JSSW Oct 2010: REACHING THE UNREACHED

8/8/2019 JSSW Oct 2010: REACHING THE UNREACHED

1/17

Journal of SCHOOL SOCIAL WORK October 2010 Journal of SCHOOL SOCIAL WORK October 2010 01

Journal of School Social Work,8 (New 14), Sridevi Colony, Seventh Avenue,

Ashok Nagar, Chennai 600 083

Mobile: 98406 02325 E-mail:[email protected]

Note:Views expressed by the contributors are not necessarily the official view of the Journal.

Hony. Special Editor: Dr Emmanuel Janagan J,Principal, Kumbhalkar Collehge of Social Work,

Nagpur, 440018

.

A National School Social Work monthly dedicated to networking of parents and teachers.

Volume Issue Contents October 201005VII

Focus: Reaching the Unreached

Price Rs 20.00

Journal ofSchool Social Work

ISSN: 0976-3759

Page

02

03

05

08

12

14

22

29

Editorial

Let Us Reach Out to Special Children And Their Parents Too!

Reaching the Unreached

The Need of the Hour

Networking and

Re-bonding with Families

Children of Migrant Workers

Reaching Students of North Chennai

Trafficking of Girl Children Reaching

through Professional Intervention

From Yes, We Can to I am No Different:

Lets Rope in Technology

Priscilla SamuelProf Visvesvaran P K

Mangaleswaran R

Fatima Jessy M

Dr Kalaimathi A

Sylvia Daisy A

Gnanasekar M

Dr Kalaiyarasan GDr Chandramohan C

Premalatha M

Dr Paranjothi

Ramalingam J

Sailaxmi Gandhi


2/17


3/17


4/17


5/17


6/17


7/17


8/17


9/17

Journal of SCHOOL SOCIAL WORK October 2010 Journal of SCHOOL SOCIAL WORK October 2010

Table-1

Comparison of Mean and SD, S-Sten Scores of

Boys and Girls of Aided Schools (N=50)

Boys Girls

Mean SD Mean SD16 PF

A

B

C

E

FG

H

I

L

M

N

O

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

2.1

1.3

1.9

1.7

1.81.8

1.6

1.6

1.8

2.1

2.1

1.2

2.0

1.3

1.6

1.9

6.5

4.0

4.6

6.7

5.15.7

4.6

6.2

6.0

6.4

6.0

7.3

4.9

5.2

3.5

6.1

5.9

3.5

4.6

7.6

4.75.1

6.1

5.5

6.1

4.8

5.4

6.8

7.3

6.0

3.6

5.7

2.0

1.3

1.8

1.4

1.82.0

1.8

1.4

2.1

2.1

1.7

2.0

1.7

1.5

1.8

2.0

Results and discussion

For ease of analysis, sixteen primary

factors are brought under eightsecond order factors such asextroversion, anxiety, tough poise,independence, self-control,adjustment, leadership and creativityare the secondary personality factorsobtained from primary factors. Fromthe values obtained from the second

order factors these followingconclusions were drawn:Extroversion

It explains the openness andexpressive characters. It is observedthat aided and matric boys havesecured a sten score of 6.0, whichindicates average extrovert nature.Girls of aided and matric also havescored at the average level indicating

that there was no significant

6.4

3.6

5.1

5.9

5.9

6.6

5.2

5.9

6.1

5.9

5.7

6.7

6.25.1

4.2

5.7

Table-2


Boys and Girls of Matric Schools (N=50)

Boys Girls


A

B

C

E

FG

H

I

L

M

N

O

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

1.6

1.4

2.1

1.9

2.1

2.0

1.9

1.6

2.2

2.0

1.9

1.6

2.21.8

1.8

2.1

5.5

3.1

4.6

7.2

5.3

5.8

5.4

4.7

5.4

4.8

5.6

5.8

7.15.8

4.5

5.0

2.2

1.3

1.8

1.8

1.7

2.0

1.6

1.5

2.1

1.8

1.9

1.7

1.81.5

1.8

2.0

difference in extroversion.Anxiety level

It explains the level of stress and

anxiety of students. It is observedthat aided school boys and girls havevery high (7.0) anxiety level andmatric school boys have very lowanxiety level, where as girls of matricschool have average level of anxiety.This indicates that aided school boys

and girls require training in copingwith their anxiety and stress.Tough poise

Tough poise expresses the self-confidence level of students. Bothaided and matric boys have averagelevel of tough poise where as girlshave very high level of tough poise.They need to improve theirrelationship and friendliness.

16 17


10/17


Table-4


Girls of Aided and Matric Schools (N=50)Aided School Matric School


A

B

C

E

FG

H

I

L

M

N

OQ1

Q2

Q3

Q4

5.9

3.5

4.6

7.6

4.75.1

6.1

5.5

6.1

4.8

5.4

6.87.3

6.0

3.6

5.7

2.0

1.3

1.8

1.4

1.82.0

1.8

1.4

2.1

2.1

1.7

2.01.7

1.5

1.8

2.0

5.5 2.2

3.1 1.3

4.6 1.8

7.2 1.8

5.3 1.75.8 2.0

5.4 1.6

4.7 1.5

5.4 2.1

4.8 1.8

5.6 1.9

5.8 1.77.1 1.8

5.8 1.5

4.5 1.8

5.0 2.0

pattern) and a better self-control.Adjustment

All students exhibit high level ofadjustment but among them Aidedand matric school girls have betteradjustment scores in that order andtheir adjustment scores aresignificantly better than the boys ofthe same schools. There is asignificant difference between boys

and girls. Girls are having moveadjustment level than boys.

Leadership Aided school boys score low inleadership traits, indicating trainingin leadership for them. Where as theaided school girls fair better than theboys, they still score less than matricboys and girls among whom the girls

score slightly better than the boys. It19

Table-3


Boys of Aided and Matric Schools (N=50)Aided School Matric School


A

B

C

E

FG

H

I

L

M

N

OQ1

Q2

Q3

Q4

6.5

4.0

4.6

6.7

5.15.7

4.6

6.2

6.0

6.4

6.0

7.34.9

5.2

3.5

6.1

2.1

1.3

1.9

1.7

1.81.8

1.6

1.6

1.8

2.1

2.1

1.22.0

1.3

1.6

1.9

6.4

3.6

5.1

5.9

5.96.6

5.2

5.9

6.1

5.9

5.7

6.76.2

5.1

4.2

5.7

1.6

1.4

2.1

1.9

2.12.0

1.9

1.6

2.2

2.0

1.9

1.62.2

1.8

1.8

2.1

Independence

Freedom levels of the students is

average for aided and matric schoolboys. There is a significantdifference among girls of aided andmatric school, both of them are havevery high independent nature whichindicates that freedom of thought ismore gender based and not school

based.

Self-control

Aided school students scored

average, matric school studentsexhibit very low (3.8) self-control.There is a significant differenceamong aided (4.0) and matric school(2.9) girls, showing low self-control.This is contrary to the popular beliefthat economically better person has

a higher DGP (deferred gratification18


11/17


12/17


13/17


14/17


15/17


16/17


17/17


Journal of School Social Work English Monthly. ISSN: 0976-3759Registered with Registrar of Newspapers for India underNo.TNENG/2004/14389.Postal Registration TN/CC(S) Dn/ 47 / 09-11.Licensed to post underWPP No. TN/CC(S) Dn/ 34/09-11.

Published and owned byP. Jayachandran Naidu . Published from

8, Sridevi Colony, 7th Avenue, Ashok Nagar, Chennai 600083 and

printed by T. Rajaguru at TRK Press, 39, Saidapet Road, Vadapalani,

Chennai 600026. Editor:P. Jayachandran Naidu.

32

Future Focus

Nov 2010 CHILDREN OF SINGLE PARENTSHSE: Dr Saraswati Raju Iyer, Asst. Professor,

Dept of Sociology and Social Work,

Acharya Nagarjuna University, Guntur, 525510.

Dec 2010 BULLYINGHSE: Shri Ramesh K S,

HOD, Dept of Social Work, Mar Gregorios College.

We thank Dr Emmanuel Janagan J,MA(SW) MPhil (SW) PGDPM PhD(SW)Principal, Kumbhalkar College of Social Work, Nagpur, 440018 forconsenting to be the honorary special editor of this issue. We admire hisprofessionalism in sending the editorial very early and shouldering all his

editorial responsibilities amidst his busy schedule of shifting from Universityof Malay. We are thankful to Dr Emmanuel Janagan for co-optingDr Keshao Patil, Principal, Tirpude College of Social Work, Nagpur andDr Tulankar L S, Principal, B P National Inst. of Social Work, Nagpur,440009 as members for the month and are thankful to them for their consent.

Send your e-mail ID to [email protected] and on request

you will be included in the group mail from where you can download

many freewares, get information periodically about professionaljournals, seminars, conferences and workshops organized in various

parts of India starting from college level to International events.

Documents

JSSW Oct 2010: REACHING THE UNREACHED