12
Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011 The Problems with Home Visiting Programs Karen R. Effrem, M.D President – Education Liberty Watch

Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011 The Problems with Home Visiting Programs Karen R. Effrem, M.D President – Education Liberty Watch

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011

The Problems with Home Visiting Programs

Karen R. Effrem, M.DPresident – Education Liberty Watch

Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011

Many Social Ills Associated with Single Many Social Ills Associated with Single Parent FamiliesParent Families

Many Social Ills Associated with Single Many Social Ills Associated with Single Parent FamiliesParent Families

63 percent of all suicides are individuals from single-parent households. (FBI)

75 percent of adolescents in chemical-dependency hospitals come from single-parent households. (CDC)

More than half of all youths incarcerated for criminal acts come from single-parent households. (Children’s Defense Fund)

63 percent of all suicides are individuals from single-parent households. (FBI)

75 percent of adolescents in chemical-dependency hospitals come from single-parent households. (CDC)

More than half of all youths incarcerated for criminal acts come from single-parent households. (Children’s Defense Fund)

Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011

Intact Families ERASE the Achievement GapIntact Families ERASE the Achievement GapIntact Families ERASE the Achievement GapIntact Families ERASE the Achievement Gap

“Dr. William Jeynes used “data from the National Educational Longitudinal Survey to examine the impact of student religious commitment and living in intact families on academic achievement among black and Hispanic 12th graders. Students with intact families and high levels of religiosity scored as well as all white students on most achievement measures and higher than their black and Hispanic counterparts without intact families or high religiosity. “(J. Urban Ed. Vol 38 No. 1, 2003 - Emphasis added)

“Dr. William Jeynes used “data from the National Educational Longitudinal Survey to examine the impact of student religious commitment and living in intact families on academic achievement among black and Hispanic 12th graders. Students with intact families and high levels of religiosity scored as well as all white students on most achievement measures and higher than their black and Hispanic counterparts without intact families or high religiosity. “(J. Urban Ed. Vol 38 No. 1, 2003 - Emphasis added)

Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011

Home Visiting Does Not Improve Home Visiting Does Not Improve Child DevelopmentChild Development

Home Visiting Does Not Improve Home Visiting Does Not Improve Child DevelopmentChild Development

Source: Home Visiting Evidence of EffectivenessSource: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness

http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3

Source: Home Visiting Evidence of EffectivenessSource: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness

http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3

Program Name Primary Effects Secondary Effects

Early Head Start Home Visiting

Favorable:  1 No effect: 21 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0

Favorable:  3 No effect: 3 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0

Healthy Families America (HFA)

Favorable:  7 No effect: 27 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0

Favorable:  0 No effect: 0 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0

Nurse Family Partnership (NFP)

Favorable:  4 No effect: 35 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0

Favorable:  2 No effect: 11 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 1

Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011

Home Visiting Does Not Improve Home Visiting Does Not Improve Child DevelopmentChild Development

Home Visiting Does Not Improve Home Visiting Does Not Improve Child DevelopmentChild Development

Source: Home Visiting Evidence of EffectivenessSource: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness

http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3

Source: Home Visiting Evidence of EffectivenessSource: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness

http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3

Type of Effects Primary Effects(% of Effects Measured for 3 studies)

Secondary Effects (% of Effects Measured for 3 studies)

Favorable 13% 25%

No Effect 87% 70%

Unfavorable or Ambiguous

0% 5%

Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011

Home Visiting Does Not Improve Home Visiting Does Not Improve Child DevelopmentChild Development

Home Visiting Does Not Improve Home Visiting Does Not Improve Child DevelopmentChild Development

Source: Home Visiting Evidence of EffectivenessSource: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness

http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3

Source: Home Visiting Evidence of EffectivenessSource: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness

http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3

Type of Effects Primary Effects(% of Effects Measured for all studies)

Secondary Effects (% of Effects Measured for all studies)

Favorable 15% 24%

No Effect 84% 76%

Unfavorable or Ambiguous

1% 0%

Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011

Home Visiting Does Not Improve Home Visiting Does Not Improve Child DevelopmentChild Development

Home Visiting Does Not Improve Home Visiting Does Not Improve Child DevelopmentChild Development

• “It is important to note, however, that the reduction in total behavioral problems on the CBCL [Child Behavior Checklist completed by the mothers] was not corroborated by teachers' reports of child behavior.” (Olds and Kitzman, 2004)

• There were no statistically significant paraprofessional program effects on children's language, executive functioning, emotional regulation, or behavioral adaptation, or on mothers' reports of externalizing

behavior problems… There were no statistically significant nurse effects on sensitive-responsive mother-child interaction, children's emotional regulation, or externalizing behavior problems [nurse visited].” (Olds and Robinson, 2004)

• “It is important to note, however, that the reduction in total behavioral problems on the CBCL [Child Behavior Checklist completed by the mothers] was not corroborated by teachers' reports of child behavior.” (Olds and Kitzman, 2004)

• There were no statistically significant paraprofessional program effects on children's language, executive functioning, emotional regulation, or behavioral adaptation, or on mothers' reports of externalizing

behavior problems… There were no statistically significant nurse effects on sensitive-responsive mother-child interaction, children's emotional regulation, or externalizing behavior problems [nurse visited].” (Olds and Robinson, 2004)

Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011

Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Child AbuseChild Abuse

Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Child AbuseChild Abuse

Source: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness

http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=4

Source: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness

http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=4

Program Name Primary Effects Secondary Effects

Early Head Start Home Visiting

Favorable:  0 No effect: 0 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0

Favorable:  0 No effect: 1 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0

Healthy Families America (HFA)

Favorable:  0 No effect: 22 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0

Favorable:  12 No effect: 101 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0

Nurse Family Partnership (NFP)

Favorable:  6 No effect: 19 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0

Favorable:  0 No effect: 0 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0

Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011

Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Child AbuseChild Abuse

Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Child AbuseChild Abuse

Source: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness

http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=4

Source: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness

http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=4

Type of Effects Primary Effects(% of Effects Measured for 3 Studies)

Secondary Effects (% of Effects Measured for 3 Studies)

Favorable 13% 11%

No Effect 87% 89%

Unfavorable or Ambiguous

0% 0%

Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011

Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Child AbuseChild Abuse

Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Child AbuseChild Abuse

Source: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness

http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=4

Source: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness

http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=4

Type of Effects Primary Effects(% of Effects Measured for All Studies)

Secondary Effects (% of Effects Measured for All Studies)

Favorable 13% 10%

No Effect 87% 90%

Unfavorable or Ambiguous

0% 0%

Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011

Other Problems with Home Other Problems with Home VisitingVisiting

Other Problems with Home Other Problems with Home VisitingVisiting

Medical record review without consentMedical record review without consent Consent may not be voluntary for participationConsent may not be voluntary for participation Visitors may only have as little as 5 days of trainingVisitors may only have as little as 5 days of training Information presented may be unscientific or biasedInformation presented may be unscientific or biased Data collectionData collection Families may unknowingly give up 4Families may unknowingly give up 4 thth amendment amendment

rights rights

Medical record review without consentMedical record review without consent Consent may not be voluntary for participationConsent may not be voluntary for participation Visitors may only have as little as 5 days of trainingVisitors may only have as little as 5 days of training Information presented may be unscientific or biasedInformation presented may be unscientific or biased Data collectionData collection Families may unknowingly give up 4Families may unknowingly give up 4 thth amendment amendment

rights rights

Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011

RecommendationsRecommendationsRecommendationsRecommendations

Delete authorizing language for home visiting Delete authorizing language for home visiting from statutefrom statute

Reallocate federal TANF funds away from home visiting

Eliminate ECFE home visiting as well

Delete authorizing language for home visiting Delete authorizing language for home visiting from statutefrom statute

Reallocate federal TANF funds away from home visiting

Eliminate ECFE home visiting as well