IWMP-I VAD PROJECT, MANGROL BLOCK , SURAT - Gujaratgswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2009-10/Surat/Mangrol DPR IWMP_I.pdf · iwmp-i vad project mangrol block, suratpage -1 iwmp-i vad

IWMP-I VAD PROJECT MANGROL BLOCK, SURATPage -1

IWMP-I VAD PROJECT, MANGROL BLOCK , SURAT

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (DPR)


Contents Chapter-I: Project Background ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11

1.1 Project Background ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 11

Project wise village area distribution (in Percent) ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 12

Table no.1: Basic project information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13

Need of Watershed Development Programme:-....................................................................................................................................................................................... 14

Table no.2: Weight age of the project .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14

Table no:2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed ................................................................................................................................................................... 15

Table no.3: Watershed information ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 17

Other Projects / Scheme running in the project area:- .............................................................................................................................................................................. 17

Table no.4: Developmental programmers running in the project area: ......................................................................................................................................................... 18

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area: .............................................................................................................................................................. 19

CHAPTER-2............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22

Project Implementing Agency ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22

The Organization and its Objectives:- ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22

SWOT Analysis of DWDU .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23

Strength:- ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 23

Weakness:- .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 23

Opportunities:- ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 24

Threats:- .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 24

Table no. 6: Detail PIA: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 25

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level:....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25


Basic Information of Project Area:- .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 27

Table no. 8: Land use pattern: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 27

Land Use and Land Cover pattern............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 29

Soil and Topography .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 30

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:............................................................................................................................................................................................... 31

11. Edaphic Factors .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 32

Table no. 11.1: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) ................................................................................................................................................................................ 32

Land and Agriculture:- ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 33

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 34

Table no. 14: Land ownership details ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35

Per Household Land Availability ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36

Table no. 15: Detail Agriculture .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 37

Table no. 16: Detail Irrigation .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 38

Table no. 17 -A: Crop details: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 39

Table no. 17 -B: Crop details: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 40

17 .0 Reasons of Low productivity of various crops ............................................................................................................................................................................. 41

Livestock: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 42

Table no. 18:Detail of Livestock ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 43

Infrastructure Facilities:- ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 44

Table no. 19: Drinking water ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 45


Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources .................................................................................................................................................................................. 46

Socio-Economic Profile ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 46

Demographic Status: .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 46

Table no. 21: Demographic information ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 47

Population Distribution category wise ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 48

Table no. 22: Literacy rate............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 49

Migration Pattern:- .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 50

Table no. 23: Migration details..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 50

Poverty .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

Table no. 24: Poverty ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

25 Infrastructure facilities ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 52

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 53

Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 54

Livelihood pattern:- ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 54

Table no. 27: Income ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 55

28. Dependence on Common Property Resource ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 55

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 56

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) ........................................................................................................................................................................ 57

Watershed Activities ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 59

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects ................................................................................................................................................ 68

Institutional formation in watershed ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 70

Table no. 31.1: Watershed Committee details in Vad Village ....................................................................................................................................................................... 71


Table no. 31.2: Watershed Committee details in Amarkui Village ................................................................................................................................................................. 72

Table no. 31.3: Watershed Committee details in Isanpur Village .................................................................................................................................................................. 73

Table no. 31.4: Watershed Committee details in Lavet Village..................................................................................................................................................................... 74

Table no. 31.5: Watershed Committee details in Motifali Village.................................................................................................................................................................. 75

Table no. 31.6: Watershed Committee details in Khareda Village ................................................................................................................................................................. 76

Table no. 31.7: Watershed Committee details Mangrol in Village ................................................................................................................................................................ 77

Table no. 31.8: Watershed Committee details in Jhankhvav Village ............................................................................................................................................................. 78

Table no. 31.9: Watershed Committee details in Nani fali Village ................................................................................................................................................................. 79

Table no. 31.10: Watershed Committee details in Nandola Village ............................................................................................................................................................... 80

Table no. 31.11: Watershed Committee details in Pataldevi Village.............................................................................................................................................................. 81

Self Help group (SHG) ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 82

Table no. 32: SHG detail ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 83

Table no. 33: UG detail ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 85

Focused Group Discussion with villagers .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 88

Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ...................................................................................................................................................... 88

Specified by Villager for Entry Point Activity (EPA)........................................................................................................................................................................................ 90

Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ............................................................................................................................... 91

36. Watershed Development Works: ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 92

Table no.36.1: Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) .................................................................................................... 95

Table no.36.2:- Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)................................................................................................... 96

Table no.36,3:- Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)................................................................................................... 97




Table no.36.6:- Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakhs Rs.) ................................................................................................. 99

Table no.36.7:- Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)................................................................................................. 100



Table no.36.10:- Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ............................................................................................... 102

Table no.36.11:- Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ............................................................................................... 103

Table no.37.1: Activities related to water conversation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) .............................................................................................. 104









Table no.37.10: Activities related to water conversation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ............................................................................................ 108

Table no.37.11 Activities related to water conversation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ............................................................................................. 109

Livelihood Intervention .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 109

Production System -1: Goatry Unit (Boer Unit) ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 109

Production System - 2: Vermi composting unit for Project villages ................................................................................................................................................................. 111

Table No-42.v: Returns from vermicomposting ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 115


Table: 42.iv Model of a Vermi-compost Unit (10 ft *3 ft *2.5 ft) ............................................................................................................................................................. 115

Production System - 3: System For Rice Intensification (SRI Method) ......................................................................................................................................................... 117

Livelihood Intervention .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 121

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas .................................................................................................................... 125

Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed workphase proposed target .................................................................................................................................................. 127

Table no.40.1: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* ....................................................................................................................................................... 128









Table no.40.10: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* ..................................................................................................................................................... 137

Table no.40.11: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* ..................................................................................................................................................... 138

Table no.41.1: Details of activities related Afforestration in watershed works (In lakhs) ............................................................................................................................. 139



Table no.41.4: Details of activities related Afforestration in watershed works (In lakes) ............................................................................................................................. 141







Table no.41.10: Details of activities related Afforestration in watershed works (In lakhs) ........................................................................................................................... 145

Table no.41.11: Details of activities related Afforestration in watershed works (In lakhs) ........................................................................................................................... 146

Table no.42.1: Details of allied / other activities ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 146









Table no.42.10: Details of allied / other activities ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 158

Table no.42.11: Details of allied / other activities ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 159

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas ............................................................................................................................................................... 160

4.4 Capacity building and Institutional collaboration ............................................................................................................................................................................. 163

Scope of capacity building at Project Villages ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 163

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 164

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 165

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: .......................................................................................................................................................... 166


Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 168

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP (In Lacks) ........................................................................................ 168

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects ................................................................................................................................................................... 177

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area: ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 177

Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area .................................................................................................................................................................... 178

Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) ....................................................................................................................... 179

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 180

Tableno. 56: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas ........................................................................................................................................................ 181

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 186

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 187

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project area .................................................................................................................................................................................. 188

(for fluids please mention in liters, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.) ...................................................................................................................... 188

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 191

Outcome analysis of the project ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 196

7 Quality and Sustainability Issues ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 201

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 201

7.2 Plans For Project management: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 202

7.3 Watershed Development Fund: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 202

7.4 User Charges: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 202

MAPS ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 203


CHAPTER-1 PROJECT BACKGROUND


Chapter-I: Project Background

1.1 Project Background

Vad(IWMP-I) project is located in Mangrol Taluka, Surat District of Gujarat State. The Project is a cluster of eight micro watershed withd

with5C1B3b3b,5C1B3b3a,5C1B3b1c,5C1B3b1b,5C1B3b1d,5C1B3b1a,5C1B3a3d,5C1B3b1fas their respective codes. The total project area of the watershed is

about 6770.10 ha.of which5000 ha is proposed for treatment under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP).

Suratis the commercial capital of Gujarat and also the second-largest commercial hub of western India after Mumbai. Vad Project is situated

in Mangrol Taluka.The nearest Railway Station is Kosamba on Mumbai - Vadodara route which is around 22 km from the project area. All villages are well

connected with pacca roads on SH 166. The project includes 11villages of which largest village are the Vad after which the project is named. All the

villages are named after different water bodies which give the historical significance of water in the lives of the villagers. The project area is

homogenously populated by tribes which include Chaudhari, Vasava, Gamit, and some Muslims communities. The livelihood of these people is

primarily based on rain fed agriculture, animal husbandry, and wage labour.

The area isvery famous has industrial area due to its mining activity. GIPCL has huge power plant near Mangrol.Mininghas resulted in anuntold

havoc on the area and its geography, disturbing rivers, canalsand other water bodies. Mining has a detrimental effect on local vegetation. The

excavatedmaterial is dumped covering huge productive tracts. These overburden dumps then erode into fertile lands making them unproductive,

silt-up live water bodies.


Project wise village area distribution (in Percent)

Vad 11%

Amarkui 15%

Isanpur 10%

Lavet 17%

Motifali 4%

Khareda 6%

Mangol 11%

Jhankhvav 9%

Nani fali 5%

Nandola 6%

Pataldevi 6%

Area of the Project


Table no.1: Basic project information

Sr

No.

Name of the

project

Villages

Gram

Panchayats Taluka District

Area of

the

project

Area

proposed to

be treated

Total

project

cost

(Lacs)

PIA

Name Census code

1

Vad Project in Mangrol

Block

Vad 220020163170000 Vad

Mangrol

Surat

808.60 570

600.00

DWDU, Surat

2 Amarkui 220020163180000 Kantvav 968.70 750

3 Isanpur 220020163200000 Isanpur 705.30 500

4 Lavet 220020163210000 Lavet 1027.50 850

5 Motifali 220020163220000 Bhadkuva 290.60 175

6 Khareda 220020163230000 Khareda 469.80 300

7 Mangrol 220020163250000 Mangrol 901.70 555

8 Jhankhvav 220020163550000

Jhankhvav 493.10 450

9 Nani fali 220020163510000 Dhodikui 297.00 250

10 Nandola 220020163520000 Nandola 357.20 300

11 Pataldevi 220020163530000 Kantvav 450.60 300

Total

6770.10 5000 600.00 -


Need of Watershed Development Programme:- Watershed Development Programme is selected on the basis of 13 parameters namely poverty index, percentage of ST population, actual wages, small & marginal

farmers, ground water status, area under rain fed agriculture, drinking water, situation in the area, productivity potentials of the land continuity of another watershed

that has already developed/treated.Based on these thirteen parameter a composite ranking has been given to the watershed project as given in Table no. 2.

The cumulative score is 113.

The total number of families under BPL is 2220, which is less than 35 per cent of total households of the village. Hence a score of 7.5 is allotted. The

percentages of schedule castes in the cluster villages are less than 17 per cent to the total population; hence a score of 10 is allotted.Rain fed agriculture

forms the primary occupation of the village due to the fact that ground water is saline and hence unfit for usage. More than 50 per cent of the farmers are

small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned by the labour is equal to or higher than minimum wages hence a composite rank of 5 and 5 are

allotted respectively.

The rains in this area are comparatively good but due to Geo hydrolical situation, the moisture index is low. Drinking water is not a major problem even though

people are facing crises during summer season. WASMO has created a drinking water facility by constructing overhead tanks in the village Pataldevi,

Mangrol,Ishanpur,Jhankhvav and Vad

Table no.2: Weight age of the project

Project name

Project type

Weight age

Vad Other I ii Iii iv v Vi vii Viii ix x xi xii Total

5 10 5 3 2 - 15 5 10 10 10 15 90


Table no:2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed S.No. Criteria Maximum

Score

Ranges & scores

i Poverty index(% of

poor to population)

10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 %(7.5) 50 to 20%(5) Below 20

ii % of SC/ST population 10 More than 40%(10) 20 to 40%(5) Less than 20%(3)

iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are

sizgnificantly lower than

minimum wages (5)

Actual wages are equal

to or higher than

minimum wages (0)

iv % of small and

marginal farmers

10 More than 80%(10) 50 to 80%(5) Less than 50 %(3)

v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Criteria (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)

vi Moisture index/DPAP

/DDP Block

15 -66.7 & Below (15)

DDP Block

-33.3 to -66.6(10)

DPAP block

0 to -33.2 (0)

Non DPDAP/DDP Block

vii Area under rain-fed

agriculture

15 More than 90% (15) 80 to 90 %(10) 70 to 80% (5) Above

70%(Reject)

viii Drinking water 10 No Source(10) Problematic village(7.5) Partially covered(5) Fully

Covered(0)

ix Degraded land 15 high-above 20%(15) Medium-10 to 20%(10) Low-less than 10% of TGA

(5)

x Productivity Potential 15 Land with low production Lands with moderate Lands with high


of the land &where productivity can be

significantly enhanced with

reasonable efforts (15)

production & where

productivity can be

enhanced with


production & where

productivity can be

marginally enhanced with


xi Contiguity to another

watershed that has

already been

developed/treated

10 Contiguous to previously

treated watershed &

contiguity within the micro

watersheds in the project

(10)

Contiguity within the

micro watersheds in

the project but non

contiguous to

previously treated

watershed (5)

Neither contiguous to

previously treated

watershed nor contiguity

within the micro

watersheds in the project

(0)

xii Cluster approach in

the plains (more than

one contiguous micro-

watersheds in the

project)

15 Above 6 micro –watersheds

in cluster (15)

4 to 6 micro

watersheds in cluster

(10)

2 to 4 micro watersheds in

cluster (5)

xiii Cluster approach in

the hills (more than

one contiguous micro-

watersheds in the

project)

15 Above 5 micro –watersheds

in cluster (15)

3 to 5 micro

watersheds in cluster

(10)

2 to 3 micro watersheds in

cluster (5)

Total 150 150 90 41 2.5


Table no.3: Watershed information

Name of the project No. Of watersheds

to be treated Watershed code

Watershed

regime/type/order

IWMP-I-Vad 8 5C1B3b3b,5C1B3b3a,5C1B3b1c,5C1B3b1b,5C1B3b1d,5C1B3b1a,5C1B3a3d,5C1B3b1f Micro Watershed

Other Projects / Scheme running in the project area:- The following works have been taken up under the scheme during last two years.

(1) MGNREGS: Pond deepening and widening of road works completed in Vad, Nani fali, and Moti fali desilting of Drainage in VadIsanpur,Motifali and

Lavet , construction of road and desalting of three check dams with a cost of 8.40 lakh and in Mangrol and Isanpur desilting of percolation tank with

cost of 3.10 lakh has been completed till date.

(2) Prehariyali/ Hariyali watershed programme: UnderIWDP project, total area of 5000 ha in total project area have been treated where all activities

related to soil and water conservation measures have been taken care. Two solar street-lamps installed so far under IWDP to promote non

conventional source of energy in each village.

(3) Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC):1493 toilets in BPL Houses and 1404 toilets in APL houses in project villages has been constructed under TSC

programme in the project area.

(4) Indira Awas Yojana: There are 818 houses have been constructed in the villages of Project area127 in Vad,17 in Amarkui, 97 in Isanpur, 45 in Lavet, 14 in

Motifali, 35 in Khareda, 139 in Mangrol, 69 in Jhankhvav, 58 in Nani fali 71 in Nandola and 146 in Pataldevi under IAY.


(5) Sardar Awas Yojana: There are 80 houses have been constructed in the villages of Project area15 in Amarkui, 5 in Isanpur, 5 in Lavet, 10 in Khareda, 25 in

Mangrol, 5 in Nani fali 10 in Nandola and 5 in Pataldevi under SAY.

(6) WASMO/Sector reform: In the project villages 60 % of the houses get water by tap connection under WASMO programme.

Table no.4: Developmental programmers running in the project area:

Sr

no

Name of the

programme/scheme Sponsoring agency

Objectives of the

programme/scheme Year of commencement Villages covered

Estimated

number of

beneficiaries

1 TSC Rural Development Dept. Sanitation 2004-05 11 2897

2 Indira Avas Yojana Rural Development Dept. Housing 1992-93 11 818

3 MGNREGS Rural Development Dept. Employment 2007-08 11 282

4 Sardar Avas Yojana

Govt of Gujarat

Housing 1995-96 8 80

5 WASMO

Govt of Gujarat

Water facilities 2003-04 5 990


Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area:

Sr

no

Project

name

Year

started

Name of

villages

No. Of

micro

watershed

Watershed

codes

Area

under

treatment

Funding

source

Nodal

agency PIA

Total

cost

(Lacs)

Expenditur

e incurred

up to start

of IWMP

%

financial

completi

on

%

physical

completio

n

1

Hariyali

2005-06

Vad

1626000 100

DoLR DRDA

Taluka

Panchayat,

Mangrol.

4.95 4.41 89.09 89.09

2 Isanpur 1626300 150 7.43 6.61 88.96 88.96

3 Motifali 1626500 75 3.71 3.34 90.02 90.02

4 Khareda 1626600 145 7.18 6.43 89.55 89.55

5 Mangrol

1626800 220

10.89 9.85 90.44 9

0.44

6 Pataldevi 1629600 85 4.81 3.82 79.41 79.41

Total 775

38.97 34.46 88.42 88.42


Back to Index


CHAPTER-2 PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY


CHAPTER-2 Project Implementing Agency

The Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is being selected by an appropriate mechanism by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA). PIAs would be

responsible for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under

State/Central Governments, Government Institutes/Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayat, Voluntary Organizations (VOs). The PIA of Vad

Watershed Project is District Watershed Development Unit, Surat

District Watershed Development Unit,Surat

Coordinator

The Organization and its Objectives:-

The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Surat is a District level nodal agency and was established on 9 Dec, 2009 to oversee for the

smooth implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development Officer (DDO) is the chairman of the DWDU. The DWDU have

dedicated and experience staffs comprising one Project Manager (Deputation from Gujarat Forest Department) a technical expert (on contract basis)

and multidisciplinary team of agriculture expert, community mobilization expert, engineer, surveyor, accountant,computer operator and messenger

are recruited. The remaining staff i.e. MIS coordinator, system analyst and Office attendant will be requited Verysoon. The DWDU suratstaff are

temporarily sitting with the District Rural Development Agency (DRDA) at Golandaz building, nanpura, surat.s The objective of the DWDU are

supervising, planning, implementing, documenting and promoting watershed development project and related development activities in the district.

Moreover , the DWDU Surat will work as a PIA for Vad IWMP project.


SWOT Analysis of DWDU

Strength:-

(1) Dedicated and experience staff and multidisciplinary team.

(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency i.e DWDU Surat.

(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, NavsariAgricultureUniversities, SouthGujaratUniversity and NGOs for capacity

building technical guidance.

(4) Scientific plan in watershed project with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar.

(5) District level monitoring, coordination and cooperation committee.

(6) Well establishment of PRIs forsocial audit.

Weakness:-

(1) Insufficient funds for complete watershed project per hectare.

(2) No permanent staff.

(3) No permanent office building.

(4) Project area is located for away from District head quarter.


Opportunities:-

(1) Sustainable livelihood generation landless and assetless.

(2) Improvement of socio economic status of poors.

(3) Awareness generation among the illiterate through IEC activities by usage of new ICT activities.

(4) Reduction of migration rate.

(5) Usage of new technologies of watershed modelling and GPS for monitoring the watershed activities.

Threats:-

(1) Lack of sustainable agriculture development.

(2) Delay of releasing project fund from the higher authority.

(3) Lack of contribution and cooperation from local people.

(4) High level of insecurity in between farmer due to land acquisition.

(5) Mining and Quarrying has resulted in water diversion and natural drainage.

(6) Low literacy rate in the project area.


Table no. 6: Detail PIA:

Sl. No. Names of project Details of PIA

1 IWMP-I,Vad Project

(i) Type of organization District level Nodal Agency

(ii) Name of organization DWDU,Surat (iii) Designation & Address Project Manager,DWDU,Surat (iv) Telephone 0261-2470211 (v) Fax 0261-2470211 (vi) E-mail [email protected]

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level:

Sr no

Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned Monthly

remuneration

1 N.V.Chaudhari 57 M Project Manager GFS 32 yrs Project

Management 30000

2 Rasmikaben Patel 30 F MDT(Engg) Diploma (civil) 7 yrs Engineering Work 11000 3 Punabhai Rathod 27 M MDT(Agri) MRS 6.4 yrs Agriculture 12000

4 Krutika Patel 24 F MDT(Com,) MSW 3 yrs Community mobilization

12000

5 Rajakbhai Vahora 35 M Surveyor Surveyer ,CADE 10 yrs Surveyer 8000 6 Alpeshbhai Kaklotar 27 M MDT(Accountant) Mcom 4 yrs Accountant 10000

7 Bhaiya Hitendrabhai D.

32 M WDT-Civil Diploma in civil 5 yrs &3 months civil work 10000

8 Prajapati Devendrabhai K.

30 M WDT-Agri BRS 3 yrs agri & forestry

Work 10000

9 Rathod Amitaben M. 29 F WDT-Com.Mobilizer BRS 4 yrs Mobilization 10000 10 Dipakbhai Parmar 36 M Data entry operater DPCS 11year Data entry 7000

mailto:[email protected]


CHAPTER-3 Basic Information of Project Area


Basic Information of Project Area:-

Vad project is located in the district of Surat about 70 kms.from district head quarters. The area is having moderate rainfall and temperature.

The total geographic area of the project is 6319.5ha. of which 5000 ha will be treated under IWMP. The forest area proposed for treatment is 670 .ha,

rest of the area include form land, Gaucher land, waste land. The area is having moderate to gentle slope.

Land Use Pattern.

The net geographical area of Vad watershed project is6319.5 ha, out of which 16% is forest area which is about 1006.5ha. The area is having

sparse vegetation due to over grazing. About4893.10 ha land is under agriculture, out of which658.40 ha is irrigated ,rest of the agriculture rainfed.

Table no. 8: Land use pattern:

S. No. Names of villages

Geographical Area of the village

Forest Area Land under

agricultural use Rainfed

area Perm-anent

pastu-res Wasteland

Cultivable Non-cultivable

1 Vad 808.60 22.70 685.90 708.60 47.25 63.40 35.00

2 Amarkui 968.70 754.90 213.80 968.70 7.29 19.00 5.40

3 Isanpur 705.30 0.00 524.00 555.30 42.26 64.30 31.30

4 Lavet 1027.50 66.50 1014.70 1027.60 17.42 93.00 12.90

5 Motifali 290.60 0.00 208.00 215.60 10.26 30.00 7.60

6 Khareda 469.80 0.00 296.30 324.80 38.48 46.30 28.50

7 Mangrol 901.70 0.00 629.60 681.70 70.34 98.30 52.10

8 Jhankhvav 1. 493.10 162.40 330.70 493.10 58.05 28.00 43.00

9 Nani fali 297.00 0.00 294.20 297.00 3.78 37.50 2.80

10 Nandola 357.20 0.00 337.20 357.20 1.08 40.10 0.80


11 Pataldevi 450.60 211.00 358.70 365.60 9.32 138.50 6.90

Total 6770.10 1217.50 4893.10 5995.20 305.51 658.40 226.30


Land Use and Land Cover pattern

Forest Area 16%

Land under agricultural use

Rainfed area 60%

Land under agricultural use

irrigated 4% Permanent

pastures 8%

Wasteland Cultivable

9%

Wasteland Non-cultivable

3%

Other 12%


Soil and Topography

Vad Watershed Project (VWP) falls under South Gujarat Agro climatic zone. The soil is mainly Deep black clayey soils. The surface soil is Reddish brown to

dark in hilly area, very dark grayish brown to dark brown & dark to Yellowish brown. The depth of soil is about 0 to 25 cm (shallow to Moderate deep) in forest

area especially in Amarkui and Pataldevi 45 to 150 cms (deep to very deeps) in predominant slope. The predominant texture of soil is heavy dominate by clay

particles. The fertility of soil is poor with less Nitrogen while Phosphorus is medium, Potash is also medium. The order of soil is mainly Inceptisols, Vertisols,

Entisols. The topography of the area is moderate ranging from 0-10% slope and undulating in the forest area.

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography:

Sr. No.

Name of the Agro-climatic zone covers project area

Area in ha Names of the

villages

Major soil types Topography

a)Type b) Area in ha

1

South Gujarat

808.60 Vad Deep to moderate Clayey 728.6 Flat to moderate slope

2 968.70 Amarkui Deep to moderate Clayey 871.7 Undulating Slope

3 705.30 Isanpur Deep to moderate Clayey 563.5 Flat to moderate slope

4 1027.50 Lavet Deep to moderate Clayey 924.5 Flat to moderate slope

5 290.60 Motifali Deep to moderate Clayey 261.60 Flat to moderate slope

6 469.80 Khareda Deep to moderate Clayey 422.8 Flat to moderate slope

7 901.70 Mangrol Deep to moderate Clayey 811.7 Flat to moderate slope

8 493.10 Jhankhvav Deep to moderate Clayey 444.10 Flat to moderate slope

9 297.00 Nani fali Deep to moderate Clayey 267 Flat to moderate slope

10 357.20 Nandola Deep to moderate Clayey 321.20 Flat to moderate slope


11 450.60 Pataldevi Deep to moderate Clayey 405.6 Undulating Slope

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:

Sr no Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)

1 Vad IN 1994 Once Nil

2 Amarkui IN 1994 Once Nil

3 Isanpur IN 1994 Once Nil

4 Lavet IN 1994 Once Nil

5 Motifali IN 1994 Once Nil

6 Khareda IN 1994 Once Nil

7 Mangrol IN 1994 Once Nil

8 Jhankhvav IN 1994 Once Nil

9 Nani fali IN 1994 Once Nil

10 Nandola IN 1994 Once Nil

11 Pataldevi IN 1994 Once Nil


11. Edaphic Factors

Table no. 11.1: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)

Name of the Village Soil pH

Type of Salinity

(Inherent/Ingress)

Vad 7 Neutral

Amarkui 7.2 Neutral

Isanpur 7.2 Neutral

Lavet 6.9 Neutral

Motifali 7.38 Neutral

Khareda 7.75 Neutral

Mangrol 7.4 Neutral

Jhankhvav 6.95 Neutral

Nani fali 7.1 Neutral

Nandola 7 Neutral

Pataldevi 7 Neutral


Land and Agriculture:-

The Project area lies in the zone of excessive rain and suitable agricultural climate on basis of the soil and Climatic features. Average rainfall during the last three

years is 1650 m.m.Mangrol taluka have "Gorada" Soil. The soil testing analysis results have revealed that the project has adequate content of nitrogen, content of

phosphorous has also been found less. Content of potash has normally found adequate. There is a vast scope of organic farming in the area there is a need of proper

IEC activity between farmers.

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions:

S. No

last 5 years Average rainfall (mm)

Average temperature Summer Winter

Max Min Max Min 1 2004 1268 40 25 23 15 2 2005 1684 39 28 24 17 3 2006 2046 38 24 22 16 4 2007 1450 40 28 25 17 5 2008 1286 42 30 25 19 6 2009 880 38 26 24 18

The project area receives ample amount of rainfall during monsoon but assess of surface waterrunoff has decreased sufficient base for irrigation as

well as for drinking purpose. The average land holding is about 1.44 ha. of which the land holding is ranging from0.2 Hato 4 ha. The excess rainfall

and lack of proper vegetative cover has resulted high rate of surface runoff of both soil and water. Paddy, Pulses (Tur, Mag, Math, Adad, Chola), Oilseeds

and Cotton are 4 main Kharif Crops grown.Wheat, Sorghum and Sugarcane are 3 main Rabi crops grown. Paddy is the main kharif crop covered 72% area under the


Kharif crops. The land conservation measures, surface water recharge activities , drip irrigation system may help farmers to take up vegetable and

other high value crops.

Pasture development can also become a major resource for animal husbandry. By this productivity of dairy animal can be increase.

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief Project name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams

Vad 0-15 meters 0-10% Bhukhi (Kim) River

Lack of check of surface water has decreased sufficient base for irrigation as well as for drinking purpose. The average land holding is about 2.60 ha. for which the

land holding is ranging from 1 to 4 ha. Lack of irrigation resulting into less agriculture productivity &the same forces landless people as well as some farmers to

migrate to ensure their livelihood. This effect directly the demographic profile of the villages. The major crop cultivated by farmers is Jawar (sorghum) and pulses

in the project area. Some of the farmers cultivates groundnut and sugarcane those who has having irrigation facilities. The land conservation measures, surface

water recharge activities, drip irrigation system may help farmers to take up rabi crop of ground nut, vegetable etc.Pasture development can also become a major

resource for animal husbandry. By this productivity of dairy animal can be increase.


Table no. 14: Land ownership details

Sr no

Village Total owned land HHs giving land

on lease (Acer) HHs taking land on lease (Acer) Gen OBC SC ST

1 Vad 0 0 0 710.15 0 3.5

2 Amarkui

4.81 0 4 180.15 0 0

3 Isanpur 0 0 0 589.96 40 72

4 Lavet 82.8 0 0 772.56 5.5 0

5 Motifali 69.67 5.84 0 176.61 36.74 26.74

6 Khareda 0 0 0 350 0 1.5

7 Mangrol 623.78 0 16.38 92.15 0 0

8 Jhankhvav 63.38 6 1.3 193.49 10.50 13.23

9 Nani fali 0 0 0 234.51 0 0

10 Nandola 58.19 0 1 300.1 0 0

11 Pataldevi 25.75 11.95 6.73 258.39 0 0

Total 928.38 23.79 29.41 3858.07 92.74 116.97


Per Household Land Availability

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Others ST SC

Availability of Land(ha/Household)

Availability of Land(ha/Household)


Table no. 15: Detail Agriculture

Sr no Village Net sown area

One time Two times Three times

1 Vad 710.15 268.25 0

2 Amarkui 189.4 69.14 0

3 Isanpur 589.96 324.1 0

4 Lavet 855.36 419.2 0

5 Motifali 252.12 128.0 0

6 Khareda 350.0 169.5 0

7 Mangrol 732.31 339.6 0

8 Jhankhvav 264.17 116.2 0

9 Nani fali 234.51 108.5 0

10 Nandola 359.29 189.4 0

11 Pataldevi 302.82 147.9 0

Total 4840.09 2279.79 0

Irrigation

The irrigated area is 292.21 ha, which is 4% of the total agricultural area of the village. Main source of irrigation is from previously constructed pond, check

dams ponds or wells/tubes. A few farmers of Vad and Isanpur get irrigation to their field by check dams and from earthen dams which were previously

constructed by different departments. Some farmers of Lavet, Mangrol and Nandola get water for irrigation from the main dugout pond cum earthen dam.


Table no. 16: Detail Irrigation

Sr no

Village Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well/Bore Well

Availability months

Net area (Ha)

Gross area (Ha)

Availability months

Net area (Ha)

Gross area (Ha)

Availability months

Net area (Ha)

Gross area (Ha)

1 Vad - - - - - - 4 month 268.25 268.25

2 Amarkui - - - - - - 4 month 69.14 69.14

3 Isanpur - - - - - - 4 month 324.1 324.1

4 Lavet - - - - - - 4 month 419.2 419.2

5 Motifali - - - - - - 4 month 128.0 128.0

6 Khareda - - - - - - 4 month 169.5 169.5

7 Mangrol - - - - - - 4 month 339.6 339.6

8 Jhankhvav - - - - - - 4 month 116.2 116.2

9 Nani fali - - - - - - 4 month 108.5 108.5

10 Nandola - - - - - - 4 month 189.4 189.4

11 Pataldevi - - - - - - 4 month 147.9 147.9

Total 2279.79 2279.79

Crop details and Productivity: The productivity is low not because that the land is unproductive or the farmer's lack the skills to managing their crop but it

is due lack of source of irrigation, salty water and scarcity of rain.

The cluster villages come under draught prone zone. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. If they get good rainfall they generally grow high value

crops as discussed above. In case of low rainfall they go for cotton, castor, pearl millet. So we can say that monsoon decides cropping patterns of the project

villages.


Table no. 17 -A: Crop details:

Sr

no Village

Kharif (Monsoon)

Crop 1(Jawar) Crop 2(Tuver) Crop 3 (Ground nut)

Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity

1 Vad 102 91800 900 44 44000 1000 70 84000 1200

2 Amarkui 50 45000 900 20 20000 1000 25 30000 1200

3 Isanpur 90 81000 900 69 69000 1000 102 122400 1200

4 Lavet 69 62100 900 156 156000 1000 89 106800 1200

5 Motifali 48 43200 900 30 30000 1000 12 14400 1200

6 Khareda 39 46800 1200 28 28000 1000 24 28800 1200

7 Mangrol 123 147600 1200 108 108000 1000 98 117600 1200

8 Jhankhvav 39 35100 900 40 40000 1000 32 38400 1200

9 Nani fali 25 22500 900 30 40000 1000 18 21600 1200

10 Nandola 42 50400 1200 43 43000 1000 22 26400 1200


11 Pataldevi 58 69600 1200 68 68000 1000 48 57600 1200

Total 685 695100 - 636 646000 - 540 648000

Table no. 17 -B: Crop details:

Sr

no Village

Rabi (Winter)

Crop 1 (Jawar) Crop 2 (Tuver) Crop 3 (Ground nut)

Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity

1 Vad 46 55200 1200 - - - 10 12000 1200

2 Amarkui 34 30600 1200 - - - 25 30000 1200

3 Isanpur 12 14400 1200 - - - 25 30000 1200

4 Lavet 29 34800 1200 - - - 46 55200 1200

5 Motifali 5 6000 1200 - - - 10 12000 1200

6 Khareda 15 18000 1200 - - - 28 33600 1200

7 Mangrol 56 67200 1200 - - - 45 54000 1200


8 Jhankhvav 6 7200 1200 - - - 4 4800 1200

9 Nani fali 8 9600 1200 - - - 13 15800 1200

10 Nandola 16 19200 1200 - - - 15 18000 1200

11 Pataldevi 29 34800 1200 - - - 38 45600 1200

256 297000 1200 - - - 259 310800 1200

17 .0 Reasons of Low productivity of various crops

Over a period of time by continuous usage of fertilizers, pesticides and insecticides, there is deterioration in the quality of soil particularly reduction of

carbon content and increase of salinity. One of the reasons ascribed to low response of bio-fertilizers in dry lands is their low status of soil organic

matter. Rejuvenation of soil characteristics is an important area to tackle, with specific emphasis on recovery of its nutrit ional value. More thrust need

to be given on adopting methods such as multi-cropping, rotation of crops and organic farming. Organic farming, nutrient management continues to be

a focal issue in dry lands as the fertilizer use is not likely to pick up significantly unless water supply is assured. Soil fertility in dry lands can be sustained

only through maintenance of organic matter and achieving better fertilizer-use efficiency through integration of moisture-conservation practices along

with soil-fertility management.

Quality of Seeds: Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to higher land

productivity. In project villages, however, there are two limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful in irrigated condition.

The agricultural land of the cluster villages however totally depend on rainfall. In villages mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers especially urea. This


has resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land.

Traditional farming methods:This is the factor that leads low productivity. There is lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and

technologies such as multiple cropping.

Erratic rainfall:The Villagers mainly depend on monsoon. Without monsoon they cannot get any crop because irrigation water is salty .Water is essential input in

agriculture. Due to the absence of proper irrigation facility, 100% of the total cultivated area depends on the uncertain

monsoon. Therefore the success or failure of the monsoon determines the success or failure of agriculture production.The rains,as a source of irrigation,

are unreliable due to two factors;

Untimely Rainfall: The rains are sometimes received when the crops are ready for harvesting. The ready crop may be ruineddue to untimely rain.

Lack of Rural Credit:Farmers face so many problems for rural credit and it leads to low agricultural productivity. Farmers need credit mainly for the

purchase of various inputs such as seed, fertilizers, and pesticides and for repair of implements. They use long term credit for buying land, and for

investment to improve the quality of land, buying the new implements and improving irrigation facilities.

Livestock:

The project area has 2324 cows and 1889 buffaloes while the other domestic animals include 892 bullocks,1829 goats and 4467 hens. This show

there is an ample potential for producing organic manures and promote organic farming in this area. But there is need to make farmer understand the advantages of

using organic manures and practice organic farming. The need for integrating the animal husbandry with promotion of organic farming needs to be given high

priority. The productivity of milk is so less due to lack of availability of good quality of fodder due to less per capita land availability.


Table no. 18:Detail of Livestock

Sr

no Village

Buffalo(ltr/yr) Cow(ltr/yr)

Total Milk

(Buffalo+Co

w)

Goat(ltr/yr) Sheep Bullock Hen Others

No Milk ltr. No Milk ltr.. Milk ltr. No Milk ltr.

1 Vad 247 237120 136 195840 432960 35 630 0 90 500 0

2 Amarkui 30 28800 100 144000 172800 250 4500 0 36 256 0

3 Isanpur 206 197760 147 211680 409440 114 2052 0 174 469 0

4 Lavet 200 192000 410 590400 782400 360 6480 0 120 698 0

5 Motifali 51 48960 179 257760 306720 41 738 0 42 189 0

6 Khareda 122 117120 291 419040 536160 56 1008 0 52 298 0

7 Mangrol 296 284160 95 136800 420960 300 5400 0 17 680 0

8 Jhankhvav 302 289920 406 584640 874560 269 4842 20 107 587 0


9 Nani fali 80 76800 137 197280 274080 0 0 0 38 240 0

10 Nandola 110 105600 205 295200 400800 200 3600 0 100 196 0

11 Pataldevi 245 235200 218 313920 549120 204 0 0 116 354 0

Total 1889 1813440 2324 3346560 5160000 1829 29250 0 892 4467 0

Infrastructure Facilities:-

Villages of project area are well connected with pacca roads with taluka place mangrol. Electricity facilities is provided under Jyoti Gram Yojana of

G.O.G. Almost 90 % is having their personal electric meters. All villages are having primary school facilities. For middle & higher secondary high

school education,the students have to go to Vankal, Jhankhvavand Mangrol. Villages do not have good health centre for which they have to go to

Vankal or Jhankhvav. Eight villages have independent panchayats, where as threevillages have group panchayat. State transport facilities are

insufficient.


Table no. 19: Drinking water

Sr.

no Village

Ground water

table (ft.)

Source of drinking water Availability in months Quality

Tube Well Well Tube Well Well

1 Vad 15 35 5 12 month 12 month Slightly Saline

2 Amarkui 18 6 3 12 month 12 month Slightly Saline

3 Isanpur 20 26 10 12 month 12 month Slightly Saline

4 Lavet 14 30 15 12 month 12 month Slightly Saline

5 Motifali 19 8 3 12 month 12 month Slightly Saline

6 Khareda 18 16 5 12 month 12 month Slightly Saline

7 Mangrol 19 46 10 12 month 12 month Slightly Saline

8 Jhankhvav 15 45 9 12 month 12 month Slightly Saline

9 Nani fali 14 19 5 12 month 12 month Slightly Saline

10 Nandola 15 25 15 12 month 12 month Slightly Saline

11 Pataldevi 16 25 10 12 month 12 month Slightly Saline

Total 281 90


Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources

Sr. No.

Names of project

CPR Particulars

Total Area (ha) Area owned/ In possession of

Area available for treatment (ha)

Pvt. persons Govt.

(specify dept.)

PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify) Pvt.

persons

Govt. (specify dept.)

PRI Any other (Pl.

Specify)

1 Vad

Project

Wasteland/ degraded land - 3950 805.80 - 4002 1 - Pastures - - 170.78 - - - 181 - Orchards Forest - 1217.50 - - - 816 - Village Ponds/ Tanks 4 22 - - - - - Community Buildings - 3 2 - - - Weekly Markets - - - - - - - Permanent markets - - - - - - - Temples/ Places of worship - - - 5 - - - Others (Pl. specify) - - -

Socio-Economic Profile

Demographic Status:

Vad project area is a cluster of eleven villages with3390 households. There are 20891 persons in the project villages (From baseline survey report), out of

which 11213 male and 9678 female members. The sex ratio is 863 females to 1000 males. The average family size is 6.16t. The project area is

homogenously populated by SC population which is more than 88 per cent of the total population. There are six major caste prevail in the village namely

Vasava,Gamit, Darbar, Kodi patel , Prajapati and Muslim. Majority of population is involved in agriculture and animal husbandry.


Table no. 21: Demographic information

Sr. no

Village Population SC ST

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %

1 Vad 1882 948 934 - - - - 1882 948 934 100%

2 Amarkui 450 238 212 - - - - 450 238 212 100%

3 Isanpur 2284 1267 1017 - - - - 2284 1267 1017 100%

4 Lavet 1960 974 986 - - - - 1960 974 986 100%

5 Motifali 427 214 213 - - - - 427 214 213 100%

6 Khareda 686 357 329 48 32 16 6.99% 638 325 313 93.00%

7 Mangrol 4942 2568 2374 580 348 232 11.73% 4362 2220 2142 88.26%

8 Jhankhvav 5262 3027 2235 854 678 176 16.22% 4408 2349 2059 83.77%

9 Nani fali 759 372 387 129 78 51 16.99% 630 294 336 83.00%

10 Nandola 1032 535 497 - - - 1032 535 497 100%

11 Pataldevi 1332 677 655 - - - - 1332 677 655 100%

Total 21016 11177 9839 1611 1136 475 7.66% 19405 10041 9364 92.33%


Population Distribution category wise

ST 78%

SC 8%

Others 14%

Population Distribution


Table no. 22: Literacy rate

Sr. no Village Literacy Literacy % above

age 14 Literacy % below

age 14 Total % Male % Female %

1 Vad 1274 67.69 684 72.15 590 63.17 82 14

2 Amarkui 330 73.33 180 75.63 150 70.75 78 16

3 Isanpur 1567 68.61 778 61.4 789 77.58 70 18

4 Lavet 1467 74.85 775 79.57 692 70.18 79 10

5 Motifali 315 73.77 175 81.78 140 65.73 72 11

6 Khareda 354 51.6 155 43.42 199 60.49 65 12

7 Mangrol 3456 69.93 1966 76.56 1490 62.76 79 13

8 Jhankhvav 3987 75.77 2580 85.23 1407 62.95 85 12

9 Nani fali 567 74.7 310 83.33 257 66.41 69 10

10 Nandola 780 75.58 480 89.72 300 60.36 80 13

11 Pataldevi 982 73.72 564 83.31 418 63.82 78 10

Total 15079 71.75 8647 77.36 6432 65.37 76 13


Migration Pattern:-

The declining yield and product, steady erosion of soil fertility and diminishing returns to the farmers and almost zero inve stment on land development

has set in motion a dynamic problem of degradation. Many small and marginal seek alternate livelihood means and work as wage labour in nearby

areas. Mining and quarrying activity have further worsen this has resulted in degradation of the fertile farm land of the farmers by erosio n of the

unfertile mass of soil dumped by these mines. Lack of employment opportunity in village has created migration resulting in daily wage labour in these

mines and quarries.

Table no. 23: Migration details

Sr no Village Total

population

Migration Migration by months Main reason for migration

Income during

migration / month

Total Male Female Up to 3 months

3-6 months More than 6

months

1 Vad 1658 145

87 58 - 145 -

Discussed as above

Rs 4500/-in month

2 Amarkui 450

79 47 32

- 79 - “ “

3 Isanpur 1772

267 160 107

- 267 - “ “

4 Lavet 1960

160 96 64

- 160 - “ “

5 Motifali 551

89 53 36

- 89 - “ “

6 Khareda 460

76 46 30

- 76 - “ “

7 Mangrol 5354

389 233 156

- 389 - “ “


8 Jhankhvav 5262

267 160 107

- 267 - “ “

9 Nani fali 839

144 86 58

- 144 - “ “

10 Nandola 1176

78 47 31

- 78 - “ “

11 Pataldevi 1409

14 8 6

- 14 - “ “

Total 20891 1708

1025 683 1708

Poverty The villages have very poor population due to lack opportunity to the villagers. Nearly 65.49 per cent of the total household are poor of which 31 per cent lies 0-16 while

other 34 per cent are in 16- 20. There is a ample opportunity for various livelihood actives to increase the opportunities.

Table no. 24: Poverty

Sl no Village Total Household BPL

% of BPL HH TotalLand less HH % of land less HH 0-16 17-20 Total

1 Vad

456 140 110 250 54.82

255 55.92

2 Amarkui

113 34 51 85 75.22

46 40.70

3 Isanpur

383 106 115 221 57.70

178 46.47

4 Lavet

420 45 96 141 33.57

347 82.81

5 Motifali

122 10 46 56 63.11

67 54.91

6 Khareda

297 38 95 133 44.78

124 41.75

7 Mangrol

547 176 190 366 65.27

395 72.21


8 Jhankhvav

566 133 274 407 71.73

236 41.69

9 Nani fali

173 45 42 87 50.29

72 41.61

10 Nandola

206 77 111 188 91.26

105 50.97

11 Pataldevi

307 243 37 280 89.58

195 63.51

Total 3597 1047 1167 2214 61.55% 2020 56.15%

25 Infrastructure facilities

All watershed villages are well connected with others villages within the taluka as well as adjoining talukas like mandvi,Umarpada and Valiyataluka with

pucca roads. Each village has electricity connectivity under Jyotigram Yojana of the State Government. Nearly 90 per cent of households in the villages have

their personal electric meters. The villages have primary school with all facilities like personal computers. For middle and higher secondary education, the

students have to go to Vankal and Jhankhvavvillage which is about 5 kilometres away from Amarkui,Motifali, Nanifali,Lavet and Khareda. Out of Eleven

villaget villages are having separate GPs .with panchayat office.


Table no. 25: Village infrastructure

Sl no

Village

Pucca road to

the village (Y/N)

Schools

Colleges (Number)

Post Office (Distance)

Km.

Banks (Number)

Distance from

nearest market

yard Km.

Milk collection

centre (Number)

Milk cooperative (Number)

Other cooperatives

/ CBIs (Number)

Any other institution LP UP HS

1 Vad

Y Y N N N 11 1(10 Km) 10 1 1 - SHC, Aanganvadi.G.

Panchayat

2 Amarkui

Y Y N N N 5 1(5Km) 5 1 1 - Aanganvadi

3 Isanpur

Y Y Y Y N Y 1(3 Km) 3 1 1 - SHC,Aanganvadi.G.

Panchayat

4 Lavet

Y Y N N N Y 1(7 Km) 7 1 1 - PHC,

Aanganvadi.G.Panchayat

5 Motifali

Y Y N N N 4 1(3 Km) 3 N - - Aanganvadi

6 Khareda

Y Y N N N 9 1(3 Km) 3 1 1 - Aanganvadi,

7 Mangrol

Y Y Y Y N Y Y-2,No. 0 1 1 1 PHC, Aanganvadi.G.

Panchayat

8 Jhankhvav

Y Y Y Y N Y Y-1,No. Y 1 1 1 CHC, Aanganvadi.

G.Panchayat

9 Nani fali

Y N N N N 3 3(3Km) 3 1 1 - Aanganvadi

10 Nandola

Y Y N N N 2 1(3Km) 3 1 1 - SHC, Aanganvadi.

11 Pataldevi

Y Y N N N 1 1(3 Km) 3 1 1 - Aanganvadi.


Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets

Sl no

Village HHs with electricity

HHs with safety

latrines

HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs with

TV set HHs with

cooking gas

HHs with Drinking

water

HHs with

fridge Land line Mobile 2-wheeler 4-wheeler

1 Vad

249 228 12 45 34 1 22 175 220 13

2 Amarkui

63 47 16 48 6 0 11 40 53 3

3 Isanpur

116 87 10 22 25 0 22 67 90 2

4 Lavet

298 25 5 10 11 1 19 189 240 9

5 Motifali

140 112 42

68 64 0 60 125 125 5

6 Khareda

26 22 2 10 13 0 6 16 20 4

7 Mangrol

339 163 145 201 118 7 202 269 278 52

8 Jhankhvav

476 226 157 254 115 23 183 387 435 63

9 Nani fali

118 105 4 15 14 0 7 55 99 0

10 Nandola

225 190 145 202 179 15 65 189 192 55

11 Pataldevi

231 120 7 35 29 4 35 169 174 1

Total 2281 1325 545 910 608 51 632 1681 1926 207

Livelihood pattern:- The villagers earn their livelihood from agriculture and animal husbandry .During lean seasons they go as daily wage laborers at sugar field of Kim and industries of surat

,Ankleshwer and Bharuch.People also collect Mahuva flowers as apart time wage earning.


Table no. 27: Income

Sr no Village Agriculture (in lacs) Animal husbandry (in

lacs) Casual labour (in

lacs) Others (in lacs) Total (in lacs)

1 Vad 23.38 7.65 11.72 0.00 42.75

2 Amarkui 2.18 1.80 3.33 0.00 7.31

3 Isanpur 12.78 6.61 10.03 0.03 29.44

4 Lavet 25.44 10.00 0.56 0.00 36.00

5 Motifali 0.10 0.90 0.80 0.01 1.81

6 Khareda 4.51 2.07 1.44 0.00 8.02

7 Mangrol 37.53 6.41 0.25 0.00 44.19

8 Jhankhvav 13.78 1.95 38.52 0.00 54.25

9 Nani fali 10.54 5.18 0.95 0.00 16.67

10 Nandola 5.68 6.70 0.68 0.00 13.06

11 Pataldevi 15.83 5.41 7.72 0.00 28.96

Total 151.75 54.69 76.00 0.04 282.47

28. Dependence on Common Property Resource

The vast majority of the denizens of this region depend on Common property resources. Most of them continue to live a virtually hand-to-mouth existence. Their pathetic poverty seems, in fact, to have further worsened in recent years, as their traditional pasture lands have been rapidly depleting due to over-grazing and encroachments. Excessive mining and quarrying in the area has also resulted in depetion of the fertile land due to


deposition of unfertile land mass and erosion of these deposits to fertile lands. This has also resulted in diversion of the natural drains and disturbing the natural hydrology of the area.

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

Sr no Village Benefit type 1 (Grass) Benefit type 2 (Fuel) Benefit type 2

Total income % sells Income % sells Income % sells Income

1 Vad

57 % 8000 60% 7000 - - 15000

2 Amarkui 87%

15400 0

0 100% 1500 16900

3 Isanpur 78 %

10000 52%

6500 - - 16500

4 Lavet 65 %

12300 56%

8700 100% 2000 23000

5 Motifali 45 %

9400 0

0 - - 9400

6 Khareda 76 %

14600 74%

10650 - - 25250

7 Mangrol 68 %

13540 88%

12700 - - 26240

8 Jhankhvav 95 %

18650 65%

10700 100% 3500 32850

9 Nani fali 55 %

12340 68%

11800 - - 24140

10 Nandola 52 %

10500 42%

8350 - - 18850

11 Pataldevi 45 %

9040 0

0 100% 4600 13640

Total

133770 76400 11600

221770


Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)

Sr no

Village Total

workforce Agriculture

Animal husbandry

(AH)

Agriculture + AH

Casual labour Services Handicraft Others

1 Vad 1650 876 909 998 1172 171 0 0

2 Amarkui 1635 118 280 355 3334 1 0 0

3 Isanpur 1608 916 770 1244 1002 74 15 0

4 Lavet 1316 1087 500 1122 560 23 0 0

5 Motifali 764 117 530 456 800 4 5 0

6 Khareda 874 235 238 245 1440 27 0 0

7 Mangrol 1439 694 727 1078 250 850 0 0

8 Jhankhvav 2445 339 333 345 3851 1245 0 0

9 Nani fali 852 278 421 478 950 5 0 0

10 Nandola 1147 876 423 987 567 16 0 0

11 Pataldevi 3839 306 655 768 7720 150 0 0

Total 17569 5842 5786 8076 21646 2566 20 0


CHAPTER-4 Watershed Activities


Watershed Activities

Watershed management as a strategy is been adapted by government of India especially in the rain fed region of semi-arid tropics. These

regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, law literacy and high incident of

migration. The inheritant low fertility of crops results in high productivity of crops which have very law biological efficiency.

Several studies have identify that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The

common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.

(1) Cluster Approach

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Vad project consist of

four micro-watersheds namely 5C1B3b3b ,5C1B3b3a, 5C1B3b1c, 5C1B3b1b, 5C1B3b1d, 5C1B3b1a, 5C1B3a3d, 5C1B3b1f as their respective codes.

Further Vad watershed project is in continuation with other watershed programme namely IWDP.

(2) Baseline survey

To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be constructed. This acts a benchmark

for any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was been undertaken which

involved household census survey, Bio-physical survey and village level data collection from Talati-cum mantri. Household census survey includes a

detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every house-hold in the village. This gave in the details of the demographic profile

of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, net consumption rate in the village, and

average milk production of the castles and varies schemes running and their benefits.


Bio-physical survey was been undertake to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, well in

the area, crop taken in the field, cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field.`

a) Door to Door Survey

The primary data was generated through questionnaire surveys in all the villages. The questionnaire was structured so as to derive the information related

to the objectives set forth. Mostly talked to

• Head of the families

• Mostly females (between 65% and 70%)

• Mostly younger adults (Age group : 25 – 44)

• High School education

• Sarpanch and Talati of respective Gram Panchayats.

• Farmers, Agricultural labours, Diamond polishing workers, handicraft unit workers, electric drum making units and workers of thresher units.

• Cattle Breeders


• Landless labour

The questionnaire was divided into nine modules through which information is extracted pertaining to

1. Village details

2. Population details

3. Water supply details

4. Water source details

5. Questions about community engagement

6. Questions about Livelihood

7. Awareness about Specific programme: Watershed

8. Desire to do more activities related to occupation

9. Productivity of farms

The secondary data was obtained through Census reports (2001). Data pertaining to social profile is also collected through Census reports. Secondary data

related to different kinds of capital assets were collected from different departments of Government agencies such as Revenue Office,

PrimaryHealthCenter, District Rural development Agency initiative-SGSY Programme office, working on poverty alleviation, Village Panchyat, other NGOs

and development societies etc.

b) Field to field Survey: Field to field survey was also carried out in the farms, community land, pasture land and land under Gram Panchayat. It also

includes the soil profiles, no of wells in the area, crop taken in the field, cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field. The


details of agriculture as well as pasture lands of the village where the existing condition and structures to be proposed, were written down. Almost all the

farmers of the village were there to support the survey team.The purpose of the survey was also to understand water availability, patterns of water use and

peoples’ understanding & perceptions about both surface and groundwater resources in this area. Village agreements will be done on the basis of such

detailed work. This also survey looked at the pattern of surface and groundwater use and the basic understanding of farmers regarding groundwater

recharge and discharge. This understanding was expected to help in improved planning for any watershed programme and to develop longer-term

protocols of groundwater management in respective areas.

c) Demand survey: To know about the livelihood pattern of the village and the present status and practice capacities required are discussed. Quantitative

involved also on possible micro enterprise development for sustainable development of village extensively for SC/ST and landless/migrated poor people.

(3) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the

program me. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and indigenous Technological knowledge


(ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach Provide a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring and post-withdrawal

activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. This decrease the effort of the ground staff i.e. WDT members and involves more of

villagers as implementers. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, and season calendars were used to understand the

physical and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers ease than the complicated

questionnaires. Various tools like matrix ranking, vane diagram were used to indentify various local vegetation (apt for a forestation), fodders

crops, various institution and their significance in the life of the farmers.

In order to understand the social, economic and political aspect of all the villages of the cluster, we conducted Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)

exercise with the help of the villagers. It was really a useful tool to appreciate the village in its totality. We had the opportunity to interact with more than

600 numbers of people in each village. To reach a concrete conclusion we requested a few villagers for focused discussion and it was entertained. As per

their convenience we conducted focused group discussion at the Community hall and Panchayat Bhavan ground. In majority of the discussion, we listened

to them carefully and tried to appreciate the discussion. Output generated through these exercise is placed below.

(i) Resource Map: - Through resource map we came to know about all the residential pattern of village, community pasture land, farm areas, about the

river etc. It also gave us a fair idea about the pasture land, other land distribution pattern and different resources of the village.

(ii) Social Map: - After this exercise we came to know the approximate location of different institution of the village. During this exercise we also had

informal discussions with the participants about the importance of these institutions. Important location pointed out during this exercise was Community

Centre, Panchayat Bhavan, temple, Primary School etc. We cross checked all the location.

(iii) Seasonal Diagram:- With this exercise we came to know about the major engagements of villagers across the twelve months of the year. We found

that rainfed agriculture and animal husbandry keep them busy at least for seven to eight months of the year. About drinking water they informed that,

situation in the month of March to June is really difficult as they get water once in three days.


(iv) Tree matrix:- We came to know about different trees of the villages and their respective utilities as fruit, fuel, fodder, medicine , timber etc. Major

trees pointed out by villagers under this exercise were Pipal, Neem, Bor, Lemon, Banyan and Pipara etc. Taking into consideration all the utilities it was

found that the tree having maximum utility is Chiku and lemon.

(v) Crop Pattern:- Agriculture is the primary source of liveihood for more than 70% household . After this exercise we came to know that there are two

major cropping pattern Kharif and partially in Rabbi. Under Kharif cotton,ground nut and fodder crops andin rabi, major crops grown are wheat, cumin,

gram and vegetables.

(vi) Income-Expenditure Pot: - Under this exercise we came to know about the different sources of income of villagers and how the money earned by

the villagers is being spent under different heads. It was found that major source of earning among villagers are farming, dairy, service etc. Major

expenditure component were food, fuel, fodder, schooling of children, medicines, festivals, relatives, and paan etc.

One focussed group discussion was organised to understand the status of different Self help Group operating in the village. This discussion concentrated

around the activities of SHG, terms and conditions of membership, working pattern of different SHG and their role in the development of society etc

Another curiosity in our mind was about the political institution of the village. Apart from different institution discussion was concentrated about

gram panchayat issue. Here the major discussion point was participation of women and deprived section of the society in the decision making process, their

representation in the panchayat. How the panchayat facilitates the process of development and poverty alleviation. In this process its relation with

different institution of village like dispensary, Aanganwari Kendra, Primary School and High school was also discussed.

The whole purpose was to identify the employment opportunities available during thedifferent seasons in a year, income, expenditure, crisis management,

daily activitiesand time allotted to each activity, the leisure time of men and women, and market network for agricultural produce etc. In the gender

analysis, an attempt was made tofind out the gendered division of labour, the status of women in relation to the right to use, to own and sell different


household properties, the means of production ofthe household, and the role and participation of women in decision-making at intrahouseholdand

community levels.

To identify different problems faced by villagers a separate focussed discussion was carried out. The villagers were grouped in to different types as shown

below to know all the details of the village in a stipulated time.

Small and marginal farmers

Large farmers

Landless farmers

Women

Gram Panchayat members

Cattle grazing population

Business man and women

Problems Identification

After analysis the information collected during PRA exercise, the main problems identified as

Poor fertility of soil and low agricultural productivity

Soil Erosion from farm land


Improper Crop Rotation

Less use of bio-fertilizers

Almost negligible cultivation of arid fruits

Less cultivation of vegetables

Low milk production and rearing of non descript breeds

No use of vermi compost

Lack of value addition practices

Drinking Water

Less availability of fodder

Market (No nearby)

Migration

Sanitation Problems

Less Nutritional Level

Malnutrition in few farm families

(4) Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning


Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development.

a) prioritization

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-morphological, Soil, BPL

population, ST/ST population, Ground water status, and Drinking water situation slope percent. These were all given proper weight ages according to the DoLR

specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.

b) Planning

A action plan matrix was been formulated by State Level Nodal Agency(SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent, soil depth,

Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agriculture land.

Global Positioning System (GPS) was used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This will be used to

create a map. Contour map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various location specific for soil and water conservation

structures.

C) Hydrological modelling

Hydrological modelling technique was being used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, and Flow accumulation. This model overlaid

over cadastral map hell to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human error which generally

occurring while calculating the catchment area of a check dam.


Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects

S. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria was

used

(A) Planning

Cluster approach Yes

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the

Institute Yes

Baseline survey Yes

Hydro-geological survey Yes

Contour mapping Yes

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover -

Ridge to Valley treatment Yes

Online IT connectivity between

(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes

(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes

(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes

Availability of GIS layers

1. Cadastral map Yes


2. Village boundaries Yes

3. Drainage Yes

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes

5. Land use Yes

6. Ground water status Yes

7. Watershed boundaries Yes

8. Activity

Crop simulation models#

Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high

speed soil nutrient analysis

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)#

Weather Station

(B) Inputs

1. Bio-pesticides

2. Organic manures Yes

3. Vermicompost Yes

4. Bio-fertilizer Yes


5. Water saving devices Yes

6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes

7. Bio-fencing Yes

8. Nutrient budgeting Yes

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No

Any other (please specify) No

#NDVI - Ratio of the differences of the response of vegetation in the near infrared & red regions of the electromagnetic spectrum

Institutional formation in watershed

(1) Watershed Committees (WC)

These are the committees formed by gram sabha to implement the watershed project works within their village with technical support of

WDTs’. These committees are to be registered under societies Registration Act-1860. Chairman & secretary of the committee is selected by

gram sabha. Both the persons are from their villages. Capacity building training to watershed committee members was given by WDT

members.

The watershed committee has pivotal role during various process like PRA & overall planning.


Table no. 31.1: Watershed Committee details in Vad Village Village:-Vad in Mangrol Block

Sl. No

.

Names of WCs

Date of Registratio

n as a Society

(dd/mm/ yyyy)

Name of Member

Designation

M/F

SC ST SF MF LF Land-less

UG SHG GP Any

other

Educa-tional

qualifi-cation

Function/s assigned#

1

Vad Watershed committee

Under Progress

Pravinchandra C. Chaudhari

President M - ¡ - - - - - - - - 7th -

2 Sevjibhai R.Chaudhari

Secretary M - ¡ - - - - - - - - 11th -

3 Hitendra D.Bhaiya

WDT-civil M - ¡ - - - - - - - - D.C.E. -

4 Sarmila N.Chaudhari

Member F - ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - 12th -

5 Pushpa R. vasava

Member F - ¡ - - - - - ¡ ¡ - 6th -

6 Chetanbhai R.Gamit

Member M - ¡ - - - ¡ - - - - 10th -

7 Amrutbhai R.Chaudhari

Member M - ¡ - - - - - - - - 10th -

8 Balubhai K.Chaudhari

Member M - ¡ - - - - - - - - 4th -

9 Pohnabhai C.Chaudhari

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 3rd -

10 Navnitbhai M. Chaudhari

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 12th -

11 Raising J.Chaudhari

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 6th -


Table no. 31.2: Watershed Committee details in Amarkui Village

Village:-Amarkui in Mangrol Block

Sl. No

.

Names of WCs

Date of Registratio

n as a Society

(dd/mm/ yyyy)

Name of Member

Designation

M/F


UG SHG GP Any

other

Educa-tional

qualifi-cation


1

Amarkui Watershed committee

Under Progress

Meharjibhai S. Chaudhari

President M - ¡ - - - - - - - - 5th -

2 Ravisankar K.Vasava

Secretary M - ¡ - - - - - - - - 10th -

3 Hitendra D.Bhaiya

WDT-civil M - ¡ - - - - - - - - D.C.E. -

4 Meeraben J.Vasava

Member F - ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - 4th -

5 Jasuben R. Gamit

Member F - ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - 5th -

6 Gulabbhai D.Chaudhari

Member M - ¡ - - - ¡ - - - - 4th -

7 Hasmukhbhai C.Chaudhari

Member M - ¡ - - - - - - ¡ - 7th -

8 Samjibhai K.Chaudhari

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 8th -

9 Navalbhai N.Vasava

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 4rd -

10 Rameshbhai J.Chaudhari

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 7th -


Table no. 31.3: Watershed Committee details in Isanpur Village Village:- Isanpur in Mangrol Block

Sl. No

.

Names of WCs

Date of Registratio

n as a Society

(dd/mm/ yyyy)

Name of Member

Designation

M/F


UG SHG GP Any

other

Educa-tional

qualifi-cation


1

Isanpur Watershed committee

Under Progress

Bhupatbhai G. Vasava

President M - ¡ - - - - - - - - 12th -

2 Brijeshbhai R. Chaudhari

Secretary M - ¡ - - - - - - - - 12th -

3 Hitendra D.Bhaiya

WDT-civil M - ¡ - - - - - - - - D.C.E. -

4 Jayaben R.Chaudhari

Member F - ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - 3rd -

5 Kailashben K.Chaudhari

Member F - ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - B.A. -

6 Sankarbhai C.Vasava Member M

- ¡ - - - ¡ - - - - illiterat

e

-

7 Amitbhai G.Chaudhari

Member M - ¡ - - - - - - ¡ - 7th -

8 Jinabhai D.Chaudhari

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 7th -

9 Kesavbhai N.Chaudhari

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 7rd -

10 Rahanjibhai R.Vasava

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 4th -

11 Babubhai s.Chaudhari

Member M ¡ ¡

- - - - - - 12th -


Table no. 31.4: Watershed Committee details in Lavet Village Village:-Lavet in Mangrol Block

Sl. No

.

Names of WCs

Date of Registratio

n as a Society

(dd/mm/ yyyy)

Name of Member

Designation

M/F


UG SHG GP Any

other

Educa-tional

qualifi-cation


1

Lavet Watershed committee

Under Progress

Dipakbhai R. Chaudhri

President M - ¡ - - - - - - - - 8th -

2 Ashishbhai N.Chaudhri

Secretary M - ¡ - - - - - - - - B.A. -

3 Hitendra D.Bhaiya

WDT-civil M - ¡ - - - - - - - - D.C.E. -

4 Kapilaben N.Vasava

Member F - ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - 9th -

5 Surtaben V.Gamit

Member F - ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - 12th -

6 Mangabhai M.Vasava Member M

- ¡ - - - ¡ - - - - illiterat

e

-

7 Manojbhai J.Vasava

Member M - ¡ - - - - - - ¡ - 9th -

8 Yasvantbhai J.Chaudhri

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 7th -

9 Jivanbhai N.Gamit

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 10rd -

10 Sankarbhai D.Gamit

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 9th -

11 Rameshbhai C.Chaudhri

Member M ¡ ¡

- - - - - - 7th

-


Table no. 31.5: Watershed Committee details in Motifali Village

Village:- Moti Fali in Mangrol Block

Sl. No

.

Names of WCs

Date of Registratio

n as a Society

(dd/mm/ yyyy)

Name of Member

Designation

M/F


UG SHG GP Any

other

Educa-tional

qualifi-cation


1

Moti Fali Watershed committee

Under Progress

Shaileshbhai C.Vasava

President M - ¡ - - - - - - - - 10th -

2 Khumansing C.Vasava

Secretary M - ¡ - - - - - - - - 10th -

3 Hitendra D.Bhaiya

WDT-civil M - ¡ - - - - - - - - DCE -

4 Malaben S.Vasava

Member F - ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - 5th -

5 Susilaben B.Vasava

Member F - ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - 10th -

6 Savijan C.Vasava

Member M - ¡ - - - ¡ - - - - 4th -

7 Chimanbhai S.vasava

Member M - ¡ - - - - - - ¡ - 4th -

8 Rupjibhai S. Vasava

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 4th -

9 Dalsukhbhai S.Vasava

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 5th -

10 Motibhai K. Vasava

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 6th -


Table no. 31.6: Watershed Committee details in Khareda Village

Village:- Khareda in Mangrol Block

Sl. No

.

Names of WCs

Date of Registratio

n as a Society

(dd/mm/ yyyy)

Name of Member

Designation

M/F


UG SHG GP Any

other

Educa-tional

qualifi-cation


1

Khareda Watershed committee

Under Progress

Roshanbhai S.Chaudhri

President M - ¡ - - - - - - - - 12th -

2 Jitubhai I.Chaudhari

Secretary M - ¡ - - - - - - - - 12th -

3 Hitendra D.Bhaiya

WDT-civil M - ¡ - - - - - - - - DCE -

4 Jayshree J.Chaudhari

Member F - ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - B.A. -

5 Mitaben S.Chaudhri

Member F - ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - 7th -

6 Narayanbhai V. Chaudhri

Member M - ¡ - - - ¡ - - - - 7th -

7 Surtaben D.Chaudhri

Member M - ¡ - - - - - - ¡ - 10th -

8 Ravjibhai C.Chaudhri

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 7th -

9 Surjibhai T.Chaudhri

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 8th -

10 Maheshbhai A.Chaudhri

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 8th -


Table no. 31.7: Watershed Committee details Mangrol in Village Village:- Mangrol in Mangrol Block

Sl. No

.

Names of WCs

Date of Registratio

n as a Society

(dd/mm/ yyyy)

Name of Member

Designation

M/F


UG SHG GP Any

other

Educa-tional

qualifi-cation

Function/s

assigned#

1

Mangrol Watershed committee

Under Progress

Udesing M.Vasava President M - ¡ - - - - - - - - 5th -

2 Satishbhai G. Kataria

Secretary M - ¡ - - - - - - - - 10th -

3 Hitendra D.Bhaiya

WDT-civil M - ¡ - - - - - - - - DCE -

4 Urmilaben D. Vasava

Member F - ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - 9th -

5 Ushaben S. Vasava

Member F - ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - illiterate -

6 Natvarbhai V. Vasava

Member M - ¡ - - - ¡ - - - - 3rd -

7 Saraben S. Sidat

Member F - ¡ - - - - - - ¡ - 12th -

8 Ganpat D. Kataria

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 10th -

9 Govindbhai b. Gamit

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 7th -

10 Kalidas G. Vasava

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - illiterate -


Table no. 31.8: Watershed Committee details in Jhankhvav Village

Village:- Jhankhvav in Mangrol Block

Sl. No.

Names of WCs

Date of Registratio

n as a Society

(dd/mm/ yyyy)

Name of Member Designation

M/F


UG SHG GP Any

other

Educa-tional

qualifi-cation

Function/s

assigned#

1

Zankhvav Watershed committee

Under Progress

UmedbhaiU. Chaudhri

President M - ¡ - - - - - - - - M.A. -

2 Dipakbhai C. Vasava

Secretary M - ¡ - - - - - - - - 12th -

3 Hitendra D.Bhaiya

WDT-civil M - ¡ - - - - - - - - DCE -

4 Kalavati S.Chaudhri

Member F - ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - 11th -

5 Ramila D. Chaudhri

Member F - ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - B.A. -

6 Rameshbhai K. Chaudhri

Member M - ¡ - - - ¡ - - - - 6th -

7 Vipul P. Patel

Member F - ¡ - - - - - - ¡ - 10th -

8 Santaben B. Chaudhri

Member M - ¡ - - - - - - ¡ - 4th -

9 Limjibhai M. Chaudhri

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 10th -

10 Navnit bhai C. Chaudhri

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 10th -

11 Chatubhai k. Chaudhri

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - illiterate


Table no. 31.9: Watershed Committee details in Nani fali Village Village:- Nani Fali in Mangrol Block

Sl. No.

Names of WCs

Date of Registratio

n as a Society

(dd/mm/ yyyy)


M/F


UG SHG GP Any

other

Educa-tional

qualifi-cation

Function/s

assigned#

1

Nani Fali Watershed committee

Under Progress

Rameshbhai V. Chaudhri

President M - ¡ - - - - - - - - B.A. -

2 Jitendra M. Chaudhri

Secretary M - ¡ - - - - - - - - B.A. -

3 Hitendra D.Bhaiya

WDT-civil M - ¡ - - - - - - - - DCE -

4 Sangitaben R. Chaudhri

Member F - ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - 10th -

5 Daxaben H. Chaudhri

Member F - ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - 4th -

6 Nileshbhai H. Gamit

Member M - ¡ - - - ¡ - - - - illiterate -

7 Nainaben A.Chaudhari

Member F - ¡ - - - - - - ¡ - 5th -

8 Dalubhai R. Chaudhari

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - 4th -

9 Vasant bhai B. Chaudhri

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 4th -

10 Manjibhai B. Chaudhri

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 2nd -


Table no. 31.10: Watershed Committee details in Nandola Village

Village:- Nandola in Mangrol Block

Sl. No.

Names of WCs

Date of Registratio

n as a Society

(dd/mm/ yyyy)


M/F


UG SHG GP Any

other

Educa-tional

qualifi-cation

Function/s

assigned#

1

Nandola Watershed committee

Under Progress

Vesuben C. Chaudhri

President F - ¡ - - - - - - - - 12th -

2 Bharatbhai C.. Chaudhri

Secretary M - ¡ - - - - - - - - 11th -

3 Hitendra D.Bhaiya

WDT-civil M - ¡ - - - - - - - - DCE -

4 Hasumatiben V. Chaudhri

Member F - ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - 10th -

5 Menaben C. Chaudhari

Member F - ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - 10th -

6 Prabhubhai H. Vasava


7 Champakbhai H. Chaudhri

Member M - ¡ - - - - - - ¡ - 7th -

8 Amar sing B. Chaudhari

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - 5th -

9 Ashokbhai M. Chaudhri

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 8th -

10 Jinabhai G. Chaudhri

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 10th -


Table no. 31.11: Watershed Committee details in Pataldevi Village

Village:- Pataldevi in Mangrol Block

Sl. No

.

Names of WCs

Date of Registration as a Society (dd/mm/

yyyy)

Name of Member Designatio

n M/F


UG SHG GP Any

other

Educa-tional

qualifi-cation

Function/s

assigned#

1

Pataldevi Watershed committee

Under Progress

Motibhai J. Vasava President M - ¡ - - - - - - - - 7th -

2 Manojbhai R. Chaudhri

Secretary M - ¡ - - - - - - - - 12th -

3 Hitendra D.Bhaiya

WDT-civil M - ¡ - - - - - - - - DCE -

4 Ramilaben B. Chaudhri

Member F - ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - 7th -

5 Nitaben S. Chaudhri

Member F - ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - 11th -

6 Girdharbhai B. Vasava


7 Hareshbhai U. Chaudhari

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - ¡ - 6th -

8 Mohanbhai B. Chaudhari

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - 10th -

9 Motibhai H. Chaudhari

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 4th -

10 Samjibhai S. Chaudhari

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - -1 - - 10th -

11 Kantubhai G, Chaudhari

Member M - ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 12 th -


# Only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned. A. PNP and PRA B. Planning C. Maintenance of Accounts D. Signing of cheques and making payments E. Supervision of construction activities F. Cost Estimation G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify).

Self Help group (SHG) Self Help group are motivated, small homogeneous group organised together through highly successful of credit and thrift activities. Self Help Group initiative especially for women to uplift their livelihood. Generally self help group includes landless and marginal sized farm women, BPL household, SC/ST women. SHG initiative in Vad watershed was being organized by having a focused group discussion between various homogeneous communities of women based on their livelihood separately. Each group discussed their basic problems with their facilitators. The major problems identified are: (a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institutes. (b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders. (c) Lack of attitude of saving among poor people due to complex and rigid conventional financial institution structure. (d) Lack of small micro- loans without collaterals and high interest rates. (e) Lack of knowledge on credit, Thrift activity and banking.

With a view point of these problems it was planned to organized these women to a into group consisting of 12 to 20 to each groups and it was also proposed to have 8 groups. With detailed discussion with some of the local NGOs working in the area like SEWA, it was planned to have some capacity building training regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will promote women empowerment this included spices packing, embroidery activities with forward and backward linkage. This will ultimately lead into a better human development in the village.


Table no. 32: SHG detail

S. No.

Village Name Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members

No. of SC/ST in each category

No. of BPL in each category

With only Men

With only Women

With both

Total Categories M F Total ST SC Total M F Total

1

Vad

1 1 0 2

(i) Landless 5 5 10 10 - 10 - - -

(ii) MF 5 5 10 10 - 10 - - - (iii) SF - - - - - - - - - (iv) LF - - - - - - - - - TOTAL 10 10 20 20 0 20 3 5 8

2 Amarkui 0 3 0 3

(i) Landless - 10 10 - - - - - -

(ii) MF - 23 23 - - - - - -

(iii) SF - - - - - - - - - (iv) LF - - - - - - - - - TOTAL 0 33 33 33 0 33 0 20 20

3

Isanpur 0 4 0 4

(i) Landless - 10 10 - - - - - - (ii) MF - 30 30 - - - - - - (iii) SF - 0 0 - - - - - - (iv) LF - 0 0 - - - - - - TOTAL 0 40 40 40 0 40 0 40 40

4

Lavet 1 2 0 3

(i) Landless 3 6 9 - - - - - - (ii) MF 7 14 21 - - - - - - (iii) SF - - - - - - - - - (iv) LF - - - - - - - - - TOTAL 10 20 30 30 0 30 0 10 10

5

Moti Fali 0 2 0 2

(i) Landless 0 15 15 - - - - - - (ii) MF 0 6 6 - - - - - - (iii) SF - - - - - - - - - (iv) LF - - - - - - - - -


40 263 303 303 0 303 16 189 205 40

6

Khareda 1 2 0

3

(i) Landless 0 4 4 - - - - - - (ii) MF 10 16 26 - - - - - - (iii)SF - - - - - - - - - (iv) LF

- - - - - - - - -

TOTAL 10 20 30 30 0 30 8 9 17

7

Mangrol 0 2 0 2

(i) Landless 0 22 22 - - - - - - (ii) MF - - - - - - - - - (iii) SF - - - - - - - - - (iv) LF - - - - - - - - - TOTAL 22 22 22 0 22 0 18 18

8 Jhankhvav

1 3 0 4

(i) Landless 10 20 30 - - - - - - (ii) MF - 15 15 - - - - - - (iii) SF - - - - - - - - - (iv) LF - - - - - - - - - TOTAL 10 35 45 45 0 45 5 20 25

9 Nani Fali 0 2 0 2

(i) Landless 0 4 4 - - - - - - (ii) MF 0 6 6 - - - - - - (iii) SF - - - - - - - - - (iv) LF - - - - - - - - - TOTAL 0 10 10 10 - 10 0 6 6

10

Nandola 0 2 0 2

(i) Landless 0 5 5 - - - - - - (ii) MF 0 15 15 - - - - - - (iii) SF 0 7 7 - - - - - - (iv) LF - - - - - - - - - TOTAL 0 22 22 22 0 22 0 10 10

11

Pataldevi 0 3 0 3

(i) Landless 0 5 5 - - - - - - (ii) MF 0 25 25 - - - - - - (iii) SF - - - - - - - - - (iv) LF - - - - - - - - - TOTAL 0 30 30 30 0 30 0 30 30


Total 40 263 303 303 0 303 16 189 205

(2) User Group:-

These are homogeneous group of persons having land holding within the watershed area. They are normally formed to manage an activity or asset on long term basis. The user group collect user charge from their members. Some of the point with were considered while forming a user group in Vad were: In case of check dam all the beneficiary of the individual check dam where involved as user group members. In case of Fodder bank all the individual beneficiaries of animal husbandry are considered as potential members. Membership was on voluntary and democratic. Focused group discussion was conducted to between the user groups to discuss the above conditions and to select potential members. It was advocated that each group to formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit.

Table no. 33: UG detail

S. No.

Village Name Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members

No. of SC/ST in each category

No. of BPL in each category

With only Men

With only Women

With both

Total Categories M F Total ST SC Total M F Total

1

Vad

1 1 0 2

(i) Landless 5 5 10 10 - 10 - - -

(ii) MF 5 5 10 10 - 10 - - - (iii) SF - - - - - - - - - (iv) LF - - - - - - - - - TOTAL 10 10 20 20 0 20 0 0 0

2 Amarkui 10 0 0 10

(i) Landless - - - - - - -

(ii) MF - 130 130 130- - 130- - - -

(iii) SF - - - - - - - - - (iv) LF - - - - - - - - - TOTAL 0 130 130 130 0 130 0 0 0

3

Isanpur 0 9 0 9

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - (ii) MF 137 - 137 137 - 137 - - - (iii) SF - - - - - - - - - (iv) LF - - - - - - - - - TOTAL 137 0 137 137 0 137 0 0 0

4 11 0 0 11 (i) Landless - - - - - - - - -


Lavet (ii) MF 165 - 165 165 165 - - - (iii) SF - - - - - - - - - (iv) LF - - - - - - - - - TOTAL 165 0 165 165 0 165 0 0 0

5

Moti Fali 4 0 0 4

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - (ii) MF 44 - 44 44 - 44 - - - (iii) SF - - - - - - - - - (iv) LF - - - - - - - - - Total 44 0 44 44 0 44 0 0 0

6

Khareda 6 0 0 6

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - (ii) MF 58 - 58 58 - 58 - - - (iii)SF - - - - - - - - -

(iv) LF - - - - - - - - -

TOTAL 58 0 58 58 0 58 0 0 0

7

Mangrol 10 0 0 10


8 Jhankhvav

9 0 0 9


9 Nani Fali 7 0 0 7

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - (ii) MF - 77 77 77 - 77 - - - (iii) SF - - - - - - - - - (iv) LF - - - - - - - - - TOTAL 0 77 77 77 0 77 0 0 0

10

Nandola 7 0 0 7

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - (ii) MF 71 - 71 71 - 71 - - - (iii) SF - - - - - - - - -


(iv) LF - - - - - - - - - TOTAL 71 0 71 71 0 71 0 0 0

11

Pataldevi 0 7 0 7

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - (ii) MF 83 - 83 83 - 83 - - - (iii) SF - - - - - - - - - (iv) LF - - - - - - - - -

66 29 0 95 TOTAL 83 - 83 83 - 83 - - -

Total 766 217 983 983 0 983 0 0 0


Focused Group Discussion with villagers

34:Physicalactivities to beundertaken under IWMP-I

EPA activities are certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local community. This helps in establishment of credibility of watershed Development

Team (WDT). It also acts as a rapport building activity of the village community. A group Discussion was conducted with watershed Development Committee regarding

the EPA activity, it was conveyed to the amount of Rs. 2.74 lakh in Vad, 3.60 lakh in Amarkui, 2.40 lakh in Isanpur, 4.08 lakh in Lavet, 0.84 Lakh in Motifali, 1.44 Lakh in

Khareda, 2.66 Lakh in Mangrol, 2.16 Lakh in Jhankhvav, 1.20 Lakhin Nani fali , 1.44 Lakh in Nandola and 1.44 lakh in Pataldevi was allotted for EPA activity, which was 4

per cent of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them that only

those activities can taken, which revive the common natural resources and common benefits . It was also taken into priority and convergences with different

departments were also proposed, which will result in sustainability of activities.

Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sr. No. Names of Villages

Amount earmarked for EPA (4%)

Entry Point Activities planned

Unit (Nos) Estimated cost (lac)

1 Vad 2.74

Bore Well/Hand pump Repairing 8 0.80 Pipe Line (mtr) 300 Rmt 0.94 Havada 1 0.60 Filter Plant with cooler 1 0.40

2 Amarkui 3.60

Bore Well/Hand pump Repairing 5 0.50 Pipe Line (mtr) 600 Rmt 1.80 Water Tank with stand Post 4 0.60 Well repairing 1 0.30 Filter Plant with cooler 1 0.40

3 Isanpur 2.40

Bore Well/Hand pump Repairing 2 0.20 Pipe Line (mtr) 300 Rmt 0.90 Water Tank with stand Post 1 0.30 Havada 2 1.00

4 Lavet 4.08 Bore Well/Hand pump Repairing 4 0.40 Pipe Line (mtr) 500 Rmt 1.28


Water Tank with stand Post 4 1.20 Havada 2 1.20

5 Moti Fali 0.84 Bore Well/Hand pump Repairing 2 0.20 Pipe Line (mtr) 150 Rmt 0.34 Water Tank with stand Post 1 0.30

6 Khareda 1.44 Bore Well/Hand pump Repairing 6 0.60 Pipe Line (mtr) 300 Rmt 0.84

7 Mangrol 2.66 Bore Well/Hand pump Repairing 9 0.90 Demonstration Plot 0.5 Ha. 1.76

8 Jhankhvav 2.16

Bore Well/Hand pump Repairing 2 0.20 Havada 2 1.06 RO Plant repairing 1 0.40 Havada repairing 2 0.50

9 Nani Fali 1.20 Bore Well/Hand pump Repairing 2 0.20 Pipe Line (mtr) 200 Rmt 0.60 Water Tank with stand Post 1 0.40

10 Nandola 1.44 Bore Well/Hand pump Repairing 4 0.40 Water Tank with stand Post 1 1.04

11 Pataldevi 1.44 Pipe Line (mtr) 150 Rmt 0.50 Water Tank with stand Post 2 0.44 Havada 1 0.50

Total 24.00 24.00


Specified by Villager for Entry Point Activity (EPA)


Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No. Name of villages Initiation of village

level institution Capacity building

IEC activities Baseline survey

Hydro-geological survey

Identifying technical support

agencies

Any other (please specify)

Estimated Cost (Rs. in lakh)

1 Vad 0.6156 1.6416 0.8208 0.4104 0.2052 0.2052 0.2052 4.104

2 Amarkui 0.81 2.16 1.08 0.54 0.27 0.27 0.27 5.4

3 Isanpur 0.54 1.44 0.72 0.36 0.18 0.18 0.18 3.6

4 Lavet 0.918 2.448 1.224 0.612 0.306 0.306 0.306 6.12

5 Motifali 0.189 0.504 0.252 0.126 0.063 0.063 0.063 1.26

6 Khareda 0.324 0.864 0.432 0.216 0.108 0.108 0.108 2.16

7 Mangrol 0.5994 1.5984 0.7992 0.3996 0.1998 0.1998 0.1998 3.996

8 Jhankhvav 0.486 1.296 0.648 0.324 0.162 0.162 0.162 3.24

9 Nani fali 0.27 0.72 0.36 0.18 0.09 0.09 0.09 1.8

10 Nandola 0.324 0.864 0.432 0.216 0.108 0.108 0.108 2.16

11 Pataldevi 0.324 0.864 0.432 0.216 0.108 0.108 0.108 2.16

Total 5.4 14.4 7.2 3.6 1.8 1.8 1.8 36

#One of the following may be entered in columns: Completed (ii) in progress (iii) just started (iv) not started


36. Watershed Development Works:

Watershed development works is to be done during implementation phase of watershed. Treatments begin from the highest point of the watershed and move

progressively downwards (ridge to valley), starting with the smallest stream and culminating in the main river of the watershed.Work is location-specific, varying

according to slope and geology as also the size of the stream being treated.The aim is to weave interventions into the contours of nature, not to seek mastery over

it.A net budget of 50 percent is allotted for this work.

36.1 Ridge Area Treatment Plans

In a watershed, the slopes falling from the ridge to the beginning of the plains are called ridge area. It is very important to treat the higher reaches of the ridge

has this is where the major water resources originate. This involves mainlyhighly and forest region in the watershed. Various watershed managing structures

should be build to arrest the erosion anddegradation of forest with grasses in upper ridges.

1. Contour Bund/trench

2. Boulder Checks

3. Gabions

4. Grass seedling/planatation

1. Gabions

Gabion structures are rock and wire dams constructed across drainage lines with a catchment area of 50-500 ha. They are also constructed to reinforce highly

erodible stream embankments.The main aim of constructing gabion structures is to reduce the velocity of water flowing through the drainage line. By reducing

the velocity of runoff, gabion structures help in


1. Reduction in soil erosion

2. Trapping silt, which reduces the rate of siltation in water harvesting structures inthe lower reaches of the watershed.

3. Increasing recharge of groundwater and

4. Increasing the duration of flow in the drainage line. Therefore, the capacity ofthe water harvesting structures created downstream on the drainage line is

utilized more fully as they get many more refills.

4.3.2.2Drainage line Treatment and water harvesting for land development:

The second tier treatment is the slope treatment. This is generally agricultural land or waste lands. These are generally water conservation or surface

water storage structures. These being highly labour intensive will involve more of manual labour so schemes like National Rural Employment Guarantee

Scheme (NREGS) can be taken.Following structures has been proposed in the project villages.

1. Check dams

2. Waste Weir

1. Check dams

Check dams are constructed across small streams having slope the selected should have sufficient thickness of permeable bed or weathered formation to

facilitate recharge of stored water within short span of time. The water stored in these structures is mostly confined to stream course and the height is

normally less than 2m and excess water is allowed to flow over the wall in order to avoid scouring from excess runoff water cushions are provided at


downstream side. To harness the maximum run off in the stream series of such check dams are to be constructed to have recharge on regional scale in

project villages.

2. Waste weirs

These are constructed for giving a safe passage to the excess runoff from the field and also store some amount of water in the field. The water stored in

these structures is mostly confined in field and height is normally less than 0. 5 mt. and excess water is allowed to flow over the wall.

4.3.2.3 Plains or Flat level/Field level:

1. Percolation tank

2. Farm bund

3. Afforestation

1) Percolation tank

Percolation Tank: Percolation dams are constructed for recharging groundwater. Such structures are usually made on the upper part of the catchment

area. Water stored here percolates to wells and tube wells located in the lower part of the catchment. Such dams can also be made in the immediate

upstream portion of wells and tube wells. Depending on the capacity of the dam and duration of water storage, the dam can have secondary benefits (such

as pisciculture) that are vital for the livelihood security of marginal farmers and landless labourers.


2) Farm bund

Farm bunds are constructed on agricultural land with the aim of arresting soilerosion and improving the soil moisture profile . Ideally, bunds on farms should

bemade on the contour line. But this creates several problems for farmers. Contour bunds divide the field into irregular sections. In such a situation, it becomes

inconvenientto maneuver bullocks for operations such as ploughing and line-sowing. Due to these

3). Afforestation

Emphasis is placed on maximizing the use of available land and resources with high yield tree species. Trees can either be of similar species or mixed in a

manner that will result in a stand or forest. Depending on the climate, geographical layout of the area and the soil conditions, trees that have the greatest

growth potential are selected like Babool, Neem, Sesame and Ailanthus.

Table no.36.1: Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No.

Village name Type of structures

Proposed target Augmentation/ repair of existing

structures Construction of new structures Total target

No. Area to be irrigated

(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

Area to be irrigated

(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

1 Vad

Nala Plug up 5-10 mtr - - - - 35 - - 1.75 - - 1.75

Pacca Nala Plug - - - - 13 - - 5.20 - - 5.20

Gabion Structure - - - - 22 - - 5.50 - - 5.50

Check Wall - - - - 4 - - 6.00 - - 6.00

Land levelling - - - - 10 - - 5.00 - - 5.00

Total 84 23.45 23.45


Table no.36.2:- Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No.





(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

2 Amarkui

Nala Plug up 5-10 mt - - - - 80 - - 4.00 - - 4.00

Pacca Nala Plug - - - - 25 - - 10.00 - -

10.00

Gabion Structure - - - - 20 - - 5.00 - - 5.00

Check Wall - - - - 8 - -

12.00 - - 12.00

Land levelling - - - - 10 - -

5.00 - - 5.00

Staggered trench - - - - 4000 - -

2.00 - - 2.00

Total 4143 38.00 38.00


Table no.36,3:- Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No.





(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

3 Isanpur

Nala Plug up 5-10 mt - - - - 46 - -

2.30 - - 2.30

Pacca Nala Plug - - - - 12 - - 4.80 - -

4.80

Gabion Structure - - - - 35 - -

8.75 - - 8.75

Check Wall - - - - 5 - -

5.50 - - 5.50


3.00 - - 3.00

Total 113 26.35 26.35



S. No.





(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

4 Lavet

Nala Plug up 5-10 mt - - - - 75 - - 3.75 - -

3.75

Pacca Nala Plug - - - - 20 - - 8.00 - -

8.00

Gabion Structure - - - - 20 - - 5.00 - -

5.00

Check Wall - - - - 10 - - 15.00 - -

15.00

Land levelling - - - - 13 - - 6.50 - -

6.50

Total 138 38.25 38.25


S. No.


Proposed target Augmentation/ repair of existing structures

Construction of new structures Total target


(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

5 Motifali

Nala Plug up 5-10 mt - - - - 10 - -

0.50 - - 0.50

Pacca Nala Plug - - - - 4 - -

1.60 - - 1.60



2.00 - - 2.00

Check Wall - - - - 1 - -

1.50 - - 1.50


2.00 - - 2.00

Total 27 7.60 7.60

Table no.36.6:- Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakhs Rs.)

S. No.





(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

6 Khareda

Nala Plug up 5-10 mt - - - - 20 - -

1.00 - - 1.00


2.80 - - 2.80


2.50 - - 2.50

Check Wall - - - - 5 - -

7.50 - - 7.50


2.00 - - 2.00

Total 46 15.80 15.80



S. No.





(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

7 Mangrol

Nala Plug up 5-10 mt - - - - 30 - -

1.50 - - 1.50


6.0 - - 6.0


5.0 - - 5.0

Check Wall - - - - 8 - -

12.00 - - 12.00


2.50 - - 2.50

Total 78 27.00 27.00


S. No.





(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

8 Jhankhvav

Nala Plug up 5-10 mt - - - - 25 - -

1.25 - - 1.25


7.20 - - 7.20


6.75 - - 6.75


Check Wall - - - - 5 - -

7.50 - - 7.50


2.50 - - 2.50

Staggered trench - - - -

2000 - - 1.00 - -

1.00

Total 2080 26.20 26.20


S. No.





(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

9 Nani fali

Nala Plug up 5-10 mt - - - - 20 - -

1.00 - - 1.00


3.2 - - 3.2


2.50 - - 2.50

Check Wall - - - - 3 - -

4.50 - - 4.50

Land levelling - - - - 2

1.00 - - 1.00

Total 43 12.20 12.20



S. No.





(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

10 Nandola

Nala Plug up 5-10 mt - - - - 20 - -

1.00 - - 1.00


3.20 - - 3.20


3.75 - - 3.75

Check Wall - - - - 4 - -

6.00 - - 6.00

Land levelling -

- -

- 5 -

- 2.5 -

- 2.5

Total 52 16.45 16.45



S. No.





(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

11 Pataldevi

Nala Plug up 5-10 mt - - - - 30 - -

1.50 - - 1.50


4.80 - - 4.80


3.75 - - 3.75

Check Wall - - - - 1 - -

1.5 - - 1.5

Land levelling -

- -

- 5 -

- 2.5 -

- 2.5

Staggered trench -

- -

- 2000 -

- 1.00 -

- 1.00

Total 2063 15.05 15.05


Table no.37.1: Activities related to water conversation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No.





(ha)

Storage capacity(in 1000 Cmt)

Estimated cost


(ha)

Storage capacity (in 1000

Cmt)

Estimated cost


(ha)


Estimated cost

1 Vad Check dam - - - - 2

20 90.00 10.00

20 90.00 10.00

Total 2

20 90.00 10.00

20 90.00 10.00


S. No.





(ha)


Estimated cost


(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost


(ha)


Estimated cost

2 Amarkui

Check dam repairing 2

16 50.00 2.00 - - - - 16 50.00 2.00

Percolation tank - - - - 1

- 35.00 3.00 35.00 3.00

Graded band - - - - 2000

1.00 1.00

Total 2

16 50.00 2.00 1501 35.0 4.0 16 85.00 6.00



S. No.





(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost


(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost


(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost

3 Isanpur Check dam repairing

1 10 40.00 1.00 - - - - 10 40.00 1.00


40.00 3.00 40.00 3.00

Total 1

10 40.00 1.00 1 40.00 3.00 10 80.00 4.00


S. No.





(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost


(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost


(ha)


Estimated cost

4 Lavet

Check dam - - - - 2

10 45.00 6.00

10 45.00 6.00

Check dam repairing 1

7 25.00 1.00 - - - - 7 25.00 1.00


50.00 5.00 50.00 5.00

Total 1

7 25.00 1.00 2 10 95.00 11.00 17 120 12.00



S. No.





(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost


(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost


(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost

5 Motifali Percolation tank - - - -

1 8 35.00

3.00 8 35.00

3.00

Total

1 8 35.00

3.00 8 35.00

3.00


S. No.





(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost


(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost


(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost

6 Khareda Percolation tank - - - -

1 8 35.00

3.00 8 35.00

3.00

Total

1 8 35.00

3.00 8 35.00

3.00



S. No.





(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost


(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost


(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost

7 Mangrol Check dam - - - -

1 10 45.00

5.00 10 45.00

5.00


7 20.00 2.00

7 20.00 2.00

Total

2

7.00

7.00


S. No.





(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost


(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost


(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost

8 Jhankhvav Percolation tank - - - -

1 8 35.00

3.00 8 35.00

3.00

Total

1 8 35.00

3.00 8 35.00

3.00



S. No.


Proposed target Augmentation/ repair of existing structures

Construction of new structures Total target

No. Area to be irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity (ltr)

Estimated cost

No. Area to be irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity (ltr)

Estimated cost

Area to be irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

9 Nani fali Check dam - - - -

1 10 45.00

5.00 10 45.00

5.00

Total

1 10 45.00

5.00 10 45.00

5.00


S. No.





(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost


(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost


(ha)


Estimated cost

10 Nandola Check dam - - - -

1 7 30.00

3.00 7 30.00

3.00

Total

1 7 30.00

3.00 7 30.00

3.00


Table no.37.11 Activities related to water conversation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No.





(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost


(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost


(ha)


Cmt)

Estimated cost

11 Pataldevi Percolation tank - - - -

3 20 80.00

6.00 20 80.00

5.00

Total

3

6.00

6.00

Livelihood Intervention

Production System -1: Goatry Unit (Boer Unit)

The Boer goat is a large framed animal with mature weights between 260-380 lbs. for males and 210-265 lbs. for females. The potential for growth is

outstanding. Under intensive performance tested conditions, males averaged 80 lbs. at 3 months of age; 160 Lbs. at 8 months; 222 Lbs. at 12 months; 257 Lbs. at

18 months; and 313 Lbs. at 25 months. Females averaged 63 Lbs. at 3 months; 139 Lbs. at 12 months; 165 Lbs. at 18 months; 220 Lbs. at 24 months.

The Boer goat is capable of attaining an average daily gain of over 400 gr. or 0.88 Lbs. daily in feed lot situations. The Boers average daily gain potential on pasture

or rangeland is outstanding and offers great possibilities for selecting to improve growth rates.


The Boer goats dressing weight percentage is over 50%. Comparead to South African sheep, the Boer goat had the higher dressing percentage with carcasses

having more total tissue in the fore arm, neck and ventral trunk, and less tissue in the hind limb.

Boer goats seem to yield a carcass superior to Angora, dairy and over meat goats and that fat content and muscling of Boer goat carcasses compared favourably

with those of specialized mutton producing breeds.

Thus, it is not surprising that with their excellent growth and carcass qualities many well known goat specialists listed the Boer goat as one breed that could make

a major contribution to increasing productivity of meat goats worldwide.

A good meat goat should also be fecund and prolific. More kids born per doe will result in greater profit margins for the producer. The ovulation rate for Boer

goats ranges from 1 to 4 eggs per doe with a mean of 1.7 (plus or minus .9). A normal kidding rate of 200% is common for the Boer goat. This is higher than most

other goat breeds, thus the Boer goat can be considered a prolific breed. This conclusion was also reached in New Zealand and Australia, based on the number of

super ovulated embryos (9) harvested from the Boer goat donor program.

The Boer goat reaches puberty early, usually about 6 months of age for males and 10-12 months for first-mating females. The Boer goat has an extended breeding

season and it is possible to achieve 3 kidding every 2 years.

Boer goats give good milk, which enables them to successfully raise their multiple offspring with excellent weight gains and with little pre-weaning mortality.

A South African study indicated that lactation length was 120-140 days for Boer goats and their yield was about half that of South African, which had a

lactation length of 278 days. Boer goats had a higher butterfat (5.6%), total solids (15.7%), and lactose (61) than any other goat breeds in South Africa. It has

been postulated that for the Boer goat to attain its high pre-weaning average daily gain, the doe must produce up to 5.5 Lbs./day. Actual milk production of

Boer goat does under extensive management systems is actually less, ranging from 3.3 to 5.5 Lbs./day, depending on age of doe and lactation number. These

milk yields are not impressive by dairy goat standards but for a goat that has not been selected for milk yield, it is considered excellent. This demonstrates the

superior maternal capabilities and the ability to rear multiple young of the Boer goat doe.


Production System - 2: Vermi composting unit for Project villages

Introduction:

The wide spread problems of soil degradation and desertification are threatening agricultural sustainability. Throughout the project village large

populations of domestic animals producing large amounts of organic wastes. These organic residues, or ‘waste materials’, can be transformed more quickly

and into a more useful vermi-compost, available for urban and land application. Nutrients within vermi-composted material are readily available to plants,

and can be added to agricultural land to improve soil structure and fertility or used asgood quality and marketable additive to potting soil or plant growth

media. The process of composting crop residues using earthworms comprise spreading the agricultural wastes and cow dung in layers as 1 m wide and 0.3

m high beds of required length. Earthworms are introduced in between the layers @ 350 worms per m3 of bed volume. The beds are maintained at about

40 - 50% moisture content and a temperature of 20 - 30° C by sprinkling water over the beds. The earthworms being voracious eaters consume the

biodegradable matter and give out a part of the matter as excreta or vermi-castings. The vermi-casting containing nutrients are rich manure for the plants.

Objectives

• To train farmers / SHGs in organic farming and vermi-culture.

• To promote production of vermi-castings as a viable small business venture


About The Worms

Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae, and Perionyx excavatius are some of the species for rearing to convert organic wastes into manure. The worms feed on any

biodegradable matter ranging from coir waste to kitchen garbage and Vermi-composting units are ideally suited to locations / units with generation of

considerable quantities of organic wastes. One earthworm reaching reproductive age of about six weeks lays one egg capsule (containing 7 embryos) every

7 - 10 days. Three to seven worms emerge out of each capsule. Thus, the multiplication of worms under optimum growth conditions is very fast. The worms

live for about 2 years. Fully grown worms could be separated and dried in an oven to make 'worm meal' which is a rich source of protein (70%) for use in

animal feed.

Location

All villages of Vad project have lots of animal so it can become good composting center as well as good source of livelihood. Vermicompost isvery suitable

for fruit, flower and vegetable as well as cereal crops. It increases quality and quantity of product in per unit area.

Market/Use

Vermi compost is a valuable input for sustainable agriculture and wasteland development. This also can be used widely in pot culture and in home gardens.

Several farmers are successfully using vermi-comost.Vermi compost has more nutrient compare to other manures and fertilizer so by the use of compost we

can reduce the use of chemical fertilizer. Vermi compost not only supply nutrient but also improve quantity of hormones for plant growth, improves the soil

structure leading to increase in water and nutrient holding capacities of soil.


Components of A Commercial Unit

Sheds

Shed is necessary as the temperature in summer is high. We can make it by the use of concrete pillars because this will act as a source of income for those in

the village who produce pillars. It will prevent wetting of beds due to rain on a windy day.While designing the sheds adequate room has to be left around the beds

for easy movement of the labour attending to filland harvest the beds.

Vermi-beds

Scientific bed size proposed here is 10ft by 3 ft by 2.5 ft. The whole bed area should be above the ground. The bed should have a uniform height over the entire

width to the extent possible to avoid low production owing to low bed volumes. The proper bed width should not be more than4.5 ft to allow easy access to the

centre of the bed.

Land

About 500 square ft of land is required to set up a vermi compost production unit in each village. It should have at least one super structure to cover the 10

beds. It should have an arrangement for watering and other equipments as required because moisture is very essential for compost production. Land can

be taken from Gram panchayat on lease of at least 10-15 years.

Seed Stock

This is very important thing because worms multiply at the rate of 350 worms per m3 of bed space over a period of 6 month to ayear.


Fencing

The entire area has to be fenced to prevent the stray animals and other unwanted elements. These could be estimated based on the length

of the periphery of the farm.

Water Supply System

We have to maintain always 50% moisture content, there is need to plan for a water source, lifting mechanism and a system of conveying and applying the

water to vermi-beds. Drippers with round the clock flow arrangement would be quite handy for continuous supply and saving on water. Such a water

supply/application system requiring considerable initial investment, however, reduces the operational costs on hand watering and proves economical in

the long run. The cost of these items depends on the capacity of the unit and the type of water supply chosen.

Machinery

Farm machinery and implements are required for cutting the raw material in small pieces, conveying shredded raw material to the vermi-sheds, loading,

unloading, collection of compost, loosening of beds for aeration, shifting of the compost. Costs of providing necessary implements and the machinery have

to be included in the project cost.


S. No

Particulars

Quantity

Rate (Rs.)

Amount (Rs.)

1 Construction of bed 10 6000 60000

2 Erection of shed

A Cost of Polls (8 ft * 5) +(10 ft* 5) =10 10 25 2250

B Cost of iron angle (16 ft * 5) + (40 ft *2) = 7 7 42 6720

C Nylon roof matting 1008 sqr ft 40 40320

D Labour charge + Transport - - 7000

3 Cow dung @ 275Kg per bed *10 bed 2750 0.35 960

4 Agri waste @ 70 kg per bed *10 bed 700 0.50 350

5 Worms 1.5 kg per bed *10 bed 15 300 4500

6 Tools - - 2000

7 Weighing scale (100 kg capacity)

- - 2000

8 Miscellaneous

- - 2000

9 Water canal on periphery - - 1420

10 Remaining cost for 1 year ( 8 cycle) - - 20480

Total cost 150000

Table No-42.v: Returns from vermicomposting

Benefits

1. Sale of vermin compost of 40 tones @ Rs.3500/- per ton

40*3500=1,40,000 Rs

2. Sale of worms @ 5 kg per ton of compost and Rs. 300per kg

200*300=60,000 Rs

3.Total

2,00,000 Rs/-

Net benefit

50,000Rs/-

Table: 42.iv Model of a Vermi-compost Unit (10 ft *3 ft *2.5 ft)


Training will be provided to all the stakeholders by KVK which can be divided in to two categories and shown below.

A. Theoretical

• Introduction to Organic Farming

• Need and the importance of Organic farming

• Introduction to Composting methods

• Vermi-culture

• Earth Worms, nature, identification and selection

• Vermi-castings

• Vermi-compost

• Marketing Avenues

• Application of vermicomposting

• Addresses of the suppliers of worms.

B. Practical

• Production Methods

• Raw Materials

• Site and the type of Infrastructure

• Tank

• Vermi-bed

•Harvest

• Quality Analysis


• Storage & Packaging

• Dos and Don’ts

Production System - 3: System For Rice Intensification (SRI Method)

SRI increases rice production and raises the productivity of land, labor, water and capital through different practices for managing:

Rice plants - Seedlings are transplanted:

very young -- usually just 8-12 days old, with just two small leaves

carefully and quickly to have minimum trauma to the roots

singly, only one per hill instead of 3-4 together to avoid root competition

widely spaced to encourage greater root and canopy growth

in a square grid pattern, 25x25 cm or wider -- 30x30 cm or 40x40 cm, even up to 50x50 cm with the best quality soil

Soil - This is kept moist but well-drained and aerated, with good structure and enough organic matter to support increased biological activity. The

quality and health of the soil is the key to best production.

Water - Only a minimum of water is applied during the vegetative growth period, and then only a thin layer of water is maintained on the field

during the flowering and grain filling stage. Alternatively, to save labor time, some farmers flood and drain (dry) their fields in 3-5 day cycles with

good results. Best water management practices depend on soil type, labor availability and other factors, so farmers should experiment on how best

to apply the principle of having moist but well-drained soil while thier rice plants are growing.


Nutrients - Soil nutrient supplies should be augmented, preferably with compost, made from any available biomass. Better quality compost such as

with manure can give additional yield advantages. Chemical fertilizer can be used and gives better results than with no nutrient amendments, but it

contributes less to good soil structure and active microbial communities in the rhizosphere than does organic matter. At least initially, nutrient

amendments may not be necessary to achieve higher yields with the other SRI practices, but it is desirable to build up soil fertility over time. Rice-

root exudation, greater with SRI, enhances soil fertility.

Weeds - Since weeds become a problem in fields that are not kept flooded, weeding is necessary at least once or twice, starting 10-12 days after

transplanting, and preferably 3 or 4 times before the canopy closes. Using a rotary hoe -- a simple, inexpensive, mechanical push-weeder has the

advantage of aerating the soil at the same time that weeds are eliminated. (They are left in the soil to decompose so their nutrients are not lost.)

Additional weedings beyond two increase yield more than enough under most conditions to justify the added labor costs.

SRI methods increase the productivity of:

water -- since yields can double or more with only half as much water, the productivity of water is greatly increased -- this is especially

important in countries or places where water is becoming scarcer;

land -- yields as indicated above can average about 8 t/ha once the methods are used correctly, and can be twice that or more when they are

used with precision and skill;

labor -- SRI does require more labor depending on the cost of labor, the value of increased production increases the returns to labor by at

least 50% and often several hundred percent. Once the methods have been mastered, the labor requirements for SRI decline. Also,

implements are being developed that save labor.

Environmental Benefits: SRI isenvironmentally-friendly. Reduced demand for water frees up water for other uses; soil that is not kept

saturated has greater biodiversity. Unflooded paddies do not produce methane, one of the major "greenhouse gases" that are contributing to


global warming. There can be more nitrous oxide from unflooded paddies, which offsets to some extent the gains from reducing methane

emissions, but when nitrogen fertilizer is not used, this effect should be small. On balance, SRI should improve environmental conditions.

Equity Considerations: SRI also has the benefit of being particularly accessible for farmers who have small landholdings and need to get the highest

yields possible from their available land. Since poorer households have relatively more labor compared to land, SRI is one of the few agricultural

innovations that has a bias in favor of equity. It is true that very poor households may find it difficult to invest labor in SRI because they need to be

earning daily incomes, even if their returns to labor would be higher from SRI. However, since returns to land, labor and water are all higher with

SRI, any household that grows rice and is labor-constrained will do better by using SRI methods on just a part of its landholding, using its other land

for production of other crops when labor is available.

Active Role for Farmers: SRI methods are most productive when used with skill and care, so there will probably continue to be long-term advantage

for labor-intensive production with SRI. However, SRI should be seen as a set of principles that are applied through various techniques, rather than

as a fixed technology to be adopted as a "package." There is synergy among practices that makes their use together more beneficial than just using

certain of the practices; but any of the practices should give some improvement in yield. We anticipate that various kinds of mechanization will over

time make SRI suitable for larger scale production.

Farmers are encouraged to experiment with the methods and to evaluate the results for themselves, not just to "adopt" SRI. The best spacing between

plants, for example, needs to be determined in relation to particular soil, climatic, hydrological and other conditions. Exactly when and how to apply

water depends on soil characteristics and field position. So recommendations for spacing, water management, age of seedling, etc. are not offered as

universal. Instead, principles are presented -- to be understood, tested and adapted by users to suit their own conditions. It is hoped that what

farmers learn from using SRI may help them to become more innovative producers in other respects.


Grain Quality: When SRI paddy is milled, the outturn if often proving to be higher, as there are fewer unfilled grains (less chaff) and fewer broken

grains (because they resist shattering). In Andhra Pradesh, India, the rice millers association is promoting SRI and paying a higher rice per bushel, as

outturn has gone from about 67% to about 75%. The sugar cooperative in Cuba that has pioneered the new production methods in that country

reports that its outturn has gone up from 60% before to 68-71% now with SRI. This adds about 15% more productivity on top of the higher yields of

paddy.

Faster Maturing: Farmers are finding that SRI methods often, though not always, reduce the time required for grain maturation. In Cambodia, on

average, SRI crops are ripening about 7 days sooner than regular crops of the same variety. In Andhra Pradesh, India, ripening is 7-10 days sooner.

(It has been alleged that SRI crops take longer to mature, but this is not the experience in the field.) In Nepal during monsoon season 2004, farmers

got more than a doubling of yield (3.37 to 7.85 t/ha) with a 15-day reduction in time to maturity. Being able to harvest sooner reduces farmers' risks

of damage from pests or from typhoons, cyclones or other extreme weather than can come the end of the season.

Health Benefits: By reducing the application of agrochemicals in rice production, the resulting grain has little or no chemical residues. No systematic

nutritional analyses have been done yet on SRI grains, but the larger root systems could enhance their micronutrient content, suggested by the

higher grain weight and greater resistance to shattering. Many things are still not known about SRI in technical terms. This page will be updated as

more information becomes available.


Livelihood Intervention

Promotion of micro-enterprises and various income generation activities is an importantaspect of empowerment. Although it is extremely difficult to find

remunerative selfemployment,there are enormous untapped opportunities in the rural sector. These includeboth on-farm and off-farm opportunities.

Typically families living below poverty line, SC, ST and landless in a cluster of villages are motivated to take part in holistic development through livelihood

opportunities through multidisciplinary interventions.

Advantages of Agro-Based Activities: While promoting various income generationactivities, agro-based activities have advantages because of the following

reasons:

1. Target groups are acquainted with most of the basic skills.

2. Easy access to inputs.

3. No problems of marketing, as most of the outputs are locally consumed as food.

4. As over 50-60 % of the rural families own land and livestock, income generationactivities can be initiated immediately without heavy capital investment.

5. Risk of failure due to improper technology, poor quality, low demand and poor pricerecovery are very low. Hence, the chances of success are high.

6. Infrastructure required for promotion of on-farm activities has been very wellestablished. Hence, the entrepreneurs can progress even in backward

regions, whichare deprived of regular power supply and electronic information connectivity.It is therefore advantageous to tap all the opportunities to

promote various on-farm activities.The experience has confirmed that the best strategy to promote income generationactivities through SHGs is to analyze

the on-going agro-based activities undertaken by the members and introduce suitable interventions to enhance the production. There are alsoexcellent

opportunities to improve post production management of the produce throughgrading, storage, processing and marketing.


Various micro-enterprises activities through UG and Self Help Groups will be promoted. The list of micro-enterprises taken up by various SHGs is presented

below. Among these activities, agriculture followed by animalhusbandry, Khadi making units and food processing. However, over a period of time,

agriculture, animalhusbandry and food processing supercede the trade as many individuals participate inenhancing their production at the family level and

try to organize themselves to market themcollectively. Other activities such as production of utility items, construction relatedactivities, handicrafts and

Moti work find it difficult to sustain due to poor marketinginfrastructure, lack market and competition from othersources.

Support Needed for Promotion of Micro-enterprises

Following support is needed to promote micro-enterprises through women SHGs.

1. Motivation of the target communities, particularly women and landless farmers

2. Formation of Self Help Groups and their Federations

3. Gender sensitization

4. Training and capacity building

5. Micro-finance. Provision of credit facilities and linkage with banks

6. Development of infrastructure, particularly through the SHG Federations to providenecessary support services and marketing

7. Trade networking and establishment of market outlets

8. Village level Information Centre: The multi-disciplinary team interacted with the SHGs and User groups to explore the potentials fordevelopment of

various enterprises and extend necessary support for dissemination oftechnologies, procurement of inputs, training of members and establishment of

linkage withthe market. There should be some agency to provide guidance to the entrepreneurs as andwhen needed.


The selected production activities for the watershed villages follow the above-mentioned process, and are selected in such a way that they should be:

economically viable

environmentally sustainable

socially equitable

energy efficient

employment generation


Production Cycle for Vad Project


Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas

S. No. Names of Villages

Major activities of the SHGs

Name of activity No. of SHGs involved Average annual income from activity

per SHG (In Lakh)

1

Vad Animal husbandry 6 1.00 catering 1 0.60

Agri demonstration plot 2 1.20 Drip irrigation 2 0.90 Vermi compost 1 1.20

Horticulture 2 0.90

2

Amarkui Animal husbandry 5 1.50 Power trailer 1 1.00

Nursery raising 2 0.60 Washing Powder 3 1.00

Agri demo Plot 2 5.00 Drip Irrigation 2 0.60 Vermi compost 2 0.90

Horticulture 2 0.90

3

Isanpur Power trailer 1 1.00 Nursery 1 0.60

Vermi compost Unit 1 1.20 Agri demonstration plot 2 2.50

Drip irrigation 2 0.90 Horticulture 2 0.90

4

Lavet Animal husbandry 2 1.00 Power trailer 1 1.00

Nursery 1 0.60 Vermi Compost Unit 2 1.20

Agri demonstration plot 4 0.90 Drip irrigation 4 0.80 Vermi Compost 1 0.60

Horticulture

2 0.90


5

Motifali Catering set 1 0.50 Agri demonstration Plot 1 0.40

Drip Irrigation 2 0.70 Horticulture 1 0.60

6

Khareda Catering set 1 0.50 Nursery 1 0.50

Washing Powder 1 0.75 Agri demonstration Plot 2 0.75

Drip irrigation 2 0.70 Vermi compost 1 0.60

Horticulture 1 0.50

7

Mangrol Animal Husbandry 4 1.00 Catering set 1 0.50

Agri demonstration plot 1 0.45 Drip irrigation 1 0.60 Vermi compost 1 0.50

Horticulture 1 0.60

8

Jhankhvav Catering set 1 0.50 Nursery 2 0.60

Vermi compost 1 0.50 Agri Demonstration plot 3 1.00

Dallia machine 1 0.50 Drip irrigation 3 0.70

Horticulture 1 1.00

9

Nani fali Animal Husbandry 4 1.00 Agri Demonstration plot 3 0.75

Drip irrigation 3 0.80 Vermi compost 2 1.00

Horticulture 1 0.50

10

Nandola Animal Husbandry 4 1.00 Agri Demonstration plot 2 1.00

Drip irrigation 2 0.50 Horticulture 2 0.75


11

Pataldevi Animal Husbandry 4 1.00 Masala product 1 1.20

Agri Demonstration plot 2 1.00 Drip irrigation 2 0.50 Horticulture 3 1.50

Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed workphase proposed target

S. No. Name of villages

Ridge area

treatment

Drainage line

treatment Nursery raising

Land

development

Crop

demonstrations

Pasture

development

Total Estimated

cost (Rs. In

lakhs) (ha) (lakh) (ha) (lakh) (ha) (lakh) (ha) (lakh) (ha) (lakh) (ha) (lakh)

1 Vad - - 67 11.55 - - 25 11.0 10 0.15 5 0.95 23.7

2 Amarkui 20 5.0 72 22.2 0.5 0.2 10 5 10 0.15 3 0.075 32.6

3 Isanpur 20 5.0 86 20.3 0.5 0.2 15 7.5 20 0.3 2 0.05 33.4

4 Lavet - - 110 14.75 1 1.5 30 16.5 9 0.27 7 1.275 34.295

5 Motifali - - 22 4.1 1 1.5 10 3.5 5 0.15 5 0.95 10.2

6 Khareda - - 27 4.3 0.5 0.2 16 8.0 2 0.075 4 0.65 13.2

7 Mangrol - - 65 12.5 - - 25 11.5 7 0.225 5 0.95 25.175

8 Jhankhvav - - 70 14.8 0.5 0.2 15 8.5 7 0.225 4 0.65 24.375


9 Nani fali - - 38 6.7 12 6 7 0.225 5 0.95 13.875

10 Nandola - - 45 7.95 17 8.5 5 0.1 5 0.95 17.5

11 Pataldevi 5 0.5 57 10.05 0.5 0.2 8 4.0 7 0.225 5 0.65 15.6

Table no.40.1: Details of engineering structures in watershed works*

S. No.

Village name

Name of structures

Type of treatment Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (D)

(iii) Land dev.

(L)

(i) Pri-vate

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG

(iii) Others (pl. specify)

No. of units (No./ cu.m./

rmt)

Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of completion

(mm/yyyy) M W O T

1 Vad

Nala Plug - D - P - - WC/WDT 35.0 Cum 0.175 1.575 - 1.75 Jan-2012

Pacca Nalaplug - D - p - - WC/WDT

13.0 Cum 2.08 3.12 - 5.20 Jan-2012

Check Wall - D - P - GP WC/WDT

4.0Cmt 4.80 1.20 - 6.0 March-2012

Land levelling with farm banding

- - L P - - WC/WDT

10.0 Ha - - - 5.0 April-2012

Gabion structures - D - P - - WC/WDT

22.0Cmt 3.85 1.65 - 5.5 June-2012

Check dam - D - - C - WC/WDT

2 8.00 2.00 - 10.0 Jan-2013

Total 86 33.45 (M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)



S. No.

Village name

Name of structures


agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (D)

(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Pri-vate

(ii) Communit

y

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG



rmt)



(mm/yyyy)

M W O T

2 Amarkui

Nala Plug - D P C Forest WC/WDT

80 0.40 3.6 4.0

Pacca Nalaplug D P Forest WC/WDT

25 4.00 6.0 10.0

Gabion structures D P Forest WC/WDT

20 3.5 1.5 5.0

Check Wall D P Forest WC/WDT

8 9.60 2.4 12.0


L P WC/WDT

10 5.00

Staggered trench R P Forest WC/WDT

4000 2.0

Check dam repairing D Forest WC/WDT

2 1.60 0.4 2.0

Percolation tank L C WC/WDT

1 0.30 0.6 2.10 3.00

Graded band R C WC/WDT

2000 1.0

Total 44.0 (M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)



S. No.

Village name

Name of structures


agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainag

e line (D)

(iii) Land

dev. (L)

(i) Pri-vate

(ii) Commu

nity

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG



rmt)



(mm/yyyy) M W O T

3 Isanpur

Nala Plug - D P WC/WDT

46 0.23 2.07 2.30 JAN-2011

Pacca Nalaplug D P WC/WDT

12 1.92 2.88 4.80 Dec-2011

Gabion structures D P WC/WDT

35 6.12

5 2.625 8.75 June-2012

Check Wall D P WC/WDT

5 6.00 1.50 7.50 June-2011

Land levellingwith farm banding

L P WC/WDT

6 3.00 Dec-2012

Check dam repairing D C WC/WDT

1 0.8 0.20 1.0 Dec-2011


1 0.30 0.60 2.1 3.00 June-2012




S. No.

Village name

Name of structures


agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (D)

(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Pri-vate

(ii) Communit

y

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG



rmt)


Expected month & year of completion (mm/yyyy)

M W O T

4 Lavet


75 0.37 3.37

3.75 JAN-2011


20 3.20 4.8 8.00 Dec-2011


20 3.5 1.5 5.00 June-2012


10 8.12 2.03

10.15 June-2011


L P WC/WDT

13 6.50 Dec-2012

Check dam L C WC/WDT

2 4.80 1.2 6.00 JAN-2011

Check dam repairing D GP WC/WDT

1 0.80 0.2 1.00 JAN-2011


1 0.5 1.0 3.5 5.00 Dec-2011




S. No.

Village name

Name of structures


agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (D)

(iii) Land

dev. (L)

(i) Pri-vate

(ii) Communi

ty

(iii) Others

(pl. specify

)

(i) UG (ii)SHG



rmt)



(mm/yyyy) M W O T

5 Motifali


10 0.05 0.45 0.50 JAN-2011

Pacca Nalaplug D P C WC/WDT

4 0.64 0.96 1.60 Dec-2011


8 1.40 0.60 2.00 June-2012

Check Wall D C WC/WDT

1 1.20 0.30 1.5 June-2011


L P WC/WDT

4 2.00 Dec-2012


1 0.30 0.60 2.1 3.00 Dec-2011

Total 28 10.6



S. No.

Village name

Name of structures


agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage line (D)

(iii) Land dev.

(L)

(i) Pri-vate

(ii) Communi

ty


(i) UG (ii)SHG


No. of units (No./ cu.m./ rmt)


Expected month & year

of completion (mm/yyyy)

M W O T

6 Khareda

Nala plug - D P WC/WDT

20 0.10 0.9 1.00 JAN-2011


7 1.12 1.68 2.80 Dec-2011


10 1.75 0.75 2.50 June-2012

Check Wall D P C WC/WDT

5 6.00 1.50 7.50 June-2011


L P WC/WDT

4 2.00 Dec-2012


1 0.30 0.60 2.1 3.00 Dec-2011




S. No.

Village name

Name of structures


agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (D)

(iii) Land dev.

(L)

(i) Pri-vate

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG





(mm/yyyy) M W O T

7 Mangrol


30 0.15 0.35 1.50 JAN-2011

Pacca Nalaplug D P GP WC/WDT

15 2.40 3.60 6.00 Dec-2011


20 3.50 1.50 5.00 June-2012

Check Wall D P C WC/WDT

8 9.6 2.4 12.0 June-2011


L P WC/WDT

5 2.50 Dec-2012

Check dam L GP WC/WDT

1 4.0 1.0 5.00 JAN-2011


1 0.20 0.40 1.4 2.00




S. No.

Village name

Name of structures


agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (D)

(iii) Land dev.

(L)

(i) Pri-vate

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG





(mm/yyyy) M W O T

8 Jhankhvav

Nala Plug - D P Forest WC/WDT

25 0.12 1.12 1.25 JAN-2011

Pacca Nalaplug D p Forest WC/WDT

18 2.88 4.32 7.20 Dec-2011

Gabion structures D p WC/WDT

27 4.725 2.025 6.75 June-2012

Check Wall D p Forest WC/WDT

5 6.00 1.50 7.50 June-2011


L p WC/WDT

5 2.50 Dec-2012

staggered trench L C Forest WC/WDT

2000 1.00 Dec-2012

Percolation tank L Forest WC/WDT

1 0.30 0.60 2.10 3.00 Dec-2011




S. No.

Village name

Name of structures


agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (D)

(iii) Land dev.

(L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community


(i) UG (ii)SHG





(mm/yyyy) M W O T

9 Nani fali

Nala Plug - D p WC/WDT

20 0.10 0.9 1.00 JAN-2011

Pacca Nalaplug D p WC/WDT

8 1.28 1.92

3.20 Dec-2011

Gabion structures D p WC/WDT

10 1.75 0.75

2.50 June-2012

Check Wall D p WC/WDT

3 3.60 0.9 4.50 June-2011

Land levelling L p

WC/WDT 2 1.00 June-2011

Check dam D GP WC/WDT

1 4.00 1.0 5.00 June-2011




S. No.

Village name

Name of structures


agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (D)

(iii) Land

dev. (L)

(i) Pri-vate

(ii) Communi

ty

(iii) Others

(pl. specify

)

(i) UG (ii)SHG





(mm/yyyy) M W O T

10 Nandola


20 0.1 0.9 1.00 JAN-2011


8 1.28 1.92 3.20 Dec-2011


15 2.625 1.125 3.75 June-2012


4 4.80 1.20 6.00 June-2011

Land levelling D P WC/WDT

5 2.50 June-2011

Check dam D C WC/WDT

1 2.40 0.60 3.00 June-2011




S. No.

Village name

Name of structures


agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (D)

(iii) Land

dev. (L)

(i) Pri-vate

(ii) Commun

ity

(iii) Others

(pl. specify

)

(i) UG (ii)SHG





(mm/yyyy) M W O T

11 Pataldevi

Nala Plug - D P Forest

WC/WDT 30 0.15 1.35 1.50 JAN-2011


12 1.92 2.88 4.80 Dec-2011


15 2.625 1.125 3.75 June-2012


1 1.20 0.30 1.50 June-2011


L P WC/WDT

5 2.50 Dec-2012

Staggered trench R C WC/WDT

2000 1.00 JAN-2011

Percolation tank L Fores

t WC/WDT

3 0.60 1.20 4.20 6.00 June-2012



Table no.41.1: Details of activities related Afforestration in watershed works (In lakhs)

S. No.

Name of village Name of structure/ work

Type of treatment Type of land Executing agency

Target

(i) Ridge area (R)


(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community


(i) UG (ii)SHG (iii) Others (pl. specify)

Area (ha)

No. of plants


Expected month & year of completion (mm/ yyyy)

1 Vad

Common waste land plantation

L C WC/WDT

5 1.50 Dec-2012

Farm forestry L P WC/WDT

10000 0.30 Jun-2011

Pasture development

L C WC/WDT

2 0.10 Jan-2011

Live fencing L p WC/WDT

3000(rmt) 0.75 Jan-2011

Total 7 2.65



S. No.



Target

(i) Ridge area (R)


(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community



Area (ha)

No. of plants



2 Amarkui


L C WC/WDT

9 2.70 Oct-2012


20000 0.600 Oct-2011

Pasture development

L P Forest WC/WDT

4 0.20 July-2011

Bio. Fencing (mtr) L P WC/WDT

3000 0.75 July-2012

Total 13 4.25



S. No.



Target

(i) Ridge area (R)


(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community



Area (ha)

No. of plants



3 Isanpur


L C WC/WDT

5 1.50 Dec-2012


15000 0.45 Jun-2011

Pasture development

L C WC/WDT

4 0.20 Jan-2011


2000 0.50 Dec-2012

Total 9 2.65

Table no.41.4: Details of activities related Afforestration in watershed works (In lakes)

S. No.



Target

(i) Ridge area (R)


(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community



Area (ha)

No. of plants



4 Lavet Common waste land plantation

L C WC/WDT

8 2.40 Dec-2012



25000 0.75 Jun-2011

Pasture development

L GP WC/WDT

3 0.15 Jan-2011


3000 0.75 Dec-2012

Gramvatika L C WC/WDT

(1) 1.50 Dec-2012

Total 11 28000 5.55


S. No.



Target

(i) Ridge area (R)


(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community



Area (ha)

No. of plants



5 Motifali

Common wasteland plantation

L C WC/WDT

4 1.20 Dec-2012


5000 0.15 Jun-2011

Pasture development

L GP WC/WDT

2 0.10 Jan-2011

Gramvatika L GP WC/WDT

1 1.50 Dec-2012

Total 6 2.95



S. No.



Target

(i) Ridge area (R)


(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community



Area (ha)

No. of plants



6 Khareda


L C WC/WDT

4 1.20 Dec-2012


8000 0.24 Jun-2011

Pasture development

L P WC/WDT

2 0.10 Jan-2011

Gramvatika L C WC/WDT

1 1.5 Jan-2011

Total 6 8000 3.04


S. No.



Target

(i) Ridge area (R)


(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community



Area (ha)

No. of plants



7 Magrol


L C WC/WDT

5 1.50 Dec-2012


10000 0.30 Jun-2011


Pasture development

L P WC/WDT

2 0.10 Jan-2011

Total 7 1.90


S. No.



Target

(i) Ridge area (R)


(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community



Area (ha)

No. of plants



8 Jhankhvav


L C WC/WDT

3 0.90 Dec-2012


10000 0.30 Jun-2011

Pasture development

L GP WC/WDT

2 0.10 Jan-2011


2000 0.50 Dec-2012

Total 5 1.80

Table no.41.9: Details of activities related Afforestration in watershed works (In lakhs) S. No.



Target


(i) Ridge area (R)


(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community



Area (ha)

No. of plants



9 Nani fali


L C WC/WDT

5 1.20 Dec-2012


10000 0.30 Jun-2011

Pasture development

L P WC/WDT

2 0.10 Jan-2011

Total 7 1.60


S. No.



Target

(i) Ridge area (R)


(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community



Area (ha)

No. of plants



10 Nandola


L C WC/WDT

4 1.20 Dec-2014


6000 0.18 Jun-2011

Pasture development

L C WC/WDT

2 0.10 Jan-2011

Total 6 1.48



S. No.



Target

(i) Ridge area (R)


(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community



Area (ha)

No. of plants



11 Pataldevi


L C WC/WDT

4 1.20 Des-2012


7000 0.21 Jun-2011

Pasture development

L GP WC/WDT

2 0.10 Jan-2011


2000 0.50 Dec-2012

Total 6 2.01

Table no.42.1: Details of allied / other activities

S. No.

Name of village Name of activity

Type of land Executing agency Target

(i) Private (ii) Community (iii) Others (pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG (iii) WC




Production System and Microenterprise Development (13%)

1 Vad

Animal husbandry Private - - WC/WDT

2.50 Dec-2012

catering - Community - WC/WDT

2.00 Jun-2011

Agri demonstration plot Private - - WC/WDT

0.20 Jan-2011

Drip irrigation Private - - WC/WDT

3.25 Dec-2012

Vermi compost Private - - WC/WDT

0.88 Dec-2012

Horticulture Private - WC/WDT

0.56 Jun -2011

Total of Microenterprise and Production systems: 9.39 lakhs

Livelihood Activities for landless people. (10%)

1 Vad

Cycle Private - - WC/WDT

0.90 Dec-2012

Trolley Private - - WC/WDT

0.30 Jun-2011

Animal Husbandry Private - WC/WDT

5.00 Jan-2011

Gotry Unit Private - WC/WDT

0.70 Dec-2012

Vocational Kit

(i) Mistry/ Carpenter work Private - - WC/WDT

0.20 Jun-2011

(ii) Haircutting kit Private

WC/WDT

0.40 Dec-2012

(iii) Cycle repairing Private

WC/WDT

0.40 Jun-2011

Total Livelihood Activities for landless people: 7.90 lakhs



S. No.







Production System and Microenterprise Development

2 Amarkui


2.50 Dec-2012

Power trailer - Community - WC/WDT

2.00 Jun-2011

Nursery raising Private - - WC/WDT

0.50 Jan-2011

Washing powder Private - - WC/WDT

0.25 Jan-2013

Agri demo Plot Private - - WC/WDT

0.34 Dec-2012

Drip Irrigation Private - - WC/WDT

4.25 Dec-2012


1.60 June-2013


0.76 Jun-2011

Total of Microenterprise and Production systems: 12.20 lakes

Livelihood Activities for landless people

2 Amarkui Cycle Private - - WC/WDT

0.90 Dec-2012



0.40 Jun-2011


7.00 Jan-2011

Go try Unit - Community - WC/WDT

0.30 Dec-2012

Vocational Kit

(i)Mistry/ Carpenter work Private - - WC/WDT

0.40 Jun-2011

(ii)Haircutting kit Private WC/WDT

0.80 Dec-2012

(iii)Cycle repairing kit Private WC/WDT

0.80 Jun-2011

Total Livelihood Activities for landless people: 10.60


S. No.



(i) Private (ii) Community






3 Isanpur


2.00 Jun-2011


0.50 Jan-2011

Vermicompost unit Private - - WC/WDT

1.00 Jan-2013


0.30 Dec-2012


3.60 Dec-2012


0.50 Jun-2011




3 Isanpur


0.30 Dec-2012


0.20 Jun-2011


5.00 Jan-2011


0.50 Dec-2012

Vocational Kit


0.30 Jun-2011

(ii) Haircutting kit Private WC/WDT

0.40 Dec-2012

(iii) Cycle repairing Private WC/WDT

0.40 Jun-2011




S. No.








4 Lavet


2.00 Dec-2012


2.00 Jun-2011


0.50 Jan-2011


1.00 Jan-2013


0.42 Dec-2012


4.75 Dec-2012


1.60 June-2013


1.39 Jun-2011

Total of Microenterprise and Production systems: 13.66 lakes Livelihood Activities for landless people

4 Lavet


0.45 Dec-2012


0.25 Jun-2011


6.25 Jan-2011


0.50 Dec-2012

Vocational Kit



0.80 Jun-2011


0.40 Dec-2012

(iii)Cycle repairing Private WC/WDT

1.50 Jun-2011

(iv) Electric Kit Private WC/WDT

1.20 Jun-2011



S. No. Name of village Name of activity

Type of land Executing agency

Target







5 Moti fali

Catering Community -

- WC/WDT

1.0 Dec-2012


0.22 Dec-2012


1.25 Dec-2012


0.26 Jun-2011

Total of Microenterprise and Production systems: 2.73 lakes


5 Moti fali Cycle Private - -

WC/WDT 0.15 Dec-2012


0.05 Jun-2011



1.50 Jan-2011


0.40 Dec-2012

Vocational Kit


0.30 Jun-2011



S. No.








6 Khareda

Catering - Community - WC/WDT

1.00 Jun-2011


0.25 Jan-2011

washing powder Community WC/WDT

0.25 Jan-2011


0.22 Dec-2012


1.50 Dec-2012


0.96 June-2013



0.50 Jun-2011

Total of Microenterprise and Production systems 4.68 lakes


6 Khareda


0.30 Dec-2012


0.25 Jun-2011


2.50 Jan-2011


0.60 Dec-2012

Vocational Kit

(i) Electric work Private WC/WDT

0.25 Dec-2012

Total of Livelihood Activities for landless people: 3.90 lakhs


S. No.








7 Mangrol Animal husbandry Private - -

WC/WDT 1.25 Des-2012


2.00 Jun-2011



0.44 Dec-2012


3.25 Dec-2012


0.96 June-2013


1.01 Jun-2011



7 Mangrol


0.30 Dec-2012


0.40 Jun-2011


5.00 Jan-2011


1.00 Dec-2012

Vocational Kit


0.15 Jun-2011


0.40 Dec-2012

(iii)Cycle repairing Private - - WC/WDT

0.41 Dec-2012




S. No.








8 Jhankhvav


1.00 Jun-2011


0.50 Jan-2011


1.00 Jan-2013


0.26 Dec-2012

Daliya machine Private - - WC/WDT

1.00


3.15 Dec-2012


0.51 Jun-2011



8 Jhankhvav


0.60 Dec-2012


0.60 Jun-2011


2.50 Jan-2011

Vocational Kit


0.60 Jun-2011



0.40 Dec-2012

(iii)Electric kit Private - - WC/WDT

0.30 Jun-2011

(iv)Cycle repairing Private WC/WDT

0.80 Dec-2012

Total Livelihood Activities for landless people: 5.80 Lakhs


S. No.








9 Nani fali


2.00 Dec-2012


0.20 Dec-2012


1.50 Dec-2012


0.60 Jun-2011



9 Nani fali


0.30 Dec-2012


0.30 Jun-2011


0.75 Jan-2011


Gotry Unit Private - - WC/WDT

0.40 Jan-2011

Vocational Kit


0.60 Jun-2011

(ii)Cycle repairing Private WC/WDT

0.80 Dec-2012



S. No.








10 Nandola


2.00 Dec-2012


0.30 Dec-2012


2.25 Dec-2012


0.53 Jun-2011

Total of Microenterprise and Production systems: 5.08 lakhs Livelihood Activities for landless people

10 Nandola


0.60 Dec-2012


0.30 Jun-2011


1.50 Jan-2011

Vocational Kit



0.90 Jun-2011

(ii)Electric kit Private - - WC/WDT

0.30 Dec-2012


0.30 Dec-2012



S. No. Name of village Name of activity

Type of land Executing agency

Target







11 Pataldevi


1.25 Dec-2012

Masala Product Private - - WC/WDT

1.00 Dec-2013


0.28 Dec-2012


1.75 Dec-2012


0.65 Jun-2011



11 Patal devi Cycle Private - -

WC/WDT 0.30 Dec-2012

Animal Husbandry Private - - WC/WDT

2.00 Jun-2011



0.60 Jan-2011

Vocational Kit

(i)Mistry/ Carpenter kit Private - - WC/WDT

0.30 Jun-2011

(ii) Hair cutting Private - - WC/WDT

0.40 Jun-2011

(ii)Electric kit Private - - WC/WDT

0.20 Dec-2012


0.30 Dec-2012


Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas

Sr. No. Name(s) of the

villages CPR particulars Activity proposed

Target

Target area under the activity (ha)

Estimated expenditure (Rs.) Expected no. of

beneficiaries

Vad

Waste land Plantation 5 0.90 50 household Waste land Farm forestry 10 1.80 40 household

Community pasture land Pasture

development 2 0.05 35 housedhod

Total for village 1.25

Amarkui

Waste land Plantation 9 2.40 35 household

Waste land Farm forestry 20 0.60 40 household


development 4 0.10

30 household

Waste land Bio fancing 10 0.75 50 household



Isanpur




development 4 0.05

35 household

Waste land Bio fancing 5 0.50 45household


Lavet




development 2 0.075

32 household


Waste land Gramvatika 1 1.50 50 household


Motifali




development 2 0.05 15 household

Waste land Gramvatika 1 1.5 50 household



Khareda




development 2 0.05

12 household


Mangrol




development 2 0.05

34 household


Jhankhvav




development 2 0.05

47household



Nani fali




development 2 0.05

29 household



Nandola




development 2 0.05

30 household


Pataldevi




development 2 0.05

30 household


Total for project 1.66

4.4 Capacity building and Institutional collaboration

Watershed management and development requires the collaboration of a wide range of farmers’ organizations as well as extension and research

institutions at various levels. This gives implementers access a wider technical resource base, creates better information flows and encourages mutual

learning. Watersheds serve as a confluence between lands and communities, providing ample opportunities for members to share complementary

expertise. A watershed contains producers (farmers), possibly actors that add value to produce, traders and consumers information, and education

institutions to test their joint efforts to make a difference.Watersheds can be also a good ground for learning and demonstration of expertise.

Scope of capacity building at Project Villages

Income Generation Activities

o Stitching


o Food Processing

o Post Harvest management practices Fodder development and Management

Crop Information

Meteorological Information

AlternativeLand Use Plan

Improved and Scientific agriculture practices

Scientific planning of Soil and Moisture conservation

Information dissemination on Audio/Video

Dairy Development and Management

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution:

Sr. No. Name of the

Training Institute

Full Address with contact no., website

& e-mail Type of Institute

Area(s) of specialization

Accreditation details

Trainings

Reference Year No. of trainings

assigned No. of trainees to be trained

1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra,Vyara

Vyara Research institute

Agriculture/ Horticulture/

Animal Husbandry

GOI 2012-2014 3 70

2 Agriculturale

university, Navsari

Navsari University

Agriculture/ Horticulture/

Animal Husbandry

GOI 2012-2014 3 40

3 BAIF,Baroda Baroda Training

institution Capacity building

NGO 2012-13 4 50

4 SPIPA Ahmadabad Training

institution Capacity building

GOG 2012-14 3 30

5 BISAG Ghandhinagar Space

application Remote sensing

GOG 2010-15 3 9

# Central govt. Dept./ State govt. Dept./ Autonomous Body/ Research Institutes/ Universities/ Others (pl. specify)


$ Capacity Building/ Agriculture/ Horticulture/ Animal Husbandry/ Pisciculture/ Remote Sensing/ Water conservation/ Ground water/ Forestry/ livelihoods/ entrepreneurship development/ others (pl. specify)

Early and ongoing stakeholder collaboration and communication in capacity building is also important from the point viewpoint of “leveling the playing

field” in anticipation of disputes that may arise. Filling strategic skills/capacity gaps supports Integrated Water resources Management, facilitates dispute

resolution, and builds practical understanding of the scope of sustainable natural resource development challenges and opportunities.

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:

S. No. Project Project Stakeholders Total no. of

persons No. of persons to be

trained No. of training programmes Estimated cost

1 IWMP-I

(Mangrol block)

PIA 12 12 4 72000 WDTs 9 9 4 54000

UGs 836 145 2 72500 SHGs 324 162 4 162000 WCs 132 55 10 137500 GPs 20 10 1 2000


Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities:

S. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.) Outcome

1 Street plays Local drama group 0.55

Awareness generation and making

beneficiaries accountable for

sustainable development

2 Video shows DWDU, Surat 0.55

3 Wall paintings/ Focussed Group

discussion

DWDU,Surat 0.55

4 Pamphlets and posters DWDU,Surat

1.00

5 Banners and hoardings DWDU, Surat

1.00

Total: 3.65


CHAPTER-5 BUDGETING


Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project Sl no Budget component Cost requirement (in lacks) 1 Administrative costs (10%) 60.00 2 Monitoring

(2%) 12.00 3 Evaluation 4 Entry Point activity (4%) 24.00 5 Institution and Capacity Building (5%) 30.00 6 Detailed Project Report (1%) 6.00 7 Watershed Development Works (50%) 300.00 8 Livelihood activities for asset less (10%) 60.00 9 Production systems and micro-enterprises (13%) 78.00 10 Consolidation phase (5%) 30.00 TOTAL 600.00

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP (In Lacks)

Sl no

Village Name Activity EPA Institution

and CB DPR Watershed

development Work

Livelihood for asset less

Production system and Microenterprises

Consolidation Total

% (4%) (5%) (1%) (50%) (10%) (13%) (5%) (88%)

1 Vad

2.74 - -

34.20 6.84 8.89 3.42 56.08


2 Amarkui 3.60

- - 45.00 9.00

11.70 4.50 73.8

3 Isanpur 2.40

- - 30.00 6.00

7.80 3.00 49.2

4 Lavet

4.08 - -

51.00 10.20 13.26 5.10 83.64

5 Motifali

0.84 - -

10.50 2.10 2.73 1.05 17.22

6 Khareda

1.44 - -

18.00 3.60 4.68 1.80 29.52

7 Mangrol 2.66

- - 33.30 6.66

8.66 3.33 54.61

8 Jhankhvav 2.16

- - 27.00 5.40

7.02 2.70 44.28

9 Nani fali 1.20

- - 15.00 3.00

3.90 1.50 24.6

10 Nandola 1.44

- - 18.00 3.60

4.68 1.80 29.52

11 Pataldevi 1.44

- - 18.00 3.60

4.68 1.80 29.52

Total 24.00 30.00 6.00 300.00 60.00 78.00 30.00 528.00


Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement Sr No

Village Total cost requirement Total funds available under

IWMP

Gap in funds requirement

1 Vad 56.13 52.67 3.46

2 Amarkui 74.65 69.30 5.35

3 Isanpur 50.4 46.20 4.20

4 Lavet 85.39 78.54 6.85

5 Motifali 19.52 16.17 3.35

6 Khareda 31.86 27.72 4.14

7 Mangrol 55.13 51.28 3.85

8 Jhankhvav 46.38 41.58 4.80

9 Nani fali 27.45 23.10 4.35

10 Nandola 31.35 27.72 3.63

11 Pataldevi 33.5 27.72 5.78

Total 511.76 462.00 49.76


Table no.50.1: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

S. No. Village Activity to be carried out

Fund made available to

IWMP due to convergence

(Rs. in lakh)

Reference no. of activity/

task/ structure in DPR

Level at which

decision for

convergence was

taken

1 Vad

Land levelling 3.00 Table no. 40.1 PIA level

Horticulture 0.44 Table no.42.1 PIA level

Total 3.46





(Rs. in lakh)



Level at which

decision for

convergence was

taken

2 Amarkui

Land levelling 5.00 Table no.40.2 PIA level

Horticulture o.35 Table no.42.2 PIA level

Total 5.35






(Rs. in lakh)



Level at which

decision for

convergence was

taken

3 Ishanpur



Drip irrigation 1.00 Table no.42.3 PIA level

Total 4.20





(Rs. in lakh)



Level at which

decision for

convergence was

taken

4 Lavet



Total 6.85






(Rs. in lakh)



Level at which

decision for

convergence was

taken

5 Motifali Land leveling 3.50 Table no.40.5 PIA level

Total 3.50





(Rs. in lakh)



Level at which

decision for

convergence was

taken

6 Khareda


Common waste land

plantation 1.20 Table no.40.6 PIA level



Total 4.20






(Rs. in lakh)



Level at which

decision for

convergence was

taken

7 Mangrol


Pasture development 0.10 Table no.40.7 PIA level

Farm forestry 0.30 Table no.40.7 PIA level


Total 3.90





(Rs. in lakh)



Level at which

decision for

convergence was

taken

8 Jhankhvav Land levelling 2.50 Table no.40.8 PIA level


Common waste land 0.90 Table no.40.8 PIA level



Total 4.80





(Rs. in lakh)



Level at which

decision for

convergence was

taken

9 Nani fali


Common wasteland 1.20 Table no.40.9 PIA level



Farm forestry 0.30 Table no.42.9 PIA level

Total 4.35






(Rs. in lakh)



Level at which

decision for

convergence was

taken

10 Nandola

Land levelling 2.50 Table no.40. 10 PIA level

Drip irrigation 1.00 Table no.42. 10 PIA level


Total 3.70





(Rs. in lakh)



Level at which

decision for

convergence was

taken

11 Pataldevi


Common waste land 1.20 Table no.40.11 PIA level



Total 5.80


Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects

S. No.

Name of

Private Sector

Partner

Agency

Type of agreement signed Financial contribution

Partnership

Interventions

Expected

Outcomes Comments

a)MoU b)Contract c) Any other

(pl. specify) IWMP

Private

sector

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area:

Sr.

NO.

Names of

Villages

Wage employment Self employment

No. of man days No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total

1 Vad 0 14500 1500 3900 16000 0 207 22 56 229 0 145 15 39 160

2 Amarkui 0 4600 100 800 4700 0 66 2 12 68 0 46 1 8 48

3 Isanpur 0 14400 600 3200 15000 0 205 9 46 214 0 144 6 32 150

4 Lavet 0 15900 8300 5000 24200 0 227 118 72 245 0 159 83 50 172

5 Motifali 0 4500 1000 2200 5500 0 64 14 32 78 0 45 10 22 55


6 Khareda 0 4600 2800 1800 7400 0 66 40 25 106 0 46 28 18 74

7 Mangrol 1780 2600 19000 2200 23380 24 37 271 32 332 17 26 190 22 232

8 Jhankhvav 170 5432 1500 2500 7102 1 77 21 35 99 1 54 15 25 69

9 Nani fali 0 5200 800 1300 6000 0 74 11 18 85 0 52 8 13 60

10 Nandola 0 9323 600 4100 9923 0 133 9 59 142 0 93 6 41 99

11 Pataldevi 0 8345 1100 2000 9445 0 118 15 28 133 0 83 11 20 93

Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area

Sr. No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project

1 Vad 20 5 120 30

2 Amarkui 10 3 90 30

3 Isanpur 19 5 120 30

4 Lavet 24 5 120 60


5 Motifali 30 10 60 30

6 Khareda 16 5 90 30

7 Mangrol 23 15 120 30

8 Jhankhvav 20 5 120 60

9 Nani fali 10 3 60 30

10 Nandola 12 3 90 30

11 Pataldevi 14 3 60 30

Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)

S. No. Names of Villages Sources Pre-Project level Expected Increase/decrease

(Post- Project)

1

Vad, Amarkui, Isanpur,

Lavet, Motifali, Khareda,

Mangrol, Jhankhvav, Nani

fali, Nandola, Pataldevi

Open wells

Open wells 10-12 mt.

Bore wells Borewells 80-100 mt


Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water

Sr.

No.

Names of

Villages

Availability of drinking water

(no. of months in a year) Quality of drinking water

Comments

Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project

1 Vad 9 12 Slightly Saline Potable -

2 Amarkui 9 12 Slightly Saline Potable -

3 Isanpur 10 12 Slightly Saline Potable -

4 Lavet 8 12 Slightly Saline Potable -

5 Motifali 8 12 Slightly Saline Potable -

6 Khareda 9 12 Slightly Saline Potable -

7 Mangrol 10 12 saline Potable -

8 Jhankhvav 9 12 Slightly Saline Potable -

9 Nani fali 8 12 Slightly Saline Potable -

10 Nandola 10 12 Slightly Saline Potable -

11 Pataldevi 10 12 Slightly Saline Potable -


Tableno. 56: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas

Sr No. Name of

village Name of crops

Pre-project Expected Post-project

Area(ha) Average Yield (Qtl) per ha. Area(ha) Average Yield per ha

(qtl)

1

vad

Kharif

Juvar 102 1200 125 2000

Tuver 44 1000 65 1600

Groundnut 70 1200 85 2200

Rabi

Juvar 46 900 65 2100

Groundnut 10 1200 15 1800

Zaid 0 0

Fodder - - 20 2000

2

Amarkui

Kharif

Juvar 50 1200 65 2000

Tuver 20 1000 25 2200

Groundnut 25 1200 35 1700

Rabi

Juvar 34 900 45 1500


Groundnut 25 1200 35 1800

Zaid

Fodder 0 0 20 2000

3 Isanpur Kharif

Juvar 90 1200 110 1600

Tuver 69 1000 80 1600

Groundnut 102 1200 125 1800

Rabi

Juvar 12 900 34 1500

Groundnut 25 1200 35 1700

Zaid

Fodder 0 0 20 2500

4 Lavet Kharif

Juvar 69 1200 85 1700

Tuver 156 1000 175 1500

Groundnut 89 1200 105 1600

Rabi

Juvar 29 900 35 1500

Groundnut 46 1200 65 1700


Zaid

Fodder 0 0 20 2200

5 Motifali Kharif

Juvar 48 1200 65 2200

Tuver 30 1000 50 1600

Groundnut 12 1200 25 1800

Rabi

Juvar 5 900 15 1500

Groundnut 10 1200 25 1700

Zaid

Fodder 0 0 20 2000

6 Khareda Kharif

Juvar 39 1200 60 1700

Tuver 28 1000 55 1500

Groundnut 24 1200 50 1700

Rabi

Juvar 15 1200 25 1600

Groundnut 28 1200 50 1500

Zaid

Fodder 0 0 20 2200


7 Mangrol Kharif

Juvar 123 1200 150 1600

Tuver 108 1000 120 1500

Groundnut 98 1200 115 1600

Rabi

Juvar 56 1200 70 1700

Groundnut 45 1200 65 1700

Zaid

Fodder 0 0 25 2200

8

Jhankhvav

Kharif

Juvar 39 1200 65 1600

Tuver 40 1000 65 1500

Groundnut 32 1200 50 1600

Rabi

Juvar 6 900 20 1400

Groundnut 4 1200 15 1700

Zaid

Fodder 0 0 20 2000

9 Nani fali

Kharif

Juvar 25 1200 45 1600


Tuver 30 1000 60 1500

Groundnut 18 1200 30 1600

Rabi

Juvar 8 900 20 1400

Groundnut 13 1200 25 1700

Zaid

Fodder 0 0 20 2000

10

Nandola

Kharif

Juvar 42 1200 65 1600

Tuver 43 1000 60 1400

Groundnut 22 1200 45 1600

Rabi

Juvar 16 1200 25 1700

Groundnut 15 1200 25 1600

Zaid

Fodder 0 0 15 2000

11 Pataldevi Kharif

Juvar 58 1200 70 1600

Tuver 68 1000 80 1400

Groundnut 48 1200 65 1700


Rabi

Juvar 29 1200 60 1600

Groundnut 38 1200 65 1700

Zaid

Fodder 0 0 15 2000

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture

Sr. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be

covered through IWMP

1 Vad 0 23

2 Amarkui 0 8

3 Isanpur 3 8

4 Lavet 3 6

5 Motifali 0 15

6 Khareda 5 1

7 Mangrol 7 13

8 Jhankhvav 5 13


9 Nani fali 1 3

10 Nandola 0 4

11 Pataldevi 0 5

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover

Sr. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed

1 Vad 10 28

2 Amarkui 2 8

3 Isanpur 1 4

4 Lavet 3 10

5 Motifali 0 2

6 Khareda 0 3

7 Mangrol 1 4

8 Jhankhvav 1 4

9 Nani fali 0 2


10 Nandola 0 3

11 Pataldevi 0 3

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project area

(for fluids please mention in liters, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)

Sr. No. Namof Village Type of Animal Pre-Project Expected Post-project

Remarks No. Yield (ltr) Income No. Yield (ltr) Income

1 Vad

Milch-animals -

Cow(Per animal/day) 136 4 18 200 4 20 -

Buffalo(Per animal/day) 247 3 27 350 5 30 -

Animals for other purpose -

Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 35 100 55 100 -

2 Amarkui

Milch-animals -




Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 250 100 300 100 -

3 Ishanpur Milch-animals -




Animals for other purpose

Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 114 100 150 100 -

4 Lavet

Milch-animals -




Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 360 100 400 100 -

5 Motifali

Milch-animals -




Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 41 100 55 100 -

6 Khareda

Milch-animals -





Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 56 100 100 100 -

7 Mangrol

Milch-animals -




Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 300 100 330 100 -

8 Jhankhvav

Milch-animals -




Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 269 100 300 100 -

9 Nani fali

Milch-animals -




Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 0 0 30 100 -

10 Nandola Milch-animals -





Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 200 100 250 100 -

11 Pataldevi

Milch-animals -




Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 463 100 500 100 -

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages

S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)

Backward linkages

Seed certification

Seed supply system

Fertilizer supply system

Pesticide supply system

Credit institutions

Water supply

Extension services


Nurseries

Tools/machinery suppliers

Price Support system

Labour


Forward linkages

Harvesting/threshing machinery

Storage (including cold storage)

Road network

Transport facilities

Markets / Mandis

Agro and other Industries

Milk and other collection centres

Labour



Logical Framework Analysis

Components Activities Outputs Effect Impact Village Institution Formation

Formation of Watershed Committee, User Group

One Watershed Committee each village

Number of User group depending on the coverage of particular intervention

Project can be implemented and managed in a democratic and participatory way ensuring equity.

Unity and prosperity

in the village management.

People's Participation and positive perception towards the programme

Strengthening Village Institutions

Organise training and awareness programme for Village institutions

Capacity building

workshops and exposure visits User Group and Watershed Committee

Failitating and

monitoring the functioning of UGs and WCs

Strengthen linkages

between UGs and WCs and Panchayat Institutions

Gender

awareness camps to be organized.

trainings and exposure

visits UGs and WCs to be held

Capacity building

workshops to be organised

1 Federations of UGs

and WC to be formed

Quality of management of common resources improved.

Quality of

distribution of benefits between people improved.

Increased

awareness amongst women about village resources.

Women

participation enhanced in decision-making of GVCs.

Involvement of

youth and children


sensitisation of UGs and WCs to increase inclusiveness of samuh decision-making.

Sensitise village

communities to involve children and youth in development.

in village development increased.

Fund Management

Improve management and utilisation of UGs and WCs.

Prepare

communities to explore other sources of income for UGs and WCs.

UGs and WCs operating bank account and managing resources on their own

Purpose, frequency and volume of use of the fund enhanced.

Volume of funds

generated for UGs and WCs from other sources of income increased.

Ecological Restoration

Protection, treatment and regeneration of common and private lands

Common and private lands to be brought under new plantations and agro-horti-forestry like Neem, Adusa, prosopis, Banyan and

Fodder availability from common and private lands increased

Accessibility to

Better Ecological order in the area

Increase in the proportion of


Protection, treatment and regeneration of forest lands

Plantation of fruits and forest species

Impart trainings,

conduct meetings and organise exposure visits for communities, village volunteers and staff to effectively plan, execute and monitor activities

Identification and

promotion of non-timber forest produce based income generation activities

Peepul

Forest lands to be brought under new plantations and protection

Trainings, exposure

visits and meetings to be organised for communities, village volunteers and staff

Income generation

intervention promoted

common and forest lands increased with removal of encroachments and resolution of conflicts

households having more security of fodder

Reduction in drudgery of fodder and fuel collection, especially women


Outcome analysis of the project

Outcome Result to

be achieved out of

the activities

Success indicator Means of

verification

Participatory

methods

Environmental

-Optimal and

judicious use of

natural resources

-Analysis of soil

-Monitoring of wells

- Water table analysis

-At least 25% of the kharif area receives

life-saving irrigation in a long dry spell

-Increase in rabi cultivated area atleast

20%

-Availability of fuel and fodder round the

year.

-Field survey

-Field survey

-Field survey

-Field

survey/observation

-Monitoring of

wells

-Mapping of

cropping area

(kharif,rabi)

-Transect

-Seasonal

analysis

-Need analysis

of fuel wood,

fodder, etc.

-Time line


- conservation of bio-diversity

-Matrix

ranking

Economic

-Increased farm

(agriculture and

allied)

productivity

-Increase in per capita income from X to Y.

-Increase in local employment inX%

-Irrigated area increase from X to Y.

-Increase in local credit availability by banks

-Decrease in consumptive loans and increase in

productive loans.

-Decreased dependence on money lenders

-Increase in on farm and supplementary

income.

-Mid-term

evaluation to see

the trends.

-Post-project

evaluation

-Seasonality of

food

availability

-Income and

expenditure

analysis of

-Matrix

ranking of

different crop

and

producton,etc.

Social

-Increased

participation of

women and

poor in decision

-Increased literacy rate of women;

-Decreased dropout ratio

-Increased health awareness and vaccination

-Survey

-School record

-Record of health

-Survey or

secondary

sources

-Venne


making and

development

Issues.

programme in village.

-Decrease in child mortality.

-Decreased number of community conflicts

-Decrease in drudgery faced by women for

fetching drinking water, fuel wood and fodder

is reduced.

department

-FGD /police

survey

-FGDs with

women

diagram

-A day in

women’s life-

Seasonal

working

calendar of

women

-Stakeholder

analysis

Institutional:

-Sustainable

community

level Institute

- Proper record maintenance by watershed

committee

-Maintenance of proper user fund and user

group

-Proper sharing of resources according to the

guiding principles of user group.

-Adequate financial resources in WDF

(Watershed development Fund)

-Proper and sustainable functioning of the

-Midterm

evaluation

-Post-project

evaluation

-Reports from

-Venne

diagram on

institution

links

-Wealth

ranking of

SHG members

-FGDs with

user group and

WC


SHGs banks


CHAPTER-7 QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSES


7 Quality and Sustainability Issues

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation

A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases. The system would

be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the entire state of Gujarat and all of those

areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related to soil type, Land-use classification,

inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be

accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available

online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area,

proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various years from the project

inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan corrective measures for

the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy of the project.

Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground staff alias

WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up official in charge of the

project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in the following manner. The WDT

equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are then

transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is reported to the server by means of an SMS by the WDT.

Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over frequent periods of

time.


7.2 Plans For Project management:

The Project management of any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organisation and the village level

institutes.In Eval, watershed committee and various user group have been formulated for post project operation and maintenance of assets created during

project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after implementation stage. A proper link-up will be built

during project period with various institutes and capacity building organisation. They will act as a major kingpin during post implementation for scaling up

the successful experience during project.

7.3 Watershed Development Fund: The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is watershed Development Fund. The contribution of it will comes mainly

fund the following:

7.4 User Charges:

Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed during the

formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The secretary of watershed committee (WC) shall

maintain the records of the following.


MAPS

CHAPTER-8 MAPS


Baseline Map


Cluster MAPS











Action Plan Maps













Documents

IWMP-I VAD PROJECT, MANGROL BLOCK , SURAT - Gujaratgswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2009-10/Surat/Mangrol DPR IWMP_I.pdf · iwmp-i vad project mangrol block, suratpage -1 iwmp-i vad