Killing Us Softly1 depopulate

8/20/2019 Killing Us Softly1 depopulate

1/110

1

KILLING US SOFTLY

CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF THE GLOBAL

DEPOPULATION POLICY

Kevin Mugur Galalae

(2013)

Published by

THE PEOPLE’S PR OTECTION FORCE

Protecting people from governments.


2/110

2

PREFACE

The insights for this arti cle, which is a prelude to a for thcoming book, came to

me dur ing a 75-day hunger strike whi le in pre-tri al detention in Canada for my

defense of human rights. Dur ing these 75 days I lost 55 pounds or 27% of my

in iti al body weight and came within an inch of death in my attempt to compel the

Canadian government and by extension the international community to stop

their devastating methods of population control and adopt wor ldwide legislation

instead. The Canadian authorit ies watched me wither from 206 to 150 pounds

and hoped that I would die. To keep my hunger stri ke secret they prevented me

from seeing the I nternational Red Cross and the Canadian media remained

sil ent throughout. Despite my sacri fi ce, the Canadian author iti es and the

in ternational community did nothing to stop the depopulation genocide. To this

day, it proceeds as it has for the past 65 years, with complete disregard for

human li fe and dignity.

Since its inception in 1945, the Global Depopulation Poli cy has never been

exposed, even though over the cour se of seven decades it has gradual ly come to

affect every human being on the planet. I t has been concealed from the world at

great cost in human li fe and treasure because it consti tutes crimes against

humani ty that are without paral lel in human history. This is the fi rst time the

Global Depopulation Poli cy is exposed. What you are about to read is forbidden

fruit.

The fol lowing pages wil l forever alter your outlook and understanding of theworld and of your fell ow human beings.


3/110

3

I. INTRODUCTION

Since the end of the Second World War and with the formation of the United Nations in 1945,

international peace and stability have been maintained by controlling population growth.

Unbeknown to the masses, governments have used covert methods to limit births in developed

and underdeveloped countries alike and to accelerate deaths in Africa and a few critically poorand overpopulated areas elsewhere.

Births have been prevented by interfering with the reproductive system so as to lower human

fertility, while deaths have been promoted by weakening the immune system so as to increase

morbidity and mortality.

The methods used by every country to control population growth have been dictated by the level

of development and the existing infrastructure as much as by political will or lack thereof and

have either been imposed by force and deception from the outside or adopted willingly by the

governing, military and scientific elites of nation states that have relied on the moral, technicaland monetary assistance of the United Nations, its agencies, and the greater international

community.

Regardless of the methods used to control population and whether they are imposed or self-

imposed, strict secrecy and deception have been necessary to prevent the masses from

discovering the bitter truth that for the past 68 years they have been the object of a silent and

global offensive, a campaign of attrition that has turned the basic elements of life into weapons

of mass infertility and selective death.

Without our knowledge or consent, governments the world over have subverted our reproductive

freedom and ability to procreate to achieve ambitious and necessary demographic objectives and

in the process have committed the most odious and wide-sweeping crimes in human history to

save mankind from even greater evils: nuclear annihilation, mass starvation, and environmental

devastation. The birth of nearly two billion people has been prevented and the death of half a

billion hurried. While these goals have been intentional, the architects of the Global

Depopulation Policy have unintentionally undermined the genetic and intellectual endowment of

the human species and have set back eons of natural selection. Their intentions have never been

malevolent, but the unintended results of their actions are frightening.

It is the task of this article to reveal this silent offensive’s secret methods and insidious means,

which make up the world’s greatest con, so that an awakening to the dire realities we face will

prompt each and every human being on earth to demand a share of the responsibility and

population control can be legislated across the globe, with little or no resistance, for the next

three generations or until our numbers are sufficiently low to allow humanity to live in balance

with nature and at peace with itself.

This is the only way our children will have a future and a life of dignity.


4/110

4

II. CAUSES: THE GENESIS OF EVIL

We started to become victims of our own success when science and technology gradually

enabled us to survive the natural scourges that have kept us in check throughout history:

pestilence, war, famine, and death. These four horsemen of the apocalypse have been the natural

enemies of our species. We have been waging war on them since times immemorial and, as wehave largely vanquished them, we found ourselves unchallenged on earth. We have become an

unstoppable force, absorbing earth’s space and productive capacity and displacing all other

species to make room for our ever-growing needs and numbers.

1. Physical Realities: The Cost of Ignorance

We now confront a set of physical realities that are unprecedented: overpopulation, hyper-

consumption, and long life spans.

Overpopulation

For the first 250 million years of our existence, we have struggled to survive and remained few

in numbers, reaching 500 million by the late Middle Ages. In the succeeding 300 years – from

circa 1500 A.D. to 1800 A.D. – we doubled our numbers thanks to improvements in agriculture,

transportation and distribution. Population pressures during these three centuries were relieved

by emigration to the New World.

The next doubling, from one to two billion, took only one century and occurred with the advent

of the Industrial Revolution when Europe’s population began to grow at an unprecedented pace.

Medical advances allowed most children to survive childhood while better nutrition and

sanitation extended the lifespan. Population pressures during this time were relieved by

European conquest and the exploitation of colonies in Africa and Asia.

As the benefits of science and technology became global, the surge in population became global

too and a billion people were added in only 50 years bringing the total to 3 billion by 1950.

Population pressures in this half century could no longer be absorbed by either migration or the

exploitation of colonies and this led to a bitter struggle for resources during the two world wars;

a struggle that has ravaged entire nations and killed more than 80 million people, more casualties

than all other conflicts in history combined.

Since 1950, we have added a billion new people every 10 to 15 years, bringing the total

population to 4 billion by 1970, to 5 billion by 1987, to 6 billion by 1999, and to 7 billion by

2011.


5/110

5

The population is expected to peak at 9 billion by 2050 and then start to decline. The reason the

population is expected to peak by 2050 is not because of prosperity and education, as we are led

to believe, but because the global elite that makes up the international community and controls

the United Nations has taken proactive measures since 1945 to ensure that resource scarcity andnational greed do not cause World War III. For better or worse we owe them six decades of

relative peace and stability, which is an extraordinary accomplishment when one considers that

this was achieved while the population has grown at the fastest pace in history.

If our leaders had taken no proactive measures to curb population growth, we would now face a

global population of 9 billion instead of 7 and our numbers would continue to double every 40

years and reach 14 billion by 2050 and 28 billion a century from now. Judging by the dismal

state of half the world’s peoples and by the alarming pace of environmental degradation, even

the current population is unsustainable.

We must not forget that even at 7 billion, half of us live in poverty or abject poverty despite the

tremendous scientific and technical advances of the past half century and that in many places on

earth conditions are so volatile and desperate that societies are on the brink of collapse. The

population explosion clearly bodes global catastrophe.

Hyper-consumption

Not only has the global population grown at the fastest pace in human history during the past six

decades, but its needs per capita have also grown at the fastest pace in human history and, in fact,at a much faster pace than the exponential population growth we have experienced. The average

modern human being consumes 100 times more resources than our forefathers a couple of

centuries ago did, and at least 5 times more resources than our grandparents did in 1950.

http://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=oS4E7BohYr7cXM&tbnid=UhaVwhKDBejRvM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://chartsbin.com/view/g7e&ei=7ao0UsaLDKis2QXw7ID4Cg&bvm=bv.52164340,d.b2I&psig=AFQjCNGCy49wm2cAmaubQ7IP-SXakdpL3A&ust=1379269654001302


6/110

6

This means that for all intents and purposes the 7 billion people who are alive today have a much

greater impact on the planet’s ecosystems than an equivalent number of our forebears in the

distant or immediate past. Consequently, the planet is straining under our load. Soil erosion,carbon dioxide accumulation, rapid deforestation, global warming and the melting of the polar

caps and glaciers are but some of the consequences of the environmental burden we have

become as a species. Given the impact we have on the planet at 7 billion strong, it takes no

scientist to foresee that the planet cannot possibly sustain 14 billion of us let alone 28 billion,

which is where we would be heading in less than a century had there been no proactive

intervention and aggressive interference with our ability to have children.

As our needs and numbers increase, we are placing unsustainable demands on critical resources

like water and fossil fuels, which are vital to our survival and define our standard of living.

Water shortages are already an impediment to development and even a threat to bare survival,

causing conflict within and between nations. Both our fresh water supplies and our fossil fuel

reserves are in crisis. 1.1 billion people live without clean drinking water and 2.6 billion lack

adequate sanitation and these combined problems kill nearly 4000 children every day from water

borne diseases.

http://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=c17gaJMBYslj_M&tbnid=D3taA08sOKkj_M:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/water--the-new-oil?page=4&ei=6sY1Ur_wCJT-qgGkzYCYAw&bvm=bv.52164340,d.aWM&psig=AFQjCNGEwpuncxOIUyIL8XgoEb9J-VJoGg&ust=1379342427861656http://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=54LbvGbi4tm5BM&tbnid=FnfKg3gQpLoBXM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://ourfiniteworld.com/2012/03/12/world-energy-consumption-since-1820-in-charts/&ei=S781UsPeDYfxqQGNh4HwDQ&bvm=bv.52164340,d.aWM&psig=AFQjCNHNVvhvs1rKvYo-1bRapKTqrkiPmw&ust=1379340437622008http://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=Efw0OBNJIKQXKM&tbnid=a-68NJ5mubzxAM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/PCE&ei=NsE1UsKKCY7bqQHN5IGoBA&bvm=bv.52164340,d.aWM&psig=AFQjCNEPXYXNoI5yVZ6lj2C3vnhSkCAr8g&ust=1379340704760114


7/110

7

For some nations water shortages are critical and growing worse from year to year because

dwindling reserves need to be shared by an increasing number of people. Daily per capita use of

water in residential areas varies accordingly. While North America and Japan have 350 litres at

their disposal for every person, Europe has only 200 litres, and sub-Saharan Africa has a paltry

10 to 20 litres.1 Water consumption in the 20th century has increased six-fold and at twice the

rate of population growth. Americans, for instance, used 7 gallons of water per day a century

ago and 145 gallons today.

Since development has occurred earlier and faster in some countries than in others, and the

politics of conquest and exploitation have prevented equitable distribution, per capita

consumption differs greatly around the globe in more than just water and oil. North Americans

on average consume 3 times more resources than Europeans, 5 times more than the Japanese, 20

times more than Asians, and 40 times more than Africans.

If everyone on earth were to have America’s standard of living then the existing global resources

could sustain only 1.2 billion people.2 If we would be content with the European standard then

our resources would sustain 3.6 billion. And if we were to universally adopt the Japanese

standard of living than our global resources could theoretically accommodate 6 billion.

The problem is that the demands we make on the environment are already much greater than the

earth’s capacity to regenerate, which is why the environment is collapsing and we are running

out of vital resources. This means that our planet could not sustain 1.2 billion Americans in

perpetuity any more than it could sustain 3.6 billion Europeans or 6 billion Japanese.

However you slice it and dice it, we can come to only one conclusion; namely that there are far

too many of us and if we are to continue to consume resources as voraciously as we have become

1 World Water Council, http://www.worldwatercouncil.org/library/archives/water-crisis/. 2 Currently the United States has 320 million people or c. 5% of the world’s population, but consumes 25% of theworld’s resources.

http://www.worldwatercouncil.org/library/archives/water-crisis/http://www.worldwatercouncil.org/library/archives/water-crisis/http://www.worldwatercouncil.org/library/archives/water-crisis/http://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=czXDdG_m1xwJuM&tbnid=70x3wub3qczWtM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://chartsbin.com/view/1470&ei=bs01UsWQDcXZrAGMgoHQBw&bvm=bv.52164340,d.aWM&psig=AFQjCNEBqyQx-FtYiGwMIh9DatsYk3TwkQ&ust=1379344030814129http://www.worldwatercouncil.org/library/archives/water-crisis/


8/110

8

accustomed to (and that all others on earth are aspiring for) and that our level of civilization

demands, we have no choice but to drastically reduce our numbers to a level that is within the

earth’s ability to regenerate.

Merely halting the global population at 7 billion, therefore, is not a solution. How well we want

to live will determine how many of us the earth can accommodate. And since human naturedemands constant improvement in our way of life we can only fulfill our personal and

civilizational needs by further reducing our numbers.

Long Lif e Spans

Not only is the earth overpopulated and straining under our ever-growing demand for resources,

we now also live longer than ever before. Life expectancy has risen dramatically over the

course of the past 100 years. While at the beginning of the 20th century one could expect to live

about 35 years, at the beginning of the 21st century one can expect to live nearly 70 years. This

doubling of our life spans means that modern human beings not only consume substantially more

resources than people in the past, but that they also consume them for twice as long as their

forefathers.

Overpopulation, overconsumption and long life spans are polar opposites of the conditions under

which man lived in the distant past, when he was at the mercy of nature, was scarce in numbers,

lived from hand to mouth and died young.

We have overturned the natural equilibrium that keeps species in symbiotic relationships and in

so doing we have become a threat to the natural environment that sustains all life on earth,

http://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=MfKMoLghPuQ6lM&tbnid=xukQoALqWxeOtM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://www.blackpoolcreative.com/feed/&ei=Vrw1UpLUPMSYrAG13oHYDQ&bvm=bv.52164340,d.aWM&psig=AFQjCNHuSotke1UO9-t78taGCVmdBh3xXA&ust=1379339661615243


9/110

9

including our own. If we have learned anything is that progress comes at the cost of nature, but

can only occur in a healthy natural environment. The competing demands of progress and nature

can only be reconciled if progress occurs within nature’s finite limits, and for that to occur there

must be fewer of us; few enough, in fact, for nature to absorb and repair our impact.

THE LAWS OF PROGRESS

The cost of progress has taught us three important lessons:

1. Given human nature, consumption per capita will only increase from one generation to

the next.

2. The greater the ecological footprint per capita, the fewer people can be accommodated by

earth’s finite resources.

3. Human civilization cannot survive into the future unless it learns to live within the

regenerative capacity of Mother Earth, thus within the limits of the natural environment

and its finite resources.

What we are about to learn is that having won the uphill battle we must now win the downhill

battle. Let me explain.

To increase in numbers our civilization has had to overcome natural obstacles set to preserve the

balance within ecosystems, a hard-won equilibrium from millennia of evolution that once

disrupted has caused nature great harm. If we are to restore the natural balance that sustains all

life on earth we must now decrease our population or else perish. But to decrease the population

our civilization must overcome man-made obstacles set to preserve the socio-economic balance

within societies, a hard-won equilibrium from centuries of give and take, trial and error, conflict

and cooperation, therefore damaging the fabric of society.

The upward and downward battles are equally hard and disruptive, the former on nature and the

latter on society. Only a stable population living within nature’s constraints can survive in

perpetuity and continue to evolve. If we fail to achieve such a state of equilibrium between man

and nature we will find ourselves living on a planet denuded of all animal and plant life and we

will die along with it.

Only man can stop man. This was realized by those with foresight who quietly began to take

proactive measures, unhindered by the indifference or ignorance of the vast majority who was

unable to foresee and remains unwilling to accept the impact we have as a species that has risenabove the natural element and has succeeded in harnessing nature solely to its own advantage

and who, as a result, now lives in a parasitical and therefore unsustainable relationship with

nature.

Once these enlightened minds realized that the global population must be stabilized they had to

find a way to stabilize it. The decision and the political will to tackle population control came


10/110

10

about at the United Nations which was set up immediately after World War II to maintain peace

between nations, thus to avoid war at all costs. But war was the last remaining natural enemy to

unrestrained population growth, since famine and pestilence have been largely eliminated in the

first half of the 20th century. The United Nations was therefore faced with the unenviable task of

having to find a substitute to war as a means to stop the population explosion. Not only had

humanity lost the taste for war after two world wars that occurred in a single generation, but the

development of nuclear weapons made the idea of war inconceivable as it would mean assured

mutual annihilation. What is the point of waging war if no one can win it as there would be

nothing left to take at the end of a nuclear war?

POPULATION CONTROL AS A SUBSTITUTE TO WAR

If the carnage of war, the last remaining scourge of humanity, could no longer be relied upon to

reduce our numbers so that nations could live within their means, then a way had to be found to prevent the birth of new people. And that is how the raison d'être of the United Nations and the

primary premise for the existence of an international community came to be population control.

Once the decision was made to pursue international peace and cooperation to avoid war, the

realization that the only way to preserve peace is by ensuring that nations live within their means

was inevitable, as was the realization that to live within the available means every country had to

limit the growth of its population.

The community of nations under the auspices of the United Nations had only to find and agree

upon acceptable ways to prevent new life, which proved to be easier said than done.

Tremendous obstacles stood in the way.

2. Systemic Obstacles – Paradoxes and Paradigms

Infanticide has been practiced throughout history as a rudimentary form of population control,

but never before had humanity endeavoured to control the population of entire nations and of the

world as a whole without committing murder. The obstacles they encountered were unexpected

and formidable.

Lack of Bi rth Control and Publi c Awareness

First, the science and technology of birth control were in their infancy in 1945 and the vast

majority of the population had neither the means nor the knowledge to prevent unwanted births.

At most a third of the population in Europe and North America practiced birth control and many

of those relied on the traditional methods of rhythm (also called periodic abstinence), withdrawal

(“coitus interruptus”), douching, and prolonged breastfeeding, which have a high failure rate but


11/110

11

were the only forms of birth control condoned for married couples. Diaphragms, contraceptive

sponges, condoms, and spermicides were available in the cities but not in wide use. The pill and

IUDs had yet to be invented and legal barriers to condom use were not removed until the 1960s

and 70s.

Chri stianity and the Doctrine of Papal Infalli bili ty

Second, neither contraception nor abortion was legal or morally acceptable to the mainstream

and both met with staunch opposition from conservative and religious elements of society.

Sexual gratification without the goal of reproduction was considered immoral and legislatures

refused to legalize any forms of birth control or to even remove obscenity laws from their

statutes so the issues could be openly discussed and the public educated. Social acceptance of

contraception was still decades away while abortion is to this day a controversial topic. While

the Anglican Church sanctioned the use of birth control by married couples in 1930, and the

Federal Council of Churches followed suit in the U.S. in 1931, the Roman Catholic Church, and

most other Christian denominations, took a firm stance against all forms of artificial birth controland has not reversed its position. Hampered by the immutability of the doctrine of papal

infallibility, by which the Vatican, since 1870, has claimed that the Pope is the ultimate moral

authority in the Christian world and preserved from the possibility of error, the Papacy could not

alter course once the Church had committed itself against birth control. And as the Holy Sea

commands the respect of one billion Christians, the population control lobby had come to a dead

end.

The Democratic Process

Third, the democratic process stood in the way of legalizing birth control let alone legislatingfamily size, as no politician could hope to be elected on a platform of government interference

with people’s reproductive freedom. The process of seeing contraception as an issue of public

health rather than one of morals had started after World War I but did not reach critical mass

until the early 1950s due to efforts initiated by the United Nations. Elected officials and

politicians could not and did not seek to convince the public that unless strict population control

measures are adopted immediately and universally society would face nuclear war in the near

future or would collapse in two or three generations from famine. They were held back by self-

serving reasons, as it would have meant the end of their political ambitions and careers, as well

as by the conservative values that define the governing class.

It would have come as a great shock to the architects of the Global Depopulation Policy that the

most valued aspects of Western society, democracy and Christianity, stood in the way of their

plans to keep the peace by limiting family size. Yet democracy and Christianity proved to be

insurmountable obstacles to man’s noblest and most civilized way to ensure peace and prosperity

for all. Paradoxically, had it not been for the intractability of church leaders of all Christian

denominations, but Catholics in particular, and for the un-electability of politicians in a


12/110

12

democratic system, the Global Depopulation Policy would not have been driven underground to

be carried out by deception through covert chemical and biological means but could have

proceeded in the open and by freely given consent and thus be legislated.

As it became clear that the systemic obstacles could not be overcome at the national level, the

responsibility to introduce effective population control measures was transferred to theinternational arena and placed onto the United Nations.

To circumvent these formidable systemic obstacles, the architects of the Global Depopulation

Policy realized that they had to deceive the world in order to move the masses to do what is

needed against their will and without their knowledge. And that is how the stage was set for

history’s greatest deception. The crimes committed behind the veil of secrecy that was raised to

shield the Global Depopulation Policy from public scrutiny and accountability for over 60 years

are without parallel in history by virtue of their sheer magnitude. While these crimes have been

committed not with malevolent but with benevolent intent, to save humanity from its own

ignorance and indifference, they nevertheless redefine the concept of crimes against humanityand throw our species into an entirely different and unflattering light.

3. Historical Circumstances – Victors and Vanquished

Every generation lives and operates within the confines of its time and is at the mercy of history.

The political climate at the end of World War II was volatile and charged with hatred and

bitterness. Europe and Japan were laid waste and economic conditions were dire everywhere.

There was no time for subtle measures. Desperate times called for desperate measures.

Al l ies versus Axis Powers – Unconditional Surrender – Gui nea Pigs

The Allies won the Second World War and its members, who called themselves the “United

Nations”, became signatories of the Declaration of the United Nations and members of the

newly-formed United Nations Organization at war’s end.

The United States, the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom, the so-called “Big Three”,

controlled Allied policy during the war and dictated the United Nations’ policy after the war.

The unconditional surrender of both Germany and Japan in 1945 provided the Allies with the

opportunity to institute strict population control measures on the conquered nations of the AxisPowers without seeking anyone’s permission. Japan,

being the most hated enemy of the United States, had

already been punished with two nuclear bombs at

Hiroshima and Nagasaki. To ensure that it rose from

the ashes but stayed humble, the reconstruction

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1d/WMD_world_map.svg


13/110

13

included a nation-wide plan of population control.

As an island nation with limited natural resources, an already large population, and a modern

economy whose industry demanded vast imports of foreign resources, Japan was the ideal testing

ground for aggressive fluoridation, which was the only tried and tested fertility-depressing agent

known at the time. The Nazis had used it on the Jews and the Soviets on their gulag prisonersand was found to be not only extremely effective in sterilizing both men and women but also in

inducing a bovine state of obedience and submissiveness.

In the cities, fluoride was put in the drinking water at every water treatment plant while in the

country fluoride pills were distributed along with food rations. The work of poisoning the

Japanese was accomplished by Japanese war criminals from Unit 731, which had performed

lethal human experiments on civilians since 1937. The members of this unit, which was

officially known as the Epidemic Prevention and Water Purification Department , were given

immunity from criminal prosecution at war’s end by General McArthur, the Supreme

Commander of the Allied Forces, and instead of being executed for having murdered tens ofthousands of innocent civilians in heinous experiments and torture they were put to work on

sterilizing their fellow nationals. The campaign was extraordinarily successful and Japan

became the only nation in the world not to have a baby boom generation after the war, the result

of which Japan also became the first nation in the world to have a larger number of retirees than

children. As a reward for their service to the Allied depopulation effort, many of the scientists of

Unit 731 were promoted to prominent careers in politics, academia, medicine, business and

especially in intelligence, aiding the United States biological weapons development program and

forming the scientific avant-garde of what was to become the Global Depopulation Policy.

Germany and Italy, the other two major Axis Powers, were subjected to similar populationcontrol measures as a result of which they now occupy the unenviable second and third place on

the list of nations with the most aged populations in the world. Japan’s elderly (defined as 65

years of age and over) make up 24% of the overall population, while in Germany and Italy the

elderly constitute nearly 22% and 21% of the population respectively.3

That the three Axis Powers are in this demographic position is obviously no coincidence but the

result of the deliberate and aggressive measures imposed on the vanquished by the victors as

soon as they unconditionally surrendered. The Axis Powers served the Allies as guinea pigs and

the lessons learned on the citizens of these nations were soon applied on the citizens of the Allied

Powers themselves.4

3 The World Bank, Databank:http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.65UP.TO.ZS?order=wbapi_data_value_2012+wbapi_data_value+wbapi _data_value-last&sort=desc 4 The percentage of elderly is much lower in the former Allied that in the former Axis Powers since populationcontrol measures were undertaken later and more carefully on their own people than on the defeated foes. The U.K.elderly stand at 17%, the U.S. at 14%, and the Russian Federation at 13%.

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.65UP.TO.ZS?order=wbapi_data_value_2012+wbapi_data_value+wbapi_data_value-last&sort=deschttp://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.65UP.TO.ZS?order=wbapi_data_value_2012+wbapi_data_value+wbapi_data_value-last&sort=deschttp://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.65UP.TO.ZS?order=wbapi_data_value_2012+wbapi_data_value+wbapi_data_value-last&sort=deschttp://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.65UP.TO.ZS?order=wbapi_data_value_2012+wbapi_data_value+wbapi_data_value-last&sort=deschttp://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.65UP.TO.ZS?order=wbapi_data_value_2012+wbapi_data_value+wbapi_data_value-last&sort=desc


14/110

14

Nuclear Weapons – Assures Mutual Annih il ation – Mi li tary-Industri al Establi shment

The second historical factor that has contributed to the secret, deceptive and unlawful nature of

the Global Depopulation Policy is the militarization of the political and especially geopolitical

climate post World War II. The war had ensured that the armies of both sides had swelled to

unprecedented numbers and absorbed large shares of their nations’ GDP. On the Allied side theywere there to stay while on the Axis side the armed forces were dismantled along with the

industry that equipped them.

The conquered nations of Europe and Asia were

placed under military administrations and

depended on handouts from their former enemies

for reconstruction. General Douglas MacArthur

took charge of the Supreme Command of Allied

Powers (SCAP), which occupied Japan from

1945 to 1952, and was assisted by British personnel to enact widespread military, political,

economic, and social reforms.

The post-war occupation of Europe, during which the Axis Powers were demilitarized with the

help of the English, French and Soviets, and the ensuing Marshall Plan (1948-1952), when they

were helped to reconstruct, were both delegated by the U.S. military. As in Japan, so in Europe a

military man was put in control, General George Marshall.

A military mentality took root in the U.S., the Soviet Union, and the U.K., and strong and all-

pervasive intelligence agencies grew at the very heart of the political power structures of thesethree global powers where they became firmly and irrevocably entrenched.

In the decade following World War II, population control was conceived and implemented solely

by the military personnel of the U.K., U.S., and U.S.S.R., whose intelligence agencies defined

and ensured the program’s secrecy and expediency and who collaborated and cooperated with

one another to solve crises and to avoid nuclear conflict.

As more nations joined the nuclear club5 the probability and desirability of war between nuclear-

armed nations became ever more remote and emphasis shifted to the silent war of attrition waged

covertly on civilians by their own militaries and governments who made human fertility their

primary enemy and target.

5 The Soviet Union acquired nuclear weapons in 1949, the U.K. in 1952, France in 1960, China in 1964, India in1974, Pakistan in 1998, and North Korea in 2006. The notion that Israel possesses nuclear weapons is a fiction todeter the Arabs from launching a renewed attack.

http://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=GSF6kWr-FVsdFM&tbnid=9fpUyKVlu9a-gM:&ved=0CAgQjRwwAA&url=http://www.wallpaperswala.com/mushroom-cloud/&ei=i2g3UtngIcKvqgHHmoF4&psig=AFQjCNFKL0wGSN9eX8KAyDJRT4qC1pIvXw&ust=1379449355598226


15/110

15

United Nations – Substitu te to War – International Peace

Gradually, as its infrastructure was built up, the United Nations took

over the responsibility for population control from the military, but

the methods and means had already been set and continued to be used

covertly while civil society and religious bodies tried to find moral justification for conventional methods of birth control and primed and

educated the public on the necessity for smaller families.

The United Nations replaced the League of Nations and like its defunct counterpart its chief

mission is to maintain world peace by promoting cooperation in solving international economic,

social, and humanitarian problems. To achieve its goal, the UN has evolved over time and has

grown to encompass six principal organs and seventeen subsidiary agencies.

The military-industrial establishments of the U.S., U.S.S.R/Russia, and the U.K. continue to be at

the forefront of the battle against human fertility and are charged with the task of conceiving andcarrying out new methods for population control that violate national and international laws with

the full knowledge and consent of their nations’ executive branches and the international

community.

The shift from military to civilian control of the depopulation policy has occurred gradually in

the 1950s and 1960s and while on the national level it is now overseen by the executive branch

of every nation, internationally it is delegated and coordinated by the United Nations and its

agencies, particularly the United Nations Development Fund (UNDP), the UN Economic and

Social Council, the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Bank Group (WB), the

International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).

The primary concern of the United Nations and the pivotal issue for the international community

is the Global Depopulation Policy, which looms invisibly behind every structural adjustment

loan and every development grant.

4. International Obstacles – Geopolitical Dilemmas

The depopulation plan has proceeded in stages through a laborious process of persuasion and

manipulation and though it has come to encompass the entire world and affects nearly every

individual on the planet it has been concealed to this day due to several considerations.

I nternational Consensus and National I nterests

Forging international consensus despite irreconcilable differences and divergent national

interests is extremely difficult and best done discreetly between high level national and

international parties. To educate an entire nation takes generations whereas to convince or co-


16/110

16

opt a select number of individuals who already possess an understanding of political and

geopolitical issues, and who are more likely to set aside cultural prejudices and historical

animosities (especially for personal gain), is a much easier and faster enterprise. The technocrats

and scientists employed by the United Nations have therefore concentrated on co-opting their

counterparts at the national level in key ministries once high level envoys have successfully

focused their attention on heads of state.

News Travel F aster Than Understanding – The Need for Secrecy

An enlightened country, or a country that has experienced population pressures for centuries

(such as the Netherlands), could conceivably receive popular approval for legislating family size

once it brings the issue out in the open and allows the media and civil society to discuss it freely.

But in so doing it would pass sensitive information beyond its borders to countries that are not

ready for general consensus and thus expose and jeopardize the covert methods that are in place.

By a domino effect, the depopulation policy could be brought to a sudden halt throughout the

world and thus the countries where only secret methods of population control are possible andthat are most likely to suffer from population pressures and resource scarcity would not benefit

from proactive measures that though painful and criminal nevertheless enable such countries to

survive the demographic transition from growing to stable populations before they either

collapse under the burden or are ready to accept and embrace legislation.

Since news travel faster than understanding the need for secrecy has remained paramount and

has been respected by nations that have already undergone the painful demographic transition by

covert chemical means.

I nglori ous Past of Eugenics –

The I nstinct to Procreate

The mere mention of population control brings back memories of the Holocaust and the Nazi

eugenic agenda, which has tainted any and all efforts to institute enlightened and voluntary

family planning measures. The inglorious past of eugenics acts as a barrier to benevolent

population control. Furthermore, people have an innate aversion to the thought that the state

should be allowed to have a say in our sex life, as this strikes at the heart of our instinct to breed,

which is among the strongest instincts we possess.

The Logistics of Moving Bil li ons

The world is a mighty big place and a depopulation program is a complex, expensive and laborintensive project that cannot happen simultaneously across the globe. Problems of timing and

coordination have dictated a piecemeal approach. It is logistically impossible to proceed on all

fronts at the same time and this has limited the United Nations and its wealthy sponsors to

proceed gradually whereby resources are focused on specific countries on any given decade.

Once the program is established and national authorities can continue it with little outside

assistance then the international community shifts its focus to the next set of nations. It is thus


17/110

17

that the Global Depopulation Policy has advanced like a wave in the ocean and has succeeded in

sweeping the entire globe.

Social and Psychological I nertia

Countries and cultures are set in their ways and it is difficult if nay impossible to thaw the socialand psychological inertia that stands in the way of change, even if change is desperately needed.

Europe’s and North America’s experience has shown that most Protestants were willing to

accept contraception and abortion whereas most Catholics and Orthodox were not. The Sunni

and Shia sections that make up the vast majority of the Muslim world appear equally reluctant to

accept any state interference with people’s reproductive freedom. The same entrenched

opposition to family planning appears throughout Africa where the international community has

advanced by force and with complete disregard for the people’s well-being. Some cultures are

more easily manipulated than others and these places were first to be subjected to population

control. This explains why 90% of the population growth of the past half century has occurred in

the developing world. Westerners, in other words, did it to themselves and are now doing it tothe rest of the world by hook or by crook, since non-western countries are far less receptive to

population control regardless of the method used.


18/110

18

III. METHODS – IN THE ABSENCE OF CHOICE – SOCIAL ENGINEERING

In this section I will only briefly list the methods to control population growth. The benefits and

drawbacks of each method are discussed further in the text.

As the Global Depopulation Policy grew in scope its methods expanded accordingly, beingdictated by the particular circumstances of each region and nation. Broadly speaking the

methods can be categorized in two groups, direct and indirect. Direct methods are aimed at

undermining fertility while the indirect methods are aimed at undermining the family. Both

direct and indirect methods subvert people’s reproductive freedom.

1. DIRECT METHODS – AIMED AT UNDERMINING FERTILITY

(i) Legislation – China

Deng Xiaoping’s One-Child Policy since 1978

China is the only country in the world that chose to restrict family size by law and

thus tackle the population problem overtly and not covertly. As a one party state,

Chinese statesmen do not have to compete for office by pandering for popularity, as

politicians in democracies have to, and this enabled the Chinese Communist Party to

introduce the One-Child Policy, officially known as the “Family Planning Policy”

(计划生育政策), immediately after Chairman Mao died and Deng Xiaoping took over

the reign of power. The policy forbids couples in urban areas to have more than one

child while rural couples and minority groups are allowed two children.

(ii) Coerced Surgical Sterilization – India

1952 Population Control Policy (first in the world)

1976-77 Indira Gandhi’s State-of-Emergency

2000 National Policy – replacement level fertility by 2010 (tubal ligations for

women and vasectomies for men)

After two failed and misguided attempts to address the population problem (in 1952

and 1976), India, which is grossly overpopulated, has settled for coerced surgical

sterilization as the method of choice. In less than 20 years, India has succeeded insurgically sterilizing 80% of its women of childbearing age, which, considering that it

is the world’s most populous nation after China and has 1.2 billion people, it is an

incredible accomplishment. It has succeeded not by persuasion or education as much

as by coercion. Mobile medical caravans scour the country’s villages, where 80% of

India’s people live, and entice the villagers, who are for the most part illiterate and

easily misled, with offers of free medical care for every woman who has had two or


19/110

19

more children. The women are then sedated and subjected without their knowledge

or consent to a tubal ligation, a procedure that takes circa 30 minutes, and that renders

them irreversibly sterile for the rest of their lives. The government of India offers

incentives to men to voluntarily undergo a vasectomy, which is a far easier and faster

medical procedure than a tubal ligation, taking only seven minutes, but that due to

India’s culture, where men have far more authority than women, remains unpopular

and therefore a statistically less significant measure for addressing the population

problem.

(iii) Covert Methods

A. Chemical Sterilization – for the developed world

fluoride

Fluoridation is the West’s method of choice for suppressing

fertility in both men and women. It has been used throughout the

West since 1950 and fluoride is delivered either through tap

water, table salt, or milk depending on the country and its level of

development. A few select and wealthy nations in northern

Europe use compulsory dental plans to ensure that every citizen

receives periodic applications of fluoride directly in the mouth.

Regardless of the delivery agent used, fluoridation has been imposed on the populace

under the pretext that it combats tooth decay, which is completely inaccurate and

dishonest. Of the four methods, water fluoridation is by far the most wide-spread, asit is used on nearly 1 billion people the world over. Water fluoridation, however, is

only possible in places with a modern infrastructure of water treatment plants and

therefore even in wealthy nations it is only viable in cities that have at least 10,000

people. Salt fluoridation is the second most popular fluoridation method and is in

use throughout Latin America and the Caribbean region as well as in a few European

countries that have abandoned water fluoridation. Milk fluoridation is restricted to

very few countries and is used as a supplementary method of fluoridation elsewhere.

To keep human beings in a constant state of fluoride poisoning, toothpaste and dental

health products throughout the world are fluoridated.

bisphenol A (BPA)

To close the loophole created by the modern habit of drinking bottled rather than tap

water, the depopulation lobby has replaced glass with plastic bottling starting in 1980

and has used a specific fertility-depressing chemical, called bisphenol A (BPA) to

http://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=-SNtC0xFXgKHbM&tbnid=QtrHo5aK5Fj2qM:&ved=0CAgQjRwwAA&url=http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/special-interests/fluoride/&ei=C2M7Uv_lK43vrAHqrIGABw&psig=AFQjCNGoWBtmBttxGEhO2qIBB51qWId0ug&ust=1379710091757438


20/110

20

manufacture two kinds of plastics:

polycarbonates and epoxy resins. BPA is

ingested when it leaches into food and

beverages for human consumption. Since

nearly every plastic bottle on the planet is now

made of BPA-based polycarbonates and almost

every metal and aluminum can in the world is

lined with epoxy resins containing BPA, people

are chronically exposed. The lining of metal

cans with BPA is aimed at both the urban and rural poor who are more likely to eat

canned soups, vegetables and fruit and will thus receive more than their share of

fertility depressing agents, as they will ingest it from multiple sources. But as the

depopulation lobby has a strong eugenic component to it, reducing the numbers of

the poor is a desirable outcome.

aerosol aluminum spraying

Spraying powdered aluminum oxide at high altitudes by airplane – a phenomenon

known as ‘chemtrails’ – is a rather new method of population control that is

restricted to NATO countries and is aimed at breaking the back of organic and

traditional farmers to make room for corporations and their genetically modified

crops. The aluminum sprayed falls to the

ground and poisons the soil and the water,

which has two intended consequences:

first, it makes the growing of traditional or

heirloom seeds impossible and forces

farmers into bankruptcy thus freeing the

land for purchase by agro-giants who stand

ready with aluminum-resistant genetically

modified seeds; and secondly, aluminum

binds with fluoride compounds and greatly

increases fluoride toxicity, therefore

reducing the human body’s toxicity threshold level previously thought safe. In other

words, you can do far more damage to human health with aluminum fluoride thanyou can do with just fluoride and you need less of it. That is why, for example, the

spraying of aerosolized aluminum is far more prevalent on the Western seaboard of

Canada and the US, where tap water fluoridation is scarce and people ingest fluoride

from bottled water and soft drinks as well as canned foods, but at lower levels than

people whose tap water is fluoridated.

http://ishtarsgate.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/chemtrails11.gifhttp://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=rP5-UKGQjHn-RM&tbnid=EWramr932Ves0M:&ved=0CAgQjRwwAA&url=http://allwellness.wordpress.com/2011/12/01/bisphenol-a-bpa-is-it-really-bad-for-your-health/&ei=YmQ7Us_JJYGHrgHJp4CoAg&psig=AFQjCNFA8sjiZmzMumfWkSWuSf5noInY2A&ust=1379710434694452


21/110

21

B. Biological and Bacteriological Methods – for the developing world

Poor countries do not have water treatment plants and therefore cannot fluoridate

their water. Salt fluoridation requires the political will and stability necessary to co-

opt a select few politicians and bureaucrats, but Africa’s political landscape is volatile

and for ever changing. And milk fluoridation is expensive and morally reprehensibleas it targets innocent children through free-milk school programs and sickens them

when they are young and defenseless. African leaders, moreover, have largely

resisted international pressure to poison their people. That is why the depopulation

lobby has devised effective methods of population control for Africa specifically and

more recently for other poor and reluctant countries whose voluntary cooperation was

impossible to gain.

HIV/AIDS

If the depopulation lobby could not control the number of people born into the world,

then they would increase the number of people leaving this world. In other words, if

they could not tackle the population problem at the front end of life by controlling

fertility, they would and did tackle it at the back end of life by increasing morbidity

and mortality. This was deemed necessary for Africa, which resisted any and all

attempts at population control. The HIV/AIDS virus was specifically created for the

Sub-Saharan African population by a cooperative effort between Soviet and

American scientists in the employ of their nations’ military-industrial establishments.

It was designed to do maximum damage by undermining the immune system and to

have an affinity for people of color. It gradually achieved its intended goal once itwas introduced into the bloodstreams of countless innocents in Africa, Brazil and

Haiti by the World Health Organization through its smallpox immunization program

that ended in 1980. Infection is as high as 30% in some African nations (5%

continent wide) and 70% of all AIDS deaths occur in Africa. More than one million

people die in Africa from AIDS annually and nearly two million new infections are

registered every year.

vaccines

Bioengineered flu strains, such as N1H1, the swine flu and the bird flu viruses, have

been used to manufacture mass fear of pandemics and condition the public to the

practice of mandatory vaccines or government-mandated vaccinations programs.

This will allow the authorities to target specific populations when and if the

eugenicists decide that a new deadly strain must be introduced into an unyielding

population, as it was done in Africa, Haiti and Brazil until 1980.


22/110

22

GMOs

Genetically Modified Organisms are the newest and most sophisticated weapon in the

eugenic arsenal and are intended for the developing world where chemical population

control methods cannot be applied due to poor infrastructure. Primary GMO cropsare corn, canola, cotton and soybean. Fierce resistance to GMO crops has however

put into doubt their viability as a global fertility depressing agent. Their advantage

lies in the fact that the people targeted will be growing their own poison and paying

for it, which makes GMOs ideal for poor nations whose governments cannot afford to

pay for population control of any kind, be it chemical, biological or bacteriological.

Their advantage lies also in the fact that they can be engineered to do as little or as

much damage as is desirable and no one will be any wiser for it.

2. INDIRECT METHODS – AIMED AT UNDERMINING THE FAMILY

(i) Psychosocial

Ever since the United Nations assumed primary control and responsibility over the

Global Depopulation Policy in the early 1960s, it has been looking for more humane

ways to achieve the intended demographic objectives and has concentrated much of

its effort and resources on finding psychosocial ways to change the dynamic of family

life and to put enough pressure on families and individuals to make it difficult and

undesirable to have more than one child.

substance abuse

Various countries have encouraged various forms of substance abuse to detract

individuals from family life and to cause the dissolution of mostly low income

families by premature death, chronic illness or crippling debt. The West has

promoted the use of recreational drugs. China has encouraged excessive tobacco

use. And Russia has made alcohol sufficiently cheap and ubiquitous to create a

nation of alcoholics. As a result, drug addiction has reached epidemic proportions in

many western countries and particularly in the U.S. and Canada, where tens of

thousands of families are destroyed by drug addiction annually. Smoking deathshave tripled in China over the course of the past decade and tobacco has become the

number one killer causing 1.2 million deaths a year. By 2030 the number of

tobacco-related deaths is expected to reach 3.5 million a year. And it is forecast that

if trends continue, a third of all males in China will be killed by tobacco by 2050.

Even more disastrous is Russia’s alcohol problem. Alcohol consumption has nearly

tripled over the past 16 years and more than half a million Russians die of alcohol-


23/110

23

related deaths annually. In no small part due to alcohol abuse, the life expectancy of

Russian males has dropped to 59 years, 17 years lower than their male counterparts

in Western Europe. These patterns of substance abuse have dire effects on family

formation and family size.

counterculture

The counterculture of the 1960s, which brought about the sexual revolution, was

encouraged in order to break the sexual taboos that prevented the mainstream from

adopting widespread and uninhibited contraceptive use. It also made drug use

socially acceptable and set the stage for the introduction of ever-more destructive

drugs both legal and illegal, creating a drug market and an underground economy

that relies on drugs and prostitution, is antithetical to families, and has become a

breeding ground for HIV/AIDS. The hippy counterculture of the 1960s was

followed by the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) counterculture of the1970s and 1980s, which brought about acceptance for and the decriminalization of

homosexuality in time for the explosion of LGBT caused by the effects of long-term

exposure to fluoride, which raises the incidence of sexual confusion from a naturally

occurring level of about 4% to an artificially high level of 15%.

criminalization

The most subtle and insidious form of population control is the manipulation of the

law to criminalize formerly acceptable social behaviors and domestic quarrels, and to

incarcerate a large percentage of the poor in order to prevent them from forming

families and raising children. Throughout the Western world and especially in the

U.S., Canada, Australia and New Zealand, this form of population control fulfills the

eugenic requirements of the

policy, as it targets primarily

minorities and the poor. The

‘zero tolerance domestic law’,

minor drug offences, and the

‘three-strikes law’ are typicalexamples of legislation designed

to fulfill the requirements of the

Global Depopulation Policy. The

zero tolerance domestic law is

designed to break families apart

at the slightest conflict by

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:US_incarceration_timeline-clean-fixed-timescale.svg


24/110

24

removing discretionary powers from the police and giving the state the authority to

go over the wishes of spouses to press criminal charges that result in bankruptcy and

family dissolution. Conflicts that could be resolved in the privacy of homes within

minutes or days are given the status of violent crime to destroy families, separate

parents from children, and to transfer their wealth to the judicial class.

The three strikes law mandates harsh sentences for anyone who has been convicted

of two felonies and who upon being convicted of a third felony faces life in prison. It

was first applied in Washington State in 1993 and then in California in 1994 to

compensate for their lack of fluoridation due to popular opposition and then spread

throughout the western seaboard for the same reason.

As a result of such eugenic laws, hundreds of thousands of families are broken apart

annually in the English-speaking world as well as in several European countries. In

the U.S., the judiciary has become the primary tool for eugenic objectives giving

America the dubious distinction of being the nation with the highest incarcerationrate in the world and also in history at 743 adults behind bars per every 100,000

citizens. When people on correctional supervision and on house arrest are factored

in, the U.S. far surpasses even Stalinist Russia in the number and proportion of

prisoners to the general population. The graph above shows that it was not until

1980 that the eugenic use of the judiciary was unleashed.

Statistics also show that visible

minorities bear the brunt of the

incarceration mania that has

gripped the United States and toa lesser extent much of the

western world. Canada ravages

its native population by this

method. Europe’s statistics, as

well as Australia’s, are skewed

by the fact that immigrants are

held in separate detention

centers and are not counted as

imprisoned.

The practice of imprisoning

immigrants and asylum seekers

is a direct consequence of the Global Depopulation Policy and is discussed later in the

text.


25/110

25

(ii) Economic

Economic pressures are used to create an environment that is hostile to families and

especially to the raising of children.

forcing women into the workforce

The United Nations’ favorite method for reducing the number of children is women’s

participation in the workforce. In the name of poverty eradication, women’s

education and employment have been given the highest priority. To this end, women

in the developing world are being encouraged to get educated and forced to leave

their traditional place at home to seek employment. A working woman has less time

for children and therefore less incentive to have children. A working woman will

also delay childbearing to satisfy career ambitions or the demands of the labor

market. But since women make up 51% of the global population the steady influx of

women into the labor market depresses wages worldwide at a time when

unemployment is already a chronic problem the world over. This mass migration of

women into the workforce is also displacing men economically, disrupting

traditional patterns of family life, confusing gender roles, and pitting men against

women, all of which aid the cause of achieving smaller and fewer families.

delayed employment

The demand for excessive and unnecessary credentials is the means by which

entrance into the workforce is delayed in the developing world so as to preventyoung people from starting families early in life when their biological clocks make

them most fertile.

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db21_Fig5.png


26/110

26

The average age for women to have children in Europe and Japan is 29 while in the

U.S. it is 25.6 Throughout the developed world women today have their children at

least four years later than women in 1970. In the first half of the 20th century, when

the population was not subjected to social engineering, European women had their

children in their late teens and early twenties. By delaying entrance into the

workforce for both men and women, an entire decade has been shaved off from

women’s childbearing years.

excessive materialism

The media is being used to condition people to be rabid consumers and to dedicate

their incomes to excessive materialism rather than invest it in children, as previous

generations did. The consumption of goods and services in ever greater amounts

has become man’s primary preoccupation in the socially engineered post-World War

II era giving rise to a consumer society that is self-centered and has relegatedchildren to secondary status.

debt

Foreign aid followed by World Bank loans and then by IMF austerity programs have

intentionally created spiraling debt in the developing world to deprive poor nations

of the revenue needed to invest in infrastructure and social programs. Coupled with

plummeting commodity prices and Western protectionism this has become the

formula for poverty that thedeveloped world has

imposed on the developing

world to create economic

conditions that are hostile to

families. Monetary coercion

has replaced military

conquest to control the

resources and destinies of

other nations. This is done

to halt the populationexplosion that prevents the

developing world from catching up with the needs of its growing population, as

much as it is done for the rich world’s self-serving need to secure access to vital

6 T.J. Mathews, M.S., and Brady E. Hamilton, Ph.D., Delayed Childbearing: More Women Are Having Their FirstChild Later in Life, NCHS Data Brief, No. 21, August 2009:http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db21.pdf

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db21.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db21.pdfhttp://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=41vgAoBf4f1j-M&tbnid=LymFogIIDpanFM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://www.ecology.com/2011/09/26/day-seven-billion/&ei=j600Uo6bOZPwqQGEw4DoCQ&bvm=bv.52164340,d.aWM&psig=AFQjCNHwMOz1G7zDNTl29Lt-KZe4ucfZTA&ust=1379270346992080http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db21.pdf


27/110

27

resources on foreign soil. This catch 22 situation is the cycle of poverty that the

architects of the Global Depopulation Policy hope to break worldwide by instituting

tough medicine now on nations that are late newcomers to population control

measures.

The population control lobby is rightfully concerned that 90% of the people born inthe past 50 years in the world were born in the developing world, thus in countries

that were already poor and could least afford unrestricted population growth. The

wealth gap that separates the developed from the developing world has grown over

the past half century in large part because the developed world has instituted

proactive population control measures and has stabilized growth whereas the

developing world has not. The developed world, in other words, has paid a very high

price for its prosperity.

Just what every region has sacrificed is the subject of the next section, which looks at

the pros and cons of the population control methods chosen by or for countries.


28/110

28

IV. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS – METHOD TO MADNESS – THE LESSER EVIL

FOR THE GREATER GOOD

Taking on man’s primal instincts is a difficult task. The instinct to breed is second only to the

instinct to live and the Global Depopulation Policy has challenged both. Not surprisingly, the

results are mixed.

1. CHINA’S One-Child Policy

111% population growth since 1960; TFR 1.6 (-73%); 400 million births prevented

Since its introduction in 1978, the One-Child Policy has prevented the birth of 400 million

Chinese. Without it, China, which has a population of 1.35 billion, would have had a population

of 1.75 billion, thus 30% more.

Prior to its introduction in 1978, Chairman

Mao encouraged large families and opposedfamily planning programs. During the 30 years

that Mao Zedong was in office (1945-1976),

China grew from 540 to 940 million people

and thus nearly doubled its population. Had

the government done nothing and the same

growth levels would have continued, China

would now have nearly 2 billion people and

none of the prosperity that has made it the second most powerful economy in the world.

Market-based economic reforms coupled with population controls have catapulted China tounprecedented prosperity. Its gross domestic product (GDP) took off as soon as the One-Child

Policy was implemented and in the ensuing three decades it grew 18-fold. China now has a per

capita income of $6,091.

There is no question that in purely economic terms the One-Child Policy, coupled with free-

market reform, has been a phenomenal success. But what are the social and political drawbacks

of the policy?

To better understand the following data readers will need a brief lesson in demographics, the

study of populations. A country’s population is the result of two primary factors, namely how

many people are born in any given year and how many die, thus the balance between fertility and

mortality. The population explosion started when our improved medicine and quality of life

enabled nearly all children to survive birth and the first critical years of life, while at the same

time extended people’s lives into old age.

To stop the population explosion governments began adopting family control measure to lower

fertility and set as their target an average of two children for every woman, which is known as

http://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=igHY-HuNaNxAqM&tbnid=kEM25wXA1ih0TM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Prc1952-2005gdp.gif&ei=kaQ5UoXGO4O4yQHU9oDIDQ&bvm=bv.52288139,d.aWc&psig=AFQjCNFMyJl4kfsiLi_j3lwrqKHFfFBtGQ&ust=1379595788684834


29/110

29

‘replacement level fertility’. The average number of children born to every woman of

childbearing age is known as the ‘total fertility rate’ or TFR. And the ideal TFR is 2 children per

woman, or replacement level fertility. The idea is that if every couple on earth has no more than

two children than the population will neither grow nor decrease, it will merely be replaced with

every new generation and will remain stable in perpetuity. Before governments began

interfering with their people’s fertility, the TFR of most nations was anywhere between 3 to 6

children per woman and this meant that populations grew at a rapid pace and doubled every 20,

30 or 40 years.

The demographic profile of a country is represented graphically by a population pyramid, which

shows the distribution of various age groups in a population, with the youngest age group at the

bottom and the oldest at the top. A natural population growth always forms a pyramid, as the

population is growing steadily thus widening the base. But once a population is interfered with

and the number of children born starts to decrease the base of the pyramid becomes narrower and

the population eventually stabilizes. The graphic representation of a stationary population looks

like a haystack rather than a pyramid. If the average number of children born per woman drops

below 2, then the bottom of the pyramid becomes in time thinner than the middle, which denotes

that the population is decreasing. The graphic representation of a population that is declining

then looks like a mushroom.

This demographic transiti on from an expanding to a stationary to a contracting population is

visible at a glance as the pyramid becomes a haystack and then a mushroom. This transition

cannot happen without active, long-term human intervention. To achieve this demographic

transition it takes anywhere between 3 to 5 generations, thus anywhere between 60 to 100 years.

This gradual and slow process requires a government’s firm and sustained commitment and by

necessity will straddle many changes of leadership. Once a country commits to achieving the

demographic transition it is in for the long haul and for a tough battle.

Most developed countries today are in phase 3 or 4 of the demographic transition, as they have

covertly chemically sterilized their people for 60 years, whereas most developing countries are in

phase 2 or 3, as they have adopted population control measures more recently.

China’s population pyramid in 1930 looked like that of any other country on earth at the time, as

no country had adopted population control measures. But once China introduced its One-Child

Policy, the number of children born decreased rapidly compared with previous cohorts and its

population pyramid began to narrow at the bottom. China will enter stage 3 of the demographic

http://basementgeographer.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/500px-DTM_Pyramids.png


30/110

30

transition in this decade and by 2025 its

population will start contracting from a peak

of about 1.5 billion people.

China will have achieved its demographic

transition in 60 years or three generations,which is a tremendous accomplishment given

the size of its population. This shows that

legislating population control and openly

enforcing it is a very effective way to fight the

population explosion.

But there are drawbacks to China’s method of combating population growth. The negative

consequences of China’s One-Child Policy are as follows:

police state enforcement

To ensure compliance draconian measures have been used especially in the countryside

where the authorities have forced women to abort and have even demolished the homes

of peasants who have had a third child. Even though rural Chinese are allowed two

children (if their first-born is a daughter or suffers from physical disability, mental illness

or mental retardation), whereas urban Chinese are allowed only one, the policy meets

with greater opposition in the countryside than in the cities. Pregnancy without a birth permit is considered “out-of- plan” and therefore illegal. The One-Child Policy is in great

part responsible for China’s police state and its massive and rigid bureaucracy. Local

governments direct officials to punish non-compliance with heavy fines, termed “social

maintenance fees” ( shehui fuyang fei), which force many couples to choose between

undergoing an unwanted abortion and incurring a fine much greater than the average

annual income. Children may go without a household registration (hukou) because they

http://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=8vRimE7iaBe3mM&tbnid=o-4jZKQUSa5sMM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://www.mbaskool.com/business-articles/finance/1331-chinas-economy-post-2025.html&ei=fr05UtSrM43YyQGz5oGYAQ&bvm=bv.52288139,d.aWc&psig=AFQjCNHAotJ_Kg4VZ7ZmxZq3QM6n2uc0zQ&ust=1379602106899666http://www.mutantfrog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/pyramid-a.gif


31/110

31

are born out of plan and their parents do not pay the mandated fees. Lack of a valid

hukou raises barriers to access to social benefits, including subsidized healthcare and

public education. To ensure enforcement, the Chinese government employs 300,000

officials. To help out with enforcement, the China Family Planning Association has 92

million members, organized into more than one million branches. Officials are given a

financial incentive to meet abortion and sterilization quotas, leading to extortion and

coercion. Family planning bureaus conduct pregnancy tests on married women and those

who miss a test will be fined. Some local governments offer rewards to informants who

report population planning violations. Village cadres face a penalty of 1,500 Yuan

(US$230) for each woman with two children whom they fail two sterilize. Conversely,

they are promised a reward of 500 Yuan (US$77) for each tubal ligation that they see

through to completion. Teachers who violate birth quotas are at risk of losing their

retirement benefits.

forced abortions and sterilizations

Millions of aspiring mothers are forced

to undergo abortion or sterilization. 13

million abortions are performed each

year at an average of 35,000 a day.

How many of them are forced is

impossible to tell. Since 1971, Chinese

doctors have performed 336 million

abortions and 196 million sterilizations.

They have also inserted 403 million

intrauterine devices. 55% of all women

in China have had an abortion. The psychological stress women face leads to a suicide

rate for females that is three times higher than for males. China, in fact, is the only

country in the world (along with the small island nation of Sao Tome and Principe) where

the suicide rate is higher for women than for men. Suicide is the leading cause of death

for adult women living in rural China and accounts for a third of all female deaths. 56%

of the world’s female suicides occur in China, but only 19% of the world’s population

lives in China. 500 women commit suicide in China each day, usually by ingesting

pesticides.

lopsided male/female ratio due to abortion of female fetuses

More than half of all abortions in China are the result of pre-natal sex selection. Many

parents prefer a male child to a female and will abort until they have a male fetus. This


32/110

32

has led to a gender imbalance and, as a result, nearly 30 million Chinese men will be

unable to find brides by 2020. Although such a large number of unmarried men could

cause social instability, it also means that a good percentage of China’s men have been

excluded from the procreation chain, even though unintentionally. China’s State

Population and Family Planning Commission reports that 118 boys are born for every

100 girls. In rural areas, where boys are preferred to girls because they can help with

farming and carry the family name, the sex imbalance is even greater, as 130 baby boys

are born for every 100 girls. To rectify this trend, the government introduced the “Care

for Girls” program in 2001 to promote the birth of girls in rural areas through financial

incentives of 100 Yuan (about $13) each month per girl. Also, local education fees are

waved for girls.

strict control of population movement

Since rural Chinese are allowed to have two children while urban Chinese are not, thegovernment exercises strict control of internal movements and prevents rural dwellers

from migrating to the cities. China’s ‘household registration system’ (hukou) acts like

an internal passport and allows rural Chinese to move to the cities only for temporary

work or post-secondary studies. The children of farm workers who have migrated to the

cities are not allowed to enroll in city schools and must attend school in their villages.

There are circa 130 million children in China who are separated from their parents

through the requirements of the hukou system which are in great part dictated by the

demographic objectives of the One-Child Policy.

2. INDIA’s Surgical Sterilization

260% population growth since 1960; TFR 2.6 (-57%); 250 million births prevented

India is the world’s largest democracy and unlike China it could not restrict family size by law.

Due to its poorly developed infrastructure and moral objections to mass poisoning, India could

also not adopt the West’s covert chemical control measures. Its method of choice, coerced

surgical sterilization, bypasses its infrastructure shortcomings and avoids the moral obstacle of

poisoning its people.

India has settled on coerced surgical sterilization of females after four decades of failed attempts

to give incentives to its male citizens to voluntarily undergo ste rilization. In the 1950s and ‘60s,

monetary compensation or bonuses were offered to medical practitioners who performed

vasectomies on low-income men, as well as to those who motivated men to receive vasectomies,

and on the men who received them. The incentives were only available to low income men,

which betrays the policy’s eugenic aspect.


33/110

33

Men were the target of sterilization efforts because of the ease and short duration of no-scalpel

vasectomies compared to tubal ligations. But even when better incentives were offered, such as

land and fertilizer, there were not enough takers to decrease the national fertility rate fast enough,

which is why in 1976 the government of India adopted a policy of compulsory sterilization and

began rounding up the poor into sterilization camps. Six million vasectomies were performed in

one year, triple the previous number. This backfired quickly and the compulsory laws were

removed a year later after having tainted the entire sterilization plan. After a cooling down

period the government began focusing on women and has proceeded since by tricking them into

being sterilized.

Through the actions of the National Population Stabilization Fund (NPSF), India has prevented

the birth of approximately 200 million Indians. It has accomplished a great deal but not enough

to stop its population from growing. During the seven decades that India has battled with the

people’s drive to breed it has reduced the country’s TFR from 6 to 2.6 children per woman, but

has far to go to reach replacement level fertility and its population continues to grow at a rapid

rate. In fact, India is not expected to reach replacement level fertility until 2050 and by 2030 it

will have surpassed China as the most populous country in the world. At that time, India will

have 1.53 billion people and will still be growing while China will have peaked at 1.46 billion.

When India gained independence from the UK in 1947, its population was a mere 350 million.

In the 65 years hence, its population has more than tripled and now stands at 1.2 billion. By

2050, India is expected to have c. 1.6 billion and by 2100 it will be the only country on the planet

to have more than 2 billion people.

Because China’s population reduction program has been far more successful than India’s, it has

substantially reduced the number of poor, whereas India’s has increased.

http://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=YNNfW84_TS69mM&tbnid=4gqGxUeAdIpWxM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://wealthforumezine.net/AMCSpeakMorgan%20Stanley090812.html&ei=zb45UvPKEcOEygHo6oHQCw&bvm=bv.52288139,d.aWc&psig=AFQjCNFheO0HQEoQFdjgZn0BiwXXgNiykQ&ust=1379602221907951


34/110

34

Even though China has started to control population 25 years later than India, it has used a more

effective method and has sustained its effort. That is why it is far ahead of India in the

demographic transition, as the graph above shows at a glance. Overt legislation is clearly a far

better way to defuse the population bomb than coerced surgical sterilization.

Let us now look at the drawbacks of India’s coerced surgical sterilization method.

coercive

The most unappealing feature of India’s method of population control is that it is for the

most part forced upon the people and is therefore involuntary. That it takes place

without the people’s knowledge or consent has far-reaching implications, not least of

which is that it invalidates India’s democracy and violates the people’s fundamental

rights and liberties. To get away with it, the country’s media has been co-opted to

maintain a veil of silence, which means that India does not have a free or truthful media.

discriminatoryFrom the very beginning of its population control efforts, India has targeted primarily the

poor, which makes for a discriminatory and divisive policy. This being said, its most

recent efforts are more even-handed.

insufficiently effective

For coerced surgical sterilization to bring the nation’s total fertility rate below

replacement level, thus below two women per woman – which is necessary if the

population is ever to decrease – it would have to be performed on most women after

their first child and not after the second or third as is currently the case. India’s leaders,

however, unlike their Western counterparts, are too humane to violate their people’s

reproductive rights to such an extent as to leave them with only one child. But as India

becomes more overcrowded and desperate, future generations of women will certainly

find themselves sterilized after their first child.

What India and China have in common as far as population control is concerned is that they both

use methods that

Documents

Killing Us Softly1 depopulate