Upload
toril
View
79
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
JLC CCD Vertex Detector R&D. Y. Sugimoto KEK 2003. 8. 19. Members. KEKA. Miyamoto, K. Nakayoshi, Y. Sugimoto, H. Yamaoka Niigata U. K. Fujiwara, G. Iwai, Y. Onuki, N. Tamura, H. Takayama Saga U. T. Kuniya, K. Nakamura, K.D. Stefanov, T. Tsukamoto - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
JLC CCD Vertex JLC CCD Vertex Detector R&DDetector R&D
Y. SugimotoY. SugimotoKEKKEK
2003. 8. 192003. 8. 19
MembersMembers KEKKEK A. Miyamoto, K. Nakayoshi, Y. Sugimoto, A. Miyamoto, K. Nakayoshi, Y. Sugimoto, H. YamaokH. Yamaok
aa Niigata U.Niigata U. K. Fujiwara,K. Fujiwara, G. Iwai, G. Iwai, Y. Onuki,Y. Onuki, N. Tamura, N. Tamura, H. TH. T
akayama akayama Saga U.Saga U. T. Kuniya, K. Nakamura, T. Kuniya, K. Nakamura, K.D. Stefanov, T. TsukaK.D. Stefanov, T. Tsuka
motomoto Tohoku U.Tohoku U. T. Nagamine, T. Nagamine, Y. ShirasakiY. Shirasaki Tohoku Gakuin U.Tohoku Gakuin U. K. AbeK. Abe Toyama CollegeToyama College T. AsoT. Aso
of Maritime Tech.of Maritime Tech.
Red names: Graduated or left ( 4 Ms and 1 D)Red names: Graduated or left ( 4 Ms and 1 D)
ContentsContents IntroductionIntroduction
Possible Options Possible Options Why CCD? Why CCD?
R&D ProgramR&D Program What has been achieved?What has been achieved? What has been left to be done?What has been left to be done?
Future Prospects Future Prospects
Possible OptionsPossible Options Candidates for Vertex Detectors at Candidates for Vertex Detectors at
LCLC Silicon Strip Detector --- OccupancySilicon Strip Detector --- Occupancy Hybrid Active Pixel Sensor --- ThicknessHybrid Active Pixel Sensor --- Thickness Charge Coupled Device (CCD)Charge Coupled Device (CCD) Monolithic Active Pixel Sensor (CMOS)Monolithic Active Pixel Sensor (CMOS) Other New Ideas (DEPFET, Other New Ideas (DEPFET, SOI, etcSOI, etc.).)
DEPFETDEPFET
p+
p+ n+
rear contact
drain bulksource
p
sym
met
ry a
xis
n+
ninternal gate
top gate clear
n -
n+p+
--
++
++
-
MIP
50 µ
m
- -- ---~1µm
Why CCD?Why CCD? Mission: Show a design by the end of 2000 (ACFA RepMission: Show a design by the end of 2000 (ACFA Rep
ort)ort) Structure of CCDStructure of CCD
Diffusion of electrons in epitaxial layerDiffusion of electrons in epitaxial layer Key of excellent spatial resolution Key of excellent spatial resolution for CCD & CMOS pixel sensorsfor CCD & CMOS pixel sensors Takes time to diffuseTakes time to diffuse d = sqrt(Dt) ~ 6d = sqrt(Dt) ~ 6m @ t=10nsm @ t=10ns OK for JLC/NLC OK for JLC/NLC (Fully depleted CCD at TESLA)(Fully depleted CCD at TESLA)
CCD has simple structureCCD has simple structure Large area sensorLarge area sensor High yieldHigh yield
CCD is the most feasible optionCCD is the most feasible option
CCD MAPS HAPS DECCD MAPS HAPS DEPFETPFET
ResolutionResolution AAAAAA AAA A A AAA A AThin material Thin material AAAAAA AAA C AA AAA C AARad. Hardness A(?) AA AAA AAARad. Hardness A(?) AA AAA AAA
(?)(?)Large waferLarge wafer AAA ? ? ?AAA ? ? ?
R&D ProgramR&D Program Design Criteria : Design Criteria : “ “The Highest Vertex Resolution with Technical The Highest Vertex Resolution with Technical
Feasibility”Feasibility”
High spatial resolution of the sensorHigh spatial resolution of the sensor Minimize multiple scattering Minimize multiple scattering Thin wafer Thin wafer Close to the IP Close to the IP Radiation Hardness Radiation Hardness Room temperature operation, if possibleRoom temperature operation, if possible
Spatial ResolutionSpatial Resolution Beam Tests in ’97 and ’98Beam Tests in ’97 and ’98
KEK PS T1 beam lineKEK PS T1 beam line 0.5 – 2.0 GeV/c pion0.5 – 2.0 GeV/c pion 4-CCD Telescope4-CCD Telescope CCD Samples: CCD Samples:
HPK 24 HPK 24 mm22 10/50 10/50 m epm epi. EEV 22 i. EEV 22 mm2 2 20 20 m epi.m epi.
Resolution better than Resolution better than 33m(r.m.s) was obtainedm(r.m.s) was obtained
Excellent spatial resolution of Excellent spatial resolution of CCD has been demonstratedCCD has been demonstrated..
Spatial Resolution Spatial Resolution (Cont.)(Cont.)
Resolution Study Resolution Study with Laser Beam with Laser Beam Scanner (Niigata U.)Scanner (Niigata U.) Beam spot size: 2Beam spot size: 2mm 532 nm / 1064 nm532 nm / 1064 nm IR(1064nm) Laser IR(1064nm) Laser simulates MIPsimulates MIP Quick study possibleQuick study possible Study of charge Study of charge
spread spread
Laser ScannerLaser Scanner 532 532 nmnm
1064 1064 nmnm
EEV V-Scan(532nm, normalized)
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 22 44 66
Irradiated Position (um)
Sign
al N
orma
lized
by
Clus
ter(r
atio
)
727374
EEV V-Scan(1064,normalized)
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 22 44 66
Irradiated Position (um)Si
gnal
Nor
maliz
ed b
y Cl
uste
r(rat
io)
727374
Thin WaferThin Wafer CCD has sensitive thickness ( = epitaxial lCCD has sensitive thickness ( = epitaxial l
ayer thickness) of ~20ayer thickness) of ~20mm
Can be thinned down to 20Can be thinned down to 20m m if mechanically OKif mechanically OK Several ideas: Several ideas:
Thin wafer stretched by tensionThin wafer stretched by tension Thin wafer glued on Be supportThin wafer glued on Be support Partially thinned wafer --- Our studyPartially thinned wafer --- Our study
Partially Thinned WaferPartially Thinned Wafer Picture Frame Picture Frame
TypeType Sample wafer : Sample wafer : Back illumination Back illumination
CCDCCD System for flatness System for flatness
measurement measurement constructedconstructed
Non-flatness has Non-flatness has been measuredbeen measured Poor FlatnessPoor Flatness
Honeycomb & Grid TypeHoneycomb & Grid Type Average thicknessAverage thickness = 76 = 76 mm = 100 = 100 m (including edge)m (including edge) ~0.1% X~0.1% X00
ANSYS analysis:ANSYS analysis:material~1/3material~1/3 rigidity~1/3rigidity~1/3
Simple plate:Simple plate:thickness 1/3thickness 1/3 rigidity 1/27rigidity 1/27
Models for ANSYS
Radiation Hardness of CCDsRadiation Hardness of CCDs
Radiation Damage on CCDsRadiation Damage on CCDs Surface Damage: Charge build-up in SiOSurface Damage: Charge build-up in SiO22
and SiOand SiO22-Si interface by dE/dx-Si interface by dE/dx Increase of surface dark currentIncrease of surface dark current Shift of operation voltage (Flat-band Voltage Shift of operation voltage (Flat-band Voltage
Shift)Shift) Bulk Damage: Displacement in latticeBulk Damage: Displacement in lattice
Increase of bulk dark currentIncrease of bulk dark current Charge Transfer In-efficiency (CTI)Charge Transfer In-efficiency (CTI)
Dark Current and Flat-band Voltage ShiftDark Current and Flat-band Voltage Shift HPK S5466 irradiated with 10mCi Sr-90 HPK S5466 irradiated with 10mCi Sr-90 --
source source
No bias during irradiation Biased during No bias during irradiation Biased during irradiationirradiation
Study of CTIStudy of CTI HPK S5466 and EEV CCD02-06 iHPK S5466 and EEV CCD02-06 i
rradiated with Sr-90 rradiated with Sr-90 -source an-source and Cf-242 n-sourced Cf-242 n-source
Read-out cycle = 3 sec (250 kHz)Read-out cycle = 3 sec (250 kHz) CTI looks decreasing at higher teCTI looks decreasing at higher te
mperature because of increase omperature because of increase of dark current which fill-up the traf dark current which fill-up the traps.ps.
(EEV CCD showed much worse (EEV CCD showed much worse CTI due to less dark current)CTI due to less dark current) NOT expected at JLC where NOT expected at JLC where Tcyc=6ms and much less dark Tcyc=6ms and much less dark currentcurrent Fat-zero charge injection Fat-zero charge injection (~1000 e) is desirable(~1000 e) is desirable
HPK S5466
Other CTI ImprovementsOther CTI Improvements Notch Channel CCDNotch Channel CCD High speed readout : Horizontal CTI is expected High speed readout : Horizontal CTI is expected
prop. to 1/f prop. to 1/f
Conclusion from Radiation Damage StudyConclusion from Radiation Damage Study Surface damage NOT problem in MPP mode Surface damage NOT problem in MPP mode
operation and 6ms cycle timeoperation and 6ms cycle time CTI study + Beam Background SimulationCTI study + Beam Background Simulation CCD can be used for 3 years withCCD can be used for 3 years with - B=2T, R=24mm- B=2T, R=24mm - JLC A-Option- JLC A-Option - Notch channel- Notch channel - Fat-zero charge injection- Fat-zero charge injection - assuming that effect of H.E. electrons is 10 - assuming that effect of H.E. electrons is 10
times stronger than Sr-90 times stronger than Sr-90 -source -source BUT large ambiguity in E-dependence of electron BUT large ambiguity in E-dependence of electron damage and neutron background level.damage and neutron background level.
Model Calculation of NIELModel Calculation of NIEL Bulk damage is thought to be Bulk damage is thought to be
proportional to Non-Ionizing Energy Loss proportional to Non-Ionizing Energy Loss (NIEL) (NIEL)
Sr-90 LC pair background
R&D Items left to be R&D Items left to be donedone
Spatial ResolutionSpatial Resolution Study of resolution of radiation-damaged CCDStudy of resolution of radiation-damaged CCD Study of charge diffusion in epi. layerStudy of charge diffusion in epi. layer
Thin WaferThin Wafer Try to get sample wafers of Honeycomb/Grid tTry to get sample wafers of Honeycomb/Grid t
ypeype
R&D Items left to be done R&D Items left to be done (Cont.)(Cont.)
Radiation Hardness StudyRadiation Hardness Study Study of energy dependence of bulk damageStudy of energy dependence of bulk damage
High energy (150MeV) electron irradiation at Tohoku Univ. High energy (150MeV) electron irradiation at Tohoku Univ. Study of characteristics of irradiated CCDsStudy of characteristics of irradiated CCDs
IIdd vs. Temp vs. Temp Flat-band Voltage ShiftFlat-band Voltage Shift CTI vs. TempCTI vs. Temp CTI vs. Readout frequency CTI vs. Readout frequency cPCI DAQ System cPCI DAQ System CTI vs. Fat-zero charge: Injection of controlled amount of chargeCTI vs. Fat-zero charge: Injection of controlled amount of charge CTI vs. clock pulse width/heightCTI vs. clock pulse width/height Annealing/anti-annealingAnnealing/anti-annealing
R&D Items left to be done R&D Items left to be done (Cont.)(Cont.)
Simulation studies concerning Vertex det.Simulation studies concerning Vertex det. Background study using Full Simulator (JIM, JUBackground study using Full Simulator (JIM, JU
PITER) PITER) Crossing angle: 7 mrad Crossing angle: 7 mrad 20 mrad 20 mrad
Physics study using Quick SimulatorPhysics study using Quick Simulator Physics and Detector study using Full SimulatoPhysics and Detector study using Full Simulato
rr
Future ProspectsFuture Prospects FY2003-FY2004FY2003-FY2004
Continue jobs left to be doneContinue jobs left to be done Find out the best design and operating Find out the best design and operating
condition of CCD vertex detectorcondition of CCD vertex detector Prepare for the next stepPrepare for the next step
Conceptual design of prototype ladder (with Conceptual design of prototype ladder (with HPK)HPK)
Find out the financial source Find out the financial source Japan-US, KAKENHI, or KEK GAISAN-YOUKYU ? Japan-US, KAKENHI, or KEK GAISAN-YOUKYU ?
FY2005- The Next StepFY2005- The Next Step Construction of prototype ladderConstruction of prototype ladder
Future plan in FY2005~Future plan in FY2005~ Custom made CCDs withCustom made CCDs with
Reduced material ( honeycomb type? )Reduced material ( honeycomb type? ) > 20MHz readout speed> 20MHz readout speed Multiple readout nodesMultiple readout nodes Notch structureNotch structure Charge injection capabilityCharge injection capability Readout by ASIC with multi-channel CDSs, AmplifierReadout by ASIC with multi-channel CDSs, Amplifier
s, ADCs, and a Multiplexers, ADCs, and a Multiplexer
Multi-Thread CCDMulti-Thread CCD Normal CCD: Normal CCD: Many V-shifts Many V-shifts Sig. Loss Sig. Loss CPCCD:CPCCD: Limited space for r.o.elec.Limited space for r.o.elec.
Multi-port CCD with few teMulti-port CCD with few tens of V-shifts : MTCCDns of V-shifts : MTCCD
Can be used as a high spCan be used as a high speed CCD cameraeed CCD camera
HPK says “Challenging but HPK says “Challenging but not impossible”not impossible”
ConclusionConclusion Feasibility of the baseline design of a CCD Vertex Feasibility of the baseline design of a CCD Vertex
Detector has been established.Detector has been established. R=24, 36, 48, 60 mmR=24, 36, 48, 60 mm < 4 < 4 mm Thickness = 300 Thickness = 300 m /layerm /layer bb = 7 + 20/(p = 7 + 20/(psinsin3/23/2mm
To get better performance, studies to getTo get better performance, studies to get Rin < 24 mm (Rin < 24 mm ( Radiation hardness) Radiation hardness) Thickness << 300 Thickness << 300 mmwill be continued. A milestone is will be continued. A milestone is bb = 5 + 10/(p = 5 + 10/(psinsin3/23/2mm
Eventually, we have to make a prototype ladder to Eventually, we have to make a prototype ladder to demonstrate the required performance. (demonstrate the required performance. ( need \) need \)
AppendixAppendix Situation in EuropeSituation in Europe
LCFI Group (UK) : R&D for Column Parallel CCDLCFI Group (UK) : R&D for Column Parallel CCD 2.26M£ from PPARC (UK): 2002, 2003, 2004 (3y)2.26M£ from PPARC (UK): 2002, 2003, 2004 (3y) Approved as DESY PRC R&D 01/01Approved as DESY PRC R&D 01/01
MAPS Group (CMOS)MAPS Group (CMOS) DESY PRC R&D 01/04DESY PRC R&D 01/04
DEPFETDEPFET DESY PRC R&D 03/01DESY PRC R&D 03/01
SiLC, CALICE, TPC, -----, submitted proposals tSiLC, CALICE, TPC, -----, submitted proposals to DESY PRCo DESY PRC