73
JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, BURNOUT AND ORGANISATIONAL COMMTTMENT OF MANAGEMENT STAFF AT A PLATINUM MINE IN THE NORTH-WEST PROVINCE Jeanette H.M. Joubert. B. Corn. Hons. Mini-dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment oi'the requirements for the. degrec Magis~er Commercii in Industrial Psychology at the Konh-West University. Potchefstroom Campus. Study leader: Prof. S. Rothmann Potchefstroon~ 2005

JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, BURNOUT AND

ORGANISATIONAL COMMTTMENT OF MANAGEMENT

STAFF AT A PLATINUM MINE IN THE NORTH-WEST

PROVINCE

Jeanette H.M. Joubert. B. Corn. Hons.

Mini-dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment oi'the requirements for the. degrec Magis~er

Commercii in Industrial Psychology at the Konh-West University. Potchefstroom Campus.

Study leader: Prof. S. Rothmann

Potchefstroon~

2005

Page 2: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

COMMENTS

The readcr is reminded of the following:

In this mini-dissertation the prescriptions. as set our by the Manual (5"' ed.) of the

American Psychological Association (.4PA) were followed regarding the references and

the editorial style. This practice is in line with the policy of the Programme in lndustrial

Psychology and WorkWell: The Research T-lnit for People. Policy and Performance.

North-West University. Potchefsiroom, South Africa.

The mini-dissertation is submitted in the form of a research article. The name of the study

leader appears on the article as it was sent for consideration for pub!ication.

Page 3: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

First and ,fo~wilost, I expres., tny humble grutitude to n v Crenior ,fi)r gruntirrg me the

opportuni@. ~alen!.s andperseverarm lo conlplete his rrudy.

In writing this mini-dissertation I was blessed with the direct and indirect assistance of many

people and organisations. I would like to thank each of the following kej individuals and

organisations for their respective contributions to the completion of this project:

MI; patient husband Marius and precious daughter Jean-Mari for their sacrifice; support.

and encouragement.

My parents Hannes and Nita and brothers Chris and Nico for thsir understanding and for

tolerating my absence in their lives during this research project.

0 My mentor Hannes van Renshurg for encouraging me to believe in my potential.

My friends Santie, Joanne and lolanda for their selfless emotional support.

0 Prof. S. Rothmann for his patient supervision, guidance, statistical analysis of the

empirical data, as well as the teclulical editing ofthis mini-dissertation.

hls. E. Roodt at the Ferdinand Postma Library for her assistance and guidance with the

literature starch. - Ms. C. van der Walt for the language editing

All the research participan7.s for their time and efl'url in completing the multiple

questionnaires.

0 My employer and the National Research Foundation for the financial assistance.

Page 4: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

TABLE OF COYTENTS

List of Tables

Abstract

Opsomming

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTIOR

1 . I Problem statement

1.2 Research objectives

1.2.1 General objective

1.2.2 Spccific objectives

1.3 Research method

1.3.1 Research design

1.3.2 Participants

1 .33 Measuring instxments

1.3.4 Statistical analysis

1.4 Chapter division

1.5 Chapter summary

References

Page

iv

CFL4PTER 2: ARTICLE 16

CHAPTER 3: CONCLUSION, LIMITATIONS AND RECOMMENDflIONS

3.1 Conclusion 54

3.1. l C:oncIusions in terms of specific theoretical objectives 54

3.1.2 Conclusions in tern~s of speciiic empirical objectives 56

3.2 Limitations of this research 58

.3 3 Recommendations 59

3 3 .1 Recon~n~endations for the organisation 60

i .3.2 Recommcndaticrns for future research 6 !

References 6:

Page 5: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

LIST OF TABLES

Description Page

Table 1

Characteristics of the Participants (A;= 202)

Table 2

Goodness-of-Fit Statistics for the Hypothcsised MBI-GS Model

Table 3

Goodness-of-Fit Statistics for the Hypothesiscd UWES Model

Table 4

Factor Loadings for Principal Factor Extraction and Varirnax Rotation on

JDRS items

Table 5

Descriptive Statistics, Alpha Coefficients and Product-Momeni

Correlation Coefficients of the Scales

Table 6

Multiple Regression Analyses with Exhaustion. Cynicism. Vigour and

Dedication as Dependent Variables

Table 7

Multiple Regression Analyses with I11 I Icalth as Dependent Variable

Table 8

Multiple Regression Analyses with Orgenisational Commitment

as Dependcnt Variable

Page 6: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

ABSTRACT

Title: Job charactcrist~ca, engagement, burnout and organisational commitrner~t of

management staff at a platinum mine in the North-West Province.

Kev terms: lob demands. job resources. engagement, bumout. organisational commitment.

management, mine.

In the new world economy the hey differentiator of competitive advantage is an

organisation's human resources. Increasingly_ cmployees hale to cope with multiple demands

arising from various rolcs. often with limited resources and no guarantee of job security. In

monitoring and improving employee effectiveness in coping with niuliiple new demands.

stimulating their growth and enhancing their well-being as well as organisational

performance, burnout and engagement are specific research areas.

'The objectives of this study were to investigate the relationships between humout.

engagement, job demands. job resources and organisational commitment of management s:aff

at a platinum mine in the North-West Province, and to determine which variables best predict

burnout, engagement and organisational commitmcut.

.4 cross-sectional survey design was used. The srudy population consisted of manasement

staff at a platinum mine in the North U'cst Province ( N = 202). The Job Demands-Resources

Scale, Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Maslach Burnout Inventory - General Suncy. a

Health Questionnaire, and an Organisational Commitment scale were administered.

Descriptive statistics, product-moment correlation coefficients and multiple regression

analyscs were used to analyse the data.

The results indicated that burnout correlated significantly with job demands, job resources.

cngagetnent, health and organisational commitment. Engagement. correlated significantly w i ~ h

job resources. health, and organisational comrnitmcnt. Exhaustion was best predicted by

workload. job insecurity and lack of resources whilst cynicism was predicted by poor

organisational support and advancement opportunities. Fngagement was bcst predicted by

organisational support. and organisational commitnlrnt \\'as predicted by both burnout and

engagement. 111 hcalth was predicted by exhaustion.

Page 7: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

Recommendations wcrc made for future research.

Page 8: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

OPSOMMING

Onderwerp: Werkseienskappe, begeestering. uitbranding en organisasieverbondenheid van

bestuurders by 'n platina-myn in die Noordwes Provinsie.

Sleutelwoorde: - Werkseise. werkhulpbronne, hegeestering. uitbranding. organlsaslever-

bondenheid, bestuurders. myn.

In die nuwe w&eldekonomie is 'n organisasic se enigste kompeterende voordeel sy menslike

hulpbronnne. Werknzmers moet toenemend voidoen aan veelvoudige werkseise wat

voortspruit uit meervoudige rolle - dikwels met beperkte hulpbronne en gccn waarborg van

werksekuriteit nie. Uitbranding en werksbegeestering is 'n spesifieke navorsingsarea rakende

die monitering en verbctcring van werknerner-doeltreffendheid, die stimulering v w

wcrknemel--goei: die verbetering van werknemer-welsyn asook die verbeterin~ van

organisasie-prestasie.

Die doelstellings van hierdie studie was om die verband tusscn uitbranding, begeestering.

werkseise, werkhulpbronne en organisasievcrbondenheid van bestuurdex by 'n platina-myn

in die Noordwes Provinsie te bepaal. en vas re stel watter veranderlikes uithranding.

begeestering en organisasieverbondenheid die beste voor~pel.

'n Dwarssnee opnarne-ontwcrp is gebruik. Die studiepopulasie hct bestam uir bestuurders b)

'n platina-myn in die. Noordwes I'rovinsie (IV = 202). Die Werkseise-hulpbronneskaal. Utrecht

Werksbegccsteri~lgskaal, Masiach-uitbrandingsvraelys - Algemene Opname. 'n

Gesondheidsvraelys en 'n Organisasieverbondenheid-skaal is afzenccm. Bcskirywende

statistiek: produk-moment-korreiasieko8fisientc en meervoudige regressir-analises is

gebnlik om die data tc ontleed.

Die resultate her aangetoon dat uitbranding verband hou rnct werkszisc, werkhulpbronne,

begeestering; gesondheid en organisatoriesc verbondenheid. Begeestering het verband gehou

met werkhulpbro~u~c, gesondheid en organisatoriese verbondenheid. Uitputting is die beste

deur werksiading. werksonsekerheid en 'n tekort aan hulpbronne voorspel. tcrwyl sinisme

deur gebrekkige organisatoriese ondersteuning en gebrekkige vorderingsgeleenthede

voorspel is. Begecstering is voorspel deur organisasie-ondersteuning. en

vii

Page 9: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

organisasieverbondenheid deur beide uitbranding en bcgeestering. Swak gesondheid is deur

uirputting voorspel.

Aanbevelings vir toekomstige navorsing is aan die hand gedoen.

Page 10: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

This mini-dissertation focuses on the relationships between job demands. job resources,

engagement. burllout and organisational commitment of management staff at a platinum mine

in the North-West Province.

In this chapter the rcseasch is motivated in terms of the problcm statement and the resezrch

objectives (including a general objecti\e and specific objectives). The research method is

explained and the division of chapters is given.

1.1 PROBLEM STATEMENT

Globalisation and international competition stimulate continuous economic, political.

technological and social changes with a profound impact on the world of work. peuplc and

their careers. As global pressurc increases. organisations worldwide are changing structures.

labour composition. reward systems. service contracts, technolog and information to

increase output with the same or rcduccd levels of resources (Schreuder & Theron. 2001 1.

These changes in the slobal organisational context are reflected in changcd psychological

contracts betwcen employers and employees. Employees arc expected to give more in terms

of time, effort. skills. and flexibility. whilst they receive less in terms of career opportunities.

lifetime employment. and job security (Maslach. Schaufeli. & Leiter, 2001).

South Africa is no exception. The country is currently ranked 49'h of 60 countries in thc

World Competitiveness Yearhook on criteria that include economic performance.

guvenment efficiency. business efficiency. and infrastructure. Specific dimensions of

business efficiency include productivity, the labour market, finance. management practices,

and attitudes and values (htt~:!hwwOl .~nlddch/\vc~i). Among other things. this ranking

reflects, the need to improve South .Africa's productivity level.

The economic and strategic importance of South Africa's mining industry is beyond dispute.

T'ne countr) is the world's largest producer of platinuni group metals among other minerals.

and has 90% of the world's platinum group metal reserves (Gastrow. 2001 ). The industry

Page 11: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

contributes significantly to economic activity. the development of sustainable job

opportunities, and foreign exchange earnings. I n the wave of globalisation, major companies

are increasinglq moving their prima!; listings to New York and London

(htl~::/i.southafrica.in!b/doina husiness/economvkey sectorslminin-m).

Thr company that fo.ms the interesr of shidy in this res-arch is the third larycst producer of

platinum group metals in the world. It is situated in the North-West Province and is listed on

the London stock exchange. South Africa's socio-economic transformation process presents a

specific legal challenge to the organiqation in the form ofthe Employment Equity Act. no. 55

of 1908 (South Africa, 1998) which aims to achieve full equity in the workplace though

promotion of equal opportunities and fair treatment, elimination of discrimination. and

implementation of affirmative action measures. Specific objectives include thc promotion

andlor appointment of Historically Disadvantayed South Afi'icans (HDSAs) into managerial

positions. The organisation's spccific target in this regard is 40% black persons in managerial

positions by the end of 2009 (http:/!www.dme.go~.za/minerais/miningc!iarter.hrm).

However. in an industry that competes for the same pool of human resources, retention of

black managers is problematic. Furthermore, white males are expected to coach and mentor

HDSAs in spite of their own employment and learning opportunities being threatened.

Improved productivity, organisational performance, organisational commitment and

engagement are now mort: critical than ever. due to the challenges bcing posed hy both the

Emplo.ynent Equity Act and internationel competition.

In the new world economy. the key difrerentiator of competitive advantage is thc

organisation's human resources (Mincrvini, Meyer. & Rourke, 2003; Veldsman. 2003).

Productivity improvement is only possible through the optimal functioning of employees.

Howeyer, employees have to cope with demands arising from various roles. often with

limited resources and no guarantee of job security. Employees have to be more multi-skilled.

technologically litcrate. and flexible as they are required to do different things for different

people in order to meet diversified needs (Mincwini el a].; 2003). In monitoring and

improving employee effectiveness in coping with multiple new demands. s~ imula t in~ their

crowth and enhancing their well bcing as well as organisational performance. burnout and - engagement are specilic research areaz (Maslach et al.. 2001)

Page 12: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

This study is approached from a systems perspective. The organisation is dependent on its

environment for providing inputs and receiving its final outputs and on its employees for

achieviug the outputs that facilitate organisational performance. Similarly. the employe? as

subsystem within the organisation, depends on rhe organisation for inputs, c . ~ . resources. and

role clarity that enable the delivery of work outputs, and for accepting hidher work outputs as

a meaningful contribution to organisational performance. The interdependence of the two

systems implies that the performance of the one will impact on that of the other (Ivanccvich

& Matteson. 1999).

This study focuses on the influence of organisational stressors on the wellness of managers

(as reflected by their levels of burnout and engagement). physical and psychological health.

and their commitment to their employinz organisarion.

Schaufeli and Enzmam (1 998) categorise organisational stressors as job demands and lack of

job resources. According to Rothmann (2002), thesz demands and lack of resources

contribute to burnout. Job demands refer to the '-things that have to be done" or work

activities to be performed and include the physical, social or organisalional aspects of the job

that require sustained physical and mental effort (Demeroud. Bakker. Nachreiner. B

Schaufeli. 2001). .lob demands include situational factors such as role ambiguity. role

conflict. stressful events, heavy workload and work pressure. pressure to make critical and

immediate decisions, being assigned more responsibility, and having to tncrt deadlines

(Rothmmn, 2002; Schaufcli d Enzmann. 1998). Job resources include all aspxts (physical.

psychological. social andlo; organisational) that reduce job demands, facilitate achievement

of work goals, andlor stimulate individual growth (Demerooti et al., 3001; Kothmann. 2002).

Burnout originally was conceptualised in the context of the helping professions (Rothmann.

2002). Schaufeli and Enzmann (1998) have found that employees in almost any job can

develop burnout. Rumout is defined as: '-a persistent. neyative. work-related state of' mind in

'normal' individuals that is primarily characterised by exhaustion, which is accompanied b!

distress, a sense of reduccd effectiveness, decreased motivation, and the developmeni of

dysfunctional attitudes and beha~iours at work" (Schaufeli & Enzmann. 1998. p.36). Maslach

et al. (2001) define it as a prolonged response to chronic emotional and intsrpersonal job

stressors. The dimensions of buruour are labelled as exhaust~on, cynicism m d low

professional efficacy (Maslach. Jackson. M Leiter. 1996).

Page 13: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

Contrary to the case of burnout: the concept of work engagement does not have a long

research history and emerged from a positive psychology perspective that focuses on

psychological health and well-being of the individual. rather than on psychological

dysfunction and ill health as is the case with burnout (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000).

According to Schaufeli and Bakker (1004). research has shown that even when exposed to

high job demands and working long hours. some individuals do not show symptoms of

burnout. Instead. they seem to find pleasure in dealing with these stressors. Such individuals

could be described as engaged in their work (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi. 2000).

According to Nelson and Simmons (2003). meaningful work leads to eustress. which can

promote engagement even in demanding conditions.

Engagement was initially regal-ded to he the direct opposite of burnout (Rothrnann. 1002).

However, Schaufeli. Salanova, Gonzalez-Romh. and Bakker (2001) consider the two

constructs to be opposites that should be measured independently with different instruments.

They have defined engagement as a positive, fulfilling. work-related state of mind

characterised b vigour, dedication. and absorption. Schutte. Toppinen. Kalimo. and

Schaufeli (2000) have defined engagement as an energetic state of employee dedication to

work performance and confidence of their effectiveness. Schaufeli and Bakker (2004) believe

that two dimensions of engagement are logically related to burnout, namel!; vigour (to

exhaustion) and dedication (to cynicism).

Disagreement exits about how engagement should he measured. Maslach et al. (1996)

measure engagement by reversing MBI scores. Schaufeli, Salanova. ct al. (2002) propose to

measure positive and negative work aspects independently. Exhaustion (depleted energy) and

cynicism or mental distancing (poor identification). arc the main features of burnout that are

assessed by the MB1 (Schaufeli, 2003); while the positive aspects of vigour (high energy) and

dedication (strong identification) can be measured b) the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale

(Schaufeli. Salanova. et al., 2007). The first psychometric results obtained with the Utrecht

Work Engagement Scale which assesses three characteristics (including vigour. dcdication

and absorption) of' engagement (Schaufeli. Martinez. P~nto. Salanova. & Rakker. 2002:

Schaufeli, Salanova: et al., 2002) are encouraging

Siu (2002) defines organisational commitment as the relative strength of an individual's

identification with and involvement in an organisation Sirnilarl~. Maslach et a1 (2001)

Page 14: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

define it as an employee's allegiance to the employing organisation. Newstrom and Davis

(1997) liken organisational commitment to employee loyalty and add to thcir definition. the

aspect of employee dcsirc to remain employed by the organisation and to continue active

participation in it. From these definitions. organisational commitment seems to encompass an

employee's belief in the mission and goals of the organisation, willingness to exert effort in

their accomplishment, and desire to continue working for the organisation.

A literature search has revealed an absence of previous research in the specific areas of

burnout and engagement within the platinum mining industr). in South Africa. Also. prior

research in the min~ng context has no1 fbcused exclusively on managerial staff. The value of

focusing on the platinum mining industry lies in its contribution to creating a broader picture

of the bumout and engagement phenomena in South Africa and enabling comparison across

different industries. Rothmann (2002) has found that burnout research in South Aliica lacks

empirical research and systematic investigation. and that it has serious scientific limitations

such as small sample sizes and poor research designs. This research can thus add to the pool

of empirical studies done in South Africa.

Ivancevich and Matteson (1999) believe that managers are responsible for the effectiveness

of individuals. groups and organisations. Managers are usually the initiators or coordinators

oforganisational change. DuBrin (1990) reports that managers who suffer from burnout harm

organisational effect~veness because they sprcad it to thcir subord~nates Verhaze and lorciaan

(2001) have found that employee burnout can be attributed to inadequate leadership.

inefiicient and dictatorial management. nepotism, lack of transparent), and poor

interpersonal relationships. From these findings it is evident that managers impact on thc

funct~oning and psychological health of subordinates. teams a n d thus the effectiveness and

productivity of the organisation. The significance of burnout for both the individual and the

organisation is found in its link to outcomes. which are related to job perfomiance. Burnout

has been associated with various forms oi'job withdrawal such as absenteeism, intcntion to

leave the job, and actual turnover (Maslach et al.. 2001). For those who stay on the job.

burnout leads to reduced productivity and effectiveness at work. Consequently, it is

associated with decreased job satisfaction and reduced commitment to the job or the

organisation (Maslach et al.. 2001 j.

Page 15: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

From the problem statement. the following research questions emerge:

How are the constructs job demands, job resources. burnout. engagement and

organisational commitment conceptualised in the literature?

What are the relationships between job demands, job resources, burnout. engagement and

organisational commitment?

Which of the variables predict burnout. engagement and organisational commitment

respectively'?

What recommendations could be made to prevent andlor manage burnout and promote

work engagement and organisational commitment of management staff at a platinum

mine?

1.2 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

The research objectives are divided into a general objective and specific objectives

1.2.1 General objective

The general objective of this study is to investigate the relationships between job dcmands.

job resources, burnout, engagement and organisational commitment of management staff at a

platinum mine in the North-West Province.

1.2.2 Specific objectives

The specific objectives of the research include:

To conceptualise the constructs job demands, job resources. burnout. engagement and

organisational commitment from the literature.

To assess the relationships between job demands: job resources, burnout. engagement and

organisational commitment.

To determine which variables best predict burnout. engagement and organisational

commitment.

Page 16: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

To make recommendations to prevcnt andlor manage burnout and promote work

engagement and organisational commitment of management staff at a platinum mine.

1.3 RESEARCH METHOD

The research method consists of a literature review and empir~cal study that encompasses the

research design. the participants the measuring instruments. and the statistical analysis to be

followed.

1.3.1 Research design

A survey design is used to attain the research objectives. The specific design is the cross-

sectional design that draws a sample from a population at one point in time (Neumari, 2000:

Shaughnessy & Zechmeister. 1997) to describe the population at that time. This design is

useful to assess interrelationships between the variables within the population and is ideally

suited to the descriptive and predictive purpose of corrclatiunal research (Shaughnessy &

Zechmeister. 1997).

1.3.2 Participants

A random sample of management staff is d r a m from the study population (X= 202)

1.3.3 Measuring instruments

Six questionnaires are used in the empirical study, namely the lob Demands-Resources Scale

(JDRS) (Demerouti et al.. 2001), the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (MRI-GS)

(Maslach el al.. 1996). the Utrecht Work Engafernent Scale (UWES) (Schaufeli, Salanova ct

al., 2002). the Health and Organisational Commitment subscales of the ASSET (An

Organizational Stress Screening Evaluation Tool) (Cartwight & Cooper. 2001). and a

biographical questionnaire.

The Job Dernarzds-Reso~trces Sculc (JDRS) (Demcrouti et al., 2001) has been contextualised

for the organisation through focus group interviews. resulting in the addition of items. The

contextualised questionnaire consists of 67 items and measurcs joh demands and job

Page 17: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

resources for employees. Questions are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (always) to 4

(never). The dimensions of the JDRS include pace, amount and variety of work, mental and

emotional load, opportunities to learn. work independence, relationships with colkagues and

immediate supervisor, ambiguities of work. infomlation, communications, participation.

contact possibilities, uncertainty about the future. remuneration, and career possibilities.

The Maslach Burnout Invenrory-GeneraI S u n q (MBI-GS) (Maslach et al.. 1996) is used to

measure burnout. The publication of the Maslach Burnout Inventory -General Survey (MBI-

GS) (Schaufeli. Leiter, Maslach. & Jackson, 1996) makes it possible to study humout outside

the service sector and to draw comparisons between different occupational groups. According

to Maslach et al. (2001) the MBI-GS, as a third general version of the Maslach Burnout

Inventory, evaluates burnout among professionals with and without the direct client contact

that characterises human service professionals. The MBI-GS consists of 16 items that

produce scores on: Exhaustion (with five items e.g. "I feel used up at the end of the

workday'.): Cynicism (with five items e.g. "I have become less enthusiastic about my work")

and Professional Efficacy (six items e.g. "In my opinion, I am good at my job") respectively.

Together. the subscales provide a three-dimensional perspective of burnout related to the

broader job and not just the personal relationships that are part of' the job (Maslach et al.,

2001). Internal consistencies (Cronbach alpha coefficients) vary from O,S7 to 0:89 for

Exhaustion. 0.73 to 0.84 for Cynicism and 0,76 to 0.84 for Professional Efficacy (Schaufeli.

Van Diederendonck. 6r Van Gorp. 1996). Test-retest reliabilities after one year werc 0.65

(Exhaustion). 0,60 (Cynicism) and 0.67 (Professional Efficacy). Items are scored on a 7-point

frequency rating scale ranging from 0 (never) to 6 (evei;vdu,v). High scores on Exhaustion and

Cynicism and low scores on Professional Efficacy are indicative of burnout.

The U~rccltr Work Engagcmcnl Scale (UWES) (Schaufeli et al.. 2002) is applied to measure

participants' levels of engagement. The UWES measures three dimensions: namely vigour.

dedication and absorption. all scored on a 7-point scale with the same range as the MBI-GS.

It includes statements such as "I am bursting with energy in my work"; "I find my work full

of meaning and purpose" and "I get carried away by my work". The alpha coefficients for the

three subscales vary between 0,78 and 0.89. Rothmann and Storm (2003) obtained alpha

coefficients of 0.78 for Vigour, 0.89 for Dedication. and 0.78 ror Absorption in a sample of

2 396 SAPS members.

Page 18: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

She Heulth Suhscale of the ASSET (An Organisational Stress Screening Tool) has been

developed by Cartwright and Cooper (2002) and is used to assess the respondents' level of

health. It consists of 19 items arranged on two subscales, namely Physical health and

Psychological well-being. All items on the Physical health subscale relate to physical

symptoms of stress. This subscale provides insight into physical health rather than a clinical

diagnosis. Examples of physical symptoms mentioned in the questionnaire include a change

in eating habits, indigestion or heartburn, insomnia, and panic or anxiety attacks. The items

on the Psychological well-being subscale are symptoms of stress-induced mental ill health.

Examples of psychological symptoms mentioned in the questionnaire include tendencies to

smoke or drink more than usual. loss of sense of humour. constant irritability or tiredness.

and mood swings. Johnson and Cooper (7003) have found that this questionnaire has good

convergent validity with an existing measure of psychiatric disorders. namely the General

Health Questionnaire.

'The Orgunisation Commi/nzent Subscalc o f the ASSET (Cartwright & Cooper. 2002) is used

to measure organisational commitment. This subscale consists of nine items divided into two

scales. namely commitment of the organisation to the employee. and commitment of the

employee to the organisation. This questionnaire reflects the non-economic reciprocal

obligations that exist between employer and employee (Cartwright & Cooper, 2002). The

items are scored on a scale varying from 1 (stronglv di.~ugree) to 6 (strongly trgree).

Commitment of the organisation to the employee is a five-item factor that measures the

extent to which individuals feel that their organisation is committed to them and that it is

worth "going the extra mile" for their organisation. It includes items such as: '.I feel valued

and trusted by my organisation". The Cronbach alpha value is 0,84. Commitment of the

employee to the organisation is a four-item factor that measures employee commitment

towards the organisation as demonstrated by their willingness to do their jobs as best they

can. loyalty, and dedication to the organisation. It includes items such as: "I feel that it is

worthwhile to work hard for this organisation". The Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient is

0,77.

A questionnaire is developed to gather information concerning the demographic

characteristics of the participants. The questionnaire will afford participants the option of

anonymous participation. Information gathered will include age. gender. race. marital status.

home language. highest education level; job level. years service in the curren! job. years

Page 19: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

service in the organisation, department within which participant is employed, and operational

unit the participant is working in.

1.3.4 Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis is carried out with the SPSS Programme (SPSS Inc., 2003) and the

Amos Programme (Arbuckle. 2003). Cronbach alpha coefficients and factor analysis are used

to assess the reliability and validity of the measuring instruments (Clark & Watson. 1995).

Descriptive statistics (e.g. means, standard deviations. skewness and kurtosis) are used to

analyse the data. Pearson correlation coefficients are computed to determine the relationships

between variables. In the case where the distribution of scores is skew, Spearman correlation

coefficients are computed. A cut-off point of p < 0,05 is set for the statistical significance of

the results. Effect sizes (Cohen, 1988) are used to decide on the practical significance of the

findings. A cut-off point of 0.30 (medium effect, Cohen, 1988) is set for the practical

significance of correlation coefficients.

Among the fit indices produced by the AMOS Programme is the Chi-square statistic (x2).

which is the test of absolute fit of the model. However, the X' value is sensitive to sample

size. Therefore. additional goodness-of-fit indices, such as the Goodness-of-Fit Index (GFI):

the Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index (AGFI). the Normed Fit Index (NFI), the Comparative

Fit Index (CFI): the Tucker-Lewis Index (TL.1) and the Root Means Square Error of

Approximation (RMSEA) are used in this study.

Standard multiple regression analysis is used to determine which combination ofjob demands

and job resources best predict burnout and work engagement. Furthermore, standard multiple

regression analyses are also used to assess whether burnout and work engagement predict ill

health and organisational commitment (Tabachnick & Fidell, 2001).

1.4 CHAPTER DIVISION

The chapters in the mini-dissertation are presented as follows:

Page 20: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

Chapter 1 : Introduction

Chapter 2: Research article

Chapter 3: Conclusion. limitations and recommendations

1.5 CHAPTER SUMMARY

Chapter 1 provides a motivation for this research in the form of the problem statement. In

addition to the problem statement. the objectives of the study and the research method are

outlined. and the division of chapters is provided.

Chapter 2 encompasses the complete study. The results ofthe statistical analysis are reported.

indicating the practical significance thereof. The findings of the study are discussed briefly.

Chapter 3 provides a comprehensive analysis and discussion of the literature and the research

results. Conclusions are drawn with reference to the specific research objectives.

recommendations are made for the organisation, and limitations of the study are discussed.

Page 21: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

REFERENCES

Arbuckle, J. L. (2003). 41iios 4.0. Chicago. IL: Smallwaters.

Broad-based Socio-economic Empowerment Charter for the South African Mining Industry.

Retrieved October, 19. 2004, from the World Wide Web:

littu:!/~w.d~ne.eov.zaimineralshinine cllarter.htm.

Cartwright, S., 8: Cooper? C. L. (2002). ASSET: An Or.gcrnizntioncr1 Stress Screening Tool -

The i2~crnrrgenien/ guide. Mnncliester, U K : Robertson Cooper Ltd.

Clark, L. A,, & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale

development. Psj~chologicd Assess~nenr. 7, 309-3 19.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statisriccd power. trnirlysis ,for. rhe behnvioraal sciences. Revised ed.

Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Demero~~ti, E., Bakker. A. B.. Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-

resources model of burnout. Ju~rrnnl ~ / ' A j ~ ~ ~ l i r t / P . ~ ) ~ c h o l o ~ : 86. 499-512.

DuBrin, A. J. (1990). Ejficrivc bl~sinessp~ychulogy (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-

Hall.

Gnstrow. P. (2001, April). Theft from South African Mines and Refineries. The illicit market

for gold and platinum. ~\lonogrr.oph, j4.Retrieved October, 21, 2004. from the World Wide

Web: litt~:C~~.iss.co.zdPubs/Monoerau1~~Mo54/CI~apl.ht1ii1.

Ivancevich, J. M., &: Matteson, M. T. (1 999). Urgmimtionnl brhrrvirnrr r ~ r d ~rrunc~gerneni (5'"

ed.). Singapore: Irwin McGraw-IIill.

Johnson, S.. & Cooper, C. (2003). Tlze C O I I S ~ ~ I I C I vnlidi/y of the ASSET slrcss rnetrsr/rc.

Manuscript made available by authors.

blaslach. C., Jackson. S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1996). Muslnch B~rrm~rt Inwntoq~: hhrnrtrl (3'"

ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Maslach. C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, hi. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annutrl Revieiv of

Ps~~cholog)~ 52. 397-422.

Minervini, R.: Meyer. M., & Rourke, L. (2003). H~onnn ctrpirtrl mnntrgernenr: A han~ihookfor

S,4 mclncrgers. South Africa: Writestuff Publishing.

Mining and Minerals in South Africa. Retrieved October. 19. 2004. from thc World Wide

Web: ht~p:ll/.southafrica.infoldoir~g busiriess/economv/kev sectors~minine.lit~i~

Page 22: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

Nelson. D. L., & Simmons, B. L. (2003). Health psychology and work stress: A more

positive approach. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tctrick (Eds.), Hrrndhook o f occ~pntiontrl l7enlth

psychology (pp. 97-1 19). Washington. DC: American Psychological Association.

Netmian, W. L. (2000). Socinl resmrch methods: Qrrcrlirntii~e ~ ~ n d q~mntitntii~e crppronche.~

(4'" ed.). London: Allyn R. Bacon.

Newstrom, J. W., & Davis, K. (1997). Orgnnizcrtionul beha~~iozrr: H11177an hehcrviorrr u/ i i w k

(10"' ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

Rothniann, S. (2002, November). Bt~rnoztr and engngernent: A ,fi)rtigenic pcrspecl i i~

Inaugural lecture presented at North-West University, Potchefstroo~n.

Rothniann. S., & Stonn, I<. (2003, May). Engcrgernent in the South Afrimn Police Service.

Poster session presented at the 11"' European Congress on Work and Organizational

Psychology. Lisbon, Portugal.

Schaufeli, W. B. (2003). Past performance and future perspectives of burnout research. Soz~tli

Africon .Journnl of Indzrstric~l P ~ j d ~ o h g y . 29(4), 1-1 5.

Schaufeli. W. B., & Bakker. A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship

with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Jo11rnn1 o f Orgcrnizntioncrl Behcriior.,

25. 293-315.

Schaufeli, W. B., Leitcr, M. P., Maslach, C., & Jackson, S.E. (1996). Maslach Burnout

Inventory - General Survey. In C. Maslach, S. E. Jackson & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), hhsltrch

B~~rnorrt hi~enlory hfnntrtrl (3'5d.). Palo Alto. CA: Consulting I'sychologists Press.

Schaufeli, W. R., & Enzmann. D. (1998). The b~rrnozrt cornpanion lo strrdj~ nr~tiprn~~tice: A

criticd m d v s i . ~ . London: Taylor & Francis.

Schaufeli, W. B., Martinez. I., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakkcr, A. 9. (2002). Burnout

and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Joztrnnl of Cross-C~dlrirtrl

P . y ~ c h o l o ~ . 33,464-481.

Schaufeli, W. B.. Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Ronia. V., & Bakker. A. B. (2002). The

measurement of engagement and burnout: A confirmatory analytic approach. Jorrn~crl of

H(1~~pi17es.s Stz~dies. 3. 71 -92.

Schaufeli. W. B.. Van Diederendonck, D., & Van Gorp, K. (1996). Burnout and reciprocity:

Towards a dual-level social exchange model. Work uridStress. 10, 225-237.

Schreuder, .4. M. ti., & Theron. A. L. (2001). Currers: An orgonisationnlpersprcli~~e. Cape

Town: Juta.

Page 23: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

Schotte. N.. Toppinen, S.. Kalimo, R.. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2000, March). The factorial

validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory - General Survey (MBI-GS) across

occupational groups and nations. Jolmnrrl of Occryntioncrl crnd Or.,qc~~~i;otionnl

Psycholop, 73, 53-66.

Seligman, M. E. P. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction.

A117ericc1ii Psychologist, jj, 5-14.

Shauglmessy. .I. J., & Zechmeister, E. B. (1997). Research nietliods in pxychology (4"' ed.).

New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Siu, 0. (2002). Occupational stressors and among Chinese employees: The role of

organisational commitment. A~~ldied Pxycho lo~: An lnter~~ationnl Review, jl, 527-544.

South Africa. (1998). Elllploy~trt.rrt Equilj' Act. rio. 55 of 19%'. (Updated 2002). Government

Printers: Pretoria.

SPSS Inc. (2003). SPSS I Z . O , f i r Wr~do~vs . Chicago, IL: Author.

Tabachnick. B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using r~irflth~nrinle stalistics (4"' ed.). Boston. MA:

Allyn & Bacon.

Veldsman, T. H. (2002). Into rile people eficthwiess arena: Nnvignting b m w e n clraos arid

order.. Johannesburg: Knowledge Resources.

Verhage, H. M., & Jordaan, tl. D. (2001, March). The ir~flrtelice of brrrnout 0 1 1 ~rcorlo~iiic

prod~il,crh'i/y Paper presented at the 1'' South African Burnout Conference, Potcl~efstroom.

World Competilivrness Yearhook. Retrieved October, 19, 2004. from the World Wide Web:

htto:/lwww0 1 .imd.cldwcy~.

Page 24: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

CHAPTER 2

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Page 25: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, BURNOUT AND ORGANISATIONAL

COMMITMENT OF MANAGEMENT STAFF AT A PLATINUM MINE IN THE

NORTH-WEST PROVINCE

J.H.M. JOUBERT

S . ROTHMANN

Workwell: Research Unit for People. Policy und Pe~formunce, North-West b'niversih'

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to investigate the relationships between burnout.

engagement, job demands, job resources, and organisational commitment of management

staff at a platinum mine in the North West Province. A cross-sectional survey d e s i ~ was

used. The study population (N = 202) consisted of management staff memhers. The

Maslach Burnout lnventoly - General Survey. Lltrecht Work Engagement Scale. Job

Demands-Resources Scale. and the Health and Organisational Commitment subscales of

the ASSET were administered. The results rewaled that exhaustion was predicted by

workload. job insecurit-\. and lack of resources while cynicism was predicted by lack of

organisational support and advancement opportunities. Engagement was best predicted

by organisational support. and organisational commitment was predicted by both burnout

and engagement. 111 health was predicted by exhaustion.

OPSOMMING

Die doel van hierdie studie was om die verband tussen uitbranding. begeestering.

werkseise, werkhulpbronne. en organisasieverbondenheid van hestuurders by 'n platina-

myn in die Noordwes Provinsie te ondersoeh. '11 Dwarssnee-opnameontwerp is gebruik.

Die studiepopulasie (N = 202) he1 hestaan uit bestuurspersoneel. Die Maslach-

uitbrandingsvraelys - Algemene Opname. Utrecht Werksbegeesteringskaal, Werkseise-

hulpbronneskaal en beide die Gesondheid- en Organisasieverbondenheidsubskale van dic

ASSET is afgeneem. Uitputting is voorspel deur werkslading. werksonsekerheid en

onvoldoende hulpbroune tenvyl sinisme deur gebrekkige organisasie-ondersteuninf en

gehrekkige vorderingsgeleenthede voorspel is. Befeestering is voorspel deur organisasie-

ondersteuning. en organisasieverbondenheid deur beidc uitbranding en hegeestering.

Swak fesondheid is deur uitputting voorspel

Page 26: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

Globalisation and continued intemational pressure on organisations to perform better with

fewer resources are reflected in the changing psychological contracts between employers and

employees. Employees arc expected to give more in terms of time. effort, skills and

flexibility whilst job security. career opportunities and lifetime employment are diminishing

(Maslach, Schaufeli; &: Leiter, 2001 j. South Africa and its mining industn are not excluded

from these pressures and impacts. The need to improve the country's productivity is reflected

in its poor ranking (49th of 60 countries) in the World Conlpetitiveness Yearbook

(htt~:Il~.wwOl.imd.~hi~~~.). The South African mining industq has 90% of the world's

platinum group metals among other minerals. Its contribution to the country's economic

activity and productivity is beyond dispute (Gastrow, 2001).

The key differentiator of competitive advantage in the new world economy is the

organisation's employees (Minemini_ Meyer, &: Rourke, 2003; Veldsman. 2002). However.

employees have to cope with increasing demands from various and diverse roles and

organisational stakeholders, often with limited resources (Minemini et al., 2003). In

monitoring and improving employee effectiveness in coping with multiple new demands.

stimulating their growth and enhancing their well-being as well as organisational

performance, burnout and engagement are specific research areas (Maslach et al., 2001 ).

I\:ancevich and Matteson (1999) believe that managers are responsible for the effectiveness

of individuals, groups and organisations. DuBrin (1990) reports that managers who suffer

from burnout harm organisational effectiveness because they sprcad it to their subordinates.

Employees who experience burnout can impact negatively on their colleagues by causing

personal conflict and disrupting job tasks. Burnout can thus be "contagious" and perpetuate

itself through the informal interactions on the job. Verhage and Jordaan (2001) have found

that employee burnout can be attribured to inadequate leadership, inefiicient and dictatorial

management. nepotism. lack of transparency and poor interpersonal relations. Rothniann

(2002) reports that burnout contributes to low morale, job dissatisfaction. staff turnover and

absenteeism and can lead to deterioration in the quality of service rendered by staff. From

these findings it can be deduced that managers can impact directly or indirectly on employee

effectiveness and organisational outcomes such as turnover.

According to Jackson. Rothmann. and Van de Vijver (in press). empirical studies lia\,e

confirmed that burnout is related to health problems and turnover intentions. and that i t

Page 27: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

(rement mediates the relationship between job demands and health problems. Also. enga,

mediates the relationship between job resources and turnover intentions.

The objectives of this study were firstly to determine the relationships between job demands.

job resources. burnout, engagement, and organisational commitment at a platinum mine in

the North-West Province where no research of this kind has been conducted before, and

secondly, to determine whether organisational commirment can be predicted by burnout and

work engagement.

Burnout and engagement

Although burnout has originally been conceptualised in the contest of the helping professions

(Rothmann, 2002), it has recently expanded to all types of professions and occupational

groups (Schaufeli & Enzmann. 1998). Schaufeli and Enzmann (1998, p. 36) define burnout as

"a persistent, negative. work-related state of mind in normal individuals that is primarily

characterised by exhaustion. which is accompanied by distress, a sense of reduced

effectiveness, decreased motivation. and the development of dysfunctional attirudcs and

behaviours at w o r k . Burnout is a pathogenically defined construct that is characterised by

emotional exhaustion. cynicism and reduced professional efficacy (Maslach et nl.. 2001).

More recently. in using adapted versions of the MBI. burnout has been conceptualised in

temis of exhaustion, mental distance (cynicism and depersonalisatlon). and reduced

professional efficacy (Barkhuizen. 2005: Jackson & Rothmann. 2005).

Seen from a theoretical perspective, exhaustion and mental distancing (cynicism or

depersonalisation) constitute the core of burnout (Schaufeli, 2003). Exhaustion represents the

individual stress component of bumout (Maslach et al.. 2001) and refers to feelings of being

overextended and depleted of emotional and physical resources. i.e. incapable of work

performance because all energy has been drained. Ln the development of burnout, exhaustion

emerges first in response to an overly demanding work environment (Leiter. 1993). Cynicism

entails a general indifferent, callous or cynical attitude towards the work. To cope with

excessive job demands and feelings of exhaustion, the individual psychologically withdraws

from the work (mental distancing) (Maslach et al., 2001). Mental distancing can thus be

described as an employee's unwillingness to perform because of an increased intolerance to

make any effort (Schaufeli. 2003). When this coping strategy becomes habitual - as is the

Page 28: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

case with cynicism and depersonalisation - it becomes dysfunctional and disrupts work

performance. in turn, this leads to an increase in job demands and exhaustion that completes

the vicious circle.

Professional efficacy refers to an individual's negative self-evaluation of competence.

achievement and productiveness, as will as feelings of insufficiency (Schaufeli & Buunk.

1996). Reduced professional efficacy results primarily from cynicism (sequential link), is the

weakest bumout dimension in terms of significant relationships with other variables. and is

often referred to as the "least specific" or "unnecessary" dimension of burnout (Lee &:

Ashforth, 1996; Schaufeli. 2003). Professional inefficacy appears to develop parallel to

exhaustion and cynicism, and originates from a lack of resources whilst exhaustion and

cynicism emerge from work overload and social conflict (Maslach et al., 2001). Several

authors argue that professional efficacy reflects a personality characteristic rather than a

genuine burnout dimension (Cordes & Dougherty, 1993: Shirom, 1989).

Seiler and Pearson (1983-5) noted that the consequences of dysfunctional stress (burnout)

include two forms of withdrawal: The employee may resign (physical withdrawal) or the

employee may remain in employment but continue to do the bare minimum (psychological

withdrawal). Maslach. Jackson. and Leiter (1996) hypothesised that burnout, as a result ofjob

demands and lack of job resources; can lead to negative outcomes such as physical illness.

staff rumover and absenteeism. Research has linlted burnout to a variet? of mental and

physical health problems (Lee &r Ashforth, 1990: Maslach. 1982). increased absenteeism

(Leiter &: Harvie. 1998). and decreased quality and quantity of work performance (Biix.

Cruise, Mitchell. & Blix: 1994; Maslach & Jackson, 1984). Eventually. individuals may leave

the job or profession as a culmination of burnout (Jackson & Simpson, 2001; Watts, Cox.

Wright, Garrison. Herkimer. &r Howze, 1991).

Empirical studies revealed that some individuals, in comparison with others, do not develop

burnout regardless of high job demands and excessive working hours. To the contrary. they

seem to find pleasure in working hard and dealing with job demands (Nelson & Simmons:

2003; Schaufeli & Bakker, 2001). This discovery saw the emergence of theoretical and

empirical studies on the concept of engagement. Initially. engagement was regarded to be the

direct opposite of burnout (Rothmann. 2002). However. Schaufeli. Salanova. Gonzalez-

Roma. and Bakker (2002) have operationalised enpgement as a construct in its own right.

Page 29: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

Research on engagement has adopted a positive psychology perspective that focuses on

psychological health and well-being rather than psychological ill health. as is the case with

burnout (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000).

Schaufeli and Bakker (2002) define engagement as a persistent. positive. fulfilling work-

related state of mind, characterised by vigour, dedication and absorption. It is not focused on

a specific object, event, individual or behaviour (Schaufeli & Bakker, 2003). Vigour refers to

high levels of energy and resilience. willingness to invest effort in one's work. and

perseverance in the face of difficulties. Dedication refers to strong involvement in one's work

accompanied by feelings of enthusiasm and signiiicance. and a sense of pride and inspiration

(Maslach et al.. 2001). Absorption refers to a satisfactory state of complete emersion in one's

work that is characterised by focused attention; time distortion, loss of self-consciousness.

effortless concentration, absolute control_ and intrinsic en.joyment (Csikszentmihalyi. 19901.

According to Schaufeli and Bakker (2004): burnout and engasement are indicators of

employees' wellness. A theorerical analysis done by these authors identify two underlying

dimensions of work wellness. namely: ( I ) activation. ranging from exhaustion to vigour. and

(2) identification, ranging from cynicism to dedication. Theoretically speaking. burnout is

thus characterised by a combination of exhaustion (low activation) and mental distance (poor

identification). whereas engagement is chracterised by vigour (high activation) and

dcdication (strong identification). Accordingl).. viyour and dedication arc considcred to be

direct opposites of exhaustion and mental distance respectively.

With the increased inrerest in positive psychology, burnout and work engagement should be

integrated as one model (Rothmann, 2002). According to Maslach et al. (2001). the study of

work-related experiences should include the entire continuum of work-related experiences.

ranging from negative (burnout) to positive (work engagement). However, burnout and

engagement are best measured with different instruments (Schaufeli. Salanma. et al.. 2002).

The Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (MBI-GS) measures burnout across

occupational settings mhilst the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) measures

engagement more effectively (Schaufeli. Salanova. et al.. 3002).

Page 30: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

Job demands and resources

Several theories and models have been developed to explain the effects of job demands (e.g.

work overload) and lack of resources (e.g. job control) on burnout. These include the

Conservation of Resources (COR) theory (I-Iobfoll 8: Freedy, 1993; Lee 8: Ashforth. 1996).

the Job Demands-Resources (ID-R) model (Demerouti, Bakker, Nachreiner, 8: Schaufeli.

2001) and the Comprehensive Burnout and Engagement (COBE) model. an extension of the

JD-R model with engagement. health impairment and organisational withdrawal as additional

components (Schaufeli & Baker. 3004). The theory underlying these models. proposes that

burnout develops in response to excessive job demands and diminished job resources.

The COBE model assumes two job-related psychological processes, namely an energetic and

a motivational process (Jackson, et al.. in press). The energetic process links job demands

with health problems via burnout. The motivational process links job resources with

organisational outcomes via work engagement. Jackson. et al. (in press) report that the model

has been confined in the Netherlands by Schaufeli and Baliker (2004) in an empirical study.

with job demands being associated with exhaustion, and job resources with work engagement

respectively. Burnout is mainly predicted by job demands and lack of resources. it is related

to health problems and turnover intentions. and mediates the relationship between job

demands and health problems. Engagement is exclusively predicted by availability of job

resources: relates onl}. to turnover intentions. and mediates the relationship between job

resources and turnover intentions.

COR theory (Hobfoll & Freedy, 1993) suggests that burnout is likely to develop when valued

resources are lost or threatened, or are inadequate to meet the demands. Major demands

include role ambiguity, work pressure and workload. Major resources include control.

participation in decision-making and job autonomy (Lee & Ashforth. 1996). '4ccording to

Leiter (1993), demands and resources are related. A work environment which is overly

demanding usually also offers insufficient resources.

The Job Demand-Control (DC) model developed by Karasek (1979) specifies two

independent inputs which influence strain or stress: job demands and control of the work

situation. Strain or stress refers to psychological stress such as time pressure and having too

much work to do (Cooper & Payne. 1978). Job demands involve the organisation of \vork in

Page 31: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

terms of employees' authority to make decisions about their own work activities and skill

usage (decision authority or job decision latitude). According to the model job strain and

related health problems occur in siruations where high demands coincide with low conrrol.

The second hypothesis of the DC model is that high demand together with high decision

latitude lead to positive learning of new behaviours, skills or procedures, and possibly

improved health through long-term positive changes in coping abilities. The importance of

job control as a health protecting factor has repeatedly been demonstrated (Landsbergis,

Schnall. Warren; Pickering, & Schwartz. 1994).

The effect of control remains even after adjusting for the confounding effects of

demographics. biological risk factors. health habits and psychosocial factors such as

personalit). traits. negative life events, social support, job insecurity. and downsizing

(Kivimaki. Vahtera; Thomson. Griffiths, Cox, & Pentti, 1997). According to Iacovides.

Fountoulakis. Kaprinis, and Kaprinis (2003), inadequate control over one's work, frustrated

hopes and the feeling of loosing meaning in life seems to be important causes of burnout. A

large number of studies have showed that job control. and sometimes job demands, are

critical components in a healthy work environment as indicated by various health outcomes

(Elovainio. Forma, Kivimaki, Sinervo. Sutinen. & Laine, 2005).

Taris. Schreurs, and Schaufeli (1999) reported that a strong correlation exists between

burnout and job stress (situational or organisational factors). Schaufeli & Enrn~ann (1998)

categorise organisational stressors as job demands and lack of job resources. Job demands

refer to the things that have to be done or activities to be performed and include the physical.

social or organisational aspects of the job that require sustained physical and mental effort

(Demerouti et al.. 2001). Job demands include situational factors such as role ambiguity. role

conflict, stressful events. heavy workload and work pressure. pressure to make critical and

immediate decisions; being assigned more responsibility and having to meet deadlines

(Rothmann, 2002; Schaufeli & Enzmann. 1998).

Many burnout researchers have studied quantitative job demands (e.g. too much work for the

available time). The findings generally indicate that burnout is a response to overload. Heavy

workload and time pressure are strongly and consistently related to burnout, particularly the

exhaustion dimension (Maslach et al.. 2001'). Studies of qualitative job demands have focused

primarily on role conflict and role ambiguity. both of which consistently show a moderatc to

Page 32: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

high correlation with burnout. Role conflict occurs when conflicting demands at the lob have

to be met. whereas role ambiguit) occurs when there is a lack of adequate information to do

the job well (Maslach et al.. 2001).

Job resources refer to all aspects (physical. psychological, social andlor organisational) that

reduce job demands. facilitate achievement of work goals. and/or stimulate individual growth

(Demerouti ei a1.. '7001 : Rothmann. 2002). Job resources include social support (supervisory

and collegial). job enhancement opportunities in the form of increased control and autonomy,

participation in decision-making. reinforcement contingencies (Burke & Richardsen, 1993') as

well as recognition, opportunities for advancement and rewards (Rothmann. 2003).

Burnout researchers have also investigated the absence of job resources. Consistent and

strong evidence exists of a correlation between lack of social support and burnout, with lack

of supervisory support being more important than support from co-workers (Mahcr, 1983:

Maslach et al.. 2001: Peerers Bi Le Blanc, 2001). Correlations havc also been confirmed

between lack of feedback and all three dimensions of burnout, and between lack of autonomy

and burnout. Verhage and Jordaan (2001) have found that hurnout is caused by poor

incentives. lack of recognition and inadequate professional supporl: among other things.

People who enjoy little participation in decision-making seem to expcriencc higher levels of

burnout (Maslach et a1.: 2001). Schaufeli and Bakker (2002) report that job demands,

including physical demands, time pressure and shift work, are associated with exhaustion,

whereas insufficient job resources. e.2. feedback. control. participative decision-making and

supervisory support, are associated with disengagement.

Based on the above discussion, the following hypotheses are fonnulated:

Hjpotltesis I : Burnout is predicted by job demands (i.e. work overload) and a lack of job

resources.

ff~vporizesis 2: Work engagement (vigocr and dedication) is predicted by job resources

Page 33: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

I11 health

Research evidence consistently links occupational stress with physical and psychological ill

health. According to Maslach et al. (2001), perceived stressors lead to emotional reactions

that, in turn, lead to ill health. Physical ill health manifests in symptoms such as migraine;

heart disease. ulcers, allergies. and back problems. Psychological ill health manifests in

stress-induced symptoms such as depression. mood swings. irritability, etcetera. aud

behaviours such as a tendency to smoke or drink more than usual, loss of sense of humour.

etcetera. Both physical and psychological ill health have been associated with stress and

burnout (Ho? 1997; Ryff & Singer, 1998; Sethi & Schuler, 1990).

Based on the above discussion, the following hypothesis is formulated:

Hypothesis 3: Exhaustion and cynicism predict phjsical and psychological ill health.

Organisational commitment

Siu (2002) defines organisational commitment as the relative strength of an individual's

identification with and involvement in an organisation. Similarly. Maslach et al. (2001 1

define it as an employee's allegiance to the organisation that provides employment.

Organisational commitment refers to employee loyalty, employee desire to remain employed

by the organisation and to continue actively participating in it jNewstrom & Davis. 1997).

From these definitions, organisational commitment can be described as an employee's

psychological attachment to the organisation.

Cartwight and Cooper (2002) identified two aspects of organisational commitment. namely

commitment of the organisation towards the employee (i.e. the degree to which employees

feel trusted, valued and respected by the organisation) and comrnitmcnt of the employee

towards the organisation (i.e. the extent to which employees are loyal and dedicated to the

organisation).

Organisational commitment can be relatively strong because it is too costly for an individual

to leave the organisation or because the indixiduai shares goals with the organisation and

wishes to maintain his or her membership (Blau 8i Boal, 1987). It interacts with sources of

Page 34: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

stress at work to determine the outcomes thereof. Organisational commitment relates

positively with desirable work outcomes_ including employee job satisfaction, motivation and

performance. and negatively with absenteeism and turnover (Mathieu & Zajac, 1990).

Organisational commitment seems to diminish in the presence of burnout (Leiter & Maslach.

1988). Organisational commitment and work engagement are related concepts but not

identical. Organisational commitment focuses on the organisation whereas engagement

concerns the work itself (Maslach et al., 2001).

Work engagement may be regarded as an antecedent to organisational commitment in that

individuals who experience high levels of work engagement identify with their organisations

(Jackson et al.. in press). Taris. et al., (1999) have interviewed engaged workers and

concluded that their values are aligned with those of their organisations. Aktouf (1992) has

confirmed that disengagement leads to lack of organisational commitment.

Based on the above discussion. the following hypothesis is formulated:

Hypolhesis 4: Vigour and dedication predict organisational commitment

METHOD

Research design

A cross-sectional survey design. by means of which a sample is drawn from a population at a

particular point in time (Shauglmessp & Zechmeister, 1997). was used to achieve the research

objectives.

Participants

Of the study population (A'= 3 10) a sample of 202 management level employees across the

different operational units of a platinum mine in the North-West Province was taken. The

characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1

Page 35: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

Table 1

Characteristics of the Participanls (A' = 202)

Vsr i ab l c Cate~n l ) Percentagt

Agc (years) 25-30 7.90

Gendcr

Race

Other

M m q valuci

Gradc I? or below

Icchntcal Cu l l r e r Cenificate

Management 1.evelllob tiradtng D-lcvel 67.40

E ~ l c v c l ? M U

F l e w (indude execuuve team, 6.50

Page 36: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

The sample consisted mainly of Afrikaans-speaking (61.90%) and of English-speaking

participants (25.70%). They were mostly within the age $goup 41 to 50 (45%), mostly white

(84,70%) and mostly men (88,60%). Most are employed at the first level of management.

namely D-Level Paterson Grading (67,40%) and most have attained a teclmikon diploma

(26.20%).

Measuring instruments

The follow instruments were used in this study:

The Maslac11 Burnour Inventory-General S u n q (MBI-GS) (Maslach et al., 1996) was used

to measure burnout. The MBI-GS consists of 16 items that produce scores on: Exhaustion

(five items, e.g. "I feel used up at the end of the workday"), Cynicism (five items, e.g. "I have

become less enthusiastic about my work") and Professional Efficacy (six items, e.g.. "In my

opinion, 1 am good at my job'') respectively. Together. the subscales provide a three-

dimensional perspective of burnout that relates to the broader job and not only to the personal

relationships that are part of the job (Maslach ei al.. 2001). Schaufeli, Van Diederendonck.

and Van Gorp (1996) reported Cronbach coefficient alphas varying from 0.87 to 0.89 for

Exhaustion. 0,73 to 0.84 for Cynicism and 0.76 to 0.83 for Professional Efficacy. Test-retest

reliabilities after one year were 0,65 (Exhaustion), 0_60 (Cynicisml and 0,67 (Professional

Efficacy). The items are scored on a 7-point frequency rating scale ranging from O (never) to

6 (alwaw/rverydq). In South African studies, Cronbach alpha coefiicients ranged from 0:86

to 0,88 for Exhaustion, and 0,79 to 0,80 for Cynicism (Coetzer & Rothmann. 2004: Storm &

Rothmann, 2003a).

The CJtrech/ Work Engugenzenf Sculc (UWES) (Schaufeli, Salanova, et a]., 2002) was applied

to measure participants' levels of engagement. The UWES consists of 17 items that produce

scores on: Vigour (5 items, e.g. "I am bursting with energy in my work"), Dedication (5

items, e.g. "I find my work full of meaning and purpose") and Absorption (7 items, e.g. ;'I get

carried away by my work"). Items are scored on a 7-point scale ranging from 0 (never.) to 6

(ulwuydeveryday). The alpha coefficients for the three subscales varied between 0,68 and

0.91 (Schaufeli. Salanova; et al.. 2U02). Alpha coefficients varied between 0.78 and 0.89 for

the three subscales by eliminating a few items without substantially decreasing the scale's

Page 37: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

internal consistency. Storm and Rothrnann (2003b) obtained alpha coefficients of 0.78 for

Vigour. 0,89 for Dedication and 0.78 for Absorption in a sample of 2396 SAPS members.

The Job Demands-Resources Scale (JDRS) was developed for the organisation through focus

group interviews. The contextualised questionnaire consists of 67 items and measures job

demands and job resources for employees. Questions are rated on a 4-point scale ranging

from 1 (alwcrys) to 4 (never). The dimensions of the JDRS include pace, amount and ixiety

of work. physical, mental and emotional workload. opportunities to learn, work

independence, relationships with colleagues and immediate supervisor. ambiguities of work,

information, communications, participation, contact possibilities; uncertainty about the

future. remuneration and career possibilities.

The Health .vuhscale of the ASSET (an Organisational Stress Screening Tool), which was

developed by Cartwright and Cooper (2002). was used to assess the respondents' level of

health. It consists of 19 items arranged 011 two subscales: Physical health and Psychological

well-being. All items on the Physical health subscale relate to physical symptoms of' stress.

This subscale provides insight into physical health rathei- than a clinical diagnosis. Examples

of physical symptoms mentioned in the questionnaire include a change in eating habits.

indigestion or heartburn. insomnia. panic or anxiety attacks, etcetera. The items on the

Psychological well-being subscale include symptoms of stress-induced mental ill health.

Examples of psychological symptoms menriotled in the questionnaire include tendencies to

smoke or drink more than usual. loss of sense of humour. constant irritability or tiredness.

mood swings, etcetera. This subscale gives an insight into psychological health. also not an

in-depth clinical diagnosis. Johnson and Cooper (2003) found Gunman split-half reliability

coefficients of O,74 for Physical Health and 0:91 for Psychological Health respectively. and

that this questio~lnaire has good convergent validity with an existing measure of psychiatric

disorders. the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12; Goldberg & Williams, 1988).

The Organisarion Cornmihnenr Subscalr of the ASSET (Cartwright & Cooper, 2002) was

used to measure organisational commitment. This subscale consists of 9 items divided intc

two scales, namely Commitn~ent of the organisation to the employee, and Commitment of the

employee to the organisation. This questionnaire reflects thc non-economic reciprocal

obligations that exist between employer and employee (Cartwright & Cooper, 2002). The

items are scored on a scale varying from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongi)~ uxree). Johnson

Page 38: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

and Cooper (2003) found a Guttman split-half reliability coefficient of 0,74 for the scale.

Commitment of the organisation to the employee is a five-item factor that measures the

extent to which individuals feel that their organisation is committed to them and that it is

worth "going the extra mile'' for their organisation. It includes items such as: "I feel valued

and trusted by my organisation". The Cronbach alpha value is 0$4. Commitment of the

employee to the organisation is a four-item factor that measures employee commitment

towards the organisation as demonstrated by their willingness to do their jobs as best the)

can, loyalty and dedication to the organisation. It includes items such as: "1 feel that it is

worthwhile to work hard for this organisation". The Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient is

0,77.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was carried out with the SPSS Programme (SPSS Inc., 2003) and the

Amos Programme (Plrbuckle, 2003). Cronbach alpha coefficients and factor analysis were

used to assess the reliability and validity of the measuring instruments (Clark &I Watson.

1995). Descriptive statistics (e.g. means and standard deviations) were used to analyse the

data. Pearson correlation coefficients were computed to determine the relationships betwecn

variables. A cut-off point of p 5 0,05 was set for the statistical significance of the results.

Effect sizes (Cohen, 1988) were used to decide on the practical significance of the findings.

A cut-off point of 0.30 (medium effect. Cohen; 1988) was set for the practical significance of

correlation coefficients.

Exploratory factor analyses were carried out to investigate the construct validity of the Health

and Commitment Scales, as well as the JDRS following a two-step procedure. First. a simple

principal components analysis was conducted on the constructs that form part of the

measurement model, including burnout and work engagement, and ill health. The eigen

values and scree plots were studied to determine the number of factors. Second, a principal

components analysis with a direct oblimin rotation was conducted if factors were related, and

a principal component analysis with a varimax rotation was used if the obtained factors were

not related (Tabachnick & Fidcll. 2001).

Structural equation modelling was used to assess the factorial validity of the measurins

instruments of burnout, work engagement. and organisational commitment. .4mon: the tit

Page 39: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

indices produced by the AMOS Programme is the Chi-square statistic ( x ~ ) , which is the test

oS absolute fit of thc model. However, the X 2 value is sensitive to sample size. Therefore

additional goodness-of-fit indices. such as the Goodness-of-Fit Index (GFI), the Ad,iusted

Goodness-of-Fit Index (AGFI), the Nomed Fit Index (NFI,!, the Comparative Fit Index

(CFI). the Tucker-Lewis Index (TLIj and the Root Means Square Error of Approximation

(RMSEA) were used in this study.

Standard multiple regression analysis was used to determine which combination of job

demands and job resources best predict burnout and work engagetnent. Furthermore. stmdard

multiple regression analyses were also used to assess whether work wellness (bumout and

work engagement) predict ill health and organisational commitment (Tabachnick & Fidell.

2001 j.

RESULTS

Structural equation modelling (SEM) methods as implemented by AMOS (Arbuckle. 1999)

were used to test the factorial models of the MBI-GS. and the UWES. Data analysis was

conducted in two consecutive steps. Firstly, quick overviews of the model fits were done by

inspecting the overall X' values. together with the degrees of freedom and probabiliry values.

Several goodness-of-fit statistics (GFI. AGFI, NFI, TLI. CFI and Rh4SEA) were used to

globally assess the model tits. Secondly, given findings of poorly fitting initially

hypothesised models. the focus shifted from model testing to model development

(exploratory factor analysis). Exploratory analyses were done for the JDRS as well as the

Health and Organisational Subscales of the ASSET. To fit revised, rr-specified models to the

data. possible misspecifications, as suggested by the so-called modification indices, werc

looked for.

Hypothesised model: MBI-GS

The full hqpothesised three-factor model consisting of all 16 items \vas tested. Table 2

presents fi t statistics for the test of the original and other modds.

Page 40: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

'Table 2

The Goodness-ofjit Sratis/ies$r the Hypothesised MBI-GS Modei

-

Mndcl X' y'ldf GFI AGFI WI IF1 1‘1-1 CFI RMSEA

Model I 652.48 6.27 0.61 0.4Y 0.56 0.60 0.54 0.60 0.16

Model 5 17?,7.1 1.01 0.91 0.87 0.88 0.94 0.92 0.94 0.07

Model h 165.25 1.94 (1.9 l 0 87 0 89 0.91 0.93 0.94 0.117

Table 2 indicates that the statistically significant X' value of 652.48 (df = 104: p 0,00)

revealed a relatively poor overall fit of the hypothesised I-factor MBI model. Th: same

applies to the hypothesised 2-factor MBJ model (x' = 320.63). Seen from a practical

perspective, both Models 1 and 2 were also not good. The NFI, TLI and CFI values lower

than 0.95. and RMSEA values higher than 0,05 are indicative of failure to confirm to

hypothesised models. It is thus apparent that some modification in specification is needed in

order to determine a model that fits the sample data better.

To pinpoint possible areas of misfit. modification indices (MI) were examined. 1,ooking at

the regression weights. one parameter which represents the cross-loading of ltem 13 indicated

a considerably lower regression weight compared to other MBI items.

Based on the regression weights and standardised residual covariances, the hypothesised 3-

factor model labelled here as Model 3 was re-estimated with ltem 13 removed. With Model 3

(Item 13 removed). the data fit improved c X 2 improved from 194,72 to 182.26). In Model 5

the errors of item pair 1 and 2 (MI = 8.54) were allowed to correlate. In the final model,

which is labelled Model 6: the errors of Items I I and 17 (MI = 7.30) were further allowed to

correlate, which resulted in a better Chi-square value of 165.25. The subsequent analysis is

therefore based on the 15-item revision (Model 6). including both error correlations. After

testing Model 6, the s2 value of 165.25 (df= 85; p < 0.0001) and other indices (CFI > 0.90;

x2 /d f '= 1,93) improved. compared to those in the other models. Although the 1' value of

Page 41: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

165.25 is still high, it is considerably lower than those in the other models. The other fi t

statistics indicate a good fit for the re-specified model.

Similar procedures were followed to determine the fit statistics for the LrWES.

Table 3

The Goodnes.s-q/{fit Statisticsfor the Hypothesised UF'ES Model

Model %? y.'ldf GFI AGFI NFI IF1 TLI CFI RMSEA

Model I 70.05 2.00 0.93 0.90 O.Y.3 0.97 0.96 0.97 0.07

Model 2 53.24 1.57 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.05

Both one-factor and two-factor models were tested. Table 3 shows that a two-factor model

labelled here as Model 2: better tits the data set with a lower statistically significant r' value

of 53.24 (df.= 34; p = 0.02). and NFI. TLI and CFI values all higher than 0,95. and RMSEA

value of 0.05 lower than the RMSEA value of 0.07 for Model 1. In order to determine a

model that better represents the sample data, modification indices (MI) were examined to

identify possible areas of misfit. Item 15 was retained in spite of a relativel~, low standardised

regression weight of 0,38.

Post hoe analysis

As with other South African studies, the items on the .Absorption factor were problematic

(due to either low internal consistencies or poor loadings) and were therefore excluded from

Model 2 (Rothmann, 3005). This improved the X' value to 53.24 (df = 34: p = 0.02). The

subsequent analysis is therefore based on a ?-factor model of the UWES, with Items 1: 4, 8.

12 and 15 loading on Vigour: and Items 2, 5 , 7, 10 and 13 loading on Dedication.

A simple principal component analysis which was conducted on the nine items of the

Organisational Commitment Subscale of the ASSET showed two factors, which explained

71,13% of the total variance. The scree plot also confirmed two extracted factors. Nest. a

principal component analysis with a direct oblimin rotation was conducted on the items. T u n

factors. namely Afictive Conzmitnzcnt and BehmCozrral Co~nmitnzent were extracted. The two

factors were relatively strongl) related ( I . = 0.53).

Page 42: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

A sin~ple component analysis which was conducted on the 19 items of tine Health Subscale

showed that four factors, which explained 60.32% of the total variance could be extracted.

However, the scree plot suggested two factors. Next. a principal component analysis with a

direct oblimin rotation was conducted on the items. Two related factors (r = 0.61), namely

Physical Ill health and Psychological Ihzwell-being were extracted.

A simple component analysis that was conducted on the 67 items of the JDRS resulted in five

factors, which explained 42,16% of the variance. Next. a principal component analysis with a

varimax rotation was conducted otl the items. The results of the factor analysis on the JDRS

are shown in Table 4. The loading of variables on factors is shown. Labels for each factor are

suggested in the footnote.

Page 43: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

Table 4

Factor Loadings for Principal Facior Extraction and T'ar*in~a.x Rolarion on .JDRS Items

Item

I feel that m y manager appreciates my *'ark

I can dlicusi w o r l prohlcmi with my manazer

My manager infomi mc ahout how wcll I am domg my w r k

I get on well ivlth my managcr

The dcpartmenl i decliron-makmg process li clear u, me

I can count on my managcr when I camc across dWculue i in m! ~ w r l

I know exactly what my manheeithtnks of my performanw

I am kept adequately up-todatc about hmponanr lsiuc$ !n thc dcpanmcnl

I can parrickpace in decislosr about the nature d m ! work

1 recewe mfomaoon on rhc result, oSmy work

I rerewe mkrmatlon on the purpose of my work

I kaou, exactly what I am responsble h i

I have a dlrert lnlluencc an the dcpanment'i d e c w m

I recewe up-ro-dare ~ n l b r m a r m ahout the changes and t ransk~mnuun in the campany

It IS u l c a to me who I should address withm thc department ahout spcc8Rc problems

I know exactl\ what i s expectcd 01 me in mv wor l

I am allowed to lnnuencr (he p l n n m g of m! work actlwries

I can pamapale in (he dec~sinn about when =!oh musr hc compictcd

M y p h oliers mc the opponunrw of mdrpendent thought and acrwn

I i h a ~ Recdom m carving out my wort actwmci

I clcarlv understand m? rnlc in rhc change pioscrr ot the compan!

I feel [hat I can achieve samethlne in m i wark

I have contac! r r m c o l l c a ~ u r r ah pan i l t my woil.

I have to give a n e n r m ro man! thlngs at the same tlm?

I work under time pressure

I h a w too much work to dcm

I have ra remcmher many ( h q i in my work

I rccewe an avuiload of ~ n f o m a u o n in m! wol i

Direrent people E X F C , dlfercnt 1 h m p o i m c in my work

In my lob I an, confrnnled wnh thmgs that allkc, mc personalty

My wark irqutres continuous anentmn from me

In mv worl I have to deal whth power r r m ~ g l r s betwccn people fnm d~iierenl groups

M! work puts mc m emotionally uprcnlng sltuauonr

I hnvc cumam wtir drfficuh pmple in my work

I h s re vanely 8n m r work

My work urci my skills and capaclrter io then Sull porcnt~al

M! rcsponr~h~lmcr have mcrcared beynnd m! orca of rechmcai expemsc

I have to solve m! suhordlnale< personal problcrnr

I am able to effeciwei! usu t c c h n o l o ~ >n my u,orkplace

I have pcoplr at the nghr !me to g a :he work done

34

Page 44: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

Table 4

Factor Loudings ,/or Principcrl Factor Exrractzon and khrirnm Rolurion on JDRS Irems

lcontinued)

I tem

M, rubordmaer arcskdled ru eel t h e work done

If nccersaq I can ask my colleapucs lor help

I hare the necessay equipment to get my work done

I can count on mv colleagues for help when I comc arrorsdl l l i iu l tm in m! work

My work oh]cct~vcs can be ach~eved w t h m lhc approved budget

I ger an wll wllh mv colleagues

I have contact with colleaguci dunng wo?klng hours

I am ablc to keep up w d l the pace a which new l e c h n n l o ~ I* intraduccd in m) work

My p h oliers me the possibdxy ul progress hnancrall!

The company pay5 good salarler

I can llvs conironably on my pa?

I thlnl. 1 am paid enuuOJi for thc work I do

My budget can he changed to arcommodarc unloieslcn clrcumstancei

I have oppamnmes lo be pramarcd

M y joh ofTcrr me oppnnunmes lor wrsonal fruwtll and devclcrpment

M\ company gives me oppomnmrr l o anend trainmg courses

I can mfluence the bdge t a!localion for m\ u,ork

I necd to bc more sccure that 1 wi l l still hi on the same job l r rel in 6 months' t m e

I need to k more sccure thvr i wdl keep my cunrnr lob in the nrrt y 1 . r

I necd to be morc bccure ti131 1 wtll mll hi worklng hr the C O ~ P W ' in 6 months' tlme

1 need lo hc more sccurc ahou what my iuturr role orjoh in the curnpmy wi l

[Factor labels TI Orgon!sauonal Suppon, F, Workluad F; Resources, ii Advanccmen~Opponun:cles. i. Job Secunti

The five factors that were extracted accounted for 42.16% of the total variance in the data.

With a cut-off of 0.35 for inclusion of a variahle in interpretation of a factor. 7 of the 67 items

did not load on the five factors. Items 42. 4;. 44 and 61 did not load strongly (< 0.35) on any

of'the factors and were removed from the questionnaire. Items 4. 21 and 34 could not be

grouped into a meaningful factor and were also removed from the questionnaire.

The first factor was labelled Organi.salionc11 S~rpporf. Items loading on this factor relate to

managerial support. communication. role clarity. and the extent of work autonomy. The

second factor was labelled Workload and encompasses physical; cognitive and emotional

load. Items loading on this factor relate to time pressure. attentiveness to many things at the

same time: too much work to do. and dealing with power struggles. The third factor was

Page 45: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

labelled Resou,-ces and involves a variety of resources including collegial support, physical

resources such as staff and equipment. as well as financial resources. The fourth factor was

labelled Ad~wzcenzer~r Opporfunilies. Items loading on this factor relate to growth and

development, promotion and financial progress. The fifth factor was labelled Job Sccurir?/.

This factor reflects respondents' indications about being secure in keeping their current jobs

in the next year, and about keeping their current job levels in the nest year.

n

Table 5 reports the descriptive statistics. Cronbach alpha coefficients and product-moment

correlation coefficients of the mcasuring instruments. namely the MBI-GS, UWES. JDRS.

the Health subscales of the ASSET and the Organisational Commitment subscales of the

ASSET

Compared to the guideline of 0.70 provided by Nunnally and Rernstein (1994) for Cronbach

coefficient alpha levels. Table 5 shows acceptable Cronbach alpha coefficients varying from

0.71 to 0,94 for all the scales. In conclusion. it can be said that all the instruments showed

sufficient reliability to be used for the subsequent analysis.

Inspection of Table 5 illustrates that Exhaustion is practically significantly related to Physical

Ill health (medium effect) and Psychological 111 health (large effect). Vigour. and Dedication

are also practically significantly related to Physical and Psychological Ill health (all medium

effects). Cynicism is practically significantly related to Psychological I11 health. Affective

Commitment is positively related to Vigour and Dedication and negatively related to

Cynicism (all medium effects).

Exhaustion is practically significantly positively related to Workload and negatively related

to Organisational Support (both medium efrects). Cynicism is practically significantly

negatively related to Organisational Support and Advancement (both medium effects).

Vigour (medium effect) and Dedication (large effect) are practically significantly related to

Organisational Suppori.

Page 46: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A
Page 47: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

Next. multiple regression analyses were carried out with exhaustion and cynicism (as

measured by the MBI-GS). vigour and dedication (as measured by the UWES) as dependent

variables, and job demands and resources (as mrasured by the JDRS) as independent

variables (see Table 6) . The multiple regression analyses were carried out by entering the

independent variables in blocks in two steps. In the case of exhaustion: overload and job

insecurity (as demands) were entered in the first step, while organisational support. resources

and advancement (as job resources) were entered in the second step. The change in R'

between the two steps is indicated in the table.

Page 48: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

Table 6

h4ultiple Regwssion Analyses with Exhaustion, Cynicism. Vigour and Dedication us

Dependent lariables

Exhaustion

Iconstant)

Worwosd

Joh recurih

Organlsat~onal Suppan

Resources

Advancement Opponunmer

Cynmsrn

(Constant)

Organisatinnal support

Resouiccs

Advancement opllortunities

Wortinad

Job secunt)

V t p x

(Conslant)

Orgsnisalional support

Rcsourcca

Advancerncnl opportunmes

Worklaad

Job sccurq.

D c d ~ a u o n

ICanstant)

Orgrnisational support

Rciources

Advmccrnent opponunitm

Workload

Joh secunlv

Table 6 shows that 33% of the variance in exhaustion (as measured by the MBI-GS) is

predicted by workload. job insecurity and lack of resourccs ( F = 19.43.p 5 0,Ol). Adding the

three job resources to the multiple regression significantly increased the R2-value from 0.19

to 0:; 1. Furthermore. 24% of the variance in cynicism is predicted by a lack of organisational

support and poor advancement opportunities ( F = 17,6S. p 5 0.01). Vigour was best predicted

Page 49: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

by best predicted by organisational support (21% of the variance) and dedication by both

organisational support and workload (34% of the variance).

Next, multiple regression analyses were carried out with physical and psychological ill health

(as measured bq the Heaith Scales) as dependent variables and exhaustion. cynicism, vigour

and dedication as independent variables (See Table 7).

Table 7

Mulfipic~ Reges.vion Ana!yses with Ill health as Depcnderll Variable

Model Non-standurd~sed Standardtred I P fi fi 8' AR' CoeFhems Coefficmts

B SF Beta

Physicrl 111 health 8s Dcpendrnt \ariahle

(Constant) 17.67 2.45 7.21 0,OO 17.53' ! I 0.21, 0.03

Psychological Ill health as Dependent Variahlc

(Constant) 16.342 2.88 5.6s 0.00 27.10' 0.611 0.36 0.02

trhausuon 0.60 u.0S 0.55 7.65 0.00'

Cyncctsm U.OO 0.10 -0.00 - U U I (199

Table 7 shows that physical ill health is best predicted by exhaustion. Exhaustion explained

26% of the variance in physical health (F = 29.5 1. p < 0.01). Exhaustion and Low dedication

predicted 36% of the variance in psychological unwell-being (F = 27.1 0.p < 0.01 ).

The results of a multiple regression analysis with organisational commitment (as measured by

the Commitment Scale) as dependent variable and exhaustion and cynicism (as measured by

the MBI-GS) and vigour and dedication (as measured by the CIWES) as independent

variables are reported in Table 8.

Page 50: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

Table 8

Multiple Regression Analyses ~ ' i r h Organisalional Commirnzenl as Dependent I'ariablc

M o d d Noii-standardwd Srandard~scd r J i R K' dl)' Coeffic~rntr Coefficlenti

U SE Bcta

Alieclive Carnmitmcnt as Dependent Variabk

(Conslant) 11.97 0.40

Exhaustton 0.01 0,U3

Cynmsrn -0.17 0.04

(Constant) 10.08 1.1 h

Exhaustm U.04 0.03

Cp lc lsm -0.0s U.04

vlgolrr 0.1; 0.05

Dcdtcat~on 0.09 0.05

Dchavioural Cornmitmcnl as 1)rpendenf Variahlc

(Constantl 32.82 1.90

txhmslion -0,lIb 0.07

Cynwsrn -0.57 0.08

(Constant) 20.04 2.63

E*haust~on -0.02 0.07

C31clsrn -0.34 0.09

Vlgour 0.08 0.1 I

Table 8 reveals that vigour accounted for 24% of the variance in affective commitment. With

the addition of vigour and dedication to the regression, the R2 value increased significantly

from 0.13 to 0.24. Cynicism and dedication accounted for 38% of the variance in behavioural

commitment (F = 30.02. p < 0.01). Adding vigour and dedication to the multiple regression

significantly increased the R'-value from 0.29 to 0.38.

DISCUSSION

This study set out to investigate the relationships between job demands. job resources.

burnout, engagement, and organisational commitment at a platinum mine in thc North-West

Province.

Page 51: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

In support of the COBE model (Schaufeli & Bakker. 2004). the Pearson correlation analysis

confinned that burnout (consisting nf exhaustion and cynicism) was negatively related to

engagement (consisting of vigour and dedication). Low levels of burnout were related to high

levels of engagement, i t . high levels of energy related to high levels o i identification.

confim~ing thc findings of Schaufeli, Martinez. Pinto. Salanova, and Bakker (7002).

Exhaustion was positively related to job demands because of workload (which encompassed

physical, emotional and cognitive workload) and negatively to job resources because of

insufficient organisational suppofl (which focused mainly on management support.

communication, performance feedback. participative decision-making. work autonomy and

role clarity). Maslach et al. (2001') iound strong correlations between job demands (heax,)

workload and time pressure) and exhaustion. The findings of this study confirmed the theory

underlying the JD-R model (Demerouti et al.. 2001) that job demands arc primarily related to

exhaustion.

Cynicism correlated negatively with job resources because of la& of organisational support

and advancement opportunities (which included growth. development and promotional

opportunities). Barkhuizen (2004) reported similar findings. Both burnout dimensions were

negatively related to organisational commitment. i.e. turnover intentions. and positively

related to both physical and psychological ill health. Barkhuizen (3001) also reported

exhaustion to be related to ill health (physical and psychological). Research has linked

burnout with various physical and psychological health problems (l.ee & Ashforth. 1990:

Maslach. 1982). Jonker (2004). Maslach (1998) and Wiese. Rothmann. and Storm (2003)

found a strong comelation between exhaustion and high job demands. Kleyn. Rothmann:

Louw, and Makgala (2003) as well as Stonn and Rothmann (2003b) confirmed the

association between exhaustion and lack ofjob resources.

Regarding thc positive outcomes of wellness_ vigour and dedication were positively related to

job resources because of organisational support and advancement opportunities. negatively to

i l l health (physical and psychological) and positively to organisational commitment (affctivt:

and behavioural). Coetzer and Rothmann (2004) found that job demands and a lack of job

resources increased levels of burnout. while availability of rcsources increased levels of

engagement. This study further confirmed the theory of the .ID-R model (Dcn~crouti et al..

2001 ) that lack of joh resources are related primarily to disengagement.

Page 52: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

The results of the multiple regression analyses also supported the underlying theory of the

COBE model and confirmed that burnout is predicted by job demands (workload and job

insecurity) and lack of job resources (insufficient organisational support and advancement

opportunities) whereas engagement is predicted by availability of job resources

(organisational support). Similarly, Storm and Rotlmann (2003b) reported exhaustion to be

predicted by job demands and lack of job resources. In this study, exhaustion was predicted

by job demands because of workload and job insecurity as well as by lack of resources that

included mainly collegial assistance, insufficient equipment and unfamiliarity with new

technology. Cynicism was best predicted by lack of job resources because of inadequate

organisational support and lack of advancement opportunities. Jonker (2004) found that

cynicism was best predicted by job demands, lack of job resources and two specific

personality characteristics. Maslach (1998) cited that cynicism was best predicted by job

demands (work overload and social conflict). Organisational commitment uas predicted by

uawment both burnout and en, ,

Therefore this study confirmed the first hypothesis that burnout is predicted by job demands

and a lack of job resources. It was clear from the results that the exhaustion component of

burnout was predicted by overload (pace and amount of work and quantitative overload), job

insecuriv and a lack of resources (including equipment. staff and financial resources), while

cynicism was predicted by a lack of organisational support. The second hypothesis. which

stated that work engagement is predicted by job resources. is also accepted. 11 can bc

concluded, however. that organisational suppofl (including managerial support.

communication; role clarity. and the extent of work autonomy) has a strong effect on both the

vigour and dedication components of work engagement. The third hypothesis, namely that

exhaustion and cynicism predict physical and psychological ill health, is partially accepted.

The results showed that. although exhaustion predicted physical ill health, both exhaustion

and lack of dedication predicted psychological unwell-being. The fourth hypothesis. which

stated that vigour and dedication predict organisational commitment, is also partiall!

accepted.

It can thus be said that job demands, because ol' high workload and job insecurity together

with lack of job resources because of insufficient organisational support and adxmcement

opportunities. contributed to a significant level of exhaustion in this study. Exhaustion (low

Page 53: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

energy) reduces engagement (identification) and organisational commitment psychological

attachment and identification) and impacts negatively on both physical and psychological

health. Existing theoretical relationships between burnout and engagement as well as burnout

and ill health were confirmed in this study, and specifically the theory that burnout develops

in response to excessive job demands and diminished joh resources (Schaufeli & Baker-

2004) and that hcalth problems are linked to burnout via job demands (Jackson et al.. in

press). This study supports the theory of the DC model and iindings of a large number of

studies which showed that job control. and sometimes job demands, are critical components

in a healthy work environment as indicated by various health outcomes (Elovainio el al..

2005). According to Iacovides. et al. (3003), inadequate control over one's work. frustrated

hopes and the feeling of loosing meaning in life seem to be important causes of burnout,

The results should be interpreted in view of the current transformation process in the

organisation and the history of the organisation. Eight months ago the organisation

commenced with restructuring aimed at becoming a world-ciass organisation and reducing

costs. The new organisational design includes centres of excellence and shared business

services that will result in job losses and possible demotions. The majority of affected

employees are within the management ranks. Although the aims of the restructuring exercise

were communicated eight months ago. communication on progess made has been limited

and the appointment of employees into their new roles has been extremely slow. 11 is likely

that the situation has escalated the anxiety levels of the employees in the organisation. and

contributed to the current levels of job insecurity experienced by the participants as well as a

sensc of reduced control, participation in decision-making and job autonomy.

Simultaneously, other change initiatives such as continuous improvement, an enterprise

resource system and a culture change initiative were implemented. The organisation expects

its managers to embrace and champion the change initiatives. According to Maslach and

Leiter (1997), major organisational transitions increase managers' workload in three ways: it

becomes more intense and more complex and demands more rime. It can thus be argued that

the workload (physical. emotional and cognitive) of the managers has increased significantly

over the past eight months. However, their job resources have not increased. In supporl of the

DC model it can thus be argued that the high job demands together with reduced influence on

thcir own control and decision making associated with the rransformation, had an adverse

effect on participants' health. both physically and psychologically.

Page 54: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

Historically. the organisation's human resource systems were ineffective. The organisation

appointed management expertise from their competitors or promoted the best internal

technical experts into management positions without regard for the complexity of

management work or the competencies required to manage others. Development

interventions focused on technical development with little attention paid to the deveiopment

of management and leadership skills. Career and succession planning as well as formal

performance managemexlt were non-existent.

When interpreting the results. it must be kept in mind that the sample was very homogeneous.

88,6096 of the participants were male. 40% of them were younger than 40. and 450% were

between ages 41 and 50. Sixtyseven percent of the participants were employed at the entry

level ofthe management ranks. namely at Paterson grading of D-level. It can thus be said that

they fall in two career development stages. namely the early and mid-career stages

(Greenhaus. Callanan, & Godshalk. 2000). With regard to advancement opportunities. it is

evident that the career development needs. i.e. growth. development and advancement needs

of the management staff were not met in the past. Forty percent of the management corps are

in the early career stage d u r i n ~ which acceptance as a valued contributor to the organisation.

and upward mobility are the main career objectives (Greenhaus et al.. 2000). Forty-five

percent of the participants find themselves in the mid-career phase during which individuals

confront the midlife transition and reconcile their acconlplishments in life and their careers

with their youthful aspirations. Many may find themselves on a career plateau with associated

feelings of frustration. guilt and stagnation as they realise that future advancement

opportunities are unlikely (Greenhaus et a].. 2000). The implementation of the Employn~ent

Equity Act further restricted (and still does) advancement opportunities for especially white

males. i.e. the majority of the management corps (88.60% of the sample were male and

84,70% white). In general, it can thus he said that the managers did not reap the anticipated

return on the individual resources that they invested in the organisation and their jobs in the

past.

As far as or_eanisational support is concerned. the technical experts who were promored to

various levels of managerial positions were not prepared for thc responsibility of managing

and developing the perfomlance of their reporting staff through relevant development

initiatives. It is possible that this. combined with the absence of a fom~al performance

Page 55: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

appraisal system, could have resulted in a lack of management support. ineffective

communication. little or ineffective performance feedback, and limited participation in

decision-making at different levels of management.

In conclusion, it can be argued that participants developed exhaustion in response to a

significant increase in workload, high levels of job insecurity, and insufficient job resources.

This resulted in psychological withdrawal (i.e. cynicism, reduced dedication and vigour) both

from the work and the organisation. as well as ill health of the participants. This is similar to

findings cited by Maslach et al. (2001) in a meta-analysis of burnout and engagement

research. The results confmed the underlying theory of the COBE model. Work weliness

(burnout and engagement) was predicted by both job demands (workload and job insecurity).

and lack of job resources (lack of organisational support and advancement opportunities).

Organisational commitment was predicted hy work wellness (burnout and engagement).

The present study has certain limitations. The research was a cross-sectional survey design.

As a result, n o causal inferences could be drawn, even though advanced analytical procedures

were employed. Another limitation is that the measurement of this model's variables was

based solely on self-reports. Furthcrmorc. the study population was very homogeneous. From

a sample of 202 managers. 88.6?h were male. and 84.7% white. South Africa's multicultural

society necessitates studying the constructs burnout. engagement and organisational

commitment for managers from different cultural groups. and proving the construct

equivalence and the absence of item bias for these groups. Future studies should also include

larger sample sizes.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Given the pervasi\;e nature of burnout, organisations should adopt a preventative approach.

According to Kompier and Kristensen (2001). interventions may, in the iirst place, bc

directed at the work situation or the coping capacity of employees. Work-oriented

interventions aim at improving the fit between an individual and the workplace to the benefit

of the individual and organisational system. Employee-oriented interventions aim at teaching

employees effective stress management skills. or skills to modify their appraisals of stressful

situations a being less stressful. In the context of the organisation, effective human resource

Page 56: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

systems including career development, and perCurmance management should be implemented

as a matter of priority.

Secondly, inlervcntions may be aimed at eliminating. reducing or altering stressors (primary

interventions,). Possible interventions include: changes in decision-making processes; work

redesign, and provision of a more suppoitive climate including constructive performance

fccdback. Thirdly, secondary level interventions can be implemented to prevent employees,

who are already showing signs of stress. from getting sick and to increase their coping

capacity. Examples of this strategy include cognitive restructuring, time managcmcnt.

conflict resolution techniques and coping strategies.

More research should be conducted on how to prevcnt burnout and enhance engagement as

well as organisational commitment. Research should also be conduc~ed 10 evaluate the

effectiveness of interventions.

Page 57: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

REFERENCES

Aktouf, 0. (1992). Management and theories of organizations in the 1990s: Toward a critical

radical humanism. Arudenp o f Management Review, 17_ 407-43 1.

Arbuckle, J . L. (1999). Amos 4.0. Chicago, IL: Smallwaters.

BarWluizen, E. N. (2005). Work ~wllness of'acudernic staff iri S~ot l t African higher edtrcntiori

institutions. Unpublished doctoral thesis. North-West University, Potchefstroom.

Barkhuizen. E. N. (2004). Burnoul of acadcmir staff . . in a higher educatiorl institution.

Unpublished master's dissertation. North-West University. Potchefstroom.

Blau, G. .I., & Boal, K. 6. (19871. Conceptualising hour job involvement and organisational

commitment affect turnover and absenteeism. Acadeni)' of Mar~ugemenl Revieu.. 12, 2S8-

300.

Blix. A. G.. Cruise; R. J., Mitchell, 6. M., & Blia. G. G. (1994). Occupational stress among

university teachers. Educalionul Keseurch, 36, 157-169.

Burke, R. 3.. & Richardsen. A. M. (1993). Psychological burnout in organizations. In R.T.

Golembiewski (Ed.). Handbook of ol-ganizatio~~ai hehavior (pp. 263-298). New York.

NY: Dekker.

Cxtwripht. S.. gi Cooper: C. L. (2002). ASSET: An Organizational Slrcsx Screrning Too/ -

The Murtagemertt glridc. Manchester. U K : Robertson Cooper Ltd.

Clark. L. A,, & Watson. D. (3995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale

development. P.gvchologica1 Assess~nent. 7. 309-3 19.

Coetzer, W. I., & Rothmann, S. (2004. August). A model qfwork ~ d l n e s . ~ of employees in a11

insurance corpanj. Poster presented at 2Sth International Congress of Psychology.

Beijing, China.

Cohen, J. (1988). Stulisticul power ana!wis for the bciiavioural sciences. Revised ed.

Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Cooper. C.L., & Payne. R. (,197S). Stress a/ work London: Wile?.

Cordes. C. L.; & Dougherty; T. W. (1993). A review and integration of research on job

burnout. Acadcmny ?fManogenzcr~t Review 18. 62 1-656.

Csikszetmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psycl~olo,?. qfoptimul experience. NewYork. KY:

Harper.

Demerouti. E.. Bakker. A. B.. Nachreiner? F.: & Schaufeli: W. B. (2001j. The job demands-

resources model of burnout. Journal ofApplird P.sycliolog~: Xh. 499-5 12.

Page 58: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

DuBrin. A. 5. (1990). Effctive business psycho lo^ ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-

Hall.

Elovainio, M., Forma, P., Kivimaki. M.. Sinervo, T.. Sutinen. R., & Laine. M. (2005). Job

demands and job control as correlates of early retirement thoughrs in Finnish social and

health care employees. Work unn' Stress, I Y(1). 84-92,

Gastrow. P. (2001, April). Theft from South African Mines and Refineries. The illicit marker

for gold and platinum. hfurro,yaph, 54.Retrieved October, 21. 2004. from the World

Wide Web: htt~:llnw~.iss.co.zaiPubs/Mono~'raphso54/Clap1 .html.

Goldberg, D. P.. & Williams, P. (1988). A werk guide lo the GI3Q. London: NFER. Nelson.

Greenhaus. J.H., Callanan, G.A., & Godshalk V.M. (2003). Career Manogemenf ord ed.).

Orlando, FL: Harcourt College Publishers.

130. J.T.S. (1997). Corporate wellncss programmes in Singapore: Effect on stress, satisfaction

and absenteeism. ./ournal qfMunugerial Psychology, 12. 177-1 89.

Hobfoll, S. E., B Freedy, J . (1993). Conservations of resources: A general stress theory

applied to burnout. In W. B. Schaufeli, C. Maslach, &. T. Marek (Eds.). Prqfi.ssionul

burnout: Recent developments in theory and rescorch (pp. 115-129). Washington; DC:

Taylor & Francis.

lacovides. A.. Fountoulakis: K.N.. Kaprinis: S.T., 8r Kaprinis, G. (2003). The relationship

between job stress, burnout, and clinical depression. Journal qfdfeclive disorder.^. 75.

209-221.

Ivancevich, J. M., & Mat~eson. M. T. (1999). O~~gani~ational hehnviour. and nmnagenzent isth

ed.). Singapore: Irwin McGraw-Hill.

.lackson. L.T.B. & Rothmann. S. 12005). .4n adapted model of burnout for educators in South

Africa. Sourh Afticun .lourrrul yf Education, 25, 100 108

Jackson, L. T. B., Rothmann, S.; B Van de Vijver. F. J. R. (in press). A model of work-

related well-being for Educators in South Africa in the North-West Province. Sfrcss und

Heuith.

Jackson, W. K., & Simpson, R. D. (2001). The implementation of a faculty development

model emphasising personal as well as professional renewal. Educa!io17, 106(4), 434-

441.

Johnson. S.. & Cooper. C. (2003). The cunsrrucr validig' o f li1c ASSET stress tneusurr.

Manuscript made available by authors.

Jonker. B. E. (2004). Burnour, ,job s1res.s und per-sonalil), traits in [he Soutl? /ifiic~m Polirr

Semite. Unpublished master's dissertation, North-West University. pot chef st room^

Page 59: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

Karasek, R.A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mcntal strain. Implications for

job redesign. Administrative Science Quurterly 24, 258-308.

K i m I \'ahtera, J., Thomson. L.. Griffiths. A.; 'ox. T.. & Pentti. J. (1997).

Pscyhosocial factors prcdicting employee sickness absence during economic decline.

Journal ofApplicd Psc.vcho/o,rr?:. 82. 858-872.

Klcyn. E.. Rothmann. S.. 1,ouw. E. J.. & Maligala, D. (200;: June). Occ~palional stress,ioh

sulisfaction and bur-nou~ in the Sourh Afiicun Police Service in the North-Wesl Pruvincc.

Paper presented at the 6'h Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and

Organisational Psychology. Johannesburg.

Kompier, A. J. , & fiistensen, T. S. (2001). Organisational work stress interventions in a

theoretical. methodological and practical context. In J. Dunham (Ed.). Slr-ess in tile

workpluce: Past, present and,firlur*e @p. 19-33). London: Whurr Publishers.

Lansdbergis, P..4.. Schnall. P.L., Warren, K.. Pickering. T.G., &: Schwartz. I.E. (1994).

Association herween arnbulator?. blood pressure and alternatiw formulations of job

strain. Scundinavian .lournu1 of Worir, Environment and Heal(li. 20, 349-363.

Lee, R. T.. &: Ashforth, B. E. (1990). On the meaning of Maslach's three dimensions of

burnout. Journal ofApplied Psycholoa.. 6,743-747.

I.ee, R. T.. & Ashforth, B. E. (1996). A meta-analytic examination ofthe correlates of three

dimensions of burnout. Journal ofAppiied Psychology, 81, 123-133.

Leiter, M. P. (1993). Burnout as a developmental process: Consideration of models. in W.B.

Schaufeli. C. Maslach, & T. Marek (Eds.). Profissiar~ul bur.nout: Kerenl deve1opmenr.r

in l i~eniy and research. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.

Leiter, M. P.: 6r Maslach; C. (1988). '[he impac: of interpcrsunal environment on burnout and

commitment. .lournu1 o f Organizalionui behavior, 9. 297-308.

Leiter, M. P.? & Harvie. P. (1998). Conditions of staff acceptance of organisational change:

Burnout as mediating construct. Anxieo? Stress and Coping I I , 1-1 5 .

Maher, E. L. (1983). Rumout and commitment: .4 theoretical alternative. Personu1 and

Guidance .lour.nal; 61, 390-393.

Maslach, C. (1982). Cnderstanding burnout: Definitional issues in analysing a complex

phenomenon. In W.S. Paine (Ed.). .Job slress and bur-nour: Research. thcor~: and

inrerwntion. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Maslach, C. (1998). A multi-dimensional view oTburnout. In C.L. Cooper (Ed.), Ti,ru~-i~.s q f

orgar~izatior?al.rtres.r. (pp. 68-85). Oxfbrd: Oxford University Press.

Page 60: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

Maslach. C., &: Jackson, S. E. (1984). Bumout in organisational settings. In S. Oskamp (Ed.).

Applied Social Psycholop Annual: Applicritions in Organisationul Settings, 5, 133-154.

Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., &: Leiter. M. P. (1996). Maslach Burnout lnvenlog': Manual (3''

ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Maslach, C.. & Leiter, M.P. (1997). The truth about burnout: HOM) organi.tations cause

personal stress and whar to do about ir. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Maslach, C.. Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter; M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Re~,iew' (IT

psycho log^. 32. 397-422.

Mathieu: J. E., & Zajac, D. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents. correlates,

and consequences of organiz,ational commitment. Psychoiogical Bulletin. 108. 171 -194.

Minemini. R.. Meyer. M.. & Rourke. L. (2003). Human cupitul nzanagetnent: A handbookfor

SA managers. Johannesburg: Writestuff Publishing.

Nelson, D. L., & Simmons; B. L. (2003). Health psychology and work stress: A more

positive approach. In J . C. Quick Br L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook ofocczcpu~iona/

h e a l t h p . s ~ ~ c h o l o ~ jpp. 97-1 19). Washington. DC: American Psychological Association.

Newstrom, J. U'.. 62 Davis. K. (1997). O~pmixitional behoviour-: Human bchaviour u f work

(10" ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Nunnally, 1. C.. &r Bemstein. I. H. (1994). Psychometr-ic theory Grd ed.). New York. NY:

McGraw-Hill.

Peeters. M. C. W.. &: Le Blanc, P. M. (2001). Towards a match between job demands and

sources of soclal support A study among oncology care providers. European .lourtml of

Work and Ollganr=atronu/ psycho lo^, l o ( ] ) , 53-72.

Rothrnann, S. (2002, November). Bwnuut and engagement: .4 ,fi,rtigenic per,pciivc.

Inaugural lecture presented at North-West University, Potchefstroom

Rothrnann, S. (2005). Work enguge~?zenf in Sourh African organizations: Relutions wirh job

und person factors. In W.B. Schaufeli (Chair); Engagemenf and burnour: Conceptual

aud measuremenr issues. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the 7 ~ ' ~ European

Work and Organization Psychology Congress, Istanbul. Turkey.

Ryff. C. D.. & Singer. B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psyrholo~icai

lnquiry Y(1), 1-28.

Schaufeli. U;. B. (2003). Past performance and future perspectives of burnout research. South

Afiical? Journal of h~hr.rtria1 Psycholoa, 29. 1-1 5 .

Page 61: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

Schaufeli. W. B.. & Bakker, A. B. (2001). Werk en welbevinden: Naar een positive

benadrring in de Arbeids en Gezondheidspsychologie {Work and wellbeing: Towards a

positive approach to occupational and health psychology]. Gcdrag en Organizcltie. 14.

229-253.

Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). .Job demands, job resources and their reiationsitip

with burnout and engagemen/: A mulli-sample studj' on /he COBE-model. Manuscript

made available by authors.

Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands. job resources. and their relationship

with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of' Organizafior~al

Behavior. 2j, 293-3 15.

Schaufeli, W. B., &: Buunk, B. P. (1996). Professional burnout. In M. J. Schabracq. J. A. M.

Winnubst 8: C. L. Cooper (Eds.). Honrlhnnk nf work and health ps,vcholo~ @p. 3 I1 -

346). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Schaufeli. W. B., & Enzmann. D. (19%). The hurnour companion to srudv uridprcrcticc: A

crifical ana/ysis. London: Taylor 8: Francis.

Schaufeli. W. B.. Martinez. 1.. Pinto, A. M.. Salanova. M.. & BaMter, A. B. (2002). Burnout

and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Jouritui of Cross-

Cultural Psvcholog),. 33.464-481

Schaufeli,W. B.. Salanova. M.. Gonzalez-RomB. V.. & Balker, A.B. (2002). The

measurement of engagement and burnout: A confinnative analytic approach. Journal o f '

Huppiness Studies. 3, 71 -92.

Schaufeli, %'. B.; Van Diederendonck. D.. & Van Gorp. K. (1996). Burnout and reciprocit).:

Towards a dual-level social exchange model. Work and Siress. 10, 225-237.

Seiler. R. E.. & Pearson, D. A. (1984-5). Dysluuctioi~al strcss among university faculty,

Educutioi7al Research Quarreriy. 9, 15-26.

Sethi. A. S.? & Schuler. R. S. (1990). Handbook oforganizational stress coping s/raregie.s.

Cambridge, MA: Ballinper.

Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi. M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction.

Americun Ps~chologis!. 35. 5- 14

Shaughnessy, J . J., &: Zechmeister, E. B. (1997). Resrurrh merhods in p..rycholo,? (41h ed.).

New York: Nl-: McGraw-Hill.

Shirom, A. (1989). Burnout in work organizations. In C.L. Cooper & I . Robertson (Eds.).

Intentalional review of' industrial and o~.ganiza/ional p~ycholog? (pp. 25-48).

Chichester. UK: Wiley.

Page 62: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

Siu. 0. (2002). Occupational stressors and among Chinese employees: The role of

organisational commitment. Applied Psycholog: An Intenta~ional Review 51: 527-544.

SPSS Inc. (2003). SPSS 12.Ilfor. Windo~ms. Chicago. IL: Author.

Storm: K., & Rothmann; S. (2003a). A psychometric analysis of the Maslach Burnout

Inventory - General Survey in the South African Police Service. Soutll Afiicur~ Journal

of Psychology 33,219-226.

Storm, K.. & Rothmann. S. (2003b). A psychometric analysis of the Utrecht Work

Engagement Scale in the South African Police Service. Soulh Afiica?~ .lournu1 of

industrial Psychology. 29. 62-70.

Tabachnick. B. G., & Fidell: L. S. (2001). Ciring multivariatr stalistics (4"' ed.). Boston. MA:

.411yn &Bacon.

Taris. T. W.. Sehreurs, P. J. G.. & Schaufeli, W. B. (1999). Construct validify of the Maslach

Burnout Inventory - General Survey: A rwo-sample examination of its factor structure

and correlates. Work and Stress. 13, 223-237.

Veldsman. T. H. (2002). Into the People Efiectivenc.s.s Arena: Navigaarir~:: henwe,: cham and

ordr~- . Johannesburg: Knowledge Resources.

Verhage, H. M., & Jordaan. B. D. (2001. March). The influence of hurrlour on academic

productivih. Paper presented at the 1" South African Burnout Conference.

Potchefstroom.

Waas, W. D.. Cox. L.. Wright. L. S.. Garrison, J.. Herkimer, A.: Br Howe. H. H. (1991).

Correlates of drinking and drug use by higher education faculty and staff Implications

for prevention. Journal ofDrug Education. 21(1). 33-63.

Wiese, L., Rothmann. S. . & Stom. K. (2003). Coping, stress and burnout in the South

African Police Service in KwaZulu-Natal. Sourh African .Journal of Ind~~srrial

Psj~cholog,. 29(3). 71 -80.

World Competiliveness Yearbook. Retrieved October, 19. 2004, from the World Wide Web:

http:i/wuwOl .imd.chlwcv/.

Page 63: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

CHAPTER 3

CONCLUSION, LIMITATIONS AND RECOMMENDATlONS

This chapter encompasses conclusions regarding the literature review and empirical study.

The limitations of the study are highlighied and recommendations are made for further

studies.

3.1 CONCLUSION

In this section conclusions are drawn in terms of speckc theoretical objectives and the results

of the empirical study.

3.1.1 Conclusions in terms of specific theoretical objectives

A literature study was undertaken to conceptualise job characteristics, burnout. engagement.

and organisational commitment. Subsequently, the following conclusions are drawn in terms

of the theoretical objectives.

With reference to job characteristics, the work environment can be classified in terms of two

broad categories, namely job demands and job resources. Job demands refer to an individual's

work goals or the "things that have to be done" (Demerouti. Bakker. Nachreiner. &: Schaufeli.

2001). It encompasses the physical, social and organisational aspects of the job that require

sustained physical, mental and emotional effort. Job resources refer to physical.

psychological, social and organisational job aspects that facilitate achievement of work goals.

reduce job demands and the psychological costs associated with distress, and stimulate

personal growth and development (Demerouti et al., 2001; Rothmann, 2002).

Burnout as a pathogenic psychological syndrome is the extreme end result of cluonic

exposure to stressors on the job. It comprises three dimensions. namely emotional exhaustion.

cynicism and reduced professional efficacy (Maslach. Schaufeli- & Leiter. 2001). .As core

dimension of burnout. emotional exhaustion refers to feelings of being overextended and

exhausted. Cynicism relates to the interpersonal dimensions of burnout and results in

negative. callous responses to various job aspects (Maslach et al.. 2001). Professional

Page 64: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

efficacy, the weakest dimension of burnout - and often reearded as unnecessary (Lee &

Ashforth. 1996: Schaufeli, 2003) - refers to individuals evaluating themselves as being

ineffective and incompetent in fulfilling required job responsibilities (Schaufeli & Ruunk.

1996).

Engagement is described as a positive, fulfilling, work-related state of mind that is

characterised by vigour, dedication and absorption (Schaufeli & Bakker. 2002). It is a

persistent and pervasive affective-cognitive state rather than situation, object or event-

specific (Schaufeli. Saianova. Gonzalez-Roma, & Bakker, 2002). Engagement is

characterised by being enthusiastic about work. doing the work with high levels of energy

and experiencing intrinsic enjoyment in doing the work. Vigour refers to high levels of

energy and resilience. willingness to invest effort in one's work and perseverance in the face

of difficulty. Dedication is described as a strong involvement in one's work accompanied by

feelings of enthusiasm, significance and pride (Maslach et a]., 2001). Absorption refers to a

state of emersion in one's work that is characterised by focused attention, time distortion and

intrinsic enjoyment, among other things (Csikszentmihalyi: 1990).

Schaufeli and Enzmann (1998) categorise organisational stressors as job demands and lack of

job resources. Job demands refer to activities to be performed or things to be done which

require sustained physical and mental effort (Demerouti et al.. 2001). Job resources refer to

all aspects that reduce job demands. facilitate achievement of work goals, andlor stimulate

individual growth (Demerouti et al.. 2001; Rothmann, 2002).

Physical ill health manifests in symptoms such as migraine, heart disease: ulcers, allergies.

and back problems. Psychological ill health manifests in stress-induced symptoms such as

depression: mood swings, irritability, etcetera and behaviours such as a tendency to smoke or

drink more than usual, loss of sense of humour, etcetera. Both physical and psychological ill

health have been associated with stress and burnout (Ho, 1997; Ryff & Singer. 1998; Sethi &

Schuler. 1990).

Organisational commitment refers to a reciprocal. psychological relationship between an

employer and its enlployees. On the one hand. it entails commitment of the organisation

towards the employees as reflected by employees' perception of the degree to which the

organisation trusts. values and respects them. On the other hand. i t refers to commitment of

Page 65: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

the employee to the organisation as demonstrated through the extent to which the employee is

loyal and dedicated to the organisation and its goals. as well as the employee's desire to

remain employed by the organisation.

Literature confirmed strong and consistent correlations between exhaustion and job demands

(workload and time pressure) (Maslach et al.. 2001; Schaufeli et al.. 2002) and between

hurnout and a lack of job resources (social support, lack of feedback, poor incentives:

etcetera) (Maher, 1983: Maslach et al.. 2001). Poor engagement is also associated with a lack

of job resources (Schaufeli et al.. 2002). Burnout is mainly predicted by job demands and

lack of job resources, is related to health problems and turnover intentions, and mediates the

relationship between job demands and health problems. Engagement is exclusively predicted

by job availability of job resources, relates to turnover intentions and mediates the

relationship between job resources and turnover intentions (Schaufeli 8: Rakker. 2004).

Consistent evidence exists of a link between burnout and ill health (physical and

psychological). Organisational commitment diminishes in the presence of burnout (Leiter gi

Maslach, 1988). Aktouf (1992) also confirmed that poor engagement leads to reduced

organisational commitment.

3.1.2 Conclusions in terms of specific empirical objectives

This study set out to establish the extent to what job demands, job resources, burnout:

engagement. health and organisational commitment were correlated. The results confirmed

the findings or previous studies and supported the theoretical assumptions of the COBE

model (Schaufeli &r Bakker, 2004). Burnout (consisting of exhaustion and cynicism) was

negatively related to engagement (consisting of vigour and dedication). Low- levels of

hurnout were related to high levels of engagement. i.e. high levels of energy related to high

levels of identification: confirming the findings of Schaufeli et al. (2002).

Exhaustion was positively related to job demands because of workload (which encompassed

physical. emotional and cognitive workload), and negatively to job resources because of

insufficient organisational support (which focused mainly on management support,

communication. performance feedback, participative decision-making, work autonomy and

role clarity). The findings of this study confirmed the theory underlying the ID-R model

(Demerouti et al.. 2001) that job demands are primarily related to exhaustion.

Page 66: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

Cynicism correlated negatively with job resources because of lack of organisational support

and advancement opportunities (which included growth: developn~ent and promotional

opportunities). Both burnout dimensions were negatively related to organisational

commitment, i.e. turnover intentions and positivcly related to hoth physical and psychological

ill health.

Vigour and dedication were positively related to job resources because of organisational

support and advancement opportunities, negatively to ill health (physical and psychological)

and positively tn organisational commitment (affective and behavioural). This study also

confirmed the theory of the ID-R model (Demerouti et al.. 2001) that lack of job resources

are related primarily to disenga, oement.

The results of the multiple regression analyses confirmed that burnout is predicted by job

demands (workload and job insecurity) and lack of job resources (insufficient organisational

support and advancement opportunities) whereas engagement is predicted by availability of

.job resources (organisational support) and workload. In this study exhaustion was predicted

by job demands because of workload and job insecurity as well as by lack of resources that

mainly included collegial assistance. insufficient equipment and unfamiliarity with new

technology. Cynicism was best predicted b> lack of job resources because of inadequate

organisational support and lack of advancement opportunities. Organisational commitment

was predicted by both burnout (cynicism) and engagement (vigour and dedication).

Therefore, this study confirmed the first hypothesis that burnout is predicted by job demands

and a lack of job resources. It was clear from the results that the exhaustion component of

burnout was predicted by overload (pace and amount of work and quantitative overload), job

insecurity, and a lack of resources (including equipment. staff and financial resources), while

cynicism was predicted by a lack of organisational support. The second hypothesis. which

stated that work engagement is predicted by job resources. is also accepted. However. it can

be concluded that organisational support (including managerial support. communication, ro!e

clarity. and the extent of work autonomy) has a strong effect on both the vigour and

dedication components of work engagement. The third hypothesis: namely that exhaustion

and cynicism predict physical and psychological ill health. is partially accepted. The results

showed that. although exhaustion predicted physical ill health, both exhaustion and lack of'

Page 67: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

dedication predicted psychological unwell-being. The fourth hypothesis. which stated that

vigour and dedication predict organisational commitment. is also accepted.

It can thus be said that job demands because of high workload and job insecurity together

with lack of job resources because of insufficient organisational support and advancement

opportunities contributed to a significant level of exhaustion in this study. Exhaustion (ION

energy) reduces engagement (identification) and organisational commitment (psychological

attachment and identification), and impacts negatively on both physical as well as

psychological health. Existing theoretical relationships between burnout. engagement. ill

health and organisational commitment were confirmed in this study.

in conclusion, it can be argued that participants developed exhaustion in response to a

significant increase in workload. high levels of job insecurity. and insufficient job resources.

This resulted in psychological withdrawal (i.e. cynicism: reduced dedication and vigour) both

from the work and the organisation: as well as ill health of the participants. This is similar to

findings cited by Maslach et al. (2001 ) in a meta-analysis of burnout and engazetnent

research. The results confirmed the underlying theory of the COBE and JD-R models. Work

wellness (burnout and engagement) was predicted by both job demands (workload and job

insecurity) and lack of job resources (lack of organisational support and advancement

opportunities). Organisational commitment was predicted by work wellness (burnout and

engagement).

3.2 LIMITATIONS OF THIS RESEARCH

?he sample size was one limitation of this study. Kerlinger and Lee (2000) recommend that

the largest possible sample always be used (the smaller the sample size, the greater the error).

The small sample size could account for the misfit between some of the originally

hypothesised theoretical models and the data set.

The san~ple was very homogeneous with regard to gender (88.6% male) and racc (84.7%

white). The research findings can therefore not bc generalised. Seen from a practical

perspective, no meaningful comparisons could be made with regard to difkrent race and

gender groups. In view of South Africa's diverse population, additional research is needed to

explore important demographic variables.

Page 68: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

Only English versions of the measuring instruments were used whilst English is the home

language of only 25.70% of the participants. This posed a language barrier and could also

have contributed to the misfit between some of the hypothesised theoretical models and the

data obtained, specifically in the case of the UWES where all the Absorption items had to be

eliminated.

The cross-sectional survey research design was limiting in itself. as it provides a snapshot

view of the topic under investigation and excludes determination of the causality of

relationships between the variables. According to Kerlinger and Lee (2000). the depth of the

survey information is ordinarily poor as compared to the scope.

Although the researchers adopted a systems approach to the research, the contribution of

personality, as a factor that impacts on the individual system. could not be studied in relation

to burnout. engagement and organisational commitment due to the scope and magnitude of

adding this additional variable. This research could not provide a holistic vieu of the

potential relationships that may exist between a variet) of potential factors that might play a

role within the individual and within the organisational system as far as burnout. engagement

and organisational commitment are concerned.

Because the organisation that formed the focus of this study was restructuring at the time of

the study, the internal organisational climate could have influenced the results of the study.

specifically with regard to job insecurity and cynicism. The potential influence of the

restructuring process on the dependent variables was not considered.

The research was presented from a pathogenic perspective and focused exciusivel> on

pathogens such as exhaustion. cynicism, reduced vigour and dedication. etcetera. No

attention was given to salutogenic or fortigenic factors.

3.3 RECOMMENDATIONS

Recommendations for the organisation and for future research are made in this section.

Page 69: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

3.3.1 Recommendations for the organisation

The consequences of burnout include disengagement from work. reduced organisational

commitment, ill health (Lee & Ashforth, 1990: Maslach, 1981: Seiler & Pearson. 1984-9,

increased absenteeism, sick leave and turnover (Leiter & Harvie. 1998; Schaufeli &

Enzmann_ 1998). and reduced work performance and poor of service delivery (Blix.

Cruise, Mitchell, & Blix. 1994: Maslach & Sackson- 1984; Schaufeli & Enzmann, 1998). In

light of these findings and the organisation's vision to become a world-class. performance-

driven organisation, it is strongly recommended that the organisation adopt multi-le~el

interventions to prevent and/or address the problem of burnout, lack of engagement and poor

organisational commitment. Interventions can be classified as primary. secondary and tertiary

with each with its own outcomes. These categories of intervention focus on the individual.

the interface between the individual and the organisation and the organisation itself

(Schaufeli & Enzmann. 1998).

Primary interventions aim at reducing risk factors or changing the nature of stressors.

Interventions that focus on the individual include self-monitoring and assessment, stress

management: and promotion of a healthy lifestyle. At the level of interface between the

individual and the organisation. interventions can include personal screening, training in time

management and interpersonal skills, promotion of a realistic job image, and balancing work

and private life. At the level of the organisation, organisation design and development

interventions feature strongly and may include improving job content and work environment.

management development interventions, career management, retraining as well as corporate

fitness and wellness programmes. In the era where organisations compete for talented

employees and given that managers can spread burnout to other employees through their

attitudes and behaviour. a preventative approach is strongly recommended. Seen from an

organisational design and development perspective. the organisation could design. develop

and implement integrated human resource systems that include effective work design and

allocation of sufficient resources, realistic recruitment and on-boarding of neM staff.

individual development plans. career and succession plans: performance management,

internal surveys to measure managers' satisfaction with the way the organisation addresses

their needs, and interventions to evaluate the effectiveness of the human resource systems.

Furthermore. the organisation could also consider the implementation and maintenance of a

corporate fitness and wellness programme that is specifically targeted at managers and

Page 70: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

includes stress audits, awareness training. and annual or bi-annual psychosocial check-ups.

One way to encourage management to support health promotion is to make it a meaningful

part of their performance appraisal process.

Secondary interventions aim at changing the ways in which individuals respond to stressors.

'file organisation should consider implementing cognitive-restructuring. relaxation

techniques, time management and conflict handling skills at individual level. At the interface

between the organisation and the individual peer-support groups: coaching as well as career

plannine could be considered.

Tertiary interventions are rzactive and aim at treating those who already suffer from burnout.

Tertiary interventions are also referred to as treatment. At the level of interface between the

individual and the organisation. it could include specialised counselling and psychotherapy.

At organisational level, it could include institutionalisation of Occupational Health and Safety

Services and Employee Assistance Programmes, both of which the organisation already

provides. However, managers could be encouraged to use the current services.

Rehabilitatior. aims at re-integrating an employee who has suffered from burnout, back into

the workplace. It goes beyond the individual level by considering the employee's job as well.

Once ar employee who has suffered burnout returns to the workplace. individual guidance

and assistance are recommended at the level of interface between the individual and the

organisation. At organisational level. and possibly as a last resort. outplacement could be

considered.

3.3.2 Recommendations for future research

The study population was very homogeneous. From a sample of 202 managers. 88.6% were

male. and 84,7% white. South Africa's multi-cultural society necessitates studying the

constructs burnout, enzagement and organisational commitment for managers from different

cultural groups, and to prove the construct equivalence and the absence of item bias for these

groups. Future studies should also include larger saniplc sizes.

DuBrin (1990) reported that managers who suffer from burnout harm organisational

effectiveness because the> spread it to their subordinates. Verhage and Jordaan (2001 ) iound

Page 71: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

that employee burnout could be attributed to inadequate leadership, inefficient and dictatorial

managcmcnt, nepotism, lack of transparency and poor interpersonal relations. From these

findings it is evident that managers impact on the functioning and psychological health of

subordinates and teams. and thus the effectiveness and productivity of the organisation.

Therefore, more studies should be focused on managers who, as leaders of the organisation

and its teams. can directly or indirectly "infect" subordinates with bumout.

Because of the negative organisational outcomes that result from burnout. and in the context

of global pressure and compztilion for ihc same scarce pool of talented human resources. thr

need for more research on burnout, t-ngagcment and organisational commitmeni is critical.

Page 72: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

REFERENCES

Aktouf, 0. (1992). Management and theories of organizations in the 1990s: Toward a critical

radical humanism. Acadenly ofA4unagenient Revieu,, 17. 407-43 1.

Blix. A. G.. Cruise, R. J., Mitchell, B. M.; 8r Blix. G. G. (1994). Occupational stress among

university teachers. Educational Research, 36. 157-169.

Csikszentmihalyi. M. (1990). Flo~.: The ps,vcholo~i o f opcinzal cxperierzce. NewYork, N Y :

Harper.

Demerouti, E.: Bakker. A. B., Nachreiner. F.. Br. Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-

resources model of burnout. .Journal ofApplied psycho log^ 86,499-512.

DuBrin. A. J . (1990). Efleclivc bftsincss,?s)~cizolmg (31d ed.). Englewood CliTfs. NS: Prenticc-

Hall.

Ho, .I. T. S. (1997). Corporate wellness programmes in Singapore: Effect on stress.

satisfaction and absenteeism. .lour-nu1 ofManagcria1 Ps.veholoy'. 12; 177- 189.

Kerlinger, F. N.. & Lce. EI. B. (2000). Foundatiom of hehaviourai research (4" ed.). Fort

Worth. TX: Harcourt College Puhlishers.

Lcc. R. T.. & Ashforth, R. E. (1990). On the meaning of hfaslach's three dinlensions of

burnout. Journal ofApplied P s y c l ~ o l o ~ , 6. 743-747.

Lxe. R. T.. & Ashforth. B. E. (1996). A meta-analytic examination of the correlates of three

dimensions of burnout. Journul qf4pplied psycho lo^, X I . 123- 13 3.

Leiter. M. P.. & Maslach. C. ( 1 988). The impact of interpersonal environment on burnout and

commitment. Jowizal of Organizutionnl Behavior.. 9,297-308.

Leiter. M. P.. & Harvie, P. (1998). Conditions of staff acceptance of organisational change:

Burnout as mediating construct. Anxiety. Slress and Coping 1 I , 1-15.

Maher, E. L. (1983). Burnout and commitment: A theoretical alternative. Personal and

Guidance Journal. 61, 3 90-393.

Maslach, C. (1982). Understanding burnout: Definitional issues in analysing a complex

phenomenon. In W.S. Paine (Ed.), Job s t res and burnout: Research. tlieorj: and

in~ervention. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Maslach, C.. & Jackson. S.E. (1984). Burnout in organisational settings. In S. Oskamp (Ed.).

,4ppliedSocial Psycholog, Annual: Applications in Organisa1ior7al Settings. 3. 133-154.

Maslach C.: Schaufeli, W. B._ & Leiter, M. P. (2001). .lob burnout. Amual Rwieu of

Psvcholog~~, 52. 397-422.

Page 73: JOB CHARACTERISTICS, ENGAGEMENT, AND STAFF AT A

Rothmann, S. (2002, Noven~ber). Burnout and en,aagement: A fortigenic perspective.

Inaugural lecture presented at North-West University. Potchefstroom.

Ryff. C. D., & Singer. B. (1998). The contours of positivc human health. P.sj~choIogica1

Inquirv, 9(1), 1-28.

Schaufeli, W. B. (2003). Past performance and future perspectives of burnout research. South

A-frican .Journal oflndustrial psycho lo^, 29. 1 - 15.

Schaufeli. W. B.. & Bakker, A. B. (2001). Job demands. job resources and their relationship

with burnout and engagemenr A mulri-sample sturi), on the CCBE-model. Manuscript

made available by authors.

Schaufeli, W. B.. & Bakker, 4 . B. (20041. Job demands, joh resources, and their relationship

with burnout and engagement: A multi-samplc study. Jo71rrzal of Organitarional

Behavior. 25. 293-315.

Schaufeli. W. B.. & Buunk. B. P. (1996). Professional burnout, In M. 3. Schabracq, J. .4. M.

Winnubst & C. L. Cooper (Eds.); Handbook of work and health psychulogy @ p 31 1 -

346). Chichester, UK: Wile!.

Schaufcii, W. B., & Enzmann. D. (1998). The burizour conzpanion to study andpruciice: .4

cr-irical analvsis. London: Taylor & Francis.

Schaufeli, W. B.: Salanova. M.. Gonzalez-Roma. V.. & Bakker. A. B. (2002). The

measurement of engagement and burnout: A confirmarive anal>& approach. .iolci.nal of

Happiness Studies, 3, 71-91.

Seiler, R. E., & Pearson. D. A. (3984-5). Dysfunctional stress among university faculty.

Educational Research Quarterb,, 9, 15-26,

Sethi. A. S.. & Schuler, R. S. (1990). Handbook ojorganituiional stress cuj~ing straregies.

Cambridge, M.4: Ballinger.

Verhage, H. M.. & Jordaan, B. D. (2001. March). The influence of burnout on ucadernic

productivity. Paper presented at the I " South African Burnout Conference.

Potchefstroom.