1
At Clearstream, we are exploring ways of leveraging blockchain to support our mandate to make markets more efficient. leader Blockchain seems to be the buzzword of 2015. The technology underlying bitcoins has suddenly evolved from a niche area of expertise to a key skill. As a result, representatives of the financial industry are grappling to understand the complex disruptive impact blockchain could potentially have on well-established financial structures. While possible scenarios range from simple process optimisation to disintermediation of key players in financial transactions, it is actually very hard to make accurate predictions on what will happen. Since the technology was only used in certain niche sectors in the past, its true scalability to the financial industry and viable adoption paths are little understood. A multitude of new partnerships between the financial industry and technology were formed with the aim of bridging this knowledge gap, for example the R3 consortium with major banks. While it would be unwise to ignore the innovative potential of blockchain, it would be equally short-sighted to completely discard the current set-up with its well- established safety mechanisms and the legal certainty they bring. At Clearstream, we are currently investigating blockchain opportunities with our parent company Deutsche Börse Group. For example, we are engaging with start-ups and entering into collaborations with clients to see how we can leverage the technology to make post-trading more streamlined and efficient. Blockchain is essentially a distributed database of transactions that removes the need for centralised ledgers, trusted parties, golden copies and manual interventions. For bitcoins, this distributed database is updated every ten minutes. During these updates, pending transactions are included in the blockchain through a distributed consensus mechanism such as the bitcoin mining process. In a public database, all participants have a complete and agreed record of past transactions. Alternatively, access to blockchain databases can also be configured to participants’ needs in a permissioned network. This customised access means that in post-trading, banks could be given access to a blockchain while the underlying client data could only be seen by the relevant banks and by all regulators. For the post-trade industry, it could be attractive to replace the current process of trade reconciliations by such a consensual approach to distributing information. In addition, the settlement cycle could be reduced from two days to a matter of seconds or minutes. Blockchain could also be used for handling new asset types or for currently untapped markets that lack supporting infrastructure. While post-trade service providers should certainly embrace any technology which improves their service to the market, we at Clearstream believe that market infrastructures currently in place guarantee a level of safety and legal certainty which a network of computers is unlikely to match. While we can use new technology to make securities services more efficient, it is important to recognise that the industry has gone to a considerable amount of effort to provide a safe, stable infrastructure for people’s money. We must avoid a trade-off between efficiency and safety; removing intermediaries will also remove the integrity they bring to the market. Against this background, the removal of major intermediaries in existing, well-developed financial markets by blockchain seems rather unlikely at this stage. It is important to refocus the discussion on the barriers the new technology could overcome while keeping in mind the major contributions that financial intermediaries could bring to models based on blockchain in terms of trust, legal certainty and safety. At Clearstream, we are exploring ways of leveraging blockchain to support our mandate to make markets more efficient. The technology could be integrated into the existing post-trade landscape. In any case, widespread changes to the financial industry based on blockchain will not happen overnight. This said, the technology has the clear potential to contribute to market efficiency and is therefore likely to continue to attract interest. A lthough blockchain technology has been around for years, it seems that the financial industry has only now started to realise its potential. While blockchains certainly offer exciting possibilities for the consolidation of transaction flows, the CEO of Clearstream Holding, Marc Robert- Nicoud, advocates a balanced approach. by Marc Robert-Nicoud, CEO, Clearstream Holding Is Blockchain Technology Really the Solution to All Our Problems? Reprinted from Treasury Management International (TMI) | www.Treasury-Management.com

Is Blockchain Technology Really the Solution to All Our ... · well-developed financial markets by blockchain seems rather unlikely at this stage. It is important to refocus the discussion

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    10

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Is Blockchain Technology Really the Solution to All Our ... · well-developed financial markets by blockchain seems rather unlikely at this stage. It is important to refocus the discussion

At

Clearstream,

we are

exploring

ways of

leveraging

blockchain

to support

our mandate

to make

markets

more

efficient.

leader

Blockchain seems to be the buzzword of 2015. The technologyunderlying bitcoins has suddenly evolved from a niche area ofexpertise to a key skill. As a result, representatives of the financialindustry are grappling to understand the complex disruptive impactblockchain could potentially have on well-established financialstructures.

While possible scenarios range from simple process optimisation todisintermediation of key players in financial transactions, it isactually very hard to make accurate predictions on what willhappen. Since the technology was only used in certain niche sectorsin the past, its true scalability to the financial industry and viableadoption paths are little understood. A multitude of newpartnerships between the financial industry and technology wereformed with the aim of bridging this knowledge gap, for examplethe R3 consortium with major banks. While it would be unwise toignore the innovative potential of blockchain, it would be equallyshort-sighted to completely discard the current set-up with its well-established safety mechanisms and the legal certainty they bring.

At Clearstream, we are currently investigating blockchainopportunities with our parent company Deutsche Börse Group. Forexample, we are engaging with start-ups and entering intocollaborations with clients to see how we can leverage thetechnology to make post-trading more streamlined and efficient.

Blockchain is essentially a distributed database of transactionsthat removes the need for centralised ledgers, trusted parties, goldencopies and manual interventions. For bitcoins, this distributeddatabase is updated every ten minutes. During these updates,pending transactions are included in the blockchain through adistributed consensus mechanism such as the bitcoin mining process.

In a public database, all participants have a complete and agreed

record of pasttransactions.A l te rnat ive ly,access to blockchaindatabases can also beconfigured to participants’needs in a permissioned network.This customised access means that in post-trading, banks could begiven access to a blockchain while the underlying client data couldonly be seen by the relevant banks and by all regulators.

For the post-trade industry, it could be attractive to replace thecurrent process of trade reconciliations by such a consensualapproach to distributing information. In addition, the settlementcycle could be reduced from two days to a matter of seconds orminutes. Blockchain could also be used for handling new assettypes or for currently untapped markets that lack supportinginfrastructure. While post-trade service providers should certainlyembrace any technology which improves their service to themarket, we at Clearstream believe that market infrastructurescurrently in place guarantee a level of safety and legal certaintywhich a network of computers is unlikely to match.

While we can use new technology to make securities servicesmore efficient, it is important to recognise that the industry hasgone to a considerable amount of effort to provide a safe, stableinfrastructure for people’s money. We must avoid a trade-offbetween efficiency and safety; removing intermediaries will alsoremove the integrity they bring to the market. Against thisbackground, the removal of major intermediaries in existing,well-developed financial markets by blockchain seems ratherunlikely at this stage. It is important to refocus the discussion onthe barriers the new technology could overcome while keeping inmind the major contributions that financial intermediaries couldbring to models based on blockchain in terms of trust, legalcertainty and safety.

At Clearstream, we are exploring ways of leveraging blockchainto support our mandate to make markets more efficient. Thetechnology could be integrated into the existing post-tradelandscape. In any case, widespread changes to the financialindustry based on blockchain will not happen overnight. Thissaid, the technology has the clear potential to contribute tomarket efficiency and is therefore likely to continue to attractinterest. �

A lthough blockchain technologyhas been around for years, itseems that the financial industry

has only now started to realise itspotential. While blockchains certainlyoffer exciting possibilities for theconsolidation of transaction flows, theCEO of Clearstream Holding, Marc Robert-Nicoud, advocates a balanced approach.

by Marc Robert-Nicoud, CEO, Clearstream Holding

Is Blockchain TechnologyReally the Solution to AllOur Problems?

TMI239 Leader.qxp_Layout 1 04/12/2015 17:49 Page 1

Reprinted from Treasury Management International (TMI) | www.Treasury-Management.com