Upload
corey-andrews
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IS 4800 Empirical Research Methods for Information Science
Class Notes March 21 and 23
Instructor: Prof. Carole Hafner, 446 [email protected] Tel: 617-373-5116
Course Web site: www.ccs.neu.edu/course/is4800sp12/
2
Qualitative Research : General characteristics
•Purpose: to study behavior patterns not well understoodand/or too complex for quantitative methods
•Research questions can be non-specific (“panoramic view”)•Research hypotheses and procedures can evolve
•Collection of data •Only partially structured (use of open-ended observations and/or questions)•Who: individuals, groups, cultures•Where: natural setting
3
•Analysis is interpretive:• importance of experimenter’s background and possible bias• coding of data defined or enhanced during analysis stage
•Reporting of results in the form of an essay or narrative• use of quotes to illustrate and back up claims• use of little “stories” of what happened for the same reason
4
Qualitative Research: Specific qualitative methods
Ethnography – observe communities/cultureCase study – observe groups/goal orientationPhenomenology – observe individualsGrounded theory – observe groups or cultures
Relevance to IT field
5
Strategy Example(s) or categories of IT-related research
Ethnography Ethnography – Observe behavior patterns (introduce email or other apps) Ex: instant messaging among HS students. Technique: field observations/ artifacts, interviews to get background and motivations. Ex: room scheduling
Case study Case study – usually IS development/deployment. Telemedicine study: introduction of IT, how it changed the patterns of service provision. Technique: interviews (facts, motivations, explanations), artifacts.
Phenomenology
How does a new technology change employee’s work experience: study secretaries, middle managers, executives. Example: email, problem reporting, cust support. Specifics: your tasks, required skills, communication (with whom, how much, method) your perception of your job (autonomy, influence, collegiality). Technique: interviews (attitudes)
Grounded theory
Grounded theory: Create a model that categorizes college students in terms of studying/learning behavior. The procrastinator. The super-prepared. Etc. and use it to explain observed impact of distance learning Ex: stages of technology adoption. Technique: interviews, artifacts
6
Qualitative Research (cont.)Data Collection
A plan for data collection – the “heart” of the research designWho, where, what, when
Techniques for data collection:field observations/participant observationinterviewsartifacts (documents, photos, “made objects”, etc.)
Recording methodstaking notesrecording/tapingcollecting artifacts
7
Qualitative ResearchData Collection (cont.)Observational protocol:
Thinking out in advance what questions you want to answer through your field observations, interviews, or examination of artifacts.
•A “structure” for taking notes
•A “template” with various “slots” to fill in. (As in Homework assignment 1).
•For an interview: opening statement, slots for specific (demo-graphic) information, questions to ask, guidelines for follow-up
8
Qualitative Research (cont.)Data Analysis
Step 1. Prepare and organize collected data (notes, tapes, artifacts). Organization may be chronological, categorical, by source. Etc.
Step 2. Read with open mind – take notes.
Step 3. Classify into categories/taxonomies. Identify important attributes/dimensions of variation. Use a coding scheme to position elements of the data collected (answers in an interview, events observed, artifacts) within your classification scheme.
9
Qualitative Research Data Analysis (cont.)
Step 4. Identify larger themes and show how the categories of your classification scheme are related. Show how these themes provide explanations for the behavior observed.
Step 5. Summarize. Design figures, tables or other means for presenting your analytical scheme in a summary fashion.
Step 6. Conclusions. What will be the “lessons learned” or conclusions of the study.
10
Validity in Qualitative ResearchSome approaches to increasing credibility
Use data from different sources (“triangulate”) to show your analysis provides a coherent explanation
Show analysis to participants to confirm accuracy
Show results to other (impartial) researchers
Present negative or conflicting information honestly
Describe researcher’s background and possible bias
11
Qualitative Research (cont.)Writing the Proposal or Report
•Be clear about the study’s purpose, research questions, research strategy, and limitations.
•Be specific about who, what, when, where and how the data will be/were collected and analyzed.
•Be scholarly by reviewing prior work and explaining how the most relevant prior work is related to the current study.
•Be honest about problems encountered, researcher’s role, conflicting data.
•Present complex material verbally and graphically.
•Follow good technical writing style.
Qualitative Research Data collection methods
I. Observation 6 months – 1 year
II. Interviews Informal
III. Analysis of artifacts (documents, arts and crafts, tools)
13
I. Observation: Developing Behavioral Categories, i.e. “Coding”
“confused” vs.
(“clicked mouse at least 5 times on inappropriate menu” OR“gazed at interface with mouth open AND no mouse clicks or keyboard presses for 5 minutes”) AND “furrowed brows”
14
Developing Behavioral Categories
• How do you know when your definitions are good enough?
• Cohen’s Kappa measure of inter-rater agreement:
• PR(a) – PR(e) / (1 – PR(e))
• a = agreement observed
• e = agreement expected by chance
15
Refining a behavioral protocol
Draft Coding manual
Two or more observers code datafor pilot subjects
Is Kappa acceptable?
Coders reviewdifferences &update coding manual
Coding manual providesreliable measure,proceed with study
yesno
16
Coding Manual
• You should write your behavior identification rules down so that you could give them to someone else to follow reliably.
• You should also write down the sampling and coding methods you will use, as well as your recording instrument (e.g., paper form).
17
Quantifying Behavior in Observational Research
• Frequency Method– Record the frequency with which a behavior occurs within a
time period
• Duration Method– Record how long a behavior lasts
• Intervals Method– Divide the observation period into several discrete time
intervals (e.g., ten 2-minute intervals), and record whether a behavior occurs within each interval
18
Example: Code Posture Shifts
19
Coping With Complexity in Observational Research
• Event Sampling– Select one behavior for observation and record all
instances of that behavior
– It is best if one behavior can be specified as more important than others
Interviews
• Interviews– Structured, semi-structured, informal, retrospective– Informal interviews seem to be casual conversations,
reveal what people think and how one person’s perceptions compare with another’s
– Difficult to conduct ethically and productively
• Key Actor or Informant interviewing
• Specific questions: open ended or closed ended
Techniques
• Grand tour techniques – show me around
• Study of faculty attitudes: tell me about the College
• Good at exploratory stage, to identify topics for further study
The Ethnographic Interview (paper)
I. Grand Tour questionsA. General Overview Ask the informant to generalize, to discuss patterns of events.
• Could you describe a typical day on the job?
• Could you show me/tell me how you usually make a box?
B. Specific Tour Ask the informant about a specific incident or what he or she did on a certain day.
• Could you describe what happened at the management meeting yesterday, from
beginning to end?
• Tell me about the last time you used the crane.
C. Guided Tour Ask the informant for a tour of the workplace or to accompany him or her while doing a job.• Could you show me around the plant? Could I go on a sales call with you? D. Task-Related Grand Tour Ask the informant to perform a task to help you understand the context. • Could you draw a flow chart of how the aluminum moves through the plant, from raw metal to the finished product? • Could I watch you use the cutting machine and ask you questions about it afterwards?
• II. Mini-Tour Questions
• "Describe what goes on when you run the coil through the annealing machine."
• III. Example Questions
• "Can you give me an example of your supervisor giving you a hard time?"
IV. Experience Questions "Could you tell me about some experiences you've had working on the annealing machine?" V. Native-Language Questions • What do you call it when you mis-measure a piece? How do you refer to your work area?
26
III. Artifacts: Content Analysis
• Used to analyze a written or spoken record for occurrence of specific behaviors or events
• Archival sources often used as sources for data
• Response categories must be clearly defined
• A method for quantifying behavior must be defined
27
Example Study
• The CEO of Global Enterprises, Inc. is very worried about the low morale in the company, as evidenced by the amount of flame email she receives. She considers sending every office on a “ropes” course, but to do this would cost the company $10M. She asks you to do a study to tell how well her scheme might actually work in reducing her flame mail.
28
Analytic Induction (Znaniecki)Nonexperimental, Qualitative analogue to scientific method
1. Phenomenon tentatively defined2. Hypothesis is developed3. A single instance is considered to determine if
hypothesis is confirmed4. If hypothesis fails, then phenomenon or hypothesis
is redefined5. Additional cases are examined and, if the new
hypothesis is repeatedly confirmed, some degree of certainty results
6. Each negative case requires that the hypothesis be reformulated until there are no exceptions
29
Typical Use of Analytic Induction
• Say you’re interested in employee’s impressions of WizziWord.
• You interview 3 people, transcribe your notes, and categorize all important statements into themes– e.g. “It’s too slow.”, “It looks cool.”, etc.
• You interview 3 more people, categorize their comments.
• Repeat until no new (significant) categories/themes emerge.
30
Exercise
• What are your impressions of Clippy?
31
Meta-Analyses• Compare/Integrate “all” studies that have
investigated a given phenomena– E.g., use of a particular medication for a
particular disease
• Common in the literature (esp. medical)• Very methodical
– Search for articles– Eligibility criteria– Statistical analyses
Lecture 1 - Introduction 32
Ethnography
•Ethnography: The art and science of describing a group or culture.
• The observer is a human instrument
• Select a place and the people or activity
•Observe behavior and identify patterns
•A great variety of techniques to gather data
“(Participant) observation”: in natural setting
• “Participant” observation occurs when you interact casually and/or form relationships with informants
• How much you actually “participate” depends on the goals of the study.
Participant observation
• Advantages:– Offers insights into complex behavior– Identify the “right questions” for further study– Verify/correct self-reports
• Disadvantage: – Time consuming– Data collection is difficult– Problem of subjectivity
How to operationalize
• Field notes– Text– Diagrams, maps– Can result in numerical data
• Interviews (interviewer more clueful)
• Focus groups (facilitator more clueful)
What to observe
• Spatial relations
• Activities
• Communication– Verbal– Other
• Tasks– How work is allocated
Ethics
• Do not disrupt the activity your are observing
versus
• Do not mislead
• No formal rules about disclosing your role as a researcher when engaging in casual conversation – article suggests a point where you want to ask specific question
• Disclosure includes: right of refusal, confidentiality
Protecting confidentiality when data is unique
• Separate identify info from field notes entered into the computer
• People, organizations/companies, should be given fictitious names
How to be an effective observer
• Preparation
• Stay in the background
• Be factual and objective in your notes– (interpretation comes later)
• Taking notes:– Hand written usually– Type in to computer later
• EXPANDING NOTES
40
Case Study Research
Steps: design, conduct (data collection), analysis, write-up
Exploratory research and the role of prior theoryImpacts case selection, data collection Scientific method – observations should have the
potential to disconfirm
Case study research questions
Example: Telemedicine paper
Case study research
Design stepsDefine unit of analysisCase selectionCreation of a protocol (plan of work)
Data CollectionAnalysis and reporting
42
Case Study Research
I. Design steps:Select the unit(s) of analysis
(temporal, organizational, technological)Case selection (“sampling”??) – one or several
critical casetheory based (confirming or disconfirming)extreme v. typicalintensecriterion (e.g., budget > $X)convenience
43
Case Study Research – Design steps (cont.)
Use of a protocol: (the “plan of work”, should be required)
1. Overview of study, including overview of data collection strategy.
2. Details of data collection (sources, procedures)3. Interview guidelines and instruments4. Outline of the expected project report
Issues to be addressed in (2): access to the organizationresources sufficient to collect the data in the fieldscheduling of data collection activitiesproviding for unanticipated events
44
Case Study Research – Data Collection
The more different methods employed, the fuller the picture of the phenomena being studied.
-- Documents (meeting minutes, project reports, newsletters, manuals)
-- Archival documents (service records, system usage data)may provide quantitative information
-- InterviewsTypical: 95 interviews over 6 months
-- Field observations (when a visit is conducted): usually meetings. (also can observe user training, etc.)
-- Artifacts (problem reports – why not archival docs??)
45
Case Study Research – Data Collection
Selecting interviewees:a. maximum variation (preferred method)b. Homogeneousc. Snowball or chaind. Purposeful v. opportunistic
Benefits of semi-structured interviewsUnstructured when questions not known in advance
What is “triangulation”? (paper mentions construct validity)
When to STOP collecting data
46
Case Study Research – Data Analysis
Data analysis very different from analysis of experimentand survey data. Why?
Stages of analysis:Preliminary analysis (early steps)Within-case analysisCross-case analysis
Qualitative analysis most difficult and least standardizedpart of empirical research.
47
Case Study Research – Data Analysis
Goals of qualitative data analysis:Identify themesDevelop categoriesExplore similarities and differencesDescribe patterns that explain why(Propose models that predict)
48
Case Study Research – Data Analysis
Techniques for qualitative data analysis: Preliminary Stage1. Coding2. Database
What is a code? a word or short phrase attached to each segment (e.g., paragraph, answer to interview question) of the collected data, indicating the “presence” of that concept.
Codes can be arranged in (or derived from) a taxonomy.
A good taxonomy will yield codes that reveal patterns in the data.
49
Case Study Research – Data Analysis
Where do codes come from:Prior work or theoryStudy of initial data (defined “inductively”)Iterative nature of codingUse of independent raters to validate codes
The code book or code manual: desirable attributesDetailed description of each codeInclusion and exclusion criteriaExamples of collected data to illustrate each code
Development of higher-level “pattern codes” identify themes or relationships that are relevant to the study’s research questions
50
Case Study Research – Data Analysis
Case study database:•uninterpreted data•complete data (answers criticism of “selective quoting”)•analogous to raw data collected in experiment or survey
Contents of case study databaseField notes (interviews, observations)Documents (including transcripts)Quantitative data (including questionnaire data if any)Contemporaneous notes (reflective remarks)
51
Case Study Research – Data AnalysisTechniques for qualitative data analysis: within-case stageGoal: identify larger themes, relationships and propositions
Looking for larger themes and patterns:Pattern-matching
compare expected elements with actual dataperform cross-checking of interview transcripts
and other data collecteddesire two or more sources for each proposition
Explanation building:challenge tactics results approach
Use of charts, table, graphs, timelines to aid understanding
52
Case Study Research – Data Analysis
Techniques for qualitative data analysis: cross-case stage
Depends on availability of several cases
Two approaches:Analyze similarities and differences among cases
(e.g., factors, behaviors, results)If goal is theory-building, develop a theory using one
case and systematically compare itspropositions to other cases
53
Case Study Research – Write-up
Weakest part of the article
Goals:•Includes the goals of all professional writing, e.g., clarity, shows relationship to earlier work, data support conclusions
•For positivist case research, shows applicability (general relevance) to other examples with similar circumstances
•Constructive – propositions translate into “lessons learned” that offer guidance on how to make use of the results (do’s and don’ts)