Upload
lindseyhaymond
View
154
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
http://starchart.esc12.net/docs/TxCSC.pdf
Langham Creek and The STaRChart
Results
Classifications
Getting to Target Tech
Teaching and Learning • Results
• Classification
• Where we want to be Educator Preparation and Development
• Results
• Classification
• Where we want to be Leadership, Administration, and Instructional Support
• Results
• Classification
• Where we want to be Infrastructure for Technology
• Results
• Classification
• Where we want to be
TL 1 TL2 TL3 TL4 TL5 TL6 TOTAL
Patterns of
classroom
use
Frequency/
Design of
Instructional
Setting
Content Area
Connections
Techology
Applications
(TA) TEKS
Implemention
Student
Mastery of
Technology
Applications
Online
Learning
TOTAL
2 2 3 2 3 2 14
Instruction is teacher-directed and
students regularly use technology.
Students use Technology on individual
basis to access electronic information and
develop communication and presentation
projects.
There is minimal use of technology
in foundation TEKS.
The teacher serves as facilitator, mentor,
and co-learner.
Students have on-demand access to all
appropriate technologies to complete activities
that have been seamlessly integrated into all core
content areas.
EP1 EP2 EP3 EP4 EP5 EP6 TOAL
Professional
Development
Experiences
Models of
Professional
Development
Capabilities of
Educators
Access to
Professional
Development
Levels of
Understanding
and Patterns of
Use
Professional
Development
for Online
Learning
TOTAL
2 2 2 2 3 2 13
Use of technology is for administrative tasks and classroom management.
There is use of online resources.
40% of educators meet SBEC standards.
Administrators expect teachers to use technology.
6-24% of technology budget allocated for professional development.
There are regular technology-supportedlearner-centered projects.
There is vertical alignment of Technology Applications TEKS and anytime, anywhere use of online resources.
Administrators ensure integrationeducators meet SBEC standards.
30% or more of budget allocated for professional development.
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 TOTAL
Leadership
and
Vision
Planning Instructional
Support
Communication
and
Collaboration
Budget Leadership
and
Support for
Online
Learning
TOTAL
2 3 2 3 2 3 15
Campus plan board approved and
supported by supt. 1 technical support staff
to 500computers, full- time district
technology director.
Technology Allotment, e-Rate, competitive
grants and local funding.
Campus plan focused on student success, supported by board and administration.
There is one technical support to 350computers.
Campus instructional support staff.
Technology Allotment, e-Rate, stateand federal competitive grants and localfunding are available.
INF1 INF2 INF3 INF4 INF5 INF5 TOTAL
Students
per
Computers
Internet
Access
Connectivity
Speed
Other
Classroom
Technology
Technical
Support
Local Area
Network
Wide
Area
Network
Distance
Learning
Capacity
TOTAL
2 3 2 3 3 2 15
There are 4 or less students per computer.
There is direct connectivity to Internet in 75% of classrooms and library.
Web-based learning is available.
All rooms are on LAN/WAN.
There is one educator per computer.
There is shared use of other resources.
There is on-demand access for every
student, direct connectivity available in all
rooms and web-based resources in multiple
rooms.
All rooms are connected to WAN.
They are fully equipped with appropriate
technology.
Technology committee
Campus plan
Doing your Part!!
Hyperlinks:
http://starchart.esc12.net/docs/campusSW
SummarybyKA20072008.pdf
http://starchart2.esc12.net/