Upload
charleen-ray
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011
The Problems with Home Visiting Programs
Karen R. Effrem, M.DPresident – Education Liberty Watch
Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011
Many Social Ills Associated with Single Many Social Ills Associated with Single Parent FamiliesParent Families
Many Social Ills Associated with Single Many Social Ills Associated with Single Parent FamiliesParent Families
63 percent of all suicides are individuals from single-parent households. (FBI)
75 percent of adolescents in chemical-dependency hospitals come from single-parent households. (CDC)
More than half of all youths incarcerated for criminal acts come from single-parent households. (Children’s Defense Fund)
63 percent of all suicides are individuals from single-parent households. (FBI)
75 percent of adolescents in chemical-dependency hospitals come from single-parent households. (CDC)
More than half of all youths incarcerated for criminal acts come from single-parent households. (Children’s Defense Fund)
Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011
Intact Families ERASE the Achievement GapIntact Families ERASE the Achievement GapIntact Families ERASE the Achievement GapIntact Families ERASE the Achievement Gap
“Dr. William Jeynes used “data from the National Educational Longitudinal Survey to examine the impact of student religious commitment and living in intact families on academic achievement among black and Hispanic 12th graders. Students with intact families and high levels of religiosity scored as well as all white students on most achievement measures and higher than their black and Hispanic counterparts without intact families or high religiosity. “(J. Urban Ed. Vol 38 No. 1, 2003 - Emphasis added)
“Dr. William Jeynes used “data from the National Educational Longitudinal Survey to examine the impact of student religious commitment and living in intact families on academic achievement among black and Hispanic 12th graders. Students with intact families and high levels of religiosity scored as well as all white students on most achievement measures and higher than their black and Hispanic counterparts without intact families or high religiosity. “(J. Urban Ed. Vol 38 No. 1, 2003 - Emphasis added)
Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011
Home Visiting Does Not Improve Home Visiting Does Not Improve Child DevelopmentChild Development
Home Visiting Does Not Improve Home Visiting Does Not Improve Child DevelopmentChild Development
Source: Home Visiting Evidence of EffectivenessSource: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness
http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3
Source: Home Visiting Evidence of EffectivenessSource: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness
http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3
Program Name Primary Effects Secondary Effects
Early Head Start Home Visiting
Favorable: 1 No effect: 21 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0
Favorable: 3 No effect: 3 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0
Healthy Families America (HFA)
Favorable: 7 No effect: 27 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0
Favorable: 0 No effect: 0 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0
Nurse Family Partnership (NFP)
Favorable: 4 No effect: 35 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0
Favorable: 2 No effect: 11 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 1
Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011
Home Visiting Does Not Improve Home Visiting Does Not Improve Child DevelopmentChild Development
Home Visiting Does Not Improve Home Visiting Does Not Improve Child DevelopmentChild Development
Source: Home Visiting Evidence of EffectivenessSource: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness
http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3
Source: Home Visiting Evidence of EffectivenessSource: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness
http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3
Type of Effects Primary Effects(% of Effects Measured for 3 studies)
Secondary Effects (% of Effects Measured for 3 studies)
Favorable 13% 25%
No Effect 87% 70%
Unfavorable or Ambiguous
0% 5%
Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011
Home Visiting Does Not Improve Home Visiting Does Not Improve Child DevelopmentChild Development
Home Visiting Does Not Improve Home Visiting Does Not Improve Child DevelopmentChild Development
Source: Home Visiting Evidence of EffectivenessSource: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness
http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3
Source: Home Visiting Evidence of EffectivenessSource: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness
http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=3
Type of Effects Primary Effects(% of Effects Measured for all studies)
Secondary Effects (% of Effects Measured for all studies)
Favorable 15% 24%
No Effect 84% 76%
Unfavorable or Ambiguous
1% 0%
Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011
Home Visiting Does Not Improve Home Visiting Does Not Improve Child DevelopmentChild Development
Home Visiting Does Not Improve Home Visiting Does Not Improve Child DevelopmentChild Development
• “It is important to note, however, that the reduction in total behavioral problems on the CBCL [Child Behavior Checklist completed by the mothers] was not corroborated by teachers' reports of child behavior.” (Olds and Kitzman, 2004)
• There were no statistically significant paraprofessional program effects on children's language, executive functioning, emotional regulation, or behavioral adaptation, or on mothers' reports of externalizing
behavior problems… There were no statistically significant nurse effects on sensitive-responsive mother-child interaction, children's emotional regulation, or externalizing behavior problems [nurse visited].” (Olds and Robinson, 2004)
• “It is important to note, however, that the reduction in total behavioral problems on the CBCL [Child Behavior Checklist completed by the mothers] was not corroborated by teachers' reports of child behavior.” (Olds and Kitzman, 2004)
• There were no statistically significant paraprofessional program effects on children's language, executive functioning, emotional regulation, or behavioral adaptation, or on mothers' reports of externalizing
behavior problems… There were no statistically significant nurse effects on sensitive-responsive mother-child interaction, children's emotional regulation, or externalizing behavior problems [nurse visited].” (Olds and Robinson, 2004)
Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011
Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Child AbuseChild Abuse
Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Child AbuseChild Abuse
Source: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness
http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=4
Source: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness
http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=4
Program Name Primary Effects Secondary Effects
Early Head Start Home Visiting
Favorable: 0 No effect: 0 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0
Favorable: 0 No effect: 1 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0
Healthy Families America (HFA)
Favorable: 0 No effect: 22 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0
Favorable: 12 No effect: 101 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0
Nurse Family Partnership (NFP)
Favorable: 6 No effect: 19 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0
Favorable: 0 No effect: 0 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0
Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011
Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Child AbuseChild Abuse
Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Child AbuseChild Abuse
Source: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness
http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=4
Source: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness
http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=4
Type of Effects Primary Effects(% of Effects Measured for 3 Studies)
Secondary Effects (% of Effects Measured for 3 Studies)
Favorable 13% 11%
No Effect 87% 89%
Unfavorable or Ambiguous
0% 0%
Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011
Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Child AbuseChild Abuse
Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Home Visiting Does Not Prevent Child AbuseChild Abuse
Source: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness
http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=4
Source: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness
http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/document.aspx?rid=2&sid=4
Type of Effects Primary Effects(% of Effects Measured for All Studies)
Secondary Effects (% of Effects Measured for All Studies)
Favorable 13% 10%
No Effect 87% 90%
Unfavorable or Ambiguous
0% 0%
Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011
Other Problems with Home Other Problems with Home VisitingVisiting
Other Problems with Home Other Problems with Home VisitingVisiting
Medical record review without consentMedical record review without consent Consent may not be voluntary for participationConsent may not be voluntary for participation Visitors may only have as little as 5 days of trainingVisitors may only have as little as 5 days of training Information presented may be unscientific or biasedInformation presented may be unscientific or biased Data collectionData collection Families may unknowingly give up 4Families may unknowingly give up 4 thth amendment amendment
rights rights
Medical record review without consentMedical record review without consent Consent may not be voluntary for participationConsent may not be voluntary for participation Visitors may only have as little as 5 days of trainingVisitors may only have as little as 5 days of training Information presented may be unscientific or biasedInformation presented may be unscientific or biased Data collectionData collection Families may unknowingly give up 4Families may unknowingly give up 4 thth amendment amendment
rights rights
Karen R.Effrem M.D. 2011
RecommendationsRecommendationsRecommendationsRecommendations
Delete authorizing language for home visiting Delete authorizing language for home visiting from statutefrom statute
Reallocate federal TANF funds away from home visiting
Eliminate ECFE home visiting as well
Delete authorizing language for home visiting Delete authorizing language for home visiting from statutefrom statute
Reallocate federal TANF funds away from home visiting
Eliminate ECFE home visiting as well