24
JNC-8 New Guidelines…Finally Let the controversies begin Eric D Peterson, MD, MPH Director of DCRI Feb, 2014 http://www.dcri.duke.edu/research/coi.jsp

JNC8.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: JNC8.pdf

JNC-8 New Guidelines…Finally Let the controversies begin

Eric D Peterson, MD, MPH Director of DCRI

Feb, 2014 http://www.dcri.duke.edu/research/coi.jsp

Page 2: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 2

• Affects 1 billion people worldwide • US – about 1 in 3 adults

– 73 million have hypertension (SBP >140/90) • A 55yo normotensive person has up to a 90% lifetime

risk of developing hypertension (Vasan 2001) • Number one reason listed for office visits • Causes/contributes to 457,000 admissions per year • A leading cause/contributor to death (MI, stroke,

vascular disease)

Page 3: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 3

• “The  greatest  danger  to  a  man  with  high  blood  pressure  lies in its discovery, because then some fool is certain to try  and  reduce  it.”- J.H. Hay, 1931.

• “Hypertension  may  be  an  important  compensatory

mechanism which should not be tampered with, even were  it  certain  that  we  could  control  it.”  Paul  Dudley  White, 1937.

How Aggressive to Treat Hypertension Some Early Views on the Controversy

Page 4: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 4

Stroke and IHD Mortality vs Systolic BP by Age

Mor

talit

y (F

loat

ing

abso

lute

risk

and

95%

CI)

Usual Systolic BP (mm Hg)

50-59 years

60-69 years

70-79 years

80-89 years

Stroke

Age at risk 256

128

64

32

16

8

4

2

1

0 120 140 160 180

Ischemic Heart Disease

Usual Systolic BP (mm Hg)

50-59 years

60-69 years

70-79 years

80-89 years Age at risk:

40-49 years

256

128

64

32

16

8

4

2

1

0 120 140 160 180

Lancet. 2002;360:1903-1913

Page 5: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 5

BP Reductions as Small as 2 mmHg Reduce the Risk of CV Events by Up to 10%

▶ Meta-analysis of 61 prospective, observational studies

▶ 1 million adults

▶ 12.7 million person-years

Prospective Studies Collaboration. Lancet. 2002;360:1903-1913

2 mmHg increase in mean SBP

10% increase in risk of stroke mortality

7% increase in risk of ischemic heart disease mortality

Page 6: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 6

Benefits of Treating Hypertension: RCT

-100-90-80-70-60-50-40-30-20-10

0

Heart failure Stroke Cardiovasculardeath

Ris

k re

duct

ion

(%)

↓ 50% ↓  40%

↓ 20%

Hebert, Archives Int Med 1993; Moser, Am Coll Cardiol 1996

Page 7: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 7

Lifestyle Modifications

Goal blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg <130/80 mm Hg with diabetes or chronic kidney disease*

Initial drug choices

Without Compelling indications

Stage 1 Hypertension (SBP 140-159 DBP 90-99 )

Diuretics for most; may consider ACE inhibitor,

ARB, beta blocker, CCB or combination

Stage 2 hypertension (SBP  ≥  160  or  DBP  ≥  100)

2-drug combination for most (Diuretic +ACE, ARB,

beta blocker, or CCB)

With compelling indications

Drug(s) for compelling indications

Diuretics, ACE inhibitor, ARB, beta blocker, CCB as

needed

* Released in 2003

Page 8: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 8

NHLBI Drops Out of Guidelines Business

JNC-8 Significantly Delayed

Page 9: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 9

James et al JAMA December 13 2014

Page 10: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 10

James et al JAMA December 13 2014

Page 11: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 11

James et al JAMA December 13 2014

JNC-8 Hypertension Treatment Choices

Page 12: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 12

Page 13: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 13

Page 14: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 14

The Evidence for Targets: JATOS Study • 2200 pts per arm • Baseline BP 170/90 • Target

<150 mild vs. <140 strict • Drugs:

– Ca++blocker 50-60% – Ace 30-40% – Alpha blocker 15% – Diuretic 15%

• Follow-up 2 yrs

Hypertens Res. 2008;31(12):2115-2127

Page 15: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 15

JATOS Results

Hypertens Res. 2008;31(12):2115-2127

Page 16: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 16

The Evidence for Targets: VALISH Trial

Hypertension. 2010;56(2):196-202

• 1630 pts per arm • Baseline BP 170/80 • Target

Mild <150, strict <140 • Drugs:

– Valsartan 100% – Ca++ blacker 30% – Diuretic 10-15%

• Median Follow-up 3 yrs

Page 17: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 17

Hypertension. 2010;56(2):196-202

VALISH Trial

Page 18: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 18

RCTs Evaluating SBP Targets in those Aged < 60

“Does  the  absence  of  evidence  lead  to  the  conclusion  of  evidence  of  absence?”

JNC-8 authors concluded: - Yes for those >60 - No for those <60

Page 19: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 19

Page 20: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 20

Guidelines, Performance Measures and Policy

• Guideline: – In past: practical advice on a course of action – Have become: RCT-based, rigorous

• Performance Measures:

– Distillation of guidelines: • Use strict criteria to define what should and must

be done to avoid a quality concern – Often applied to public reporting or financial

incentives

Page 21: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 21

BP Treatment Targets Have Risks Both Ways

• If one votes to keep all at 140/90 – PM’s  and  incentives  may  encourage  over-treatment

• Worse symptoms, falls, costs in elderly

• If one votes to move to 150/90 in elderly – Risk of under-treatment

• Despite  existing  guideline  goals/PM’s,  <50% of public reaches goal!

Page 22: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 22

JNC-8 Implications for US

All US Adults Ages 18-59 Ages 60+ JNC 7: HTN 66.6 32.8 33.8 Controlled 26.6 (39.9%) 13.3 (40.5%) 13.3 (39.3%) JNC 8: HTN 60.8 30.8 30.0 Controlled 34.3 (56.4%) 14.6 (47.4%%) 19.7 (65.7%)

Page 23: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 23

Major Findings

• Currently: 66.7 million in US have hypertension, – of which 39.9% met guideline targets.

• Using JNC 8: 60.8 million in US have hypertension, – of which 56.4% have controlled blood pressure.

• In 60+, switching to JNC-8 – improves BP control rates from 34.3% to 60.8% – reclassifying 13.6 million with previously

uncontrolled BP now seen as under control

Page 24: JNC8.pdf

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 sb/Strategy & Innovation Group | 24

Conclusions

• Hypertension: common, costly and modifiable

• Interpretation of existing evidence is challenging – Determining the optimal threshold will require

more RCTs.

• In interim: My view: – Aim for 140/90 but allow for individualization – What’s  your  take?