www.spacenews.com MAY 23, 2016 SPACENEWS | 27

THE FLY IN THE OINTMENTWhy satellite constellations are battling with the limitations

of today’s flat panel antenna market

hen I think of the new wave of constellations and high-throughput satellites in our industry and the enormous potential to change the telecommunications landscape, I fear past

mistakes of former satellites will hold to one unfor-tunate truth: history often repeats itself.

Think back to the 1990’s when all the talk was about the development of satellite constellations to provide telephone and data services.

The most notorious of those was Teledesic, which staked the ambitious plan to launch and operate almost 1,000 satellites for high-speed data services, but never got off the ground. Others such as Globalstar and Iridium deployed their systems, but survived only as a result of Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and considerable write downs, revaluing those systems at little more than 20 cents to the dollar.

Today, constellations are making a huge resurgence. As the ‘big four’ satellite operators enhance their global GEO fleet coverage with next-generation space-craft, new independent companies are planning to

compete with those GEO-HTS systems, as well as the geosynchronous satellites that remain the backbone of commercial satellite communications today.

But, will history repeat itself? And if not, what is the fly in the ointment? What will the new generation of constellation com-panies have to master to avoid becoming a slave to the past?

Interestingly enough, Teledesic’s ambitions were very similar to a l l the tried-and-failed con-stellations of the 90s in terms of their stated vision to deliver the world’s biggest satellite data networks. Now, in our era, everyone has a very similar vision with next gen-eration satellite systems such as OneWeb, O3b and

< JOHN FINNEY >

W

noun an expression of opinions or offering of explanations about an event or situation.

COMMENTARY PAGE 28

JOHN

FINN

EY FO

R SPA

CENE

WSThe real demise of the constel lat ions bor n in the 1990’s was a lack of i nvest ment i n grou nd infrastructure and devices completely mismatched with the investment being made in Space.

other global HTS providers operating, designing or building networks to tap into a highly lucrative global data market.

So in that sense, history is already repeating itself in a very positive way.

But the reasons behind Teledesic’s demise outlines the major pitfalls that must be avoided — if in fact, this time around that vision can finally be achieved commercially as well as technically and operationally.

20:20 vision hindsight is wonderful. We now know the former con-stellation companies completely ignored or misunderstood the future development and take up of wireless services as the primary competition to satellite,

turning many famous and exciting ventures of the 90s into relics of the past.

When Teledesic started, cellular networks could transmit only voice, and no one had announced plans to handle data on those voice networks.

Just a few years later, wireless companies from AT&T Wireless to T-Mobile rolled out data services that delivered very low cost high-speed broadband.

Competition among wireless equipment manu-facturers kept a tighter lid on costs and terrestrial providers have always been able to build the service and revenues incrementally — one city at a time.

A satellite venture, in contrast, has to finance and launch the entire network before signing up the first customer.

The opportunit y ahead of us is vast and it’s all driven by data services. In the 90s the need for data was a

prophecy; now it’s a fact. Looking at the incredible success of O3b (the only constellation company in the world to really make it — i.e. break even and become a major acquisition target) and the very credible future plans of OneWeb, Intelsat Epic, Inmarsat GlobalXpress, Eutelsat, ViaSat, SES and others all with their own HTS offerings, there is now a real chance to create global satellite networks that in many aspects will outstrip the performance of terrestrial networks.

As an industry, we are always first past the post in terms of reach and our ability to deliver the Internet to any spot on the globe but in reality when I talk to the CEOs or CTOs of mobile operators, they love to tell me that today’s satellites are referred to as “a need is a must.”

A back-handed compliment if ever there was one. But what are they driving at exactly?

They point out that their “need” for satellite “must” be fulfilled because it’s the “only” option left on the table; they have exhausted all other means before finally resorting to satellite and its inherent limita-tions over the last 20 year. Ouch!

But that’s exactly why I love what the HTS players in all orbits are doing, because we are about to go beyond reach, and for the first time into the paradigm of Quality of Experience and price points on par with terrestrial alternatives at the point of delivery, if we can do that, then we really bridged the digital world together and the new generation of HTS have delivered on the original missions of all those who have tried and failed up to this point.

Bottom line: The growing demand for broadband services in satellite markets, higher quality services and new price points, driven by innovation, lower manufacturing and launch costs can now make constellations both technically and economically viable now.

So what f ly in what ointment!?The fly in the satellite ointment of HTS and all

constellation companies is very simple — Distribution. Distribution. Distribution.

The ability to distribute capacity is critically important, due to incredibly high amounts of capacity being offered into smaller and smaller beam footprints. This presents a huge, but equally risky opportunity and one that requires all opera-tors to address a major HTS challenge: to generate new demand through a completely new generation of innovative ground antennas that matches the innovation HTS provides.

Remember, the more widely you distribute HTS coverage, the more challenging the business case. The demographics are different and the economies and the willingness to pay both in terms of capital and operational expenses are challenging to say the least.

In order to fill LEO, MEO or GEO HTS satellite payloads to the point of profitable returns, both the cost of the antenna, its efficiency and therefore monthly operational expenses has to be part of the value propositions in order to create new market demand for what is now an enormous amount of

28 | SPACENEWS MAY 23, 2016 www.spacenews.com

COMMENTARY FROM PAGE 27

You simply can not dip your toe in the water when it comes to satellite constel-lations, it’s all or nothing, so you have to have a higher right win far out into the future and extending beyond the advancing capabilities of your nearest terrestrial rival.

We are always first past the post in terms of reach and our ability to deliver the internet to any spot on the globe but today’s constellation and HTS companies are about to enter into the paradigm of Quality of Experience on par with terrestrial. Wow!

available satellite capacity. Successful distribution of HTS capacity is measured by the operators’ ability to access a much larger base of customers at the base of the pyramid, with much higher volumes of data achieved by connecting substantially more users and in a new way that creates hard to access demand in remote areas — despite those end-users having substantially reduced budgets for hardware and services.

It’s a classic high-stakes risk and reward situation. Especially considering the cost of HTS to deploy from any orbit is much higher as the business case is never proven until the satellite system, both ground and space are fully operational.

To fully enable HTS the industry needs very inno-vative antennas with varying price and performance, able to track from mobile platforms, or track moving satellites whether fixed or on the move, efficiently and at costs that create accretive returns for opera-tors through an attractive end-user business case.

Yet, today’s f lat panel antenna market boasts credible technology but only at the top of the pyramid, the low volume, high end markets, where the business case supports such very high capital and operational

investment to offer a reasonable level of service in sectors such as aeronautical, super yachts but certainly not in a way that can fill HTS by accessing much larger market opportunities for HTS.

Put simply, the barrier to enter in terms of current f lat panel antenna terminal costs and the increased cost of operat ing those antennas is far too high to have an effective distribution model for HTS.

Satellite operators who succeed in dis-tributing such large amounts of bandwidth in the new HTS world will be those who are pioneering, investing and accelerating innovation in antenna technology very early on. A new range of antenna technology has to built ‘from the ground up’ to close the business case for their particular customer needs.

John Finney is the founder and majority shareholder of Isotropic Systems Ltd., A London startup developing a low profile, conformal, multi-band, electronically steered antenna for

satellite operators. He formerly was Chief Commercial Officer of O3b Networks.

www.spacenews.com MAY 23, 2016 SPACENEWS | 29

SpeakersMs. Michele Flournoy - Chief Executive Officer, Center for a New American SecurityMs. Pamela Melroy - Deputy Director, Tactical Technology Office, DARPADr. Jamie Morin - Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, U.S. Department of DefenseMr. Tom Stroup - President, Satellite Industry Association

Agenda 2:00 pm - 3:00 pm Registration3:00 pm - 5:30 pm Program5:30 pm - 6:30 pm Reception

AEROSPACE 2016: Innovation in AerospaceJune 8, 2016 • Marriott Mayflower Hotel • 1127 Connecticut Ave NW • Washington, DC 20036 This new and innovative conference experience will provide members with tailored programs specifically for the aerospace community, greater opportunities for building business relationships, and programs that can easily fit into hectic schedules.

Join WIA for an in-depth discussion on the latest technological innovations to drive next generation capabilities as they are being pursued by the government and industry.

3rd Offset Strategy: The Role of Commercial Practices and Technology in Government Sectors to Drive Next Generation CapabilityThe first conference will take a hard look at the concept of a Third Offset Strategy and answer such question as:• HowwilltheU.S.anditsalliesleapfrogtheirmilitaryandtechnologicaladvantagesinaneraof

increasingly tight budgets?• Whichbusinessmodelsandtechnologyareasarethemostpromising?• Whatcommercialandadditionalfederalagencypracticesandtechnologiescanbeleveragedin

Government sectors to drive next generation capability and competitive advantage? What do we need to stop doing as part of the acquisition reform?

Platinum: Bronze: Reception: General:With Special Thanks to Our Sponsors

Registration: http://www.womeninaerospace.org/events/conf/

Don’t forget to also register for the second conference session on The Commercialization of Space. Join WIA for a thought-provoking discussion as we hear from experts in the industry discuss the innovations currently taking place as it relates to the commercialization of space and plans for the future. This session will be an eye-opening look at ways our member firms will need to continue to evolve to stay relevant, find new partners, and begin to look at opportunities for the future with a new light. Registration for the September 16th event begins at 8:30 AM, followed by a breakfast networking reception and a full event program that lasts until 12:30 PM.

Silver:

2016 WIA Half Page Ad - Size-7x4.833.indd 1 5/5/16 9:28 AM

The barrier to enter in terms of flat panel antenna costs and operating those antennas is far too high to have an effective distribution model for HTS.