12
‘Invisible’ Healthcare Providers Not-for-profit, non-government hospitals and clinics in developing countries Belinda Thompson, PhD Scholar

‘Invisible’ Healthcare Providers

  • Upload
    karis

  • View
    36

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

‘Invisible’ Healthcare Providers. Not-for-profit, non-government hospitals and clinics in developing countries Belinda Thompson, PhD Scholar. Why they are important. Why they are ‘invisible’. No list exists International governance structures Politics External to health systems Scale - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: ‘Invisible’ Healthcare Providers

‘Invisible’ Healthcare Providers

Not-for-profit, non-government hospitals and clinics in developing countriesBelinda Thompson, PhD Scholar

Page 2: ‘Invisible’ Healthcare Providers

Why they are important

2

Page 3: ‘Invisible’ Healthcare Providers

Why they are ‘invisible’

• No list exists• International governance structures• Politics• External to health systems• Scale• Poorly functioning bureaucracies

3

Page 4: ‘Invisible’ Healthcare Providers

Barriers to the research

• Lack of academic precedent • Contested / contentious terminology• Inaccessibility of information• Confounding factors

4

Page 5: ‘Invisible’ Healthcare Providers

What do we know?

• Absence of data• Calls for further research• Some limited, regional attempts at

typology• Lack of framework for research

5

Page 6: ‘Invisible’ Healthcare Providers

What I want to know is….

• What, where, when, why & how• Origins, ownership, succession• Operational structures, facilities• Relationships with other actors• Government – friend or foe?• Funding & engagement

6

Page 7: ‘Invisible’ Healthcare Providers

My approach

1. Scope out a typology2. Select three case studies from one of the

types identified

7

Page 8: ‘Invisible’ Healthcare Providers

Proposed methodology

• Research publicly available materials, informal discussions

• Initial public survey• Literature review• Specific surveys of types identified• Three case studies – interviews on site

8

Page 9: ‘Invisible’ Healthcare Providers

Right now…

• Initial survey has 223 responses to date• Showing a large lack of awareness – 65% • Firming views on types, being:

i. Vertical ii. Faith-basediii. Emergency responseiv. Personality-basedv. Specialistsvi. Delivery innovators vii. Mining-relatedviii. Travelling health clinics / individuals

9

Page 10: ‘Invisible’ Healthcare Providers

Research outcomes?

• Raise awareness / recognition• Increase understanding• Provide opportunities for collaboration• Information sharing

10

Page 11: ‘Invisible’ Healthcare Providers

How you can help

• Fill out my survey at https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/G58X8H2

• If you see /hear something, contact me: Belinda Thompson PhD ScholarCrawford School of Public Policy, ANU0409 305 [email protected]

11

Page 12: ‘Invisible’ Healthcare Providers

Key references• Ahmed, S, Bloom, A & Sweeney, R 2011, ‘Analysing relationship between the state

and non-state health care providers, with special reference to Asia and the Pacific’, Health Policy and Health Finance Knowledge Hub Working Paper, no. 10.

• Buse, K & Walt, G 1997, ‘An unruly mélange? Coordinating external resources to the health sector: A review’, Social Science & Medicine, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 449-63.

• Gilson, L 2012, Health Policy and Systems Research: A methodology reader, Geneva: Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research & World Health Organisation.

• Green, A 1987, ‘The role of non‐governmental organizations and the private sector in the provision of health care in developing countries’, The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 37-58.

• Olivier, J & Wodon, Q 2012, ‘Playing broken telephone: assessing faith-inspired health care provision in Africa’, Development in Practice, vol. 22, no. 5-6, pp. 819-34.

• Salamon, L & Anheier, H 1992, ‘In search of the non-profit sector. I: The question of definitions’, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 125-51.

12