Upload
vivian-stokes
View
216
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Jesusland North? The Christian Right in
Canadian Politics
Jonathan MalloyFulbright Visiting Professor, Center for Canadian Studies
Duke University
Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Carleton University, Ottawa
Canada: Jesusland North?
2006 election of evangelically-influenced Conservative government
Attempts to reverse legalization of same-sex marriage
Increased mobilization and activity by Christian Right
Religion in Canada: Traditional
• Prior to 1960s, similar or higher levels of religiosity in Canada compared to U.S.– Higher church attendance
– Political and social rhetoric rooted in Christianity
– Multiple church-state connections
• “More observant…and more orthodox” (Mark Noll)
• Particularly strong Catholic presence in French-speaking Quebec
Religion in Canada: Since 1960s
• Dramatic decrease in religiosity in Canada– Church attendance now well below U.S.– Absence of religious rhetoric and behavior in Canadian public
life
• Most dramatic changes in Quebec
• Strong secularization trend across Canada
Evangelicals
Growing evangelical population in Canada since 1970s, as in USA
Approximately half the proportion found in the USA (10-15% vs. 20-30% of population) – about 3-5 million people
Strong cross-border subculture and connections
Christian Right
• Unlike the USA, no major Christian Right emerged in Canada in the 1980s and 1990s
• Small groups and campaigns, especially anti-abortion demonstrations
• Very little involvement in electoral politics
Why no 1980s Christian Right?
• Smaller resources and economies of scale
• Fewer political opportunities and openings in parliamentary system of government
• Different political orientations and objectives
Parliamentary System
• Party discipline reduces freedom of MPs to pursue evangelical-friendly agendas
• Permanent senior bureaucracy reduces ability to appoint evangelicals to key posts
• Judges: no legislative hearings means less politicization of judicial appointments
Orientations/Objectives
• Canadian theological traditions and outlooks differ from American
– Less fundamentalist-modernist splits
– Less anti-state orientation
– Absence of civil religious myths
• Different Canadian political culture; less polarized and more multi-party and regionalized
• Resistance to “Americanization” of politics among both evangelicals and non-evangelicals
1980s/1990s Activism
• Evangelical groups active against abortion and gay rights, although not very visible or effective
• But little growth of a larger Christian Right
• New party - Reform – had strong evangelical presence but religious dimension downplayed both publicly and privately
Two approaches to evangelicals in Canadian politics
Manning(Reform leader, 1987-2000)
Day(Alliance leader, 2000-2002)
2000s - New Growth?
1. Increased Evangelical Presence in Conservative Party
2. Attempts to roll back same-sex marriage
3. Increasing American-style activism
Conservative Party
Split and reunification of the Conservative Party has increased evangelical presence
Progressive Conservative
Party
Reform PartyCanadianAlliance
Party
Progressive Conservatives
Conservative Party
1980s 1990s 2004
Progressive Conservative
Party
Reform PartyCanadianAlliance
Party
Progressive Conservatives
Conservative Party
1980s 1990s 2004
Evangelicals
Evangelicals and the Conservatives in 2007
• Prominent evangelical cabinet ministers and MPs
• More open evangelical identification with Conservatives and activism within party
• Decreasing involvement in other parties
But…
• Overall, evangelicals remain small within the party
• Influence and autonomy limited by institutional rules
• Harper “hidden agenda” is more economic than social
Same-Sex Marriage
Early 2000s –exclusion of same-sex couples ruled unconstitutional by various courts
2004 – Supreme Court of Canada agrees; up to Parliament to decide how to proceed
2005 – Same-sex marriage bill passes in Parliament
Parties
Conservative Party – Left to individual members; most opposed to same-sex marriage
Liberal Party – PM and cabinet support legislation; significant minority opposed
NDP and Bloc Quebecois – strong support
Elections
2004 - ElectionAfter court rulings but before legislation
- important but not crucial election issue
2005 – Legislation
2006 - Election Conservatives pledge new vote on issue
Evangelical Lobbying on Same-Sex Marriage
Evangelical groups strongly opposed
Unlike most issues, same-sex marriage provided clear political opportunity – electing and lobbying individual MPs
Free Vote
• Rare opportunity for MPs to vote freely without party discipline
• Nominating, electing and lobbying MPs thus unusually important
• Allows evangelicals to use more American-style direct tactics
Vote #2
Throughout 2006, Conservatives repeatedly promise vote
Finally held on week’s notice in December 2006
Defeated; same-sex marriage stands
Interpretations
Minor Setback
Conservatives will wait for parliamentary majority and hold new vote
Hidden agenda
Manipulation
Conservatives held quick vote to fulfil election promise; no intention of success
Issue closed
Groups (examples)
Older
Evangelical Fellowship of Canada
Focus on the Family Canada
New
4MYCanada
Equipping Christians for the Public Square
Concerned Christians Inc.
National House of Prayer
The New Activism
Older
Services and programs
Charitable tax exemption
Broad and restrained approach to politics
New
Exclusively political focus
No tax exemption
Extensive involvement in right-wing politics
The New Activists
• Charismatic leader/spokespersons
• Media and communications savvy
• Mobilizing through churches and personal networks
• Identifiably “Christian Right”
But
• Shallow, lacking broad leadership and membership base
• Mobilized primarily by same-sex marriage votes
• Long-term prospects unclear
Evangelicals vs Christian Right
• Distinction unclear in both Canadian and U.S. politics
• In Canada, evangelical conservatism on abortion/sexual orientation does not extend to generally conservative politics
Long-term
• Institutional factors provide strong explanation for Canadian trends
• Strong barriers to evangelical political mobilization
But
• Doctrinal and sociological differences between Canadian and American evangelicals– Less anti-state orientation– Limited civil religious myths
• Different Canadian political culture