Upload
gary-caldwell
View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IRISH MEDICAL ORGANISATIONPresentation On Review Of Presentation On Review Of GMS And Publicly Funded GMS And Publicly Funded Primary Care SchemesPrimary Care Schemes
Dr Martin DalyChairpersonIMO GP Committee
16th November 2005
BACKGROUNDBACKGROUND
GMS Scheme now 33 years old
Repeatedly modified by successive memos and circulars
Existing contract model has served GPs and patients well but has failed to evolve in line with GP and societal needs
STRENGTHS OF STRENGTHS OF CURRENT SYSTEMCURRENT SYSTEM
High patient satisfaction
Equal access for Public and Private patients
Same-day service
Flexibility in responding to health crises as they arise
Value for Money!
Contd.. Contd..
Strengths Of Current Strengths Of Current SystemSystem 24 hour 7 day service, 365
days per year
Extensive network of GP centres of practice
Easily accessible service
WEAKNESSES OF WEAKNESSES OF CURRENT SYSTEMCURRENT SYSTEM Failure to expand the contract to
support Preventive Medicine and Chronic Illness Care
Inadequate and uneven access by GPs to essential diagnostic services
Failure to adequately support infrastructural development
Failure to adequately resource support staff
Contd.. Contd..
Weaknesses Of Current Weaknesses Of Current SystemSystem Lack of flexibility in
accommodating changing practices in the workplace
Inadequate support to allow GPs to take sick leave, maternity leave and study leave in line with public service norms
Lack of uniform out of hours service
1972-2005 1972-2005 CHANGED LANDSCAPE!CHANGED LANDSCAPE! Changes in GMS population
served
Changes in GP workload
Changes in GP service delivery
Changes in GP age, gender and career expectations
CHANGES IN GMS CHANGES IN GMS POPULATION SERVEDPOPULATION SERVED
Scheme was designed and costed on the basis of a community-rated means tested scheme with even mix of sick and healthy and designed to cater for episodic illness
Contd.. Contd..
Changes In GMS Changes In GMS Population ServedPopulation ServedSince 1989 :Since 1989 :
Frontloading with individual high-need patients at discretion of CEOs (? 80,000)
Non-EU Nationals/Asylum Seekers
Cancer patients, Hepatitis C, Foster Children
Inclusion of all over 70s
GP Visit Cards with greatly reduced entitlements
CHANGES IN GENERAL CHANGES IN GENERAL PRACTICE WORKLOADPRACTICE WORKLOAD People living longer
More chronic disease
Escalating administrative burden
Evidence based disease management
“Offloading” of workload from the hospital sector (Warfarin, Psychiatry etc.)
Contd.. Contd..
Changes In General Changes In General Practice WorkloadPractice Workload Increasingly litigious society
Higher patient expectation
Imperative for more CME/CPD
Demands for GP representation on countless committees, PCTs, interview boards, working groups etc.
CHANGES IN GP CHANGES IN GP SERVICE DELIVERYSERVICE DELIVERY
Improvements in standard of premises
More ancillary staff employed
Widespread adoption of ICT
Shared care (Heart-watch, Mother and Infant Scheme, Diabetes etc)
CHANGES IN GPS’ CHANGES IN GPS’ AGE, GENDER AND AGE, GENDER AND EXPECTATIONSEXPECTATIONS
Fewer newly trained GPs committing to whole time General Practice
Aging GP population in many areas
Greater demand for flexible contracts
Difficulty accessing locums
Contd.. Contd..
Changes In GPs’ Age, Changes In GPs’ Age, Gender And Gender And ExpectationsExpectations Changed expectations in younger
GPs:
Less interested in single-handed practice
Less interested in working in rural areas
Less interested in working in deprived urban areas
A NEW CONTRACT – A NEW CONTRACT – FIRST PRINCIPLESFIRST PRINCIPLES
Patient is paramount
Any new contract has to deliver a service more suited to the needs of the general public going forwards
Needs of the State and of General Practice must also be satisfied
Contd.. Contd..
A New Contract – First A New Contract – First PrinciplesPrinciples
Win-win elements should be identified and dealt with as early in the process as possible to engender trust and assist progress
PUBLIC-PRIVATE MIXPUBLIC-PRIVATE MIX
GPs look after 100% of the population, while the GMS extends to < 30% of the population
The state currently has no contractual relationship with GPs in respect of the other 70% of the population, other than through the Mother & Infant Scheme and the Primary Childhood Immunisation Scheme
Preventive and Chronic Illness schemes should be available on a whole-population basis with appropriate contractual arrangements
Contd.. Contd..
Public-Private MixPublic-Private Mix Recognition that there are 2
distinct populations with very distinct eligibility
The State should not assume a remit over the provision of the totality of GP care to those citizens outside the GMS unless and until relevant contractual arrangements have been negotiated
PRIORITIES FOR PRIORITIES FOR GENERAL PRACTICEGENERAL PRACTICE
Infrastructure
Service Issues
Contractual Issues
Universal Patient Registration
PRIORITIES FOR PRIORITIES FOR GENERAL PRACTICEGENERAL PRACTICEInfrastructureInfrastructure Imaginative approach to the
funding of necessary GP capital infrastructure
Realistic support for current infrastructure costs, such that these are not provided at a net cost to GPs (staff, ICT, diagnostics….)
PRIORITIES FOR PRIORITIES FOR GENERAL PRACTICEGENERAL PRACTICE
Service IssuesService Issues Need for realistic funding of:
Expanded range of special items of service (e.g. 24 hr BP monitoring, minor surgery, joint injection)
Chronic Illness Schemes (e.g. Diabetes, CHD, Asthma/COPD, Anticoagulation)
PRIORITIES FOR PRIORITIES FOR GENERAL PRACTICEGENERAL PRACTICEContd.. Contd.. Service IssuesService Issues Need for realistic funding of: National Preventive Programmes (e.g.
Cervical Screening, CVS Screening) Age-appropriate annual check-ups Proper uniform access to community
diagnostics (e.g. near-patient testing, Dexa scanning, Ultrasound), as well as hospital-based diagnostics
PRIORITIES FOR PRIORITIES FOR GENERAL PRACTICEGENERAL PRACTICEContract IssuesContract Issues Flexibility of contract Out-of-Hours CME – CPD Representation GMS entry & exit Pensions
PRIORITIES FOR PRIORITIES FOR GENERAL PRACTICEGENERAL PRACTICE
Universal Patient RegistrationUniversal Patient Registration Can significantly improve practice for
GPs and patients Needs proper funding and ICT support Data Protection and other safeguards
required
SUMMARYSUMMARY Timely Review
Interests of 3 Parties Ensured
Modern Service Demands
Modern Infrastructure
Shift From Secondary Care
Continuance of High Quality