22
LEAN MANAGEMENT PRESENTATION on “CSSC” Group 1 Abhishek Agarwal Akshay Hiremath Arushi Bafna Atanu Misra Chetan Gupta Debolina Pratik Patil

Lean Management

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

CSSC

Citation preview

  • LEAN MANAGEMENT PRESENTATIONon

    CSSC

    Group 1

    Abhishek Agarwal Akshay Hiremath

    Arushi Bafna Atanu Misra

    Chetan Gupta Debolina

    Pratik Patil

  • Brief Overview

    About Company

    50-year-old spring manufacturing and metal stamping firm in U.S.

    Business Motto We make the tough jobs

    ISO9000 certified

    Family of Products:

    Stamped products

    Coiled Products

    Multi-side Bent Products

    Close to 800 customers

    Problems Faced

    Slow sales growth at 2% to 3%

    Intense global competition

    Global vendors provide lower cost , similar quality products

    Leveraging comparative advantage of low labor cost (assembling products)

    Increased competition in aerospace

    Customer related issues

    Less understanding of their needs

    On-time delivery issues

    Focus on Improving manufacturing efficiency, respond to customer demands with higher quality, low cost and shorter delivery lead times

  • Products

    Stamping

    Hydraulic Press

    Forming

    Bending

    Punching

    Cutting

    Spring

    Coiling

    Cutting

    Bending

    Product Types

    Cigarette Lighter Metal Head

    Connectors for Electrical

    Equipment parts

    Coatings

    Different Widths, Elasticity, lengths

    Metal Sheets Metal Wires

    Spring (Automated)

    Bending

    Metal Rods/WiresInitial ProductKey Points

    Demand from same upstream and downstream processes

    Quality Check

    First Piece after tool change

    Periodic drawn

    Last piece of lot

    Different products meeting in final assembly

    6000 items product line

    Decentralization done twice with evolved Hub and Spoke Model

    Secondary Operations

    Grinding

    Deburring

    Washing

    Plating

    Heat Treatment

    Packaging

  • Current Plant Operations: Computer Generated Master Schedule

    Computer GeneratedMaster Schedule

    Provided each process andwork stations withinstructions

    Each process separated byWIP inventory

    Process Improvement Initiations

    SEAL Teams

    Lean ManufacturingConsultants

    Associations forManufacturing Excellence

    TSSC

  • Lean Manufacturing Consultants

    Firstly, SEAL team was trained in the following 3 areas

    Reducing WIP for a stamped metal part run on a 200-ton power press

    Reducing set-up times for a high performance spring looping and wire forming machine

    Reducing WIP in a connector clamp part stamping line

    RESULTS

    Day 1

    Training on how to conduct a kaizen meeting

    Introduction to requisite tools

    Order of Steps to be followed

    Day 2

    Each team documented for its process a baseline work setup that included footprint & machinery layout, product and information flows & signals

    Operator motion was documented using standard worksheets

    Findings were presented and analyzed

    Day 3

    Brainstorming session generation of new ideas for CI

    Day 4 & 5

    Teams worked within the context of improvements to make them error proof and to identify and eliminate wasted efforts

    Still Challenges were faced on how to implementthe techniques on CSSCs other product areasbecause of different equipment andmanufacturing process

  • Kaizen Blitzes:Cross-functional team consisting of AME (Association for Manufacturing Excellence)

    trainers was set up for brainstorming on Kaizen initiatives

    Objectives:

    Reduce repackaging

    by 90%

    Reduce cycle time by 30%

    Visually scheduling the jobs to be shipped and display shipping man-hour load

    Eliminating tasks equivalent to 2 full-time people

    Initiatives:

    Revamp physical layout to reduce walking distance by 94%

    Consolidated tasks from 22 steps to 16 steps per shipment

    Smoothened work flow by introducing support person and visual cues

    Short term to do lists: Creation and improvement of visual

    controls

    Tapping of floors Clearing labels of all shelves to be done

    using existing revamping teams

    Long term to do lists: Improving measurements Reducing stock levels Simplifying paperwork and

    certification process for every

    shipment

    Association for Manufacturing Excellence: Kaizen Blitzes

    Visual Tour of Organization

    Reviewed SEAL Team Results

    Toyota Supplier Support Center

    Conditional Mutual Agreement:

    1. No Workers be laid off due to TSSC

    productivity improvements

    2. Long Term Commitment to TSSC

    3. CSSCs success be used to teach competitor

    companies about TPS.

    SEAL Teams: Solutions through Employee

    Action & Leadership

    Cross functional teams

    19 missions initiated in different divisions

    Goals were set and Results analyzed

    Results not achieved

    Visual Kanban System

    Set-Up Time Reduction

    Quick Changeover

  • REASONS FOR SELECTING THE COIL SPRING LINE

    TSSC wanted to implement TPS in areas where learning potential

    was the greatest.Plethora of

    complications in the coil

    production area.

    Spring line was far-away from Lean.

    Practical Reason Moving a 700 lbs. coiling equipment is

    easier and faster than moving a 300 ton stamping press.

    Spring line had more business than the other

    units.

    Long and short production runs.

    Multiplicity of processes.

    A large number of different part orders

    Lot of WIP.

    Long lead times.

    Poor communication within the department

    IMPLEMENTATION ON THE COIL SPRING LINE

  • MAPPING THE PRODUCTION PROCESS AS-IS

    Steel wire was coiled into a spring

    on a winding machine.

    The ends of the coil were shaped as specified by a kick-

    press.

    The spring is set to its correct length

    and stiffness.

    The springs are ground.

    The springs are heated to impart

    strength and hardness to them.

    The springs are then washed.

    The springs are finally packed as per

    the orders.

    The packaged springs are then

    sent to the distribution centers.

    Examining Data Collection of first hand information about quantities of part numbers, machines used to run

    parts, machine layouts, order sizes, Total Prod. Volume, delivery frequencies.

    Organizing Data Mapping of workflows and grouping parts based on

    similar processes

    Questioning Data- Reorganizing data vis--vis implementation of changes.

    PROCESS ANALYSIS BY TSSC

  • RESULTS OF ANALYSIS AND ACTIONS TAKEN

    Two types of spring orders.

    A-type Large quantities, repetitive production, scheduled deliveries.

    B-type Lesser volume, uncertain delivery schedules.

    Number of commonalities between the two types were found.

    Grinding and the subsequent processes increased the process time.

    High set-up time of spring coiling machine.

    High overall changeover time.

    Re-arrangement of medium coil machines based on part groupings.

    Grinding, heating, washing were combined in a cell.

    Shifting the kick-press machine close to coil-machine to reduce the changeover and no-activity time, and motion.

    Placing the required tools close to machines.

    Increasing operator awareness, and skills.

    Visual Management- Use of instruction cards, marking of defects, photos, sketches.

    Synchronization- Simultaneous arrival of set-up card, blueprint, material at the machines.

    Focused on implementing a pull system.

    FINDINGS ACTIONS

  • Recommendations 1: Value Stream Mapping

    Value-stream maps are the blueprints for lean transformations because it shows you where you could apply lean techniques, such as kaizen events, for maximum effect

    Represents every process in the material and information flow of a product or product family, along with key data

    By establishing a direction for the companys improvement efforts maps become the blueprints for the lean transformation

    Identifying the target kaizen activities for bigger and more sustainable impact

    Gaining a better understanding of the linkages between material and information flow

    Visualize improvements to the overall production flow, instead of spot improvements to single processes

    Create the basis for an effective lean implementation plan by designing how a facilitys door -to-door material and information flow could operate

    Give operators, engineers, and managers a common language and process for continuous improvement

    It helps to identify the bottleneck process, the various waste element areas in the entire manufacturing process

    Helps to identify manufacturing value-add ratio (productivity) and percentage of NVA and ENVA.

    Conducting a VSM exercise will help the company in following ways,

  • Recommendation 2: Implementing Mixed Pull system

    Categorization of springs based on customer demand.

    A- 60% demand, B-25% demand, C-15% demand.

    Designing a replenishment pull system for A-category springs.

    Designing a sequential pull system for B and C- category springs to cope demand variations.

    Usage of empty containers instead of Kanbans. (Kanbans are considered as inventory).

    Further arrangements to convert the entire process into a sequential-pull system.

  • PRODUCTIONSCHEDULING

    CUSTOMER

    ORDER

    Steel wire was

    coiled into a

    spring

    WINDING

    Coils are shaped

    as specified

    KICK-PRESS

    Spring is set to

    correct length

    and stiffness

    TUNING

    Spring is

    ground, heated

    and washed

    GRINDING CELL

    Springs are

    packed as per

    orders

    PACKAGING SHIPPING

    Daily Schedule

    FIFO FIFOFIFOFIFOFIFO

    Implementing Mixed Pull system

  • Recommendation 3 : Improving set-up and changeover time

    Applying SMED by:

    Separating (move elements to external)

    Converting (modify elements so they can be external, or remove them completely)

    Streamlining (complete elements faster).

    Operators knowledge of machines are deepened.

    Slide tooling will help operators exchange plates quickly.

    Restricting range of parts on the general purpose machines.

    Inspection of only the first sample of products. (Machines will recognize errors)

    Making the change-over time visual.

    Maintaining Setup boxes next to machines for each part number

    Using slides tooling and mounting devices to use more than one part and provide some degree of automation.

    Adapting changes in the machine itself to permanently assist

    Challenge

  • Recommendation 4: Development of Good Metrics and not just Missions

    Under SEAL team, too many goals were assigned

    Lack of awareness about company vision and strategic goals

    Different groups pursued different agendas and effort is not linked to company strategy

    Lack of participation from operators and employees

    Feedback was tactical (short-term results) and not strategic

    Proposal: Create a Performance Measurement Framework

    Reflects the goals and objectives of organization

    Helps managers at all levels understand both drivers and results of their activities

    Metrics present information and quantified measures Helps to identify what should be done

    Helps to identify who should do it

    Foster process understanding and individuals and teams at all levels relate to it

  • Proposed Performance Measurement Framework

    Strategic Objectives Value Stream Goal Value Stream Measures Cell Critical Success

    factors

    Cell Goals Cell Measures

    Increased Sales and

    market share

    Increase customer

    satisfaction

    Create Continuous improvement

    culture

    Educate workforce

    Timely Delivery

    Reduce order fulfillment time

    Reduce inventory

    (RM / FG)

    Improve Quality

    Improve Productivity

    Increase Output

    per unit cost of

    production

    Optimize use of labour

    Employee

    advancement

    Eliminate poor

    financial

    management

    Delivery-on-time

    On-time shipments Dock-to-Dock

    time

    Manufacturing cycle time

    First Time Through Capacity

    Utilization

    Value added-to-sales ratio

    Average cost per unit

    Product yield per

    employee

    Average cross

    training per person

    Eliminate obstacles

    to flow

    Use Standard Work

    Make products on

    time

    Effective Visual

    Pull

    Quick Changeover

    on machines

    Quality Operator

    participation

    Labour

    productivity

    Increase training

    Reduce Cycle Time

    Set-up time reduction

    Eliminate machine

    downtime

    Introduce Single

    Piece Flow

    Reduce motion

    Consistent Tool

    change

    Eliminate

    Variability

    Reduce inspection

    time

    Reduce overtime Increase Cross-

    Training

    Implement 5S

    WIP-to-SWIP

    OEE First Time Through

    Walking Distance

    Set-up time Machine

    Utilization

    Cross-Training

    Chart and Skill

    Chart

    5S Audit

  • Press

    Secondary Press

    Spring

    SC

    MC

    SC

    AL

    T

    ForSlide

    To Customer

    Staging

    Secondary Operations

    Grinding

    Deburring

    Washing

    Plating

    Heat Treatment

    WIP StoreProcesses

    Raw Material

    Supplier

    Customer

    Packaging

    At CSSC: Challenge

    Instructions from Centralized

    Production Control Team

    Production on basis of

    availability of material

    Parts added to WIP/Finished Goods Store

    Recommendation 5 : Proposed Information flow:

    Customer Co-ordinate Raw Material, Order and Shipment The raw Material supplier be intimated (w.r.t lead time) about

    the raw Material that has to be supplied to CSSC Plant

    Dedicated Shipping team to draw order from the Market Pull from Shipment according to order Sequence

    Order Material

    according to

    requirements

    Pull from Shipment according to Order

    sequence

    Dedicated Shipping team to draw order from

    Market

  • Standardization:

    Formulate parameters for new parts and document them.

    Machine Specifications, running speeds and settings be

    recorded.

    Establish minimum required skill for a specific part and

    machine.

    Part Delivery details be documented for future orders.

    PPC (Production Planning and Control) manuals be prepared.

    Kaizan improvements and Cost improvements

    Knowledge sharing be done across the employees and teams to

    learn best practices.

    Recommendation 6 : Standardization & Automation

    Automation:

    Establish minimum Level 3 Automation through the

    plant.

    Automatically loading of parts

    Operation based on specific count e.g. cutting to a

    specific size

    Automatically shutting down in case of unmatched

    material

    Can be used in Material Handling and improving

    material flow across the consuming cells and raw

    material areas.

  • Challenges : Cost Recommendation 7Introduce Value Stream Costing because it serves the following purposes,

    So, how can this corporation go about implementing VS costing

    Report the costs by Value stream and not by departments

    Generating Weekly value stream income statements because more frequent income statements give

    better understanding, better control, and timely lean improvement activities

    (Perfection)

    Introduction of control through visual management because it empowers VS teams to make

    better and faster improvements

    The resources (man, machine, material) in the company should be assigned to the entire value stream and not to an individual

    departments

    Introduction of a shared service department which will do all

    daily allocations and calculations and appointment of a VS

    Manager (Value and Accountability)

    Standardizing the production process and all the back end

    operations

    Continuously monitoring the activities across entire VS and

    identifying problems, RCA and implementing Solutions

    Difficulty in assigning costs for hundreds of product part numbers and complex parts

    Difficulty in measuring profitability

    Increase in costs due to redundant purchasing and sales and hence difficulty in assigning the costs

    Focus on entire value stream and not on a single operationLean focused information

    Simplified financial reporting that is common to everyone

    Most of the costs involved can be directly allocated to the Value

    stream rather than independently assigning it to separate departments

  • IMPLEMENTING CELLULAR LAYOUT

    Steel wire was coiled into a spring on a winding machine.

    The ends of the coil were shaped as

    specified by a kick-press.

    The spring is set to its correct length and

    stiffness.

    The springs are ground.

    The springs are heated to impart strength and

    hardness to them.

    The springs are then washed.

    The springs are finally packed as per the

    orders.

    The packaged springs are then sent to the distribution centers.

    Going a Step Further

  • AUTOMATING THE UPSTREAM PROCESS

    Item and Qty. check

    Safety stock check

    Obsolete reference

    check

    Vendor & Price check

    Max./Min. lot size check

    Rounding val. check

    Correct qty. check

    Mode check

    Without Automation

    Automated Inputs to System

    Safety Stock check ,Obsolete reference ,Vendor & price check ,Max./Min lot

    size check ,Rounding val. Check ,Correct qty. check.

    Item & Qty. Check Mode check

    Post Automation

    No. of steps before automation: 8

    No. of steps post automation:

    2

    i.e. 75%(6/8) improvement in

    efficiency over current process,

    assuming all process steps

    took equal time.

    DIVISON-ED/M1, M2 and MC (SOE) AREA-VENDOR MANAGEMENT

  • Under utilization of highly skilled workforce

    Human resources involved in manual work which can be automated

    Billable hours invested in non value added activities

    Wastage of direct revenue over non value adding activities

    Opportunity cost lost in form of revenue which could have been generated in the same time through the same labor

    Estimated Revenue Impact

    No. of hours for manual work by buyer per day 4

    Total Hours worked in a day 9

    No. of working days in a month 20

    Wasted time (hours) in a month 80

    Buyer's monthly salary 45000

    Per day salary 2250

    Per hour salary 250

    Amount of money wasted for a day for the 4 hours 1000

    Amount of money wasted for the month 20000

    Amount of money wasted in the year 240000

    Opportunity cost 240000

    Total money wasted 480000

    After Automation

    Revenue saved 480000

    Efficiency increased (in hrs.) = (9-5)/9*100 44.44444

    Inefficiencies in manual process

  • THANK YOU