14
Community Information Meeting: The Future of Public Education in Shelby County January 19, 2011 Daniel Kiel The University of Memphis School of Law

Kiel stand presentation slides

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Kiel stand presentation slides

Community Information Meeting: The Future of Public Education in Shelby County

January 19, 2011

Daniel KielThe University of Memphis

School of Law

Page 2: Kiel stand presentation slides

Shelby County Comparison:Government vs. Schools

Shelby County Government

Serves ENTIRETY of Shelby County (including Memphians and non‐Memphians)

Shelby County Schools

Serves only the portion of Shelby County outside of the Memphis city limits

Page 3: Kiel stand presentation slides
Page 4: Kiel stand presentation slides

City of Memphis Taxpayer

City of Memphis Government

Shelby County Government

Individual 1: The Memphian

PATH OF PROPERTY TAXESVotes for Member of Memphis City School Board

Children Assigned to Attend Memphis City Schools

Page 5: Kiel stand presentation slides

Taxpayer Outside Memphis

Shelby County Government

Individual 2: The Non‐Memphian

PATH OF PROPERTY TAXES

Votes for Members of Shelby County School Board

Children Assigned to Attend Shelby County Schools

Page 6: Kiel stand presentation slides

Funding Sources

Source(103,593 students) (47,342 students)

State of Tennessee $428M (49.5%)

$174M (50.7%)

Shelby County Property Taxes(paid by all county residents –Memphian and non‐Memphian)

$255M (29.5%)

$115M (33.5%)

Shelby County Sales Taxes $89M (10.3%)

$43M (12.6%)

City of Memphis Property Taxes (paid only by Memphians)

$84M (9.8%)

N/A

Other $8M (1.0%)

$10M (3.0%)

Page 7: Kiel stand presentation slides

Why Change the Status Quo?: Interests of the Two Districts

Sustainability in Funding

Continued Local Control

Page 8: Kiel stand presentation slides

Strategy: SCS Conversion to Special School District

Currently: SCS is a “County” District

Changes if SCS Converted to Special School DistrictoFrozen BoundariesoIndependent Taxing AuthorityoVeto Power Over Merger with Other School Systems

To Create a Special School District:oLift Statewide BanoLegislative Creation of New Special School District

Page 9: Kiel stand presentation slides

Why Change the Status Quo?: Interests of the Two Districts

Sustainability in Funding

Continued Local Control

Page 10: Kiel stand presentation slides

Strategy: Surrender of MCS Charter

Motivating Force: Funding UncertaintiesoCity ContributionoCounty Contribution if SCS becomes Special School District

Meaning and Effect of Charter Surrender

To Dissolve Memphis City Schools Charter:oSchool Board Surrender of CharteroCitywide Referendum

Page 11: Kiel stand presentation slides

Step One: MCS Board Votes to Surrender Charter (Dec. 20, 2010)

Next Step: Citywide Referendum

Page 12: Kiel stand presentation slides

What If…..the referendum succeeds?

Impact on Funding:Single-Source Local Funding – Shelby County Gov’t

Impact on Governance: Merged DistrictShort-Term UncertaintyLong-Term = Reconstituted County-wide Board

Impact on Students:Transition Period to Hammer Out Details (for

example, uniforms, staffing, textbooks, etc.)New Board to Make Long-Term Decisions on student

assignment, academic programs

Page 13: Kiel stand presentation slides

What If…..the referendumdoes not succeed?

Maintenance of Status Quo in funding and governance

Shelby County Schools free to continue pursuit of Special School District status in state legislature

Memphis City Schools free to consider other agreements to ensure sustainable funding

Page 14: Kiel stand presentation slides

Current Sub‐Issues

Continued Negotiation Between the DistrictsoMCS Rejection of SCS Proposed Agreement

Legislation that Could Change Current LandscapeoState LegislatureoMemphis City Council