56
Geology 228/378 Applied and Environmental Geophysics Lecture 14 Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

Lect_GPR

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Lecture for GPR Survey

Citation preview

Page 1: Lect_GPR

Geology 228/378Applied and Environmental

Geophysics

Lecture 14Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

Page 2: Lect_GPR
Page 3: Lect_GPR

Outline

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) 1. GPR System 2. Fundamental principles3. Coupled with the media:What physical parameters play role? 4. Penetration versus resolution:Can see and cannot see5. Examples

Page 4: Lect_GPR

RADAR is an acronym coined in the 1934 for RAdioDetection And Ranging (Buderi, 1996; Centre for the History of Defence Electronics). The first ground penetrating radar (GPR) survey was performed in Austria in 1929 to sound the depth of a glacier (Stern, 1929, 1930). The technology was largely forgotten (despite more than 36 patents filed between 1936 and 1971 that might loosely be called subsurface radar) until the late 1950's when U.S. Air Force radars were seeing through ice as planes tried to land in Greenland, but misread the altitude and crashed into the ice. This started investigations into the ability of radar to see into the subsurface not only for ice sounding but also mapping subsoil properties and the water table (Cook, 1964; Barringer, 1965; Lundien, 1966).

Page 5: Lect_GPR

In 1967, a system much like Stern's original glacier sounder wasproposed, and eventually built and flown as the Surface Electrical Properties Experiment on Apollo 17 to the moon (Simmons et al., 1972, see also the Apollo 17 Lunar Sounder Experiment). Before the early 1970's, if you wanted to do GPR, you had to build your own (Ohio State University Electroscience Laboratory). But in 1972, Rex Morey and Art Drake began Geophysical Survey Systems Inc. to sell commercial ground penetrating radar systems (Morey, 1974). Thus began an explosion of applications, publications, and research, fostered in great part by research contracts from the Geological Survey of Canada, the U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL), and others. There are now over 300 patents that might loosely be related to ground penetrating radar around the world (Patent Office).

Page 6: Lect_GPR

Ground penetrating radar (GPR) is sometimes called georadar, ground probing radar, or subsurface radar. GPR uses electromagnetic wave propagation and scattering to image, locateand quantitatively identify contrasts in electrical and magneticproperties in the ground. It may be performed from the surface of the earth, in a borehole or between boreholes, from aircraft or satellites.

GPR has the highest resolution in subsurface imaging of any geophysical method, approaching centimeters under the right conditions. Depth of Investigation varies from less than a meter to over 5,400 meters (over glacial ice sheet), depending upon material properties.

Page 7: Lect_GPR

Detectability of a subsurface feature depends upon contrast in electrical and magnetic properties, and the geometric relationship with the antenna. Quantitative interpretation through modeling can derive from ground penetrating radar data such information as depth, orientation, size and shape of buried objects, density and water content of soils, and much more.

Page 8: Lect_GPR
Page 9: Lect_GPR
Page 10: Lect_GPR

1-GHz GPR on the Paved sidewalk of UConn CEE Building

Page 11: Lect_GPR

GPR system

Page 12: Lect_GPR

GPR System: AntennasGeneric properties describing antennas:

Simple Dipoles Loaded Dipoles Folded Dipoles Bowtie Logarithmic Spiral End Fire Slot Fractal Arrays

Page 13: Lect_GPR

GSSI 1.0 GHz SIR 20 System with Horn Antenna mounted on a pavement assessment vehicle

Page 14: Lect_GPR

Horn Antenna and its time function (impulse) and footprint

Page 15: Lect_GPR

Electromagnetic wave

Page 16: Lect_GPR

Maxwell Equations

0=⋅∇

=⋅∇∂∂

+=×∇

∂∂

−=×∇

B

D

DJH

BE

e

t

t

ρ

Faraday’s law

Ampere’s law

Gaussian Theorem, elec.

Gaussian Theorem, mag.

James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879)

Page 17: Lect_GPR

The electromagnetic constitutive relationships

• The magnetic permeability in free space:

• The dielectric permittivity in free space:

mHenry /104 70

−×= πµ

r

r

µµµεεε

µε

0

0

====

HBED electric displacement and electric field

magnetic Induction and magnetic field

dielectric permittivity

magnetic permeability

mFarady /1036

1 90

−×=π

ε

Page 18: Lect_GPR

Representative physical properties of basic constituents and composites of soil*

Material Porosity(%)

WaterSaturation

(%)

DielectricConstant

ElectricalConductivity

(mS/m)

Velocity(m/ns)

Attenuation(Np/m)

Skindepth(m)

Air - - 1 0 0.300 0 ∝Water - - 81 1 0.033 0.021 47.7Ice 3.7-4.0Dry Sand 30 0 4 0.1 0.150 0.009 106Wet Sand 30 100 17.2

2521.310

0.0720.060

0.970.38

1.02.6

Dry Clay 30 0 4 10 0.150 0.94 1.1Wet Clay 30 100 17.7

1631.3100

0.0710.075

1.404.71

0.70.2

Average Soil 30 - 16 20 0.075 0.94 1.1*(1) The unit of the electrical conductivity is mili-Siemens per meter (mS/m);

The unit of the velocity is meters per nano-second (m/ns);The unit of the attenuation is nepers per meter (Np/m);The unit of the skip depth is meter (m).

(2) In the first row of the Wet Sand and Wet Clay, the dielectric constants are calculatedfrom the CRIM model; the electrical conductivities are calculated from Archie’s law;In the second row of the Wet Sand and Wet Clay, the dielectric constants and theelectrical conductivities are ‘typical’ values averaged from difference sources.

Page 19: Lect_GPR

Electrical Properties of Earth materials (Rocks, Soils and Fluids (air, water, and liquid phase contaminants)

The electrical and magnetic properties of rocks, soils and fluids (natural materials) control the speed of propagation of radar waves and their attenuation (amplitude decay and pulse broadening). In most cases, the electrical properties are much more important than the magnetic properties. At radar frequencies, electrical properties are dominantly controlled by rock or soil density, and by the chemistry, state (liquid/gas/solid), distribution (pore space connectivity) and content of water.

Page 20: Lect_GPR

Electrical properties come in two basic types: one that describes energy dissipation and one that describes energy storage. Electrical dissipation comes as the result of charge motion (or transport) called conduction. Electrical conductivity is the ability of a material to transport charge through the process of conduction, normalized by geometry to describe a material property. Dissipation (or energy loss) results from the conversion of electrical energy to thermal energy (Joule heating) through momentum transfer during collisions as the charges move. Electrical storage is the result of charge storing energy when the application of an external force moves the charge from some equilibrium position and there is a restoring force trying to move the charge back. This process is dielectric polarization, normalized by geometry to be the material property called dielectric permittivity. As polarization occurs, causing charges to move, the charge motion is also dissipative.

Page 21: Lect_GPR

In either case, charge motion is described by the diffusion equation. Charges moving with finite velocity result in frequency dependent properties described by overdampedharmonic oscillators and the Debye single relaxation equation (Pellat, 1897; Debye, 1929) at frequencies below tens of gigahertz. Adding the storage force balance in the acceleration term to the diffusion equation results in a wave propagation equation. The combined electrical and magnetic storage (polarization) terms through the properties of dielectric permittivity and magnetic permeability control the velocity of electromagnetic wave propagation.

Page 22: Lect_GPR

As we have discussed in the Induced Polarization lecture,electrical polarization is the result of a wide variety of processes, including polarization of electrons in orbits around atoms, distortion of molecules, reorientation of polar moelcules(like water molecules), accumulation of charge at interfaces, and electrochemical reactions. Nearly all polarization of importance in earth materials is the result of some interaction involving water (Franks, 1970). The dominant mechanisms of electrical conduction are ionic charge transport through water filling porespaces in rocks and soils.

Page 23: Lect_GPR

Dielectric permittivity ε:

A non-conducting material whose molecules align or polarize under the influence of applied electric fields.

Electric conductivity σ:

Electronic transport.

Magnetic permeability µ:

Related to magnetic susceptibility.

Page 24: Lect_GPR

.

Electric conductivity σ:

Electronic transport. GPR cannot work effectively when resistivity lower than 100 ohm-meter.

Page 25: Lect_GPR

Radar wave velocity v:

rrr

ccvεµε

≈=

c is the speed of light, we got the approximate equality for the second for non-magnetic material.

Page 26: Lect_GPR

Radar wave attenuation α:

rr

r

επσ

εµ

πσε

µσα 6060

2≈==

The unit for attenuation coefficient is Neper/meter. Neper is dimensionless; σ is the conductivity, we got the approximate equality for non-magnetic material. For example, for freshwater with conductivity of 0.01 S/m, and dielectric constant of 81, we get attenuation of .2094 Neper/meter.

Page 27: Lect_GPR

Skin depth δ:Skin depth is defined as the depth at which the amplitude decays to 1/e (0.368) of its original value.

σε

δ r31.5≈

σ is the conductivity and in unit of mS/meter, this is an approximate equality for non-magnetic material.

Page 28: Lect_GPR

Comparison between GPR and Seismic Reflection

In-elasticityElectric conductivityAttenuation determined by

Elastic modulii & densityDielectric constant, mag. permeaVelocity determined by

Positive gradient wrt zNegative gradient wrt zVelocity structure

0.3 -3 x 103 m/s0.3 -3 x 108 m/svelocity

Meter to kilometerCentimeter to 10 meterwavelength

1 - 1000 Hz10 - 1500 106 HzFrequency

Seismic ReflectionGPRItem

resolution 1/2 - 1/4 of the wavelength 1/2 - 1/4 of the wavelength

penetration Max. ~20 m (soil, rock), 1 km ice Max. ~10 km rock

Page 29: Lect_GPR

Things to bring for GPR Fieldwork• GPR control unit;• Antennas (25, 50, 100, 200, 400 MHz, and 1 GHz);• Fiber-optical cables;• Cable to PC computer;• Laptop computer;• Spare computer batteries;• Spare GPR batteries;• Wooden towing plate for 200 and 400 MHz antennas;• A can of high-pressure air for cleaning;• Tool box;• Tape measures;• Pins to lay down the tape measures;• Hand-held GPS receiver to mark locations of the profile;• Magnetic compass;• Flags and paints.Notes:• Make sure batteries are fully charged before go to field;• Make sure to take good care of the fiber optical cables;• Make sure to cover the optical connectors properly.

Page 30: Lect_GPR

Field Examples

• Geotechnical• Hydrogeology• Environmental cleanup• Archeology• ...

Page 31: Lect_GPR
Page 32: Lect_GPR

GPR survey of block wall using 1500 MHz antenna, GPR image showing rebar, and confirmation of rebar locations (note cut-away in wall to expose rebar)

Page 33: Lect_GPR

GPR image with a 400 MHz antenna of three underground storage tanks (UST, left), and UST being removed from ground (right).

Page 34: Lect_GPR
Page 35: Lect_GPR
Page 36: Lect_GPR
Page 37: Lect_GPR

A Hydrogeological Application

• MirrorLake test site, Grafton county, New Hampshire

• Geology– Granite with small amounts of chist– Intruded by pegmatite and aplite dikes – Poorly connected, deeply dipping fractures– Two hydraulically conductive zones (upper: 10-7—10-6

m/s; lower: 10-6—10-5 m/s)

Page 38: Lect_GPR

A Hydrogeological Application

• FSE Well Field, Mirror Lake, NH

Page 39: Lect_GPR
Page 40: Lect_GPR

Electric Conductivity (S/m)

Page 41: Lect_GPR

GPR Profile Parallel to Tennis Courts

Page 42: Lect_GPR

GPR Profile Normal to Tennis Courts

Page 43: Lect_GPR

GPR Result (100 MHz)

Page 44: Lect_GPR

A 300 feet long GPR profile consisting 1,576 traces obtained from WAFB, Michigan, USA

Page 45: Lect_GPR

Field Examples

• Archeology investigation of the Nathan Hale Monument

Page 46: Lect_GPR
Page 47: Lect_GPR
Page 48: Lect_GPR
Page 49: Lect_GPR
Page 50: Lect_GPR
Page 51: Lect_GPR
Page 52: Lect_GPR
Page 53: Lect_GPR
Page 54: Lect_GPR
Page 55: Lect_GPR
Page 56: Lect_GPR

Summary of GPR

• High resolution imaging;• Ideal for resistive ground;• Work best for searching large electric

property contrast (concrete/re-bar);• Still challenging for direct search and

image contaminants;• Need sophisticated interpretation skill.