j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

  • Upload
    beny

  • View
    231

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    1/43

    CHARACTERIZATION OF DESERTIFICATION STATUS

    BY INTEGRATED USE OF SATELITE

    REMOTE SENSING AND GISA CASE STUDY OF EASTERN PART OF

    RAJASTHAN STATE

    BY

    TUUL BATBALDAN ( MONGOLIA )

    SUPERVISED BY

    Dr .S. K. SAHA

    Agriculture and Soils Division, IIRS

    9th POST GRADUATE COURSE IN REMOTE SENSING

    AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM.

    CSSTEAP

    INDIAN INSTITUTE OF REMOTE SENSING

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    2/43

    Many nations of the world are facing the problem of rapidly growing

    population and lack of food supply.

    Around 70% of all agriculturally used dry lands are some degree

    degraded, especially in terms of soils and plant cover (UNEP 1992A, 1992B).

    In the last 25 years, desertification has become increasingly apparent inthe dry sub-humid (annual rainfall 750 to 1500 mm ) regions of theworld.

    The extent and impact of desertification on the utilization of natural

    resources, environmental deterioration, the production of agriculture,forest, and animal husbandry are now much higher than before.

    Therefore, studies on desertification will have greater significance both

    in theory and in practice.

    Importance of the project

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    3/43

    WHAT IS DESERTIFICATION?

    Desertification can be defined as: Land degradation in arid, semi-

    arid and dry sub-humid areas resulting from various factors,

    including climatic variation and human activities. (United Nations

    Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD1994))

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    4/43

    To assess and map spatial desertificationstatus by GIS aided integration of satellite

    derived desertification indicators, soils and

    climatic conditions

    To characterize present biophysical

    conditions of desertification induced

    degraded zones using satellite derived

    temporal biophysical parameters.

    OBJECTIVE

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    5/43

    Study area and location

    The study area is the Part of Eastern Rajasthan

    State and falls in geographic coordinates of

    Latitude 23

    03

    N to 28

    13

    N and Longitude72 14 E to 78 16 E. The study area

    (132,981 sq.km) covers 21 districts of Eastern

    Rajasthan State.

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    6/43

    District-wise Mean Monthly Rainfall (Cm)

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    Jan

    Feb

    March

    April

    May

    June

    July

    Aug

    Sep O

    ct

    Nov

    Dec

    Month

    Precipitation(Centimeters

    AJMER ALWARBANSWARA BHARATPUR

    BHILWARA BUNDICHITTAURGARH DUNGARPURJAIPUR & DAUSA JHALAWAR

    KOTA & BARAN PALI

    SAWAI MADHOPUR SIROHITONK UDAIPUR & RAJSAMAND

    CLIMATE: semi-arid to sub humid

    ANNUAL RAINFALL: (550mm-1640mm).

    The daily minimum temperatures at night are

    around 26C (summer) /4 C (winter)The daily maximum temperature reach in summer

    40-48C (summer) / 28C (winter)

    ELEVATION (100m-1698m).

    SOILS: Dominant surface soil textures are

    sandy, loamy and clayey. Large area 68.10 %

    is under loamy surface soil texture and next

    dominant texture is sandy (16.58%).

    AGRO-CLIMATIC ZONES :Zone 1: Semi-Arid Eastern Plain (Ajmer, Jaipur, Dausa, Tonk districts)

    Zone 2:Flood Prone Eastern Plains (Alwar, Bharatpur, Dhaulpur, Karauli

    districts)

    Zone 3:Sub-humid Southern Plains (Aravalli Hills-Udaipur, Rajsamand,

    Bhilwara,Chittaurgarh, Sirohi districts) Zone 4:Humid Southern Plains (Dungarpur and Banswara districts)

    Zone 5: Humid South-Eastern Plains (Bundi, Sawai Madhopur, Kota,

    Baran, Jhalwar districts)

    AGRICULTURAL LAND USE: Kharif (Rainy) season-Bajra (pearl millet), Jowar (Sorghum), maize,guar, sesamum (oil seeds), Soybean and Groundnut, Pulses

    Rabi (Winter) season -Wheat, barley, gram, mustardCotton and sugarcane are the chief cash crops grown in the black soil in some region.

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    7/43

    DATA USED

    REMOTE SENSING DATAIRS 1D Wide Field Sensor (WiFS) 188m, swath 810m

    Path&Row: 096/051; 096/056

    17 October 2004 (Kharif)

    18 February 2005 (Rabi)

    MODIS data (36 bands; 1km; swath 2,330 km)NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index): monthly composite

    EVI (Enhanced Vegetation Index), monthly composite

    LST (Land Surface Temperature), 8 day composite

    LAI (Leaf Area Index), 8 day composite

    Albedo, 16 day composite

    METEOROLOGICAL DATA(Source:Department of Science and Technology Government of Rajasthan.Jaipur Resource Atlas of Rajasthan.)

    Rainfall (past 25 years)Air temperature data (past 25 years)

    Climatic water balance water surplus / water deficit

    SOIL MAP: ( 1: 500,000 scale) ( Published by NBSS & LUP, India)

    SOI TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS : 1:250,000 Scale ( 20 nos.)

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    8/43

    SATELLITE DATA IRS 1D WiFS

    Rabi image (17 October, 2005)

    SATELLITE DATA IRS 1D WiFS

    Rabi image (17 October, 2005)Download MODIS image

    of study area

    Download MODIS image

    of study area

    Crop Inventory

    Kharif

    Crop Inventory

    Kharif

    Crop Inventory

    Rabi

    Crop Inventory

    Rabi

    Import to ERDASImport to ERDAS

    Image ReprojectionImage Reprojection

    Extraction of study area

    Image from MODIS data

    Extraction of study area

    Image from MODIS data

    SATELLITE DATA IRS 1D WiFS

    Kharif image (18 February, 2005)

    SATELLITE DATA IRS 1D WiFS

    Kharif image (18 February, 2005)

    Image Rectification and transformation

    using MODIS data

    Image Rectification and transformation

    using MODIS data

    Subset study areaSubset study area

    Digital classification

    Of Rabi and Kharif images

    Digital classification

    Of Rabi and Kharif images

    Generation of cropping system, cropping pattern mapGeneration of cropping system, cropping pattern map

    Mosaic imagesMosaic images

    Extraction of study area Images of Kharif and RabiExtraction of study area Images of Kharif and Rabi

    GIS aided spatial integration of

    Kharif and Rabi crop seasons

    GIS aided spatial integration of

    Kharif and Rabi crop seasons

    GCP identification of map to image

    Transformation model

    GCP identification of map to image

    Transformation model

    METHODOLOGY OF CROP & LAND USE INVENTORY AND CROPPING PATTERN MAPPING

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    9/43

    GROUND PHOTOS LU /LC CLASSES

    Agricultural field (wheat harvesting)Severe affected for desertification

    (sand dunes with scattered trees)

    Severe affected for desertification (sand dunes with scattered trees)

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    10/43

    GROUND PHOTOS LU /LC CLASSES

    Agricultural field

    Current fallow landHarvested mustard field

    Agricultural field with mustard

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    11/43

    GROUND PHOTOS LU /LC CLASSES

    Sambar salt lake with salt affected area

    Sand StormUndulating up Lands with forest plantations

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    12/43

    Barren hills with scrubs Rock-out crops

    Dry deciduous forest with undulating area Undulating up lands with barren sparse vegetation

    Sandy barren area

    GROUND PHOTOS LU /LC CLASSES

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    13/43

    ELEVATION MAP

    Eastern part of Rajasthan state

    0 40 80 120 16020

    Kilometers

    TERRAIN SLOPE MAP

    Eastern part of Rajasthan state

    0 40 80 120 16020

    Kilometers

    N

    LEGEND

    LEGEND

    SRTM

    DEM (90m)

    download

    SRTM

    DEM (90m)

    download

    Mosaic imagesMosaic images

    Image ReprojectImage Reproject

    ReclassifyReclassify Filtering and ReclassifyFiltering and Reclassify 3D Visualization3D Visualization

    ELEVATION MAPELEVATION MAP SLOPE MAPSLOPE MAP3D perspective

    image after combining

    With FCC

    3D perspective

    image after combining

    With FCC

    Subset study areaSubset study area

    N

    FLOW DIAGRAMMFLOW DIAGRAMM

    OF ELEVATION AND SLOPEOF ELEVATION AND SLOPE

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    14/43

    0 40 80 120 16020

    Kilometers

    CLASSIFIED IMAGE OF

    KHARIF SEASON

    LEGEND

    N

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    15/43

    1. Area statistics of land use / land cover classes of Kharif season (sq.km.)

    1 AJMER 2528.83 6.73 1147.97 2.43 0.00 128.23 1.97 241.29 4.93 376.10

    2 ALWAR 369.84 0.98 51 82 .1 4 1 0.9 8 28.81 0.99 1 09 4.71 16 .7 8 3.78 0.08 933.58

    3 BANSWARA 1263.16 3.36 761.13 1.61 107.59 3.71 500.44 7.67 95.25 1.94 486.76

    4 B ARAN 15.59 0.04 2615.20 5.54 81.82 2.82 708.15 10.85 90.55 1.85 1228.20

    5 BHARATPUR 232.35 0.62 4022.22 8.52 2.40 0.08 74.33 1.14 0.39 0.01 218.36

    6 BHILWARA 5 496 .0 6 1 4.62 1367.22 2.90 0.78 0.03 397.51 6.09 497.25 10.15 315.98

    7 B UNDI 1079.76 2.87 2273.46 4.82 25.52 0.88 164.17 2.52 108.12 2.21 246.70

    8 CHITTAURGARH 2378.05 6.33 2480.34 5.25 457.10 15.76 1108.53 16.99 987.33 20.16 632.209 DAUS A 708.40 1.88 1628.97 3.45 0.00 73.02 1.12 8.98 0.18 214.22

    10 DHAULPUR 776.37 2.07 1260.33 2.67 3.29 0.11 156.82 2.40 0.07 0.00 407.37

    11 DUNGARPUR 2784.33 7.41 139.01 0.29 30.89 1.06 35.27 0.54 117.20 2.39 47.11

    12 JAIPUR 3296.43 8.77 5019.09 10.63 15.34 0.53 224.36 3.44 55.81 1.14 643.08

    13 JHALAWAR 15.24 0.04 3530.94 7.48 35.56 1.23 680.09 10.42 12.51 0.26 472.87

    14 KARAULI 573.49 1.53 2136.08 4.52 0.00 113.42 1.74 2.72 0.06 1085.45

    15 KOTA 352.21 0.94 3783.33 8.01 35.87 1.24 381.86 5.85 156.43 3.19 316.36

    16 PALI 4326.21 11.51 883.53 1.87 113.98 3.93 23.01 0.35 95.08 1.94 316.72

    17 RAJSAMAND 2457.96 6.54 72.10 0.15 311.49 10.74 59.55 0.91 592.19 12.09 678.60

    18 SAWAI MADHOPUR 361.39 0.96 3309.97 7.01 0.28 0.01 228.15 3.50 8.02 0.16 278.65

    19 SIROHI 2784.79 7.41 231.53 0.49 146.75 5.06 42.09 0.65 152.33 3.11 144.66

    20 TONK 651.14 1.73 4783.25 10.13 0.00 171.88 2.63 120.66 2.46 145.26

    21 UDAIPUR 5138.59 13.67 580.88 1.23 1 50 3.7 8 5 1.8 3 159.68 2.45 1 55 2.6 3 3 1.7 0 676.24

    Sum 37590 100 47209 100 2901 100 6525 100 4899 100 9864

    No

    District Name

    Gullied/RavinousLand

    Hills(Barren/Rocky)

    C.

    Fallow

    B

    ajra

    Gullied/Ra

    vinousLand(%)

    Bajra(%)

    C.Fa

    llow(%)

    Forest(Dense)(%)

    Forest(Open)(%)

    Forest(Dense)

    Fore

    st(Open)

    Contd.

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    16/43

    2. Area statistics of land use / land cover classes of Kharif season (sq.km.)

    1 AJMER 3.81 0.00 185.77 12.40 1840.01 19.47 1 23 2.0 2 12 .7 6 46.51 3.08

    2 ALWAR 9.46 2.58 0.14 0.00 1.98 0.02 61.32 0.64 5.12 0.34

    3 BANSWARA 4.93 517.22 27.55 0.00 0.28 0.00 676.41 7.01 134.13 8.89

    4 B ARAN 12.45 4.21 0.22 0.00 39.51 0.42 328.81 3.41 29.72 1.97

    5 BHARATPUR 2.21 0.71 0.04 0.00 1.17 0.01 102.21 1.06 3.78 0.25

    6 BHILWARA 3.20 26.58 1.42 32.69 2.18 622.23 6.58 651.67 6.75 134.94 8.94

    7 B UNDI 2.50 323.43 17.23 7.70 0.51 509.27 5.39 296.32 3.07 50.65 3.36

    8 CHITTAURGARH 6.41 464.21 24.73 8.62 0.58 368.64 3.90 463.89 4.80 261.23 17.319 DAUS A 2.17 0.78 0.04 0.00 24.18 0.26 36.58 0.38 59.73 3.96

    10 DHAULPUR 4.13 1.70 0.09 0.00 12.44 0.13 121.58 1.26 23.79 1.58

    11 DUNGARPUR 0.48 95.36 5.08 0.25 0.02 9.75 0.10 113.49 1.18 39.73 2.63

    12 JAIPUR 6.52 10.71 0.57 218.14 14.56 540.23 5.72 196.80 2.04 36.90 2.44

    13 JHALAWAR 4.79 2.05 0.11 0.00 20.82 0.22 840.76 8.71 34.18 2.26

    14 KARAULI 11.00 1.17 0.06 1.10 0.07 89.35 0.95 828.18 8.58 10.07 0.67

    15 KOTA 3.21 149.26 7.95 0.81 0.05 319.55 3.38 521.43 5.40 17.07 1.13

    16 PALI 3.21 18.34 0.98 671.15 44.80 4092.98 43.30 712.82 7.38 49.94 3.31

    17 RAJSAMAND 6.88 43.51 2.32 23.19 1.55 107.09 1.13 1145.39 11.86 24.42 1.62

    18 SAWAI MADHOPUR 2.82 0.18 0.01 2.19 0.15 139.40 1.47 292.75 3.03 161.42 10.70

    19 SIROHI 1.47 19.58 1.04 334.99 22.36 388.89 4.11 330.04 3.42 24.35 1.61

    20 TONK 1.47 4.63 0.25 7.03 0.47 305.62 3.23 161.24 1.67 309.33 20.50

    21 UDAIPUR 6.86 191.28 10.19 4.49 0.30 19.12 0.20 541.22 5.61 52.27 3.46

    Sum 100 1877 100 1498 100 9453 100 9655 100 1509 100

    Hills(Barren/Rocky)(%)

    UndulatingUpland(Barren/

    Scrub)

    WaterBody/River

    UndulatingUpland(Barren/

    Scrub)(%)

    Other

    Crop(%)

    Salt-affec

    tedLand(%)

    Sandy/SandDunes(Barren)

    (%)

    Oth

    erCrop

    Salt-affectedLand

    Sandy/SandDunes(Barren)

    No

    District Name

    WaterBo

    dy/River(%)

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    17/43

    CLASSIFIED IMAGE OF

    RABI SEASON

    N

    LEGEND

    0 40 80 120 16020

    Kilometers

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    18/43

    1. Area statistics of land use / land cover classes of Rabi season (sq.km.)

    1 AJMER 2072.57 4.76 0.00 128.23 1.97 241.29 4.93 376.10 3.81 170.15

    2 ALWAR 785.38 1.80 28.81 0.99 1094.71 16.78 3.78 0.08 933.58 9.46 2705.30

    3 BANSWARA 1313.55 3.02 107.59 3.71 500.44 7.67 95.25 1.94 486.76 4.93 711.05

    4 BARAN 1071.72 2.46 81.82 2.82 708.15 10.85 90.55 1.85 1 228 .2 0 1 2.45 1404.57

    5 BHARATPUR 526.85 1.21 2.40 0.08 74.33 1.14 0.39 0.01 218.36 2.21 3246.56

    6 BHILWARA 3946.97 9.06 0.78 0.03 397.51 6.09 497.25 10.15 315.98 3.20 841.40

    7 BUNDI 1517.01 3.48 25.52 0.88 164.17 2.52 108.12 2.21 246.70 2.50 1434.44

    8 CHITTAURGARH 3150.25 7.23 457.10 15.76 1 10 8.5 3 16 .9 9 987.33 20.16 632.20 6.41 1201.639 DAUSA 794.12 1.82 0.00 73.02 1.12 8.98 0.18 214.22 2.17 1292.21

    10 DHAULPUR 838.29 1.92 3.29 0.11 156.82 2.40 0.07 0.00 407.37 4.13 887.38

    11 DUNGARPUR 2279.09 5.23 30.89 1.06 35.27 0.54 117.20 2.39 47.11 0.48 170.85

    12 JAIPUR 4645.32 10.66 15.34 0.53 224.36 3.44 55.81 1.14 643.08 6.52 2176.52

    13 JHALAWAR 2384.92 5.47 35.56 1.23 680.09 10.42 12.51 0.26 472.87 4.79 1075.20

    14 KARAULI 1012.14 2.32 0.00 113.42 1.74 2.72 0.06 1085.45 11.00 1465.30

    1 5 KOTA 924.80 2.12 35.87 1.24 381.86 5.85 156.43 3.19 316.36 3.21 2326.62

    1 6 PALI 2720.50 6.24 113.98 3.93 23.01 0.35 95.08 1.94 316.72 3.21 1.91

    17 RAJSAMAND 1511.95 3.47 311.49 10.74 59.55 0.91 592.19 12.09 678.60 6.88 5.23

    18 SAWAI MADHOPUR 2021.86 4.64 0.28 0.01 228.15 3.50 8.02 0.16 278.65 2.82 1511.70

    19 SIROHI 1785.57 4.10 146.75 5.06 42.09 0.65 152.33 3.11 144.66 1.47 6.57

    2 0 TONK 3498.90 8.03 0.00 171.88 2.63 120.66 2.46 145.26 1.47 1640.07

    21 UDAIPUR 4761.22 10.93 1503.78 51.83 159.68 2.45 1 552 .6 3 3 1.7 0 676.24 6.86 300.92

    SUM 43563 100 2901 100 6525 100 4899 100 9864 100 24576

    Hills(Barren/Rocky)(%)

    No

    Hills(Barren/Rocky)

    District Name

    C.

    Fallow

    Mustard

    C.Fallow(%)

    Forest(Dense)(%)

    Forest(Dense)

    Fore

    st(Open)

    Gullied/RavinousLand

    Forest(Open)(%)

    Gullied/Ra

    vinousLand(%)

    Contd.

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    19/43

    2. Area statistics of land use / land cover classes of Rabi season (sq.km.)

    1 AJMER 0.69 192.41 11.91 3165.30 16.64 12 32.02 1 2.76 45.63 2.99 103.03 1.17

    2 ALWAR 11.01 0.00 2.23 0.01 61.32 0.64 5.58 0.37 2 06 3.17 23 .3 5

    3 BANSWARA 2.89 0.32 0.02 53.30 0.28 676.41 7.01 134.17 8.80 463.53 5.25

    4 BARAN 5.72 0.00 41.11 0.22 328.81 3.41 30.64 2.01 156.19 1.77

    5 BHARATPUR 13.21 0.00 1.94 0.01 102.21 1.06 3.46 0.23 481.42 5.45

    6 BHILWARA 3.42 38.63 2.39 2226.28 11.70 651.67 6.75 136.43 8.95 490.01 5.55

    7 BUNDI 5.84 7.88 0.49 631.53 3.32 296.32 3.07 50.12 3.29 603.29 6.838 CHITTAURGARH 4.89 10.25 0.63 725.12 3.81 463.89 4.80 262.99 17.25 610.85 6.91

    9 DAUSA 5.26 0.00 33.26 0.17 36.58 0.38 61.78 4.05 240.69 2.72

    10 DHAULPUR 3.61 0.00 14.46 0.08 121.58 1.26 22.76 1.49 311.74 3.53

    11 DUNGARPUR 0.70 1.31 0.08 497.50 2.62 113.49 1.18 39.41 2.59 80.27 0.91

    12 JAIPUR 8.86 225.25 13.94 639.20 3.36 196.80 2.04 38.91 2.55 1396.30 15.80

    13 JHALAWAR 4.38 0.00 22.09 0.12 840.76 8.71 34.85 2.29 86.17 0.98

    14 KARAULI 5.96 1.13 0.07 104.02 0.55 828.18 8.58 10.18 0.67 218.49 2.47

    15 KOTA 9.47 0.49 0.03 403.63 2.12 521.43 5.40 16.68 1.09 950.01 10.75

    1 6 PALI 0.01 700.91 43.39 6533.44 34.35 712.82 7.38 49.76 3.26 35.63 0.40

    17 RAJSAMAND 0.02 28.98 1.79 1146.98 6.03 1145.39 11.86 24.53 1.61 10.60 0.12

    18 SAWAI MADHOPUR 6.15 2.54 0.16 162.44 0.85 292.75 3.03 165.66 10.87 110.35 1.2519 SIROHI 0.03 390.80 24.19 1557.47 8.19 330.04 3.42 23.68 1.55 20.04 0.23

    2 0 TONK 6.67 7.39 0.46 388.75 2.04 161.24 1.67 315.27 20.68 210.62 2.38

    21 UDAIPUR 1.22 7.10 0.44 671.92 3.53 541.22 5.61 51.85 3.40 193.62 2.19

    SUM 100 1615 100 19022 100 9655 100 1524 100 8836 100

    No

    WaterB

    ody/River

    WaterBody/River(%)

    W

    heat

    District Name

    Must

    ard(%)

    Salt-affectedLand

    Salt-affectedLand(%)

    Wheat(%)

    Sandy/Sand

    Dunes(Barren)

    Sandy/SandDunes

    (Barren)(%)

    UndulatingU

    pland(Barren

    Sc

    rub)

    UndulatingU

    pland(Barren

    Scru

    b)(%)

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    20/43

    0 40 80 120 16020

    Kilometers

    CROPPING PATTERN MAP N

    LEGEND

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    21/43

    1. Area statistics of Cropping pattern (sq.km.)

    1 AJMER 49.27 2.24 15.30 0.51 0.00 0.00 128.23 1010.24 4.75 7.07 5.82

    2 ALWAR 128.44 5.84 90.45 3.03 2.65 0.43 1.02 0.13 28.81 1094.71 591.06 2.78 0.00

    3 BANSWARA 84.61 3.84 230.69 7.73 243.48 39.58 203.58 25.51 107.59 500.44 431.09 2.03 0.00

    4 BARAN 0.00 0.07 0.00 4.42 0.72 1.24 0.16 81.82 708.15 1087.00 5.11 1.02 0.84

    5 BHARATPUR 23.15 1.05 75.28 2.52 0.85 0.14 0.39 0.05 2.40 74.33 382.88 1.80 0.00

    6 BHILWARA 266.14 12.09 176.76 5.92 11.24 1.83 10.11 1.27 0.78 397.51 654.85 3.08 5.69 4.69

    7 BUNDI 153.75 6.99 219.91 7.37 40.04 6.51 265.19 33.23 25.52 164.17 950.82 4.47 0.35 0.29

    8 CHITTAURGARH 109.64 4.98 67.68 2.27 176.08 28.63 179.76 22.53 457.10 1108.53 1274.82 5.99 1.38 1.149 DAUSA 64.93 2.95 387.16 12.97 0.25 0.04 0.14 0.02 73.02 590.99 2.78 0.00

    10 DHAULPUR 132.65 6.03 163.82 5.49 1.48 0.24 0.57 0.07 3.29 156.82 360.23 1.69 0.00

    11 DUNGARPUR 59.20 2.69 87.41 2.93 37.50 6.10 9.19 1.15 30.89 35.27 130.28 0.61 1.77 1.46

    12 JAIPUR 868.93 39.48 991.05 33.19 5.44 0.88 0.78 0.10 15.34 224.36 3 428.1 6 1 6.1 2 5.34 4.40

    13 JHALAWAR 1.38 0.06 1.70 0.06 1.87 0.30 0.67 0.08 35.56 680.09 2392.29 11.25 0.00

    14 KARAULI 19.93 0.91 188.56 6.32 0.64 0.10 0.81 0.10 113.42 695.75 3.27 0.00

    15 KOTA 50.47 2.29 56.62 1.90 37.50 6.10 109.07 13.67 35.87 381.86 775.45 3.65 0.00

    16 PALI 25.24 1.15 0.64 0.02 0.18 0.03 0.04 0.01 113.98 23.01 972.10 4.57 33.54 27.63

    17 RAJSAMAND 7.35 0.33 0.60 0.02 3.15 0.51 0.11 0.01 311.49 59.55 78.85 0.37 6.89 5.67

    18 SAWAI MADHOPUR 14.39 0.65 92.42 3.10 0.11 0.02 0.00 0.28 228.15 1820.99 8.56 0.00

    19 SIROHI 19.76 0.90 0.67 0.02 1.84 0.30 0.00 146.75 42.09 246.38 1.16 56.20 46.29

    20 TONK 32.30 1.47 57.43 1.92 0.00 0.00 171.88 3010.39 14.16 0.04 0.03

    21 UDAIPUR 89.67 4.07 81.61 2.73 46.37 7.54 15.30 1.92 1503.78 159.68 380.69 1.79 2.12 1.75

    Sum 2201 100.01 2986 100.00 615 100.00 798 100.00 2901 6525 21265 100.00 121 100.00

    SaltAffec

    tedLand-single

    crop

    (Bajra)(%)

    For

    est(Dense)

    Forest(Open)

    Lo

    ngFallow

    SaltAffec

    tedLand-single

    crop(Bajra)

    Long

    Fallow

    (%)

    DC(OtherCrop-Wheat)(%)

    District Name

    DC(B

    ajra-Wheat)

    DC(Ba

    jra-Mustard)

    DC(OtherCrop-Mustard)

    DC(Othe

    rCrop-Wheat)

    DC(Bajra-Wheat)(%)

    DC(Bajr

    a-Mustard)(%)

    DC(OtherCrop-Mustard)

    (%)

    Contd.

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    22/43

    2.Area statistics of Cropping pattern (sq.km).

    1 AJMER 1215.48 13.75 0.00 153.50 0.76 50.08 0.85 1134.86 4.97 0.25 0.05 3962.45 10.67

    2 ALWAR 0.88 0.01 0.00 2644.83 13.01 1885.00 31.90 184.07 0.81 0.25 0.05 1031.69 2.78

    3 BANSWARA 51.18 0.58 0.25 0.60 184.18 0.91 187.85 3.18 882.79 3.87 60.05 12.41 1374.59 3.70

    4 BARAN 0.00 0.00 1357.03 6.68 170.61 2.89 16.19 0.07 0.53 0.11 1713.68 4.62

    5 BHARATPUR 0.74 0.01 0.00 3150.78 15.50 457.85 7.75 149.58 0.65 0.28 0.06 339.41 0.91

    6 BHILWARA 1457.94 16.49 1.31 3.13 609.68 3.00 206.97 3.50 3331.00 14.59 7.25 1.50 2405.68 6.48

    7 BUNDI 104.23 1.18 1.45 3.46 1112.91 5.47 203.44 3.44 585.33 2.56 16.47 3.40 1241.52 3.348 CHITTAURGARH 310.60 3.51 5.97 14.26 897.56 4.42 310.11 5.25 1836.58 8.04 113.42 23.44 2760.91 7.44

    9 DAUSA 8.91 0.10 0.00 845.53 4.16 190.93 3.23 232.32 1.02 0.35 0.07 360.33 0.97

    10 DHAULPUR 2.79 0.03 0.00 724.38 3.56 178.49 3.02 471.63 2.07 0.00 567.61 1.53

    11 DUNGARPUR 462.62 5.23 0.14 0.33 30.54 0.15 7.32 0.12 2112.76 9.25 50.72 10.48 356.78 0.96

    12 JAIPUR 92.04 1.04 0.07 0.17 1090.61 5.37 522.38 8.84 1260.76 5.52 6.75 1.40 1744.88 4.70

    13 JHALAWAR 1.10 0.01 0.00 1078.03 5.30 90.66 1.53 13.01 0.06 0.64 0.13 1348.02 3.63

    14 KARAULI 12.23 0.14 0.00 1233.97 6.07 213.83 3.62 341.18 1.49 0.07 0.01 2020.64 5.44

    15 KOTA 75.92 0.86 0.25 0.60 2136.26 10.51 841.15 14.23 174.00 0.76 9.30 1.92 1350.46 3.64

    16 PALI 2 30 1.0 0 2 6.02 1.31 3.13 1.31 0.01 8.02 0.14 1845.17 8.08 19.40 4.01 5958.82 16.05

    17 RAJSAMAND 946.23 10.70 15.13 36.14 1.77 0.01 1.77 0.03 1550.22 6.79 35.49 7.33 2496.89 6.73

    18 SAWAI MADHOPUR 16.97 0.19 0.00 1377.74 6.78 111.02 1.88 227.86 1.00 0.49 0.10 891.98 2.40

    19 SIROHI 1104.99 12.50 2.37 5.66 4.70 0.02 0.00 1604.41 7.03 18.13 3.75 1351.71 3.64

    20 TONK 78.36 0.89 0.00 1536.33 7.56 185.06 3.13 486.76 2.13 4.28 0.88 1097.21 2.96

    21 UDAIPUR 597.81 6.76 13.61 32.51 156.43 0.77 87.16 1.47 4396.90 19.25 139.75 28.88 2749.30 7.41

    Sum 8842 100.00 42 100.00 20328 100.00 5910 100.00 22837 100.00 484 100.00 37125 100.00

    SC(Fallow-Wheat)

    Sandy/SDune

    s-singlecrop

    (othercrop)

    Sandy/SDune

    s-singlecrop

    (otherc

    rop)(%)

    SC(Fallow-Mustard)

    SC(Fallow-

    Mustard)(%)

    District Name

    Sandy/SDune

    s-singlecrop

    (Ba

    jra)

    Sandy/SDune

    s-singlecrop

    (Bajr

    a)(%)

    SC(OtherCro

    p-Fallow)(%)

    Otherarea

    Othera

    rea(%)

    SC(Fallow

    -Wheat)(%)

    SC(Bajra-Fallow)

    SC(Bajra-

    Fallow)(%)

    SC(OtherC

    rop-Fallow)

    METHODOLOGY OF DESERTIFICATION STATUS MAPPING

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    23/43

    TEMPORAL SATELLITE DATA

    OF KHARIF AND RABI

    DIGITAL CLASSIFICATION

    AND INTEGRATION

    TEMPORAL SATELLITE DATA

    OF KHARIF AND RABI

    DIGITAL CLASSIFICATION

    AND INTEGRATION

    METEOROLOGICAL DATA

    RAINFALL, AIR

    TEMPERATURE AND SOIL

    MOISTURE STORAGE

    METEOROLOGICAL DATA

    RAINFALL, AIR

    TEMPERATURE AND SOIL

    MOISTURE STORAGE

    DIGITIZED SOIL MAP

    AND SOIL ATTRIBUTE TABLE

    DIGITIZED SOIL MAP

    AND SOIL ATTRIBUTE TABLE

    LAND USE AND CROPPING

    PATTERN MAPS

    LAND USE AND CROPPING

    PATTERN MAPSWATER SURPLUS / DEFICIT

    MAP

    WATER SURPLUS / DEFICIT

    MAP

    Maps of soil parameters affecting

    desertification processes such as

    soil texture, salinity, erosion,

    available soil moisture

    Maps of soil parameters affecting

    desertification processes such as

    soil texture, salinity, erosion,

    available soil moisture

    Assigning numeric values to

    Thematic classes based on

    desertification risk

    Assigning numeric values to

    Thematic classes based on

    desertification risk

    Assigning numeric values to

    Thematic classes based on

    desertification risk

    Assigning numeric values to

    Thematic classes based on

    desertification risk

    Assigning numeric values to

    Thematic classes based on

    desertification risk

    Assigning numeric values to

    Thematic classes based on

    desertification risk

    DESERTIFICATION STATUS

    INDEX

    DESERTIFICATION STATUS

    INDEX

    DESERTIFICATION STATUS

    MAP

    DESERTIFICATION STATUS

    MAP

    METHODOLOGY OF DESERTIFICATION STATUS MAPPING

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    24/43

    Soil Map

    (showing associations of soils with similar taxonomic classes)

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    25/43

    Rainfall Pattern &Water Surplus / Deficit map

    N

    0 40 80 120 16020

    Kilometers

    0 40 80 120 16020

    Kilometers

    LEGEND

    N

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    26/43

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    27/43

    NDESERTIFICATION STATUS MAP

    Eastern part of Rajasthan state

    0 40 80 120 16020

    Kilometers

    The percentage of areas

    under various classes of

    degree of desertification

    status in the study area are

    1.67 % very high;

    6.94 % high;

    22.11% moderately high;

    39.87% moderate;

    25.11% less;

    4.30 % very less.

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    28/43

    1 AJMER 431.20 1.63 3495.10 8.31 2771.29 11.88 422.71 5.77 186.26 10.58 420.17 7727

    2 ALWAR 567.84 2.14 2788.68 6.63 861.72 3.69 68.32 0.93 0.04 0.00 3397.26 7684

    3 BANSWARA 812.45 17.91 1488.97 5.62 1153.06 2.74 463.11 1.99 0.04 0.00 624.74 4542

    4 BARAN 468.17 10.32 1463.56 5.52 770.61 1.83 436.57 1.87 17.42 0.24 1985.43 5142

    5 BHARATPUR 0.00 577.77 2.18 3054.15 7.26 378.29 1.62 41.28 0.56 0.25 0.01 606.18 4658

    6 BHILWARA 22.48 0.50 2419.65 9.13 4190.60 9.96 1421.54 6.09 200.75 2.74 7.10 0.40 1280.79 9543

    7 BUNDI112.71 2.49 1776.35 6.70 1381.67 3.28 534.90 2.29 364.01 4.97 10.21 0.58 905.25

    5085

    8 CHITTAURGARH 311.49 6.87 2971.37 11.21 2800.98 6.66 1504.56 6.45 102.07 1.39 0.00 1919.67 9610

    9 DAUSA 46.30 0.17 1171.51 2.78 1093.68 4.69 191.92 2.62 11.88 0.68 239.57 2755

    10 DHAULPUR 22.69 0.50 1200.64 4.53 1164.02 2.77 73.23 0.31 303.18 2764

    11 DUNGARPUR 7.81 0.17 1424.65 5.38 1050.46 2.50 260.49 1.12 5.87 0.08 663.11 3412

    12 JAIPUR 0.00 373.59 1.41 2472.70 5.88 3554.72 15.24 2423.89 33.08 359.70 20.44 1072.29 10257

    13 JHALAWAR 781.49 17.23 2892.87 10.92 392.57 0.93 99.53 0.43 0.04 0.00 0.00 1478.52 5645

    14 KARAULI 7.81 0.17 452.72 1.71 2691.45 6.40 1117.79 4.79 50.33 0.69 0.07 0.00 520.86 4841

    15 KOTA 1837.00 40.51 2123.93 8.02 337.96 0.80 297.67 1.28 109.57 1.50 1.59 0.09 1326.46 6034

    16 PALI 324.88 1.23 2653.52 6.31 3678.11 15.77 2664.37 36.37 1150.13 65.36 832.75 11304

    17 RAJSAMAND 358.99 1.35 1433.55 3.41 1355.65 5.81 259.07 3.54 2108.23 5515

    18 SAWAI MADHOPUR 50.58 1.12 549.18 2.07 2047.58 4.87 1116.52 4.79 177.32 2.42 5.87 0.33 835.35 4782

    19 SIROHI 78.78 1.74 813.90 3.07 1160.98 2.76 1033.28 4.43 113.70 1.55 20.46 1.16 1378.90 4600

    20 TONK 0.00 1545.98 5.83 3548.93 8.44 852.64 3.66 86.49 1.18 6.19 0.35 619.81 6660

    21 UDAIPUR 21.67 0.48 2691.23 10.16 2311.07 5.49 422.25 1.81 27.11 0.37 4946.85 10420

    Sum 4535 26496 42071 23328 7326 1760 27465 132981

    High(%)

    Moderat

    elyHigh(%)

    Moderate(%)

    Le

    ss(%)

    No

    Dis trict Name

    VeryLess

    Less

    VeryLess(%)

    Moderate

    Moder

    atelyHigh

    High

    VeryHigh

    Rock-out,B

    uilt-UpWater

    body

    Sum

    Very

    High(%)

    Area statistics of desertification status (sq.km).

    Methodology of computation of area weighted spectral indices &

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    29/43

    DOWNLOADING MODIS DATA

    MAY 2004-APRIL 2005

    DOWNLOADING MODIS DATA

    MAY 2004-APRIL 2005

    Import to ERDASImport to ERDAS

    Layer Stack,Max computation,

    Image re-projection,

    Extraction of study area,

    Multiplying with scale factor

    Layer Stack,Max computation,

    Image re-projection,

    Extraction of study area,

    Multiplying with scale factor

    LAI/FPAR

    8 day composite

    LAI/FPAR

    8 day composite

    Land Surface

    Temperature

    8 day composite

    Land Surface

    Temperature

    8 day composite

    Surface Reflectance

    8 day composite

    Surface Reflectance

    8 day compositeVegetation Indices

    NDVI/EVI

    Vegetation Indices

    NDVI/EVIBRDF/Albedo

    16 day composite

    BRDF/Albedo

    16 day composite

    Digitized district

    map

    of the study area

    Digitized district

    map

    of the study area

    Monthly images of bio-physicalparameters of the study areaMonthly images of bio-physicalparameters of the study area

    Desertification status

    Zones map

    Desertification status

    Zones map

    Computation of district wise and

    Desertification zones wise

    weighted average values ofbio-physical parameters

    Computation of district wise and

    Desertification zones wise

    weighted average values of

    bio-physical parameters

    et odo ogy o co putat o o a ea we g ted spect a d ces &

    biophysical parameters

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    30/43

    Monthly NDVI Images of The Study Area

    M hl EVI I f Th S d A

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    31/43

    Monthly EVI Images of The Study Area

    District and Desertification Status Zone Wise Variation of

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    32/43

    District and Desertification Status Zone Wise Variation of

    Average Monthly NDVI & EVI

    M thl Alb d I f Th St d A

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    33/43

    Monthly Albedo Images of The Study Area

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    34/43

    Monthly LAI (Leaf Area Index) Images of The Study Area

    District and Desertification Status Zone Wise Variation of

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    35/43

    District and Desertification Status Zone Wise Variation of

    Average Monthly Albedo & LAI (Leaf Area Index)

    District and Desertification Status Zone Wise Variation of

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    36/43

    District and Desertification Status Zone Wise Variation of

    Average Monthly LST (Land Surface Temperature)

    S ( S f ) f S A

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    37/43

    Monthly LST (Land Surface Temperature) Images of The Study Area

    Relationships Between Biophysical Parameters (Peak Kharif Period Sept 2004)

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    38/43

    Albedo and LST Correlation

    y = 70.07x + 24.272

    R2

    = 0.4428

    20

    30

    40

    50

    0.13 0.15 0.17 0.19 0.21

    Albedo

    Temperature(C

    NDVI and LST Correlation

    y = -19.742x + 39.578

    R2

    = 0.5808

    25

    30

    35

    40

    0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30

    NDVI

    Temperature(C

    EVI and LST Correlation

    y = -34.961x + 36.639

    R2

    = 0.5985

    25

    30

    35

    40

    -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10

    EVI

    Temperature(C

    LAI and LST Correlation

    y = -1.7968x + 40.585

    R2

    = 0.4363

    25

    30

    35

    40

    1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

    LAI

    Temperature(C

    Albedo and LAI Correlatio

    y = -0.0124x + 0.202

    R2

    = 0.33910.10

    0.15

    0.20

    1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

    Albedo

    LAI

    Albedo and NDVI Correlation

    y = -2.8698x + 0.6564

    R2

    = 0.6343

    0.0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.13 0.15 0.17 0.19 0.21

    Albedo

    NDVI

    NDVI and EVI Correlation

    y = 0.5612x - 0.0835

    R2

    = 0.9586

    -0.10

    -0.05

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30

    NDVI

    EVI

    Albedo and EVI Correlation

    y = -1.3966x + 0.248

    R2

    = 0.4864

    -0.1

    0.13 0.15 0.17 0.19 0.21Albedo

    EVI

    NDVI and LAI Correlation

    y = 8.4573x + 0.9564

    R2

    = 0.78871.00

    2.00

    3.00

    4.00

    0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30

    NDVI

    LAI

    EVI and LAI Correlation

    y = 14.578x + 2.217

    R2

    = 0.77

    1.00

    2.00

    3.00

    4.00

    -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10

    EVI

    LAI

    Relationships Between Biophysical Parameters (Peak Kharif Period, Sept., 2004)

    Relationships Between Biophysical Parameters (Peak Rabi Period Feb 2004)

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    39/43

    EVI and LST Correlation

    y = -32.316x + 30.635

    R2

    = 0.5487

    25.0

    30.0

    35.0

    40.0

    -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10

    EVI

    LST

    NDVI and LST Correlation

    y = -24.933x + 33.807

    R2 = 0.4588

    25.0

    30.0

    35.0

    40.0

    -0.02 0.03 0.08 0.13 0.18 0.23

    NDVI

    LST

    LAI and LST Correlation

    y = -2.2255x + 34.254

    R2

    = 0.2367

    25.0

    30.0

    35.0

    40.0

    0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50LAI

    LST

    Albedo and LST Correlation

    y = 85.164x + 13.448

    R2

    = 0.3818

    25.0

    30.0

    35.0

    40.0

    0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22

    Albedo

    LST

    NDVI and EVI Correlation

    y = 0.8231x - 0.1032

    R2

    = 0.9516

    -0.2

    -0.1

    -0.1

    0.0

    0.1

    0.1

    -0.05 0.05 0.15 0.25NDVI

    E

    VI

    NDVI and LAI Correlation

    y = 4.6761x + 0.8198

    R2

    = 0.4909

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    -0.05 0.05 0.15 0.25NDVI

    LAI

    NDVI and Albedo Correlation

    y = -0.078x + 0.2011

    R2

    = 0.1711

    0.2

    0.2

    0.3

    -0.05 0.05 0.15 0.25

    NDVI

    A

    lbedo

    EVI and LAI Correlatio

    y = 4.6026x + 1.305

    R2

    = 0.3794

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10

    EVI

    LAI

    EVI and Albedo Correlation

    y = -0.09x + 0.1952

    R2

    = 0.1318

    0.1

    0.2

    0.2

    0.3

    -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10EVI

    Albedo

    Relationships Between Biophysical Parameters (Peak Rabi Period,Feb., 2004)

    Summary

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    40/43

    Summary Rabi season dominant crops wheat and mustard and Kharif season dominant

    crops Bajra and other crops (soybean, guar etc.) were identified and mapped

    by digital classification of IRS: WiFS data.

    Very large areas under degraded lands such as undulating upland (barren /

    scrub); sand / sand dunes, gullied / ravenous; hills (barren /rocky) are also

    mapped by digital classification of WiFS data. Over all more than 85%

    classification accuracies were achieved for digital crop and land use / land

    cover mapping.

    12 different types of cropping pattern were identified and mapped by GIS aided

    integration of Kharif and Rabi seasons crop and land use inventories.

    Desertification status map showing spatial distribution of six classes of various

    degree of degradation viz. very less, less, moderate, moderately high, high and

    very high was generated by GIS aided integration of cropping pattern. Landuse, climatic water balance component (water surplus / deficit) and soil

    properties information which control desertification process.

    The percentage of areas under various classes of degree of desertification

    status in the study area are 1.67% very high; 6.94% high; 22.11% moderately

    high; 39.87% moderate; 25.11% less; and 4.30% very less. Contd

    S

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    41/43

    Summary

    The monthly MODIS satellite derived biophysical data of the study area

    indicated that that very high to high desertification status zones have highervalues of albedo and lower values of NDVI, EVI and LAI. This is because of

    the fact that these areas are mostly under barren landscape, sand / sand

    dunes; highly eroded and less vegetated. The reverse trends have been

    observed for the very less to less desertification status zones.

    Significant positive linear relations have been observed between monthly

    district wise average NDVI vs. LAI; EVI vs. LAI; Albedo vs. LST ; and NDVI

    vs. EVI.

    Whereas inverse linear relations have been observed for NDVI vs. Albedo;EVI vs. Albedo; LAI vs. Albedo; NDVI vs. LST; EVI vs. LST; LAI vs. LST.

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    42/43

    CONCLUSIONS

    IRS: WiFS digital data with moderately coarser spatial resolution (188m) can be

    effectively used for regional crop and land use inventory following digitalsupervised classification with acceptable classification accuracy;

    GIS tool is very helpful for generation of spatial cropping pattern inventory by

    logical

    integration of satellite derived multi crop seasons (Kharif and Rabi) crop and land use

    inventories;

    Desertification status map showing varying degree of soil and landscapes

    degradation

    can effectively be prepared by following GIS based spatial modeling approach, using

    variety of information like cropping pattern; land use / land cover; climatic water

    balance component (water surplus / deficit); desertification controlling soil propertiessoil surface texture, water holding capacity, soil salinity and erosion.

    Public web-domain available various temporal MODIS data products such as

    Albedo,

    NDVI, EVI, LAI, and NPP etc are very useful for temporal characterization of

    biophysical conditions of the desert prone areas. Long-term trends of these

  • 8/14/2019 j02 Tuul Beny Friend Presentation Tuul

    43/43

    THANK YOU