32
Lab report 4 •Very important: if you raise the sample to the 10 mm line during pumpdown, the working distance will be approximately 10 mm. (How do you know what the WD is?) •There is no “elephant” (pink or otherwise) for the Quanta. •Some people still aren’t getting the hint about attaching a copy of their lab notes •Nobody reminded me to upload

Lab report 4

  • Upload
    jaafar

  • View
    21

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Lab report 4. Very important: if you raise the sample to the 10 mm line during pumpdown, the working distance will be approximately 10 mm. (How do you know what the WD is?) There is no “elephant” (pink or otherwise) for the Quanta. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Lab report 4

Lab report 4•Very important: if you raise the sample to the 10 mm line during pumpdown, the working distance will be approximately 10 mm. (How do you know what the WD is?)•There is no “elephant” (pink or otherwise) for the Quanta. •Some people still aren’t getting the hint about attaching a copy of their lab notes•Nobody reminded me to upload images!

Page 2: Lab report 4

Nanowires, 1 MP

Page 3: Lab report 4

Nanowires, 512x442

Page 4: Lab report 4

High resolution imaging

• Why?– To see really tiny stuff!

• Soot particles (Combustion research)• Gold nanoparticles and nanorods (Jennifer

Shumaker-Parry)– To get really sharp images of “fairly small” stuff

• Gold nanoparticles and nanorods (Marc Porter…)– Same considerations should apply to e-beam

lithography

Page 5: Lab report 4

Tin balls 2.4 Mx!

Page 6: Lab report 4

Soot on TEM Grid

Page 7: Lab report 4

High resolution imaging• How?

– FEG Why?

• dp2 = 4ip/( π2 * β * αp

2)– To see small stuff, you need a small spot.– Small spot requires

• Low probe current (small “spot size”)• High brightness• Large aperture angle

– αp = dA/2*WD– Short working distance – Large aperture? We’re still arguing over that one, but

nobody believes it!

Page 8: Lab report 4

Contributions to actual beam diameter

Page 9: Lab report 4

Optimum convergence angle

• The previous equation can be differentiated and the derivative set equal to zero

• Result is quadratic in α4

Page 10: Lab report 4

Optimum convergence angle• If chromatic aberrations can be neglected:

– αopt = [2/3Cs2)(8ip/βπ2 + 0.72 λ2)]1/8

– At 10 kV, λ = 0.01 nm, 100 pA, and β = 108 A/cm2sr Cs = 2 mm, then αopt = 6.4*10-3 rad

– αp = dA/2*WD• If dA = 30 microns: WD = 2.4 mm

– At 1 kv λ increases by a factor of 10• αp increases to 9 mrad• WD decreases to 1.7 mm

• Much shorter for W-filament!• Note that αopt was 4 mrad for W-filament

(Cs = 10 mm), 20 kV in Fig 2.22.

Page 11: Lab report 4

High resolution imaging• What’s the point of all this math for high

resolution imaging?• Short WD is important!• ETD is out of the game• Other options

– TLD– vCD– Helix

• Immersion mode increases resolution about another order of magnitude

Page 12: Lab report 4

High resolution imaging• Minimize emi (Ian’s lecture of last Friday!)• Minimize floor vibrations

– Each lab in INSCC is on an individually poured slab of concrete

• Minimize acoustic vibrations (audio noise)• Minimize temperature fluctuations• Try “Mains lock”• Replace carbon tape with silver or carbon

paste• Use single sample mount

Page 13: Lab report 4

Minimize Acoustic vibrations!

Page 14: Lab report 4

DCJ - High Resolution 14

When do we run out of resolution?

SE1 have a range of a few nm and create the ‘edge bright line’ effect

As a result when the feature size is close to the SE escape range the object is not resolved. This occurs at ~ 5-10nm for low Z materials

Page 15: Lab report 4

DCJ - High Resolution 15

In other samples...

When an object gets small enough to be comparable with the SE1 generation volume then it becomes bright all over and the defining edges disappear.

For low Z, low density materials this can happen at a scale of 5-10nm

Carbon nanotubes 5nm and 10nm wide

edge brightness

no edges

Page 16: Lab report 4

DCJ - High Resolution 16

SE image of Single Wall NanoTube

Page 17: Lab report 4

DCJ - High Resolution 17

..but how wide is this nanotube?

?

The image does not have defined edges - its width is indeterminate and equal to carbon

If these are the edges then width

= 5.8nm

If these are the edges then width

= 1.5nm

C =5.5nm

Page 18: Lab report 4

DCJ - High Resolution 18

Bypassing the SE1 limit

Metals have lower than carbon, and a higher SE yield

A thin metal film on a low Z, low density sample localizes all SE production within itself. The resolution now is a function of the film thickness only

Works even with very thin metal films (a few atoms thick)

We can exploit this effect to give interpretable contrast beyond the theoretical limit

Low SE yield

High SE yield

width ~ film thicknesseven when <

Page 19: Lab report 4

DCJ - High Resolution 19

Mass thickness contrast The SE1 yield varies

with the thickness of the metal

SE1 yield reaches the bulk value at a film thickness equal to about 3

The conformation of the film to surface topography provides contrast 1nm 2nm 3nm

Film thickness

SE

Yield

bulk value

mass thickness variation

Page 20: Lab report 4

DCJ - High Resolution 20

Metal builds contrast

The SE localization in the film provides edge definition

The mass thickness effect gives extra contrast enhancement

The feature is now ‘resolved’ since its size and shape are visible

5nm low Z object

2nm metal film

Beam position

SE profile with metal filmSE profile without metal

SE

Page 21: Lab report 4

DCJ - High Resolution 21

courtesy of Martin Müller and Rene Herrmann, ETH Zürich

T4 Phage coated with Cr

Cr coatings Cr films are smooth and

without structure even as thin as 1nm

The mass thickness contrast resolves edges and make the detail visible down to a nanometer scale

The high SE yield of the Cr improves the S/N ratio

However these coatings are not stable - so use Cr coated samples immediately after they have been made

T4 Phage + Cr

Page 22: Lab report 4

DCJ - High Resolution 22

Coating Summary

Coatings are an essential part of the technique of high resolution SEM because they generate interpretable contrast, improve resolution, and enhance the S/N ratio

Thin coatings are better than thick coatings - do not make your sample a piece of jewelry

Below 100kx particulate coatings are useful because of their higher SE yields and better S/N ratios

Above 100kx can use chromium or titanium or particulate coatings of W,Pt or Ir

Carbon is a contaminant not a coating

Page 23: Lab report 4

Helix Detector

• Looks just like the LowVac detector• Mounts just like the LowVac detector• Costs $28.5k• “You break it, you bought it.”• Runs in Immersion Mode, like the TLD• Gives super images in LowVac• Aperture is 62 microns

Page 24: Lab report 4

Helix Detector page

Page 25: Lab report 4

Helix detector settings• 1- why and when should Helix detector voltage be changed?• Helix detector voltage should be optimized after every parameter

change.  This just means, from the previous Helix sweet spot, needing to bump it up or down a 1% or 2% after changing a parameter like water, FWD, beam current, kV, dwell.

• I believe Helix needs to be running at full current, just prior to arcing, at all times. A typical Helix session may run like this; 78.5% voltage = arcing, 77.5% voltage = no arcing and good signal contrast, 76.5% voltage = no arcing and poor contrast. I don’t expect you to see identical numbers as these but I’d expect you to experience a similar “narrow window” of good zone.

• For me, Helix sweet spots are 1%-1.5% off saturation, 3.2-mm FWD, 4kV- 7kV, as much as 30% less water than what was needed for LVD.

• Reducing Spot size just means increasing dwell times but I typically work between spots 2.0 and 3.0

Page 26: Lab report 4

Gold on glass, LowVac, Helix Detector

Page 27: Lab report 4

vCD Detector

• Backscatter detector• Mounts on pole piece• Has small aperture; will work in LowVac• Works with beam deceleration• Works in immersion mode

Page 28: Lab report 4

Landing Energy Page

Page 29: Lab report 4

Gold Nanoparticles, TLD

Page 30: Lab report 4

Gold Nanoparticles, vCD

Page 31: Lab report 4

Worm cross-section, vCD

Page 32: Lab report 4

Virus, vCD