe as well as stable demand for naphtha
in the Far East.
0
10
20
30
40
50
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
LR1 (TC5)
5-year average 2014 2015 2016 2017
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
MR (Average)
5-year average 2014 2015 2016 2017
31
FLEET UPDATE
As of 14.11.2017# of vessels
Q2 2017 Changes Q3 2017 Changes 2017 Changes 2018 Changes 2019
Owned vessels
LR2 7 - 7 - 7 4 11 - 11
LR1 7 - 7 - 7 - 7 - 7
MR 48 2 50 - 50 - 50 4 54
Handysize 9 -1 8 - 8 -1 7 - 7
Total 71 1 72 - 72 3 75 4 79
Charter-in and leaseback vessels
LR2 3 - 3 - 3 -2 1 - 1
LR1 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0
MR 2 - 2 - 2 - 2 - 2
Handysize 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0
Total 5 - 5 - 5 -2 3 - 3
Total fleet 76 1 77 - 77 1 78 4 82
Note: In addition to above development, TORM is currently planning towards a potential sale of one older MR vessel. The transaction is subject to mutual Board approvals.
32
Share information
OAKTREE IS THE MAJORITY SHAREHOLDER AND
OWNERSHIP HAS BECOME MORE DISPERSED
TORM’s shares are listed on Nasdaq
Copenhagen under the ticker TRMD A
and on Nasdaq New York under the
ticker TRMD
Shares
• 62.3m A shares, one B share and one
C share
• The B and C shares have certain
voting rights
• A Shares have a nominal value of
USD/share 0.01
100
13
13
TotalUnknown
2
RetailInstitutionalDW
8
Oaktree
64
Estimated shareholdings as of 31 January 2017, %
33
TORM HAS DISTRIBUTED A TOTAL OF USD 48M TO SHAREHOLDERS IN 2016 AND 2017
* Based on share price as of 31 December 2016 and a USD/DKK fx rate of 7.0
• During the first nine months of 2017, TORM has
paid a USD 1.2m dividend on 12 September
2017, corresponding to a dividend per share of
USD 0.02 or DKK ~0.13
• During 2016, TORM has distributed a total of
USD 47m to shareholders, corresponding to a
yield of 8%*
25
19
2017 H1 dividendRepurchase
from Corporate
Reorganization
3
2016 dividend Total distribution
48
Market purchase
1
Distribution to shareholders (USDm)
TORM’s Distribution Policy for 2017
• 25 to 50% of Net Income
• Semi-annual distribution
• Dividend and/or share repurchase
• Policy reviewed periodically
34
Jacob Meldgaard
▪ Executive Director in TORM plc
▪ CEO of TORM A/S since April 2010
▪ Previously Executive Vice President of the Danish shipping company NORDEN, where he was in charge of the company’s dry cargo division
▪ Prior to that, he held various positions with J. Lauritzen and A.P. Møller-Mærsk
▪ More than 25 years of shipping experience
Lars Christensen
▪ Head of Projects
▪ With TORM since 2011
▪ Previously with Navita Ship,
Maersk Broker and EA
Gibson
▪ More than 25 years of
shipping experience
Executive Director
Senior Management
Christian Søgaard-Christensen
▪ Chief Financial Officer
▪ With TORM since 2010
▪ Previously with McKinsey & Co
▪ More than 10 years of shipping and
transportation experience
Jesper S. Jensen
▪ Head of Technical Division
▪ With TORM since 2014
▪ Previously with Clipper and
Maersk
▪ More than 25 years of shipping
experience
MANAGEMENT TEAM WITH AN INTERNATIONAL OUTLOOK AND MANY YEARS OF SHIPPING EXPERIENCE
35
RECONCILIATION OF NON-IFRS FINANCIAL MEASURES
Q3 Q3 Q1-Q3 Q1-Q3
USDm 2017 2016 2017 2016
Non-IFRS Financial Measures
Time charter equivalent (TCE) earnings 95.2 103.4 295.1 364.6
Gross profit 47.1 50.1 146.6 198.0
EBITDA 37.0 40.2 116.8 166.3
Invested capital 1,409.6 1,572.7 1,409.6 1,572.7
Net interestbearing debt 630.0 611.5 630.0 611.5
Net Asset Value (NAV) 707.7 800.0 707.7 800.0
Q3 Q3 Q1-Q3 Q1-Q3
USDm 2017 2016 2017 2016
Time charter equivalent (TCE) earnings
Revenue 155.8 155.8 485.6 526.4
Port expenses, bunkers and commision -60.6 -52.4 -190.5 -161.8
Total 95.2 103.4 295.1 364.6
Q3 Q3 Q1-Q3 Q1-Q3
USDm 2017 2016 2017 2016
Gross profit
Operating profit 5.8 9.9 26.9 75.5
Depreciation 28.6 30.3 86.3 90.8
Impairment losses on tangible and intangible assets 2.6 0.0 3.6 0.0
Other operating expenses 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3
Administrative expenses 10.1 9.8 32.3 31.4
Profit from sale of vessels 0.0 0.0 -2.8 0.0
Total 47.1 50.1 146.6 198.0
Q3 Q3 Q1-Q3 Q1-Q3
USDm 2017 2016 2017 2016
EBITDA
Net profit/(loss) for the period -4.2 1.6 -1.2 47.4
Tax expense 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.8
Financial expenses 11.1 8.7 29.9 30.1
Financial income -1.4 -0.6 -2.4 -2.8
Depreciation 28.6 30.3 86.3 90.8
Impairment losses on tangible and intangible assets 2.6 0.0 3.6 0.0
Total 37.0 40.2 116.8 166.3
36
RECONCILIATION OF NON-IFRS FINANCIAL MEASURES CONTINUED
Q3 Q3 Q1-Q3 Q1-Q3
USDm 2017 2016 2017 2016
Net interest-bearing debt
Mortgage debt and bank loans (current and non-current) 741.8 671.2 741.8 671.2
Finance lease liabilities (current and non-current) 28.8 15.8 28.8 15.8
Amortized bank fees 4.5 1.9 4.5 1.9
Cash and cash equivalents -145.1 -77.4 -145.1 -77.4
Total 630.0 611.5 630.0 611.5
Q3 Q3 Q1-Q3 Q1-Q3
USDm 2017 2016 2017 2016
Invested capital
Tangible and intangible fixed assets 1,404.2 1,590.3 1,404.2 1,590.3
Investments in joint ventures 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Bunkers 34.1 28.9 34.1 28.9
Accounts receivables *) 75.2 64.0 75.2 64.0
Deferred tax liability -44.9 -45.0 -44.9 -45.0
Trade payables **) -57.7 -63.7 -57.7 -63.7
Current tax liabilities -1.4 -1.9 -1.4 -1.9
Deferred income -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2
Total 1,409.6 1,572.7 1,409.6 1,572.7
Q3 Q3 Q1-Q3 Q1-Q3
USDm 2017 2016 2017 2016
Net Asset Value
Total vessels value including newbuildings (broker values) 1,523.5 1,540.6 1,523.5 1,540.6
Committed CAPEX on newbuildings -238.0 -158.4 -238.0 -158.4
Cash position 145.1 77.4 145.1 77.4
Bunkers 34.1 28.9 34.1 28.9
Freight receivables 62.1 54.6 62.1 54.6
Other receivables 10.3 3.7 10.3 3.7
Other plant and operating equipment 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
Investments in joint ventures 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Prepayment 2.8 5.7 2.8 5.7
Outstanding debt *) -775.1 -688.9 -775.1 -688.9
Trade payables -24.7 -21.5 -24.7 -21.5
Other liabilities -33.0 -42.2 -33.0 -42.2
Current tax liabilities -1.4 -1.9 -1.4 -1.9
Total Net Asset Value (NAV) 707.7 800.0 707.7 800.0
Q3 Q3 Q1-Q3 Q1-Q3
USDm 2017 2016 2017 2016
Return on Invested Capital (adjusted ROIC)
Operating profit for the period 5.8 9.9 26.9 75.5
Reversal of impairment losses on tangible and intangible assets 2.6 0.0 3.6 0.0
Tax expense -0.3 -0.2 -0.6 -0.8
Adjusted return for the period 8.1 9.7 29.9 74.7
Full year equivalent return 32.4 38.8 39.9 99.6
Invested capital, beginning of period 1,340.6 1,587.1 1,387.8 1,587.5
Invested capital, end of period 1,409.6 1,572.7 1,409.6 1,572.7
Accumulated impairment, begining of period 173.6 0.0 173.6 0.0
Accumulated impairment, end of period 173.6 0.0 173.6 0.0
Average invested capital, ajdusted for impairment 1,548.7 1,579.9 1,572.3 1,580.1
ROIC 2.1% 2.5% 2.5% 6.3%