Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Jury Management Indices Report
Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data cannot be confirmed by OSCA staff.
The Jury Management indices were developed to monitor jury systems performance in the local trial courts. Consistently poor performance on one or more of the indices may indicate the need to review and conceivably change procedures. Often, however, the indices are not sufficient to isolate the specific problem or suggest alternative or modifications that will improve performance. The following are definitions of the indices used in this report. SUMMONING YIELD A comparison of the number of jurors who are available to serve on the first day of the term of service to the number of prospective jurors summoned for the term. The Summoning Yield percentage is calculated by dividing the total number of prospective jurors available to serve by the total number of jurors summoned. The Florida Supreme Court goal for the Summoning Yield index is forty percent (40%) or more. JUROR DAYS PER TRIAL (JDPT) The average number of days a juror is needed for each trial. JDPT is calculated by dividing the sum of jurors reporting daily and carry-overs by the total number of jury trials (six-person + twelve-person). The Florida Supreme Court goal for the JDPT is 30.5 or less. PEOPLE BROUGHT IN PER TRIAL (PBI) The average number of prospective jurors needed to start a trial. PBI is calculated by dividing the total number of jurors reporting daily by the total number of jury trials (six-person + twelve-person). The Florida Supreme Court goal for the PBI is 18.3 or less for a "typical" six-person trial and 30.5 or less for a “typical” twelve-person trial. PERCENT TO VOIR DIRE The percentage of prospective jurors that undergo questioning by counsel for a specific trial. The percentage is calculated by dividing the total number of persons sent to voir dire by the total number of jurors reporting daily. The Florida Supreme Court goal for Percent to Voir Dire is 100% or more. AVERAGE PANEL SIZE The average number of prospective jurors selected from the pool and sent to voir dire for the empanelment of one jury. In Florida, there are standard panel sizes for all trials. These standard panel sizes are set by administrative order of the Chief Justice. NUMBER OF TRIALS The total number of six-person and twelve-person trials.
Jury Management Indices Report First Judicial Circuit
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
31.7% 30.3% 29.7% 32.0% 46.5 49.5 46.1 45.5
40.7% 40.2% 39.0% 40.5% 58.9 62.1 59.5 59.9Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
First Circuit First Circuit
50
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
10
20
30
40
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201337.1 40.5 37.4 37.0 58.1% 57.2% 53.7% 59.7%
48.7 48.8 49.4 50.5 55.8% 57.9% 56.5% 57.6%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
First Circuit First Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
21.5 23.2 20.1 22.1 129 119 139 129
27.7 29.9 29.1 29.0 115 112 115 110
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
First Circuit First Circuit
g
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 1 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Jury Management Indices Report Escambia County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
40
50
60
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
23.3% 24.3% 22.5% 23.5% 41.2 42.7 38.1 38.8
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Escambia Escambia
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201332.2 32.9 29.8 30.1 75.5% 72.0% 70.7% 77.6%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Escambia Escambia
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
100
200
300
400
500
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
24.3 23.7 21.1 25.9 81 85 101 85
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Escambia Escambia
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 1 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Jury Management Indices Report Okaloosa County
40%
50%
60%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
80
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
10%
20%
30%
40%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
51.4% 49.8% 51.6% 54.4% 59.1 46.2 67.6 60.2
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Okaloosa Okaloosa
State Median State Median
60
70
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201346.8 37.3 54.8 50.3 45.4% 81.8% 58.7% 57.2%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Okaloosa
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Okaloosa
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
60
70
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
21.2 30.6 32.2 28.8 17 18 13 17
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Okaloosa Okaloosa
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 1 - 3
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Jury Management Indices Report Santa Rosa County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
36.6% 38.6% 36.9% 40.5% 63.6 124.8 72.1 58.7
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Santa Rosa Santa Rosa
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0%
30%
60%
90%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201353.9 121.7 65.1 56.2 24.7% 5.3% 11.5% 12.8%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Santa Rosa Santa Rosa
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
13.3 6.4 7.5 7.2 21 9 18 18
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Santa Rosa Santa Rosa
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 1 - 4
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Walton County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
40.3% 22.9% 30.6% 29.6% 32.6 43.7 55.6 53.8
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Walton Walton
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201325.1 35.7 43.4 39.2 66.9% 52.8% 34.9% 70.5%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Walton
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Walton
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
16.8 18.9 15.1 27.7 10 7 7 9
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Walton Walton
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 1 - 5
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Second Judicial Circuit
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
44.2% 43.5% 40.6% 41.6% 44.1 43.6 49.2 40.1
40.7% 40.2% 39.0% 40.5% 58.9 62.1 59.5 59.9Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Second Circuit Second Circuit
50
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
10
20
30
40
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201335.5 35.8 38.9 32.4 78.0% 72.7% 70.4% 75.9%
48.7 48.8 49.4 50.5 55.8% 57.9% 56.5% 57.6%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Second Circuit Second Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
300
350
400
450
500
550
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
27.7 26.1 27.4 24.6 120 94 95 105
27.7 29.9 29.1 29.0 115 112 115 110
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
First Circuit Second Circuit
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 2 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Jury Management Indices Report Franklin County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
33.3% 25.6% 38.0% 30.0% 40.3 115.0 100.0 37.0
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Franklin Franklin
State Median State Median
60
70
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201333.3 115.0 76.0 33.8 64.0% 24.3% 38.8% 68.9%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Franklin
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Franklin
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
21.3 28.0 29.5 23.3 3 1 2 4
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Franklin Franklin
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 2 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Gadsden County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
48.8% 62.0% 45.7% 41.9% 56.7 73.8 66.9 49.4
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Gadsden Gadsden
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201345.8 57.3 49.7 40.7 63.6% 42.4% 55.3% 51.8%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Gadsden Gadsden
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
29.1 24.3 27.5 21.1 15 6 10 12
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Gadsden Gadsden
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 2 - 3
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Jefferson County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
70
80
90
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
39.4% 37.3% 0.0% 41.3% 110.0 59.5 0.0 62.0
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Jefferson Jefferson
State Median State Median
100
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
20
40
60
80
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201398.5 56.0 0.0 62.0 7.6% 12.5% 0.0% 11.3%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Jefferson
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Jefferson
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
7.5 7.0 0.0 7.0 2 2 0 1
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Jefferson Jefferson
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 2 - 4
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Leon County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
40
50
60
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
42.9% 41.5% 38.6% 41.8% 42.1 40.0 47.5 39.1
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Leon Leon
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201333.4 32.4 38.0 31.0 83.3% 79.5% 71.1% 80.3%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Leon Leon
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
80
160
240
320
400
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
27.8 25.7 27.0 24.9 91 76 74 82
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Leon Leon
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 2 - 5
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Liberty County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
28.0% 32.6% 37.7% 39.3% 35.0 66.0 69.0 53.0
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Liberty Liberty
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201328.0 66.0 58.5 53.0 75.0% 34.1% 52.1% 39.6%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Liberty
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Liberty
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
21.0 22.5 30.5 21.0 1 2 2 2
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Liberty Liberty
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 2 - 6
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Wakulla County
50%
60%
70%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
20%
30%
40%
50%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
58.5% 59.5% 62.8% 60.0% 29.3 35.1 22.3 23.5
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Wakulla Wakulla
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
180%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
60%
100%
140%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201324.9 29.1 17.3 18.3 124.6% 127.5% 171.9% 205.5%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Wakulla Wakulla
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
31.0 37.1 29.7 37.5 8 7 7 4
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Wakulla Wakulla
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 2 - 7
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Third Judicial Circuit
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
45.4% 53.0% 33.0% 44.7% 43.0 33.3 44.2 50.2
40.7% 40.2% 39.0% 40.5% 58.9 62.1 59.5 59.9Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Third Circuit Third Circuit
50
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201342.7 28.8 36.3 45.1 54.1% 62.9% 58.7% 63.7%
48.7 48.8 49.4 50.5 55.8% 57.9% 56.5% 57.6%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Third Circuit Third Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
120
220
320
420
520
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
23.1 18.1 21.3 28.7 22 19 13 14
27.7 29.9 29.1 29.0 115 112 115 110
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Third Circuit Third Circuit
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 3 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Jury Management Indices Report Columbia County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
48.8% 58.9% 31.7% 45.3% 32.7 32.3 34.2 62.0
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Columbia Columbia
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201332.7 32.3 34.2 62.0 86.6% 100.0% 100.0% 84.2%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Columbia Columbia
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
60
70
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
28.3 32.3 34.2 52.2 13 8 5 5
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Columbia Columbia
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 3 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Dixie County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
80
100
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
20
40
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
21.8% 0.0% 18.8% 22.0% 92.5 0.0 37.5 64.0
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Dixie Dixie
State Median State Median
100
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
20
40
60
80
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201392.5 0.0 37.5 64.0 38.9% 0.0% 49.3% 37.5%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Dixie
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Dixie
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
36.0 0.0 18.5 24.0 2 0 2 1
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Dixie Dixie
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 3 - 3
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Hamilton County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
120
160
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
40
80
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
0.0% 0.0% 21.0% 4.7% 0.0 0.0 21.0 7.0
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Hamilton Hamilton
State Median State Median
160
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
40
80
120
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
20130.0 0.0 21.0 7.0 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Hamilton Hamilton
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
20
40
60
80
100
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
0.0 0.0 21.0 7.0 0 0 1 1
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Hamilton Hamilton
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 3 - 4
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Lafayette County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
80
100
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
20
40
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
36.3% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Lafayette Lafayette
State Median State Median
100
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
20
40
60
80
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
20130.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0% 70.0% 0.0% 0.0%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Lafayette
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Lafayette
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
0.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Lafayette Lafayette
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 3 - 5
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Madison County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
120
160
200
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
40
80
120
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
42.7% 0.0% 43.8% 46.9% 54.0 0.0 0.0 91.0
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Madison Madison
State Median State Median
200
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
50
100
150
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201351.0 0.0 0.0 75.0 13.7% 0.0% 0.0% 10.7%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Madison Madison
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
7.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 2 0 0 1
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Madison Madison
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 3 - 6
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Suwannee County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
80
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
46.9% 40.8% 38.0% 55.2% 32.3 32.8 63.3 43.5
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Suwannee Suwannee
State Median State Median
90
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
30
50
70
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201332.3 24.3 37.5 43.5 21.7% 29.6% 18.7% 16.1%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Suwannee
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Suwannee
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
7.0 7.2 7.0 7.0 4 10 4 2
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Suwannee Suwannee
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 3 - 7
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Taylor County
60%
70%
80%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
80
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
20%
30%
40%
50%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
100.0% 28.9% 100.0% 54.5% 70.0 0.0 20.0 36.0
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Taylor Taylor
State Median State Median
100
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
20
40
60
80
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201370.0 0.0 20.0 22.0 38.6% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Taylor Taylor
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
27.0 0.0 20.0 22.0 1 0 1 4
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Taylor Taylor
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 3 - 8
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Fourth Judicial Circuit
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
34.3% 35.2% 36.0% 34.9% 74.4 60.4 54.6 54.7
40.7% 40.2% 39.0% 40.5% 58.9 62.1 59.5 59.9
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Fourth Circuit Fourth Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201355.9 45.2 42.6 42.5 75.0% 91.5% 96.4% 85.0%
48.7 48.8 49.4 50.5 55.8% 57.9% 56.5% 57.6%Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Fourth Circuit Fourth Circuit
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
350
430
510
590
670
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
41.9 41.3 41.1 36.1 93 139 124 138
27.7 29.9 29.1 29.0 115 112 115 110
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Fourth Circuit Fourth Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 4 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Jury Management Indices Report Clay County
50%
60%
70%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
70
90
110
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
20%
30%
40%
50%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
10
30
50
70
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
42.0% 45.1% 40.8% 45.3% 143.3 93.7 114.5 102.1
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Clay Clay
State Median State Median
100
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
20
40
60
80
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013133.3 77.3 100.2 89.1 18.6% 37.8% 26.8% 31.8%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Clay
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Clay
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
24.9 29.2 26.8 28.4 7 9 6 8
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Clay Clay
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 4 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Duval County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
31.1% 32.8% 34.6% 31.8% 66.6 57.7 49.4 49.2
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Duval Duval
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201346.7 41.9 37.1 36.7 95.5% 103.4% 114.6% 100.7%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Duval Duval
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
44.6 43.3 42.6 36.9 81 123 113 126
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Duval Duval
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 4 - 3
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Nassau County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
80
100
120
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
40
60
80
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
43.5% 41.1% 39.7% 45.3% 104.2 66.3 100.6 134.5
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Nassau Nassau
State Median State Median
100
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
20
40
60
80
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201395.8 61.3 97.6 131.0 22.5% 35.2% 26.2% 18.5%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Nassau
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Nassau
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
21.6 21.6 25.6 24.3 5 7 5 4
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Nassau Nassau
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 4 - 4
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Ma
30%
40%
50%
Quarterly
0%
10%
20%
30%
Circuit Median
Quarterly Summoning YieFifth Circuit
nagement Indices Report Fifth Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar
Q l JDPT
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
42.4% 40.9% 43.9% 43.0% 67.6 46.4 51.1 57.9
40.7% 40.2% 39.0% 40.5% 58.9 62.1 59.5 59.9Circuit Median
ld
Quarterly JDPT
Fifth Circuit
50
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
90%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
10
20
30
40
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201351.8 37.9 41.8 48.2 51.9% 59.5% 53.0% 53.0%
48.7 48.8 49.4 50.5 55.8% 57.9% 56.5% 57.6%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Fifth Circuit Fifth Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
300
350
400
450
500
550
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
26.9 22.6 22.2 25.6 101 136 116 98
27.7 29.9 29.1 29.0 115 112 115 110
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Fifth Circuit Fifth Circuit
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 5 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Jury Management Indices Report Citrus County
40%
50%
60%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
80
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
10%
20%
30%
40%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
47.9% 54.6% 63.4% 48.9% 70.0 55.3 50.9 62.9
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Citrus Citrus
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201357.8 46.1 41.6 48.0 46.1% 44.3% 51.7% 56.8%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Citrus Citrus
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
20
40
60
80
100
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
26.7 20.4 21.5 27.3 6 9 8 11
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Citrus Citrus
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 5 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Hernando County
50%
60%
70%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
80
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
20%
30%
40%
50%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
55.2% 54.8% 60.2% 50.1% 57.1 67.2 59.1 80.2
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Hernando Hernando
State Median State Median
60
70
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201344.8 59.3 48.2 63.6 71.5% 56.6% 63.3% 73.3%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Hernando
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Hernando
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
60
70
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
32.0 33.6 30.5 46.6 18 9 14 9
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Hernando Hernando
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 5 - 3
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Lake County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
35.5% 34.3% 38.4% 41.7% 48.5 49.3 37.6 37.9
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Lake Lake
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201339.1 37.8 27.5 29.9 58.2% 65.0% 82.6% 70.9%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Lake Lake
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
30
60
90
120
150
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
22.7 24.6 22.7 21.2 29 29 35 26
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Lake Lake
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 5 - 4
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Marion County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
37.7% 37.5% 36.3% 38.9% 82.8 41.7 54.8 66.2
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Marion Marion
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201361.7 34.2 46.9 57.9 43.9% 60.4% 42.2% 42.4%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Marion
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Marion
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
70
140
210
280
350
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
27.1 20.7 19.8 24.6 47 86 55 47
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Marion Marion
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 5 - 5
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Sumter County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
30.0% 23.4% 32.9% 34.1% 83.0 64.7 91.5 32.6
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Sumter Sumter
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201345.0 54.7 76.0 25.6 100.0% 55.5% 29.3% 61.7%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Sumter Sumter
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
45.0 30.3 22.3 15.8 1 3 4 5
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Sumter Sumter
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 5 - 6
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Sixth Judicial Circuit
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
42.8% 42.8% 42.6% 44.4% 60.9 64.3 64.4 66.1
40.7% 40.2% 39.0% 40.5% 58.9 62.1 59.5 59.9Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Sixth Circuit Sixth Circuit
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201352.2 56.7 54.8 55.5 52.5% 48.4% 51.2% 53.0%
48.7 48.8 49.4 50.5 55.8% 57.9% 56.5% 57.6%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Sixth Circuit Sixth Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
27.4 27.4 28.1 29.4 166 134 142 170
27.7 29.9 29.1 29.0 115 112 115 110
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Sixth Circuit Sixth Circuit
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 6 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Jury Management Indices Report Pasco County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
39.1% 41.5% 39.7% 41.4% 62.9 58.0 74.2 67.0
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Pasco Pasco
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201351.1 47.4 62.5 59.2 56.8% 58.2% 42.9% 47.5%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Pasco Pasco
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
60
120
180
240
300
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
29.0 27.6 26.8 28.1 43 40 34 41
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Pasco Pasco
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 6 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Pinellas County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
44.9% 43.5% 44.1% 45.8% 60.3 67.0 61.3 65.8
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Pinellas Pinellas
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201352.6 60.7 52.4 54.3 51.1% 45.1% 54.3% 54.9%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Pinellas
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Pinellas
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
26.9 27.4 28.5 29.8 123 94 108 129
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Pinellas Pinellas
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 6 - 3
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Seventh Judicial Circuit
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
40.9% 40.1% 41.8% 42.6% 48.2 46.5 41.2 45.1
40.7% 40.2% 39.0% 40.5% 58.9 62.1 59.5 59.9
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Seventh Circuit Seventh Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
50
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
10
20
30
40
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201337.1 35.7 30.8 35.1 57.5% 55.6% 70.0% 57.4%
48.7 48.8 49.4 50.5 55.8% 57.9% 56.5% 57.6%Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Seventh Circuit Seventh Circuit
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
50
150
250
350
450
550
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
21.4 19.9 21.5 20.2 74 69 87 79
27.7 29.9 29.1 29.0 115 112 115 110
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Seventh Circuit Seventh Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 7 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Jury Management Indices Report Flagler County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
80
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
28.8% 35.7% 33.3% 28.6% 54.5 35.2 37.2 58.1
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Flagler Flagler
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201349.2 28.9 29.5 51.3 30.8% 45.7% 73.1% 27.9%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Flagler Flagler
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
15.2 13.2 21.5 14.3 6 10 13 7
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Flagler Flagler
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 7 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Putnam County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
29.5% 33.0% 32.8% 30.4% 34.5 51.5 28.7 55.0
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Putnam Putnam
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201326.5 45.3 20.2 44.2 77.0% 42.3% 108.8% 52.8%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Putnam
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Putnam
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
20.4 19.2 22.0 23.3 12 6 14 6
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Putnam Putnam
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 7 - 3
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report St. Johns County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
40.3% 41.0% 43.3% 45.7% 56.4 41.7 38.6 39.1
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
St. Johns St. Johns
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201335.3 24.9 26.3 24.4 54.3% 75.3% 37.1% 66.6%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
St. Johns St. Johns
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
19.1 18.7 9.8 16.3 8 14 9 12
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
St. Johns St. Johns
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 7 - 4
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Volusia County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
44.6% 41.7% 44.4% 46.1% 49.5 50.3 46.1 43.6
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Volusia Volusia
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201338.6 39.9 34.8 34.4 58.9% 55.4% 67.5% 62.4%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Volusia
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Volusia
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
70
140
210
280
350
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
22.8 22.1 23.5 21.4 48 39 51 54
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Volusia Volusia
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 7 - 5
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report* Eighth Judicial Circuit
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
40.4% 38.0% 38.3% 43.0% 43.3 48.9 50.8 50.4
40.7% 40.2% 39.0% 40.5% 58.9 62.1 59.5 59.9
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Eighth Circuit Eighth Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
50
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
10
20
30
40
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201335.0 38.2 38.6 38.5 75.3% 79.0% 76.4% 76.8%
48.7 48.8 49.4 50.5 55.8% 57.9% 56.5% 57.6%Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Eighth Circuit Eighth Circuit
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
100
200
300
400
500
600
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
26.3 30.2 29.5 29.6 50 45 50 55
27.7 29.9 29.1 29.0 115 112 115 110
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Eighth Circuit Eighth Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
*Missing data for Baker County for August 2012.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 8 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Jury Management Indices Report Alachua County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
40
50
60
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
39.9% 38.6% 37.5% 44.6% 45.6 48.1 49.8 43.4
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Alachua Alachua
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201335.7 36.1 36.9 32.5 87.9% 84.6% 78.4% 93.8%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Alachua
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Alachua
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
40
80
120
160
200
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
31.4 30.6 28.9 30.5 33 36 42 40
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Alachua Alachua
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 8 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report* Baker County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
80
100
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
20
40
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
42.4% 42.6% 43.2% 45.0% 26.6 78.0 61.3 27.5
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Baker Baker
State Median State Median
100
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
20
40
60
80
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201321.9 74.5 46.3 21.5 48.7% 42.3% 36.0% 48.3%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Baker Baker
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
10.7 31.5 16.7 10.4 9 2 3 8
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Baker Baker
*Missing data for Baker County for August 2012.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 8 - 3
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Bradford County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
90
120
150
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
30
60
90
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
47.2% 34.0% 54.7% 40.6% 203.0 42.0 0.0 117.3
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Bradford Bradford
State Median State Median
150
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
30
60
90
120
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013196.0 36.5 0.0 86.0 3.6% 69.9% 0.0% 75.6%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Bradford
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Bradford
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
20
40
60
80
100
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
7.0 25.5 0.0 65.0 1 4 0 3
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Bradford Bradford
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 8 - 4
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Gilchrist County
40%
50%
60%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
80
100
120
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
10%
20%
30%
40%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
20
40
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 31.4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.0
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Gilchrist Gilchrist
State Median State Median
110
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
30
50
70
90
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
20130.0 0.0 0.0 55.0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.7%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Gilchrist Gilchrist
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 0 0 0 1
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Gilchrist Gilchrist
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 8 - 5
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Levy County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
34.5% 34.2% 36.0% 38.1% 32.5 38.0 59.7 123.7
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Levy Levy
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201325.5 31.0 52.7 99.7 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 41.5%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Levy
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Levy
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
25.5 31.0 52.7 41.3 6 3 3 3
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Levy Levy
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 8 - 6
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Union County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
150
200
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
50
100
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
31.3% 30.0% 35.0% 36.0% 25.0 0.0 28.0 0.0
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Union Union
State Median State Median
150
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
30
60
90
120
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201325.0 0.0 28.0 0.0 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Union Union
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
25.0 0.0 28.0 0.0 1 0 2 0
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Union Union
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 8 - 7
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Ninth Judicial Circuit
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
45.3% 46.9% 46.0% 46.8% 44.6 48.4 50.9 61.9
40.7% 40.2% 39.0% 40.5% 58.9 62.1 59.5 59.9Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Ninth Circuit Ninth Circuit
50
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
10
20
30
40
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201337.0 42.3 45.0 53.5 67.0% 60.8% 57.3% 53.3%
48.7 48.8 49.4 50.5 55.8% 57.9% 56.5% 57.6%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Ninth Circuit Ninth Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
300
600
900
1,200
1,500
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
24.8 25.7 25.8 28.5 360 303 281 226
27.7 29.9 29.1 29.0 115 112 115 110
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Ninth Circuit Ninth Circuit
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 9 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Jury Management Indices Report Orange County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
40
50
60
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
46.3% 48.2% 47.4% 48.1% 46.4 51.7 50.7 59.9
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Orange Orange
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201338.5 45.2 44.8 52.0 67.2% 59.0% 59.1% 56.4%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Orange
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Orange
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
25.9 26.6 26.4 29.3 272 228 222 186
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Orange Orange
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 9 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Osceola County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
40.2% 40.4% 39.0% 40.2% 39.0 38.5 52.0 71.4
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Osceola Osceola
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201332.5 33.6 45.7 60.6 66.4% 68.2% 51.0% 41.0%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Osceola Osceola
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
70
140
210
280
350
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
21.6 22.9 23.3 24.9 88 75 59 40
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Osceola Osceola
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 9 - 3
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Tenth Judicial Circuit
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
39.0% 35.6% 38.6% 36.1% 41.4 48.0 39.7 39.0
40.7% 40.2% 39.0% 40.5% 58.9 62.1 59.5 59.9
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Tenth Circuit Tenth Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201328.8 33.7 27.9 26.2 106.4% 89.8% 113.8% 109.5%
48.7 48.8 49.4 50.5 55.8% 57.9% 56.5% 57.6%Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Tenth Circuit Tenth Circuit
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
200
300
400
500
600
700
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
30.6 30.2 31.7 28.7 112 111 115 141
27.7 29.9 29.1 29.0 115 112 115 110
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Tenth Circuit Tenth Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 10 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Jury Management Indices Report Hardee County
60%
70%
80%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
145
185
225
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
30%
40%
50%
60%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
25
65
105
145
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
65.7% 61.1% 51.0% 36.7% 36.0 51.5 283.0 95.8
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Hardee Hardee
State Median State Median
200
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
40
80
120
160
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201325.5 44.5 269.0 63.2 27.5% 15.7% 2.6% 18.7%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Hardee
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Hardee
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
7.0 7.0 7.0 11.8 4 4 1 5
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Hardee Hardee
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 10 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Highlands County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
40
50
60
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
15.9% 16.0% 22.1% 22.1% 28.4 42.2 28.5 31.1
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Highlands Highlands
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201319.5 25.9 17.3 18.8 82.1% 78.1% 95.2% 101.8%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Highlands Highlands
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
16.0 20.2 16.4 19.2 8 9 12 12
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Highlands Highlands
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 10 - 3
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Polk County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
39.9% 36.2% 39.1% 37.1% 42.7 48.4 38.7 37.5
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Polk Polk
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201329.7 33.9 26.8 25.4 110.4% 94.6% 126.2% 119.1%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Polk
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Polk
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
32.7 32.1 33.8 30.3 100 98 102 124
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Polk Polk
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 10 - 4
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Eleventh Judicial Circuit
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
70
80
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
38.6% 36.3% 35.1% 36.6% 82.1 86.7 90.0 88.7
40.7% 40.2% 39.0% 40.5% 58.9 62.1 59.5 59.9Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Eleventh Circuit Eleventh Circuit
100
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
20
40
60
80
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201368.9 71.0 73.2 71.4 61.3% 60.7% 59.7% 57.8%
48.7 48.8 49.4 50.5 55.8% 57.9% 56.5% 57.6%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Eleventh Circuit Eleventh Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
300
500
700
900
1,100
1,300
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
42.2 43.1 43.7 41.2 244 206 224 222
27.7 29.9 29.1 29.0 115 112 115 110
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Eleventh Circuit Eleventh Circuit
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 11 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Jury Management Indices Report Dade County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
80
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
38.6% 36.3% 35.1% 36.6% 82.1 86.7 90.0 88.7
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Dade Dade
State Median State Median
100
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
20
40
60
80
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201368.9 71.0 73.2 71.4 61.3% 60.7% 59.7% 57.8%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Dade Dade
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
42.2 43.1 43.7 41.2 244 206 224 222
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Dade Dade
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 11 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Twelfth Judicial Circuit
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
37.5% 36.2% 37.9% 37.7% 62.3 75.7 66.6 69.5
40.7% 40.2% 39.0% 40.5% 58.9 62.1 59.5 59.9
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Twelfth Circuit Twelfth Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201353.3 60.6 57.0 55.3 55.6% 56.4% 55.7% 57.9%
48.7 48.8 49.4 50.5 55.8% 57.9% 56.5% 57.6%Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Twelfth Circuit Twelfth Circuit
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
300
350
400
450
500
550
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
29.6 34.2 31.7 32.0 82 80 86 89
27.7 29.9 29.1 29.0 115 112 115 110
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Twelfth Circuit Twelfth Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 12 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Jury Management Indices Report Desoto County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
90
110
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
30
50
70
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
20.9% 0.0% 0.0% 18.3% 75.0 0.0 0.0 73.0
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Desoto Desoto
State Median State Median
100
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
20
40
60
80
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201360.0 0.0 0.0 73.0 48.3% 0.0% 0.0% 41.1%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Desoto
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Desoto
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
29.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 2 0 0 1
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Desoto Desoto
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 12 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Manatee County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
80
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
43.0% 41.4% 46.6% 45.8% 48.7 68.6 54.8 63.2
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Manatee Manatee
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201339.5 51.6 45.2 51.4 72.9% 66.9% 67.1% 62.9%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Manatee Manatee
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
50
100
150
200
250
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
28.8 34.5 30.3 32.3 50 39 46 34
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Manatee Manatee
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 12 - 3
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Sarasota County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
80
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
35.5% 33.7% 32.6% 34.7% 84.2 82.5 80.1 73.4
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Sarasota Sarasota
State Median State Median
80
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
20
40
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201375.7 69.1 70.5 57.4 40.9% 49.0% 47.4% 55.5%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Sarasota
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Sarasota
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
60
120
180
240
300
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
31.0 33.9 33.4 31.9 30 41 40 54
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Sarasota Sarasota
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 12 - 4
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Thirteenth Judicial Circuit
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
24.9% 23.6% 23.9% 23.6% 51.4 47.3 44.7 49.1
40.7% 40.2% 39.0% 40.5% 58.9 62.1 59.5 59.9Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Thirteenth Circuit Thirteenth Circuit
50
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
10
20
30
40
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201339.6 35.9 30.6 33.2 75.3% 82.9% 102.4% 90.0%
48.7 48.8 49.4 50.5 55.8% 57.9% 56.5% 57.6%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Thirteenth Circuit Thirteenth Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
300
400
500
600
700
800
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
29.8 29.7 31.3 29.9 171 151 174 194
27.7 29.9 29.1 29.0 115 112 115 110
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Thirteenth Circuit Thirteenth Circuit
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 13 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Jury Management Indices Report Hillsborough County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
24.9% 23.6% 23.9% 23.6% 51.4 47.3 44.7 49.1
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Hillsborough Hillsborough
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201339.6 35.9 30.6 33.2 75.3% 82.9% 102.4% 90.0%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Hillsborough Hillsborough
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
200
400
600
800
1000
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
29.8 29.7 31.3 29.9 171 151 174 194
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Hillsborough Hillsborough
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 13 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Fourteenth Judicial Circuit
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
41.2% 42.9% 39.3% 39.2% 56.9 74.4 68.9 45.4
40.7% 40.2% 39.0% 40.5% 58.9 62.1 59.5 59.9Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Fourteenth Circuit Fourteenth Circuit
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201345.6 63.7 60.0 36.5 17.0% 16.8% 16.1% 21.1%
48.7 48.8 49.4 50.5 55.8% 57.9% 56.5% 57.6%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Fourteenth Circuit Fourteenth Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
100
200
300
400
500
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
7.7 10.7 9.7 7.7 31 21 21 36
27.7 29.9 29.1 29.0 115 112 115 110
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Fourteenth Circuit Fourteenth Circuit
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 14 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Jury Management Indices Report Bay County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
42.6% 44.5% 42.9% 40.9% 58.9 81.1 73.4 44.4
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Bay Bay
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
110%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
10%
30%
50%
70%
90%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201345.9 68.6 65.1 35.2 16.2% 10.7% 11.1% 20.2%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Bay Bay
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
30
60
90
120
150
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
7.4 7.3 7.2 7.1 23 13 14 29
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Bay Bay
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 14 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Calhoun County
60%
70%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
90
120
150
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
30%
40%
50%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
30
60
90
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
56.6% 44.3% 38.0% 0.0% 0.0 95.0 63.0 0.0
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Calhoun Calhoun
State Median State Median
150
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
30
60
90
120
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
20130.0 77.5 50.7 0.0 0.0% 38.1% 40.8% 0.0%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Calhoun
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Calhoun
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
0.0 29.5 20.7 0.0 0 2 3 0
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Calhoun Calhoun
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 14 - 3
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Gulf County
40%
50%
60%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
10%
20%
30%
40%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
0.0% 36.4% 64.0% 37.3% 0.0 96.0 14.0 28.0
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Gulf Gulf
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
20130.0 82.0 14.0 28.0 0.0% 43.9% 42.9% 25.0%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Gulf Gulf
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
0.0 36.0 6.0 7.0 0 1 1 1
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Gulf Gulf
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 14 - 4
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Holmes County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
150
200
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
50
100
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
23.1% 0.0% 13.7% 24.7% 111.0 0.0 48.0 51.0
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Holmes Holmes
State Median State Median
150
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
30
60
90
120
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201397.0 0.0 41.0 37.0 21.6% 0.0% 51.2% 48.6%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Holmes
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Holmes
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
21.0 0.0 21.0 18.0 1 0 1 2
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Holmes Holmes
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 14 - 5
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Jackson County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
46.4% 42.5% 33.3% 0.0% 34.8 49.5 77.0 0.0
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Jackson Jackson
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201329.0 42.5 50.0 0.0 23.6% 16.5% 14.0% 0.0%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Jackson Jackson
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
6.8 7.0 7.0 0.0 6 2 1 0
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Jackson Jackson
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 14 - 6
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Washington County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
90
120
150
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
30
60
90
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
32.7% 35.1% 33.5% 38.5% 49.0 41.0 92.0 54.8
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Washington Washington
State Median State Median
150
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
30
60
90
120
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201349.0 41.0 92.0 47.8 14.3% 16.3% 6.5% 14.7%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Washington
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Washington
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
7.0 6.7 6.0 7.0 1 3 1 4
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Washington Washington
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 14 - 7
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Fifteenth Judicial Circuit
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
80
100
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
20
40
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
32.6% 31.7% 32.1% 33.0% 76.5 70.5 65.4 67.3
40.7% 40.2% 39.0% 40.5% 58.9 62.1 59.5 59.9Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Fifteenth Circuit Fifteenth Circuit
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201363.5 55.0 53.9 53.8 47.8% 58.0% 53.0% 54.4%
48.7 48.8 49.4 50.5 55.8% 57.9% 56.5% 57.6%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Fifteenth Circuit Fifteenth Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
30.3 31.9 28.6 29.3 186 176 197 206
27.7 29.9 29.1 29.0 115 112 115 110
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Fifteenth Circuit Fifteenth Circuit
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 15 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Jury Management Indices Report Palm Beach County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
80
100
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
20
40
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
32.6% 31.7% 32.1% 33.0% 76.5 70.5 65.4 67.3
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Palm Beach Palm Beach
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201363.5 55.0 53.9 53.8 47.8% 58.0% 53.0% 54.4%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Palm Beach Palm Beach
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
30.3 31.9 28.6 29.3 186 176 197 206
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Palm Beach Palm Beach
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 15 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Sixteenth Judicial Circuit
50%
60%
70%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
20%
30%
40%
50%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
30.6% 27.5% 23.6% 25.9% 52.7 63.7 82.3 66.1
40.7% 40.2% 39.0% 40.5% 58.9 62.1 59.5 59.9Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Sixteenth Circuit Sixteenth Circuit
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201344.1 52.4 72.6 57.2 52.2% 57.8% 29.7% 35.4%
48.7 48.8 49.4 50.5 55.8% 57.9% 56.5% 57.6%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Sixteenth Circuit Sixteenth Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
23.0 30.3 21.5 20.3 24 23 15 21
27.7 29.9 29.1 29.0 115 112 115 110
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Sixteenth Circuit Sixteenth Circuit
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 16 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Jury Management Indices Report Monroe County
50%
60%
70%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
20%
30%
40%
50%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
30.6% 27.5% 23.6% 25.9% 52.7 63.7 82.3 66.1
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Monroe Monroe
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201344.1 52.4 72.6 57.2 52.2% 57.8% 29.7% 35.4%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Monroe Monroe
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
40
80
120
160
200
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
23.0 30.3 21.5 20.3 24 23 15 21
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Monroe Monroe
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 16 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Seventeenth Judicial Circuit
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
70
80
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
39.2% 40.4% 40.3% 39.5% 99.5 79.6 77.8 73.2
40.7% 40.2% 39.0% 40.5% 58.9 62.1 59.5 59.9
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Seventeenth Circuit Seventeenth Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
150%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0%
30%
60%
90%
120%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201378.7 63.0 59.3 57.1 54.4% 48.3% 51.1% 52.9%
48.7 48.8 49.4 50.5 55.8% 57.9% 56.5% 57.6%Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Seventeenth Circuit Seventeenth Circuit
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
300
600
900
1,200
1,500
1,800
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
42.8 30.4 30.3 30.2 183 173 176 186
27.7 29.9 29.1 29.0 115 112 115 110
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Seventeenth Circuit Seventeenth Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 17 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Jury Management Indices Report Broward County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
80
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
39.2% 40.4% 40.3% 39.5% 99.5 79.6 77.8 73.2
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Broward Broward
State Median State Median
100
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
20
40
60
80
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201378.7 63.0 59.3 57.1 54.4% 48.3% 51.1% 52.9%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Broward
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Broward
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
400
800
1,200
1,600
2,000
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
42.8 30.4 30.3 30.2 183 173 176 186
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Broward Broward
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 17 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Eighteenth Judicial Circuit
40%
50%
60%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
10%
20%
30%
40%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
49.4% 46.4% 44.5% 51.4% 70.0 84.4 77.4 87.8
40.7% 40.2% 39.0% 40.5% 58.9 62.1 59.5 59.9
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Eighteenth Circuit Eighteenth Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201353.0 68.3 66.1 72.0 56.0% 45.1% 47.7% 44.6%
48.7 48.8 49.4 50.5 55.8% 57.9% 56.5% 57.6%Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Eighteenth Circuit Eighteenth Circuit
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
300
400
500
600
700
800
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
29.6 30.8 31.5 32.1 150 99 115 109
27.7 29.9 29.1 29.0 115 112 115 110
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Eighteenth Circuit Eighteenth Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 18 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Jury Management Indices Report Brevard County
40%
50%
60%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
80
100
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
10%
20%
30%
40%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
20
40
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
47.1% 45.4% 45.2% 47.0% 96.0 111.5 103.0 99.6
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Brevard Brevard
State Median State Median
100
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
20
40
60
80
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201372.9 89.4 89.8 80.7 46.5% 39.1% 40.3% 41.7%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Brevard
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Brevard
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
100
200
300
400
500
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
33.9 35.0 36.2 33.6 75 59 66 67
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Brevard Brevard
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 18 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Seminole County
50%
60%
70%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
20%
30%
40%
50%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
55.1% 48.9% 43.0% 59.0% 44.0 44.5 42.9 69.1
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Seminole Seminole
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201333.1 37.1 34.1 58.1 76.7% 66.2% 73.7% 51.1%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Seminole Seminole
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
70
140
210
280
350
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
25.4 24.6 25.2 29.7 75 40 49 42
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Seminole Seminole
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 18 - 3
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Nineteenth Judicial Circuit
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
70
80
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
44.5% 43.7% 46.9% 45.6% 83.2 69.5 66.2 62.2
40.7% 40.2% 39.0% 40.5% 58.9 62.1 59.5 59.9Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Nineteenth Circuit Nineteenth Circuit
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201372.5 60.8 56.5 52.7 53.6% 55.8% 62.1% 65.3%
48.7 48.8 49.4 50.5 55.8% 57.9% 56.5% 57.6%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Nineteenth Circuit Nineteenth Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
100
200
300
400
500
600
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
38.8 33.9 35.1 34.4 62 67 78 89
27.7 29.9 29.1 29.0 115 112 115 110
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Nineteenth Circuit Nineteenth Circuit
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 19 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Jury Management Indices Report Indian River County
50%
60%
70%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
20%
30%
40%
50%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
55.0% 54.9% 58.1% 54.8% 77.4 50.2 66.2 45.4
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Indian River Indian River
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201355.5 38.8 46.4 38.2 57.9% 79.9% 72.0% 65.0%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Indian River
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Indian River
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
32.2 31.0 33.4 24.8 19 23 21 25
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Indian River Indian River
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 19 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Martin County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
80
100
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
20
40
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
37.1% 32.1% 44.4% 35.0% 114.7 105.2 95.7 87.3
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Martin Martin
State Median State Median
100
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
20
40
60
80
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201399.3 87.1 76.9 61.8 36.5% 52.5% 65.0% 78.0%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Martin Martin
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
36.2 45.7 50.0 48.2 10 10 15 24
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Martin Martin
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 19 - 3
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Okeechobee County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
80
100
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
20
40
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
22.5% 25.4% 33.2% 29.6% 54.5 66.5 37.9 19.2
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Okeechobee Okeechobee
State Median State Median
100
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
20
40
60
80
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201342.5 48.8 32.4 14.3 100.0% 34.9% 96.3% 135.0%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Okeechobee
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Okeechobee
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
42.5 17.0 31.2 19.3 4 8 10 10
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Okeechobee Okeechobee
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 19 - 4
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report St. Lucie County
30%
40%
50%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
60
70
80
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
0%
10%
20%
30%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
44.3% 46.9% 43.4% 47.8% 80.1 73.8 61.1 70.4
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
St. Lucie St. Lucie
State Median State Median
100
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
20
40
60
80
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201378.4 73.8 61.1 70.4 55.6% 50.3% 49.9% 51.8%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
St. Lucie St. Lucie
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
50
100
150
200
250
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
43.6 37.1 30.5 36.5 29 26 32 30
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
St. Lucie St. Lucie
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 19 - 5
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report* Twentieth Judicial Circuit
40%
50%
60%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
70
80
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
10%
20%
30%
40%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
61.8% 60.2% 59.3% 57.3% 74.0 73.9 87.7 77.2
40.7% 40.2% 39.0% 40.5% 58.9 62.1 59.5 59.9
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Twentieth Circuit Twentieth Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
60
70
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201368.3 68.6 75.2 71.2 40.6% 40.9% 45.6% 40.2%
48.7 48.8 49.4 50.5 55.8% 57.9% 56.5% 57.6%Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Twentieth Circuit Twentieth Circuit
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
300
400
500
600
700
800
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
27.7 28.1 34.3 28.6 117 112 111 111
27.7 29.9 29.1 29.0 115 112 115 110
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Twentieth Circuit Twentieth Circuit
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
*Missing data for Hendry County for June2012.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 20 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Jury Management Indices Report Charlotte County
50%
60%
70%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
40
50
60
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
20%
30%
40%
50%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
63.2% 61.4% 67.6% 63.8% 48.5 39.8 52.4 43.7
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Charlotte Charlotte
State Median State Median
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201340.2 34.2 46.3 40.5 74.0% 86.3% 68.1% 79.8%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Charlotte
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Charlotte
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
30
60
90
120
150
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
29.8 29.5 31.5 32.3 20 30 16 26
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Charlotte Charlotte
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 20 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Collier County
50%
60%
70%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
80
100
120
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
20%
30%
40%
50%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
40
60
80
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
67.8% 62.2% 63.9% 59.4% 91.5 115.8 74.8 87.2
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Collier Collier
State Median State Median
100
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
20
40
60
80
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201386.8 109.2 66.4 79.2 24.2% 18.4% 31.1% 29.8%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Collier Collier
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
80
160
240
320
400
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
21.0 20.1 20.6 23.6 25 16 29 24
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Collier Collier
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 20 - 3
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Glades County
40%
50%
60%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
180
240
300
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
10%
20%
30%
40%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
60
120
180
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
76.6% 0.0% 17.3% 34.4% 34.8 0.0 114.0 113.0
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Glades Glades
State Median State Median
300
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
60
120
180
240
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201334.8 0.0 107.0 103.0 76.3% 0.0% 23.4% 27.5%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Glades
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Glades
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
26.5 0.0 25.0 28.3 4 0 1 3
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Glades Glades
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 20 - 4
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report* Hendry County
60%
70%
80%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
50
60
70
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
30%
40%
50%
60%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
80.7% 83.7% 62.8% 56.0% 58.8 38.5 84.7 91.4
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Hendry Hendry
State Median State Median
60
70
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201358.8 38.5 80.2 90.9 52.7% 67.7% 48.5% 36.3%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Hendry Hendry
State Median State Median
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
31.0 26.1 38.9 33.0 5 12 9 7
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Hendry Hendry
*Missing data for Hendry County for June2012.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 20 - 5
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Jury Management Indices Report Lee County
50%
60%
70%
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend
70
80
90
Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-MarQuarterly
Q l JDPT
20%
30%
40%
50%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
40
50
60
70
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
Apr Jun 2012
Jul Sep 2012
Oct Dec 2012
Jan Mar 2013
54.1% 50.6% 54.2% 56.4% 78.9 88.2 104.5 85.6
40.2% 37.5% 38.4% 40.2% 54.0 50.2 54.8 58.1
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Lee Lee
State Median State Median
100
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
P l B ht I P T i l Q t l D t P t t V i Di Q t l D t
0
20
40
60
80
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
201372.7 82.4 86.6 78.5 40.7% 36.5% 48.0% 36.4%
44.1 41.0 45.7 51.3 52.7% 49.0% 51.1% 51.8%
Lee
State Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Lee
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
0
70
140
210
280
350
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataApr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013Apr-Jun
2012Jul-Sep
2012Oct-Dec
2012Jan-Mar
2013
29.6 30.1 41.6 28.5 63 54 56 51
25.4 24.6 25.0 24.6 10 9 12 11
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Lee Lee
Quarter Ending March 31, 2013 (Data as of May 14, 2013) 20 - 6
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed