Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Land Commission Award Number 3498 toKaupe (Volume 7, Page 491)
z.,t
ta.....
-.7
1.7
7..
wi_vs.
/1-.-
--
-
L-:-:-: .4
-[-
-
-
.1.-’-,,
cjr
j/If
n(m
,r
‘‘t
r4;4
flF
r’r
4*/r7
ris
r“
/1/
7r
//
“i’
g”
-.t:s
rI
‘17/
i-
1//fr
t-or
-
‘d7’
4,
///1
-
-di
‘j(
$“P
/
?y)7y-/
tU9’
‘v//p
7,cs-,
r
$i
4$
77
211
“3’&‘7
rr
41216tft’f1
flh/S
*2rr
,7Ø
,-“
LI$
- _:Mn
nsf
°“F
nfl/_
s7
:;
//‘
rrr%
r7
*v4..%
Ti-
rtY
e’
-‘—‘--‘-.‘—
xZ
---,—7-.
fiD
7.t
I_—
-)
aN
\ -
‘S\ .N
‘*
& S
S
. %
r
Royal Patent Number 7432(Volume 27, Page 623)
Pip.k hA KB All!, MAMJJLI 0 KA OLELO A KA POE HOONA KULEANA.
Us hooholo na Luna Hoon i na kumu kuleana nina i k olelo, he kulenna oiaio ko
14’J
•/4’.
.1
Kuleana H&u c39’
ma ke Ano Alodlo iLoko o kab.i i olelois malalo.
me kela PaLpaL I1 NW, ke hoike aku nei o KALAKAUA, ke Alii Nui a ke Akw
i kona lokoinaikai i hoouoho aimaluns o ko Hewaii P Aing, i na kanaka a pau, I kela la noniho,
kon msu hope Alif, a ua huwi aku oii ma ke *110 Alodlo Ia
I kela
ma ks okupunio
wahi a psu lou ma
. penel us mokuna:
VV
1•,1
4,Z1
.3. 34
V
- 4 - 4 . 4
4 ,.
4 4
i6!
o
‘fl4LaC/. ‘ro-o.
it2
4’, 6;9.
:.fa4 2”’
• ,. .t’,•
61”
a.• .
-
.;
V
V
V V
V
V•V
VV
V
VV
4
___
__
_
V
_V
V•V
V—
-
t
*.
t;..
.
Il?
P•
e •1
f I*
*
-
-•••
••
••
•
.
.4
••
-It
S.
0
/m-ia L L ai
/417&a ,-ja /--z-a.
4
--
,/1 LL/4
L%3-4
La- 1-za ta
• A/%a- aIa
.4’ %-% 2%;c
%iai-
/1:- , cz4 ,
‘d3ha.. it A
ft
__
V •
•. /€‘m- Liaz. g. 4€ç
• LvL a
• h44 ....- .y..
•4/%?tL •
J_ff%;7L
-
NATIVE REGISTER(ENGLISH)
copied on Hawaii State Archives public c
No 349:1 Kuaptu—
No, 3492 Kanalulu
Greetings to the Land Commissioners: I hereby tell of my :Lois,At KapaaLoa are 39 lo’i and a kula, that is my c:Laim which1 öccupy,,A respectful farewel:L to the Land Commissioners,Wailuku, 5 Jan, :1848 KANALULU
No. 3493 Kamaka
I, Kamaka, have 4 loi in Paukukalo, L o°i in Waihee; that is myc:Laim which I occupy. A respectful farewe:L:L,Wai:Luku, 4 Jan, :1848 KAMAKA
No. 3494 Keaka
I, Keaka, hereby state to the Land Commissioners that I have 20 :Loiat Halemano, that is my claim which is occupied, A respectful farweLl,Wailuku, 4 Jan, 1848 KEAKA
No, 3495 - Kawahie Page 94
Greetings to the Land Commissioners: I hereby state my claim: inPapohaku are 18 lo’i, Farewel:1 to the Land Commissioners,Wai:luku, 4 Jan, :i 84 KAWAHIE
No. 3496 Kekuapahipahi
Greetings to the Land Commissioners: I hereby tel:1 of my :Lo’is.At Kekuakaeo are :14 lot1, at Keahupio are 8 :Lo’i, at Mokuhau are 5:Lo’ i, at Puako are 10 :1o’ i, that is my c:laim Parewel:1 to the Corn-.missioners.Wailuku, 5 Jan. :1848 KEKUAPAHIPAHI
No, 3497 Kaulahea
Greetings to the Land Commissioners: I hereby state my claim atPapohaku. There are 15 :Lo’i which I claim, Respectfully,Wailuku, 3 Jan, :L848
KAULAHEA
No. 3498 Kaupe
Greetings to the Land Commissioners: I hereby tell of my :13 lo’i,1 hala clump and the pLace where the house stands; that is my claim,FareweLL to the Land Commissioners,Wailuku, 5 Jan, :1847 KUAPUU
Page 93
My claims which I occupy are at Kaluaoopu. There are four rno,’o,
j copied on Hawaii State ArcIvespubHccIa portion are weed grorn and a portion have taro, That is the sizeof my claim, FareweLL to the Commissioners.,Wailuku 6 Jan, 1848 IcAUPE
No, 3499 — Kiowal
Greetings to the Land Commissioners: I hereby state myPage 95
blessings: I am a man of Koolau, in Wailua, I state my claim forLoi land and kula In Wailua i t Lo’i, in Keonalu i 1Oe1 atala is a the house stands ‘fiTe, /At/ Pauhala i aflu1agrove of hala, At Waie:Li in Wailua are 7 Lo i, at Paakamaka inWai:Lua are 5 lo’i, at PaLolena are 27 1’i, A kula is at Kealaalaea,There iJ thes :Lands, is my :Land,Wailua, Koolau, 27 Dec. :1847 KIOWAI
[ No. 3500 — Mama
r Greetings to the Land Commissioners: At Auhaka I have 22 lo’i, thatis my statement to you. Farewell to the Commissioners,Wai:Luku, 3 January :1848KAINA
No. 3502 — Kahawai
Greetings to the Land Commissioners: I hereby state my c:Laim formy 17 lo’i, perhaps it is good, perhaps it is not, The Elele hasencouraged us, Farewel:L to you al:1,Wailuku, 4 Jan. 1848 KAHAWAI
No, 3506 — Kamakal
To the Land CQmmissioners, Greetings: I hereby state my claim for14 :Lo’i at Waikapu on Maui, however they jump, 3 lo’i are at Kaopa:la, L0 are at Macpals, 1 is at K.aopaLa. These are three ‘I:Lis,with one name, I received them from m kaikuahine and she got themfrom the konohikis,
Page 96and mine were from the one with the rightto them.Waikapu, 25 Dec. :L847 KAMAKAI
No. 3507 — Kuahine
To the Land Commissioners, Greetings: I have a claim for an ‘rLinamed Waiau, it is at Waihee on Maui, between Ohia andWaiauUU, I testify as to my occupancy of the land. Respectfully.Waihee, 20 Dec. :1847
KUAHINE
3C
Page 94
NATIVE TESTIMONY(HAWAIIAN)
C
n>:fly’‘rr‘r”°t/
r77rt’tPt”Ørm’°rr7rr
.-.-977ay
vrr7r
‘‘
‘9r“°—rrrr7’7wfl’rr
n‘7Wrvy‘‘m4rn7nv4
°rr4 ,7ou,n,y7W7777W4t2
•7W7—frs%v,6777V7727‘777
inrr
Vrrrrr22rs‘Kr-’’rrcc
“arrrs#r7z-rr/y7n’nwrwycroivØ,,nr-r‘rynfl/flr’tntrr t.‘.‘
.‘•4t.a--
:e
7rn_tz,#
7/ •3
tt7°7,tn,rran7nv 3,
•bO7 2Vryfl
%.:“‘*‘‘•‘
:.,--,7°r7rrr&t&y •rrcrr‘rrrn”•n
•“---k‘V772.Ø
“r‘V7•‘
rr—’zr’7’”r‘y°—rw‘r ••
:‘‘‘
N••
•ffl79flflf/’G7
NATIVE TESTIMONY(ENGLISH)
Page 618
It was from his upimas in the time of Kamehameha I There is noopposition It is bounded as follows maiika, by Kehaukai andKalawalahonu,
Page 6i9
Waihee by Poupou, makal by Pinao and Kalaikoa Naalaea by Wailukustream,
No 3465 Keawe July 9 , 1849
o sworn I know of one parcel of taro in the I:Li of Ahuena in WaiLuku, It was from Kailihiwa in :1844, There is no opposition, There are two &aLima lfl it, It is bounded mauka by Paele,Waihee by Naea Makai by Keoho, Maalaea, by Kahauo:Lopua,
No, 3254 Hana
Mahoell sworn I know hIs :iana in wai:Luku, two parcels,Parcel 1, Taro land at Ahuena
2. HouseHis land was from Kehakeha in :1845, who had had it from the time ofKamehameha I, There is no opposition, These aic two po’ai ia in it1 Mauka, by Kaiae, Wathee, my land, maltai, Kaulli, Maalaea, my land,2, Mauka, by Kaulii, Waihee, my land, makal, Raulli, Maalaea, my land,
No, 3502 Kahawal
Kanoil sworiu I know his land in Wailuku, three parcels,Parcel 1, Taro land at Halemano ‘Ill
2. 3 loi of taro at IC CC
3 5 CC at Pauniu I1His land was from Keawe in 1835, There is no opposition,1 Mauka, Lonoaea, Waihee, Keahi, makai, Keawe, Maalaea, Ohiai2, Mauka, Keahi, Waihee, the sartle, makal, Nuhi, Maa:Laea, Ohial3, Mauka, Kekipi, Wathee, the same, makal, the same, Maalaea,Stream,
No, 3498 Kaupe
Moomoolki sworn I know of one parceL in the Ili of Ka1uao
Page 620
opu in Wailuku, It eras from the mcis, from the time of KamehamehaI. The makuas died in 1848, and he is the heir to this land.There is no opposition. The boundaries ares mauka, ‘Ill of Kahewa, Waihee, Il1 of Pohakupukupu, makal, ‘Iii of Ho1u Maaiaea,‘1:11 of Kahewa,
,V-r 3’’1
tdoo oiqnd soqaiy 1s !!‘I-I uo poicIoo
FOREIGN TESTIMONY
dy
OiAtd/o4% ‘f
7 , 7j 1 (/1 1cr / / / e 4/
7/ / ei;/,12V,2, /44j
AJap;i. 7 A % f
;z:,/4;/
42 4 / .ec4i 4 /n/Zr€’/c -
V *
2A_7cP’4-/r //r/ 7. / // ‘
%, F
// / ,, /t,/ /3’ /7/ ,,//f_
/ 7p 47(77,:: 1 7 // -
/, 7/ %, /4 //
%74Ve.-%c9c44-r (%r/’% /7%/:7C7(*c#*f/:61**
0
///7/ ////- 7rn
/ j
h tj;/tri4r:n, --
/ / /
‘/7/7 7 E3/,/,/
• -
.r4r//:’* -‘:rm..4 ?:-:- // 7L/7J7/0
/ 4
‘4,- a/. - j /7/ 7/_
-e 4’ (7/4/
‘-‘/7 r2 yc ‘0%L/E/:7,/
//y•/ :/7t4* /&: ‘
/
* ,;7//7-Z/ Z7;;1*/V;,% 7* 1
4*/ ••
41
1.’ .• .• *
13!d03 oiqnd SOAiq3i OVflg !!BMEH UO paidoo
Land Commission Award Number 3294-B,Apana 2;
Apana 1, Mahele 1;Apana 1, Mahele 2 to Momooiki
(Volume 3, Page 730)
AAt %tc€%%
A fl46
A
(0
//
,& ±1Kg I,
Mz /1.i//
,w a-,,,% flr,i’
Szht isiacAaht&’A
/A
ta% /a%a’n’.Aai•%’ & c% Aw4Øi’ .LØfrr.£zi’rAa,1 A-h Aac’ a’
4/ Mm//i ,*. ,nn& AA/PA’ i/t 1’
, /Zr.,,‘,
• )i° M’. %yy* •\NS
A ;S’$-M: 2SF,,,,
c% .9° M/4’ )/°j :S 4’ff*t • ,,
cAt in -e ni11 ‘.
6fl14 a=
gnai ,Z £,ahc”cnr S4niak&mJa7eiZc$
7,% fl4 M.
4cgLV
‘It,
fl-*C.
‘/‘t A i:j4ai
7/
If
#.
// ‘7/
4afl tdrnzIAvA%u c4hwn%c’r
4’A-’‘
M-d7
cAt t2° &4c9o-, ,,,
A eli’ ,% ,Sr; ,,
ct4’ /4‘$ 73 1 // a ,4fl’6L1,.%J2,46
A‘h-”
I 4‘‘‘/N
‘4
LA
/6r’
/1
4;
, ,Z .
// a /2 z
a
-W/ 7)’t14
‘ /,73
./// f/. ii
/
MA-c’
/Z” .2:
f Mh.gz?/J4;&J %t%1 V
,4. f4:a
(A ré-t A-:
(A a41
A &‘
iJJ’
(,U2t-
ii a ,;:44;;
4
4/.— N
,‘ A - — p ,,‘
g• o ,/ o — ,
•1
____
— I
Al , e /
—
4’L./ I
—
2d!tlN.
c . .4’ ‘ Al ,. /
4 ./
‘V.
%\%
Z4%.k\’%
Nss
!flttt\
t\\?
c•
*4
‘
%“
%
‘
7
44
k
;.
,
r”s.
4%
%cc
a
t.F
Royal Patent Number 6102(Volume 23, Page 371)
•
—
A2 ke:.Ai% m.aanali ok& oieTh a• )q Th-
.7J*Z4i(1 .5t-’ /
F, (_-€ “t7ta
.4
.4.
a.
)
it
1•-—
C 1 iL i:_qi(t1 t.ic;i !iii .:. . - -
MfiL.7;iC. ::.
t to .& ft i ii.ihi.a Liii a.
Nuiail:i, na ic’in ninpain Ru ‘.11;, IU’ iil4ke. Win u K.aaiebn:ischn IV.. :Aiii .. :,.
iii Il:ailL Li LI iii Ituwnii i’ne A tiii, I in Icin’.ibn IL flhiI, I Iiiit ii IWLILI th!1 a LW iiiiI nan ii. . •— ut. . ,. -
& i hi pu inn an — a
a )i’&tIIlhaUJ If piiti( tin iii:iiunn. t
I t - c:4an L- i
ac2 / fl /!scn.t
7 -
ft
-,
- . a’4— ‘• .•• //
ff
fjf/;,.t
•
•; Cs. t, . :-
:1
-..
n-f
A--
NATIVE TESTIMONY(HAWAIIAN)
r”-“‘.‘fl77‘rrfl/
‘49/rrcrc7°“77rt“v°rrr%r‘•—rvvrrrr
nvj
W7’r7rWrr“reyrr>q4,t,
7’7r—’rr-7?w
i#/.°‘-
‘7
a::
‘r°ri*re7v
,2
“2w’wYrtrO%
r—.—vp
r‘°rrrr‘r‘rr’°mrrr*vr/i,oo
*.
:rr“r“r‘*r#uy7Ic7’7flZ/fl¼y7rnuOflW7
/fl7n’‘—Ar—r
wepyçn 4%9
t’r71/rv7s9)rni,Øy924tV°wr*
.o/ryorrnP*rrrnsflt‘rrrrr/*
____
fl777,r7r0’rtfr7-7_4,77
flflV
eOt6’trr,*
7‘
rr‘nsrr7’-rr-e7’r‘rr7!‘I,
‘I
I
iiôcr
NATIVE TESTIMONY(ENGLISH)
1-age 654
in the 1:11 of Ha:Lelani in Wai:Luku, His land was from Ianakaole in184,. Kanakaole had it from B. Mahune, and B. Mahune had it fromthe Moi, Kanakao:ie dispossessed him without cause in :1848w itshoulbe returned to him, since that land is his, not for Apiki.
Page 655it is bounded manNa by the Ill of Kapuakea, Wathee by the land ofKalawaiahonu9 makai, the same, Maalaea by the Pall of Wai:Lukua
No. 3294B Moomooiki July 239 1849
I, Napea sworn: It was :E who wrote his claim in the month ofi5einber 1847,
Kauhi sworn: I know of two parcels of taro in the ‘I:Ls of Pohakupukupu and Kapalaalaea, Wal :Luku,Parcel 1 Taro land and house at Pohakupukupu
2. Taro moo at Kapalaalaea. The first parcel was fromKaniau in 1843, wh had it from H. KaLania, Parcel 2 was from Paiwi in the hme ot Kamehameh Ii, No oppoiton, No po’alirna iniIi,:i. is bounded mauka by Government land, Waihee by the I1i of Ka-hewa, makal by the I1i of Waikani, Naalaea by the I1l of Puki2, is bounded manNa by the LLi. of Umieu, Waihee by the Viii ofPuki, makai by the Ili of Waikani, Maalaea by the ‘Iii of TJnieu,/In Eng:Lish :LanguagT See Page 6?, H. :L6 Testimon7
No, 2337 Ihuole
Ihuo:Le sworn: I personally witnessed Kahale write my claim in themonth of Ju:Ly, 1848,
Floloua sworn: I know of one parcel of taro in the jL1jof Papàhaku in Wailuku, He had it from Z, Kaauwai in 18 Lsi/, whohad it from Namakeha. No opposition. It is bounded manNa by the:Land of Z. Kaauwai Waihee by the land of Nasa, makal by my landand that of Kaulahea, Maa:Laea, by the :Land of the Mo’i,
No, 32941) Kahue
Kahue sworn: I saw that Naleipuleho wrote my c:Laim in the monthof December 1847,
Holoua sworn: I know his :Land in Wailuku, two parcels,
Page 66Parcel 1. Taro m&o in the I:Li of Papohaku2, 2 TarTi in thli of KapaLaalaea..The first parcel was Kalapa Thf846, who had it from Z, Kaauwai,Parcel 2 was from Naai, in :1843; it had been Naais from ancienttimes. No opposition,
-
.ndoo oijqnd sQATqoI 1TS !!lMI-I uo poidoo
FOREIGN TESTIMONY
,.VI• V,V
I ;11Z——
/ , / / —
F
I: ‘d z /1F
/ —
r ;- / _4 ,-:: — / 4
/ / /- /
, 7 A
azz::zI
4 —___
‘
hVVV •. /;// V V V : V
I‘ ( /14 I / -
- -,
V. rV
, V /2 -‘1 / dI/ € : // -
•
V
V V / ,
V / V V
-I d 4
% /r
1•
/ ,
/ 2 1 (/ ‘ / /
I
IL
/ ‘
__
V V ‘V V V V V VV .V V V V V
V V
I : —
// A sJ / / i, / 1/
_________
I / — -‘-.-
4
F J
_77/’ ,“ e’ - I
-
,:‘Z r / //
; /2* 1 L // ?4 - /z
p ‘ ‘z Z (A4, /
iiI 7 4
VS
• V,•.•..
VVV.VV1
VV.. V
V
‘V
VV VV
VV
VVV V
V.k— ‘
V•V
-
.ioido OJqnd sAJqI1\/ ig 1tM1 uo poidoo
3))4%7>-tA-
te 16 ra/ // 7 ti/’c /1/4 44 aes/a)r// ? A€
fi/_/f’ and //?/,rd V * # /c £,j,,rit’Jt;t
dt—ny:> &?? - 6/6 ./, d e%/o-ht- iY
/A-1;din;dtz(U -/-/‘JCtc-.
d:u(N-. -
it/i ,,-‘e-ed ,‘ /-nc :2:’ /, ,t1- , ,f 7 ,‘,, /i /
&z..tC417?/j. .?p4;.JC.’4.tL. ,fla’ ,i,et-c./’c d>/;iCtI
i’ ,e4;’ ; ctZ c7;né% t% ôfa ata-n-7 v.-,;/ /I’zc(/c
4 /%reMi/zaJ 4n;4 ‘
CI/
— —- ¾- — ——- - :4C-‘ / A
-..
-/:41-/-k,v. &,tflL //fn4’. .
it - _4\-. --
L - ,/* ,s .j4i4n-ut1 //fnrnz/ r/£—/flnj a hp—
:, O4I;L ArA:í—_t7-ae t-ytJ /7k :‘n/tc-;’ ,44flI:/t)9’a /z
-tn- 1157 ///t,o a-ni Zt-)i%v Zn t&-’- °“ U
- oft- a—
1!1I00oqqndsaAufOI Oju;g !!UMPIJ 110 P3!dOo .- i £—.-t)
H76/a nn c4i/
en/’-; ic tin n ‘€ /bzj
at--i-A//-cI a-* /a4
i46-npI,’ kg” j. 5%z; .1/h-/’,nd cn-,/-/J4 c/.%-, /i -.i,i4’i
6A,... (f4-/ &? - -. : - - -.- --• gnn- / -.4,4. / z/-.; /h tfc%
V,,.
. -, - 4?t//t6
t/. 4i’,ih/ J€ tØaa6- C. ,‘2?J -ted /n;-z-o
/,tr9.i. ii! i,//i%,?’(L 1)1
);-/‘( /,_,;‘/%t;c2c€a --:°- tuicn in i/c )cct /;:Jr.tf/
z.-i; :h/niJ4tieo-c-tr7/iió
d./ -
-4.- -. at1-//n,,d /ea,-/tet6,j E/a. ‘z4 / %n•(ta ‘i(-€VfLi’4 6
uI?... 79A - .< . -2. i hi-i-nc4d-ai-i/a fr //c’2c/ii7n. /6/ee/- 4-
,/ ccA’nAru,, 7/ c//cadniie’ 4a%C’ /<7
:‘ ... -. . . - - - - -- _:
t-% -
I —. —— —H.--.
I!!
-Lp.1:’..
-ifI-f.
f-I
Water
Related
Term
sfor
Various
Land
Com
mission
Aw
ardsin
Wailuku
LCAR
P406
Api
5376453
Ap
1,2997
24346397
2436A
p1,2,3
20092495
Ap
1,2,3,47790
2502A
p1,3
59732503
Ap2
36522533
Ap
16529
&6437
32256298
3237A
p36888
3275E5154
329232948
Ap1M
1&
M2,
Ap
61023330
4424&
46223335
7774338733884461
Ap
1,2
Aw
ardeeN
apelaK
uihelaniK
ahookeK
ahaikiK
aiaholokuaaulhum
aiO
huleM
alaihiO
punuiH
ewahew
aK
aleoM
uaM
oomoolki
Lonohiw
aN
aonohiPooliiliiPaiw
iK
awaa
Water
Term
scited
inM
etesand
Bounds
Description
This
award
containsm
anylo1i
maloo
(drytaro)
patchesA
p1
isbounded
bya
Poalima
andA
p2
isthe
siteof
1o9(taropatches)
APoalim
a(ali’itaro
patch)cited
asa
boundaryAll
3A
panaare
identifiedas
kalo(taro)
lotsand
Apana
2cites
anauw
ai(ditch)
APoalim
asits
within
Apana
4A
pana1
&3
arekalo
(taro)lots
andan
auwai
runsthrough
Ap
3A
pana2
isa
kalo(taro)
andhouse
lotbounded
bya
Poalima
Apana
1is
anam
akalo
(taroland)
boundedby
aPoalim
aA
Kahaw
al(stream
)and
2Poalim
alie
within
thisparcel
that
isbounded
byan
auwa
APoalim
ais
surroundedby
thisparcel
boundedby
anauw
ai(ditch)
Parcels1
&4
containa
kahawai
(stream)
andPoalim
aIdentified
asa
kalo(taro)
lotcontaining
auwai
(ditch)and
Poalima
Api
Mi,
Ap
1M2,
Ap2
allidentified
askalo
(taro)lots
with
anauw
aiadjoining
Akalo
(taro)lot
with
anauw
aiadjoining
Identifiedas
akalo
(taro)lot
containingauw
ai(ditch)
Aw
ardidentified
ashaving
9Io’i
(taropatches)
Akalo
(taro)lot
with
anauw
aiadjoining
Both
parcelsidentified
askalo
(taro)lots
606561016630
1• ‘ r
04
‘9
•1
a’ a a’
F
Jtz&4a4sJa t,t4Qfk%4l4i&4t
jn,’t: %,v,4 M1%74iai-nrnnA,’,,41J4.AZt14-t2.
A ;í’ &rn / // . rn*a 4’A/I’M’ ,,
A. %Zt,,‘I&: j,,, * ‘ 4
;1’li 2ff. -
‘-0‘4w.,
1’4;j’
S. gf -
c-,4 1/’* Fe(Mza aL ,&6zd
&A44t&j flf’S7Lfl/ ltL
€‘-
cSaa a
A. ;r’ %ag4 M.gn,v4, p4”A 14’ Mr /,ySA dfl Mt1s. F
A 21’tIa .c,,c* /1° fr a -
cM ,7fl &‘4’.fl-..a i’t /,14t - , ,,
2nhba:
1D4Q n44it itkie N
%. fr’%r4,ryt4.,%,J1
,4 14”t &3ry,,Md. J &. ,j2 -
cA 16’t A’ .t79 :cA. f2’r 4>: 4Jr,,
c% eli’ ,4.’ .2,;,LA,/4Lj ,,73 . -
,m.na-4- ,4 t*ai
46J)
at%Ao
te . — . — Ft I
a.
I. itan — Flat 4
4/’9. t.,. ._a,’.... - L Si
—I-
=11%:’
s_If.j/F’
,c7‘
‘F,
4
_)I/Yl
4-
12F.4,t3(4V
34/
“-I
4
‘I-f
.1
IIW
F
zy1;7
$
Q4\
TOM QuITIQuIT CHEE WATTS & YAMAMOTO, LLPCarl Tom Donna H YamamotoS.V. (Bud) Quitiquit ATTORNEYS AT LAW Danielle Degele-MathewsDavid W.H. Chee 841 Bishop Street, Suite 2125 Jerilynn Ono HallJeffrey D. Watts Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Edward R. Brooks
Telephone: (808) 526-3011Fax: (808) 523-1171
dyamamotobtpqIaw.com
April27,2012
Department of Land and Natural ResourcesCommission on Water Resource ManagementAttention: Robert ChongKalammoku Building, Room 2271151 Punchbowl StreetHonolulu, Hawaii 96813
Re: Wailuku Country Estates Irrigation Company and the Wailuku CountryEstates Community Association, Inc.
Appurtenant Rights Determination in Na Wai Eha Surface WaterManagement Areas (Waihee, Waiehu, lao and Waikanu Streams)
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
This firm represents the Wailuku Country Estates Irrigation Company (“WCEIC”) andthe Wailuku Country Estates Community Association, Inc. (“WCECA”) in connection with theirapplications that were submitted to the Commission for existing and new water uses.
This letter is in response to the water commission’s letter dated February 21, 2012,regarding the water commission’s review and comments to the information we submitted forappurtenant right claims (for TMK: (2) 3-2002: various) except with respect to the followingwhich the water commission found to support WCEIC’s and WCECA’s appurtenant rightclaims:
1. LCA 2533:1 and RP 6529 (appurtenant right claim documented for Ap 1).2. LCA 3225 and RP 6298 & 6458 (appurtenant right claim documented).3. LCA 3292 (appurtenant right claim documented).4. LCA 3330 and RP 4424, 4622 (appurtenant right claim documented).5. LCA 3335 and RP 7774 (appurtenant right claim documented).6. LCA 3387 and RP 6065 (appurtenant right claim documented).7. LCA 3388 and RP 6101 (appurtenant right claim documented).
KAILUA-KONA: 75-1000 Henry Street, Suite 208 Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 Telephone: (808) 326-7300 Facsimile: (808) 326-7725
Department of Land and Natural ResourcesCommission on Water Resource ManagementAttention: Robert ChongApril 27, 2012Page 2
Please see the attached chart with our responses to the water commission’s February 21,2012 letter. In addition, we would like to add the following which explains our responses to thewater commission’s comments that there were no references to water use in some of the RoyalPatents (“RP”) and Land Commission Awards (“LCA”) in WCEIC’s/WCECA’s application. Inshort, implicit in a LCA and RP is the appurtenant right to water. Since the LCA and RP wererequired to be in literal agreement with the other, reference to water use in either one means thatthere was a reference to water use in the other.
Further, as explained below, since the form of the RP required description by metes andbounds only, reference to water use may not be in the RP. This should hold true for LCAs aswell. Consequently, testimony at the time of application (which we submitted) should weight inon whether the lands were being cultivated at that time.
Background
In 1845, the Board of Land Commissioners to quiet land titles was formed. It was theLand Commission’s responsibility to ascertain or reject claims of interest in land brought beforeit. The Board was not empowered to grant fee simple title to land. Its duty was to determineeach applicant’s identifiable interests in land and issue an award describing those interests.Public Access Shoreline Hawaii v. Hawaii County Planning Commission, 79 Raw. 425, 445, 903P.2d 1246, 1266 (1995) (“PASII’); Application ofElizabeth Cockett Robinson, 49 Haw. 429,434,421 P.2d 570, 574 (1966) (the Land Commission Award is a determination of a right to a patent).Actual title to land could be gained only by a payment of commutation to the Kingdom andissuance of a royal patent. PASH, 79 Haw. at 445, 903 P.2d at 1266; Omerod v. Heirs ofKainoaKupuna Kaheananui, 116 Haw. 239, 247, 172 P.3d 983, 991 (2007) (citing PASH).
After the Land Commission entered a LCA, the Minister of Interior could issue a RP afterthe awardee paid a commutation fee. In essence, a RP was a quitclaim of the government’sinterest in the land. Id.; Brunz v. Mott Smith, 3 Raw. 783, 1877 WL 7569 (1877) (the effect of apatent is to relinquish the government’s interest in the area described therein unto the originalawardee). In summary, neither the LCA nor RP was required to show the use of the land.
Additional Responses to Water Commission ‘s Comments
Form ofRP required metes and bounds
The water commission commented that there were no references to water use in some ofthe LCA’s and/or RP’s in WCEIC’s/WCECA’s application. However, this should not bedeterminable on the issue of water use or cultivation on the lands since the they were onlyrequired to show the lands’ metes and bounds.
Department of Land and Natural ResourcesCommission on Water Resource ManagementAttention: Robert ChongApril 27, 2012Page 3
The form of all RPs were required to describe the land therein by metes and bounds or bynatural boundaries. In order to obtain a RP and obtain fee simple ownership of land conveyedduring the Mahele, an awardee needed to present a Boundary Commission judgment describinghis or her land by metes and bounds. Id.; Greenwell v. Paris, 6 Raw. 315, 1882 WL 7783 (1882)(The object of the boundary commissioner is to enable parties to obtain such Royal Patentsdefining their lands by metes and bounds); See Application ofElizabeth Cockett Robinson, 49Raw. 429, 421 P.2d 570 (1966) (the form of all Royal Patents shall describe the land by actualsurvey or by natural boundaries as the case may be).
There were some instances where the water commission noted references to water use inthe LCA but not in the RP, and vice versa. However, the metes, bounds and description of thesurvey in the petition must be in literal agreement with the award. Brunz, 3 Raw. 783, 1877 WL7569 (1877). Consequently, if water use is referenced in either the LCA or the RP it shouldapply equally to the other.
Testimony Regarding Water Use
We note that the water commission did not comment on the testimony submitted and soare unsure on the water commission’s position regarding the same. Since neither the LCA norRP can be relied upon to reference water use (since metes and bounds only were required inthem), testimony by applicants and others at the time of application should weigh equally in onthe question. Furthermore, by virtue of the lands being Kuleana lands, the use of water thereon isimplied. In this regard, the first six sections of the Kuleana Act enabled the common people ofHawaii to secure fee simple title to the lands they actually cultivated. The seventh sectioncontained the rights that were to accompany a commoner’s tenancy. Reppun v. Board of WaterSupply, 65 Raw. 531, 549, 656 P.2d 57, 69 (1982).
Generally, the conveyance of land, confirmed by a LCA and/or when the RP was issuedbased on such award, carried with it the appurtenant right to water for taro growing.McBryde Sugar Company, Limitedv. Robinson, 54 Raw. 174, 188, 504 P.2d 1330, 1339 (1973);See also Maikai v. Hasings & Co., 5 Haw. 133, 1884 WL 6659 (1884) (Holders of Kuleanas areentitled to water for irrigation purposes from the stream in the land which their Kuleanas aresituated.) Unlike riparian rights, appurtenant water rights are incidents of land ownership. Thisincludes the water on their lands and all the water which the lands had enjoyed from timeimmemorial. Reppun, 65 Raw. at 551, 656 P.2d at 70.
We are also enclosing the following documents that respond to the Commission’s variouscomments:
1. File Plan - regarding location of the various apanas.2. Enlargement of File Plan re LCA 4452:9, RP 7302.3. Index re LCA 3237.
4. Land Patent No. S8536 re LCA 3237:3 issued in 1960.5. CopyofRP6lO2
We trust our responses satisfies the Commission’s comments. Please do not hesitate toadvise the undersigned if you have any questions. Thank you for your consideration in thismatter.
Very truly yours,
TOM QUITIQUIT CHEE WATTS &YAMAMOTO, LLP
Donna H. Yamamoto
Enclosures
cc: client
WAILUKU COUNTRY ESTATES IRRIGATION COMPANYand the WAILUKU COUNTRY ESTATES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.
Document Commission Comment WCEI/WCECA Comment
LCA 377 Appurtenant right claim documented for The description of the land in the LCA and the RP are the“cultivated” and “kuleana” land. same. Consequently, both LCA and RP document the
appurtenant right claim.
RP 5366 Appurtenant right claim documented
LCA 406:1 1 1 Apana are listed. No specific ref to water The LCA states: “There are many dry taro lots in the iii ofuse for Ap 1. Further documentation required Puhiawaawa.” Puhiawaawa is apana 1. Consequently,for Api. NR, NT, and FT refer to loi, taro, appurtenant right is documented for apana 1. See thesugar cane and potato patches but do not following that references “Puhiawaawa:specify which apana. 1. English translation
2. native register (English) that “some taro patches are atPuhiawaawa...”3. native testimony (English) by Kuihelani: “There is apatch and a field at Puhiawaawa...”, by Kailihiwa: “There isa field and patches at Puhiawaawa...”
RP 5376 No ref to water use. As well, the RP says that the land is in Puhiawaawa. Thisshould be tied in to the LCA that says there are many drytaro lots in the ili of Puhiawaawa.
LCA 453: 1 & 2 Appurtenant right claim documented.
RP 997 RP refers to LCA 3572. The File Plan refers to RP 997 (which we submitted for yourNo ref to water use. reference only). However, we believe RP “997” is a typo on
the File Plan (the “1” is missing) and RP “1997” is correctbecause RP 1997 cites LCA 453. Furthermore, RP 1997mirrors the description in LCA 453 and as such documentsthe appurtenant right claim. Also, the register referencestaro patches and the native testimony references patches andfarming.
LCA 2434 & 2435 LCA 2434 & 2435 are not shown on survey There appears to be two (2) LCA 243 5’s. One was issued toor TMK maps. Documentation provided for Kaakole (a copy was submitted) and the other was issued toLCA 2435 but 2435 is crossed out. NR, NT, Kahooke (a copy was submitted). The RP 6397 also statesFT documentation provided for LCA 2434. Kuleana Helu 2435 to Kahooke. However, we believe the
LCA and RP for Kahooke showing 2435 are typos ( andshould be 2434) because the register and testimony forKahooke (property in Wailuku) is numbered 2434 while theproperty for Kaakole (2435) is in Kapunakea. A poalima isreferenced in the LCA for Kahooke. The register for 2434refers to loi’ s and the native testimony refers to taro and 3p0’ alimas and the foreign testimony references kalo and 3poalimas on the property.
See File Plan (LCA 2435 indicated below Lot 69)
NOTE: all LCA’s that were commented as not locatedare shown highlighted on the File Plan.
RP 6397 RP ref to LCA 2435. See above. A poalima is also referenced in the RP. Thedescription of the land mirrors the LCA.
2
LCA 2436:1, 2 &3 Appurtenant right claim documented for Ap LCA shows that all 3 apanas are identified as kalo (taro) lots2. Survey map only shows Ap 2 but not Ap 1 and Apana 2 cites an auwai (ditch). See translation of LCAor 3 into English that was submitted. The register also refers to
loi’s and the native and foreign testimonies refer to loi’s andkalo. The LCA, RP, testimony and register all cite the sameareas of Pohakukupukupu, Holu and Waikani
See File Plan Map (Apana 1 is indicated on Lot 43; Apana 3is indicated on Lot 120)
RP 2009 Appurtenant right claim documented for Ap The RP mirrors the LCA that shows all 3 apanas identified2. Survey map only shows Ap 2 but does not as kalo lots.showAp I or3.
LCA 2495:1, 2, 3 Appurtenant right claim documented for Ap Apana 4 contains a poalima Alii taro patch (see translation& 4 1. TMK map only shows Ap 1 but does not into English that was submitted and drawing of apana 4 in
show Ap 2-4. LCA with poalima drawn in). See register, native andforeign testimonies that references taro land/taro moo atPohakupukupu (apana 1 & 2) and Puuokala (apana 3) andpoalima (apana 4).
See File Plan (Apana 2 is indicated on Lot 43; Apana 3 isindicated on Lot 43; Apana 4 is indicated across Lots 37 and44)
RP 7790 No ref to water use for Ap 1. The land description in the RP and LCA are the same andthe comment as to LCA 2495 applies here.
3
LCA 2502: 1 & 3 Appurtenant right claim documented for Ap 2 See English translation of LCA indicating water use for& 3 Apana 1 & 3 which are both taro lots and an auwai runs
through Apana 3. See also the register (reference to loi) andnative testimony (reference to taro (apana 1 & 3) & poalima(apana 3) and foreign testimony (reference to loi’s (apana 1& 3) and poalima (apana 3))
RP 5973 Appurtenant right claim documented for Ap 2 The description of the land in the RP mirrors the LCA.&3
LCA 2503: 2 LCA is not shown on TMK. Ref to kalo and See File Plan (LCA 2503:2 is indicated on Lot 12 of thepahale North lao Village)
RP 3652 RP is for LCA 2502 RP 3652 cites LCA 2502. However, we believe it is a typobecause the description in RP 3652 is exactly the same as inLCA 2503. Consequently, both reference water use.Further, both RP 3652 and LCA 2503 are to Ohule. TheLCA and RP references poalimas, the register referenceslois, native testimony references taro and poalimas andforeign testimony references kalo and poalima.
LCA 3237: 3 Appurtenant right claim documented.
4
RP 6888 No ref to water use The purpose of the RP was to quitclaim the government’sinterest in the property and to contain metes and boundsdescription. Consequently, reference to water use would notnecessarily be in the RP. The register references lois, nativetestimony references taro land, taro loi, taro pauku andforeign testimony references lois.
Royal Patent 6888 is indicated in the Index for LCA 3237but it is land in Kalihi, Oahu. Before 1960, no RP wasissued. The RP was issued in 1960 and oniy shows metesand bounds. A copy is attached.
LCA 3275-E: 3,4,6 Appurtenant right claim documented
RP 5154 No ref to water use The description of the land in RP is the same as in LCA3275-E and thus, appurtenant right claim was documented inthe RP as well. Native testimony references taro patches(apana 3), taro pauku (apana 4 & 6) and foreign testimonyreferences lois (apana 3, 4 & 6):
LCA 3294-B: 2; Appurtenant right claim documentedLCA 3294-B:1,Ml; LCA 3294-B-I, M2
5
RP 6102 No ref to water use. RP tracks LCA and references kalo. Appurtenant rightcontained in LCA is in RP. Enclosed is a clearer copy of RP6102. The native testimony references taro land and taromoo (cultivated piece of land) and foreign testimonyreferences moo of kalo.
LCA 3488 Appurtenant right claim documented.
RP 5289 No ref to water use. The RP notes the land is “Ama Kalo”. The registerreferences 127 loi’s, native testimony references taro andpoalimas and foreign testimony references kalo land andpoalimas,
LCA 3498 Appurtenant right claim documented.
RP 7432 No ref to water Reference to “kalo” is contained in both the LCA and RP.The description in the RP and the LCA are exactly the same.Consequently, both LCA and RP refer to water use. Theregister references taro.
LCA 4452:9 LCA is not shown on TMK map. No ref to Reference to “Apana 9” appears on the LCA under the wordsAp. 9. “Helu 4452’
See File Plan (LCA 4452 is shown on the enclosed 8 V2 x 1 1map)
6
RP 7302 No ref to water use RP evidenced the government’s quitclaim of its interest inthe property and the RP was only required to contain themetes and bounds of the property.
LCA 4461:1 & 2 LCA is not shown on TMK MAP. Ref to See File Plan (Apana 2 is indicated across Lots 30 and 31;kalo and moo kalo. Apana 2 is indicated on Lot 32).
RP 6630 Ref to kalo and moo kalo. RP references kalo moo and mirrors the LCA. Also, nativetestimony references taro moo.
7
I
I
:.. ;•
u EL
PALAPALA WLk’ Ui.A ke Ahi, nam]j e ks olelo a ks Poe ROona Ku1ana
— - —
NO 1< A MEA,,. lw1o Lung Boono I n kwa kulqnos ano k u4.Io 1 a4ab it•X4.ano
n ke Ano A1OdIO Iluku u kahi i ,,l4IUia inalalø.
ma kci P.I.pala s:i. Ni. ke Iioik. aku net o K..inebLneba iT., he Alit net eke Akus I kono loko hit I• ni in lIla. k. hawaii I’m Ala., i na keneka. pan, I hal. Ii no a no kone man hop. clii, no beawi cii a4., mi h4 AD
walil. an ba me
urn mokuna:
-._ £6) ‘Z4 •
/ ,J’ ?* /, ‘A’ ,/1 ‘?‘ -,
(34$4) ,,2&‘ .9 —
. I-.Jj’’ . — 4
7 2 ‘,AL/’aP.. 4
-i--- .• V. ‘& 4 .,, 4
aeZ.)fL—4 “d ‘
ti42g ,‘ c4b /J’ 4%.€
4’ ,,i -. . -, 4-L)F J, t/
4 3
, i—. . 4
c.—’Fta.L) 6’ €_..
d4 ‘4 4
-‘
k * ‘•;74 a —
4 c_..— ..
. -4
-.,
‘4 4’ -‘ —AJ ‘ ‘
L
I.
II”4)
4L4&
• -
.
a4: i7:b• 3*4;I.S tk44i1t%.
.fr—e
“fr” —
• 4
N --
S - - — . S’•
r - •
4’ 2-
tfi •:%:,% -
.‘
-:*.-. -J[ -,--
!‘‘:‘L:;’t?:
r .r - - - “ - --‘
4. -- -
4,: ‘%,.,,-
... .7(-
1
:.
I— ( —
___% \_\
‘‘ — -J’
-‘ 4.
4. %.4 --
4—
u’.fl -
ad aan r. -
a—itsaoi
---k4%
N
,—..4..
I .5:1
I
-:
- -c ;r4.
- *
- L- -?.- - -: -:
4 CL :4