IWB data

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 IWB data

    1/2

    MeanStd.

    Deviation

    IWB lessons are fun. 4.18 .945

    IWB lessons are more attractive. 4.13 .972

    I participate more in IWB lessons. 3.75 .978

    I understand more in IWB lessons. 3.76 .923

    I am more creative in IWB lessons. 3.70 .953

    My grades are better on IWB lessons. 3.60 .947

    I complete more work in less time during IWB lessons. 3.75 .988

    I remember more from IWB lessons. 3.69 1.028

    I prefer IWB lessons because I learn better when I do things. 3.69 1.018

    I feel more independent in IWB lessons. 3.66 1.049

    I work in groups in IWB lessons. 3.45 1.104

    I dislike IWB lessons because I do not like technology. 1.87 1.230

    IWB lessons are useful for difficult subjects (e.g., engineering). 3.85 1.188

    IWB lessons are useful for easy subjects (e.g., language learning). 3.42 1.193

    My teachers are good at using IWBs. 3.34 1.129

    My learning style fits IWB lessons better. 3.77 .950

    I wish we could use the IWB in all lessons. 3.95 1.017

    IWB will replace todays boards in the future. 4.04 1.193

    Tab le 1. Students perceptions on the impact of IWBs on learning

    No. Statements Mean Std.Deviation

    1 IWB lessons are fun. 4.18 .9452 IWB lessons are more attractive. 4.13 .9723 I participate more in IWB lessons. 3.75 .9784 I understand more in IWB lessons. 3.76 .923

    5 I am more creative in IWB lessons. 3.70 .9536 My grades are better on IWB lessons. 3.60 .9477 I complete more work in less time during IWB lessons. 3.75 .9888 I remember more from IWB lessons. 3.69 1.0289 I prefer IWB lessons because I learn better when I do things. 3.69 1.018

    10 I feel more independent in IWB lessons. 3.66 1.04911 I work in groups in IWB lessons. 3.45 1.10412 I dislike IWB lessons because I do not like technology. 1.87 1.23013 IWB lessons are useful for difficult subjects (e.g., engineering). 3.85 1.18814 IWB lessons are useful for easy subjects (e.g., language learning). 3.42 1.19315 My teachers are good at using IWBs. 3.34 1.12916 My learning style fits IWB lessons better. 3.77 .95017 I wish we could use the IWB in a ll lessons. 3.95 1.01718 IWB will replace todays boards in the future. 4.04 1.193

  • 8/2/2019 IWB data

    2/2

    Descriptive Statistics

    N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

    Q1 350 1 5 4.19 .935

    Q2 350 1 5 4.13 .972

    Q3 350 1 5 3.74 .984

    Q4 350 1 5 3.74 .926

    Q5 350 1 5 3.69 .956

    Q6 350 2 5 3.59 .953

    Q7 350 1 5 3.75 .988

    Q8 350 1 5 3.68 1.027

    Q9 350 1 5 3.70 1.027

    Q10 350 1 5 3.68 1.052

    Q11 350 1 5 3.46 1.103

    Q12 350 1 5 1.90 1.247

    Q13 350 1 5 3.86 1.167

    Q14 350 1 5 3.44 1.185

    Q15 350 1 5 3.32 1.133

    Q16 350 1 5 3.78 .936

    Q17 350 1 5 3.94 1.005

    Q18 350 1 5 4.02 1.191

    Valid N (listwise) 350