Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Results Driven Accountability
Federal Programs Division
"Kids First, New Mexico Wins!"
Hanna Skandera Secretary of Education
New Mexico Public Education Department Denise Koscielniak
Director of Federal Programs
2
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) History
• Message from Secretary Arne Duncan
• Shift from compliance to outcomes
• 2011 Continuous Improvement Visit (CIV)
• Must focus on measurable indicator(s)
• 2nd State to pilot plan
4
NM’s RDA Plan • Stakeholder Meeting
2011 o Focus on state efforts o Elementary-level reading o Overall school improvements
(school grades) o Lowest quartile (students with
disabilities, low socio-economic status, Native American students)
RDA • NM’s plan
o Supports A-F school grading
o Focuses on reading growth rates especially in grades K-3
o Supports Reads to Lead o Math and positive
behavioral interventions and supports
o Includes parent involvement and funding for parent centers for parent training
5
o Title I and Special Education Collaboration
o Shared FTE o IDEA B State Directed
Activities funds o Fiscal plan – support RDA
activities o REC Support o IDEA Advisory Panel
RDA Cont’d • Site Selection and
Consideration o C, D or F school grade o Quartile 1 Grade o High % spec. ed.
enrollment o School-wide Title I o Elementary Schools o 50% sites high Native
American population
6
• Coordination with Priority Schools Bureau
• Collaboration with Literacy Bureau
8
• Keep on implementing plan
• Guidelines forthcoming
11
“It’s Official” RDA Next Steps
• RDA announced o Accountability o State Systemic Improvement
Plan (SSIP)
• How to scale up o Infrastructure o Alignment of state initiatives o Implementation
• HR • Fiscal
New Mexico
Other States
12
RDA or SSIP • Student oriented • 5 year plan (2014/15-
2018/19) • Does not have to be
state-wide • Includes scale up • Must relate to other
indicators o Reading Proficiency – direct o Disproportionate
Representation – direct o Other indirect indicators
Phase I SSIP
13
Phase I
IDEA Data Center
15
RDA Data Analysis • State Reading
Assessment • NAEP • NMSBA & PARCC • Graduation Rates • Drop-out Rates • Suspension/Expulsion • Disproportionality • State Demographics,
including poverty
Reading Proficiency
through Early Reading Initiative
Increased Graduation Rates
Decreased Drop Out Rates
Decreased Discipline Infractions
Decreased Inappropriate
Referrals
Improved School Grade
Improved Q1 grade
16
RDA in the Title I Bureau • RDA is housed in the Title I bureau of PED, funded
through special education (the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act – IDEA Part B and D)
• In-kind support Title I staff and combined FTE • At risk students and students with disabilities tend to
score in the lowest quartile (the lowest 25%) • Focus is on lowest quartile, but important to support
entire school improvement o Most students with disabilities spend most of their time in general
education classrooms
17
Priority Schools Support
Results Driven Accountability Interventions
Desk-top Monitoring
State-identified Measurable Result(s) (SIMR) for Children with Disabilities
19
A description of the result(s) the State intends to achieve through the implementation of the SSIP. The State-identified result(s) must be aligned to an SPP/APR indicator or a component of an SPP/APR indicator. The State-identified result(s) must be clearly based on the Data and State Infrastructure Analyses and must be a child-level outcome in contrast to a process outcome. The State may select a single result (e.g., increasing the graduation rate for children with disabilities) or a cluster of related results (e.g., increasing the graduation rate and decreasing the dropout rate for children with disabilities).
SIMR
FFY 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Target 39.8 41.8 43.8 45.8 47.8
20
New Mexico’s State Identified Measurable Result (SIMR) is: By federal fiscal year (FFY) 2018, 47.8% of students with disabilities in Results Driven Accountability schools will score benchmark on the End of Year DIBELS-Next Composite. Baseline data and targets are measurable and rigorous Baseline data from 2013 indicate that 37.8% of students with disabilities in Results Driven Accountability (RDA) schools scored benchmark on the End of Year DIBELS-Next Composite. Reaching the 2018 goal of 47.8% represents a 26% increase in achievement from the baseline data, collected in FFY 2013. FFY 2013 – FFY 2018 Targets
21
Phase II SSIP
22
Phase II
IDEA Data Center
Measures Short-Term Outcomes • What customers and
people learn as a result of outputs
• What awareness, attitudes, or skills they develop
24
Outputs • Program
Accomplishments • Direct Results of Activities • Description and number
of products and events • Customer contacts with
products and events • Fidelity of program
activities
IDEA Data Center
Measures Long-Term Outcomes • Broad program
outcomes • Results that fulfill the
program’s goals • Impact on children and
families • Program sustainability,
or what ensures or promotes scale-up and sustainability
25
Intermediate Outcomes • Changes in adult
actions or behaviors based in knowledge
• Fidelity of the planned interventions
• Improved organizational functioning
• Improved system functioning
IDEA Data Center
Formative Evaluation
26 IDEA Data Center
IDEA Data Center
Summative Evaluation
28
29
30
We are seeing results with result driven accountability
31
RDA sites through 2015-2016