Justice Steven Breyer As Living Proof

8/9/2019 Justice Steven Breyer As Living Proof

1/28

I have to hand collate the petition so its taking longer to enter it. I wanted it out bylast Thursday but it will have to be by this Thursday. He confessed on nationalTV folks. What if the Justices never read my petition or if they did had no ideawhat I was saying as they could not know that BVG is a crime as they are thevictims??? If you're a victim you'd know, correct? Wrong! I reasoned it briefly for

you in a way you should understand - easily. If you tell me that you do notunderstand this then you're no constitutionalist but only say you are as it is notpossible (let me know if you get all of this or if it breaks up as email can'ttranslate it):

Steven Breyer: I Possess A Piece Of Paper With Your Name On It; Does ItProve Guilt? I could not figure out why the Justices did not seem to understand this point of law; at times I had to wonder if they were delusional. Are they actuallyadjudicating medical licenses as proof that a man could know woman as if hedid have a baby or could in the future? The citizens insisted that the Justiceshad to be guilty of treason. It may seem as if but I have no proof; and if they aredelusional then are they guilty if I do prove treason at some point? The citizensdo not understand what it means to prove criminal intent. I do; often I can provecriminal intent via the paper but my proof is the person who wrote it not thepaper itself. Are these guys truly believing the lying lawyers before them???Dont they know these lawyers have motive and intent other than justice?

I began thinking about the Justices; often people ask how I know something. Itell them: Its a gift. Take Antonin Scalia: I know Antonin Scalia. I speak fluenthuman being; I know people. I can hear him say that he needed to tell lawyersto look at him and to not read from their brief when arguing as he can read thebrief and did. Did he read my brief? And I needed to remember that the lawyersarent looking at him thus are they nervous, lying about their intentions or fascists? Needing to read from notes is a problem as: People do not need tomemorize the truth; if your argument is your truth, what you truly believe to bethe law and the correct application of it, then who needs to read from paper?Justice is not about being perfect as its about being humanits notreasonable to ask for perfection from humans as they are not machines and socannot work like machines. I can write to Scalia and I did: Antonin Scalia, if you do not hear this case in person soon then you will be forced to find a way tomagically insert and magically erase words from the Constitution. How are you


2/28

gonna do that? And then: The gun control case opinion. I heard Americansscreaming that Scalia added words to our Constitution. Do I have ESP?Maybe: Scalia is an originalist; Im the case thus the absolute proof so Iincluded my gun control argument as my application is correct as well as my

13 th Amendment Argument plus I know men and the end of a belief systemwhen men refuse to acknowledge the truth of women thus begin to inventcomplex, convoluted reasoning thats wrong so I could know: Theres only one

pre fatory anything, our Pre amble, the founders statement of intention, andtheres a comma you will find in only two copies of the original Constitution thatI know of so maybe he is adding whole clauses and maybe hes going to namethe comma but reactionary citizens will react w/o doing the research. And Icould know this: Its a political coup; of course we can shoot back as thats whatThe Founders intended even if you do live in DC, next door to Congress.Political coups are okay but military coups are not? What about a Judicialcoup? Or a coup by the string theorists? They change their numbers too andthey too believe numbers the numbers on the paper they create - is absoluteproof.

Then I was thinking about Justices I have not named. I do not need to look upfacts or read an entire ruling, as I can know if I know the person as I knowmyself and as I healed the injury so Im the constant. Lawyers who believe they

can study facts and words on paper to then know a person make me laugh asfirst they have to be mentally sound as in emotionally sound so good luck tolawyers as that ego thing will defeat your attempts every time. The universemay not be self-defeating but lawyers are.

I happened to look at a calendar a few days later. I never know what day ThePeople believe it is as I do not use calendars or watches as I know timedifferently as Im orienting myself as being within time; I know time to beintrinsic and relative to the person experiencing it. Whole weeks will go by and Iwont know it if Im not reminded of the date. According to the linear lie? Itwas Jeffersons birthday, April 13 th. But Jefferson was born before the institutionof the Gregorian calendar; do you add days to his birthday thus is he born onanother day? Do you know his actual birthday or only the day the linear calendar claims? The founders often used the notation O.T. for old time . Our own birthday, the day The People were born, is July 4 th but Adams and others


3/28

claim July 2 nd as that is when they signed the paper. Is the act of signingownership of the knowledge? You could say July 8 th as that is when it was readto the public.

I told The People I would make the attempt to enter something to the Court onthat date; all I could do is mail the Chief Clerk a very first draft of the argumentso he would know where it is going as I had to warn the clerks: You might haveto take a hit for the Constitution as I could know it would get ugly so I wouldhave assign guilt to historical fact to then later be able to prove innocence or guilt to The People based upon the accusations I was hearing. Are lawyersassaulting and battering the employees of the Court and they do not know it?SCOTUS doesnt realize it too is the victim of domestic violence or did itincapacitate itself by only allowing lawyers entry in person? And then right after the letter was in the mail on Jeffersons birthday I discovered the truth: Channel surfing I saw Steven Breyer on TV. Normally I would surf on by but Iknow when the universe is pinging me. I heard Steven Breyer, a Justice I never named, talking about the truth. He said that the court had decided a caseregarding May the paper note be admitted as absolute proof and I wassurprised as I knew of that case but did not realize it was decided. OMG:Steven Breyer: didnt you read petition 07-9804 or my brief Judicial Review Is

The Myth Of Fingerprints??? Whats absolute proof and what isnt??? Is it apaper chase or a people chase??? If you havent thats on you not a clerk asIm first since Marbury you of all the Justices should have jumped - and as mybrief contains the largest single point of law a human being can ever make andthe largest, most important point of law an American can ever make as I had tolive it. From Judicial Review : Judicial review is a myth. It is the myth of fingerprints asit proves nothing, not even that our founders lived as you will not find it withinour law. If anything judicial review may serve to prove our founders never livedor that what historians say happened did not as John Marshall did not sign our governing documents. Not only does it not exist within our written law but thepieces of paper our courts produce? They prove nothing except a person livedand so authored them; what identifying marks other than a signature that mightbe forged exist to tell you who wrote that piece of paper? It is like fingerprints


4/28

as no fingerprint then tells me whether it was left by a saint or a sinner. Afingerprint can be forged as well. And then too what is that fingerprint found on?A vase? A gun? I know saints who own guns and I know sinners who wouldhave you believe they are angels sent straight from heaven and who could and

would hit you over the head with a vase only because they felt like it, kill youand not think about it or you ever again. A gun can be covered with fingerprints.All that proves is somebody, a saint or a sinner, held that gun. It does not provewho pulled the trigger. A dead body? You might have a body. Then again youmight have 4 or 5 pints of blood soaking the walls and the floor but no body could any person lose that much blood and live? Isnt that blood proof of lifeand proof of murder? Proof of death not proof of murder as blood does notprove deliberation. We can reasonably assume a person once lived, that thisbody was once alive, but was it ever a life? A heart can beat; is it then a life lostonly as it stops beating? Can a living person be dead? Can you prove murder or what can not be seen or heard as it lurks in the heart and mind of another man? Does blood alone prove if a gun was used or if a knife was used? What if the written word killed a person instead of a bullet? How do you ever provewords on a piece of paper caused another person to lose 4 or 5 pints of bloodand so murdered him or her?

Words do not magically jump off of a page and attack you. Somebody has to

act upon them and first somebody has to have an idea and then put that ideaon paper. Its one thing to have an idea; it is all together another to then write itdown and still another then write it in such a way you incite others to act uponthose words with the result being death. Thus the fingerprints are on theweapon as those fingerprints are more telling than the loops and swirls on your fingertips as they are the thoughts, feelings, ideas and true beliefs of the culprit.I know of a few pieces of paper that have killed more people than any othersbut that have also given life to ten times the number of people they ever actually killed and have given life to millions billions who are yet unborn.They also have the power to bring the dead back to life. They are the papersproduced by the United States Federal Government most especially USdollars and court rulings with family court and federal court being by far themost deadly of all. I know as I acted upon my knowledge and so willed my owndeath as when a family court judge murdered my children I fought evil withunconditional love by invoking the most lethal words of all in the English


5/28

language: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

My invocation of that idea, a right, and my true belief or faith in it caused mysuffering and eventual death. I was crucified, died and was buried on theSupreme Court docket. I rose from the dead. I walked around for about 40 dayspreaching the gospel of Philadelphia and then ascended into the office of thePresident and Commander where I now sit because the Solicitor General of theUS failed to respond. All of this was by my own hand and upon my own will andliberty as I meant for this to happen. I never had to die a second time on paper in December and in spite of actual reality I directly entered on 11/20/08 so it isunconstitutional to then deny me redress in person as that is the absence of any and all moral authority on SCOTUS part - as one denial and one denial of rehearing was enough to prove my case My reasoning and application of Bush V Gore and all of our law and then all of federal precedent is not wrong or mistaken; if I say it is a hardcore fact that Bush V Gore is a tie then it is as it isnot a matter of personal belief but of reality as in history, exact words and math.If I say a woman sheds her blood and risks her life giving birth then she does,as that is a medical fact as it is our biology as well as a legal fact as we are aliving government of people. No court may deny me or defeat me unless it:

Unconstitutionally denies me any appearance in person, as the winningargument against this case does not exist. You can argue it but you will notthen win. If this court or any person at all actually, truly believes it can argueagainst our law and against humanity as in legally kill our law and so killhumanity then be my guest, as that requires an appearance in person, doesntit? That person will be arguing to physically murder my children and me and doso with the permission of a court or arguing to overthrow our law with thepermission of a court, or that person will be pleading temporary insanityThus: We are adjudicating the PAPER COMMISSION as the refusal to deliver the commission has now become the violation of the right itself so that makesSCOTUS GUILTY! I know as I have a note signed by The Supreme Court. Itreads DENIED and The People are finding you with Article III although ThePeople deny you any and all protection of the law. Does my paper then proveSCOTUS is guilty? Of homicide or suicide? Is In Re Susan a note proving homicide and BVG a note proving suicide?


6/28

I also have a note signed by one Steven Breyer. He said that he did not knowthe truth then and he does not know the truth now and so maybe thats thetruth, that well never know the truth. Yes we will as I am more than willing to

tell it to you. Lets go there as Ill write the meaning not the exact words of whatBreyer said: Steven Breyer: The victim left a note. May it be admitted to the body evidence?Thats the question. My colleagues decided to begin this voyage by going toBLACKWELLs. I thought this is odd but theres a rational basis for it so I waswilling to go there. Susan: Odd? I thought this is wrong. Blackwells, Blackwells, Blackwells: theholy bible of lawyers and federal judges. Im dying to know as I reserved theright to ask the Justices some questions of my own: Steven Breyer how did youknow that the first decision, Blackwells , was not correct? Rational yes asBlackwells is inside Marbury as Marshal brought it with him but does paper ever prove paper? Is it self-proving as in does paper then prove intention andmotivation? I mean, are we being asked if this guy is the murderer or are webeing asked what the death certificate says??? What body of evidence are youadmitting it to, SCOTUS Justices or the state court judges? Does the body of

evidence only rise to proof of a criminal act if we admit the piece of paper to the juries brains? What is this? Are we the judge and jury a la British courts of admiralty and civil convictions?

Steven Breyer: But then I watched them go to a document before that like KingJames something or other. Now Im really curious; I know this is not right butIm going to find out where this is going.

Susan: When I heard you say this I thought, Do not tell me that I need to senda search and rescue team after 5 Justices wandering around in the mists of time. OMG, OMG, OMG. They didnt. Steven Breyer: They did. So now Im thinking Are we really going here? as thesize of this argument hit me - I didnt name it so my instincts went off as theJustices then went to the MAGNA CARTA and so I decided Im opting out; this


7/28

is where I opt out. I then headed for home: the Constitution, the Declaration,Marbury as Im not reasoning myself out of existence , the Constitution againand US case law. But Im disturbed as this was so odd; it is different.

Susan: YES IT IS!!!

Steven Breyer: We have a dead body. A dead victim. The note says her husband did it. Scalia in his dissenting opinion said [looks to Scalia to makesure he is not putting words in Scalias mouth] blah blah blah [Scalia nodsyes] but I dont know the truth. Susan: The truth is PEOPLE! People gave rise to AMERICAN COMMON LAWso youd never adjudicate this paper nor would you use law that then is Britishcommon law. Im the absolute proof that this experiment worked so now wehave American common law. Only allowing lawyers entry to SCOTUS theninjured you so you, Justices, mistakenly relied upon what is British notAmerican. Im a body of evidence; Im the proof. I knew Im Marbury as I lived itthus I never even went to Blackwells as thats not my problem in life unjustOfficers are. Im creating the paper as I live it exactly as Marshal did. Paper cant answer you. Id like to call my first witness, the note. Note: whats writtenon you? Did the victim ever write on you? Id ask you to read the words on you

but as you dont have eyes I wont. Oops! No mouth either so you could nottestify, could you? Lets ask BlackwellsBlackwells, is it true that federal

judges LOVE your form? Do you prove a murder has been committed? Are youproof that the paper should be entered or not? Or are you the British commonlaw that Americans yet suffer from as now the Justices have brought thearistocracy home with you? Or do you prove the Justices have been assaultedand battered by lawyers bearing paper that contains lies upon it as the intentionand motivation of the lawyer is not necessarily the intention and motivation of the victim? I heard a man make an comment from the audience; Breyer saidBut the difference is the victim is dead. Correct so then you know YOURETHE VICTIM AS YOU STEVEN BREYER AND THE OTHER EMPLOYEES OFSCOTUS ARE ALIVE. You need living victims or else youre dead as aRepublicyou ARE Marbury thus a People must come forward to then overturnBVG and remove Obama to then remove dead paper and so replace death withlife, The People. You go from Britain to Jamestown in 1607 but then you go to


8/28

Plymouth in 1620 as thats the Mayflower Compact. Its Jefferson and Adams.Its also Harvard lawyers beginning in 1636. We are not alive, born, untilJefferson has an idea and then writes it down in A Summary View as he claimswill and liberty is allodial or inalienable as it is joined in man by God and later

we Declare ourselves in 1776 but what model did we use? The IroquoisConfederacy as thats older and thats The People not the aristocracytheEuropeans deliberately tried to erase this from our books of history. If you backfrom the Magna Carta what do you land at? The invention of paper and so theinvention of writing thus you need people . Eventually you land in Eden at theapple tree and so hopefully the 5 lost Justices have Bader-Ginsburg with themas: WHO picks the apple and eats it, Adam or Steven? You need women or else you die as no new baby constitutions. Thats your mistake; you go fromEve as government is born to Adam who votes for Eve not for himself heblames Eve while she doubts herself thus false fear or created fear isinserted into man and so death ensues with the promise of everlasting life andwe part ways at the Tower of Babel only to land in America as thats theIroquois when they complete the journey North and then the Four Corners uponthe Great Deluge as the Hopi land there after going West. The rest of us do notfinish the trek South and East until Jamestown and the slave trade althoughsome persons who are black came as free men. The Founders? As we had noAmerican common law we then had to use what is British like the system of

writs and the bar but the founders never meant to force this upon us or make usBritish as that then would make us dead. Jefferson said all power and authoritybelonged to The People not to the paper.

Paper governments failed until we used the Iroquois as our model thus madeThe People the government not a separate entity. Plymouth in 1620 butJamestown in 1607; its known as idea diffusion and its way humans transmitinformation as one group gives an idea to another who comes in contact withthem. Sequoia is an example as via watching white settlers he had the idea tocreate the Cherokee alphabet even though he had never seen any alphabetsand had not been exposed to any books. He observed people talking and madethe connection between speech and what is written upon paper and their success thus he had the idea to form a system of writing for the Cherokee. Itsown of the only original alphabets in the world in that it arose on its own asSequoia had no outside influences when he first had the idea. Can you imagine


9/28

having a flash of genius that big? I can as I did. My truth is: As I never went tolaw school then I was not indoctrinated by law school professors who teachMarbury and several other points of law incorrectly only as they are to lazy tovisit them for the first time or to revisit them. I was not indoctrinated by reading

everything in the third person such as The appellant stated. I had originalideas no person could squash as they are the truth and you cannot kill the truth.Some of my applications were not so original at all as I am told my missing war check and balance is something we once practiced but abandoned and so thequestion becomes: do we fine tune what we have now or jettison it for theoriginal?

The truth: you can never change what was; what was happened and so willalways be. All you can do is change it in the now. All of the constitutionalramifications of everything I bring up? Theyve been realized as we died. Deathis the end result as a foreigner sits in the Office of the Executive, a unjust war wages on and women have never had any legal power. All the bad things youimagine already are, now , so all you do is acknowledge them to then resolvethem.

Steven Breyer told me that he does not know the truth, then or now. I, Susan,can and will tell you the truth of the whole universe but: If Breyer wrote anything

other than I do not know the truth on the paper opinion did he lie? Did hecommit treason ? Is a SCOTUS opinion ever treason and if so are the peopleguilty or at fault? Is Breyer himself the proof or is his signature? I would like toenter another note as evidence. This note names a victim, names the killer,names the motivation and intention and names the cause of death as well asnames I, the other victim, who is yet alive and so is before the Court now:

We have a body: Thomas Jefferson is dead and buried in VA. He left us a notethat names King George III as the man who is responsible but he namesdespotism as his killer. He exactly wrote the cause is liberty and that KingGeorge never meant to do less than kill him via paper like the Stamp Act. Hesays his repeated petitions fell on deaf ears and so it is by his own hand that herisked his life but that he had some cohorts in crime and that his reasoning is allmen are created equal and so no dead institution of government like paper canor may hold him hostage thus this is not a coup but a Right. He says he must


10/28

leave Britain and things British behind so that I might be born. Before he diedhe left other notes pertaining to Kingly, papery abuses of his person; he wrotethat he despised lawyers then who now wield law licenses as if they, thatpaper, are absolute proof and that "trial by jury in all matters of fact triable by

the laws of the land [as opposed the law of admiralty] and not by the laws of Nations [i.e. not by the law of admiralty]." If Im testing Marbury and soadjudicating the paper commission may the Declaration and Constitution beadmitted as evidence? Or is it proof? Did the paper murder Jefferson? Whichpaper? BVG or Election 2008? Does an electronic ballot count as much as apaper ballot? Or am I, Susan, the absolute proof that King George III fell under his own delusion thus equality is and so is American common law? My opinionis: I am with Scalia; but I dissent as unless there are living witnesses, people,and living victims, more people, then we may not admit the paper as they willnot conduct the investigation and as the paper did not murder anybody as itcannot. No piece of paper stormed SCOTUS and screamed, Admit me!Lawyers did that. My opinion is lawyers killed Jefferson. You can, may andmust admit the paper Declaration and Constitution if testing Marbury but if creating the venue to then adjudicate the natural birth clause you must admit alife, Susan, as shes one of the victims, she has no paper yet shes the counseland without her there is no case and no equality let alone a body known asAmerican common law and/or The People:

I, my own self, am proof the first patriots lived and were actual humans, realpeople alive in or around 1776 and 1787. I, my own self, prove they acted asthey did and that what the historians say happened did actually happen and isfact. No photographs exist to prove they lived; no paper is proof of them. Nomuseum, created record or title in a book of history makes the words on anydocument the truth. The words are myth unless lived out as true belief asfingerprints, photographs and words prove nothing not even actual life. It is I,Susan, acting on her own that is proof as the fingerprints our Founders leftbehind are all over me and inside my person and have become my faith. I,Susan, am proof that our American story now a legend and soon to become amyth unless I am heard was and is history.


11/28

When the purple sea parted with red states on one side and blue on the other I,Susan, saw the promised land, SCOTUS, and William Rhenquist was beforeme holding out a bright, shiny red apple named BVG so I ran from my slavemasters and into liberty. I truly believe Rhenquist was deliberate as he named

exacting numbers and paper ballots over and over to the point of exhaustionafter he named one, himself, so that I or any natural born citizen could equalhim thus level the playing field although he may not have informed the other Justices. Steven Breyer seems to prove this absolutely. I phoned an Americanin Arizona: Do you realize just how huge the truth is that came from StevenBreyer? What if Rhenquist never told any other Justice? What if Breyer doesnot know we died as only lawyers are allowed entry to SCOTUS in open and direct violation of the law once BVG went there as he cant see or hear the

proof, as he is the proof? I happened upon that same apple as Breyer and tooka bite. I took the biggest bite I could, as Im the most willing as I had no doubtsthen and I have no doubts now. Im not afraid, as I own the knowledge of thetruth. Im no ghost; Im not a shadow body of government as Im a living spirit.Not once did I believe that I, a People, could not enter SCOTUS only as snakeylawyers are my problem or as I am not a lawyer as I do not need one: ImSCOTUS certified and my cert number is 07-9804/08-6622. I want to beblamed for this:

The Proof Of Life Cases as judicial review paper - is the myth of fingerprints. Steven Breyer is The Peoples absolute proof of life.

Heres some paper that rises to proof but not absolute proof: I had to

name all I did to then be able to leverage the power of my one vote; what do

you do if the UN refuses to apply the human rights clause to you that it and the

federal court apply to any corporation sailing a ship between two ports one of

them international as it first refuses to acknowledge our 1871 incorporation as abusiness entity? You remind the UN that you know we never had a treaty with it

when we quit claimed the US Treasury, The People, to it and to the IMF thus

the UN might want to rethink their action and so recall they did codify sea law. It

can reason itself out of existence or into existence as a sort of modern day


12/28

Nuremberg only this time we hope to avoid the very worst of Nazi Germany.

What law says that you must wait for a Hitler in the making to actually become

the Hitler? You fight back with knowledge the truth. How could every

American be informed and so give consent in 1871 or even 1944 w/o the

existing technology? And werent the Nazis Nationalist Socialists at first, before

they were Nazis? Hasnt America been the prize from day one for power hungry

egomaniacs the world over? Didnt Japan attack us like the Saudis attacked

us? What youre witnessing as you live it is unjust people taking advantage of

the situation as it arises. The more lawless we became the easier it became for

unjust men to do this; nobody orchestrated some great big plan unless you

count me although they tried for generations. Every Rockefeller truly believes

hes the Nero who wont play the violin when Rome burns so this time he playsa saxophone and everyone acts as if it never happened. Rome is burning; who

cares what instrument or what song you play? Why repeat what has never

worked in the past? Youre the successful, magnanimous, humanitarian Nero?

The Founders would laugh and cry. Its like my business card says: John Jay

weeps.

All I did was steal a play from the Founders own playbook only I kept repeating

what worked. The Founders invented a few of these plays so were the first; all I

did was drag them out of the closet. If Washington attacked the drunken

Hessians on the day after Christmas then I could attack the drunken power

brokers on the day after the election, 11/05/08. All that needed to happen?

Process, even if it is undue process it could and would work. Who knew how

perfectly it would work? I did as on Christmas day 2007 I sent a copy of my

petition to Ralph Nader and said These people are unsafe at any speed. I

could possess inviolate faith in myself as the existence of my American person

is not an accident. Thus: If a giant physical chain worked for the Founders than

a giant metaphysical chain should work for me, as your one vote is both

physical and metaphysical. Its your first and last line of defense. Ideally you

cause change with your vote as I do. I worked it and worked it until I could

cause direct change via direct action. I moved the sitting illegal President with


13/28

the truth. Everybody has this same ability you do not use it. Now you must as

a dictator does not go away by ignoring him away. Its what Jews have been

telling you for years: These unjust people cant operate in the open thus you

need to act as witnesses and slaughter them with the truth of who and what

they are; you may not ignore it or you might be next. No person needs to suffer

injustice. We suffer only if we know yet let others suffer. I made a different

decision as I turned suffering into sacrifice via acting upon the truth.

This became an actual emergency when I mailed this petition as I have looked

and looked and I have not found a single case of a sitting US President legal or

not threatening to falsely imprison and/or kill a citizen for filing a lawsuit against

him in federal court so what do I know that Barack Obama is desperate tosilence? What would ever drive him to act as if he really is insane? The exact

phrase used was falsely imprison even though Im quite certain the paper

does not say this as the US Marshal never read from it. He escalated it to

death; what could Obama be so desperate to hide? Everyone knows he is

foreign but does he realize this truth or does he truly believe he has us fooled?

Riddle this: Remembering that the US Government has admitted it did issue an

order for the National Guard to fire upon citizens in Ohio, why then would the

US government who calls itself they as if it is a separate entity other than The

People want to keep the name of who issued the order to fire a secret?

Because it is chain of command theory: If a President ever issues this order he

or she has to do it in person so the National Guardsman has an opportunity to

stand aside or down thus Barack Obama has to shoot me himself. A

Guardsman, as we violated the law to form the guard from state militias, would

then be able to object thus refuse to obey as per Marbury and so hand his gun

to the President issuing the order as there is no person in between the lowest

Guardsman and that order but the President. Its all The People in this case; its

not a military action. People who are guardsmen then guard the people

represented by one of the people, the president. Chain of command then is

Guardsman and President as the President is ordering the Guardsmen to fire


14/28

on his own people thus if a guardsman cannot refuse then you have a fascist,

dictator, military regime not a Republic. If the sitting President is not before you

then how would you ever know the order was actual and not a forgery? Only a

sitting President, the living embodiment of The People, has the power and

authority to order the Guardsman and/or the US Military to open fire on The

People as that then is opening fire on your own self so its a massacre or a

Revolution. A revolution is inherently, intrinsically just while massacres are not.

You can impersonate another human being on the phone; you can forge their

signature on paper but in a living government you yourself must issue the

order. If youre dealing with National Guardsman then no person is between the

lowest guardsman holding the gun and the President as that is the presidential

chain not the command chain. No actual constitutional government ever opensfire on its own citizens thus if it does youre watching the rise of fascism which

would not occur here as rapidly as it would elsewhere due to our form. No

matter how hard he tries Obama can never, ever prove he owned this answer

at all or else he would never have issued this type of order as it constitutes

treason and he never would have sent a witness by creating one as in sending

it down via chain of command until it came to rest at the US Marshals Service

as now we can follow it to Obama. Fact is: if every one of those people dropped

dead we could yet follow it as how did my paper and what is on it that came out

the Marshals mouth ever get to him IF Obama never discussed the case?

Obama is not guilty if Obama never becomes President as this HAD to go to

the President and I intended it to go to him when I wrote it. If Ralph Nader

became President then it would have gone to Ralph Nader. I can and will prove

it several times over. Obama himself said Louisiana Purchase. Thats our

absolute proof. No person forced Obama to say that phrase and several million

Americans heard it. I designed the experiment and conducted it as once I am

denied by SCOTUS then nothing is a crime for me as I made myself a

sovereign entity and the last time I checked? A citizen can and may sue a legal

sitting President thus filing a lawsuit is not a crime and is one reason we exist

as a nation. If you look I was very careful to ORDER the other citizens not to

shoot and that if they did then they are guilty of a crime, as the process was not


15/28

exhausted yet and I would inform them when it is. If you own the knowledge

you claim you own then you would not be threatening Nancy Pelosi or flying

airplanes into buildings. It was not personal until Obama made it personal but

all that action did was make it easier for me to sue him as a citizen can and

may sue a sitting President for direct injury while hes sitting legally or not (a

threat is a criminal act and if you knowingly commit a crime while in office?

Youre no longer legal even if you once were; we never protected sitting

Presidents from guilt regarding their own direct actions [were past Marbury so

it comes back to Obama not the US marshal] and as I have pointed out to

invoke Executive Privilege first you have to be the legal Executive and Obama

must know he is not or else I wouldnt have been threatened). If Chester Arthur

were yet alive Id sue him and he was born in NY. Obama can make theattempt but it took me over 20 years to answer this question: Why shouldnt a

constitutional Republic violate it own terms only to favor men and others

already overly privileged and overly powerful? Egomania also known as death

as you should vote for yourselves first as:

The People is the constitutionally set government of the US not the

Officers.

So then: How do I tell Antonin Scalia in a nice judicial way that he might as well

have been agreeing with Breyer that he's actually insane? Breyer could have

been saying "I believe Justice Scalia meant to claim he's a nut" and Scalia

could have been nodding his head yes and we'd still have an actual fascist in

the Whitehouse as only Breyer seems to realize a crime has been committed

as death has entered SCOTUS? At BVG and In Re Susan's DENIAL OF

REALITY "LAWYER" became the constitutionally set government as SCOTUS

is closed to nonlawyers. An open-ended system became a closed system thus

died and apparently only the Justices do not know, lol. And: If your ego died so

none of it is outsized in relationship to your id then you no longer possess the

human ability to write like a lawyer as that itself - third person narrative that is

mostly or all a lie - is an affectation. You are thus I am. Enlightenment does that


16/28

to you. all affectations fall away. For some of us its a bigger fall than for others.

As I do not subscribe to authoritative belief systems - I am my own authority -

then it was not such a fall for me. Think: I can forge any voice on a piece of

paper. You tell me who and I'll forge a document so good that you'll truly

believe that person wrote it. Recall Hitlers diaries? That's easier than you think

it is as people tend to be stilted upon paper so the nuances that make you YOU

are lost in translation. Who's voice can't be forged then? My own as there's no

record of it except what I create!!! I'm not in any book so if you wanted to forge

my voice you couldn't do it. And: it is unique among all voices as I'm the first to

do this. That's a benefit to volunteering to be first: you then are the only

example. It sounds funny to say it but I can't even forge my own voice as I

never know what I'll say until its in the mail so I can't take it back or edit it. Imwriting it in the now, at that very moment. Who can't know if I wrote something

as it sounds like me uniquely? Even my typos are common or unique to me.

How could I do what Donofrio, Berg and Taitz could not do all working

together? Ask the clerks what I'd write to them, lol. I talked about everything but

law as the legal assumption is they know the law or they wouldn't be SCOTUS

clerks. Donofrio called them and spoke to the stay clerk for 7 minutes. That's

interminable. I have not spoken to them for 7 minutes total in over three years.

Donofrio obstructed justice so he received no justice; imagine that. What

happens when you obstruct justice? Do little judicial elves bring justice to your

front door wrapped up like a Christmas present? What, no liberty only for you or

none for anyone who obstructs justice thus obstructs liberty? You do not know

how badly I wish I had a copy of In Re Thomas Jefferson as I wrote it as if I'm

Jefferson only here and now as that gave me certain liberties with the

Justices as he volunteered his name so its in the public domain and he is

fundamentally responsible for Marbury. I describe it like this (If I never told you):

if Bob Bauer thought that an octopus lawyer was responsible for In Re Susan

then he took one look at In Re Thomas and thought "This is no octopus. This is

the work of a Humboldt squid." It's intelligent and disturbing as you know I'm

not wrong but right. If you do not believe in everlasting life you will after reading

it, lol. Look - John Adams came true: Jefferson yet survives.


17/28

America: In case you're still lost? I took on every single lawyer in America and

won. That's why they are fighting me so hard. I mean if you're Harvard Law,

you were first in 1636 and you graudated Obama with nothing to show for it as

he can't argue the law on his best day so he paid for a worthless degree and

you're about to go down it'd be much easier if one of your own did it rather than

me, a non-lawyer, non-degreed, poor woman . I'm Professor Kingsfield in the

Paper Chase telling his students to take a dime and call their mother to come

pick them up now that they are playing with the big boys and they suck. By

suing the Surpeme Court I sued every lawyer and law school in America as

they produced the BVG lawyers and then could not argue their own cases!!!

One of the very first lessons my mother taught me was if you're going to be acriminal be a smart criminal as good crooks do not get caught. In my most

recent petition? I took it back; Dick Cheney is not Satan as Satan, THE Satan,

would be a semi-worthy adversary and Cheney went down with one blow, the

very first time I engaged him. I truly believe THE Satan would last at least two

full rounds. Cheney? I did not even need to waste so much as a postage

stamp. I emailed his office with my BVG reasoning as he can't defeat math and

out came the rats: January 3rd, 2007.

Entering SCOTUS directly and firstly? It's known as a supermagical

square in mathematics. The knight moves landing on each square of the

chess board once and then exists on the same square from which he he

entered. Your first move is your end game then. Ben Franklin found a

'new' supermagical square as they are rare and so did I; if he was looking

at the same thing as I maybe he only saw the square on the chessboard

not in the law. When I read that the road around Rennes Chapel is named

Pass of the Rook I laughed as what's a rook? You use a rook to castle as

did I to castle but a rook is chariot in chess and a swindler and a cheat in

other games. How many Americans can castle in chess especially if its a

court of law not a kingly court a la BVG? I thought, Okay God: I'll bite! It

might scare you but as I'm a physicist by my nature its all science to me.


18/28

History does not repeat itself people do. So here I am making the same

mistake over gain after avoiding them my first time around:

I never went to Europeanized American schools in the 1950's and 1960's

designed to force you to accept authority w/o question thus crush critical

thinking skills and I never fell for hypnotic language designed to sway you and

convince you so that you never make any actual choices. I swear: I truly

believed you were all nuts until a person told me that no, you honestly believed

all this crap you were taught. How did i first come to know what you were taught

that is garbage? I made a bet and i bet on myself as I have had a skill since

birth that people insist is not reality as it scares them; Ill do it in front of them

and they'll pretend they never saw me do it. I knew you had been taughtsomething that is utterly garbage so I went to the library and set my autopilot on

God literally; it's sincerity; anybody can do it if you know that feeling. I knew god

would show me the book when I came to it so I started walking up and down

the aisles until I saw the book. I even told someone that I was doing this and

they laughed. I said whatever knowledge I needed would reveal itself. Hey. if

I'm really fighting Hitler when they were still Nationalist Socialists I need god,

THE god. I saw the edge of a book and had that feeling so I knew it was THE

book I was supposed to read. I ran down the aisle and pulled it off of the shelf.

The title of this book? THE CASE FOR A CREATOR. Are you guys for real???

This is junk science; J U N K . J U N K. Miller should have sent you off of the

deep end. Who believes this??? My Catholic School told me: you have to figure

out what the truth is for your own self. nobody is supposed to be dictating the

truth to kids. Darwin is just as bad as fundamental Christianity in that respect.

You CAN'T legislate beliefs. NONE OF THIS IS LAW. DARWINISTS DO NOT

BELIEVE CHARLES DARWIN TODAY ACCORDING TO THEIR OWN

TESTIMONY. You can't legislate beliefs as people are the absolute proof so

you are your own best or worst proof. How do you know what is the truth if

you only know one thing? The truth falls somewhere in the middle. It gets

very tricky in the US as we accidentally did legislate morals w/o realizing it but a

national ethic - do not lie, cheat and steal as your life depends upon it - is not


19/28

then legislating beliefs. It's as I say: to possess an ethic first you must possess

a metaphysic; no metaphysic? No ethic. You can't annihlate the idea of God

w/o annihliating yourself in the US but you can't inflict your personal god upon

anyone either. It's a very, very, very splippery slope then. What of the

Founders leveld the playing field in such a way you're equal to the earthly

concepts of god? That's what you are if you are yoru own power and authority.

But if that's you? Then you would not be violating anybody's rights either

especially not for profit. By "God" I mean the general concept that's intrinsically

and inherently just. The word "liberty" is all over the bible.

It's fun to believe this is a myth we live, that this is science or that this is divine

in nature but the truth is it's a little of it all as myth is history, fact that thenbecomes a story then a legend and then a myth. A scholar will tell you that to

believe Jesus or Buddha never lived is to believe over half the planet fell for the

same mass delusion at separate times; it's not possible if you reason it. Do you

know what it would take to inflict that type of mass delusion over the centuries

w/o any proof? The Church is The People not the institutions; people would

abandon it. People always abandon what does not work. Is it possible that

Jefferson never lived? What if you were sold that lie only it is packaged as

BVG? Or Obama?

If you can be any mythological creature as you're living the history out then why

not pick a Founding Knight? Why not pull the sword from the keystone and so

slaughter them with sloppy math and their own exacting words and actions as

they all come tumbling down? A lawyer will be so very careful he'll make what I

call "careful mistakes": you need to be a scientist to recognize them. So then:

Start writing like John Adams said. Write yourself into the books you were once

written out of. Join the class and so declare yourselves independent. When I

mail the newest petition in as the case ripened when Obama

threatened Roberts as it is direct injury I can prove absolutely I will warn you so

you can look for it. You can attach yourself as a third party petitioner. It's a very

short form; copy the one from BVG that was denied off of the internet only


20/28

tweak it to make it personal. LICENSED LAWYERS HAD NO THIRD PARTY

STANDING BUT THE PEOPLE DO. Copy any SCOTUS third party filing. I can

then represent you as you are not likely able to make this case on your own so

invoke Willowbrook v Olech. Then use the federal highway funds, unjust

taxes, to then prove you've been humanly trafficked as you did not want to

move but were forced to do so by corporate America which 'government'

America is since the US Treasury, YOU, was quitlcaimed to the IMF/UN when

we did not even have a legal treaty with the UN. Then you can mail it in a day

or so after I do so that you'll arrive at SCOTUS after me. If you've never moved

then find another way federal tax money was used to force something upon you

unjustly. Like: Wall street bailouts reward the criminal element afoot,

businessmen who are lawyers. No body pays Susan to then commit trilliondollar crimes. Have you ever heard of rewarding the crooks??? With your tax

dollar???

I don't know about you but if "Susan Herbert" just stole back the US Treasury,

right from under the crooks noses and while they were watching her do it, and

when she warned them she was coming and how she would look and so what

they should not argue if they wanted to win, making her the world's greatest

thief ever, then I'd want my share of the 'prize'.

All they could not do? Tell a lie. So they did not: It reads AFRICAN, lol, as

black Africans do not call or refer to themselves 'black'!!! Ask an African.

I want to say duh Oprah.

Susan.

P.S. More truth:" When people talk of the freedom of writing, speaking

or thinking I cannot choose but laugh. No such thing ever existed. No

such thing now exists; but I hope it will exist. But it must be

hundreds of years after you and I shall write and speak no more." -

Adams. I, Susan, can make that dream be realized in America. I can


21/28

make it come true. I can and will embody that idea. I can become

the fruition of that dream as I'm the absolute proof John Adams is

not wrong. I prove Adams absolutely so I'm the fruit of the tree

known as liberty. It's known in the law as ripening, as a case ripens.

If you happen to see Obama in person taunt him with this poem by

Thomas Campion; chant "cherry ripe" as he'll know who its from as

he now understands I'm not for sale - you can't steal liberty if I'm

standing around the orchard - so its like telling him you know he

cried uncle recently:

There is a garden in her face

Where roses and white lilies blow;A heavenly paradise is that place,

Wherein all pleasant fruits do flow:

There cherries grow which none may buy

Till 'Cherry-ripe' themselves do cry.

Those cherries fairly do enclose

Of orient pearl a double row,

Which when her lovely laughter shows,

They look like rose-buds fill'd with snow;

Yet them nor peer nor prince can buy


Her eyes like angels watch them still;

Her brows like bended bows do stand,

Threat'ning with piercing frowns to kill

All that attempt with eye or hand

Those sacred cherries to come nigh,



22/28

P.P.S. Africans;look at " chinese africans ": Further information: Demographics of Africa

Sub-Saharan Africa is a common if imprecise term that encompasses Africancountries located south of the Sahara Desert. It is commonly used to differentiatethe region culturally, ecologically, politically and, more controversially, racially ,from North Africa , which has historically been part of the Mediterranean sphere.Because the indigenous people of this region are primarily dark-skinned, it isalternatively called "Black Africa". [12] Some criticize the use of the term, because,having become in many quarters synonymous with Black Africa , it can leave themistaken impression that there are not indigenous Black populations in NorthAfrica. Furthermore, the Sahara cuts across countries such as Mauritania , Mali,Niger , Chad , and Sudan , leaving some parts of them in North Africa and some insub-Saharan Africa.

Owen 'Alik Shahadah argues that the term sub-Saharan Africa has racistovertones:

Sub-Saharan Africa is a racist byword for "primitive", a place whichhas escaped advancement. Hence, we see statements like nowritten languages exist in Sub-Saharan Africa. Ancient Egypt wasnot a Sub-Saharan African civilization. Sub-Sahara serves as anexclusion, which moves, jumps and slides around to suit negativegeneralization of Africa. [13]

However, some Black Africans prefer to be culturally distinguished from thosewho live in the north of the continent. [14]

Cultural ideas of a black race

South Africa

In South Africa during the apartheid era , the population was classified into four groups: Black , White , Asian (mostly Indian ), and Coloured . The Coloured groupincluded people of mixed Bantu , Khoisan , and European descent (with someMalay ancestry, especially in the Western Cape ). The Coloured definitionoccupied an intermediary position between the Black and White definitions inSouth Africa.

The apartheid bureaucracy devised complex (and often arbitrary) criteria in thePopulation Registration Act to determine who belonged in which group. Minor officials administered tests to enforce the classifications. When it was unclear from a person's physical appearance whether a person was to be consideredColored or Black, the "pencil test" was employed. This involved inserting a pencil
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub-Saharan_Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saharahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(classification_of_human_beings)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-11http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mauritaniahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chadhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owen_'Alik_Shahadahhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-Shahadah-12http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-13http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_South_Africa_in_the_apartheid_erahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colouredhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colouredhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bantu_peopleshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khoisanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_ethnic_groupshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cape_Malayshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Capehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apartheidhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_Registration_Acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub-Saharan_Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saharahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(classification_of_human_beings)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-11http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mauritaniahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chadhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owen_'Alik_Shahadahhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-Shahadah-12http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-13http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_South_Africa_in_the_apartheid_erahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colouredhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bantu_peopleshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khoisanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_ethnic_groupshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cape_Malayshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Capehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apartheidhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_Registration_Act


23/28

in a person's hair to determine if the hair was kinky enough for the pencil to getstuck. [15]

During the apartheid era, those classed as 'Coloured' were oppressed anddiscriminated against. However, they did have limited rights and overall had

slightly better socioeconomic conditions than those classed as 'Black'. In thepost-apartheid era the government's policies of affirmative action have favored'Blacks' over 'Coloureds'. Some South Africans categorized as 'Black' openlystate that 'Coloureds' did not suffer as much as they did during apartheid. Thepopular saying by 'Coloured' South Africans to illustrate this dilemma is:

Not white enough under apartheid and not black enough under theANC ( African National Congress )

Other than by appearance, 'Coloureds' can be distinguished from 'Blacks' bylanguage. Most speak Afrikaans or English as a first language , as opposed to

Bantu languages such as Zulu or Xhosa . They also tend to have more European-sounding names than Bantu names. [16]

In 2008, the High Court in South Africa has ruled that Chinese South Africans are to be reclassified as Black people .[17]

In the Middle East

Arab world

See also: Afro-Arab

Black African and Near Eastern peoples have interacted since prehistoric times.[18][19] Some historians estimate that as many as 14 million black slaves crossedthe Red Sea , Indian Ocean , and Sahara Desert in the Arab slave trade from 650to 1900 CE .[20][21] The Moroccan Sultan Moulay Ismail "the Bloodthirsty" (16721727) raised a corps of 150,000 black slaves, called his Black Guard , whocoerced the country into submission. [22][23]

The Afro-Asiatic languages , which include Semitic languages such as Arabic andHebrew , are believed by some scholars to have originated in Ethiopia .[24] This isbecause the region has very diverse language groups in close geographic

proximity, often considered a telltale sign for a linguistic geographic origin.In more recent times, about 1000 CE, interactions between black peopleand Arabs resulted in the incorporation of extensive Arabic vocabulary intoSwahili , which became a useful lingua franca for merchants. Some of thislinguistic exchange occurred as part of the slave trade; the history of Islam and slavery shows that the major juristic schools traditionally accepted theinstitution of slavery .[25] As a result, Arab influence spread along the east
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-14http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_actionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_National_Congresshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afrikaanshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bantu_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zulu_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xhosahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-15http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_South_Africanshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_South_Africanshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-16http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afro-Arabhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_Easthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-17http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-18http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-18http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Seahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Oceanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Oceanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sahara_Deserthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_slave_tradehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-19http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-19http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-20http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moulay_Ismailhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Guardhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-21http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-22http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afro-Asiatic_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrewhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethiopiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-23http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-23http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-23http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swahili_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lingua_francahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_slaveryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_slaveryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madh'habhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slaveryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-Lewis-24http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-14http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_actionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_National_Congresshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afrikaanshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bantu_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zulu_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xhosahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-15http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_South_Africanshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_South_Africanshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-16http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afro-Arabhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_Easthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-17http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-18http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Seahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Oceanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sahara_Deserthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_slave_tradehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-19http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-20http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moulay_Ismailhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Guardhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-21http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-22http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afro-Asiatic_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrewhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethiopiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-23http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swahili_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lingua_francahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_slaveryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_slaveryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madh'habhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slaveryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-Lewis-24


24/28

coast of Africa and to some extent into the interior (see East Africa ).Timbuktu was a trading outpost that linked west Africa with Berber , Arab,and Jewish traders throughout the Arab World . As a result of theseinteractions many Arab people in the Middle East have black ancestry andmany black people on the east coast of Africa and along the Sahara have

Arab ancestry.[26]

Kenya is in East Africa.

According to Dr. Carlos Moore, resident scholar at Brazil's Universidade do Estado da Bahia , Afro-multiracials in the Arab world self-identify in waysthat resemble Latin America . He claims that black-looking Arabs, much likeblack-looking Latin Americans , consider themselves white because theyhave some distant white ancestry. [27]

Moore also claims that a film about Egyptian President Anwar Sadat had to becanceled when Sadat discovered that an African-American had been cast to playhim. In fact, the 1983 television movie Sadat , starring Louis Gossett, Jr. , was not

canceled. The Egyptian government refused to let the drama air in Egypt,partially on the grounds of the casting of Gossett. [28] The objections, however, didnot come from Sadat, who had been assassinated two years earlier.

Sadat's mother was a black Sudanese woman and his father was a lighter-skinned Egyptian . In response to an advertisement for an acting positionhe remarked, "I am not white but I am not exactly black either. Myblackness is tending to reddish". [29] LOL! I said that too; I said I'm an appleIndian only in reverse.

Fathia Nkrumah was another Egyptian with ties to Black Africa. She was the late

wife of Ghanaian revolutionary Kwame Nkrumah , whose marriage was seen ashelping plant the seeds of cooperation between Egypt and other Africancountries as they struggled for independence from European colonization, whichin turn helped advance the formation of the African Union .[30]

In general, Arabs had a more positive view of black women than black men, evenif the women were of slave origin. More black women were enslaved than men,and, because the Qur'an was interpreted to permit sexual relations between a male master and his female slave outside of marriage, [31][32] many mixed race children resulted. When an enslaved woman became pregnant with her Arabcaptor's child, she became umm walad or mother of a child, a status that

granted her privileged rights. The child would have prospered from the wealth of the father and been given rights of inheritance. [33] Because of patrilineality , thechildren were born free and sometimes even became successors to their rulingfathers, as was the case with Sultan Ahmad al-Mansur , (whose mother was aFulani concubine), who ruled Morocco from 1578 to 1608. Such tolerance,however, was not extended to wholly black persons, even when technically"free," and the notion that to be black meant to be a slave became a common
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timbuktuhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berber_peoplehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Worldhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Worldhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_Easthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-25http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-25http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Universidade_do_Estado_da_Bahia&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Universidade_do_Estado_da_Bahia&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_Americahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_Americanshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-26http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-26http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_Egypthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anwar_Sadathttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African-Americanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African-Americanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Gossett,_Jr.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_of_Egypthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-27http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptianshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-28http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-28http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fathia_Nkrumahhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghanahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kwame_Nkrumahhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_Unionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qur'anhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ma_malakat_aymanukum_and_sexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ma_malakat_aymanukum_and_sexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-30http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-31http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-31http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed_racehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-Arab_Slave_Trade-32http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrilinealityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmad_al-Mansurhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulanihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moroccohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moroccohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timbuktuhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berber_peoplehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Worldhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_Easthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-25http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Universidade_do_Estado_da_Bahia&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Universidade_do_Estado_da_Bahia&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_Americahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_Americanshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-26http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_Egypthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anwar_Sadathttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African-Americanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Gossett,_Jr.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_of_Egypthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-27http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptianshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-28http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fathia_Nkrumahhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghanahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kwame_Nkrumahhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_Unionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qur'anhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ma_malakat_aymanukum_and_sexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ma_malakat_aymanukum_and_sexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-30http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-31http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed_racehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-Arab_Slave_Trade-32http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrilinealityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmad_al-Mansurhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulanihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morocco


25/28

belief. [34] The term " abd ," ( Arabic : ,) "slave," remains a common term for blackpeople in the Middle East, often though not always derogatory. [35]

In the first 200 years that black people had been in the United States , theycommonly referred to themselves as Africans. In Africa, people primarily

identified themselves by ethnic group (closely allied to language) and not by skincolor. Individuals would be Ashanti , Igbo , Bakongo or Wolof . But when Africanswere brought to the Americas they were forced to give up their ethnic affiliationsfor fear of uprisings. The result was the Africans had to intermingle with other Africans from different ethnic groups. This is significant as Africans came from avast geographic region, the West African coastline stretching from Senegal toAngola and in some cases from the south east coast such as Mozambique . Anew identity and culture was born that incorporated elements of the variousethnic groups and of European cultural heritage, resulting in fusions such as theBlack church and Black English . This new identity was now based on skin color and African ancestry rather than any one ethnic group. [13]

In March 1807, Britain , which largely controlled the Atlantic, declared the trans-atlantic slave trade illegal , as did the United States. (The latter prohibition tookeffect January 1, 1808, the earliest date on which Congress had the power to doso under Article I, Section 9 of the United States Constitution .)

By that time, the majority of black people were U.S.-born, so use of the term"African" became problematic. Though initially a source of pride, many blacksfeared its continued use would be a hindrance to their fight for full citizenship inthe US. They also felt that it would give ammunition to those who wereadvocating repatriating black people back to Africa. In 1835 black leaders called

upon black Americans to remove the title of "African" from their institutions andreplace it with " Negro " or "Colored American". A few institutions however electedto keep their historical names such as African Methodist Episcopal Church ."Negro" and "colored" remained the popular terms until the late 1960s. [41]

The term black was used throughout but not frequently as it carried a certainstigma. In his 1963 " I Have a Dream " speech, [42] Martin Luther King, Jr. uses theterms Negro 15 times and black 4 times. Each time he uses black it is in parallelconstruction with white (e.g., black men and white men). [43] With the successes of the civil rights movement a new term was needed to break from the past andhelp shed the reminders of legalized discrimination. In place of Negro , black waspromoted as standing for racial pride, militancy and power. Some of the turningpoints included the use of the term " Black Power " by Kwame Toure ( Stokely Carmichael ) and the release of James Brown's song " Say It Loud - I'm Black and I'm Proud ".

In 1988 Jesse Jackson urged Americans to use the term African American because the term has a historical cultural base. Since then African American andblack have essentially a coequal status. There is still much controversy over
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-33http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abd_(Arabic)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-34http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Stateshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashantihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Igbo_peoplehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kongo_peoplehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolof_peoplehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolof_peoplehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Americashttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senegalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angolahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozambiquehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_churchhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AAVEhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-Shahadah-12http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_of_Great_Britain_and_Irelandhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_of_Great_Britain_and_Irelandhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abolition_of_the_Slave_Trade_Acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abolition_of_the_Slave_Trade_Acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Congresshttp://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_United_States_of_America#Section_9http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Constitutionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Constitutionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negrohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_Methodist_Episcopal_Churchhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-40http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Have_a_Dreamhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-41http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther_King,_Jr.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-42http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-42http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African-American_Civil_Rights_Movement_(1955-1968)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Powerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stokely_Carmichaelhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stokely_Carmichaelhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Say_It_Loud_-_I'm_Black_and_I'm_Proudhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Say_It_Loud_-_I'm_Black_and_I'm_Proudhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Jacksonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_Americanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-33http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abd_(Arabic)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-34http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Stateshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashantihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Igbo_peoplehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kongo_peoplehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolof_peoplehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Americashttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senegalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angolahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozambiquehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_churchhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AAVEhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-Shahadah-12http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_of_Great_Britain_and_Irelandhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abolition_of_the_Slave_Trade_Acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abolition_of_the_Slave_Trade_Acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Congresshttp://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_United_States_of_America#Section_9http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Constitutionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negrohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_Methodist_Episcopal_Churchhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-40http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Have_a_Dreamhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-41http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther_King,_Jr.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-42http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African-American_Civil_Rights_Movement_(1955-1968)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Powerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stokely_Carmichaelhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stokely_Carmichaelhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Say_It_Loud_-_I'm_Black_and_I'm_Proudhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Say_It_Loud_-_I'm_Black_and_I'm_Proudhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Jacksonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_American


26/28

which term is more appropriate. Some such as Maulana Karenga and Owen Alik Shahadah argue African-American is more appropriate because it accuratelyarticulates geography and historical origin. [13] Others believe the term black isinaccurate because African Americans have a variety of skin tones. [44][not in citation given ]

Surveys show that when interacting with each other African Americans prefer the

term black, as it is associated with intimacy and familiarity. The term "AfricanAmerican" is preferred for public and formal use .[45] The appropriateness of theterm "African American" is further confused, however, by increases in Africanimmigrants from Africa , the Caribbean and Latin America. The more recentAfrican immigrants may sometimes view themselves, and be viewed, asculturally distinct from native descendants of African slaves. [46]

The U.S. census race definitions says a black is a person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa. It includes people who indicate their race as"Black, African Am., or Negro," or who provide written entries such as AfricanAmerican, Afro American, Kenyan , Nigerian , or Haitian . However, the Census

Bureau notes that these classifications are socio-political constructs and shouldnot be interpreted as scientific or anthropological. [47]

A considerable portion of the U.S. population identified as black actually havesome Native American or European American ancestry. For instance, geneticstudies of African American people show an ancestry that is on average 1718%European. [48]

One drop rule

Historically, the United States used a colloquial term, the one-drop rule , to

designate a black person as any person with any known African ancestry.[49]

Legally the definition varied from state to state. Thomas Jefferson had slaveswho were legally white (less than 25% Black) and legally slaves (mother was aslave). Outside of the US, some other countries have adopted the practice, butthe definition of who is black and the extent to which the one drop "rule" appliesvaries from country to country.

The one drop rule may have originated as a means of increasing the number of black slaves [50] and been maintained as an attempt to keep the white race pure. [51]

One of the results of the one drop rule was uniting the African Americancommunity and preserving an African identity. [49] Some of the most prominent civil

rights activists were multiracial, and advocated equality for all.President Barack Obama self-identifies as black and African Americaninterchangeably. [52] According to a Williams Identity Survey conducted by ZogbyInternational interactive poll conducted November 12, 2006, among those whovoted, 55 percent of white voters and 61 percent of Hispanics voters classifiedhim as biracial instead of black after being told that his mother is white, and 66percent of Black voters classified Obama as black. [53] Another poll conducted by
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maulana_Karengahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owen_Alik_Shahadahhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owen_Alik_Shahadahhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-Shahadah-12http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-43http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-43http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiabilityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-44http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-44http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-44http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_immigration_to_the_United_Stateshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-Swarns-45http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(United_States_Census)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(United_States_Census)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenyanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigerianhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigerianhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haitihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Census_Bureauhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Census_Bureauhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-46http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._populationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_peoples_of_the_Americashttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Americanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-47http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colloquialhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-drop_rulehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-Davis-48http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-49http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-50http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-Davis-48http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obamahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-Kroft-51http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-52http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-52http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maulana_Karengahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owen_Alik_Shahadahhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owen_Alik_Shahadahhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-Shahadah-12http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-43http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiabilityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-44http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_immigration_to_the_United_Stateshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-Swarns-45http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(United_States_Census)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenyanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigerianhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haitihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Census_Bureauhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Census_Bureauhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-46http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._populationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_peoples_of_the_Americashttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Americanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-47http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colloquialhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-drop_rulehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-Davis-48http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-49http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-50http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-Davis-48http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obamahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-Kroft-51http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-52


27/28

the same group returned results that 42 percent of African-Americans votersdescribed Tiger Woods as black, as did 7% of white voters. [54]

Color? It's an experience of life as it is what other people truly believeabout you not what you truly believe about yourself. If I truly believed

what you truly believe about woman , lawyers, genius and money ? You'd be sunk. Obama can't be African American as he is notAmerican and black is legally debatable. British is not. Obama "self-identifies"? You mean lies??? WHO DOESN'T KNOW HE WROTE ABOOK CLAIMING TO BE BRITISH VIA HIS FATHER???? He himself said his wife's not his relatives were former slaves. I know overlycareful lawyer-ese when I hear it. If any living Rockefeller wants tocome to court, hold up his book and claim "I did not know Obama'sfather is not American but Kenyan" then come on down and look likethe lunatic you are as I named the Rockefellers exactly and theCouncil of Foreign Relations as well as the Bildebergers. The People

will bring the video of Oprah and Obama mugging it up with his bookfor the cameras. black Africans do not even call Obama black, lol,he'd be an Arab African as Arabs settled this part of Africa:

According to Dr. Carlos Moore, resident scholar at Brazil'sUniversidade do Estado da Bahia , Afro-multiracials in the Arab world self-identify in ways that resemble Latin America . He claims that black-looking Arabs, much like black-looking Latin Americans ,consider themselves white because they have some distant whiteancestry.

If you look in petition 07-9804, it might be in the attachments or perhaps

within 08-6622, I said that Egypt is in Africa not the Middle East buttraditionally people believe it to be Middle Eastern. Ready? Mosesclimbed up a hill but came down a mountain as Sinai is a mountain,MT. Sinai. The appearance of it all is deceptive. Can you imagineWashington leading a charging army of flamingos who can't even defeatother flamingos??? Nazis are shrimps in real life; read all about how theyappeared and behaved at Nuremberg once the illusion was gone...theyacted worse then defeated, as if hey were actually smaller in size;reporters could not get over it...if a flamingo could not defeat a shrimp thenthey would not be pink so I know you can defeat an actual shrimp at thevery least. Practice being American thus forever pro se by declaring

yourself when I enter this petition. Start now and you should finish in a dayor two. The entire form to petition SCOTUS? it's about six pages and onmost of them there is one or two words like "FACTS" and "QUESTIONS".An actual monkey might do this and soon which is why I say if you ever see two monkeys in close conversation one and of them is holding a copyof the New Testament or the Declaration then a just monkey governmentand monkey law is born! Per usual, disseminate this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger_Woodshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-53http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Universidade_do_Estado_da_Bahia&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_Americahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_Americanshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger_Woodshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people#cite_note-53http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Universidade_do_Estado_da_Bahia&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_Americahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_Americans


28/28

Documents

Justice Steven Breyer As Living Proof