2
Pimentel, Mark Anthony B. JD 1C1 Legal Research Employers have the freedom and prerogative, according to their discretion and best judgment, to regulate and control all aspects of employment in their business organizations. Such aspects of employment include hiring, work assignments, working-methods, time, place and manner of work, supervision of workers, working regulations, transfer of employees, work suspension, lay-off of workers and discipline, dismissal and recall of workers. (Philippine Airlines vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 115785, August 4, 2000). As in case of AAA Inc. who wanted to implement a labor rationalization scheme with the intention of reducing the number of Executive Systems Administrators from 100 to 50 and transferring back the other 50 to their previous and lower position of Head Technical Support and maintaining the salaries of ESAs. AAA Inc., however, believes that there is no demotion considering that there is no change in pay and benefits of the employees transferred back to their previous position. Jurisprudence has shown that there is demotion when an employee is appointed to a position that results in a diminution in duties, responsibilities, status or rank which may or may not involve a reduction in salary. Where an employee is appointed to a position with the same duties and responsibilities with a rank and salary higher than those he enjoyed in his previous position, there is no demotion and the appointment is valid. (Virginia D. Bautista vs. Civil Service Commission and Development Bank of the Philippines, G.R. No. 185215, July 22, 2010). Also, citing the case of Norkis Trading Co., Inc. and/or Manuel Gaspar E. Albos, Jr. vs Melvin Nilo, G.R. No. 159730 , the court ruled that the transfer of respondent from Credit and Collection Manager to Marketing Assistant did not result in the reduction of his salary, there was a reduction in his duties and responsibilities which amounted to a demotion tantamount to a constructive dismissal as correctly held by the NLRC and the CA. It is clear from the abovementioned statements that there is demotion if a person’s appointment resulted in a diminution of his duties, responsibilities, status or rank even though there is no reduction in his salary. The mere showing that there is a reduction or lowering in position,

Legres III

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

legal research

Citation preview

Pimentel, Mark Anthony B.JD 1C1Legal Research

Employers have the freedom and prerogative, according to their discretion and best judgment, to regulate and control all aspects of employment in their business organizations. Such aspects of employment include hiring, work assignments, working-methods, time, place and manner of work, supervision of workers, working regulations, transfer of employees, work suspension, lay-off of workers and discipline, dismissal and recall of workers. (Philippine Airlines vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 115785, August 4, 2000).

As in case of AAA Inc. who wanted to implement a labor rationalization scheme with the intention of reducing the number of Executive Systems Administrators from 100 to 50 and transferring back the other 50 to their previous and lower position of Head Technical Support and maintaining the salaries of ESAs. AAA Inc., however, believes that there is no demotion considering that there is no change in pay and benefits of the employees transferred back to their previous position.

Jurisprudence has shown that there is demotion when an employee is appointed to a position that results in a diminution in duties, responsibilities, status or rank which may or may not involve a reduction in salary. Where an employee is appointed to a position with the same duties and responsibilities with a rank and salary higher than those he enjoyed in his previous position, there is no demotion and the appointment is valid. (Virginia D. Bautista vs. Civil Service Commission and Development Bank of the Philippines, G.R. No. 185215, July 22, 2010). Also, citing the case of Norkis Trading Co., Inc. and/or Manuel Gaspar E. Albos, Jr. vs Melvin Nilo, G.R. No. 159730, the court ruled that the transfer of respondent from Credit and Collection Managerto Marketing Assistant did not result in the reduction of his salary, there was a reduction in his duties and responsibilities which amounted to a demotion tantamount to a constructive dismissal as correctly held by the NLRC and the CA.

It is clear from the abovementioned statements that there is demotion if a persons appointment resulted in a diminution of his duties, responsibilities, status or rank even though there is no reduction in his salary. The mere showing that there is a reduction or lowering in position, rank or responsibilities as a result of a transfer from the previous one, considering that there is no change in pay and benefits would still constitutes a demotion.

Therefore, if the said labor rationalization scheme will be fully implemented by AAA Inc. there would be a clear manifestation of demotion.