22
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1999,31 (3), 531-552 A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, Image variability, and age of acquisition F.-XAVIER ALARIO and LUDOVIC FERRAND CNRS and Unioersite Rene Descartes, Paris, France The present article provides Freneh normative measures for 400 line drawings taken from Cyeowiez, Friedman, Rothstein, and Snodgrass (1997), including the 260 line drawings that were normed by Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980). The pictures have been standardized on the following variables: name agreement, Image agreement, familiarity, visual eomplexity, Image variability, and age of acqui- sition. These normative data also include word frequeney values and the first verbal associate (taken from Ferrand & Alario, 1998). The six variables obtained are important beeause of their potential ef- feet in many fields of psyehology, especially the study of eognitive processes such as visual perception, language, and memory. 531 Inrecent years, experiments employing pietures of ob- jeets have proliferated. However, little standardization of line drawings exists. To date, each investigator has been foreed to develop his or her own set of pietures, whieh are neeessarily highly idiosyncratie (Snodgrass, Levy- Berger, & Haydon, 1985). One exception is the pioneer- ing work of Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980). These authors have provided a set of 260 pictures (blaek-and- white line drawings) that have been standardized on four variables of relevanee to experimentation in visual per- eeption, language, and memory. The four variables eol- leeted were name agreement (the degree to whieh sub- jects agree on the name ofthe pieture), image agreement (the degree to which images generated by subjects to a pieture's name agree with the pieture's appearanee), fa- miliarity (the familiarity ofthe eoncept depicted), and vi- sual complexity (the amount of lines and details in the drawing). These normative data for pietures were col- leeted in Ameriean English for young adults. Since then, other normative data for pictures have been collected by Berman, Friedman, Hamberger, and Snod- grass (1989) for 5- and 6-year-old ehildren and by Cy- cowiez, Friedman, Rothstein, and Snodgrass (1997) for 8- to 10-year-old ehildren. More reeently, these normative This research was supported by a grant from the Direction de la Recherche et de la Technologie (a division ofthe Direction Generale de I'Armement) to the first author. We are grateful to Robert Proctor, Joan Gay Snodgrass, Carmen Sanfeliu, Ronald Peereman, and Juan Segui for helpful feedback on an earlier version of this manuscript. Thanks are extended to Carmen Sanfeliu for sending the set of data for Span- ish and English. Correspondence conceming this article should be ad- dressed to F.-X. Alario or to L. Ferrand, CNRS and Universite Rene Descartes, Laboratoire de Psychologie Experimentale, 28 rue Serpente, 75006 Paris, France (e-mail: [email protected]@ psycho.univ-paris5.fr). data have also been collected for adults in British English (Barry, Morrison, & Ellis, 1997; Vitkovitch & Tyrrell, 1995), in Spanish (Sanfeliu & Femandez, 1996), and in Dutch (Martein, 1995). However, to our knowledge, there is no such normative database available in Freneh. Be- eause it is vital for the experimenter to have as much con- trol of the experimental situation as possible, careful se- lection of stimuli is necessary. The present article provides normative measures for 400 line drawings and their corre- sponding names viewed by French-speaking young adults. When available, these normative studies have been ex- tremely useful in many fields of psychology, including memory and language, through the use of different kinds of subjects (e.g., children, adults, and pathologieal cases). Coneerning the study of language, for instance, these databases have been used to study the processes in- volved in pieture naming (e.g., Ferrand, Grainger, & Segui, 1994; Ferrand, Humphreys, & Segui, 1998; Humphreys, Lamote, & Lloyd-Jones, 1995; Johnson, Paivio, & Clark, 1996; Snodgrass & Yuditsky, 1996) and, more generally, in speech production (e.g., Ferrand & Segui, 1998; Fer- rand, Segui, & Grainger, 1996). These normative data have also been very useful in the fields of perceptual identifieation and recognition (e.g., Kroll & Potter, 1984; Snodgrass & Poster, 1992) and implicit memory (e.g., Feenan & Snodgrass, 1990; Hirshman, Snodgrass, Min- des, & Feenan, 1990; Snodgrass & Feenan, 1990; Snod- grass, Smith, Feenan, & Corwin, 1987; Snodgrass & Sur- prenant, 1989). The motivation for the present study was to obtain a normative database for pictorial material that will be use- ful for future studies with French-speaking subjeets. We eonducted a study in which the stimuli were the 400 pic- tures used by Cycowicz et al. (1997), including the 260 line drawings that were normed by Snodgrass and Van- Copyright 1999 Psyehonomie Soeiety, Ine.

link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers1999,31 (3), 531-552

A set of 400 pictures standardized for French:Norms for name agreement, image agreement,familiarity, visual complexity, Image variability,

and age of acquisition

F.-XAVIER ALARIO and LUDOVIC FERRANDCNRS and Unioersite Rene Descartes, Paris, France

The present article provides Freneh normative measures for 400 line drawings taken from Cyeowiez,Friedman, Rothstein, and Snodgrass (1997), including the 260 line drawings that were normed bySnodgrass and Vanderwart (1980). The pictures have been standardized on the following variables:name agreement, Image agreement, familiarity, visual eomplexity, Image variability, and age of acqui­sition. These normative data also include word frequeney values and the first verbal associate (takenfrom Ferrand & Alario, 1998). The six variables obtained are important beeause of their potential ef­feet in many fields of psyehology, especially the study of eognitive processes such as visual perception,language, and memory.

531

Inrecent years, experiments employing pietures ofob­jeets have proliferated. However, little standardization ofline drawings exists. To date, each investigator has beenforeed to develop his or her own set of pietures, whiehare neeessarily highly idiosyncratie (Snodgrass, Levy­Berger, & Haydon, 1985). One exception is the pioneer­ing work of Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980). Theseauthors have provided a set of 260 pictures (blaek-and­white line drawings) that have been standardized on fourvariables of relevanee to experimentation in visual per­eeption, language, and memory. The four variables eol­leeted were name agreement (the degree to whieh sub­jects agree on the name ofthe pieture), image agreement(the degree to which images generated by subjects to apieture's name agree with the pieture's appearanee), fa­miliarity (the familiarity ofthe eoncept depicted), and vi­sual complexity (the amount of lines and details in thedrawing). These normative data for pietures were col­leeted in Ameriean English for young adults.

Since then, other normative data for pictures have beencollected by Berman, Friedman, Hamberger, and Snod­grass (1989) for 5- and 6-year-old ehildren and by Cy­cowiez, Friedman, Rothstein, and Snodgrass (1997) for 8­to 10-year-old ehildren. More reeently, these normative

This research was supported by a grant from the Direction de laRecherche et de la Technologie (a division ofthe Direction Generale deI'Armement) to the first author. We are grateful to Robert Proctor, JoanGay Snodgrass, Carmen Sanfeliu, Ronald Peereman, and Juan Seguifor helpful feedback on an earlier version of this manuscript. Thanksare extended to Carmen Sanfeliu for sending the set of data for Span­ish and English. Correspondence conceming this article should be ad­dressed to F.-X. Alario or to L. Ferrand, CNRS and Universite ReneDescartes, Laboratoire de Psychologie Experimentale, 28 rue Serpente,75006 Paris, France (e-mail: [email protected]@psycho.univ-paris5.fr).

data have also been collected for adults in British English(Barry, Morrison, & Ellis, 1997; Vitkovitch & Tyrrell,1995), in Spanish (Sanfeliu & Femandez, 1996), and inDutch (Martein, 1995). However, to our knowledge, thereis no such normative database available in Freneh. Be­eause it is vital for the experimenter to have as much con­trol of the experimental situation as possible, careful se­lection ofstimuli is necessary. The present article providesnormative measures for 400 line drawings and their corre­sponding names viewed by French-speaking young adults.

When available, these normative studies have been ex­tremely useful in many fields of psychology, includingmemory and language, through the use ofdifferent kindsof subjects (e.g., children, adults, and pathologiealcases). Coneerning the study of language, for instance,these databases have been used to study the processes in­volved in pieture naming (e.g., Ferrand, Grainger, & Segui,1994; Ferrand, Humphreys, & Segui, 1998; Humphreys,Lamote, & Lloyd-Jones, 1995; Johnson, Paivio, & Clark,1996; Snodgrass & Yuditsky, 1996) and, more generally,in speech production (e.g., Ferrand & Segui, 1998; Fer­rand, Segui, & Grainger, 1996). These normative datahave also been very useful in the fields of perceptualidentifieation and recognition (e.g., Kroll & Potter, 1984;Snodgrass & Poster, 1992) and implicit memory (e.g.,Feenan & Snodgrass, 1990; Hirshman, Snodgrass, Min­des, & Feenan, 1990; Snodgrass & Feenan, 1990; Snod­grass, Smith, Feenan, & Corwin, 1987; Snodgrass & Sur­prenant, 1989).

The motivation for the present study was to obtain anormative database for pictorial material that will be use­ful for future studies with French-speaking subjeets. Weeonducted a study in which the stimuli were the 400 pic­tures used by Cycowicz et al. (1997), including the 260line drawings that were normed by Snodgrass and Van-

Copyright 1999 Psyehonomie Soeiety, Ine.

Page 2: link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

532 ALARIO AND FERRAND

derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van­derwart's procedure, norms for name agreement, imageagreement, picture familiarity, visual complexity, imagevariability, and age of acquisition were collected. Thenormative database also include the most common namegiven to each of the 400 concepts (modal name), wordfrequency (taken from Content, Mousty, & Radeau,1990), and the first verbal associate ofthe names ofthepictures (taken from Ferrand & Alario, 1998).

In what follows, we briefly discuss empirical findingsrelated to each variable. Name agreement refers to thedegree to which subjects agree on the name of the pic­ture. This information is important for naming latencystudies, picture-name matehing studies, recall memorystudies, and recognition studies in which verbal encod­ing is manipulated. Name agreement is measured bythe number of different names given to a particular pic­ture across subjects. Pictures that elicit many differentnames have lower name agreement than those eliciting asingle name. Name agreement is a robust predictor ofnaming difficulty. Pictures with a single dominant re­sponse are named more quickly and accurately thanthose with multiple responses (Barry et al., 1997; Lach­man, Shaffer, & Hennrikus, 1974; Paivio, Clark, Digdon,& Bons, 1989; Vitkovitch & Tyrrell, 1995). More impor­tant, name agreement affects naming independently ofthe effects of correlated attributes, such as word fre­quency and rated age of name acquisition (Lachman etal., 1974).

Image agreement refers to the degree to which imagesgenerated by subjects to a picture's name agree with thepicture's appearance. Barry et al. (1997) showed that pic­tures with higher ratings ofimage agreement were namedfaster than were those with lower ratings. They sug­gested that image agreement has its influence at the levelof object recognition, so that the closer a picture is toone's mental image of an object, the faster the namingtime for that item will be.

Familiarity refers to the familiarity ofthe concept de­picted. Familiarity has been shown to have important ef­fects on various memory and cognitive processing tasks(see, e.g., Gernsbacher, 1984). In particular, Snodgrassand Yuditsky (1996) and Feyereisen, Van der Borght, andSeron (1988) showed that rated familiarity is an impor­tant predictor of picture-naming latencies, so that themore familiar a concept is, the faster the naming time forthat item will be.

Visual complexity refers to the amount oflines and de­tails in the drawing. It is supposed to determine the easeof processing at or before the structural stage of objectrecognition. Visual complexity may affect such variablesas naming latencies, tachistoscopic recognition thresh­olds, and memorability. Early research using pictorialstimuli has established that, when complexity is rnanip­ulated, more complex stimuli are more difficult to processthan simple stimuli (Attneave, 1957; Ellis & Morrison,1998). However, other investigators showed that com­plex objects are identified and named as readily as sim-

ple objects (Biederman, 1987; Paivio et al., 1989; Snod­grass & Corwin, 1988; Snodgrass & Yuditsky, 1996).

Forfrequency and age ofacquisition, picture-naminglatencies decrease as name frequency increases (Old­field & Wingfield, 1965) and increase as age ofword ac­quisition increases (Carroll & White, 1973; Ellis & Mor­rison, 1998). It is possible that the influence of wordfrequency on learning, memory, and perception dependson another attribute, such as the age at which the partic­ular word was first learned. Some investigators (Carroll& White, 1973; Ellis & Morrison, 1998; Morrison, Chap­pell, & Ellis, 1997; Morrison, Ellis, & Quinlan, 1992)suggested that age of acquisition is a more importantvariable than frequency in print, However, Barry et al.(1997) and Snodgrass and Yuditsky (1996) found thatthe time taken to name a pictured object correctly wasaffected both by rated age of acquisition and by the fre­quency ofthe name (in accordance with Lachman, 1973;Lachman et al., 1974). Interestingly, Barry et al. (1997)showed that the age-of-acquisition effect interacted withfrequency, the age-of-acquisition effect being more pro­nounced for pictures with low-frequency names.

METHOD

SubjectsA total of 173 students from introductory courses in psychology

from the Ecole des Psychologues Praticiens and from UniversiteRene Descartes in Paris participated in the study. Different subjectsparticipated in each of the six tasks. There were 28 in the nameagreement task, 30 in the image agreement task, 30 in the familiar­ity task, 29 in the visual complexity task, 30 in the image variabil­ity agreement task, and 26 in the age-of-acquisition task. All thesubjects were native French speakers and participated voluntarily asa course activity. The subjects were run in groups offrom 26 to 30in a classroom.

MaterialsThe pictures were the 400 black-and-white line drawings ofcom­

mon objects taken from Cycowicz et al. (1997). These pictures weredownloaded from the Internet (http://www.nyspi.cpmc.columbia.edu/nyspi/respaprs/picnorm.htm). Some ofthe originalline draw­ings (n = 7) were replaced for obvious reasons: The pictures hadbeen selected in the American context (things such as a baseballbat, a football heimet, or a pretzel are more familiar to Englishspeakers in America than to French speakers in France). In partic­ular, we replaced the following drawings (a baseball bat, a football,a football heimet, a fishing reel, a grocery bag, a baseball glove,and a pretzel) by drawings of objects more common in the Frenchspeakers' realm of experience (a ski, a French croissant, a motor­bike heimet, a swimsuit, a rugby ball, a fishing rod, and a super­market caddie). These seven pictures were adapted from two Frenchbooks of pictures (Des Mots en Images, 1988; L'imagier du PereCastor, 1991; they are available on request).

ProeedureThe procedure closely followed the steps described by Snodgrass

and Vanderwart (1980) and by Morrisson et al. (1997; for age ofac­quisition), both in terms ofthe tasks performed and in the way thetasks were done.

The name agreement task, the image agreement task, the famil­iarity task, and the complexity task were run in a similar way.How­ever, for the image variability task and the age-of-acquisition task,

Page 3: link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

the modalname ofthe object (instead ofthe object itself) was pre­sentedto the subjects. The400 pictureswere projected sequentiallyon a large white screen at the front of a slightly darkened room,using an overheadprojector.At the beginningofeach task, the sub­jects wereread the instructionsand eneouraged to answerearefullyand consistently. They weregiven individualanswer sheets and in­strueted to respond to every drawing. They were informed of thegeneralnatureofthe pictures-s-that is, that they were relativelysim­ple black-and-whiteoutline drawings.Each slide was presentedforaperiod of 5 sec. Halfway through the slides, the subjects weregiven a 15-min rest period. The total amount of time was about11/ 2 h.

In the name agreement task, the subjeetswere instructedto iden­tify the drawingwith the first name that eame to mind and to writethe name on the answer sheet. They were told that a name couldconsistofmore than one word.1fthat was not possible, they had toindieatewhether the reasonwasdon't know the object (DKO),don 'tknow the name (DKN), or tip ofthe tongue (TOT).

In the image agreement task, the subjects were asked to judgehow elosely eaeh picture resembled their mental image of the ob­jeet. Prior to presenting eaeh pieture, the experimenter ealled outthe pieture's most eommon name, waited approximately5 sec, andthen projected the picture on the sereen. During the 5-sec period,the subjects looked at the blank sereen and formed their mentalimageofthe named objeet. Following the appearance ofthe pictureon the sereen, the subjeets rated the degree of agreement betweentheir imageand the pieture,using the 5-pointseale. A ratingof I in­dieated low agreement, that the pieture provided a poor match totheir image, and a rating of 5 indieated high agreement.

In the familiarity task, the subjeets were asked to judge thefamiliarity of the eoncept of eaeh pieture "according to how usualor unusual the objeet is in your realm of experience." Familiaritywas defined as "the degree to whieh you eome in contact with orthink about the concept." They were told to rate the coneept itself,rather than the way it was drawn. Their answer to each itemwas again a whole number from a 5-point seale (1 = a very unfa­miliar object, 5 = a very familiar object). The subjects were en­couragedto employ the full range of scalevalues throughoutthe setof pictures.

The visual complexity task requiredthe subjects to rate the com­plexity of each drawing, rather than the complexity of the object itrepresented.They also had to provide ratings from a 5-point scale(I = drawing very simple, 5 = drawing very complex). Complex­ity was defined as the amountof detailsor the intricacy ofthe linesin the picture.

The two remaining tasks (image variability and age of acquisi­tion) consistedofjudgments on the names ofthe pictures.No over­head projector was used here. The subjects were given a four-pagebookletwith the 400 names ofthe pictures. In the image variabilitytask, they were instructed to rate on a 5-pointscale (I = few images,5 = many images) whether the name evoked few or manydifferentimagesfor that particular object. In the age-of-acquisitiontask, thesubjects were asked to estimate the age at which they thought theyhad learned each ofthe names, in its written or its oral form. Weal­tered the scale used by Morrison et al. (1997) from 7 points to 5points,where I = learned at 0-3 years and 5 = learned at age 12+,with 3-year age bands in between.For this specific task, 17wordswere repeated, to provide a reliability check. The correlation be­tween these repeated ratings was .94, and the means were not sig­nificantly different [2.68 vs. 2.56; t(16) = 0.11].

Concerning verbal association measures,we report Ferrand andAlario's (1998) results (when available for the present stimuli).Overall, 263 associations were available out of the 400 stimuli.These free association norms were collected by presenting a largegroup of French-speaking subjects (n = 89) with a written stimu­lus wordand asking them to respond with the first word they thinkof, as quickly as they can (for details, see Ferrand & Alario, 1998).

PICTURES STANDARDIZED FOR FRENCH 533

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A summary ofthe rating data obtained from our sam­pIe of French-speaking subjects is presented in Appen­dix A. To allow for easy reference and data comparison,entries are listed according to the identifying numbersoriginally assigned to each drawing by Cycowicz et al.(1997). Moreover, a computer file (Excel or ASCII for­mat) with all the data is available on request for researchfacilities. For each picture, the following information ispresented: (1) the most frequent name given in French(with an English translation); (2) two measures ofnameagreement, the statistic H (taken from Snodgrass & Van­derwart, 1980) and the percentage of subjects producingthe most common name; and (3) the means and standarddeviations for image agreement, familiarity, visual com­plexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Alongwith the ratings obtained for French-speaking subjects,Appendix A presents the frequency of the single name(taken from Content et al., 1990), as well as the first ver­bal associate (obtained by Ferrand & Alario, 1998). Ap­pendix B lists the alternate names given to each draw­ing, with an indication oftheir frequency. A frequency ofzero indicates that the single-word name did not occur inthe Content et al. corpus. Because the Content et al. cor­pus does not provide counts for names of more than oneword, these unavailable frequencies are indicated by adash. Failures in the naming task are listed as DKN,DKO, and TOT. All nondominant names given for eachconcept are listed and accompanied by their frequencies(when available).

Following Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980), we useda strict criterion for counting different instances ofnames when computing H values. In many cases, thename given by a subject was similar to but not identicalwith an established name category. A picture that elicitedthe same name from every subject in the sampIe who wasable to name it has an H value of .00. Increasing H val­ues indicate decreasing name agreement and, generally,decreasing percentages of subjects who all gave the samename. According to Snodgrass and Vanderwart,

the H value captures more information about the distrib­ution of names across subjects than does the percentageagreement measure. For example, iftwo concepts both aregiven their dominant name by 60% of the subjects, butone is given a single other name and the second is givenfour other names, both concepts will have equal percent­age agreement scores, but the first will have a lower Hvalue. (p. 184)

Table 1 presents summary statistics for the followingindices: H (reflecting name agreement), percentage ofsubjects producing the modal names, image agreement,familiarity, complexity, variability, age of acquisition,and frequency. Although Hand percentage are two mea­sures ofname agreement, following Snodgrass and Van­derwart's (1980) arguments, we will use H as the mea­sure of name agreement. The 25th (Ql) and the 75th(Q3) percentiles are shown to facilitate selection ofcon-

Page 4: link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

534 ALARIO AND FERRAND

Table 1Summary Statistics for All Variables

NameAgreement Image Image

Statistic H* % Agreement Familiarity Complexity Variability A-A F

M 0.36 84.63 3.44 2.72 3.09 2.76 2.56 29.82SD 0.43 20.31 0.78 1.19 0.92 0.63 0.79 78.96Median 0.15 96 3.57 2.42 3.07 2.60 2.51 7.04Range 1.87 82 3.90 3.94 4 3.50 3.65 892Min 0 18 1 1.03 I 1.20 1.12 0Max 1.87 100 4.90 4.97 5 4.70 4.77 892QI 0 75 2.97 1.73 2.38 2.30 1.95 1.61Q3 0.65 100 4 3.77 3.74 3.17 3.08 21.88IRQ 0.65 25 1.03 2.04 1.36 0.87 1.13 20.27Skew 3.33 0.19 0.72 1.98 0.97 1.90 1.02 2.74

Note-H, name agreement; A-A, age of acquisition; F, frequency (taken from Content, Mousty, & Radeau,1990); Ql, 25thpercentile; Q3, 75th percentile; IRQ, interquartile range; skew, (Q3 - Median)/(Median - QI); >I is positivelyskewed. *Increasing H values indicate decreasing name agreement.

cepts from the extremes of the distribution. The distrib­ution ofH valueshas a low mean and is positively skewed,reflecting the fact that many concepts show high nameagreement.

Table 2 presents summary statistics for the followingindices: H, image agreement, familiarity, and complex­ity. This table contains the summary for the French sam­pIes of the current study, the Spanish-speaking sampIesreported by Sanfeliu and Fernändez (1996), and theEnglish-speaking sampIes reported by Snodgrass andVanderwart (1980). As can be seen from this table, therewere small differences for image agreement, familiarity,and complexity. There was a larger difference when theH value was considered. The English-speaking sampIehad bigger H values than did the French and Spanishones. It seems to indicate that the French sampIe and theSpanish sampIe showed less variability in the number ofnames applied to objects than did the English-speakingsampIe.

We performed two correlational analyses on the data.The first one correlated (1) the data provided by Snod­grass and Vanderwart (1980) with the data obtained inthe present study (for the 253 drawings common to bothstudies) for H, image agreement, familiarity, and visual

complexity and (2) the data provided by Sanfeliu andFernandez (1996) with the data obtained in the presentstudy for the same variables. As is shown in Tables 3 and4, there were fairly high and significant correlations forall the variables. Correlations were higher for familiar­ity and complexity (for both French-English and French­Spanish) than for name agreement (H and %) and imageagreement.

The second correlational analysis concemed the dataobtained in the present study for the 400 line drawingstaken from Cycowicz et al. (1997). To determine the de­gree of relationship among our measures and betweenthem and some important measures already available, wecomputed the interitem correlations among all the at­tributes presented in Appendix A (following Snodgrass& Vanderwart, 1980). Table 5 shows the matrix of cor­relations for all the concepts, with the significant corre­lation coefficients marked with an asterisk. Because fre­quency measures (taken from Content et al., 1990) wereavailable for only 355 ofthe 400 concept names, a sepa­rate set of correlations was computed for this subset.

As was expected, the two measurcs ofname agreement(H and %) show a high negative correlation (- .952 inTable 5). The correlations among the other measures col-

Table2Summary Statistics for Four Variables: American, Spanish, and French Sampies

(for Snodgrass and Vanderwart Pietures)

Name Agreement (H) Image Agreement Familiarity Complexity

Statistic US. Spain France US. Spain France US. Spain France US. Spain France

M 0.56 0.27 0.28 3.69 3.71 3.46 3.29 3.12 3.06 2.96 2.67 3.00SD 0.53 0.41 0.36 0.58 0.60 0.78 0.96 1.11 l.21 0.89 0.93 0.96Median 0.42 0.12 0.15 3.72 3.84 3.60 3.32 3.06 2.92 2.93 2.52 2.95Range 2.55 2.19 1.41 2.68 3.03 3.73 3.72 3.67 3.90 3.78 3.68 4Min 0 0 0 2.05 1.74 1.17 1.18 1.27 1.07 I 1.05 IMax 2.55 2.19 1.41 4.73 4.77 4.90 4.90 4.94 4.97 4.78 4.73 5Ql 0.12 0.04 0 3.27 3.29 2.93 2.49 2.16 1.97 2.28 1.98 2.28Q3 0.87 0.28 0.47 4.15 4.16 4.05 4.09 4.08 4.17 3.59 3.39 3.71Skew 1.5 2.39 2.13 0.96 -0.71 0.67 0.93 0.01 1.32 1.02 0.28 1.13Valid cases 260 254 256 260 245 256 260 254 256 260 254 256

Note--QI, 25th percentile; Q3, 75th percentile; skew, (Q3 - Median)/(Median - QI); > I is positively skewed. * In-creasing H values indicate decreasing name agreement.

Page 5: link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

PICTURES STANDARDIZED FOR FRENCH 535

Table3Significant Correlations Among the Measured Variables in the French and

American SampIes (for Snodgrass and Vanderwart Pictures)

American SampIe

French Sampie NA (H) % IA Farn Comp

Name agreement (H) .428Name agreement (%) .429Image agreement .498Familiarity .913Visual complexity .945

Note-NA, name agreement; IA, image agreement; Farn, familiarity; Comp, visualcomplexity. Alllisted correlation coefficients for the present study and the Snodgrassand Vanderwart (1980) study are significant at p < .0I.

Table4Significant CorreIations Among the Measured Variables in the French and

Spanish SampIes (for Snodgrass and Vanderwart Pictures)

Spanish SampIe (Sanfeliu & Fernandez, 1996)

French SampIe NA (H) % IA Fam Comp

Name agreement (H) .313Name agreement (%) .506Image agreement .524Familiarity .778Visual complexity .727

Note-NA, name agreement; IA, image agreement; Farn, familiarity; Comp, visualcomplexity. All listed correlation coefficients for the present study and the Sanfeliuand Fernandez (1996) study are significant at p < .0I.

leeted in the present study (familiarity, eomplexity, imageagreement, image variability, and age of aequisition) areall relatively small in magnitude, suggesting that the mea­sures represent independent attributes. Overall, these cor­relations are similar to the ones obtained by Snodgrassand Vanderwart (1980) and by Cyeowiez et al. (1997).

Familiarity is negatively eorrelated with age ofaequi­sition (- .578), suggesting that names of eoneepts thatare familiar tend to be learned at an early age. As is shownin Table 5, familiarity is positively eorrelated with fre­queney (.360). The eorrelation between age of aequisi­tion and frequeney, although modest ( - .367), is also sig­nifieant. Of the eorrelations among our own measures,name agreement and image agreement are negativelyeorrelated (- .343), suggesting that eoneepts that have

many names also evoke many different images. The eor­relation between age ofaequisition and name agreement(.453) suggests that, for eoneepts aequired at an earlyage, the level of agreement is high. The faet that Frenehspeakers' name agreement eorre1ates less with word fre­queney than with age ofaequisition is similar to the find­ing that, for Ameriean and Eng1ish speakers, age of ae­quisition has a greater influenee on pieture naming thando other variables (Caroll & White, 1973; Ellis & Mor­rison, 1998). The eorrelations between image variabi1ityand both age of aequisition (- .654) and familiarity(.616) suggest that eoneepts that are 1earned early evokemore images than do eoneepts that are learned late. Fi­nally, visually eomplex pietures tend to be rated as unfa­miliar (signifieant eorre1ation of - .391).

Table5Correlations Among the Measured Variables in a French SampIe for Cycowicz, Friedman, Rothstein,

and Snodgrass (1997) Pictures

Variable NA % IA Farn Comp I-Var A-A Freq]

Name agreement (H) 1.000Name agreement (%) - .952* 1.000Image agreement - .343* .370* 1.000Familiarity -.183* .215* -.035 1.000Visual complexity .081 - .081 - .009 - .391* 1.000Image variability - .255* .317* - .097 .616* - .210* 1.000Age ofacquisition .453* -.524* -.140* -.578* .214* -.654* 1.000Frequencyt - .140* .151* - .005 .360* - .136* .340* - .367* 1.000

Note-NA, name agreement; IA, image agreement; Farn, familiarity; Comp, visual complexity; I-Var, imagevariability; A-A, age ofacquisition; Freq, frequency (taken from Content, Mousty, & Radeau, 1990). *Corre­lation coefficients significant atp < .0I. t Conceming the frequency variable, correlations among all measuredvariables were obtained for a sampIe of 355 concepts only, for which frequency values were available.

Page 6: link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

536 ALARIO AND FERRAND

CONCLUSION

The main goal of the present research was to collectnormative data for pictorial stimuli that could be used inresearch with French-speaking sampies (see Sanfeliu &Fernändez, 1996, for the same approach in Spanish). De­scriptive ratings for a number of picture attributes of thedrawings previously presented by Cycowicz et al. (1997)and by Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) with AmericanEnglish-speaking subjects are now available for French­speaking subjects. We believe that these normative datawill be particularly useful for French researchers inter­ested in memory, language, and other cognitive processes.

REFERENCES

ATTNEAVE, E (1957). Physical determinants ofthe judged complexityof shapes. Journal 0/Experimental Psychology, 53, 221-227.

BARRY, C., MORRISON, C. M., & ELLIS, A. W (1997). Naming the Snod­grass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, fre­quency, and name agreement. Quarterly Journal 0/ ExperimentalPsychology, 50A, 560-585.

BERMAN, S., FRIEDMAN, D., HAMBERGER, M., & SNODGRASS, J. G.(1989). Developmental picture norms: Relationships between nameagreement, familiarity, and visual complexity for child and adult rat­ings of two sets of line drawings. Behavior Research Methods, In­struments, & Computers, 21, 371-382.

BIEDERMAN, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory ofhumanimage understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-145.

CAROLL, J. B., & WHITE, M. N. (1973). Age-of-acquisition norms for220 picturable nouns. Journal ofVerbalLearning & Verbal Behavior,12, 563-576.

CONTENT, A., MOUSTY, P., & RADEAU, M. (1990). BRULEX. Une basede donnees lexicales informatisee pour le francais ecrit et parle. L'An­nee Psychologique, 90,551-566.

CYCOWICZ, Y.M., FRIEDMAN, D., ROTHSTEIN, M., & SNODGRASS, 1. G.(1997). Picture naming by young children: Norms for name agree­ment, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal 0/ ExperimentalChild Psychology, 65, 171-237.

Des mots en images (1988). Paris: Nathan.ELLIS, A. W, & MORRISON, C. M. (1998). Real age-of-acquisition ef­

fects in lexical retrieva1. Journal 0/Experimental Psychology: Learn­ing, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 515-523.

FEENAN, K, & SNODGRASS, J. G. (1990). The effect of context on dis­crimination and bias in recognition memory for pictures and words.Memory & Cognition, 18, 515-527.

FERRAND, L., & ALARIO, E-X. (1998). French word association normsfor 366 names of objects. L'Annee Psychologique, 98, 659-709.

FERRAND, L., GRAINGER, J., & SEGUI, J. (1994). A study of maskedform priming in picture and word naming. Memory & Cognition, 22,431-441.

FERRAND, L., HUMPHREYS, G. W, & SEGUI, J. (1998). Masked repeti­tion and phonological priming in picture naming. Perception &Psychophysics, 60, 263-274.

FERRAND, L., & SEGUI, J. (1998). The syllable's role in speech produc­tion: Are syllables chunks, schemas, or both? Psychonomic Bulletin& Review, 5, 253-258.

FERRAND, L., SEGUI, J., & GRAINGER, J. (1996). Masked priming ofword and picture naming: The role ofsyllabic units. Journal 0/Mem­ory & Language, 36, 708-723.

FEYEREISEN, P., VAN DER BORGHT, E, & SERON, X. (1988). The opera­tivity effect in naming: Are-analysis. Neuropsychologia, 26, 401-415.

GERNSBACHER, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interac­tions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, andpolysemy.Journal ofExperimental Psychology: General, 113, 256-281.

HIRSHMAN, E., SNODGRASS, J. G., MINDES, J., & FEENAN, K (1990).Conceptual priming in fragment completion. Journal 0/Experimen­tal Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 634-647.

HUMPHREYS, G. W, LAMOTE, C, & LLOYD-JONES, T. J. (1995). An in­teractive activation approach to object processing: Effects of struc­tural similarity, name frequency and task in normality and pathology.Memory, 3, 535-586.

L'imagier du Pere Castor (1991). Paris: Flammarion.JOHNSON, C. J., PAIVIO, A., & CLARK, J. M. (1996). Cognitive compo­

nents ofpicture naming. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 113-139.KROLL, J. E, & POTTER, M. C. (1984). Recognizing words, pictures, and

concepts: A comparison of lexical, object, and reality decisions.Journal ofVerbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 39-66.

LACHMAN, R. (1973). Uncertainty effects on time to access the internallexicon. Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 99,199-208.

LACHMAN, R., SHAFFER, J. P., & HENNRIKUS, D. (1974). Language andcognition: Effects of stimulus codability, name-word frequency, andage of acquisition on lexical reaction time. Journal 0/Verbal Learn­ing & Verbal Behavior, 13,613-625.

MARTEIN, R. (1995). Norms for name and concept agreement, famil­iarity, visual complexity and image agreement on a set of 216 pic­tures. Psychologica Belgica, 35, 205-225.

MORRISON, C. M., CHAPPELL, T. D., & ELLIS,A. W (1997). Age of ac­quisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation toadult estimates and other variables. Quarterly Journal 0/Experimen­tal Psychology, 50A, 528-559.

MORRISON, C. M., ELLIS, A. W, & QUINLAN, P. T. (1992). Age of ac­quisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not objectrecognition. Memory & Cognition, 20, 705-714.

OLDFIELD, R. c.,& WINGFIELD, A. (1965). Response latencies in nam­ing objects. Quarterly Journal 0/Experimental Psychology, 17, 273­281.

PAIVIO, A., CLARK, J. M., DIGDON, N., & BONS,T. (1989). Referentialprocessing: Reciprocity and correlates ofnaming and imaging. Mem­ory & Cognition, 17, 163-174.

SANFELIU, M. C, & FERNANDEZ, A. (1996). A set of254 Snodgrass­Vanderwart pictures standardized for Spanish: Norms for nameagreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Be­havior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 537-555.

SNODGRASS, J. G., & CORWIN, J. (1988). Perceptual identificationthresholds for 150 fragmented pictures from the Snodgrass and Van­derwart picture set. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 67, 3-36.

SNODGRASS, J. G., & FEENAN, K (1990). Priming effects in picturefragment completion: Support for the perceptual closure hypothesis.Journal ofExperimental Psychology: General, 119, 276-298.

SNODGRASS, J. G., LEVY-BERGER, G., & HAYDON, M. (1985). Humanexperimental psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

SNODGRASS, J. G., & POSTER, M. (1992). Visual-word recognitionthresholds for screen-fragmented names ofthe Snodgrass and Van­derwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Com­puters, 24,1-15.

SNODGRASS, J. G., SMITH, B., FEENAN, K, & CORWIN, J. (1987). Frag­menting pictures on the Apple Macintosh computer for experimentaland clinical applications. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments,& Computers, 19,270-274.

SNODGRASS, J. G., & SURPRENANT, A. (1989). Effect of retention inter­val on implicit and explicit memory for pictures. Bulletin ofthe Psy­chonomic Society, 27, 395-398.

SNODGRASS, J. G., & VANDERWART, M. (1980). A standardized set of260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, famil­iarity, and visual complexity. Journal 0/Experimental Psychology:Human Learning & Memory, 6,174-215.

SNODGRASS, J. G., & YUDITSKY, T. (1996). Naming times for the Snod­grass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instru­ments, & Computers, 28,516-536.

VITKOVITCH, M., & TYRRELL, L. (1995). Sources ofdisagreement in ob­ject naming. Quarterly Journal 0/Experimental Psychology, 48A,822-848.

Page 7: link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

AP

PE

ND

IXA

Th

efo

llo

win

gin

form

atio

nis

sho

wn

bel

ow

:It

emis

the

iden

tify

ing

nu

mb

ero

fea

chp

ictu

re;

inte

nd

edn

ame

isth

ein

ten

ded

nam

efo

rea

chco

nce

pt;

mo

dal

nam

eis

the

nam

eg

iven

by

the

maj

ori

tyo

fsu

bje

cts;

the

Hst

atis

tic

and

per

cen

tag

eag

reem

ent

(%)

are

two

mea

sure

so

fn

ame

agre

emen

t;th

em

ean

san

dst

and

ard

dev

iati

on

sar

efo

rra

tin

gs

of

imag

eag

ree-

men

t,fa

mil

iari

ty,

com

ple

xit

y,

var

iab

ilit

y,

and

age

of

acq

uis

itio

n;

Fis

the

freq

uen

cyfo

rea

chsi

ng

le-w

ord

nam

e(t

aken

fro

mC

on

ten

t,M

ou

sty

,&

Rad

eau

,1

99

0);

the

mai

nv

erb

alas

-so

ciat

ion

for

each

sin

gle

-wo

rdn

ame

isp

rese

nte

dw

hen

avai

lab

le(t

aken

fro

mF

erra

nd

&A

lari

o,

19

98

).

Nam

eIm

age

Ag

eof

Agr

eem

ent

Agr

eem

ent

Fam

ilia

rity

Com

plex

ity

Var

iabi

lity

Acq

uisi

tion

Ver

bal

Item

Inte

nded

Nam

eM

odal

Nam

eE

ngli

shH

%M

SDM

SDM

SDM

SDM

SDF

Ass

ocia

tion

%I

acco

rdeo

nac

cord

eon

acco

rdio

n.0

010

03.

530.

731.

630.

814.

860.

352.

170.

593.

080.

894.

33m

usiq

ue49

.42

avio

nav

ion

airp

lane

.29

963.

931.

082.

631.

163.

170.

763.

331.

061.

920.

9349

.8ci

el15

.73

croc

odil

ecr

ocod

ile

alli

gato

r.2

996

4.23

0.94

1.43

0.73

4.34

0.72

2.37

0.72

2.23

0.65

3.65

dent

s20

.24

ancr

ean

cre

anch

or.0

010

04.

131.

171.

900.

922.

140.

582.

330.

663.

320.

956.

12ba

teau

39.3

5fo

urm

ifo

urm

ian

t.6

282

2.80

1.42

2.30

0.95

4.52

0.57

2.60

1.07

1.92

0.69

10.5

ciga

le18

.06

pom

me

pom

me

appl

e.0

010

04.

000.

794.

400.

721.

550.

633.

230.

861.

460.

5830

.41

poir

e16

.87

bras

bras

arm

.15

964.

071.

014.

930.

252.

280.

652.

901.

241.

500.

7134

6ja

mb

e27

.08

flec

hefl

eche

arro

w.0

010

03.

830.

871.

530.

731.

930.

372.

801.

062.

520.

7717

.91

are

52.8

9ar

tich

aut

arti

chau

tar

tich

oke

.23

894.

230.

862.

131.

113.

590.

871.

970.

413.

041.

001.

44co

eur

24.7

10ce

ndri

erce

ndri

eras

htra

y.1

693

3.30

1.12

4.00

1.23

2.62

0.82

3.30

1.21

2.85

0.92

2.72

ciga

rett

e43

.811

aspe

rge

aspe

rge

aspa

ragu

s.1

693

3.40

0.93

2.37

1.19

3.24

0.87

1.93

0.45

3.19

0.85

1.61

legu

me

21.3

12ha

che

hach

eax

e.0

096

4.20

1.00

1.57

0.77

2.55

0.69

2.23

0.63

2.64

0.76

9.35

coup

er16

.813

land

aula

ndau

baby

carr

iage

.80

793.

471.

012.

071.

173.

971.

022.

470.

822.

540.

991.

5714

balle

bal

lon

ball

.00

100

2.57

0.82

2.87

0.97

2.45

0.91

3.07

1.05

1.27

0.45

38te

nnis

46.1

15ba

llon

ball

onba

lloo

n.4

089

1.23

0.77

2.50

0.90

1.52

0.78

3.47

1.07

1.35

0.49

12.5

5fo

otba

ll32

.616

bana

neba

nane

bana

na.0

010

04.

600.

673.

870.

941.

210.

412.

230.

681.

580.

702.

68ja

une

19.1

"'0

17gr

ange

gran

geba

rn1.

1250

2.40

1.16

2.23

1.43

3.52

0.83

2.57

0.77

3.27

0.87

17.2

7..... o

18to

nnea

uto

nnea

uba

rrel

.79

714.

570.

731.

270.

454.

100.

562.

330.

713.

150.

929.

91vi

n73

.0>

-i19

ski

ski

ski

.00

100

4.03

0.85

2.73

1.14

2.83

0.76

3.17

1.21

2.64

0.86

1.61

neig

e47

.2C

20pa

nier

pani

erba

sket

.00

100

2.63

0.76

2.30

1.15

4.59

0.57

3.13

0.94

1.92

0.69

22.5

9os

ier

22.5

~21

ours

ours

bear

.00

100

3.07

1.01

1.60

1.00

3.93

0.80

2.67

0.80

1.62

0.75

10.1

2pe

luch

e25

.8cn

22lit

litbe

d.5

186

3.40

0.67

4.93

0.37

2.62

0.49

3.73

1.08

1.24

0.52

204

dorm

ir46

.1tr

:23

abei

lle

abei

lle

bee

.47

823.

631.

072.

431.

014.

930.

262.

330.

841.

880.

7116

.76

mie

l50

.5~

24sc

arab

eesc

arab

eeb

eetl

e.2

636

3.70

1.06

1.83

0.99

4.21

0.82

2.17

0.59

3.08

0.80

1.74

Z25

cloc

hecl

oche

bell

.15

963.

700.

792.

100.

763.

000.

602.

570.

732.

190.

8038

.67

egli

se37

.1t::I

26ce

intu

rece

intu

rebe

lt.4

186

4.23

0.77

4.13

1.07

1.93

0.65

2.87

0.90

2.42

0.70

24.8

4pa

ntal

on34

.8;J>

27ve

love

lobi

cycl

e.4

186

4.20

0.76

3.37

1.03

4.17

0.85

3.57

1.01

1.80

0.71

4.42

roue

s19

.1§

28oi

seau

oise

aubi

rd.4

186

3.90

1.12

3.87

1.28

3.38

0.86

4.70

0.70

1.38

0.57

112

nid

13.5

..... N29

chem

isie

rch

emis

ebl

ouse

.65

641.

170.

594.

470.

973.

760.

792.

450.

782.

960.

820.

63bo

uton

s14

.6m

30liv

reliv

rebo

ok.2

996

4.07

1.05

4.97

0.18

2.14

0.74

4.37

0.85

1.50

0.58

371

lire

18.0

t::I31

botte

botte

boot

.40

892.

471.

043.

731.

012.

690.

763.

071.

112.

040.

7721

.39

plui

e19

.1'T

I32

bout

eill

ebo

utei

lle

bott

le.0

010

04.

000.

954.

200.

811.

830.

804.

170.

871.

920.

8040

.67

vin

56.1

0 :::033

noeu

dno

eud

bow

.00

100

1.57

1.22

2.40

1.00

3.24

0.64

3.07

0.98

2.31

0.79

23.2

7pa

pilI

on27

.0'T

I34

bol

bol

bow

l.2

993

3.30

1.21

4.47

0.82

1.62

0.73

3.47

1.07

1.38

0.50

8.04

lait

23.6

~35

boit

ebo

ite

box

.26

892.

701.

492.

971.

031.

210.

623.

871.

141.

650.

7553

.05

allu

met

tes

10.1

Z36

pain

pai

nd

emie

brea

d1.

3446

1.57

0.90

4.57

0.68

1.69

0.54

3.60

1.10

1.27

0.45

86.8

7m

ie22

.5n

,37

bala

iba

lai

broo

m.0

010

03.

771.

434.

100.

842.

280.

752.

600.

931.

950.

807.

23br

osse

27.0

:r:38

bros

sebr

osse

brus

h.1

596

2.67

1.27

4.23

1.10

2.69

0.81

3.17

1.02

1.77

0.71

9.27

chev

eux

41.5

39bu

sbu

sbu

s.3

489

4.00

1.02

4.03

1.00

3.76

1.09

3.17

0.87

2.19

0.80

0tr

ansp

ort

13.5

40pa

pilI

onpa

pilI

onbu

tter

fly

.00

100

4.37

0.49

2.33

0.88

4.10

0.49

3.57

1.17

1.92

0.95

16.0

8nu

it15

.7V

Iw

41bo

uton

bout

onbu

tton

.00

100

4.80

0.48

4.43

0.90

2.03

0.63

3.77

1.19

1.85

0.78

29.3

1ch

emis

e18

.0-.

.l

Page 8: link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

AP

PE

ND

IXA

(Con

tin

ued

)V

lw

Nam

eIm

age

Ag

eo

f0

0

Agr

eem

ent

Agr

eem

ent

Fam

ilia

rity

Com

plex

ity

Var

iabi

lity

Acq

uisi

tion

Ver

bal

Item

Inte

nded

Nam

eM

odal

Nam

eE

ngli

shH

%M

SDM

SDM

SDM

SDM

SDF

Ass

ocia

tion

%:>

42gä

teau

gäte

auca

ke.0

010

02.

870.

903.

670.

992.

340.

614.

100.

991.

270.

5311

.35

choc

o1at

42.7

r-43

cham

eau

cham

eau

cam

e1.6

850

2.70

1.51

1.20

0.48

3.86

0.79

2.17

0.70

2.62

0.90

9.01

boss

es29

.2:> ::c

44bo

ugie

boug

ieca

ndle

.00

100

4.03

0.85

3.60

1.03

2.45

0.63

3.43

1.01

1.96

0.68

17.8

6lu

mie

re16

.8- 0

45ca

non

cano

nca

nnon

.16

933.

431.

041.

070.

254.

620.

492.

030.

613.

080.

9845

.13

guer

re39

.3

~46

casq

uett

eca

sque

tte

cap

.29

961.

800.

852.

571.

072.

280.

753.

070.

832.

270.

7814

.84

sole

il18

.047

voit

ure

voit

ure

car

.15

963.

000.

954.

531.

073.

830.

544.

430.

821.

400.

5811

8ro

uler

11.2

tl48

caro

tte

caro

tte

carr

ot.0

010

04.

470.

633.

900.

963.

070.

922.

300.

791.

580.

643.

14la

pin

23.6

'T1

49ch

atch

atca

t.0

010

03.

501.

043.

631.

433.

590.

874.

171.

051.

350.

4943

.26

chie

n30

.3tI1

50ch

enil

lech

enil

leca

terp

illa

r.3

489

3.83

1.21

1.47

0.73

3.83

0.89

2.37

0.81

2.65

0.75

6.63

papi

lIon

31.5

~51

cele

rice

leri

cele

ry.6

561

1.80

1.27

2.00

1.14

4.66

0.61

1.87

0.68

3.46

1.03

0.63

legu

me

27.0

52ch

aine

chai

nech

ain

.67

792.

931.

662.

931.

392.

721.

033.

171.

152.

690.

8440

.50

velo

14.6

53ch

aise

chai

sech

air

.00

100

3.13

0.97

4.93

0.25

2.24

0.74

3.43

1.14

1.38

0.64

81.6

8ta

b1e

34.8

tl54

ceri

sece

rise

cher

ry.2

993

3.77

1.19

3.13

1.14

1.34

0.61

2.73

1.01

2.00

0.80

7.01

roug

e29

.255

pou1

epo

u1e

chic

ken

.47

824.

370.

762.

301.

093.

790.

862.

470.

821.

500.

5821

.82

coq

36.0

56bu

rin

tou

rnev

isch

isei

.98

292.

871.

701.

730.

942.

970.

681.

670.

844.

040.

770.

46m

arte

au19

.157

egli

seeg

lise

chur

ch.1

596

3.27

0.91

2.97

1.30

3.86

0.74

3.80

1.10

2.27

0.87

175

cloc

her

11.2

58ci

gare

ciga

reci

gar

.00

100

3.80

0.81

2.00

1.08

3.59

1.05

2.33

0.80

2.96

1.04

14.1

2fu

mee

21.3

59ci

gare

tte

ciga

rett

eci

gare

tte

.29

933.

930.

944.

101.

242.

170.

892.

871.

072.

380.

8044

.71

fum

ee20

.260

horl

oge

horl

oge

cloc

k1.

0154

1.70

0.79

4.73

0.52

2.14

0.79

3.57

0.90

2.69

0.97

13.8

6he

ure

55.0

61pi

nce

älin

gepi

nce

älin

gecl

othe

spin

.00

100

4.83

0.46

3.10

1.21

3.07

0.75

2.40

1.07

2.65

0.80

3.48

linge

21.3

62nu

age

nuag

ecl

oud

.40

892.

900.

803.

871.

282.

450.

913.

471.

141.

680.

6364

.11

plui

e27

.063

clow

ncl

own

clow

n.2

993

3.47

0.90

1.83

0.83

4.41

0.63

2.93

0.98

1.52

0.77

2.59

cirq

ue22

.564

man

teau

man

teau

coat

.29

933.

230.

904.

530.

822.

590.

633.

731.

141.

760.

8347

.94

froi

d24

.765

peig

nepe

igne

com

b.0

010

03.

830.

953.

871.

222.

690.

662.

620.

822.

000.

756.

08ch

eveu

x48

.366

mai

sm

ais

corn

.56

753.

901.

183.

100.

804.

210.

682.

400.

772.

600.

877.

48ja

un

e20

.267

cana

peca

nape

couc

h.3

489

3.17

1.02

4.40

0.89

2.31

0.81

3.27

1.14

2.16

0.90

8.93

lit22

.568

vach

eva

che

cow

.00

100

3.40

0.89

2.63

0.96

3.59

0.68

2.73

0.83

1.60

0.76

35.2

6la

it42

.769

cour

onne

cour

onne

crow

n.0

010

03.

330.

961.

400.

624.

100.

672.

770.

972.

200.

8228

.33

roi

39.3

70ta

sse

tass

ecu

p.1

596

3.60

0.81

4.83

0.46

1.69

0.47

3.50

0.94

2.16

0.80

21.3

cafe

39.3

71ce

rfce

rfde

er.2

993

3.80

0.96

1.87

1.07

3.66

0.72

2.20

0.66

2.88

1.14

3.82

bieh

e25

.872

bure

aubu

reau

desk

.00

100

3.20

0.81

4.60

0.93

2.97

0.73

3.67

0.88

2.65

0.85

105

trav

ail

47.2

73ch

ien

chie

ndo

g.0

010

02.

230.

773.

801.

062.

760.

744.

330.

761.

190.

4012

1ch

at48

.374

poup

eepo

upee

doll

.94

542.

000.

643.

071.

014.

310.

603.

831.

211.

230.

6510

.59

enfa

nt19

.175

äne

äne

donk

ey.0

010

04.

200.

812.

070.

873.

590.

782.

330.

802.

080.

8022

.67

bete

16.8

76po

rte

port

edo

or.2

993

3.30

0.88

4.67

0.61

3.17

0.60

3.40

1.16

1.52

0.77

0.8

poig

nee

20.2

77po

igne

epo

igne

edo

orkn

ob.8

975

1.87

0.97

4.07

1.20

3.10

0.62

1.93

0.91

4.15

0.83

24.4

1po

rte

45.0

78ro

bero

bedr

ess

.00

100

1.80

0.66

3.40

1.19

2.07

0.75

4.27

0.98

1.46

0.65

99.2

9ju

pe

16.8

79co

mm

ode

com

mod

edr

esse

r.1

596

3.30

0.88

4.27

0.83

2.83

0.80

3.07

1.05

2.96

0.87

6.89

arm

oire

19.1

80ta

mbo

urta

mbo

urdr

um.0

010

03.

770.

681.

570.

772.

790.

492.

270.

832.

150.

8814

.76

brui

t22

.581

cana

rdca

nard

duck

.29

933.

470.

682.

500.

942.

970.

732.

830.

911.

850.

9212

.97

mar

e16

.882

aigl

eai

gle

eagl

e.5

486

3.67

1.09

1.50

0.73

4.34

0.55

2.53

0.86

2.73

1.00

11.3

5oi

seau

21.3

83or

eill

eor

eill

eea

r.0

010

04.

270.

784.

930.

372.

970.

682.

401.

101.

350.

5614

1en

tend

re20

.284

elep

hant

elep

hant

elep

hant

.00

100

3.90

0.80

1.40

0.72

4.55

0.57

2.37

0.76

2.04

0.82

7.01

trom

pe12

.385

enve

lopp

een

velo

ppe

enve

lope

.15

964.

270.

874.

230.

821.

000.

002.

871.

112.

580.

7626

.24

86oe

iloe

iley

e.0

010

03.

930.

964.

900.

403.

830.

763.

771.

171.

380.

5719

3vo

ir13

.587

haie

barr

tere

fenc

e.7

775

1.53

1.17

3.00

1.14

2.72

0.96

2.70

1.02

3.31

0.84

20.1

288

doig

tdo

igt

fing

er.5

279

4.10

0.84

4.90

0.40

2.52

0.74

2.87

1.14

1.31

0.47

167

mai

n31

.5

Page 9: link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

AP

PE

ND

IXA

(Con

tin

ued

)N

ame

Imag

eA

geo

fA

gree

men

tA

gree

men

tF

amil

iari

tyC

ompl

exit

yY

aria

bili

tyA

cqui

siti

onY

erba

lIt

emIn

tend

edN

ame

Mod

alN

ame

Eng

lish

H%

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

FA

ssoc

iati

on%

89po

isso

npo

isso

nfi

sh.0

010

03.

000.

833.

330.

993.

480.

634.

131.

011.

620.

5736

.45

mer

19.1

90dr

apea

udr

apea

ufl

ag.0

010

03.

130.

972.

170.

951.

790.

684.

071.

112.

580.

6421

.99

Fran

cais

14.6

91fl

eur

fleu

rfl

ower

.15

963.

401.

043.

930.

942.

930.

844.

500.

681.

400.

5816

4ro

se21

.392

flut

etr

aver

sier

efl

ute

trav

ersi

ere

flut

e.8

268

4.13

0.78

1.53

0.94

3.83

0.71

2.76

0.87

2.20

0.71

12.6

7m

usiq

ue28

.193

mou

che

mou

che

fly

.00

100

3.17

0.75

2.60

0.97

4.62

0.62

2.63

1.03

1.77

0.59

33.7

3in

sect

e12

.394

pied

pied

foot

.00

100

4.33

0.88

4.80

0.66

2.41

0.50

2.90

1.32

1.31

0.55

333

chau

ssur

e22

.595

ball

onde

rugb

yid

emru

gby

ball

.00

100

3.93

0.78

1.93

0.83

2.34

0.67

2.10

0.61

2.96

0.96

96ca

sque

casq

uehe

Imet

.00

100

2.20

1.03

2.80

1.30

1.45

0.57

3.37

1.03

2.69

0.68

11.7

8m

oto

31.5

97fo

urch

ette

four

chet

tefo

rk.0

010

04.

000.

834

.90

0.31

2.66

0.67

2.80

1.13

1.42

0.58

5.87

cout

eau

49.5

98re

nard

rena

rdfo

x.4

186

3.87

0.94

1.47

0.68

4.10

0.56

2.27

0.58

2.15

0.88

13.2

7ru

se19

.199

cor

cor

fren

chho

rn1.

0561

3.13

1.31

1.53

0.78

4.93

0.26

1.93

0.58

4.0

00.

987.

06ch

asse

53.9

100

gren

ouil

legr

enou

ille

frog

.67

614.

170.

871.

870.

903.

690.

712.

670.

881.

920.

809.

18ve

rte

36.0

101

poöl

epo

ele

fryi

ngpa

n.8

275

2.67

0.71

4.0

01.

141.

930.

462.

501.

042.

731.

0419

.18

frir

e30

.310

2po

ubel

lepo

ubel

lega

rbag

eca

n.0

010

04.

071.

204.

370.

613.

380.

563.

031.

031.

810.

633.

19or

dure

s25

.810

3gi

rafe

gira

fegi

raff

e.0

010

04.

470.

571.

300.

654.

970.

192.

170.

702.

120.

811.

19co

u60

.710

4ve

rre

verr

egl

ass

.00

100

3.63

1.54

4.97

0.18

1.93

0.46

4.07

1.01

1.23

0.51

98.4

8ea

u28

.110

5lu

nett

eslu

nett

esgl

asse

s.1

596

3.73

0.87

4.03

1.16

2.38

0.68

3.87

1.14

2.00

0.69

0so

leiI

34.8

106

gant

gant

glov

e.0

010

03.

230.

943.

971.

252.

930.

653.

301.

242.

000.

6322

.71

mai

n19

.110

7ch

evre

chev

rego

at.6

679

4.13

0.90

1.80

0.81

3.48

0.57

2.33

0.80

2.12

0.86

15.2

3fr

omag

e36

.010

8go

rill

ego

rill

ego

rill

a.2

993

3.37

0.85

1.40

0.86

3.28

0.75

2.37

0.72

2.50

0.91

1.44

sing

e33

.710

9ra

isin

rais

ingr

apes

.29

934.

200.

663.

600.

973.

760.

692.

730.

982.

040.

8711

.57

vin

32.6

110

saut

ereI

lesa

uter

eIle

gras

shop

per

1.15

543.

001.

111.

630.

854.

970.

192.

130.

862.

500.

862.

93ve

rte

13.5

""C:l

III

guit

are

guit

are

guit

ar.1

596

4.57

0.57

2.90

1.03

3.45

0.78

3.10

1.03

2.50

0.71

4.33

mus

ique

32.6

......

(J11

2re

volv

erp

isto

let

gun

.73

683.

570.

901.

530.

733.

550.

573.

031.

072.

810.

8021

.8>

-l11

3ch

eveu

xch

eveu

xha

ir.6

882

1.90

0.76

4.70

0.65

2.41

0.57

4.10

0.71

1.23

0.43

0lo

ngs

21.3

e11

4m

arte

aum

arte

auh

amm

er.1

596

2.33

0.71

2.10

1.06

2.90

0.72

2.17

0.53

2.19

0.75

11.6

9cl

ou40

.4:;0 t'I1

115

mai

nm

ain

hand

.00

100

3.80

0.85

4.97

0.18

2.97

0.68

3.10

1.27

1.12

0.33

892

doig

t32

.6\/

J11

6ci

ntre

cint

reha

nger

.29

934.

330.

844.

100.

991.

000.

002.

700.

922.

880.

953.

10ve

tem

ents

27.0

\/J

117

harp

eha

rpe

harp

.15

964.

270.

941.

671.

064.

760.

442.

130.

513.

421.

065.

10m

usiq

ue32

.6~

118

chap

eau

chap

eau

hat

.00

100

2.93

1.01

2.83

1.23

2.38

0.56

4.00

0.98

1.62

0.70

87.2

1m

elon

24.7

Z11

9co

eur

coeu

rhe

art

.00

100

3.73

1.70

3.50

1.25

1.00

0.00

3.07

1.01

1.81

0.80

605

amo

ur

28.1

~12

0he

lico

pter

ehe

lico

pter

ehe

lico

pter

.00

100

3.77

0.68

1.97

0.76

3.48

0.74

2.33

0.66

2.72

1.10

0.08

heli

ce22

.512

1ch

eval

chev

alho

rse

.00

100

4.07

0.98

2.63

1.07

3.93

0.65

3.27

1.05

1.54

0.71

135

equi

tati

on10

.1§

122

mai

son

mai

son

hous

e.0

010

02.

530.

784.

471.

013.

240.

794.

370.

891.

380.

7550

7fa

mil

ie14

.6.....

.N

123

fer

äre

pass

erfe

rar

epas

ser

iron

.00

100

2.57

0.90

3.10

1.27

3.52

0.74

2.43

0.90

2.73

0.92

t'I112

4ta

blear

epas

ser

tabl

repa

sser

iron

ing

boar

d.5

675

4.33

0.80

3.03

1.25

1.79

0.62

2.23

0.68

3.16

0.85

012

5ve

ste

vest

eja

cket

.56

751.

870.

734.

231.

073.

450.

743.

660.

972.

690.

7920

.63

pant

alon

10.1

'Tl

126

kang

ouro

uka

ngou

rou

kang

aroo

.00

100

4.37

0.81

1.07

0.37

4.0

70.

532.

170.

652.

881.

030.

63A

ustr

alie

30.3

0 :;012

7bo

uill

oire

boui

lloi

reke

ttle

1.01

572.

271.

083.

601.

282.

930.

702.

330.

763.

310.

622.

04ea

u34

.8'T

l12

8cl

l:cl

l:ke

y.0

010

02.

130.

944.

970.

182.

450.

513.

550.

991.

880.

7162

.5se

rrur

e33

.7~

129

cerf

-vol

ant

cerf

-vol

ant

kite

.00

100

3.87

0.78

1.80

0.85

2.72

0.65

3.27

1.14

2.58

0.99

1.06

vent

43.8

130

cout

eau

cout

eau

knif

e.0

010

02.

800.

814.

970.

181.

590.

633.

201.

101.

650.

6931

.95

coup

er24

.7Z (J

131

eche

lle

eche

lle

ladd

er.0

010

03.

970.

912.

701.

022.

590.

732.

670.

922.

270.

9634

.16

mon

ter

30.3

::r:13

2la

mpe

lam

pela

mp

.00

100

2.73

0.87

4.8

00.

412.

000.

533.

730.

942.

040.

7271

.55

lum

iere

51.7

133

feui

lle

feui

lle

leaf

1.09

613.

271.

203.

601.

002.

760.

644.

031.

001.

540.

6510

3pa

pier

30.3

,13

4ja

mb

eja

mb

ele

g.4

389

3.77

0.73

4.8

00.

662.

340.

672.

831.

121.

400.

7111

4pi

ed21

.3v. V

J13

5ci

tron

citr

onle

mon

.00

100

4.83

0.38

3.63

1.10

1.72

0.70

2.53

0.90

1.88

0.82

5.02

jau

ne

25.8

'0

Page 10: link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

AP

PE

ND

IXA

(Con

tinu

ed)

Vl~

Nam

eIm

age

Ag

eof

0

Agr

eem

ent

Agr

eem

ent

Fam

ilia

rity

Com

plex

ity

Var

iabi

lity

Acq

uisi

tion

Ver

bal

Iter

nIn

tend

edN

ame

Mod

alN

ame

Eng

lish

H%

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

FA

ssoc

iati

on%

>-13

6le

opar

dle

opar

dle

opar

d1.

4036

3.93

0.87

1.37

0.89

4.72

0.45

2.20

0.48

2.69

0.97

0.93

täch

es19

.1r'

137

chou

cabb

age

-2.

200.

552.

480.

8710

.08

legu

me

32.6

>- :;:tl

138

ampo

ule

ampo

ule

light

bub

.00

100

4.53

0.86

3.70

0.75

2.93

0.65

2.30

0.84

2.69

0.84

7.31

lum

iere

59.5

.....13

9in

terr

upte

urin

terr

upte

urlig

htsw

itch

.16

932.

600.

814.

660.

772.

720.

882.

470.

863.

270.

960

lum

iere

72.0

014

0lio

nlio

nlio

n.0

010

03.

530.

941.

500.

824.

170.

542.

330.

711.

690.

7917

.91

roi

20.2

~14

1le

vres

bo

uch

elip

s.5

675

4.03

0.85

4.77

0.57

1.69

0.60

3.43

1.12

1.77

0.71

0ro

uge

38.2

014

2ho

mar

dho

mar

dlo

bste

r.7

379

3.93

0.94

2.03

0.93

4.03

0.50

2.07

0.45

3.36

1.04

1.74

crus

tace

15.7

'Tl

143

cade

nas

cade

nas

lock

.00

964.

200.

612.

471.

142.

140.

582.

470.

863.

380.

901.

40fe

rmer

21.3

t:rl

144

mou

fle

mou

fle

mit

ten

.15

964.

230.

902.

771.

332.

070.

592.

270.

642.

601.

350.

46ga

nt43

.8

~14

5si

nge

sing

em

onke

y.4

393

3.03

1.00

1.40

0.72

3.41

0.63

3.37

1.10

1.80

0.82

16.4

6gr

imac

e12

.314

6lu

nelu

nem

oon

.52

793.

601.

193.

800.

891.

030.

193.

201.

161.

770.

6584

.49

nuit

18.0

147

mot

om

oto

mot

orcy

cle

.00

100

3.60

0.89

3.00

1.23

5.00

0.00

3.50

0.97

2.23

1.03

1.57

vite

sse

23.6

014

8m

onta

gne

mon

tagn

em

ount

ain

.29

932.

831.

052.

671.

272.

930.

703.

701.

151.

880.

6510

1ne

ige

27.0

149

sour

isso

uris

mou

se.2

993

4.27

0.74

2.27

1.11

3.38

0.68

2.63

1.03

1.62

0.75

10.4

2ra

t21

.315

0ch

ampi

gnon

cham

pign

onm

ushr

oom

.00

100

3.67

0.99

2.90

0.88

3.00

0.65

3.57

1.07

2.35

1.06

6.42

vene

neux

30.3

151

clou

clou

nail

.15

964.

370.

762.

700.

951.

660.

552.

601.

072.

310.

7918

.59

mar

teau

42.7

152

lime

lime

nail

file

.00

100

2.23

1.04

3.00

1.41

2.90

0.72

2.00

0.37

3.19

0.90

1.57

vem

is14

.615

3co

llie

rco

llie

rne

ckla

ce.4

782

3.90

1.03

3.33

1.09

1.79

0.94

3.77

1.19

1.86

0.69

13.0

1pe

r/es

41.6

154

aigu

ille

aigu

ille

need

le.8

071

4.90

0.31

2.70

1.12

1.55

0.69

2.53

0.73

2.52

0.71

21.9

0fi

l38

.215

5ne

zne

zno

se.0

010

03.

600.

894.

900.

311.

790.

563.

171.

231.

120.

3310

7bo

uche

10.1

156

ecro

uec

rou

nut

.69

503.

901.

451.

901.

032.

210.

622.

000.

643.

920.

950.

72vi

s43

.815

7oi

gnon

oign

onon

ion

.33

792.

800.

892.

871.

073.

590.

682.

230.

862.

580.

706.

04ai

l16

.815

8or

ange

oran

geor

ange

.29

934.

000.

954.

031.

101.

760.

692.

471.

011.

620.

7511

.65

jus

25.8

159

autr

uche

autr

uche

ostr

ich

.15

964.

200.

851.

100.

313.

720.

452.

070.

582.

880.

931.

95o

euf

23.6

160

hibo

uhi

bou

owl

.52

794.

370.

671.

670.

804.

100.

412.

300.

652.

480.

823.

23nu

it42

.716

1pi

ncea

upi

ncea

upa

intb

rush

.15

964.

101.

122.

571.

252.

520.

783.

030.

852.

230.

869.

14pe

intu

re63

.016

2pa

ntal

onpa

ntal

onpa

nts

.15

963.

400.

864.

870.

432.

280.

533.

701.

091.

540.

7628

.46

jupe

18.0

163

pech

epe

che

peac

h1.

1250

3.50

1.11

2.87

0.94

2.14

0.79

2.47

0.90

2.12

1.11

12.2

9po

isso

n21

.316

4pa

onpa

onpe

acoc

k.0

010

04.

070.

871.

370.

814.

930.

262.

130.

633.

081.

234.

72ro

ue28

.116

5ca

caho

uete

caca

houe

tepe

anut

.00

100

3.87

1.38

2.60

0.89

2.59

0.82

2.20

0.71

2.35

0.85

1.06

aper

itif

25.8

166

poir

epo

ire

pear

.00

100

4.40

0.67

3.37

1.03

1.14

0.35

2.50

0.94

1.81

0.63

5.31

pom

me

22.5

167

styl

ost

ylo

pen

1.10

543.

501.

044.

900.

402.

790.

683.

831.

091.

800.

763.

40pl

ume

29.2

168

cray

oncr

ayon

penc

il.0

010

04.

230.

684.

830.

382.

500.

643.

830.

951.

380.

5719

.39

papi

er29

.216

9pi

ngou

inpi

ngou

inpe

ngui

n.1

596

3.27

0.94

1.37

0.93

2.66

0.48

2.17

0.65

2.77

0.95

0.42

banq

uise

22.5

170

poiv

ron

poiv

ron

pepp

er.0

093

3.17

1.12

2.47

1.01

2.62

0.49

2.40

0.81

3.23

1.03

0.51

roug

e42

.717

1pi

ano

pian

opi

ano

.00

100

3.80

1.16

3.10

1.37

4.72

0.59

2.93

0.94

2.00

0.80

39.7

3m

usiq

ue33

.717

2co

chon

coch

onpi

g.6

071

3.60

1.04

1.83

0.87

3.21

0.77

2.43

0.77

1.76

0.78

17.9

1po

rc19

.117

3an

anas

anan

aspi

neap

ple

.00

100

4.77

0.43

2.73

1.11

4.52

0.69

2.28

0.70

2.46

0.76

1.10

frui

t26

.917

4pi

pepi

pepi

pe.0

010

03.

900.

801.

930.

941.

930.

462.

730.

942.

460.

8626

.58

taba

c34

.817

5pi

chet

cru

che

pitc

her

1.34

363.

431.

043.

970.

931.

760.

512.

430.

733.

650.

890.

5917

6pi

nce

pinc

epl

iers

.57

863.

571.

042.

071.

112.

240.

692.

270.

833.

120.

993.

48al

inge

38.2

177

pris

epr

ise

plug

.00

961.

830.

993.

601.

072.

550.

512.

230.

772.

920.

9347

.30

cour

ant

33.7

178

saco

che

sac

pock

etbo

ok1.

0650

2.80

1.16

4.37

1.07

2.86

0.52

3.03

0.96

3.46

0.81

1.57

179

cass

erol

eca

sser

ole

pot

.00

100

3.60

0.86

4.50

0.78

2.14

0.44

3.07

0.83

1.96

0.72

7.35

cUls

me

31.5

180

pom

me

dete

rre

pom

me

dete

rre

pota

to.5

375

4.07

0.91

3.97

0.93

1.97

0.94

2.83

0.95

1.84

0.75

181

citr

ouil

leci

trou

ille

pum

pkin

.29

933.

600.

891.

900.

802.

340.

672.

500.

822.

771.

070.

85ce

ndri

llon

27.0

182

lapi

nla

pin

rabb

it.0

010

04.

070.

782.

671.

093.

140.

642.

901.

061.

650.

8020

.12

orei

lles

12.3

Page 11: link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

AP

PE

ND

IXA

(Con

tin

ued

)N

ame

Imag

eA

geo

fA

gree

men

tA

gree

men

tF

amil

iari

tyC

ompl

exit

yV

aria

bili

tyA

cqui

siti

onV

erba

lIt

emIn

tend

edN

ame

Mod

alN

ame

Eng

lish

H%

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

FA

ssoc

iati

on%

183

rato

n-la

veur

rato

n-Ia

veur

raco

on.9

154

2.63

1.22

1.13

0.43

4.59

0.50

1.97

0.49

3.15

0.92

anim

al16

.818

4to

ume-

disq

ueto

ume-

disq

uere

cord

pla

yer

.65

823.

570.

942.

070.

943.

520.

832.

770.

823.

040.

840.

80m

usiq

ue43

.818

5fr

igid

aire

frig

idai

rere

frig

erat

or1.

0154

3.83

0.87

4.73

0.52

2.31

0.60

2.53

0.82

2.31

0.88

0.34

froi

d42

.7IS

6rh

inoc

eros

rhin

ocer

osrh

inoc

eros

.00

100

4.17

0.87

1.17

0.46

3.93

0.80

2.10

0.66

2.96

1.15

1.10

com

e42

.718

7ba

gue

bagu

eri

ng.0

010

02.

630.

894.

001.

052.

280.

753.

971.

102.

320.

8511

.78

fian

cail

les

28.1

188

faut

euil

abas

cule

idem

rock

ing

chai

r1.

4136

3.73

1.01

1.87

0.73

3.97

0.42

2.40

0.72

3.12

1.05

189

pati

nar

oule

tte

idem

roll

ersk

ate

.15

962.

471.

171.

930.

873.

720.

592.

200.

552.

810.

9819

0ro

ulea

uap

atis

seri

eid

emro

llin

gpi

n.3

489

4.57

0.64

2.00

0.87

1.38

0.49

2.03

0.56

3.04

1.04

191

coq

coq

roos

ter

.00

100

4.43

0.68

2.40

1.30

3.76

0.64

2.43

0.97

1.85

0.67

18.4

2po

ule

56.1

192

regl

ere

gle

rule

r.0

010

03.

730.

784.

530.

682.

280.

752.

770.

902.

420.

7690

.78

mes

ure

21.3

193

voil

ier

voil

ier

sail

boat

.80

573.

670.

802.

871.

013.

410.

873.

371.

033.

120.

933.

99m

er3

l.5

194

sali

ere

sali

ere

salt

shak

er.2

993

4.33

0.92

4.30

0.88

3.07

0.59

2.50

0.82

3.00

0.91

0.85

sei

37.1

195

sand

wic

hsa

ndw

ich

sand

wic

h.0

010

03.

031.

003.

930.

913.

210.

683.

531.

112.

520.

873.

78pa

in20

.219

6sc

iesc

iesa

w.0

010

04.

600.

721.

971.

132.

410.

682.

200.

612.

680.

904.

21bo

is29

.219

7ci

seau

cise

ausc

isso

rs.3

489

4.50

0.73

4.07

0.83

2.24

0.69

3.03

1.03

2.00

0.63

7.27

coup

er73

.019

8vi

svi

ssc

rew

.15

963.

871.

042.

301.

153.

550.

872.

230.

682.

770.

952.

68to

umev

is33

.719

9to

umev

isto

urne

vis

scre

wdr

iver

.00

100

4.37

0.76

2.47

1.33

2.31

0.47

2.30

0.65

2.96

0.92

0.63

vis

31.5

200

hipp

ocam

pehi

ppoc

ampe

sea

hors

e.0

096

4.00

1.08

1.20

0.55

4.55

0.63

2.37

0.81

3.65

1.16

0.12

mer

3l.

520

1ph

oque

phoq

uese

al.8

957

2.67

0.88

1.27

0.64

2.86

0.79

2.13

0.63

2.96

1.11

2.89

banq

uise

13.5

202

mou

ton

mou

ton

shee

p.0

010

02.

900.

801.

830.

873.

590.

572.

431.

041.

650.

6922

.37

lain

e30

.320

3ch

emis

ech

emis

esh

irt

.00

100

3.80

0.92

4.37

0.85

3.10

0.62

3.70

0.99

2.04

0.66

46.5

8ho

mm

e11

.220

4ch

auss

ure

chau

ssur

esh

oe.0

010

02.

900.

964.

930.

253.

140.

644.

141.

061.

380.

5714

.25

pied

19.1

""cl

205

jup

eju

pe

skir

t.0

010

02.

370.

813.

231.

281.

660.

553.

730.

911.

650.

6922

.07

cour

te22

.5.....

. o20

6m

oufe

tte

puto

issk

unk

.76

712.

031.

381.

070.

254.

760.

641.

430.

684.

620.

640

...,20

7lu

gelu

gesi

ed.2

689

2.83

1.02

1.90

0.84

3.28

0.65

2.57

0.57

2.81

1.23

0.34

neig

e74

.1e

208

esca

rgot

esca

rgot

snai

l.0

010

03.

770.

772.

301.

063.

000.

712.

670.

881.

880.

824.

93le

nt24

.7~

209

serp

ent

serp

ent

snak

e.0

010

03.

330.

92l.

50

0.82

4.00

0.80

3.17

1.05

2.23

0.91

21.9

ason

nett

e30

.3r:n

210

bonh

omm

ede

neig

eid

emsn

owrn

an.0

010

03.

870.

682.

331.

032.

760.

793.

101.

032.

000.

91tr

:21

1ch

auss

ette

chau

sset

teso

ck.0

010

03.

200.

854.

970.

181.

790.

733.

931.

17l.

58

0.64

7.91

chau

ssur

e19

.1~

212

arai

gnee

arai

gnee

spid

er.1

596

3.03

0.89

2.20

0.96

3.21

0.82

3.13

1.01

2.15

0.83

10.4

2to

ile40

.4Z

213

roue

tro

uet

spin

ning

whe

el1.

1439

2.47

l.5

01.

170.

463.

860.

691.

700.

794.

360.

911.

270

214

bobi

nede

fil

bobi

nede

fil

spoo

lo

fthr

ead

.29

934.

001.

052.

60l.

l64.

070.

922.

170.

593.

080.

98cu

ltur

e3

l.5

>-21

5cu

ille

recu

ille

resp

oon

.00

100

3.83

0.79

4.93

0.25

2.38

0.68

2.97

1.07

1.35

0.56

0so

upe

22.5

§21

6ec

ureu

ilec

ureu

ilsq

uirr

el.0

010

04.

330.

611.

830.

953.

550.

632.

330.

802.

420.

994.

89ar

bre

23.6

......

N21

7et

oile

etoi

lest

ar.0

010

04.

30l.

l23.

770.

77l.

l70.

473.

431.

251.

690.

6892

.10

ciel

21.3

tTl

218

tabo

uret

tabo

uret

stoo

l.0

010

03.

600.

933.

801.

302.

240.

692.

570.

942.

200.

877.

48ch

aise

19.1

021

9cu

isin

iere

cuis

inie

rest

ove

1.03

612.

930.

694.

371.

074.

240.

793.

001.

052.

880.

918.

55'T

l22

0fr

aise

frai

sest

raw

berr

y.0

010

03.

031.

033.

201.

032.

760.

692.

701.

121.

810.

856.

12de

sbo

is18

.00 :::0

221

vali

seva

lise

suit

case

.43

892.

770.

733.

900.

993.

480.

573.

200.

892.

230.

7125

.9vo

yage

43.8

'Tl

222

sole

iIso

leil

sun

.00

100

3.53

1.14

4.37

0.67

1.14

0.35

3.30

1.37

1.42

0.64

257

chal

eur

13.5

~22

3cy

gne

cygn

esw

an.1

596

3.73

1.11

1.87

0.86

2.86

0.64

2.23

0.68

2.65

0.89

8.21

blan

c25

.8Z

224

pull

-ove

rpu

ll-o

ver

swea

ter

.29

933.

300.

754.

870.

352.

760.

743.

971.

002.

310.

971.

10ch

aud

20.2

o.2

25ba

lanc

oire

bala

ncoi

resw

ing

.00

100

3.57

l.l0

2.47

0.90

1.69

0.66

2.90

0.77

1.84

0.85

1.74

enfa

nts

29.2

::c:22

6ta

ble

tabl

eta

ble

.00

100

3.50

1.17

4.83

0.46

1.45

0.57

3.73

1.11

1.35

0.56

254

chai

se28

.122

7te

leph

one

tele

phon

ete

leph

one

.00

100

3.20

1.27

4.93

0.25

3.10

0.56

3.75

0.97

1.77

0.82

37.5

2co

mm

unic

atio

n11

.222

8te

levi

sion

tele

visi

onte

levi

sion

.15

962.

970.

964.

431.

013.

280.

533.

37l.

ll2.

040.

770.

46em

issi

ons

10.1

VI

229

raqu

ette

dete

nnis

idem

tenn

isra

cket

.00

100

3.57

0.97

2.90

1.03

3.03

0.73

2.89

0.88

2.50

0.81

tenn

is88

.7.j::

>. -

Page 12: link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

AP

PE

ND

IXA

(Con

tinu

ed)

VI

.j:>

.

Nam

eIm

age

Ag

eo

fN

Agr

eem

ent

Agr

eem

ent

Fam

ilia

rity

Com

plex

ity

Yar

iabi

lity

Acq

uisi

tion

Ver

bal

Item

Inte

nded

Nam

eM

odal

Nam

eE

ngli

shH

%M

SDM

SDM

SDM

SDM

SDF

Ass

ocia

tion

%>

230

deac

oudr

ede

acou

dre

thim

ble

.00

100

2.93

1.60

1.83

0.91

3.14

0.92

2.57

0.88

2.23

0.59

cout

ure

34.8

t""'

231

pouc

epo

uce

thum

b.1

596

4.27

0.83

4.77

0.68

2.24

0.64

2.46

1.07

1.23

0.51

19.4

4in

dex

28.1

> :::023

2cr

avat

ecr

avat

etie

.00

100

3.80

0.89

3.33

0.92

2.66

0.61

3.07

1.05

2.38

0.75

1.61

cost

ume

18.0

-23

3ti

gre

tigr

eti

ger

.00

100

3.63

0.76

1.30

0.65

4.62

0.68

2.25

0.65

2.31

1.05

5.27

lion

18.0

0 >23

4gr

ille

-pai

ngr

ille

-pai

nto

aste

r.1

596

2.83

0.83

3.63

1.19

2.90

0.67

2.50

0.69

2.88

0.99

0.08

peti

t-de

jeun

er20

.2Z

235

orte

ilor

teil

toe

.80

543.

830.

704.

600.

672.

070.

592.

250.

842.

310.

974.

25C

l23

6to

mat

eto

mat

eto

mat

o.1

596

4.37

0.85

4.27

0.78

1.93

0.65

2.57

0.92

1.65

0.75

3.44

roug

e49

.4'T

l23

7br

osse

äde

nts

bros

seä

dent

sto

othb

rush

.00

100

3.93

0.74

4.87

0.57

2.38

0.68

2.89

0.92

1.81

0.69

-de

ntif

rice

56.1

rn23

8to

upie

toup

ieto

p.0

010

02.

630.

891.

800.

893.

070.

752.

390.

922.

310.

932.

51to

um

er43

.8

~23

9fe

ufe

utr

affi

clig

ht.0

010

02.

670.

884.

330.

923.

410.

633.

321.

251.

650.

7522

6ro

uge

18.0

240

trai

ntr

ain

trai

n.6

761

2.87

0.97

3.97

1.07

4.69

0.47

3.43

0.96

1.73

0.92

168

vape

ur12

.324

1ar

bre

arbr

etr

ee.1

596

3.37

0.96

4.60

0.67

4.31

0.71

4.50

0.79

1.38

0.57

206

feui

lIes

23.6

Cl

242

cam

ion

cam

ion

truc

k.0

010

02.

771.

043.

231.

102.

900.

673.

291.

081.

620.

7521

.44

voit

ure

15.7

243

trom

pett

etr

ompe

tte

trum

pet

.29

934.

330.

801.

900.

803.

550.

872.

070.

542.

350.

8511

.91

mus

ique

29.2

244

tort

ueto

rtue

turt

le.0

010

04.

100.

662.

031.

073.

280.

652.

710.

981.

920.

805.

57le

nt32

.624

5pa

rapl

uie

para

plui

eum

brel

la.4

782

3.23

0.73

3.43

0.86

3.24

0.69

3.07

0.90

1.88

0.77

10.2

5pl

uie

75.3

246

vase

vase

vase

.15

962.

200.

892.

901.

213.

620.

733.

681.

092.

310.

7425

.95

fleu

rs63

.024

7gi

let

gile

tve

st.9

864

1.93

1.20

2.43

1.01

2.76

0.64

3.21

0.99

2.50

1.03

11.4

0sa

uvet

age

18.0

248

viol

onvi

olon

viol

in.1

596

4.27

0.69

2.03

0.96

4.28

0.65

2.36

0.78

2.54

1.07

13.8

6m

usiq

ue31

.524

9ch

arre

tte

char

iot

wag

on1.

2743

1.20

0.48

1.33

0.55

3.34

0.77

2.21

0.63

2.88

0.91

11.3

525

0m

ontr

em

ontr

ew

atch

.00

100

3.23

0.73

4.70

0.60

2.93

0.80

3.61

1.10

2.19

0.57

27.7

3he

ure

251

arro

soir

arro

soir

wat

erin

gca

n.0

096

4.00

0.79

2.27

1.17

2.72

0.65

2.43

0.84

2.31

0.97

1.40

eau

29.2

252

past

eque

past

eque

wat

erm

eIon

.47

822.

701.

262.

531.

041.

860.

582.

140.

712.

810.

900.

68ea

u20

.225

3pu

itspu

its

wel

l.0

010

03.

401.

101.

901.

033.

790.

562.

500.

842.

770.

9923

.73

eau

52.8

254

roue

roue

whe

el.0

010

03.

731.

481.

670.

843.

340.

863.

431.

032.

120.

775.

02vo

itur

e23

.625

5si

ffle

tsi

ffle

tw

hist

le.0

010

04.

700.

602.

100.

922.

240.

582.

390.

632.

380.

8011

.52

brui

t21

.325

6m

ouli

nm

ouli

nw

indm

ill

.00

100

3.33

1.09

1.57

0.77

4.79

0.41

2.36

0.73

2.31

0.93

18.1

6ve

nt41

.625

7fe

netr

efe

netr

ew

indo

w.0

096

1.77

0.63

3.67

1.32

3.48

0.91

3.57

0.88

1.69

0.88

196

port

e15

.725

8ve

rre

äpi

edve

rre

äpi

edw

ine

glas

s.9

857

2.67

1.32

4.67

0.61

1.97

0.73

2.75

1.00

3.12

0.91

259

cleae

crou

sele

wre

nch

1.30

362.

871.

222.

131.

142.

170.

602.

570.

962.

191.

2326

0ze

hre

zebr

eze

bra

.00

100

4.27

0.69

1.07

0.37

4.55

0.51

2.04

0.43

2.46

0.95

1.61

rayu

res

42.7

261

glan

dgl

and

aco

m.4

186

3.37

1.19

1.90

0.96

3.38

0.86

2.11

0.58

3.12

1.03

2.63

262

bass

ine

bass

ine

basi

n.9

961

2.93

0.94

3.00

0.98

2.10

0.49

2.32

0.72

2.60

0.82

1.78

263

banc

banc

benc

h.0

010

03.

400.

933.

630.

932.

900.

622.

890.

922.

150.

6747

.86

ecol

e13

.526

4ju

mel

les

jum

elle

sbi

nocu

lars

.00

100

3.63

0.96

2.07

0.87

4.52

0.74

2.39

0.79

2.80

0.76

0vu

e18

.026

5ni

dni

dbi

rdne

st.0

010

03.

770.

682.

171.

154.

900.

412.

430.

742.

230.

9121

.52

oise

au75

.326

6m

aiso

nao

isea

uid

embi

rdho

use

1.39

433.

170.

831.

901.

062.

620.

681.

960.

793.

731.

0026

7ba

llon

diri

geab

leid

embl

imp

1.87

182.

401.

521.

270.

693.

620.

622.

180.

554.

150.

7326

8ap

pare

ilph

oto

idem

cam

era

.00

100

3.83

0.79

3.70

0.92

4.34

0.67

3.26

0.94

2.96

1.04

269

mal

lem

alle

ehes

t1.

054

3.03

0.89

2.63

1.10

2.52

0.63

2.89

1.03

3.19

0.80

12.3

voya

ge27

.027

0ch

emin

eech

emin

eech

imne

y.0

010

02.

001.

313.

131.

173.

760.

793.

321.

222.

310.

9341

.22

feu

57.3

271

plac

ard

pend

erie

clos

et.9

661

2.57

1.01

3.97

1.19

4.59

0.57

3.32

1.16

2.23

0.76

10.8

272

pass

oire

pass

oire

cola

nder

.73

753.

571.

173.

671.

213.

640.

832.

230.

573.

120.

780.

5127

3pl

aneh

ead

ecou

per

idem

cutt

ing

boar

d.8

657

3.33

1.32

3.07

1.14

2.03

0.57

2.97

1.03

2.52

0.82

274

daup

hin

daup

hin

dolp

hin

.00

100

4.70

0.53

1.80

0.81

3.10

0.72

2.67

0.92

2.44

0.87

3.70

275

pell

epe

lle

dust

pan

.00

100

3.73

1.01

2.10

0.80

2.41

0.68

2.37

0.72

1.76

0.78

6.63

räte

au,

sabl

e14

.627

6ev

enta

ilev

enta

ilfa

n.0

096

3.23

0.82

1.53

1.07

3.10

0.62

2.73

0.83

2.68

0.95

10.8

Page 13: link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

AP

PE

ND

IXA

(Co

nti

nu

ed)

Nam

eIm

age

Age

of

Agr

eem

ent

Agr

eem

ent

Fam

ilia

rity

Com

plex

ity

Var

iabi

lity

Acq

uisi

tion

Ver

bal

Item

Inte

nded

Nam

eM

odal

Nam

eE

ngli

shH

%M

SDM

SDM

SDM

SDM

SDF

Ass

ocia

tion

%

277

robi

net

robi

net

fauc

et.0

010

03.

031.

004.

800.

613.

930.

802.

770.

942.

080.

865.

87ea

u66

.327

8pl

ume

plum

efe

athe

r.0

010

04.

201.

102.

301.

213.

661.

043.

430.

902.

160.

8551

.05

279

foug

ere

foug

ere

fern

.68

712.

970.

961.

830.

994.

210.

982.

471.

073.

121.

096.

2928

0gr

ande

roue

gran

dero

uefe

rris

whe

el.6

282

3.13

1.36

1.73

0.64

4.86

0.44

2.13

0.63

3.16

0.94

281

born

ein

cend

ieb

ou

che

ince

nd

iefi

rehy

dran

t1.

06.3

62.

471.

381.

931.

173.

790.

621.

970.

493.

920.

9528

2ha

mec

onha

mec

onfi

shho

ok.9

464

4.03

1.27

1.63

0.72

1.79

0.62

2.27

0.64

3.54

0.99

1.70

283

cann

e11

pech

eca

nne

11pö

che

fish

ing

rod

.40

894

.30

0.70

1.77

0.86

3.00

0.93

2.40

0.67

2.80

0.82

284

tore

heto

rehe

flas

hlig

ht1.

3136

3.47

1.28

2.93

0.94

3.38

0.68

2.63

0.81

3.46

0.71

7.57

285

map

pem

onde

map

pem

onde

glob

e.8

768

4.20

1.21

2.13

1.11

3.17

0.85

2.73

1.01

3.96

0.89

028

6m

asqu

em

asq

ue

plo

ng

eego

ggle

s1.

4046

1.20

0.41

1.73

1.05

2.76

0.64

3.87

0.97

2.27

0.83

35.7

328

7ba

rbec

ueba

rbec

uegr

ill.0

010

02.

800.

852.

630.

933.

720.

652.

700.

793.

231.

030

288

cadd

ieca

ddie

cady

.52

792.

570.

820

289

ecou

teur

sec

oute

urs

head

phon

es1.

1939

2.80

1.37

2.43

1.19

4.07

0.80

2.87

1.01

3.64

0.70

029

0hi

ppop

otam

ehi

ppop

otam

ehi

ppop

otam

us.0

096

2.97

0.89

1.23

0.68

4.10

0.49

2.03

0.32

3.65

1.16

1.74

gros

30.3

291

bine

tte

bine

tte

hoe

1.16

292.

501.

431.

530.

862.

170.

761.

470.

574.

200.

960.

5129

2la

mpe

11pe

trol

ela

mpe

11pe

trol

ela

nter

n1.

6132

3.70

1.09

1.73

1.01

3.93

0.53

2.27

0.74

3.69

0.93

lum

iere

51.7

293

tond

euse

tond

euse

law

nmow

er.0

010

03.

601.

002.

331.

094.

860.

352.

200.

482.

880.

830

294

büch

esbü

ches

logs

1.42

393.

241.

022.

870.

973.

310.

852.

300.

753.

080.

938.

08fe

u33

.729

5m

arac

asm

arac

asm

arac

as.8

143

3.17

1.26

1.47

0.57

3.55

1.02

1.73

0.83

4.08

1.02

029

6m

icro

scop

em

icro

scop

em

icro

scop

e.0

093

3.97

0.81

1.53

0.68

4.3

40.

552.

330.

923.

650.

754.

0829

7fi

let

11pa

pilI

onid

emne

t.6

857

3.63

1.03

1.63

0.72

3.07

0.92

2.07

0.58

3.23

1.07

298

raqu

ette

ping

-pon

gid

empa

ddle

.00

100

4.63

0.76

2.30

1.02

1.93

0.65

2.30

0.70

2.96

0.92

"'d

299

para

chut

epa

rach

ute

para

chut

e.7

071

3.00

1.11

1.23

0.50

3.72

0.88

2.57

0.97

3.15

1.01

1.53

tom

ber

13.5

,.....

(130

0pe

rroq

uet

perr

oque

tpa

rrot

1.49

573.

670.

841.

470.

684.

900.

312.

870.

902.

580.

864.

46re

pete

r18

.0>

-l30

1ta

blea

uta

blea

upi

ctur

e.3

489

3.47

1.31

4.10

0.99

4.21

0.77

4.07

1.05

2.19

0.75

85.3

8C

302

flip

per

flip

per

pinb

all

mac

hine

.00

962.

900.

921.

700.

754.

690.

602.

800.

923.

680.

900

~30

3or

nith

oryn

que

orni

thor

ynqu

epl

atyp

us.9

039

2.20

1.54

1.10

0.40

3.17

0.60

1.47

0.57

4.72

0.46

0.38

tr:

304

räte

aurä

teau

rake

.00

100

3.97

0.72

2.47

1.07

2.17

0.66

2.10

0.40

1.96

1.00

2.8

pell

e39

.3r/

J

305

fuse

efu

see

rock

et.0

010

03.

500.

821.

670.

884.

210.

622.

730.

832.

460.

819.

87es

pace

31.5

~30

6co

rde

cord

ero

pe.1

596

3.70

0.84

2.37

0.76

3.34

0.86

2.53

0.86

2.08

0.69

42.7

5Z

307

seile

seile

sadd

le.0

010

03.

701.

212.

101.

244

.10

0.62

2.67

1.03

3.00

0.89

7.95

tJ30

8co

ffre

-for

tco

ffre

-for

tsa

fe.2

993

3.57

1.10

1.77

1.07

3.93

0.65

2.67

0.96

3.23

0.86

2.8

;l>

309

bala

nce

bala

nce

scal

e.0

096

3.13

1.43

1.93

1.26

3.28

0.70

2.97

0.85

2.73

0.83

15.0

310

spat

ule

pell

esp

atul

a.2

257

1.40

0.62

1.73

0.94

2.21

0.68

2.43

0.77

3.46

0.76

0.42

,.....

N31

1do

uche

douc

hesh

ower

head

.78

612.

331.

034.

870.

433.

720.

923.

231.

042.

230.

765.

36t'I

'l31

2se

ring

uese

ring

uesy

ring

e.2

993

4.31

0.85

2.20

1.21

3.72

0.59

2.57

0.90

3.50

0.86

3.27

tJ31

3ta

mbo

urin

tam

bour

inta

mbo

urin

e.1

879

3.33

1.52

1.80

0.71

3.00

0.71

2.00

0.45

2.85

1.22

0.93

"Tl

314

tele

scop

ete

lesc

ope

tele

scop

e.6

957

3.77

0.90

1.37

0.61

3.72

0.70

2.37

0.76

3.88

0.73

2.04

0 ~31

5th

errn

osth

errn

osth

errn

os.6

861

3.33

1.09

2.03

1.00

3.76

0.87

2.40

0.72

3.54

0.86

1.06

"Tl

316

pneu

pneu

tire

.68

574.

500.

633.

871.

173.

690.

662.

700.

952.

760.

664.

33vo

itur

e48

.2~

317

trac

teur

trac

teur

trac

tor

.00

100

2.93

0.94

2.50

1.17

4.41

0.50

2.37

0.72

2.38

0.90

1.36

cham

ps20

.2Z

318

cabi

neo

euf

tram

car

1.18

541.

130.

432.

431.

103.

450.

992.

571.

103.

420.

8611

.23

(1,3

19

giro

uett

egi

roue

tte

wea

ther

vane

.00

793.

231.

251.

971.

104.

590.

572.

431.

103.

540.

861.

48::r:

320

yo-y

oyo

-yo

yoyo

.29

934.

300.

751.

570.

632.

480.

632.

500.

822.

500.

810

321

ferm

etur

eec

lair

ferm

etur

eec

lair

zipp

er.3

382

3.50

1.11

4.27

0.91

3.41

0.73

2.53

0.86

2.69

0.79

322

four

mil

ier

four

rnil

ier

ante

ater

1.78

212.

071.

511.

030.

183.

410.

731.

330.

614.

620.

640.

46V

l

323

encl

ume

encl

ume

anvi

l.3

679

2.93

1.26

1.10

0.31

2.59

0.63

1.93

0.45

4.04

0.72

3.44

~ VJ

Page 14: link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

AP

PE

ND

IXA

(Con

tin

ued

)V

l.j:

:>.

Nam

eIm

age

Ag

eo

f.j:

:>.

Agr

eem

ent

Agr

eem

ent

Fam

ilia

rity

Com

plex

ity

Var

iabi

lity

Acq

uisi

tion

Ver

bal

Item

Inte

nded

Nam

eM

odal

Nam

eE

ngli

shH

%M

SDM

SDM

SDM

SDM

SDF

Ass

ocia

tion

%>

324

arch

ear

che

arch

1.57

292.

001.

172.

271.

111.

690.

852.

370.

723.

690.

798.

33r-

325

tato

uta

tou

arm

adil

lo1.

0239

2.10

1.21

1.07

0.37

3.59

0.63

1.57

0.73

4.65

0.56

0)- IC

326

avoc

atav

ocat

avoc

ado

.26

893.

371.

163.

071.

012.

140.

642.

600.

862.

731.

0424

.67

-32

7m

aill

otde

bain

mai

llot

deba

insw

imsu

it.4

886

3.07

1.11

3.17

1.17

2.03

0.68

3.87

0.97

2.00

0.69

032

8ch

auve

-sou

ris

chau

ve-s

ouri

sba

t.0

010

03.

830.

871.

630.

893.

030.

632.

300.

792.

881.

032.

8~

329

cage

cage

bird

cage

.00

100

3.13

0.94

1.80

0.89

4.38

0.78

3.50

0.86

2.27

0.78

19.8

6I:'

330

pois

son-

lune

pois

son-

lune

blow

fish

.67

501.

570.

941.

300.

652.

900.

671.

200.

484.

690.

880.

02"r

j33

1ce

rvea

uce

rvea

ubr

ain

.15

963.

371.

002.

801.

323.

340.

902.

831.

053.

120.

7750

.58

inte

llig

ence

19.1

tT133

2bu

ffie

bis

on

buff

alo

.79

712.

201.

421.

070.

253.

480.

691.

890.

423.

461.

032.

08

~33

3ca

ctus

cact

usca

ctus

.00

100

3.76

0.83

1.47

1.01

1.90

0.62

3.00

1.02

2.35

0.85

1.65

dese

rt30

.333

4co

mpa

spi

nceae

pile

rca

lipe

rs1.

0943

1.10

0.31

1.53

1.07

1.76

0.64

2.33

0.61

3.46

0.71

4.21

mat

hs15

.733

5bo

ite

deco

nser

veid

emca

n.0

010

03.

500.

943.

900.

883.

070.

653.

031.

032.

690.

79I:'

336

from

age

gruy

ere

chee

se.5

675

3.27

0.98

4.03

1.03

2.34

0.72

4.37

0.81

1.72

0.74

13.4

8ch

evre

18.0

337

blat

tebl

atte

cock

roac

h1.

5339

3.27

1.26

1.50

0.68

3.24

0.69

2.50

0.97

4.35

0.63

0.38

338

bous

sole

bous

sole

com

pass

.41

863.

901.

182.

070.

943.

100.

672.

270.

583.

190.

752.

3833

9cr

abe

crab

ecr

ab.0

010

04.

130.

512.

100.

964.

100.

673.

071.

012.

380.

943.

95pi

nces

45.0

340

cym

bale

scy

mba

les

cym

bals

1.12

503.

731.

111.

630.

964.

410.

982.

200.

763.

770.

950

341

flec

hett

efl

eche

tte

dart

.00

100

3.87

1.01

1.87

0.86

3.76

0.83

2.27

0.69

2.88

0.93

0.42

342

dino

saur

edi

nosa

ure

dino

saur

.34

893.

401.

221.

140.

443.

140.

693.

371.

033.

001.

040

343

nich

eni

che

dogh

ouse

.15

964.

430.

771.

831.

022.

170.

802.

931.

072.

420.

765.

734

4Ii

bell

ule

libe

llul

edr

agon

fly

.53

753.

130.

971.

930.

874.

410.

682.

370.

723.

000.

941.

734

5ch

eval

etch

eval

etea

sel

.78

543.

030.

932.

131.

173.

240.

742.

530.

684.

150.

782.

6834

6an

guil

lean

guil

leee

l1.

0854

2.77

0.94

1.27

0.52

2.21

0.68

2.00

0.64

3.38

0.98

3.14

347

boca

pois

son

aqu

ariu

mfi

shbo

wl

.65

644.

200.

663.

301.

343.

590.

872.

730.

982.

770.

7534

8qu

eue

depo

isso

nid

emfi

shta

il.2

689

3.37

0.93

2.20

1.30

2.90

0.77

2.70

0.95

2.76

1.13

349

flam

and

rose

flam

and

rose

flam

ingo

.48

863.

730.

911.

230.

502.

970.

732.

370.

853.

310.

9335

0en

tonn

oir

ento

nnoi

rfu

nnel

.00

934.

300.

882.

071.

111.

140.

352.

130.

513.

560.

872.

7635

1ha

mbu

rger

ham

burg

erha

mbu

rger

.29

934.

130.

943.

520.

873.

550.

833.

171.

123.

231.

030

352

ham

acha

mac

ham

moc

k.1

596

2.80

0.89

2.03

0.93

3.10

0.62

2.77

0.90

3.40

1.12

2.12

353

harm

onic

aha

rmon

ica

harm

onic

a.0

093

3.57

1.04

2.04

0.93

4.24

0.74

2.23

0.68

3.04

0.82

1.48

354

fer

äch

eval

fer

äch

eval

hors

esho

e.0

010

03.

830.

872.

101.

302.

070.

592.

531.

073.

190.

9035

5hy

ene

hyen

ehy

ena

.65

823.

431.

251.

100.

313.

240.

582.

130.

434.

040.

961.

3635

6ig

loo

iglo

oig

loo

.00

100

4.87

0.35

1.27

0.52

2.10

0.62

2.47

0.73

3.08

1.08

0.08

357

boca

lbo

cal

jar

1.02

642.

831.

422.

931.

172.

660.

722.

970.

962.

770.

653.

0635

8m

edus

ern

edus

eje

!lyf

ish

.30

863.

470.

901.

370.

563.

140.

582.

700.

752.

961.

102.

4635

9ko

ala

koal

ako

ala

.15

964.

130.

731.

370.

723.

520.

742.

230.

733.

311.

190

360

louc

helo

uche

ladl

e.1

596

4.30

0.75

3.43

0.94

2.10

0.49

2.23

0.63

2.96

0.82

0.46

361

cocc

ine!

leco

ccin

elle

lady

bug

.15

963.

430.

942.

271.

013.

030.

782.

730.

982.

230.

991.

02ro

uge

22.5

362

agne

auag

neau

lam

b.6

679

4.03

0.81

1.90

1.03

3.10

0.56

2.30

0.75

2.58

0.95

9.01

363

roug

levr

esro

uge

äle

vres

Iips

tick

.15

964.

270.

643.

231.

503.

070.

923.

071.

202.

520.

9636

4le

zard

leza

rdli

zard

.69

863.

670.

711.

530.

942.

760.

642.

600.

932.

801.

004.

9736

5la

ma

lam

a!l

ama

.00

863.

700.

881.

170.

462.

830.

762.

200.

663.

650.

981.

1036

6po

umon

spo

umon

slu

ngs

.29

933.

230.

941.

931.

082.

790.

732.

230.

683.

230.

710

367

elan

elan

moo

se1.

5632

3.33

0.92

1.17

0.46

3.10

0.72

1.93

0.45

4.15

0.97

68.8

336

8po

ulpe

poul

peoc

topu

s1.

0146

3.33

1.21

1.67

0.88

4.00

0.60

2.30

0.84

3.88

0.99

0.59

369

palm

ier

palm

ier

palm

tree

.00

100

3.83

0.95

2.10

1.27

3.76

0.69

2.77

1.19

3.19

0.94

9.91

370

pand

apa

nda

pand

a.1

596

4.00

0.95

1.30

0.60

3.00

0.71

2.23

0.68

2.96

1.14

0

Page 15: link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

AP

PE

ND

IXA

(Con

tin

ued

)N

ame

Imag

eA

geo

fA

gree

men

tA

gree

men

tF

amil

iari

tyC

ompl

exit

yV

aria

bili

tyA

cqui

siti

onV

erba

lIt

emIn

tend

edN

ame

Mod

alN

ame

Eng

lish

H%

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

FA

ssoc

iati

on%

371

peti

tspo

ispe

tits

pois

peas

1.11

392.

701.

182.

901.

122.

860.

692.

230.

902.

770.

9137

2pe

lica

npe

lica

npe

lica

n.4

086

3.67

1.03

1.07

0.25

3.17

0.60

2.33

0.76

3.20

1.08

2.55

373

croi

ssan

tcr

oiss

ant

Fre

nch

croi

ssan

t.0

010

04.

770.

573.

770.

942.

930.

703.

001.

112.

040.

6025

.22

374

helic

ehe

lice

prop

elle

r.0

0.1

002.

830.

991.

330.

802.

520.

742.

470.

903.

440.

873.

5737

5py

ram

ide

pyra

mid

epy

ram

id.0

010

04.

500.

781.

670.

882.

340.

902.

871.

043.

190.

987.

4437

6ra

tra

tra

t.8

675

3.50

0.82

1.73

0.94

2.83

0.66

2.57

1.10

2.35

0.69

22.0

7so

uris

39.3

377

raie

raie

ray

.26

893.

570.

971.

530.

902.

760.

792.

200.

663.

690.

938.

5937

8bo

uton

defl

eur

tleu

rro

sebu

d1.

5525

3.07

0.94

3.03

1.27

3.90

0.72

3.30

1.21

3.46

1.03

379

saxo

phon

esa

xoph

one

saxo

phon

e.0

096

4.37

1.07

1.90

1.03

4.45

0.57

2.50

0.94

3.62

0.90

0.72

380

scor

pion

scor

pion

scor

pion

.40

894.

071.

011.

660.

944.

210.

562.

130.

683.

120.

952.

0438

1re

quin

requ

insh

ark

.00

100

3.83

0.91

1.87

0.97

2.28

0.75

3.27

0.87

2.85

1.12

3.02

382

sque

lett

esq

uele

tte

skel

eton

.00

100

4.77

0.50

1.60

0.81

4.66

0.55

3.00

1.05

3.00

0.85

9.78

383

crän

ecr

äne

skul

l.5

582

4.10

0.96

1.43

0.68

3.59

0.68

2.97

1.03

3.12

0.77

25.2

2os

16.8

384

pale

tte

pelle

atar

tesp

atul

a1.

5818

1.00

0.00

2.07

0.94

2.69

0.71

2.27

0.78

4.1

385

toile

d'ar

aign

eeto

ileda

raig

nee

spid

erw

eb.0

010

04.

330.

712.

831.

092.

760.

913.

001.

052.

580.

8138

6co

loqu

inte

colo

quin

tesq

uash

1.35

251.

631.

191.

370.

761.

520.

511.

600.

974.

770.

510.

1238

7et

oile

dem

eret

oile

dem

erst

arfi

sh.0

010

04.

430.

631.

700.

883.

100.

822.

770.

902.

480.

9638

8st

etho

scop

est

etho

scop

est

etho

scop

e.0

079

3.80

1.00

2.03

0.85

2.59

0.68

1.97

0.81

4.12

1.09

0.42

389

espa

don

espa

don

swor

dfis

h1.

1450

3.40

1.35

1.27

0.58

3.10

0.56

1.90

0.71

4.19

0.80

039

0th

erm

omet

reth

erm

omet

reth

erm

omet

er.1

596

2.63

1.27

3.07

1.23

2.83

0.71

3.13

0.97

2.65

0.80

3.44

391

tote

mto

tem

tote

m.1

693

4.17

1.09

1.20

0.48

4.00

0.60

2.50

1.04

4.46

0.58

0.76

392

touc

anto

ucan

touc

an1.

3246

3.23

1.41

1.20

0.48

3.31

0.60

2.10

0.88

4.35

0.85

0'i:

l39

3di

ndon

dind

ontu

rkey

.90

543.

471.

111.

370.

674.

450.

512.

170.

703.

191.

102.

04.....

.(J

394

vaut

our

vaut

our

vult

ure

.70

713.

731.

011.

200.

553.

790.

492.

430.

863.

420.

863.

19....,

395

mor

sem

orse

wal

rus

1.11

503.

931.

011.

130.

353.

340.

552.

030.

493.

880.

990.

38C

396

mac

hine

ala

ver

mac

hine

äla

ver

was

hing

mac

hine

.15

962.

870.

783.

671.

183.

480.

912.

600.

892.

620.

90i'O t'I1

397

bale

ine

bale

ine

wha

le.1

689

3.23

0.86

1.27

0.58

2.79

0.56

2.57

0.68

2.38

0.94

2.63

mer

23.6

r.n39

8fo

uet

foue

tw

hip

.15

963.

431.

301.

300.

653.

171.

002.

370.

562.

920.

8615

.4tr

:39

9lo

uplo

upw

olf

.00

963.

530.

821.

400.

772.

900.

622.

630.

892.

080.

9338

.84

garo

u31

.5~

400

ver

dete

rre

ver

dete

rre

wor

m.5

182

3.50

0.86

1.47

0.78

2.66

0.67

2.30

0.70

2.19

0.85

Z §2 i'O t::J ......

N t'I1 t::J

(Con

tinu

edon

next

page

)'T

j 0 i'O 'Tj ~ Z (J ::r:: VI~ V

I

Page 16: link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

AP

PE

ND

IXB

Vl~ 0

\

Sho

wn

here

are

all

the

conc

epts

for

whi

chon

eor

mor

ena

min

gor

iden

tifi

cati

onfa

ilur

esoc

curr

ed,

adi

ffer

ent

obje

ctw

asim

aged

,or

mor

eth

anon

ena

me

was

give

n.F

ailu

res

inth

ena

min

gta

skar

eli

sted

DK

N(d

on

'tkn

owna

me)

,D

KO

(do

n't

know

obje

ct),

and

TO

T(t

ipo

fth

eto

ngue

).A

llno

ndom

inan

tna

mes

give

nfo

rea

chco

ncep

tar

eli

sted

and

acco

m-

>-pa

nied

byth

eir

freq

uenc

ies

(whe

nav

aila

ble)

.t"

"' >-It

emIn

tend

edN

ame

Mod

alN

ame

Eng

lish

DK

ND

KO

TO

TN

ondo

min

antN

ames

c:2

avio

nav

ion

airp

lane

00

0B

oein

g(0

)0

3cr

ocod

ile

croc

odil

eal

liga

tor

00

0al

liga

tor

(0.5

)>- Z

5fo

urm

ifo

urm

ian

t0

00

arai

gnee

(10.

4),

criq

uet

(0.2

),in

sect

e(2

5.3)

07

bras

bras

arm

00

0av

ant-

bras

(-)

'TI

9ar

tich

aut

arti

chau

tar

tich

oke

00

Ich

ou-f

leur

(-),

poir

eau

(1.1

)t'r1

10ce

ndri

erce

ndri

eras

htra

yI

00

cend

ar(0

)~

IIas

perg

eas

perg

eas

para

gus

00

Irh

ubar

be(0

.2)

Z12

hach

eha

che

axe

00

10

13la

ndau

land

auba

byca

rria

ge0

00

pous

sett

e(0

.2),

berc

eau

(15.

6)15

ball

onba

llon

ball

oon

00

0ba

llon

gonf

labl

e(-

),ba

llon

deba

udru

che

(-)

17gr

ange

gran

geba

rn0

00

ferm

e(3

4.7)

,ha

ngar

(8.5

),us

ine

(39.

7),

silo

agra

in(-

)18

tonn

eau

tonn

eau

barr

el0

00

bari

l(1

.5),

bido

n(5

.2),

barr

ique

(1.9

)22

litlit

bed

00

0lit

doub

le(-

),lit

deux

pers

onne

s(-

)23

abei

lle

abei

lle

bee

00

0gu

epe

(4.2

)24

scar

abee

scar

abee

beet

le0

00

cafa

rd(3

.7),

blat

te(0

.3),

inse

cte

(25.

3),

ciga

le(3

.7),

(bee

tle)

mou

stiq

ue(5

.1),

cole

opte

re(0

.6)

25cl

oche

cloc

hebe

ll0

00

cloc

hett

e(0

)26

cein

ture

cein

ture

belt

00

0co

llie

rde

chie

n(-

)27

velo

velo

bicy

cle

00

0bi

cycl

ette

(12.

7)28

oise

auoi

seau

bird

00

0pi

nson

(2.6

),m

oine

au(4

.2)

29ch

emis

ier

ehem

ise

blou

se0

00

chem

isie

r(0

.6)

30liv

reliv

rebo

ok0

00

bouq

uin

(9.2

)31

bott

ebo

tte

boot

00

0ch

auss

ure

(14.

2),

bott

ine

(7.1

)34

bol

bol

bow

l0

00

ecue

lle

(3.7

),co

upe

(25.

1)35

boit

ebo

ite

box

0I

0br

ique

(17.

2)36

pain

pain

dem

iebr

ead

00

0br

ioch

e(0

.06)

,pa

in(8

6.8)

,pa

inen

tran

ches

(-),

cake

(0.6

3),

mic

hede

pain

(-)

38br

osse

bros

seb

rush

00

0ba

laye

tte

(0.0

4)39

bus

bus

bus

00

0ca

r(8

05.7

)43

cham

eau

cham

eau

cam

el0

00

drom

adai

re(0

.5)

45ca

non

cano

nca

nnon

00

Ifu

sil

(44.

6)46

casq

uett

eca

sque

tte

cap

00

0be

ret(

5.0)

47vo

itur

evo

itur

eca

r0

00

Cad

illa

c(0

)50

chen

ille

chen

ille

cate

rpil

lar

00

0m

ille

-pat

tes

(0)

51ce

leri

cele

rice

lery

40

3fe

noui

l(0

.8),

queu

ede

radi

s(-

)52

chai

nech

aine

chai

nI

00

brac

elet

(4.8

),ch

aino

n(1

.7),

coll

ier

(13.

0)54

cen

sece

rise

cher

ry0

00

prun

e(0

.5),

po

mm

epo

urri

e(-

)55

poul

epo

ule

chic

ken

00

0po

ulet

(10.

7),

coq

(18.

4)56

buri

nto

urne

vis

chis

eI4

27

tour

nevi

s(0

.6),

rabo

t(0

.5),

spat

ule

(0.4

),pi

ncea

u(9

.1),

outi

l(2

5.1)

Page 17: link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

AP

PE

ND

IXB

(Con

tin

ued

)

Item

Inte

nded

Nam

eM

odal

Nam

eE

ngli

shD

KN

DK

OT

OT

Non

dom

inan

tNam

es57

eglis

eeg

lise

chur

ch0

00

chap

elle

(32.

6)59

ciga

rett

eci

gare

tte

ciga

rett

e0

00

clop

e(0

)60

horl

oge

horl

oge

cloc

k0

00

reve

il(2

6.5)

,pe

ndul

e(1

5.4)

62nu

age

nuag

ecl

oud

00

0ep

onge

(6.3

),m

ouss

e(1

5.4)

63cl

own

clow

ncl

own

00

0te

tede

clow

n(-

)64

man

teau

man

teau

coat

00

0im

perm

eabl

e(5

.0),

vest

e(2

0.6)

66m

ais

rnat

sco

rn0

00

epis

dem

ais

(-)

67ca

nape

cana

peco

uch

00

0di

van

(16.

4)70

tass

eta

sse

cup

00

0bo

l(8

.0)

71ce

rfce

rfde

er0

00

elan

(68.

8),

bich

e(5

.0)

74po

upee

poup

eedo

ll0

00

fill

ette

(15.

0),

peti

tefi

lle(-

)76

port

epo

rte

door

00

0fe

netr

e(1

96.4

),po

rte

vitr

ee(-

)77

poig

nee

poig

nee

door

knob

00

0el

eneh

e(0

.1),

serr

ure

(14.

2),p

orte

man

teau

(0)

79co

mm

ode

com

mod

edr

esse

r0

00

arm

oire

(26.

6)81

cana

rdca

nard

duck

00

0oi

e(8

.8)

82ai

gle

aigl

eea

gle

00

0pe

rroq

uet(

4.4)

,fa

ucon

(2.0

),oi

seau

(112

.0)

85en

velo

ppe

enve

lopp

een

velo

pe0

00

lettr

e(3

83.6

)87

haie

bar

rjer

efe

nce

00

0cl

ötur

e(6

.7),

port

ail

(9.6

),ha

ie(2

0.1)

88do

igt

doig

tfi

nger

00

0in

dex

(15.

5)91

fleu

rfl

eur

flow

er0

00

mar

guer

ite

(1.6

)92

flut

etr

aver

sier

efl

ute

trav

ersi

ere

flut

e2

00

flut

e(1

2.6)

,pi

peau

(0.5

),cl

arin

ette

(1.1

)98

rena

rdre

nard

fox

00

0lo

up(3

8.8)

'"C99

cor

cor

fren

chho

rn0

02

trom

pett

e(1

1.9)

,cl

airo

n(5

.1),

trom

bone

(0.9

),sa

xoph

one

(0.7

).....

.(J

100

gren

ouil

legr

enou

ille

frog

00

0cr

apau

d(6

.4)

.., C10

1po

ele

poel

efr

ying

pan

00

0sa

uteu

se(0

),lo

upe

(3.8

),ca

sser

ole

(7.3

),cu

isin

e(8

.5)

~10

5lu

nett

eslu

nett

esgl

asse

s0

00

pair

ede

lune

ttes

(-)

trx

107

chev

rech

evre

goat

00

0bo

uc(5

.9),

breb

is(9

.4)

fJ)

108

gori

llego

rill

ego

rill

a0

00

sing

e(1

6.4)

,or

ang-

outa

n(0

)~

109

rais

inra

isin

grap

es0

00

grap

ede

rais

in(-

)Z

110

saut

ereI

lesa

uter

eIle

gras

shop

per

00

0cr

ique

t(0.

2),

ciga

le(3

.7),

inse

cte

(25.

3),

mou

stiq

ue(5

.1)

~11

1gu

itar

egu

itar

egu

itar

00

0gu

itar

ese

che

(-)

§11

2re

volv

erpi

stol

etgu

n0

00

revo

lver

(0.2

),fl

ingu

e(0

.5)

113

chev

eux

chev

eux

hair

00

0pe

rruq

ue(5

.4),

ehig

non

(4.5

),tö

te(6

37),

chev

elur

e(1

7.1)

......

N11

4m

arte

aum

arte

auha

mm

er0

00

piol

et(1

.2)

tri t:l

116

cint

reci

ntre

hang

er0

00

port

eman

teau

(0)

'Tl

117

harp

eha

rpe

harp

00

0Iy

re(3

.9)

012

4ta

ble

arep

asse

rta

ble

äre

pass

erir

onin

gbo

ard

00

0pl

aneh

ear

epas

ser

(-)

Itl 'Tl

125

vest

eve

ste

jack

et0

00

chem

ise

(46.

6)Itl

127

boui

lloi

rebo

uill

oire

kettl

e0

0I

thei

ere

(1.4

),ca

feti

ere

(2.0

),co

cott

e-m

inut

e(0

)tr

i Z13

3fe

uille

feui

llele

af0

00

feui

lled'

erab

le,

deeb

ene,

d'ar

bre

(-)

(J

134

jam

beja

mbe

leg

00

0m

olle

t(6

.2),

pied

(332

.9),

geno

u(9

2.2)

::t: VI~ -.

..l

Page 18: link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

AP

PE

ND

IXB

(Con

tin

ued

)V

l+

:-It

emIn

tend

edN

ame

Mod

alN

ame

Eng

lish

DK

ND

KO

TO

TN

ondo

min

antN

ames

00

136

leop

ard

leop

ard

leop

ard

00

0ti

gre

(5.2

),gu

epar

d(0

.8),

pant

here

(2.4

),ja

gu

ar(0

.9)

139

inte

rrup

teur

inte

rrup

teur

ligh

tsw

itch

01

0co

ffre

(10.

2)>-

141

levr

esbo

uehe

lips

00

0le

vres

(0)

t""' >-

142

hom

ard

hom

ard

lobs

ter

00

0ec

revi

sse

(2.8

),la

ngou

ste

(1.8

),cr

evet

te(1

.5)

~14

3ca

dena

sca

dena

slo

ck0

0I

014

4m

oufl

em

oufl

em

itte

n0

00

gant

(22.

7)>-

145

sing

esi

nge

mon

key

00

0m

acaq

ue(0

.4),

babo

uin

(1.7

)Z

146

lune

lune

moo

n0

00

croi

ssan

tde

lune

(-)

t114

8m

onta

gne

mon

tagn

em

ount

ain

00

0pi

c(1

0.8)

"Tl

tr'l

149

sour

isso

uris

mou

se0

00

rat

(22.

0)

~15

1cl

oucl

ouna

il0

00

raso

ir(4

.5)

153

coll

ier

coll

ier

neck

lace

00

0co

llie

rde

perl

es(-

)15

4ai

guil

leai

guil

lene

edle

00

0ep

ingl

e(1

3.9)

,ai

guil

leac

oudr

e(-

)t1

156

ecro

uec

rou

nut

10

2bo

ulon

(1.0

)15

7oi

gnon

oign

onon

ion

20

Iai

l(4

.0),

echa

lote

(0.2

),gr

enad

e(1

2.6)

158

oran

geor

ange

oran

ge0

00

man

dari

ne(1

.1)

159

autr

uche

autr

uche

ostr

lch

00

0fl

aman

dro

se(-

)16

0hi

bou

hibo

uow

l0

00

chou

ette

(4.0

)16

1pi

ncea

upi

ncea

upa

intb

rush

00

0pl

ume

(51.

0)16

2pa

ntal

onpa

ntal

onpa

nts

00

0fu

tal

(0)

163

pech

epe

che

peac

h0

00

abri

cot

(1.9

),or

ange

(11.

6),p

rune

(3.9

),am

ande

(4.0

)16

7st

ylo

styl

ope

n0

00

styl

obi

lle

(-),

styl

obi

c(-

),cr

ayon

bic

(-)

169

ping

ouin

ping

ouin

peng

uin

00

0m

anch

ot(0

.7)

170

poiv

ron

poiv

ron

pepp

er0

02

172

coch

onco

chon

pig

00

0po

rc(8

.2)

175

pich

eter

uehe

pitc

her

00

0ca

rafe

(4.0

),br

oc(2

.4),

broc

aeau

(-),

potal

ait

(-)

176

pinc

epi

nce

plie

rs0

00

tena

ille

(1.1

),cl

e(6

2.5)

,pin

ceac

oupe

r(-

),ou

til

(25.

1)17

7pr

ise

pris

epl

ug0

0I

178

saco

che

sae

pock

etbo

ok0

00

sac

amai

n(0

),sa

coch

e(1

.5),

besa

ce(1

.8)

180

pom

me

dete

rre

pom

me

dete

rre

pota

to0

I0

pata

te(1

.9)

181

citr

ouil

leci

trou

ille

pum

pkin

00

0po

tiro

n(0

.4)

183

rato

n-la

veur

rato

n-la

veur

raco

on3

03

rena

rd(1

3.2)

,put

ois

(0.8

),ca

stor

(1.1

)18

4to

urne

-dis

que

tour

ne-d

isqu

ere

cord

play

er0

00

pick

-up

(0),

plat

ine

dedi

sque

(-),

elec

trop

hone

(0)

185

frig

idai

refr

igid

aire

refr

iger

ator

00

0fr

igo

(0.3

),re

frig

erat

eur

(0.3

)18

8fa

uteu

ilab

ascu

leid

emro

ckin

gch

air

00

0ro

ckin

g-ch

air

(0.8

),ch

aise

(81.

6),

roll

ing-

chai

r(-

),ch

aise

abas

cule

(-)

189

pati

nar

oule

tte

pati

nar

oule

tte

roll

ersk

ate

00

0ro

ller

(0)

190

roul

eau

pati

sser

ieid

emro

llin

gpi

n0

03

193

voil

ier

voil

ier

sail

boat

00

0de

rive

ur(0

),ba

teau

avoi

le(-

)19

4sa

lier

esa

lier

esa

ltsh

aker

00

0se

i(2

0.5)

,pot

dese

iH

197

cise

aux

cise

aux

scis

sors

00

0pa

ire

deci

seau

x(-

)19

8V

lSV

lSsc

rew

00

0cl

ou(1

8.5)

200

hipp

ocam

pehi

ppoc

ampe

sea

hors

e1

00

Page 19: link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

AP

PE

ND

IXB

(Con

tin

ued

)

Item

Inte

nded

Nam

eM

odal

Nam

eE

ngli

shD

KN

DK

OT

OT

Non

dom

inan

tNam

es

201

phoq

ueph

oque

seal

00

3ot

arie

(0.4

),lo

utre

(1.3

),lio

nde

mer

(-)

206

mou

fett

epu

tois

skun

k0

00

fure

t(1

.9),

rat

(22)

,bl

aire

au(3

.5),

rato

n-Ia

veur

(0)

207

luge

luge

sIed

10

0tr

aine

au(2

.0)

212

arai

gnee

arai

gnee

spid

er0

00

myg

ale

(0.2

)21

3ro

uet

roue

tsp

inni

ngw

heel

60

4qu

enou

ille

(1.8

),m

achi

neaf

ilet

(-),

atis

ser

(-),

acou

dre

(-),

filac

oudr

e(-

)21

4bo

bine

defi

lbo

bine

defi

lsp

ool

oft

hrea

d0

00

filac

oudr

e(-

)21

9cu

isin

iere

cuis

inie

rest

ove

00

0fo

ur(1

0.1)

,ga

zini

ere

(0),

tabl

ede

cuis

son

(-)

221

vali

seva

lise

suit

case

00

0sa

coch

e(1

.5),

sac

(59.

5),

serv

iett

e(2

1.9)

223

cygn

ecy

gne

swan

00

0oi

e(8

.8)

224

pull

-ove

rpu

ll-o

ver

swea

ter

00

0sw

eat-

shir

t(-

)22

8te

levi

sion

tele

visi

onte

levi

sion

00

0te

levi

seur

(0)

231

pouc

epo

uce

thum

b0

00

doig

t(1

66.5

)23

4gr

ille

-pai

ngr

ille

-pai

nto

aste

r0

00

toas

ter

(0)

235

orte

ilor

teil

toe

00

0pi

ed(3

32.9

),do

igt

depi

ed(-

)23

6to

mat

eto

mat

eto

mat

o0

00

pech

e(1

2.2)

240

trai

ntr

ain

trai

n0

00

loco

mot

ive

(7.9

)24

1ar

bre

arbr

etr

ee0

00

chen

e(2

8.0)

243

trom

pett

etr

ompe

tte

trum

pet

00

0tr

ombo

ne(7

1)24

5pa

rapl

uie

para

plui

eum

brel

la0

00

ombr

elle

(5.7

)24

6va

seva

seva

se0

00

vase

Chi

nois

(-)

247

gile

tgi

let

vest

00

2ve

ste

(20.

6),

vest

on(1

9.3)

,co

star

d(0

),sp

ence

r(0

)24

8vi

olon

viol

onvi

olin

00

0vi

olon

cell

e(2

.0)

'i:l

249

char

rett

ech

ario

tw

agon

41

3br

ouet

te(3

.9),

char

rett

e(1

1.3)

,jo

uet

(12.

2),j

eud'

enfa

nt(-

).....

.(J

251

arro

sotr

arro

soir

wat

erin

gca

n0

0I

...., e25

2pa

steq

uepa

steq

uew

ater

mel

on0

0I

part

depa

steq

ue(-

):;d

257

fene

tre

fene

tre

win

dow

10

0tT

l25

8ve

rre

äpi

edve

rre

äpi

edw

ine

glas

s0

00

verr

e(9

8.4)

,ve

rre

ävi

n(-

),fl

ute

(12.

6)V"

JV"

J25

9cl

ecro

uscle

wre

nch

20

Icl

e(6

2.5)

,cl

eam

olet

te(-

),cl

ede

dix,

cle

dedo

uze,

angl

aise

(-)

~26

1gl

and

glan

dac

orn

00

1no

iset

te(3

.0)

Z26

2ba

ssin

eba

ssin

eba

sin

00

2cu

vett

e(6

.3),

baqu

et(3

.2),

boit

e(5

3.0)

,bac

apei

ntur

e(-

)~

266

caba

neä

oise

aum

aiso

nao

isea

ubi

rdho

use

I0

2pe

rcho

ir(1

.8),

man

geoi

re(1

.1),

cage

äoi

seau

x(-

),ca

bane

äoi

seau

x(-

):;d

267

ball

ondi

rige

able

ball

ondi

rige

able

blim

p2

25

diri

geab

le(0

.6),

mon

tgol

fier

e(0

),ob

us(2

6.9)

,tor

pill

e(2

),co

rnic

hon

(1.0

),so

us-

0 ......

mar

in(9

.7),

Zep

peli

n(0

)N

269

mal

lem

alle

ches

t0

00

coff

re(1

0.2)

,ca

isse

(28.

8),

valis

e(2

5.9)

tTl

027

1pl

acar

dpe

nder

iecl

oset

00

0dr

essi

ng(0

),ve

stia

ire

(5.1

),pl

acar

d(1

0.8)

'Tj

272

pass

oire

pass

oir

eco

land

er0

01

ecum

oire

(0.4

),eg

outt

oir

(0),

pani

eras

alad

e(-

)0

273

plan

ehe

äde

coup

erid

emcu

ttin

gbo

ard

10

3:;d 'T

j27

6ev

enta

ilev

enta

ilfa

n0

01

:;d27

9fo

uger

efo

uger

efe

rn0

30

plan

te(4

3.3)

,ar

bust

e(6

.8),

encr

ier

(3.5

)tT

lZ

280

gran

dero

uegr

ande

roue

ferr

isw

heel

00

0ro

ue(5

.0),

man

ege

(10.

0),

roue

defe

tefo

rain

e(-

)(J

281

born

ein

cend

iebo

uche

ince

ndie

fire

hydr

ant

6I

4bo

rne

ince

ndie

(-),

born

ean

ti-f

eu(-

),po

mpe

ainc

endi

e(-

)::r:

282

ham

econ

ham

econ

fish

hook

00

1an

cre

(6.1

2),

harp

on(0

.6),

croc

het

(9.0

)

Vl

.j::>.

'0

Page 20: link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

AP

PE

ND

IXB

(Con

tinu

ed)

Vl

Vl

Item

Inte

nded

Nam

eM

odal

Nam

eE

ngli

shD

KN

DK

OT

OT

Non

dom

inan

tNam

es0

283

cann

pech

eca

nneap

eche

fish

ing

rod

00

0lig

ne(2

07),

pech

eal

alig

ne(-

)28

4to

rehe

tore

hefl

ashl

ight

00

0la

mpe

tore

he(-

),la

mpe

depo

che

(-)

>-28

5m

appe

mon

dem

appe

mon

degl

obe

00

2gl

obe

(15.

4),

plan

isph

ere

(0.2

),gl

obe-

terr

estr

e(0

)r- >-

286

mas

que

mas

que

plon

gee

gogg

les

00

0lu

nett

esd'

avio

n(-

),de

plon

gee

(-),

dech

irni

e(-

),m

asqu

eas

oude

r(-

)~

288

cadd

ieca

ddie

cadd

ie0

00

char

iot(

5.1)

......

028

9ec

oute

urs

ecou

teur

she

adph

ones

00

0ca

sque

(11.

7),

casq

ueau

dio

(-),

casq

uede

wal

kman

(-)

>-29

0hi

ppop

otar

nehi

ppop

otar

nehi

ppop

otam

us1

00

Z29

1bi

nett

ebi

nett

eho

e5

32

böch

e(3

.8),

böch

euse

(0),

pioc

he(5

.0),

outil

(25.

1)tl '"r

J29

2la

mpe

äpe

trol

ela

mpe

apet

role

lant

em0

0I

lam

peag

az(-

),ä

huile

(-),

aess

ence

(-),

deca

mpi

ng(-

),la

mpe

tem

pete

(-),

tri

lant

eme

(22.

1),

tore

he(7

.5)

~29

4bU

ches

buch

eslo

gs0

00

bois

(215

.1),

fago

ts(0

),ta

sde

bois

(-),

rond

ins

debo

is(-

)29

5m

arac

asm

arac

asm

arac

as6

06

cast

agne

ttes

(0),

cym

bale

s(0

),qu

ille

s(0

)Z

296

mic

rosc

ope

mic

rosc

ope

mic

rosc

ope

00

2tl

297

file

tap

apil

Ion

file

papi

lIon

net

00

0ep

uise

tte

(0.2

)29

9pa

rach

ute

para

chut

epa

rach

ute

00

0m

ontg

olfi

ere

(0),

colis

del'

ON

D(-

)30

0pe

rroq

uet

perr

oque

tpa

rrot

00

0ch

ouet

te(4

),pe

rruc

he(1

.1),

caca

toes

(0.6

),bu

se(0

.8),

hibo

u(3

.2),

corb

eau

(7.1

),oi

seau

(112

)30

1ta

blea

uta

blea

upi

ctur

e0

00

cadr

e(4

4.5)

302

flip

per

flip

per

pinb

all

mac

hine

I0

030

3om

itho

rynq

ueom

itho

rynq

uepl

atyp

us13

00

mar

soui

n(0

.3),

lout

re1.

3,la

man

tin

(0),

elep

hant

dem

er(-

)30

6co

rde

cord

ero

pe0

00

cord

on(8

.1)

308

coff

re-f

ort

coff

re-f

ort

safe

00

0re

frig

erat

eur

(0.3

)30

9ba

lanc

eba

lanc

esc

ale

00

I31

0sp

atul

epe

llesp

atul

a0

110

pell

e(6

.6),

pilo

n(1

.8)

311

douc

hedo

uche

show

erhe

ad0

00

jetd

edo

uche

(-),

pom

mea

ude

douc

he(-

)31

2se

ring

uese

ring

uesy

ring

e0

00

piqü

re(1

0.8)

313

tam

bour

inta

mbo

urin

tam

bour

ine

30

2cy

mba

les

(0)

314

tele

scop

ete

lesc

ope

tele

scop

e0

07

lune

tte

(24.

5),

long

uevu

e(-

)31

5th

errn

osth

erm

osth

erm

os0

60

shak

er(0

),ta

rnta

rnH

316

pneu

pneu

tire

00

0ro

ue(5

.0)

318

cabi

neoe

uftr

amca

r0

00

cabi

ne(1

1.2)

,te

leca

bine

(0),

tele

pher

ique

(0),

rem

onte

em

ecan

ique

(-)

319

giro

uett

egi

roue

tte

wea

ther

vane

I0

532

0yo

-yo

yo-y

oyo

yo0

00

pend

ule

(15.

4),

pend

enti

f(0.

4)32

1fe

rrne

ture

ecla

irfe

rmet

ure

ecla

irzi

pper

03

0br

ague

tte

(1.1

),ou

vre-

boit

es(0

)32

2fo

urm

ilie

rfo

urrn

ilie

ran

teat

er4

03

tapi

r(2

.7),

tam

anoi

r(0

.2),

tato

u(0

),an

imal

(131

.7),

omit

hory

nque

(0.3

),m

ar-

supi

lam

i(0

)32

3en

clum

een

clum

ean

vil

II

3et

au(2

.1)

324

arch

ear

che

arch

20

Ipo

rche

(10.

8),

arca

de(7

.7),

port

ail

(9.6

),da

lles

(0),

pont

(68)

,vo

üte

(22.

5)32

5ta

tou

tato

uar

mad

illo

63

3fo

urrn

ilie

r(0

.4),

taup

e(3

.6),

omit

hory

nque

(0.3

),be

te(1

73.7

)32

6av

ocat

avoc

atav

ocad

o0

0I

pech

e(1

2.2)

,de

mi-

avoc

at(-

)32

7m

aill

otde

bain

mai

llot

deba

insw

imsu

it0

00

body

(0),

just

auco

rps

(0)

330

pois

son-

Iune

pois

son-

Iune

blow

fish

05

0po

isso

n(3

6.4)

Page 21: link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

AP

PE

ND

IXB

(Con

tin

ued

)

Item

Inte

nded

Nam

eM

odal

Nam

eE

ngli

shD

KN

DK

OT

OT

Non

dom

inan

tN

ames

331

cerv

eau

cerv

eau

brai

n0

00

ence

phal

e(0

.2)

332

buff

lebi

son

buff

alo

00

0bu

ffle

(2.0

),m

amm

outh

(0.7

),ze

bulo

n(0

)33

4co

mpa

spi

nce

aepi

ler

cali

pers

47

0m

anil

le(1

.9),

com

pas

(4.2

),sa

ngle

(1.3

),cr

oche

t(9

.0)

336

from

age

gruy

ere

chee

se0

00

from

age

(13.

4)33

7bl

atte

blat

teco

ckro

ach

I0

0ca

fard

(3.7

),pu

nais

e(3

.2),

scar

abee

(1.7

),cr

evet

te(1

.5),

puce

ron

(0.5

),gr

ilIo

n(3

.0)

338

bous

sole

bous

sole

com

pass

00

0ch

rono

met

re(1

.3)

340

cym

bale

scy

mba

les

cym

bals

04

1di

sque

(13.

5),

poid

s(7

3.1)

,al

tere

s(0

)34

2di

nosa

ure

dino

saur

edi

nosa

ur0

00

T-r

ex(-

)34

3ni

che

nich

edo

ghou

se0

00

caba

ne(8

.9)

344

libe

llul

eli

bell

ule

drag

onfl

y0

10

papi

lIon

(16.

0),

mou

stiq

ue(5

.1)

345

chev

alet

chev

alet

ease

l2

01

tabl

eau

(85.

3),

pupi

tre

(5.1

),tr

etea

u(2

.2)

346

angu

ille

angu

ille

eel

00

1m

uren

e(0

.5),

coul

euvr

e(2

.9),

cong

re(0

.4),

inve

rteb

re(0

.5)

347

boca

lap

oiss

onaq

uari

umfi

shbo

wl

00

0bo

calap

oiss

on(-

)34

8qu

eue

depo

isso

nid

emfi

shta

il0

I0

nage

oire

depo

isso

n(-

)34

9fl

aman

dro

sefl

aman

dro

sefl

amin

go0

00

cygn

e(8

.2),

hero

n(0

.8)

350

ento

nnoi

ren

tonn

oir

funn

el0

02

351

ham

burg

erha

mbu

rger

ham

burg

er0

00

chee

sebu

rger

(0)

352

ham

acha

mac

ham

moc

k0

00

pani

er(2

2.5)

353

harm

onic

aha

rmon

ica

harm

onic

a0

1I

355

hyen

ehy

ene

hyen

a0

00

chac

al(1

.6),

loup

(38.

8),

igua

ne(0

.1)

357

boca

lbo

cal

jar

00

0po

t(2

1.9)

,fl

acon

(10.

9),

pot

äco

nser

ve(-

),bo

ite

deco

nser

ve(~)

358

rned

use

med

use

jell

yfis

h2

00

algu

e(4

.6),

bigo

rnea

u(0

.7)

'"d35

9ko

ala

koal

ako

ala

00

0pa

nda

(0)

......

(1

360

louc

helo

uche

ladl

e0

00

cuil

lere

(0)

>-l e

361

cocc

inel

leco

ccin

elle

lady

bug

00

0sc

arab

ee(1

.7)

:::036

2ag

neau

agne

aula

mb

00

0m

outo

n(2

2.3)

,br

ebis

(9.4

)t'I'

lr/

J36

3ro

ugeal

evre

sro

uge

äle

vres

lips

tick

00

0tu

bede

roug

eal

evre

s(-

)tr

:36

4le

zard

leza

rdli

zard

00

0ig

uane

(0.1

),sa

lam

andr

e(1

.1)

~36

5la

ma

lam

all

ama

I0

3Z

366

poum

ons

poum

ons

lung

s0

00

bron

ches

(0),

appa

reil

resp

irat

oire

(-)

t::l

367

elan

elan

moo

seI

03

cerf

(3.8

),d

aim

(1.6

),re

nne

(0.8

),ch

evre

uil

(1.7

),ca

ribo

u(0

.1),

wap

iti

(0)

> :::036

8po

ulpe

poul

peoc

topu

s0

00

pieu

vre

(1.5

),m

edus

e(2

.4),

sech

e(0

)t::

l.....

.37

0pa

nda

pand

apa

nda

00

0ou

rs(1

0.1)

N37

1pe

tits

pois

peti

tspo

ispe

as0

I0

hari

cots

(0),

coss

ede

hari

cots

(-),

coss

ede

peti

tspo

is(-

)t'I

'lt::

l37

2pe

lica

npe

lica

npe

lica

nI

00

goel

and

(0.8

),ci

gogn

e(1

.0)

"Tl

376

rat

rat

rat

00

0so

uris

(10.

4), h

amst

er(0

),m

ulot

(0.5

),m

usar

aign

e(0

.8)

0 :::037

7ra

rera

rera

y0

01

carp

e(2

.6)

"Tl

378

bout

onde

fleu

rfl

eur

rose

bud

40

0bo

urge

on(5

),ro

se(1

23),

fleu

r(1

64),

bout

onde

rose

(-)

G;37

9sa

xoph

one

saxo

phon

esa

xoph

one

00

1Z

380

scor

pion

scor

pion

scor

pion

00

0la

ngou

ste

(1.8

),ec

revi

sse

(2.8

)(1

383

crän

ecr

äne

skul

l0

00

sque

lett

e(9

.7),

tete

dem

ort(~)

::r: VI

VI ......

Page 22: link.springer.com · 2017-08-29 · 532 ALARIO AND FERRAND derwart (1980). In closely following Snodgrass and Van derwart'sprocedure, norms for name agreement, image agreement, picture

AP

PE

ND

IXB

(Con

tin

ued

)V

\V

\

Item

Inte

nded

Nam

eM

odal

Nam

eE

ngli

shD

KN

DK

OT

OT

Non

dom

inan

tNam

esN

384

spat

ule

pelle

atar

tesp

atul

a6

21

true

lle

(0.7

),pe

lle

(6.6

),sc

alpe

l(1

.0),

glac

e(5

9)38

6co

loqu

inte

colo

quin

tesq

uash

28

0fi

gue

(2.6

),co

urge

(0.7

),co

ing

(0.6

),le

gum

e(1

1.6)

;I> r-38

8st

etho

scop

est

etho

scop

est

etho

scop

e2

04

;I>38

9es

pado

nes

pado

nsw

ordf

ish

I0

0th

on(0

.8),

pois

son

scie

(-),

pois

son

(-),

pois

son

chat

(-),

requ

inm

arte

au(-

)::t

I -39

0th

erm

omet

reth

erm

orne

tre

ther

mom

eter

00

0ba

rom

etre

(2.7

)0

391

tote

mto

tem

tote

mpo

le0

0I

embl

eme

(3.4

);I>

392

touc

anto

ucan

touc

an3

0I

perr

oque

t(4.

4),

peli

can

(2.5

),ca

cato

es(0

.6),

mai

nate

(0),

ara

(0)

Z I::'

393

dind

ondi

ndon

turk

ey3

02

dind

e(1

.82)

,pa

on(4

.7),

glou

glou

(-)

"Tl

394

vaut

our

vaut

our

vult

ure

I1

Iai

gle

(11.

3),

rapa

ce(2

.6)

tI:I

395

mor

sem

orse

wal

rus

I0

Iph

oque

(2.8

),ot

arie

(0.4

),el

epha

ntde

mer

(-)

~39

6m

achi

neä

lave

rm

achi

neä

lave

rw

ashi

ngm

achi

ne0

00

lave

-lin

ge(0

)39

7ba

lein

eba

lein

ew

hale

0I

1da

uphi

n(3

.7)

Z I::'

398

foue

tfo

uet

whi

p0

00

crav

ache

(1.9

)39

9lo

uplo

upw

olf

0I

040

0ve

rde

terr

eve

rde

terr

ew

orm

00

1lo

mbr

ie(0

.1),

asti

cot

(1.4

)

(Man

uscr

iptr

ecei

ved

Febr

uary

10,1

998;

revi

sion

acce

pted

forp

ublic

atio

nM

ay27

,199

8.)