8/14/2019 kioiko

1/6

8/14/2019 kioiko

2/6

2010NoelLevitz

PrioritiesSurveyforOnlineLearnersUNDCollegeLevelComparison

#ofRespondents 20

NUR

33 192

GAPSATIMP GAPSATIMPGAPSAT

UND EntireCampus

375

IMP SAT GAP

A&S GRAD

IMP

31. There are opportunities to interact with

fellow classmantes. (Campus item 5) 5.14 43 5.37 23

0.23 33 4.42 48 5.17 27

0.74 35 5.41 39 5.62 23

0.21 34 5.39 48 5.31 17 0.08 34

32. Assistance is available when I have

problems utilizing technology.(Campus item 6) 6.26 24 5.88 7 0.38 26 6.16 28 6.04 5 0.13 28 6.49 16 5.98 7 0.51 22 6.33 27 6.00 3 0.33 32

33. I feel comfortable with the online

atmosphere of this campus. (Campus item 7) 6.43 14 6.03 2 0.40 25 6.52 9 5.94 8 0.58 19 6.52 15 6.12 2 0.40 27 6.22 30 5.89 6 0.33 33

34. Lab experiences are available to me.

(Campus item 8) 5.47 39 5.31 25 0.16 30 5.68 40 4.60 36 1.08 7 5.19 41 5.13 34 0.07 31 5.92 38 6.00 3 0.08 35

35. Online couse designs are easy to

navigate. (Campus item 9) 6.44 13 5.91 5 0.53 19 6.55 5 6.03 6 0.52 24 6.53 14 5.90 12 0.63 10 6.50 22 5.42 13 1.08 14

36. I am able to achieve my educational goals

at this institution. (Campus item 10) 6.76 1 6.13 1 0.63 12 6.83 1 5.71 16 1.12 6 6.79 1 6.27 1 0.52 21 6.72 3 6.05 2 0.67 26

37. Sou rce of information: Catalog and

brochures (printed)

3.69 6 4.15 5 3.80 6 4.79 5

38. Sou rce of information: Catalog (online) 5.90 2 6.21 2 5.89 2 6.11 2

39. Source of information: College

representatives 3.88 5 3.70 6 3.84 5 5.00 4

40. Sou rce of information: Web site 6.28 1 6.36 1 6.37 1 6.55 1

41. Source of information: Advertisemen ts 3.11 7 3.39 7 3.14 7 3.93 7

42. Source of information: Recommendation

from instructor or program advisor 5.02 3 5.17 3 5.19 3 4.73 6

43. Sou rce of information: Contact wih

current students and/or recent graduates of

the program4.33 4 4.15 4 4.58 4 5.43 3

44. Factor to enroll: Ability to transfer credits 5.59 8 6.19 4 4.86 10 6.25 6

45. Factor to enroll: Cost 5.91 6 6.09 7 6.24 5 5.90 746. Factor to enroll: F inancial assistance

available 5.01 10 6.14 6 5.02 9 5.59 9

47. Fac tor to enroll: Future employment

opportunities 5.68 7 5.38 10 5.91 7 5.56 10

48. Factor to enroll: Reputation of institution 6.07 5 6.06 8 6.21 6 6.40 4

49. Fac tor to enrol: Work schedule 6.57 2 6.37 2 6.65 2 6.80 150. Factor to enroll: Flexible pacing for

completing a program 6.25 4 6.25 3 6.39 4 6.55 3

51. Factor to enroll: Convenience 6.61 1 6.61 1 6.67 1 6.75 2

52. Factor to enroll: Distance from campus 5.22 9 6.15 5 5.26 8 5.69 8

53. Fac tor to enroll: Program requirements 6.29 3 6.06 8 6.47 3 6.40 4

54. Fac tor to enroll: Recommendations from

employer 4.15 11 3.71 11 4.10 11 4.89 11

Satisfactionnotaskedforsources

of

information

Gapnotcalculated

Satisfactionnotaskedforsources

of

information

Gapnotcalculated

Satisfactionnotaskedforsources

of

information

Gapnotcalculated

Satisfactionnotaskedforenrollmentfactors.

Gapnotcalculated

Satisfactionnotaskedforenrollmentfactors.

Gapnotcalculated

Satisfactionnotaskedforenrollmentfactors.

Gapnotcalculated

Satisfactionnotaskedforenrollmentfactors.

Gapnotcalculated

Satisfactionnotaskedforsources

of

information

Gapnotcalculated

UND Office for Institutional Research

S:\Surveys\NDUS-Student Satisfaction Inventory\2010 SSI_PSOL\College Data

GREEN items indicate STRENGTHS; RED items indicate CHALLENGES

8/14/2019 kioiko

3/6

2010NoelLevitz

PrioritiesSurveyforOnlineLearnersUNDCollegeLevelComparison

#ofRespondents 20

NUR

33 192

GAPSATIMP GAPSATIMPGAPSAT

UND EntireCampus

375

IMP SAT GAP

A&S GRAD

IMP

Sofar,howhasyourcollegeexperiencemetyourexpectations?1.Muchworsethanexpected

2. QuiteabitworsethanIexpected

3. WorsethanIexpected

4. AboutwhatIexpected

5. BetterthanIexpected

6. QuiteabitbetterthanIexpected

7. MuchbetterthanIexpected

MeanScoreRateyouroverallsatisfactionwithyourexperienceherethusfar.1. Notsatisfiedatall

2. Notverysatisfied

3.

Somewhatdissatisfied

4. Neutral

5. Somewhatsatisfied

6. Satisfied

7. Verysatisfied

MeanScoreAllinall,ifyouhadtodoitover,wouldyouenrollhereagain?1. Definitelynot

2. Probablynot

3. Maybenot

4. Idon'tknow

5. Maybeyes

6.

Probablyyes

7. Definitelyyes

MeanScore

0% 0% 1%

6.03

5.64

0%

2%

3%

6%

7%

13%

44%

25%

6%

9%

25%

34%

9%

7%

6%

30%

48%

6%

2%

0%

2%

14%

4.93

15%

29%

31%

9%

6%

22%

38%

19%

5.81

5.31

0%

3%

3%

16%

4.78

0%

6%

13%

9%

34%

38%

17%

6.16

5.84

52%

2%

3%

8%

6%

28%

54%

6%

4%

10%

46%

31%

18%

5.07

1%

2%

15%

5.00

5%

0%

0%

15%

55%

0%

15%

15%

4.60

5%

0%

15%

5%

35%

2%

6%

27%

31%

30%

5.30

10%

5%

0%

20%

30%

25%

UND Office for Institutional Research

S:\Surveys\NDUS-Student Satisfaction Inventory\2010 SSI_PSOL\College Data

GREEN items indicate STRENGTHS; RED items indicate CHALLENGES

8/14/2019 kioiko

4/6

8/14/2019 kioiko

5/6

2010NoelLevitz

PrioritiesSurveyforOnlineLearnersUNDCollegeLevelComparison

#ofRespondents

UND EntireCampus

375

IMP SAT GAP

31. There are opportunities to interact with

fellow classmantes. (Campus item 5) 5.14 43 5.37 23

0.23 33

32. Assistance is available when I have

problems utilizing technology.(Campus item 6) 6.26 24 5.88 7 0.38 26

33. I feel comfortable with the online

atmosphere of this campus. (Campus item 7) 6.43 14 6.03 2 0.40 25

34. Lab experiences are available to me.

(Campus item 8) 5.47 39 5.31 25 0.16 30

35. Online couse designs are easy to

navigate. (Campus item 9) 6.44 13 5.91 5 0.53 19

36. I am able to achieve my educational goals

at this institution. (Campus item 10) 6.76 1 6.13 1 0.63 12

37. Sou rce of information: Catalog and

brochures (printed) 3.69 6

38. Sou rce of information: Catalog (online) 5.90 2

39. Source of information: College

representatives 3.88 5

40. Sou rce of information: Web site 6.28 1

41. Source of information: Advertisemen ts 3.11 7

42. Source of information: Recommendation

from instructor or program advisor 5.02 3

43. Sou rce of information: Contact wih

current students and/or recent graduates of

the program4.33 4

44. Factor to enroll: Ability to transfer credits 5.59 8

45. Factor to enroll: Cost 5.91 646. Factor to enroll: F inancial assistance

available 5.01 10

47. Fac tor to enroll: Future employment

opportunities 5.68 7

48. Factor to enroll: Reputation of institution 6.07 5

49. Fac tor to enrol: Work schedule 6.57 250. Factor to enroll: Flexible pacing for

completing a program 6.25 4

51. Factor to enroll: Convenience 6.61 1

52. Factor to enroll: Distance from campus 5.22 9

53. Fac tor to enroll: Program requirements 6.29 3

54. Fac tor to enroll: Recommendations from

employer 4.15 11

Satisfactionnotaskedforsourcesof

information

Gapnotcalculated

Satisfactionnotaskedforenrollmentfac

tors.

Gapnotcalculated

SEM

GAPSATIMPGAPSATIMPGAPSATIMP

192779

UNDECIDEDSMHS

4.63 43 4.82 33

0.19 29 4.62 45 5.48 11

0.86 35 5.53 41 4.54 31 0.99 13

6.07 24 5.60 17 0.47 15 5.28 37 5.52 8 0.24 31 6.24 26 6.00 5 0.24 32

6.45 5 6.08 3 0.36 20 5.63 27 5.52 8 0.10 25 6.41 18 5.84 11 0.57 24

5.63 31 5.75 12 0.11 28 5.90 16 5.35 13 0.55 16 5.30 42 4.67 30 0.63 22

6.41 6 6.11 2 0.30 22 5.48 32 5.70 4 0.22 30 6.61 7 5.89 8 0.72 21

6.79 1 6.23 1 0.56 10 6.38 1 5.54 7 0.85 9 6.83 1 6.00 5 0.83 16

2.91 6 3.36 6 4.00 6

5.92 2 5.25 2 6.00 2

3.88 4 3.62 5 3.42 7

6.26 1 5.67 1 6.05 1

2.50 7 3.19 7 4.08 5

4.42 3 5.22 3 5.25 3

3.34 5 4.48 4 4.45 4

6.29 3 5.95 3 6.29 4

5.04 8 6.00 2 5.78 74.37 10 4.82 10 4.60 10

5.23 7 6.04 1 4.86 9

5.84 6 5.50 6 6.00 6

6.78 1 5.36 7 6.33 2

6.20 4 5.09 9 6.06 5

6.69 2 5.67 4 6.58 1

4.81 9 4.62 11 5.08 8

6.09 5 5.61 5 6.31 3

4.13 11 5.11 8 3.63 11

Satisfactionnotaskedforsourcesof

information

Gapnotcalculated

Satisfactionnotaskedforsourcesof

information

Gapnotcalculated

Gapnotcalculated

Satisfactionnotaskedforenrollmentfac

tors.

Gapnotcalculated

Satisfactionnotaskedforenrollmentfac

tors.

Gapnotcalculated

Satisfactionnotaskedforenrollmentfac

tors.

Satisfactionnotaskedforsourcesof

information

Gapnotcalculated

UND Office for Institutional Research

S:\Surveys\NDUS-Student Satisfaction Inventory\2010 SSI_PSOL\College Data

GREEN items indicate STRENGTHS; RED items indicate CHALLENGES

8/14/2019 kioiko

6/6

2010NoelLevitz

PrioritiesSurveyforOnlineLearnersUNDCollegeLevelComparison

#ofRespondents

UND EntireCampus

375

IMP SAT GAP

Sofar,howhasyourcollegeexperiencemetyourexpectations?1.Muchworsethanexpected

2. QuiteabitworsethanIexpected

3. WorsethanIexpected

4. AboutwhatIexpected

5. BetterthanIexpected

6. QuiteabitbetterthanIexpected

7. MuchbetterthanIexpected

MeanScoreRateyouroverallsatisfactionwithyourexperienceherethusfar.1. Notsatisfiedatall

2. Notverysatisfied

3.

Somewhatdissatisfied

4. Neutral

5. Somewhatsatisfied

6. Satisfied

7. Verysatisfied

MeanScoreAllinall,ifyouhadtodoitover,wouldyouenrollhereagain?1. Definitelynot

2. Probablynot

3. Maybenot

4. Idon'tknow

5. Maybeyes

6.

Probablyyes

7. Definitelyyes

MeanScore

0%

6.03

5.64

0%

2%

3%

6%7%

13%

44%

25%

7%

6%

30%48%

6%

2%

0%

2%

14%

4.93

15%

29%

31%

SEM

GAPSATIMPGAPSATIMPGAPSATIMP

192779

UNDECIDEDSMHS

5.74

0%

1%

5%

35%

29%

18%

12%

4.92

0%

1%

5%5%

33%54%

6.21

0%

4%

4%

48%

40%

0%

4%

4.40

0%

4%

4%

0%

3%

4%

5%

1%

14%

47%

24%

0%

11%

4%

0%

8%

12%

32%

16%

40%

4%

4.96

5%11%

5%

42%

26%

5.42

0%

0%

5%

0%

5%

5%

32%

26%

16%

16%

4.89

12%

28%36%

5.56

11%

11%

37%37%

5.89

UND Office for Institutional Research

S:\Surveys\NDUS-Student Satisfaction Inventory\2010 SSI_PSOL\College Data

GREEN items indicate STRENGTHS; RED items indicate CHALLENGES